1
|
Iyer RR, Applegate CC, Arogundade OH, Bangru S, Berg IC, Emon B, Porras-Gomez M, Hsieh PH, Jeong Y, Kim Y, Knox HJ, Moghaddam AO, Renteria CA, Richard C, Santaliz-Casiano A, Sengupta S, Wang J, Zambuto SG, Zeballos MA, Pool M, Bhargava R, Gaskins HR. Inspiring a convergent engineering approach to measure and model the tissue microenvironment. Heliyon 2024; 10:e32546. [PMID: 38975228 PMCID: PMC11226808 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2024] [Revised: 05/22/2024] [Accepted: 06/05/2024] [Indexed: 07/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Understanding the molecular and physical complexity of the tissue microenvironment (TiME) in the context of its spatiotemporal organization has remained an enduring challenge. Recent advances in engineering and data science are now promising the ability to study the structure, functions, and dynamics of the TiME in unprecedented detail; however, many advances still occur in silos that rarely integrate information to study the TiME in its full detail. This review provides an integrative overview of the engineering principles underlying chemical, optical, electrical, mechanical, and computational science to probe, sense, model, and fabricate the TiME. In individual sections, we first summarize the underlying principles, capabilities, and scope of emerging technologies, the breakthrough discoveries enabled by each technology and recent, promising innovations. We provide perspectives on the potential of these advances in answering critical questions about the TiME and its role in various disease and developmental processes. Finally, we present an integrative view that appreciates the major scientific and educational aspects in the study of the TiME.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rishyashring R. Iyer
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA
| | - Catherine C. Applegate
- Division of Nutritional Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA
| | - Opeyemi H. Arogundade
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA
| | - Sushant Bangru
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA
| | - Ian C. Berg
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA
| | - Bashar Emon
- Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA
| | - Marilyn Porras-Gomez
- Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA
| | - Pei-Hsuan Hsieh
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA
| | - Yoon Jeong
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA
| | - Yongdeok Kim
- Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA
| | - Hailey J. Knox
- Department of Chemistry, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA
| | - Amir Ostadi Moghaddam
- Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA
| | - Carlos A. Renteria
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA
| | - Craig Richard
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA
| | - Ashlie Santaliz-Casiano
- Division of Nutritional Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA
| | - Sourya Sengupta
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA
| | - Jason Wang
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA
| | - Samantha G. Zambuto
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA
| | - Maria A. Zeballos
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA
| | - Marcia Pool
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA
- Cancer Center at Illinois, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA
| | - Rohit Bhargava
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA
- Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA
- Department of Chemistry, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA
- Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA
- Cancer Center at Illinois, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA
- NIH/NIBIB P41 Center for Label-free Imaging and Multiscale Biophotonics (CLIMB), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA
| | - H. Rex Gaskins
- Division of Nutritional Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA
- Cancer Center at Illinois, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA
- Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA
- Department of Biomedical and Translational Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA
- Department of Pathobiology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schultheis BC, Ross-Steinhagen N, Jerosch J, Breil-Wirth A, Weidle PA. The Impact of Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation on Pain Levels and Functionality in Patients With Chronic Postsurgical Knee Pain. Neuromodulation 2024; 27:151-159. [PMID: 36464561 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2022.10.057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2022] [Revised: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic postsurgical pain is a considerable source of disabling neuropathic pain. Rates of knee replacement surgeries are increasing, and many patients report chronic postsurgical pain in their wake. When conventional therapies prove ineffective, neuromodulation options such as dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRGS) may be used. However, little is known about the effect of DRGS on improvements in quantitative functional outcome parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS In a prospective observational study at two pain centers, patients with chronic postsurgical knee pain underwent implantation with a DRGS system after an interdisciplinary multimodal pain program. Ratings of pain, mood, quality of life, and function were captured at baseline and through 12 months of treatment. Quantitative measures (range of motion, walking distance, and pain medication usage) were also recorded. RESULTS Visual analog scale ratings of pain decreased from 8.6 to 3.0 (p < 0.0001; N = 11), and other pain measures agreed. Quality of life on the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey questionnaire improved from 69.3 to 87.6 (p < 0.0001), whereas the improvement in depression ratings was nonsignificant. International Knee Documentation Committee questionnaire ratings of function improved from 27.7 to 51.7 (p < 0.0001), which aligned with other functional measures. On average, knee range of motion improved by 24.5°, and walking distance dramatically increased from 125 meters to 1481. Cessation of opioids, antidepressants, and/or anticonvulsants was achieved by 73% of participants. CONCLUSIONS Both subjective-based questionnaire and quantitative examination-based variables were in broad agreement on the value of DRGS in improving functionality and chronic postsurgical pain in the knee. Although this finding is limited by the small sample size, this intervention may have utility in the many cases in which pain becomes problematic after orthopedic knee surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Björn Carsten Schultheis
- Hospital Neuwerk, Muscular-Skeletal Center, Spinalsurgery and Departement of Interventional Pain Management, Dünnerstrasse, Mönchengladbach, Germany.
| | - Nikolas Ross-Steinhagen
- Hospital Neuwerk, Muscular-Skeletal Center, Spinalsurgery and Departement of Interventional Pain Management, Dünnerstrasse, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Joerg Jerosch
- Johanna Etienne Hospital Neuss, Endoprthetic Center, Neuss, Germany
| | | | - Patrick A Weidle
- Hospital Neuwerk, Muscular-Skeletal Center, Spinalsurgery and Departement of Interventional Pain Management, Dünnerstrasse, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mol F, Scheltinga M, Roumen R, Wille F, Gültuna I, Kallewaard JW, Elzinga L, van de Minkelis J, Nijhuis H, Stronks DL, Huygen FJPM. Comparing the Efficacy of Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation With Conventional Medical Management in Patients With Chronic Postsurgical Inguinal Pain: Post Hoc Analyzed Results of the SMASHING Study. Neuromodulation 2023; 26:1788-1794. [PMID: 36456417 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2022.09.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2022] [Accepted: 09/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Approximately 10% of patients who undergo inguinal hernia repair or Pfannenstiel incision develop chronic (> three months) postsurgical inguinal pain (PSIP). If medication or peripheral nerve blocks fail, a neurectomy is the treatment of choice. However, some patients do not respond to this treatment. In such cases, stimulation of the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) appears to significantly reduce chronic PSIP in selected patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this multicenter, randomized controlled study, DRG stimulation was compared with conventional medical management (CMM) (noninvasive treatments, such as medication, transcutaneous electric neurostimulation, and rehabilitation therapy) in patients with PSIP that was resistant to a neurectomy. Patients were recruited at a tertiary referral center for groin pain (SolviMáx, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) between March 2015 and November 2016. Suitability for implantation was assessed according to the Dutch Neuromodulation Association guidelines. The sponsor discontinued the study early owing to slow enrollment. Of 78 planned patients, 18 were randomized (DRG and CMM groups each had nine patients). Six patients with CMM (67%) crossed over to DRG stimulation at the six-month mark. RESULTS Fifteen of the 18 patients met the six-month primary end point with a complete data set for a per-protocol analysis. Three patients with DRG stimulation had a negative trial and were lost to follow-up. The average pain reduction was 50% in the DRG stimulation and crossover group (from 6.60 ± 1.24 to 3.28 ± 2.30, p = 0.0029). Conversely, a 13% increase in pain was observed in patients with CMM (from 6.13 ± 2.24 to 6.89 ± 1.24, p = 0.42). Nine patients with DRG stimulation experienced a total of 19 adverse events, such as lead dislocation and pain at the implantation site. CONCLUSIONS DRG stimulation is a promising effective therapy for pain relief in patients with PSIP resistant to conventional treatment modalities; larger studies should confirm this. The frequency of side effects should be a concern in a new study. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION The Clinicaltrials.gov registration number for the study is NCT02349659.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Rudi Roumen
- Maxima Medical Center, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Wille
- Maxima Medical Center, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Lars Elzinga
- Maxima Medical Center, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rosado Caracena R, Mendiola de la Osa A, Rincón Higuera A, Abad Fau de Casajuana E, Ruiz Córdoba G, García de Lucas F. Cervical dorsal root ganglion stimulation for complex regional pain syndrome: Technical description and results of seven cases. Pain Pract 2023; 23:242-251. [PMID: 36380700 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Revised: 09/20/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is characterized by nociplastic pain with alterations in sympathetic function. Neuromodulation could be a useful alternative therapy option. Dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation has demonstrated better results than conventional spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for patients with CRPS in lower limbs. METHODS We report a case series of seven patients treated with cervical DRG stimulation for CRPS of the hand that required neuromodulation for pain relief, after no response with other analgesic techniques (medication and interventional). We report retrospective data collection of seven consecutive patients with a 1-year follow-up. RESULTS Seven patients were trialed, and six were implanted with a permanent pulse generator after achieving more than 50% pain relief during 2-7 days of trial phase. The average pain relief (rated on a standard 100 mm visual analog scale) after 1 year of treatment was 64.3% ± 16.6. No major complications were observed during a 1-year follow-up. DISCUSSION The results for cervical DRG stimulation are similar to other DRG stimulation studies for the treatment of refractory CRPS at lower levels. The cervical DRG implant technique guided with C-arm fluoroscopy and under conscious sedation could be a safe and effective option for relieving pain of the upper limbs CRPS. Monitoring neural status is required for cervical DRG stimulation either with a responder awake patient or with intraoperative neural monitoring in non-responder patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Agustín Mendiola de la Osa
- Hospital FREMAP Majadahonda, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.,Puerta de Hierro Hospital, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chapman KB, Sayed D, Lamer T, Hunter C, Weisbein J, Patel KV, Dickerson D, Hagedorn JM, Lee DW, Amirdelfan K, Deer T, Chakravarthy K. Best Practices for Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation for Chronic Pain: Guidelines from the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience. J Pain Res 2023; 16:839-879. [PMID: 36942306 PMCID: PMC10024474 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s364370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/14/2023] Open
Abstract
With continued innovations in neuromodulation comes the need for evolving reviews of best practices. Dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRG-S) has significantly improved the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), and it has broad applicability across a wide range of other conditions. Through funding and organizational leadership by the American Society for Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN), this best practices consensus document has been developed for the selection, implantation, and use of DRG stimulation for the treatment of chronic pain syndromes. This document is composed of a comprehensive narrative literature review that has been performed regarding the role of the DRG in chronic pain and the clinical evidence for DRG-S as a treatment for multiple pain etiologies. Best practice recommendations encompass safety management, implantation techniques, and mitigation of the potential complications reported in the literature. Looking to the future of neuromodulation, DRG-S holds promise as a robust intervention for otherwise intractable pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth B Chapman
- The Spine & Pain Institute of New York, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra Northwell, Manhasset, NY, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
- Correspondence: Kenneth B Chapman, NYU Langone Medical Center, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Pain Medicine at Staten Island University Hospital, 1360 Hylan Boulevard, Staten Island, NY, 10305, USA, Email
| | - Dawood Sayed
- Department of Anesthesiology, The University of Kansas Medical Center (KUMC), Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Tim Lamer
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Corey Hunter
- Ainsworth Institute of Pain Management, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Kiran V Patel
- The Spine & Pain Institute of New York, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra Northwell, Manhasset, NY, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - David Dickerson
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL, USA
- Department of Anesthesia & Critical Care, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - David W Lee
- Fullerton Orthopedic Surgery Medical Group, Fullerton, CA, USA
| | | | - Timothy Deer
- The Spine and Nerve Center of the Virginias, Charleston, WV, USA
| | - Krishnan Chakravarthy
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of California San Diego Health Sciences, San Diego, CA, USA
- VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Telkes I, Hadanny A, DiMarzio M, Chitnis G, Paniccioli S, O'Connor K, Grey R, McCarthy K, Khazen O, McLaughlin B, Pilitsis JG. High-Resolution Spinal Motor Mapping Using Thoracic Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients With Chronic Pain. Neurosurgery 2022; 91:459-469. [PMID: 35876669 PMCID: PMC10553191 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2021] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND High-resolution spinal cord stimulation (HR-SCS) paddle can stimulate medial-dorsal columns and extend stimulation coverage to the laterally positioned spinal targets. OBJECTIVE To investigate the medio-lateral selectivity of an HR-SCS paddle in patients with chronic pain. METHODS During standard-of-care spinal cord stimulation (SCS) placement, epidurally evoked electromyography and antidromic dorsal column-evoked potentials were recorded in 12 subjects using an HR-SCS paddle with 8 medio-lateral sites spanning the full epidural width at thoracic T9-12 and a commercial paddle consecutively. RESULTS Recruitment maps were aligned with respect to physiological midline which was overlapping with anatomic midline in 10 of 11 cases. Overlapping contacts between the HR-SCS and commercial paddles exhibited similar patterns while HR-SCS demonstrated higher precision targeting of certain dermatomes. Spinal motor maps showed that the lateral contacts triggered stronger responses in medial gastrocnemius, adductor magnus, and tibialis anterior while the medial contacts triggered stronger responses in gluteus maximus and adductor hallucis. The time-locked popliteal fossa responses indicated ipsilateral activation by HR-SCS at the lateral contacts and bilateral activation at the medial contacts with stronger ipsilateral responses. CONCLUSION This study is the first to perform high-resolution medio-lateral SCS mapping in patients with chronic pain. These results show promise that HR-SCS may provide additional ipsilateral recruitment within the extremities which improve targeting of focal pain in the lower extremities. Furthermore, this study supports the functional use of intraoperative neuromonitoring as a decision tool to determine physiological midline in thoracic SCS surgeries and provides a full methodological framework.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilknur Telkes
- Department of Neuroscience and Experimental Therapeutics, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Amir Hadanny
- Department of Neurosurgery, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Marisa DiMarzio
- Department of Neuroscience and Experimental Therapeutics, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA
| | | | | | | | - Rachael Grey
- Nuvasive Clinical Services, San Diego, California, USA
| | | | - Olga Khazen
- Department of Neuroscience and Experimental Therapeutics, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA
| | | | - Julie G. Pilitsis
- Department of Neuroscience and Experimental Therapeutics, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Potter ST, Welch S, Tata F, Probert S, Nagpal A. Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2022; 33:359-378. [DOI: 10.1016/j.pmr.2022.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
8
|
A prospective long-term follow-up of dorsal root ganglion stimulation for the management of chronic intractable pain. Pain 2022; 163:702-710. [PMID: 35302973 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2021] [Accepted: 06/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Initial clinical studies have shown that the stimulation of the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) can significantly reduce chronic intractable pain. However, clinical data on long-term results and complications of these systems are limited. The aim of this prospective study is to report on a single center long-term follow-up of DRG stimulation for intractable chronic pain. Participants were implanted with DRG stimulation devices between 2013 and 2015 with an observation period of 24 months. Patients were contacted again in 2020 for a final follow-up (ie, between 5 and 7 years postimplantation). Forty-two participants were recruited, of whom 32 received the fully implantable pulse generator (IPG). At the final follow-up, 50% (16/32) of participants were still using DRG stimulation. Two participants still had the original IPG and 14 had received a replacement IPG. Pain scores were significantly reduced at 24 months, mean difference 1.7 (95% confidence interval: 0.2-3.3, P = 0.03), and at the last follow-up, mean difference 2.1 (95% confidence interval: 0.3-4, P = 0.03). Significant improvements were observed for health-related quality of life. The findings were generally robust to imputation methods of missing data. Implantable pulse generators of 8 patients were explanted because of dissatisfaction with pain relief. In conclusion, DRG stimulation can provide effective pain relief and improved quality of life in patients suffering with neuropathic pain, although this study had a revision rate of 42% within the first 24 months, and 56% of IPGs that were replaced because of battery depletion had a shorter than expected battery life.
Collapse
|
9
|
Okumo T, Takayama Y, Maruyama K, Kato M, Sunagawa M. Senso-Immunologic Prospects for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Treatment. Front Immunol 2022; 12:786511. [PMID: 35069559 PMCID: PMC8767061 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.786511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a chronic pain syndrome that occurs in tissue injuries as the result of surgery, trauma, or ischemia. The clinical features of this severely painful condition include redness and swelling of the affected skin. Intriguingly, it was recently suggested that transient receptor potential ankyrin 1 (TRPA1) is involved in chronic post-ischemia pain, a CRPS model. TRPA1 is a non-selective cation channel expressed in calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)-positive primary nociceptors that becomes highly activated in ischemic conditions, leading to the generation of pain. In this review, we summarize the history of TRPA1 and its involvement in pain sensation, inflammation, and CRPS. Furthermore, bone atrophy is also thought to be a characteristic clinical sign of CRPS. The altered bone microstructure of CRPS patients is thought to be caused by aggravated bone resorption via enhanced osteoclast differentiation and activation. Although TRPA1 could be a target for pain treatment in CRPS patients, we also discuss the paradoxical situation in this review. Nociceptor activation decreases the risk of bone destruction via CGRP secretion from free nerve endings. Thus, TRPA1 inhibition could cause severe bone atrophy. However, the suitable therapeutic strategy is controversial because the pathologic mechanisms of bone atrophy in CRPS are unclear. Therefore, we propose focusing on the remission of abnormal bone turnover observed in CRPS using a recently developed concept: senso-immunology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takayuki Okumo
- Department of Physiology, Showa University School of Medicine, Shinagawa, Japan
| | - Yasunori Takayama
- Department of Physiology, Showa University School of Medicine, Shinagawa, Japan
| | - Kenta Maruyama
- Department of Physiology, Showa University School of Medicine, Shinagawa, Japan.,Division of Cell Signaling, National Institute for Physiological Sciences, Natural Institutes for Natural Sciences, Okazaki, Japan
| | - Mami Kato
- Department of Physiology, Showa University School of Medicine, Shinagawa, Japan.,Department of Molecular and System Pharmacology, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Masataka Sunagawa
- Department of Physiology, Showa University School of Medicine, Shinagawa, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Malone IG, Kelly MN, Nosacka RL, Nash MA, Yue S, Xue W, Otto KJ, Dale EA. Closed-Loop, Cervical, Epidural Stimulation Elicits Respiratory Neuroplasticity after Spinal Cord Injury in Freely Behaving Rats. eNeuro 2022; 9:ENEURO.0426-21.2021. [PMID: 35058311 PMCID: PMC8856702 DOI: 10.1523/eneuro.0426-21.2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Revised: 12/08/2021] [Accepted: 12/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Over half of all spinal cord injuries (SCIs) are cervical, which can lead to paralysis and respiratory compromise, causing significant morbidity and mortality. Effective treatments to restore breathing after severe upper cervical injury are lacking; thus, it is imperative to develop therapies to address this. Epidural stimulation has successfully restored motor function after SCI for stepping, standing, reaching, grasping, and postural control. We hypothesized that closed-loop stimulation triggered via healthy hemidiaphragm EMG activity has the potential to elicit functional neuroplasticity in spinal respiratory pathways after cervical SCI (cSCI). To test this, we delivered closed-loop, electrical, epidural stimulation (CLES) at the level of the phrenic motor nucleus (C4) for 3 d after C2 hemisection (C2HS) in freely behaving rats. A 2 × 2 Latin Square experimental design incorporated two treatments, C2HS injury and CLES therapy resulting in four groups of adult, female Sprague Dawley rats: C2HS + CLES (n = 8), C2HS (n = 6), intact + CLES (n = 6), intact (n = 6). In stimulated groups, CLES was delivered for 12-20 h/d for 3 d. After C2HS, 3 d of CLES robustly facilitated the slope of stimulus-response curves of ipsilesional spinal motor evoked potentials (sMEPs) versus nonstimulated controls. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of CLES eliciting respiratory neuroplasticity after C2HS in freely behaving animals. These findings suggest CLES as a promising future therapy to address respiratory deficiency associated with cSCI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian G Malone
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
- Breathing Research and Therapeutics Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
| | - Mia N Kelly
- Breathing Research and Therapeutics Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
| | - Rachel L Nosacka
- Department of Physiology and Functional Genomics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
| | - Marissa A Nash
- Department of Physiology and Functional Genomics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
| | - Sijia Yue
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
| | - Wei Xue
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
| | - Kevin J Otto
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
- Breathing Research and Therapeutics Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
- McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
- J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
- Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
- Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
| | - Erica A Dale
- Breathing Research and Therapeutics Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
- Department of Physiology and Functional Genomics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
- McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Prospective Observational Cohort Study on Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation in Chronic Postsurgical Pain: Results of Patient-Reported Outcomes at Two Years. Neuromodulation 2022; 25:998-1005. [DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2021.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2021] [Revised: 10/28/2021] [Accepted: 11/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
12
|
D'Souza RS, Kubrova E, Her YF, Barman RA, Smith BJ, Alvarez GM, West TE, Abd-Elsayed A. Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation for Lower Extremity Neuropathic Pain Syndromes: An Evidence-Based Literature Review. Adv Ther 2022; 39:4440-4473. [PMID: 35994195 PMCID: PMC9464732 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-022-02244-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2022] [Accepted: 06/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
Dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRG-S) is a form of selective neuromodulation therapy that targets the dorsal root ganglion. DRG-S offers analgesia in a variety of chronic pain conditions and is approved for treatment of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). There has been increasing utilization of DRG-S to treat various neuropathic pain syndromes of the lower extremity, although evidence remains limited to one randomized controlled trial and 39 observational studies. In this review, we appraised the current evidence for DRG-S in the treatment of lower extremity neuropathic pain using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) criteria. The primary outcome was change in pain intensity after DRG-S compared to baseline. We stratified presentation of results based of type of neuropathy (CRPS, painful diabetic neuropathy, mononeuropathy, polyneuropathy) as well as location of neuropathy (hip, knee, foot). Future powered randomized controlled trials with homogeneous participants are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan S D'Souza
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Eva Kubrova
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Yeng F Her
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Ross A Barman
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Brandon J Smith
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Gabriel M Alvarez
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Tyler E West
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Alaa Abd-Elsayed
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Vuka I, Marciuš T, Kovačić D, Šarolić A, Puljak L, Sapunar D. Implantable, Programmable, and Wireless Device for Electrical Stimulation of the Dorsal Root Ganglion in Freely-Moving Rats: A Proof of Concept Study. J Pain Res 2021; 14:3759-3772. [PMID: 34916842 PMCID: PMC8668248 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s332438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2021] [Accepted: 11/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective This was a proof of concept study, based on systematic reviews of the efficacy and safety of the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation. The main objective was to develop an implantable, programmable, and wireless device for electrical stimulation of DRG and a methodology that can be used in translational research, especially to understand the mechanism of neuromodulation and to test new treatment modalities in animal models of pain. Methods We developed and tested a stimulator that uses a battery-powered microelectronic circuit, to generate constant current square biphasic or monophasic pulsed waveform of variable amplitudes and duration. It is controlled by software and an external controller that allows radio frequency communication with the stimulator. The stimulator was implanted in Sprague–Dawley (SD) rats. The lead was positioned at the L5 DRG level, while the stimulator was placed in the skin pocket at the ipsilateral side. Forty-five animals were used and divided into six groups: spinal nerve ligation (SNL), chronic compression injury of the DRG (CCD), SNL + active DRG stimulation, intact control group, group with the implanted sham stimulator, and sham lead. Behavioral testing was performed on the day preceding surgery and three times postoperatively (1st, 3rd, and 7th day). Results In animals with SNL, neurostimulation reduced pain-related behavior, tested with pinprick hyperalgesia, pinprick withdrawal test, and cold test, while the leads per se did not cause DRG compression. The rats well tolerated the stimulator. It did not hinder animal movement, and it enabled the animals to be housed under regular conditions. Conclusion A proof-of-concept experiment with our stimulator verified the usability of the device. The stimulator enables a wide range of research applications from adjusting stimulation parameters for different pain conditions, studying new stimulation methods with different frequencies and waveforms to obtain knowledge about analgesic mechanisms of DRG stimulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivana Vuka
