1
|
Mittal R, McKenna K, Keith G, McKenna E, Sinha R, Lemos JRN, Hirani K. Systematic review of translational insights: Neuromodulation in animal models for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0308556. [PMID: 39116099 PMCID: PMC11309513 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2024] [Accepted: 07/23/2024] [Indexed: 08/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (DPN) is a prevalent and debilitating complication of diabetes, affecting a significant proportion of the diabetic population. Neuromodulation, an emerging therapeutic approach, has shown promise in the management of DPN symptoms. This systematic review aims to synthesize and analyze the current advancements in neuromodulation techniques for the treatment of DPN utilizing studies with preclinical animal models. A comprehensive search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Inclusion criteria were focused on studies utilizing preclinical animal models for DPN that investigated the efficacy of various neuromodulation techniques, such as spinal cord stimulation, transcranial magnetic stimulation, and peripheral nerve stimulation. The findings suggest that neuromodulation significantly alleviated pain symptoms associated with DPN. Moreover, some studies reported improvements in nerve conduction velocity and reduction in nerve damage. The mechanisms underlying these effects appeared to involve modulation of pain pathways and enhancement of neurotrophic factors. However, the review also highlights the variability in methodology and stimulation parameters across studies, highlighting the need for standardization in future research. Additionally, while the results are promising, the translation of these findings from animal models to human clinical practice requires careful consideration. This review concludes that neuromodulation presents a potentially effective therapeutic strategy for DPN, but further research is necessary to optimize protocols and understand the underlying molecular mechanisms. It also emphasizes the importance of bridging the gap between preclinical findings and clinical applications to improve the management of DPN in diabetic patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rahul Mittal
- Diabetes Research Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States of America
| | - Keelin McKenna
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, United States of America
| | - Grant Keith
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - Evan McKenna
- Diabetes Research Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States of America
| | - Rahul Sinha
- Diabetes Research Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States of America
| | - Joana R. N. Lemos
- Diabetes Research Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States of America
| | - Khemraj Hirani
- Diabetes Research Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhang S, Chen L, Ladez SR, Seferge A, Liu J, Feng B. Blocking Aδ- and C-fiber neural transmission by sub-kilohertz peripheral nerve stimulation. Front Neurosci 2024; 18:1404903. [PMID: 39077428 PMCID: PMC11284050 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1404903] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 07/02/2024] [Indexed: 07/31/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction We recently showed that sub-kilohertz electrical stimulation of the afferent somata in the dorsal root ganglia (DRG) reversibly blocks afferent transmission. Here, we further investigated whether similar conduction block can be achieved by stimulating the nerve trunk with electrical peripheral nerve stimulation (ePNS). Methods We explored the mechanisms and parameters of conduction block by ePNS via ex vivo single-fiber recordings from two somatic (sciatic and saphenous) and one autonomic (vagal) nerves harvested from mice. Action potentials were evoked on one end of the nerve and recorded on the other end from teased nerve filaments, i.e., single-fiber recordings. ePNS was delivered in the middle of the nerve trunk using a glass suction electrode at frequencies of 5, 10, 50, 100, 500, and 1000 Hz. Results Suprathreshold ePNS reversibly blocks axonal neural transmission of both thinly myelinated Aδ-fiber axons and unmyelinated C-fiber axons. ePNS leads to a progressive decrease in conduction velocity (CV) until transmission blockage, suggesting activity-dependent conduction slowing. The blocking efficiency is dependent on the axonal conduction velocity, with Aδ-fibers efficiently blocked by 50-1000 Hz stimulation and C-fibers blocked by 10-50 Hz. The corresponding NEURON simulation of action potential transmission indicates that the disrupted transmembrane sodium and potassium concentration gradients underly the transmission block by the ePNS. Discussion The current study provides direct evidence of reversible Aδ- and C-fiber transmission blockage by low-frequency (<100 Hz) electrical stimulation of the nerve trunk, a previously overlooked mechanism that can be harnessed to enhance the therapeutic effect of ePNS in treating neurological disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Bin Feng
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chapman KB, Amireh A, van Helmond N, Yousef TA. Evaluation of Washout Periods After Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation Trial. Neuromodulation 2024; 27:881-886. [PMID: 38551547 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2024.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Revised: 02/18/2024] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 07/08/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRG-S) is a novel therapy to treat chronic pain. It has shown efficacy when delivered intermittently, suggesting a delayed washout effect exists. To measure the washout period, and to determine whether there are differences in washout times among different types of treated pain, we measured the time for pain to return at the end of the patients' one-week DRG stimulation trials. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients who completed a successful DRG-S trial were included. The times until 25% (t25) and 90% (t90) of baseline pain level returned were recorded. The patients were divided into neuropathic, nociceptive, and mixed pain groups for subgroup comparison. t25 and t90 were plotted in the entire cohort and subgroups using reverse Kaplan-Meier plots (failure curves) and compared using a log-rank test. RESULTS In total, 29 consecutive patients were included. Median t25 and t90 times were 7.1 and 19.5 hours, respectively. Median (interquartile range) times were longest for the nociceptive pain group (n = 17) and shortest for the neuropathic pain group (n = 6), with the mixed-pain group (n = 6) in between (t25: 7.1 [1.7-19.4], 3.40 [1.4-8.4], and 5.7 [0.8-17.6]; t90, 22.0 [10.7-71.0], 7.6 [3.6-19.8], and 20.9 [14.2-31.2], respectively). t90 times differed significantly by pain type (p = 0.040). CONCLUSIONS This study showed a prolonged washout period after cessation of DRG-S therapy. Washout times vary according to pain type. The observed effects are possibly due to long-term depression of pain signaling and could allow the implementation of alternative stimulation strategies with DRG-S. Further investigations evaluating DRG-S washout times are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth B Chapman
- The Spine & Pain Institute of New York, New York City, NY, USA; Department of Anesthesiology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York City, NY, USA; The Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New York City, NY, USA; Department of Anesthesiology, Pain, and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Ahmad Amireh
- The Spine & Pain Institute of New York, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Noud van Helmond
- The Spine & Pain Institute of New York, New York City, NY, USA; Department of Anesthesiology, Pain, and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Tariq A Yousef
- The Spine & Pain Institute of New York, New York City, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sayed D, Deer TR, Hagedorn JM, Sayed A, D’Souza RS, Lam CM, Khatri N, Hussaini Z, Pritzlaff SG, Abdullah NM, Tieppo Francio V, Falowski SM, Ibrahim YM, Malinowski MN, Budwany RR, Strand NH, Sochacki KM, Shah A, Dunn TM, Nasseri M, Lee DW, Kapural L, Bedder MD, Petersen EA, Amirdelfan K, Schatman ME, Grider JS. A Systematic Guideline by the ASPN Workgroup on the Evidence, Education, and Treatment Algorithm for Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: SWEET. J Pain Res 2024; 17:1461-1501. [PMID: 38633823 PMCID: PMC11022879 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s451006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) is a leading cause of pain and disability globally with a lack of consensus on the appropriate treatment of those suffering from this condition. Recent advancements in both pharmacotherapy and interventional approaches have broadened the treatment options for PDN. There exists a need for a comprehensive guideline for the safe and effective treatment of patients suffering from PDN. Objective The SWEET Guideline was developed to provide clinicians with the most comprehensive guideline for the safe and appropriate treatment of patients suffering from PDN. Methods The American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) identified an educational need for a comprehensive clinical guideline to provide evidence-based recommendations for PDN. A multidisciplinary group of international experts developed the SWEET guideline. The world literature in English was searched using Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, BioMed Central, Web of Science, Google Scholar, PubMed, Current Contents Connect, Meeting Abstracts, and Scopus to identify and compile the evidence for diabetic neuropathy pain treatments (per section as listed in the manuscript) for the treatment of pain. Manuscripts from 2000-present were included in the search process. Results After a comprehensive review and analysis of the available evidence, the ASPN SWEET guideline was able to rate the literature and provide therapy grades for most available treatments for PDN utilizing the United States Preventive Services Task Force criteria. Conclusion The ASPN SWEET Guideline represents the most comprehensive review of the available treatments for PDN and their appropriate and safe utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dawood Sayed
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Timothy Ray Deer
- Pain Services, Spine and Nerve Center of the Virginias, Charleston, WV, USA
| | - Jonathan M Hagedorn
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Asim Sayed
- Podiatry/Surgery, Susan B. Allen Memorial Hospital, El Dorado, KS, USA
| | - Ryan S D’Souza
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Christopher M Lam
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Nasir Khatri
- Interventional Pain Medicine, Novant Spine Specialists, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Zohra Hussaini
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Scott G Pritzlaff
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | | | - Vinicius Tieppo Francio
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | | | - Yussr M Ibrahim
- Pain Medicine, Northern Light Eastern Maine Medical Center, Bangor, ME, USA
| | | | - Ryan R Budwany
- Pain Services, Spine and Nerve Center of the Virginias, Charleston, WV, USA
| | | | - Kamil M Sochacki
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Anuj Shah
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Tyler M Dunn
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Morad Nasseri
- Interventional Pain Medicine / Neurology, Boomerang Healthcare, Walnut Creek, CA, USA
| | - David W Lee
- Pain Management Specialist, Fullerton Orthopedic, Fullerton, CA, USA
| | | | - Marshall David Bedder
- Chief of Pain Medicine Service, Augusta VAMC, Augusta, GA, USA
- Associate Professor and Director, Addiction Medicine Fellowship Program, Department Psychiatry and Health Behavior, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - Erika A Petersen
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Kasra Amirdelfan
- Director of Clinical Research, Boomerang Healthcare, Walnut Creek, CA, USA
| | - Michael E Schatman
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Care & Pain Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Population Health – Division of Medical Ethics, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jay Samuel Grider
- Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bhowmick S, Graham RD, Verma N, Trevathan JK, Franke M, Nieuwoudt S, Fisher LE, Shoffstall AJ, Weber DJ, Ludwig KA, Lempka SF. Computational modeling of dorsal root ganglion stimulation using an Injectrode. J Neural Eng 2024; 21:026039. [PMID: 38502956 PMCID: PMC11007586 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ad357f] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Revised: 02/23/2024] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/21/2024]
Abstract
Objective.Minimally invasive neuromodulation therapies like the Injectrode, which is composed of a tightly wound polymer-coated Platinum/Iridium microcoil, offer a low-risk approach for administering electrical stimulation to the dorsal root ganglion (DRG). This flexible electrode is aimed to conform to the DRG. The stimulation occurs through a transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TES) patch, which subsequently transmits the stimulation to the Injectrode via a subcutaneous metal collector. However, it is important to note that the effectiveness of stimulation through TES relies on the specific geometrical configurations of the Injectrode-collector-patch system. Hence, there is a need to investigate which design parameters influence the activation of targeted neural structures.Approach.We employed a hybrid computational modeling approach to analyze the impact of Injectrode system design parameters on charge delivery and neural response to stimulation. We constructed multiple finite element method models of DRG stimulation, followed by the implementation of multi-compartment models of DRG neurons. By calculating potential distribution during monopolar stimulation, we simulated neural responses using various parameters based on prior acute experiments. Additionally, we developed a canonical monopolar stimulation and full-scale model of bipolar bilateral L5 DRG stimulation, allowing us to investigate how design parameters like Injectrode size and orientation influenced neural activation thresholds.Main results.Our findings were in accordance with acute experimental measurements and indicate that the minimally invasive Injectrode system predominantly engages large-diameter afferents (Aβ-fibers). These activation thresholds were contingent upon the surface area of the Injectrode. As the charge density decreased due to increasing surface area, there was a corresponding expansion in the stimulation amplitude range before triggering any pain-related mechanoreceptor (Aδ-fibers) activity.Significance.The Injectrode demonstrates potential as a viable technology for minimally invasive stimulation of the DRG. Our findings indicate that utilizing a larger surface area Injectrode enhances the therapeutic margin, effectively distinguishing the desired Aβactivation from the undesired Aδ-fiber activation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sauradeep Bhowmick
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America
- Biointerfaces Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America
| | - Robert D Graham
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America
- Biointerfaces Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America
| | - Nishant Verma
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI, United States of America
- Wisconsin Institute for Translational Neuroengineering (WITNe)–Madison, Madison, WI, United States of America
| | - James K Trevathan
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI, United States of America
- Wisconsin Institute for Translational Neuroengineering (WITNe)–Madison, Madison, WI, United States of America
| | | | | | - Lee E Fisher
- Rehab Neural Engineering Labs (RNEL), Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
| | - Andrew J Shoffstall
- Neuronoff Inc., Cleveland, OH, United States of America
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States of America
| | - Douglas J Weber
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
- Neuroscience Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
| | - Kip A Ludwig
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI, United States of America
- Wisconsin Institute for Translational Neuroengineering (WITNe)–Madison, Madison, WI, United States of America
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI, United States of America
| | - Scott F Lempka
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America
- Biointerfaces Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sammartino F, MacDonell J, North RB, Krishna V, Poree L. Disease applications of spinal cord stimulation: Chronic nonmalignant pain. Neurotherapeutics 2024; 21:e00314. [PMID: 38184449 PMCID: PMC11103216 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurot.2023.e00314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2023] [Revised: 12/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Neuropathic pain is a chronic condition representing a significant burden for society. It is estimated 1 out of 10 people over the age of 30 that in the US have been diagnosed with neuropathic pain. Most of the available treatments for neuropathic pain have moderate efficacy over time which limit their use; therefore, other therapeutic approaches are needed for patients. Spinal cord stimulation is an established and cost-effective modality for treating severe chronic pain. In this article we will review the current approved indications for the use of spinal cord stimulation in the US and the novel therapeutic options which are now available using this therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Sammartino
- The Ohio State University, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Columbus OH, USA.
