1
|
Sherman WJ, Romiti E, Michaelides L, Moniz-Garcia D, Chaichana KL, Quiñones-Hinojosa A, Porter AB. Systemic Therapy for Melanoma Brain and Leptomeningeal Metastases. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2023; 24:1962-1977. [PMID: 38158477 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-023-01155-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Melanoma has a high propensity to metastasize to the brain which portends a poorer prognosis. With advanced radiation techniques and targeted therapies, outcomes however are improving. Melanoma brain metastases are best managed in a multi-disciplinary approach, including medical oncologists, neuro-oncologists, radiation oncologists, and neurosurgeons. The sequence of therapies is dependent on the number and size of brain metastases, status of systemic disease control, prior therapies, performance status, and neurological symptoms. The goal of treatment is to minimize neurologic morbidity and prolong both progression free and overall survival while maximizing quality of life. Surgery should be considered for solitary metastases, or large and/or symptomatic metastases with edema. Stereotactic radiosurgery offers a benefit over whole-brain radiation attributed to the relative radioresistance of melanoma and reduction in neurotoxicity. Thus far, data supports a more durable response with systemic therapy using combination immunotherapy of ipilimumab and nivolumab, though targeting the presence of BRAF mutations can also be utilized. BRAF inhibitor therapy is often used after immunotherapy failure, unless a more rapid initial response is needed and then can be done prior to initiating immunotherapy. Further trials are needed, particularly for leptomeningeal metastases which currently require the multi-disciplinary approach to determine best treatment plan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wendy J Sherman
- Department of Neurology, Division of Neuro-Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd S, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA.
| | - Edoardo Romiti
- Vita e Salute San Raffaele University in Milan, Via Olgettina, 58, 20132, Milan, MI, Italy
| | - Loizos Michaelides
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd S, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
| | - Diogo Moniz-Garcia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd S, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
| | - Kaisorn L Chaichana
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd S, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
| | | | - Alyx B Porter
- Department of Neurology, Division of Neuro-Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5777 E Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ngu S, Werner C, D' Amico RS, Wernicke AG. Whole brain radiation therapy resulting in radionecrosis: a possible link with radiosensitising chemoimmunotherapy. BMJ Case Rep 2023; 16:e256758. [PMID: 38016763 PMCID: PMC10685978 DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2023-256758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Radionecrosis describes a rare but serious complication of radiation therapy. In clinical practice, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is increasingly used in combination with systemic therapy, including chemotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitor and targeted therapy, either concurrently or sequentially. There is a paucity of literature regarding radionecrosis in patients receiving whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) alone (without additional SRS) in combination with immunotherapy or targeted therapies. It is observed that certain combinations increase the overall radiosensitivity of the tumorous lesions. We present a rare case of symptomatic radionecrosis almost 1 year after WBRT in a patient with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer on third-line chemoimmunotherapy. We discuss available research regarding factors that may lead to radionecrosis in these patients, including molecular and genetic profiles, specific drug therapy combinations and their timing or increased overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sam Ngu
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York, USA
- Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York, USA
| | - Cassidy Werner
- Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Randy S D' Amico
- Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - A Gabriella Wernicke
- Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York, USA
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York, USA
- Northwell Health Cancer Institute, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ji X, Wang L, Tan Y, Shang Y, Huo R, Fang C, Li C, Zhang L. Radionecrosis mimicking pseudo‑progression in a patient with lung cancer and brain metastasis following the combination of anti‑PD‑1 therapy and stereotactic radiosurgery: A case report. Oncol Lett 2023; 26:361. [PMID: 37545620 PMCID: PMC10398635 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2023.13947] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Brain metastases (BMs) usually develop in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. In addition to systemic therapy, radiation therapy and surgery, anti-programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) therapy is another promising clinical anticancer treatment modality. However, the optimal timing and drug-drug interactions of anti-PD-L1 therapy with other combined treatments remain to be elucidated. Treatment with anti-PD-L1 therapy is associated with an increased risk of radionecrosis (RN) regardless of tumor histology. The present study described a case of RN in a patient with lung adenocarcinoma and with BM who received anti-PD-L1 therapy. Before anti-PD-L1 treatment, the patient received whole brain radiotherapy. During durvalumab treatment, the intracranial metastases regressed. The progression of intracranial lesions 9 months later prompted a second-line of therapy with PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab and stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT). Despite stereotactic irradiation, the lesions progressed further, leading to surgical resection. On examination, RN was detected, but there was no evidence of metastatic lung cancer. The aim of the present study was to present the longitudinal change in magnetic resonance imaging in RN following STR and anti-PD-L1 combined therapy. The atypical image of RN is conditionally important for making an accurate preoperative diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaolin Ji
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Medicine College, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071000, P.R. China
| | - Luxuan Wang
- Department of Neurological Examination, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071000, P.R. China
| | - Yanli Tan
- Department of Pathology, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071000, P.R. China
| | - Yanhong Shang
- Department of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071000, P.R. China
| | - Ran Huo
- Department of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071000, P.R. China
| | - Chuan Fang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Medicine College, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071000, P.R. China
- Postdoctoral Research Station of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071000, P.R. China
| | - Chunhui Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Medicine College, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071000, P.R. China
| | - Lijian Zhang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Medicine College, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071000, P.R. China
- Postdoctoral Research Station of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071000, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Long GV, Swetter SM, Menzies AM, Gershenwald JE, Scolyer RA. Cutaneous melanoma. Lancet 2023:S0140-6736(23)00821-8. [PMID: 37499671 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(23)00821-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 78.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Revised: 03/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023]
Abstract
Cutaneous melanoma is a malignancy arising from melanocytes of the skin. Incidence rates are rising, particularly in White populations. Cutaneous melanoma is typically driven by exposure to ultraviolet radiation from natural sunlight and indoor tanning, although there are several subtypes that are not related to ultraviolet radiation exposure. Primary melanomas are often darkly pigmented, but can be amelanotic, with diagnosis based on a combination of clinical and histopathological findings. Primary melanoma is treated with wide excision, with margins determined by tumour thickness. Further treatment depends on the disease stage (following histopathological examination and, where appropriate, sentinel lymph node biopsy) and can include surgery, checkpoint immunotherapy, targeted therapy, or radiotherapy. Systemic drug therapies are recommended as an adjunct to surgery in patients with resectable locoregional metastases and are the mainstay of treatment in advanced melanoma. Management of advanced melanoma is complex, particularly in those with cerebral metastasis. Multidisciplinary care is essential. Systemic drug therapies, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors, have substantially increased melanoma survival following a series of landmark approvals from 2011 onward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgina V Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Mater Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Susan M Swetter
- Department of Dermatology and Pigmented Lesion and Melanoma Program, Stanford University Medical Center and Cancer Institute, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Dermatology, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Alexander M Menzies
- Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Mater Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jeffrey E Gershenwald
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Department of Cancer Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Richard A Scolyer
- Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tijtgat J, Calliauw E, Dirven I, Vounckx M, Kamel R, Vanbinst AM, Everaert H, Seynaeve L, Van Den Berge D, Duerinck J, Neyns B. Low-Dose Bevacizumab for the Treatment of Focal Radiation Necrosis of the Brain (fRNB): A Single-Center Case Series. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15092560. [PMID: 37174026 PMCID: PMC10177060 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15092560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Revised: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Focal radiation necrosis of the brain (fRNB) is a late adverse event that can occur following the treatment of benign or malignant brain lesions with stereotactic radiation therapy (SRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Recent studies have shown that the incidence of fRNB is higher in cancer patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors. The use of bevacizumab (BEV), a monoclonal antibody that targets the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), is an effective treatment for fRNB when given at a dose of 5-7.5 mg/kg every two weeks. In this single-center retrospective case series, we investigated the effectiveness of a low-dose regimen of BEV (400 mg loading dose followed by 100 mg every 4 weeks) in patients diagnosed with fRNB. A total of 13 patients were included in the study; twelve of them experienced improvement in their existing clinical symptoms, and all patients had a decrease in the volume of edema on MRI scans. No clinically significant treatment-related adverse effects were observed. Our preliminary findings suggest that this fixed low-dose regimen of BEV can be a well-tolerated and cost-effective alternative treatment option for patients diagnosed with fRNB, and it is deserving of further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jens Tijtgat
- Department of Medical Oncology, UZ Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Evan Calliauw
- Department of Medical Oncology, UZ Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Iris Dirven
- Department of Medical Oncology, UZ Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Manon Vounckx
- Department of Medical Oncology, UZ Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Randa Kamel
- Department of Radiotherapy, UZ Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Anne Marie Vanbinst
- Department of Medical Imaging, UZ Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Hendrik Everaert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, UZ Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Laura Seynaeve
- Department of Neurology, UZ Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Dirk Van Den Berge
- Department of Radiotherapy, UZ Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Johnny Duerinck
- Department of Neurosurgery, UZ Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Bart Neyns
- Department of Medical Oncology, UZ Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lolli J, Tessari F, Berti F, Fusella M, Fiorentin D, Bimbatti D, Basso U, Busato F. Impressive reduction of brain metastasis radionecrosis after cabozantinib therapy in metastatic renal carcinoma: A case report and review of the literature. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1136300. [PMID: 36959812 PMCID: PMC10028179 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1136300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Radionecrosis is a consequence of SRS (stereotactic radiosurgery) for brain metastases in 34% of cases, and if symptomatic (8%-16%), it requires therapy with corticosteroids and bevacizumab and, less frequently, surgery. Oncological indications are increasing and appropriate stereotactic adapted LINACs (linear accelerators) are becoming more widely available worldwide. Efforts are being made to treat brain radionecrosis in order to relieve symptoms and spare the use of active therapies. Case presentation Herein, we describe a 65-year-old female patient presenting with brain radionecrosis 6 months after stereotactic radiotherapy for two brain metastatic lesions. Being symptomatic with headache and slow cognitive-motor function, the patient received corticosteroids. Because of later lung progression, the patient took cabozantinib. An impressive reduction of the two brain radionecrosis areas was seen at the brain MRI 2 months after the initiation of the angiogenic drug. Discussion The high incidence of radionecrosis (2/2 treated lesions) can be interpreted by the combination of SRS and previous ipilimumab that is associated with increased risk of radionecrosis. The molecular mechanisms of brain radionecrosis, and its exact duration in time, are poorly understood. We hypothesize that the antiangiogenic effect of cabozantinib may have had a strong effect in reducing brain radionecrosis areas. Conclusion In this clinical case, cabozantinib is associated with a fast and significant volume reduction of brain radionecrosis appearing after SRS and concomitant immunotherapy. This drug seems to show, like bevacizumab, clinical implications not only for its efficacy in systemic disease control but also in reducing brain radionecrosis. More research is needed to evaluate all molecular mechanisms of brain radionecrosis and their interaction with systemic therapies like third-generation TKIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacopo Lolli
- Radiotherapy Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV – IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Francesca Tessari
- Radiotherapy Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV – IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Franco Berti
- Radiotherapy Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV – IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Marco Fusella
- Radiotherapy Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV – IRCCS, Padua, Italy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Abano Terme Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - Davide Fiorentin
- Radiotherapy Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV – IRCCS, Padua, Italy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Abano Terme Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - Davide Bimbatti
- Medical Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCSS, Padua, Italy
| | - Umberto Basso
- Medical Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCSS, Padua, Italy
| | - Fabio Busato
- Radiotherapy Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV – IRCCS, Padua, Italy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Abano Terme Hospital, Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Burke AM, Carrasquilla M, Jean WC, Collins BT, Anaizi AN, Atkins MB, Gibney GT, Collins SP. Volume of Disease as a Predictor for Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Melanoma Brain Metastases Treated With Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Immune Checkpoint Therapy. Front Oncol 2022; 11:794615. [PMID: 35096594 PMCID: PMC8789649 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.794615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2021] [Accepted: 12/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose/Objectives Clinical trials of anti-Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein (CTLA-4) therapies have demonstrated a clinical benefit with low rates of neurologic adverse events in patients with melanoma brain metastases (MBMs). While the combined effect of these immunotherapies (ITs) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has yielded impressive results with regard to local control (LC) and overall survival (OS), it has also been associated with increased rates of radiation necrosis (RN) compared to historical series of SRS alone. We retrospectively reviewed patients treated with IT in combination with SRS to report on predictors of clinical outcomes. Materials and Methods Patients were included if they had MBMs treated with SRS within 1 year of receiving anti-PD-1 and/or CTLA-4 therapy. Clinical outcomes including OS, LC, intracranial death (ID), and RN were correlated with type and timing of IT with SRS, radiation dose, total volume, and size and number of lesions treated. Results Twenty-nine patients with 171 MBMs were treated between May 2012 and May 2018. Patients had a median of 5 lesions treated (median volume of 6.5 cm3) over a median of 2 courses of SRS. The median dose was 21 Gy. Most patients were treated with ipilimumab (n = 13) or nivolumab-ipilimumab (n = 10). Most patients underwent SRS concurrently or within 3 months of receiving immunotherapy (n = 21). Two-year OS and LC were 54.4% and 85.5%, respectively. In addition, 14% of patients developed RN; however, only 4.7% of the total treated lesions developed RN. The median time to development of RN was 9.5 months. Patients with an aggregate tumor volume >6.5 cm3 were found to be at increased risk of ID (p = 0.05) and RN (p = 0.03). There was no difference in OS, ID, or RN with regard to type of IT, timing of SRS and IT, number of SRS courses, SRS dose, or number of cumulative lesions treated. Conclusions In our series, patients treated with SRS and IT for MBMs had excellent rates of OS and LC; however, patients with an aggregate tumor volume >6.5 cm3 were found to be at increased risk of ID and RN. Given the efficacy of combined anti-PD-1/CTLA-4 therapy for MBM management, further study of optimal selection criteria for the addition of SRS is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aidan M Burke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, United States
| | - Michael Carrasquilla
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Walter C Jean
