1
|
Goree JH, Grant SA, Dickerson DM, Ilfeld BM, Eshraghi Y, Vaid S, Valimahomed AK, Shah JR, Smith GL, Finneran JJ, Shah NN, Guirguis MN, Eckmann MS, Antony AB, Ohlendorf BJ, Gupta M, Gilbert JE, Wongsarnpigoon A, Boggs JW. Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of 60-Day Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation Treatment Indicates Relief of Persistent Postoperative Pain, and Improved Function After Knee Replacement. Neuromodulation 2024; 27:847-861. [PMID: 38739062 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2024.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2023] [Revised: 02/22/2024] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an effective surgery for end-stage knee osteoarthritis, but chronic postoperative pain and reduced function affect up to 20% of patients who undergo such surgery. There are limited treatment options, but percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) is a promising nonopioid treatment option for chronic, persistent postoperative pain. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effect of a 60-day percutaneous PNS treatment in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial for treating persistent postoperative pain after TKA. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with postoperative pain after knee replacement were screened for this postmarket, institutional review board-approved, prospectively registered (NCT04341948) trial. Subjects were randomized to receive either active PNS or placebo (sham) stimulation. Subjects and a designated evaluator were blinded to group assignments. Subjects in both groups underwent ultrasound-guided placement of percutaneous fine-wire coiled leads targeting the femoral and sciatic nerves on the leg with postoperative pain. Leads were indwelling for eight weeks, and the primary efficacy outcome compared the proportion of subjects in each group reporting ≥50% reduction in average pain relative to baseline during weeks five to eight. Functional outcomes (6-minute walk test; 6MWT and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) and quality of life (Patient Global Impression of Change) also were evaluated at end of treatment (EOT). RESULTS A greater proportion of subjects in the PNS groups (60%; 12/20) than in the placebo (sham) group (24%; 5/21) responded with ≥50% pain relief relative to baseline (p = 0.028) during the primary endpoint (weeks 5-8). Subjects in the PNS group also walked a significantly greater distance at EOT than did those in the placebo (sham) group (6MWT; +47% vs -9% change from baseline; p = 0.048, n = 18 vs n = 20 completed the test, respectively). Prospective follow-up to 12 months is ongoing. CONCLUSIONS This study provides evidence that percutaneous PNS decreases persistent pain, which leads to improved functional outcomes after TKA at EOT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johnathan H Goree
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
| | - Stuart A Grant
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - David M Dickerson
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Endeavor Health, Evanston, IL, USA; The University of Chicago, Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Brian M Ilfeld
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Yashar Eshraghi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Sandeep Vaid
- Better Health Clinical Research, Newnan, GA, USA
| | | | - Jarna R Shah
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - G Lawson Smith
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - John J Finneran
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Nirav N Shah
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Endeavor Health, Evanston, IL, USA; The University of Chicago, Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Maged N Guirguis
- Department of Anesthesiology, Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Maxim S Eckmann
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Texas San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | | | - Brian J Ohlendorf
- Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Mayank Gupta
- Neuroscience Research Center, Overland Park, KS, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Parikh S, Echevarria AC, Cemenski BR, Small T. The Relevance of Implanted Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in Orthopedics Surgery: A Systematic Review. J Clin Med 2024; 13:3699. [PMID: 38999266 PMCID: PMC11242780 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13133699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2024] [Revised: 05/17/2024] [Accepted: 05/30/2024] [Indexed: 07/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) is a form of neuromodulation that involves the transmission of electrical energy via metal contacts known as leads or electrodes. PNS has gained popularity in orthopedic surgery as several studies have supported its use as a pain control device for patients suffering from pain due to orthopedic pathologies involving the knee, shoulder, and foot. The purpose of this systematic review is to summarize the literature involving peripheral nerve stimulation in orthopedic surgery. The existing body of literature provides support for further research regarding the use of PNS in the management of knee pain, hip pain, shoulder pain, foot pain, and orthopedic trauma. Notably, the evidence for its efficacy in addressing knee and shoulder pain is present. Methods: This study was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Seven hundred and forty-five unique entries were identified. Two blinded reviewers assessed each article by title and abstract to determine its relevance and categorized them as "include", "exclude", and "maybe". After a preliminary review was completed, reviewers were unblinded and a third reviewer retrieved articles labeled as "maybe" and those with conflicting labels to determine their relevance. Twenty-eight articles were included, and seven hundred and seventeen articles were excluded. Articles discussing the use of PNS in the field of orthopedic surgery in patients > 18 years of age after 2010 were included. Exclusion criteria included neuropathic pain, phantom limb pain, amputation, non-musculoskeletal related pathology, non-orthopedic surgery related pathology, spinal cord stimulator, no reported outcomes, review articles, abstracts only, non-human subjects. Results: A total of 16 studies analyzing 69 patients were included. All studies were either case series or case reports. Most articles involved the application of PNS in the knee (8) and shoulder (6) joint. Few articles discussed its application in the foot and orthopedic trauma. All studies demonstrated that PNS was effective in reducing pain. Discussion: Peripheral nerve stimulation can be effective in managing postoperative or chronic pain in patients suffering from orthopedic pathology. This systematic review is limited by the scarcity of robust studies with substantial sample sizes and extended follow up periods in the existing literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarthak Parikh
- Saint Francis Health Systems, Tulsa, OK 74136, USA
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Oklahoma State University, Tulsa, OK 74078, USA
- Orthopedic and Trauma Services of Oklahoma, Tulsa, OK 74135, USA
| | - Alexandra C Echevarria
- Kiran Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Davie, FL 33328, USA
| | - Brandon R Cemenski
- College of Osteopathic Medicine, Des Moines University, Des Moines, IA 50266, USA
| | - Travis Small
- Saint Francis Health Systems, Tulsa, OK 74136, USA
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Oklahoma State University, Tulsa, OK 74078, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ilfeld BM, Finneran JJ, Alexander B, Abramson WB, Sztain JF, Ball ST, Gonzales FB, Abdullah B, Cha BJ, Said ET. Percutaneous auricular neuromodulation (nerve stimulation) for the treatment of pain following total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled pilot study. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2024:rapm-2023-105028. [PMID: 38388019 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2023-105028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Percutaneous auricular nerve stimulation (neuromodulation) is an analgesic technique involving the percutaneous implantation of multiple leads at various points on/around the ear followed by the delivery of electric current using an external pulse generator. A device is currently available within the USA cleared to treat symptoms from opioid withdrawal, and multiple reports suggest a possible postoperative analgesic effect. The current randomized, controlled pilot study was undertaken to (1) determine the feasibility and optimize the protocol for a subsequent definitive clinical trial and (2) estimate the treatment effect of auricular neuromodulation on postoperative pain and opioid consumption following total knee arthroplasty. METHODS Within the recovery room following primary, unilateral, total knee arthroplasty, an auricular neuromodulation device (NSS-2 Bridge, Masimo, Irvine, California, USA) was applied using three percutaneous leads and one ground electrode. Participants were randomized to 5 days of either electrical stimulation or sham stimulation in a double-masked fashion. Participants were discharged with the stimulator in situ and removed the disposable devices at home. The dual primary treatment effect outcome measures were the cumulative opioid use (oral oxycodone) and the mean of the "average" daily pain measured with the Numeric Rating Scale for the first 5 postoperative days. RESULTS During the first five postoperative days, oxycodone consumption in participants given active stimulation (n=15) was a median (IQR) of 4 mg (2-12) vs 13 mg (5-23) in patients given sham (n=15) treatment (p=0.039). During this same period, the average pain intensity in patients given active stimulation was a median (IQR) of 2.5 (1.5-3.3) vs 4.0 (3.6-4.8) in those given sham (p=0.014). Awakenings due to pain over all eight postoperative nights in participants given active stimulation was a median (IQR) of 5 (3-8) vs 11 (4-14) in those given sham (p<0.001). No device-related localized cutaneous irritation, systemic side effects, or other adverse events were identified. CONCLUSIONS Percutaneous auricular neuromodulation reduced pain scores and opioid requirements during the initial week after total knee arthroplasty. Given the ease of application as well as the lack of systemic side effects and reported complications, a definitive clinical trial appears warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT05521516.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian M Ilfeld
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
- Outcomes Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - John J Finneran
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
- Outcomes Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Brenton Alexander
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Wendy B Abramson
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Jacklynn F Sztain
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Scott T Ball
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Francis B Gonzales
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Baharin Abdullah
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Brannon J Cha
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Engy T Said
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kelly TD, Pazzol ML, Rahimi Darabad R. Peripheral Nerve Stimulation in Chronic Knee Pain: A Case Series. Cureus 2023; 15:e50127. [PMID: 38186428 PMCID: PMC10771261 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.50127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Chronic knee pain is increasing in prevalence and is associated with substantial limitations in functional mobility. Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) has been increasingly used to treat various chronic pain conditions. However, there is a paucity of research exploring the potential therapeutic benefit of PNS for chronic knee pain. Methods This research is a retrospective case series of all patients who received PNS for the treatment of chronic knee pain performed at a single-center academic medical institution between March 2021 and June 2022. The primary outcome was percent pain reduction six months after implantation. Outcome data was obtained via chart review and phone calls to patients. Secondary outcomes included percent pain reduction two weeks and two months after implantation and adverse medical events related to the procedure and nerve stimulation. Results Fourteen individual patients received PNS for chronic knee pain during the study period. Three of these patients received bilateral PNS for a total of 17 cases. The mean percent pain reduction six months after implantation was 52% (SD=28.2) (N=12). A total of 75.0% of participants (9/12) reported ≥50% reductions in pain six months after implantation. No adverse events were reported relating to the implantation procedure and/or nerve stimulation. Conclusion PNS is a safe and efficacious treatment modality for chronic knee pain with demonstrated long-term benefit. Further research should clarify patient factors associated with improved treatment response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy D Kelly
