Development of macitentan for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension

Real-world effectiveness and safety of macitentan in patients with pulmonary artery hypertension: a multicenter, retrospective, observational study in China

BACKGROUND

Macitentan, either as monotherapy or part of combination therapy, improved clinical outcomes in patients with pulmonary artery hypertension (PAH) in clinical trials. Evidence on the effectiveness and safety of macitentan administered in real-world clinical practice in China is limited.

METHODS

This real-world, retrospective, multicenter chart review study was conducted at seven hospitals in China. Adult patients with a diagnosis of PAH who initiated macitentan and had medical assessments at 3-7 months after macitentan initiation were included. The primary outcomes were changes in the World Health Organization functional class (WHO-FC), 6-min walk distance (6MWD), and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP)/B-type natriuretic peptide from baseline to first follow-up visit (months 3-7). Serious adverse events (SAEs) and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of macitentan were collected.

RESULTS

From 30 August 2021 to 31 March 2022, 214 eligible patients were included in the safety analysis set and 105 patients were included in the analysis of effectiveness. At the first follow-up visit compared with baseline, significant changes in WHO-FC were observed (p = .04), 93.5% patients had their WHO-FC improved (25.8%) or maintained (67.7%). 6MWD changed by a mean (standard deviation [SD]) of 45.0 (81.4) meters (p < .001), with 94.7% having their 6MWD improved (34.7%) or maintained (60.0%). The mean (SD) of NT-proBNP decreased from 1667.4 (3233.0) ng/L to 1090.0 (2230.1) ng/L (p < .001). In the safety analysis set, 24 (11.2%) patients experienced at least one ADR and/or SAE. ADRs and SAEs were reported in 11 (5.1%) and 18 (8.4%), respectively. No deaths or unexpected safety events were observed.

CONCLUSION

This study provided real-world evidence on the clinical benefits and good tolerance of macitentan in Chinese patients with PAH treated in routine clinical practice.

Pipersentan: A De Novo Synthetic Endothelin Receptor Antagonist that Inhibits Monocrotaline- and Hypoxia-Induced Pulmonary Hypertension

Background: Although major advances have been made in the pathogenesis and management of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), the endothelin system is still considered to play a vital role in the pathology of PAH due to its vasoconstrictive action. Endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs), either as monotherapy or in combination with other drugs, have attracted much attention in the treatment of this lethal disease, and research is continuing.

Methods: A novel ERA, pipersentan 5-(1,3-Benzodioxol-5-yl)-6-[2-(5-bromopyrimidin-2-yl)oxyethoxy]-N-(2-methoxyethylsulfamoyl)pyrimidin-4-amine, was recently synthesized and the physicochemical characterizations and the pharmacology both in vitro and in vivo were studied.

Results: This orally administered ERA can both competitively and selectively inhibit the binding of endothelin-1 (ET-1) to its receptors with good physicochemical characteristics. Pipersentan efficaciously antagonized the effects of ET-1 on pulmonary artery smooth muscle cell proliferation, migration and calcium mobilization and effectively improved right ventricular hypertrophy and pulmonary arterial pressure in both monocrotaline- and hypoxia-induced pulmonary hypertension (PH) rat models.

Conclusions: This profile identifies pipersentan as a new agent for treating ET-1 system activation-related PH.

Inhibiting Endothelin Receptors with Macitentan Strengthens the Bone Protective Action of RANKL Inhibition and Reduces Metastatic Dissemination in Osteosarcoma

Simple Summary

The efficacy of current osteosarcoma therapy is diminished by two adverse events, namely resistance to chemotherapy and metastatic dissemination. In recent decades, research has been devoted to reducing these adverse events. Inhibiting bone resorption has shown promising effects on metastatic dissemination and tumor growth, with, however, the formation of significant tumoral mineralized tissue. Endothelin signaling is implicated in activating the cell that forms the mineralized tissues, consequently the impact of inhibiting it alone and in combination with the inhibition of bone resorption was evaluated using osteosarcoma models. The results obtained showed that inhibiting endothelin signaling significantly reduced the formation of mineralized tumor tissue concomitantly to metastatic dissemination without affecting sensitivity to chemotherapy. This inhibition appears to be a promising new therapeutic tool in the fight against osteosarcoma.

Abstract

Current treatments for osteosarcoma, combining conventional polychemotherapy and surgery, make it possible to attain a five-year survival rate of 70% in affected individuals. The presence of chemoresistance and metastases significantly shorten the patient’s lifespan, making identification of new therapeutic tools essential. Inhibiting bone resorption has been shown to be an efficient adjuvant strategy impacting the metastatic dissemination of osteosarcoma, tumor growth, and associated bone destruction. Unfortunately, over-apposition of mineralized matrix by normal and tumoral osteoblasts was associated with this inhibition. Endothelin signaling is implicated in the functional differentiation of osteoblasts, raising the question of the potential value of inhibiting it alone, or in combination with bone resorption repression. Using mouse models of osteosarcoma, the impact of macitentan, an endothelin receptor inhibitor, was evaluated regarding tumor growth, metastatic dissemination, matrix over-apposition secondary to RANKL blockade, and safety when combined with chemotherapy. The results showed that macitentan has no impact on tumor growth or sensitivity to ifosfamide, but significantly reduces tumoral osteoid tissue formation and the metastatic capacity of the osteosarcoma. To conclude, macitentan appears to be a promising therapeutic adjuvant for osteosarcoma alone or associated with bone resorption inhibitors.