| | | | | | - Vibhor Krishna
- UNC School of Medicine, Department of Neurosurgery, Chapel Hill NC, USA
| | - Lawrence Poree
- University of California San Francisco, Division of Pain Medicine, San Francisco CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zuidema X, de Galan B, Brouwer B, Cohen SP, Eldabe S, Argoff CE, Huygen F, Van Zundert J. 4. Painful diabetic polyneuropathy. Pain Pract 2024; 24:308-320. [PMID: 37859565 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Pain as a symptom of diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN) significantly lowers quality of life, increases mortality and is the main reason for patients with diabetes to seek medical attention. The number of people suffering from painful diabetic polyneuropathy (PDPN) has increased significantly over the past decades. METHODS The literature on the diagnosis and treatment of diabetic polyneuropathy was retrieved and summarized. RESULTS The etiology of PDPN is complex, with primary damage to peripheral nociceptors and altered spinal and supra-spinal modulation. To achieve better patient outcomes, the mode of diagnosis and treatment of PDPN evolves toward more precise pain-phenotyping and genotyping based on patient-specific characteristics, new diagnostic tools, and prior response to pharmacological treatments. According to the Toronto Diabetic Neuropathy Expert Group, a presumptive diagnosis of "probable PDPN" is sufficient to initiate treatment. Proper control of plasma glucose levels, and prevention of risk factors are essential in the treatment of PDPN. Mechanism-based pharmacological treatment should be initiated as early as possible. If symptomatic pharmacologic treatment fails, spinal cord stimulation (SCS) should be considered. In isolated cases, where symptomatic pharmacologic treatment and SCS are unsuccessful or cannot be used, sympathetic lumbar chain neurolysis and/or radiofrequency ablation (SLCN/SLCRF), dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRGs) or posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) may be considered. However, it is recommended that these treatments be applied only in a study setting in a center of expertise. CONCLUSIONS The diagnosis of PDPN evolves toward pheno-and genotyping and treatment should be mechanism-based.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xander Zuidema
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht/Zeist, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Bastiaan de Galan
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- CARIM School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Brigitte Brouwer
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Steven P Cohen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain Medicine Division, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Sam Eldabe
- Department of Pain Medicine and Anesthesiology, Durham University, Durham, UK
| | - Charles E Argoff
- Department of Neurology, New York University School of Medicine, and Pain Management Center, North Shore University Hospital, Manhasset, New York, USA
| | - Frank Huygen
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Van Zundert
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine and Multidisciplinary Pain Center, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Koetsier E, Vacchi E, Maino P, Dukanac J, Melli G, van Kuijk SMJ. Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation in Chronic Painful Polyneuropathy: A Potential Modulator for Small Nerve Fiber Regeneration. Neuromodulation 2023; 26:1772-1780. [PMID: 36192280 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2022.08.455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Revised: 08/02/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Neuromodulatory treatments like spinal cord stimulation and dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRGS) have emerged as effective treatments to relieve pain in painful polyneuropathy. Animal studies have demonstrated that neurostimulation can enhance nerve regeneration. This study aimed to investigate if DRGS may impact intraepidermal nerve fiber regeneration and sensory nerve function. MATERIALS AND METHODS Nine patients with chronic, intractable painful polyneuropathy were recruited. Intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) quantification in 3 mm punch skin biopsy was performed 1 month before DRGS (placed at the level of the L5 and S1 dorsal root ganglion) and after 12- and 24-month follow-up. Quantitative sensory testing, nerve conduction studies, and a clinical scale score were also performed at the same time points. RESULTS In 7 of 9 patients, DRGS was successful (defined as a reduction of ≥ 50% in daytime and/or night-time pain intensity), allowing a definitive implantable pulse generator implantation. The median baseline IENFD among these 7 patients was 1.6 fibers/mm (first and third quartile: 1.2; 4.3) and increased to 2.6 fibers/mm (2.5; 2.9) and 1.9 fibers/mm (1.6; 2.4) at 1- and 2-years follow-up, respectively. These changes were not statistically significant (p = 1.000 and 0.375). Sensory nerve tests did not show substantial changes. CONCLUSIONS Although not significant, the results of this study showed that in most of the patients with implants, there was a slight increase of the IENFD at the 1- and 2-year follow-up. Larger-scale clinical trials are warranted to explore the possible role of DRGS in reversing the progressive neurodegeneration over time. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION The Clinicaltrials.gov registration number for the study is NCT02435004; Swiss National Clinical Trials Portal: SNCTP000001376.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Koetsier
- Pain Management Center, Neurocenter of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Lugano, Switzerland; Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland.
| | - Elena Vacchi
- Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland; Laboratories for Translational Research, Neurocenter of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Paolo Maino
- Pain Management Center, Neurocenter of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Lugano, Switzerland; Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Jasmina Dukanac
- Pain Management Center, Neurocenter of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Giorgia Melli
- Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland; Laboratories for Translational Research, Neurocenter of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Neurology Department, Neurocenter of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Sander M J van Kuijk
- Pain Management Center, Neurocenter of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Lugano, Switzerland; Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Fisher LE, Lempka SF. Neurotechnology for Pain. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2023; 25:387-412. [PMID: 37068766 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-111022-121637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/19/2023]
Abstract
Neurotechnologies for treating pain rely on electrical stimulation of the central or peripheral nervous system to disrupt or block pain signaling and have been commercialized to treat a variety of pain conditions. While their adoption is accelerating, neurotechnologies are still frequently viewed as a last resort, after many other treatment options have been explored. We review the pain conditions commonly treated with electrical stimulation, as well as the specific neurotechnologies used for treating those conditions. We identify barriers to adoption, including a limited understanding of mechanisms of action, inconsistent efficacy across patients, and challenges related to selectivity of stimulation and off-target side effects. We describe design improvements that have recently been implemented, as well as some cutting-edge technologies that may address the limitations of existing neurotechnologies. Addressing these challenges will accelerate adoption and change neurotechnologies from last-line to first-line treatments for people living with chronic pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lee E Fisher
- Rehab Neural Engineering Labs, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA;
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Scott F Lempka
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Biointerfaces Institute, and Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Burkey AR, Chen J, Argoff CE, Edgar DR, Petersen EA. Painful Peripheral Neuropathies of the Lower Limbs and/or Lower Extremities Treated with Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Systematic Review with Narrative Synthesis. J Pain Res 2023; 16:1607-1636. [PMID: 37229154 PMCID: PMC10202826 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s403715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2023] [Accepted: 04/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Painful peripheral neuropathy (PPN) is a debilitating condition with varied etiologies. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is increasingly used when conservative treatments fail to provide adequate pain relief. Few published reviews have examined SCS outcomes in all forms of PPN. Methods We conducted a systematic review of SCS in PPN. The PubMed database was searched up to February 7th, 2022, for peer-reviewed studies of SCS that enrolled PPN patients with pain symptoms in their lower limbs and/or lower extremities. We assessed the quality of randomized controlled trial (RCT) evidence using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Data were tabulated and presented narratively. Results Twenty eligible studies documented SCS treatment in PPN patients, including 10 kHz SCS, traditional low-frequency SCS (t-SCS), dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRGS), and burst SCS. In total, 451 patients received a permanent implant (10 kHz SCS, n=267; t-SCS, n=147; DRGS, n=25; burst SCS, n=12). Approximately 88% of implanted patients had painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN). Overall, we found clinically meaningful pain relief (≥30%) with all SCS modalities. Among the studies, RCTs supported the use of 10 kHz SCS and t-SCS to treat PDN, with 10 kHz SCS providing a higher reduction in pain (76%) than t-SCS (38-55%). Pain relief with 10 kHz SCS and DRGS in other PPN etiologies ranged from 42-81%. In addition, 66-71% of PDN patients and 38% of nondiabetic PPN patients experienced neurological improvement with 10 kHz SCS. Conclusion Our review found clinically meaningful pain relief in PPN patients after SCS treatment. RCT evidence supported the use of 10 kHz SCS and t-SCS in the diabetic neuropathy subpopulation, with more robust pain relief evident with 10 kHz SCS. Outcomes in other PPN etiologies were also promising for 10 kHz SCS. In addition, a majority of PDN patients experienced neurological improvement with 10 kHz SCS, as did a notable subset of nondiabetic PPN patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jeffrey Chen
- UCSD Department of Anesthesiology Center for Pain, University of California San Diego Medical Center, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Erika A Petersen
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Chapman KB, Sayed D, Lamer T, Hunter C, Weisbein J, Patel KV, Dickerson D, Hagedorn JM, Lee DW, Amirdelfan K, Deer T, Chakravarthy K. Best Practices for Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation for Chronic Pain: Guidelines from the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience. J Pain Res 2023; 16:839-879. [PMID: 36942306 PMCID: PMC10024474 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s364370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/14/2023] Open
Abstract
With continued innovations in neuromodulation comes the need for evolving reviews of best practices. Dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRG-S) has significantly improved the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), and it has broad applicability across a wide range of other conditions. Through funding and organizational leadership by the American Society for Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN), this best practices consensus document has been developed for the selection, implantation, and use of DRG stimulation for the treatment of chronic pain syndromes. This document is composed of a comprehensive narrative literature review that has been performed regarding the role of the DRG in chronic pain and the clinical evidence for DRG-S as a treatment for multiple pain etiologies. Best practice recommendations encompass safety management, implantation techniques, and mitigation of the potential complications reported in the literature. Looking to the future of neuromodulation, DRG-S holds promise as a robust intervention for otherwise intractable pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth B Chapman
- The Spine & Pain Institute of New York, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra Northwell, Manhasset, NY, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
- Correspondence: Kenneth B Chapman, NYU Langone Medical Center, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Pain Medicine at Staten Island University Hospital, 1360 Hylan Boulevard, Staten Island, NY, 10305, USA, Email
| | - Dawood Sayed
- Department of Anesthesiology, The University of Kansas Medical Center (KUMC), Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Tim Lamer
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Corey Hunter
- Ainsworth Institute of Pain Management, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Kiran V Patel
- The Spine & Pain Institute of New York, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra Northwell, Manhasset, NY, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - David Dickerson
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL, USA
- Department of Anesthesia & Critical Care, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - David W Lee
- Fullerton Orthopedic Surgery Medical Group, Fullerton, CA, USA
| | | | - Timothy Deer
