1
|
Lochrin SE, Buonocore DJ, Young RJ, Kaley TJ, Postow MA, Wolchok JD, Shoushtari AN, Momtaz P, Betof Warner AS, Callahan MK. Durable complete response in a patient with leptomeningeal melanoma after treatment with dabrafenib, trametinib, and nivolumab. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res 2024. [PMID: 38960393 DOI: 10.1111/pcmr.13179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2024] [Revised: 05/07/2024] [Accepted: 05/29/2024] [Indexed: 07/05/2024]
Abstract
Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is a devastating complication of melanoma with a dismal prognosis. We present the case of a young man with stage IV BRAF V600E mutant melanoma with lung, lymph node, and brain metastases initially treated with ipilimumab and nivolumab, who subsequently developed LMD. Upon change to BRAF/MEK targeted therapy with nivolumab, a durable complete response was achieved and remains ongoing, off treatment, 7 years from diagnosis. Management of symptomatic LMD remains a critical unmet clinical challenge, with limited clinical trial data. This exceptional case is instructive, as the first published case of the use of the triplet, and the first durable response with therapy discontinuation, in melanoma LMD. The triple-drug regimen may be considered a viable option in fit patients. This case highlights the potential for long-term disease control and the critical and urgent need to develop clinical trials inclusive of patients with LMD to define the best treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah E Lochrin
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Darren J Buonocore
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Robert J Young
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Thomas J Kaley
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Michael A Postow
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Jedd D Wolchok
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Alexander N Shoushtari
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Parisa Momtaz
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Allison S Betof Warner
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Margaret K Callahan
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Smalley I, Boire A, Brastianos P, Kluger HM, Hernando-Monge E, Forsyth PA, Ahmed KA, Smalley KSM, Ferguson S, Davies MA, Glitza Oliva IC. Leptomeningeal disease in melanoma: An update on the developments in pathophysiology and clinical care. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res 2024; 37:51-67. [PMID: 37622466 DOI: 10.1111/pcmr.13116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Revised: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023]
Abstract
Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) remains a major challenge in the clinical management of metastatic melanoma patients. Outcomes for patient remain poor, and patients with LMD continue to be excluded from almost all clinical trials. However, recent trials have demonstrated the feasibility of conducting prospective clinical trials in these patients. Further, new insights into the pathophysiology of LMD are identifying rational new therapeutic strategies. Here we present recent advances in the understanding of, and treatment options for, LMD from metastatic melanoma. We also annotate key areas of future focus to accelerate progress for this challenging but emerging field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inna Smalley
- Department of Metabolism and Physiology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Adrienne Boire
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Priscilla Brastianos
- Department of Medicine, MGH Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Harriet M Kluger
- Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Eva Hernando-Monge
- Department of Pathology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
- Interdisciplinary Melanoma Cooperative Group, Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Peter A Forsyth
- Department of Neuro-Oncology and Tumor Biology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Kamran A Ahmed
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Immunology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Keiran S M Smalley
- Department of Tumor Biology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Sherise Ferguson
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Michael A Davies
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Isabella C Glitza Oliva
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Primdahl D, Cohen-Nowak A, Kumthekar P. Novel approaches to treatment of leptomeningeal metastases. Curr Opin Neurol 2023; 36:592-602. [PMID: 37865856 DOI: 10.1097/wco.0000000000001218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The incidence of leptomeningeal metastases is increasing in the setting of improved survival from systemic cancers. In more recent years, our understanding of leptomeningeal metastasis pathogenesis, how to diagnose and treat has been evolving. RECENT FINDINGS Diagnosing leptomeningeal metastasis has been challenging due to the limitations of cytology and neuroimaging; However, newer techniques detecting circulating tumor cells (CTCs) or circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) have shown potential advantage with diagnosis, quantification and detection of oncogenic mutations. The use of small molecule inhibitors and immunotherapy has shown some promise in specific leptomeningeal metastasis subtypes. SUMMARY These new discoveries have improved clinical trials' ability to assess treatment response and thereby more optimally compare different treatments. Furthermore, they have helped the individual clinician better diagnose, monitor the disease and provide novel therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ditte Primdahl
- Department of Neurology at The Feinberg School of Medicine at Northwestern University and The Malnati Brain Tumor Institute at the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University
| | - Adam Cohen-Nowak
- Department of Internal Medicine, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Priya Kumthekar
- Department of Neurology at The Feinberg School of Medicine at Northwestern University and The Malnati Brain Tumor Institute at the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sherman WJ, Romiti E, Michaelides L, Moniz-Garcia D, Chaichana KL, Quiñones-Hinojosa A, Porter AB. Systemic Therapy for Melanoma Brain and Leptomeningeal Metastases. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2023; 24:1962-1977. [PMID: 38158477 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-023-01155-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Melanoma has a high propensity to metastasize to the brain which portends a poorer prognosis. With advanced radiation techniques and targeted therapies, outcomes however are improving. Melanoma brain metastases are best managed in a multi-disciplinary approach, including medical oncologists, neuro-oncologists, radiation oncologists, and neurosurgeons. The sequence of therapies is dependent on the number and size of brain metastases, status of systemic disease control, prior therapies, performance status, and neurological symptoms. The goal of treatment is to minimize neurologic morbidity and prolong both progression free and overall survival while maximizing quality of life. Surgery should be considered for solitary metastases, or large and/or symptomatic metastases with edema. Stereotactic radiosurgery offers a benefit over whole-brain radiation attributed to the relative radioresistance of melanoma and reduction in neurotoxicity. Thus far, data supports a more durable response with systemic therapy using combination immunotherapy of ipilimumab and nivolumab, though targeting the presence of BRAF mutations can also be utilized. BRAF inhibitor therapy is often used after immunotherapy failure, unless a more rapid initial response is needed and then can be done prior to initiating immunotherapy. Further trials are needed, particularly for leptomeningeal metastases which currently require the multi-disciplinary approach to determine best treatment plan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wendy J Sherman
- Department of Neurology, Division of Neuro-Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd S, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA.
