Assessment of immunological anti-platelet factor 4 antibodies for vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) in a large Australian cohort: A multicenter study comprising 1284 patients

2023 ISTH update of the 2022 ISTH guidelines for antithrombotic treatment in COVID-19

Based on emerging evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic, the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) guidelines for antithrombotic treatment in COVID-19 were published in 2022. Since then, at least 16 new randomized controlled trials have contributed additional evidence, which necessitated a modification of most of the previous recommendations. We used again the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association methodology for assessment of level of evidence (LOE) and class of recommendation (COR). Five recommendations had the LOE upgraded to A and 2 new recommendations on antithrombotic treatment for patients with COVID-19 were added. Furthermore, a section was added to answer questions about COVID-19 vaccination and vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT), for which studies have provided some evidence. We only included recommendations with LOE A or B. Panelists agreed on 19 recommendations, 4 for nonhospitalized, 5 for noncritically ill hospitalized, 3 for critically ill hospitalized, and 2 for postdischarge patients, as well as 5 for vaccination and VITT. A strong recommendation (COR 1) was given for (a) use of prophylactic dose of low-molecular-weight heparin or unfractionated heparin in noncritically ill patients hospitalized for COVID-19, (b) for select patients in this group, use of therapeutic-dose low-molecular-weight heparin/unfractionated heparin in preference to prophylactic dose, and (c) for use of antiplatelet factor 4 enzyme immunoassays for diagnosing VITT. A strong recommendation was given against (COR 3) the addition of an antiplatelet agent in hospitalized, noncritically ill patients. These international guidelines provide recommendations for countries with diverse healthcare resources and COVID-19 vaccine availability.

Thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS) and vaccine-induced immune thrombocytopenia and thrombosis (VITT): Brighton Collaboration case definitions and guidelines for data collection, analysis, and presentation of immunisation safety data

This is a revision of the online November 2021 Brighton thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS) case definition and a new Brighton Collaboration case definition for vaccine-induced immune thrombocytopenia and thrombosis (VITT). These case definitions are intended for use in clinical trials and post-licensure pharmacovigilance activities to facilitate safety data comparability across multiple settings. They are not intended to guide clinical management. The case definitions were developed by a group of subject matter and Brighton Collaboration process experts as part of the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI)-funded Safety Platform for Evaluation of vACcines (SPEAC). The case definitions, each with defined levels of diagnostic certainty, are based on relevant published evidence and expert consensus and are accompanied by specific guidelines for TTS and VITT data collection and analysis. The document underwent peer review by a reference group of vaccine safety stakeholders and haematology experts to ensure case definition useability, applicability and scientific integrity.

Evolution of Hemostasis Testing: A Personal Reflection Covering over 40 Years of History

There is no certainty in change, other than change is certain. As Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis celebrates 50 years of publication, I felt it appropriate to reflect on my own 40-year plus scientific career. My career in the thrombosis and hemostasis field did not start until 1987, but the subsequent 35 years reflected a period of significant change in associated disease diagnostics. I started in the Westmead Hospital "coagulation laboratory" when staff were still performing manual clotting tests, using stopwatches, pipettes, test tubes, and a water bath, which we transported to the hospital outpatient department to run our weekly warfarin clinic. Several hemostasis instruments have come and gone, including the Coag-A-Mate X2, the ACL-300R, the MDA-180, the BCS XP, and several StaR Evolution analyzers. Some instruments remain, including the PFA-100, PFA-200, the AggRAM, the CS-5100, an AcuStar, a Hydrasys gel system, and two ACL-TOP 750s. We still have a water bath, but this is primarily used to defrost frozen samples, and manual clotting tests are only used to teach visiting medical students. We have migrated across several methodologies in the 45-year history of the local laboratory. Laurel gel rockets, used for several assays in the 1980s, were replaced with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay assays and most assays were eventually placed on automated instruments. Radio-isotopic assays, used in the 1980s, were replaced by an alternate safer method or else abandoned. Test numbers have increased markedly over time. The approximately 31,000 hemostasis assays performed at the Westmead-based laboratory in 1983 had become approximately 200,000 in 2022, a sixfold increase. Some 90,000 prothrombin times and activated partial thromboplastic times are now performed at this laboratory per year. Thrombophilia assays were added to the test repertoires over time, as were the tests to measure several anticoagulant drugs, most recently the direct oral anticoagulants. I hope my personal history, reflecting on the changes in hemostasis testing over my career to date in the field, is found to be of interest to the readership, and I hope they forgive any inaccuracies I have introduced in this reflection of the past.

