Effect of prior general anesthesia or sedation and antiseizure drugs on the diagnostic utility of wireless video electroencephalography in dogs

Epilepsy is more than a simple seizure disorder: Causal relationships between epilepsy and its comorbidities

This review draws connections between the pathogenesis of canine epilepsy and its most commonly recognised comorbidities: cognitive impairment (CI), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)-like behaviour, fear and anxiety. Uni/bidirectional causalities and the possibility of a common aetiology triggering both epilepsy and the associated diseases are considered. Research on this topic is sparse in dogs, so information has been gathered and assessed from human and laboratory animal studies. Anatomical structures, functional connections, disrupted neurotransmission and neuroinflammatory processes collectively serve as a common foundation for epilepsy and its comorbidities. Specific anatomical structures, especially parts of the limbic system, such as the amygdala and the hippocampus, are involved in generating seizures, as well as cognitive- and behavioural disorders. Furthermore, disturbances in inhibitory and excitatory neurotransmission influence neuronal excitability and networks, leading to underlying brain dysfunction. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs), and electroencephalography (EEG) have demonstrated functional brain connections that are related to the emergence of both epilepsy and its various comorbidities. Neuroinflammatory processes can either cause or be a consequence of seizures, and inflammatory mediators, oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction, can equally evoke mood disorders. The extensive relationships contributing to the development and progression of seizures and comorbid cognitive and behavioural conditions illustrate the complexity of the disease that is epilepsy.

Survey of electroencephalography usage and techniques for dogs

Background

Canine epilepsy is a chronic common neurologic condition where seizures may be underreported. Electroencephalography (EEG) is the patient-side test providing an objective diagnostic criterion for seizures and epilepsy. Despite this, EEG is thought to be rarely used in veterinary neurology.

Objectives

This survey study aims to better understand the current canine EEG usage and techniques and barriers in veterinary neurology.

Methods

The online Qualtrics link was distributed via listserv to members of the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine (ACVIM) Neurology Specialty and the European College of Veterinary Neurology (ECVN), reaching at least 517 veterinary neurology specialists and trainees worldwide.

Results

The survey received a 35% response rate, for a total of 180 participant responses. Fewer than 50% of veterinary neurologists are currently performing EEG and it is performed infrequently. The most common indication was to determine a discrete event diagnosis. Other reasons included monitoring treatment, determining brain death, identifying the type of seizure or epilepsy, localizing foci, sleep disorders, for research purposes, and post-op brain surgery monitorization. Most respondents interpreted their own EEGs. Clinical barriers to the performance of EEG in dogs were mainly equipment availability, insufficient cases, and financial costs to clients.

Conclusion

This survey provides an update on EEG usage and techniques for dogs, identifying commonalities of technique and areas for development as a potential basis for harmonization of canine EEG techniques. A validated and standardized canine EEG protocol is hoped to improve the diagnosis and treatment of canine epilepsy.

Pathophysiology of drug-resistant canine epilepsy

Drug resistance continues to be a major clinical problem in the therapeutic management of canine epilepsies with substantial implications for quality of life and survival times. Experimental and clinical data from human medicine provided evidence for relevant contributions of intrinsic severity of the disease as well as alterations in pharmacokinetics and -dynamics to failure to respond to antiseizure medications. In addition, several modulatory factors have been identified that can be associated with the level of therapeutic responses. Among others, the list of potential modulatory factors comprises genetic and epigenetic factors, inflammatory mediators, and metabolites. Regarding data from dogs, there are obvious gaps in knowledge when it comes to our understanding of the clinical patterns and the mechanisms of drug-resistant canine epilepsy. So far, seizure density and the occurrence of cluster seizures have been linked with a poor response to antiseizure medications. Moreover, evidence exists that the genetic background and alterations in epigenetic mechanisms might influence the efficacy of antiseizure medications in dogs with epilepsy. Further molecular, cellular, and network alterations that may affect intrinsic severity, pharmacokinetics, and -dynamics have been reported. However, the association with drug responsiveness has not yet been studied in detail. In summary, there is an urgent need to strengthen clinical and experimental research efforts exploring the mechanisms of resistance as well as their association with different etiologies, epilepsy types, and clinical courses.

