1
|
Schindler A, Fischer J, Beeskow AB, Lincke T, Ebel S, Seehofer D, Denecke T, Veelken R, Sabri O, Öcal O, Seidensticker M, Berg T, van Bömmel F. Impact of IL-8 on survival after TARE in HCC: a comprehensive investigation and external validation from the SORAMIC trial. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2024; 150:486. [PMID: 39503874 PMCID: PMC11541297 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-024-05947-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2024] [Accepted: 09/10/2024] [Indexed: 11/09/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE In the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with transarterial radioembolization (TARE), identifying reliable biomarkers for predicting survival outcomes remains a critical challenge. We aimed to address this gap by investigating the significance of serum cytokines associated with inflammation as potential biomarkers for the selection of patients for TARE. METHODS Our retrospective study involved 161 patients diagnosed with HCC who underwent Y90 radioembolization at our medical center between 2010 and 2020. Serum samples from a subset of 78 patients were retrospectively analyzed to determine the concentrations of pro-inflammatory cytokines. The results from the prospective SORAMIC trial were used for independent validation. RESULTS With a median overall survival of 36 weeks (range 4-436), our study showed the strongest correlation between 12-week survival and IL-8 levels before treatment (p < 0.001), while other relevant interleukins, interferon-α2, INF-γ, TNF-α and MCP-1 were not associated with survival. IL-8 levels below the cut-off of 190 pg/mL were significantly associated with increased 12-week and 24-week survival, with hazard ratios of 19.01 (95% CI: 2.29-157.89) and 2.57 (95% CI: 1.05-6.31), respectively (p = 0.006 and p = 0.039, respectively). In the adjusted multivariate analysis, the 190 pg/mL cut-off for IL-8 remained independently associated with 12- (p = 0.011) and 24-week survival (p = 0.039). Similarly, the SORAMIC population showed a strong association between IL-8 levels and 36-week survival (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION Our study emphasizes the pivotal role of IL-8 as a valuable parameter, demonstrating its potential for predicting treatment outcomes and assessing liver function in patients with HCC undergoing TARE. The robustness of these findings warrants further validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron Schindler
- Division of Hepatology, Department of Medicine II, Leipzig University Medical Center, Liebigstrasse 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
- University Liver Tumor Center (ULTC), Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Janett Fischer
- Division of Hepatology, Department of Medicine II, Leipzig University Medical Center, Liebigstrasse 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
- University Liver Tumor Center (ULTC), Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
- Division of Hepatology, Department of Medicine II, Laboratory for Clinical and Experimental Hepatology, Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Anne-Bettina Beeskow
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
- University Liver Tumor Center (ULTC), Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Thomas Lincke
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Leipzig University Medical Center, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
- University Liver Tumor Center (ULTC), Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Sebastian Ebel
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
- University Liver Tumor Center (ULTC), Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Daniel Seehofer
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
- University Liver Tumor Center (ULTC), Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Timm Denecke
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
- University Liver Tumor Center (ULTC), Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Rhea Veelken
- Division of Hepatology, Department of Medicine II, Leipzig University Medical Center, Liebigstrasse 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Osama Sabri
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Leipzig University Medical Center, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
- University Liver Tumor Center (ULTC), Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Osman Öcal
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Max Seidensticker
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas Berg
- Division of Hepatology, Department of Medicine II, Leipzig University Medical Center, Liebigstrasse 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
- University Liver Tumor Center (ULTC), Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
- Division of Hepatology, Department of Medicine II, Laboratory for Clinical and Experimental Hepatology, Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Florian van Bömmel
- Division of Hepatology, Department of Medicine II, Leipzig University Medical Center, Liebigstrasse 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
- University Liver Tumor Center (ULTC), Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.
- Division of Hepatology, Department of Medicine II, Laboratory for Clinical and Experimental Hepatology, Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hao K, Paik AJ, Han LH, Makary MS. Yttrium-90 radioembolization treatment strategies for management of hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Radiol 2024; 16:512-527. [PMID: 39494134 PMCID: PMC11525828 DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v16.i10.512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2024] [Revised: 10/14/2024] [Accepted: 10/21/2024] [Indexed: 10/28/2024] Open
Abstract
As the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents a significant global health challenge. This paper provides an introduction and comprehensive review of transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with Yttrium-90 (Y90), a widely performed transcatheter procedure for HCC patients who are not suitable candidates for surgery. TARE involves the targeted delivery of radioactive microspheres to liver tumors, offering a promising treatment option for managing HCC across various stages of the disease. By evaluating Y90 TARE outcomes across early, intermediate, and advanced stages of HCC, the review aims to present a thorough understanding of its efficacy and safety. Additionally, this paper highlights future research directions focusing on the potential of combination therapies with systemic and immunotherapies, as well as personalized treatments. The exploration of these innovative approaches aims to improve treatment outcomes, reduce adverse events, and provide new therapeutic opportunities for HCC patients. The review underscores the importance of ongoing research and clinical trials to optimize TARE further and integrate it into comprehensive HCC treatment paradigms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly Hao
- College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, United States
| | - Andrew J Paik
- College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, United States
| | - Lauren H Han
- College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, United States
| | - Mina S Makary
- Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yu Q, Wang Y, Ungchusri E, Pillai A, Liao CY, Fung J, DiSabato D, Baker T, Patel M, Van Ha T, Ahmed O. Modified Radiation Lobectomy Strategy of Radioembolization for Right-Sided Unresectable Primary Liver Tumors. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2024; 35:989-997.e2. [PMID: 38490364 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2024.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Revised: 02/18/2024] [Accepted: 03/02/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the safety and effectiveness of using modified radiation lobectomy (mRL) to treat primary hepatic tumors located in the right hepatic lobe (Segments V-VIII) and to determine future liver remnant (FLR) hypertrophy. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective review was performed at a single institution to include 19 consecutive patients (7 females, 12 males) who underwent single-session mRL for right-sided primary hepatic tumors: 15 received segmentectomy plus lobectomy (segmental dose of >190 Gy and lobar dose of >80 Gy); 4 were treated with the double-segmental approach (dominant segments of >190 Gy and nondominant segments of >80 Gy). Treated tumors included 13 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), 4 cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), and 2 mixed-type HCC-CCA with a median dominant tumor size of 5.3 cm (interquartile range [IQR], 3.7-7.3 cm). FLR of the left hepatic lobe was measured at baseline, T1 (4-8 weeks), T2 (2-4 months), T3 (4-6 months), and T4 (9-12 months). RESULTS Objective tumor response and tumor control were achieved in 17 of the 19 (89.5%) and 18 of the 19 (94.7%) patients, respectively. FLR hypertrophy was observed at T1 (median, 47.8%; P = .025), T2 (median, 48.4%; P = .012), T3 (median, 50.4%; P = .015), and T4 (median, 59.1%; P < .001). Patients without cirrhosis demonstrated greater hypertrophy by 6 months (median, 55.8% vs 47.2%; P = .031). One patient developed a Grade 3 adverse event (ascites requiring paracentesis) at 1-month follow-up. Grade ≥2 serum toxicities were associated with worse baseline Child-Pugh Score, serum albumin, and total bilirubin (P < .05). Among 7 patients who underwent neoadjuvant mRL, 2 underwent resection and 1 received liver transplant. CONCLUSIONS mRL appears safe and effective for treatment of right-sided primary hepatic tumors with the benefit of promoting FLR hypertrophy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qian Yu
- Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Medical Center, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
| | - Yating Wang
- Hematology and Oncology, Ascension Providence Hospital, Southfield, Michigan
| | - Ethan Ungchusri
- Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Medical Center, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Anjana Pillai
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Chicago Medical Center, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Chih-Yi Liao
- Department of Medicine; Hematology and Oncology, University of Chicago Medical Center, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - John Fung
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplant Surgery, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Diego DiSabato
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplant Surgery, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Talia Baker
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation and Advanced Hepatobiliary Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Mikin Patel
- Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Medical Center, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Thuong Van Ha
- Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Medical Center, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Osman Ahmed
- Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Medical Center, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Feng X, Zhang L, Niu H, Zhang H, Yang L, Wen Y, Chen SY, Shi Y, He Z, Yu L, Wang Y, Huang X, Wang Z, Qin M, Wen X, Zhang Z, Song J, Zheng Z, Yin H, Zhang H, Ma L, Wei J, Wu X, Zhang L, Zhao Y, Lu Q, Xiao H, Liu T, Fang P, Wei L, Gandhi RT, Dong J. Selective internal radiation therapy with yttrium-90 resin microspheres followed by anatomical hepatectomy: A potential curative strategy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2024; 20:319-322. [PMID: 36658669 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2022] [Revised: 10/17/2022] [Accepted: 10/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
About 80% of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients are in advanced stages and ineligible for curative surgery. Palliative treatments just maintained limited survival, thus an effective downstaging therapy is badly needed. Here we report an initially unresectable patient who underwent radical hepatectomy after successful downstaging with selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT). A 34-year-old man was diagnosed with China Liver Cancer Staging (CNLC) IIIa HCC. Due to insufficient future liver remnant and vascular involvement, the patient was suggested to be unresectable. SIRT with yttrium-90 resin microspheres was given. At three months post-SIRT, a complete response was achieved. The tumor was downstaged to CNLC Ia stage. The patient underwent anatomical hepatectomy 5 months after SIRT. Histopathological examination of the resected specimen showed 4% viable tumor cells inside a necrotic mass. To our knowledge, this is the first case who underwent SIRT with yttrium-90 resin microspheres in China mainland. The success of the downstaging in this case renders a possible cure to be achieved in an initially unresectable patient. In addition, the nearly complete tumor necrosis in the resected specimen indicates a good prognosis post-surgery. This is the first case who underwent SIRT with yttrium-90 resin microspheres in China mainland. SIRT followed by anatomical hepatectomy is a potentially curative strategy for unresectable HCC, which deserves a confirmative trial in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaobin Feng
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Lin Zhang
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | | | - Hui Zhang
- The Southwest Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Li Yang
- Hainan Bo'ao Super Hospital, Qionghai, China
| | - Yong Wen
- Hainan Bo'ao Super Hospital, Qionghai, China
| | - Steve Y Chen
- Department of Radiology, Banner University Medical Center-Phoenix, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Yuhong Shi
- The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, China National Nuclear Corporation 416 Hospital, Chengdu, China
| | - Zuoxiang He
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Lijuan Yu
- Hainan Cancer Hospital, Haikou, China
| | | | - Xin Huang
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | | | - Mengmeng Qin
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoxi Wen
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Zhenyu Zhang
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Jiyong Song
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Zhuozhao Zheng
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Hongfang Yin
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Huan Zhang
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Lijuan Ma
- Hainan Bo'ao Super Hospital, Qionghai, China
| | - Jixiang Wei
- Hainan Bo'ao Super Hospital, Qionghai, China
| | - Xinlai Wu
- Hainan Cancer Hospital, Haikou, China
| | - Leida Zhang
- The Southwest Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Yue Zhao
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Qian Lu
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Hui Xiao
- Hainan Bo'ao Super Hospital, Qionghai, China
| | | | - Pihua Fang
- Hainan Bo'ao Super Hospital, Qionghai, China
| | - Lai Wei
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Ripal T Gandhi
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Florida International University Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Jiahong Dong
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Karimi A, Yarmohammadi H, Erinjeri JP. Immune Effects of Intra-Arterial Liver-Directed Therapies. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2024; 35:178-184. [PMID: 38272638 PMCID: PMC11334421 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2023.10.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Revised: 10/08/2023] [Accepted: 10/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Image-guided intra-arterial locoregional therapies (LRTs) such as transarterial embolization, transarterial chemoembolization, and transarterial radioembolization exhibit effects on the immune system. Understanding the humoral (cytokine, chemokine, and growth factor) and cellular (T cell, neutrophil, dendritic cell, and macrophage) mechanisms underlying the immune effects of LRT is crucial to designing rational and effective combinations of immunotherapy and interventional radiology procedures. This article aims to review the immune effects of intra-arterial LRTs and provide insight into strategies to combine LRTs with systemic immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anita Karimi
- Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Hooman Yarmohammadi
- Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Joseph P Erinjeri
- Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Girardet R, Knebel JF, Dromain C, Vietti Violi N, Tsoumakidou G, Villard N, Denys A, Halkic N, Demartines N, Kobayashi K, Digklia A, Schaefer N, Prior JO, Boughdad S, Duran R. Anatomical Quantitative Volumetric Evaluation of Liver Segments in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Treated with Selective Internal Radiation Therapy: Key Parameters Influencing Untreated Liver Hypertrophy. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:586. [PMID: 38339337 PMCID: PMC10854872 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16030586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Revised: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Factors affecting morphological changes in the liver following selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) are unclear, and the available literature focuses on non-anatomical volumetric assessment techniques in a lobar treatment setting. This study aimed to investigate quantitative changes in the liver post-SIRT using an anatomical volumetric approach in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with different levels of treatment selectivity and evaluate the parameters affecting those changes. This retrospective, single-institution, IRB-approved study included 88 HCC patients. Whole liver, liver segments, tumor burden, and spleen volumes were quantified on MRI at baseline and 3/6/12 months post-SIRT using a segmentation-based 3D software relying on liver vascular anatomy. Treatment characteristics, longitudinal clinical/laboratory, and imaging data were analyzed. The Student's t-test and Wilcoxon test evaluated volumetric parameters evolution. Spearman correlation was used to assess the association between variables. Uni/multivariate analyses investigated factors influencing untreated liver volume (uLV) increase. Results: Most patients were cirrhotic (92%) men (86%) with Child-Pugh A (84%). Absolute and relative uLV kept increasing at 3/6/12 months post-SIRT vs. baseline (all, p ≤ 0.005) and was maximal during the first 6 months. Absolute uLV increase was greater in Child-Pugh A5/A6 vs. ≥B7 at 3 months (A5, p = 0.004; A6, p = 0.007) and 6 months (A5, p = 0.072; A6, p = 0.031) vs. baseline. When the Child-Pugh class worsened at 3 or 6 months post-SIRT, uLV did not change significantly, whereas it increased at 3/6/12 months vs. baseline (all p ≤ 0.015) when liver function remained stable. The Child-Pugh score was inversely correlated with absolute and relative uLV increase at 3 months (rho = -0.21, p = 0.047; rho = -0.229, p = 0.048). In multivariate analysis, uLV increase was influenced at 3 months by younger age (p = 0.013), administered 90Y activity (p = 0.003), and baseline spleen volume (p = 0.023). At 6 months, uLV increase was impacted by younger age (p = 0.006), whereas treatment with glass microspheres (vs. resin) demonstrated a clear trend towards better hypertrophy (f = 3.833, p = 0.058). The amount (percentage) of treated liver strongly impacted the relative uLV increase at 3/6/12 months (all f ≥ 8.407, p ≤ 0.01). Conclusion: Liver function (preserved baseline and stable post-SIRT) favored uLV hypertrophy. Younger patients, smaller baseline spleen volume, higher administered 90Y activity, and a larger amount of treated liver were associated with a higher degree of untreated liver hypertrophy. These factors should be considered in surgical candidates undergoing neoadjuvant SIRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raphaël Girardet
- Department of Radiology and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; (R.G.); (J.-F.K.); (C.D.); (N.V.V.); (G.T.); (N.V.); (A.D.)
