Rethinking the need for a platelet transfusion threshold of 50 × 10 9 /L for lumbar puncture in cancer patients

Lowering Platelet Threshold to 20,000/μL for Fluoroscopy-Guided Lumbar Puncture Does Not Result in Observed Clinical Adverse Outcomes

PURPOSE

Fluoroscopic-guided lumbar puncture (FG-LP) is a common neuroradiologic procedure. Traditionally, a minimum platelet count (MPC) of 50,000/μL for this procedure has been required; however, we recently adopted a lower MPC threshold of 20,000/μL. The purpose of this study was to compare adverse events in patients undergoing FG-LP with MPCs above to those below the conventional 50,000/μL threshold.

MATERIALS

This was an institutional review board-approved, retrospective study on adult patients with hematologic malignancy undergoing FG-LP in the neuroradiology division between May 2021 and December 2022, after lowering the minimal required MPC to 20,000/μL. Recorded data included indication for FG-LP, preprocedure and postprocedure MPC, need for and number of platelet transfusions within 24 hours of FG-LP, presence of traumatic tap, FG-LP-related complications, and any platelet transfusion-related adverse event. Patients were classified into 2 groups based on MPC: (1) those above 50,000/μL and (2) those below 50,000/μL. Descriptive statistics were used comparing these 2 groups.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-eight patients underwent FG-LP, with 46 having an MPC between 20,000 and 50,000/μL and 82 having an MPC above 50,000/μL. No postprocedural complications were encountered in either group. Traumatic taps occurred in 10/46 (22%)​ with MPC below 50,000/μL versus 10/82 (12%)​ in those with MPC above 50,000/μL. Forty of 46 patients (87%) were transfused with platelets within 24 hours prior to FG-LP. One patient developed a transfusion-related reaction.

CONCLUSION

Lowering the MPC threshold from 50,000/μL to 20,000/μL for FG-LP did not result in a higher incidence of spinal hematoma.

Elevated platelet count is associated with decreased mortality from hemorrhagic stroke in hospital: a multi-center retrospective cohort study

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between platelet count (PC) and mortality in patients with hemorrhagic stroke (HS). The research reviewed data from 10,466 patients hospitalized in 208 hospitals in the United States from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2015. Of these, 3262 HS patients were included in the primary analysis for those admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). The average age of these patients was 67.05 years, with 52.79% being male. The median PC was (221.67 ± 73.78) × 109/L. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that PC was a protective factor for mortality in HS patients (OR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.97-1.00, P < 0.05). Additionally, a non-linear association between PC and mortality in HS patients was found using a generalized additive model (GAM) and smooth curve fitting (penalty spline method). For the first time, a recursive algorithm identified the inflection point of platelet count as 194 × 109/L. On the left side of the inflection point, for every increase of 10 units in platelet count, the mortality rate of HS patients decreases by 10%. The study demonstrates a non-linear relationship between PC and the risk of mortality in HS patients. A platelet counts higher than the inflection point (194 × 109/L) may be a significant intervention to reduce mortality in HS patients.

Transfusion Strategies in the 21st Century: A Case-Based Narrative Report

The transfusion of all blood components (red blood cells, plasma, and platelets) has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality in children. It is essential that pediatric providers weigh the risks and benefits before transfusing a critically ill child. A growing body of evidence has demonstrated the safety of restrictive transfusion practices in critically ill children.

Can we lower the platelet threshold of ≥ 50 × 109/L for performing a lumbar puncture safely in patients with hematological malignancies?

Lumbar punctures (LP) are routinely used to administer intrathecal chemotherapy for children and adults with hematologic malignancies. The current guidelines suggest a platelet threshold of ≥ 50 × 10⁹/L prior to LP for intrathecal chemotherapy (ITC). This can be challenging in patients with hematological malignancies who are thrombocytopenic. We conducted a retrospective chart review of 900 LPs for ITC and compared adverse events in patients with a platelet count of ≥ 50 × 10⁹/L and < 50 × 10⁹/L. Cohort 1 included 682 LPs (75.8%) with a pre-procedure platelet count ≥ 50 × 10⁹/L, and cohort 2 included 218 LPs (24.2%) with a pre-procedure platelet count < 50 × 10⁹/L. Cohort 2 was further subdivided into pre-procedure platelet counts of 41 × 10⁹/L-49 × 10⁹/L (n = 43), 31 × 10⁹/L-40 × 10⁹/L (n = 77), 21 × 10⁹/L-30 × 10⁹/L (n = 84), and 11 × 10⁹/L-20 × 10⁹/L (n = 14). Among 900 LP procedures, a pre-procedure platelet count < 50 × 10⁹/L did not demonstrate a higher rate of post-procedure adverse events (6.5% vs 6.8%, p = 0.8237). When cohort 2 was further stratified, the cohort with a pre-procedure platelet count of 21 × 10⁹/L-30 × 10⁹/L had the highest percentage of complications from LP (9.5%) and the highest rates of traumatic taps with observed LP RBC count > 200 (35.7%, p = 0.0015). The rate of red blood cells (RBC) in the CSF was significantly higher in the group with platelets < 50 × 10⁹/L with observed LP RBC count ≥ 200 (31.2% vs 20.5%, p = 0.0016), ≥ 500 (27.1% vs 14.6%, p < 0.0001), and ≥ 1000 (23% vs 11.6%, p < 0.0001). No instances of epidural hematomas were seen. We found no significant difference in bleeding complications between patients undergoing LPs for ITC with a platelet count above or below 50 × 10⁹/L.