| | - Edoardo Romiti
- Vita e Salute San Raffaele University in Milan, Via Olgettina, 58, 20132, Milan, MI, Italy
| | - Loizos Michaelides
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd S, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
| | - Diogo Moniz-Garcia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd S, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
| | - Kaisorn L Chaichana
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd S, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
| | | | - Alyx B Porter
- Department of Neurology, Division of Neuro-Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5777 E Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Khaled ML, Tarhini AA, Forsyth PA, Smalley I, Piña Y. Leptomeningeal Disease (LMD) in Patients with Melanoma Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15061884. [PMID: 36980770 PMCID: PMC10047692 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15061884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Revised: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is a devastating complication caused by seeding malignant cells to the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and the leptomeningeal membrane. LMD is diagnosed in 5-15% of patients with systemic malignancy. Management of LMD is challenging due to the biological and metabolic tumor microenvironment of LMD being largely unknown. Patients with LMD can present with a wide variety of signs and/or symptoms that could be multifocal and include headache, nausea, vomiting, diplopia, and weakness, among others. The median survival time for patients with LMD is measured in weeks and up to 3-6 months with aggressive management, and death usually occurs due to progressive neurologic dysfunction. In melanoma, LMD is associated with a suppressive immune microenvironment characterized by a high number of apoptotic and exhausted CD4+ T-cells, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, and a low number of CD8+ T-cells. Proteomics analysis revealed enrichment of complement cascade, which may disrupt the blood-CSF barrier. Clinical management of melanoma LMD consists primarily of radiation therapy, BRAF/MEK inhibitors as targeted therapy, and immunotherapy with anti-PD-1, anti-CTLA-4, and anti-LAG-3 immune checkpoint inhibitors. This review summarizes the biology and anatomic features of melanoma LMD, as well as the current therapeutic approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariam Lotfy Khaled
- Metabolism and Physiology Department, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
- Biochemistry Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University, Cairo 12613, Egypt
| | - Ahmad A Tarhini
- Departments of Cutaneous Oncology and Immunology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Peter A Forsyth
- Neuro-Oncology Department, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Inna Smalley
- Metabolism and Physiology Department, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Yolanda Piña
- Neuro-Oncology Department, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Leptomeningeal metastases represent an aggressive stage of cancer with few durable treatment options. Improved understanding of cancer biology, neoplastic reliance on oncogenic driver mutations, and complex immune system interactions have resulted in an explosion in cancer-directed therapy in the last two decades to include small molecule inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Most of these therapeutics are underexplored in patients with leptomeningeal metastases, limiting extrapolation of extracranial and even intracranial efficacy outcomes to the unique leptomeningeal space. Further confounding our interpretation of drug activity in the leptomeninges is an incomplete understanding of drug penetration through the blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier of the choroid plexus. Nevertheless, a number of retrospective studies and promising prospective trials provide evidence of leptomeningeal activity of several small molecule and immune checkpoint inhibitors and underscore potential areas of further therapeutic development for patients harboring leptomeningeal disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica A Wilcox
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Adrienne A Boire
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Brain Tumor Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wilcox JA, Li MJ, Boire AA. Leptomeningeal Metastases: New Opportunities in the Modern Era. Neurotherapeutics 2022; 19:1782-1798. [PMID: 35790709 PMCID: PMC9723010 DOI: 10.1007/s13311-022-01261-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/03/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Leptomeningeal metastases arise from cancer cell entry into the subarachnoid space, inflicting significant neurologic morbidity and mortality across a wide range of malignancies. The modern era of cancer therapeutics has seen an explosion of molecular-targeting agents and immune-mediated strategies for patients with breast, lung, and melanoma malignancies, with meaningful extracranial disease control and improvement in patient survival. However, the clinical efficacy of these agents in those with leptomeningeal metastases remains understudied, due to the relative rarity of this patient population, the investigational challenges associated with studying this dynamic disease state, and brisk disease pace. Nevertheless, retrospective studies, post hoc analyses, and small prospective trials in the last two decades provide a glimmer of hope for patients with leptomeningeal metastases, suggesting that several cancer-directed strategies are not only active in the intrathecal space but also improve survival against historical odds. The continued development of clinical trials devoted to patients with leptomeningeal metastases is critical to establish robust efficacy outcomes in this patient population, define drug pharmacokinetics in the intrathecal space, and uncover new avenues for treatment in the face of leptomeningeal therapeutic resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica A Wilcox
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Min Jun Li
- Brain Tumor Center, Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Adrienne A Boire
