V1b vasopressin receptor trafficking and signaling: Role of arrestins, G proteins and Src kinase

Membrane phosphoinositides regulate GPCR-β-arrestin complex assembly and dynamics

Binding of arrestin to phosphorylated G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is crucial for modulating signaling. Once internalized, some GPCRs remain complexed with β-arrestins, while others interact only transiently; this difference affects GPCR signaling and recycling. Cell-based and in vitro biophysical assays reveal the role of membrane phosphoinositides (PIPs) in β-arrestin recruitment and GPCR-β-arrestin complex dynamics. We find that GPCRs broadly stratify into two groups, one that requires PIP binding for β-arrestin recruitment and one that does not. Plasma membrane PIPs potentiate an active conformation of β-arrestin and stabilize GPCR-β-arrestin complexes by promoting a fully engaged state of the complex. As allosteric modulators of GPCR-β-arrestin complex dynamics, membrane PIPs allow for additional conformational diversity beyond that imposed by GPCR phosphorylation alone. For GPCRs that require membrane PIP binding for β-arrestin recruitment, this provides a mechanism for β-arrestin release upon translocation of the GPCR to endosomes, allowing for its rapid recycling.

Structure of the vasopressin hormone-V2 receptor-β-arrestin1 ternary complex

Arrestins interact with G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) to stop G protein activation and to initiate key signaling pathways. Recent structural studies shed light on the molecular mechanisms involved in GPCR-arrestin coupling, but whether this process is conserved among GPCRs is poorly understood. Here, we report the cryo-electron microscopy active structure of the wild-type arginine-vasopressin V2 receptor (V2R) in complex with β-arrestin1. It reveals an atypical position of β-arrestin1 compared to previously described GPCR-arrestin assemblies, associated with an original V2R/β-arrestin1 interface involving all receptor intracellular loops. Phosphorylated sites of the V2R carboxyl terminus are clearly identified and interact extensively with the β-arrestin1 N-lobe, in agreement with structural data obtained with chimeric or synthetic systems. Overall, these findings highlight a notable structural variability among GPCR-arrestin signaling complexes.

Serodolin, a β-arrestin-biased ligand of 5-HT7 receptor, attenuates pain-related behaviors

Transmembrane signaling through G protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs), originally described as requiring coupling to intracellular G proteins, also uses G protein–independent pathways through β-arrestin recruitment. Biased ligands, by favoring one of the multiple bioactive conformations of GPCRs, allow selective signaling through either of these pathways. Here, we identified Serodolin as the first β-arrestin–biased agonist of the serotonin 5-HT₇ receptor. This new ligand, while acting as an inverse agonist on G_s signaling, selectively induces ERK activation in a β-arrestin–dependent way. Importantly, we report that Serodolin decreases pain intensity caused by thermal, mechanical, or inflammatory stimuli. Our findings suggest that targeting the 5-HT₇R with β-arrestin–biased ligand could be a valid alternative strategy to the use of opioids for the relief of pain.

G protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs) are involved in regulation of manifold physiological processes through coupling to heterotrimeric G proteins upon ligand stimulation. Classical therapeutically active drugs simultaneously initiate several downstream signaling pathways, whereas biased ligands, which stabilize subsets of receptor conformations, elicit more selective signaling. This concept of functional selectivity of a ligand has emerged as an interesting property for the development of new therapeutic molecules. Biased ligands are expected to have superior efficacy and/or reduced side effects by regulating biological functions of GPCRs in a more precise way. In the last decade, 5-HT₇ receptor (5-HT₇R) has become a promising target for the treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders, sleep and circadian rhythm disorders, and pathological pain. In this study, we showed that Serodolin is unique among a number of agonists and antagonists tested: it behaves as an antagonist/inverse agonist on G_s signaling while inducing ERK activation through a β-arrestin–dependent signaling mechanism that requires c-SRC activation. Moreover, we showed that Serodolin clearly decreases hyperalgesia and pain sensation in response to inflammatory, thermal, and mechanical stimulation. This antinociceptive effect could not be observed in 5-HT₇R knockout (KO) mice and was fully blocked by administration of SB269-970, a specific 5-HT₇R antagonist, demonstrating the specificity of action of Serodolin. Physiological effects of 5-HT₇R stimulation have been classically shown to result from G_s-dependent adenylyl cyclase activation. In this study, using a β-arrestin–biased agonist, we provided insight into the molecular mechanism triggered by 5-HT₇R and revealed its therapeutic potential in the modulation of pain response.