Minimum platelet count threshold before invasive procedures in cirrhosis: Evolution of the guidelines

Cirrhotic patients with severe thrombocytopenia are at increased risk of bleeding during invasive procedures. The need for preprocedural prophylaxis aimed at reducing the risk of bleeding in cirrhotic patients with thrombocytopenia who undergo scheduled procedures is assessed via the platelet count; however, establishing a minimum threshold considered safe is challenging. A platelet count ≥ 50000/μL is a frequent target, but levels vary by provider, procedure, and specific patient. Over the years, this value has changed several times according to the different guidelines proposed in the literature. According to the latest guidelines, many procedures can be performed at any level of platelet count, which should not necessarily be checked before the procedure. In this review, we aim to investigate and describe how the guidelines have evolved in recent years in the evaluation of the minimum platelet count threshold required to perform different invasive procedures, according to their bleeding risk.

Peri-procedure management of antithrombotic agents and thrombocytopenia for common procedures in oncology: Guidance from the SSC of the ISTH

Patients with cancer have an increased risk of thrombosis requiring anticoagulants and/or antiplatelet agents, and they can also encounter thrombocytopenia due to cancer itself or cancer therapies. They often undergo many procedures such as tissue or bone marrow biopsies, placement of central access lines, diagnostic or therapeutic draining procedures, lumbar puncture, and more. Management of antithrombotic agents or thrombocytopenia around the time of these procedures is highly variable. In this document, the Hemostasis and Malignancy Subcommittee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis aims to provide useful practice guidance in the management of antithrombotic agents and thrombocytopenia around the time of common procedures in patients with cancer.

Plasma and Platelet Transfusion Strategies in Critically Ill Children Following Noncardiac Surgery and Critically Ill Children Undergoing Invasive Procedures Outside the Operating Room: From the Transfusion and Anemia EXpertise Initiative-Control/Avoidance of Bleeding

OBJECTIVES

To present consensus statements and supporting literature for plasma and platelet transfusions in critically ill children following noncardiac surgery and critically ill children undergoing invasive procedures outside the operating room from the Transfusion and Anemia EXpertise Initiative - Control/Avoidance of Bleeding.

DESIGN

Systematic review and consensus conference of international, multidisciplinary experts in platelet and plasma transfusion management of critically ill children.

SETTING

Not applicable.

PATIENTS

Critically ill children undergoing invasive procedures outside of the operating room or noncardiac surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A panel of 10 experts developed evidence-based and, when evidence was insufficient, expert-based statements for plasma and platelet transfusions in critically ill children following noncardiac surgery or undergoing invasive procedures outside of the operating room. These statements were reviewed and ratified by the 29 Transfusion and Anemia EXpertise Initiative-Control/Avoidance of Bleeding experts. A systematic review was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases, from inception to December 2020. Consensus was obtained using the Research and Development/University of California, Los Angeles Appropriateness Method. Results were summarized using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation method. We developed eight expert consensus statements focused on the critically ill child following noncardiac surgery and 10 expert consensus statements on the critically ill child undergoing invasive procedures outside the operating room.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence regarding plasma and platelet transfusion in critically ill children in this area is very limited. The Transfusion and Anemia EXpertise Initiative-Control/Avoidance of Bleeding Consensus Conference developed 18 pediatric specific consensus statements regarding plasma and platelet transfusion management in these critically ill pediatric populations.

Research Priorities for Plasma and Platelet Transfusion Strategies in Critically Ill Children: From the Transfusion and Anemia EXpertise Initiative-Control/Avoidance of Bleeding

OBJECTIVES

To present a list of high-priority research initiatives for the study of plasma and platelet transfusions in critically ill children from the Transfusion and Anemia EXpertise Initiative-Control/Avoidance of Bleeding.

DESIGN

Systematic review and consensus conference of international, multidisciplinary experts in platelet and plasma transfusion management of critically ill children.

SETTING

Not applicable.

PATIENTS

Critically ill pediatric patients at risk of bleeding and receiving plasma and/or platelet transfusions.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A panel of 13 experts developed research priorities for the study of plasma and platelet transfusions in critically ill children which were reviewed and ratified by the 29 Transfusion and Anemia EXpertise Initiative-Control/Avoidance of Bleeding experts. The specific priorities focused on the following subpopulations: severe trauma, traumatic brain injury, intracranial hemorrhage, cardiopulmonary bypass surgery, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, oncologic diagnosis or stem cell transplantation, acute liver failure and/or liver transplantation, noncardiac surgery, invasive procedures outside of the operating room, and sepsis and/or disseminated intravascular coagulation. In addition, tests to guide plasma and platelet transfusion, as well as component selection and processing, were addressed. We developed four general overarching themes and 14 specific research priorities using modified Research and Development/University of California, Los Angeles methodology.

CONCLUSIONS

Studies are needed to focus on the efficacy/harm, dosing, timing, and outcomes of critically ill children who receive plasma and/or platelet transfusions. The completion of these studies will facilitate the development of evidence-based recommendations.