Achieving higher efficacy without compromising safety with factor XI inhibitors versus low molecular weight heparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in major orthopedic surgery-Systematic review and meta-analysis

A Systematic Review of Safety and Efficacy of Factor XI/XIa Inhibitors in Patients With ESKD on Hemodialysis

Introduction

Factor XI/XIa (FXI/XIa) has emerged as a potential target for antithrombotic therapy, driven by preclinical evidence showing the role of FXI/XIa inhibition for preventing thrombosis without impeding hemostasis. This is particularly promising for patients at high risk of both thromboembolic events and bleeding, such as patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) on hemodialysis (HD).

Methods

We systematically searched Embase, MEDLINE, and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized controlled trials evaluating FXI/XIa inhibitors in patients with ESKD on HD, without restricting inclusion to specific comparators or indications. Interventional treatment arms were pooled, and study results were synthesized by fitting random-effects models, calculating odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

Five phases 2 studies encompassing 1270 participants were identified, investigating gruticibart, IONIS-FXIRx, osocimab, or fesomersen in the general HD population and using placebo as a comparator. Four studies were fully published and included in the meta-analysis. Use of FXI/XIa inhibitors was associated with an OR of 0.80 (95% CI = 0.47-1.35) for clinically relevant bleeding, 0.51 (95% CI = 0.21-1.28) for major bleeding, and 0.90 (95% CI = 0.49-1.68) for clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding. The ORs for thromboembolic events and all-cause mortality were 0.66 (95% CI = 0.28-1.56) and 0.46 (95% CI = 0.15-1.40), respectively.

Conclusion

Currently available evidence does not indicate a significantly increased bleeding risk of FXI/XIa inhibitors in patients with ESKD on HD compared to placebo. Their efficacy and their association with all-cause mortality need to be investigated in sufficiently powered, randomized controlled phase 3 trials.

Factor XI as a new target for prevention of thromboembolism in cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Anticoagulant therapy is a mainstay in the management of patients with cardiovascular disease. The use of conventional anticoagulants carries potential side effects, mainly bleeding. Drugs targeting Factor XI (FXI) have been investigated in randomized controlled trials as a new option with more favorable outcomes. A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify relevant studies comparing FXI inhibitors to placebo or standard therapy. The primary outcomes were incidence of all bleeding events, major bleeding, and thromboembolism. Secondary outcomes included incidence of all adverse events (AE), serious AE, and all-cause mortality. A total of 11 studies involving 10,536 patients were included. FXI inhibitors were associated with a trend toward reduction of bleeding events and incidence of thromboembolism compared to the control group (placebo/standard therapy). There was no statistically significant difference between both groups in terms of adverse events and all-cause mortality. When compared to enoxaparin, FXI inhibitors significantly reduced the risk of bleeding events (RR = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.23-0.76, P = 0.004) and thromboembolism (RR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.44-0.77, P = 0.001). On the other hand, when compared to DOACs, FXI inhibitors were associated with a significant reduction in bleeding events but not thromboembolism. Whereas, compared to placebo, FXI inhibitors did not increase the risk of bleeding events, adverse events, or all-cause mortality (P > 0.05). FXI inhibitors could be a safer and more potent option for prevention of thromboembolism than conventional therapy.

The impact of OCEANIC-AF and the future of factor XIa inhibitors

The OCEANIC-AF trial was terminated early due to inferiority of asundexian compared with apixaban for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation.1 However, the promisingly low bleeding rates support continued exploration of factor XIa inhibitors. Future efforts should focus on achieving greater factor XIa inhibition and identifying patient populations that may benefit most from these therapies.

Medical Clinics of North America-Periprocedural Antithrombotics: Prophylaxis and Interruption

Anticoagulation management in the surgical patient requires clinical expertise and careful attention. For patients already receiving anticoagulation for a defined indication (ie, stroke prevention for atrial fibrillation, treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE), or presence of a mechanical heart valve), understanding how to manage these agents by weighing the risks of thromboembolic events and bleeding is paramount. Additionally, prevention of VTE in the surgical patient involves the identification of patient-specific and procedure-specific risk factors for both VTE and bleeding. With this information, as well as familiarity with the several antithrombotic options available, an appropriate prophylaxis strategy can be employed.