New Structural Perspectives in G Protein-Coupled Receptor-Mediated Src Family Kinase Activation

Src family kinases (SFKs) are key regulators of cell proliferation, differentiation, and survival. The expression of these non-receptor tyrosine kinases is strongly correlated with cancer development and tumor progression. Thus, this family of proteins serves as an attractive drug target. The activation of SFKs can occur via multiple signaling pathways, yet many of them are poorly understood. Here, we summarize the current knowledge on G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)-mediated regulation of SFKs, which is of considerable interest because GPCRs are among the most widely used pharmaceutical targets. This type of activation can occur through a direct interaction between the two proteins or be allosterically regulated by arrestins and G proteins. We postulate that a rearrangement of binding motifs within the active conformation of arrestin-3 mediates Src regulation by comparison of available crystal structures. Therefore, we hypothesize a potentially different activation mechanism compared to arrestin-2. Furthermore, we discuss the probable direct regulation of SFK by GPCRs and investigate the intracellular domains of exemplary GPCRs with conserved polyproline binding motifs that might serve as scaffolding domains to allow such a direct interaction. Large intracellular domains in GPCRs are often understudied and, in general, not much is known of their contribution to different signaling pathways. The suggested direct interaction between a GPCR and a SFK could allow for a potential immediate allosteric regulation of SFKs by GPCRs and thereby unravel a novel mechanism of SFK signaling. This overview will help to identify new GPCR-SFK interactions, which could serve to explain biological functions or be used to modulate downstream effectors.

Efficient G protein coupling is not required for agonist-mediated internalization and membrane reorganization of the adenosine A3 receptor

Organization of G protein‐coupled receptors at the plasma membrane has been the focus of much recent attention. Advanced microscopy techniques have shown that these receptors can be localized to discrete microdomains and reorganization upon ligand activation is crucial in orchestrating their signaling. Here, we have compared the membrane organization and downstream signaling of a mutant (R108A, R3.50A) of the adenosine A₃ receptor (A₃AR) to that of the wild‐type receptor. Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy (FCS) studies with a fluorescent agonist (ABEA‐X‐BY630) demonstrated that both wild‐type and mutant receptors bind agonist with high affinity but in subsequent downstream signaling assays the R108A mutation abolished agonist‐mediated inhibition of cAMP production and ERK phosphorylation. In further FCS studies, both A₃AR and A₃AR R108A underwent similar agonist‐induced increases in receptor density and molecular brightness which were accompanied by a decrease in membrane diffusion after agonist treatment. Using bimolecular fluorescence complementation, experiments showed that the R108A mutant retained the ability to recruit β‐arrestin and these receptor/arrestin complexes displayed similar membrane diffusion and organization to that observed with wild‐type receptors. These data demonstrate that effective G protein signaling is not a prerequisite for agonist‐stimulated β‐arrestin recruitment and membrane reorganization of the A₃AR.

A Dynamic, Split-Luciferase-Based Mini-G Protein Sensor to Functionally Characterize Ligands at All Four Histamine Receptor Subtypes

In drug discovery, assays with proximal readout are of great importance to study target-specific effects of potential drug candidates. In the field of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), the determination of GPCR-G protein interactions and G protein activation by means of radiolabeled GTP analogs ([³⁵S]GTPγS, [γ-³²P]GTP) has widely been used for this purpose. Since we were repeatedly faced with insufficient quality of radiolabeled nucleotides, there was a requirement to implement a novel proximal functional assay for the routine characterization of putative histamine receptor ligands. We applied the split-NanoLuc to the four histamine receptor subtypes (H₁R, H₂R, H₃R, H₄R) and recently engineered minimal G (mini-G) proteins. Using this method, the functional response upon receptor activation was monitored in real-time and the four mini-G sensors were evaluated by investigating selected standard (inverse) agonists and antagonists. All potencies and efficacies of the studied ligands were in concordance with literature data. Further, we demonstrated a significant positive correlation of the signal amplitude and the mini-G protein expression level in the case of the H₂R, but not for the H₁R or the H₃R. The pEC₅₀ values of histamine obtained under different mini-G expression levels were consistent. Moreover, we obtained excellent dynamic ranges (Z’ factor) and the signal spans were improved for all receptor subtypes in comparison to the previously performed [³⁵S]GTPγS binding assay.

