1
|
Gascón P, Harbeck N, Rapoport BL, Anderson R, Brueckmann I, Howe S, Aapro M. Filgrastim biosimilar (EP2006): A review of 15 years' post-approval evidence. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2024; 196:104306. [PMID: 38401695 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Revised: 02/16/2024] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 02/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Filgrastim is approved for several indications, including reduction of the incidence and duration of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and for stem cell mobilization. The filgrastim biosimilar, EP2006, has been available in Europe since 2009, and in the United States since 2015. In this time, preclinical and clinical data used to support the approval of EP2006 have been published. These data established the biosimilarity of EP2006 to reference filgrastim in terms of structure, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity. Additional real-world evidence studies have also demonstrated equivalent efficacy and safety of EP2006 compared with reference filgrastim, both in the reduction of neutropenia and in stem cell mobilization in clinical practice. This review summarizes these preclinical, clinical, and real-world data, as well as the available cost-effectiveness data, for EP2006 since its approval 15 years ago.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pere Gascón
- Division of Medical Oncology, IDIBAPS, Hospital Clinic, Casanova 143, Barcelona 08036, Spain
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, Department OB&GYN and Center for hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistraße 15, Munich 81377, Germany
| | - Bernardo L Rapoport
- The Medical Oncology Centre of Rosebank, 129 Oxford Road, Johannesburg 2196, South Africa; Department of Immunology, Pathology Building, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0001, South Africa
| | - Ronald Anderson
- Department of Immunology, Pathology Building, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0001, South Africa
| | - Ines Brueckmann
- Sandoz Group AG, Global Medical Affairs, Industriestr. 25, Holzkirchen D-83607, Germany
| | - Sebastian Howe
- Sandoz Group AG, Global Medical Affairs, Industriestr. 25, Holzkirchen D-83607, Germany.
| | - Matti Aapro
- Cancer Center, Clinique de Genolier, Route du Muids 3, Genolier 1272, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Serin I, Sevindik OG, Balik Aydin B, Melek E, Mutlu YG, Bilgen H, Bekoz H, Kaynar L. Plerixafor in autologous stem cell transplantation: Does it affect engraftment kinetics? Transfus Apher Sci 2023; 62:103809. [PMID: 37690861 DOI: 10.1016/j.transci.2023.103809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Revised: 08/18/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023]
Abstract
Plerixafor increases stem cell mobilization by reversibly binding to the chemokine receptor CXCR4. In our study, we examined the results of mobilization with plerixafor and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and revealed their effects on autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) engraftment kinetics. The study included all cases of ASCT performed in the Adult Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit of xxx University between January 2014 and January 2022. It included a total of 300 patients. The total number of CD34 + cells collected was 7.44 ± 4.19 in patients with plerixafor and 9.53 ± 6.09 in patients without plerixafor. The mean neutrophil and platelet engraftment took longer in plerixafor-mobilized patients (neutrophil: 12 ± 4.1 vs. 10.2 ± 2.7 days; platelet: 21.6 ± 13.9 vs. 14.2 ± 5.9 days; p = 0.008 and p = 0.002). The number of febrile neutropenia attacks was significantly higher in plerixafor-mobilized patients (p = 0.04). In the chemo-mobilized patient subgroup, plerixafor-mobilized patients experienced more febrile neutropenia attacks (p = 0.04). The mean time to both neutrophil and platelet engraftment was longer in patients mobilized with plerixafor. In the subgroup of patients with MM, the mean time to platelet engraftment was longer in patients mobilized with plerixafor. Plerixafor and its effect on engraftment kinetics should be evaluated with further studies in a larger population with survival analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Istemi Serin
- University of Health Sciences, Istanbul Training and Research Hospital, Department of Hematology, Istanbul, Turkey.