| | - Jean-François Knebel
- Department of Radiology and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; (R.G.); (J.-F.K.); (C.D.); (N.V.V.); (G.T.); (N.V.); (A.D.)
| | - Clarisse Dromain
- Department of Radiology and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; (R.G.); (J.-F.K.); (C.D.); (N.V.V.); (G.T.); (N.V.); (A.D.)
| | - Naik Vietti Violi
- Department of Radiology and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; (R.G.); (J.-F.K.); (C.D.); (N.V.V.); (G.T.); (N.V.); (A.D.)
| | - Georgia Tsoumakidou
- Department of Radiology and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; (R.G.); (J.-F.K.); (C.D.); (N.V.V.); (G.T.); (N.V.); (A.D.)
| | - Nicolas Villard
- Department of Radiology and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; (R.G.); (J.-F.K.); (C.D.); (N.V.V.); (G.T.); (N.V.); (A.D.)
| | - Alban Denys
- Department of Radiology and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; (R.G.); (J.-F.K.); (C.D.); (N.V.V.); (G.T.); (N.V.); (A.D.)
| | - Nermin Halkic
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; (N.H.); (N.D.); (K.K.)
| | - Nicolas Demartines
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; (N.H.); (N.D.); (K.K.)
| | - Kosuke Kobayashi
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; (N.H.); (N.D.); (K.K.)
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo 135-8550, Japan
| | - Antonia Digklia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland;
| | - Niklaus Schaefer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; (N.S.); (J.O.P.); (S.B.)
| | - John O. Prior
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; (N.S.); (J.O.P.); (S.B.)
| | - Sarah Boughdad
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; (N.S.); (J.O.P.); (S.B.)
| | - Rafael Duran
- Department of Radiology and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; (R.G.); (J.-F.K.); (C.D.); (N.V.V.); (G.T.); (N.V.); (A.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Khan F, Jones K, Lyon P. Immune checkpoint inhibition: a future guided by radiology. Br J Radiol 2023; 96:20220565. [PMID: 36752570 PMCID: PMC10321249 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20220565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Revised: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/29/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2023] Open
Abstract
The limitation of the function of antitumour immune cells is a common hallmark of cancers that enables their survival. As such, the potential of immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) acts as a paradigm shift in the treatment of a range of cancers but has not yet been fully capitalised. Combining minimally and non-invasive locoregional therapies offered by radiologists with ICI is now an active field of research with the aim of furthering therapeutic capabilities in medical oncology. In parallel to this impending advancement, the "imaging toolbox" available to radiologists is also growing, enabling more refined tumour characterisation as well as greater accuracy in evaluating responses to therapy. Options range from metabolite labelling to cellular localisation to immune checkpoint screening. It is foreseeable that these novel imaging techniques will be integrated into personalised treatment algorithms. This growth in the field must include updating the current standardised imaging criteria to ensure they are fit for purpose. Such criteria is crucial to both appropriately guide clinical decision-making regarding next steps of treatment, but also provide reliable prognosis. Quantitative approaches to these novel imaging techniques are also already being investigated to further optimise personalised therapeutic decision-making. The therapeutic potential of specific ICIs and locoregional therapies could be determined before administration thus limiting unnecessary side-effects whilst maintaining efficacy. Several radiological aspects of oncological care are advancing simultaneously. Therefore, it is essential that each development is assessed for clinical use and optimised to ensure the best treatment decisions are being offered to the patient. In this review, we discuss state of the art advances in novel functional imaging techniques in the field of immuno-oncology both pre-clinically and clinically.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faraaz Khan
- Foundation Doctor, Buckinghamshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Amersham, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom
| | - Keaton Jones
- Academic Clinical Lecturer Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences University of Oxford, Wellington Square, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Lyon
- Consultant Radiologist, Department of Radiology, Oxford University Hospitals, Headington, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Brandi N, Renzulli M. The Synergistic Effect of Interventional Locoregional Treatments and Immunotherapy for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:ijms24108598. [PMID: 37239941 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24108598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Revised: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Immunotherapy has remarkably revolutionized the management of advanced HCC and prompted clinical trials, with therapeutic agents being used to selectively target immune cells rather than cancer cells. Currently, there is great interest in the possibility of combining locoregional treatments with immunotherapy for HCC, as this combination is emerging as an effective and synergistic tool for enhancing immunity. On the one hand, immunotherapy could amplify and prolong the antitumoral immune response of locoregional treatments, improving patients' outcomes and reducing recurrence rates. On the other hand, locoregional therapies have been shown to positively alter the tumor immune microenvironment and could therefore enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy. Despite the encouraging results, many unanswered questions still remain, including which immunotherapy and locoregional treatment can guarantee the best survival and clinical outcomes; the most effective timing and sequence to obtain the most effective therapeutic response; and which biological and/or genetic biomarkers can be used to identify patients likely to benefit from this combined approach. Based on the current reported evidence and ongoing trials, the present review summarizes the current application of immunotherapy in combination with locoregional therapies for the treatment of HCC, and provides a critical evaluation of the current status and future directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolò Brandi
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Albertoni 15, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Matteo Renzulli
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Albertoni 15, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Duan Y, Hou X, Guo J, Li H, Cai L, Cheng L, Zhao W, Shao X, Du H, Diao Z, Li C. D-dimer for assessment of treatment response, and survival to drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 2023; 47:102096. [PMID: 36801385 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinre.2023.102096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Revised: 02/04/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND D-dimer exhibits a certain prognostic value in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who underwent hepatectomy and microwave ablation, while its value in estimating the clinical benefit of drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) remains unclear. Hence, this study aimed to investigate the correlation of D-dimer with tumor features, response and survival to DEB-TACE in HCC patients. METHODS Fifty-one HCC patients treated with DEB-TACE were recruited. Their serum samples at baseline and after DEB-TACE were collected and proposed for D-dimer detection by the immunoturbidimetry method. RESULTS Elevated D-dimer levels were related to a higher Child‒Pugh stage (P = 0.013), tumor nodule number (P = 0.031), largest tumor size (P = 0.004), and portal vein invasion (P = 0.050) in HCC patients. Then, patients were classified by the median value of D-dimer, and it was observed that patients with D-dimer >0.7 mg/L achieved a lower complete response rate (12.0% vs. 46.2%, P = 0.007) but a similar objective response rate (84.0% vs. 84.6%, P = 1.000) compared to those with D-dimer ≤0.7 mg/L. The Kaplan‒Meier curve showed that D-dimer >0.7 mg/L (vs. ≤0.7 mg/L) was related to shorter overall survival (OS) (P = 0.013). Further univariate Cox regression analyses showed that D-dimer >0.7 mg/L (vs. ≤0.7 mg/L) was related to unfavorable OS [hazard ratio (HR): 5.524, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.209-25.229, P = 0.027], but it failed to independently estimate OS (HR: 10.303, 95%CI: 0.640-165.831, P = 0.100) in multivariate Cox regression analyses. Moreover, D-dimer was elevated during DEB-TACE therapy (P<0.001). CONCLUSION D-dimer may be helpful for monitoring prognosis to DEB-TACE therapy in HCC, while further large-scale-study validation is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Youjia Duan
- Department of Oncology Interventional Radiology, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 8 Jingshundong Road, Beijing 100015, China
| | - Xiaopu Hou
- Department of Oncology Interventional Radiology, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 8 Jingshundong Road, Beijing 100015, China
| | - Jiang Guo
- Department of Oncology Interventional Radiology, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 8 Jingshundong Road, Beijing 100015, China.
| | - Honglu Li
- Department of Oncology Interventional Radiology, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 8 Jingshundong Road, Beijing 100015, China
| | - Liang Cai
- Department of Oncology Interventional Radiology, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 8 Jingshundong Road, Beijing 100015, China
| | - Long Cheng
- Department of Oncology Interventional Radiology, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 8 Jingshundong Road, Beijing 100015, China
| | - Wenpeng Zhao
- Department of Oncology Interventional Radiology, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 8 Jingshundong Road, Beijing 100015, China
| | - Xihong Shao
- Department of Oncology Interventional Radiology, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 8 Jingshundong Road, Beijing 100015, China
| | - Hongliu Du
- Department of Oncology Interventional Radiology, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 8 Jingshundong Road, Beijing 100015, China
| | - Zhenying Diao
- Department of Oncology Interventional Radiology, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 8 Jingshundong Road, Beijing 100015, China
| | - Changqing Li
- Department of Oncology Interventional Radiology, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 8 Jingshundong Road, Beijing 100015, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Cancer Immunology: Impact of Radioembolization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma on Immune Response Modulation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2023; 220:863-872. [PMID: 36752368 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.22.28800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most prevalent primary liver cancer and the fourth most common cause of cancer mortality. The tumor microenvironment (TME) is increasingly recognized as having a central role in HCC carcinogenesis, with factors such as tumor and immune cell interactions, cytokines, and extracellular matrix serving key roles. Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) is a locoregional therapy for HCC that not only has a direct tumoricidal effect, but induces an immune response against tumor cells with subsequent immunogenic cell death. This TARE-induced tumor immunogenicity occurs through enhancement of tumor-associated antigen expression, as well as recruitment and diversification of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. In addition, immunologically related biomarkers, including the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, lymphocyte count, and cytokine levels, may be useful tools to predict outcomes after TARE. Early data are promising regarding the potential synergistic benefit from treatment algorithms that combine TARE and immunotherapies, and interest is growing in the clinical application of such combinations. This review provides an overview of cancer immunology, summarizes the available data regarding the biologic effects of TARE on local and systemic immune responses, and explores the potential role of the combination of TARE and immunotherapy for HCC.