COVID-19 vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia: pathophysiology and diagnosis

Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is a rare but serious clinical condition with high mortality rate in apparently healthy individuals without noticeable risk factors. VITT typically arises due to the administration of vaccines that possess recombinant adenoviral vectors, including ChAdOx1 nCov-19 (AstraZeneca) and Ad26 COV2.S (Johnson & Johnson/Janssen). Thrombosis frequently occurs at atypical sites, such as the cerebral or splanchnic circulations, in this particular pathological state. Similar to heparin-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (HITT), it seems that the cause of VITT is the misdirection of anti-platelet factor 4 antibodies (anti-PF4 Abs), an ancient antimicrobial mechanism. Anti-PF4 Abs in patients with VITT activates the coagulation system, leading to thrombosis. This process occurs through the stimulation of platelets (Plts) and neutrophils and subsequently release of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs). Due to the potentially fatal consequences of VITT, early diagnosis is mandatory. In addition to thrombocytopenia, thrombosis, and the presence of anti-PF4 Abs, the day of symptoms onset and the elevation of D-dimer are also required for definitive diagnosis of VITT. The absence of one or more criteria can result in the exclusion of definitive VITT and lead to the diagnosis of probable, possible, or unlikely VITT.

The clinicopathological features of thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome following ChAdOx1-S (AZD1222) vaccination and case outcomes in Australia: a population-based study

Background

Thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS) associated with viral vector COVID-19 vaccines, including ChAdOx1-S (AstraZeneca AZD1222) vaccine, can result in significant morbidity and mortality. We report the clinicopathological features of TTS following ChAdOx1-S vaccination and summarise the case outcomes in Australia.

Methods

In this cohort study, patients diagnosed with TTS in Australia between 23 March and 31 December 2021 were identified according to predefined criteria. Cases were included if they met the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) probable and confirmed case definitions and were reclassified using Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) definition for analysis. Data were collected on patient baseline characteristics, clinicopathological features, risk factors, treatment and outcomes.

Findings

A total of 170 TTS cases were identified, with most occurring after the first dose (87%) of ChAdOx1-S. The median time to symptom onset after vaccination and symptom onset to admission was 11 and 2 days respectively. The median age of cases was 66 years (interquartile range 55-74). All except two patients received therapeutic anticoagulation and 66% received intravenous immunoglobulin. Overall, 85.3% of cases were discharged home after a median hospitalisation of 6 days, 9.4% required ongoing rehabilitation and 5.3% died. Eight deaths were related to TTS, with another dying from an unrelated condition while receiving treatment for TTS. Deaths occurred more commonly in those classified as Tier 1 according to the CDC definition and were associated with more severe thrombocytopenia and disease-related haemorrhage.

Interpretation

TTS, while rare, can be severe and have catastrophic outcomes in some individuals. In Australia, the mortality rate was low compared to that reported in other high-income countries. Almost all received therapeutic anticoagulation with no bleeding complications and were successfully discharged. This emphasises the importance of community education and an established pathway for early recognition, diagnosis and treatment of TTS.

Funding

Australian Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care. H.A Tran, N. Wood, J. Buttery, N.W. Crawford, S.D. Chunilal, V.M. Chen are supported by Medical Research Future Funds (MRFF) grant ID 2015305.

Cerebral venous thrombosis in patients with autoimmune disease, hematonosis or coronavirus disease 2019: Many familiar faces and some strangers

BACKGROUND

Cerebral venous thrombosis, a rare stroke, is characterized by neurological dysfunction caused by bleeding and/or infarction resulting from venous sinus thrombosis, the so-called venous stroke. Current guidelines recommend anticoagulants as first-line therapy in the treatment of venous stroke. With complicated causes of cerebral venous thrombosis, treatment is difficult, especially when combined with autoimmune diseases, blood diseases, and even COVID-19.

AIMS

This review summarizes the pathophysiological mechanisms, epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, and clinical prognosis of cerebral venous thrombosis combined with autoimmune diseases, blood diseases, or infectious diseases such as COVID-19.

CONCLUSION

A systematic understanding of particular risk factors that should not be neglected when unconventional cerebral venous thrombosis occurs and for a scientific understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms, clinical diagnosis, and treatment, thus contributing to knowledge on special types of venous stroke.

Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia: what do we know hitherto?

Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT), also known as thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome, is a catastrophic and life-threatening reaction to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines, which occurs disproportionately in response to vaccination with non-replicating adenovirus vector (AV) vaccines. The mechanism of VITT is not well defined and it has not been resolved why cases of VITT are predominated by vaccination with AV vaccines. However, virtually all VITT patients have positive platelet-activating anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4) antibody titers. Subsequently, platelets are activated and depleted in an Fcγ-receptor IIa (FcγRIIa or CD32a)-dependent manner, but it is not clear why or how the anti-PF4 response is mounted. This review describes the pathogenesis of VITT and provides insight into possible mechanisms that prompt the formation of a PF4/polyanion complex, which drives VITT pathology, as an amalgam of current experimental data or hypotheses.

Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia post dose 2 ChAdOx1 nCoV19 vaccination: Less severe but remains a problem

BACKGROUND

Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is a rare but established complication of 1st dose ChAdOx1 nCoV19 vaccination (AZD1222), however this complication after dose 2 remains controversial.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the clinicopathological features of confirmed cases of VITT post dose 2 AZD1222 vaccination in Australia, and to compare this cohort to confirmed cases of VITT post 1st dose.

METHODS

Sequential cases of clinically suspected VITT (thrombocytopenia, D-Dimer > 5x upper limit normal and thrombosis) within 4-42 days of dose 2 AZD1222 referred to Australia's centralised testing centre underwent platelet activation confirmatory testing in keeping with the national diagnostic algorithm. Final classification was assigned after adjudication by an expert advisory committee. Descriptive statistics were performed on this cohort and comparative analyses carried out on confirmed cases of VITT after 1st and 2nd dose AZD1222.

RESULTS

Of 62 patients referred, 15 demonstrated presence of antibody mediated platelet activation consistent with VITT after dose 2 AZD1222. Four were immunoassay positive. Median time to presentation was 13 days (range 1-53) platelet count 116x10^9/L (range 63-139) and D-dimer elevation 14.5xULN (IQR 11, 26). Two fatalities occurred. In each, the dosing interval was less than 30 days. In comparison to 1st dose, dose 2 cases were more likely to be male (OR 4.6, 95% CI 1.3-15.8, p = 0.03), present with higher platelet counts (p = 0.05), lower D-Dimer (p = 01) and less likely to have unusual site thromboses (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.04-0.28, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

VITT is a complication of dose 2 AZD1222 vaccination. Whilst clinicopathological features are less severe, fatalities occurred in patients with concomitant factors.

Platelet-activating functional assay resolution in vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia: differential alignment to PF4 ELISA platforms

Background

Anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4) antibodies in vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) appear to be transient, with discrepant persistence depending on the platform used for detection.

Objectives

We aimed to report a longitudinal study of antibody persistence using 2 ELISA platforms and 2 platelet-activating functional assays in a clinical cohort of patients with VITT referred for follow-up testing.

Methods

In total, 32 Australian patients with VITT or pre-VITT, confirmed by expert adjudication, with samples referred for clinical follow-up were included. Clinical follow-up assays, including Stago and Hyphen ELISAs, procoagulant platelet flow cytometry, and modified PF4-serotonin-release assay, were performed according to the pattern of reactivity for that patient at diagnosis.

Results

The median follow-up was 24 weeks after diagnosis. A general decline in anti-PF4 antibody levels and platelet-activating capacity over time was observed with a more rapid median time to resolution of 16 weeks by functional assay vs 24 weeks by Stago ELISA. Decline in platelet-activating antibody levels detected by functional assays mirrored Stago ELISA titer but not Hyphen. However, 87% of patients received a documented second vaccination and 74% received an mRNA booster with no reported adverse events.

Conclusion

Anti-PF4 antibodies persist longer than functional platelet-activating antibodies in VITT but do not warrant avoidance of subsequent vaccinations. Persistence detection is assay-dependent. Stago ELISA may be a surrogate where functional assays are unavailable for follow-up testing of confirmed patients with VITT.

COVID-19 Vaccine-Associated Immune Thrombosis and Thrombocytopenia (VITT): Diagnostic Discrepancies and Global Implications

Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) has been reported in association with the coronavirus disease 2019 preventative adenovirus vector-based vaccines ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (Oxford/AstraZeneca) and Ad26.COV2.S (Janssen/Johnson & Johnson) in hundreds of recipients across the globe. VITT is characterized by thrombosis, typically at unusual sites, low fibrinogen, and elevated plasma D-dimer, generally manifesting between 4 and 28 days following vaccination. Detection of anti-platelet factor antibodies using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is often confirmatory. Although several similar principles subside in most diagnostic criteria for VITT, the presentation of a positive ELISA assay, use of expert hematology and neurology opinion, and exclusion of possible VITT cases outside the "standard" 4 to 28-day timeframe have contributed a lack of global standardization for defining VITT. Accordingly, the global and regional incidence of VITT differs according to the diagnostic pathway and case definition used. This has influenced the public perception of VITT's severity and the decision to use adenovirus vector-based vaccines for limiting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. We hereby delineate the recognized pathogenic mechanisms, global incidence, discrepancies in diagnostic criteria, recommended treatments, and global implications to vaccine hesitancy from this coagulopathy.