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
- Brain Tumor Center, Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Melanoma Brain Metastases: An Update on the Use of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Molecularly Targeted Agents. Am J Clin Dermatol 2022; 23:523-545. [PMID: 35534670 DOI: 10.1007/s40257-022-00678-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
Brain metastases from melanoma are no longer uniformly associated with dismal outcomes. Impressive tumor tissue-based (craniotomy) translational research has consistently shown that distinct patient subgroups may have a favorable prognosis. This review provides a historical overview of the standard-of-care treatments until the early 2010s. It subsequently summarizes more recent advances in understanding the biology of melanoma brain metastases (MBMs) and treating patients with MBMs, mainly focusing upon prospective clinical trials of BRAF/MEK and PD-1/CTLA-4 inhibitors in patients with previously untreated MBMs. These additional systemic treatments have provided effective complementary treatment approaches and/or alternatives to radiation and craniotomy. The current role of radiation therapy, especially in conjunction with systemic therapies, is also discussed through the lens of various retrospective studies. The combined efficacy of systemic treatments with radiation has improved overall survival over the last 10 years and has sparked considerable research interest regarding optimal dosing and sequencing of radiation treatments with systemic treatments. Finally, the review describes ongoing clinical trials in patients with MBMs.
Collapse
|
9
|
Leptomeningeal dissemination as a first sign of progression in metastatic melanoma: a diagnostic lesson. Melanoma Res 2022; 32:55-58. [PMID: 34698702 DOI: 10.1097/cmr.0000000000000786] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
One of the most serious complications of advanced melanoma is the diffusion of cancer cells to the central nervous system. The diagnosis of leptomeningeal metastasis (LMM) is notoriously challenging and requires a combination of consistent MRI and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytology. In ambiguous cases, mutations like BRAF V600E in CSF-cell-free (cf)DNA may help to clarify diagnosis of LMM. Here we present the case of a young woman who developed isolated LMM after the diagnosis of a node-positive primary melanoma with normal LDH. The CSF was negative for tumour cells by cytology but positive for cfDNA BRAF V600E mutation, thus allowing us to diagnose LMM. To our knowledge, this is the first case where CSF sampling for the detection of BRAF mutation was used to identify leptomeningeal disease in the presence of negative MRI and without involvement of any other distant sites.
Collapse
|
10
|
Ferguson SD, Fomchenko EI, Guerrieri RA, Glitza Oliva IC. Challenges and Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment of Leptomeningeal Disease (LMD). Front Oncol 2022; 11:800053. [PMID: 35096602 PMCID: PMC8789647 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.800053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is a devastating category of CNS metastasis with a very poor prognosis and limited treatment options. With maximal aggressive therapy, survival times remain short and, without treatment, prognosis is measured in weeks. Both LMD diagnosis and treatment are challenging topics within neuro-oncology. In this review, we discuss the advances in LMD diagnosis with a focus on the role of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and discuss the role of targeted and immunotherapy in LMD treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sherise D Ferguson
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Elena I Fomchenko
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Renato A Guerrieri
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Isabella C Glitza Oliva
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Burgos R, Cardona AF, Santoyo N, Ruiz-Patiño A, Cure-Casilimas J, Rojas L, Ricaurte L, Muñoz Á, Garcia-Robledo JE, Ordoñez C, Sotelo C, Rodríguez J, Zatarain-Barrón ZL, Pineda D, Arrieta O. Case Report: Differential Genomics and Evolution of a Meningeal Melanoma Treated With Ipilimumab and Nivolumab. Front Oncol 2022; 11:691017. [PMID: 35070950 PMCID: PMC8766339 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.691017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Primary melanocytic tumors of the CNS are extremely rare conditions, encompassing different disease processes including meningeal melanoma and meningeal melanocytosis. Its incidence range between 3-5%, with approximately 0.005 cases per 100,000 people. Tumor biological behavior is commonly aggressive, with poor prognosis and very low survivability, and a high recurrence rate, even after disease remission with multimodal treatments. Specific genetic alterations involving gene transcription, alternative splicing, RNA translation, and cell proliferation are usually seen, affecting genes like BRAF, TERT, GNAQ, SF3B1, and EIF1AX. Here we present an interesting case of a 59-year-old male presenting with neurologic symptoms and a further confirmed diagnosis of primary meningeal melanoma. Multiple therapy lines were used, including radiosurgery, immunotherapy, and chemotherapy. The patient developed two relapses and an evolving genetic makeup that confirmed the disease’s clonal origin. We also provide a review of the literature on the genetic basis of primary melanocytic tumors of the CNS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Remberto Burgos
- Neurosurgery Department, Clínica del Country/Clínica Colsanitas, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Andrés F Cardona
- Foundation for Clinical and Applied Cancer Research (FICMAC), Bogotá, Colombia.,Molecular Oncology and Biology Systems Research Group (Fox-G), Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia.,Direction of Research and Education, Luis Carlos Sarmiento Angulo Cancer Treatment and Research Center (CTIC), Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Nicolas Santoyo
- Foundation for Clinical and Applied Cancer Research (FICMAC), Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Alejandro Ruiz-Patiño
