Association of BK viremia with human leukocyte antigen mismatches and acute rejection, but not with type of calcineurin inhibitor

The Second International Consensus Guidelines on the Management of BK Polyomavirus in Kidney Transplantation

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) remains a significant challenge after kidney transplantation. International experts reviewed current evidence and updated recommendations according to Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE). Risk factors for BKPyV-DNAemia and biopsy-proven BKPyV-nephropathy include recipient older age, male sex, donor BKPyV-viruria, BKPyV-seropositive donor/-seronegative recipient, tacrolimus, acute rejection, and higher steroid exposure. To facilitate early intervention with limited allograft damage, all kidney transplant recipients should be screened monthly for plasma BKPyV-DNAemia loads until month 9, then every 3 mo until 2 y posttransplant (3 y for children). In resource-limited settings, urine cytology screening at similar time points can exclude BKPyV-nephropathy, and testing for plasma BKPyV-DNAemia when decoy cells are detectable. For patients with BKPyV-DNAemia loads persisting >1000 copies/mL, or exceeding 10 000 copies/mL (or equivalent), or with biopsy-proven BKPyV-nephropathy, immunosuppression should be reduced according to predefined steps targeting antiproliferative drugs, calcineurin inhibitors, or both. In adults without graft dysfunction, kidney allograft biopsy is not required unless the immunological risk is high. For children with persisting BKPyV-DNAemia, allograft biopsy may be considered even without graft dysfunction. Allograft biopsies should be interpreted in the context of all clinical and laboratory findings, including plasma BKPyV-DNAemia. Immunohistochemistry is preferred for diagnosing biopsy-proven BKPyV-nephropathy. Routine screening using the proposed strategies is cost-effective, improves clinical outcomes and quality of life. Kidney retransplantation subsequent to BKPyV-nephropathy is feasible in otherwise eligible recipients if BKPyV-DNAemia is undetectable; routine graft nephrectomy is not recommended. Current studies do not support the usage of leflunomide, cidofovir, quinolones, or IVIGs. Patients considered for experimental treatments (antivirals, vaccines, neutralizing antibodies, and adoptive T cells) should be enrolled in clinical trials.

Incidence, risk factors, outcomes, and clinical management of BK viremia in the modern era of kidney transplantation

BK viremia is endemic among kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). Incidence, risk factors, outcomes, and clinical management of detectable versus high BK viremia have not been considered previously in KTR in the modern era. This observational study examined KTR transplanted between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2016. Any BK viral load in the serum constituted detectable BK viremia and ≥10³ copies/ml constituted high viremia. Among 1193 KTRs, the cumulative probability of developing detectable and high BK viremia within 2 years posttransplant were 27.8% and 19.6%, respectively. Significant risk factors for detectable BK viremia included recipient age (HR 1.02 [95% CI: 1.01, 1.03]) and donor age (HR 1.01 [95% CI: 1.00, 1.02]). Recipient age also predicted high BK viremia (HR 1.02 [95% CI: 1.01, 1.03]), whereas White race (HR 0.70 [95% CI: 0.52, 0.95]), nondepleting induction therapy (HR 0.61 [95% CI: 0.42, 0.89]), and delayed graft function (HR 0.61 [95% CI: 0.42, 0.88]) were protective. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rates were 4.28 ml/min/1.72 m² (95% CI: 2.71, 5.84) lower with detectable BK viremia. Although low viral load was usually not acted upon at first presentation, antiproliferative dose reductions were the most common initial management. BK viremia remains a common early complication in a modern cohort of KTRs. These findings highlight the benefit of early BKV monitoring in addition to intensive clinical management. Clinical responses beyond first positive BK viremia tests, and their implications for graft outcomes, merit further investigation.

Dynamic risk prediction of BK polyomavirus reactivation after renal transplantation

Purpose

To construct a dynamic prediction model for BK polyomavirus (BKV) reactivation during the early period after renal transplantation and to provide a statistical basis for the identification of and intervention for high-risk populations.

