1
|
Hussain MA, Grill WM, Pelot NA. Highly efficient modeling and optimization of neural fiber responses to electrical stimulation. Nat Commun 2024; 15:7597. [PMID: 39217179 PMCID: PMC11365978 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-51709-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2024] [Accepted: 08/13/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Peripheral neuromodulation has emerged as a powerful modality for controlling physiological functions and treating a variety of medical conditions including chronic pain and organ dysfunction. The underlying complexity of the nonlinear responses to electrical stimulation make it challenging to design precise and effective neuromodulation protocols. Computational models have thus become indispensable in advancing our understanding and control of neural responses to electrical stimulation. However, existing approaches suffer from computational bottlenecks, rendering them unsuitable for real-time applications, large-scale parameter sweeps, or sophisticated optimization. In this work, we introduce an approach for massively parallel estimation and optimization of neural fiber responses to electrical stimulation using machine learning techniques. By leveraging advances in high-performance computing and parallel programming, we present a surrogate fiber model that generates spatiotemporal responses to a wide variety of cuff-based electrical peripheral nerve stimulation protocols. We used our surrogate fiber model to design stimulation parameters for selective stimulation of pig and human vagus nerves. Our approach yields a several-orders-of-magnitude improvement in computational efficiency while retaining generality and high predictive accuracy, demonstrating its robustness and potential to enhance the design and optimization of peripheral neuromodulation therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minhaj A Hussain
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA
| | - Warren M Grill
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA
- Department of Neurobiology, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA
| | - Nicole A Pelot
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Spiliotis K, Appali R, Fontes Gomes AK, Payonk JP, Adrian S, van Rienen U, Starke J, Köhling R. Utilising activity patterns of a complex biophysical network model to optimise intra-striatal deep brain stimulation. Sci Rep 2024; 14:18919. [PMID: 39143173 PMCID: PMC11324959 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-69456-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2024] [Accepted: 08/05/2024] [Indexed: 08/16/2024] Open
Abstract
A large-scale biophysical network model for the isolated striatal body is developed to optimise potential intrastriatal deep brain stimulation applied to, e.g. obsessive-compulsive disorder. The model is based on modified Hodgkin-Huxley equations with small-world connectivity, while the spatial information about the positions of the neurons is taken from a detailed human atlas. The model produces neuronal spatiotemporal activity patterns segregating healthy from pathological conditions. Three biomarkers were used for the optimisation of stimulation protocols regarding stimulation frequency, amplitude and localisation: the mean activity of the entire network, the frequency spectrum of the entire network (rhythmicity) and a combination of the above two. By minimising the deviation of the aforementioned biomarkers from the normal state, we compute the optimal deep brain stimulation parameters, regarding position, amplitude and frequency. Our results suggest that in the DBS optimisation process, there is a clear trade-off between frequency synchronisation and overall network activity, which has also been observed during in vivo studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Konstantinos Spiliotis
- Institute of Mathematics, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
- Laboratory of Mathematics and Informatics (ISCE), Department of Civil Engineering, Democritus University of Thrace, Xanthi, Greece.
| | - Revathi Appali
- Institute of General Electrical Engineering, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
- Department of Ageing of Individuals and Society, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | | | - Jan Philipp Payonk
- Institute of General Electrical Engineering, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Simon Adrian
- Faculty of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Ursula van Rienen
- Institute of General Electrical Engineering, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
- Department of Life, Light and Matter, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
- Department of Ageing of Individuals and Society, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Jens Starke
- Institute of Mathematics, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Rüdiger Köhling
- Department of Life, Light and Matter, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
- Department of Ageing of Individuals and Society, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
- Oscar-Langendorff-Institute of Physiology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wu Y, Hu K, Liu S. Computational models advance deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease. NETWORK (BRISTOL, ENGLAND) 2024:1-32. [PMID: 38923890 DOI: 10.1080/0954898x.2024.2361799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 05/25/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation(DBS) has become an effective intervention for advanced Parkinson's disease(PD), but the exact mechanism of DBS is still unclear. In this review, we discuss the history of DBS, the anatomy and internal architecture of the basal ganglia (BG), the abnormal pathological changes of the BG in PD, and how computational models can help understand and advance DBS. We also describe two types of models: mathematical theoretical models and clinical predictive models. Mathematical theoretical models simulate neurons or neural networks of BG to shed light on the mechanistic principle underlying DBS, while clinical predictive models focus more on patients' outcomes, helping to adapt treatment plans for each patient and advance novel electrode designs. Finally, we provide insights and an outlook on future technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yongtong Wu
- School of Mathematics, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Kejia Hu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- Center for Functional Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Shenquan Liu
- School of Mathematics, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schmid W, Danstrom IA, Crespo Echevarria M, Adkinson J, Mattar L, Banks GP, Sheth SA, Watrous AJ, Heilbronner SR, Bijanki KR, Alabastri A, Bartoli E. A biophysically constrained brain connectivity model based on stimulation-evoked potentials. J Neurosci Methods 2024; 405:110106. [PMID: 38453060 PMCID: PMC11233030 DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2024.110106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2023] [Revised: 01/24/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Single-pulse electrical stimulation (SPES) is an established technique used to map functional effective connectivity networks in treatment-refractory epilepsy patients undergoing intracranial-electroencephalography monitoring. While the connectivity path between stimulation and recording sites has been explored through the integration of structural connectivity, there are substantial gaps, such that new modeling approaches may advance our understanding of connectivity derived from SPES studies. NEW METHOD Using intracranial electrophysiology data recorded from a single patient undergoing stereo-electroencephalography (sEEG) evaluation, we employ an automated detection method to identify early response components, C1, from pulse-evoked potentials (PEPs) induced by SPES. C1 components were utilized for a novel topology optimization method, modeling 3D electrical conductivity to infer neural pathways from stimulation sites. Additionally, PEP features were compared with tractography metrics, and model results were analyzed with respect to anatomical features. RESULTS The proposed optimization model resolved conductivity paths with low error. Specific electrode contacts displaying high error correlated with anatomical complexities. The C1 component strongly correlated with additional PEP features and displayed stable, weak correlations with tractography measures. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD Existing methods for estimating neural signal pathways are imaging-based and thus rely on anatomical inferences. CONCLUSIONS These results demonstrate that informing topology optimization methods with human intracranial SPES data is a feasible method for generating 3D conductivity maps linking electrical pathways with functional neural ensembles. PEP-estimated effective connectivity is correlated with but distinguished from structural connectivity. Modeled conductivity resolves connectivity pathways in the absence of anatomical priors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Schmid
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University, 6100 Main Street, Houston, TX 77005, USA
| | - Isabel A Danstrom
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Maria Crespo Echevarria
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Joshua Adkinson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Layth Mattar
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Garrett P Banks
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Sameer A Sheth
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Andrew J Watrous
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Sarah R Heilbronner
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Kelly R Bijanki
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Alessandro Alabastri
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University, 6100 Main Street, Houston, TX 77005, USA.
