Serum creatinine elevation after switch to dolutegravir in a human immunodeficiency virus-positive kidney transplant recipient

Dolutegravir-based Antiretroviral Therapy in People With HIV With Solid Organ Transplantation: A Single-arm Pilot Clinical Trial (DTG-SOT)

Background

This study assessed the pharmacokinetic interactions between dolutegravir (DTG)-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) and immunosuppressants in solid organ transplantation (SOT) recipients with HIV and ART safety.

Methods

A phase IV, single-center, open-label, single-arm clinical trial (DTG-SOT, NCT03360682) including adult SOT recipients with HIV conducted between 2017 and 2019. People with HIV with plasma viral load <50 copies/mL during ≥12 months and receiving stable raltegravir-based ART during ≥6 months were switched to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine or lamivudine/abacavir + DTG and followed up for 48 weeks. Immunosuppressant pharmacokinetic parameters were compared before and 2 weeks after ART switch (primary outcome). Efficacy and safety were analyzed at 48 weeks by intention-to-treat analysis.

Results

Nineteen consecutive participants (median, 57 years; interquartile range, 51-60), mostly liver recipients (63.2%), received DTG/lamivudine/abacavir (63.2%) and DTG + emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (36.8%). Pharmacokinetic parameters changed, albeit not significantly, before and after ART, for mycophenolic acid (maximum [Cmax] +63%, trough [Cmin] +53%, area under the curve [AUC] +16%; n = 7) and cyclosporine A (Cmax -64%, Cmin +14%, AUC -47%; n = 2), with smaller changes for tacrolimus (Cmax +14%, Cmin -29%, AUC -9%; n = 7). No participants experienced acute rejection or virological failure and CD4+ cell counts and percentages remained unchanged during follow-up. Three (15.8%) discontinued treatment because of adverse events. Estimated glomerular filtration rate decreased (P = 0.0015) and creatinine increased (P = 0.0001) slightly.

Conclusions

DTG-based ART lacked clinically significant drug-drug interactions with tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid. Switching to DTG-based ART was effective in people with HIV SOT recipients. More studies are needed to evaluate DTG safety in this setting.

Pharmacotherapeutic Interventions in People Living With HIV Undergoing Solid Organ Transplantation: A Scoping Review

The pharmacotherapeutic management of people living with HIV (PLWHIV) undergoing solid organ transplantation (SOT) is clinically challenging, mainly due to the frequent occurrence of complex drug-drug interactions. Although various strategies have been proposed to improve treatment outcomes in these patients, several uncertainties remain, and consensus practice guidelines are just beginning to emerge. The main objective of this scoping review was to map the extent of the literature on the pharmacotherapeutic interventions performed by healthcare professionals for PLWHIV undergoing SOT.

Methods

We searched Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane databases as well as gray literature for articles published between January 2010 and February 2020. Study selection was performed by at least 2 independent reviewers. Articles describing pharmacotherapeutic interventions in PLWHIV considered for or undergoing SOT were included in the study.

Results

Of the 12 599 references identified through our search strategy, 209 articles met the inclusion criteria. Results showed that the vast majority of reported pharmacotherapeutic interventions concerned the management of immunosuppressive and antimicrobial therapy, including antiretrovirals. Analysis of the data demonstrated that for several aspects of the pharmacotherapeutic management of PLWHIV undergoing SOT, there were differing practices, such as the choice of immunosuppressive induction and maintenance therapy. Other important aspects of patient management, such as patient counseling, were rarely reported.

Conclusions

Our results constitute an extensive overview of current practices in the pharmacotherapeutic management of SOT in PLWHIV and identify knowledge gaps that should be addressed to help improve patient care in this specific population.

A Review of Specific Biomarkers of Chronic Renal Injury and Their Potential Application in Nonclinical Safety Assessment Studies

A host of novel renal biomarkers have been developed over the past few decades which have enhanced monitoring of renal disease and drug-induced kidney injury in both preclinical studies and in humans. Since chronic kidney disease (CKD) and acute kidney injury (AKI) share similar underlying mechanisms and the tubulointerstitial compartment has a functional role in the progression of CKD, urinary biomarkers of AKI may provide predictive information in chronic renal disease. Numerous studies have explored whether the recent AKI biomarkers could improve upon the standard clinical biomarkers, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and urinary albumin to creatinine ratio, for predicting outcomes in CKD patients. This review is an introduction to alternative assays that can be utilized in chronic (>3 months duration) nonclinical safety studies to provide information on renal dysfunction and to demonstrate specific situations where these assays could be utilized in nonclinical drug development. Novel biomarkers such as symmetrical dimethyl arginine, dickkopf homolog 3, and cystatin C predict chronic renal injury in animals, act as surrogates for GFR, and may predict changes in GFR in patients over time, ultimately providing a bridge from preclinical to clinical renal monitoring.

Dolutegravir-Based Antiretroviral Regimens for HIV Liver Transplant Patients in Real-Life Settings

Background and Objectives

Liver transplantation is now considered a safe procedure in patients with HIV because of the advent of potent antiretroviral therapies (ART).

Objective

We aimed to describe the use of dolutegravir-based maintenance ART in patients with HIV and liver transplant regularly followed in our hospital.

Methods

We searched the database of our Department of Infectious Diseases for liver transplant recipients receiving calcineurin inhibitor-based maintenance immunosuppression concomitantly treated with dolutegravir for at least 1 month.