Frequency of non-generalized tonic clonic seizures in a referral population of dogs

Absence seizures are a type of generalized onset seizure associated in humans with brief activity interruptions, unresponsiveness and staring. Absence seizures are infrequently reported in veterinary patients, visually indistinguishable from focal seizures, and so may be grouped as non-generalized tonic clonic seizures (non-GTCS). The objective of this retrospective study was to provide a preliminary understanding of the frequency of non-GTCS in dogs and estimate its prevalence by evaluating the distribution of seizure types presented to a referral hospital over 4 years (May 2017-April 2021), as determined from the medical record history and electroencephalography (EEG) diagnostic testing where available. A total of 528 cases were included via a medical record search for dogs with epilepsy and/or seizures presented to the neurology or emergency services. Cases were categorized into seizure types based on reported clinical signs. Each year, 53-63 % of seizure cases were described as generalized tonic clonic seizures (GTCS), 9-15 % GTCS with additional events and 29-35 % suspected non-GTCS. EEG confirmed absence seizures in 12 of 44 EEGs, 5 cases having a history of GTCS and seven without prior GTCS. This preliminary study suggests that non-GTCS may be relatively common as one third of seizure cases in the referral population presented with non-GTCS clinical signs. Prospective studies using EEG are merited to definitively determine the prevalence of these different seizure types in dogs. Acknowledging the impact of these seizures will improve awareness, aiding veterinarians in their recognition, diagnosis and potential treatment options.

Translational veterinary epilepsy: A win-win situation for human and veterinary neurology

Epilepsy is a challenging multifactorial disorder with a complex genetic background. Our current understanding of the pathophysiology and treatment of epilepsy has substantially increased due to animal model studies, including canine studies, but additional basic and clinical research is required. Drug-resistant epilepsy is an important problem in both dogs and humans, since seizure freedom is not achieved with the available antiseizure medications. The evaluation and exploration of pharmacological and particularly non-pharmacological therapeutic options need to remain a priority in epilepsy research. Combined efforts and sharing knowledge and expertise between human medical and veterinary neurologists are important for improving the treatment outcomes or even curing epilepsy in dogs. Such interactions could offer an exciting approach to translate the knowledge gained from people and rodents to dogs and vice versa. In this article, a panel of experts discusses the similarities and knowledge gaps in human and animal epileptology, with the aim of establishing a common framework and the basis for future translational epilepsy research.

Experiment protocols for brain-body imaging of locomotion: A systematic review

Introduction

Human locomotion is affected by several factors, such as growth and aging, health conditions, and physical activity levels for maintaining overall health and well-being. Notably, impaired locomotion is a prevalent cause of disability, significantly impacting the quality of life of individuals. The uniqueness and high prevalence of human locomotion have led to a surge of research to develop experimental protocols for studying the brain substrates, muscle responses, and motion signatures associated with locomotion. However, from a technical perspective, reproducing locomotion experiments has been challenging due to the lack of standardized protocols and benchmarking tools, which impairs the evaluation of research quality and the validation of previous findings.

Methods

This paper addresses the challenges by conducting a systematic review of existing neuroimaging studies on human locomotion, focusing on the settings of experimental protocols, such as locomotion intensity, duration, distance, adopted brain imaging technologies, and corresponding brain activation patterns. Also, this study provides practical recommendations for future experiment protocols.

Results

The findings indicate that EEG is the preferred neuroimaging sensor for detecting brain activity patterns, compared to fMRI, fNIRS, and PET. Walking is the most studied human locomotion task, likely due to its fundamental nature and status as a reference task. In contrast, running has received little attention in research. Additionally, cycling on an ergometer at a speed of 60 rpm using fNIRS has provided some research basis. Dual-task walking tasks are typically used to observe changes in cognitive function. Moreover, research on locomotion has primarily focused on healthy individuals, as this is the scenario most closely resembling free-living activity in real-world environments.

Discussion

Finally, the paper outlines the standards and recommendations for setting up future experiment protocols based on the review findings. It discusses the impact of neurological and musculoskeletal factors, as well as the cognitive and locomotive demands, on the experiment design. It also considers the limitations imposed by the sensing techniques used, including the acceptable level of motion artifacts in brain-body imaging experiments and the effects of spatial and temporal resolutions on brain sensor performance. Additionally, various experiment protocol constraints that need to be addressed and analyzed are explained.

Novel subscalp and intracranial devices to wirelessly record and analyze continuous EEG in unsedated, behaving dogs in their natural environments: A new paradigm in canine epilepsy research

Epilepsy is characterized by unprovoked, recurrent seizures and is a common neurologic disorder in dogs and humans. Roughly 1/3 of canines and humans with epilepsy prove to be drug-resistant and continue to have sporadic seizures despite taking daily anti-seizure medications. The optimization of pharmacologic therapy is often limited by inaccurate seizure diaries and medication side effects. Electroencephalography (EEG) has long been a cornerstone of diagnosis and classification in human epilepsy, but because of several technical challenges has played a smaller clinical role in canine epilepsy. The interictal (between seizures) and ictal (seizure) EEG recorded from the epileptic mammalian brain shows characteristic electrophysiologic biomarkers that are very useful for clinical management. A fundamental engineering gap for both humans and canines with epilepsy has been the challenge of obtaining continuous long-term EEG in the patients' natural environment. We are now on the cusp of a revolution where continuous long-term EEG from behaving canines and humans will be available to guide clinicians in the diagnosis and optimal treatment of their patients. Here we review some of the devices that have recently emerged for obtaining long-term EEG in ambulatory subjects living in their natural environments.