| | - Eleonora Bartoli
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Patrick EE, Fleeting CR, Patel DR, Casauay JT, Patel A, Shepherd H, Wong JK. Modeling the volume of tissue activated in deep brain stimulation and its clinical influence: a review. Front Hum Neurosci 2024; 18:1333183. [PMID: 38660012 PMCID: PMC11039793 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1333183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2023] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a neuromodulatory therapy that has been FDA approved for the treatment of various disorders, including but not limited to, movement disorders (e.g., Parkinson's disease and essential tremor), epilepsy, and obsessive-compulsive disorder. Computational methods for estimating the volume of tissue activated (VTA), coupled with brain imaging techniques, form the basis of models that are being generated from retrospective clinical studies for predicting DBS patient outcomes. For instance, VTA models are used to generate target-and network-based probabilistic stimulation maps that play a crucial role in predicting DBS treatment outcomes. This review defines the methods for calculation of tissue activation (or modulation) including ones that use heuristic and clinically derived estimates and more computationally involved ones that rely on finite-element methods and biophysical axon models. We define model parameters and provide a comparison of commercial, open-source, and academic simulation platforms available for integrated neuroimaging and neural activation prediction. In addition, we review clinical studies that use these modeling methods as a function of disease. By describing the tissue-activation modeling methods and highlighting their application in clinical studies, we provide the neural engineering and clinical neuromodulation communities with perspectives that may influence the adoption of modeling methods for future DBS studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin E. Patrick
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Chance R. Fleeting
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Drashti R. Patel
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Jed T. Casauay
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Aashay Patel
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Hunter Shepherd
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Joshua K. Wong
- Department of Neurology, Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Willett A, Wylie SA, Bowersock JL, Dawant BM, Rodriguez W, Ugiliweneza B, Neimat JS, van Wouwe NC. Focused stimulation of dorsal versus ventral subthalamic nucleus enhances action-outcome learning in patients with Parkinson's disease. Brain Commun 2024; 6:fcae111. [PMID: 38646144 PMCID: PMC11032193 DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcae111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Revised: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 04/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus is an effective treatment for the clinical motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease, but may alter the ability to learn contingencies between stimuli, actions and outcomes. We investigated how stimulation of the functional subregions in the subthalamic nucleus (motor and cognitive regions) modulates stimulus-action-outcome learning in Parkinson's disease patients. Twelve Parkinson's disease patients with deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus completed a probabilistic stimulus-action-outcome task while undergoing ventral and dorsal subthalamic nucleus stimulation (within subjects, order counterbalanced). The task orthogonalized action choice and outcome valence, which created four action-outcome learning conditions: action-reward, inhibit-reward, action-punishment avoidance and inhibit-punishment avoidance. We compared the effects of deep brain stimulation on learning rates across these conditions as well as on computed Pavlovian learning biases. Dorsal stimulation was associated with higher overall learning proficiency relative to ventral subthalamic nucleus stimulation. Compared to ventral stimulation, stimulating the dorsal subthalamic nucleus led to a particular advantage in learning to inhibit action to produce desired outcomes (gain reward or avoid punishment) as well as better learning proficiency across all conditions providing reward opportunities. The Pavlovian reward bias was reduced with dorsal relative to ventral subthalamic nucleus stimulation, which was reflected by improved inhibit-reward learning. Our results show that focused stimulation in the dorsal compared to the ventral subthalamic nucleus is relatively more favourable for learning action-outcome contingencies and reduces the Pavlovian bias that could lead to reward-driven behaviour. Considering the effects of deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus on learning and behaviour could be important when optimizing stimulation parameters to avoid side effects like impulsive reward-driven behaviour.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Willett
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA
| | - Scott A Wylie
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA
| | - Jessica L Bowersock
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA
| | - Benoit M Dawant
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
| | - William Rodriguez
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
| | - Beatrice Ugiliweneza
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA
| | - Joseph S Neimat
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA
| | - Nelleke C van Wouwe
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Seas A, Noor MS, Choi KS, Veerakumar A, Obatusin M, Dahill-Fuchel J, Tiruvadi V, Xu E, Riva-Posse P, Rozell CJ, Mayberg HS, McIntyre CC, Waters AC, Howell B. Subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation evokes two distinct cortical responses via differential white matter activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2024; 121:e2314918121. [PMID: 38527192 PMCID: PMC10998591 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2314918121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Subcallosal cingulate (SCC) deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an emerging therapy for refractory depression. Good clinical outcomes are associated with the activation of white matter adjacent to the SCC. This activation produces a signature cortical evoked potential (EP), but it is unclear which of the many pathways in the vicinity of SCC is responsible for driving this response. Individualized biophysical models were built to achieve selective engagement of two target bundles: either the forceps minor (FM) or cingulum bundle (CB). Unilateral 2 Hz stimulation was performed in seven patients with treatment-resistant depression who responded to SCC DBS, and EPs were recorded using 256-sensor scalp electroencephalography. Two distinct EPs were observed: a 120 ms symmetric response spanning both hemispheres and a 60 ms asymmetrical EP. Activation of FM correlated with the symmetrical EPs, while activation of CB was correlated with the asymmetrical EPs. These results support prior model predictions that these two pathways are predominantly activated by clinical SCC DBS and provide first evidence of a link between cortical EPs and selective fiber bundle activation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Seas
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC27708
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC27708
| | - M. Sohail Noor
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC27708
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH10900
| | - Ki Sueng Choi
- Nash Family Center for Advanced Circuit Therapeutics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY10029
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA30329
| | - Ashan Veerakumar
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA30329
| | - Mosadoluwa Obatusin
- Nash Family Center for Advanced Circuit Therapeutics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY10029
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA30329
| | - Jacob Dahill-Fuchel
- Nash Family Center for Advanced Circuit Therapeutics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY10029
| | - Vineet Tiruvadi
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA30329
| | - Elisa Xu
- Nash Family Center for Advanced Circuit Therapeutics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY10029
| | - Patricio Riva-Posse
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA30329
| | - Christopher J. Rozell
- School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA30332
| | - Helen S. Mayberg
- Nash Family Center for Advanced Circuit Therapeutics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY10029
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA30329
| | - Cameron C. McIntyre
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC27708
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC27708
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH10900
| | - Allison C. Waters
- Nash Family Center for Advanced Circuit Therapeutics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY10029
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA30329
| | - Bryan Howell
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC27708
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH10900