Novel horizons in anticoagulation: the emerging role of factor XI inhibitors across different settings

Anticoagulants have long been fundamental in preventing and treating thromboembolic disorders, with a recent shift of focus towards direct oral anticoagulants, thanks to their ease of use, efficacy, and safety. Despite these advancements, bleeding complications remain a major concern with any anticoagulant, highlighting the need for safer drugs. Factor XI (FXI) inhibitors have emerged as promising agents in this regard, offering a novel approach by targeting upstream factors in the coagulation system. Phase II trials have shown encouraging outcomes, indicating a reduced bleeding risk compared to that associated with traditional anticoagulants, particularly in the context of cardiovascular disease management when combined with antiplatelet therapy. However, the variability in findings and limited efficacy data call for a cautious interpretation pending insights from phase III trials. These trials are essential for validating the potential of FXI inhibitors to balance bleeding risk reduction and maintain anticoagulant efficacy. This review explores the pharmacology, potential indications, clinical data, and future directions of FXI inhibitors, providing a perspective on their evolving role in anticoagulant therapy. It also provides a detailed analysis of data from published clinical trials on FXI inhibitors in various indications. Preliminary data from ongoing trials are also outlined. As the field moves forward, a cautiously optimistic outlook can be expected, focusing on comprehensive data from phase III trials to define the role of FXI inhibitors in various clinical scenarios.

Advances and current research in primary thromboprophylaxis to prevent hospital-associated venous thromboembolism

Hospital-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) is defined as any case of VTE occurring during hospital admission and for up to 90 days post discharge. It accounts for over 50% of all cases of VTE internationally; indeed, there are an estimated 10 million cases of hospital-associated VTE annually. Over the last decade, there has been increasing interest in improving VTE risk assessment and thromboprophylaxis. This review summarises all the recent and ongoing major research studies and future challenges in the different areas, including medical, surgical and obstetric patients, as well as special areas such as lower limb immobilisation. We include sections on both pharmacological and mechanical thromboprophylaxis.

Prevention of thromboembolism after a fracture: is aspirin enough?

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a serious complication that can arise during and after hospitalization, particularly following surgery under general anaesthesia. Particularly at risk are major orthopaedic surgical procedures such as elective knee or hip replacement and the treatment of hip fractures. In these patients, current guidelines recommend (low or low-moderate level of evidence) aspirin as a possible alternative to anticoagulant therapy for the prophylaxis of long-term venous thromboembolism after an initial period with anticoagulant drugs. Several randomized trials and meta-analyses demonstrate no significant differences in the risk of VTE when comparing aspirin with anticoagulants. However, it must be considered that most recommendations are based on elective orthopaedic surgery and that trials after fractures have excluded patients at high thrombotic risk. Consequently, the overall incidence of major clinical events (death and pulmonary embolism) was ∼1% with wide confidence margins in even large non-inferiority studies. The incidence of asymptomatic VTE, especially distal, appears to be higher with aspirin. Patient preference and lower costs could play an important role in the choice in favour of aspirin.

Factor XI Inhibitors: A New Horizon in Anticoagulation Therapy

Anticoagulation therapy has undergone significant evolution, marked by the emergence of direct oral anticoagulants with distinct advantages. Despite these advancements, challenges persist in managing residual thrombotic and bleeding risks, particularly among vulnerable populations. The pursuit of alternative drugs has honed in on factor XI/XIa inhibitors. This comprehensive review delves into several key aspects regarding this new target: (i) the role of factor XI in the coagulation cascade; (ii) the genetic evidence and pathophysiologic rationale supporting factor XI inhibition as a therapeutic target; (iii) an exploration of the various types of factor XI/XIa inhibitors currently under investigation; (iv) potential applications of these medications, spanning thromboprophylaxis after orthopedic surgery, stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation, secondary prevention after acute coronary syndrome, non-cardioembolic stroke, thromboprophylaxis after foreign material implantation, end-stage renal disease, and patients with cancer; and (v) an overview of ongoing studies, recent findings, and the future trajectory of research into these drugs.

Factor XI/XIa inhibitors for the prevention and treatment of venous and arterial thromboembolism: A narrative review

During the past decade, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have advanced and simplified the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, there remains a high incidence of bleeds, which calls for agents that have a reduced risk of bleeding. Factor XI (FXI) deficiency is associated with lower rates of venous thrombosis and stroke compared to the general population with a lower risk of bleeding. In conjunction with this, phase 2 studies have demonstrated safety and the potential for reduced thrombotic events with FXI inhibitors as compared to currently available medications. The aim of this review is to summarize key data on the clinical pharmacology of FXI, the latest developments in clinical trials of FXI inhibitors, and to describe the efficacy and safety profiles of FXI inhibitors for the prevention of venous and arterial thromboembolism.