- Foundation for Clinical and Applied Cancer Research (FICMAC), Bogotá, Colombia.,Molecular Oncology and Biology Systems Research Group (Fox-G), Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia
| | | | - Leonardo Rojas
- Molecular Oncology and Biology Systems Research Group (Fox-G), Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia.,Clinical and Translational Oncology Group, Clínica del Country, Bogotá, Colombia.,Clinical Oncology Department, Clínica Colsanitas, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Luisa Ricaurte
- Molecular Oncology and Biology Systems Research Group (Fox-G), Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia.,Direction of Research and Education, Luis Carlos Sarmiento Angulo Cancer Treatment and Research Center (CTIC), Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Álvaro Muñoz
- Radiotherapy Department, Carlos Ardila Lulle Institute of Cancer (ICCAL), Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Bogotá, Colombia
| | | | - Camila Ordoñez
- Foundation for Clinical and Applied Cancer Research (FICMAC), Bogotá, Colombia.,Molecular Oncology and Biology Systems Research Group (Fox-G), Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Carolina Sotelo
- Foundation for Clinical and Applied Cancer Research (FICMAC), Bogotá, Colombia.,Molecular Oncology and Biology Systems Research Group (Fox-G), Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - July Rodríguez
- Foundation for Clinical and Applied Cancer Research (FICMAC), Bogotá, Colombia.,Molecular Oncology and Biology Systems Research Group (Fox-G), Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Zyanya Lucia Zatarain-Barrón
- Thoracic Oncology Unit and Personalized Oncology Laboratory, National Cancer Institute (INCan), México City, Mexico
| | - Diego Pineda
- Thoracic Oncology Unit and Personalized Oncology Laboratory, National Cancer Institute (INCan), México City, Mexico
| | - Oscar Arrieta
- Radiology Department, Clinica del County/Resonancia Magnética de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Piña Y, Yadugiri S, Yeboa DN, Ferguson SD, Forsyth PA, Oliva ICG. Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment for Leptomeningeal Disease in Melanoma. Curr Oncol Rep 2022; 24:43-54. [DOI: 10.1007/s11912-021-01162-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
13
|
Pellerino A, Brastianos PK, Rudà R, Soffietti R. Leptomeningeal Metastases from Solid Tumors: Recent Advances in Diagnosis and Molecular Approaches. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:2888. [PMID: 34207653 PMCID: PMC8227730 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13122888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2021] [Accepted: 06/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Leptomeningeal metastases (LM) from solid tumors represent an unmet need of increasing importance due to an early use of MRI for diagnosis and improvement of outcome of some molecular subgroups following targeted agents and immunotherapy. In this review, we first discussed factors limiting the efficacy of targeted agents in LM, such as the molecular divergence between primary tumors and CNS lesions and CNS barriers at the level of the normal brain, brain tumors and CSF. Further, we reviewed pathogenesis and experimental models and modalities, such as MRI (with RANO and ESO/ESMO criteria), CSF cytology and liquid biopsy, to improve diagnosis and monitoring following therapy. Efficacy and limitations of targeted therapies for LM from EGFR-mutant and ALK-rearranged NSCLC, HER2-positive breast cancer and BRAF-mutated melanomas are reported, including the use of intrathecal administration or modification of traditional cytotoxic compounds. The efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors in LM from non-druggable tumors, in particular triple-negative breast cancer, is discussed. Last, we focused on some recent techniques to improve drug delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessia Pellerino
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University and City of Health and Science Hospital, 10126 Turin, Italy; (R.R.); (R.S.)
| | - Priscilla K. Brastianos
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA;
| | - Roberta Rudà
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University and City of Health and Science Hospital, 10126 Turin, Italy; (R.R.); (R.S.)
- Department of Neurology, Castelfranco Veneto and Brain Tumor Board Treviso Hospital, 31100 Treviso, Italy
| | - Riccardo Soffietti
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University and City of Health and Science Hospital, 10126 Turin, Italy; (R.R.); (R.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Etchevers HC. Pericyte Ontogeny: The Use of Chimeras to Track a Cell Lineage of Diverse Germ Line Origins. Methods Mol Biol 2021; 2235:61-87. [PMID: 33576971 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1056-5_6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
The goal of lineage tracing is to understand body formation over time by discovering which cells are the progeny of a specific, identified, ancestral progenitor. Subsidiary questions include unequivocal identification of what they have become, how many descendants develop, whether they live or die, and where they are located in the tissue or body at the end of the window examined. A classical approach in experimental embryology, lineage tracing continues to be used in developmental biology and stem cell and cancer research, wherever cellular potential and behavior need to be studied in multiple dimensions, of which one is time. Each technical approach has its advantages and drawbacks. This chapter, with some previously unpublished data, will concentrate nonexclusively on the use of interspecies chimeras to explore the origins of perivascular (or mural) cells, of which those adjacent to the vascular endothelium are termed pericytes for this purpose. These studies laid the groundwork for our understanding that pericytes derive from progenitor mesenchymal pools of multiple origins in the vertebrate embryo, some of which persist into adulthood. The results obtained through xenografting, like in the methodology described here, complement those obtained through genetic lineage-tracing techniques within a given species.