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bower KL, Noecker AM, Frankemolle-Gilbert AM, McIntyre CC. Model-Based Analysis of Pathway Recruitment During Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation. Neuromodulation 2024; 27:455-463. [PMID: 37097269 PMCID: PMC10598236 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2023.02.084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Revised: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 04/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Subthalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established clinical therapy, but an anatomically clear definition of the underlying neural target(s) of the stimulation remains elusive. Patient-specific models of DBS are commonly used tools in the search for stimulation targets, and recent iterations of those models are focused on characterizing the brain connections that are activated by DBS. OBJECTIVE The goal of this study was to quantify axonal pathway activation in the subthalamic region from DBS at different electrode locations and stimulation settings. MATERIALS AND METHODS We used an anatomically and electrically detailed computational model of subthalamic DBS to generate recruitment curves for eight different axonal pathways of interest, at three generalized DBS electrode locations in the subthalamic nucleus (STN) (ie, central STN, dorsal STN, posterior STN). These simulations were performed with three levels of DBS electrode localization uncertainty (ie, 0.5 mm, 1.0 mm, 1.5 mm). RESULTS The recruitment curves highlight the diversity of pathways that are theoretically activated with subthalamic DBS, in addition to the dependence of the stimulation location and parameter settings on the pathway activation estimates. The three generalized DBS locations exhibited distinct pathway recruitment curve profiles, suggesting that each stimulation location would have a different effect on network activity patterns. We also found that the use of anodic stimuli could help limit activation of the internal capsule relative to other pathways. However, incorporating realistic levels of DBS electrode localization uncertainty in the models substantially limits their predictive capabilities. CONCLUSIONS Subtle differences in stimulation location and/or parameter settings can impact the collection of pathways that are activated during subthalamic DBS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelsey L Bower
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Angela M Noecker
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Cameron C McIntyre
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ng PR, Bush A, Vissani M, McIntyre CC, Richardson RM. Biophysical Principles and Computational Modeling of Deep Brain Stimulation. Neuromodulation 2024; 27:422-439. [PMID: 37204360 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2023.04.471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2022] [Revised: 04/02/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has revolutionized the treatment of neurological disorders, yet the mechanisms of DBS are still under investigation. Computational models are important in silico tools for elucidating these underlying principles and potentially for personalizing DBS therapy to individual patients. The basic principles underlying neurostimulation computational models, however, are not well known in the clinical neuromodulation community. OBJECTIVE In this study, we present a tutorial on the derivation of computational models of DBS and outline the biophysical contributions of electrodes, stimulation parameters, and tissue substrates to the effects of DBS. RESULTS Given that many aspects of DBS are difficult to characterize experimentally, computational models have played an important role in understanding how material, size, shape, and contact segmentation influence device biocompatibility, energy efficiency, the spatial spread of the electric field, and the specificity of neural activation. Neural activation is dictated by stimulation parameters including frequency, current vs voltage control, amplitude, pulse width, polarity configurations, and waveform. These parameters also affect the potential for tissue damage, energy efficiency, the spatial spread of the electric field, and the specificity of neural activation. Activation of the neural substrate also is influenced by the encapsulation layer surrounding the electrode, the conductivity of the surrounding tissue, and the size and orientation of white matter fibers. These properties modulate the effects of the electric field and determine the ultimate therapeutic response. CONCLUSION This article describes biophysical principles that are useful for understanding the mechanisms of neurostimulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alan Bush
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Matteo Vissani
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Cameron C McIntyre
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Robert Mark Richardson
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Spiliotis K, Butenko K, Starke J, van Rienen U, Köhling R. Towards an optimised deep brain stimulation using a large-scale computational network and realistic volume conductor model. J Neural Eng 2024; 20:066045. [PMID: 37988747 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ad0e7c] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 11/23/2023]
Abstract
Objective. Constructing a theoretical framework to improve deep brain stimulation (DBS) based on the neuronal spatiotemporal patterns of the stimulation-affected areas constitutes a primary target.Approach. We develop a large-scale biophysical network, paired with a realistic volume conductor model, to estimate theoretically efficacious stimulation protocols. Based on previously published anatomically defined structural connectivity, a biophysical basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical neuronal network is constructed using Hodgkin-Huxley dynamics. We define a new biomarker describing the thalamic spatiotemporal activity as a ratio of spiking vs. burst firing. The per cent activation of the different pathways is adapted in the simulation to minimise the differences of the biomarker with respect to its value under healthy conditions.Main results.This neuronal network reproduces spatiotemporal patterns that emerge in Parkinson's disease. Simulations of the fibre per cent activation for the defined biomarker propose desensitisation of pallido-thalamic synaptic efficacy, induced by high-frequency signals, as one possible crucial mechanism for DBS action. Based on this activation, we define both an optimal electrode position and stimulation protocol using pathway activation modelling.Significance. A key advantage of this research is that it combines different approaches, i.e. the spatiotemporal pattern with the electric field and axonal response modelling, to compute the optimal DBS protocol. By correlating the inherent network dynamics with the activation of white matter fibres, we obtain new insights into the DBS therapeutic action.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Konstantin Butenko
- Institute of General Electrical Engineering, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
- Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Unit, Department for Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jens Starke
- Institute of Mathematics, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Ursula van Rienen
- Institute of General Electrical Engineering, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
- Department Life, Light and Matter, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
- Department of Ageing of Individuals and Society, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Rüdiger Köhling
- Department of Ageing of Individuals and Society, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
- Oscar-Langendorff-Institute of Physiology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Schmid W, Danstrom IA, Echevarria MC, Adkinson J, Mattar L, Banks GP, Sheth SA, Watrous AJ, Heilbronner SR, Bijanki KR, Alabastri A, Bartoli E. A biophysically constrained brain connectivity model based on stimulation-evoked potentials. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.11.03.565525. [PMID: 37986830 PMCID: PMC10659345 DOI: 10.1101/2023.11.03.565525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2023]
Abstract
Background Single-pulse electrical stimulation (SPES) is an established technique used to map functional effective connectivity networks in treatment-refractory epilepsy patients undergoing intracranial-electroencephalography monitoring. While the connectivity path between stimulation and recording sites has been explored through the integration of structural connectivity, there are substantial gaps, such that new modeling approaches may advance our understanding of connectivity derived from SPES studies. New Method Using intracranial electrophysiology data recorded from a single patient undergoing sEEG evaluation, we employ an automated detection method to identify early response components, C1, from pulse-evoked potentials (PEPs) induced by SPES. C1 components were utilized for a novel topology optimization method, modeling 3D conductivity propagation from stimulation sites. Additionally, PEP features were compared with tractography metrics, and model results were analyzed with respect to anatomical features. Results The proposed optimization model resolved conductivity paths with low error. Specific electrode contacts displaying high error correlated with anatomical complexities. The C1 component strongly correlates with additional PEP features and displayed stable, weak correlations with tractography measures. Comparison with existing methods Existing methods for estimating conductivity propagation are imaging-based and thus rely on anatomical inferences. Conclusions These results demonstrate that informing topology optimization methods with human intracranial SPES data is a feasible method for generating 3D conductivity maps linking electrical pathways with functional neural ensembles. PEP-estimated effective connectivity is correlated with but distinguished from structural connectivity. Modeled conductivity resolves connectivity pathways in the absence of anatomical priors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Schmid
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University, 6100 Main Street, Houston 77005, Texas, USA
| | - Isabel A. Danstrom
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston 77030, Texas, USA
| | - Maria Crespo Echevarria
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston 77030, Texas, USA
| | - Joshua Adkinson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston 77030, Texas, USA
| | - Layth Mattar
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston 77030, Texas, USA
| | - Garrett P. Banks
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston 77030, Texas, USA
| | - Sameer A. Sheth
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston 77030, Texas, USA
| | - Andrew J. Watrous
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston 77030, Texas, USA
| | - Sarah R. Heilbronner
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston 77030, Texas, USA
| | - Kelly R. Bijanki
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston 77030, Texas, USA
| | - Alessandro Alabastri
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University, 6100 Main Street, Houston 77005, Texas, USA
| | - Eleonora Bartoli