- Department of Emergency Medicine Residency, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, USA
| | - Michael L Pazzol
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cho AM, Xiong JS, Burns SL. The Emerging Role of Peripheral Nerve Stimulation in Postoperative Analgesia. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2023; 27:601-605. [PMID: 37556045 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-023-01159-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Though peripheral nerve stimulation has long been utilized in the field of chronic pain management, its use in acute pain management in the postoperative period is relatively novel and warrants further consideration. RECENT FINDINGS In the postsurgical period, peripheral nerve stimulation may offer an additional low-risk, opioid-sparing analgesic option, which is particularly pertinent in the setting of the ongoing opioid epidemic, as inadequate postsurgical analgesia has been shown to increase the risk of developing persistent or chronic postsurgical pain. In this review, we discuss the current literature that illustrate the emerging role of peripheral nerve stimulation as an effective treatment modality in the postoperative period for the management of acute pain, as various studies have recently been conducted evaluating the feasibility of utilizing percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation as an adjunct in postsurgical analgesia. Nonetheless, future studies are necessary to continue to elucidate the short- and long-term impacts of peripheral nerve stimulation use in acute postsurgical analgesia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annie M Cho
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Jennifer S Xiong
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Stacey L Burns
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Finneran JJ, Ilfeld BM. Continuous peripheral nerve blocks for analgesia following painful ambulatory surgery: a review with focus on recent developments in infusion technology. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2023; 36:525-532. [PMID: 37552018 DOI: 10.1097/aco.0000000000001284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Continuous peripheral nerve blocks (cPNB) decrease pain scores and opioid consumption while improving patient satisfaction following ambulatory surgery. This review focuses on the history and evolution of ambulatory cPNBs, recent developments in infusion technology that may prolong the duration of analgesia, optimal choice of cPNB for various surgical procedures, and novel analgesic modalities that may prove to be alternatives or supplements to cPNBs. RECENT FINDINGS The primary factor limiting the duration of an ambulatory cPNB is the size of the local anesthetic reservoir. Recent evidence suggests the use of automated boluses, as opposed to continuous infusions, may decrease the rate of consumption of local anesthetic and, thereby, prolong the duration of analgesia. Utilizing a long-acting local anesthetic (e.g. ropivacaine) for initial block placement and an infusion start-delay timer may further increase this duration. SUMMARY Patients undergoing painful ambulatory surgery are likely to have less pain and require fewer opioid analgesics when receiving a cPNB for postoperative analgesia. Advances in electronic pumps used for cPNBs may increase the duration of these benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John J Finneran
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California
- Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Brian M Ilfeld
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California
- Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chow RM, Lee RY, Rajput K. Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Pain Management: A Review. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2023; 27:321-327. [PMID: 37523121 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-023-01143-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Peripheral nerve stimulation has seen a recent upsurge in utilization for various chronic pain conditions, specifically from a neuropathic etiology, where a single peripheral nerve can be pinpointed as a culprit for pain. RECENT FINDINGS There is conflicting evidence about the efficacy and long-term outcomes of peripheral nerve stimulation for chronic pain, with most studies being small sized. The focus of this article is to review available evidence for the utilization of peripheral nerve stimulation for chronic pain syndromes as well as upcoming evidence in the immediate postoperative realm. The indications for the use of PNS have expanded from neuropathic pain such as occipital neuralgia and post-amputation pain, to more widespread disease processes such as chronic low back pain. Percutaneous PNS delivered over a 60-day period may provide significant carry-over effects including pain relief, potentially avoiding the need for a permanently implanted system while enabling improved function in patients with chronic pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert M Chow
- Department of Anesthesiology, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT, TMP306510, USA
| | - Ryan Yesung Lee
- Medical Student-3, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, USA
| | - Kanishka Rajput
- Department of Anesthesiology, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT, TMP306510, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tsui BCH, Gupta RK. Role of neuromodulation in acute pain settings. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2023; 48:338-342. [PMID: 37080583 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2022-103837] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 11/15/2022] [Indexed: 04/22/2023]
Abstract
Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS), a type of neuromodulatory technique, is increasingly used to treat chronic pain syndromes. PNS has also recently gained popularity as a viable adjunct analgesic modality in acute pain settings, where the practice primarily relies on using boluses or infusion of local anesthetics for nerve blockade, followed by stimulation to extend the analgesia. There is some early promise in PNS for perioperative analgesic control, but considerable obstacles must be addressed before it can be implemented into standard practice. In this daring discourse, we explore the possibilities and constraints of using the PNS paradigm in acute pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ban C H Tsui
- Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Rajnish K Gupta
- Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zhu CC, Gargya A, Haider N. A Case Report of Three Patients Who Underwent Temporary Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Treatment of Knee Pain Secondary to Osteoarthritis. Cureus 2023; 15:e40473. [PMID: 37333044 PMCID: PMC10270311 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.40473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Knee osteoarthritis affects millions of people worldwide. There remains a role for novel therapies to manage pain for patients who are unable or unwilling to undergo knee arthroplasty. A peripheral nerve stimulator (PNS) may be beneficial in this population. We present a case report of three patients who received temporary femoral or saphenous PNS and were either unwilling or unable to undergo knee arthroplasty. Two of the three patients reported significantly reduced pain and improved functioning. Our case report demonstrates that temporary PNS may offer a safe and effective treatment for chronic knee pain secondary to knee osteoarthritis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheng-Cheng Zhu
- Anesthesiology and Pain Management, The Robert Larner, M.D. College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, USA
| | - Akshat Gargya
- Anesthesiology and Pain Management, The Robert Larner, M.D. College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, USA
| | - Naeem Haider
- Anesthesiology and Pain Management, The Robert Larner, M.D. College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ong Sio LC, Hom B, Garg S, Abd-Elsayed A. Mechanism of Action of Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Chronic Pain: A Narrative Review. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:ijms24054540. [PMID: 36901970 PMCID: PMC10003676 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24054540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2023] [Revised: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2023] Open
Abstract
The use of stimulation of peripheral nerves to test or treat various medical disorders has been prevalent for a long time. Over the last few years, there has been growing evidence for the use of peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) for treating a myriad of chronic pain conditions such as limb mononeuropathies, nerve entrapments, peripheral nerve injuries, phantom limb pain, complex regional pain syndrome, back pain, and even fibromyalgia. The ease of placement of a minimally invasive electrode via percutaneous approach in the close vicinity of the nerve and the ability to target various nerves have led to its widespread use and compliance. While most of the mechanism behind its role in neuromodulation is largely unknown, the gate control theory proposed by Melzack and Wall in the 1960s has been the mainstay for understanding its mechanism of action. In this review article, the authors performed a literature review to discuss the mechanism of action of PNS and discuss its safety and usefulness in treating chronic pain. The authors also discuss current PNS devices available in the market today.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lady Christine Ong Sio
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA
| | - Brian Hom
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA
| | - Shuchita Garg
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA
| | - Alaa Abd-Elsayed
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI 53726, USA
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-608-263-8100; Fax: +1-608-263-0575
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kalia H, Abd-Elsayed A, Malinowski M, Burkey A, Abdallah RT, Sivanesan E, Malik T, Tolba R, Eshraghi Y, Ferguson K, Schnur M, Raslan A, Guirguis M, Russo M, Slavin KV. Educational Curriculum for Peripheral Nerve Stimulation Developed by the North American Neuromodulation Society. Neuromodulation 2022; 26:483-489. [PMID: 36526547 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2022.09.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Revised: 08/15/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) is an effective neuromodulation therapy for chronic neuropathic and nociceptive pain. Although the total number of PNS implantations has increased over the last decade, no curriculum exists to guide training and learning of this therapy. The goal of the North American Neuromodulation Society (NANS) education committee is to develop a series of competency-based curriculums for neuromodulation therapies. The PNS curriculum is the latest part of such series, following the curriculums for spinal cord stimulation and intrathecal drug delivery system. MATERIALS AND METHODS A multidisciplinary task force (anesthesiology, physical medicine and rehabilitation, neurosurgery, preventive medicine and public health, and neurology) was created by the educational committee of NANS to develop a PNS curriculum in accordance with the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) milestones. The curriculum was created based on the best available evidence and expert knowledge (from our task force members) of available PNS systems. The final PNS curriculum was approved by the NANS board. RESULTS A PNS curriculum was developed by the task force. Milestones included professionalism, practice-based learning, interpersonal communication, medical knowledge, systems-based practice, procedural skills, and patient care. Each milestone was defined into three categories: early learner, advanced learner, and practitioner. CONCLUSIONS This manuscript provides a PNS training curriculum developed by a multidisciplinary task force of the NANS educational committee in accordance with the milestones described by ACGME for basic learners, advanced learners, and practitioners. This curriculum will help provide a structured training and evaluation process for obtaining proficiency in PNS treatment(s).