Methods

A retrospective study of 312 first renal allograft recipients was conducted between January 2015 and March 2022. The covariates were screened using univariable time-dependent Cox regression, and those with P<0.1 were included in the dynamic and static analyses. We constructed a prediction model for BKV reactivation from 2.5 to 8.5 months after renal transplantation using dynamic Cox regression based on the landmarking method and evaluated its performance using the area under the curve (AUC) value and Brier score. Monte-Carlo cross-validation was done to avoid overfitting. The above evaluation and validation process were repeated in the static model (Cox regression model) to compare the performance. Two patients were presented to illustrate the application of the dynamic model.

Results

We constructed a dynamic prediction model with 18 covariates that could predict the probability of BKV reactivation from 2.5 to 8.5 months after renal transplantation. Elder age, basiliximab combined with cyclophosphamide for immune induction, acute graft rejection, higher body mass index, estimated glomerular filtration rate, urinary protein level, urinary leukocyte level, and blood neutrophil count were positively correlated with BKV reactivation, whereas male sex, higher serum albumin level, and platelet count served as protective factors. The AUC value and Brier score of the static model were 0.64 and 0.14, respectively, whereas those of the dynamic model were 0.79 ± 0.05 and 0.08 ± 0.01, respectively. In the cross-validation, the AUC values of the static and dynamic models decreased to 0.63 and 0.70 ± 0.03, respectively, whereas the Brier score changed to 0.11 and 0.09 ± 0.01, respectively.

Conclusion

Dynamic Cox regression based on the landmarking method is effective in the assessment of the risk of BKV reactivation in the early period after renal transplantation and serves as a guide for clinical intervention.

BK Polyomavirus Infection and Risk Factors in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Kidney Transplant

OBJECTIVES

BK polyomavirus infection is a critical complication affecting graft survival after kidney transplant. We aimed to determine the frequency, the effect on graft function, and the risk factors of BK polyomavirus infection in pediatric kidney transplant patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed data of 144 pediatric patients (female/male: 67/77; 0-18 years of age) who received kidney transplants in the past 10 years at our center. Demographic/ laboratory data, kidney failure etiologies, donor types, and immunosuppressive treatments were recorded. Patients were grouped as those with and without BKV infection, with groups compared in terms of transplant age, sex, kidney failure etiology, donor type, immunosuppressive treatments, presence of ureteral stents, acute rejection episodes, accompanying viral infections, glomerular filtration rate, and graft loss rate.

RESULTS

Twelve patients (8.3%) had BK polyomavirus infection. All 12 patients had viruria (8.3%), 8 (5.5%) had viremia, and 4 (2.8%) had BK polyomavirus nephropathy. Two patients (1.4%) had graft loss because of BK polyomavirus nephropathy. When patients with and without infection were compared, no significant differences were found in terms of sex, transplant age, donor type, presence of a ureteral stent, acute rejection, graft loss, or immunosuppressive treatment (P > .05). Rates of congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract were 30.3% and 66.6% in those without and with BK polyomavirus infection, respectively (P < .05). The group positive for BK polyomavirus had a significantly higher incidence of cytomegalovirus infection versus the group without infection (P < .05). Glomerular filtration rate values at years 1 and 3 were similar between groups (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Frequency of BK polyomavirus nephropathy in pediatric patients undergoing kidney transplant in our center was consistent with data from other centers. Graft loss can be prevented by early detection and treatment through close periodic control and adequate evaluation of risk factors.