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston 77030, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Makaroff SN, Nummenmaa AR, Noetscher GM, Qi Z, McIntyre CC, Bingham CS. Influence of charges deposited on membranes of human hyperdirect pathway axons on depolarization during subthalamic deep brain stimulation. J Neural Eng 2023; 20:10.1088/1741-2552/ace5de. [PMID: 37429285 PMCID: PMC10542971 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ace5de] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/12/2023]
Abstract
Objective.The motor hyperdirect pathway (HDP) is a key target in the treatment of Parkinson's disease with deep brain stimulation (DBS). Biophysical models of HDP DBS have been used to explore the mechanisms of stimulation. Built upon finite element method volume conductor solutions, such models are limited by a resolution mismatch, where the volume conductor is modeled at the macro scale, while the neural elements are at the micro scale. New techniques are needed to better integrate volume conductor models with neuron models.Approach.We simulated subthalamic DBS of the human HDP using finely meshed axon models to calculate surface charge deposition on insulting membranes of nonmyelinated axons. We converted the corresponding double layer extracellular problem to a single layer problem and applied the well-conditioned charge-based boundary element fast multipole method (BEM-FMM) with unconstrained numerical spatial resolution. Commonly used simplified estimations of membrane depolarization were compared with more realistic solutions.Main result.Neither centerline potential nor estimates of axon recruitment were impacted by the estimation method used except at axon bifurcations and hemispherical terminations. Local estimates of axon polarization were often much higher at bifurcations and terminations than at any other place along the axon and terminal arbor. Local average estimates of terminal electric field are higher by 10%-20%.Significance. Biophysical models of action potential initiation in the HDP suggest that axon terminations are often the lowest threshold elements for activation. The results of this study reinforce that hypothesis and suggest that this phenomenon is even more pronounced than previously realized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergey N Makaroff
- Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Worcester Polytechnic Institution, Worcester, MA 01609, United States of America
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, United States of America
| | - Aapo R Nummenmaa
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, United States of America
| | - Gregory M Noetscher
- Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Worcester Polytechnic Institution, Worcester, MA 01609, United States of America
- ARMY DEVCOM-SC, General Greene Ave, Natick, MA 01760, United States of America
| | - Zhen Qi
- Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Worcester Polytechnic Institution, Worcester, MA 01609, United States of America
| | - Cameron C McIntyre
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, United States of America
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, United States of America
| | - Clayton S Bingham
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Neumann WJ, Horn A, Kühn AA. Insights and opportunities for deep brain stimulation as a brain circuit intervention. Trends Neurosci 2023; 46:472-487. [PMID: 37105806 DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2023.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Revised: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/17/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023]
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective treatment and has provided unique insights into the dynamic circuit architecture of brain disorders. This Review illustrates our current understanding of the pathophysiology of movement disorders and their underlying brain circuits that are modulated with DBS. It proposes principles of pathological network synchronization patterns like beta activity (13-35 Hz) in Parkinson's disease. We describe alterations from microscale including local synaptic activity via modulation of mesoscale hypersynchronization to changes in whole-brain macroscale connectivity. Finally, an outlook on advances for clinical innovations in next-generation neurotechnology is provided: from preoperative connectomic targeting to feedback controlled closed-loop adaptive DBS as individualized network-specific brain circuit interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolf-Julian Neumann
- Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Einstein Center for Neurosciences Berlin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andreas Horn
- Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Einstein Center for Neurosciences Berlin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Department of Neurology, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; MGH Neurosurgery & Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery at MGH Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrea A Kühn
- Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Einstein Center for Neurosciences Berlin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; NeuroCure Clinical Research Centre, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; DZNE, German Center for Degenerative Diseases, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Golabek J, Schiefer M, Wong JK, Saxena S, Patrick E. Artificial neural network-based rapid predictor of biological nerve fiber activation for DBS applications. J Neural Eng 2023; 20. [PMID: 36599158 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/acb016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Objective.Computational models are powerful tools that can enable the optimization of deep brain stimulation (DBS). To enhance the clinical practicality of these models, their computational expense and required technical expertise must be minimized. An important aspect of DBS models is the prediction of neural activation in response to electrical stimulation. Existing rapid predictors of activation simplify implementation and reduce prediction runtime, but at the expense of accuracy. We sought to address this issue by leveraging the speed and generalization abilities of artificial neural networks (ANNs) to create a novel predictor of neural fiber activation in response to DBS.Approach.We developed six variations of an ANN-based predictor to predict the response of individual, myelinated axons to extracellular electrical stimulation. ANNs were trained using datasets generated from a finite-element model of an implanted DBS system together with multi-compartment cable models of axons. We evaluated the ANN-based predictors using three white matter pathways derived from group-averaged connectome data within a patient-specific tissue conductivity field, comparing both predicted stimulus activation thresholds and pathway recruitment across a clinically relevant range of stimulus amplitudes and pulse widths.Main results.The top-performing ANN could predict the thresholds of axons with a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.037 V, and pathway recruitment with an MAE of 0.079%, across all parameters. The ANNs reduced the time required to predict the thresholds of 288 axons by four to five orders of magnitude when compared to multi-compartment cable models.Significance.We demonstrated that ANNs can be fast, accurate, and robust predictors of neural activation in response to DBS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin Golabek
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America
| | - Matthew Schiefer
- Malcom Randall Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Gainesville, FL, United States of America
| | - Joshua K Wong
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America
| | - Shreya Saxena
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America
| | - Erin Patrick
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Oxenford S, Roediger J, Neudorfer C, Milosevic L, Güttler C, Spindler P, Vajkoczy P, Neumann WJ, Kühn A, Horn A. Lead-OR: A multimodal platform for deep brain stimulation surgery. eLife 2022; 11:e72929. [PMID: 35594135 PMCID: PMC9177150 DOI: 10.7554/elife.72929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrode implant trajectories are stereotactically defined using preoperative neuroimaging. To validate the correct trajectory, microelectrode recordings (MERs) or local field potential recordings can be used to extend neuroanatomical information (defined by MRI) with neurophysiological activity patterns recorded from micro- and macroelectrodes probing the surgical target site. Currently, these two sources of information (imaging vs. electrophysiology) are analyzed separately, while means to fuse both data streams have not been introduced. Methods Here, we present a tool that integrates resources from stereotactic planning, neuroimaging, MER, and high-resolution atlas data to create a real-time visualization of the implant trajectory. We validate the tool based on a retrospective cohort of DBS patients (N = 52) offline and present single-use cases of the real-time platform. Results We establish an open-source software tool for multimodal data visualization and analysis during DBS surgery. We show a general correspondence between features derived from neuroimaging and electrophysiological recordings and present examples that demonstrate the functionality of the tool. Conclusions This novel software platform for multimodal data visualization and analysis bears translational potential to improve accuracy of DBS surgery. The toolbox is made openly available and is extendable to integrate with additional software packages. Funding Deutsche Forschungsgesellschaft (410169619, 424778381), Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DynaSti), National Institutes of Health (2R01 MH113929), and Foundation for OCD Research (FFOR).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simón Oxenford
- Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité — Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu BerlinBerlinGermany
| | - Jan Roediger
- Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité — Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu BerlinBerlinGermany
- Charité — Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Einstein Center for Neurosciences BerlinBerlinGermany