- The Spine and Nerve Center of the Virginias, Charleston, WV, USA
| | - Krishnan Chakravarthy
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of California San Diego Health Sciences, San Diego, CA, USA
- VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hoelzer BC, Edgar D, Lu SP, Taylor RS. Indirect Comparison of 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) versus Traditional Low-Frequency SCS for the Treatment of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. Biomedicines 2022; 10:2630. [PMID: 36289892 PMCID: PMC9599433 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10102630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2022] [Revised: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is increasingly used to treat painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN). At the time of a recent meta-analysis in this field, data were only available from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of traditional low-frequency SCS (LF-SCS). However, outcomes from high-frequency 10 kHz SCS treatment are now available. Our study aimed to systematically review the contemporary evidence for SCS in patients with lower limb pain due to PDN and include an indirect comparison of the high- and low-frequency modalities. We searched the PubMed/CENTRAL databases up to 18 August 2022, for peer-reviewed RCTs of SCS that enrolled PDN patients with lower limb pain symptoms. The quality of the evidence was assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Using SCS treatment arm data from the RCTs, we indirectly compared the absolute treatment effect of 10 kHz SCS and LF-SCS. Results are presented in tables and forest plots. This systematic review was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. Three RCTs met our eligibility criteria, including the recent 10 kHz SCS RCT (N = 216, 90 implanted) and 2 others that examined LF-SCS (N = 36, 17 implanted; N = 60, 37 implanted). Our analysis of 6-month data found clinically meaningful pain relief with each SCS modality. However, significantly greater pain reduction was identified for 10 kHz SCS over LF-SCS: average pain reduction in the 10 kHz SCS cohort was 73.7% compared with 47.5% in the pooled LF-SCS group (p < 0.0001). In the permanent implant subset, the 50% pain reduction responder rate was 83.3% in the 10 kHz SCS cohort versus 63.0% in the pooled LF-SCS group (p = 0.0072). The overall risk of bias of each included RCT was deemed high, mainly due to the absence of patient blinding. Our analysis indicates that paresthesia-free 10 kHz SCS can provide superior pain relief and responder rate over LF-SCS for managing PDN patients refractory to conventional medical management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryan C. Hoelzer
- Medical Director, Southwest Spine and Pain Center, Provo, UT 84059, USA
| | | | | | - Rod S. Taylor
- MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit & Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, School of Health and Well Being, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK
- Health Service Research, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter EX1 2LU, UK
- National Institute of Public Health, University of South Denmark, 1455 Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Smith S, Normahani P, Lane T, Hohenschurz-Schmidt D, Oliver N, Davies AH. Prevention and Management Strategies for Diabetic Neuropathy. LIFE (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2022; 12:life12081185. [PMID: 36013364 PMCID: PMC9410148 DOI: 10.3390/life12081185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2022] [Revised: 07/17/2022] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Diabetic neuropathy (DN) is a common complication of diabetes that is becoming an increasing concern as the prevalence of diabetes rapidly rises. There are several types of DN, but the most prevalent and studied type is distal symmetrical polyneuropathy, which is the focus of this review and is simply referred to as DN. It can lead to a wide range of sensorimotor and psychosocial symptoms and is a major risk factor for diabetic foot ulceration and Charcot neuropathic osteoarthropathy, which are associated with high rates of lower limb amputation and mortality. The prevention and management of DN are thus critical, and clinical guidelines recommend several strategies for these based on the best available evidence. This article aims to provide a narrative review of DN prevention and management strategies by discussing these guidelines and the evidence that supports them. First, the epidemiology and diverse clinical manifestations of DN are summarized. Then, prevention strategies such as glycemic control, lifestyle modifications and footcare are discussed, as well as the importance of early diagnosis. Finally, neuropathic pain management strategies and promising novel therapies under investigation such as neuromodulation devices and nutraceuticals are reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sasha Smith
- Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London W6 8RF, UK; (S.S.); (P.N.); (T.L.)
- Imperial Vascular Unit, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London W6 8RF, UK
| | - Pasha Normahani
- Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London W6 8RF, UK; (S.S.); (P.N.); (T.L.)
- Imperial Vascular Unit, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London W6 8RF, UK
| | - Tristan Lane
- Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London W6 8RF, UK; (S.S.); (P.N.); (T.L.)
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - David Hohenschurz-Schmidt
- Pain Research Group, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London SW10 9NH, UK;
| | - Nick Oliver
- Section of Metabolic Medicine, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London W2 1PG, UK;
- Division of Medicine and Integrated Care, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London W2 1NY, UK
| | - Alun Huw Davies
- Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London W6 8RF, UK; (S.S.); (P.N.); (T.L.)
- Imperial Vascular Unit, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London W6 8RF, UK
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Smith S, Normahani P, Lane T, Hohenschurz-Schmidt D, Oliver N, Davies AH. Pathogenesis of Distal Symmetrical Polyneuropathy in Diabetes. LIFE (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2022; 12:life12071074. [PMID: 35888162 PMCID: PMC9319251 DOI: 10.3390/life12071074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Revised: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 07/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Distal symmetrical polyneuropathy (DSPN) is a serious complication of diabetes associated with significant disability and mortality. Although more than 50% of people with diabetes develop DSPN, its pathogenesis is still relatively unknown. This lack of understanding has limited the development of novel disease-modifying therapies and left the reasons for failed therapies uncertain, which is critical given that current management strategies often fail to achieve long-term efficacy. In this article, the pathogenesis of DSPN is reviewed, covering pathogenic changes in the peripheral nervous system, microvasculature and central nervous system (CNS). Furthermore, the successes and limitations of current therapies are discussed, and potential therapeutic targets are proposed. Recent findings on its pathogenesis have called the definition of DSPN into question and transformed the disease model, paving the way for new research prospects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sasha Smith
- Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London W6 8RF, UK; (S.S.); (P.N.); (T.L.)
- Imperial Vascular Unit, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London W6 8RF, UK
| | - Pasha Normahani
- Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London W6 8RF, UK; (S.S.); (P.N.); (T.L.)
- Imperial Vascular Unit, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London W6 8RF, UK
| | - Tristan Lane
- Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London W6 8RF, UK; (S.S.); (P.N.); (T.L.)
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - David Hohenschurz-Schmidt
- Pain Research Group, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London SW10 9NH, UK;
| | - Nick Oliver
- Section of Metabolic Medicine, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London W2 1PG, UK;
- Division of Medicine and Integrated Care, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London W2 1NY, UK
| | - Alun Huw Davies
- Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London W6 8RF, UK; (S.S.); (P.N.); (T.L.)
- Imperial Vascular Unit, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London W6 8RF, UK
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
D'Souza RS, Barman R, Joseph A, Abd-Elsayed A. Evidence-Based Treatment of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: a Systematic Review. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2022; 26:583-594. [PMID: 35716275 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-022-01061-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) manifests with pain typically in the distal lower extremities and can be challenging to treat. The authors appraised the literature for evidence on conservative, pharmacological, and neuromodulation treatment options for PDN. RECENT FINDINGS Intensive glycemic control with insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes may be associated with lower odds of distal symmetric polyneuropathy compared to patients who receive conventional insulin therapy. First-line pharmacologic therapy for PDN includes gabapentinoids (pregabalin and gabapentin) and duloxetine. Additional pharmacologic modalities that are approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) but are considered second-line agents include tapentadol and 8% capsaicin patch, although studies have revealed modest treatment effects from these modalities. There is level I evidence on the use of dorsal column spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for treatment of PDN, delivering either a 10-kHz waveform or tonic waveform. In summary, this review provides an overview of treatment options for PDN. Furthermore, it provides updates on the level of evidence for SCS therapy in cases of PDN refractory to conventional medical therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan S D'Souza
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Ross Barman
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Amira Joseph
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Alaa Abd-Elsayed
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hagedorn JM, Engle AM, George TK, Karri J, Abdullah N, Ovrom E, Bocanegra-Becerra JE, D'Souza RS. An overview of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: Diagnosis and treatment advancements. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2022; 188:109928. [PMID: 35580704 DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2022.109928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Revised: 04/12/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Diabetes mellitus remains a public health problem, affecting 422 million people worldwide. Currently, there is no consensus around treating painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy in a step-wise manner. Among the non-pharmacological interventions, neuromodulation has become a promising alternative. Over the past decade, significant clinical trials have paved the way for prompt inclusion of high-frequency spinal cord stimulation within the painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy treatment algorithm. This article aims to provide an updated evidence-based approach for the management of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alyson M Engle
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Jay Karri
- Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Newaj Abdullah
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Erik Ovrom
- Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Ryan S D'Souza
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
A prospective long-term follow-up of dorsal root ganglion stimulation for the management of chronic intractable pain. Pain 2022; 163:702-710. [PMID: 35302973 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2021] [Accepted: 06/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Initial clinical studies have shown that the stimulation of the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) can significantly reduce chronic intractable pain. However, clinical data on long-term results and complications of these systems are limited. The aim of this prospective study is to report on a single center long-term follow-up of DRG stimulation for intractable chronic pain. Participants were implanted with DRG stimulation devices between 2013 and 2015 with an observation period of 24 months. Patients were contacted again in 2020 for a final follow-up (ie, between 5 and 7 years postimplantation). Forty-two participants were recruited, of whom 32 received the fully implantable pulse generator (IPG). At the final follow-up, 50% (16/32) of participants were still using DRG stimulation. Two participants still had the original IPG and 14 had received a replacement IPG. Pain scores were significantly reduced at 24 months, mean difference 1.7 (95% confidence interval: 0.2-3.3, P = 0.03), and at the last follow-up, mean difference 2.1 (95% confidence interval: 0.3-4, P = 0.03). Significant improvements were observed for health-related quality of life. The findings were generally robust to imputation methods of missing data. Implantable pulse generators of 8 patients were explanted because of dissatisfaction with pain relief. In conclusion, DRG stimulation can provide effective pain relief and improved quality of life in patients suffering with neuropathic pain, although this study had a revision rate of 42% within the first 24 months, and 56% of IPGs that were replaced because of battery depletion had a shorter than expected battery life.