Collapse
|
11
|
Radiological and pathological assessment with EOB-MRI after Y90 radiation lobectomy prior to liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. HPB (Oxford) 2022; 24:2185-2192. [PMID: 36085263 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2022.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2022] [Revised: 07/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiation lobectomy (RL) utilizes Yttrium-90 (Y90) radioembolization for achieving tumor control and inducing contralateral lobe hypertrophy. Our objective was to evaluate the chronological changes occurring radiologically and histopathologically after Y90 RL. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 22 patients with chronic liver disease who underwent Y90 RL prior to planned liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (EOB-MRI) was performed every 3 months. RESULTS Future liver remnant volume (FLRV) significantly increased up to 9 months after Y90 RL. Gd-EOB-DTPA uptake in the treated lobe experienced a 40% reduction in enhancement ratio (ER) during ensuing first 3 months, and never recovered. The reduced ER in the non-tumoral parenchyma was significantly correlated with increased FLRV and FLR (r = 0.41 and r = 0.35, respectively; both p < 0.01). Histopathological evaluation of non-tumor liver tissue found features of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome as an early change after Y90 RL (median 5.7 months) and parenchymal collapse as a late change (mean 11 months). DISCUSSION The reduced uptake of Gd-EOB-DTPA at 3 months post Y90 RL correlates with a significant increase in FLRV prior to liver resection. EOB-MRI evaluation at 3 months can guide future plan of action after Y90 RL.
Collapse
|
12
|
Coskun N, Yildirim A, Yuksel AO, Canyigit M, Ozdemir E. The Radiation Dose Absorbed by Healthy Parenchyma Is a Predictor for the Rate of Contralateral Hypertrophy After Unilobar Radioembolization of the Right Liver. Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2022; 56:291-298. [PMID: 36425272 PMCID: PMC9679057 DOI: 10.1007/s13139-022-00770-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2022] [Revised: 07/28/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To investigate the predictors of contralateral hypertrophy in patients treated with unilobar transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with yttrium-90-loaded resin microspheres due to unresectable right-liver tumors. Methods Patients who underwent right unilobar TARE with resin microspheres between May 2019 and September 2021 were screened retrospectively. Contralateral hypertrophy was evaluated by calculating the kinetic growth rate (KGR) in 8-10 weeks after TARE. The predictors of increased KGR were determined with linear regression analysis. Results A total of 24 patients (16 with primary and 8 with metastatic liver tumors) were included in the study. After right unilobar TARE, mean volume of the left lobe increased from 368.26 to 436.16 mL, while the mean volume of the right lobe decreased from 1576.22 to 1477.89 mL. The median KGR of the left lobe was 0.28% per week. The radiation dose absorbed by the healthy parenchyma of the right lobe was significantly higher in patients with increased KGR (31.62 vs. 18.78 Gy, p = 0.037). Linear regression analysis showed that the dose absorbed by healthy parenchyma was significantly associated with increased KGR (b = 0.014, p = 0.043). Conclusion Patients who received right unilobar TARE for liver malignancies could develop a substantial contralateral hypertrophy, and the radiation dose absorbed by the healthy parenchyma of the right lobe was significantly associated with increased KGR in the left lobe. TARE could have a role for inducing contralateral hypertrophy as it offers the advantage of concurrent local tumor control along with its hypertrophic effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nazim Coskun
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Aslihan Yildirim
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | - Murat Canyigit
- Department of Radiology, Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Elif Ozdemir
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Radioembolization-Induced Changes in Hepatic [ 18F]FDG Metabolism in Non-Tumorous Liver Parenchyma. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12102518. [PMID: 36292207 PMCID: PMC9600277 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12102518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2022] [Revised: 10/07/2022] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: [18F]FDG-PET/CT is increasingly used for response assessments after oncologic treatment. The known response criteria for [18F]FDG-PET/CT use healthy liver parenchyma as the reference standard. However, the [18F]FDG liver metabolism results may change as a result of the given therapy. The aim of this study was to assess changes in [18F]FDG liver metabolism after hepatic 90Y resin radioembolization. Methods: [18F]FDG-PET/CT scans prior to radioembolization and one and three months after radioembolization (consistent with the PERCIST comparability criteria), as well as 90Y-PET/CT scans, were analyzed using 3 cm VOIs. The FDG activity concentration and absorbed dose were measured. A linear mixed-effects logistic regression model and logistic mixed-effects model were used to assess the correlation between the FDG-activity concentration, absorbed dose, and biochemical changes. Results: The median SULVOI,liver at baseline was 1.8 (range = 1.2−2.8). The mean change in SULVOI,liver per month with an increase in time was 0.05 (95%CI 0.02−0.09) at p < 0.001. The median absorbed dose per VOI was 31.3 Gy (range = 0.1−82.3 Gy). The mean percent change in ΔSULVOI,liver for every Gy increase in the absorbed dose was −0.04 (95%CI −0.22−0.14) at p = 0.67. The SULblood and SULspleen results showed no increase. Conclusions: The [18F]FDG metabolism in the normal liver parenchyma is significantly but mildly increased after radioembolization, which can interfere with its use as a threshold for therapy response.
Collapse
|
14
|
Immunotherapy-Based Treatments of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2022; 219:533-546. [PMID: 35506555 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.22.27633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
The advent of immunotherapy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has changed the treatment landscape and conferred survival benefit for patients with advanced HCC who typically have a very poor prognosis. The most pronounced improvements in response, as documented by standardized response criteria based on CT or MRI, have been achieved when immunotherapy is combined with other systemic or locoregional therapies. Immune checkpoint inhibitor treatments result in unique patterns on CT and MRI that challenge the application of conventional response criteria such as RECIST, modified RECIST, and European Association for the Study of the Liver criteria. Thus, newer criteria have been developed to gauge therapy response or disease progression for patients on immunotherapy, including immune-related RECIST (iRECIST) and immune-modified RECIST (imRECIST), though these remain unvalidated. In this review, we describe the current landscape of immunotherapeutic agents used for HCC, summarize results of published studies, review pathobiological mechanisms that provide a rationale for the use of these agents, and report on the status of response assessment for immunotherapy, either alone or in combination with other treatment options. Finally, consensus statements are provided to inform radiologists on essential considerations in the era of a rapidly changing treatment paradigm for patients with HCC.
Collapse
|
15
|
D'Avola D, Granito A, Torre-Aláez MDL, Piscaglia F. The importance of liver functional reserve in the non-surgical treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 2022; 76:1185-1198. [PMID: 34793869 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.11.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2020] [Revised: 11/02/2021] [Accepted: 11/05/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
The aim of any oncological treatment is not just to eliminate the tumour, but to maximise patient survival and quality of life. Since the liver has a vital function, any radical treatment that severely compromises liver function will result in a shortening of life expectancy, rather than a prolongation. Furthermore, even non-severe liver damage may prevent the delivery of further effective therapies. This is particularly important in the case of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), as it is associated with underlying cirrhosis in most patients - cirrhosis itself is not only a potentially lethal disease and independent prognostic factor in HCC, but it also makes liver function fragile. Accordingly, some information about liver dysfunction is included in most staging systems for HCC and can be used to guide the selection of treatments that the functional liver reserve can tolerate. Unfortunately, the prediction of functional damage to the liver in the case of antitumor treatments is very challenging and still suboptimal in any given patient. Moreover, while the assessment of functional reserve can now be used to avoid postoperative liver failure in the surgical setting, its use has been less well clarified for non-surgical therapies, which is of particular relevance today, as several lines of effective non-surgical treatments, including systemic therapies, have become available. The present article will a) critically review the implications of the assessment of liver functional reserve in patients with HCC, b) illustrate the available tools to assess liver functional reserve and c) discuss the role of functional assessment for each type of non-surgical therapy for HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Delia D'Avola
- Liver Unit, Internal Medicine Department, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona and Madrid, Spain; Centro de Investigación Bio Medica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (Ciberehd), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Alessandro Granito
- Division of Internal Medicine, Hepatobiliary and Immunoallergic Diseases, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Italy; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Italy
| | - Manuel de la Torre-Aláez
- Liver Unit, Internal Medicine Department, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona and Madrid, Spain
| | - Fabio Piscaglia
- Division of Internal Medicine, Hepatobiliary and Immunoallergic Diseases, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Italy; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Aliseda D, Martí-Cruchaga P, Zozaya G, Benito A, Lopez-Olaondo L, Rodríguez-Fraile M, Bilbao JI, Hidalgo F, Iñarrairaegui M, Ciria R, Pardo F, Sangro B, Rotellar F. Pure laparoscopic major liver resection after yttrium 90 radioembolization: a case-matched series analysis of feasibility and outcomes. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2022; 407:1099-1111. [PMID: 35229168 PMCID: PMC9151566 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-022-02474-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 02/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Background Liver surgery after radioembolization (RE) entails highly demanding and challenging procedures due to the frequent combination of large tumors, severe RE-related adhesions, and the necessity of conducting major hepatectomies. Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) and its associated advantages could provide benefits, as yet unreported, to these patients. The current study evaluated feasibility, morbidity, mortality, and survival outcomes for major laparoscopic liver resection after radioembolization. Material and methods In this retrospective, single-center study patients diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma or metastases from colorectal cancer undergoing major laparoscopic hepatectomy after RE were identified from institutional databases. They were matched (1:2) on several pre-operative characteristics to a group of patients that underwent major LLR for the same malignancies during the same period but without previous RE. Results From March 2011 to November 2020, 9 patients underwent a major LLR after RE. No differences were observed in intraoperative blood loss (50 vs. 150 ml; p = 0.621), operative time (478 vs. 407 min; p = 0.135) or pedicle clamping time (90.5 vs 74 min; p = 0.133) between the post-RE LLR and the matched group. Similarly, no differences were observed on hospital stay (median 3 vs. 4 days; p = 0.300), Clavien–Dindo ≥ III complications (2 vs. 1 cases; p = 0.250), specific liver morbidity (1 vs. 1 case p = 1.000), or 90 day mortality (0 vs. 0; p = 1.000). Conclusion The laparoscopic approach for post radioembolization patients may be a feasible and safe procedure with excellent surgical and oncological outcomes and meets the current standards for laparoscopic liver resections. Further studies with larger series are needed to confirm the results herein presented. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00423-022-02474-z.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Aliseda
- HPB and Liver Transplant Unit, Department of General Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Av. Pío XII, 36, 31008, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Pablo Martí-Cruchaga
- HPB and Liver Transplant Unit, Department of General Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Av. Pío XII, 36, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.,Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Gabriel Zozaya
- HPB and Liver Transplant Unit, Department of General Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Av. Pío XII, 36, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.,Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Alberto Benito
- Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain.,Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Av. Pío XII, 36, 31008, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Luis Lopez-Olaondo
- Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain.,Anesthesiology Unit, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Av. Pío XII, 36, 31008, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Macarena Rodríguez-Fraile
- Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain.,Nuclear Medicine Department, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Av. Pío XII, 36, 31008, Pamplona, Spain
| | - José I Bilbao
- Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain.,Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Av. Pío XII, 36, 31008, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Francisco Hidalgo
- Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain.,Anesthesiology Unit, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Av. Pío XII, 36, 31008, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Mercedes Iñarrairaegui
- Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain.,Liver Unit and HPB Oncology Area, Clinica Universidad de Navarra and CIBEREHD, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Rubén Ciria
- Unit of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, IMIBIC, University Hospital Reina Sofía, University of Cordoba, Cordoba, Spain
| | - Fernando Pardo
- HPB and Liver Transplant Unit, Department of General Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Av. Pío XII, 36, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.,Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Bruno Sangro
- Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain.,Liver Unit and HPB Oncology Area, Clinica Universidad de Navarra and CIBEREHD, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Fernando Rotellar
- HPB and Liver Transplant Unit, Department of General Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Av. Pío XII, 36, 31008, Pamplona, Spain. .,Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Páramo M, Santamaría E, Idoate MA, Rodríguez-Fraile M, Benito A, Collantes M, Quincoces G, Peñuelas I, Berasain C, Argemi J, Quiroga J, Sangro B, Bilbao JI, Iñarrairaegui M. A new animal model of atrophy-hypertrophy complex and liver damage following Yttrium-90 lobar selective internal radiation therapy in rabbits. Sci Rep 2022; 12:1777. [PMID: 35110610 PMCID: PMC8810801 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-05672-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Lobar selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) is widely used to treat liver tumors inducing atrophy of the treated lobe and contralateral hypertrophy. The lack of animal model has precluded further investigations to improve this treatment. We developed an animal model of liver damage and atrophy–hypertrophy complex after SIRT. Three groups of 5–8 rabbits received transportal SIRT with Yttrium 90 resin microspheres of the cranial lobes with different activities (0.3, 0.6 and 1.2 GBq), corresponding to predicted absorbed radiation dose of 200, 400 and 800 Gy, respectively. Another group received non-loaded microspheres (sham group). Cranial and caudal lobes volumes were assessed using CT volumetry before, 15 and 30 days after SIRT. Liver biochemistry, histopathology and gene expression were evaluated. Four untreated rabbits were used as controls for gene expression studies. All animals receiving 1.2 GBq were euthanized due to clinical deterioration. Cranial SIRT with 0.6 GBq induced caudal lobe hypertrophy after 15 days (median increase 34% -ns-) but produced significant toxicity. Cranial SIRT with 0.3 GBq induced caudal lobe hypertrophy after 30 days (median increase 82%, p = 0.04). No volumetric changes were detected in sham group. Transient increase in serum transaminases was detected in all treated groups returning to normal values at 15 days. There was dose-dependent liver dysfunction with bilirubin elevation and albumin decrease. Histologically, 1.2 GBq group developed permanent severe liver damage with massive necrosis, 0.6 and 0.3 GBq groups developed moderate damage with inflammation and portal fibrosis at 15 days, partially recovering at 30 days. There was no difference in the expression of hepatocyte function and differentiation genes between 0.3 GBq and control groups. Cranial SIRT with 0.3 GBq of 90Y resin microspheres in rabbits is a reliable animal model to analyse the atrophy–hypertrophy complex and liver damage without toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María Páramo
- Department of Radiology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Eva Santamaría
- Hepatology Program, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.,CIBERehd, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Miguel A Idoate
- Department of Pathology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Macarena Rodríguez-Fraile
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.,Instituto de Investigaciones Sanitarias de Navarra-IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Alberto Benito
- Department of Radiology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.,Instituto de Investigaciones Sanitarias de Navarra-IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Maria Collantes
- Instituto de Investigaciones Sanitarias de Navarra-IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain.,Radiopharmacy, Radionanopharmacology and Translational Molecular Imaging Research Group, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Gemma Quincoces
- Instituto de Investigaciones Sanitarias de Navarra-IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain.,Radiopharmacy, Radionanopharmacology and Translational Molecular Imaging Research Group, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.,Radiopharmacy Unit, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Iván Peñuelas
- Instituto de Investigaciones Sanitarias de Navarra-IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain.,Radiopharmacy, Radionanopharmacology and Translational Molecular Imaging Research Group, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.,Radiopharmacy Unit, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Carmen Berasain
- Hepatology Program, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.,CIBERehd, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.,Instituto de Investigaciones Sanitarias de Navarra-IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Josepmaria Argemi
- Hepatology Program, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.,CIBERehd, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.,Liver Unit, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Jorge Quiroga
- CIBERehd, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.,Instituto de Investigaciones Sanitarias de Navarra-IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain.,Liver Unit, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Bruno Sangro
- CIBERehd, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.,Instituto de Investigaciones Sanitarias de Navarra-IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain.,Liver Unit, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - José I Bilbao
- Department of Radiology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.,Instituto de Investigaciones Sanitarias de Navarra-IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Mercedes Iñarrairaegui
- CIBERehd, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain. .,Instituto de Investigaciones Sanitarias de Navarra-IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain. .,Liver Unit, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Nuclear Medicine Therapy in primary liver cancers. Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-822960-6.00180-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
|
19
|
Abstract
Selective internal radiation therapy represents an endovascular treatment option for patients with primary liver malignancies, in different clinical stages. Potential applications of this treatment are in early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma, as a curative option, or in combination with systemic treatments in intermediate and advanced-stages. This review, based on existing literature and ongoing trials, will focus on the future of this treatment in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, in combination with systemic treatments, or with the use of new devices and technological developments; it will also describe new potential future indications and structural and organizational perspectives.
