1
|
Bhowmick S, Graham RD, Verma N, Trevathan JK, Franke M, Nieuwoudt S, Fisher LE, Shoffstall AJ, Weber DJ, Ludwig KA, Lempka SF. Computational modeling of dorsal root ganglion stimulation using an Injectrode. J Neural Eng 2024; 21:026039. [PMID: 38502956 PMCID: PMC11007586 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ad357f] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Revised: 02/23/2024] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/21/2024]
Abstract
Objective.Minimally invasive neuromodulation therapies like the Injectrode, which is composed of a tightly wound polymer-coated Platinum/Iridium microcoil, offer a low-risk approach for administering electrical stimulation to the dorsal root ganglion (DRG). This flexible electrode is aimed to conform to the DRG. The stimulation occurs through a transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TES) patch, which subsequently transmits the stimulation to the Injectrode via a subcutaneous metal collector. However, it is important to note that the effectiveness of stimulation through TES relies on the specific geometrical configurations of the Injectrode-collector-patch system. Hence, there is a need to investigate which design parameters influence the activation of targeted neural structures.Approach.We employed a hybrid computational modeling approach to analyze the impact of Injectrode system design parameters on charge delivery and neural response to stimulation. We constructed multiple finite element method models of DRG stimulation, followed by the implementation of multi-compartment models of DRG neurons. By calculating potential distribution during monopolar stimulation, we simulated neural responses using various parameters based on prior acute experiments. Additionally, we developed a canonical monopolar stimulation and full-scale model of bipolar bilateral L5 DRG stimulation, allowing us to investigate how design parameters like Injectrode size and orientation influenced neural activation thresholds.Main results.Our findings were in accordance with acute experimental measurements and indicate that the minimally invasive Injectrode system predominantly engages large-diameter afferents (Aβ-fibers). These activation thresholds were contingent upon the surface area of the Injectrode. As the charge density decreased due to increasing surface area, there was a corresponding expansion in the stimulation amplitude range before triggering any pain-related mechanoreceptor (Aδ-fibers) activity.Significance.The Injectrode demonstrates potential as a viable technology for minimally invasive stimulation of the DRG. Our findings indicate that utilizing a larger surface area Injectrode enhances the therapeutic margin, effectively distinguishing the desired Aβactivation from the undesired Aδ-fiber activation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sauradeep Bhowmick
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America
- Biointerfaces Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America
| | - Robert D Graham
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America
- Biointerfaces Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America
| | - Nishant Verma
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI, United States of America
- Wisconsin Institute for Translational Neuroengineering (WITNe)–Madison, Madison, WI, United States of America
| | - James K Trevathan
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI, United States of America
- Wisconsin Institute for Translational Neuroengineering (WITNe)–Madison, Madison, WI, United States of America
| | | | | | - Lee E Fisher
- Rehab Neural Engineering Labs (RNEL), Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
| | - Andrew J Shoffstall
- Neuronoff Inc., Cleveland, OH, United States of America
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States of America
| | - Douglas J Weber
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
- Neuroscience Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
| | - Kip A Ludwig
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI, United States of America
- Wisconsin Institute for Translational Neuroengineering (WITNe)–Madison, Madison, WI, United States of America
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI, United States of America
| | - Scott F Lempka
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America
- Biointerfaces Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Madden LR, Graham RD, Lempka SF, Bruns TM. Multiformity of extracellular microelectrode recordings from Aδ neurons in the dorsal root ganglia: a computational modeling study. J Neurophysiol 2024; 131:261-277. [PMID: 38169334 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00385.2023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2023] [Revised: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Microelectrodes serve as a fundamental tool in electrophysiology research throughout the nervous system, providing a means of exploring neural function with a high resolution of neural firing information. We constructed a hybrid computational model using the finite element method and multicompartment cable models to explore factors that contribute to extracellular voltage waveforms that are produced by sensory pseudounipolar neurons, specifically smaller A-type neurons, and that are recorded by microelectrodes in dorsal root ganglia. The finite element method model included a dorsal root ganglion, surrounding tissues, and a planar microelectrode array. We built a multicompartment neuron model with multiple trajectories of the glomerular initial segment found in many A-type sensory neurons. Our model replicated both the somatic intracellular voltage profile of Aδ low-threshold mechanoreceptor neurons and the unique extracellular voltage waveform shapes that are observed in experimental settings. Results from this model indicated that tortuous glomerular initial segment geometries can introduce distinct multiphasic properties into a neuron's recorded waveform. Our model also demonstrated how recording location relative to specific microanatomical components of these neurons, and recording distance from these components, can contribute to additional changes in the multiphasic characteristics and peak-to-peak voltage amplitude of the waveform. This knowledge may provide context for research employing microelectrode recordings of pseudounipolar neurons in sensory ganglia, including functional mapping and closed-loop neuromodulation. Furthermore, our simulations gave insight into the neurophysiology of pseudounipolar neurons by demonstrating how the glomerular initial segment aids in increasing the resistance of the stem axon and mitigating rebounding somatic action potentials.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We built a computational model of sensory neurons in the dorsal root ganglia to investigate factors that influence the extracellular waveforms recorded by microelectrodes. Our model demonstrates how the unique structure of these neurons can lead to diverse and often multiphasic waveform profiles depending on the location of the recording contact relative to microanatomical neural components. Our model also provides insight into the neurophysiological function of axon glomeruli that are often present in these neurons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren R Madden