- George Washington University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Brian T Collins
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Amjad N Anaizi
- Department of Neurosurgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Michael B Atkins
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Geoffrey T Gibney
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Sean P Collins
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Rzeniewicz K, Larkin J, Menzies AM, Turajlic S. Immunotherapy use outside clinical trial populations: never say never? Ann Oncol 2021; 32:866-880. [PMID: 33771665 PMCID: PMC9246438 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.03.199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Revised: 03/02/2021] [Accepted: 03/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Based on favourable outcomes in clinical trials, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), most notably programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors, are now widely used across multiple cancer types. However, due to their strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, clinical studies often do not address challenges presented by non-trial populations. DESIGN This review summarises available data on the efficacy and safety of ICIs in trial-ineligible patients, including those with autoimmune disease, chronic viral infections, organ transplants, organ dysfunction, poor performance status, and brain metastases, as well as the elderly, children, and those who are pregnant. In addition, we review data concerning other real-world challenges with ICIs, including timing of therapy switch, relationships to radiotherapy or surgery, re-treatment after an immune-related toxicity, vaccinations in patients on ICIs, and current experience around ICI and coronavirus disease-19. Where possible, we provide recommendations to aid the often-difficult decision-making process in those settings. CONCLUSIONS Data suggest that ICIs are often active and have an acceptable safety profile in the populations described above, with the exception of PD-1 inhibitors in solid organ transplant recipients. Decisions about whether to treat with ICIs should be personalised and require multidisciplinary input and careful counselling of patients with respect to potential risks and benefits. Clinical judgements need to be carefully weighed, considering factors such as underlying cancer type, feasibility of alternative treatment options, or activity in trial-eligible patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Rzeniewicz
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Warwick, UK; Cancer Dynamics Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK
| | - J Larkin
- Renal and Skin Units, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - A M Menzies
- Melanoma Institute Australia and The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, Australia
| | - S Turajlic
- Cancer Dynamics Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK; Renal and Skin Units, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Choi S, Hong A, Wang T, Lo S, Chen B, Silva I, Kapoor R, Hsiao E, Fogarty GB, Carlino MS, Menzies AM, Long GV, Shivalingam BS. Risk of radiation necrosis after stereotactic radiosurgery for melanoma brain metastasis by anatomical location. Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 197:1104-1112. [PMID: 34114045 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01798-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2020] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In this retrospective study, we have explored the anatomical factors that lead to the development of radiation necrosis (RN) in the setting of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for melanoma brain metastases (MBM). METHODS Between 2014 and 2018, 137 patients underwent SRS for 311 MBM. Lesions were assessed according to anatomical zones: zone 1-peripheral grey-white matter junction and cortical mantle, zone 2-deep white matter, including tumours located at base of sulci, zone 3-tumours adjacent to ependymal lining or in deep locations such as brainstem, basal ganglia and thalamus. Other anatomical factors including lobes, medial-peripheral, supra or infratentorial locations were also recorded. RESULTS In all, 12.4% (n = 17) of patients and 6.1% (n = 20) of lesions developed RN, actuarial incidence of RN at 12 and 24 months was 10% and 14.2% respectively. Zone 2 lesions recorded the highest rate of development of RN (n = 7/19; 36%), zone 3 (N = 4/24; 16%) and zone 1 (n = 9/268; 3%). Five of 17 patients developed symptomatic RN and 7/17 patients underwent surgery for RN. CONCLUSION This study raises awareness of the increased likelihood of deep lesions particularly in white matter structures to develop RN after SRS. Further studies including larger cohorts would be useful in identifying statistical differences in the rate of development of RN in different anatomical zones.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siujoon Choi
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
| | - Angela Hong
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.,Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.,Melanoma Institute Australia, North Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Tim Wang
- Melanoma Institute Australia, North Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead, NSW, Australia.,Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Seringe Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia, North Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Bi Chen
- Melanoma Institute Australia, North Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Ines Silva
- Melanoma Institute Australia, North Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Rony Kapoor
- Melanoma Institute Australia, North Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Mater Hospital, North Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Edward Hsiao
- Melanoma Institute Australia, North Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
| | - Gerald B Fogarty
- Melanoma Institute Australia, North Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Mater Hospital, North Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Matteo S Carlino
- Melanoma Institute Australia, North Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead, NSW, Australia.,Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Alexander M Menzies
- Melanoma Institute Australia, North Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Mater Hospital, North Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia.,Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Georgina V Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, North Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Mater Hospital, North Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia.,Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Brindha S Shivalingam
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.,Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.,Melanoma Institute Australia, North Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Mater Hospital, North Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Krishnan T, Menzies AM, Roberts-Thomson R. Recent advancements in melanoma management. Intern Med J 2021; 51:327-333. [PMID: 33738950 DOI: 10.1111/imj.15228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2020] [Revised: 11/11/2020] [Accepted: 11/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
The treatment options for patients with melanoma have expanded significantly over the past decade. In particular, the use of targeted therapy and immunotherapy has dramatically transformed the outlook for patients with advanced disease. These treatments are now being utilised as adjuvant therapy for patients with earlier stage melanoma after surgical resection. We review the latest updates for melanoma staging, surgical resection, radiotherapy and systemic therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tharani Krishnan
- Medical Oncology Department, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Alexander M Menzies
- Medical Oncology Department, Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Medical Oncology Department, Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rachel Roberts-Thomson
- Medical Oncology Department, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tawbi HA, Forsyth PA, Hodi FS, Lao CD, Moschos SJ, Hamid O, Atkins MB, Lewis K, Thomas RP, Glaspy JA, Jang S, Algazi AP, Khushalani NI, Postow MA, Pavlick AC, Ernstoff MS, Reardon DA, Puzanov I, Kudchadkar RR, Tarhini AA, Sumbul A, Rizzo JI, Margolin KA. Safety and Efficacy of the Combination of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Patients With Melanoma and Asymptomatic or Symptomatic Brain Metastases (CheckMate 204). Neuro Oncol 2021; 23:1961-1973. [PMID: 33880555 PMCID: PMC8563325 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noab094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In patients with melanoma and asymptomatic brain metastases (MBM), nivolumab plus ipilimumab provided an intracranial response rate of 55%. Here, we present the first report for patients who were symptomatic and/or required corticosteroids and updated data for asymptomatic patients. Methods Patients with measurable MBM, 0.5-3.0 cm, were enrolled into Cohort A (asymptomatic) or Cohort B (stable neurologic symptoms and/or receiving corticosteroids). Nivolumab, 1 mg/kg, and ipilimumab, 3 mg/kg, were given intravenously every 3 weeks ×4, followed by nivolumab, 3 mg/kg, every 2 weeks until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or 24 months. The primary endpoint was intracranial clinical benefit rate (CBR; complete response [CR], partial response [PR], or stable disease ≥6 months). Results Symptomatic patients (N = 18) received a median of one nivolumab and ipilimumab combination dose and had an intracranial CBR of 22.2%. Two of 12 patients on corticosteroids had CR; 2 responded among the 6 not on corticosteroids. Median intracranial progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 1.2 and 8.7 months, respectively. In contrast, with 20.6 months of follow-up, we confirmed an intracranial CBR of 58.4% in asymptomatic patients (N = 101); median duration of response, PFS, and OS were not reached. No new safety signals were observed. Conclusions Nivolumab plus ipilimumab provides durable clinical benefit for asymptomatic patients with MBM and should be considered for first-line therapy. This regimen has limited activity in MBM patients with neurologic symptoms and/or requiring corticosteroids, supporting the need for alternative approaches and methods to reduce the dependency on corticosteroids. Clinical trial registration. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02320058.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hussein A Tawbi