Collapse
|
20
|
Ricke J, Schinner R, Seidensticker M, Gasbarrini A, van Delden OM, Amthauer H, Peynircioglu B, Bargellini I, Iezzi R, De Toni EN, Malfertheiner P, Pech M, Sangro B. Liver function after combined selective internal radiation therapy or sorafenib monotherapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 2021; 75:1387-1396. [PMID: 34454995 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.07.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2021] [Revised: 07/09/2021] [Accepted: 07/29/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS SORAMIC is a previously published randomised controlled trial assessing survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who received sorafenib with or without selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT). Based on the per-protocol (PP) population, we assessed whether the outcome of patients receiving SIRT+sorafenib vs. sorafenib alone was affected by adverse effects of SIRT on liver function. METHODS The PP population consisted of 109 (SIRT+sorafenib) vs. 173 patients (sorafenib alone). Comparisons were made between subgroups who achieved a significant survival benefit or trend towards improved survival with SIRT and the inverse group without a survival benefit: <65 years-old vs. ≥65 years-old, Child-Pugh 5 vs. 6, no transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) vs. prior TACE, no cirrhosis vs. cirrhosis, non-alcohol- vs. alcohol-related aetiology. The albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score was used to monitor liver function over time during follow-up. RESULTS ALBI scores increased in all patient groups during follow-up. In the PP population, ALBI score increases were higher in the SIRT+sorafenib than the sorafenib arm (p = 0.0021 month 4, p <0.0001 from month 6). SIRT+sorafenib conferred a survival benefit compared to sorafenib alone in patients aged <65 years-old, those without cirrhosis, those with Child-Pugh 5, and those who had not received TACE. A higher increase in ALBI score was observed in the inverse subgroups in whom survival was not improved by adding SIRT (age ≥65 years-old, p <0.05; cirrhosis, p = 0.07; Child-Pugh 6, p <0.05; prior TACE, p = 0.08). CONCLUSION SIRT frequently has a negative, often subclinical, effect on liver function in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, which may impair prognosis after treatment. Careful patient selection for SIRT as well as prevention of clinical and subclinical liver damage by selective treatments, high tumour uptake ratio, and medical prophylaxis could translate into better efficacy. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER EudraCT 2009-012576-27, NCT01126645 LAY SUMMARY: This study of treatments in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma found that selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) has an adverse effect on liver function that may affect patient outcomes. Patients should be carefully selected before they undergo SIRT and the treatment technique should be optimised for maximum protection of non-target liver parenchyma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, Ludwig Maximilan University Munich, München, Germany.
| | - Regina Schinner
- Department of Radiology, Ludwig Maximilan University Munich, München, Germany
| | - Max Seidensticker
- Department of Radiology, Ludwig Maximilan University Munich, München, Germany
| | - Antonio Gasbarrini
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Medicina interna e gastroenterologia, Roma, Italy
| | - Otto M van Delden
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Irene Bargellini
- Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Roberto Iezzi
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, UOC di Radiologia, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Roma, Italy
| | - Enrico N De Toni
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Malfertheiner
- Department of Radiology and Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Maciej Pech
- Departments of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Bruno Sangro
- Liver Unit and HPB Oncology Area, Clinica Universidad de Navarra-IDISNA and CIBEREHD, Pamplona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Biondetti P, Saggiante L, Ierardi AM, Iavarone M, Sangiovanni A, Pesapane F, Fumarola EM, Lampertico P, Carrafiello G. Interventional Radiology Image-Guided Locoregional Therapies (LRTs) and Immunotherapy for the Treatment of HCC. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:5797. [PMID: 34830949 PMCID: PMC8616392 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13225797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2021] [Revised: 11/16/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Image-guided locoregional therapies (LRTs) are a crucial asset in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which has proven to be characterized by an impaired antitumor immune status. LRTs not only directly destroy tumor cells but also have an immunomodulating role, altering the tumor microenvironment with potential systemic effects. Nevertheless, the immune activation against HCC induced by LRTs is not strong enough on its own to generate a systemic significant antitumor response, and it is incapable of preventing tumor recurrence. Currently, there is great interest in the possibility of combining LRTs with immunotherapy for HCC, as this combination may result in a mutually beneficial and synergistic relationship. On the one hand, immunotherapy could amplify and prolong the antitumoral immune response of LRTs, reducing recurrence cases and improving outcome. On the other hand, LTRs counteract the typical immunosuppressive HCC microenvironment and status and could therefore enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy. Here, after reviewing the current therapeutic options for HCC, we focus on LRTs, describing for each of them the technique and data on its effect on the immune system. Then, we describe the current status of immunotherapy and finally report the recently published and ongoing clinical studies testing this combination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierpaolo Biondetti
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department, IRCCS Cà Granda Fondazione Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy; (A.M.I.); (G.C.)
| | - Lorenzo Saggiante
- Postgraduate School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy;
| | - Anna Maria Ierardi
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department, IRCCS Cà Granda Fondazione Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy; (A.M.I.); (G.C.)
| | - Massimo Iavarone
- Gastroenterology Department, IRCCS Cà Granda Fondazione Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy; (M.I.); (A.S.); (P.L.)
| | - Angelo Sangiovanni
- Gastroenterology Department, IRCCS Cà Granda Fondazione Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy; (M.I.); (A.S.); (P.L.)
| | - Filippo Pesapane
- Radiology Department, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20122 Milan, Italy;
| | - Enrico Maria Fumarola
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, 20122 Milan, Italy;
| | - Pietro Lampertico
- Gastroenterology Department, IRCCS Cà Granda Fondazione Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy; (M.I.); (A.S.); (P.L.)
| | - Gianpaolo Carrafiello
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department, IRCCS Cà Granda Fondazione Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy; (A.M.I.); (G.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
Radiation segmentectomy is an yttrium-90 transarterial radioembolization treatment where a high radiation dose is administered to a small volume of liver to achieve a high tumoricidal dose to a target with anatomic surgical precision while sparing surrounding parenchyma. This therapeutic modality is often used to treat hepatocellular carcinoma, and recent studies have demonstrated that radiation segmentectomy is an effective treatment as a neoadjuvant to transplant, resection, or as a standalone treatment. This article provides a review of radiation segmentectomy, indications for treatment, recent outcome data, and guidelines for postprocedural management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristina Prachanronarong
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York
| | - Edward Kim
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Cousins MM, Devasia TP, Maurino CM, Mikell J, Schipper MJ, Kaza RK, Lawrence TS, Cuneo KC, Dewaraja YK. Pre-treatment sTNFR1 and HGF levels predict toxicity and overall survival after 90Y radioembolization: potential novel application of biomarkers for personalized management of hepatotoxicity. J Nucl Med 2021; 63:882-889. [PMID: 34503962 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2021] [Revised: 08/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Liver function may be negatively affected by radiation for treatment of hepatic malignancy. Pretreatment blood cytokine levels are biomarkers for prediction of toxicity and survival after external beam radiation therapy. We hypothesized that cytokines may also predict outcomes after radioembolization, enabling a biomarker-driven personalized approach to treatment. Methods: Pre-therapy blood samples from patients enrolled on a prospective protocol evaluating 90Y radioembolization for management of intrahepatic malignancy were analyzed for two cytokines selected based on prior studies in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 (sTNFR1) and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and key dosimetric parameters were derived from post-treatment 90Y PET/CT imaging. Toxicity was defined as a change in albumin-bilirubin score (ALBI) from baseline to follow up [3-6-month post-treatment (ΔALBI)]. Associations of cytokine levels, dose metrics, and baseline liver function with toxicity and overall survival were assessed. Results: Data from 43 patients treated with 90Y radioembolization for primary [48.8% (21/43)] or secondary [51.2% (22/43)] malignancy were assessed. Examined dose metrics and baseline liver function were not associated with liver toxicity; however, levels of sTNFR1 (P = 0.045) and HGF (P = 0.005) were associated with liver toxicity in univariate models. Cytokines were the only predictors of toxicity in multivariable models including dose metrics and prior liver directed therapy. sTNFR1 (HR 12.3; CI 3.5-42.5, p<0.001) and HGF (HR 7.5; CI 2.4-23.1, p<0.001) predicted overall survival, and findings were similar when models were controlled for absorbed dose and presence of metastatic disease. Conclusion: Pretreatment cytokine levels predict liver toxicity and overall survival. These pathways can be targeted with available drugs, an advantage over previously studied dose metrics and liver function tests. Interventions directed at the TNF alpha axis should be considered in future studies for prevention of liver toxicity, and HGF should be explored further to determine whether its elevation drives toxicity or indicates ongoing liver regeneration after prior injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew M Cousins
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, United States
| | - Theresa P Devasia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, United States
| | | | - Justin Mikell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, United States
| | | | - Ravi K Kaza
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan
| | | | - Kyle C Cuneo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Immune Responses Following Locoregional Treatment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Possible Roles of Adjuvant Immunotherapy. Pharmaceutics 2021; 13:pharmaceutics13091387. [PMID: 34575463 PMCID: PMC8471821 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13091387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2021] [Revised: 08/29/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Unlike other types of cancer, HCC can be treated with locoregional treatments (LRTs) such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). However, recurrences following LRTs are common, and strategies to improve long-term outcomes need to be developed. The exhaustion of anti-tumor immunity in HCC has been well established in many reports and the immunomodulatory effects of LRTs (enhancement of tumor antigen-specific T cell responses after RFA, reduction of effector regulatory T cells after TACE) have also been reported in several previous studies. However, a comprehensive review of previous studies and the possible roles of immunotherapy following LRTs in HCC are not known. In this review, we discuss the immunological evidence of current clinical trials using LRTs and combined immunotherapies, and the possible role of this strategy.