Collapse
|
12
|
Muacevic A, Adler JR. Peripheral Nerve Stimulator Versus Ultrasound-Guided Femoral Nerve Block for Knee Arthroscopy Procedures: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Cureus 2022; 14:e32043. [PMCID: PMC9710297 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.32043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Femoral nerve block (FNB) provides effective analgesia and is a widely used technique for postoperative pain relief for orthopedic procedures on lower limbs. This study aims to compare the efficacy of ultrasonography (USG) versus peripheral nerve stimulator (PNS)-guided FNB in knee arthroscopic procedures. Methodology This randomized comparative study included two study groups with 30 participants in each group who were given FNB with either PNS or USG for knee arthroscopic procedures following spinal anesthesia. The study evaluated the number of needle repositioning, the time taken for performing the block, the efficacy of postoperative analgesia based on the duration of the block, and patient satisfaction. Results The number of needle repositioning and time taken to finish the procedure using USG was lower compared to the group using PNS (p < 0.001). The duration of the block was comparable in both groups (p = 0.584). Patients were satisfied with both techniques and responded as either very good or outstanding and chose neither as inferior (p = 0.310). Conclusions Both techniques have equal efficacy concerning the duration of the effect of the block and patient satisfaction. However, the procedural time and number of needle repositioning were significantly less in the group where USG was used for the block.
Collapse
|
13
|
Infection of a Retained Peripheral Nerve Stimulation Lead: A Case Report. A A Pract 2022; 16:e01626. [PMID: 36599038 DOI: 10.1213/xaa.0000000000001626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation is used to provide analgesia for weeks or even months. While infection of any percutaneously implanted object is a concern, it is exceedingly rare for helically coiled leads, with a reported incidence of less than 1 infection for every 32,000 indwelling days. We now report an infected helically coiled lead requiring sedation for extraction and complicated by lead fracture during removal, leaving a remnant in situ. The infection was successfully treated with oral antibiotics. We speculate on the cause of this infection and propose steps to prevent this complication, including the avoidance of sling-to-lead insertion site overlap.
Collapse
|
14
|
Lee G, Ray E, Yoon HJ, Genovese S, Choi YS, Lee MK, Şahin S, Yan Y, Ahn HY, Bandodkar AJ, Kim J, Park M, Ryu H, Kwak SS, Jung YH, Odabas A, Khandpur U, Ray WZ, MacEwan MR, Rogers JA. A bioresorbable peripheral nerve stimulator for electronic pain block. SCIENCE ADVANCES 2022; 8:eabp9169. [PMID: 36197971 PMCID: PMC9534494 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abp9169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Accepted: 08/18/2022] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
Local electrical stimulation of peripheral nerves can block the propagation of action potentials, as an attractive alternative to pharmacological agents for the treatment of acute pain. Traditional hardware for such purposes, however, involves interfaces that can damage nerve tissue and, when used for temporary pain relief, that impose costs and risks due to requirements for surgical extraction after a period of need. Here, we introduce a bioresorbable nerve stimulator that enables electrical nerve block and associated pain mitigation without these drawbacks. This platform combines a collection of bioresorbable materials in architectures that support stable blocking with minimal adverse mechanical, electrical, or biochemical effects. Optimized designs ensure that the device disappears harmlessly in the body after a desired period of use. Studies in live animal models illustrate capabilities for complete nerve block and other key features of the technology. In certain clinically relevant scenarios, such approaches may reduce or eliminate the need for use of highly addictive drugs such as opioids.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geumbee Lee
- Querrey Simpson Institute for Bioelectronics, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA
- Precision Biology Research Center, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Republic of Korea
| | - Emily Ray
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Hong-Joon Yoon
- Querrey Simpson Institute for Bioelectronics, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA
| | - Sabrina Genovese
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Yeon Sik Choi
- Querrey Simpson Institute for Bioelectronics, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA
| | - Min-Kyu Lee
- Querrey Simpson Institute for Bioelectronics, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA
| | - Samet Şahin
- Querrey Simpson Institute for Bioelectronics, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, Bilecik Şeyh Edebali University, 11230 Bilecik, Merkez/Bilecik, Turkey
| | - Ying Yan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Hak-Young Ahn
- Querrey Simpson Institute for Bioelectronics, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA
| | - Amay J. Bandodkar
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27606, USA
- Center for Advanced Self-Powered Systems of Integrated Sensors and Technologies (ASSIST), North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27606, USA
| | - Joohee Kim
- Querrey Simpson Institute for Bioelectronics, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA
| | - Minsu Park
- Querrey Simpson Institute for Bioelectronics, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA
| | - Hanjun Ryu
- Department of Advanced Materials Engineering, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung Soo Kwak
- Center for Bionics, Biomedical Research Division, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Seoul 02792, Republic of Korea
| | - Yei Hwan Jung
- Department of Electronic Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea
| | - Arman Odabas
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Umang Khandpur
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Wilson Z. Ray
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Matthew R. MacEwan
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - John A. Rogers
- Querrey Simpson Institute for Bioelectronics, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA
- Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Gabriel RA, Ilfeld BM. Extending Perioperative Analgesia with Ultrasound-Guided, Percutaneous Cryoneurolysis, and Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (Neuromodulation). Anesthesiol Clin 2022; 40:469-479. [PMID: 36049875 DOI: 10.1016/j.anclin.2022.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
The use of regional anesthesia is key to a successful approach to improving postoperative analgesia, which involves local anesthetic deposition either around peripheral nerves or within a fascial plane. Unfortunately, the realistic duration even with continuous peripheral nerve blocks usually does not match the duration of surgical pain, comprising a major limitation. Here, the use of 2 interventional modalities-ultrasound-guided percutaneous cryoneurolysis and peripheral nerve stimulation-is discussed, both of which may be used to treat acute and subacute pain and may therefore have a positive impact on the incidence and severity of chronic pain development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodney A Gabriel
- Division of Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, University of California, San Diego, 200 West Arbor Drive, San Diego, California 92103-8990, USA
| | - Brian M Ilfeld
- Division of Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, University of California, San Diego, 200 West Arbor Drive, San Diego, California 92103-8990, USA; Department of Anesthesiology, 9500 Gilman Drive, MC 0898, La Jolla, CA 92093-0898, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ultrasound-Guided Median Nerve Electrical Stimulation to Promote Upper Limb Function Recovery after Stroke. EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE 2022; 2022:3590057. [PMID: 35873627 PMCID: PMC9303480 DOI: 10.1155/2022/3590057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2022] [Revised: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 06/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Peripheral electrical nerve stimulation enhances hand function during stroke rehabilitation. Here, we proposed a percutaneous direct median nerve stimulation guided by ultrasound (ultrasound‐guided median nerve electrical stimulation, UG-MNES) and evaluated its feasibility and effectiveness in the treatment of stroke patients with upper limb extremity impairments. Sixty-three stroke patients (2-3 months of onset) were randomly divided into control and UG-MNES groups. Both groups received routine rehabilitation and the UG-MNES group received an additional ultrasound-guided electrical stimulation of the median nerve at 2 Hz, 0.2 ms pulse-width for 20 minutes with gradual intensity enhancement. The Fugl-Meyer Assessment for upper extremity motor function (FMA-UE) was used as the primary outcome. The secondary outcomes were the Functional Test for the Hemiplegic Upper Extremity (FTHUE-HK), Hand Function Rating Scale, Brunnstrom Stages, and Barthel Index scores for motor and daily functions. All the participants completed the trial without any side effects or adverse events during the intervention. After 4 weeks of intervention, the functions of the upper limbs on the hemiplegic side in both groups achieved significant recovery. Compared to the control group, all evaluation indices used in this trial were improved significantly in the UG-MNES group after 2 and 4 weeks of intervention; particularly, the first intervention of UG-MNES immediately improved all the assessment items significantly. In conclusion, the UG-MNES is a safe and feasible treatment for stroke patients with upper limb extremity impairments and could significantly improve the motor function of the affected upper limb, especially in the first intervention. The UG-MNES could be an effective alternative intervention for stroke with upper limb extremity impairments.