Tetrahydroimidazo[1,2-a]pyrazine Derivatives: Synthesis and Evaluation as Gαq -Protein Ligands

The 5,6,7,8-tetrahydroimidazo[1,2-a]pyrazine derivative BIM-46174 and its dimeric form BIM-46187 (1) are heterocyclized dipeptides that belong to the very few cell-permeable compounds known to preferentially silence Gαq proteins. To explore the chemical space of Gαq inhibitors of the BIM chemotype, a combinatorial approach was conducted towards a library of BIM molecules. This library was evaluated in a second messenger-based fluorescence assay to analyze the activity of Gαq proteins through the determination of intracellular myo-inositol 1-phosphate. Structure-activity relationships were deduced and structural requirements for biological activity obtained, which were (i) a redox reactive thiol/disulfane substructure, (ii) an N-terminal basic amino group, (iii) a cyclohexylalanine moiety, and (iv) a bicyclic skeleton. Active compounds exhibited cellular toxicity, which was investigated in detail for the prototypical inhibitor 1. This compound affects the structural cytoskeletal dynamics in a Gαq/11 -independent manner.

The Role of β-Arrestin1 in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Introduction

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is the predominant type of esophageal carcinoma with a low survival rate and a poor prognosis. Therefore, it is of great significance to explore the effective tumor markers in early diagnosis, treatment monitoring and prognosis evaluation of ESCC. The current study was designed to explore the important role of β-arrestin1 in ESCC and the underlying mechanism.

Methods

The defined effects of β-arrestin1 on cell proliferation, migration, invasion, EMT and tumor growth were investigated both in ESCC cells and in vivo model of ESCC. β-arrestin1 expression was detected using Western blot and immunohistochemistry assay. The cell proliferation ability was determined using CCK-8 assay. Wound healing assay and trans-well invasion assay were performed to determine cell migration and invasion. The key proteins related to cell migration, invasion and EMT were detected by Western blot. Tumor growth in vivo was also monitored by tumor volume and weight. In addition, the effects of β-arrestin1 on AKT/GSK3β/β-catenin pathway were evaluated.

Results

β-arrestin1 was aberrantly upregulated in human ESCC tissues, ESCC cell lines and animal model of ESCC. β-arrestin1 downregulation inhibited cell proliferation, migration, invasion and EMT of ESCC in vitro and vivo. β-arrestin downregulation also suppressed tumor growth in vivo model of ESCC. In addition, the inhibitory effects of β-arrestin1 downregulation were exerted via AKT/GSK3β/β-catenin signaling pathway.

Discussion

The results in the present study together confirmed the truth that β-arrestin1 interference may suppress ESCC cell proliferation, migration, invasion, EMT and tumor growth via AKT/GSK3β/β-catenin signaling pathway.

CRF1 Receptor Signaling via the ERK1/2-MAP and Akt Kinase Cascades: Roles of Src, EGF Receptor, and PI3-Kinase Mechanisms