Collapse
|
18
|
Staudt MD, Prabhala T, Sheldon BL, Quaranta N, Zakher M, Bhullar R, Pilitsis JG, Argoff CE. Current Strategies for the Management of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2022; 16:341-352. [PMID: 32856490 PMCID: PMC8861791 DOI: 10.1177/1932296820951829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
The development of painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) is a common complication of chronic diabetes that can be associated with significant disability and healthcare costs. Prompt symptom identification and aggressive glycemic control is essential in controlling the development of neuropathic complications; however, adequate pain relief remains challenging and there are considerable unmet needs in this patient population. Although guidelines have been established regarding the pharmacological management of PDN, pain control is inadequate or refractory in a high proportion of patients. Pharmacotherapy with anticonvulsants (pregabalin, gabapentin) and antidepressants (duloxetine) are common first-line agents. The use of oral opioids is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality and can also lead to opioid-induced hyperalgesia. Their use is therefore discouraged. There is an emerging role for neuromodulation treatment modalities including intrathecal drug delivery, spinal cord stimulation, and dorsal root ganglion stimulation. Furthermore, consideration of holistic alternative therapies such as yoga and acupuncture may augment a multidisciplinary treatment approach. This aim of this review is to focus on the current management strategies for the treatment of PDN, with a discussion of treatment rationale and practical considerations for their implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael D Staudt
- Department of Neurosurgery, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Tarun Prabhala
- Department of Neuroscience and Experimental Therapeutics, Albany Medical College, Albany NY, USA
| | - Breanna L Sheldon
- Department of Neuroscience and Experimental Therapeutics, Albany Medical College, Albany NY, USA
| | - Nicholas Quaranta
- Department of Anesthesiology, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Michael Zakher
- Department of Anesthesiology, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Ravneet Bhullar
- Department of Anesthesiology, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Julie G Pilitsis
- Department of Neurosurgery, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA
- Department of Neuroscience and Experimental Therapeutics, Albany Medical College, Albany NY, USA
| | - Charles E Argoff
- Department of Neurology, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Strand NH, Burkey AR. Neuromodulation in the Treatment of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: A Review of Evidence for Spinal Cord Stimulation. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2022; 16:332-340. [PMID: 34842478 PMCID: PMC8861784 DOI: 10.1177/19322968211060075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neuropathies, the most common complication of diabetes, manifest in various forms, including entrapments, mononeuropathies or, most frequently, a distal symmetric polyneuropathy. Painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) in the classic "stocking" distribution is a disease of increasing prevalence worldwide and a condition for which standard medical treatment only provides modest relief. Neuromodulation offers a potential alternative to pharmacotherapies given its demonstrated efficacy in other refractory chronic neuropathic pain syndromes. High-quality evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is available in these other settings for two approaches to spinal cord stimulation (SCS): (1) conventional low-frequency SCS (LF-SCS), which modulates axonal activity in the dorsal column and is paresthesia-dependent, and (2) high-frequency SCS delivered at 10 kilohertz (10 kHz SCS), which targets neurons in the superficial dorsal horn and is paresthesia-independent. METHOD This review examines the evidence for SCS from published RCTs as well as prospective studies exploring the safety and effectiveness of treating PDN with neuromodulation. RESULTS Two RCTs enrolling 60 and 36 participants with PDN showed treatment with LF-SCS reduced daytime pain by 45% to 55% for up to two years. An RCT testing 10 kHz SCS versus conventional medical management (CMM) in 216 participants with PDN revealed 76% mean pain relief after six months of stimulation. None of the studies revealed unexpected safety issues in the use of neuromodulation in this patient population. CONCLUSION These well-designed RCTs address the unmet need for improved PDN therapies and provide data on the safety, effectiveness, and durability of SCS therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie H. Strand
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department
of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Natalie H. Strand, MD, Division of Pain
Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 E. Mayo Blvd,
Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
| | - Adam R. Burkey
- Chair of Pain Section, American Academy
of Neurology, Minneapolis, MI, USA
- Anesis Spine & Pain Care, Renton,
WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
D'Souza RS, Langford B, Dombovy-Johnson M, Abd-Elsayed A. Neuromodulation Interventions for the Treatment of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: a Systematic Review. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2022; 26:365-377. [PMID: 35226258 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-022-01035-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) is a prevalent and debilitating condition, characterized by severe burning, tingling, and lancinating pain usually located in the distal lower extremities. In addition to manifesting with severe pain, PDN may also be associated with poor quality of life and sleep, mood disorders, burns, falls, and social withdrawal. The authors appraised the current body of literature for evidence on neuromodulation interventions for PDN. RECENT FINDINGS In patients with refractory PDN unresponsive to conventional medical management (glucose optimization and oral analgesic medications), there is level I evidence supporting the use of 10-kHz and tonic dorsal column spinal cord stimulation (SCS). Included studies reported significant associations between 10-kHz and tonic dorsal column SCS and superior analgesic outcomes, physical functioning, and patient satisfaction. Current level of evidence remains limited for other modalities of neuromodulation for PDN including burst SCS (level II-3), dorsal root ganglion SCS (level III), and peripheral nerve stimulation (level II-3). Some studies reported improvements in neurological physical examination, sensory testing, and/or reflex testing in patients undergoing 10-kHz SCS for treatment of PDN. In summary, the purpose of this review is to equip provider with important updates on the use of neuromodulation interventions for the treatment of PDN that is refractory to conventional medical therapy, with current level I evidence supporting use of 10-kHz and tonic SCS for PDN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan S D'Souza
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Brendan Langford
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Alaa Abd-Elsayed
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Graham RD, Sankarasubramanian V, Lempka SF. Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation for Chronic Pain: Hypothesized Mechanisms of Action. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2022; 23:196-211. [PMID: 34425252 PMCID: PMC8943693 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2021.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Revised: 06/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/20/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRGS) is a neuromodulation therapy for chronic pain that is refractory to conventional medical management. Currently, the mechanisms of action of DRGS-induced pain relief are unknown, precluding both our understanding of why DRGS fails to provide pain relief to some patients and the design of neurostimulation technologies that directly target these mechanisms to maximize pain relief in all patients. Due to the heterogeneity of sensory neurons in the dorsal root ganglion (DRG), the analgesic mechanisms could be attributed to the modulation of one or many cell types within the DRG and the numerous brain regions that process sensory information. Here, we summarize the leading hypotheses of the mechanisms of DRGS-induced analgesia, and propose areas of future study that will be vital to improving the clinical implementation of DRGS. PERSPECTIVE: This article synthesizes the evidence supporting the current hypotheses of the mechanisms of action of DRGS for chronic pain and suggests avenues for future interdisciplinary research which will be critical to fully elucidate the analgesic mechanisms of the therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert D. Graham
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States,Biointerfaces Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States
| | - Vishwanath Sankarasubramanian
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States,Biointerfaces Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States
| | - Scott F. Lempka
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States,Biointerfaces Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States,Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States,Corresponding author: Scott F. Lempka, PhD, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Road, NCRC 14-184, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2800,
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Xu L, Sun Z, Casserly E, Nasr C, Cheng J, Xu J. Advances in Interventional Therapies for Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: A Systematic Review. Anesth Analg 2022; 134:1215-1228. [PMID: 35051958 DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000005860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) is one of the major complications of diabetes mellitus. It is often debilitating and refractory to pharmaceutical therapies. Our goal was to systematically review and evaluate the strength of evidence of interventional management options for PDN and make evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice. METHODS We searched PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Llibrary and systematically reviewed all types of clinical studies on interventional management modalities for PDN. RESULTS We identified and analyzed 10 relevant randomized clinical trials (RCTs), 8 systematic reviews/meta-analyses, and 5 observational studies of interventional modalities for PDN using pain as primary outcome. We assessed the risk of bias in grading of evidence and found that there is moderate to strong evidence to support the use of dorsal column spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in treating PDN in the lower extremities (evidence level: 1B+), while studies investigating its efficacy in the upper extremities are lacking. Evidence exists that acupuncture and injection of botulinum toxin-A provide relief in pain or muscle cramps due to PDN with minimal side effects (2B+/1B+). Similar level of evidence supports surgical decompression of lower limb peripheral nerves in patients with intractable PDN and superimposed nerve compression (2B±/1B+). Evidence for sympathetic blocks or neurolysis and dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation is limited to case series (2C+). CONCLUSIONS Moderate to strong evidence exists to support the use of SCS in managing lower extremity pain in patients who have failed conventional medical management for PDN. Acupuncture or injection of botulinum toxin-A can be considered as an adjunctive therapy for PDN. Surgical decompression of peripheral nerves may be considered in patients with PDN superimposed with nerve compression. High-quality studies are warranted to further evaluate the safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of interventional therapies for PDN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Xu
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Zhuo Sun
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia
| | | | | | - Jianguo Cheng
- Department of Pain Management, Anesthesiology Institute.,Department of Neuroscience, Lerner Research Institute
| | - Jijun Xu
- Department of Pain Management, Anesthesiology Institute.,Inflammation and Immunity, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.,Department of Anesthesiology, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Sloan G, Alam U, Selvarajah D, Tesfaye S. The Treatment of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy. Curr Diabetes Rev 2022; 18:e070721194556. [PMID: 34238163 DOI: 10.2174/1573399817666210707112413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2020] [Revised: 02/18/2021] [Accepted: 03/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (painful-DPN) is a highly prevalent and disabling condition, affecting up to one-third of patients with diabetes. This condition can have a profound impact resulting in a poor quality of life, disruption of employment, impaired sleep, and poor mental health with an excess of depression and anxiety. The management of painful-DPN poses a great challenge. Unfortunately, currently there are no Food and Drug Administration (USA) approved disease-modifying treatments for diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) as trials of putative pathogenetic treatments have failed at phase 3 clinical trial stage. Therefore, the focus of managing painful- DPN other than improving glycaemic control and cardiovascular risk factor modification is treating symptoms. The recommended treatments based on expert international consensus for painful- DPN have remained essentially unchanged for the last decade. Both the serotonin re-uptake inhibitor (SNRI) duloxetine and α2δ ligand pregabalin have the most robust evidence for treating painful-DPN. The weak opioids (e.g. tapentadol and tramadol, both of which have an SNRI effect), tricyclic antidepressants such as amitriptyline and α2δ ligand gabapentin are also widely recommended and prescribed agents. Opioids (except tramadol and tapentadol), should be prescribed with caution in view of the lack of definitive data surrounding efficacy, concerns surrounding addiction and adverse events. Recently, emerging therapies have gained local licenses, including the α2δ ligand mirogabalin (Japan) and the high dose 8% capsaicin patch (FDA and Europe). The management of refractory painful-DPN is difficult; specialist pain services may offer off-label therapies (e.g. botulinum toxin, intravenous lidocaine and spinal cord stimulation), although there is limited clinical trial evidence supporting their use. Additionally, despite combination therapy being commonly used clinically, there is little evidence supporting this practise. There is a need for further clinical trials to assess novel therapeutic agents, optimal combination therapy and existing agents to determine which are the most effective for the treatment of painful-DPN. This article reviews the evidence for the treatment of painful-DPN, including emerging treatment strategies such as novel compounds and stratification of patients according to individual characteristics (e.g. pain phenotype, neuroimaging and genotype) to improve treatment responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gordon Sloan
- Diabetes Research Unit, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Uazman Alam
- Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine and the Pain Research Institute, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, and Liverpool University Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
- Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Gastroenterology, Institute of Human Development, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Dinesh Selvarajah
- Diabetes Research Unit, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
- Department of Oncology and Human Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Solomon Tesfaye
- Diabetes Research Unit, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
D'Souza RS, Kubrova E, Her YF, Barman RA, Smith BJ, Alvarez GM, West TE, Abd-Elsayed A. Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation for Lower Extremity Neuropathic Pain Syndromes: An Evidence-Based Literature Review. Adv Ther 2022; 39:4440-4473. [PMID: 35994195 PMCID: PMC9464732 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-022-02244-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2022] [Accepted: 06/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
Dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRG-S) is a form of selective neuromodulation therapy that targets the dorsal root ganglion. DRG-S offers analgesia in a variety of chronic pain conditions and is approved for treatment of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). There has been increasing utilization of DRG-S to treat various neuropathic pain syndromes of the lower extremity, although evidence remains limited to one randomized controlled trial and 39 observational studies. In this review, we appraised the current evidence for DRG-S in the treatment of lower extremity neuropathic pain using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) criteria. The primary outcome was change in pain intensity after DRG-S compared to baseline. We stratified presentation of results based of type of neuropathy (CRPS, painful diabetic neuropathy, mononeuropathy, polyneuropathy) as well as location of neuropathy (hip, knee, foot). Future powered randomized controlled trials with homogeneous participants are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan S D'Souza
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Eva Kubrova
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Yeng F Her
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Ross A Barman
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Brandon J Smith
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Gabriel M Alvarez
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Tyler E West
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Alaa Abd-Elsayed
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Olmsted ZT, Hadanny A, Marchese AM, DiMarzio M, Khazen O, Argoff C, Sukul V, Pilitsis JG. Recommendations for Neuromodulation in Diabetic Neuropathic Pain. FRONTIERS IN PAIN RESEARCH 2021; 2:726308. [PMID: 35295414 PMCID: PMC8915647 DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2021.726308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2021] [Accepted: 07/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Over 50% of the 34 million people who suffer from diabetes mellitus (DM) are affected by diabetic neuropathy. Painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) impacts 40–50% of that group (8.5 million patients) and is associated with a significant source of disability and economic burden. Though new neuromodulation options have been successful in recent clinical trials (NCT03228420), still there are many barriers that restrict patients from access to these therapies. We seek to examine our tertiary care center (Albany Medical Center, NY, USA) experience with PDN management by leveraging our clinical database to assess patient referral patterns and utilization of neuromodulation. We identified all patients with a diagnosis of diabetes type 1 (CODE: E10.xx) or diabetes type 2 (CODE: E11.xx) AND neuralgia/neuropathic pain (CODE: M79.2) or neuropathy (CODE: G90.09) or chronic pain (CODE: G89.4) or limb pain (CODE: M79.6) OR diabetic neuropathy (CODE: E11.4) who saw endocrinology, neurology, and/or neurosurgery from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2019. We then determined which patients had received pain medications and/or neuromodulation to divide the cohort into three groups: no treatment, conservative treatment, and neuromodulation treatment. The cohorts were compared with chi-square or one-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons to analyze the differences. A total of 2,635 PDN patients were identified, of which 700 received no treatment for PDN, 1,906 received medication(s), and 29 received neuromodulation (intrathecal therapy, spinal cord stimulation, or dorsal root ganglion stimulation). The patients who received pain medications for PDN visited neurology more often than the pain specialists. Of the patients that received neuromodulation, 24 had seen neurology, 6 neurology pain, and 3 anesthesia pain. They averaged 2.78 pain medications prior to implant. Approximately 41% of the patients in the conservative management group were prescribed three or more medications. Of the 1,935 treated patients, only 1.5% of the patients received neuromodulation. The patients on three or more pain medications without symptomatic relief may be potential candidates for neuromodulation. An opportunity, therefore, exists to educate providers on the benefits of neuromodulation procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary T. Olmsted
- Department of Neuroscience and Experimental Therapeutics, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, United States
| | - Amir Hadanny
- Department of Neurosurgery, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, United States
| | - Anthony M. Marchese
- Department of Neuroscience and Experimental Therapeutics, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, United States
| | - Marisa DiMarzio
- Department of Neuroscience and Experimental Therapeutics, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, United States
| | - Olga Khazen
- Department of Neuroscience and Experimental Therapeutics, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, United States
| | - Charles Argoff
- Department of Neurology, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, United States
| | - Vishad Sukul
- Department of Neurosurgery, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, United States
| | - Julie G. Pilitsis
- Department of Neuroscience and Experimental Therapeutics, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, United States
- *Correspondence: Julie G. Pilitsis
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Moman RN, Peterson AA, Maher DP, Eli I, Hagedorn JM, Bendel MA, Gerberi D, Murad MH, Hooten WM. Infectious Complications of Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis of Incidence. Neuromodulation 2021; 25:956-964. [PMID: 34096135 DOI: 10.1111/ner.13473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2021] [Revised: 04/16/2021] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRGS) is a newer form of neuromodulation that targets the dorsal root ganglion. DRGS has superior efficacy in complex regional pain syndrome compared to spinal cord stimulation (SCS) and may have efficacy in other forms of chronic pain. While decades of safety data are available for SCS, there is less available safety information for DRGS. The objectives of this systematic review and pooled analysis of incidence are to determine the overall incidence of DRGS infections, incidence at each stage (trial vs. implant vs. revision), infection characteristics, and outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS A comprehensive search of databases from January 1980 to January 2021 was conducted. RESULTS Ten studies met inclusion criteria. Eight studies reported patients with trial data (n = 291), ten studies reported patients with implant data (n = 250), and seven studies reported data with revisions (n = 26). The pooled incidence of trial infections was 1.03% (95% CI 0.35-2.99%), implant infections was 4.80% (95% CI 2.77-8.20%), revision infections was 3.85% (95% CI 0.20-21.59%), and overall infections was 2.82% (95% CI 1.62-4.54%). There was a statistically significant difference in infection rates between the trial, implant, and revision stages, X2 (2, N = 567) = 8.9839, p = 0.01. CONCLUSIONS This is the first systematic review and pooled analysis that followed PRISMA guidelines to report infectious complications of DRGS by stage (trial vs. implant vs. revision). DRGS trial appears to be low risk for infection but that risk is significantly increased with DRGS implant. Our findings highlight the need for further study of infectious complications, their risks, and optimal prophylaxis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rajat N Moman
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Ashley A Peterson
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Dermot P Maher
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ilhan Eli
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jonathan M Hagedorn
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Markus A Bendel
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - M Hassan Murad
- Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - W Michael Hooten
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Nagpal A, Clements N, Duszynski B, Boies B. The Effectiveness of Dorsal Root Ganglion Neurostimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Pelvic Pain and Chronic Neuropathic Pain of the Lower Extremity: A Comprehensive Review of the Published Data. PAIN MEDICINE 2021; 22:49-59. [PMID: 33260203 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnaa369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effectiveness of dorsal root ganglion neurostimulation for the treatment of refractory, focal pain in the pelvis and lower extremities. DESIGN Systematic review. OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was ≥50% pain relief. Secondary outcomes were physical function, mood, quality of life, opioid usage, and complications. RESULTS One pragmatic randomized controlled trial, four prospective cohort studies, and eight case series met the inclusion criteria. A worst-case scenario analysis from the randomized controlled trial reported ≥50% pain relief in 74% of patients with dorsal root ganglion neurostimulation vs. 51% of patients who experienced at least 50% relief with spinal cord stimulation at 3 months. Cohort data success rates ranged from 43% to 83% at ≤6 months and 27% to 100% at >6 months. Significant improvements were also reported in the secondary outcomes assessed, including mood, quality of life, opioid usage, and health care utilization, though a lack of available quantitative data limits further statistical analysis. Complication rates vary, though the only randomized controlled trial reported a higher rate of adverse events than that seen with traditional neurostimulation. CONCLUSIONS In accordance with the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system, low-quality evidence supports dorsal root ganglion neurostimulation as a more effective treatment than traditional neurostimulation for pain and dysfunction associated with complex regional pain syndrome or causalgia. Very low-quality evidence supports dorsal root ganglion neurostimulation for the treatment of chronic pelvic pain, chronic neuropathic groin pain, phantom limb pain, chronic neuropathic pain of the trunk and/or limbs, and diabetic neuropathy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ameet Nagpal
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Nathan Clements
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | | | - Brian Boies
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Spinal cord stimulation in chronic neuropathic pain: mechanisms of action, new locations, new paradigms. Pain 2021; 161 Suppl 1:S104-S113. [PMID: 33090743 PMCID: PMC7434213 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
29
|
Stelter B, Karri J, Marathe A, Abd-Elsayed A. Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation for the Treatment of Non-Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Related Chronic Pain Syndromes: A Systematic Review. Neuromodulation 2021; 24:622-633. [PMID: 33501749 DOI: 10.1111/ner.13361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2020] [Revised: 12/08/2020] [Accepted: 12/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While the majority of indications and approvals for dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRGS) are for the refractory management of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), emerging evidence has suggested that DRGS may be favorably used for a plethora of other chronic pain phenomena. Consequently, we aimed to characterize the use and efficacy of DRGS for these non-CRPS-related chronic pain syndromes. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic review of clinical studies demonstrating the use of DRGS for non-CRPS-related chronic pain syndromes. The literature search was performed using PubMed, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL plus across August and September 2020. RESULTS A total of 28 reports comprising 354 total patients were included in the analysis. Of the chronic pain syndromes presented, axial low back pain, chronic pelvic and groin pain, other peripheral neuropathies, and studies with multiple concomitant pain syndromes, a majority demonstrated >50% mean pain reduction at the time of last follow-up following DRGS. Physical function, quality of life (QOL), and lesser pain medication usage also were repeatedly reported to be significantly improved. CONCLUSIONS DRGS continues to lack supportive evidence from well designed, high level studies and recommendations from consensus committee experts. However, we present repeated and consistent evidence from lower level studies showing success with the use of DRGS for various non-CRPS chronic pain syndromes in reducing pain along with increasing function and QOL from one week to three years. Due to such low-level, high bias evidence, we strongly encourage the continuation of high-level studies in order to provide a stronger foundation for the use of DRGS in non-CRPS chronic pain patients. However, it may be reasonable and appropriate to evaluate patients for DRGS candidacy on a case-by-case basis particularly if they manifest focal pain syndromes refractory to noninterventional measures and may not be ideal candidates for other forms of neuromodulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bradly Stelter
- Department of Anesthesia, Division of Pain Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Jay Karri
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Anuj Marathe
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Alaa Abd-Elsayed
- Department of Anesthesia, Division of Pain Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Koetsier E, van Kuijk SMJ, Melli G, Dukanac J, Barbero M, van Zundert J, Joosten EA, Maino P. Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation for the Management of Intractable Painful Polyneuropathy: A Prospective Pilot Study. Neuromodulation 2020; 24:685-694. [PMID: 33340192 DOI: 10.1111/ner.13336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2020] [Revised: 09/22/2020] [Accepted: 10/19/2020] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRGS) is a promising neurostimulation modality in the treatment of painful polyneuropathy. The aim of this prospective pilot study was to investigate the effect of DRGS on pain intensity in patients with intractable painful polyneuropathy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Nine patients with chronic, intractable painful polyneuropathy in the lower limbs were recruited. In each subject, between two and four DRGS leads were placed at the level of the L5 and S1 dorsal root ganglion. If trial stimulation was successful, a definitive implantable pulse generator (IPG) was implanted. Pain intensity was scored using an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) and reported as median and interquartile range (IQR), and compared to baseline values using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Additionally, patients' global impression of change (PGIC), pain extent, presence of neuropathic pain, physical functioning, quality of life, and mood were assessed. RESULTS Eight out of nine patients had a successful trial phase, of which seven received an IPG. Daytime pain decreased from a median (IQR) NRS score of 7.0 (5.9-8.3) to 2.0 (1.0-3.5) and 3.0 (1.6-4.9) in the first week and at six months after implantation, respectively. Similar effects were observed for night time and peak pain scores. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study suggest that DRGS significantly reduces both pain intensity and PGIC in patients with intractable painful polyneuropathy in the lower extremities. Large-scale clinical trials are needed to prove the efficacy of DRGS in intractable painful polyneuropathy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Koetsier