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
- Biointerfaces Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
| | - Robert D Graham
- Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, United States
| | - Scott F Lempka
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
- Biointerfaces Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
| | - Tim M Bruns
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
- Biointerfaces Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sivanesan E, North RB, Russo MA, Levy RM, Linderoth B, Hayek SM, Eldabe S, Lempka SF. A Definition of Neuromodulation and Classification of Implantable Electrical Modulation for Chronic Pain. Neuromodulation 2024; 27:1-12. [PMID: 37952135 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2023.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Revised: 09/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Neuromodulation therapies use a variety of treatment modalities (eg, electrical stimulation) to treat chronic pain. These therapies have experienced rapid growth that has coincided with escalating confusion regarding the nomenclature surrounding these neuromodulation technologies. Furthermore, studies are often published without a complete description of the effective stimulation dose, making it impossible to replicate the findings. To improve clinical care and facilitate dissemination among the public, payors, research groups, and regulatory bodies, there is a clear need for a standardization of terms. APPROACH We formed an international group of authors comprising basic scientists, anesthesiologists, neurosurgeons, and engineers with expertise in neuromodulation. Because the field of neuromodulation is extensive, we chose to focus on creating a taxonomy and standardized definitions for implantable electrical modulation of chronic pain. RESULTS We first present a consensus definition of neuromodulation. We then describe a classification scheme based on the 1) intended use (the site of modulation and its indications) and 2) physical properties (waveforms and dose) of a neuromodulation therapy. CONCLUSIONS This framework will help guide future high-quality studies of implantable neuromodulatory treatments and improve reporting of their findings. Standardization with this classification scheme and clear definitions will help physicians, researchers, payors, and patients better understand the applications of implantable electrical modulation for pain and guide informed treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eellan Sivanesan
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - Richard B North
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Marc A Russo
- Hunter Pain Specialists, Broadmeadow, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Robert M Levy
- Neurosurgical Services, Clinical Research, Anesthesia Pain Care Consultants, Tamarac, FL, USA
| | - Bengt Linderoth
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Salim M Hayek
- Division of Pain Medicine, University Hospitals, Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Sam Eldabe
- Department of Pain Medicine, The James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Scott F Lempka
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Biointerfaces Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bhowmick S, Graham RD, Verma N, Trevathan JK, Franke M, Nieuwoudt S, Fisher LE, Shoffstall AJ, Weber DJ, Ludwig KA, Lempka SF. Computational modeling of dorsal root ganglion stimulation using an Injectrode. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.09.20.558675. [PMID: 37790562 PMCID: PMC10542492 DOI: 10.1101/2023.09.20.558675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/05/2023]
Abstract
Objective Minimally invasive neuromodulation therapies like the Injectrode, which is composed of a tightly wound polymer-coated platinum/iridium microcoil, offer a low-risk approach for administering electrical stimulation to the dorsal root ganglion (DRG). This flexible electrode is aimed to conform to the DRG. The stimulation occurs through a transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TES) patch, which subsequently transmits the stimulation to the Injectrode via a subcutaneous metal collector. However, effectiveness of stimulation relies on the specific geometrical configurations of the Injectrode-collector-patch system. Hence, there is a need to investigate which design parameters influence the activation of targeted neural structures. Approach We employed a hybrid computational modeling approach to analyze the impact of the Injectrode system design parameters on charge delivery and the neural response to stimulation. We constructed multiple finite element method models of DRG stimulation and multi-compartment models of DRG neurons. We simulated the neural responses using parameters based on prior acute preclinical experiments. Additionally, we developed multiple human-scale computational models of DRG stimulation to investigate how design parameters like Injectrode size and orientation influenced neural activation thresholds. Main results Our findings were in accordance with acute experimental measurements and indicated that the Injectrode system predominantly engages large-diameter afferents (Aβ-fibers). These activation thresholds were contingent upon the surface area of the Injectrode. As the charge density decreased due to increasing surface area, there was a corresponding expansion in the stimulation amplitude range before triggering any pain-related mechanoreceptor (Aδ-fibers) activity. Significance The Injectrode demonstrates potential as a viable technology for minimally invasive stimulation of the DRG. Our findings indicate that utilizing a larger surface area Injectrode enhances the therapeutic margin, effectively distinguishing the desired Aβ activation from the undesired Aδ-fiber activation.