Factor XI inhibitors for the prevention of cardiovascular disease: A new therapeutic approach on the horizon?

Anticoagulant drugs that are currently used to prevent and/or treat thrombosis have some limitations that hinder their ability to meet specific clinical requirements. While these drugs effectively reduce the rates of thrombotic events, they simultaneously increase the risk of bleeding. Moreover, their risk-to-benefit balance is problematic in some patients, such as those with severe chronic kidney disease or those at high bleeding risk. A novel anticoagulation method, FXI inhibition has emerged as a promising alternative. It demonstrates a strong rationale for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism and the potential fulfillment of unmet clinical needs in the cardiovascular field. A number of FXI inhibitors are currently undergoing clinical investigation. The objective of this review is to provide an overview of early results of research on FXI inhibitors in the cardiovascular setting, offering valuable insights into their potential role in shaping the future of anticoagulation.

A new strategy for anticoagulation: The factor XI inhibitors

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are currently the first-choice therapy for the prevention of cardioembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation and for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) due to their more favorable efficacy to safety profile in comparison to vitamin K antagonists (VKA). DOACs did not show a clinical benefit when used for in stroke prevention in patients with mechanic or rheumatic valves or in those who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), in the treatment of VTE in patients with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome and in prevention of VTE in medically ill patients. There are some concerns for bleeding excess at the gastrointestinal site for some, but not all, DOACs. In recent years, in order to overcome the limitations of the available DOACs and to explore the advantages of anticoagulation in additional clinical settings, the development of factor XI and factor XII inhibitors as anticoagulant agents has been proposed. Emerging data show that factor XI has a minor role in the physiological process of hemostasis and an important role in the development of thrombosis. Bleeding has been viewed for several years as an unavoidable side effect of anticoagulant therapy. The aim of factor XI inhibitors is to challenge this dogma by favoring the uncoupling between hemostasis and thrombosis. This paper provides an update on the rationale for the use of factor XI inhibitors, their pharmacological properties and the preliminary clinical findings.

Inhibition of Factor XI: A New Era in the Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism in Cancer Patients?

Direct oral anticoagulants against activated factor X and thrombin were the last milestone in thrombosis treatment. Step by step, they replaced antivitamin K and heparins in most of their therapeutic indications. As effective as the previous anticoagulant, the decreased but persistent risk of bleeding while using direct oral anticoagulants has created space for new therapeutics aiming to provide the same efficacy with better safety. On this basis, drug targeting factor XI emerged as an option. In particular, cancer patients might be one of the populations that will most benefit from this technical advance. In this review, after a brief presentation of the different factor IX inhibitors, we explore the potential benefit of this new treatment for cancer patients.

Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Major Orthopedic Surgeries and Factor XIa Inhibitors

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), comprising pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT), poses a significant risk during and after hospitalization, particularly for surgical patients. Among various patient groups, those undergoing major orthopedic surgeries are considered to have a higher susceptibility to PE and DVT. Major lower-extremity orthopedic procedures carry a higher risk of symptomatic VTE compared to most other surgeries, with an estimated incidence of ~4%. The greatest risk period occurs within the first 7-14 days following surgery. Major bleeding is also more prevalent in these surgeries compared to others, with rates estimated between 2% and 4%. For patients undergoing major lower-extremity orthopedic surgery who have a low bleeding risk, it is recommended to use pharmacological thromboprophylaxis with or without mechanical devices. The choice of the initial agent depends on the specific surgery and patient comorbidities. First-line options include low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs), direct oral anticoagulants, and aspirin. Second-line options consist of unfractionated heparin (UFH), fondaparinux, and warfarin. For most patients undergoing knee or hip arthroplasty, the initial agents recommended for the early perioperative period are LMWHs (enoxaparin or dalteparin) or direct oral anticoagulants (rivaroxaban or apixaban). In the case of hip fracture surgery, LMWH is recommended as the preferred agent for the entire duration of prophylaxis. However, emerging factor XI(a) inhibitors, as revealed by a recent meta-analysis, have shown a substantial decrease in the occurrence of VTE and bleeding events among patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery. This discovery poses a challenge to the existing paradigm of anticoagulant therapy in this specific patient population and indicates that factor XI(a) inhibitors hold great promise as a potential strategy to be taken into serious consideration.