Polyoma BK Virus in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Screening, Monitoring, and Management

Polyomavirus BK virus (BKPyV) infection is an important complication of kidney transplantation and allograft failure. The prevalence of viremia is 10%-15%, compared with BK-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) at 3%-5%. Given that there are no effective antiviral prophylaxis or treatment strategies for BKPyVAN, active screening to detect BKPyV viremia is recommended, particularly during the early posttransplant period. Immunosuppression reduction to allow viral clearance may avoid progression to severe and irreversible allograft damage. The frequency and duration of screening are highly variable between transplant centers because the evidence is reliant largely on observational data. While the primary treatment goals center on achieving viral clearance through immunosuppression reduction, prevention of subsequent acute rejection, premature graft loss, and return to dialysis remain as major challenges. Treatment strategies for BKPyV infection should be individualized to the recipient's underlying immunological risk and severity of the allograft infection. Efficacy data for adjuvant therapies including intravenous immunoglobulin and cidofovir are sparse. Future well-powered and high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to inform evidence-based clinical practice for the management of BKPy infection.

Risk factors and outcomes of BK viremia among deceased donor kidney transplant recipients based on donor characteristics

INTRODUCTION

BK polyomavirus (BKV) is a common infection among kidney transplant recipients (KTR). Risk factors and outcomes based on donor characteristics remain largely unknown.

METHODS

In this study, we aimed to analyze the impact of donor factors through a paired kidney analysis. We included 289 pairs of adult deceased donor transplants (578 KTRs total); each pair had received kidneys from the same donor. Recipient pairs were divided into three groups: "no BK group" if neither KTR developed BK viremia (n = 336), "discordant" if the only one did (n = 176), and "concordant" if both did (n = 66). Acute rejection (AR), graft failure, and BK nephropathy (BKN) were outcomes of interest.

RESULTS

Donors in the concordant group were younger, had lower kidney donor profile index (KDPI), and were less likely to be donor after circulatory death (DCD). In multivariate analyses, KTRs who had a donor with a higher body mass index (BMI) (hazard ratio (HR): 0.97; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.95-0.99; p = .009) were less likely to develop BKV. Concordance was not associated with AR (HR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.51-1.34; p = .45), graft failure (HR: 1.77; 95% CI: 0.42-7.50; p = .43), or BKN (HR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.51-2.03; p = .96).

DISCUSSION

Our study suggests lower donor BMI is associated with BKV infection, and concordance or discordance between paired kidney recipients is not associated with poor outcomes.

Investigation of the Relationship Between BK Virus and Human Leukocyte Antigens in Kidney Transplant Recipients

OBJECTIVES

The main function of HLA is to present antigens to lymphocytes and to initiate specific immune responses. Autoimmune, viral, allergic, and neurologic diseases have been found to be related to HLA molecules. In renal transplant, the main target of the recipient's immune system is the HLA molecules on the surface of donor cells. HLA also plays a role in the development of an immune response to viral infections. After renal transplant, BK virus infections may occur due to immunosuppression. Here, we investigated the relationship between HLA and BK virus in renal transplant recipients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study investigated HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-DR tissue typing before renal transplant. DNA was isolated from whole blood, and tissue typing tests were performed based on polymerase chain reaction. Patients were tested for BK virus posttransplant using DNA isolated from urine and/or plasma samples.

RESULTS

We found HLA-B*13 allele to be a protective factor (P < .049; odds ratio: 0.131; 95% confidence interval, 0.017-1.029) and HLA-DRB1*03 allele to be a possible risk factor (P < .029; odds ratio: 2.521; 95% confidence interval, 1.157-5.490) against BK virus. No significant relationships were found between BK virus and age, sex, donor type, and HLA mismatch.

CONCLUSIONS

HLA class I molecules are known to be effective against viruses with the help of cytotoxic T cells. HLA-B*13 alleles within the HLA class I molecules were identified as protective factors against BK virus. HLA class II is associated with CD4-positive T cells that help secrete immune system cytokines, playing a role in stimulating and suppressing the immune system. We demonstrated that HLA-DRB1*03 allele could be a risk factor against BK virus. This allele may be associated with immunomodulatory cytokine secretion of the immune system.