- Pain Management Center, Neurocenter of Southern Switzerland, Lugano, Switzerland.,Division of Anaesthesiology, Department of Acute Medicine, Regional Hospital of Lugano, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Sander M J van Kuijk
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Giorgia Melli
- Laboratory for Biomedical Neurosciences, Neurocenter of Southern Switzerland, Torricella-Taverne, Switzerland.,Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland.,Neurology Department, Neurocenter of Southern Switzerland, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Jasmina Dukanac
- Pain Management Center, Neurocenter of Southern Switzerland, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Marco Barbero
- Pain Management Center, Neurocenter of Southern Switzerland, Lugano, Switzerland.,Rehabilitation Research Laboratory 2rLab, Department of Business Economics, Health and Social Care, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland, Landquart, Manno/Landquart, Switzerland
| | - Jan van Zundert
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Anesthesiology and Multidisciplinary Pain Centre, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk/Lanaken, Belgium
| | - Elbert A Joosten
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Translational Neuroscience, School of Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Paolo Maino
- Pain Management Center, Neurocenter of Southern Switzerland, Lugano, Switzerland.,Division of Anaesthesiology, Department of Acute Medicine, Regional Hospital of Lugano, Lugano, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Sindt JE, Larsen SD, Dalley AP, Collier WH, Brogan SE. The Rate of Infectious Complications After Intrathecal Drug Delivery System Implant for Cancer-Related Pain Is Low Despite Frequent Concurrent Anticancer Treatment or Leukopenia. Anesth Analg 2020; 131:280-287. [PMID: 31990731 DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000004639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The efficacy of intrathecal drug delivery (IDD) for cancer-related pain is well established. Cancer therapies are often associated with immunosuppression and increased risk of infection, and the rate of infection after intrathecal drug delivery system (IDDS) implant in cancer patients has been reported as 2.4%-6.3%. Our objective is to report on the rate of surgical site infections (SSI) in patients implanted with IDDS for cancer-related pain and to provide a data-driven discussion on the relationship between antineoplastic treatment, leukopenia, and other clinical or demographic characteristics and SSI. METHODS Following local institutional review board approval, we conducted a retrospective chart review of IDDS implants from May 2014 through December 2018. Data collected included demographic data, health status, prophylactic antibiotic administration, surgery duration, presence of leukopenia (white blood cell [WBC] count of <4.0 K/µL) or moderate neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count [ANC] of <1000/μL) within the 30 days before IDDS implant, and details of antineoplastic treatment or systemic corticosteroid use in the perioperative period. This information was assessed in relation to SSI incidence up to 6 months following implant. RESULTS Two hundred seventeen IDDS implants were identified. A majority of patients (79.3%) received ≥1 form of antineoplastic therapy within 30 days before or after implant, and 42.4% received multiple forms of antineoplastic therapy. Therapies included chemotherapy in 46.5%, immunotherapy in 28.6%, systemic steroids in 32.3%, and radiation therapy in 28.1%. One-quarter of patients (25.8%) were leukopenic within 30 days before implant, with 3.2% having moderate neutropenia. There were 2 infectious complications representing an infection rate of 0.9% (95% CI, 0.1%-3.3%), with limited shared characteristics between those experiencing SSI. CONCLUSIONS SSI risk after IDDS placement for cancer pain is low, despite frequent concurrent antineoplastic therapy and leukopenia in the perioperative period. Concomitant cancer therapies should not be a barrier to the implementation of IDD for cancer pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jill E Sindt
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.,Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Steven D Larsen
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | | | - Willem H Collier
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Shane E Brogan
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.,Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Raghu ALB, Parker T, Aziz TZ, Green AL, Hadjipavlou G, Rea R, FitzGerald JJ. Invasive Electrical Neuromodulation for the Treatment of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Neuromodulation 2020; 24:13-21. [PMID: 32588933 DOI: 10.1111/ner.13216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2020] [Revised: 04/27/2020] [Accepted: 05/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Neuromodulation is a treatment option for people suffering from painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) unresponsive to conventional pharmacotherapy. We systematically examined the pain outcomes of patients with PDN receiving any type of invasive neuromodulation for treatment of neuropathic pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS MEDLINE and Embase were searched through 10 January 2020, without language restriction. All study types were included. Two reviewers independently screened publications and extracted data. Quantitative meta-analysis was performed with pain scores converted to a standard 100-point scale. Randomized controlled trial (RCT) scores were pooled using the inverse variance method and expressed as mean differences. RESULTS RCTs of tonic spinal cord stimulation (t-SCS) showed greater pain improvement than best medical therapy at six months (intention-to-treat: 38/100, 95% CI: 29-47). By per-protocol analysis, case series of t-SCS and dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRGS) showed improvement by 56 (95% CI: 39-73) and 55 (22-87), respectively, at 12 months. For t-SCS, the rate of failing a therapeutic stimulation trial was 16%, the risk of infection was 4%, and the rate of lead problems requiring surgery to resolve was 4% per year of follow-up. High-frequency SCS and burst SCS both showed efficacy, with few patients studied. CONCLUSION Efficacious, lasting and safe surgical pain management options are available to diabetic patients suffering from PDN. Tonic-SCS is the established standard of treatment; however, other SCS paradigms and DRGS are emerging as promising treatments offering comparable pain benefits, but with few cases published to date. Randomized controlled trials are ongoing to assess their relative merits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley L B Raghu
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Tariq Parker
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Tipu Z Aziz
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,Department of Neurosurgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Alexander L Green
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,Department of Neurosurgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - George Hadjipavlou
- Nuffield Department of Anaesthesia, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Rustam Rea
- Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - James J FitzGerald
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,Department of Neurosurgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Graham RD, Bruns TM, Duan B, Lempka SF. The Effect of Clinically Controllable Factors on Neural Activation During Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation. Neuromodulation 2020; 24:655-671. [PMID: 32583523 DOI: 10.1111/ner.13211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2020] [Revised: 05/08/2020] [Accepted: 05/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRGS) is an effective therapy for chronic pain, though its mechanisms of action are unknown. Currently, we do not understand how clinically controllable parameters (e.g., electrode position, stimulus pulse width) affect the direct neural response to DRGS. Therefore, the goal of this study was to utilize a computational modeling approach to characterize how varying clinically controllable parameters changed neural activation profiles during DRGS. MATERIALS AND METHODS We coupled a finite element model of a human L5 DRG to multicompartment models of primary sensory neurons (i.e., Aα-, Aβ-, Aδ-, and C-neurons). We calculated the stimulation amplitudes necessary to elicit one or more action potentials in each neuron, and examined how neural activation profiles were affected by varying clinically controllable parameters. RESULTS In general, DRGS predominantly activated large myelinated Aα- and Aβ-neurons. Shifting the electrode more than 2 mm away from the ganglion abolished most DRGS-induced neural activation. Increasing the stimulus pulse width to 500 μs or greater increased the number of activated Aδ-neurons, while shorter pulse widths typically only activated Aα- and Aβ-neurons. Placing a cathode near a nerve root, or an anode near the ganglion body, maximized Aβ-mechanoreceptor activation. Guarded active contact configurations did not activate more Aβ-mechanoreceptors than conventional bipolar configurations. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that DRGS applied with stimulation parameters within typical clinical ranges predominantly activates Aβ-mechanoreceptors. In general, varying clinically controllable parameters affects the number of Aβ-mechanoreceptors activated, although longer pulse widths can increase Aδ-neuron activation. Our data support several Neuromodulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee guidelines on the clinical implementation of DRGS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert D Graham
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Biointerfaces Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Tim M Bruns
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Biointerfaces Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Bo Duan
- Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Scott F Lempka
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Biointerfaces Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Horan M, Jacobsen AH, Scherer C, Rosenlund C, Gulisano HA, Søe M, Sørensen JCH, Meier K, Blichfeldt-Eckhardt MR. Complications and Effects of Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation in the Treatment of Chronic Neuropathic Pain: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Denmark. Neuromodulation 2020; 24:729-737. [PMID: 32539189 DOI: 10.1111/ner.13171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2019] [Revised: 04/03/2020] [Accepted: 04/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation is a novel treatment of chronic neuropathic pain and has been shown to be efficacious across several case reports and randomized trials. However, long-term follow-up is limited, as are reports of complication rates. This study presents efficacy and complications for patients treated with DRG stimulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed an observational, multicenter cohort study of all patients in Denmark implanted with FDA-approved DRG stimulation systems to treat chronic, neuropathic pain between 2014 and 2018. Follow-up period was one to three years. RESULTS Forty-three patients underwent trial DRG stimulation; 33 were subsequently fully implanted. Pain location: 58% lower extremity; 21% upper extremity; 21% thoracic/abdominal. At the end of the observation period, 58% of fully implanted patients were still implanted; 42% had fully functional systems. In these patients, average Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)-score of pain was reduced from 6.8 to 3.5 (p = 0.00049) and worst NRS-score was reduced from 8.6 to 6.0 (p = 0.0039) at 12 months follow-up. Pain Catastrophizing Score was reduced from 32 to 15 (p = 0.0039). Thirteen patients experienced complications related to defect leads (39% of implanted systems). In four patients (12%), lead removal left fragments in the root canal due to lead fracture, and three patients suffered permanent nerve damage during attempts to replace broken leads. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests a significant, clinically relevant effect of DRG stimulation on neuropathic pain, but also demonstrates substantial problems with maintenance and revision of currently available systems. Consequently, treatment with equipment marketed specifically for DRG stimulation is currently paused in Denmark.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mattias Horan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | | | - Christian Scherer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | | | | | - Morten Søe
- Department of Neurosurgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | | | - Kaare Meier
- Department of Neurosurgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Morten Rune Blichfeldt-Eckhardt
- Department of Neurosurgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Esposito MF, Malayil R, Hanes M, Deer T. Unique Characteristics of the Dorsal Root Ganglion as a Target for Neuromodulation. PAIN MEDICINE 2020; 20:S23-S30. [PMID: 31152179 PMCID: PMC6544557 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnz012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 114] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Objective The dorsal root ganglion (DRG) is a novel target for neuromodulation, and DRG stimulation is proving to be a viable option in the treatment of chronic intractable neuropathic pain. Although the overall principle of conventional spinal cord stimulation (SCS) and DRG stimulation—in which an electric field is applied to a neural target with the intent of affecting neural pathways to decrease pain perception—is similar, there are significant differences in the anatomy and physiology of the DRG that make it an ideal target for neuromodulation and may account for the superior outcomes observed in the treatment of certain chronic neuropathic pain states. This review highlights the anatomy of the DRG, its function in maintaining homeostasis and its role in neuropathic pain, and the unique value of DRG as a target in neuromodulation for pain. Methods A narrative literature review was performed. Results Overall, the DRG is a critical structure in sensory transduction and modulation, including pain transmission and the maintenance of persistent neuropathic pain states. Unique characteristics including selective somatic organization, specialized membrane characteristics, and accessible and consistent location make the DRG an ideal target for neuromodulation. Because DRG stimulation directly recruits the somata of primary sensory neurons and harnesses the filtering capacity of the pseudounipolar neural architecture, it is differentiated from SCS, peripheral nerve stimulation, and other neuromodulation options. Conclusions There are several advantages to targeting the DRG, including lower energy usage, more focused and posture-independent stimulation, reduced paresthesia, and improved clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rudy Malayil