Collapse
|
17
|
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Lower Extremity Pain. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10071666. [PMID: 35884969 PMCID: PMC9313008 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10071666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2022] [Revised: 07/06/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) is rapidly increasing in use. This interventional pain treatment modality involves modulating peripheral nerves for a variety of chronic pain conditions. This review evaluated its use specifically in the context of chronic lower extremity pain. Studies continue to elucidate the utility of PNS and better define indications, contraindications, as well as short- and long-term benefits of the procedure for the lower extremity. While large, prospective evidence is still lacking, the best available evidence suggests that improvements may be seen in pain scores, functionality, and opioid consumption. Overall, evidence synthesis suggests that PNS for the lower extremities may be a viable option for patients with chronic lower extremity pain.
Collapse
|
18
|
García-Collado A, Valera-Calero JA, Fernández-de-las-Peñas C, Arias-Buría JL. Effects of Ultrasound-Guided Nerve Stimulation Targeting Peripheral Nerve Tissue on Pain and Function: A Scoping Review. J Clin Med 2022; 11:3753. [PMID: 35807034 PMCID: PMC9267318 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11133753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2022] [Revised: 06/25/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
This paper assesses the effects of percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (PENS) on pain- and function-related outcomes by means of a scoping review of studies with single cases, case-series, quasi-experimental, and randomized or non-randomized trial designs. We consulted the PubMed, MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. Data were extracted by two reviewers. The methodological quality of studies was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale for experimental studies and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) tool for case reports or cases series. Mapping of the results included: (1), description of included studies; (2), summary of results; and, (3), identification of gaps in the existing literature. Eighteen articles (five randomized controlled trials, one trial protocol, nine case series and three case reports) were included. The methodological quality of the papers was moderate to high. The conditions included in the studies were heterogeneous: chronic low back pain, lower limb pain after lumbar surgery, chronic post-amputation pain, rotator cuff repair, foot surgery, knee arthroplasty, knee pain, brachial plexus injury, elbow pain and ankle instability. In addition, one study included a healthy athletic population. Interventions were also highly heterogeneous in terms of sessions, electrical current parameters, or time of treatment. Most studies observed positive effects of PENS targeting nerve tissue against the control group; however, due to the heterogeneity in the populations, interventions, and follow-up periods, pooling analyses were not possible. Based on the available literature, PENS interventions targeting peripheral nerves might be considered as a potential therapeutic strategy for improving pain-related and functional outcomes. Nevertheless, further research considering important methodological quality issues (e.g., inclusion of control groups, larger sample sizes and comparatives between electric current parameters) are needed prior to recommending its use in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Juan A. Valera-Calero
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health, Universidad Camilo José Cela, 28692 Villanueva de la Cañada, Spain
| | - César Fernández-de-las-Peñas
- Department of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, 28922 Alcorcón, Spain;
| | - José L. Arias-Buría
- Department of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, 28922 Alcorcón, Spain;
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Fogel HP, Winfree CJ. What’s New in Peripheral Nerve Stimulation. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2022; 33:323-330. [DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2022.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
20
|
Juncker RB, Mirza FM, Gagnier JJ. Reduction in opioid use with perioperative non-pharmacologic analgesia in total knee arthroplasty and ACL reconstruction: a systematic review. SICOT J 2021; 7:63. [PMID: 34928208 PMCID: PMC8686827 DOI: 10.1051/sicotj/2021063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: The world’s opioid epidemic has gotten increasingly severe over the last several decades and projects to continue worsening. Orthopedic surgery is the largest contributor to this epidemic, accounting for 8.8% of postoperative opioid dependence cases. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction are commonly performed orthopedic operations heavily reliant on opioids as the primary analgesic in the peri- and immediate postoperative period. These downfalls highlight the pressing need for an alternate, non-pharmacologic analgesic to reduce postoperative opioid use in orthopedic patients. The presented systematic review aimed to analyze and compare the most promising non-pharmacologic analgesic interventions in the available literature to guide future research in such a novel field. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science was performed for studies published before July 2020 based on the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) guidelines, and the obtained manuscripts were evaluated for inclusion or exclusion against strict, pre-determined criteria. Risk-of-bias and GRADE (grades of recommendation, assessment, development, and evaluation) assessments were then performed on all included studies. Results: Six studies were deemed fit for inclusion, investigating three non-pharmacologic analgesics: percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation, cryoneurolysis, and auricular acupressure. All three successfully reduced postoperative opioid use while simultaneously maintaining the safety and efficacy of the procedure. Discussion: The results indicate that all three presented non-pharmacologic analgesic interventions are viable and warrant future research. That said, because of its slight advantages in postoperative pain control and operational outcomes, cryoneurolysis seems to be the most promising. Further research and eventual clinical implementation of these analgesics is not only warranted but should be a priority because of their vast potential to reduce orthopedics surgeries’ contribution to the opioid epidemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan B Juncker
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), 615 Charles E Young Dr S, Rm. 410, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Faisal M Mirza
- Coastal Health Partners, 65 Nielson St #102, Watsonville, CA 95076, USA
| | - Joel J Gagnier
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation: A Review of Techniques and Clinical Efficacy. Pain Ther 2021; 10:961-972. [PMID: 34331668 PMCID: PMC8586305 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-021-00298-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Chronic pain is a common source of morbidity in many patient populations worldwide. There are growing concerns about the potential side effects of currently prescribed medications and a continued need for effective treatment. Related to these concerns, peripheral nerve stimulation has been regaining popularity as a potential treatment modality. Peripheral nerve stimulation components include helically coiled electrical leads, which direct an applied current to afferent neurons providing sensory innervation to the painful area. In theory, the applied current to the peripheral nerve will alter the large-diameter myelinated afferent nerve fibers, which interfere with the central processing of pain signals through small-diameter afferent fibers at the level of the spinal cord. Multiple studies have shown success in the use of peripheral nerve stimulation for acute post-surgical pain for orthopedic surgery, including post total knee arthroplasty and anterior cruciate ligament surgery, and chronic knee pain. Many studies have investigated the utility of peripheral nerve stimulation for the management of chronic shoulder pain. Peripheral nerve stimulation also serves as one of the potential non-pharmacologic therapies to treat back pain along with physical therapy, application of transcutaneous electrical neurostimulation unit, radiofrequency ablation, epidural steroid injections, permanently implanted neurostimulators, and surgery. Studies regarding back pain treatment have shown that peripheral nerve stimulation led to significant improvement in all pain and quality-of-life measures and a reduction in the use of opioids. Further studies are needed as the long-term risks and benefits of peripheral nerve stimulation have not been well studied as most information available on the effectiveness of peripheral nerve stimulation is based on shorter-term improvements in chronic pain.