| | - Omur Gokmen Sevindik
- Istanbul Medipol University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Hematology, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Berrin Balik Aydin
- Istanbul Medipol University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Hematology, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Elif Melek
- Istanbul Medipol University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Hematology, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Yasa Gul Mutlu
- Istanbul Medipol University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Hematology, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Hulya Bilgen
- Istanbul Medipol University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Hematology, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Huseyin Bekoz
- Istanbul Medipol University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Hematology, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Leylagul Kaynar
- Istanbul Medipol University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Hematology, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pınar İE, Özkocaman V, Özkalemkaş F, Durgut H, Dakiki B, Ersal T, Gürsoy V, Yalçın C, Orhan B, Candar Ö, Ali R. Is split-dose better than single-dose? Results of Turkish Stem Cell Coordination Center (TURKOK) donors in the era of rising biosimilar G-CSF. J Clin Apher 2022; 37:430-437. [PMID: 35689647 DOI: 10.1002/jca.21995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Revised: 05/12/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Turkish Stem Cell Coordination Center (TURKOK) carries out the procurement process of unrelated allogeneic hematopoietic stem cells in Turkey. This study aims to compare the efficacy of both once-daily and divided-dose G-CSF administration and the original and biosimilar G-CSF use and the frequency and severity of adverse events in TURKOK donors. METHOD The study was conducted retrospectively with 142 healthy TURKOK donors. For PBSC mobilization, two different subcutaneous G-CSF programs were used as 10 μ/kg/day single-dose and 5 μ/kg/12 h. Neupogen (Amgen, Puerto Rico) and Tevagrastim (Teva, Kfar Saba, Israel) were used as G-CSF. All donors started apheresis on the fifth day, and all side effects were recorded during the procedure. RESULTS Stem cell yield was similar between single-dose and divided-doses based on donor weight, favoring the split-dose based on recipient weight (P = .506 and P = .023, respectively). Both G-CSF posologies were comparable if the target CD34+ cell yield was ≥4 × 106 /kg. CD34+ cell yield was equivalent when evaluated against recipient weight, significantly favoring Tevagrastim vs Neupogen by donor weight (P = .740 and P = .021, respectively). Side effects, duration of pain, and need for analgesia favor Tevagratim over Neupogen. CONCLUSION Split-dose may be recommended for cases where the need for large numbers of CD34+ cells to be harvested is anticipated due to significant cell yield relative to recipient weight. However, sufficient hematopoietic stem cells can be collected with both posology. Tevagrastim is non-inferiority effective to Neupogen. Side effects during administration are both low-grade and temporary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- İbrahim Ethem Pınar
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Bursa Uludag University Faculty of Medicine, Bursa, Turkey
| | - Vildan Özkocaman
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Bursa Uludag University Faculty of Medicine, Bursa, Turkey
| | - Fahir Özkalemkaş
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Bursa Uludag University Faculty of Medicine, Bursa, Turkey
| | - Himmet Durgut
- Republic of Turkey Ministry of Health, Turkish Stem Cell Coordination Center, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Bahar Dakiki
- Department of Internal Medicine, Bursa Uludag University Faculty of Medicine, Bursa, Turkey
| | - Tuba Ersal
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Bursa Uludag University Faculty of Medicine, Bursa, Turkey
| | - Vildan Gürsoy
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Bursa City Hospital, Bursa, Turkey
| | - Cumali Yalçın
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Bursa Uludag University Faculty of Medicine, Bursa, Turkey
| | - Bedrettin Orhan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Bursa Uludag University Faculty of Medicine, Bursa, Turkey
| | - Ömer Candar
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Bursa Uludag University Faculty of Medicine, Bursa, Turkey
| | - Rıdvan Ali
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Bursa Uludag University Faculty of Medicine, Bursa, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Husian S, Jeyaraman P, Gupta SK, Rai R, Pathak S, Dayal N, Naithani R. Innovator Filgrastim versus Generic Filgrastim in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Mobilization. South Asian J Cancer 2021; 10:172-174. [PMID: 34938680 PMCID: PMC8687862 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1729446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Methods
This is a retrospective study. G-CSF was administered in the dose of 10 μg/kg subcutaneous as a single dose for 4 days. On day 5, peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) apheresis was performed using Haemonetics MCS plus or COBE Spectra apheresis machine through a double-lumen central venous catheter. Primary outcome parameters were the total number of CD34+ HSCs/kg of recipient weight mobilized in peripheral blood and the number of days required for neutrophil and platelets engraftment, respectively.