Collapse
|
5
|
Jantz MK, Liang L, Damiani A, Fisher LE, Newton T, Neufeld E, Hitchens TK, Pirondini E, Capogrosso M, Gaunt RA. A Computational Study of Lower Urinary Tract Nerve Recruitment with Epidural Stimulation of the Lumbosacral Spinal Cord. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 2022; 2022:744-747. [PMID: 36086335 DOI: 10.1109/embc48229.2022.9871292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Bladder dysfunction is a major health risk for people with spinal cord injury. Recently, we have demonstrated that epidural sacral spinal cord stimulation (SCS) can be used to activate lower urinary tract nerves and provide both major components of bladder control: voiding and continence. To effectively control these functions, it is necessary to selectively recruit the afferents of the pudendal nerve that evoke these distinct bladder reflexes. Translation of this innovation to clinical practice requires an understanding of optimal electrode placements and stimulation parameters to guide surgical practice and therapy design. Computational modeling is an important tool to address many of these experimentally intractable stimulation optimization questions. Here, we built a realistic MRI-based finite element computational model of the feline sacral spinal cord which included realistic axon trajectories in the dorsal and ventral roots. We coupled the model with biophysical simulations of membrane dynamics of afferent and efferent axons that project to the lower urinary tract through the pelvic and pudendal nerves. We simulated the electromagnetic fields arising from stimulation through SCS electrodes and calculated the expected recruitment of pelvic and pudendal fibers. We found that SCS can selectively recruit pudendal afferents, in agreement with our experimental data in cats. Our results suggest that SCS is a promising technology to improve bladder function after spinal cord injury, and computational modeling unlocks the potential for highly optimized, selective stimulation. Clinical Relevance - This model provides a method to non-invasively establish electrode placement and stimulation parameters for improving bladder function with epidural spinal cord stimulation.
Collapse
|
6
|
Electrical Stimulation Increases Axonal Growth from Dorsal Root Ganglia Co-Cultured with Schwann Cells in Highly Aligned PLA-PPy-Au Microfiber Substrates. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms23126362. [PMID: 35742806 PMCID: PMC9223746 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23126362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Revised: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 06/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Nerve regeneration is a slow process that needs to be guided for distances greater than 5 mm. For this reason, different strategies are being studied to guide axonal growth and accelerate the axonal growth rate. In this study, we employ an electroconductive fibrillar substrate that is able to topographically guide axonal growth while accelerating the axonal growth rate when subjected to an exogenous electric field. Dorsal root ganglia were seeded in co-culture with Schwann cells on a substrate of polylactic acid microfibers coated with the electroconductive polymer polypyrrole, adding gold microfibers to increase its electrical conductivity. The substrate is capable of guiding axonal growth in a highly aligned manner and, when subjected to an electrical stimulation, an improvement in axonal growth is observed. As a result, an increase in the maximum length of the axons of 19.2% and an increase in the area occupied by the axons of 40% were obtained. In addition, an upregulation of the genes related to axon guidance, axogenesis, Schwann cells, proliferation and neurotrophins was observed for the electrically stimulated group. Therefore, our device is a good candidate for nerve regeneration therapies.
