Permanent immunosuppression in SLA/LP-positive autoimmune hepatitis is required although overall response and survival are similar

The frequency and clinical significance of antibodies to soluble liver antigen/liver pancreas in autoimmune hepatitis: a prospective single-center study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Soluble liver antigen/liver pancreas antibodies (anti-SLA/LP) are specific markers for autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) that have been associated with a distinct clinical phenotype and a more aggressive form of AIH. We prospectively evaluated the frequency and clinical significance of anti-SLA/LP in Turkish patients with AIH.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We prospectively included patients diagnosed with AIH between January 2018 and May 2023. Autoantibodies were detected using by immunofluorescence and immunoblot.

RESULTS

We included 61 (80%, female) AIH patients with a median age of 31 years (15-78) at the time of diagnosis. Anti-SLA/LP was detected in 20% ( n  = 12) of the patients. Baseline characteristics, treatment responses and outcomes were similar among anti-SLA/LP-positive and anti-SLA/LP-negative AIH patients. Anti-SLA/LP-positive patients had significantly higher biochemical response rates after 4 weeks (100 vs. 67%, P  = 0.027), 3 months (100 vs. 39%, P  < 0.001), 6 months (100 vs. 69%, P  = 0.041) of therapy but not after 12 months (100 vs. 76%, P  = 0.103) and at the end of follow-up (100 vs. 91%, P  = 0.328). Relapse rates following treatment response were similar in patients with and without anti-SLA/LP (22 vs. 23%, P  = 0.956). Second-line therapies (tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil) were given to seven (11%) patients, all were anti-SLA/LP-negative. Two of these progressed into end-stage liver disease and both underwent liver transplantation.

CONCLUSION

Our study results suggest that anti-SLA/LP positivity does not entail clinically distinct or severe features in AIH. In our cohort, anti-SLA/LP-positive patients showed a quicker response to immunosuppressive therapy.

Prevalence and significance of antimitochondrial antibodies in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH): Results from a large multicentre study of the International AIH Group

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Antimitochondrial antibodies (AMA) are specific markers for the diagnosis of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) but can also be found occasionally in patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). The present large multicentre cohort study assessed the prevalence and significance of AMA in AIH-patients.

METHODS

123 AMA-positive AIH-patients were investigated and compared with 711 age-matched AMA-negative AIH-patients and 69 patients with AIH/PBC variant.

RESULTS

AMA prevalence in AIH-patients was 5.1% (range: 1.2%-11.8%). AMA-positivity was associated with female sex (p = 0.031) in AMA-positive AIH-patients but not with liver biochemistry, bile duct injury on liver biopsy, disease severity at baseline and response to treatment compared to AMA-negative AIH-patients. Comparing AMA-positive AIH-patients to those with AIH/PBC variant, there was no difference in disease severity. Regarding liver histology, AIH/PBC variant patients were characterized by the presence of at least one feature of bile duct damage (p<0.001). Response to immunosuppressive treatment was similar among groups. From AMA-positive AIH patients only those with evidence of non-specific bile duct injury had higher risk to progress to cirrhosis (HR=4.314, 95%CI: 2.348-7.928; p<0.001). During follow-up, AMA-positive AIH-patients had higher risk to develop histological bile duct injury (HR 4.654, 95%CI 1.829-11.840; p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

AMA presence is relatively common among AIH-patients, but their clinical significance seems important only when they co-exist with non-specific bile duct injury at the histological level. Therefore, a careful evaluation of liver biopsy seems of utmost importance in these patients.

Treatment responses and outcomes in patients with autoimmune hepatitis and concomitant features of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

Background & Aims

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and steatohepatitis (NASH) affect 17-46% of Western countries, making coexistence with other liver diseases inevitable. We investigated the prevalence and clinical significance of NAFLD/NASH or the components of metabolic syndrome (MetS) in a large multicentric cohort of patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH).

Methods

Data from six academic centres (Greece, Canada, Japan, Germany, The Netherlands, and Spain) were evaluated. The presence of NAFLD/NASH in liver biopsy, MetS components, and clinical and laboratory parameters were recorded.