Collapse
|
15
|
Tétu P, Sirven-Villaros L, Cuzzubbo S, Ursu R, Baroudjian B, Delyon J, Nataf F, De Margerie-Mellon C, Allayous C, Lefevre W, Carpentier AF, Lebbé C. Impact of New Systemic Treatment and Radiotherapy in Melanoma Patients with Leptomeningeal Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12092635. [PMID: 32947841 PMCID: PMC7564430 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12092635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2020] [Revised: 08/25/2020] [Accepted: 08/31/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Although the recent years have seen incredible progress in the treatment of advanced melanoma including brain metastases, the survival of melanoma patients with leptomeningeal disease (LM) is still poor. There are currently only a handful of reports suggesting that BRAF and MEK inhibitors, or immune checkpoint inhibitors, may induce survival benefit in advanced melanoma patients with LM. The objective of this study was to gain a better understanding of patients, disease characteristics, and therapeutics interventions in LM melanoma patients in the era of new systemic treatment and radiosurgery. This study demonstrated that new treatment modalities appear to be promising new treatment options for melanoma LM, and need to be tested in larger prospective studies. A subset of patients are long-term survivors, and factors associated with improved survival such as low serum LDH level may be identified. Abstract Importance: Few data are available on patients with leptomeningeal disease (LM) from melanoma treated with new systemic therapies. Objective: To gain a better understanding of patients, disease characteristics, and therapeutic interventions in melanoma patients with LM in the era of new systemic treatment. Design: Clinical characteristics, treatments, and survival of melanoma patients diagnosed with LM, isolated or associated with brain metastases, were collected. The Cox regression model assessed the influence of patient and melanoma characteristics on survival. Setting: Monocentric, retrospective, real-life cohort of patients with LM from melanoma. Participants: All patients followed up at Saint-Louis University Hospital and diagnosed with LM between December 2013 and February 2020 were included. For each patient identified, a central review by dermato-oncologist and neuro-oncologist experts was performed to confirm the diagnosis of LM. Exposure: Impact of new systemic therapies and radiotherapy. Results: Among the 452 advanced melanoma patients followed at St Louis Hospital between 2013 and 2020, 41 patients with LM from melanoma were identified. Among them, 29 patients with a diagnosis of LM “confirmed” or “probable” after central neuro-oncologists reviewing were included. Nineteen patients had known melanoma brain metastases at LM diagnosis. Among the 27 patients treated with systemic therapy, 17 patients were treated with immunotherapy, 5 patients received targeted therapy, 1 was treated with chemotherapy, and 4 patients were treated with anti-PD-1 in combination with BRAF inhibitor. The median overall survival (OS) from LM diagnosis was 5.1 months. Median OS was 7.1 months for the 9 patients receiving systemic therapy combined with radiotherapy, and 3.2 months for the 20 patients not receiving combined radiotherapy. Elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.09–1.90, p < 0.01) and presence of neurological symptoms at LM diagnosis (HR 2.96, 95% CI 1.25–6.99, p = 0.01) were associated with poor survival. At the time of data analysis, five patients were still alive with a median follow-up of 47.4 months and had persistent complete response. Conclusion: Targeted therapy and immunotherapy are promising new treatment options in LM from melanoma that can increase overall survival, and may induce long lasting remission in some patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pauline Tétu
- Assitance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris Dermatology, Department of Dermatology, Hôpital Saint-Louis, 75010 Paris, France; (B.B.); (J.D.); (C.A.); (W.L.); (C.L.)
- INSERM U976, Paris 7 Diderot University, 75475 Paris, France
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +33-658720475; Fax: +33-142384310
| | - Lila Sirven-Villaros
- Service de Neurologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Saint-Louis, 75010 Paris, France; (L.S.-V.); (S.C.); (R.U.); (A.F.C.)
| | - Stefania Cuzzubbo
- Service de Neurologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Saint-Louis, 75010 Paris, France; (L.S.-V.); (S.C.); (R.U.); (A.F.C.)
| | - Renata Ursu
- Service de Neurologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Saint-Louis, 75010 Paris, France; (L.S.-V.); (S.C.); (R.U.); (A.F.C.)
| | - Barouyr Baroudjian
- Assitance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris Dermatology, Department of Dermatology, Hôpital Saint-Louis, 75010 Paris, France; (B.B.); (J.D.); (C.A.); (W.L.); (C.L.)
- INSERM U976, Paris 7 Diderot University, 75475 Paris, France
| | - Julie Delyon
- Assitance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris Dermatology, Department of Dermatology, Hôpital Saint-Louis, 75010 Paris, France; (B.B.); (J.D.); (C.A.); (W.L.); (C.L.)