Collapse
|
7
|
Graham RD, Sankarasubramanian V, Lempka SF. Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation for Chronic Pain: Hypothesized Mechanisms of Action. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2022; 23:196-211. [PMID: 34425252 PMCID: PMC8943693 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2021.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Revised: 06/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/20/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRGS) is a neuromodulation therapy for chronic pain that is refractory to conventional medical management. Currently, the mechanisms of action of DRGS-induced pain relief are unknown, precluding both our understanding of why DRGS fails to provide pain relief to some patients and the design of neurostimulation technologies that directly target these mechanisms to maximize pain relief in all patients. Due to the heterogeneity of sensory neurons in the dorsal root ganglion (DRG), the analgesic mechanisms could be attributed to the modulation of one or many cell types within the DRG and the numerous brain regions that process sensory information. Here, we summarize the leading hypotheses of the mechanisms of DRGS-induced analgesia, and propose areas of future study that will be vital to improving the clinical implementation of DRGS. PERSPECTIVE: This article synthesizes the evidence supporting the current hypotheses of the mechanisms of action of DRGS for chronic pain and suggests avenues for future interdisciplinary research which will be critical to fully elucidate the analgesic mechanisms of the therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert D. Graham
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States,Biointerfaces Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States
| | - Vishwanath Sankarasubramanian
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States,Biointerfaces Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States
| | - Scott F. Lempka
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States,Biointerfaces Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States,Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States,Corresponding author: Scott F. Lempka, PhD, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Road, NCRC 14-184, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2800,
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Graham RD, Jhand AS, Lempka SF. Dorsal root ganglion stimulation produces differential effects on action potential propagation across a population of biophysically distinct C-neurons. FRONTIERS IN PAIN RESEARCH 2022; 3:1017344. [PMID: 36387415 PMCID: PMC9643723 DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2022.1017344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRGS) is a neurostimulation therapy used to manage chronic pain that does not respond to conventional therapies. Unfortunately, not all patients receive sufficient pain relief from DRGS, leaving them with few other treatment options. Presently, our understanding of the mechanisms of action of DRGS is incomplete, preventing us from determining why some patients do not receive analgesia from the therapy. One hypothesis suggests that DRGS augments the filtering of action potentials (APs) at the T-junction of nociceptive C-neurons. To test this hypothesis, we utilized a computational modeling approach in which we developed a population of one thousand biophysically distinct C-neuron models which each produced electrophysiological characteristics (e.g., AP height, AP duration) reported in previous experimental studies. We used this population of model C-neurons to study how morphological and electrophysiological characteristics affected the propagation of APs through the T-junction. We found that trains of APs can propagate through the T-junction in the orthodromic direction at a higher frequency than in the antidromic direction due to the decrease in axonal diameter from the peripheral to spinal axon. Including slow outward conductances in the axonal compartments near the T-junction reduced following frequencies to ranges measured experimentally. We next used the population of C-neuron models to investigate how DRGS affected the orthodromic propagation of APs through the T-junction. Our data suggest that suprathreshold DRGS augmented the filtering of APs at the T-junction of some model C-neurons while increasing the activity of other model C-neurons. However, the stimulus pulse amplitudes required to induce activity in C-neurons (i.e., several mA) fell outside the range of stimulation pulse amplitudes used clinically (i.e., typically ≤1 mA). Furthermore, our data suggest that somatic GABA currents activated directly or indirectly by the DRGS pulse may produce diverse effects on orthodromic AP propagation in C-neurons. These data suggest DRGS may produce differential effects across a population of C-neurons and indicate that understanding how inherent biological variability affects a neuron's response to therapeutic electrical stimulation may be helpful in understanding its mechanisms of action.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert D Graham
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.,Biointerfaces Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Amolak S Jhand
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.,Biointerfaces Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Scott F Lempka
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.,Biointerfaces Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.,Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Verma N, Graham RD, Mudge J, Trevathan JK, Franke M, Shoffstall AJ, Williams J, Dalrymple AN, Fisher LE, Weber DJ, Lempka SF, Ludwig KA. Augmented Transcutaneous Stimulation Using an Injectable Electrode: A Computational Study. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2021; 9:796042. [PMID: 34988068 PMCID: PMC8722711 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.796042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2021] [Accepted: 11/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Minimally invasive neuromodulation technologies seek to marry the neural selectivity of implantable devices with the low-cost and non-invasive nature of transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TES). The Injectrode® is a needle-delivered electrode that is injected onto neural structures under image guidance. Power is then transcutaneously delivered to the Injectrode using surface electrodes. The Injectrode serves as a low-impedance conduit to guide current to the deep on-target nerve, reducing activation thresholds by an order of magnitude compared to using only surface stimulation electrodes. To minimize off-target recruitment of cutaneous fibers, the energy transfer efficiency from the surface electrodes to the Injectrode must be optimized. TES energy is transferred to the Injectrode through both capacitive and resistive mechanisms. Electrostatic finite element models generally used in TES research consider only the resistive means of energy transfer by defining tissue conductivities. Here, we present an electroquasistatic model, taking into consideration both the conductivity and permittivity of tissue, to understand transcutaneous power delivery to the Injectrode. The model was validated with measurements taken from (n = 4) swine cadavers. We used the validated model to investigate system and anatomic parameters that influence the coupling efficiency of the Injectrode energy delivery system. Our work suggests the relevance of electroquasistatic models to account for capacitive charge transfer mechanisms when studying TES, particularly when high-frequency voltage components are present, such as those used for voltage-controlled pulses and sinusoidal nerve blocks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nishant Verma