Results

A total of 640 patients (474 females, age 49 [4-87] years; follow-up 78 [1-521] months) were included. NAFLD was present in 146 (22.8%) patients (AIH/non-alcoholic fatty liver [NAFL] 115 [18%], AIH/NASH 31 [4.8%]). AIH/NAFL patients were older (p = 0.017), more frequently overweight or obese (p = 0.002), had hypertension (p = 0.001), and had diabetes (p = 0.016), whereas they less frequently had acute presentation (p = 0.002) and soluble liver antigen/liver pancreas positivity (p <0.05), lower transaminases (p <0.001), ALP (p = 0.028) and IgG (p = 0.004) and higher albumin (p <0.001) than patients with AIH only. Patients with AIH/NASH more frequently had cirrhosis at diagnosis (p = 0.036) and higher IgG (p = 0.009). Response to treatment did not differ between groups. Patients with cirrhosis with AIH/NAFL had higher frequency of decompensation compared with patients with AIH only (p <0.05). Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and dyslipidaemia had increased hazard of disease progression (p <0.05 for each).

Conclusions

The prevalence of NAFLD in AIH is similar to the general population. Concurrence of NASH in patients with AIH signifies a more severe disease, whereas that of NAFL may indicate a worse prognosis in patients with cirrhosis. T2DM and dyslipidaemia in AIH patients are associated with dismal parameters of outcome. Our findings suggest that NAFLD presence or even components of MetS in patients with AIH may affect prognosis, so closer follow-up of such patients is warranted.

Impact and implications

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and steatohepatitis (NASH) affect many people, making coexistence with other liver diseases inevitable. We investigated the prevalence and clinical significance of NAFLD/NASH or the components of metabolic syndrome (MetS) in patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). NAFLD and NASH presence in patients with AIH is as frequent as in the general population. The concurrence of NASH in patients with AIH seems to signify a more severe disease, whereas that of non-alcoholic fatty liver may indicate a worse prognosis in a specific subgroup of patients who already have cirrhosis at diagnosis. Diabetes or dyslipidaemia in patients with AIH were associated with worse prognosis. Therefore, it seems that closer follow-up of patients with concurrent AIH and NAFLD or AIH and components of MetS is needed.

Evaluation of immunoserological detection of anti-liver kidney microsomal, anti-soluble liver antigen and anti-mitochondrial antibodies

Autoantibodies are the diagnostic hallmark of autoimmune liver diseases. Indirect immunofluorescence (IFT) is the reference method for the detection of anti-mitochondrial antibodies (AMA) and anti-liver kidney microsomal type-1 (anti-LKM1) antibodies, and inhibition ELISA (iELISA) for anti-soluble liver antigen (anti-SLA) antibodies. Given the complexity of these techniques, commercial ELISAs have emerged as a practical alternative, but without head-to-head validations. This study evaluated the agreement between three commercial ELISAs and the reference techniques and the impact of polyreactive immunoglobulin G (pIgG), a recently described phenomenon in autoimmune hepatitis, on commercial ELISAs. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using Cohen-Kappa coefficient (κ). Forty-eight, 46, and 66 samples were analyzed for AMA, anti-LKM1, and anti-SLA, respectively. For AMA, one commercial assay showed high agreement (κ = 0.91 (0.78-1.00)) with the reference method, while the other two showed weak or moderate agreement. For anti-LKM1, only one commercial assay showed high agreement (κ = 0.86 (0.71-1.0)). For anti-SLA antibodies only moderate agreement was achieved (κ up to 0.71 (0.52-0.89)). There was a trend towards higher pIgG levels in false-positives in the commercial ELISAs. Patients with high suspicion of autoimmune liver diseases should be referred to reference laboratories with the capacity of performing gold standard methods if the initial ELISA-based screening was performed.

