A comparison of two centrifuge techniques for constructing vulnerability curves: insight into the 'open-vessel' artifact

Modeling and Analyzing Xylem Vulnerability to Embolism as an Epidemic Process

Xylem vulnerability to embolism can be quantified by "vulnerability curves" (VC) that are obtained by subjecting wood samples to increasingly negative water potential and monitoring the progressive loss of hydraulic conductivity. VC are typically sigmoidal, and various approaches are used to fit the experimentally obtained VC data for extracting benchmark data of vulnerability to embolism. In addition to such empirical methods, mechanistic approaches to calculate embolism propagation are epidemic modeling and network theory. Both describe the transmission of "objects" (in this case, the transmission of gas) between interconnected elements. In network theory, a population of interconnected elements is described by graphs in which objects are represented by vertices or nodes and connections between these objections as edges linking the vertices. A graph showing a population of interconnected xylem conduits represents an "individual" wood sample that allows spatial tracking of embolism propagation. In contrast, in epidemic modeling, the transmission dynamics for a population that is subdivided into infection-relevant groups is calculated by an equation system. For this, embolized conduits are considered to be "infected," and the "infection" is the transmission of gas from embolized conduits to their still water-filled neighbors. Both approaches allow for a mechanistic simulation of embolism propagation.

Cropping systems alter hydraulic traits of barley but not pea grown in mixture

Extreme events such as drought and heatwaves are among the biggest challenges to agricultural production and food security. However, the effects of cropping systems on drought resistance of arable crops via their hydraulic behaviour remain unclear. We investigated how hydraulic traits of a field-grown pea-barley (Pisum sativum L. and Hordeum vulgare L.) mixture were affected by different cropping systems, that is, organic and conventional farming with intensive or conservation tillage. Xylem vulnerability to cavitation of both species was estimated by measuring the pressure inducing 50% loss of hydraulic conductivity (P50 ), while the water stress plants experienced in the field were assessed using native percentage loss of hydraulic conductivity (nPLC). Pea and barley showed contrasting hydraulic behaviours: pea was less vulnerable to xylem cavitation and less stressed than barley; cropping systems affected the xylem vulnerability of barley, but not of pea. Barley grown under conventional farming with no tillage was more vulnerable and stressed than under organic farming with intensive tillage. nPLC proved to be a valuable indicator for plant water stress. Our results highlight the impact of cropping systems on crop xylem vulnerability and drought resistance, thus plant hydraulic traits, for protecting food security under future climate.

What causes the differences in cavitation resistance of two shrubs? Wood anatomical explanations and reliability testing of vulnerability curves

Relationships between xylem anatomical traits and cavitation resistance have always been a major content of plant hydraulics. To know how plants cope with drought, it is extremely important to acquire detailed knowledge about xylem anatomical traits and assess the cavitation resistance accurately. This study aims to increase our knowledge in the methods determining cavitation resistance and xylem anatomical traits. We selected a semi-ring-porous species, Hippophae rhamnoides L., and a diffuse-porous species, Corylus heterophylla F., to clarify the reasons for the difference in cavitation resistance based on detailed xylem anatomical traits and reliable vulnerability curves (VCs). Both Cavitron and bench dehydration (BD) were used to construct VCs. Xylem anatomical traits, including pit membrane ultrastructure of these two species, were determined. The VCs obtained by the two different techniques were of different types for H. rhamnoides, its Cavitron VCs might be unreliable because of open-vessel artifacts. On the basis of BD VCs, H. rhamnoides showed higher cavitation resistance than C. heterophylla, and this is attributed to its low vessel connectivity as well as non-porous and thicker pit membranes.