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI, United States
- Wisconsin Institute for Translational Neuroengineering (WITNe)–Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Robert D. Graham
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
- Biointerfaces Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Jonah Mudge
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI, United States
- Wisconsin Institute for Translational Neuroengineering (WITNe)–Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| | - James K. Trevathan
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI, United States
- Wisconsin Institute for Translational Neuroengineering (WITNe)–Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| | | | - Andrew J Shoffstall
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Justin Williams
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI, United States
- Wisconsin Institute for Translational Neuroengineering (WITNe)–Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Ashley N. Dalrymple
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
- Rehab Neural Engineering Labs (RNEL), Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Lee E. Fisher
- Rehab Neural Engineering Labs (RNEL), Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Douglas J. Weber
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
- Rehab Neural Engineering Labs (RNEL), Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Scott F. Lempka
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
- Biointerfaces Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Kip A. Ludwig
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI, United States
- Wisconsin Institute for Translational Neuroengineering (WITNe)–Madison, Madison, WI, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Dalrymple AN, Ting JE, Bose R, Trevathan JK, Nieuwoudt S, Lempka SF, Franke M, Ludwig KA, Shoffstall AJ, Fisher LE, Weber DJ. Stimulation of the dorsal root ganglion using an Injectrode ®. J Neural Eng 2021; 18. [PMID: 34650008 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac2ffb] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 10/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
Objective. The goal of this work was to compare afferent fiber recruitment by dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation using an injectable polymer electrode (Injectrode®) and a more traditional cylindrical metal electrode.Approach. We exposed the L6 and L7 DRG in four cats via a partial laminectomy or burr hole. We stimulated the DRG using an Injectrode or a stainless steel (SS) electrode using biphasic pulses at three different pulse widths (80, 150, 300μs) and pulse amplitudes spanning the range used for clinical DRG stimulation. We recorded antidromic evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) in the sciatic, tibial, and common peroneal nerves using nerve cuffs. We calculated the conduction velocity of the ECAPs and determined the charge-thresholds and recruitment rates for ECAPs from Aα, Aβ, and Aδfibers. We also performed electrochemical impedance spectroscopy measurements for both electrode types.Main results. The ECAP thresholds for the Injectrode did not differ from the SS electrode across all primary afferents (Aα, Aβ, Aδ) and pulse widths; charge-thresholds increased with wider pulse widths. Thresholds for generating ECAPs from Aβfibers were 100.0 ± 32.3 nC using the SS electrode, and 90.9 ± 42.9 nC using the Injectrode. The ECAP thresholds from the Injectrode were consistent over several hours of stimulation. The rate of recruitment was similar between the Injectrodes and SS electrode and decreased with wider pulse widths.Significance. The Injectrode can effectively excite primary afferents when used for DRG stimulation within the range of parameters used for clinical DRG stimulation. The Injectrode can be implanted through minimally invasive techniques while achieving similar neural activation to conventional electrodes, making it an excellent candidate for future DRG stimulation and neuroprosthetic applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley N Dalrymple
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Ave, Wean 1323, Pittsburgh, PA 15217, United States of America.,Rehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15217, United States of America
| | - Jordyn E Ting
- Rehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15217, United States of America.,Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.,Center for Neural Basis of Cognition, Pittsburgh, PA, 15217, United States of America
| | - Rohit Bose
- Rehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15217, United States of America.,Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.,Center for Neural Basis of Cognition, Pittsburgh, PA, 15217, United States of America
| | - James K Trevathan
- Departments of Biomedical Engineering and Neurological Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States of America
| | | | - Scott F Lempka
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America
| | | | - Kip A Ludwig
- Departments of Biomedical Engineering and Neurological Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States of America.,Neuronoff Inc., Cleveland, OH, United States of America.,Wisconsin Institute for Translational Neuroengineering (WITNe), Madison, WI, United States of America
| | - Andrew J Shoffstall
- Neuronoff Inc., Cleveland, OH, United States of America.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States of America
| | - Lee E Fisher
- Rehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15217, United States of America.,Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.,Center for Neural Basis of Cognition, Pittsburgh, PA, 15217, United States of America.,Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
| | - Douglas J Weber
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Ave, Wean 1323, Pittsburgh, PA 15217, United States of America.,Rehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15217, United States of America.,Center for Neural Basis of Cognition, Pittsburgh, PA, 15217, United States of America.,Neuroscience Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Ave, Wean 1323, Pittsburgh, PA 15217, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|