- INSERM U976, Paris 7 Diderot University, 75475 Paris, France
| | - François Nataf
- Department of Neurosurgery, Groupement Hospitalo-Universitaire-PARIS, Hôpital Sainte-Anne Paris, 75014 Paris, France;
| | - Constance De Margerie-Mellon
- INSERM UMR 1149, Université de Paris, F-75018 Paris, France;
- Radiology Department, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, F-75010 Paris, France
| | - Clara Allayous
- Assitance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris Dermatology, Department of Dermatology, Hôpital Saint-Louis, 75010 Paris, France; (B.B.); (J.D.); (C.A.); (W.L.); (C.L.)
- INSERM U976, Paris 7 Diderot University, 75475 Paris, France
| | - Wendy Lefevre
- Assitance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris Dermatology, Department of Dermatology, Hôpital Saint-Louis, 75010 Paris, France; (B.B.); (J.D.); (C.A.); (W.L.); (C.L.)
- INSERM U976, Paris 7 Diderot University, 75475 Paris, France
| | - Antoine F. Carpentier
- Service de Neurologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Saint-Louis, 75010 Paris, France; (L.S.-V.); (S.C.); (R.U.); (A.F.C.)
| | - Céleste Lebbé
- Assitance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris Dermatology, Department of Dermatology, Hôpital Saint-Louis, 75010 Paris, France; (B.B.); (J.D.); (C.A.); (W.L.); (C.L.)
- INSERM U976, Paris 7 Diderot University, 75475 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Glitza IC, Smalley KSM, Brastianos PK, Davies MA, McCutcheon I, Liu JKC, Ahmed KA, Arrington JA, Evernden BR, Smalley I, Eroglu Z, Khushalani N, Margolin K, Kluger H, Atkins MB, Tawbi H, Boire A, Forsyth P. Leptomeningeal disease in melanoma patients: An update to treatment, challenges, and future directions. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res 2020; 33:527-541. [PMID: 31916400 PMCID: PMC10126834 DOI: 10.1111/pcmr.12861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2019] [Revised: 11/26/2019] [Accepted: 01/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
In February 2018, the Melanoma Research Foundation and the Moffitt Cancer Center hosted the Second Summit on Melanoma Central Nervous System Metastases in Tampa, Florida. The meeting included investigators from multiple academic centers and disciplines. A consensus summary of the progress and challenges in melanoma parenchymal brain metastases was published (Eroglu et al., Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research, 2019, 32, 458). Here, we will describe the current state of basic, translational, clinical research, and therapeutic management, for melanoma patients with leptomeningeal disease. We also outline key challenges and barriers to be overcome to make progress in this deadly disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabella C. Glitza
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Keiran S. M. Smalley
- Melanoma Research Center of Excellence, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | - Michael A. Davies
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ian McCutcheon
- Department of Neurosurgery, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - James K. C. Liu
- Department of Neuro-Oncology & Tumor Biology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Kamran A. Ahmed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - John A. Arrington
- Head of Neuroradiology Section, Department of Radiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Brittany R. Evernden
- Department of Neuro-Oncology & Tumor Biology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Inna Smalley
- Department of Tumor Biology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Zeynep Eroglu
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Nikhil Khushalani
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Kim Margolin
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Harriet Kluger
- Department of Medical Oncology, Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Michael B. Atkins
- Department of Medical Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Hussein Tawbi
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Adrienne Boire
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, NY, USA
| | - Peter Forsyth
- Department of Neuro-Oncology & Tumor Biology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Becco P, Gallo S, Poletto S, Frascione MPM, Crotto L, Zaccagna A, Paruzzo L, Caravelli D, Carnevale-Schianca F, Aglietta M. Melanoma Brain Metastases in the Era of Target Therapies: An Overview. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12061640. [PMID: 32575838 PMCID: PMC7352598 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12061640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2020] [Revised: 06/16/2020] [Accepted: 06/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Malignant melanoma is the third most common type of tumor that causes brain metastases. Patients with cerebral involvement have a dismal prognosis and their treatment is an unmet medical need. Brain involvement is a multistep process involving several signaling pathways such as Janus kinase/signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription (JAK/STAT), Phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Protein Kinase B (PI3K/AKT), Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Phosphatase and Tensin Homolog (PTEN). Recently therapy that targets the MAPK signaling (BRAF/MEK inhibitors) and immunotherapy (anti-CTLA4 and anti-PD1 agents) have changed the therapeutic approaches to stage IV melanoma. In contrast, there are no solid data about patients with brain metastases, who are usually excluded from clinical trials. Retrospective data showed that BRAF-inhibitors, alone or in combination with MEK-inhibitors have interesting clinical activity in this setting. Prospective data about the combinations of BRAF/MEK inhibitors have been recently published, showing an improved overall response rate. Short intracranial disease control is still a challenge. Several attempts have been made in order to improve it with combinations between local and systemic therapies. Immunotherapy approaches seem to retain promising activity in the treatment of melanoma brain metastasis as showed by the results of clinical trials investigating the combination of anti-CTL4 (Ipilimumab) and anti-PD1(Nivolumab). Studies about the combination or the sequential approach of target therapy and immunotherapy are ongoing, with immature results. Several clinical trials are ongoing trying to explore new approaches in order to overcome tumor resistance. At this moment the correct therapeutic choices for melanoma with intracranial involvement is still a challenge and new strategies are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Becco
- Istituto di Candiolo, FPO - IRCCS - Str. Prov.le 142, km 3,95, 10060 Candiolo, Italy; (P.B.); (S.P.); (M.P.M.F.); (L.C.); (A.Z.); (L.P.); (D.C.); (F.C.-S.); (M.A.)