Collapse
|
22
|
Chitneni A, Berger AA, Orhurhu V, Kaye AD, Hasoon J. Peripheral Nerve Stimulation of the Saphenous and Superior Lateral Genicular Nerves for Chronic Pain After Knee Surgery. Orthop Rev (Pavia) 2021; 13:24435. [PMID: 34745463 DOI: 10.52965/001c.24435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2021] [Accepted: 05/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most commonly conducted surgeries in the United States. Typically, TKA is conducted to relieve pain from patients with long-standing osteoarthritis. Postoperative knee pain is a common issue after TKA. For some patients, postoperative knee pain exceeds the normal 3-6-month phase and becomes chronic. Pain is typically managed with the use of medications and physical therapy. In this case, we describe the use of peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) of the saphenous and superior lateral genicular nerves for a patient experiencing chronic postoperative knee pain utilizing SPRINT PNS technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Vwaire Orhurhu
- Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Alan D Kaye
- Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, Shreveport, LA
| | - Jamal Hasoon
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Pain Specialists of America, Austin, TX
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Ilfeld BM, Plunkett A, Vijjeswarapu AM, Hackworth R, Dhanjal S, Turan A, Cohen SP, Eisenach JC, Griffith S, Hanling S, Sessler DI, Mascha EJ, Han Y, Boggs JW, Wongsarnpigoon A, Gelfand H. Percutaneous Neuromodulation of the Brachial Plexus and Sciatic Nerve for the Treatment of Acute Pain Following Surgery: Secondary Outcomes From a Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Pilot Study. Neuromodulation 2021; 26:638-649. [PMID: 34343394 DOI: 10.1111/ner.13492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2021] [Revised: 05/20/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We recently reported that percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS or "neuromodulation") decreased pain and opioid consumption within the first two weeks following ambulatory surgery. However, the anatomic lead locations were combined for the analysis, and benefits for each location remain unknown. We therefore now report the effects of percutaneous PNS for brachial plexus and sciatic nerve leads separately. MATERIALS AND METHODS Before surgery, leads were implanted percutaneously to target the brachial plexus (N = 21) for rotator cuff repair or sciatic nerve (N = 40) for foot/ankle surgery, followed by a single injection of local anesthetic. Postoperatively, subjects were randomized in a double masked fashion to 14 days of electrical stimulation (N = 30) or sham/placebo (N = 31) using an external pulse generator. The primary outcome of interest was opioid consumption and pain scores evaluated jointly. Thus, stimulation was deemed effective if superior on either outcome and at least noninferior on the other. RESULTS For brachial plexus leads, during the first seven postoperative days pain measured with the numeric rating scale in participants given active stimulation was a median [interquartile range ] of 0.8 [0.5, 1.6] versus 3.2 [2.7, 3.5] in patients given sham (p < 0.001). For this same group, opioid consumption in participants given active stimulation was 10 mg [5, 20] versus 71 mg [35, 125] in patients given sham (p = 0.043). For sciatic nerve leads, pain scores for the active treatment group were 0.7 [0, 1.4] versus 2.8 [1.6, 4.6] in patients given sham (p < 0.001). During this same period, participants given active stimulation consumed 5 mg [0, 30] of opioids versus 40 mg [20, 105] in patients given sham (p = 0.004). Treatment effects did not differ statistically between the two locations. CONCLUSIONS Ambulatory percutaneous PNS of both the brachial plexus and sciatic nerve is an effective treatment for acute pain free of systemic side-effects following painful orthopedic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian M Ilfeld
- Department of Anesthesiology, University California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.,Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Anthony Plunkett
- Department of Anesthesiology, Womack Army Medical Center, Fayetteville, NC, USA
| | | | - Robert Hackworth
- Department of Anesthesiology, Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Sandeep Dhanjal
- Department of Anesthesiology, Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Alparslan Turan
- Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Departments of General Anesthesiology and Outcomes Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Steven P Cohen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - James C Eisenach
- Department of Anesthesiology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Scott Griffith
- Department of Anesthesiology, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Steven Hanling
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Columbia Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Columbia, SC, USA
| | - Daniel I Sessler
- Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Department of Outcomes Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Edward J Mascha
- Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Departments of Quantitative Health Sciences and Outcomes Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Yanyan Han
- Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Departments of Quantitative Health Sciences and Outcomes Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | | | - Harold Gelfand
- Department of Anesthesiology, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (Neuromodulation) for Postoperative Pain: A Randomized, Sham-controlled Pilot Study. Anesthesiology 2021; 135:95-110. [PMID: 33856424 DOI: 10.1097/aln.0000000000003776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation is an analgesic technique involving the percutaneous implantation of a lead followed by the delivery of electric current using an external pulse generator. Percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation has been used extensively for chronic pain, but only uncontrolled series have been published for acute postoperative pain. The current multicenter study was undertaken to (1) determine the feasibility and optimize the protocol for a subsequent clinical trial and (2) estimate the treatment effect of percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation on postoperative pain and opioid consumption. METHODS Preoperatively, an electrical lead was percutaneously implanted to target the sciatic nerve for major foot/ankle surgery (e.g., hallux valgus correction), the femoral nerve for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, or the brachial plexus for rotator cuff repair, followed by a single injection of long-acting local anesthetic along the same nerve/plexus. Postoperatively, participants were randomized to 14 days of either electrical stimulation (n = 32) or sham stimulation (n = 34) using an external pulse generator in a double-masked fashion. The dual primary treatment effect outcome measures were (1) cumulative opioid consumption (in oral morphine equivalents) and (2) mean values of the "average" daily pain scores measured on the 0 to 10 Numeric Rating Scale within the first 7 postoperative days. RESULTS During the first 7 postoperative days, opioid consumption in participants given active stimulation was a median (interquartile range) of 5 mg (0 to 30) versus 48 mg (25 to 90) in patients given sham treatment (ratio of geometric means, 0.20 [97.5% CI, 0.07 to 0.57]; P < 0.001). During this same period, the average pain intensity in patients given active stimulation was a mean ± SD of 1.1 ± 1.1 versus 3.1 ± 1.7 in those given sham (difference, -1.8 [97.5% CI, -2.6 to -0.9]; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation reduced pain scores and opioid requirements free of systemic side effects during at least the initial week after ambulatory orthopedic surgery. EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE
Collapse
|
25
|
Ye Y, Gabriel RA, Mariano ER. The expanding role of chronic pain interventions in multimodal perioperative pain management: a narrative review. Postgrad Med 2021; 134:449-457. [PMID: 34033737 DOI: 10.1080/00325481.2021.1935281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Surgery is a risk factor for chronic pain and long-term opioid use. As perioperative pain management continues to evolve, treatment modalities traditionally used for chronic pain therapy may provide additional benefit to patients undergoing surgery. Interventions such as radiofrequency ablation, cryoneurolysis, and neuromodulation may potentially be used in conjunction with acute pain procedures such as nerve blocks and multimodal analgesia. Pharmacological agents associated with chronic pain medicine, including gabapentinoids, ketamine, and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, may be useful adjuncts in perioperative pain management when indicated. There may also be a role for acupuncture, music therapy, and other integrative medicine therapies. A transitional pain service can help coordinate outpatient care with inpatient perioperative pain management and promote a more personalized and comprehensive approach that can improve postoperative outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Ye
- Anesthesiology and Perioperative Care Service, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System; Palo Alto, California, USA.,Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, California, USA
| | - Rodney A Gabriel
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Regional Anesthesia, University of California, San Diego; California, USA.,Department of Medicine, Division of Biomedical Informatics, University of California, San Diego; California, USA
| | - Edward R Mariano
- Anesthesiology and Perioperative Care Service, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System; Palo Alto, California, USA.,Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Cryoneurolysis and Peripheral Nerve Stimulation: Reply. Anesthesiology 2021; 134:818-819. [PMID: 33721910 DOI: 10.1097/aln.0000000000003740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
27
|
Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (PENS) as a Rehabilitation Approach for Reducing Mixed Chronic Pain in Patients with Musculoskeletal Disorders. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL 2021. [DOI: 10.3390/app11094257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
“Mixed pain” is a term recently introduced to define the overlapping of nociceptive, neuropathic and nociplastic pain. To date, it has been reported that pharmacological treatments might have a modest effectiveness on patients affected by mixed chronic pain, with detrimental consequences in terms of disability, physical function and health-related quality of life. In this scenario, Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (PENS), a mini-invasive neuromodulation technique, has been recently suggested as a promising approach for the complex management of mixed pain in musculoskeletal disorders. Albeit PENS showed to be effective in reducing unspecified pain in several chronic pain conditions, there is still a lack of evidence in the literature about its role in the management of neuropathic or mixed pain not responsive to pharmacological treatments. Therefore, by the present scoping review, we portray the potential effects of PENS in the multidisciplinary and multidimensional management of mixed chronic pain in patients with musculoskeletal disorders.