Results

Ten HIV-positive liver transplant recipients were identified. At 4.6 ± 3.5 years post-transplant, all the patients were switched to dolutegravir-based therapies for treatment simplification. However, at 1 year after the switch, five of the ten patients returned to their previous ART regimens because of increased serum transaminases (n = 1), reversible increased serum creatinine (n = 4), repeated episodes of nausea/vomiting (n = 1) and variable out-of-range concentrations of tacrolimus or cyclosporine (n = 2). However, it should be recognized that these events cannot be unequivocally ascribed to dolutegravir and, in the case of increased serum creatinine, are predictable.

Conclusions

The management of HIV-positive liver transplant recipients in clinical practice is a complex task, where possibility of simplifying antiretroviral regimens must be balanced with the need to guarantee optimal immunosuppression and the finest treatment tolerability. A multidisciplinary approach involving physicians and clinical pharmacologists/pharmacists could help achieve this goal.

Successful optimization of antiretroviral regimens in treatment-experienced people living with HIV undergoing liver transplantation

Modern antiretroviral therapy (ART) extends life expectancy for people living with HIV (PLWH). However, most older PLWH (≥50 years) "aged" with HIV and were exposed to historical HIV care practices and older, more toxic ART. In PLWH with exposure to older and multiple ART regimens, the drug interactions between ART frequently used in treatment-experienced persons and commonly used immunosuppressants remain a significant challenge. However, the advent of newer ART classes (eg, integrase non-strand transfer inhibitors) and more advanced HIV genetic resistance testing may allow optimization of ART regimens with minimal drug interactions. Here, we present a case series of three PLWH whose complicated ART interacted (or was at risk for interacting) with their post-liver transplant immunosuppression. After a review of their proviral DNA resistance testing, they successfully transitioned onto safer integrase non-strand transfer inhibitor-containing ART regimens without viral blips or evidence of organ rejection.

Solid Organ Transplantation in HIV-Infected Recipients: History, Progress, and Frontiers

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

End-stage organ disease prevalence is increasing among HIV-infected (HIV+) individuals. Trial and registry data confirm that solid organ transplantation (SOT) is efficacious in this population. Optimizing access to transplant and decreasing complications represent active frontiers.

RECENT FINDINGS

HIV+ recipients historically experienced 2-4-fold higher rejection. Integrase strand transferase inhibitors (INSTIs) minimize drug interactions and may reduce rejection along with lymphodepleting induction immunosuppression. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection has been associated with inferior outcomes, yet direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) may mitigate this. Experience in South Africa and the US HIV Organ Policy Equity (HOPE) Act support HIV+ donor to HIV+ recipient (HIV D+/R+) transplantation. SOT is the optimal treatment for end-stage organ disease in HIV+ individuals. Recent advances include use of INSTIs and DAAs in transplant recipients; however, strategies to improve access to transplant are needed. HIV D+/R+ transplantation is under investigation and may improve access and provide insights for HIV cure and pathogenesis research.

Solid organ transplantation in the HIV-infected patient: Guidelines from the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice

These updated guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Community of Practice of the American Society of Transplantation review the management of transplantation in HIV-infected individuals. Transplantation has become the standard of care for patients with HIV and end-stage kidney or liver disease. Although less data exist for thoracic organ and pancreas transplantation, it is likely that transplantation is also safe and effective for these recipients as well. Despite what is typically a transient decline in CD4⁺ T lymphocytes, HIV remains well controlled and infection risks are similar to those of HIV-uninfected transplant recipients. The availability of effective directly active antivirals for the treatment of Hepatitis C is likely to improve outcomes in HIV and HCV co-infected individuals, a population previously noted to have decreased survival. Drug interactions remain an important consideration, and integrase inhibitor-based regimens are preferred due to the absence of interactions with calcineurin and mTOR inhibitors. Additionally, despite the use of more potent immunosuppression, rejection rates exceed those found in HIV-uninfected recipients. Ongoing research evaluating HIV-positive organ donors may provide support for utilizing these donors for HIV-positive patients in need of transplantation.

Drug interaction after ritonavir discontinuation: considerations for antiretroviral therapy changes in renal transplant recipients

Organ transplantation among people living with human immunodeficiency virus (PLHIV) is increasing. Guidelines recommend any changes in antiretroviral therapy (ART) prior to transplantation, but there are limited data regarding ART changes post transplantation. We report a case where an ART switch from a protease inhibitor-based regimen to dolutegravir plus emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide in a renal transplant recipient led to subtherapeutic tacrolimus concentrations and an increased serum creatinine (SCr). A workup for graft rejection was performed (including kidney biopsy and cytomegalovirus and BK virus polymerase chain reaction) following the rise in SCr, which was higher than expected from dolutegravir initiation (via organ cation transporter 2 inhibition). This case highlights the potential challenges of switching ART regimens in PLHIV post transplantation.

Kidney Transplantation in HIV-Positive Patients: A Single-Center, 16-Year Experience

Hahnemann University Hospital has performed 120 kidney transplantations in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive individuals during the last 16 years. Our patient population represents ∼10% of the entire US population of HIV-positive kidney recipients. In our earlier years of HIV transplantation, we noted increased rejection rates, often leading to graft failure. We have established a multidisciplinary team and over the years have made substantial protocol modifications based on lessons learned. These modifications affected our approach to candidate evaluation, donor selection, perioperative immunosuppression, and posttransplantation monitoring and resulted in excellent posttransplantation outcomes, including 100% patient and graft survival at 1 year and patient and graft survival at 3 years of 100% and 96%, respectively. We present key clinical data, including a granular patient-level analysis of the associations of antiretroviral therapy regimens with long-term survival, cellular and antibody-mediated rejection rates, and the causes of allograft failures. In summary, we provide details on the evolution of our approach to HIV transplantation during the last 16 years, including strategies that may improve outcomes among HIV-positive kidney transplantation candidates throughout the United States.