- St. Mary's Pain Relief Specialists, Huntington, West Virginia
| | | | - Timothy Deer
- The Spine and Nerve Center of the Virginias, Charleston, West Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Franken G, Debets J, Joosten EAJ. Nonlinear Relation Between Burst Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation Amplitude and Behavioral Outcome in an Experimental Model of Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy. Neuromodulation 2019; 23:158-166. [PMID: 31738474 PMCID: PMC7065114 DOI: 10.1111/ner.13070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2019] [Revised: 09/25/2019] [Accepted: 10/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Background and objective Dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRGS) has recently emerged as a neuromodulation modality in the treatment of chronic neuropathic pain. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of different Burst‐DRGS amplitudes in an experimental model of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (PDPN). Methods Diabetes mellitus was induced in female Sprague–Dawley rats by intraperitoneal injection of streptozotocin (STZ, n = 28). Animals were tested for mechanical hypersensitivity (von Frey paw withdrawal test) before, and four weeks after STZ injection. PDPN rats (n = 13) were implanted with a unilateral bipolar electrode at the L5 DRG. Animals received Burst‐DRGS at 0%, 10%, 33%, 50%, 66%, and 80% of motor threshold (MT) in a randomized crossover design on post‐implantation days 2–7 (n = 9). Mechanical hypersensitivity was assessed before stimulation onset, 15 and 30 min during stimulation, and 15 and 30 min after stimulation. Results Burst‐DRGS at amplitudes of 33%, 50%, 66%, and 80% MT resulted in significant attenuation of STZ‐induced mechanical hypersensitivity at 15 and 30 min during stimulation, as well as 15 min after cessation of stimulation. No effect on mechanical hypersensitivity was observed for Burst‐DRGS at 0% MT and 10% MT. Optimal pain relief and highest responder rates were achieved with Burst‐DRGS at 50–66% MT, with an estimated optimum at 52% MT. Conclusion Our findings indicate a nonlinear relationship between Burst‐DRGS amplitude and behavioral outcome, with an estimated optimal amplitude of 52% MT. Further optimization and analysis of DRGS driven by insights into the underlying mechanisms related to the various stimulation paradigms is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Glenn Franken
- Pain Management and Research Centre, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, MUMC, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jacques Debets
- Muroidean Facility, School of Cardiovascular Diseases, CARIM, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Elbert A J Joosten
- Pain Management and Research Centre, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, MUMC, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Koetsier E, Franken G, Debets J, van Kuijk SMJ, Linderoth B, Joosten EA, Maino P. Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation in Experimental Painful Diabetic Polyneuropathy: Delayed Wash-Out of Pain Relief After Low-Frequency (1Hz) Stimulation. Neuromodulation 2019; 23:177-184. [PMID: 31524325 DOI: 10.1111/ner.13048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2019] [Revised: 07/24/2019] [Accepted: 08/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Up until now there is little data about the pain relieving effect of different frequency settings in DRGS. The aim of this study was to compare the pain relieving effect of DRGS at low-, mid-, and high-frequencies and Sham-DRGS in an animal model of painful diabetic neuropathy (PDPN). MATERIAL AND METHODS Diabetes mellitus was induced by an intraperitoneal injection of streptozotocin in 8-week-old female Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 24; glucose ≥15 mmol/L: n = 20; mechanical hypersensitivity: n = 15). Five weeks later, a DRGS device was implanted at the L5 DRG. Ten animals were included for stimulation, alternating 30 minutes of low (1 Hz)-, mid (20 Hz)-, and high (1000 Hz)-frequencies and Sham-DRGS during four days, with a pulse width of 0.2 msec (average amplitude: 0.19 ± 0.01 mA), using a randomized cross-over design. The effect on mechanical hypersensitivity of the hind paw to von Frey filaments was evaluated. RESULTS All DRGS frequencies resulted in a complete reversal of mechanical hypersensitivity and "a clinically relevant reduction" was achieved in 70-80% of animals. No significant differences in maximal pain relieving effect were found between the different frequency treatments (p = 0.24). Animals stimulated at 1000 and 20 Hz returned to baseline mechanical hypersensitivity values 15 and 30 min after stimulation cessation, respectively, while animals stimulated at 1 Hz did not. CONCLUSIONS These results show that DRGS is equally effective when applied at low-, mid-, and high-frequency in an animal model of PDPN. However, low-frequency-(1 Hz)-DRGS resulted in a delayed wash-out effect, which suggests that this is the most optimal frequency for pain therapy in PDPN as compared to mid- and high-frequency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Koetsier
- Pain Management Center, Neurocenter of Southern Switzerland, Regional Hospital of Lugano, Lugano, Switzerland.,Division of Anaesthesiology, Department of Acute Medicine, Regional Hospital of Lugano, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Glenn Franken
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Translational Neuroscience, School of Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jacques Debets
- Muroidean Facility, School of Cardiovascular Diseases (CARIM), Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Sander M J van Kuijk
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Bengt Linderoth
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Elbert A Joosten
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Translational Neuroscience, School of Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Paolo Maino
- Pain Management Center, Neurocenter of Southern Switzerland, Regional Hospital of Lugano, Lugano, Switzerland.,Division of Anaesthesiology, Department of Acute Medicine, Regional Hospital of Lugano, Lugano, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Koetsier E, Franken G, Debets J, Heijmans L, van Kuijk SMJ, Linderoth B, Joosten EA, Maino P. Mechanism of dorsal root ganglion stimulation for pain relief in painful diabetic polyneuropathy is not dependent on GABA release in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord. CNS Neurosci Ther 2019; 26:136-143. [PMID: 31334605 PMCID: PMC6930820 DOI: 10.1111/cns.13192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2019] [Revised: 06/17/2019] [Accepted: 06/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS It is hypothesized that dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRGS), sharing some of the mechanisms of traditional spinal cord stimulation (SCS) of the dorsal columns, induces γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) release from interneurons in the spinal dorsal horn. METHODS We used quantitative immunohistochemical analysis in order to investigate the effect of DRGS on intensity of intracellular GABA-staining levels in the L4-L6 spinal dorsal horn of painful diabetic polyneuropathy (PDPN) animals. To establish the maximal pain relieving effect, we tested for mechanical hypersensitivity to von Frey filaments and animals received 30 minutes of DRGS at day 3 after implantation of the electrode. One day later, 4 Sham-DRGS animals and four responders-to-DRGS received again 30 minutes of DRGS and were perfused at the peak of DRGS-induced pain relief. RESULTS No significant difference in GABA-immunoreactivity was observed between DRGS and Sham-DRGS in lamina 1-3 of the spinal levels L4-6 neither ipsilaterally nor contralaterally. CONCLUSIONS Dorsal root ganglion stimulation does not induce GABA release from the spinal dorsal horn cells, suggesting that the mechanisms underlying DRGS in pain relief are different from those of conventional SCS. The modulation of a GABA-mediated "Gate Control" in the DRG itself, functioning as a prime Gate of nociception, is suggested and discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Koetsier
- Pain Management Center, Neurocenter of Southern Switzerland, Regional Hospital of Lugano, Lugano, Switzerland.,Division of Anaesthesiology, Department of Acute Medicine, Regional Hospital of Lugano, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Glenn Franken
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Translational Neuroscience, School of Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), University of Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jacques Debets
- Muroidean Facility, School of Cardiovascular Diseases (CARIM), Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Lonne Heijmans
- Department of Translational Neuroscience, School of Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), University of Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Sander M J van Kuijk
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Bengt Linderoth
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Elbert A Joosten
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Translational Neuroscience, School of Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), University of Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Paolo Maino
- Pain Management Center, Neurocenter of Southern Switzerland, Regional Hospital of Lugano, Lugano, Switzerland.,Division of Anaesthesiology, Department of Acute Medicine, Regional Hospital of Lugano, Lugano, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Viswanath O, Urits I, Bouley E, Peck JM, Thompson W, Kaye AD. Evolving Spinal Cord Stimulation Technologies and Clinical Implications in Chronic Pain Management. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2019; 23:39. [DOI: 10.1007/s11916-019-0778-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
40
|
Graham RD, Bruns TM, Duan B, Lempka SF. Dorsal root ganglion stimulation for chronic pain modulates Aβ-fiber activity but not C-fiber activity: A computational modeling study. Clin Neurophysiol 2019; 130:941-951. [PMID: 30981900 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.02.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2018] [Revised: 01/23/2019] [Accepted: 02/16/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The goal of this project was to use computational models to investigate which types of primary sensory neurons are modulated by dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRGS) to provide pain relief. METHODS We modeled DRGS by coupling an anatomical finite element model of a human L5 dorsal root ganglion to biophysical models of primary sensory neurons. We calculated the stimulation amplitude needed to elicit an action potential in each neuron, and examined how DRGS affected sensory neuron activity. RESULTS We showed that within clinical ranges of stimulation parameters, DRGS drives the activity of large myelinated Aβ-fibers but does not directly activate small nonmyelinated C-fibers. We also showed that the position of the active and return electrodes and the polarity of the stimulus pulse influence neural activation. CONCLUSIONS Our results indicate that DRGS may provide pain relief by activating pain-gating mechanisms in the dorsal horn via repeated activation of large myelinated afferents. SIGNIFICANCE Understanding the mechanisms of action of DRGS-induced pain relief may lead to innovations in stimulation technologies that improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert D Graham
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Biointerfaces Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Tim M Bruns
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Biointerfaces Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Bo Duan
- Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Scott F Lempka
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Biointerfaces Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Deer T, Pope J, Hunter C, Falowski S, Kapural L, Kramer J, Levy R. Safety Analysis of Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation in the Treatment of Chronic Pain. Neuromodulation 2019; 23:239-244. [PMID: 30861617 PMCID: PMC7065079 DOI: 10.1111/ner.12941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2018] [Accepted: 02/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Background Stimulation of the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) in the treatment of chronic, intractable pain has shown excellent clinical results in multiple published studies, including a large prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Both safety and efficacy have been demonstrated utilizing this therapeutic approach for many chronic complaints. Continued assessment of neuromodulation therapies, such as DRG stimulation, are not only an important aspect of vigilant care, but are also necessary for the evaluation for safety. Materials and Methods Safety and complaint records for DRG and spinal cord stimulation (SCS) stimulation were obtained from the manufacturer, analyzed and compiled to further assess ongoing device safety. Complaint event data were stratified according to complain type as well as overall rates. Data from similar time periods were compared between epidural neurostimulation devices by the same manufacturer as well as rates reported in the literature. Results Overall, DRG stimulation device event rates were lower or comparable to similar epidurally placed neurostimulation devices. Rates of events varied from 0 to 1.0% for DRG stimulation (n >500+ implants) which was similar to the event rate for SCS by the same manufacturer (n >2000+ implants). In comparison, complaints and adverse events ranged from 0 to 14% for SCS in the literature. Discussions The current results from a large consecutive cohort obtained from manufacturer records indicates that DRG stimulation demonstrates an excellent safety profile. Reported event rates are similar to previously reported adverse event and complaint rates in the literature for this therapy. Similarly, safety events rates were lower or similar to previously reported rates for SCS, further demonstrating the comparative safety of this neuromodulation technique for chronic pain treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy Deer
- The Spine and Nerve Center of The Virginias, Charleston, WV, USA
| | - Jason Pope
- Evolve Restorative Center, Santa Rosa, CA, USA
| | - Corey Hunter
- Ainsworth Institute of Pain Management, New York, NY, USA
| | - Steven Falowski
- Functional Neurosurgery, Neurosurgical Associates of Lancaster, Lancaster, PA, USA
| | | | | | - Robert Levy