Collapse
|
28
|
Pérez-Neri I, González-Aguilar A, Sandoval H, Pineda C, Ríos C. Therapeutic Potential of Ultrasound Neuromodulation in Decreasing Neuropathic Pain: Clinical and Experimental Evidence. Curr Neuropharmacol 2021; 19:334-348. [PMID: 32691714 PMCID: PMC8033967 DOI: 10.2174/1570159x18666200720175253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2020] [Revised: 05/23/2020] [Accepted: 07/07/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background For more than seven decades, ultrasound has been used as an imaging and diagnostic tool. Today, new technologies, such as focused ultrasound (FUS) neuromodulation, have revealed some innovative, potential applications. However, those applications have been barely studied to deal with neuropathic pain (NP), a cluster of chronic pain syndromes with a restricted response to conventional pharmaceuticals. Objective To analyze the therapeutic potential of low-intensity (LIFUS) and high-intensity (HIFUS) FUS for managing NP. Methods We performed a narrative review, including clinical and experimental ultrasound neuromodulation studies published in three main database repositories. Discussion Evidence shows that FUS may influence several mechanisms relevant for neuropathic pain management such as modulation of ion channels, glutamatergic neurotransmission, cerebral blood flow, inflammation and neurotoxicity, neuronal morphology and survival, nerve regeneration, and remyelination. Some experimental models have shown that LIFUS may reduce allodynia after peripheral nerve damage. At the same time, a few clinical studies support its beneficial effect on reducing pain in nerve compression syndromes. In turn, Thalamic HIFUS ablation can reduce NP from several etiologies with minor side-effects, but some neurological sequelae might be permanent. HIFUS is also useful in lowering non-neuropathic pain in several disorders. Conclusion Although an emerging set of studies brings new evidence on the therapeutic potential of both LIFUS and HIFUS for managing NP with minor side-effects, we need more controlled clinical trials to conclude about its safety and efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iván Pérez-Neri
- Department of Neurochemistry, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Insurgentes Sur 3877, La Fama, Tlalpan, Mexico City, 14269, Mexico
| | - Alberto González-Aguilar
- Neuro-oncology Unit, Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugia Manuel Velasco Suarez, Insurgentes Sur 3877, La Fama, Tlalpan, Mexico City, 14269, Mexico
| | - Hugo Sandoval
- Sociomedical Research Unit, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, Calzada México-Xochimilco 289, Col, Arenal de Guadalupe, Alcaldia Tlalpan, C.P. 14389, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Carlos Pineda
- Division of Musculoskeletal and Rheumatic Disorders, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitacion Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, Calzada Mexico-Xochimilco 289, Col, Arenal de Guadalupe, Alcaldia Tlalpan, C.P.14389, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Camilo Ríos
- Department of Neurochemistry, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Insurgentes Sur 3877, La Fama, Tlalpan, Mexico City, 14269, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Deer TR, Eldabe S, Falowski SM, Huntoon MA, Staats PS, Cassar IR, Crosby ND, Boggs JW. Peripherally Induced Reconditioning of the Central Nervous System: A Proposed Mechanistic Theory for Sustained Relief of Chronic Pain with Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation. J Pain Res 2021; 14:721-736. [PMID: 33737830 PMCID: PMC7966353 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s297091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Accepted: 02/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) is an effective tool for the treatment of chronic pain, although its efficacy and utilization have previously been significantly limited by technology. In recent years, purpose-built percutaneous PNS devices have been developed to overcome the limitations of conventional permanently implanted neurostimulation devices. Recent clinical evidence suggests clinically significant and sustained reductions in pain can persist well beyond the PNS treatment period, outcomes that have not previously been observed with conventional permanently implanted neurostimulation devices. This narrative review summarizes mechanistic processes that contribute to chronic pain, and the potential mechanisms by which selective large diameter afferent fiber activation may reverse these changes to induce a prolonged reduction in pain. The interplay of these mechanisms, supported by data in chronic pain states that have been effectively treated with percutaneous PNS, will also be discussed in support of a new theory of pain management in neuromodulation: Peripherally Induced Reconditioning of the Central Nervous System (CNS).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy R Deer
- The Spine and Nerve Center of the Virginias, Charleston, WV, USA
| | - Sam Eldabe
- Department of Pain Medicine, The James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Steven M Falowski
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurosurgical Associates of Lancaster, Lancaster, PA, USA
| | - Marc A Huntoon
- Anesthesiology, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, VA, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Xu J, Sun Z, Wu J, Rana M, Garza J, Zhu AC, Chakravarthy KV, Abd-Elsayed A, Rosenquist E, Basi H, Christo P, Cheng J. Peripheral Nerve Stimulation in Pain Management: A Systematic Review. Pain Physician 2021; 24:E131-E152. [PMID: 33740342 PMCID: PMC8897810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) has been increasingly used to manage acute and chronic pain. However, the level of clinical evidence to support its use is not clear. OBJECTIVES To assess the clinical evidence of PNS in the treatment of acute or chronic pain. STUDY DESIGN A systematic review of the efficacy and safety of PNS in managing acute or chronic pain. METHODS Data sources were PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, CINAHL Plus, Google Scholar, and reference lists. The literature search was performed up to December 2019. Study selection included randomized trials, observational studies, and case reports of PNS in acute or chronic pain. Data extraction and methodological quality assessment were performed utilizing Cochrane review methodologic quality assessment and Interventional Pain Management Techniques-Quality Appraisal of Reliability and Risk of Bias Assessment (IPM-QRB) and Interventional Pain Management Techniques-Quality Appraisal of Reliability and Risk of Bias Assessment for Nonrandomized Studies (IPM-QRBNR). The evidence was summarized utilizing principles of best evidence synthesis on a scale of 1 to 5. Data syntheses: 227 studies met inclusion criteria and were included in qualitative synthesis. RESULTS Evidence synthesis based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies showed Level I and II evidence of PNS in chronic migraine headache; Level II evidence in cluster headache, postamputation pain, chronic pelvic pain, chronic low back and lower extremity pain; and Level IV evidence in peripheral neuropathic pain, and postsurgical pain. Peripheral field stimulation has Level II evidence in chronic low back pain, and Level IV evidence in cranial pain. LIMITATIONS Lack of high-quality RCTs. Meta-analysis was not possible due to wide variations in experimental design, research protocol, and heterogeneity of study population. CONCLUSIONS The findings of this systematic review suggest that PNS may be effective in managing chronic headaches, postamputation pain, chronic pelvic pain, and chronic low back and lower extremity pain, with variable levels of evidence in favor of this technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jijun Xu
- Department of Pain Management, Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
- Department of Inflammation and Immunity, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
- Department of Anesthesiology, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
| | - Zhuo Sun
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Augusta University Medical Center, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA
| | - Jiang Wu
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Maunak Rana
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Joshua Garza
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Alyssa C. Zhu
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of California San Diego, VA San Diego Healthcare System, La Jolla, CA
| | - Krishnan V. Chakravarthy
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of California San Diego, VA San Diego Healthcare System, La Jolla, CA
| | - Alaa Abd-Elsayed
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | - Ellen Rosenquist
- Center for Spine Health and Pain Management, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Hersimren Basi
- Department of Pain Management, Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Paul Christo
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Jianguo Cheng
- Department of Pain Management, Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
- Department of Neuroscience, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Gabriel RA, Ilfeld BM. Acute postoperative pain management with percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation: the SPRINT neuromodulation system. Expert Rev Med Devices 2021; 18:145-150. [PMID: 33446005 DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2021.1877134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Ultrasound-guided percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) may be used to treat acute postoperative pain for various types of surgeries. This modality avoids several limitations of traditional local anesthetic-based peripheral nerve blocks including avoidance of motor blockade and sensory deficits. AREAS COVERED In this review, we discuss the use of SPRINT (SPR Therapeutics, Cleveland, OH) neuromodulation system in the setting of acute postoperative pain management. EXPERT OPINION PNS is a novel modality in regional anesthesia that has much promise in reducing overall opioid use after surgery. Placement of PNS is very similar to that of catheter-based regional anesthesia techniques. Ultrasound is used to guide the percutaneously placed introducer needle in proximity to the target nerve. There are several benefits of PNS over catheter-based approaches, including: 1) avoidance of motor or sensory blockade; 2) no medication bag required to be carried; and 3) electric leads may be kept in situ safely for up to 60 days. While several proof-of-concept studies have been published highlighting its use in various types of surgeries, large high-quality randomized controlled trials are still needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodney A Gabriel
- Division of Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Medicine, Medical Director, Koman Outpatient Pavilion, Department of Anesthesiology, University of California, San Diego. United States
| | - Brian M Ilfeld
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of California, San Diego, United States
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Mainkar O, Singh H, Gargya A, Lee J, Valimahomed A, Gulati A. Ultrasound-Guided Peripheral Nerve Stimulation of Cervical, Thoracic, and Lumbar Spinal Nerves for Dermatomal Pain: A Case Series. Neuromodulation 2020; 24:1059-1066. [PMID: 33314509 DOI: 10.1111/ner.13334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2020] [Revised: 10/29/2020] [Accepted: 11/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES With the development of percutaneously inserted devices, peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) has been gaining attention within chronic pain literature as a less invasive neurostimulation alternative to spinal column and dorsal root ganglion stimulation. A majority of current PNS literature focuses on targeting individual distal nerves to treat individual peripheral mononeuropathies, limiting its applications. This article discusses our experience treating dermatomal pain with neurostimulation without needing to access the epidural space by targeting the proximal spinal nerve with peripheral nerve stimulation under ultrasound-guidance. MATERIALS AND METHODS A temporary, percutaneous PNS was used to target the proximal spinal nerve in 11 patients to treat various dermatomal pain syndromes in patients seen in an outpatient chronic pain clinic. Four patients received stimulation targeting the lumbar spinal nerves and seven patient received stimulation targeting the cervical or thoracic spinal nerves. RESULTS The case series presents 11 cases of PNS of the proximal spinal nerve. Seven patients, including a majority of the patients with lumbar radiculopathy, had analgesia during PNS. Four patients, all of whom targeted the cervical or thoracic spinal nerves, did not receive analgesia from PNS. CONCLUSION PNS of the proximal spinal nerve may be an effective modality to treat dermatomal pain in patients who are not candidates for other therapies that require access to the epidural space. This technique was used to successfully treat lumbar radiculopathy, post-herpetic neuralgia, and complex regional pain syndrome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ojas Mainkar
- New York Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, New York, NY, USA
| | - Harmandeep Singh
- New York Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, New York, NY, USA
| | - Akshat Gargya
- New York Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jane Lee
- New York Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ali Valimahomed
- Advanced Orthopedics and Sports Medicine Institute, Freehold, NJ, USA
| | - Amitabh Gulati
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Anesthesiology, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Cryoneurolysis and Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation to Treat Acute Pain. Anesthesiology 2020; 133:1127-1149. [PMID: 32898231 DOI: 10.1097/aln.0000000000003532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Two regional analgesic modalities currently cleared by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration hold promise to provide postoperative analgesia free of many of the limitations of both opioids and local anesthetic-based techniques. Cryoneurolysis uses exceptionally low temperature to reversibly ablate a peripheral nerve, resulting in temporary analgesia. Where applicable, it offers a unique option given its extended duration of action measured in weeks to months after a single application. Percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation involves inserting an insulated lead through a needle to lie adjacent to a peripheral nerve. Analgesia is produced by introducing electrical current with an external pulse generator. It is a unique regional analgesic in that it does not induce sensory, motor, or proprioception deficits and is cleared for up to 60 days of use. However, both modalities have limited validation when applied to acute pain, and randomized, controlled trials are required to define both benefits and risks.