Objective
We compared the effectiveness and safety of innovator filgrastim versus generic filgrastim in patients who underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).
Results
A total of 91 stem cell mobilizations was analyzed. There were 58 normal healthy donors for allogeneic HSCT and 33 patients for autologous HSCT. There was no statistically significant difference among groups in terms of total collected CD34+ cells value (
p
= 0.609). The mean time to neutrophil engraftment was 13.7 days in the innovator group and 13.2 days in the Grafeel group (
p
= 0.518). The mean time to platelet engraftment was 16.2 days in the innovator group and 14.8 days in the generic group (
p
= 0.435). The patient who received generic filgrastim had more febrile episodes during the course of transplantation (
p
= 0.020).
Conclusion
Generic filgrastim was found to be comparable to original filgrastim for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in normal healthy donors for allogeneic HSCT and patients for autologous HSCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sadik Husian
- Department of Pharmacology, Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research University, New Delhi, India
| | - Preethi Jeyaraman
- Division of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplant, Saket, New Delhi, India
| | - S K Gupta
- Department of Pharmacology, Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research University, New Delhi, India
| | - Reeta Rai
- Division of Transfusion Medicine, Department of Lab Medicine Transfusion Medicine, Max Super Specialty Hospital, Saket, New Delhi, India
| | - Sangeeta Pathak
- Division of Transfusion Medicine, Department of Lab Medicine Transfusion Medicine, Max Super Specialty Hospital, Saket, New Delhi, India
| | - Nitin Dayal
- Department of Lab Medicine, Max Super Specialty Hospital, Saket, New Delhi, India
| | - Rahul Naithani
- Division of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplant, Saket, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Real World Clinical Experience of Biosimilar G-CSF (Grastofil) for Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Mobilization: Single Center Experience in Canada Following Early Adoption. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 28:1571-1580. [PMID: 33922026 PMCID: PMC8161742 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol28030148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2021] [Revised: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 04/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is the first line treatment for mobilization, most commonly using a regimen of daily filgrastim. The use of biosimilars can provide substantial cost savings to the health care system while delivering comparable efficacy outcomes. In 2016, the Saskatchewan Cancer Agency was a leader in Canada, instituting formulary changed from a G-CSF originator product to a cost savings alternative biosimilar for stem cell mobilization prior to autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) and for engraftment. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical comparability of biosimilar G-CSF to its reference product in a real-world clinical setting and to validate use of the biosimilar in mobilization and engraftment-an indication which had been granted by extrapolation. METHODS A retrospective chart review was completed including all patients diagnosed with a hematological malignancy between 2012 and 2018 who underwent ASCT. To assess real-world outcomes across a diverse population, successful CD34+ stem cell collection was compared between patients mobilized with originator filgrastim, Neupogen, and biosimilar filgrastim, Grastofil. Additional comparisons included the number of apheresis required, time to absolute neutrophil count (ANC) engraftment, platelet engraftment, length of hospital stay, and Plerixafor use. RESULTS 217 patients were mobilized and transplanted during the study period. There was no statistically significant difference in success rate between patients mobilized with biosimilar filgrastim and those who had received originator G-CSF (100% vs. 92.4%, p = 0.075). Neither disease type, nor concurrent chemomobilization regimen resulted in a detectable difference between the two G-CSF products in successful stem cell harvest. Engraftment was highly similar between groups, as demonstrated by ANC recovery (11.6 days Neupogen vs. 11.6 days Grastofil), platelet recovery (14.0 days Neupogen vs. 14.2 days Grastofil), and total length of hospital stay (22.4 days Neupogen vs. 22.3 days Grastofil). No statistically significant difference in adjunctive use of Plerixafor® was observed between Neupogen and Grastofil patients (25.9% vs. 23.4%, p = 0.72). CONCLUSION Extrapolation of indications for biosimilars is justified. This real-world evidence builds upon registrational studies to confirm that no clinically meaningful differences were detected between originator Neupogen and biosimilar Grastofil in the setting of PBSC mobilization and engraftment post ASCT. Biosimilars are as safe and effective as originator products. Implementation across all approved indications without hesitation maximizes cost savings to the provincial system, allowing for more optimal allocation of health care resources.