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Peter A Forsyth
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - F Stephen Hodi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | - Stergios J Moschos
- Division of Hematology & Oncology, The University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Omid Hamid
- Department of Translational Research & Immunotherapy, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, A Cedars-Sinai Affilliate, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Michael B Atkins
- Department of Medical Oncology,Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington DC
| | - Karl Lewis
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Comprehensive Cancer Center, Aurora, CO
| | - Reena P Thomas
- Department of Neurology, Stanford University Cancer Center, Stanford, CA
| | - John A Glaspy
- Department of Medicine, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Sekwon Jang
- Department of Medicine, Inova Schar Cancer Institute, Virginia Commonwealth University, Fairfax, VA
| | - Alain P Algazi
- Department of Hematology & Oncology, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - Nikhil I Khushalani
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Michael A Postow
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Anna C Pavlick
- Department of Medical Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Marc S Ernstoff
- Department of Immuno-Oncology, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD
| | - David A Reardon
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Igor Puzanov
- Department of Medical Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - Ragini R Kudchadkar
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Ahmad A Tarhini
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Anne Sumbul
- Biostatistics, Bristol Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ
| | - Jasmine I Rizzo
- Oncology Clinical Development, Bristol Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ
| | - Kim A Margolin
- Department of Medical Oncology, City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Dimitriou F, Zaremba A, Allayous C, Kähler KC, Gerard CL, Festino L, Schäfer S, Toussaint F, Heinzerling L, Hassel JC, Ascierto PA, Michielin O, Hauschild A, Lebbe C, Livingstone E, Ramelyte E, Cheng PF, Dummer R, Mangana J. Sustainable responses in metastatic melanoma patients with and without brain metastases after elective discontinuation of anti-PD1-based immunotherapy due to complete response. Eur J Cancer 2021; 149:37-48. [PMID: 33823361 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.02.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2020] [Revised: 02/05/2021] [Accepted: 02/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anti-PD1-based immunotherapy is currently used in most patients with advanced melanoma. Despite the remarkable data regarding overall survival, the optimal treatment duration is still unknown. METHODS We evaluated the outcome of 125 patients with advanced melanoma with and without brain metastases (MBM), treated either with anti-PD1 monotherapy (N = 97) or combined with anti-CTLA4 (N = 28) after elective treatment discontinuation due to complete response (CR) (group A, N = 86), or treatment-limiting toxicity (N = 33) and investigator's decision (ID, N = 6) (group B) with subsequent CR. RESULTS For group A, median duration of treatment (mDoT) was 22 months (range 5-49) and median time to CR 9 months (range 2-47). Accordingly, mDoT for group B was 3 months (range 0-36) and median time to CR 7 months (range 1-32). Seven patients from group A and three from group B experienced disease recurrence. Off-treatment survival was not reached. Median off-treatment response time (mOTRt) was 19 months (range 0-42) and 25 months (range 0-66), respectively. For MBM, mOTRt was 17 months (range 7-41) and 28 months (range 9-39), respectively. After a median follow-up of 38 months (range 9-70), seven (5.6%) patients had deceased, one (0.8%) due to melanoma. CONCLUSIONS Treatment discontinuation is feasible also in patients with MBM. Efficacy outcomes seemed to be similar in both groups of patients who achieved CR, regardless of reason for discontinuation. In patients who experienced disease relapse, treatment re-challenge with anti-PD1 resulted in subsequent renewed response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anne Zaremba
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Clara Allayous
- APHP Department of Dermatology, Paris University Saint-Louis Hospital, U976, Paris, France
| | - Katharina C Kähler
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany
| | - Camille L Gerard
- Precision Oncology Center, Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Lucia Festino
- Melanoma Unit, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Sarah Schäfer
- Department of Dermatology and National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Frédéric Toussaint
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Germany
| | - Lucie Heinzerling
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Germany
| | - Jessica C Hassel
- Department of Dermatology and National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Paolo A Ascierto
- Melanoma Unit, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Olivier Michielin
- Precision Oncology Center, Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Axel Hauschild
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany
| | - Céleste Lebbe
- APHP Department of Dermatology, Paris University Saint-Louis Hospital, U976, Paris, France
| | | | - Egle Ramelyte
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Phil F Cheng
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Reinhard Dummer
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Joanna Mangana
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Galldiks N, Kocher M, Ceccon G, Werner JM, Brunn A, Deckert M, Pope WB, Soffietti R, Le Rhun E, Weller M, Tonn JC, Fink GR, Langen KJ. Imaging challenges of immunotherapy and targeted therapy in patients with brain metastases: response, progression, and pseudoprogression. Neuro Oncol 2021; 22:17-30. [PMID: 31437274 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noz147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The advent of immunotherapy using immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and targeted therapy (TT) has dramatically improved the prognosis of various cancer types. However, following ICI therapy or TT-either alone (especially ICI) or in combination with radiotherapy-imaging findings on anatomical contrast-enhanced MRI can be unpredictable and highly variable, and are often difficult to interpret regarding treatment response and outcome. This review aims at summarizing the imaging challenges related to TT and ICI monotherapy as well as combined with radiotherapy in patients with brain metastases, and to give an overview on advanced imaging techniques which potentially overcome some of these imaging challenges. Currently, major evidence suggests that imaging parameters especially derived from amino acid PET, perfusion-/diffusion-weighted MRI, or MR spectroscopy may provide valuable additional information for the differentiation of treatment-induced changes from brain metastases recurrence and the evaluation of treatment response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norbert Galldiks
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany.,Center of Integrated Oncology, Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Martin Kocher
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany.,Department of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Garry Ceccon
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Jan-Michael Werner
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Anna Brunn
- Institute of Neuropathology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Martina Deckert
- Institute of Neuropathology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Whitney B Pope
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Riccardo Soffietti
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University and City of Health and Science Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Emilie Le Rhun
- Neuro-Oncology, General and Stereotaxic Neurosurgery Service, University Hospital Lille, Lille, France.,Breast Cancer Department, Oscar Lambret Center, Lille, France.,Department of Neurology & Brain Tumor Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology & Brain Tumor Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jörg C Tonn
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium, partner site Munich, Germany
| | - Gereon R Fink
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
| | - Karl-Josef Langen