- Laboratory for Pain Research, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia
| | - Tihana Marciuš
- Laboratory for Pain Research, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia
| | - Damir Kovačić
- Laboratory for Biophysics and Medical Neuroelectronics, University of Split Faculty of Science, Split, Croatia
| | - Antonio Šarolić
- Laboratory for Applied Electromagnetics (EMLab), FESB, University of Split, Split, Croatia
| | - Livia Puljak
- Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine and Health Care, Catholic University of Croatia, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Damir Sapunar
- Laboratory for Pain Research, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Chao D, Mecca CM, Yu G, Segel I, Gold MS, Hogan QH, Pan B. Dorsal root ganglion stimulation of injured sensory neurons in rats rapidly eliminates their spontaneous activity and relieves spontaneous pain. Pain 2021; 162:2917-2932. [PMID: 33990112 PMCID: PMC8486885 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Dorsal root ganglion field stimulation (GFS) relieves evoked and spontaneous neuropathic pain by use-dependent blockade of impulse trains through the sensory neuron T-junction, which becomes complete within less than 1 minute for C-type units, also with partial blockade of Aδ units. We used this tool in the spinal nerve ligation (SNL) rat model to selectively block sensory neuron spontaneous activity (SA) of axotomized neurons at the fifth lumbar (L5) level vs blockade of units at the L4 level that remain uninjured but exposed to inflammation. In vivo dorsal root single-unit recordings after SNL showed increased SA in L5 units but not L4 units. Ganglion field stimulation blocked this SA. Ganglion field stimulation delivered at the L5 dorsal root ganglion blocked mechanical hyperalgesia behavior, mechanical allodynia, and ongoing spontaneous pain indicated by conditioned place preference, whereas GFS at L4 blocked evoked pain behavior but not spontaneous pain. In vivo single-unit recordings of spinal cord dorsal horn (DH) wide-dynamic-range neurons showed elevated SA after SNL, which was reduced by GFS at the L5 level but not by GFS at the L4 level. In addition, L5 GFS, but not L4 GFS, increased mechanical threshold of DH units during cutaneous mechanical stimulation, while L5 GFS exceeded L4 GFS in reducing evoked firing rates. Our results indicate that SA in injured neurons supports increased firing of DH wide-dynamic-range neurons, contributing to hyperalgesia, allodynia, and ongoing pain. Ganglion field stimulation analgesic effects after nerve injury are at least partly attributable to blocking propagation of this SA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dongman Chao
- Department of Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 W Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI 53226
| | - Christina M. Mecca
- Department of Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 W Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI 53226
| | - Guoliang Yu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 W Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI 53226
| | - Ian Segel
- Department of Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 W Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI 53226
| | - Michael S. Gold
- Department of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh, 3500 Terrace Street Rm E1440 BST, Pittsburgh, PA 15213
| | - Quinn H. Hogan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 W Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI 53226
| | - Bin Pan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 W Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI 53226
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Dalrymple AN, Ting JE, Bose R, Trevathan JK, Nieuwoudt S, Lempka SF, Franke M, Ludwig KA, Shoffstall AJ, Fisher LE, Weber DJ. Stimulation of the dorsal root ganglion using an Injectrode ®. J Neural Eng 2021; 18. [PMID: 34650008 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac2ffb] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 10/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
Objective. The goal of this work was to compare afferent fiber recruitment by dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation using an injectable polymer electrode (Injectrode®) and a more traditional cylindrical metal electrode.Approach. We exposed the L6 and L7 DRG in four cats via a partial laminectomy or burr hole. We stimulated the DRG using an Injectrode or a stainless steel (SS) electrode using biphasic pulses at three different pulse widths (80, 150, 300μs) and pulse amplitudes spanning the range used for clinical DRG stimulation. We recorded antidromic evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) in the sciatic, tibial, and common peroneal nerves using nerve cuffs. We calculated the conduction velocity of the ECAPs and determined the charge-thresholds and recruitment rates for ECAPs from Aα, Aβ, and Aδfibers. We also performed electrochemical impedance spectroscopy measurements for both electrode types.Main results. The ECAP thresholds for the Injectrode did not differ from the SS electrode across all primary afferents (Aα, Aβ, Aδ) and pulse widths; charge-thresholds increased with wider pulse widths. Thresholds for generating ECAPs from Aβfibers were 100.0 ± 32.3 nC using the SS electrode, and 90.9 ± 42.9 nC using the Injectrode. The ECAP thresholds from the Injectrode were consistent over several hours of stimulation. The rate of recruitment was similar between the Injectrodes and SS electrode and decreased with wider pulse widths.Significance. The Injectrode can effectively excite primary afferents when used for DRG stimulation within the range of parameters used for clinical DRG stimulation. The Injectrode can be implanted through minimally invasive techniques while achieving similar neural activation to conventional electrodes, making it an excellent candidate for future DRG stimulation and neuroprosthetic applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley N Dalrymple
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Ave, Wean 1323, Pittsburgh, PA 15217, United States of America.,Rehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15217, United States of America
| | - Jordyn E Ting
- Rehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15217, United States of America.,Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.,Center for Neural Basis of Cognition, Pittsburgh, PA, 15217, United States of America
| | - Rohit Bose
- Rehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15217, United States of America.,Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.,Center for Neural Basis of Cognition, Pittsburgh, PA, 15217, United States of America
| | - James K Trevathan
- Departments of Biomedical Engineering and Neurological Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States of America
| | | | - Scott F Lempka
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America
| | | | - Kip A Ludwig
- Departments of Biomedical Engineering and Neurological Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States of America.,Neuronoff Inc., Cleveland, OH, United States of America.,Wisconsin Institute for Translational Neuroengineering (WITNe), Madison, WI, United States of America
| | - Andrew J Shoffstall
- Neuronoff Inc., Cleveland, OH, United States of America.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States of America
| | - Lee E Fisher
- Rehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15217, United States of America.,Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.,Center for Neural Basis of Cognition, Pittsburgh, PA, 15217, United States of America.,Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
| | - Douglas J Weber
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Ave, Wean 1323, Pittsburgh, PA 15217, United States of America.,Rehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15217, United States of America.,Center for Neural Basis of Cognition, Pittsburgh, PA, 15217, United States of America.,Neuroscience Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Ave, Wean 1323, Pittsburgh, PA 15217, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Malone IG, Nosacka RL, Nash MA, Otto KJ, Dale EA. Electrical epidural stimulation of the cervical spinal cord: implications for spinal respiratory neuroplasticity after spinal cord injury. J Neurophysiol 2021; 126:607-626. [PMID: 34232771 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00625.2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (cSCI) can lead to damage of bulbospinal pathways to the respiratory motor nuclei and consequent life-threatening respiratory insufficiency due to respiratory muscle paralysis/paresis. Reports of electrical epidural stimulation (EES) of the lumbosacral spinal cord to enable locomotor function after SCI are encouraging, with some evidence of facilitating neural plasticity. Here, we detail the development and success of EES in recovering locomotor function, with consideration of stimulation parameters and safety measures to develop effective EES protocols. EES is just beginning to be applied in other motor, sensory, and autonomic systems; however, there has only been moderate success in preclinical studies aimed at improving breathing function after cSCI. Thus, we explore the rationale for applying EES to the cervical spinal cord, targeting the phrenic motor nucleus for the restoration of breathing. We also suggest cellular/molecular mechanisms by which EES may induce respiratory plasticity, including a brief examination of sex-related differences in these mechanisms. Finally, we suggest that more attention be paid to the effects of specific electrical parameters that have been used in the development of EES protocols and how that can impact the safety and efficacy for those receiving this therapy. Ultimately, we aim to inform readers about the potential benefits of EES in the phrenic motor system and encourage future studies in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian G Malone
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.,Breathing Research and Therapeutics Center (BREATHE), University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Rachel L Nosacka
- Department of Physiology and Functional Genomics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Marissa A Nash
- Department of Physiology and Functional Genomics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Kevin J Otto
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.,Breathing Research and Therapeutics Center (BREATHE), University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.,J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.,Department of Neuroscience, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.,Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.,Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.,McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Erica A Dale
- Breathing Research and Therapeutics Center (BREATHE), University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.,Department of Physiology and Functional Genomics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.,Department of Neuroscience, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.,McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Yu G, Segel I, Tran H, Park HJ, Ross E, Hogan QH, Pan B. Analgesic Effects of Tonic and Burst Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation in Rats With Painful Tibial Nerve Injury. Neuromodulation 2021; 25:970-979. [PMID: 34096146 DOI: 10.1111/ner.13472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2021] [Revised: 05/06/2021] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation is effective in treating chronic pain. While burst stimulation has been proven to enhance the therapeutic efficacy in spinal cord stimulation, currently only a tonic stimulation waveform is clinically used in DRG stimulation. We hypothesized that burst DRG stimulation might also produce analgesic effect in a preclinical neuropathic pain model. We evaluated both the therapeutic effects of burst DRG stimulation and the possible effects of DRG stimulation upon inflammation within the DRG in a preclinical neuropathic pain model. MATERIALS AND METHODS Rats received either a painful tibial nerve injury or sham surgery. Analgesic effects of DRG stimulation were evaluated by testing a battery of evoked pain-related behaviors as well as measuring the positive affective state associated with relief of spontaneous pain using conditioned place preference. Histological evidence for neuronal trauma or neuroinflammation was evaluated. RESULTS All of the waveforms tested (20 Hz-tonic, 20 Hz-burst, and 40 Hz-burst) have similar analgesic effects in sensory tests and conditioned place preference. Long-term DRG stimulation for two weeks does not change DRG expression of markers for nerve injury and neuroinflammation. CONCLUSIONS DRG stimulation using burst waveform might be also suitable for treating neuropathic pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guoliang Yu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA
| | - Ian Segel
- Department of Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA
| | - Hai Tran
- Department of Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA
| | | | - Erika Ross
- Abbott Neuromodulation, Plano, TX, 75024, USA
| | - Quinn H Hogan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA
| | - Bin Pan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Analgesic dorsal root ganglionic field stimulation blocks conduction of afferent impulse trains selectively in nociceptive sensory afferents. Pain 2021; 161:2872-2886. [PMID: 32658148 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Increased excitability of primary sensory neurons after peripheral nerve injury may cause hyperalgesia and allodynia. Dorsal root ganglion field stimulation (GFS) is effective in relieving clinical pain associated with nerve injury and neuropathic pain in animal models. However, its mechanism has not been determined. We examined effects of GFS on transmission of action potentials (APs) from the peripheral to central processes by in vivo single-unit recording from lumbar dorsal roots in sham injured rats and rats with tibial nerve injury (TNI) in fiber types defined by conduction velocity. Transmission of APs directly generated by GFS (20 Hz) in C-type units progressively abated over 20 seconds, whereas GFS-induced Aβ activity persisted unabated, while Aδ showed an intermediate pattern. Activity generated peripherally by electrical stimulation of the sciatic nerve and punctate mechanical stimulation of the receptive field (glabrous skin) was likewise fully blocked by GFS within 20 seconds in C-type units, whereas Aβ units were minimally affected and a subpopulation of Aδ units was blocked. After TNI, the threshold to induce AP firing by punctate mechanical stimulation (von Frey) was reduced, which was reversed to normal during GFS. These results also suggest that C-type fibers, not Aβ, mainly contribute to mechanical and thermal hypersensitivity (von Frey, brush, acetone) after injury. Ganglion field stimulation produces use-dependent blocking of afferent AP trains, consistent with enhanced filtering of APs at the sensory neuron T-junction, particularly in nociceptive units.