| | - Clemens Neudorfer
- Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité — Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu BerlinBerlinGermany
- Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics Department of Neurology, Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUnited States
- MGH Neurosurgery & Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (CNTR) at MGH Neurology Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUnited States
| | - Luka Milosevic
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of TorontoTorontoCanada
- Krembil Brain Institute, University Health NetworkTorontoCanada
| | - Christopher Güttler
- Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité — Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu BerlinBerlinGermany
| | - Philipp Spindler
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité — Universitätsmedizin BerlinBerlinGermany
| | - Peter Vajkoczy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité — Universitätsmedizin BerlinBerlinGermany
| | - Wolf-Julian Neumann
- Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité — Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu BerlinBerlinGermany
| | - Andrea Kühn
- Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité — Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu BerlinBerlinGermany
| | - Andreas Horn
- Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité — Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu BerlinBerlinGermany
- Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics Department of Neurology, Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUnited States
- MGH Neurosurgery & Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (CNTR) at MGH Neurology Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUnited States
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Pujol S, Cabeen RP, Yelnik J, François C, Fernandez Vidal S, Karachi C, Bardinet E, Cosgrove GR, Kikinis R. Somatotopic Organization of Hyperdirect Pathway Projections From the Primary Motor Cortex in the Human Brain. Front Neurol 2022; 13:791092. [PMID: 35547388 PMCID: PMC9081715 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.791092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2021] [Accepted: 03/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The subthalamic nucleus (STN) is an effective neurosurgical target to improve motor symptoms in Parkinson's Disease (PD) patients. MR-guided Focused Ultrasound (MRgFUS) subthalamotomy is being explored as a therapeutic alternative to Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) of the STN. The hyperdirect pathway provides a direct connection between the cortex and the STN and is likely to play a key role in the therapeutic effects of MRgFUS intervention in PD patients. Objective This study aims to investigate the topography and somatotopy of hyperdirect pathway projections from the primary motor cortex (M1). Methods We used advanced multi-fiber tractography and high-resolution diffusion MRI data acquired on five subjects of the Human Connectome Project (HCP) to reconstruct hyperdirect pathway projections from M1. Two neuroanatomy experts reviewed the anatomical accuracy of the tracts. We extracted the fascicles arising from the trunk, arm, hand, face and tongue area from the reconstructed pathways. We assessed the variability among subjects based on the fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) of the fibers. We evaluated the spatial arrangement of the different fascicles using the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) of spatial overlap and the centroids of the bundles. Results We successfully reconstructed hyperdirect pathway projections from M1 in all five subjects. The tracts were in agreement with the expected anatomy. We identified hyperdirect pathway fascicles projecting from the trunk, arm, hand, face and tongue area in all subjects. Tract-derived measurements showed low variability among subjects, and similar distributions of FA and MD values among the fascicles projecting from different M1 areas. We found an anterolateral somatotopic arrangement of the fascicles in the corona radiata, and an average overlap of 0.63 in the internal capsule and 0.65 in the zona incerta. Conclusion Multi-fiber tractography combined with high-resolution diffusion MRI data enables the identification of the somatotopic organization of the hyperdirect pathway. Our preliminary results suggest that the subdivisions of the hyperdirect pathway projecting from the trunk, arm, hand, face, and tongue motor area are intermixed at the level of the zona incerta and posterior limb of the internal capsule, with a predominantly overlapping topographical organization in both regions. Subject-specific knowledge of the hyperdirect pathway somatotopy could help optimize target definition in MRgFUS intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonia Pujol
- Surgical Planning Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Ryan P Cabeen
- Laboratory of Neuro Imaging, Stevens Institute for Neuroimaging and Informatics, Keck School of Medicine of the USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Jérôme Yelnik
- Sorbonne Université, CNRS, INSERM, APHP GH Pitié-Salpêtriére, Paris Brain Institute - Institut du Cerveau (ICM), Paris, France.,CENIR Platform, Institut du Cerveau (ICM), Paris, France
| | - Chantal François
- Sorbonne Université, CNRS, INSERM, APHP GH Pitié-Salpêtriére, Paris Brain Institute - Institut du Cerveau (ICM), Paris, France.,CENIR Platform, Institut du Cerveau (ICM), Paris, France
| | - Sara Fernandez Vidal
- Sorbonne Université, CNRS, INSERM, APHP GH Pitié-Salpêtriére, Paris Brain Institute - Institut du Cerveau (ICM), Paris, France.,CENIR Platform, Institut du Cerveau (ICM), Paris, France
| | - Carine Karachi
- Sorbonne Université, CNRS, INSERM, APHP GH Pitié-Salpêtriére, Paris Brain Institute - Institut du Cerveau (ICM), Paris, France.,CENIR Platform, Institut du Cerveau (ICM), Paris, France.,Department of Neurosurgery, APHP, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié-Salpêtriére/Charles Foix, Paris, France
| | - Eric Bardinet
- Sorbonne Université, CNRS, INSERM, APHP GH Pitié-Salpêtriére, Paris Brain Institute - Institut du Cerveau (ICM), Paris, France.,CENIR Platform, Institut du Cerveau (ICM), Paris, France
| | - G Rees Cosgrove
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Ron Kikinis
- Surgical Planning Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Tödt I, Al-Fatly B, Granert O, Kühn AA, Krack P, Rau J, Timmermann L, Schnitzler A, Paschen S, Helmers AK, Hartmann A, Bardinet E, Schuepbach M, Barbe MT, Dembek TA, Fraix V, Kübler D, Brefel-Courbon C, Gharabaghi A, Wojtecki L, Pinsker MO, Thobois S, Damier P, Witjas T, Houeto JL, Schade-Brittinger C, Vidailhet M, Horn A, Deuschl G. The Contribution of Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation to the Improvement in Motor Functions and Quality of Life. Mov Disord 2022; 37:291-301. [PMID: 35112384 DOI: 10.1002/mds.28952] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2021] [Revised: 01/17/2022] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) effectively treats motor symptoms and quality of life (QoL) of advanced and fluctuating early Parkinson's disease. Little is known about the relation between electrode position and changes in symptom control and ultimately QoL. OBJECTIVES The relation between the stimulated part of the STN and clinical outcomes, including the motor score of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) and the quality-of-life questionnaire, was assessed in a subcohort of the EARLYSTIM study. METHODS Sixty-nine patients from the EARLYSTIM cohort who underwent DBS, with a comprehensive clinical characterization before and 24 months after surgery, were included. Intercorrelations of clinical outcome changes, correlation between the affected functional parts of the STN, and changes in clinical outcomes were investigated. We further calculated sweet spots for different clinical parameters. RESULTS Improvements in the UPDRS III and Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) correlated positively with the extent of the overlap with the sensorimotor STN. The sweet spots for the UPDRS III (x = 11.6, y = -13.1, z = -6.3) and the PDQ-39 differed (x = 14.8, y = -12.4, z = -4.3) ~3.8 mm. CONCLUSIONS The main influence of DBS on QoL is likely mediated through the sensory-motor basal ganglia loop. The PDQ sweet spot is located in a posteroventral spatial location in the STN territory. For aspects of QoL, however, there was also evidence of improvement through stimulation of the other STN subnuclei. More research is necessary to customize the DBS target to individual symptoms of each patient. © 2022 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inken Tödt
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Bassam Al-Fatly
- Department of Neurology, Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Section, Charité Medicine University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Oliver Granert
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Andrea A Kühn
- Department of Neurology, Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Section, Charité Medicine University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Paul Krack
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bern and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Joern Rau
- Coordinating Center for Clinical Trials, Philipps-University, Marburg, Germany
| | - Lars Timmermann
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Alfons Schnitzler
- Department of Neurology, Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Heinrich-Heine University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Steffen Paschen
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Ann-Kristin Helmers
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Andreas Hartmann
- Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Center d'Investigation Clinique 9503, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière, Paris, France.,Département de Neurologie, Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris 6 et INSERM, Paris, France
| | - Eric Bardinet
- Department of Neurology, NS-PARK/F-CRIN, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France.,Center de Neuroimagerie de Recherche, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle (ICM), Paris, France
| | - Michael Schuepbach