Genetic Variants Determine Treatment Response in Autoimmune Hepatitis

Background: Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a rare entity; in addition, single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) may impact its course and outcome. We investigated liver-related SNPs regarding its activity, as well as in relation to its stage and treatment response in a Central European AIH cohort. Methods: A total of 113 AIH patients (i.e., 30 male/83 female, median 57.9 years) were identified. In 81, genotyping of PNPLA3-rs738409, MBOAT7-rs626238, TM6SF2-rs58542926, and HSD17B13-rs72613567:TA, as well as both biochemical and clinical data at baseline and follow-up, were available. Results: The median time of follow-up was 2.8 years; five patients died and one underwent liver transplantation. The PNPLA3-G/G homozygosity was linked to a worse treatment response when compared to wildtype [wt] (ALT 1.7 vs. 0.6 × ULN, p < 0.001). The MBOAT7-C/C homozygosity was linked to non-response vs. wt and heterozygosity (p = 0.022). Male gender was associated with non-response (OR 14.5, p = 0.012) and a higher prevalence of PNPLA3 (G/G vs. C/G vs. wt 41.9/40.0/15.0% males, p = 0.03). The MBOAT7 wt was linked to less histological fibrosis (p = 0.008), while no effects for other SNPs were noted. A polygenic risk score was utilized comprising all the SNPs and correlated with the treatment response (p = 0.04). Conclusions: Our data suggest that genetic risk variants impact the treatment response of AIH in a gene-dosage-dependent manner. Furthermore, MBOAT7 and PNPLA3 mediated most of the observed effects, the latter explaining, in part, the predisposition of male subjects to worse treatment responses.

Diagnosis and management of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis is an inflammatory disease of the liver of unknown cause that may progress to liver cirrhosis and end stage liver failure if diagnosis is overlooked and treatment delayed. The clinical presentation is often that of acute hepatitis, sometimes very severe; less frequently, it can be insidious or completely asymptomatic. The disease can affect people of any age and is more common in women; its incidence and prevalence seem to be on the rise worldwide. An abnormal immune response targeting liver autoantigens and inducing persistent and self-perpetuating liver inflammation is the pathogenic mechanism of the disease. A specific set of autoantibodies, increased IgG concentrations, and histological demonstration of interface hepatitis and periportal necrosis are the diagnostic hallmarks of autoimmune hepatitis. Prompt response to treatment with corticosteroids and other immunomodulatory drugs is almost universal and supports the diagnosis. The aims of treatment are to induce and maintain long term remission of liver inflammation. Treatment can often even reverse liver fibrosis, thus preventing progression to advanced cirrhosis and its complications. Most patients need lifelong maintenance therapy, and repeated follow-up in experienced hands improves the quality of care and quality of life for affected patients.

Autoimmune serology testing in clinical practice: An updated roadmap for the diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis

Diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is in most cases challenging for clinicians as there is not a single specific laboratory or histological marker to diagnose or exclude the presence of the disease. The clinical spectrum of AIH varies from completely asymptomatic to acute-severe or even rarely fulminant hepatic failure, while everybody can be affected irrespective of age, gender, and ethnicity. The old revised and the newer simplified diagnostic scores have been established by the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group (IAIHG) in 1999 and 2008, respectively, which are based on several clinical, laboratory and histological parameters. Additionally, a thorough differential diagnosis from other diseases mimicking AIH is absolutely indicated. In this context, autoantibodies detection in patients with suspected AIH is mandatory -even though not pathognomonic- not only for AIH diagnosis but furthermore, for AIH classification (AIH-type 1 and AIH-type 2). Although autoimmune serology can be supportive of AIH diagnosis in ≥95% of cases if testing has been performed according to the IAIHG guidelines, this is not the case under real-life circumstances in routine clinical laboratories. Clinicians should be careful both for the importance of the required testing and how to interpret the results and therefore, they should communicate and discuss with the laboratory personnel to achieve the maximum benefit for the patient. Herein, a detailed and updated review of the diagnostic work-up for AIH diagnosis under real-life conditions is given to minimize the underestimation and misdiagnosis of AIH which can result in progression of the disease and unfavourable outcomes.