Collapse
|
19
|
Nagpal A, Clements N, Duszynski B, Boies B. The Effectiveness of Dorsal Root Ganglion Neurostimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Pelvic Pain and Chronic Neuropathic Pain of the Lower Extremity: A Comprehensive Review of the Published Data. PAIN MEDICINE 2021; 22:49-59. [PMID: 33260203 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnaa369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effectiveness of dorsal root ganglion neurostimulation for the treatment of refractory, focal pain in the pelvis and lower extremities. DESIGN Systematic review. OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was ≥50% pain relief. Secondary outcomes were physical function, mood, quality of life, opioid usage, and complications. RESULTS One pragmatic randomized controlled trial, four prospective cohort studies, and eight case series met the inclusion criteria. A worst-case scenario analysis from the randomized controlled trial reported ≥50% pain relief in 74% of patients with dorsal root ganglion neurostimulation vs. 51% of patients who experienced at least 50% relief with spinal cord stimulation at 3 months. Cohort data success rates ranged from 43% to 83% at ≤6 months and 27% to 100% at >6 months. Significant improvements were also reported in the secondary outcomes assessed, including mood, quality of life, opioid usage, and health care utilization, though a lack of available quantitative data limits further statistical analysis. Complication rates vary, though the only randomized controlled trial reported a higher rate of adverse events than that seen with traditional neurostimulation. CONCLUSIONS In accordance with the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system, low-quality evidence supports dorsal root ganglion neurostimulation as a more effective treatment than traditional neurostimulation for pain and dysfunction associated with complex regional pain syndrome or causalgia. Very low-quality evidence supports dorsal root ganglion neurostimulation for the treatment of chronic pelvic pain, chronic neuropathic groin pain, phantom limb pain, chronic neuropathic pain of the trunk and/or limbs, and diabetic neuropathy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ameet Nagpal
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Nathan Clements
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | | | - Brian Boies
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Berger AA, Liu Y, Possoit H, Rogers AC, Moore W, Gress K, Cornett EM, Kaye AD, Imani F, Sadegi K, Varrassi G, Viswanath O, Urits I. Dorsal Root Ganglion (DRG) and Chronic Pain. Anesth Pain Med 2021; 11:e113020. [PMID: 34336621 PMCID: PMC8314073 DOI: 10.5812/aapm.113020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2021] [Revised: 03/01/2021] [Accepted: 03/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Context Chronic neuropathic pain is a common condition, and up to 11.9% of the population have been reported to suffer from uncontrolled neuropathic pain. Chronic pain leads to significant morbidity, lowered quality of life, and loss of workdays, and thus carries a significant price tag in healthcare costs and lost productivity. dorsal root ganglia (DRG) stimulation has been recently increasingly reported and shows promising results in the alleviation of chronic pain. This paper reviews the background of DRG stimulation, anatomical, and clinical consideration and reviews the clinical evidence to support its use. Evidence Acquisition The DRG span the length of the spinal cord and house the neurons responsible for sensation from the periphery. They may become irritated by direct compression or local inflammation. Glial cells in the DRG respond to nerve injury, producing inflammatory markers and contribute to the development of chronic pain, even after the resolution of the original insult. While the underlying mechanism is still being explored, recent studies explored the efficacy of DRG stimulation and neuromodulation for chronic pain treatment. Results Several reported cases and a small number of randomized trials were published in recent years, describing different methods of DRG stimulation and neuromodulation with promising results. Though evidence quality is mostly low, these results provide evidence to support the utilization of this technique. Conclusions Chronic neuropathic pain is a common condition and carries significant morbidity and impact on the quality of life. Recent evidence supports the use of DRG neuromodulation as an effective technique to control chronic pain. Though studies are still emerging, the evidence appears to support this technique. Further studies, including large randomized trials evaluating DRG modulation versus other interventional and non-interventional techniques, are needed to further elucidate the efficacy of this method. These studies are also likely to inform the patient selection and the course of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amnon A. Berger
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Corresponding Author: Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Yao Liu
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - HarLee Possoit
- LSU Health Shreveport, School of Medicine, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Anna C. Rogers
- LSU Health Shreveport, School of Medicine, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Warner Moore
- LSU Health Shreveport, School of Medicine, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Kyle Gress
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Elyse M. Cornett
- LSU Health Shreveport, Department of Anesthesiology, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Alan David Kaye
- LSU Health Shreveport, Department of Anesthesiology, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Farnad Imani
- Pain Research Center, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Kambiz Sadegi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Zabol University of Medical Sciences, Zabol, Iran
- Corresponding Author: Department of Anesthesiology, Zabol University of Medical Sciences, Zabol, Iran.
| | | | - Omar Viswanath
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
- University of Arizona College of Medicine - Phoenix, Department of Anesthesiology, Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Creighton University School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Omaha, NE, USA
- Valley Anesthesiology and Pain Consultants – Envision Physician Services, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Ivan Urits
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
- Southcoast Health, Southcoast Health Physicians Group Pain Medicine, Wareham, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Hagedorn JM, McArdle I, D'Souza RS, Yadav A, Engle AM, Deer TR. Effect of Patient Characteristics on Clinical Outcomes More Than 12 Months Following Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation Implantation: A Retrospective Review. Neuromodulation 2021; 24:695-699. [PMID: 33508161 DOI: 10.1111/ner.13326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2020] [Revised: 11/10/2020] [Accepted: 11/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation is an effective treatment option for lower extremity complex regional pain syndrome and other focal pain conditions. However, the patient characteristics that may predict long-term outcomes have not been defined. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a retrospective observational study that included 93 patients who were implanted with a DRG stimulator at a single private practice institution. A variety of demographic data was collected. Follow-up results were reviewed from multiple time points more than 12 months. Patients were classified as either "responder" or "nonresponder" status using two different thresholds, "greater than or equal to 50% pain relief" and "greater than or equal to 80% pain relief." RESULTS A history of prior chronic opioid use was associated with significantly lower rates of responder status based on both a 50% pain relief threshold and 80% pain relief threshold at the one week to one month, three months, and 12-months visits. CONCLUSIONS This single-center retrospective study found patients prescribed chronic opioids at the time of DRG stimulator implantation had a higher likelihood of less than 50% pain relief and 80% pain relief at one month, three months, and 12 months follow-up visits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan M Hagedorn
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Ian McArdle
- West Virginia University School of Medicine, Charleston, WV, USA
| | - Ryan S D'Souza
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Abhishek Yadav
- Department of Anesthesiology, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Alyson M Engle
- The Spine and Nerve Center of the Virginias, Charleston, WV, USA
| | - Timothy R Deer
- The Spine and Nerve Center of the Virginias, Charleston, WV, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Yeh TY, Luo IW, Hsieh YL, Tseng TJ, Chiang H, Hsieh ST. Peripheral Neuropathic Pain: From Experimental Models to Potential Therapeutic Targets in Dorsal Root Ganglion Neurons. Cells 2020; 9:cells9122725. [PMID: 33371371 PMCID: PMC7767346 DOI: 10.3390/cells9122725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2020] [Accepted: 12/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Neuropathic pain exerts a global burden caused by the lesions in the somatosensory nerve system, including the central and peripheral nervous systems. The mechanisms of nerve injury-induced neuropathic pain involve multiple mechanisms, various signaling pathways, and molecules. Currently, poor efficacy is the major limitation of medications for treating neuropathic pain. Thus, understanding the detailed molecular mechanisms should shed light on the development of new therapeutic strategies for neuropathic pain. Several well-established in vivo pain models were used to investigate the detail mechanisms of peripheral neuropathic pain. Molecular mediators of pain are regulated differentially in various forms of neuropathic pain models; these regulators include purinergic receptors, transient receptor potential receptor channels, and voltage-gated sodium and calcium channels. Meanwhile, post-translational modification and transcriptional regulation are also altered in these pain models and have been reported to mediate several pain related molecules. In this review, we focus on molecular mechanisms and mediators of neuropathic pain with their corresponding transcriptional regulation and post-translational modification underlying peripheral sensitization in the dorsal root ganglia. Taken together, these molecular mediators and their modification and regulations provide excellent targets for neuropathic pain treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ti-Yen Yeh
- Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10051, Taiwan;
| | - I-Wei Luo
- Department of Life Science, College of Life Science, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan;
| | - Yu-Lin Hsieh
- Department of Anatomy, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan;
- School of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
- Department of Medical Research, Kaohsiung Medical University Hostpital, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
| | - To-Jung Tseng
- Department of Anatomy, School of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung 40201, Taiwan;
- Department of Medical Education, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung 40201, Taiwan
| | | | - Sung-Tsang Hsieh
- Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10051, Taiwan;
- Department of Neurology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei 10002, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Brian and Mind Sciences, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10051, Taiwan
- Center of Precision Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10055, Taiwan
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +886-2-23123456 (ext. 88182); Fax: +886-223915292
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation Alleviates Pain-related Behaviors in Rats with Nerve Injury and Osteoarthritis. Anesthesiology 2020; 133:408-425. [PMID: 32433276 DOI: 10.1097/aln.0000000000003348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dorsal root ganglion field stimulation is an analgesic neuromodulation approach in use clinically, but its mechanism is unknown as there is no validated animal model for this purpose. The authors hypothesized that ganglion stimulation is effective in reducing pain-like behaviors in preclinical chronic pain models. METHODS The authors provided ganglion stimulation or spinal cord stimulation to rats with traumatic neuropathy (tibial nerve injury), or osteoarthritis induced by intraarticular knee monosodium iodoacetate, or without injury (naïve). Analgesia was evaluated by testing a battery of pain-related reflexive, functional, and affective behaviors. RESULTS In rats with nerve injury, multilevel L4 and L5 ganglion stimulation decreased hypersensitivity to noxious mechanical stimulation more (area under curve, -1,447 ± 423 min × % response; n = 12) than single level ganglion stimulation at L4 ([-960 ± 251 min × % response; n = 8; P = 0.012] vs. L4 and L5), and L5 ([-676 ± 295 min × % response; n = 8; P < 0.0001] vs. L4 and L5). Spontaneous pain-like behavior, evaluated by conditioned place preference, responded to single L4 (Pretest [-93 ± 65 s] vs. Test [87 ± 82 s]; P = 0.002; n = 9), L5 (Pretest [-57 ± 36 s] vs. Test [137 ± 73 s]; P = 0.001; n = 8), and multilevel L4 and L5 (Pretest: -81 ± 68 s vs. Test: 90 ± 76 s; P = 0.003; n = 8) ganglion stimulation. In rats with osteoarthritis, multilevel L3 and L4 ganglion stimulation reduced sensitivity to knee motion more (-156 ± 28 min × points; n = 8) than L3 ([-94 ± 19 min × points in knee bend test; n = 7; P = 0.002] vs. L3 and L4) or L4 ([-71 ± 22 min × points; n = 7; P < 0.0001] vs. L3 and L4). Conditioned place preference during osteoarthritis revealed analgesic effectiveness for ganglion stimulation when delivered at L3 (Pretest [-78 ± 77 s] vs. Test [68 ± 136 s]; P = 0.048; n = 9), L4 (Pretest [-96 ± 51 s] vs. Test [73 ± 111 s]; P = 0.004; n = 9), and L3 and L4 (Pretest [-69 ± 52 s; n = 7] vs. Test [55 ± 140 s]; P = 0.022; n = 7). CONCLUSIONS Dorsal root ganglion stimulation is effective in neuropathic and osteoarthritic preclinical rat pain models with peripheral pathologic origins, demonstrating effectiveness of ganglion stimulation in a placebo-free setting and justifying this model as a suitable platform for mechanistic studies.