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bern and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.,Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Center d'Investigation Clinique 9503, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière, Paris, France.,Département de Neurologie, Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris 6 et INSERM, Paris, France.,Institute of Neurology, Konolfingen, Switzerland
| | - Michael T Barbe
- Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, Cologne, Germany
| | - Till A Dembek
- Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, Cologne, Germany
| | - Valerie Fraix
- Université Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, Grenoble, France.,Neurology Department, Grenoble University Hospital, Grenoble, France
| | - Dorothee Kübler
- Department of Neurology, Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Section, Charité Medicine University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Alireza Gharabaghi
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neurotechnology Institute for Neuromodulation and Neurotechnology, University Hospital and University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Lars Wojtecki
- Department of Neurology and Neurorehabilitation, Hospital zum Heiligen Geist GmbH & Co.KG Academic Teaching Hospital of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf Von-Broichhausen-Allee 1, Kempen, Germany
| | - Marcus O Pinsker
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Stephane Thobois
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, Service de Neurologie C, Center Expert Parkinson, Bron, France.,Université Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Faculté de Médecine Lyon Sud Charles Mérieux, Oullins, France
| | | | - Tatiana Witjas
- Department of Neurology, Timone University Hospital UMR 7289, CNRS Marseille, Marseille, France
| | - Jean-Luc Houeto
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, Service de Neurologie C, Center Expert Parkinson, Bron, France
| | | | - Marie Vidailhet
- Department of Neurology, Sorbonne Université, ICM UMR1127, INSERM &1127, CNRS 7225, Salpêtriere University Hospital AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Andreas Horn
- Department of Neurology, Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Section, Charité Medicine University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Günther Deuschl
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Davids M, Guerin B, Wald LL. A Huygens' surface approach to rapid characterization of peripheral nerve stimulation. Magn Reson Med 2022; 87:377-393. [PMID: 34427346 PMCID: PMC8689355 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.28966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2020] [Revised: 06/18/2021] [Accepted: 07/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) modeling has a potential role in designing and operating MRI gradient coils but requires computationally demanding simulations of electromagnetic fields and neural responses. We demonstrate compression of an electromagnetic and neurodynamic model into a single versatile PNS matrix (P-matrix) defined on an intermediary Huygens' surface to allow fast PNS characterization of arbitrary coil geometries and body positions. METHODS The Huygens' surface approach divides PNS prediction into an extensive pre-computation phase of the electromagnetic and neurodynamic responses, which is independent of coil geometry and patient position, and a fast coil-specific linear projection step connecting this information to a specific coil geometry. We validate the Huygens' approach by performing PNS characterizations for 21 body and head gradients and comparing them with full electromagnetic-neurodynamic modeling. We demonstrate the value of Huygens' surface-based PNS modeling by characterizing PNS-optimized coil windings for a wide range of patient positions and poses in two body models. RESULTS The PNS prediction using the Huygens' P-matrix takes less than a minute (instead of hours to days) without compromising numerical accuracy (error ≤ 0.1%) compared to the full simulation. Using this tool, we demonstrate that coils optimized for PNS at the brain landmark using a male model can also improve PNS for other imaging applications (cardiac, abdominal, pelvic, and knee imaging) in both male and female models. CONCLUSION Representing PNS information on a Huygens' surface extended the approach's ability to assess PNS across body positions and models and test the robustness of PNS optimization in gradient design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathias Davids
- A.A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Computer Assisted Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Bastien Guerin
- A.A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Lawrence L. Wald
- A.A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Sobesky L, Goede L, Odekerken VJJ, Wang Q, Li N, Neudorfer C, Rajamani N, Al-Fatly B, Reich M, Volkmann J, de Bie RMA, Kühn AA, Horn A. Subthalamic and pallidal deep brain stimulation: are we modulating the same network? Brain 2021; 145:251-262. [PMID: 34453827 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awab258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2021] [Revised: 04/05/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The subthalamic nucleus and internal pallidum are main target sites for deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease. Multiple trials that investigated subthalamic versus pallidal stimulation were unable to settle on a definitive optimal target between the two. One reason could be that the effect is mediated via a common functional network. To test this hypothesis, we calculated connectivity profiles seeding from deep brain stimulation electrodes in 94 patients that underwent subthalamic and 28 patients with pallidal treatment based on a normative connectome atlas calculated from 1,000 healthy subjects. In each cohort, we calculated connectivity profiles that were associated with optimal clinical improvements. The two maps showed striking similarity and were able to cross-predict outcomes in the respective other cohort (R = 0.37 at p < 0.001; R = 0.34 at p = 0.032). Next, we calculated an agreement map which retained regions common to both target sites. Crucially, this map was able to explain an additional amount of variance in clinical improvements of either cohort when compared to the maps calculated on the two cohorts alone. Finally, we tested profiles and predictive utility of connectivity maps calculated from different motor symptom subscores with a specific focus on bradykinesia and rigidity. While our study is based on retrospective data and indirect connectivity metrics, it may deliver empirical data to support the hypothesis of a largely overlapping network associated with effective deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease irrespective of the specific target.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leon Sobesky
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité Campus Mitte, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin 10117, Germany
| | - Lukas Goede
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité Campus Mitte, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin 10117, Germany
| | - Vincent J J Odekerken
- Department of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Qiang Wang
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité Campus Mitte, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin 10117, Germany
| | - Ningfei Li
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité Campus Mitte, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin 10117, Germany
| | - Clemens Neudorfer
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité Campus Mitte, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin 10117, Germany
| | - Nanditha Rajamani
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité Campus Mitte, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin 10117, Germany
| | - Bassam Al-Fatly
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité Campus Mitte, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin 10117, Germany
| | - Martin Reich
- Department of Neurology, University Clinic of Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Jens Volkmann
- Department of Neurology, University Clinic of Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Rob M A de Bie
- Department of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andrea A Kühn
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité Campus Mitte, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin 10117, Germany
| | - Andreas Horn
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité Campus Mitte, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin 10117, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Howell B, Isbaine F, Willie JT, Opri E, Gross RE, De Hemptinne C, Starr PA, McIntyre CC, Miocinovic S. Image-based biophysical modeling predicts cortical potentials evoked with subthalamic deep brain stimulation. Brain Stimul 2021; 14:549-563. [PMID: 33757931 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2021.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2020] [Revised: 02/19/2021] [Accepted: 03/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Subthalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective surgical treatment for Parkinson's disease and continues to advance technologically with an enormous parameter space. As such, in-silico DBS modeling systems have become common tools for research and development, but their underlying methods have yet to be standardized and validated. OBJECTIVE Evaluate the accuracy of patient-specific estimates of neural pathway activations in the subthalamic region against intracranial, cortical evoked potential (EP) recordings. METHODS Pathway activations were modeled in eleven patients using the latest advances in connectomic modeling of subthalamic DBS, focusing on the hyperdirect pathway (HDP) and corticospinal/bulbar tract (CSBT) for their relevance in human research studies. Correlations between pathway activations and respective EP amplitudes were quantified. RESULTS Good model performance required accurate lead localization and image fusions, as well as appropriate selection of fiber diameter in the biophysical model. While optimal model parameters varied across patients, good performance could be achieved using a global set of parameters that explained 60% and 73% of electrophysiologic activations of CSBT and HDP, respectively. Moreover, restricted models fit to only EP amplitudes of eight standard (monopolar and bipolar) electrode configurations were able to extrapolate variation in EP amplitudes across other directional electrode configurations and stimulation parameters, with no significant reduction in model performance across the cohort. CONCLUSIONS Our findings demonstrate that connectomic models of DBS with sufficient anatomical and electrical details can predict recruitment dynamics of white matter. These results will help to define connectomic modeling standards for preoperative surgical targeting and postoperative patient programming applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryan Howell