Collapse
|
34
|
Peripheral nerve blockade and novel analgesic modalities for ambulatory anesthesia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2020; 33:760-767. [DOI: 10.1097/aco.0000000000000928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
35
|
Chitnis SS, Tang R, Mariano ER. The role of regional analgesia in personalized postoperative pain management. Korean J Anesthesiol 2020; 73:363-371. [PMID: 32752602 PMCID: PMC7533178 DOI: 10.4097/kja.20323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2020] [Accepted: 07/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Pain management plays a fundamental role in enhanced recovery after surgery pathways. The concept of multimodal analgesia in providing a balanced and effective approach to perioperative pain management is widely accepted and practiced, with regional anesthesia playing a pivotal role. Nerve block techniques can be utilized to achieve the goals of enhanced recovery, whether it be the resolution of ileus or time to mobilization. However, the recent expansion in the number and types of nerve block approaches can be daunting for general anesthesiologists. Which is the most appropriate regional technique to choose, and what skills and infrastructure are required for its implementation? A multidisciplinary team-based approach for defining the goals is essential, based on each patient's needs, and incorporating patient, surgical, and social factors. This review provides a framework for a personalized approach to postoperative pain management with an emphasis on regional anesthesia techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shruti S Chitnis
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Care, University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, BC, Canada
| | - Raymond Tang
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Care, University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, BC, Canada
| | - Edward R Mariano
- Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.,Anesthesiology and Perioperative Care Service, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Lin CP, Chang KV, Wu WT, Özçakar L. Ultrasound-Guided Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Knee Pain: A Mini-Review of the Neuroanatomy and the Evidence from Clinical Studies. PAIN MEDICINE 2020; 21:S56-S63. [DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnz318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/30/2023]
Abstract
AbstractObjectivesPeri- and postoperative pain frequently develops after joint replacement for severe knee osteoarthritis. A continuous nerve block is commonly used for pain relief, but the risks of infection and catheter dislodgement should be considered. The present mini-review aimed to brief the innervation and neural sonoanatomy of the knee joint and summarize the newest evidence of peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) use in the management of knee pain.MethodsWe used a systematic approach to search for relevant articles. We used the combination of “peripheral nerve stimulation” and “knee pain” as the key words for the literature search using the electronic database without language or article type restriction. The search period was from the earliest record to August 2019.ResultsThe present review identified six studies, four of which were related to PNS for management of postoperative knee pain and two of which probed neuropathic pain. Most of the studies were either case series or case reports. Based on our search result, PNS is likely to be a feasible and safe treatment for knee pain, but its effectiveness remains uncertain.ConclusionsThe present review reveals that PNS is feasible for the management of knee pain, especially in the postoperative period. The procedure is safe under ultrasound guidance used for proper placement of the electrodes near the target nerves. In the future, more prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to validate the effectiveness of PNS in acute and chronic knee pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ke-Vin Chang
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital, Bei-Hu Branch, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Ting Wu
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital, Bei-Hu Branch, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Levent Özçakar
- Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Cohen SP, Gilmore CA, Rauck RL, Lester DD, Trainer RJ, Phan T, Kapural L, North JM, Crosby ND, Boggs JW. Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Pain Following Amputation. Mil Med 2020; 184:e267-e274. [PMID: 31111898 PMCID: PMC6614808 DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usz114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2019] [Revised: 04/02/2019] [Accepted: 04/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Chronic pain and reduced function are significant problems for Military Service members and Veterans following amputation. Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) is a promising therapy, but PNS systems have traditionally been limited by invasiveness and complications. Recently, a novel percutaneous PNS system was developed to reduce the risk of complications and enable delivery of stimulation without surgery. Materials and Methods Percutaneous PNS was evaluated to determine if stimulation provides relief from residual and phantom limb pain following lower-extremity amputation. PNS leads were implanted percutaneously to deliver stimulation to the femoral and/or sciatic nerves. Patients received stimulation for up to 60 days followed by withdrawal of the leads. Results A review of recent studies and clinical reports found that a majority of patients (18/24, 75%) reported substantial (≥50%) clinically relevant relief of chronic post-amputation pain following up to 60 days of percutaneous PNS. Reductions in pain were frequently associated with reductions in disability and pain interference. Conclusions Percutaneous PNS can durably reduce pain, thereby enabling improvements in quality of life, function, and rehabilitation in individuals with residual or phantom limb pain following amputation. Percutaneous PNS may have additional benefit for Military Service members and Veterans with post-surgical or post-traumatic pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven P Cohen
- Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, 8901 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD
| | | | - Richard L Rauck
- Center for Clinical Research, 145 Kimel Park Dr, Suite 330, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Denise D Lester
- Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center, 1201 Broad Rock Blvd, Richmond, VA
| | - Robert J Trainer
- Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center, 1201 Broad Rock Blvd, Richmond, VA
| | - Thomas Phan
- Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center, 1201 Broad Rock Blvd, Richmond, VA
| | - Leonardo Kapural
- Center for Clinical Research, 145 Kimel Park Dr, Suite 330, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - James M North
- Center for Clinical Research, 145 Kimel Park Dr, Suite 330, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Nathan D Crosby
- SPR Therapeutics, 22901 Millcreek Blvd, Suite 110, Cleveland, OH
| | - Joseph W Boggs
- SPR Therapeutics, 22901 Millcreek Blvd, Suite 110, Cleveland, OH
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Neuromodulation in Patients with Unilateral Anterior Knee Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL 2020. [DOI: 10.3390/app10134647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate the short-term and crossover effects of a percutaneous neuromodulation (PNM) intervention on the femoral nerve, regarding the pain, knee flexion motion (range of motion (ROM)), and functionality, in patients with unilateral anterior knee pain (AKP). Our study used a randomized clinical trial design. Thirty patients were divided into two groups: one asymptomatic knee group in which patients received stimulation in the femoral nerve corresponding to the nonsymptomatic knee; and one symptomatic knee group, in which patients received stimulation in the femoral nerve corresponding to the painful knee. Pain, knee flexion ROM, Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Patella (VISA-P) and Kujala questionnaires were evaluated. Twenty-eight patients completed the study. Compared to their baseline values, both groups showed an increase immediately at 24 h, and at 1 week for the knee flexion ROM variable. In addition, the symptomatic knee group showed an increase for the Kujala score and a decrease for the numeric rating scale (NRS) variable from baseline to 1 week. VISA-P score did not show statistically significant differences for the time-group interaction. After the intervention, there were no differences between the groups in any measured time. Conclusion: a single-shot ultrasound-guided PNM intervention per week in the femoral nerve may be an effective treatment for improving the pain, knee flexion ROM, and knee functionality. In addition, this technique produces crossover benefits in the nonintervention limb.
