Comparison of Blue and White Lamp Light with Sunlight for Daylight-Mediated, 5-ALA Photodynamic Therapy, in vivo

Observational pilot study of multi-wavelength wearable light dosimetry for erythropoietic protoporphyria

BACKGROUND

Erythropoietic protoporphyria (EPP) causes painful light sensitivity, limiting quality of life. Our objective was to develop and validate a wearable light exposure device and correlate measurements with light sensitivity in EPP to predict and prevent symptoms.

METHODS

A wearable light dosimeter was developed to capture light doses of UVA, blue, and red wavelengths. A prospective observational pilot study was performed in which five EPP patients wore two light dosimeters for 3 weeks, one as a watch, and one as a shirt clip.

RESULTS

Standard deviation (SD) increases from the mean in the daily blue light dose increased the odds ratio (OR) for symptom risk more than the self-reported outdoor time (OR 2.76 vs. 2.38) or other wavelengths, and a one SD increase from the mean in the daily blue light wristband device dose increased the OR for symptom risk more than the daily blue light shirt clip (OR 2.45 vs. 1.62). The area under the receiver operator curve for the blue light wristband dose was 0.78, suggesting 78% predictive accuracy.

CONCLUSION

These data demonstrate that wearable blue light dosimetry worn as a wristband is a promising method for measuring light exposure and predicting and preventing symptoms in EPP.

Advanced Light Source Technologies for Photodynamic Therapy of Skin Cancer Lesions

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an increasingly popular dermatological treatment not only used for life-threatening skin conditions and other tumors but also for cosmetic purposes. PDT has negligible effects on underlying functional structures, enabling tissue regeneration feasibility. PDT uses a photosensitizer (PS) and visible light to create cytotoxic reactive oxygen species, which can damage cellular organelles and trigger cell death. The foundations of modern photodynamic therapy began in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, and in recent times, it has gained more attention due to the development of new sources and PSs. This review focuses on the latest advancements in light technology for PDT in treating skin cancer lesions. It discusses recent research and developments in light-emitting technologies, their potential benefits and drawbacks, and their implications for clinical practice. Finally, this review summarizes key findings and discusses their implications for the use of PDT in skin cancer treatment, highlighting the limitations of current approaches and providing insights into future research directions to improve both the efficacy and safety of PDT. This review aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of PDT for skin cancer treatment, covering various aspects ranging from the underlying mechanisms to the latest technological advancements in the field.

5-Aminolevrinic Acid Exhibits Dual Effects on Stemness in Human Sarcoma Cell Lines under Dark Conditions

5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) is used for tumor-targeting phototherapy because it is converted to protoporphyrin IX (PPIX) upon excitation and induces phototoxicity. However, the effect of ALA on malignant cells under unexcited conditions is unclear. This information is essential when administering ALA systemically. We used sarcoma cell lines that usually arise deep in the body and are rarely exposed to light to examine the effects of ALA treatment under light (daylight lamp irradiation) and dark (dark room) conditions. ALA-treated human SW872 liposarcoma cells and human MG63 osteosarcoma cells cultured under light exhibited growth suppression and increased oxidative stress, while cells cultured in the dark showed no change. However, sphere-forming ability increased in the dark, and the expression of stem-cell-related genes was induced in dark, but not light, conditions. ALA administration increased heme oxygenase 1 (HO-1) expression in both cell types; when carbon monoxide (CO), a metabolite of HO-1, was administered to sarcoma cells via carbon-monoxide-releasing molecule 2 (CORM2), it enhanced sphere-forming ability. We also compared the concentration of biliverdin (BVD) (a co-product of HO-1 activity alongside CO) with sphere-forming ability when HO-1 activity was inhibited using ZnPPIX in the dark. Both cell types showed a peak in sphere-forming ability at 60–80 μM BVD. Furthermore, a cell death inhibitor assay revealed that the HO-1-induced suppression of sphere formation was rescued by apoptosis or ferroptosis inhibitors. These findings suggest that in the absence of excitation, ALA promotes HO-1 expression and enhances the stemness of sarcoma cells, although excessive HO-1 upregulation induces apoptosis and ferroptosis. Our data indicate that systemic ALA administration induces both enhanced stemness and cell death in malignant cells located in dark environments deep in the body and highlight the need to pay attention to drug delivery and ALA concentrations during phototherapy.

Measurements of illuminance in simulated daylight photodynamic therapy

BACKGROUND

Simulated daylight photodynamic therapy (SDL-PDT) is a new treatment alternative for actinic keratosis. The aim of this study was to show how the illuminance that reaches the target skin area during SDL-PDT depends on the spatial positioning of the patient.