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, USA
| | | | - Jon T Willie
- Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University, USA
| | - Enrico Opri
- Department of Neurology, Emory University, USA
| | | | | | - Philip A Starr
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, USA
| | - Cameron C McIntyre
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Dembek TA, Baldermann JC, Petry-Schmelzer JN, Jergas H, Treuer H, Visser-Vandewalle V, Dafsari HS, Barbe MT. Sweetspot Mapping in Deep Brain Stimulation: Strengths and Limitations of Current Approaches. Neuromodulation 2021; 25:877-887. [PMID: 33476474 DOI: 10.1111/ner.13356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2020] [Revised: 12/15/2020] [Accepted: 12/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Open questions remain regarding the optimal target, or sweetspot, for deep brain stimulation (DBS) in, for example, Parkinson's disease. Previous studies introduced different methods of mapping DBS effects to determine sweetspots. While having a direct impact on surgical targeting and postoperative programming in DBS, these methods so far have not been compared. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study investigated five previously published DBS mapping approaches regarding their potential to correctly identify a predefined target. Methods were investigated in silico in eight different use-case scenarios, which incorporated different types of clinical data, noise, and differences in underlying neuroanatomy. Dice coefficients were calculated to determine the overlap between identified sweetspots and the predefined target. Additionally, out-of-sample predictive capabilities were assessed using the amount of explained variance R2 . RESULTS The five investigated methods resulted in highly variable sweetspots. Methods based on voxel-wise statistics against average outcomes showed the best performance overall. While predictive capabilities were high, even in the best of cases Dice coefficients remained limited to values around 0.5, highlighting the overall limitations of sweetspot identification. CONCLUSIONS This study highlights the strengths and limitations of current approaches to DBS sweetspot mapping. Those limitations need to be taken into account when considering the clinical implications. All future approaches should be investigated in silico before being applied to clinical data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Till A Dembek
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | | | - Hannah Jergas
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Harald Treuer
- Department of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Veerle Visser-Vandewalle
- Department of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Haidar S Dafsari
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Michael T Barbe
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Jeong H, Ntolkeras G, Alhilani M, Atefi SR, Zöllei L, Fujimoto K, Pourvaziri A, Lev MH, Grant PE, Bonmassar G. Development, validation, and pilot MRI safety study of a high-resolution, open source, whole body pediatric numerical simulation model. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0241682. [PMID: 33439896 PMCID: PMC7806143 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2020] [Accepted: 10/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Numerical body models of children are used for designing medical devices, including but not limited to optical imaging, ultrasound, CT, EEG/MEG, and MRI. These models are used in many clinical and neuroscience research applications, such as radiation safety dosimetric studies and source localization. Although several such adult models have been reported, there are few reports of full-body pediatric models, and those described have several limitations. Some, for example, are either morphed from older children or do not have detailed segmentations. Here, we introduce a 29-month-old male whole-body native numerical model, "MARTIN", that includes 28 head and 86 body tissue compartments, segmented directly from the high spatial resolution MRI and CT images. An advanced auto-segmentation tool was used for the deep-brain structures, whereas 3D Slicer was used to segment the non-brain structures and to refine the segmentation for all of the tissue compartments. Our MARTIN model was developed and validated using three separate approaches, through an iterative process, as follows. First, the calculated volumes, weights, and dimensions of selected structures were adjusted and confirmed to be within 6% of the literature values for the 2-3-year-old age-range. Second, all structural segmentations were adjusted and confirmed by two experienced, sub-specialty certified neuro-radiologists, also through an interactive process. Third, an additional validation was performed with a Bloch simulator to create synthetic MR image from our MARTIN model and compare the image contrast of the resulting synthetic image with that of the original MRI data; this resulted in a "structural resemblance" index of 0.97. Finally, we used our model to perform pilot MRI safety simulations of an Active Implantable Medical Device (AIMD) using a commercially available software platform (Sim4Life), incorporating the latest International Standards Organization guidelines. This model will be made available on the Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging website.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongbae Jeong
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Georgios Ntolkeras
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
- Fetal-Neonatal Neuroimaging and Developmental Science Center, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Michel Alhilani
- Fetal-Neonatal Neuroimaging and Developmental Science Center, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
- Department of Medicine, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Seyed Reza Atefi
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Lilla Zöllei
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Kyoko Fujimoto
- Center for Devices and Radiological Health, U. S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, United States of America
| | - Ali Pourvaziri
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Michael H. Lev
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - P. Ellen Grant
- Fetal-Neonatal Neuroimaging and Developmental Science Center, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Giorgio Bonmassar
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Noecker AM, Frankemolle-Gilbert AM, Howell B, Petersen MV, Beylergil SB, Shaikh AG, McIntyre CC. StimVision v2: Examples and Applications in Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease. Neuromodulation 2021; 24:248-258. [PMID: 33389779 DOI: 10.1111/ner.13350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2020] [Revised: 11/16/2020] [Accepted: 12/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Subthalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established therapy for Parkinson's disease. Connectomic DBS modeling is a burgeoning subfield of research aimed at characterizing the axonal connections activated by DBS. This article describes our approach and methods for evolving the StimVision software platform to meet the technical demands of connectomic DBS modeling in the subthalamic region. MATERIALS AND METHODS StimVision v2 was developed with Visualization Toolkit (VTK) libraries and integrates four major components: 1) medical image visualization, 2) axonal pathway visualization, 3) electrode positioning, and 4) stimulation calculation. RESULTS StimVision v2 implemented two key technological advances for connectomic DBS analyses in the subthalamic region. First was the application of anatomical axonal pathway models to patient-specific DBS models. Second was the application of a novel driving-force method to estimate the response of those axonal pathways to DBS. Example simulations with directional DBS electrodes and clinically defined therapeutic DBS settings are presented to demonstrate the general outputs of StimVision v2 models. CONCLUSIONS StimVision v2 provides the opportunity to evaluate patient-specific axonal pathway activation from subthalamic DBS using anatomically detailed pathway models and electrically detailed electric field distributions with interactive adjustment of the DBS electrode position and stimulation parameter settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela M Noecker
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Bryan Howell
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Mikkel V Petersen
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Sinem Balta Beylergil
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Aasef G Shaikh
- Department of Neurology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Cameron C McIntyre
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Department of Neurology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Malaga KA, Costello JT, Chou KL, Patil PG. Atlas-independent, N-of-1 tissue activation modeling to map optimal regions of subthalamic deep brain stimulation for Parkinson disease. NEUROIMAGE-CLINICAL 2020; 29:102518. [PMID: 33333464 PMCID: PMC7736726 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2020] [Revised: 11/25/2020] [Accepted: 11/27/2020] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Neuroanatomical variations among patients are obscured in atlas-based VTA modeling. N-of-1 neuroanatomical and VTA modeling enables patient-level precision. Mean optimal stimulation is dorsomedial to the STN, near its posterior half. Individual VTAs deviate from optimal stimulation sites to varying degrees. Optimal stimulation sites for rigidity, bradykinesia, and tremor partially overlap.