Collapse
|
25
|
Öcal O, Kupčinskas J, Morkunas E, Amthauer H, Schütte K, Malfertheiner P, Klümpen HJ, Sengel C, Benckert J, Seidensticker R, Sangro B, Wildgruber M, Pech M, Bartenstein P, Ricke J, Seidensticker M. Prognostic value of baseline interleukin 6 levels in liver decompensation and survival in HCC patients undergoing radioembolization. EJNMMI Res 2021; 11:51. [PMID: 34080071 PMCID: PMC8172845 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-021-00791-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background To confirm the prognostic value of previously published baseline interleukin 6 (IL6) and IL8 cutoff values in survival and liver dysfunction in patients with advanced HCC undergoing 90Y radioembolization. Methods A total of 83 patients (77 male) represented a subset of HCC patients undergoing 90Y radioembolization combined with sorafenib as part of the prospective multicenter phase II trial SORAMIC. IL6 and IL8 levels were determined in serum samples collected at baseline. In this post hoc analysis, we sought to confirm the prognostic value of baseline cutoff values of 6.53 pg/mL and 60.8 pg/mL for IL6 and IL8, respectively, in overall survival (OS) or liver dysfunction (grade 2 bilirubin increase) after treatment. Results Median OS was 12.0 months. While low baseline albumin and high bilirubin values were associated with high IL6, liver cirrhosis, alcoholic liver disease, and portal vein infiltration were associated with high IL8. In univariate analysis, high baseline IL6 and IL8 were associated with significantly shorter overall survival (7.8 vs. 19.0 months for IL6 and 8.4 vs. 16.0 months for IL8). In addition to IL values, liver cirrhosis, Child–Pugh grade, baseline albumin (< 36 g/dL), and total bilirubin (≥ 17 µmol/L), and higher mALBI grade (2b &3) values were associated with OS. At multivariate analysis, high baseline IL6 was the only independent prognostic factor for OS (HR 2.35 [1.35–4.1], p = 0.002). Risk factors for liver dysfunction were high baseline IL6, albumin, and total bilirubin, and mALBI grade as found in univariate analysis. High baseline IL6 (HR 2.67 [1.21–5.94], p = 0.016) and total bilirubin ≥ 17 µmol/L (HR 3.73 [1.72–8.06], p < 0.001) were independently associated with liver dysfunction. Conclusion In advanced HCC patients receiving 90Y radioembolization combined with sorafenib, baseline IL6 values proved to be prognostic, confirming previous findings in patients undergoing 90Yradioembolization. IL6 might be useful for patient selection or stratification in future trials. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13550-021-00791-w.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Osman Öcal
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Juozas Kupčinskas
- Institute for Digestive Research and Department of Gastroenterology, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Egidijus Morkunas
- Institute for Digestive Research and Department of Gastroenterology, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Kerstin Schütte
- Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Niels-Stensen-Kliniken Marienhospital, Osnabrück, Germany
| | - Peter Malfertheiner
- Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Heinz Josef Klümpen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Christian Sengel
- Radiology Department, Grenoble University Hospital, La Tronche, France
| | - Julia Benckert
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ricarda Seidensticker
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Bruno Sangro
- Liver Unit, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Moritz Wildgruber
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Maciej Pech
- Departments of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Max Seidensticker
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Hepatobiliary Scintigraphy and Glass 90Y Radioembolization with Personalized Dosimetry: Dynamic Changes in Treated and Nontreated Liver. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:diagnostics11060931. [PMID: 34064296 PMCID: PMC8224303 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11060931] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2021] [Revised: 05/13/2021] [Accepted: 05/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The functional changes that occur over time in the liver following 90Y-radioembolization (RE) using personalized dosimetry (PD) remain to be investigated. Methods: November 2016–October 2019: we retrospectively included hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated by 90Y-glass RE using PD, who underwent hepatobiliary scintigraphy (HBS) at baseline and at 15 days, 1, 2, 3, and 6 months after RE. Results: There were 16 patients with unilobar disease (100%) included, and 64 HBS were performed. Whole liver function significantly decreased over time. The loss was maximal at 2 weeks: −32% (p = 0.002) and remained below baseline at 1 (−15%; p = 0.002), 2 (−25%; p < 0.001), and 3 months (−16%; p = 0.027). No radioembolization-induced liver disease was observed. Treated liver function strongly decreased to reach −64% (p < 0.001) at 2 months. Nontreated liver function decreased at 2 weeks (−21%; p = 0.027) and remained below baseline before reaching +20% (p = 0.002) and +59% (p < 0.001) at 3 and 6 months, respectively. Volumetric and functional changes exhibited parallel evolutions in the treated livers (p = 0.01) but independent evolutions in the nontreated livers (p = 0.08). Conclusion: RE using PD induces significant regional changes in liver function over time. As early as 15 days following RE, both the treated and nontreated livers showed a decreased function. Nontreated liver function recovered after 3 months and greatly increased afterwards.
Collapse
|
27
|
Hardy M, Michaux I, Dive A, Lecompte T, Mullier F. Could Daily Monitoring of Fibrin Related Markers Help Suspect a Thrombotic Event in COVID-19 Patients? A Prospective Pilot Study. TH OPEN 2021; 5:e152-e154. [PMID: 34007953 PMCID: PMC8116170 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1728722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Hardy
- Université catholique de Louvain, CHU UCL Namur, Namur Thrombosis and Hemostasis Center (NTHC), Namur Research Institute for Life Sciences (NARILIS), Hematology Laboratory, Yvoir, Belgium.,Université catholique de Louvain, CHU UCL Namur, Namur Thrombosis and Hemostasis Center (NTHC), Namur Research Institute for Life Sciences (NARILIS), Anesthesiology Department, Yvoir, Belgium
| | - Isabelle Michaux
- Université catholique de Louvain, CHU UCL Namur, Intensive Care Department, Yvoir, Belgium
| | - Alain Dive
- Université catholique de Louvain, CHU UCL Namur, Intensive Care Department, Yvoir, Belgium
| | - Thomas Lecompte
- Division of Angiology and Hemostasis - Geneva Platelet Group, Departement of Medicine, Université de Genève et Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - François Mullier
- Université catholique de Louvain, CHU UCL Namur, Namur Thrombosis and Hemostasis Center (NTHC), Namur Research Institute for Life Sciences (NARILIS), Hematology Laboratory, Yvoir, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Induction of Contralateral Hepatic Hypertrophy by Unilobar Yttrium-90 Transarterial Radioembolization versus Portal Vein Embolization: An Animal Study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2021; 32:836-842.e2. [PMID: 33689835 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2021.01.281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2020] [Revised: 01/18/2021] [Accepted: 01/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare hepatic hypertrophy in the contralateral lobe achieved by unilobar transarterial radioembolization (TARE) versus portal vein embolization (PVE) in a swine model. METHODS After an escalation study to determine the optimum dose to achieve hypertrophy after unilobar TARE in 4 animals, 16 pigs were treated by TARE (yttrium-90 resin microspheres) or PVE (lipiodol/n-butyl cyanoacrylate). Liver volume was calculated based on CT before treatment and during 6 months of follow-up. Independent t-test (P < .05) was used to compare hypertrophy. The relationship between hypertrophy after TARE and absorbed dose was calculated using the Pearson correlation. RESULTS At 2 and 4 weeks after treatment, a significantly higher degree of future liver remnant hypertrophy was observed in the PVE group versus the TARE group, with a median volume gain of 31% (interquartile range [IQR]: 16%-66%) for PVE versus 23% (IQR: 6%-36%) for TARE after 2 weeks and 51% (IQR: 47%-69%) for PVE versus 29% (IQR: 20%-50%) for TARE after 4 weeks. After 3 and 6 months, hypertrophy converged without a statistically significant difference, with a volume gain of 103% (IQR: 86%-119%) for PVE versus 82% (IQR: 70%-96%) for TARE after 3 months and 115% (IQR: 70%-46%) for PVE versus 86% (IQR: 58%-111%) for TARE after 6 months. A strong correlation was observed between radiation dose (median 162 Gy, IQR: 139-175) and hypertrophy. CONCLUSIONS PVE resulted in rapid hypertrophy within 1 month of the procedure, followed by a plateau, whereas TARE resulted in comparable hypertrophy by 3-6 months. TARE-induced hypertrophy correlated with radiation absorbed dose.
Collapse
|
29
|
Helmberger T. The evolution of interventional oncology in the 21st century. Br J Radiol 2020; 93:20200112. [PMID: 32706978 PMCID: PMC7465871 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20200112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2020] [Revised: 07/08/2020] [Accepted: 07/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Interventional oncology (IO) has proven to be highly efficient in the local therapy of numerous malignant tumors in addition to surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Due to the advent of immune-oncology with the possibility of tumor control at the molecular and cellular levels, a system change is currently emerging. This will significantly rule oncology in the coming decades. Therefore, one cannot think about IO in the 21st century without considering immunology. For IO, this means paying much more attention to the immunomodulatory effects of the interventional techniques, which have so far been neglected, and to explore the synergistic possibilities with immuno-oncology. It can be expected that the combined use of IO and immuno-oncology will help to overcome the limitations of the latter, such as limited local effects and a high rate of side-effects. To do this, however, sectoral boundaries must be removed and interdisciplinary research efforts must be strengthened. In case of success, IO will face an exciting future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Helmberger
- Department of Radiology, Neuroradiology, and minimal-invasive Therapy, Munich Klinik Bogenhausen Englschalkingerstr. 77 81925, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Nance ME, Biedermann GB, Bhat AP, Davis RM. Chemorefractory liver metastasis from cervical cancer successfully treated with a combination of yttrium-90 and immunotherapy. Radiol Case Rep 2020; 15:1359-1365. [PMID: 32636973 PMCID: PMC7327429 DOI: 10.1016/j.radcr.2020.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2020] [Revised: 06/01/2020] [Accepted: 06/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Liver metastases in cervical cancer is rare and can be difficult-to-treat. The current guidelines established by the Gynecologic Oncology Group recommend platinum-based systemic chemotherapy in combination with an anti-angiogenic agent such as bevacizumab, however, overall survival remains poor following diagnosis and options for patients who fail chemotherapy are limited. Yttrium-90 (Y90) radioembolization (RE) has shown great promise in the treatment of chemo-refractory colorectal liver metastases. We describe a 30-year-old female with a history of stage IB endocervical adenocarcinoma who later developed metastases to the liver, that were unresponsive to multiple chemotherapeutics and chemoembolization, and was successfully treated with Y90 RE with concurrent systemic Pembrolizumab. The Y90 RE treatment resulted in positive clinical and imaging responses with improvement in her quality of life, all of which continue to persist at the time of writing this manuscript about 8-months into her RE treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael E. Nance
- School of Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
- Department of Radiology, Section of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Missouri, One Hospital drive, Columbia, MO 65212, USA
| | - Gregory B. Biedermann
- Department of Radiology, Section of Radiation Oncology, University of Missouri, Columbia, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - Ambarish P. Bhat
- Department of Radiology, Section of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Missouri, One Hospital drive, Columbia, MO 65212, USA
- Corresponding author.
| | - Ryan M. Davis
- Department of Radiology, Section of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Missouri, One Hospital drive, Columbia, MO 65212, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Core JM, Frey GT, Sharma A, Bussone ST, Legout JD, McKinney JM, Lewis AR, Ritchie C, Devcic Z, Paz-Fumagalli R, Toskich BB. Increasing Yttrium-90 Dose Conformality Using Proximal Radioembolization Enabled by Distal Angiosomal Truncation for the Treatment of Hepatic Malignancy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2020; 31:934-942. [PMID: 32381352 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2019.12.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2019] [Revised: 12/08/2019] [Accepted: 12/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate safety and feasibility of improving radiation dose conformality via proximal radioembolization enabled by distal angiosomal truncation where selective administration was not practical. MATERIALS AND METHODS Hepatic malignancies treated via angiosomal truncation between January 2017 and March 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. Thirty-three patients (8 women, 25 men; mean age, 62.2 y; range, 36-78 y) underwent 39 treatments. Of treatments, 74.3% (n = 29) were for hepatocellular carcinomas, 10.2% (n = 4) were for cholangiocarcinomas, and 15.4% (n = 6) were for metastatic tumors (1 colorectal adenocarcinoma, 1 pancreatic adenocarcinoma, 3 melanomas, and 1 endometroid carcinoma). Truncation was achieved using temporary embolic devices including a microvascular plug, detachable coil, gelatin slurry, and balloon microcatheter, after which proximal radioembolization was performed. Range of treatment activity was 0.47-5.75 GBq. Technetium-99m macroaggregated albumin and bremsstrahlung single photon emission computed tomography (CT)/CT threshold analysis was conducted to delineate and compare distribution of activity within the treatment angiosome before and after radioembolization. RESULTS Dosimetric analysis of 14 patients demonstrated a significant reduction in nontarget liver radiation exposure at 5, 20, and 40% thresholds (P = .002, P = .001, and P = .008, respectively). There were no grade 3 or higher adverse events. There was no significant change in Albumin-Bilirubin grade and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (P = .09 and P = .74) before and 3 months after the procedure. Truncated arteries were patent on subsequent angiography in 11 cases and on MR angiography or CT angiography in 38 of 39 cases. CONCLUSIONS Proximal radioembolization enabled by distal angiosomal truncation is safe and decreases nontarget parenchymal radioembolization dose in cases not amenable to selective administration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob M Core
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL 32224.