Collapse
|
24
|
Deer TR, Hunter CW, Mehta P, Sayed D, Grider JS, Lamer TJ, Pope JE, Falowski S, Provenzano DA, Esposito MF, Slavin KV, Baranidharan G, Russo M, Jassal NS, Mogilner AY, Kapural L, Verrills P, Amirdelfan K, McRoberts WP, Harned ME, Chapman KB, Liem L, Carlson JD, Yang A, Aiyer R, Antony A, Fishman MA, Al-Kaisy AA, Christelis N, Levy RM, Mekhail N. A Systematic Literature Review of Dorsal Root Ganglion Neurostimulation for the Treatment of Pain. PAIN MEDICINE 2020; 21:1581-1589. [DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnaa005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
AbstractObjectiveTo conduct a systematic literature review of dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation for pain.DesignGrade the evidence for DRG stimulation.MethodsAn international, interdisciplinary work group conducted a literature search for DRG stimulation. Abstracts were reviewed to select studies for grading. General inclusion criteria were prospective trials (randomized controlled trials and observational studies) that were not part of a larger or previously reported group. Excluded studies were retrospective, too small, or existed only as abstracts. Studies were graded using the modified Interventional Pain Management Techniques–Quality Appraisal of Reliability and Risk of Bias Assessment, the Cochrane Collaborations Risk of Bias assessment, and the US Preventative Services Task Force level-of-evidence criteria.ResultsDRG stimulation has Level II evidence (moderate) based upon one high-quality pivotal randomized controlled trial and two lower-quality studies.ConclusionsModerate-level evidence supports DRG stimulation for treating chronic focal neuropathic pain and complex regional pain syndrome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy R Deer
- Spine and Nerve Center of the Virginias, Charleston, West Virginia
| | - Corey W Hunter
- Ainsworth Institute of Pain Management, New York, New York
| | | | - Dawood Sayed
- University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Jay S Grider
- UK HealthCare Pain Services, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - Tim J Lamer
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Jason E Pope
- Evolve Restorative Center, Santa Rosa, California
| | - Steven Falowski
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurosurgical Associates of Lancaster, Lancaster, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | - Konstantin V Slavin
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | - Marc Russo
- Hunter Pain Specialists, Broadmeadow, NSW, Australia
| | - Navdeep S Jassal
- Department of Neurology/Pain, University of South Florida, Spine & Pain Institute of Florida, Lakeland, Florida
| | - Alon Y Mogilner
- Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Leo Kapural
- Carolina Pain Institute at Brookstown, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | | | | | | | - Michael E Harned
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
| | | | - Liong Liem
- St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | | | - Ajax Yang
- Mt. Sinai Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Rohit Aiyer
- Interventional Pain Management and Pain Psychiatry Faculty, Henry Ford Health System Detroit, Michigan
| | - Ajay Antony
- University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Michael A Fishman
- Center for Interventional Pain and Spine, Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Adnan A Al-Kaisy
- Pain Management and Neuromodulation Centre at Guy’s and St. Thomas’ NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Nick Christelis
- Pain Specialists Australia, Monash University, Richmond, Victoria, Australia
| | - Robert M Levy
- Neurosurgical Services and of Clinical Research, Anesthesia Pain Care Consultants, Tamarac, Florida
| | - Nagy Mekhail
- Evidence-Based Pain Management Research and Education, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Hagedorn JM, Demian PS, Scarfo KA, Engle AM, Deer TR. Proclaim™ DRG Neurostimulator System for the management of chronic, intractable pain. Pain Manag 2020; 10:225-233. [DOI: 10.2217/pmt-2020-0010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Chronic pain is consistently listed as one of the most costly and disabling health problems worldwide. In an effort to treat these suffering individuals, significant amounts of time and energy have been devoted to discover safe and effective pain relieving treatments. Dorsal root ganglion stimulation is the newest treatment modality to be created for chronic intractable pain. In this manuscript, we review the history and development, published research and safety profile of the Proclaim™ DRG Neurostimulator System (Abbott, TX, USA). At last, we offer our outlook on future developments with dorsal root ganglion stimulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan M Hagedorn
- Department of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Pavli S Demian
- The Pain Management Center, 2271 NJ-33 #103, Hamilton Township, NJ 08690, USA
| | - Keith-Austin Scarfo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, 593 Eddy Street, George 1st Floor, Providence, RI 02903, USA
| | - Alyson M Engle
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 3471 Fifth Avenue, Suite 402, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
| | - Timothy R Deer
- The Spine & Nerve Center of The Virginias, 400 Court Street, Suite 100, Charleston, WV 25301, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Horan M, Jacobsen AH, Scherer C, Rosenlund C, Gulisano HA, Søe M, Sørensen JCH, Meier K, Blichfeldt-Eckhardt MR. Complications and Effects of Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation in the Treatment of Chronic Neuropathic Pain: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Denmark. Neuromodulation 2020; 24:729-737. [PMID: 32539189 DOI: 10.1111/ner.13171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2019] [Revised: 04/03/2020] [Accepted: 04/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation is a novel treatment of chronic neuropathic pain and has been shown to be efficacious across several case reports and randomized trials. However, long-term follow-up is limited, as are reports of complication rates. This study presents efficacy and complications for patients treated with DRG stimulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed an observational, multicenter cohort study of all patients in Denmark implanted with FDA-approved DRG stimulation systems to treat chronic, neuropathic pain between 2014 and 2018. Follow-up period was one to three years. RESULTS Forty-three patients underwent trial DRG stimulation; 33 were subsequently fully implanted. Pain location: 58% lower extremity; 21% upper extremity; 21% thoracic/abdominal. At the end of the observation period, 58% of fully implanted patients were still implanted; 42% had fully functional systems. In these patients, average Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)-score of pain was reduced from 6.8 to 3.5 (p = 0.00049) and worst NRS-score was reduced from 8.6 to 6.0 (p = 0.0039) at 12 months follow-up. Pain Catastrophizing Score was reduced from 32 to 15 (p = 0.0039). Thirteen patients experienced complications related to defect leads (39% of implanted systems). In four patients (12%), lead removal left fragments in the root canal due to lead fracture, and three patients suffered permanent nerve damage during attempts to replace broken leads. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests a significant, clinically relevant effect of DRG stimulation on neuropathic pain, but also demonstrates substantial problems with maintenance and revision of currently available systems. Consequently, treatment with equipment marketed specifically for DRG stimulation is currently paused in Denmark.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mattias Horan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | | | - Christian Scherer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | | | | | - Morten Søe
- Department of Neurosurgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | | | - Kaare Meier
- Department of Neurosurgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Morten Rune Blichfeldt-Eckhardt
- Department of Neurosurgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Deer TR, Naidu R, Strand N, Sparks D, Abd-Elsayed A, Kalia H, Hah JM, Mehta P, Sayed D, Gulati A. A review of the bioelectronic implications of stimulation of the peripheral nervous system for chronic pain conditions. Bioelectron Med 2020; 6:9. [PMID: 32346553 PMCID: PMC7181529 DOI: 10.1186/s42234-020-00045-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2019] [Accepted: 03/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Peripheral Nerve Stimulation has been used to treat human disease including pain for several decades. Innovation has made it a more viable option for treatment of common chronic pain processes, and interest in the therapy is increasing. Main body While clinical data is forthcoming, understanding factors that influence successful outcomes in the use of PNS still needs to be delineated. This article reviews the evolution and bioelectronic principles of peripheral nerve stimulation including patient selection, nerve targets, techniques and guidance of target delivery. We collate the current evidence for outcomes and provide recommendations for salient topics in PNS. Conclusion Peripheral nerve stimulation has evolved from a surgically invasive procedure to a minimally invasive technique that can be used early in the treatment of peripheral nerve pain. This review identifies and addresses many of the variables which influence the success of PNS in the clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy R Deer
- Spine and Nerve Center for the Virginias, 400 Court Street, Suite 100, Charleston, West Virginia 25301 USA
| | - Ramana Naidu
- Spine and Nerve Center for the Virginias, 400 Court Street, Suite 100, Charleston, West Virginia 25301 USA
| | - Natalie Strand
- Spine and Nerve Center for the Virginias, 400 Court Street, Suite 100, Charleston, West Virginia 25301 USA
| | - Dawn Sparks
- Spine and Nerve Center for the Virginias, 400 Court Street, Suite 100, Charleston, West Virginia 25301 USA
| | - Alaa Abd-Elsayed
- Spine and Nerve Center for the Virginias, 400 Court Street, Suite 100, Charleston, West Virginia 25301 USA
| | - Hemant Kalia
- Spine and Nerve Center for the Virginias, 400 Court Street, Suite 100, Charleston, West Virginia 25301 USA
| | - Jennifer M Hah
- Spine and Nerve Center for the Virginias, 400 Court Street, Suite 100, Charleston, West Virginia 25301 USA
| | - Pankaj Mehta
- Spine and Nerve Center for the Virginias, 400 Court Street, Suite 100, Charleston, West Virginia 25301 USA
| | - Dawood Sayed
- Spine and Nerve Center for the Virginias, 400 Court Street, Suite 100, Charleston, West Virginia 25301 USA
| | - Amitabh Gulati
- Spine and Nerve Center for the Virginias, 400 Court Street, Suite 100, Charleston, West Virginia 25301 USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Esposito MF, Malayil R, Hanes M, Deer T. Unique Characteristics of the Dorsal Root Ganglion as a Target for Neuromodulation. PAIN MEDICINE 2020; 20:S23-S30. [PMID: 31152179 PMCID: PMC6544557 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnz012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 114] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Objective The dorsal root ganglion (DRG) is a novel target for neuromodulation, and DRG stimulation is proving to be a viable option in the treatment of chronic intractable neuropathic pain. Although the overall principle of conventional spinal cord stimulation (SCS) and DRG stimulation—in which an electric field is applied to a neural target with the intent of affecting neural pathways to decrease pain perception—is similar, there are significant differences in the anatomy and physiology of the DRG that make it an ideal target for neuromodulation and may account for the superior outcomes observed in the treatment of certain chronic neuropathic pain states. This review highlights the anatomy of the DRG, its function in maintaining homeostasis and its role in neuropathic pain, and the unique value of DRG as a target in neuromodulation for pain. Methods A narrative literature review was performed. Results Overall, the DRG is a critical structure in sensory transduction and modulation, including pain transmission and the maintenance of persistent neuropathic pain states. Unique characteristics including selective somatic organization, specialized membrane characteristics, and accessible and consistent location make the DRG an ideal target for neuromodulation. Because DRG stimulation directly recruits the somata of primary sensory neurons and harnesses the filtering capacity of the pseudounipolar neural architecture, it is differentiated from SCS, peripheral nerve stimulation, and other neuromodulation options. Conclusions There are several advantages to targeting the DRG, including lower energy usage, more focused and posture-independent stimulation, reduced paresthesia, and improved clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rudy Malayil
- St. Mary's Pain Relief Specialists, Huntington, West Virginia
| | | | - Timothy Deer