Neurosurgery in canine epilepsy

Epilepsy surgery is functional neurosurgery applied to drug-resistant epilepsy. Although epilepsy surgery has been established and achieves fair to good outcomes in human medicine, it is still an underdeveloped area in veterinary medicine. With the spread of advanced imaging and neurosurgical modalities, intracranial surgery has become commonplace in the veterinary field, and, therefore, it is natural that expectations for epilepsy surgery increase. This review summarizes current standards of intracranial epilepsy surgery in human medicine and describes its current status and expectation in veterinary medicine. Intracranial epilepsy surgery is classified generally into resection surgery, represented by cortical resection, lobectomy, and lesionectomy, and disconnection surgery, such as corpus callosotomy and multiple subpial transection. In dogs with drug-resistant epilepsy, corpus callosotomy is available as a disconnection surgery for generalized epilepsy. However, other types of disconnection and resection surgeries for focal epilepsy are limited to experimental studies in laboratory dogs and/or anecdotal case reports of lesionectomy, such as tumor or encephalocele removal, without epileptogenic evidence. Veterinary epilepsy surgery is a new and challenging neurosurgery field; with the development of presurgical evaluations such as advanced electroencephalography and neuroimaging, it may become more readily practiced.

Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography detects the elevation of cerebral blood flow during ictal-phase of pentetrazol-induced seizures in dogs

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association between changes in cerebral blood flow and electrographic epileptic seizure in dogs using transcranial Doppler ultrasonography (TCD).

ANIMALS

6 healthy Beagle dogs.

PROCEDURES

Each dog was administered pentetrazol (1.5 mg/kg/min) or saline (0.9% NaCl) solution under general anesthesia with continuous infusion of propofol. Both pentetrazol and saline solution were administered to all 6 dogs, with at least 28 days interval between the experiments. Blood flow waveforms in the middle cerebral artery and the basilar artery were obtained using TCD at baseline, after pentetrazol administration, and after diazepam administration. TCD velocities, including peak systolic velocity, end-diastolic velocity, and mean velocity and resistance variables, were determined from the Doppler waveforms.

RESULTS

During ictal-phase of pentetrazol-induced seizures, the TCD velocities significantly increased in the basilar and middle cerebral arteries while TCD vascular resistance variables did not change in either artery. The TCD velocities significantly decreased after diazepam administration. Systemic parameters, such as the heart rate, mean arterial pressure, systemic vascular resistance, cardiac index, end-tidal carbon dioxide, oxygen saturation, and body temperature, did not change significantly during seizures.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study showed that cerebral blood flow, as obtained from TCD velocities, increased by 130% during ictal-phase of pentetrazol-induced seizures in dogs. The elevated velocities returned to baseline after seizure suppression. Thus, TCD may be used to detect electrographic seizures during the treatment of status epilepticus in dogs, and further clinical studies clarifying the association between changes in cerebral blood flow and non-convulsive seizure cases are needed.

Seizure frequency discrepancy between subjective and objective ictal electroencephalography data in dogs

Background

Many studies of epilepsy in veterinary medicine use subjective data (eg, caregiver‐derived histories) to determine seizure frequency. Conversely, in people, objective data from electroencephalography (EEG) are mainly used to diagnose epilepsy, measure seizure frequency and evaluate efficacy of antiseizure drugs. These EEG data minimize the possibility of the underreporting of seizures, a known phenomenon in human epileptology.

Objective

To evaluate the correlation between reported seizure frequency and EEG frequency of ictal paroxysmal discharges (PDs) and to determine whether seizure underreporting phenomenon exists in veterinary epileptology.

Animals

Thirty‐three ambulatory video‐EEG recordings in dogs showing ≥1 ictal PD, excluding dogs with status epilepticus.

Methods

Retrospective observational study. Ictal PDs were counted manually over the entire recording to obtain the frequency of EEG seizures. Caregiver‐reported seizure frequency from the medical record was categorized into weekly, daily, hourly, and per minute seizure groupings. The Spearman rank test was used for correlation analysis.

Results

The coefficient value (r_s) comparing reported seizure to EEG‐confirmed ictal PD frequencies was 0.39 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.048‐0.64, P = .03). Other r_s values comparing history against various seizure types were: 0.36 for motor seizures and 0.37 for nonmotor (absence) seizures.

Conclusions and Clinical Importance

A weak correlation was found between the frequency of reported seizures from caregivers (subjective data) and ictal PDs on EEG (objective data). Subjective data may not be reliable enough to determine true seizure frequency given the discrepancy with EEG‐confirmed seizure frequency. Confirmation of the seizure underreporting phenomenon in dogs by prospective study should be carried out.