| | - Gregory T Frey
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL 32224
| | - Akash Sharma
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL 32224
| | - Steven T Bussone
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL 32224
| | - Jordan D Legout
- Division of Body MRI, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL 32224
| | - J Mark McKinney
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL 32224
| | - Andrew R Lewis
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL 32224
| | - Charles Ritchie
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL 32224
| | - Zlatko Devcic
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL 32224
| | - Ricardo Paz-Fumagalli
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL 32224
| | - Beau B Toskich
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL 32224
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
de la Torre-Aláez M, Jordán-Iborra C, Casadei-Gardini A, Bilbao JI, Rodriguez-Fraile M, Sancho L, D’Avola D, Herrero JI, Iñarrairaegui M, Sangro B. The Pattern of Progression Defines Post-progression Survival in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with SIRT. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2020; 43:1165-1172. [DOI: 10.1007/s00270-020-02444-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2019] [Accepted: 02/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
33
|
Rahman M, Al-Ghamdi SA, Alharbi KS, Beg S, Sharma K, Anwar F, Al-Abbasi FA, Kumar V. Ganoderic acid loaded nano-lipidic carriers improvise treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Drug Deliv 2020; 26:782-793. [PMID: 31357897 PMCID: PMC6711158 DOI: 10.1080/10717544.2019.1606865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
This work evaluates nano-lipid carrier of ganoderic acid (GA) and molecular docking on various cancer signaling pathways, an attempt to improve the hepatic condition associated with hepatic carcinoma (HCC) induced by diethyl-nitrosamine (DEN) in Wistar rats. Molecular docking mechanism of GA was performed through binding simulation analysis for various cancer signaling pathway, viz., Bcl-2, Pl3K, NF-κB, Akt/PKB, and Stat-3. Double emulsion solvent displacement method was implied for preparation of GA-loaded nano-lipid carrier. GA-NLCs were evaluated for drug loading capacity, entrapment efficiency, particle size, gastric stability, in vitro drug release, cytotoxicity, cellular uptake, and in vivo studies including macroscopical, hepatic injury markers, non-hepatic, biochemical, antioxidant parameters, and histopathological evaluation. HCC was induced by intraperitoneal injection of DEN (200 mg/kg). Both in vivo and molecular docking results were compatible in establishing the alteration in hepatic nodules, hepatic, non-hepatic, and antioxidant parameters, in a significant manner (p < .001) by GA and GA-NLC along with signal alteration of Bcl-2, Pl3K, NF-κB Akt/PKB, and Stat-3 pathway. Histopathological observation confirmed and supported the above result by GA and GA-NLC. On the basis of our results, we can advocate that, GA interferes with various cancer signaling proteins involved in pathogenesis of cancer and was able to cease the progression of disease. Additionally, GA-NLCs proved its chemoprotective effect against the DEN-induced HCC by modulation of hepatic and non-hepatic parameters through various mechanisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahfoozur Rahman
- a Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shalom Institute of Health & Allied Sciences, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology & Sciences , Allahabad , India
| | | | - Khalid S Alharbi
- c Department of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, Jouf University , Sakakah 72341 , Saudi Arabia
| | - Sarwar Beg
- d School of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Nanomedicine Research Lab, Jamia Hamdard , New Delhi , India
| | - Kalicharan Sharma
- e School of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Jamia Hamdard , New Delhi , India
| | - Firoz Anwar
- b Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University , Jeddah , Saudi Arabia
| | - Fahad A Al-Abbasi
- b Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University , Jeddah , Saudi Arabia
| | - Vikas Kumar
- f Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Natural Product Drug Discovery Laboratory, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology & Sciences , Allahabad , India
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Deipolyi AR, England RW, Ridouani F, Riedl CC, Kunin HS, Boas FE, Yarmohammadi H, Sofocleous CT. PET/CT Imaging Characteristics After Radioembolization of Hepatic Metastasis from Breast Cancer. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2019; 43:488-494. [PMID: 31732778 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-019-02375-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2019] [Accepted: 11/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To define positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging characteristics during follow-up of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) treated with yttrium-90 (Y90) radioembolization (RE). MATERIALS AND METHODS From January 2011 to October 2017, 30 MBC patients underwent 38 Y90 glass or resin RE treatments. Pre-RE PET/CT was performed on average 51 days before RE. There were 68 PET/CTs performed after treatment. Response was assessed using modified PERCIST criteria focusing on the hepatic territory treated with RE, normalizing SUVpeak to the mean SUV of liver uninvolved by tumor. An objective response (OR) was defined as a decrease in SUVpeak by at least 30%. RESULTS Of the 68 post-RE scans, 6 were performed at 0-30 days, 15 at 31-60 days, 9 at 61-90 days, 13 at 91-120 days, 14 scans at 121-180 days, and 11 scans at > 180 days after RE. Of the 30 patients, 25 (83%) achieved OR on at least one follow-up. Median survival was 15 months after the first RE administration. Highest response rates occurred at 30-90 days, with over 75% of cases demonstrating OR at that time. After 180 days, OR was seen in only 25%. There was a median TTP of 169 days among responders. CONCLUSION In MBC, follow-up PET/CT after RE demonstrates optimal response rates at 30-90 days, with progression noted after 180 days. These results help to guide the timing of imaging and also to inform patients of expected outcomes after RE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy R Deipolyi
- Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Ryan W England
- Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Fourat Ridouani
- Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Christopher C Riedl
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Henry S Kunin
- Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - F Edward Boas
- Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hooman Yarmohammadi
- Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Labgaa I, Tabrizian P, Titano J, Kim E, Thung SN, Florman S, Schwartz M, Melloul E. Feasibility and safety of liver transplantation or resection after transarterial radioembolization with Yttrium-90 for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. HPB (Oxford) 2019; 21:1497-1504. [PMID: 31005494 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.03.360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2018] [Revised: 02/14/2019] [Accepted: 03/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The benefit of transarterial radioembolization (TARE) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is increasingly evidenced. However, data on outcome of liver transplantation or resection after TARE remain scarce. This study aimed to assess the safety and feasibility of surgery after TARE in patients with unresectable HCC. METHODS Patients exclusively undergoing TARE followed by either orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) or liver resection (LR) for HCC between 2012 and 2016 were included. Primary outcomes were postoperative morbidity and mortality. Secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and response to TARE. RESULTS Among 349 patients with HCC treated with TARE, 32 (9%) underwent either OLT (n = 22) or LR (n = 10), which represent the study cohort. In this group, TARE induced decreased viable nodules (p < 0.001), an efficient downsizing (p < 0.001) as well as a significant downstaging based on BCLC classification (p < 0.001). Overall, major complications and mortality after surgery occurred in 5 (16%) and 1 (3%) patients, respectively. For the whole study cohort, OS was 47 months while survival rates at 1-, 3- and 5-years reached 97%, 86% and 86%, respectively. DISCUSSION Liver surgery after TARE is feasible and safe. This strategy allows to offer a curative treatment in a subset of patients with unresectable HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ismail Labgaa
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Switzerland; Department of Liver Surgery, Recanati/Miller Transplantation Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Parissa Tabrizian
- Department of Liver Surgery, Recanati/Miller Transplantation Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joseph Titano
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Edward Kim
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Swan N Thung
- Mount Sinai Liver Cancer Program, Division of Liver Diseases, Department of Pathology, Recanati/Miller Transplant Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA
| | - Sander Florman
- Department of Liver Surgery, Recanati/Miller Transplantation Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Myron Schwartz
- Department of Liver Surgery, Recanati/Miller Transplantation Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Emmanuel Melloul
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Switzerland; Department of Liver Surgery, Recanati/Miller Transplantation Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Kessler J, Park JJ. Yttrium-90 Radioembolization After Local Hepatic Therapy: How Prior Treatments Impact Patient Selection, Dosing, and Toxicity. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 2019; 22:112-116. [PMID: 31079707 DOI: 10.1053/j.tvir.2019.02.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Numerous local treatment strategies now exist for patients with primary and metastatic liver tumors. Increasingly, patients who cannot be adequately treated with a single form of focal therapy, go on to receive a variety of sequential treatments. However, the impact of each prior therapy on subsequent treatments and the cumulative toxicity of these therapies remains uncertain. Yttrium-90 radioembolization is becoming an increasingly common treatment for patients with hepatic malignancies. Though the baseline toxicity of radioembolization is low, greater care must be taken when treating patients who have undergone prior hepatic treatments. While this population can be treated safely, additional measures should be taken to ensure that patients are carefully screened and all effort is made to minimize liver toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Kessler
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA.
| | - John J Park
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Essentials Interventional Radiologists Need to Know. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2019; 42:1262-1270. [PMID: 31069465 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-019-02221-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2018] [Accepted: 04/10/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
38
|
Greten TF, Mauda-Havakuk M, Heinrich B, Korangy F, Wood BJ. Combined locoregional-immunotherapy for liver cancer. J Hepatol 2019; 70:999-1007. [PMID: 30738077 PMCID: PMC6462230 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.01.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 151] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2018] [Revised: 01/23/2019] [Accepted: 01/26/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Locoregional therapies are commonly used to treat patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. It has been noted for many years that locoregional therapies may have additional systemic effects other than simple tumour elimination. Immunological "side effects" have been described in response to locoregional therapies in animal studies and in patients. With the advent of immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma, there is increasing interest in determining the best way to combine immunotherapy with locoregional therapies. Herein, we provide a compact summary of answered and unanswered questions in the field, including: What animal model is best suited to test combined immune-locoregional treatments? How does tumour cell death affect immune responses? What type of immune responses have been observed in patients treated with different types of locoregional therapies? What can be surmised from the results of the first study testing the combination of locoregional therapy with immune checkpoint blockade? Finally, we discuss the outlook for this rapidly growing area of research, focussing on the issues which must be overcome to bridge the gap between interventional radiology and cancer immunology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim F Greten
- Gastrointestinal Malignancies Section, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, United States; NCI CCR Liver Cancer Program, United States.
| | - Michal Mauda-Havakuk
- Center for Interventional Oncology, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, NIH Clinical Center & Center for Cancer Research, National Institutes of Health, United States; NIBIB & NIH Clinical Center Clinical Translational Research Fellowship Program, United States
| | - Bernd Heinrich
- Gastrointestinal Malignancies Section, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, United States
| | - Firouzeh Korangy
- Gastrointestinal Malignancies Section, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, United States
| | - Bradford J Wood
- Center for Interventional Oncology, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, NIH Clinical Center & Center for Cancer Research, National Institutes of Health, United States; NCI CCR Liver Cancer Program, United States
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Erinjeri JP, Fine GC, Adema GJ, Ahmed M, Chapiro J, den Brok M, Duran R, Hunt SJ, Johnson DT, Ricke J, Sze DY, Toskich BB, Wood BJ, Woodrum D, Goldberg SN. Immunotherapy and the Interventional Oncologist: Challenges and Opportunities-A Society of Interventional Oncology White Paper. Radiology 2019; 292:25-34. [PMID: 31012818 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2019182326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Interventional oncology is a subspecialty field of interventional radiology that addresses the diagnosis and treatment of cancer and cancer-related problems by using targeted minimally invasive procedures performed with image guidance. Immuno-oncology is an innovative area of cancer research and practice that seeks to help the patient's own immune system fight cancer. Both interventional oncology and immuno-oncology can potentially play a pivotal role in cancer management plans when used alongside medical, surgical, and radiation oncology in the care of cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph P Erinjeri
- From the Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, H-118, New York, NY 10065 (J.P.E.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah (G.C.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (G.J.A., M.d.B.); Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (M.A.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (J.C.); Department of Radiodiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (R.D.); Penn Image-Guided Interventions Laboratory and Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.J.H.); Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colo (D.T.J.); Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany (J.R.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (D.Y.S.); Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Center for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Md (B.J.W.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester Minn (D.W.); and Department of Radiology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (S.N.G.)