Collapse
|
6
|
Fenna J, Guirguis M, Ibrahim C, Shirvaikar N, Sandhu I, Ghosh S, Jenkins M. Effect on Patients' Outcomes of a Change to Biosimilar Filgrastim Product in Autologous Stem Cell Mobilization. Can J Hosp Pharm 2021; 74:122-129. [PMID: 33896951 PMCID: PMC8042197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Following addition of a biosimilar filgrastim product to the formulary, sites in the authors' provincial health authority transitioned from using the originator filgrastim to the biosimilar for autologous stem cell mobilization. OBJECTIVE To assess the effect on patient outcomes of a universal change to use of the biosimilar filgrastim in stem cell mobilization. METHODS This retrospective pre-post study included patients undergoing autologous stem cell mobilization at 2 cancer hospitals in Alberta, Canada, between July 1, 2018, and November 30, 2019. Clinical outcomes were investigated for patients treated with a granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (biosimilar or originator product) for mobilization before stem cell transplant, approximately 6 months before and after the defined date of product change. RESULTS In total, 102 patients were treated with the originator product and 101 patients with the biosimilar. Effectiveness was similar between the originator and biosimilar products, with 98% successful harvest of stem cells in all patients treated. Independent t tests showed no statistically significant differences between patients receiving the originator and those receiving the biosimilar in terms of time from mobilization to collection (difference of means -0.9 days, 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.12 to 0.32), time for neutrophil engraftment (difference of means 0 days, 95% CI -0.36 to 0.36), time for platelet engraftment (difference of means 1 day, 95% CI -0.55 to 2.55), average length of stay (difference of means -0.7 day, 95% CI -2.71 to 1.31), and CD34+ value (difference of means -1 × 106/kg body weight, 95% CI -2.11 to 0.11). A 98% rate of conversion to use of the biosimilar filgrastim was achieved, with an estimated annual drug-cost saving of $67 500. CONCLUSIONS In this pre-post study, changing to the biosimilar product from the originator maintained clinical effectiveness outcomes while decreasing overall drug expenditures. A well-planned change to the biosimilar product, executed in conjunction with clinician consultation and monitoring of effectiveness outcomes, can ensure appropriate patient therapy while significantly improving the uptake of biosimilars and decreasing expenditures for biologic drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Fenna
- , BScPharm, MHS, is a Drug Utilization and Stewardship Pharmacist with Pharmacy Services, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta
| | - Micheal Guirguis
- , BScPharm, PhD, is a Drug Stewardship Pharmacist with Pharmacy Services, Alberta Health Services, and is an Academic Adjunct Colleague with the Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta
| | - Caroline Ibrahim
- , BSc, BPharm, MHS, is a Drug Utilization and Stewardship Pharmacist with Pharmacy Services, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta
| | - Neeta Shirvaikar
- , BSc, MSc, MS, PhD, is a Quality Management Consultant with the Northern Alberta Blood and Marrow Transplant Program, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta
| | - Irwindeep Sandhu
- , MD, is an Associate Professor with the Division of Clinical Hematology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta
| | - Sunita Ghosh
- , PhD (Biostatistics), PStat, PStat® (ASA), is a Biostatistician with the Cross Cancer Institute, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta
| | - Melissa Jenkins
- , BSc, is a Clinical Research Coordinator with the Alberta Blood and Marrow Transplant Program, Holy Cross Centre - Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
The Combination of Jiedu Xiaoluo Decoction with Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation (APBSCT) Accelerates Disease Remission of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma. EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE 2021; 2021:2745705. [PMID: 33505491 PMCID: PMC7810534 DOI: 10.1155/2021/2745705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2020] [Revised: 12/04/2020] [Accepted: 12/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Objective This study aimed to explore the therapeutic effects of autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (APBSCT) with Jiedu Xiaoluo decoction (JDX) on non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Method B lymphoma cells A20 were used to establish nude mice-transplanted tumor model. The peripheral blood of mice was analyzed by automatic blood cell counter. Inflammatory cytokines in tumor tissues were measured by ELISA, real-time qRT-PCR, and western blotting assays. Immunohistochemical staining was employed to evaluate tumor cell growth and apoptosis. CCK8 and Transwell assays were used to detect cell viability, migration, and invasion. Cell apoptosis in vitro was evaluated with flow cytometry. Result In the in vitro co-culture system of A20 cells and hemopoietic stem cells (HSC), JDX notably inhibited the proliferation, migration, and invasion and promoted apoptosis of A20 cells compared to HSC treatment alone. In animal tumor xenografts of NHL, the combination of APBSCT with JDX significantly promoted hematopoietic reconstitution, inhibited tumorigenesis of A20 cell, promoted the inflammatory microenvironment remission, inhibited cell proliferation, and promoted apoptosis compared to APBSCT alone. Conclusion The combination of APBSCT with JDX might be an effective strategy to treat NHL through inhibiting tumorigenesis and reconstructing hematopoietic and immune microenvironment. Our finding provided a novel insight into the clinical application of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) against NHL.