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mays AC, Yarlagadda B, Achim V, Jackson R, Pipkorn P, Huang AT, Rajasekaran K, Sridharan S, Rosko AJ, Orosco RK, Coughlin AM, Wax MK, Shnayder Y, Spanos WC, Farwell DG, McDaniel LS, Hanasono MM. Examining the relationship of immunotherapy and wound complications following flap reconstruction in patients with head and neck cancer. Head Neck 2021; 43:1509-1520. [PMID: 33417293 DOI: 10.1002/hed.26601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2020] [Revised: 11/12/2020] [Accepted: 12/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immunotherapy agents are used to treat advanced head and neck lesions. We aim to elucidate relationship between immunotherapy and surgical wound complications. METHODS Retrospective multi-institutional case series evaluating patients undergoing ablative and flap reconstructive surgery and immunotherapy treatment. MAIN OUTCOME wound complications. RESULTS Eight-two (62%) patients received preoperative therapy, 89 (67%) postoperative, and 33 (25%) in both settings. Forty-one (31%) patients had recipient site complications, 12 (9%) had donor site. Nineteen (14%) had major recipient site complications, 22 (17%) had minor. There was no statistically significant difference in complications based on patient or tumor-specific variables. Preoperative therapy alone demonstrated increased major complications (odds ratio [OR] 3.7, p = 0.04), and trend to more donor site complications (OR 7.4, p = 0.06), however treatment in both preoperative and postoperative therapy was not. CONCLUSIONS Preoperative immunotherapy may be associated with increased wound complications. Controlled studies are necessary to delineate this association and potential risks of therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley C Mays
- Department of Otolaryngology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA
| | - Bharat Yarlagadda
- Department of Otolaryngology, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Virginie Achim
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Ryan Jackson
- Department of Otolaryngology, Washington University - St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Patrik Pipkorn
- Department of Otolaryngology, Washington University - St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Andrew T Huang
- Department of Otolaryngology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Karthik Rajasekaran
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Shaum Sridharan
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Andrew J Rosko
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Ryan K Orosco
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Andrew M Coughlin
- Department of Otolaryngology, Nebraska Methodist Health System, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Mark K Wax
- Department of Otolaryngology, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | | | - William C Spanos
- Department of Otolaryngology, Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, USA
| | - Donald Gregory Farwell
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California, USA
| | - Lee S McDaniel
- Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center School of Public Health, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Matthew M Hanasono
- Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kim PH, Suh CH, Kim HS, Kim KW, Kim DY, Aizer AA, Rahman R, Guenette JP, Huang RY. Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy may increase the incidence of treatment-related necrosis after stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 2020; 31:4114-4129. [PMID: 33241519 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07514-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2020] [Revised: 09/28/2020] [Accepted: 11/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare the incidence of treatment-related necrosis between combination SRS+ICI therapy and SRS therapy alone in patients with brain metastases from melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS A systematic literature search of Ovid-MEDLINE and EMBASE was performed up to August 10, 2020. The difference in the pooled incidence of treatment-related necrosis after SRS+ICI or SRS alone was evaluated. The cumulative incidence of treatment-related necrosis at the specific time point after the treatment was calculated and plotted. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were additionally performed. RESULTS Sixteen studies (14 on melanoma, 2 on NSCLC) were included. In NSCLC brain metastasis, the reported incidences of treatment-related necrosis in SRS+ICI and SRS alone ranged 2.9-3.4% and 0-2.9%, respectively. Meta-analysis was conducted including 14 studies on melanoma brain metastasis. The incidence of treatment-related necrosis was higher in SRS+ICI than SRS alone (16.0% vs. 6.5%; p = 0.065; OR, 2.35). The incidence showed rapid increase until 12 months after the SRS when combined with ICI therapy (14%; 95% CI, 8-22%) and its pace of increase slowed thereafter. Histopathologic diagnosis as the reference standard for treatment-related necrosis and inclusion of only symptomatic cases were the source of heterogeneity in SRS+ICI. CONCLUSIONS Treatment-related necrosis tended to occur 2.4 times more frequently in the setting of combination SRS+ICI therapy compared with SRS alone in melanoma brain metastasis showing high cumulative incidence within the first year. Treatment-related necrosis should be considered when SRS+ICI combination therapy is used for melanoma brain metastasis, especially in the first year. KEY POINTS • Treatment-related necrosis occurred 2.4 times more frequently in the setting of combination SRS+ICI therapy compared with SRS alone in melanoma brain metastasis. • Treatment-related necrosis more frequently occurred in brain metastases from melanoma than NSCLC. • Reference standard for treatment-related necrosis and inclusion of only symptomatic treatment-related necrosis were a significant source of heterogeneity, indicating varying definitions of treatment-related necrosis in the literature need to be unified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pyeong Hwa Kim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Olympic-ro 33, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea
| | - Chong Hyun Suh
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Olympic-ro 33, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.
| | - Ho Sung Kim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Olympic-ro 33, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyung Won Kim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Olympic-ro 33, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong Yeong Kim
- Department of Quarantine, Incheon Airport National Quarantine Station, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Ayal A Aizer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Rifaquat Rahman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Jeffrey P Guenette
- Division of Neuroradiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Raymond Y Huang
- Division of Neuroradiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Randall Patrinely J, Funck-Brentano E, Nguyen K, Rapisuwon S, Salem JE, Gibney GT, Carlino M, Johnson DB. A Multicenter Analysis of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors as Adjuvant Therapy Following Treatment of Isolated Brain Metastasis. Oncologist 2020; 26:e505-e507. [PMID: 33225544 DOI: 10.1002/onco.13608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2020] [Accepted: 11/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The objective of this work was to characterize outcomes of patients with isolated brain metastases managed with local therapy followed by immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients from four medical centers were included if they presented with isolated brain metastases treated with local therapy and received adjuvant treatment with ICIs. RESULTS Eleven patients with median size of largest brain metastasis of 3.9 cm, treated with surgical resection (n = 8) and/or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS; n = 6), were included. Ipilimumab/nivolumab was the adjuvant ICI used in four patients, of whom one recurred (25%) and none died, compared with three of seven (43%) who recurred and two of seven (29%) who died following adjuvant treatment with ICI monotherapy. All recurrences were intracranial. CONCLUSION Patients with isolated brain metastases treated with surgery or SRS appeared to benefit from adjuvant ICI therapy, particularly with combination therapy. Recurrences in this setting appear to largely occur intracranially.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Elisa Funck-Brentano
- Université de Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Université Paris-Saclay, Biomarkers in Cancerology and Hemato-oncology, Department of General and Oncologic Dermatology, Ambroise-Paré Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - Khang Nguyen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Centre for Cancer Research, Westmead Millennium Institute, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.,Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,The Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Suthee Rapisuwon
- Department of Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Joe-Elie Salem
- Department of Pharmacology, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Universités, Paris, France
| | - Geoffrey T Gibney
- Department of Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Matteo Carlino
- Department of Medical Oncology, Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Centre for Cancer Research, Westmead Millennium Institute, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.,Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,The Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Douglas B Johnson