| | - Gabriel C Fine
- From the Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, H-118, New York, NY 10065 (J.P.E.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah (G.C.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (G.J.A., M.d.B.); Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (M.A.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (J.C.); Department of Radiodiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (R.D.); Penn Image-Guided Interventions Laboratory and Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.J.H.); Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colo (D.T.J.); Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany (J.R.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (D.Y.S.); Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Center for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Md (B.J.W.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester Minn (D.W.); and Department of Radiology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (S.N.G.)
| | - Gosse J Adema
- From the Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, H-118, New York, NY 10065 (J.P.E.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah (G.C.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (G.J.A., M.d.B.); Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (M.A.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (J.C.); Department of Radiodiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (R.D.); Penn Image-Guided Interventions Laboratory and Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.J.H.); Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colo (D.T.J.); Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany (J.R.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (D.Y.S.); Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Center for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Md (B.J.W.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester Minn (D.W.); and Department of Radiology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (S.N.G.)
| | - Muneeb Ahmed
- From the Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, H-118, New York, NY 10065 (J.P.E.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah (G.C.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (G.J.A., M.d.B.); Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (M.A.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (J.C.); Department of Radiodiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (R.D.); Penn Image-Guided Interventions Laboratory and Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.J.H.); Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colo (D.T.J.); Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany (J.R.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (D.Y.S.); Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Center for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Md (B.J.W.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester Minn (D.W.); and Department of Radiology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (S.N.G.)
| | - Julius Chapiro
- From the Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, H-118, New York, NY 10065 (J.P.E.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah (G.C.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (G.J.A., M.d.B.); Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (M.A.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (J.C.); Department of Radiodiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (R.D.); Penn Image-Guided Interventions Laboratory and Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.J.H.); Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colo (D.T.J.); Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany (J.R.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (D.Y.S.); Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Center for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Md (B.J.W.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester Minn (D.W.); and Department of Radiology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (S.N.G.)
| | - Martijn den Brok
- From the Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, H-118, New York, NY 10065 (J.P.E.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah (G.C.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (G.J.A., M.d.B.); Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (M.A.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (J.C.); Department of Radiodiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (R.D.); Penn Image-Guided Interventions Laboratory and Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.J.H.); Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colo (D.T.J.); Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany (J.R.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (D.Y.S.); Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Center for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Md (B.J.W.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester Minn (D.W.); and Department of Radiology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (S.N.G.)
| | - Rafael Duran
- From the Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, H-118, New York, NY 10065 (J.P.E.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah (G.C.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (G.J.A., M.d.B.); Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (M.A.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (J.C.); Department of Radiodiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (R.D.); Penn Image-Guided Interventions Laboratory and Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.J.H.); Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colo (D.T.J.); Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany (J.R.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (D.Y.S.); Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Center for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Md (B.J.W.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester Minn (D.W.); and Department of Radiology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (S.N.G.)
| | - Stephen J Hunt
- From the Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, H-118, New York, NY 10065 (J.P.E.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah (G.C.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (G.J.A., M.d.B.); Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (M.A.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (J.C.); Department of Radiodiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (R.D.); Penn Image-Guided Interventions Laboratory and Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.J.H.); Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colo (D.T.J.); Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany (J.R.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (D.Y.S.); Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Center for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Md (B.J.W.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester Minn (D.W.); and Department of Radiology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (S.N.G.)
| | - D Thor Johnson
- From the Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, H-118, New York, NY 10065 (J.P.E.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah (G.C.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (G.J.A., M.d.B.); Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (M.A.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (J.C.); Department of Radiodiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (R.D.); Penn Image-Guided Interventions Laboratory and Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.J.H.); Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colo (D.T.J.); Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany (J.R.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (D.Y.S.); Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Center for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Md (B.J.W.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester Minn (D.W.); and Department of Radiology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (S.N.G.)
| | - Jens Ricke
- From the Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, H-118, New York, NY 10065 (J.P.E.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah (G.C.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (G.J.A., M.d.B.); Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (M.A.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (J.C.); Department of Radiodiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (R.D.); Penn Image-Guided Interventions Laboratory and Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.J.H.); Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colo (D.T.J.); Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany (J.R.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (D.Y.S.); Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Center for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Md (B.J.W.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester Minn (D.W.); and Department of Radiology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (S.N.G.)
| | - Daniel Y Sze
- From the Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, H-118, New York, NY 10065 (J.P.E.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah (G.C.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (G.J.A., M.d.B.); Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (M.A.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (J.C.); Department of Radiodiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (R.D.); Penn Image-Guided Interventions Laboratory and Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.J.H.); Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colo (D.T.J.); Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany (J.R.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (D.Y.S.); Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Center for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Md (B.J.W.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester Minn (D.W.); and Department of Radiology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (S.N.G.)
| | - Beau Bosko Toskich
- From the Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, H-118, New York, NY 10065 (J.P.E.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah (G.C.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (G.J.A., M.d.B.); Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (M.A.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (J.C.); Department of Radiodiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (R.D.); Penn Image-Guided Interventions Laboratory and Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.J.H.); Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colo (D.T.J.); Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany (J.R.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (D.Y.S.); Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Center for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Md (B.J.W.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester Minn (D.W.); and Department of Radiology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (S.N.G.)
| | - Bradford J Wood
- From the Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, H-118, New York, NY 10065 (J.P.E.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah (G.C.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (G.J.A., M.d.B.); Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (M.A.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (J.C.); Department of Radiodiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (R.D.); Penn Image-Guided Interventions Laboratory and Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.J.H.); Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colo (D.T.J.); Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany (J.R.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (D.Y.S.); Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Center for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Md (B.J.W.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester Minn (D.W.); and Department of Radiology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (S.N.G.)
| | - David Woodrum
- From the Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, H-118, New York, NY 10065 (J.P.E.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah (G.C.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (G.J.A., M.d.B.); Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (M.A.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (J.C.); Department of Radiodiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (R.D.); Penn Image-Guided Interventions Laboratory and Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.J.H.); Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colo (D.T.J.); Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany (J.R.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (D.Y.S.); Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Center for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Md (B.J.W.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester Minn (D.W.); and Department of Radiology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (S.N.G.)
| | - S Nahum Goldberg
- From the Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, H-118, New York, NY 10065 (J.P.E.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah (G.C.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (G.J.A., M.d.B.); Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (M.A.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (J.C.); Department of Radiodiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (R.D.); Penn Image-Guided Interventions Laboratory and Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.J.H.); Department of Radiology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colo (D.T.J.); Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany (J.R.); Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (D.Y.S.); Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Center for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Md (B.J.W.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester Minn (D.W.); and Department of Radiology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (S.N.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Domouchtsidou A, Barsegian V, Mueller SP, Best J, Ertle J, Bedreli S, Horn PA, Bockisch A, Lindemann M. Impaired lymphocyte function in patients with hepatic malignancies after selective internal radiotherapy. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2018; 67:843-853. [PMID: 29500633 PMCID: PMC11028233 DOI: 10.1007/s00262-018-2141-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2017] [Accepted: 02/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of our study was to assess the immune function of patients with inoperable hepatic malignancies after treatment with selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT) and to identify possible correlations with clinical parameters. In 25 patients receiving SIRT lymphocyte proliferation and the production of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines (interferon-γ and interleukin-10) after stimulation with mitogens and microbial antigens were tested prior to therapy, directly after therapy (day 1) and at day 2, 7 and 28 post therapy using the lymphocyte transformation test and enzyme-linked immunospot assays. Absolute counts and percentages of leukocyte and lymphocyte subsets were determined by flow cytometry. The most prominent finding was an immediate and significant (p < 0.05) decrease of lymphocyte proliferation and interferon-γ production directly after therapy which lasted until day 28 and was stronger upon stimulation with microbial antigens than with mitogens. Moreover, lymphopenia was revealed, affecting all lymphocyte subsets (CD3+, CD4+, CD8+ T cells, CD4+ CD8+ T cells, B cells and NK cells). SIRT led to a reduction in the percentage of activated HLA-DR+ monocytes and of CD45R0+ memory T cells. Higher radiation activity, the presence of liver cirrhosis, chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus and metastases were unfavorable factors for immunocompetence, while a better Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was associated with stronger immunological reactions. In conclusion, SIRT leads to severe impairment of cellular in vitro immune responses. Further studies are needed to assess a potential clinical impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aglaia Domouchtsidou
- Institute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Virchowstraße 179, 45147, Essen, Germany
| | - Vahé Barsegian
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Helios Kliniken, Schwerin, Germany
| | - Stefan P Mueller
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Jan Best
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Judith Ertle
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Sotiria Bedreli
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Peter A Horn
- Institute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Virchowstraße 179, 45147, Essen, Germany
| | - Andreas Bockisch
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Monika Lindemann
- Institute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Virchowstraße 179, 45147, Essen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Kinetic analysis of contralateral liver hypertrophy after radioembolization of primary and metastatic liver tumors. Surgery 2018; 163:1020-1027. [PMID: 29325784 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.11.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2017] [Revised: 11/02/2017] [Accepted: 11/20/2017] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radioembolization induces liver hypertrophy, although the extent and rate of hypertrophy are unknown. Our goal was to examine the kinetics of contralateral liver hypertrophy after transarterial radioembolization. METHODS A retrospective study (2010-2014) of treatment-naïve patients with primary/secondary liver malignancies undergoing right lobe radioembolization was performed. Computed tomography volumetry was performed before and 1, 3, and 6 months after radioembolization. Outcomes of interest were left lobe (standardized future liver remnant) degree of hypertrophy, kinetic growth rate, and ability to reach goal standardized future liver remnant ≥40%. Medians were compared with the Kruskall-Wallis test. Time to event analysis was used to estimate time to reach goal standardized future liver remnant. RESULTS In the study, 25 patients were included. At 1, 3, and 6 months, median degree of hypertrophy was 4%, 8%, and 12% (P < .001), degree of hypertrophy relative to baseline future liver remnants was 11%, 17%, and 31% (P = .015), and kinetic growth rate was 0.8%, 0.5%, and 0.4%/week (P = .002). In patients with baseline standardized future liver remnant <40% (N= 16), median time to reach standardized future liver remnant ≥40% was 7.3 months, with 75% accomplishing standardized future liver remnant ≥40% at 8.2 months. CONCLUSION Radioembolization induces hypertrophy of the contralateral lobe to a similar extent as existing methods, although at a lower rate. The role of radioembolization as a dual therapy (neoadjuvant and hypetrophy-inducing) for selected patients needs to be studied. (Surgery 2017;160:XXX-XXX.).
Collapse
|
42
|
Dosimetric parameters predicting contralateral liver hypertrophy after unilobar radioembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2017; 45:392-401. [PMID: 29177870 PMCID: PMC5787216 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-017-3845-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2017] [Accepted: 09/28/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Purpose This study aimed at identifying prior therapy dosimetric parameters using 99mTc-labeled macro-aggregates of albumin (MAA) that are associated with contralateral hepatic hypertrophy occurring after unilobar radioembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) performed with 90Y–loaded glass microspheres. Methods The dosimetry data of 73 HCC patients were collected prior to the treatment with 90Y–loaded microspheres for unilateral disease. The injected liver dose (ILD), the tumor dose (TD) and healthy injected liver dose (HILD) were calculated based on MAA quantification. Following treatment, the maximal hypertrophy (MHT) of an untreated lobe was calculated. Results Mean MHT was 35.4 ± 40.4%. When using continuous variables, the MHT was not correlated with any tested variable, i.e., injected activity, ILD, HILD or TD except with a percentage of future remnant liver (FRL) following the 90Y–microspheres injection (r = −0.56). MHT ≥ 10% was significantly more frequent for patients with HILD ≥ 88 Gy, (52% of the cases), i.e., in 92.2% versus 65.7% for HILD < 88 Gy (p = 0.032). MHT ≥ 10% was also significantly more frequent for patients with a TD ≥ 205 Gy and a tumor volume (VT) ≥ 100 cm3 in patients with initial FRL < 50%. MHT ≥10% was seen in 83.9% for patients with either an HILD ≥ 88 Gy or a TD ≥ 205 Gy for tumors larger than 100cm3 (85% of the cases), versus only 54.5% (p = 0.0265) for patients with none of those parameters. MHT ≥10% was also associated with FRL and the Child-Pugh score. Using multivariate analysis, the Child-Pugh score (p < 0.0001), FRL (p = 0.0023) and HILD (p = 0.0029) were still significantly associated with MHT ≥10%. Conclusion This study demonstrates for the first time that HILD is significantly associated with liver hypertrophy. There is also an impact of high tumor doses in large lesions in one subgroup of patients. Larger prospective studies evaluating the MAA dosimetric parameters have to be conducted to confirm these promising results.