HLA and Non-HLA gene polymorphisms in autoimmune hepatitis patients of North Indian adults

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic and progressive disease of the liver. This is a multifactorial autoimmune disease with both environmental factors and genetic factors playing a role in its pathogenesis. Certain environmental agents like viruses, drugs, etc., can trigger the disease in a genetically susceptible individual. The present study was aimed to explore the distribution of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DRB1, Protein tyrosine phosphatase non-receptor type 22 (PTPN22) and Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) polymorphisms in North Indian adult AIH patients and their associations with clinical and pathological characteristics associated with the disease. A total of 147 subjects with 47 cases and 100 healthy controls were enrolled. Diagnosis of AIH was made by Revised International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group scoring system. HLA-DRB1 Typing was done by Luminex-based reverse Sequence-Specific Oligonucleotide Probing (SSOP). Single nucleotide variant (SNV) genotyping for CTLA-4 and PTPN22 was done by simple probe-based SNP arrays. Results indicated SLA positive AIH patients are poor responders to therapy. A significant predispositional association of HLA-DRB1*03 was observed in AIH patients from the North Indian population (p= 0.0001, OR=4.83 (2.30-10.15). The frequency of the GG genotype of CTLA-4 CT 60 was significantly increased in AIH patients compared to controls. Multinomial analysis showed that CTLA-4 CT 60 is an independent predictor for cases.

Autoimmune hepatitis and pregnancy: considerations for the clinician

INTRODUCTION

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is an immune mediated inflammatory disease of the liver which affects females of reproductive age. AIH poses unique challenges in pregnancy and historically was associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes.

AREAS COVERED

This report aims to review the current evidence for AIH pregnancy outcomes and the use of medical therapies in pregnancy. The disease course of AIH in pregnancy including loss of biochemical response (LOBR) and hepatic decompensation is also reviewed. The importance of preconception counselling and continued monitoring into the post-partum phase are reinforced.

EXPERT OPINION

The lack of prognostic markers and targeted immunosuppression are some of the areas for future development, as this will aid the move towards individualised risk stratification and personalised care.

First Results From a Propensity Matching Trial of Mycophenolate Mofetil vs. Azathioprine in Treatment-Naive AIH Patients

Background/Aims

As previous real-world studies and meta-analyses have shown that mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) might have better efficacy than azathioprine (AZA) in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), we conducted a propensity matching study to assess the efficacy and safety of MMF vs. AZA.

Methods

All 126 consecutive treatment-naive adult AIH patients, diagnosed and followed in our department since 2016, were included. Patients received prednisolone 0.5-1 mg/kg/day plus either AZA 1-2 mg/kg/day or 1.5-2 g/day MMF. The tapering of prednisolone was identical between groups.

Results

After propensity matching score and adjustment for known factors affecting response to treatment and outcome, 64 patients were included in the study (MMF = 32 and AZA = 32). Rates of non-response, complete biochemical response (CBR) at 6 and 12 months, and prednisolone withdrawal (6 months, 12 months, and end of follow-up) were identical between groups. However, MMF treatment was significantly associated with CBR at the end of follow-up [odds ratio (OR) 11.259; 95% CI: 1.3-97.4, p = 0.028]. AZA patients were more prone to stop treatment due to AZA intolerance/insufficient response (p = 0.0001). At the end of follow-up, the overall efficacy of each schedule was also significantly higher in the MMF group compared to the AZA group (p = 0.0001).

Conclusion

We showed for the first time in a propensity matching study that MMF can be used as first-line therapy in AIH as attested by the significantly higher CBR at end of follow-up compared to AZA. Whether this better efficacy is also associated with higher histological remission rates and sustained CBR off immunosuppression needs further evaluation.

Autoimmune Hepatitis: Serum Autoantibodies in Clinical Practice

Circulating autoantibodies are a key diagnostic tool in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), being positive in 95% of the cases if tested according to dedicated guidelines issued by the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group. They also allow the distinction between type 1 AIH, characterized by positive anti-nuclear and/or anti-smooth muscle antibody, and type 2 AIH, characterized by positive anti-liver kidney microsomal type 1 and/or anti-liver cytosol type 1 antibody. Anti-soluble liver antigen is the only AIH-specific autoantibody, and is found in 20-30% of both type 1 and type 2 AIH. Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody is frequently positive in type 1 AIH, being associated also with inflammatory bowel disease and with primary/autoimmune sclerosing cholangitis. The reference method for autoantibody testing remains indirect immunofluorescence on triple tissue (rodent liver, kidney and stomach), allowing both the detection of the majority of liver-relevant reactivities, including those autoantibodies whose molecular target antigens are unknown. Of note, the current knowledge of the clinical significance of autoantibodies relies on studies based on this technique. However, immunofluorescence requires trained laboratory personnel, is observer-dependent, and lacks standardization, leading to ongoing attempts at replacing this method with automated assays, the sensitivity, and specificity of which, however, require further studies before they can be used as a reliable alternative to immunofluorescence; currently, they may be used as complementary to immunofluorescence.