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Keilholz U, Ascierto PA, Dummer R, Robert C, Lorigan P, van Akkooi A, Arance A, Blank CU, Chiarion Sileni V, Donia M, Faries MB, Gaudy-Marqueste C, Gogas H, Grob JJ, Guckenberger M, Haanen J, Hayes AJ, Hoeller C, Lebbé C, Lugowska I, Mandalà M, Márquez-Rodas I, Nathan P, Neyns B, Olofsson Bagge R, Puig S, Rutkowski P, Schilling B, Sondak VK, Tawbi H, Testori A, Michielin O. ESMO consensus conference recommendations on the management of metastatic melanoma: under the auspices of the ESMO Guidelines Committee. Ann Oncol 2020; 31:1435-1448. [PMID: 32763453 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 107] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2020] [Revised: 07/08/2020] [Accepted: 07/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) held a consensus conference on melanoma on 5-7 September 2019 in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. The conference included a multidisciplinary panel of 32 leading experts in the management of melanoma. The aim of the conference was to develop recommendations on topics that are not covered in detail in the current ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline and where available evidence is either limited or conflicting. The main topics identified for discussion were (i) the management of locoregional disease; (ii) targeted versus immunotherapies in the adjuvant setting; (iii) targeted versus immunotherapies for the first-line treatment of metastatic melanoma; (iv) when to stop immunotherapy or targeted therapy in the metastatic setting; and (v) systemic versus local treatment for brain metastases. The expert panel was divided into five working groups to each address questions relating to one of the five topics outlined above. Relevant scientific literature was reviewed in advance. Recommendations were developed by the working groups and then presented to the entire panel for further discussion and amendment before voting. This manuscript presents the results relating to the management of metastatic melanoma, including findings from the expert panel discussions, consensus recommendations and a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation. All participants approved the final manuscript.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- U Keilholz
- Charité Comprehensive Cancer Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
| | - P A Ascierto
- Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - R Dummer
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - C Robert
- Department of Dermatology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Paris-Saclay University, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - P Lorigan
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester and The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - A van Akkooi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A Arance
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - C U Blank
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - V Chiarion Sileni
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Oncology, Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - M Donia
- National Center for Cancer Immune Therapy, Department of Oncology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark; University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - M B Faries
- Department of Surgery, The Angeles Clinic, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA
| | - C Gaudy-Marqueste
- Department of Dermatology and Skin Cancer, Aix Marseille University, Hôpital De La Timone, Marseille, France
| | - H Gogas
- First Department of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | - J J Grob
- Department of Dermatology and Skin Cancer, Aix Marseille University, Hôpital De La Timone, Marseille, France
| | - M Guckenberger
- Department of Radio-Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - J Haanen
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A J Hayes
- Department of Academic Surgery, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - C Hoeller
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - C Lebbé
- AP-HP Dermatology, Université de Paris, Paris, France; INSERM U976, Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris, France
| | - I Lugowska
- Early Phase Clinical Trials Unit, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - M Mandalà
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, Papa Giovanni XXIII Cancer Center Hospital, Bergamo, Italy
| | - I Márquez-Rodas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Madrid, Spain
| | - P Nathan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK
| | - B Neyns
- Department of Medical Oncology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - R Olofsson Bagge
- Sahlgrenska Cancer Center, Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Region Västra Götaland, Sweden; Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - S Puig
- Dermatology Service, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona and University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, Barcelona, Spain; CIBER, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Barcelona, Spain
| | - P Rutkowski
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - B Schilling
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - V K Sondak
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, USA
| | - H Tawbi
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - A Testori
- Department of Dermatology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - O Michielin
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Voronova V, Lebedeva S, Sekacheva M, Helmlinger G, Peskov K. Quantification of Scheduling Impact on Safety and Efficacy Outcomes of Brain Metastasis Radio- and Immuno-Therapies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Oncol 2020; 10:1609. [PMID: 32984027 PMCID: PMC7492564 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2020] [Accepted: 07/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: The goal of this quantitative research was to evaluate the impact of various factors (e.g., scheduling or radiotherapy (RT) type) on outcomes for RT vs. RT in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), in the treatment of brain metastases, via a meta-analysis. Methods: Clinical studies with at least one ICI+RT treatment combination arm with brain metastasis patients were identified via a systematic literature search. Data on 1-year overall survival (OS), 1-year local control (LC) and radionecrosis rate (RNR) were extracted; for combination studies which included an RT monotherapy arm, odds ratios (OR) for the aforementioned endpoints were additionally calculated and analyzed. Mixed-effects meta-analysis models were tested to evaluate impact on outcome, for different factors such as combination treatment scheduling and the type of ICI or RT used. Results: 40 studies representing a total of 4,359 patients were identified. Higher 1-year OS was observed in ICI and RT combination vs. RT alone, with corresponding incidence rates of 59% [95% CI: 54-63%] vs. 32% [95% CI: 25-39%] (P < 0.001). Concurrent ICI and RT treatment was associated with significantly higher 1-year OS vs. sequential combinations: 68% [95% CI: 60-75%] vs. 54% [95% CI: 47-61%]. No statistically significant differences were observed in 1-year LC and RNR, when comparing combinations vs. RT monotherapies, with 1-year LC rates of 68% [95% CI: 40-90%] vs. 72% [95% CI: 63-80%] (P = 0.73) and RNR rates of 6% [95% CI: 2-13%] vs. 9% [95% CI: 5-14%] (P = 0.37). Conclusions: A comprehensive, study-level meta-analysis of brain metastasis disease treatments suggest that combinations of RT and ICI result in higher OS, yet comparable neurotoxicity profiles vs. RT alone, with a superiority of concurrent vs. sequential combination regimens. A similar meta-analysis using patient-level data from past trials, as well as future prospective randomized trials would help confirming these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Svetlana Lebedeva
- Institute of Pharmacy, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Marina Sekacheva
- Computational Oncology Group, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Gabriel Helmlinger
- Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Obsidian Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA, United States
| | - Kirill Peskov
- M&S Decisions LLC, Moscow, Russia
- Computational Oncology Group, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Jiang C, Wallington DG, Anker CJ, Lawson DH, Yushak ML, Kudchadkar RR, Tarhini A, Khan MK. Changing Therapeutic Landscape for Melanoma With Multiple Brain Metastases. Neurosurgery 2020; 87:498-515. [PMID: 32315430 DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2019] [Accepted: 01/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Over 90 000 people are expected to be diagnosed with melanoma in the United States this year. The development of brain metastases is particularly difficult to manage. Over the past few years, melanoma patients with multiple unresectable brain metastases for which stereotactic surgery might also not be a viable option have fortunately experienced a dramatic expansion in available management options given improvements made to targeted agents, immunotherapy, and radiotherapy. Whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) is a long-standing radiation technique that has become increasingly sophisticated. In this review, we summarize retrospective and prospective studies on individual advances in targeted agents, immunotherapy, and WBRT, highlighting important variables such as overall survival, intracranial progression-free survival, control and response rates, and toxicities. We also discuss the recent integration of these therapies into a multimodality approach, which has shown promise in the clinical setting although toxicities have not been insignificant. Finally, we describe ongoing prospective trials relevant to melanoma with brain metastases, and we conclude with our own thoughts on the optimal approach for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cecilia Jiang
- Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - David G Wallington
- Western Michigan University Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine, Kalamazoo, Michigan
| | - Christopher J Anker
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont
| | - David H Lawson
- Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, Georgia.,Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Melinda L Yushak
- Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, Georgia.,Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Ragini R Kudchadkar
- Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, Georgia.,Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Ahmad Tarhini
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
| | - Mohammad K Khan
- Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, Georgia.,H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Patrinely JR, Young AC, Quach H, Williams GR, Ye F, Fan R, Horn L, Beckermann KE, Gillaspie EA, Sosman JA, Friedman DL, Moslehi JJ, Johnson DB. Survivorship in immune therapy: Assessing toxicities, body composition and health-related quality of life among long-term survivors treated with antibodies to programmed death-1 receptor and its ligand. Eur J Cancer 2020; 135:211-220. [PMID: 32599411 PMCID: PMC7374019 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2020] [Revised: 04/27/2020] [Accepted: 05/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
AIM Antibodies to programmed death-1 receptor and its ligand (anti-PD-1/PD-L1) produce durable responses in many cancers. However, the long-term effects of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 blockade are not well defined. We identified the toxicities, health outcomes and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) amongst long-term survivors treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1. METHODS We assessed 217 patients who received anti-PD-1/PD-L1 for melanoma, renal cell carcinoma or non-small-cell lung carcinoma between 2009 and 2017, with survival greater than two years after treatment. Patient and tumour characteristics, immune-related adverse events (irAEs), cardiometabolic parameters (glucose, blood pressure, body mass index [BMI]), body composition (using automated body composition analyser, computed tomography and Slice-o-matic software) and HRQoL outcomes were tracked. RESULTS Among the included patients, most were men (70.3%) and at anti-PD-1/PD-L1 initiation had an average age of 61.0 years and median BMI of 28.5. Median overall survival was not reached; 33 (15.2%) died during the follow-up primarily from progressive cancer (n = 28). At the last follow-up, most patients' Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 0 (38%) or 1 (41%). There was no difference in blood pressure, glucose or BMI from baseline to two years after treatment initiation. Body composition showed increased adiposity (p = 0.05), skeletal muscle mass (p = 0.03) and skeletal muscle gauge (p = 0.04). We observed chronic irAEs at the last follow-up including hypothyroidism (10.6%), arthritis (3.2%), adrenal insufficiency (3.2%) and neuropathy (2.8%). New diagnoses of type 2 diabetes (6.5%) and hypertension (6.0%) were observed, with uncertain relationship to anti-PD-1/PD-L1. Patient-reported outcomes compared favourably with cancer and general populations, although younger age (p = 0.003) and need for subsequent therapy (p = 0.03) were associated with worse HRQoL outcomes. CONCLUSION Durable responses to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy and favourable HRQoL outcomes are encouraging. Chronic events may be more common than previously thought although no clear chronic adverse cardiometabolic effects were observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Arissa C Young
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Henry Quach
- Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Grant R Williams
- Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Fei Ye
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Run Fan
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Leora Horn
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Kathryn E Beckermann
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Erin A Gillaspie
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Jeffrey A Sosman
- Department of Medicine, Robert H. Lurie Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Debra L Friedman
- Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Javid J Moslehi
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Douglas B Johnson
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Gutzmer R, Vordermark D, Hassel JC, Krex D, Wendl C, Schadendorf D, Sickmann T, Rieken S, Pukrop T, Höller C, Eigentler TK, Meier F. Melanoma brain metastases - Interdisciplinary management recommendations 2020. Cancer Treat Rev 2020; 89:102083. [PMID: 32736188 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2020.102083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2020] [Revised: 07/09/2020] [Accepted: 07/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Melanoma brain metastases (MBM) are common and associated with a particularly poor prognosis; they directly cause death in 60-70% of melanoma patients. In the past, systemic treatments have shown response rates around 5%, whole brain radiation as standard of care has achieved a median overall survival of approximately three months. Recently, the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors and combinations of MAP-kinase inhibitors both have shown very promising response rates of up to 55% and 58%, respectively, and improved survival. However, current clinical evidence is based on multi-cohort studies only, as prospectively randomized trials have been carried out rarely in MBM, independently whether investigating systemic therapy, radiotherapy or surgical techniques. Here, an interdisciplinary expert team reviewed the outcome of prospectively conducted clinical studies in MBM, identified evidence gaps and provided recommendations for the diagnosis, treatment, outcome evaluation and monitoring of MBM patients. The recommendations refer to four distinct scenarios: patients (i) with 'brain-only' disease, (ii) with oligometastatic asymptomatic intra- and extracranial disease, (iii) with multiple asymptomatic metastases, and (iv) with multiple symptomatic MBM or leptomeningeal disease. Changes in current management recommendations comprise the use of immunotherapy - preferably combined anti-CTLA-4/PD-1-immunotherapy - in asymptomatic MBM minus/plus stereotactic radiosurgery which remains the mainstay of local brain therapy being safe and effective. Adjuvant whole-brain radiotherapy provides no clinical benefit in oligometastatic MBM. Among the systemic therapies, combined MAPK-kinase inhibition provides, in BRAFV600-mutated patients with rapidly progressing or/and symptomatic MBM, an alternative to combined immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ralf Gutzmer
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Skin Cancer Center Hannover, Hannover Medical School, Germany.
| | - Dirk Vordermark
- Department for Radiation Oncology, Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
| | - Jessica C Hassel
- Skin Cancer Center, Department of Dermatology and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Dietmar Krex
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Christina Wendl
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Dirk Schadendorf
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Stefan Rieken
- Policlinic for Radiation Therapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Tobias Pukrop
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Christoph Höller
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Thomas K Eigentler
- Center for Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Friedegund Meier
- Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Centre and National Center for Tumor Diseases, Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Extent of surrounding edema does not correlate with acute complications after radiosurgery for melanoma brain metastases. J Neurooncol 2019; 145:581-585. [PMID: 31691060 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-019-03330-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2019] [Accepted: 10/31/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
AIM To assess whether extent of surrounding edema correlates with acute adverse clinical outcomes within 3 months after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for melanoma brain metastases (BM). METHODS Patients with melanoma BM treated with SRS were included in a single center retrospective analysis. A contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance image (MRI) brain was acquired on the day of treatment and used to calculate the volume of the largest lesion (the index BM) and total volume of all BM. Their corresponding volume of surrounding edema was defined based on the fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequence. After SRS, MRI was performed every 3 months for at least 2 years if the patient remained well enough to do so. Adverse neurologic events after SRS were defined using common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) version 5.0. Multivariate regression analyses assessed for associations between BM size and edema at baseline with increasing edema and neurologic adverse events within 3 months after SRS. RESULTS Mean volume of the index BM reduced from 2.2 to 0.5 cm3 at 3 months after SRS (p = 0.03). Mean volume of edema surrounding the index BM was 6.4 cm3 at baseline, 10.2 cm3 at 3 months and 5.5 cm3 at 6 months. There were 7/43 (16%) patients that experienced an adverse neurological event within 3 months (attributable to any cause) and 4/43 (9%) were associated with an increase in BM edema. On univariate and multivariate analyses, there were no correlations between any baseline factors and volume of edema at 3 months. However, SRS dose delivered and systemic therapy use within 4 weeks of SRS both correlated with a reduction in edema surrounding the index BM. CONCLUSION A transient increase in mean volume of edema was apparent at 3 months after SRS. However, this resolved by 6 months and did not correlate with adverse events or dexamethasone requirement. Thus, the clinical significance is uncertain.