Collapse
|
43
|
Sangro B, Martínez-Urbistondo D, Bester L, Bilbao JI, Coldwell DM, Flamen P, Kennedy A, Ricke J, Sharma RA. Prevention and treatment of complications of selective internal radiation therapy: Expert guidance and systematic review. Hepatology 2017; 66:969-982. [PMID: 28407278 DOI: 10.1002/hep.29207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2016] [Revised: 02/02/2017] [Accepted: 03/02/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Selective internal radiation therapy (or radioembolization) by intra-arterial injection of radioactive yttrium-90-loaded microspheres is increasingly used for the treatment of patients with liver metastases or primary liver cancer. The high-dose beta-radiation penetrates an average of only 2.5 mm from the source, thus limiting its effects to the site of delivery. However, the off-target diversion of yttrium-90 microspheres to tissues other than the tumor may lead to complications. The most prominent of these complications include radiation gastritis and gastrointestinal ulcers, cholecystitis, radiation pneumonitis, and radioembolization-induced liver disease, which may occur despite careful pretreatment planning. Thus, selective internal radiation therapy demands an expert multidisciplinary team approach in order to provide comprehensive care for patients. This review provides recommendations to multidisciplinary teams on the optimal medical processes in order to ensure the safe delivery of selective internal radiation therapy. Based on the best available published evidence and expert opinion, we recommend the most appropriate strategies for the prevention, early diagnosis, and management of potential radiation injury to the liver and to other organs. (Hepatology 2017;66:969-982).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruno Sangro
- Liver Unit, Clinica Universidad de Navarra and Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Diego Martínez-Urbistondo
- Liver Unit, Clinica Universidad de Navarra and Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Lourens Bester
- Department of Interventional Radiology, University of New South Wales St. Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, Australia
| | - Jose I Bilbao
- Department of Radiology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra and Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Douglas M Coldwell
- James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY
| | - Patrick Flamen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Andrew Kennedy
- Radiation Oncology, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Ricky A Sharma
- University College London, UCL Cancer Institute, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This article reviews recent developments in targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) approaches directed to malignant liver lesions, bone metastases, neuroendocrine tumors, and castrate-resistant metastatic prostate cancer and discusses challenges and opportunities in this field. CONCLUSION TRT has been employed since the first radioiodine thyroid treatment almost 75 years ago. Progress in the understanding of the complex underlying biology of cancer and advances in radiochemistry science, multimodal imaging techniques including the concept of "see and treat" within the framework of theranostics, and universal traction with the notion of precision medicine have all contributed to a resurgence of TRT.
Collapse
|
45
|
Seidensticker M, Powerski M, Seidensticker R, Damm R, Mohnike K, Garlipp B, Klopffleisch M, Amthauer H, Ricke J, Pech M. Cytokines and 90Y-Radioembolization: Relation to Liver Function and Overall Survival. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2017; 40:1185-1195. [PMID: 28283704 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-017-1622-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2016] [Accepted: 03/02/2017] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate the course of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines after 90Y-radioembolization (RE) of liver malignancies and to identify prognosticators for liver-related adverse events and survival. METHODS In 34 consecutive patients with secondary or primary liver tumors scheduled for RE, the following cytokines were measured prior to and 2 h, 3 days, and 6 weeks after RE: interleukin (IL) -1, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), and interferon-γ. Liver function impairment was defined as an elevation of liver-related laboratory values as graded by CTCAE ≥ 2 and/or serum bilirubin ≥30 µmol/l and/or development of ascites at 6-week follow-up. RESULTS Significant changes over time were seen in IL-1 (increase from 0.4 pg/ml (±0.7) at baseline to 1.1 pg/ml (±1.4) 3 days after RE (p = 0.02)), and in IL-6 (increase from 16.8 pg/ml (±21.8) at baseline to 54.6 pg/ml (±78.2) 3 days after RE (p = 0.003)). Baseline values of IL-6 and IL-8 were independently associated with liver function impairment at follow-up as well as decreased survival with an optimal cutoff at 6.53 and 60.8 pg/ml, respectively. CONCLUSION Expected changes in pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines after RE were shown. Furthermore, baseline values of IL-6 and IL-8 were associated with later liver dysfunction and survival. We hypothesize that these biomarkers are potential prognosticators and might help in patient selection for RE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max Seidensticker
- Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinik Magdeburg, Leipziger Strasse 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany. .,International School of Image-Guided Interventions, Deutsche Akademie für Mikrotherapie, Magdeburg, Germany.
| | - Maciej Powerski
- Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinik Magdeburg, Leipziger Strasse 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Ricarda Seidensticker
- Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinik Magdeburg, Leipziger Strasse 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.,International School of Image-Guided Interventions, Deutsche Akademie für Mikrotherapie, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Robert Damm
- Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinik Magdeburg, Leipziger Strasse 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Konrad Mohnike
- Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinik Magdeburg, Leipziger Strasse 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.,International School of Image-Guided Interventions, Deutsche Akademie für Mikrotherapie, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Garlipp
- Klinik für Allgemein-Viszeral- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinik Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Maurice Klopffleisch
- Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinik Magdeburg, Leipziger Strasse 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinik Magdeburg, Leipziger Strasse 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.,International School of Image-Guided Interventions, Deutsche Akademie für Mikrotherapie, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Jens Ricke
- Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinik Magdeburg, Leipziger Strasse 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.,International School of Image-Guided Interventions, Deutsche Akademie für Mikrotherapie, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Maciej Pech
- Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinik Magdeburg, Leipziger Strasse 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.,International School of Image-Guided Interventions, Deutsche Akademie für Mikrotherapie, Magdeburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Abstract
Radioembolization (RE) is a relatively novel treatment modality for primary and secondary hepatic malignancies. Microspheres embedded with a β-emitting radioisotope are injected into the hepatic artery, resulting in microsphere deposition in the tumor arterioles and normal portal triads. Microsphere deposition in nontumorous parenchyma can result in radiation-induced liver injury, with lethal RE-induced liver disease (REILD) at the outer end of the spectrum. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate RE-related hepatotoxicity and present an overview of the currently applied definitions and clinically relevant characteristics of REILD. A systematic literature search on REILD was performed. Studies after the introduction of the term REILD (2008) were screened for definitions of REILD. Hepatotoxicity and applied definitions of REILD were compared. Liver biochemistry test abnormalities occur in up to 100% of patients after RE, mostly self-limiting. The incidence of symptomatic REILD varied between 0 and 31%, although in most reports, the incidence was 0-8%, with a lethal outcome in 0-5%. With the exception of bilirubin, the presentation of hepatotoxicity and REILD was similar for cirrhotic and noncirrhotic patients. No uniform definition of REILD was established in the current literature. Here, we propose a unifying definition and grading system for REILD. RE-related hepatotoxicity is a common phenomenon; symptomatic REILD, however, is rare. Currently, reporting of REILD is highly variable, precluding reliable comparison between studies, identification of risk factors, and treatment developments.
Collapse
|
47
|
Yu J, Li D, Lei D, Yuan F, Pei F, Zhang H, Yu A, Wang K, Chen H, Chen L, Wu X, Tong X, Wang Y. Tumor-Specific D-Dimer Concentration Ranges and Influencing Factors: A Cross-Sectional Study. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0165390. [PMID: 27835633 PMCID: PMC5105993 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2016] [Accepted: 09/20/2016] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
D-dimer level in cancer patients is associated with risk of venous thromboembolism and deep venous thrombosis. Most cancer patients have "abnormal" D-dimer levels based on the current normal reference range. To investigate tumor-specific D-dimer reference range, we compared D-dimer levels for nine different tumour types with healthy controls by using simultaneous quantile regression and constructing a median, 5th percentile, and 95th percentile model of normal tumour D-dimer concentration. Associations with tumour primary site, stage, pathological type, and treatment were also explored. Additionally, 190 patients were tracked to reveal the relevance of initial D-dimer levels to cancer prognosis. D-dimer ranges (median, 5th, 95th) in various cancers (mg/L) were: liver 1.12, 0.27, 5.25; pancreatic 0.96, 0.23, 4.81; breast 0.44, 0.2, 2.17; gastric 0.65, 0.22, 5.03; colorectal 0.73, 0.22, 4.45; lung 0.7, 0.25, 4.0; gynaecological 0.61, 0.22, 3.98; oesophageal 0.23, 0.7, 3.45; and head and neck 0.22, 0.44, 2.19. All were significantly higher than that of healthy controls (0.18, 0.07, 0.57). D-dimer peaked 1-2 days postoperatively but had decreased to the normal range by 1 week. Additionally, cancer patients with high initial D-dimer were shown a tendency of poor prognosis in survival rate. In conclusion, D-dimer levels in cancer depend on patient age, tumour primary site, and tumour stage. Thrombosis prevention is necessary if D-dimer has not decreased to the tumor-specific baseline a week after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Yu
- The State Key Laboratory of Virology, College of Life Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China
| | - Dongqing Li
- Department of Microbiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Wuhan University; Wuhan, China
| | - Dansheng Lei
- Department of Laboratory, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Wuhan, China
| | - Feng Yuan
- Department of Laboratory, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Wuhan, China
| | - Feng Pei
- Department of Laboratory, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Wuhan, China
| | - Huifeng Zhang
- Department of Laboratory, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Wuhan, China
| | - Anming Yu
- Stago Diagnosis Company, Wuhan, China
| | - Kun Wang
- Department of Laboratory, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Wuhan, China
| | - Hu Chen
- Department of Laboratory, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Wuhan, China
| | - Liang Chen
- Department of Orthopaedics, Renmin Hospital, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Xianglei Wu
- Laboratory of Immunology, University of Lorraine, Lorraine, France
| | - Xianli Tong
- Department of Laboratory, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Wuhan, China
| | - Yefu Wang
- The State Key Laboratory of Virology, College of Life Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Abraham JA, Yeghiazaryan K, Golubnitschaja O. Selective internal radiation therapy in treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: new concepts of personalization. Per Med 2016; 13:347-360. [PMID: 29749819 DOI: 10.2217/pme-2016-0014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a global health problem, with more than half a million new cases diagnosed annually and mortality rates at similar level. The majority of HCC is diagnosed at intermediate-advanced stages being, therefore, an issue for palliative rather than curative care. Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) is one of the best appropriate palliative treatment modalities in HCC management. Although delivering satisfactory results, SIRT application comes along with frequent complications and tumor recurrence. Recent studies suggest treatment algorithm tailored to the person as improving individual outcomes and reducing treatment-related complications. This review provides insights to implicate innovative concepts of predictive, preventive and personalized medicine in SIRT application to HCC cohorts.
Collapse
|
49
|
[Contralateral hepatic hypertrophy following unilateral yttrium-90 radioembolization : Implications for liver surgery]. Chirurg 2016; 87:380-8. [PMID: 26879820 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-016-0154-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preservation of an adequate future liver remnant (FLR) is the principal limitation to liver surgery in patients with primary or secondary liver malignancies. Hence, methods to increase the volume of the FLR in preparation for liver resection are gaining in importance. OBJECTIVE In addition to the traditional methods for induction of FLR hypertrophy, such as portal vein embolization (PVE) or portal vein ligation (PVL) with or without parenchymal dissection (ALPPS, in situ split), radioembolization (RE) using yttrium-90 microspheres also leads to a volume increase of non-embolized liver parenchyma. This review outlines its potential role as an alternative procedure for induction of liver hypertrophy. MATERIAL AND METHODS Synopsis and critical discussion of the available literature on the mechanisms of induction of liver hypertrophy, the advantages and drawbacks of the traditional methods, and current research on volume changes associated with RE as well as their implications for possible clinical use in preparation for liver surgery. RESULTS Both PVE and PVL can achieve a substantial contralateral volume gain of up to 70 %. The development of contralateral hypertrophy can be accelerated by dissecting the liver parenchyma along the intended plane of resection in addition to PVL (in situ split). Compared to these methods, RE achieves less contralateral liver hypertrophy; however, this effect should not be disregarded as RE provides effective treatment of ipsilateral liver tumors along with induction of hypertrophy and may be associated with a reduced risk of tumor progression compared to PVE and PVL. CONCLUSION The available data suggest that RE can complement the armamentarium of methods for induction of FLR hypertrophy in specific situations. Further studies are needed to establish its definitive role for this indication and are in preparation.
Collapse
|
50
|
Iñarrairaegui M, Sangro B. Radioembolization as an adjunct therapy to the resection of liver tumors. Hepat Oncol 2015; 2:335-338. [PMID: 30191014 PMCID: PMC6095312 DOI: 10.2217/hep.15.23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Mercedes Iñarrairaegui
- Liver Unit at Clinica Universidad de Navarra, CIBEREHD, & Navarra Institute for Health Research, Avda. Pio XII 36, 31008 Pamplona, Spain
| | - Bruno Sangro
- Liver Unit at Clinica Universidad de Navarra, CIBEREHD, & Navarra Institute for Health Research, Avda. Pio XII 36, 31008 Pamplona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|