Pathogenesis of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic progressive liver disease whose etiology and pathogenesis are not yet clear. It is currently believed that the occurrence of AIH is closely related to genetic susceptibility and immune abnormalities, and other factors such as environment, viral infection and drugs that may cause immune dysfunction. This article reviews the pathogenesis of AIH and describes the latest research results in the past 5 years.

Autoimmune hepatitis in patients aged 70 years or older: Disease characteristics, treatment response and outcome

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) affects both sexes and all age groups. However, very few studies have focused specifically on the characteristics and outcome of AIH in patients aged 70 y or older.

METHODS

25/234 patients with well-established AIH and disease onset at ≥70-y (median: 73-y) were analysed and compared to the rest patients (median: 47 y). Treatment response was assessed in all patients from both groups who were eligible for treatment (n = 202).

RESULTS

Disease presentation was mainly insidious in both groups (19/25, 76% vs. 134/209, 64.1%; P = .313). At diagnosis, older patients had lower alaninoaminotrasferase (101[433] vs. 199[441] IU/L, P < .05) but were more frequently cirrhotic (12/25, 48% vs. 57/209, 27.3%; P = .03). Importantly, similar rates of on-treatment response (16/18, 89% vs. 154/184, 84%; P = .565), corticosteroid withdrawal (10/16, 62.5% vs. 113/154, 73.4%; P = .355) and complete withdrawal of immunosuppression (1/16, 6.3% vs. 40/154, 26%; P = .122) were achieved in both groups. Treatment-related adverse events were evenly observed between groups (6/18, 33% vs. 54/184, 29%; P = .724). In treated patients, the age ≥70 y was only associated with the overall mortality (HR 8.3 [95% CI: 2.1-36.4], P = .003), but not with the liver-related mortality (HR 3.4 [95% CI: 0.4-30.0], P = .268).

CONCLUSION

AIH should be seriously considered in patients ≥70 y with unexplained impaired liver function tests as the disease is not infrequent in this group and seems to bear an increased risk for advanced disease stage at diagnosis. However, if immunosuppression is started promptly, it seems as safe and effective as in younger patients.

An update on the pharmacological management of autoimmune hepatitis

Introduction: Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is an immune mediated, inflammatory disease affecting the liver as a result of environmental triggers in susceptible individuals leading to loss of self-tolerance. The immunopathogenesis of AIH is not fully understood, which limits targeted therapeutic options.Areas covered: In this review, the authors provide an overview of current practice in the management of AIH, which include induction therapy with corticosteroids (± thiopurines), followed by maintenance therapy. Lack of early response to treatment may serve as a predictor of those at risk of requiring treatment escalation to second- and third-line agents such as mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), calcineurin inhibitors or biologics. Evidence for third-line agents from small retrospective studies or individual centers are reviewed. The nuances of AIH treatment in pregnancy, overlap syndromes, and drug induced liver injury (DILI) warrant further consideration.Expert opinion: Augmenting the balance of regulatory T cells (Treg) and effector T cells is an appealing therapeutic target with a multitude of agents in development. Many of the challenges in AIH research are due to its rarity and lack of randomized data. Management of AIH should strive towards individualized care through risk stratification and use of the best therapeutic modality for each patient.

Alcoholic liver disease and autoimmune hepatitis: Sometimes a closer look under the surface is needed

AIMS

Differential diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) incorporates various liver diseases, including alcoholic liver disease (ALD). We report on clinical, laboratory and outcome characteristics of AIH patients who were initially referred as ALD based on increased alcohol consumption (AIH/ALD).

METHODS

From 2000-2019, we retrospectively identified 12 AIH/ALD patients [9 males, age: 61 (30-73) years] in our prospective data base of 317 AIH patients.