Usefulness of BK virus-specific interferon-γ enzyme-linked immunospot assay for predicting the outcome of BK virus infection in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND/AIMS

To investigate if BK virus (BKV)-specific T cell immunity measured by an interferon-γ enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assay can predict the outcome of BK virus infection in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs).

METHODS

We included 68 KTRs with different viremia status (no viremia [n = 17], BK viremia [n = 27], and cleared viremia [n = 24]) and 44 healthy controls (HCs). The BK viremia group was divided into controller (< 3 months) and noncontroller (> 3 months) according to sustained duration of BKV infection. We compared BKV-ELISPOT results against five BKV peptides (large tumor antigen [LT], St, VP1-3).

RESULTS

BKV-ELISPOT results were higher in three KTRs groups with different BKV infection status than the HCs group (p < 0.05). In KTR groups, they were higher in cleared viremia group than no viremia or BK viremia group. Within the BK viremia group, controller group had higher LT-ELISPOT results compared to noncontroller group (p = 0.032). Also, KTRs without BK virus-associated nephropathy (BKVN) had higher LT, St, VP1, and VP2-ELISPOT results than those with BKVN (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

BKV-ELISPOT assay may be effective in predicting clinical outcomes of BKV infection in terms of clearance of BK virus and development of BKVN.

The Role of HLA and KIR Immunogenetics in BK Virus Infection after Kidney Transplantation

BK virus (BKV) is a polyomavirus with high seroprevalence in the general population with an unremarkable clinical presentation in healthy people, but a potential for causing serious complications in immunosuppressed transplanted patients. Reactivation or primary infection in kidney allograft recipients may lead to allograft dysfunction and subsequent loss. Currently, there is no widely accepted specific treatment for BKV infection and reduction of immunosuppressive therapy is the mainstay therapy. Given this and the sequential appearance of viruria-viremia-nephropathy, screening and early detection are of utmost importance. There are numerous risk factors associated with BKV infection including genetic factors, among them human leukocyte antigens (HLA) and killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIR) alleles have been shown to be the strongest so far. Identification of patients at risk for BKV infection would be useful in prevention or early action to reduce morbidity and progression to frank nephropathy. Assessment of risk involving HLA ligands and KIR genotyping of recipients in the pre-transplant or early post-transplant period might be useful in clinical practice. This review summarizes current knowledge of the association between HLA, KIR and BKV infection and potential future directions of research, which might lead to optimal utilization of these genetic markers.

Impact of human leukocyte antigen and calculated panel reactive antibody on BK viremia in kidney transplant recipients: A single-center experience and literature review

BACKGROUND

The aim of this retrospective analysis was to investigate the effect of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) and calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) on BK virus activation as evidenced by BK viremia (BKV).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

At our institution, 649 kidney transplant patients were screened for BKV from 2009 to 2017. Patients were considered to have BKV if they had >10 000 copies/mL of BK DNA in their blood. Donor and recipient HLA and cPRA, demographic, clinical and laboratory data, as well as immunosuppressive medications were collected.

RESULTS

We identified 122 BK positive and 527 BK negative patients. Only 25% of the patients had cPRA of 20% or more, and 64% had more than three HLA-A, -B, and -DR mismatches. In both univariate and multivariate analyses, male gender, age, and maintenance of steroid therapy significantly increased the risk of BKV (P = 0.005, 0.005 and <0.001, respectively). The degree of cPRA and the individual HLA allele and HLA allele matching did not significantly affect BKV.

CONCLUSION

Neither the degree of HLA mismatching nor cPRA appears to affect BKV. Moreover, no specific HLA allele, HLA allele matching, or cPRA were associated with BKV.

BK polyomavirus viremia and antibody responses of pediatric kidney transplant recipients in Finland

BACKGROUND

BKPyV is an important cause of premature graft failure after KT. Most clinical studies describe BKPyV infection in adult KT patients. We studied the prevalence of post-transplant BKPyV viremia, serology, and graft function in pediatric KT recipients.