Mechanisms of Thrombosis in Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia and Vaccine-Induced Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) are rare, iatrogenic immune-mediated conditions with high rates of thrombosis-related morbidity and mortality. HIT is a long-recognized reaction to the administration of the common parenterally administered anticoagulant heparin (or its derivatives), while VITT is a new, distinct syndrome occurring in response to adenovirus-based vaccines against coronavirus disease 2019 and potentially other types of vaccines. A feature of both HIT and VITT is paradoxical thrombosis despite a characteristic low platelet count, mediated by the presence of platelet-activating antibodies to platelet factor 4. Several additional factors have also been suggested to contribute to clot formation in HIT and/or VITT, including monocytes, tissue factor, microparticles, endothelium, the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps, complement, procoagulant platelets, and vaccine components. In this review, we discuss the literature to date regarding mechanisms contributing to thrombosis in both HIT and VITT and explore the pathophysiological similarities and differences between the two conditions.

Heparin-Induced Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia (HITT) and Vaccine-Induced Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia (VITT): Similar but Different

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) represents an autoimmune process whereby antibodies are formed against heparin in complex with platelet factor 4 (PF4) after heparin administration. These antibodies can be detected by a variety of immunological assays, including ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) and by chemiluminescence on the AcuStar instrument. However, pathological HIT antibodies are those that activate platelets in a platelet activation assay and cause thrombosis in vivo. We would tend to call this condition heparin-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (HITT), although some workers instead use the truncated abbreviation HIT. Vaccine-induced (immune) thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) instead reflects an autoimmune process whereby antibodies are formed against PF4 after administration of a vaccine, most notably adenovirus-based vaccines directed against COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019). Although both VITT and HITT reflect similar pathological processes, they have different origins and are detected in different ways. Most notable is that anti-PF4 antibodies in VITT can only be detected immunologically by ELISA assays, tending to be negative in rapid assays such as that using the AcuStar. Moreover, functional platelet activation assays otherwise used for HITT may need to be modified to detect platelet activation in VITT.

Severe Thrombocytopenia, Thrombosis and Anti-PF4 Antibody after Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Booster-Is It Vaccine-Induced Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia?

Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is a serious and life-threatening complication occurring after adenovirus-vector COVID-19 vaccines, and is rarely reported after other vaccine types. Herein, we report a case of possible VITT after the Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccine booster, who presented with extensive lower limb deep vein thrombosis, severe thrombocytopenia, markedly elevated D-dimer and positive anti-PF4 antibody occurring 2 weeks post-vaccination, concurrent with a lupus anticoagulant. A complete recovery was made after intravenous immunoglobulin, prednisolone and anticoagulation with the oral direct Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban. The presenting features of VITT may overlap with those of antiphospholipid syndrome associated with anti-PF4 and immune thrombocytopenia. We discuss the diagnostic considerations in VITT and highlight the challenges of performing VITT confirmatory assays in non-specialized settings. The set of five diagnostic criteria for VITT is a useful tool for guiding initial management, but may potentially include patients without VITT. The bleeding risks of severe thrombocytopenia in the face of thrombosis, requiring anticoagulant therapy, present a clinical challenge, but early recognition and management can potentially lead to favorable outcomes.

Autoimmune Diseases Affecting Hemostasis: A Narrative Review

Hemostasis reflects a homeostatic mechanism that aims to balance out pro-coagulant and anti-coagulant forces to maintain blood flow within the circulation. Simplistically, a relative excess of procoagulant forces can lead to thrombosis, and a relative excess of anticoagulant forces can lead to bleeding. There are a wide variety of congenital disorders associated with bleeding or thrombosis. In addition, there exist a vast array of autoimmune diseases that can also lead to either bleeding or thrombosis. For example, autoantibodies generated against clotting factors can lead to bleeding, of which acquired hemophilia A is the most common. As another example, autoimmune-mediated antibodies against phospholipids can generate a prothrombotic milieu in a condition known as antiphospholipid (antibody) syndrome (APS). Moreover, there exist various autoimmunity promoting environments that can lead to a variety of antibodies that affect hemostasis. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) represents perhaps the contemporary example of such a state, with potential development of a kaleidoscope of such antibodies that primarily drive thrombosis, but may also lead to bleeding on rarer occasions. We provide here a narrative review to discuss the interaction between various autoimmune diseases and hemostasis.

Special Issue "Advances in Thrombocytopenia"

Thrombocytopenia is a commonly encountered hematologic challenge in medicine [...].