In the present study, we determined the cellular regulators of ERK1/2 and Akt signaling pathways in response to human CRF₁ receptor (CRF₁R) activation in transfected COS-7 cells. We found that Pertussis Toxin (PTX) treatment or sequestering Gβγ reduced CRF₁R-mediated activation of ERK1/2, suggesting the involvement of a G_i-linked cascade. Neither G_s/PKA nor G_q/PKC were associated with ERK1/2 activation. Besides, CRF induced EGF receptor (EGFR) phosphorylation at Tyr¹⁰⁶⁸, and selective inhibition of EGFR kinase activity by AG1478 strongly inhibited the CRF₁R-mediated phosphorylation of ERK1/2, indicating the participation of EGFR transactivation. Furthermore, CRF-induced ERK1/2 phosphorylation was not altered by pretreatment with batimastat, GM6001, or an HB-EGF antibody indicating that metalloproteinase processing of HB-EGF ligands is not required for the CRF-mediated EGFR transactivation. We also observed that CRF induced Src and PYK2 phosphorylation in a Gβγ-dependent manner. Additionally, using the specific Src kinase inhibitor PP2 and the dominant-negative-SrcYF-KM, it was revealed that CRF-stimulated ERK1/2 phosphorylation depends on Src activation. PP2 also blocked the effect of CRF on Src and EGFR (Tyr⁸⁴⁵) phosphorylation, further demonstrating the centrality of Src. We identified the formation of a protein complex consisting of CRF₁R, Src, and EGFR facilitates EGFR transactivation and CRF₁R-mediated signaling. CRF stimulated Akt phosphorylation, which was dependent on G_i/βγ subunits, and Src activation, however, was only slightly dependent on EGFR transactivation. Moreover, PI3K inhibitors were able to inhibit not only the CRF-induced phosphorylation of Akt, as expected, but also ERK1/2 activation by CRF suggesting a PI3K dependency in the CRF₁R ERK signaling. Finally, CRF-stimulated ERK1/2 activation was similar in the wild-type CRF₁R and the phosphorylation-deficient CRF₁R-Δ386 mutant, which has impaired agonist-dependent β-arrestin-2 recruitment; however, this situation may have resulted from the low β-arrestin expression in the COS-7 cells. When β-arrestin-2 was overexpressed in COS-7 cells, CRF-stimulated ERK1/2 phosphorylation was markedly upregulated. These findings indicate that on the base of a constitutive CRF₁R/EGFR interaction, the G_i/βγ subunits upstream activation of Src, PYK2, PI3K, and transactivation of the EGFR are required for CRF₁R signaling via the ERK1/2-MAP kinase pathway. In contrast, Akt activation via CRF₁R is mediated by the Src/PI3K pathway with little contribution of EGFR transactivation.

Lipid mediator Leukotriene D4-induces airway epithelial cells proliferation through EGFR/ERK1/2 pathway

BACKGROUND

Cysteinyl leukotrienes (CysLTs), the potent lipid inflammatory mediators, are elevated in many pathological conditions and implicated in various inflammatory diseases including asthma, however their role in airway epithelial cells modulation is not clearly understood. We have investigated the effects of a CysLT, Leukotriene D₄ (LTD₄) on human airway epithelial cells, and assessed its role and mode of action in these cells.

METHODOLOGY

Human small airway epithelial cells (SAECs) and A549 cells were incubated with different concentrations of LTD₄ for different time intervals. Subsequently trypan blue dye exclusion assay, MTT assay, Western blotting, RT-PCR and immunofluorescence experiments were performed to examine the effects of LTD₄ on proliferation and related molecular changes in the airway epithelial cells.

RESULTS

The treatment of human airway epithelial cells with LTD₄ resulted in a significant increase in cell proliferation and modulation in the expression of receptors, CysLT₁R and CysLT₂R in SAECs as well as A549 cells. In both types of cells, LTD₄ increased the expression levels of PCNA and c-myc, and trans-activated EGF receptor and increased the activation of ERK1/2. When treated along with epidermal growth factor (EGF), LTD₄ showed a marginal additive effect in ERK1/2 and EGFR phosphorylation compared to LTD₄ alone in both types of airway epithelial cells.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, these results suggest that sustained presence of lipid inflammatory mediator LTD₄ could induce human airway epithelial cell proliferation through ERK1/2 phosphorylation, either directly via CysLT₁ receptor or by transactivating EGFR.

Lack of beta-arrestin signaling in the absence of active G proteins

G protein-independent, arrestin-dependent signaling is a paradigm that broadens the signaling scope of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) beyond G proteins for numerous biological processes. However, arrestin signaling in the collective absence of functional G proteins has never been demonstrated. Here we achieve a state of “zero functional G” at the cellular level using HEK293 cells depleted by CRISPR/Cas9 technology of the Gs/q/12 families of Gα proteins, along with pertussis toxin-mediated inactivation of Gi/o. Together with HEK293 cells lacking β-arrestins (“zero arrestin”), we systematically dissect G protein- from arrestin-driven signaling outcomes for a broad set of GPCRs. We use biochemical, biophysical, label-free whole-cell biosensing and ERK phosphorylation to identify four salient features for all receptors at “zero functional G”: arrestin recruitment and internalization, but—unexpectedly—complete failure to activate ERK and whole-cell responses. These findings change our understanding of how GPCRs function and in particular of how they activate ERK1/2.

Arrestins terminate signaling from GPCRs, but several lines of evidence suggest that they are also able to transduce signals independently of G proteins. Here, the authors systematically ablate G proteins in cell lines, and show that arrestins are unable to act as genuine signal initiators.