METHODS

In this technical validation study, illuminance from the SDL-PDT system IndoorLux© was measured at different angles, directions, and distances from the light sources corresponding to potential target skin areas. Using two different photometers, data from 63 measuring points at seven specific distances from the ceiling were collected at 0°, 45°, and 90° angles, respectively. Illuminance levels ≥12,000 lux were regarded as adequate. Hotspots were defined as adequate measurements in all directions at a specific measuring point at distances of 1.3, 1.5, and 1.8 m from the light sources (i.e., the most common patient treatment positions).

RESULTS

Adequate illuminance levels were more common with photometer 1 (73%) than photometer 2 (57%). Almost all illuminance levels were adequate at a 0° angle with both photometers. Adequate illuminance levels were observed at 82-93% of the measuring points at a 45° angle and 22-47% at a 90° angle. Hotspots were registered with both photometers at all measuring points at 0°; 59-79% of the measuring points at 45°; and 0-21% at 90°.

CONCLUSION

Patient positioning is important during SDL-PDT. Adequate illuminance is achieved if target skin areas are positioned at 0°-45° angles relative to the light sources, but not at 90° angles.

Light Technology for Efficient and Effective Photodynamic Therapy: A Critical Review

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a cancer treatment with strong potential over well-established standard therapies in certain cases. Non-ionising radiation, localisation, possible repeated treatments, and stimulation of immunological response are some of the main beneficial features of PDT. Despite the great potential, its application remains challenging. Limited light penetration depth, non-ideal photosensitisers, complex dosimetry, and complicated implementations in the clinic are some limiting factors hindering the extended use of PDT. To surpass actual technological paradigms, radically new sources, light-based devices, advanced photosensitisers, measurement devices, and innovative application strategies are under extensive investigation. The main aim of this review is to highlight the advantages/pitfalls, technical challenges and opportunities of PDT, with a focus on technologies for light activation of photosensitisers, such as light sources, delivery devices, and systems. In this vein, a broad overview of the current status of superficial, interstitial, and deep PDT modalities-and a critical review of light sources and their effects on the PDT process-are presented. Insight into the technical advancements and remaining challenges of optical sources and light devices is provided from a physical and bioengineering perspective.

Aloe-emodin-mediated antimicrobial photodynamic therapy against multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: An in vivo study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) has shown great potential for treatment of superficial or localized multidrug-resistant (MDR) Acinetobacter baumannii infections. The purpose of this study was to investigate the cytotoxicity and in vivo safety of aloe-emodin (AE), and its photodynamic treatment efficacy against MDR A. baumannii infections.

METHODS

The cytotoxicity (dark toxicity) and phototoxicity of AE to human immortalized keratinocytes and mice fibroblasts were detected by CCK-8 kit. Low and high doses of AE were intravenously injected into mice to evaluate the safety of AE in vivo. Bioluminescent MDR A. baumannii strain was employed to establish the infection model on BALB/c mice after skin scald, and infection status and therapeutic effect of AE-mediated aPDT were assessed by animal imaging system. The peripheral blood of mice was analyzed by flow cytometer.

RESULTS

AE had low cytotoxicity to human immortalized keratinocytes and mice fibroblasts, and had certain phototoxicity to these cells under light irradiation. The in vivo experiments demonstrated that AE caused no obvious effects on the weight and pathological changes of mice. AE-mediated aPDT was effective in the treatment of MDR A. baumannii caused infections in mice after skin scald.

CONCLUSIONS

AE has potential to be used in the photodynamic treatment of MDR A. baumannii caused superficial infections after scald.

Effect of Different Wavelengths of Laser Irradiation on the Skin Cells

The invention of systems enabling the emission of waves of a certain length and intensity has revolutionized many areas of life, including medicine. Currently, the use of devices emitting laser light is not only an indispensable but also a necessary element of many diagnostic procedures. It also contributed to the development of new techniques for the treatment of diseases that are difficult to heal. The use of lasers in industry and medicine may be associated with a higher incidence of excessive radiation exposure, which can lead to injury to the body. The most exposed to laser irradiation is the skin tissue. The low dose laser irradiation is currently used for the treatment of various skin diseases. Therefore appropriate knowledge of the effects of lasers irradiation on the dermal cells’ metabolism is necessary. Here we present current knowledge on the clinical and molecular effects of irradiation of different wavelengths of light (ultraviolet (UV), blue, green, red, and infrared (IR) on the dermal cells.