- The Spine and Nerve Center of the Virginias, Charleston, West Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Eldufani J, Elahmer N, Blaise G. A medical mystery of complex regional pain syndrome. Heliyon 2020; 6:e03329. [PMID: 32149194 PMCID: PMC7033333 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2019] [Revised: 12/31/2019] [Accepted: 01/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a condition of neuropathic pain, which is characterized by significant autonomic and inflammatory features. CRPS occurs in patients who have limb surgery, limb fractures, or trauma. Many patients may have pain resolve within twelve months of the inciting incident; however, a small subset progresses to the chronic form. This transitional process often happens by changing from warm CRPS with dominant inflammatory phase to cold CRPS, in which autonomic characteristics or manifestations dominate. Several peripheral and central mechanisms are involved, which might vary among individuals over a period of time. Other contributors include peripheral and central sensitization, autonomic alterations, inflammatory and immune changes, neurochemical changes, and psychological and genetic factors. Although effective management of the chronic CRPS form is often challenging, there are a few high quality randomized controlled trials that support the efficacy of the most commonly used therapeutic approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jabril Eldufani
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Elmergib University, El-khums, Libya
- Department of Medicine and Anesthesia, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Nyruz Elahmer
- Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Gilbert Blaise
- Department of Medicine and Anesthesia, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Martini ML, Caridi JM, Zeldin L, Neifert SN, Nistal DA, Kim JD, Khelemsky Y, Gal JS. Perioperative Outcomes of Spinal Cord Stimulator Placement in Patients with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Compared with Patients without Complex Regional Pain Syndrome. World Neurosurg 2020; 137:e106-e117. [PMID: 31954908 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.01.061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2019] [Revised: 01/07/2020] [Accepted: 01/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a multifaceted disorder resulting in an abnormal pain response to tissue injury. Among key CRPS features are neurogenic inflammation, maladaptive plasticity, and vasomotor dysfunction, which can result in severe pain and disability. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an efficacious treatment for several chronic pain conditions and may improve pain and life quality in CRPS patients with CRPS. However, little information exists regarding perioperative outcomes of patients with CRPS undergoing surgical implantation of an SCS device. METHODS Patients were included if they underwent an SCS procedure at our institution between 2008 and 2016 for chronic pain. Cases were excluded if the procedure involved stimulator removal or if it was an outpatient procedure. Multivariate regression assessed the effect of CRPS and other clinical variables on perioperative outcomes. RESULTS Eighty-one inpatient SCS implantation cases for chronic pain were included, with 9 patients (11.1%) having a CRPS diagnosis. The CRPS cohort received higher mean quantities of intraoperative opioids and had a lower proportion of patients reporting meaningful pain reduction (16.7%) in the 24-hour postoperative setting compared with patients without CRPS (35.9%), although this was not statistically significant. Multivariate regression modeling suggested that CRPS was a significant predictor of increased odds of extended time to the postanesthesia care unit discharge (P = 0.0406) and higher direct costs of hospitalization (P = 0.0326). CONCLUSIONS Our data suggest that CRPS may pose several unique risks in the perioperative period after inpatient SCS implantation. These findings support the need for future prospective investigations examining risks and outcomes for SCS procedures in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael L Martini
- Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - John M Caridi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Lawrence Zeldin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sean N Neifert
- Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Dominic A Nistal
- Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jinseong D Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Yury Khelemsky
- Department of Anesthesiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jonathan S Gal
- Department of Anesthesiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Martín FJ, Ares JDA. SÍNDROME DE DOLOR REGIONAL COMPLEJO: CLAVES DIAGNÓSTICAS PARA EL MÉDICO NO ESPECIALISTA. REVISTA MÉDICA CLÍNICA LAS CONDES 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rmclc.2019.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
|
32
|
Herschkowitz D, Kubias J. A case report of wireless peripheral nerve stimulation for complex regional pain syndrome type-I of the upper extremity: 1 year follow up. Scand J Pain 2019; 19:829-835. [DOI: 10.1515/sjpain-2019-0071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2019] [Accepted: 07/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a chronic disabling painful disorder with limited options to achieve therapeutic relief. CRPS type I which follows trauma, may not show obvious damage to the nervous structures and remains dubious in its pathophysiology and also its response to conservative treatment or interventional pain management is elusive. Spinal cord and dorsal root ganglion stimulation (SCS, DRGS) provide good relief, mainly for causalgia or CRPS I of lower extremities but not very encouraging for upper extremity CRPS I. we reported earlier, a case of CRPS I of right arm treated successfully by wireless peripheral nerve stimulation (WPNS) with short term follow up. Here we present 1-year follow-up of this patient.
Objective
To present the first case of WPNS for CRPS I with a year follow up. The patient had minimally invasive peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS), without implantable pulse generator (IPG) or its accessories.
Case report
This was a case of refractory CRPS I after blunt trauma to the right forearm of a young female. She underwent placement of two Stimwave electrodes (Leads: FR4A-RCV-A0 with tines, Generation 1 and FR4A-RCV-B0 with tines, Generation 1) in her forearm under intraoperative electrophysiological and ultrasound guidance along radial and median nerves. This WPNS required no IPG. At high frequency (HF) stimulation (HF 10 kHz/32 μs, 2.0 mA), patient had shown remarkable relief in pain, allodynia and temperature impairment. At 5 months she started driving without opioid consumption, while allodynia disappeared. At 1 year follow up she was relieved of pain [visual analogue scale (VAS) score of 4 from 7] and Kapanji Index (Score) improved to 7–8. Both hands look similar in color and temperature. She never made unscheduled visits to the clinic or visited emergency room for any complications related to the WPNS.
Conclusions
CRPS I involving upper extremity remain difficult to manage with conventional SCS or DRGS because of equipment related adverse events. Minimally invasive WPNS in this case had shown consistent relief without any complications or side effects related to the wireless technology or the technique at the end of 1 year.
Implications
This is the first case illustration of WPNS for CRPS I, successfully treated and followed up for 1 year.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jana Kubias
- Mgr, Parimed GmbH , Unter Sagi 6 , Stansstad 6362 , Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Abraham ME, Potdar A, Ward M, Herschman Y, Mammis A. Risk Factors Associated with Lead Migration Requiring Revision in Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation. World Neurosurg 2019; 128:e649-e652. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.04.225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2019] [Revised: 04/24/2019] [Accepted: 04/25/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
34
|
Koetsier E, Franken G, Debets J, Heijmans L, van Kuijk SMJ, Linderoth B, Joosten EA, Maino P. Mechanism of dorsal root ganglion stimulation for pain relief in painful diabetic polyneuropathy is not dependent on GABA release in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord. CNS Neurosci Ther 2019; 26:136-143. [PMID: 31334605 PMCID: PMC6930820 DOI: 10.1111/cns.13192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2019] [Revised: 06/17/2019] [Accepted: 06/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS It is hypothesized that dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRGS), sharing some of the mechanisms of traditional spinal cord stimulation (SCS) of the dorsal columns, induces γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) release from interneurons in the spinal dorsal horn. METHODS We used quantitative immunohistochemical analysis in order to investigate the effect of DRGS on intensity of intracellular GABA-staining levels in the L4-L6 spinal dorsal horn of painful diabetic polyneuropathy (PDPN) animals. To establish the maximal pain relieving effect, we tested for mechanical hypersensitivity to von Frey filaments and animals received 30 minutes of DRGS at day 3 after implantation of the electrode. One day later, 4 Sham-DRGS animals and four responders-to-DRGS received again 30 minutes of DRGS and were perfused at the peak of DRGS-induced pain relief. RESULTS No significant difference in GABA-immunoreactivity was observed between DRGS and Sham-DRGS in lamina 1-3 of the spinal levels L4-6 neither ipsilaterally nor contralaterally. CONCLUSIONS Dorsal root ganglion stimulation does not induce GABA release from the spinal dorsal horn cells, suggesting that the mechanisms underlying DRGS in pain relief are different from those of conventional SCS. The modulation of a GABA-mediated "Gate Control" in the DRG itself, functioning as a prime Gate of nociception, is suggested and discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Koetsier
- Pain Management Center, Neurocenter of Southern Switzerland, Regional Hospital of Lugano, Lugano, Switzerland.,Division of Anaesthesiology, Department of Acute Medicine, Regional Hospital of Lugano, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Glenn Franken
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Translational Neuroscience, School of Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), University of Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jacques Debets
- Muroidean Facility, School of Cardiovascular Diseases (CARIM), Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Lonne Heijmans
- Department of Translational Neuroscience, School of Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), University of Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Sander M J van Kuijk
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Bengt Linderoth
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Elbert A Joosten
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Translational Neuroscience, School of Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), University of Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Paolo Maino
- Pain Management Center, Neurocenter of Southern Switzerland, Regional Hospital of Lugano, Lugano, Switzerland.,Division of Anaesthesiology, Department of Acute Medicine, Regional Hospital of Lugano, Lugano, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Anthony CL, Tora MS, Bentley JN, Texakalidis P, Boulis NM. Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation for Thoracic Neuralgia: A Report of Six Cases. Cureus 2019; 11:e4615. [PMID: 31312542 PMCID: PMC6615574 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.4615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: Thoracic neuralgia (TN) is a chronic pain syndrome that can be refractory to pharmacologic intervention and management by pain specialists. Dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation has shown promise as a targeted and effective modality compared to traditional therapies for several indications but has not yet been applied in the thoracic region. This study aims to report the outcomes of off-label thoracic DRG stimulation in patients with refractory TN. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed at Emory University Hospital for patients who underwent thoracic DRG stimulation in a two-year period. Relevant outcomes for safety and efficacy were evaluated. Results: Six patients were identified that underwent thoracic DRG stimulation for various etiologies of TN, including post-mastectomy, post-herpetic, and post-abdominoplasty neuralgia. All patients initially underwent trial DRG stimulation with a mean pre-operative visual analogue scale (VAS) (0-10) of 6.8 ± 1.6 (range: 4-8). Four of six patients (67%) were non-responders and did not pursue permanent implantation; two experienced pain with stimulation during the trial, and two patients experienced no significant benefit. In addition, all three patients with post-herpetic neuralgia did not respond to treatment. Two of six patients (33%) responded well to stimulation, elected to receive permanent leads, and reported significant pain relief with VAS scores of 0/10 and 1/10, and 100% reduction in morphine equivalent use. Complications included lead migration and need to reset stimulator programming. Conclusions: DRG stimulation may be an effective therapy for patients experiencing chronic TN as a result of peripheral nerve injury; however, post-herpetic neuralgia may be unresponsive to this treatment. Future prospective studies are warranted to evaluate the feasibility of this procedure in patients with refractory TN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Casey L Anthony
- Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Shim H, Rose J, Halle S, Shekane P. Complex regional pain syndrome: a narrative review for the practising clinician. Br J Anaesth 2019; 123:e424-e433. [PMID: 31056241 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.03.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 94] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2019] [Revised: 02/25/2019] [Accepted: 03/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a life-altering condition that usually affects the extremities after a trauma or nerve injury. The physiologic changes that occur as a result of the inciting injury are complex, as the name of the syndrome implies. The pain and disability associated with CRPS often lead to psychological co-morbidities that create a vicious cycle of pain, isolation, and depression. We review recent developments in the understanding of CRPS and advancements in management of this syndrome. Further research in targeting specific mechanisms involved in the pathophysiology of CRPS should lead to prevention of this condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Shim
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai West and St. Luke's Hospitals, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - J Rose
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai West and St. Luke's Hospitals, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - S Halle
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai West and St. Luke's Hospitals, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - P Shekane
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai West and St. Luke's Hospitals, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Feng B, Chen L, Ilham SJ. A review on ultrasonic neuromodulation of the peripheral nervous system: enhanced or suppressed activities? APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL 2019; 9. [PMID: 34113463 PMCID: PMC8188893 DOI: 10.3390/app9081637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Ultrasonic (US) neuromodulation has emerged as a promising therapeutic means by delivering focused energy deep into the tissue. Low-intensity ultrasound (US) directly activates and/or inhibits neurons in the central nervous system (CNS). US neuromodulation of the peripheral nervous system (PNS) is less developed and rarely used clinically. Literature on the neuromodulatory effects of US on the PNS is controversy with some documenting enhanced neural activities, some showing suppressed activities, and others reporting mixed effects. US, with different range of intensity and strength, is likely to generate distinct physical effects in the stimulated neuronal tissues, which underlies different experimental outcomes in the literature. In this review, we summarize all the major reports that documented the effects of US on peripheral nerve endings, axons, and/or somata in the dorsal root ganglion. In particular, we thoroughly discuss the potential impacts by the following key parameters to the study outcomes of PNS neuromodulation by the US: frequency, pulse repetition frequency, duty cycle, intensity, metrics for peripheral neural activities, and type of biological preparations used in the studies. Potential mechanisms of peripheral US neuromodulation are summarized to provide a plausible interpretation to the seemly contradictory effects of enhanced and suppressed neural activities from US neuromodulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bin Feng
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: (001-860-486-6435)
| | - Longtu Chen
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
| | - Sheikh J. Ilham
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Koetsier E, Franken G, Debets J, van Kuijk SMJ, Perez RSGM, Linderoth B, Joosten EAJ, Maino P. Effectiveness of dorsal root ganglion stimulation and dorsal column spinal cord stimulation in a model of experimental painful diabetic polyneuropathy. CNS Neurosci Ther 2019; 25:367-374. [PMID: 30246327 PMCID: PMC6488890 DOI: 10.1111/cns.13065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2018] [Revised: 07/31/2018] [Accepted: 08/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS Conventional dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRGS) is known to achieve better pain-paresthesia overlap of difficult-to-reach areas like the feet compared to dorsal column spinal cord stimulation (SCS). As in painful diabetic polyneuropathy (PDPN) pain is mostly present in the feet, we hypothesized that DRGS is more effective in relieving pain in PDPN when compared to SCS. METHODS Diabetes was induced in female Sprague-Dawley rats with an intraperitoneal injection of 65 mg/kg of streptozotocin (STZ; n = 48). Rats with a significant decrease in mechanical paw withdrawal response to von Frey filaments 4 weeks after injection were implanted with DRGS electrodes (n = 18). Rats were assigned to DRGS (n = 11) or sham-DRGS (n = 7). Mechanical paw withdrawal thresholds (WT, measured in grams) in response to DRGS (50 Hz, 0.18 ± 0.05 mA) were assessed with von Frey testing. The results of the experiments on these animals were compared to the results of a previous study using exactly the same model on PDPN animals selected for SCS (n = 8) (40-50 Hz, 0.19 ± 0.01 mA) and sham-SCS (n = 3). RESULTS In the SCS group, the log10 (10 000 × 50% WT) increased from 4910 to 5211 at t = 15 minutes (P < 0.05) and 5264 at t = 30 minutes (P = 0.11). In the DRGS group, the log10 (10,000 × 50% WT) increased from 4376 to 4809 at t = 15 minutes (P < 0.01) and 5042 at t = 30 minutes (P < 0.01). Both DRGS and SCS induced a similar and complete reversal of mechanical hypersensitivity. After cessation of stimulation (t = 60), the return of the log10 (10 000 × 50% WT) response was significantly faster with DRGS than that of SCS (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS We conclude that conventional DRGS is as effective as SCS in reduction of PDPN-associated mechanical hypersensitivity in STZ-induced diabetic rats. The wash-in effect of DRGS and SCS was similar, but DRGS showed a faster washout course. Long-term efficacy should be studied in future animal research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Koetsier
- Pain Management Center, Neurocenter of Southern SwitzerlandRegional Hospital of LuganoLuganoSwitzerland
| | - Glenn Franken
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain ManagementMaastricht University Medical CenterMaastrichtThe Netherlands
- Department of Translational Neuroscience, School of Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS)University of MaastrichtMaastrichtThe Netherlands
| | - Jacques Debets
- Muroidean Facility, School of Cardiovascular Diseases (CARIM)MaastrichtThe Netherlands
| | - Sander M. J. van Kuijk
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology AssessmentMaastricht University Medical CenterMaastrichtThe Netherlands
| | - Roberto S. G. M. Perez
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain ManagementVU University Medical CenterAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Bengt Linderoth
- Department of Clinical NeuroscienceKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| | - Elbert A. J. Joosten
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain ManagementMaastricht University Medical CenterMaastrichtThe Netherlands
- Department of Translational Neuroscience, School of Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS)University of MaastrichtMaastrichtThe Netherlands
| | - Paolo Maino
- Pain Management Center, Neurocenter of Southern SwitzerlandRegional Hospital of LuganoLuganoSwitzerland
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Vuka I, Marciuš T, Došenović S, Ferhatović Hamzić L, Vučić K, Sapunar D, Puljak L. Neuromodulation with electrical field stimulation of dorsal root ganglion in various pain syndromes: a systematic review with focus on participant selection. J Pain Res 2019; 12:803-830. [PMID: 30881093 PMCID: PMC6398970 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s168814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective We conducted a systematic review about patient selection, efficacy, and safety of neuromodulation with electrical field stimulation (EFS) of dorsal root ganglion (DRG) in various painful conditions. We also analyzed conclusion statements as well as conflict of interest and financing of the included studies. Methods All study designs were eligible for inclusion. We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, and clinical trial registries until September 7, 2018. We assessed risk of bias by using Cochrane tool for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Results Among the 29 included studies, only one was RCT, majority being case series and case reports. The evidence is based on studies with small number of participants (median: 6, range 1–152) with various painful conditions. Neuromodulation with EFS of DRG was mostly performed in participants who have failed other treatment modalities. Most of the authors of the included studies reported positive, but inconclusive, evidence regarding efficacy of neuro-modulation with EFS of DRG. Meta-analysis was not possible since only one RCT was included. Conclusion Available evidence suggest that neuromodulation with EFS of DRG may help highly selected participants with various pain syndromes, who have failed to achieve adequate pain relief with other pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions. However, these findings should be confirmed in high-quality RCTs with sufficient numbers of participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivana Vuka
- Laboratory for Pain Research, University of Split School of Medicine, 21000 Split, Croatia
| | - Tihana Marciuš
- Laboratory for Pain Research, University of Split School of Medicine, 21000 Split, Croatia
| | - Svjetlana Došenović
- Department of Anesthesiology, Reanimatology and Intensive Care, University Hospital Split, 21000 Split, Croatia
| | - Lejla Ferhatović Hamzić
- Department for Proteomics, Center for Translational and Clinical Research, University of Zagreb School of Medicine, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Katarina Vučić
- Department for Safety and Efficacy Assessment of Medicinal Products, Agency for Medicinal Products and Medical Devices, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Damir Sapunar
- Laboratory for Pain Research, University of Split School of Medicine, 21000 Split, Croatia.,Center for Evidence-Based Medicine and Health Care, Catholic University of Croatia, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia,
| | - Livia Puljak
- Center for Evidence-Based Medicine and Health Care, Catholic University of Croatia, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia,
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Verrills P, Mitchell B, Vivian D, Cusack W, Kramer J. Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation Is Paresthesia-Independent: A Retrospective Study. Neuromodulation 2019; 22:937-942. [PMID: 30701632 DOI: 10.1111/ner.12921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2018] [Revised: 11/20/2018] [Accepted: 12/04/2018] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Neuromodulation is an important tool for achieving pain relief in otherwise-intractable neuropathic pain conditions. Dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation, in which primary sensory neurons are stimulated prior to their entry into the spinal canal, provides treatment with high levels of dermatomal specificity and can provide advantages compared to conventional spinal cord stimulation. Although DRG stimulation can produce perceptible paresthesias, many patients operate their systems at subthreshold amplitudes that do not elicit this sensation. Pain relief both with and without paresthesia was investigated in this retrospective analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective review of all qualifying permanent DRG stimulation systems at a single center over more than a three-year period was completed. Pain (0-10 numeric rating scale) was assessed at baseline, at the end of the trial, and after three, six, and twelve months of treatment. Patients were categorized based on their usage of the stimulator at amplitudes that either did or did not produce paresthesias. RESULTS Of the 39 patients, 34 (87%) reported having no-paresthesias at any of the follow-up visits. Average pain relief was 73.9% after the trial period and 63.1% after 12 months of treatment. The responder rate (50% or better pain relief) after three months of treatment was more than 80%. Exploratory subgroup analyses showed that similar degrees of pain relief were achieved in numerous body regions and with various pain etiologies. The five patients who reported paresthesias during treatment had pain relief similar to those of the group that did not experience paresthesias. DISCUSSION Clinically significant and sustained pain relief over more than a period of 12 months was achieved with DRG stimulation programmed at amplitudes below the perceptual level. Thus, the reported analgesia was paresthesia-independent. That good clinical outcomes were observed independent of the generation of paresthesia in DRG stimulation suggests several mechanisms of action, including the inhibition of supraspinal regions involved in somatic paresthesia sensation. The retrospective results presented here posit that future prospective study of DRG stimulation delivered at below the threshold of perceptible paresthesias is warranted.