METHODS

Forty-six pediatric patients transplanted between 2009 and 2014 were followed up for BKPyV DNAemia by plasma PCR for median 2.3 (range: 1-6) years. BKPyV-specific antibodies were retrospectively analyzed using virus-like particle ELISA. GFR was measured annually by ⁵¹ Cr-EDTA clearance, and serum samples were screened for DSAs by Luminex assay.

RESULTS

BKPyV viremia was demonstrated in nine patients at a median of 6 months post-KT. Early BKPyV viremia at 3 months post-KT associated with decreased concomitant GFR and tendency for decreased subsequent graft function. Three of nine patients with BKPyV viremia developed DSA, all against class II antigens. PyVAN developed to four patients and responded to judicious reduction in IS. One graft was lost later due to ABMR. BKPyV-IgG was found in 18 of 31 patients (58%) tested at transplantation, and seven recipients seroconverted after transplantation with a significant increase in IgG levels with IgM. Finally, BKPyV-IgG was detectable in 31 of 40 patients (78%) at the end of the study.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-transplant BKPyV viremia in pediatric KT patients may alter graft function and contribute to progression of chronic allograft injury. BKPyV-IgG predicts past exposure. Low or absent BKPyV-specific antibody levels were seen pretransplant in 42% of tested patients, but were not predictive of prolonged replication or poor outcome.

Risk factors for BK virus viremia and nephropathy after kidney transplantation: A systematic review

In the last 20 years, the management of BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) reactivation in kidney transplant patients has become a true challenge for the transplant community. The only treatment option is based on the early identification of at-risk patients. The number of reported risk factors for BKPyV reactivation has increased markedly in the literature last years, although they are sometimes in an unclear or contradictory manner. Our purpose is to provide a systematic review and meta-analysis of risk factors for BKPyV viremia and nephropathy described in multivariate analyses. The PubMed database was searched for prospective or prospectively-based observational studies on risk factors for BKPyV viremia and/or nephropathy. Our qualitative assessment of risk factors was based on the odds ratios and hazard ratios calculated in multivariate regression analyses. Of the 241 publications screened, 34 were included in the qualitative analysis. In all, 144 and 19 distinct factors were analyzed for BKPyV viremia and for BKPyV nephropathy, respectively. Our evaluation highlighted eight risk factors for BKPyV viremia: a tacrolimus regimen, a deceased donor, a male recipient, a history of previous transplant, age at transplantation, ureteral stent use, delayed graft function, and acute rejection episodes increased the risk of BKV viremia to varying extents. Tacrolimus and acute rejection episodes were also associated with a higher incidence of BKPyV nephropathy. BKPyV reactivation is a serious complication after renal transplantation. With a view to combating this problem, existing data should be published in full, and new prospective international multicenter studies should be performed.

Kidney transplant recipients with polycystic kidney disease have a lower risk of post-transplant BK infection than those with end-stage renal disease due to other causes

BACKGROUND

Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy is associated with high risk of kidney allograft loss. Whether the cause of native end-stage renal disease influences the risk of BK infection is unclear.

METHODS

A retrospective, single-center study of 2741 adult kidney transplant recipients between 1994 and 2014 was performed. Recipients had end-stage renal disease due to polycystic kidney disease (PKD, n = 549), diabetes mellitus (DM, n = 947), hypertension (HTN, n = 442), or glomerulonephritis (GN, n = 803).