Theoretical and Experimental Analysis of Protoporphyrin IX Photodegradation Using Multi-Wavelength Light Sources

Photodynamic procedures have been used in many applications, ranging from cancer treatment to microorganism inactivation. Photodynamic reactions start with the activation of a photosensitizing molecule with light, leading to the production of cytotoxic molecules that promote cell death. However, establishing the correct light and photosensitizer dosimetry for a broadband light source remains challenging. In this study, we proposed a theoretical mathematical model for the photodegradation of protoporphyrin IX (PpIX), when irradiated by multi-wavelength light sources. The theoretical model predicts the experimental photobleaching (temporal change in PpIX concentration) of PpIX for different light sources. We showed that photobleaching occurs independently of the light source wavelengths but instead depends only on the number of absorbed photons. The model presented here can be used as an important mathematical approach to better understand current photodynamic therapy protocols and help achieve optimization of the doses delivered.

SmartPDT®: Smartphone enabled real-time dosimetry via satellite observation for daylight photodynamic therapy

BACKGROUND

Actinic keratosis (AK) affects one quarter of over 60  year olds in Europe with the risk of transforming into invasive squamous cell carcinoma. Daylight photodynamic therapy (dPDT) is an effective and patient preferred treatment that uses sunlight to clear AK. Currently, there is no standardised method for measuring the light received during treatment.

METHODS

SmartPDT® is a smartphone-based application and web-portal, developed by siHealth Ltd, enabling remote delivery of dPDT. It uses satellite imagery and computational algorithms to provide real-time determination of exposure to PpIX-effective solar radiation ("light dose"). The application also provides forecast of expected radiant exposures for 24- and 48-hs prior to the treatment period. Validation of the real-time and forecasted radiant exposure algorithms was performed against direct ground-based measurement under all weather conditions in Chilton, UK.

RESULTS

Agreement between direct ground measurements and satellite-determined radiant exposure for 2-h treatment was excellent at -0.1 % ± 5.1 % (mean ± standard deviation). There was also excellent agreement between weather forecasted radiant exposure and ground measurement, 1.8 % ± 17.7 % at 24-hs and 1.6 % ± 25.2 % at 48-hs. Relative Root Mean Square of the Error (RMSE_r) demonstrated that agreement improved as time to treatment reduced (RMSE_r = 22.5 % (48 -hs), 11.2 % (24-hs), 5.2 % (real-time)).

CONCLUSION

Agreement between satellite-determined, weather-forecasted and ground-measured radiant exposure was better than any existing published literature for dPDT. The SmartPDT® application and web-portal has excellent potential to assist with remote delivery of dPDT, an important factor in reducing risk in an elderly patient population during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Light Sources and Dosimetry Techniques for Photodynamic Therapy

Effective treatment delivery in photodynamic therapy (PDT) requires coordination of the light source, the photosensitizer, and the delivery device appropriate to the target tissue. Lasers, light-emitting diodes (LEDs), and lamps are the main types of light sources utilized for PDT applications. The choice of light source depends on the target location, photosensitizer used, and light dose to be delivered. Geometry of minimally accessible areas also plays a role in deciding light applicator type. Typically, optical fiber-based devices are used to deliver the treatment light close to the target. The optical properties of tissue also affect the distribution of the treatment light. Treatment light undergoes scattering and absorption in tissue. Most tissue will scatter light, but highly pigmented areas will absorb light, especially at short wavelengths. This review will summarize the basic physics of light sources, and describe methods for determining the dose delivered to the patient.

Weather-informed Light-tissue Model-Based Dose Planning for Indoor Daylight Photodynamic Therapy

Daylight activation for photodynamic therapy (PDT) of skin lesions is now widely adopted in many countries as a less painful and equally effective treatment mechanism, as compared to red or blue light activation. However, seasonal daylight availability and transient weather conditions complicate light dose estimations. A method is presented for dose planning without placing a large burden on clinical staff, by limiting spectral measurements to a one-time site assessment, and then using automatically acquired weather reports to track transient conditions. The site assessment tools are used to identify appropriate treatment locations for the annual and daily variations in sunlight exposure for clinical center planning. The spectral information collected from the site assessment can then be integrated with real-time daily electronic weather data. It was shown that a directly measured light exposure has strong correlation (R² : 0.87) with both satellite cloud coverage data and UV index, suggesting that the automated weather indexes can be surrogates for daylight PDT optical dose. These updated inputs can be used in a dose-planning treatment model to estimate photodynamic dose at depth in tissue. A simple standardized method for estimating light dose during daylight-PDT could help improve intersite reproducibility while minimizing treatment times.