Potential anticoagulant of traditional chinese medicine and novel targets for anticoagulant drugs

BACKGROUND

Anticoagulants are the main drugs used for the prevention and treatment of thrombosis. Currently, anticoagulant drugs are primarily multitarget heparin drugs, single-target FXa inhibitors and FIIa inhibitors. In addition, some traditional Chinese drugs also have anticoagulant effects, but they are not the main direction of treatment at present. But the anticoagulant drugs mentioned above, all have a common side effect is bleeding. Many other anticoagulation targets are under investigation. With further exploration of coagulation mechanism, how to further determine new anticoagulant targets and how to make traditional Chinese medicine play anticoagulant role have become a new field of exploration.

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to summarize the recent research progress on coagulation mechanisms, new anticoagulant targets and traditional Chinese medicine.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted using four electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, CNKI, Wanfang database and ClinicalTrials.gov, from the inception of the study to 28 Feb 2023. Key words used in the literature search were "anticoagulation", "anticoagulant targets", "new targets", "coagulation mechanisms", "potential anticoagulant", "herb medicine", "botanical medicine", "Chinese medicine", "traditional Chinese medicine", "blood coagulation factor", keywords are linked with AND/OR. Recent findings on coagulation mechanisms, potential anticoagulant targets and traditional Chinese medicine were studied.

RESULTS

The active components extracted from the Chinese medicinal herbs, Salvia miltiorrhiza, Chuanxiong rhizoma, safflower and Panax notoginseng have obvious anticoagulant effects and can be used as potential anticoagulant drugs, but the risk of bleeding is unclear. TF/FVIIa, FVIII, FIX, FXI, FXII, and FXIII have all been evaluated as targets in animal studies or clinical trials. FIX and FXI are the most studied anticoagulant targets, but FXI inhibitors have shown stronger advantages.

CONCLUSION

This review of potential anticoagulants provides a comprehensive resource. Literature analysis suggests that FXI inhibitors can be used as potential anticoagulant candidates. In addition, we should not ignore the anticoagulant effect of traditional Chinese medicine, and look forward to more research and the emergence of new drugs.

Titanium is a potent inducer of contact activation: implications for intravascular devices

BACKGROUND

Titanium (Ti) and its alloys are widely used in manufacturing medical devices because of their strength and resistance to corrosion. Although Ti compounds are considered compatible with blood, they appear to support plasma contact activation and may be thrombogenic.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to compare Ti and titanium nitride (TiN) with known activators of contact activation (kaolin and silica) in plasma-clotting assays and to assess binding and activation of factor XII, (FXII), factor XI (FXI), prekallikrein, and high-molecular-weight kininogen (HK) with Ti/TiN.

METHODS

Ti-based nanospheres and foils were compared with kaolin, silica, and aluminum in plasma-clotting assays. Binding and activation of FXII, prekallikrein, HK, and FXI to surfaces was assessed with western blots and chromogenic assays.

RESULTS

Using equivalent surface amounts, Ti and TiN were comparable with kaolin and superior to silica, for inducing coagulation and FXII autoactivation. Similar to many inducers of contact activation, Ti and TiN are negatively charged; however, their effects on FXII are not neutralized by the polycation polybrene. Antibodies to FXII, prekallikrein, or FXI or coating Ti with poly-L-arginine blocked Ti-induced coagulation. An antibody to FXII reduced FXII and PK binding to Ti, kallikrein generation, and HK cleavage.

CONCLUSION

Titanium compounds induce contact activation with a potency comparable with that of kaolin. Binding of FXII with Ti shares some features with FXII binding to soluble polyanions but may have unique features. Inhibitors targeting FXII or FXI may be useful in mitigating Ti-induced contact activation in patients with titanium-based implants that are exposed to blood.

Factor XI Inhibitors in Early Clinical Trials: A Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

 Phase II randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on factor(F)XI inhibitors have shown promising results but they were burdened by low statistical power for clinical outcomes.

METHODS

 We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCT comparing FXI inhibitors versus other anticoagulants (enoxaparin or direct oral anticoagulants, DOACs) or versus placebo on top of antiplatelet therapy.