Safety and tolerability of macitentan in the management of pulmonary arterial hypertension: an update

Macitentan is a medication in the endothelin receptor antagonist class, approved for treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension in 2013 based on the results of the pivotal SERAPHIN Trial (Study with an Endothelin Receptor Antagonist in Pulmonary arterial Hypertension to Improve cliNical outcome). Macitentan was shown in initial trials to reduce the likelihood of a morbidity/mortality event. Real-world use of this medication additionally reveals a reduced risk of hospitalizations related to pulmonary arterial hypertension, improved health-related quality of life scores, potential clinical utility in other conditions (such as chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension and pulmonary hypertension related to congenital heart disease), and has a similar safety profile as demonstrated in initial trials.

A Focus on Macitentan in the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

The approval of macitentan has increased the number of pharmacological treatments of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Here, we review the effect on PAH of macitentan compared to other endothelin receptor antagonists. Drugs targeting the endothelin (ET) pathway include the selective ET_A receptor antagonist ambrisentan, the ET_A /ET_B receptor antagonists, bosentan and macitentan, which were recently approved for PAH treatment. Macitentan exhibits higher antagonistic potency than bosentan and ambrisentan in pulmonary smooth muscle cells. Compared to ambrisentan and bosentan, macitentan has a longer duration of action, reflected by the longer half-life, as well as pharmacodynamics attributed to its active metabolite, ACT-132577. The efficacy of macitentan on PAH was investigated in the phase III SERAPHIN trial (NCT00660179). Macitentan significantly reduced morbidity and mortality. It improved the 6-min. walk distance (6MWD) among PAH patients. In the AMB-320/321-E (NCT00578786) study, ambrisentan improved exercise capacity. In the EARLY study (NCT00091715), bosentan showed improvements in 6MWD which were not statistically significant. Bosentan had an effect on PAH in patients with Eisenmenger syndrome (ES) in the BREATHE-5 study (NCT00367770), while macitentan did not improve 6MWD in these patients, but there are differences regarding study size and functional class, and that 30% of the patients treated with macitentan were already in treatment with a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor. Macitentan revealed a lower risk of developing peripheral oedema and hepatotoxicity in the SERAPHIN study. In summary, macitentan has an efficiency comparable to bosentan and ambrisentan in the treatment of PAH. Patients treated with macitentan exhibited less adverse effects compared to bosentan and ambrisentan. In patients with PAH associated with ES, the trials with bosentan and macitentan do not seem comparable, and it needs to be clarified whether these drugs are effective when administered as part of a combination treatment in this condition.

Effects of an endothelin receptor antagonist, Macitentan, on right ventricular substrate utilization and function in a Sugen 5416/hypoxia rat model of severe pulmonary arterial hypertension

BACKGROUND

Altered myocardial energy metabolism has been linked to worsening of RV function in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The aim of this study was to evaluate RV glucose and fatty acid metabolism in vivo in a rat model of PAH using positron emission tomography (PET) and investigate the effects of Macitentan on RV substrate utilization.

METHODS

PAH was induced in male Sprague-Dawley rats by a single subcutaneous injection of Sugen 5416 (20 mg/kg) followed by 3 weeks of hypoxia (10% oxygen). At week 5 post-injection, the PAH rats were randomized to Macitentan (30 mg/kg daily) treatment or no treatment. Substrate utilization was serially assessed 5 and 8 weeks post-injection with 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (FDG) and 14(R,S)-[18F]fluoro-6-thia-heptadecanoic acid (FTHA) PET for glucose and fatty acid metabolism respectively and correlated with in vivo functional measurements.

RESULTS

PAH induction resulted in a 2.5-fold increase in RV FDG uptake (standardized uptake value (SUV) of normal control: 1.6 ± 0.4, week 5: 4.1 ± 1.9, week 8: 4.0 ± 1.6, P < 0.05 for all groups vs. control). RV FTHA showed twofold increased uptake at week 5 (SUV control: 1.50 ± 0.39, week 5: 3.06 ± 1.10, P = 0.03). Macitentan significantly decreased RV FDG uptake at 8 weeks (SUV: 2.5 ± 0.9, P = 0.04), associated with improved RV ejection fraction and reduced RV systolic pressure, while FTHA uptake was maintained.

CONCLUSION

PAH is associated with metabolic changes in the RV, characterized by a marked increase in FDG and FTHA uptake. Macitentan treatment reduced PAH severity and was associated with a decrease in RV FDG uptake and improved RV function.