Collapse
|
41
|
Morgalla MH, de Barros Filho MF, Chander BS, Soekadar SR, Tatagiba M, Lepski G. Neurophysiological Effects of Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation (DRGS) in Pain Processing at the Cortical Level. Neuromodulation 2018; 22:36-43. [PMID: 30561852 DOI: 10.1111/ner.12900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2018] [Revised: 10/25/2018] [Accepted: 10/25/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRGS) has been used successfully against localized neuropathic pain. Nevertheless, the effects of DRGS on pain processing, particularly at the cortical level, remain largely unknown. In this study, we investigated whether positive responses to DRGS treatment would alter patients' laser-evoked potentials (LEP). METHODS We prospectively enrolled 12 adult patients with unilateral localized neuropathic pain in the lower limbs or inguinal region and followed them up for six months. LEPs were assessed at baseline, after one month of DRGS, and after six months of DRGS. Clinical assessment included the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), SF-36, and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). For each patient, LEP amplitudes and latencies of the N2 and P2 components on the deafferented side were measured and compared to those of the healthy side and correlated with pain intensity, as measured with the NRS. RESULTS At the one- and six-month follow-ups, N2-P2 amplitudes were significantly greater and NRS scores were significantly lower compared with baseline (all p's < 0.01). There was a negative correlation between LEP amplitudes and NRS scores (rs = -0.31, p < 0.10). CONCLUSIONS DRGS is able to restore LEPs to normal values in patients with localized neuropathic pain, and LEP alterations are correlated with clinical response in terms of pain intensity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marcos Fortunato de Barros Filho
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.,Applied Neurotechnology Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.,Division of Functional Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Bankim Subhash Chander
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.,Applied Neurotechnology Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Surjo Raphael Soekadar
- Applied Neurotechnology Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.,Clinical Neurotechnology Laboratory, Neuroscience Research Center (NWFZ) & Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marcos Tatagiba
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Guilherme Lepski
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.,Division of Functional Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Loeb GE. Neural Prosthetics:A Review of Empirical vs. Systems Engineering Strategies. Appl Bionics Biomech 2018; 2018:1435030. [PMID: 30532801 PMCID: PMC6247642 DOI: 10.1155/2018/1435030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2018] [Revised: 06/28/2018] [Accepted: 08/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Implantable electrical interfaces with the nervous system were first enabled by cardiac pacemaker technology over 50 years ago and have since diverged into almost all of the physiological functions controlled by the nervous system. There have been a few major clinical and commercial successes, many contentious claims, and some outright failures. These tend to be reviewed within each clinical subspecialty, obscuring the many commonalities of neural control, biophysics, interface materials, electronic technologies, and medical device regulation that they share. This review cites a selection of foundational and recent journal articles and reviews for all major applications of neural prosthetic interfaces in clinical use, trials, or development. The hard-won knowledge and experience across all of these fields can now be amalgamated and distilled into more systematic processes for development of clinical products instead of the often empirical (trial and error) approaches to date. These include a frank assessment of a specific clinical problem, the state of its underlying science, the identification of feasible targets, the availability of suitable technologies, and the path to regulatory and reimbursement approval. Increasing commercial interest and investment facilitates this systematic approach, but it also motivates projects and products whose claims are dubious.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerald E. Loeb
- Professor of Biomedical Engineering, University of Southern California, 1042 Downey Way (DRB-B11) Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Guha D, Shamji MF. The Dorsal Root Ganglion in the Pathogenesis of Chronic Neuropathic Pain. Neurosurgery 2018; 63 Suppl 1:118-126. [PMID: 27399376 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000001255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mohammed F Shamji
- Department of Surgery and.,Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Victor S, Burnett C, Lange R, Pohler K. Dorsal root ganglion stimulator for avascular necrosis of the hip. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 2018; 31:532-533. [DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2018.1483149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2018] [Revised: 05/23/2018] [Accepted: 05/31/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Victor
- Division of Pain Management, Department of Anesthesiology, Scott & White Medical CenterTempleTexas
| | - Christopher Burnett
- Division of Pain Management, Department of Anesthesiology, Scott & White Medical CenterTempleTexas
| | - Rodney Lange
- Division of Pain Management, Department of Anesthesiology, Scott & White Medical CenterTempleTexas
| | - Kelsey Pohler
- Division of Pain Management, Department of Anesthesiology, Scott & White Medical CenterTempleTexas
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Falowski S, Pope JE, Raza A. Early US Experience With Stimulation of the Dorsal Root Ganglia for the Treatment of Peripheral Neuropathy in the Lower Extremities: A Multicenter Retrospective Case Series. Neuromodulation 2018; 22:96-100. [DOI: 10.1111/ner.12860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2018] [Revised: 07/10/2018] [Accepted: 08/15/2018] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
46
|
Deer TR, Pope JE, Lamer TJ, Grider JS, Provenzano D, Lubenow TR, FitzGerald JJ, Hunter C, Falowski S, Sayed D, Baranidharan G, Patel NK, Davis T, Green A, Pajuelo A, Epstein LJ, Harned M, Liem L, Christo PJ, Chakravarthy K, Gilmore C, Huygen F, Lee E, Metha P, Nijhuis H, Patterson DG, Petersen E, Pilitsis JG, Rowe JJ, Rupert MP, Skaribas I, Sweet J, Verrills P, Wilson D, Levy RM, Mekhail N. The Neuromodulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee on Best Practices for Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation. Neuromodulation 2018; 22:1-35. [PMID: 30246899 DOI: 10.1111/ner.12845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2018] [Revised: 05/03/2018] [Accepted: 05/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The Neuromodulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC) is dedicated to improving the safety and efficacy of neuromodulation and thus improving the lives of patients undergoing neuromodulation therapies. With continued innovations in neuromodulation comes the need for evolving reviews of best practices. Dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation has significantly improved the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), among other conditions. Through funding and organizational leadership by the International Neuromodulation Society (INS), the NACC reconvened to develop the best practices consensus document for the selection, implantation and use of DRG stimulation for the treatment of chronic pain syndromes. METHODS The NACC performed a comprehensive literature search of articles about DRG published from 1995 through June, 2017. A total of 2538 article abstracts were then reviewed, and selected articles graded for strength of evidence based on scoring criteria established by the US Preventive Services Task Force. Graded evidence was considered along with clinical experience to create the best practices consensus and recommendations. RESULTS The NACC achieved consensus based on peer-reviewed literature and experience to create consensus points to improve patient selection, guide surgical methods, improve post-operative care, and make recommendations for management of patients treated with DRG stimulation. CONCLUSION The NACC recommendations are intended to improve patient care in the use of this evolving therapy for chronic pain. Clinicians who choose to follow these recommendations may improve outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Tim J Lamer
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jay S Grider
- UKHealthCare Pain Services, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA
| | | | | | - James J FitzGerald
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.,Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Corey Hunter
- Ainsworth Institute of Pain Management, New York, NY, USA
| | - Steven Falowski
- Functional Neurosurgery, St. Lukes University Health Network, Bethlehem, PA, USA
| | - Dawood Sayed
- University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | | | - Nikunj K Patel
- Institute of Clinical Neurosciences, Department of Neurosurgery, Southmead Hospital, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Alex Green
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | | | - Michael Harned
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Liong Liem
- St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Frank Huygen
- Erasmus University Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eric Lee
- Summit Pain Alliance, Santa Rosa, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Erika Petersen
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Julie G Pilitsis
- Neurosurgery and Neuroscience & Experimental Therapeutics, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | - Jennifer Sweet
- Case Western Reserve University, Stereotactic & Functional Neurosurgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Derron Wilson
- Goodman Campbell Brain and Spine, Indiana University School of Medicine Department of Neurological Surgery, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | - Nagy Mekhail
- Evidence-Based Pain Management Research and Education, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Huygen FJPM, Liem L, Nijhuis H, Cusack W, Kramer J. Evaluating Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation in a Prospective Dutch Cohort. Neuromodulation 2018; 22:80-86. [PMID: 30079622 DOI: 10.1111/ner.12798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2018] [Revised: 04/09/2018] [Accepted: 04/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation is a recent neuromodulation option that has delivered safe, effective pain relief for a number of etiologies. This prospective observational study was intended to establish the effectiveness of this treatment in a typical real-world clinical context. MATERIALS AND METHODS Participants with chronic, intractable pain of the trunk or lower limbs were recruited from multiple pain clinics in the Netherlands. Subjects were trialed and implanted with DRG stimulation systems. Pain, function, mood, and quality of life, ratings were collected through 12 months postimplant. RESULTS Of the 66 subjects enrolled, failed back surgery syndrome, peripheral nerve injury, and complex regional pain syndrome formed the largest etiologies. Permanent implants were placed in 86.2% subjects (56/65). After 12 months of treatment, average pain ratings in subjects' primary area of pain decreased from 8.0 cm at baseline to 4.1 cm, and 49% of subjects had ≥50% reduction in pain (visual analog scale). In addition, functional capacity was increased, and mood and quality of life improved. No confirmed lead migrations were observed, and there was a low rate of infection. CONCLUSIONS DRG stimulation significantly reduced the severity of subjects' pain and enabled participatory changes that improved quality of life through 12-months postimplant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Liong Liem
- Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Skaribas IM, Peccora C, Skaribas E. Single S1 Dorsal Root Ganglia Stimulation for Intractable Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Foot Pain After Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Case Series. Neuromodulation 2018; 22:101-107. [DOI: 10.1111/ner.12780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2017] [Revised: 02/17/2018] [Accepted: 02/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
|
49
|
Sdrulla AD, Guan Y, Raja SN. Spinal Cord Stimulation: Clinical Efficacy and Potential Mechanisms. Pain Pract 2018. [PMID: 29526043 DOI: 10.1111/papr.12692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 191] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a minimally invasive therapy used for the treatment of chronic neuropathic pain. SCS is a safe and effective alternative to medications such as opioids, and multiple randomized controlled studies have demonstrated efficacy for difficult-to-treat neuropathic conditions such as failed back surgery syndrome. Conventional SCS is believed mediate pain relief via activation of dorsal column Aβ fibers, resulting in variable effects on sensory and pain thresholds, and measurable alterations in higher order cortical processing. Although potentiation of inhibition, as suggested by Wall and Melzack's gate control theory, continues to be the leading explanatory model, other segmental and supraspinal mechanisms have been described. Novel, non-standard, stimulation waveforms such as high-frequency and burst have been shown in some studies to be clinically superior to conventional SCS, however their mechanisms of action remain to be determined. Additional studies are needed, both mechanistic and clinical, to better understand optimal stimulation strategies for different neuropathic conditions, improve patient selection and optimize efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrei D Sdrulla
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, U.S.A
| | - Yun Guan
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.A.,Department of Neurological Surgery, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.A
| | - Srinivasa N Raja
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Wireless peripheral nerve stimulation for complex regional pain syndrome type I of the upper extremity: a case illustration introducing a novel technology. Scand J Pain 2018; 18:555-560. [DOI: 10.1515/sjpain-2018-0014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2018] [Accepted: 03/18/2018] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a debilitating painful disorder, cryptic in its pathophysiology and refractory condition with limited therapeutic options. Type I CRPS with its variable relationship to trauma has often no discernible fractures or nerve injuries and remains enigmatic in its response to conservative treatment as well as the other limited interventional therapies. Neuromodulation in the form of spinal cord and dorsal root ganglion stimulation (SCS, DRGS) has shown encouraging results, especially of causalgia or CRPS I of lower extremities. Upper extremity CRPS I is far more difficult.
Objective
To report a case of upper extremity CRPS I treated by wireless peripheral nerve stimulation (WPNS) for its unique features and minimally invasive technique. The system does not involve implantation of battery or its connections.
Case report
A 47 year old female patient presented with refractory CRPS I following a blunt trauma to her right forearm. As interventional treatment in the form of local anesthetics (Anesthesia of peripheral branches of radial nerve) and combined infusions of ketamine/lidocaine failed to provide any significant relief she opted for WPNS treatment. Based on the topographic distribution, two electrodes (Stimwave Leads: FR4A-RCV-A0 with tines, Generation 1 and FR4A-RCV-B0 with tines, Generation 1), were placed along the course of radial and median nerves under ultrasonography monitoring and guided by intraoperative stimulation. This procedure did not involve implantation of extension cables or the power source. At a frequency of 60 Hz and 300 μs the stimulation induced paresthesia along the distribution of the nerves. Therapeutic relief was observed with high frequency (HF) stimulation (HF 10 kHz/32 μs, 2.0 mA) reducing her pain from a visual analogue scale (VAS) score of 7–4 postoperatively. Three HF stimulations programs were provided at the time of discharge, as she improved in her sensory impairment to touch, pressure and temperature at her first follow up visit. At 5-months she was able to drive, did not require opioids and allodynia disappeared.
Conclusions
In a case with difficult CRPS I involving upper extremity, a minimally invasive WPNS of radial and median nerves provided good symptomatic relief. The procedure was tolerated well and both electrodes remained in place without any adverse events.
Implications
In view of the very limited options currently available to manage CRPS, WPNS can be a promising therapeutic modality.
Collapse
|