RESULTS

AIH diagnosis was based on aminotransferases elevation in 10 patients, high IgG in 8, compatible autoantibody profile in all and typical/compatible histology in all 9 with available biopsy. There were no significant differences of baseline demographics, presentation, cirrhosis at diagnosis, response to treatment and simplified score compared to 45 age- and sex-matched AIH patients without alcohol consumption and 44 age- and sex-matched ALD patients. However, the AIH/ALD cohort was characterized by more frequent progression to cirrhosis, higher liver-related deaths and overall mortality compared to AIH, though similar to the ALD group. AST/ALT ratio>1 seems to bear a good positive (0.84) and negative predictive value (0.88) for ALD and AIH diagnosis, respectively, but cannot help in discriminating the AIH/ALD variant.

CONCLUSIONS

AIH should not be forgotten in patients with alcohol use when clinical and laboratory features hint towards the diagnosis of AIH/ALD variant as this group seems to have worse outcome compared to those with AIH alone suggesting the need for closer follow-up and surveillance. Reliable autoantibody testing and cautious interpretation of liver histology appear mandatory for AIH diagnosis in these difficult to diagnose cases.

Clinical characteristics and HLA genotypes in Chinese patients with anti-SLA/LP-positive autoimmune hepatitis

Background

Anti-soluble liver antigen/liver pancreas (anti-SLA/LP) is a highly specific serological marker for the diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). The aim of the present study was to define the clinical characteristics and human leucocyte antigen (HLA) genotypes of Chinese patients with anti-SLA/LP positive AIH.

Methods

Ninety-one AIH patients who were anti-SLA/LP positive were enrolled in this case control study. Clinical information was obtained through reviewing patients’ clinical notes. High-resolution genotyping of HLA-A, B, C, DRB1, and DQB1 alleles was performed by sequence-based typing polymerase chain reaction on 62 of the 91 patients. Data from 500 healthy patients were used as baseline controls.

Results

Anti-SLA/LP-positive AIH patients were characterized as follows: adults (age 20–80 years), female (88%), and frequent anti-nuclear antibody positivity (91%). Genetically, compared with the controls, HLA-B*35:01 and C*08:01 were significantly more frequent in patients. The frequencies of HLA-B*08:01, B*40:02, DRB1*04:01, DRB1*04:05, DRB1*14:01, and DRB1*16:02 increased, and the frequency in DRB1*15:01 decreased in patients, but did not reach significance after Bonferroni’s correction. Patients with other autoimmune diseases had a higher DRB1*04:05 and DQB1*04:01 allele carrier frequency than those without. DRB1*04:05 and DQB1*04:01 alleles were found at increased frequency in patients with decompensated liver disease than those with compensated liver disease.

Conclusions

Chinese anti-SLA/LP-positive AIH patients have some distinct clinical characteristics than other populations reported in the literature. The presence of certain specific HLA alleles could potentially increase the risk of developing anti-SLA/LP-positive AIH or other autoimmune disease and decompensated liver disease in the Chinese population.

NAFLD and autoimmune hepatitis: Do not judge a book by its cover

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common chronic liver disease (almost 25% of the general population). Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a relatively rare liver disease of unknown aetiology characterized by female predominance and large heterogeneity regarding epidemiology, clinical manifestations, genetics, serology and liver pathology. The potential NAFLD/AIH coincidence or an AIH diagnosis alone instead of NAFLD represent a challenge for clinicians, both in making a correct and timely diagnosis but also in the management of these diseases. The diagnosis of both diseases can be challenging as: (a) reliable laboratory tests to confidently diagnose or exclude NAFLD or AIH are missing; (b) physicians and pathologists are much more familiar with a very common disease like NAFLD so, they do not consider an alternative or additional diagnosis; (c) most NAFLD studies do not investigate the patients for all autoantibodies involved in AIH diagnosis, apply the diagnostic scoring systems for AIH or address the possibility of AIH features on liver histology and (d) the recent European and American practice guidelines for NAFLD do not mention clearly the importance of IgG determination and liver autoimmune serology according to the AIH guidelines. Patients with NAFLD/AIH coincidence have significantly more frequently hypertension, diabetes, obesity, older age, lower transaminases, bilirubin and simplified score for AIH diagnosis but no female predominance compared to AIH patients only. The true outcome of NAFLD/AIH patients is practically unknown while their management is quite problematic because official clinical practice guidelines for this condition are missing.