RESULTS

A total of 327 recipients (12%) developed post-transplant BK viremia over a median follow-up time of 5 years. The incidence rate of BK viremia was lowest in patients with PKD (1.46 per 100 person-years) compared to other causes of ESRD (DM = 2.06, HTN = 2.65, and GN = 2.01 per 100 person-years). A diagnosis of PKD was associated with a lower risk of post-transplant BK viremia (adjusted HR (95% CI) = 0.67 (0.48-0.95), P = 0.02). BK nephropathy was significantly less common in patients with PKD (0.21 per 100 person-years) compared to those with HTN (0.80 per 100 person-years, P ≤ 0.001). Among patients with PKD, the risk of BK viremia was lower in patients with nephrectomy, compared to those without nephrectomy (adjusted HR (95% CI) = 0.42 (0.19-0.92), P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

ESRD due to PKD is associated with a lower risk of post-transplant BK infection. The renal tubular epithelial cells in PKD are unique; they are in a proliferative but non-differentiated state. Whether this characteristic of renal tubular epithelial cells alters the BK viral reservoir or replication in PKD patients warrants further study.

Torque Teno Virus Load-Inverse Association With Antibody-Mediated Rejection After Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) represents one of the cardinal causes of late allograft loss after kidney transplantation, and there is great need for noninvasive tools improving early diagnosis of this rejection type. One promising strategy might be the quantification of peripheral blood DNA levels of the highly prevalent and apathogenic Torque Teno virus (TTV), which might mirror the overall level of immunosuppression and thus help determine the risk of alloimmune response.

METHODS

To assess the association between TTV load in the peripheral blood and AMR, 715 kidney transplant recipients (median, 6.3 years posttransplantation) were subjected to a systematical cross-sectional AMR screening and, in parallel, TTV quantification.

RESULTS

Eighty-six of these recipients had donor-specific antibodies and underwent protocol biopsy, AMR-positive patients (n = 46) showed only 25% of the TTV levels measured in patients without AMR (P = 0.003). In a generalized linear model, higher TTV levels were associated with a decreased risk for AMR after adjustment for potential confounders (risk ratio 0.94 per TTV log level; 95% confidence interval 0.90-0.99; P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Future studies will have to clarify whether longitudinal assessment of TTV load might predict AMR risk and help guide the type and intensity of immunosuppression to prevent antibody-mediated graft injury.

Incidence, risk factors and the effect of polyomavirus infection in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients

Objective The effect of polyomavirus infection in HSCT recipients is poorly understood. Methods We evaluated 38 HSCT recipients. Polyomavirus was detected by nested qualitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays of urine. The risk factors for BK virus and JC virus were analysed. The kidney and liver functions of infected and uninfected patients were compared. Results BK virus, JC virus, and simian virus 40 were detected in 21%, 42%, and 0% of HSCT recipients respectively. HCMV infection was found to be an independent risk factor for JC virus infection (odds ratio (OR): 8.528), while transplants with mismatched HLA are more susceptible to BK virus infection (OR: 12.000). Liver function of JC virus-infected subjects was worse than that of uninfected subjects. Conclusion We must be vigilant for opportunistic polyomavirus infections in HSCT recipients, especially those with HCMV co-infection or a mismatched HLA transplant. When unexplained liver function deterioration is observed, JC virus infection should be considered.

Pretransplantation Donor-Recipient Pair Seroreactivity Against BK Polyomavirus Predicts Viremia and Nephropathy After Kidney Transplantation

Kidney transplant donors are not currently implicated in predicting BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) infection in kidney transplant recipients. It has been postulated, however, that BKPyV infection originates from the kidney allograft. Because BKPyV seroreactivity correlates with BKPyV replication and thus might mirror the infectious load, we investigated whether BKPyV seroreactivity of the donor predicts viremia and BKPyV-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) in the recipient. In a retrospective cohort of 407 living kidney donor-recipient pairs, pretransplantation donor and recipient sera were tested for BKPyV IgG levels and correlated with the occurrence of recipient BKPyV viremia and BKPyVAN within 1 year after transplantation. Donor BKPyV IgG level was strongly associated with BKPyV viremia and BKPyVAN (p < 0.001), whereas recipient BKPyV seroreactivity showed a nonsignificant inverse trend. Pairing of high-BKPyV-seroreactive donors with low-seroreactive recipients resulted in a 10-fold increased risk of BKPyV viremia (hazard ratio 10.1, 95% CI 3.5-29.0, p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, donor BKPyV seroreactivity was the strongest pretransplantation factor associated with viremia (p < 0.001) and BKPyVAN (p = 0.007). The proportional relationship between donor BKPyV seroreactivity and recipient infection suggests that donor BKPyV seroreactivity reflects the infectious load of the kidney allograft and calls for the use of pretransplantation BKPyV serological testing of (potential) donors and recipients.