| | - Susanna Gallo
- Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I-Largo Turati 62, 10128 Torino, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Stefano Poletto
- Istituto di Candiolo, FPO - IRCCS - Str. Prov.le 142, km 3,95, 10060 Candiolo, Italy; (P.B.); (S.P.); (M.P.M.F.); (L.C.); (A.Z.); (L.P.); (D.C.); (F.C.-S.); (M.A.)
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, 10124 Torino, Italy
| | - Mirko Pio Manlio Frascione
- Istituto di Candiolo, FPO - IRCCS - Str. Prov.le 142, km 3,95, 10060 Candiolo, Italy; (P.B.); (S.P.); (M.P.M.F.); (L.C.); (A.Z.); (L.P.); (D.C.); (F.C.-S.); (M.A.)
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, 10124 Torino, Italy
| | - Luca Crotto
- Istituto di Candiolo, FPO - IRCCS - Str. Prov.le 142, km 3,95, 10060 Candiolo, Italy; (P.B.); (S.P.); (M.P.M.F.); (L.C.); (A.Z.); (L.P.); (D.C.); (F.C.-S.); (M.A.)
| | - Alessandro Zaccagna
- Istituto di Candiolo, FPO - IRCCS - Str. Prov.le 142, km 3,95, 10060 Candiolo, Italy; (P.B.); (S.P.); (M.P.M.F.); (L.C.); (A.Z.); (L.P.); (D.C.); (F.C.-S.); (M.A.)
| | - Luca Paruzzo
- Istituto di Candiolo, FPO - IRCCS - Str. Prov.le 142, km 3,95, 10060 Candiolo, Italy; (P.B.); (S.P.); (M.P.M.F.); (L.C.); (A.Z.); (L.P.); (D.C.); (F.C.-S.); (M.A.)
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, 10124 Torino, Italy
| | - Daniela Caravelli
- Istituto di Candiolo, FPO - IRCCS - Str. Prov.le 142, km 3,95, 10060 Candiolo, Italy; (P.B.); (S.P.); (M.P.M.F.); (L.C.); (A.Z.); (L.P.); (D.C.); (F.C.-S.); (M.A.)
| | - Fabrizio Carnevale-Schianca
- Istituto di Candiolo, FPO - IRCCS - Str. Prov.le 142, km 3,95, 10060 Candiolo, Italy; (P.B.); (S.P.); (M.P.M.F.); (L.C.); (A.Z.); (L.P.); (D.C.); (F.C.-S.); (M.A.)
| | - Massimo Aglietta
- Istituto di Candiolo, FPO - IRCCS - Str. Prov.le 142, km 3,95, 10060 Candiolo, Italy; (P.B.); (S.P.); (M.P.M.F.); (L.C.); (A.Z.); (L.P.); (D.C.); (F.C.-S.); (M.A.)
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, 10124 Torino, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Cohen JV, Wang N, Venur VA, Hadfield MJ, Cahill DP, Oh K, Brastianos PK. Neurologic complications of melanoma. Cancer 2020; 126:477-486. [DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2019] [Revised: 09/28/2019] [Accepted: 10/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Justine V. Cohen
- Division of Medical Oncology and Neuro‐Oncology Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center Boston Massachusetts
| | - Nancy Wang
- Division of Neuro‐Oncology Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center Boston Massachusetts
| | - Vyshak A. Venur
- Division of Neuro‐Oncology Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center Boston Massachusetts
| | - Matthew J. Hadfield
- Division of Internal Medicine University of Connecticut Hartford Connecticut
| | - Daniel P. Cahill
- Division of Neurosurgery Massachusetts General Hospital Boston Massachusetts
| | - Kevin Oh
- Division of Radiation Oncology Massachusetts General Hospital Boston Massachusetts
| | - Priscilla K. Brastianos
- Division of Medical Oncology and Neuro‐Oncology Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center Boston Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Thakkar JP, Kumthekar P, Dixit KS, Stupp R, Lukas RV. Leptomeningeal metastasis from solid tumors. J Neurol Sci 2020; 411:116706. [PMID: 32007755 DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2020.116706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2019] [Revised: 01/17/2020] [Accepted: 01/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Central nervous system (CNS) metastasis from systemic cancers can involve the brain parenchyma, leptomeninges (pia, subarachnoid space and arachnoid mater), and dura. Leptomeningeal metastases (LM), also known by different terms including neoplastic meningitis and carcinomatous meningitis, occur in both solid tumors and hematologic malignancies. This review will focus exclusively on LM arising from solid tumors with a goal of providing the reader an understanding of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, prognostication, current management and future directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jigisha P Thakkar
- Loyola University Medical Center, Department of Neurology, United States of America; Department of Neurosurgery, United States of America
| | - Priya Kumthekar
- Northwestern University, Department of Neurology, United States of America; Lou & Jean Malnati Brain Tumor institute of the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, United States of America; Division of Hematology/Oncology, United States of America
| | - Karan S Dixit
- Northwestern University, Department of Neurology, United States of America; Lou & Jean Malnati Brain Tumor institute of the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, United States of America
| | - Roger Stupp
- Northwestern University, Department of Neurology, United States of America; Lou & Jean Malnati Brain Tumor institute of the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, United States of America; Department of Neurological Surgery, United States of America; Division of Hematology/Oncology, United States of America
| | - Rimas V Lukas