Collapse
|
39
|
Deer TR, Naidu R, Strand N, Sparks D, Abd-Elsayed A, Kalia H, Hah JM, Mehta P, Sayed D, Gulati A. A review of the bioelectronic implications of stimulation of the peripheral nervous system for chronic pain conditions. Bioelectron Med 2020; 6:9. [PMID: 32346553 PMCID: PMC7181529 DOI: 10.1186/s42234-020-00045-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2019] [Accepted: 03/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Peripheral Nerve Stimulation has been used to treat human disease including pain for several decades. Innovation has made it a more viable option for treatment of common chronic pain processes, and interest in the therapy is increasing. Main body While clinical data is forthcoming, understanding factors that influence successful outcomes in the use of PNS still needs to be delineated. This article reviews the evolution and bioelectronic principles of peripheral nerve stimulation including patient selection, nerve targets, techniques and guidance of target delivery. We collate the current evidence for outcomes and provide recommendations for salient topics in PNS. Conclusion Peripheral nerve stimulation has evolved from a surgically invasive procedure to a minimally invasive technique that can be used early in the treatment of peripheral nerve pain. This review identifies and addresses many of the variables which influence the success of PNS in the clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy R Deer
- Spine and Nerve Center for the Virginias, 400 Court Street, Suite 100, Charleston, West Virginia 25301 USA
| | - Ramana Naidu
- Spine and Nerve Center for the Virginias, 400 Court Street, Suite 100, Charleston, West Virginia 25301 USA
| | - Natalie Strand
- Spine and Nerve Center for the Virginias, 400 Court Street, Suite 100, Charleston, West Virginia 25301 USA
| | - Dawn Sparks
- Spine and Nerve Center for the Virginias, 400 Court Street, Suite 100, Charleston, West Virginia 25301 USA
| | - Alaa Abd-Elsayed
- Spine and Nerve Center for the Virginias, 400 Court Street, Suite 100, Charleston, West Virginia 25301 USA
| | - Hemant Kalia
- Spine and Nerve Center for the Virginias, 400 Court Street, Suite 100, Charleston, West Virginia 25301 USA
| | - Jennifer M Hah
- Spine and Nerve Center for the Virginias, 400 Court Street, Suite 100, Charleston, West Virginia 25301 USA
| | - Pankaj Mehta
- Spine and Nerve Center for the Virginias, 400 Court Street, Suite 100, Charleston, West Virginia 25301 USA
| | - Dawood Sayed
- Spine and Nerve Center for the Virginias, 400 Court Street, Suite 100, Charleston, West Virginia 25301 USA
| | - Amitabh Gulati
- Spine and Nerve Center for the Virginias, 400 Court Street, Suite 100, Charleston, West Virginia 25301 USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Percutaneous and Implanted Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for the Management of Pain: Current Evidence and Future Directions. CURRENT PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION REPORTS 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s40141-019-00256-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
41
|
Mauck WD, Hunt CL, Olatoye OO, Warner NS, Lamer TJ. Spinal Cord and Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Painful Disorders. Adv Anesth 2019; 37:163-186. [PMID: 31677655 DOI: 10.1016/j.aan.2019.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- William David Mauck
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Christine L Hunt
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Oludare O Olatoye
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Nafisseh S Warner
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Tim J Lamer
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This article discussed how the knowledge and technique of a few chronic pain procedures benefited the perioperative clinicians in their care of patients receiving specific orthopaedic surgical procedures. RECENT FINDINGS Recent emerging interest in hip and knee denervation for chronic pain management secondary to osteoarthritis stimulates publications on the new understanding of hip and knee joint innervation. The improved understanding of the anatomy allows better precision in targeting the articular branches. The procedures for chronic joint pain such as radiofrequency ablation, chemical neurolysis and neuromodulation procedure have recently been applied to the perioperative care in orthopaedic procedures because of the potential long-lasting analgesia, opioid-sparing effect and consequent improvement in physical function and health-related quality of life after surgery. SUMMARY Despite the widespread use of regional anaesthesia and multimodal analgesia in the perioperative pain management, more than two-third of the patients reported severe postoperative pain. Therefore, other therapeutic strategies used in chronic pain management such as radiofrequency ablation and neuromodulation have been proposed to optimize acute postsurgical pain. The early experience with those techniques is encouraging, and more studies are required to explore the incorporation of these procedures in the perioperative care.
Collapse
|
43
|
Gabriel RA, Swisher MW, Ilfeld BM. Percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation for acute postoperative pain. Pain Manag 2019; 9:347-354. [PMID: 31099305 DOI: 10.2217/pmt-2018-0094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Peripheral nerve stimulation or peripheral neuromodulation is a modality utilized for decades to manage chronic pain. There have been recent studies published describing its use in managing acute surgical pain for orthopedic surgery. The postoperative acute pain associated with several types of surgeries often outlasts the analgesia duration provided by single and continuous peripheral nerve blocks. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation has the potential to provide much longer analgesia for acute pain while avoiding some limitations associated with local anesthetic-based peripheral nerve blocks. We summarize the current devices used in published studies to demonstrate feasibility with a focus on acute pain control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodney A Gabriel
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Regional Anesthesia & Acute Pain, Department of Medicine, Division of Biomedical Informatics, University of California, San Diego, 200 West Arbor Dr, MC 8770, San Diego, CA 92103, USA
| | - Matthew W Swisher
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Regional Anesthesia & Acute Pain, University of California, San Diego, 200 West Arbor Dr, MC 8770, San Diego, CA 92103, USA
| | - Brian M Ilfeld
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Regional Anesthesia & Acute Pain, University of California, San Diego, 200 West Arbor Dr, MC 8770, San Diego, CA 92103, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Ilfeld BM, Finneran JJ, Gabriel RA, Said ET, Nguyen PL, Abramson WB, Khatibi B, Sztain JF, Swisher MW, Jaeger P, Covey DC, Meunier MJ, Hentzen ER, Robertson CM. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation: neuromodulation of the suprascapular nerve and brachial plexus for postoperative analgesia following ambulatory rotator cuff repair. A proof-of-concept study. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2019; 44:310-318. [PMID: 30770421 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2018-100121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2018] [Accepted: 11/04/2018] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) is an analgesic modality involving the insertion of a lead through an introducing needle followed by the delivery of electric current. This modality has been reported to treat chronic pain as well as postoperative pain following knee and foot surgery. However, it remains unknown if this analgesic technique may be used in ambulatory patients following upper extremity surgery. The purpose of this proof-of-concept study was to investigate various lead implantation locations and evaluate the feasibility of using percutaneous brachial plexus PNS to treat surgical pain following ambulatory rotator cuff repair in the immediate postoperative period. METHODS Preoperatively, an electrical lead (SPR Therapeutics, Cleveland, Ohio) was percutaneously implanted to target the suprascapular nerve or brachial plexus roots or trunks using ultrasound guidance. Postoperatively, subjects received 5 min of either stimulation or sham in a randomized, double-masked fashion followed by a 5 min crossover period, and then continuous stimulation until lead removal postoperative days 14-28. RESULTS Leads (n=2) implanted at the suprascapular notch did not appear to provide analgesia, and subsequent leads (n=14) were inserted through the middle scalene muscle and placed to target the brachial plexus. Three subjects withdrew prior to data collection. Within the recovery room, stimulation did not decrease pain scores during the first 40 min of the remaining subjects with brachial plexus leads, regardless of which treatment subjects were randomized to initially. Seven of these 11 subjects required a single-injection interscalene nerve block for rescue analgesia prior to discharge. However, subsequent average resting and dynamic pain scores postoperative days 1-14 had a median of 1 or less on the Numeric Rating Scale, and opioid requirements averaged less than 1 tablet daily with active stimulation. Two leads dislodged during use and four fractured on withdrawal, but no infections, nerve injuries, or adverse sequelae were reported. CONCLUSIONS This proof-of-concept study demonstrates that ultrasound-guided percutaneous PNS of the brachial plexus is feasible for ambulatory shoulder surgery, and although analgesia immediately following surgery does not appear to be as potent as local anesthetic-based peripheral nerve blocks, the study suggests that this modality may provide analgesia and decrease opioid requirements in the days following rotator cuff repair. Therefore, it suggests that a subsequent, large, randomized clinical trial with an adequate control group is warranted to further investigate this therapy in the management of surgical pain in the immediate postoperative period. However, multiple technical issues remain to be resolved, such as the optimal lead location, insertion technique, and stimulating protocol, as well as preventing lead dislodgment and fracture. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT02898103.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian M Ilfeld
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA .,The Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - John J Finneran
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.,The Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Rodney A Gabriel
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.,The Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Engy T Said
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Patrick L Nguyen
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Wendy B Abramson
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Bahareh Khatibi
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Jacklynn F Sztain
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Matthew W Swisher
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.,The Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Pia Jaeger
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.,The Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.,Department of Anesthesiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Dana C Covey
- Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Matthew J Meunier
- Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Eric R Hentzen
- Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Catherine M Robertson
- Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|