Collapse
|
8
|
Parody R, Sánchez-Ortega I, Ferrá C, Guardia R, Talarn C, Encuentra M, Fort E, López D, Morgades M, Alonso E, Ortega S, Sarrá J, Gallardo D, Ribera JM, Sureda A. Mobilization of Hematopoietic Stem Cells into Peripheral Blood for Autologous Transplantation Seems Less Efficacious in Poor Mobilizers with the Use of a Biosimilar of Filgrastim and Plerixafor: A Retrospective Comparative Analysis. Oncol Ther 2020; 8:311-324. [PMID: 32700041 PMCID: PMC7683658 DOI: 10.1007/s40487-020-00115-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Biosimilars of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF) have shown similar efficacy to originator filgrastim (Neupogen® [NEU]; Amgen Inc.) as prophylaxis in neutropenia and in the mobilization of stem cells in patients receiving combination chemotherapy with G-CSF. Methods This was a retrospective study in which the characteristics of stem cell mobilization treated with a G-CSF alone were compared in 216 patients and 56 donors. The two G-CSF compared were NEU and the biosimilar filgrastim Zarzio® (Sandoz GmbH) (referred to hereafter as BIO). Primary objectives were mobilization rate (minimum of 10 × 103/ml CD34+ on day 4 of treatment [day +4]) and use of the immunostimulant plerixafor (PLEX) in each group. Results The general characteristics of the patients receiving NEU (n = 138) and those receiving BIO (n = 78) did not differ significantly. PLEX was used in 24% of BIO patients and in 25.7% of NEU patients. The median CD34+ cell count on day +4 was significantly lower in BIO patients who needed PLEX than in those who did not (2.4 vs. 4.8 × 103/ml; p = 0.002), as was the final CD34+ cell count (2.5 vs. 3.3 × 106/kg; p 0.03). Mobilization failure rate was higher in the BIO group than in the NEU group (20 vs. 0%; p = 0.01). With respect to donors, more than one apheresis was needed in three BIO donors, one of them with PLEX. The use of BIO was the only risk factor for mobilization failure in patients who needed PLEX (hazard ratio 10.3; 95% confidence interval 1.3–77.8). Conclusion The study revealed that BIO had a lower efficacy for stem cell mobilization when the only treatment was G-CSF, especially in poor mobilizers needing PLEX.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rocío Parody
- Clinical Hematology Department, Institut Català d'Oncologia, L'Hospitalet, Institut d'Investigacio Biomedica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Isabel Sánchez-Ortega
- Clinical Hematology Department, Institut Català d'Oncologia, L'Hospitalet, Institut d'Investigacio Biomedica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Christelle Ferrá
- Hematology Department, Institut Català d'Oncologia-Badalona, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias I Pujol, Josep Carreras Leukemia Research Institute,, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Carme Talarn
- Hospital Universitari Joan XXIII, Tarragona, Spain
| | - Maite Encuentra
- Clinical Hematology Department, Institut Català d'Oncologia, L'Hospitalet, Institut d'Investigacio Biomedica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Spain.,Institut Català d'Oncologia, L'Hospitalet, IDIBELL, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Eduard Fort
- Pharmacy Department, Institut Català d'Oncologia, L'Hospitalet, IDIBELL, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David López
- Pharmacy Department, Institut Català d'Oncologia, L'Hospitalet, IDIBELL, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mireia Morgades
- Hematology Department, Institut Català d'Oncologia-Badalona, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias I Pujol, Josep Carreras Leukemia Research Institute,, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Institut Català d'Oncologia, L'Hospitalet, IDIBELL, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Eva Alonso
- Banc de Sang I Teixits de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sandra Ortega
- Banc de Sang I Teixits de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Josep Sarrá
- Hospital Universitari Joan XXIII, Tarragona, Spain
| | | | - Josep M Ribera