Background Motor outcomes after subthalamic deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) for Parkinson disease (PD) vary considerably among patients and strongly depend on stimulation location. The objective of this retrospective study was to map the regions of optimal STN DBS for PD using an atlas-independent, fully individualized (N-of-1) tissue activation modeling approach and to assess the relationship between patient-level therapeutic volumes of tissue activation (VTAs) and motor improvement. Methods The stimulation-induced electric field for 40 PD patients treated with bilateral STN DBS was modeled using finite element analysis. Neurostimulation models were generated for each patient, incorporating their individual STN anatomy, DBS lead position and orientation, anisotropic tissue conductivity, and clinical stimulation settings. A voxel-based analysis of the VTAs was then used to map the optimal location of stimulation. The amount of stimulation in specific regions relative to the STN was measured and compared between STNs with more and less optimal stimulation, as determined by their motor improvement scores and VTA. The relationship between VTA location and motor outcome was then assessed using correlation analysis. Patient variability in terms of STN anatomy, active contact position, and VTA location were also evaluated. Results from the N-of-1 model were compared to those from a simplified VTA model. Results Tissue activation modeling mapped the optimal location of stimulation to regions medial, posterior, and dorsal to the STN centroid. These regions extended beyond the STN boundary towards the caudal zona incerta (cZI). The location of the VTA and active contact position differed significantly between STNs with more and less optimal stimulation in the dorsal-ventral and anterior-posterior directions. Therapeutic stimulation spread noticeably more in the dorsal and posterior directions, providing additional evidence for cZI as an important DBS target. There were significant linear relationships between the amount of dorsal and posterior stimulation, as measured by the VTA, and motor improvement. These relationships were more robust than those between active contact position and motor improvement. There was high variability in STN anatomy, active contact position, and VTA location among patients. Spherical VTA modeling was unable to reproduce these results and tended to overestimate the size of the VTA. Conclusion Accurate characterization of the spread of stimulation is needed to optimize STN DBS for PD. High variability in neuroanatomy, stimulation location, and motor improvement among patients highlights the need for individualized modeling techniques. The atlas-independent, N-of-1 tissue activation modeling approach presented in this study can be used to develop and evaluate stimulation strategies to improve clinical outcomes on an individual basis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karlo A Malaga
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Joseph T Costello
- Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Kelvin L Chou
- Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Parag G Patil
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Zander HJ, Graham RD, Anaya CJ, Lempka SF. Anatomical and technical factors affecting the neural response to epidural spinal cord stimulation. J Neural Eng 2020; 17:036019. [PMID: 32365340 PMCID: PMC8351789 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ab8fc4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a common neurostimulation therapy to treat chronic pain. Computational models represent a valuable tool to study the potential mechanisms of action of SCS and to optimize the design and implementation of SCS technologies. However, it is imperative that these computational models include the appropriate level of detail to accurately predict the neural response to SCS and to correlate model predictions with clinical outcomes. Therefore, the goal of this study was to investigate several anatomic and technical factors that may affect model-based predictions of neural activation during thoracic SCS. APPROACH We developed computational models that consisted of detailed finite element models of the lower thoracic spinal cord, surrounding tissues, and implanted SCS electrode arrays. We positioned multicompartment models of sensory axons within the spinal cord to calculate the activation threshold for each sensory axon. We then investigated how activation thresholds changed as a function of several anatomical variables (e.g. spine geometry, dorsal rootlet anatomy), stimulation type (i.e. voltage-controlled vs. current-controlled), electrode impedance, lead position, lead type, and electrical properties of surrounding tissues (e.g. dura conductivity, frequency-dependent conductivity). MAIN RESULTS Several anatomic and modeling factors produced significant percent differences or errors in activation thresholds. Rostrocaudal positioning of the cathode with respect to the vertebrae had a large effect (up to 32%) on activation thresholds. Variability in electrode impedance produced significant changes in activation thresholds for voltage-controlled stimulation (38% to 51%), but had little effect on activation thresholds for current-controlled stimulation (less than 13%). Changing the dura conductivity also produced significant differences in activation thresholds. SIGNIFICANCE This study demonstrates several anatomic and technical factors that can affect the neural response to SCS. These factors should be considered in clinical implementation and in future computational modeling studies of thoracic SCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans J Zander
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America. Biointerfaces Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Davids M, Guérin B, Klein V, Schmelz M, Schad LR, Wald LL. Optimizing selective stimulation of peripheral nerves with arrays of coils or surface electrodes using a linear peripheral nerve stimulation metric. J Neural Eng 2020; 17:016029. [PMID: 31665707 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ab52bd] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We present a PNS oracle, which solves these computation time and linearity problems and is, therefore, well-suited for fast optimization of voltage distributions in contact electrode arrays and current drive patterns in non-contact magnetic coil arrays. APPROACH The PNS oracle metric for a nerve fiber is computed from an electric field map using only linear operations (projection, differentiation, convolution, scaling). Due to its linearity, this PNS metric can be precomputed for a set of coil or electrode segments, allowing rapid PNS prediction and comparison of any possible coil or electrode stimulation configuration constructed from this set. The PNS oracle is closely related to the classical activating function and modified driving functions but is adjusted to better correlate with full neurodynamic modeling of myelinated mammalian nerves. MAIN RESULTS We validated the PNS oracle in three MRI gradient coils and two body models and found good correlation between the PNS oracle and the full neurodynamic modeling approach (R 2 > 0.995). Finally, we demonstrated its potential utility by optimizing the driving currents and voltages of arrays of 108 magnetic coils or 108 contact electrodes to selectively stimulate target nerves in the lower leg. SIGNIFICANCE Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) by electromagnetic fields can be accurately simulated using coupled electromagnetic and neurodynamic modeling. Such simulations are slow and non-linear in the electric field, which makes it difficult to iteratively optimize coil and electrode configurations or drive patterns aiming to avoid PNS or to initiate it for therapeutic purposes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathias Davids
- A A Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, United States of America. Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America. Computer Assisted Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Duffley G, Anderson DN, Vorwerk J, Dorval AD, Butson CR. Evaluation of methodologies for computing the deep brain stimulation volume of tissue activated. J Neural Eng 2019; 16:066024. [PMID: 31426036 PMCID: PMC7187771 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ab3c95] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Objective. Computational models are a popular tool for predicting the effects of deep brain stimulation (DBS) on neural tissue. One commonly used model, the volume of tissue activated (VTA), is computed using multiple methodologies. We quantified differences in the VTAs generated by five methodologies: the traditional axon model method, the electric field norm, and three activating function based approaches—the activating function at each grid point in the tangential direction (AF-Tan) or in the maximally activating direction (AF-3D), and the maximum activating function along the entire length of a tangential fiber (AF-Max). Approach. We computed the VTA using each method across multiple stimulation settings. The resulting volumes were compared for similarity, and the methodologies were analyzed for their differences in behavior. Main results. Activation threshold values for both the electric field norm and the activating function varied with regards to electrode configuration, pulse width, and frequency. All methods produced highly similar volumes for monopolar stimulation. For bipolar electrode configurations, only the maximum activating function along the tangential axon method, AF-Max, produced similar volumes to those produced by the axon model method. Further analysis revealed that both of these methods are biased by their exclusive use of tangential fiber orientations. In contrast, the activating function in the maximally activating direction method, AF-3D, produces a VTA that is free of axon orientation and projection bias. Significance. Simulating tangentially oriented axons, the standard approach of computing the VTA, is too computationally expensive for widespread implementation and yields results biased by the assumption of tangential fiber orientation. In this work, we show that a computationally efficient method based on the activating function, AF-Max, reliably reproduces the VTAs generated by direct axon modeling. Further, we propose another method, AF-3D as a potentially superior model for representing generic neural tissue activation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gordon Duffley
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America. Scientific Computing & Imaging (SCI) Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Analysis of patient-specific stimulation with segmented leads in the subthalamic nucleus. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0217985. [PMID: 31216311 PMCID: PMC6584006 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2018] [Accepted: 05/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Segmented deep brain stimulation leads in the subthalamic nucleus have shown to increase therapeutic window using directional stimulation. However, it is not fully understood how these segmented leads with reduced electrode size modify the volume of tissue activated (VTA) and how this in turn relates with clinically observed therapeutic and side effect currents. Here, we investigated the differences between directional and omnidirectional stimulation and associated VTAs with patient-specific therapeutic and side effect currents for the two stimulation modes. Approach Nine patients with Parkinson’s disease underwent DBS implantation in the subthalamic nucleus. Therapeutic and side effect currents were identified intraoperatively with a segmented lead using directional and omnidirectional stimulation (these current thresholds were assessed in a blinded fashion). The electric field around the lead was simulated with a finite-element model for a range of stimulation currents for both stimulation modes. VTAs were estimated from the electric field by numerical differentiation and thresholding. Then for each patient, the VTAs for given therapeutic and side effect currents were projected onto the patient-specific subthalamic nucleus and lead position. Results Stimulation with segmented leads with reduced electrode size was associated with a significant reduction of VTA and a significant increase of radial distance in the best direction of stimulation. While beneficial effects were associated with activation volumes confined within the anatomical boundaries of the subthalamic nucleus at therapeutic currents, side effects were associated with activation volumes spreading beyond the nucleus’ boundaries. Significance The clinical benefits of segmented leads are likely to be obtained by a VTA confined within the subthalamic nucleus and a larger radial distance in the best stimulation direction, while steering the VTA away from unwanted fiber tracts outside the nucleus. Applying the same concepts at a larger scale and in chronically implanted patients may help to predict the best stimulation area.
Collapse
|