Measuring Daylight: A Review of Dosimetry in Daylight Photodynamic Therapy

Successful daylight photodynamic therapy (DPDT) relies on the interaction of light, photosensitisers and oxygen. Therefore, the 'dose' of light that a patient receives during treatment is a clinically relevant quantity, with a minimum dose for effective treatment recommended in the literature. However, there are many different light measurement methods used in the published literature, which may lead to confusion surrounding reliable and traceable dose measurement in DPDT, and what the most appropriate method of light measurement in DPDT might be. Furthermore, for the majority of practitioners who do not carry out any formal dosimetry and for the patients receiving DPDT, building confidence in the evidence supporting this important treatment option is of key importance. This review seeks to clarify the methodology of DPDT and discusses the literature relating to DPDT dosimetry.

A regimen to minimize pain during blue light photodynamic therapy of actinic keratoses: Bilaterally controlled, randomized trial of simultaneous versus conventional illumination

BACKGROUND

Blue light photodynamic therapy (PDT) is effective for actinic keratosis, but many patients experience stinging pain during illumination.

OBJECTIVE

To compare a conventional regimen (1 hour of 5-aminolevulinic acid [ALA] preincubation, followed by blue light) versus a new modified regimen in which blue light is started immediately after ALA application.

METHODS

A clinical trial with a bilaterally controlled, intrapatient study design was conducted with 23 patients. Topical 20% ALA was applied to the entire face and/or scalp. On 1 side of the body, blue light was started immediately and continued for either 30, 45, or 60 minutes (simultaneous PDT). On the contralateral side, the blue light began 1 hour after ALA application and lasted 1000 seconds (conventional PDT). Pain was evaluated on a scale from 0 to 10. Actinic keratosis lesion counts were determined by clinical examination and photography.

RESULTS

All patients experienced significantly less pain during simultaneous illumination than during the conventional regimen. At 3 months after treatment, lesion clearance was nearly identical on the 2 sides, as determined by statistical testing of noninferiority ± 15% margin.

LIMITATIONS

Although bilaterally controlled, the study was relatively small. Additional studies are recommended.

CONCLUSION

The modified PDT regimen is essentially painless, yet it provides treatment efficacy similar to a conventional regimen.

Updates on Treatment Approaches for Cutaneous Field Cancerization

Purpose of Review

Field cancerization describes the phenomenon that multiple heterogenous mutations may arise in an area exposed to chronic carcinogenic stimuli. Advances in the understanding of cutaneous field cancerization have led to novel therapeutic approaches to the management of actinic keratoses (AKs). Herein, we review the literature on the pathophysiology and emerging research of field cancerization in dermatology.

Recent Findings

The classification systems for grading AK lesions are being refined with investigations focusing on their clinical utility. There is a growing shift towards field-directed treatment for AKs as the importance of field cancerization becomes clearer. Current field-directed therapies are being optimized and novel therapeutic modalities are being studied.

Summary

Field cancerization underlies the transformation of photodamaged skin into AKs and potentially cutaneous SCC (cSCC). Clinically meaningful classification systems for AKs are needed to better inform decisions regarding treatment. As we learn more about the role of field characterization in photodamage, AKs and cSCCs, therapeutic strategies are becoming more field-directed rather than lesion-directed.

Preclinical Evaluation of White Led-Activated Non-porphyrinic Photosensitizer OR141 in 3D Tumor Spheroids and Mouse Skin Lesions

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is used to treat malignancies and precancerous lesions. Near-infrared light delivered by lasers was thought for a while to be the most appropriate option to activate photosensitizers, mostly porphyrins, in the depth of the diseased tissues. More recently, however, several advantages including low cost and reduced adverse effects led to consider light emitting diodes (LED) and even daylight as an alternative to use PDT to treat accessible lesions. In this study we examined the capacity of OR141, a recently identified non-porphyrin photosensitizer (PS), to exert significant cytotoxic effects in various models of skin lesions and tumors upon white light activation. Using different cancer cell lines, we first identified LED lamp as a particularly suited source of light to maximize anti-proliferative effects of OR141. We then documented that OR141 diffusion and light penetration into tumor spheroids both reached thresholds compatible with the induction of cell death deep inside these 3D culture models. We further identified Arlasove as a clinically suitable solvent for OR141 that we documented by using Franz cells to support significant absorption of the PS through human skin. Finally, using topical but also systemic administration, we validated growth inhibitory effects of LED-activated OR141 in mouse skin tumor xenograft and precancerous lesions models. Altogether these results open clinical perspectives for the use of OR141 as an attractive PS to treat superficial skin malignant and non-malignant lesions using affordable LED lamp for photoactivation.