Collapse
|
23
|
Di Giacomo AM, Valente M, Cerase A, Lofiego MF, Piazzini F, Calabrò L, Gambale E, Covre A, Maio M. Immunotherapy of brain metastases: breaking a "dogma". J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2019; 38:419. [PMID: 31623643 PMCID: PMC6798349 DOI: 10.1186/s13046-019-1426-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2019] [Accepted: 09/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Until very few years ago, the oncology community dogmatically excluded any clinical potential for immunotherapy in controlling brain metastases. Therefore, despite the significant therapeutic efficacy of monoclonal antibodies to immune check-point(s) across a wide range of tumor types, patients with brain disease were invariably excluded from clinical trials with these agents. Recent insights on the immune landscape of the central nervous system, as well as of the brain tumor microenvironment, are shedding light on the immune-biology of brain metastases.Interestingly, retrospective analyses, case series, and initial prospective clinical trials have recently investigated the role of different immune check-point inhibitors in brain metastases, reporting a significant clinical activity also in this subset of patients. These findings, and their swift translation in the daily practice, are driving fundamental changes in the clinical management of patients with brain metastases, and raise important neuroradiologic challenges. Along this line, neuro-oncology undoubtedly represents an additional area of active investigation and of growing interest to support medical oncologists in the evaluation of clinical responses of brain metastases to ICI treatment, and in the management of neurologic immune-related adverse events.Aim of this review is to summarize the most recent findings on brain metastases immunobiology, on the evolving scenario of clinical efficacy of ICI therapy in patients with brain metastases, as well as on the increasing relevance of neuroradiology in this therapeutic setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Maria Di Giacomo
- Department of Oncology, Center for Immuno-Oncology, Medical Oncology and Immunotherapy, University Hospital of Siena, Viale Bracci, 14, 53100 Siena, Italy
| | - Monica Valente
- Department of Oncology, Center for Immuno-Oncology, Medical Oncology and Immunotherapy, University Hospital of Siena, Viale Bracci, 14, 53100 Siena, Italy
| | - Alfonso Cerase
- Unit of Neuroradiology, University Hospital, Siena, Italy
| | - Maria Fortunata Lofiego
- Department of Oncology, Center for Immuno-Oncology, Medical Oncology and Immunotherapy, University Hospital of Siena, Viale Bracci, 14, 53100 Siena, Italy
| | - Francesca Piazzini
- Department of Oncology, Center for Immuno-Oncology, Medical Oncology and Immunotherapy, University Hospital of Siena, Viale Bracci, 14, 53100 Siena, Italy
| | - Luana Calabrò
- Department of Oncology, Center for Immuno-Oncology, Medical Oncology and Immunotherapy, University Hospital of Siena, Viale Bracci, 14, 53100 Siena, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Gambale
- Department of Oncology, Center for Immuno-Oncology, Medical Oncology and Immunotherapy, University Hospital of Siena, Viale Bracci, 14, 53100 Siena, Italy
| | - Alessia Covre
- Department of Oncology, Center for Immuno-Oncology, Medical Oncology and Immunotherapy, University Hospital of Siena, Viale Bracci, 14, 53100 Siena, Italy
| | - Michele Maio
- Department of Oncology, Center for Immuno-Oncology, Medical Oncology and Immunotherapy, University Hospital of Siena, Viale Bracci, 14, 53100 Siena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Schvartsman G, Ma J, Bassett RL, Haydu LE, Amaria RN, Hwu P, Wong MK, Hwu WJ, Diab A, Patel SP, Davies MA, Hamerschlak N, Tawbi HAH, Glitza Oliva IC. Incidence, patterns of progression, and outcomes of preexisting and newly discovered brain metastases during treatment with anti-PD-1 in patients with metastatic melanoma. Cancer 2019; 125:4193-4202. [PMID: 31398264 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2019] [Revised: 06/06/2019] [Accepted: 07/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Melanoma brain metastases (MBM) occur in up to 50% of patients with metastatic melanoma (MM) and represent a frequent site of systemic treatment failure for targeted therapies. However, to the authors' knowledge, little is known regarding the incidence, patterns of disease progression, and outcomes of MBM in patients treated with anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. METHODS A total of 320 patients with MM who were treated with anti-PD-1 at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston were reviewed. Analyses were performed to identify factors associated with brain metastasis-free survival and overall survival (OS) using Cox regression models. RESULTS The median age of the patients was 63.3 years. OS from the initiation of anti-PD-1 therapy was not significantly different between patients without MBM prior to anti-PD-1 compared with patients with prior MBM (P = .359). Among patients without prior MBM, 21 patients (8.6%) developed MBM during anti-PD-1 therapy, 12 of whom (4.9%) presented with disease progression in the central nervous system (CNS) only. Developing MBM during or after therapy with anti-PD-1 (hazard ratio, 4.70; 95% CI, 3.18-6.93) was associated with shorter OS. Among patients with MBM prior to anti-PD-1 treatment, 15 (20.0%) progressed in the CNS only and 19 (25.3%) progressed both intracranially and extracranially; at the time of the last data cutoff, 27 patients (36.0%) had not developed disease progression. Radiation necrosis occurred in 11.3% of patients (7 of 62 patients) in the group with a prior MBM who received stereotactic radiosurgery. CONCLUSIONS Anti-PD-1 therapy may change the natural history of patients with preexisting MBM. However, CNS failure during treatment with anti-PD-1 is predictive of a worse prognosis compared with extracranial progression. The results of the current study support the activity of anti-PD-1 in patients with MBM, although routine CNS imaging during therapy is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gustavo Schvartsman
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Albert Einstein Israeli Hospital, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Junsheng Ma
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Roland L Bassett
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Lauren E Haydu
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Rodabe Navroze Amaria
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Patrick Hwu
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Michael K Wong
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Wen-Jen Hwu
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Adi Diab
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Sapna Pradyuman Patel
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Michael A Davies
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Nelson Hamerschlak
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Albert Einstein Israeli Hospital, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Hussein Abdul-Hassan Tawbi
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Isabella C Glitza Oliva
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|