- Northwestern University, Department of Neurology, United States of America; Lou & Jean Malnati Brain Tumor institute of the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Buszek SM, Chung C. Radiotherapy in Leptomeningeal Disease: A Systematic Review of Randomized and Non-randomized Trials. Front Oncol 2019; 9:1224. [PMID: 31803614 PMCID: PMC6872542 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2019] [Accepted: 10/25/2019] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Leptomeningeal disease (LMD), also known as neoplastic meningitis, leptomeningeal carcinomatosis, or carcinomatous meningitis, is a rare cancer complication occurring in ~5% of cases and ultimately leads to significant morbidity and mortality. In the modern era, incidence of this condition continues to rise with longer survival of patients with advanced and even metastatic disease due to continued improvements in systemic therapies that are providing prolonged control of distant disease, but with limited effect in the central nervous system (CNS). Typical treatment strategies include optimal systemic therapy for the primary disease, as well as neuroaxis directed therapies, which may include intrathecal chemotherapy (ITC) or radiotherapy (RT). Methods: A systematic review of radiotherapy for LMD was performed. Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched from 1946 to 2018 for clinical trials, retrospective/prospective reviews, and case series with ≥2 human subjects that used radiation therapy techniques in the treatment of LMD. The outcome measures of interest included: characteristics of trial participants, inclusion/exclusion criteria, study type, number of participants, primary cancer histology, type of intervention for LMD, survival results if reported, length of follow up, and study conclusion. Results: Of 547 unique citations, 62 studies met the pre-specified eligibility criteria. These studies included 36 retrospective cohorts, 11 prospective series, 12 case series, and a single citation of guidelines, NCDB analysis, and a randomized control trial. Owing to study heterogeneity, meta-analyses of the endpoint data could not be performed. Conclusions: LMD is a devastating complication of cancer with reported survivals ranging from 2 to 4 months. Based on this systematic review, the recommendation for the treatment of LMD is for multimodality discussion of cases and treatment, including the use of radiotherapy, for LMD. However, with continued advances in systemic therapy as well as imaging advances, the landscape of LMD is evolving rapidly and the role of RT will likely also continue to evolve and advance. There is limited high-quality evidence to guide the optimal use of RT for the treatment of LMD, and there is a great need for prospective, histology specific investigation of the role of radiotherapy for LMD in the era of modern systemic therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha M Buszek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Caroline Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kuske M, Rauschenberg R, Garzarolli M, Meredyth-Stewart M, Beissert S, Troost EGC, Glitza OIC, Meier F. Melanoma Brain Metastases: Local Therapies, Targeted Therapies, Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Their Combinations-Chances and Challenges. Am J Clin Dermatol 2018; 19:529-541. [PMID: 29417399 PMCID: PMC6061393 DOI: 10.1007/s40257-018-0346-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Recent phase II trials have shown that BRAF/MEK inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors are active in patients with melanoma brain metastases (MBM), reporting intracranial disease control rates of 50-75%. Furthermore, retrospective analyses suggest that combining stereotactic radiosurgery with immune checkpoint inhibitors or BRAF/MEK inhibitors prolongs overall survival. These data stress the need for inter- and multidisciplinary cooperation that takes into account the individual prognostic factors in order to establish the best treatment for each patient. Although the management of MBM has dramatically improved, a substantial number of patients still progress and die from brain metastases. Therefore, there is an urgent need for prospective studies in patients with MBM that focus on treatment combinations and sequences, new treatment strategies, and biomarkers of treatment response. Moreover, further research is needed to decipher brain-specific mechanisms of therapy resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marvin Kuske
- Department of Dermatology, Medical Faculty of Technische Universität Dresden, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, University of Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany
- Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Centre Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Ricarda Rauschenberg
- Department of Dermatology, Medical Faculty of Technische Universität Dresden, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, University of Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany
- Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Centre Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Marlene Garzarolli
- Department of Dermatology, Medical Faculty of Technische Universität Dresden, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, University of Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany
- Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Centre Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Michelle Meredyth-Stewart
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Faculty of Technische Universität Dresden, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Stefan Beissert
- Department of Dermatology, Medical Faculty of Technische Universität Dresden, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, University of Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany
- Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Centre Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Esther G C Troost
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, University Hospital, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Dresden, Germany
- Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
- Institute of Radiooncology, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | | | - Friedegund Meier
- Department of Dermatology, Medical Faculty of Technische Universität Dresden, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, University of Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
- Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Centre Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|