Outcomes of renal transplant recipients with BK virus infection and BK virus surveillance in the Auckland region from 2006 to 2012

AIM

To evaluate incidence, risk factors and treatment outcome of BK polyomavirus nephropathy (BKVN) in a cohort of renal transplant recipients in the Auckland region without a formal BK polyomavirus (BKV) surveillance programme.

METHODS

A cohort of 226 patients who received their renal transplants from 2006 to 2012 was retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Seventy-six recipients (33.6%) had a BK viral load (BKVL) test and 9 patients (3.9%) developed BKVN. Cold ischaemia time (HR = 1.18, 95%CI: 1.04-1.35) was found to be a risk factor for BKVN. Four recipients with BKVN had complete resolution of their BKV infection; 1 recipient had BKVL less than 625 copies/mL; 3 recipients had BKVL more than 1000 copies/mL and 1 had graft failure from BKVN. BKVN has a negative impact on graft function [median estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 22.5 (IQR 18.5-53.0) mL/min per 1.73 m², P = 0.015), but no statistically significant difference (P = 0.374) in renal allograft function was found among negative BK viraemia group [median eGFR 60.0 (IQR 48.5-74.2) mL/min per 1.73 m²), positive BK viraemia without BKVN group [median eGFR 55.0 (IQR 47.0-76.0) mL/min per 1.73 m²] and unknown BKV status group [median eGFR 54.0 (IQR 43.8-71.0) mL/min per 1.73 m²]. The incidence and treatment outcomes of BKVN were similar to some centres with BKV surveillance programmes.

CONCLUSION

Recipients with BVKN have poorer graft function. Although active surveillance for BKV has been shown to be effective in reducing incidence of BKVN, it should be tailored specifically to that transplant centre based on its epidemiology and outcomes of BKVN, particularly in centres with limited resources.

Viral Origin, Clinical Course, and Renal Outcomes in Patients With BK Virus Infection After Living-Donor Renal Transplantation

BACKGROUND

BK virus (BKV) nephropathy remains the main cause of renal graft loss after living-donor renal transplantation. The aim of the study was to investigate the source and factors influencing the course of BKV infection.

METHODS

We investigated 214 living donor-recipient pairs. Urine and blood of donors and recipients were tested by qPCR for the presence of BKV DNA before and after transplantation; genotyping of BKV subtypes was performed.

RESULTS

Eighty-five recipients (40%) had posttransplant BK viruria including 61 with additional viremia and 22 with nephropathy. Pretransplant urinary BKV shedding of donor or recipient was a significant risk factor for posttransplant viruria and viremia (OR, 4.52; CI, 2.33-8.77; P < 0.0001) and nephropathy (OR, 3.03; CI, 1.16-7.9; P = 0.02). In the BKV nephropathy group, urine and blood became BKV positive earlier than in the group with viruria and viremia. Renal function was worse in BKV-nephropathy compared with BKV-negative patients beginning at transplantation. Comparing BKV subtypes of donor and recipient before with the subtype of the infected recipient after transplantation, donor-derived transmission was identified in 24 of 28 corresponding pairs. BKV subtype IV had a higher prevalence in recipients with BKV nephropathy than in those with viruria and viremia (P = 0.045).

CONCLUSIONS

Pretransplant urinary BKV shedding of donor and recipient is a risk for posttransplant infection. Donor-derived BKV transmission is an important mode of infection. BKV subtype IV may be one of the viral determinants. Early BKV positivity of urine and blood indicates later BKV nephropathy. Decreased renal function may favor BKV infection.