- University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA.,Institute for Neuromodulation, Boca Raton, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Koetsier E, Franken G, Debets J, van Kuijk SMJ, Perez RSGM, Linderoth B, Joosten EAJ, Maino P. Effectiveness of dorsal root ganglion stimulation and dorsal column spinal cord stimulation in a model of experimental painful diabetic polyneuropathy. CNS Neurosci Ther 2019; 25:367-374. [PMID: 30246327 PMCID: PMC6488890 DOI: 10.1111/cns.13065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2018] [Revised: 07/31/2018] [Accepted: 08/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS Conventional dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRGS) is known to achieve better pain-paresthesia overlap of difficult-to-reach areas like the feet compared to dorsal column spinal cord stimulation (SCS). As in painful diabetic polyneuropathy (PDPN) pain is mostly present in the feet, we hypothesized that DRGS is more effective in relieving pain in PDPN when compared to SCS. METHODS Diabetes was induced in female Sprague-Dawley rats with an intraperitoneal injection of 65 mg/kg of streptozotocin (STZ; n = 48). Rats with a significant decrease in mechanical paw withdrawal response to von Frey filaments 4 weeks after injection were implanted with DRGS electrodes (n = 18). Rats were assigned to DRGS (n = 11) or sham-DRGS (n = 7). Mechanical paw withdrawal thresholds (WT, measured in grams) in response to DRGS (50 Hz, 0.18 ± 0.05 mA) were assessed with von Frey testing. The results of the experiments on these animals were compared to the results of a previous study using exactly the same model on PDPN animals selected for SCS (n = 8) (40-50 Hz, 0.19 ± 0.01 mA) and sham-SCS (n = 3). RESULTS In the SCS group, the log10 (10 000 × 50% WT) increased from 4910 to 5211 at t = 15 minutes (P < 0.05) and 5264 at t = 30 minutes (P = 0.11). In the DRGS group, the log10 (10,000 × 50% WT) increased from 4376 to 4809 at t = 15 minutes (P < 0.01) and 5042 at t = 30 minutes (P < 0.01). Both DRGS and SCS induced a similar and complete reversal of mechanical hypersensitivity. After cessation of stimulation (t = 60), the return of the log10 (10 000 × 50% WT) response was significantly faster with DRGS than that of SCS (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS We conclude that conventional DRGS is as effective as SCS in reduction of PDPN-associated mechanical hypersensitivity in STZ-induced diabetic rats. The wash-in effect of DRGS and SCS was similar, but DRGS showed a faster washout course. Long-term efficacy should be studied in future animal research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Koetsier
- Pain Management Center, Neurocenter of Southern SwitzerlandRegional Hospital of LuganoLuganoSwitzerland
| | - Glenn Franken
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain ManagementMaastricht University Medical CenterMaastrichtThe Netherlands
- Department of Translational Neuroscience, School of Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS)University of MaastrichtMaastrichtThe Netherlands
| | - Jacques Debets
- Muroidean Facility, School of Cardiovascular Diseases (CARIM)MaastrichtThe Netherlands
| | - Sander M. J. van Kuijk
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology AssessmentMaastricht University Medical CenterMaastrichtThe Netherlands
| | - Roberto S. G. M. Perez
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain ManagementVU University Medical CenterAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Bengt Linderoth
- Department of Clinical NeuroscienceKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| | - Elbert A. J. Joosten
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain ManagementMaastricht University Medical CenterMaastrichtThe Netherlands
- Department of Translational Neuroscience, School of Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS)University of MaastrichtMaastrichtThe Netherlands
| | - Paolo Maino
- Pain Management Center, Neurocenter of Southern SwitzerlandRegional Hospital of LuganoLuganoSwitzerland
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Vuka I, Marciuš T, Došenović S, Ferhatović Hamzić L, Vučić K, Sapunar D, Puljak L. Neuromodulation with electrical field stimulation of dorsal root ganglion in various pain syndromes: a systematic review with focus on participant selection. J Pain Res 2019; 12:803-830. [PMID: 30881093 PMCID: PMC6398970 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s168814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective We conducted a systematic review about patient selection, efficacy, and safety of neuromodulation with electrical field stimulation (EFS) of dorsal root ganglion (DRG) in various painful conditions. We also analyzed conclusion statements as well as conflict of interest and financing of the included studies. Methods All study designs were eligible for inclusion. We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, and clinical trial registries until September 7, 2018. We assessed risk of bias by using Cochrane tool for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Results Among the 29 included studies, only one was RCT, majority being case series and case reports. The evidence is based on studies with small number of participants (median: 6, range 1–152) with various painful conditions. Neuromodulation with EFS of DRG was mostly performed in participants who have failed other treatment modalities. Most of the authors of the included studies reported positive, but inconclusive, evidence regarding efficacy of neuro-modulation with EFS of DRG. Meta-analysis was not possible since only one RCT was included. Conclusion Available evidence suggest that neuromodulation with EFS of DRG may help highly selected participants with various pain syndromes, who have failed to achieve adequate pain relief with other pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions. However, these findings should be confirmed in high-quality RCTs with sufficient numbers of participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivana Vuka
- Laboratory for Pain Research, University of Split School of Medicine, 21000 Split, Croatia
| | - Tihana Marciuš
- Laboratory for Pain Research, University of Split School of Medicine, 21000 Split, Croatia
| | - Svjetlana Došenović
- Department of Anesthesiology, Reanimatology and Intensive Care, University Hospital Split, 21000 Split, Croatia
| | - Lejla Ferhatović Hamzić
- Department for Proteomics, Center for Translational and Clinical Research, University of Zagreb School of Medicine, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Katarina Vučić
- Department for Safety and Efficacy Assessment of Medicinal Products, Agency for Medicinal Products and Medical Devices, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Damir Sapunar
- Laboratory for Pain Research, University of Split School of Medicine, 21000 Split, Croatia.,Center for Evidence-Based Medicine and Health Care, Catholic University of Croatia, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia,
| | - Livia Puljak
- Center for Evidence-Based Medicine and Health Care, Catholic University of Croatia, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia,
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Ho KWD, Rempe T, Jerath N, Antony A. Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation as a Potentially Effective Treatment for Painful Hereditary and Idiopathic Axonal Polyneuropathy: A Retrospective Case Series. Neuromodulation 2019; 23:234-238. [DOI: 10.1111/ner.12924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2018] [Revised: 12/05/2018] [Accepted: 01/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Torge Rempe
- Department of NeurologyUniversity of Florida Gainesville FL USA
| | - Nivedita Jerath
- Department of NeurologyUniversity of Florida Gainesville FL USA
| | - Ajay Antony
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain MedicineUniversity of Florida Gainesville FL USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Franken G, Debets J, Joosten EAJ. Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation in Experimental Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: Burst vs. Conventional Stimulation Paradigm. Neuromodulation 2018; 22:943-950. [PMID: 30570187 PMCID: PMC7027839 DOI: 10.1111/ner.12908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2018] [Revised: 10/26/2018] [Accepted: 11/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Objectives Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (PDPN) is a long‐term complication of diabetes mellitus (DM). Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation (DRGS) has recently emerged as a neuromodulation modality in the treatment of chronic neuropathic pain. The objective of this study was to compare the effect of burst DRGS (Burst‐DRGS) and conventional DRGS (Con‐DRGS) in an experimental model of PDPN. Materials and Methods DM was induced in female Sprague–Dawley rats by intraperitoneal injection of streptozotocin (STZ, n = 48). Animals were tested for mechanical hypersensitivity (50% hind paw withdrawal threshold on Von Frey test) before, and 4 weeks after STZ injection. PDPN rats were then implanted with a unilateral bipolar lead at the L5 DRG (n = 22) and were stimulated for 30 min at days 2 and 3 postimplantation. Animals received Con‐DRGS and Burst‐DRGS in a randomized crossover design (n = 10), or received Sham‐DRGS (n = 7) for 30 min, and were tested for mechanical hypersensitivity at baseline, 15 and 30 min during DRGS, and 15 and 30 min following DRGS. Five animals were withdrawn from the study due to electrode‐related technical problems. Results Con‐DRGS and Burst‐DRGS normalized STZ‐induced mechanical hypersensitivity at 15 and 30 min during stimulation. A significant difference in terms of mechanical hypersensitivity was observed between both of the stimulated groups and the Sham‐DRGS group at 15 and 30 min during stimulation. Interestingly, Burst‐DRGS showed signs of a residual effect at 15 min after cessation of stimulation, while this was not the case for Con‐DRGS. Conclusions Under the conditions tested, Con‐DRGS and Burst‐DRGS are equally effective in attenuating STZ‐induced mechanical hypersensitivity in an animal model of PDPN. Burst‐DRGS showed signs of a residual effect at 15 min after cessation of stimulation, which requires further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Glenn Franken
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Pain Management and Research Centre, MUMC, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jacques Debets
- Muroidean Facility, School of Cardiovascular Diseases (CARIM), Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Elbert A J Joosten
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Pain Management and Research Centre, MUMC, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Morgalla MH, de Barros Filho MF, Chander BS, Soekadar SR, Tatagiba M, Lepski G. Neurophysiological Effects of Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation (DRGS) in Pain Processing at the Cortical Level. Neuromodulation 2018; 22:36-43. [PMID: 30561852 DOI: 10.1111/ner.12900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2018] [Revised: 10/25/2018] [Accepted: 10/25/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRGS) has been used successfully against localized neuropathic pain. Nevertheless, the effects of DRGS on pain processing, particularly at the cortical level, remain largely unknown. In this study, we investigated whether positive responses to DRGS treatment would alter patients' laser-evoked potentials (LEP). METHODS We prospectively enrolled 12 adult patients with unilateral localized neuropathic pain in the lower limbs or inguinal region and followed them up for six months. LEPs were assessed at baseline, after one month of DRGS, and after six months of DRGS. Clinical assessment included the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), SF-36, and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). For each patient, LEP amplitudes and latencies of the N2 and P2 components on the deafferented side were measured and compared to those of the healthy side and correlated with pain intensity, as measured with the NRS. RESULTS At the one- and six-month follow-ups, N2-P2 amplitudes were significantly greater and NRS scores were significantly lower compared with baseline (all p's < 0.01). There was a negative correlation between LEP amplitudes and NRS scores (rs = -0.31, p < 0.10). CONCLUSIONS DRGS is able to restore LEPs to normal values in patients with localized neuropathic pain, and LEP alterations are correlated with clinical response in terms of pain intensity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marcos Fortunato de Barros Filho
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.,Applied Neurotechnology Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.,Division of Functional Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Bankim Subhash Chander
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.,Applied Neurotechnology Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Surjo Raphael Soekadar
- Applied Neurotechnology Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.,Clinical Neurotechnology Laboratory, Neuroscience Research Center (NWFZ) & Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marcos Tatagiba
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Guilherme Lepski
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.,Division of Functional Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Yu T, Li L, Liu H, Li H, Liu Z, Li Z. KCNQ2/3/5 channels in dorsal root ganglion neurons can be therapeutic targets of neuropathic pain in diabetic rats. Mol Pain 2018; 14:1744806918793229. [PMID: 30027794 PMCID: PMC6088482 DOI: 10.1177/1744806918793229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Diabetic neuropathic pain is poorly controlled by analgesics, and the precise molecular mechanisms underlying hyperalgesia remain unclear. The KCNQ2/3/5 channels expressed in dorsal root ganglion neurons are important in pain transmission. The expression and activity of KCNQ2/3/5 channels in dorsal root ganglion neurons in rats with diabetic neuropathic pain were investigated in this study. Methods The mRNA levels of KCNQ2/3/5 channels were analyzed by real-time polymerase chain reaction. The protein levels of KCNQ2/3/5 channels were evaluated by Western blot assay. KCNQ2/3/5 channel expression in situ in dorsal root ganglion neurons was detected by double fluorescent labeling technique. M current (IM) density and neuronal excitability were determined by whole-cell voltage and current clamp recordings. Mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia were assessed by von Frey filaments and plantar analgesia tester, respectively. Results The mRNA and protein levels of KCNQ2/3/5 channels significantly decreased, followed by the reduction of IM density and elevation of neuronal excitability of dorsal root ganglion neurons from diabetic rats. Activation of KCNQ channels with retigabine reduced the hyperexcitability and inhibition of KCNQ channels with XE991 enhanced the hyperexcitability. Administration of retigabine alleviated both mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia, while XE991 augmented both mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia in diabetic neuropathic pain in rats. Conclusion The findings elucidate the mechanisms by which downregulation of the expression and reduction of the activity of KCNQ2/3/5 channels in diabetic rat dorsal root ganglion neurons contribute to neuronal hyperexcitability, which results in hyperalgesia. These data provide intriguing evidence that activation of KCNQ2/3/5 channels might be the potential new targets for alleviating diabetic neuropathic pain symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ting Yu
- 1 Department of Anatomy, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Shandong University, Jinan, China.,2 Department of Physiology, Jining Medical University, Jining, China
| | - Lei Li
- 3 Department of Diagnosis, Jining Medical University, Jining, China
| | - Huaxiang Liu
- 4 Department of Rheumatology, Shandong University Qilu Hospital, Jinan, China
| | - Hao Li
- 5 Department of Orthopaedics, Shandong University Qilu Hospital, Jinan, China
| | - Zhen Liu
- 1 Department of Anatomy, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Zhenzhong Li
- 1 Department of Anatomy, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| |
Collapse
|