RESULTS

 Eight RCTs testing FXI inhibitors (ISIS 416858, osocimab, abelacimab, milvexian, asundexian) and enrolling 9,216 patients were included. Compared with enoxaparin, FXI inhibitors were associated with reduced any-bleeding (risk ratio [RR]: 0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.31-0.77), no difference in major bleeding (RR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.41-2.28), and reduced trial-defined efficacy endpoint (RR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.49-0.79), the latter driven by the high-dose regimens. Compared with DOACs, FXI inhibitors were associated with a trend toward reduced any-bleeding (RR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.31-1.38) and no difference in major bleeding (RR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.22-4.78) or in trial-defined efficacy endpoint (RR: 1.23, 95% CI: 0.88-1.70). Compared with placebo, FXI inhibitors were associated with increased any-bleeding (RR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.08-1.43) and a trend toward increased major bleeding (RR: 1.21, 95% CI: 0.75-1.93), both driven by high-dose regimens, with no difference in trial-defined efficacy endpoint (RR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.92-1.13).

CONCLUSION

 Results of this meta-analysis on FXI inhibitors suggest increased safety and efficacy compared with enoxaparin and modest increased safety compared with DOACs. The use of FXI inhibitors in adjunct to antiplatelet therapy versus placebo appears to be associated with a dose-dependent increase in bleeding without any difference in efficacy.

STUDY REGISTRATION

 This study is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022367706).

A Review of FXIa Inhibition as a Novel Target for Anticoagulation

Limitations of vitamin K antagonists as chronic oral anticoagulant therapy have largely been supplanted by direct factor IIa and factor Xa inhibitor oral anticoagulants with similar efficacy but an overall better safety profile, lack of routine monitoring, and very limited drug-drug interactions compared with agents such as warfarin. However, an increased risk of bleeding remains even with these new-generation oral anticoagulants in fragile patient populations, in patients requiring dual or triple antithrombotic therapy, or high bleed risk surgeries. Epidemiologic data in patients with hereditary factor XI deficiency and preclinical studies support the notion that factor XIa inhibitors have the ability to be an effective but potentially safer alternative to existing anticoagulants, based on their ability to prevent thrombosis directly within the intrinsic pathway without affecting hemostatic mechanisms. As such, various types of factor XIa inhibitors have been studied in early phase clinical studies, including inhibitors of the biosynthesis of factor XIa with antisense oligonucleotides or direct inhibitors of factor XIa using small peptidomimetic molecules, monoclonal antibodies, aptamers, or natural inhibitors. In this review, we discuss how different types of factor XIa inhibitors work and present findings from recently published Phase II clinical trials across multiple indications, including stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation, dual pathway inhibition with concurrent antiplatelets post-myocardial infarction, and thromboprophylaxis of orthopaedic surgery patients. Finally, we refer to ongoing Phase III clinical trials of factor XIa inhibitors and their potential to provide definitive answers regarding their safety and efficacy in preventing thromboembolic events in specific patient groups.

Achieving higher efficacy without compromising safety with factor XI inhibitors versus low molecular weight heparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in major orthopedic surgery-Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In recent years, many important advances have been seen in anticoagulation therapy. However, bleeding risk is still a major concern. Factor XI (FXI) inhibition has emerged as a potential advantageous target to minimize this risk.

OBJECTIVES

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of current evidence on FXI inhibitors for thromboprophylaxis in major orthopedic surgery.

METHODS

We performed a systematic search of electronic databases (PubMed, CENTRAL, and Scopus) until May of 2022. Studies were considered eligible if they were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating FXI inhibitors in thromboprophylaxis versus low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). For analysis purposes, we considered efficacy (venous thromboembolism [VTE], symptomatic VTE) and safety (major and clinically relevant non-major [CRNM] bleeding events, major bleeding events, blood transfusion necessities, adverse events, major adverse events) outcomes.

RESULTS

Overall, four RCTs were included, with a total of 2269 patients, 372 VTE events, and 50 major or CRNM bleeding events. Regarding efficacy outcomes, FXI inhibitors were associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of VTE events (odds ratio [OR] 0.50; 95% confidence interval [CI: 0.36, 0.69]). Concerning safety outcomes, FXI inhibitors significantly reduced major or CRNM bleeding events (OR 0.41; 95% CI [0.22, 0.75]). It was also associated with a lower percentage of patients needing a blood transfusion, despite not meeting statistical significance (OR 0.69; 95% CI [0.32, 1.48]). Incidence of adverse events and major adverse events were similar between groups.

CONCLUSION

Factor XI inhibitors showed a significant reduction in the incidence of VTE and bleeding events among patients submitted to major orthopedic surgery.