Increased gene expression of TGF-β in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from renal transplant patients with polyomavirus BK viremia

We aimed to investigate the roles of cytokines during polyomavirus BK (BKV) reactivation in renal transplant patients. Forty-eight renal allograft recipients were enrolled, and their sera BKV viral load and mRNA expression levels of cytokines in peripheral blood mononuclear cells were measured by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Patient's age and gene expression levels of interleukin (IL)-2 (10.04 ± 2.63 vs. 8.70 ± 2.40, p = 0.049) and transforming growth factor (TGF)-β (12.58 ± 2.59 vs. 10.89 ± 1.91, p = 0.015) were significantly higher in BKV viremia (+) renal transplant patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that age and mRNA expression levels of TGF-β, but not IL-2, significantly correlated with the presence of BKV viremia. Sera BKV viral loads showed a positive correlation with patient age and the levels of TGF-β and IL-6 mRNA. After adjusting for age and sex in the regression model, both age and TGF-β mRNA levels maintained a significant positive association with sera BKV viral loads. Serum TGF-β concentration tended to be higher in BKV viremia (+) patients (p = 0.079). In conclusion, expression levels of TGF-β were found to correlate with both BKV viremia positivity and sera BKV viral loads in renal transplant patients.

The Impact of Infection on Chronic Allograft Dysfunction and Allograft Survival After Solid Organ Transplantation

Infectious diseases after solid organ transplantation (SOT) are a significant cause of morbidity and reduced allograft and patient survival; however, the influence of infection on the development of chronic allograft dysfunction has not been completely delineated. Some viral infections appear to affect allograft function by both inducing direct tissue damage and immunologically related injury, including acute rejection. In particular, this has been observed for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in all SOT recipients and for BK virus infection in kidney transplant recipients, for community-acquired respiratory viruses in lung transplant recipients, and for hepatitis C virus in liver transplant recipients. The impact of bacterial and fungal infections is less clear, but bacterial urinary tract infections and respiratory tract colonization by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Aspergillus spp appear to be correlated with higher rates of chronic allograft dysfunction in kidney and lung transplant recipients, respectively. Evidence supports the beneficial effects of the use of antiviral prophylaxis for CMV in improving allograft function and survival in SOT recipients. Nevertheless, there is still a need for prospective interventional trials assessing the potential effects of preventive and therapeutic strategies against bacterial and fungal infection for reducing or delaying the development of chronic allograft dysfunction.

Clinical impact of BK virus surveillance on outcomes in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to investigate the clinical impact of BK virus surveillance on graft injury in kidney transplantation.

METHODS

BK viremia in kidney transplant recipients was evaluated by use of plasma quantitative polymerase chain reaction. The prevalence of BK viremia and BK virus-associated nephropathy (BKVAN) and the clinical impact of BK viremia on graft outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

This study took place between January 2008 and June 2013. A total of 213 kidney transplant recipients were included. The prevalence of BK viremia and high BK viremia (≥1 × 10(4) copies/mL) was 66.7% (142/213) and 17.4% (37/213), respectively. A diagnosis of BKVAN was confirmed by means of allograft biopsy in 9 patients (4.2%). The estimated glomerular filtration rate after transplantation was similar in both the low BK viremia (<1 × 10(4) copies/mL) and non-BK viremia groups but was significantly lower in the high BK viremia group after 18 months. In receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the area under the curve value of plasma polymerase chain reaction was 0.980. We found that a viral load >92,850 copies/mL was able to predict BKVAN with 89% sensitivity and 94.6% specificity. The risk factors for viral loads ≥1 × 10(4) copies/mL were cytomegalovirus infection, steroid pulse therapy, and acute rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

High BK viremia was associated with poor graft function after kidney transplantation. The serial monitoring of BK viremia in kidney transplant recipients was helpful in predicting BKVAN and might prevent further progression.