- Hematology Department, Institut Català d'Oncologia-Badalona, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias I Pujol, Josep Carreras Leukemia Research Institute,, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anna Sureda
- Clinical Hematology Department, Institut Català d'Oncologia, L'Hospitalet, Institut d'Investigacio Biomedica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gascon P, Krendyukov A, Mathieson N, Natek M, Aapro M. Extrapolation in Practice: Lessons from 10 Years with Biosimilar Filgrastim. BioDrugs 2019; 33:635-645. [PMID: 31440986 PMCID: PMC6875156 DOI: 10.1007/s40259-019-00373-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Biosimilar filgrastim (Sandoz) was approved in Europe in 2009 and, in 2015, was the first biosimilar approved in the USA. These authorizations were based on the "totality of evidence" concept, an approach that considers data from structural and functional characterization and comparability analysis and non-clinical and clinical studies. For biosimilar filgrastim, phase III confirmatory clinical studies were performed in the most sensitive population, patients with breast cancer undergoing myelosuppressive chemotherapy. In Europe and the USA, approval was granted for all indications of the reference biologic. Hence, stem cell mobilization and severe chronic neutropenia indications were approved on the basis of extrapolation, with no clinical data available at the time of market authorization in the EU. Although extrapolation is well-accepted in biologic development and regulatory contexts, it remains a misunderstood part of the biosimilarity concept in the medical community. Since approval, more than a decade of obtained clinical experience supports the totality of evidence and reassures clinicians regarding the efficacy and safety of biosimilar filgrastim. This includes real-world data from MONITOR-GCSF, a multicenter, prospective, observational study describing treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of patients with cancer (n = 1447) receiving biosimilar filgrastim for the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in solid tumors and hematological malignancies. Evidence is also available from unrelated healthy donors and those with severe chronic neutropenia. Together, the experience from a decade of use of biosimilar filgrastim includes over 24 million patient-days of exposure, which can help reassure oncologists that extrapolation is based on strong scientific evidence and works in practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pere Gascon
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Hematology-Oncology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Matti Aapro
- Cancer Center, Clinique de Genolier, Route du Muids 3, 1272, Genolier, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Miller EM, Schwartzberg LS. Biosimilars for breast cancer: a review of HER2-targeted antibodies in the United States. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2019; 11:1758835919887044. [PMID: 31798693 PMCID: PMC6859678 DOI: 10.1177/1758835919887044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2019] [Accepted: 10/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The utilization of trastuzumab biosimilar medications is of particular interest in HER2-positive breast cancer as these drugs have the potential for cost savings and increased utilization/access to HER2 targeted therapy in both early stage and metastatic HER2-positive breast cancers. Five trastuzumab biosimilars: MYL-1401O (Ogivri), CT-P6 (Herzuma), SB3 (Ontruzant), PF-05280014 (Trazimera), and ABP980 (Kanjinti), have now been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in HER2-positive breast cancers. This review provides an overview of these agents with special consideration of the development and approval process, including available clinical data results for these trastuzumab biosimilars. Adoption in the clinic will depend on the degree of comfort with the overall evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily M Miller
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Germantown, TN, USA
| | - Lee S Schwartzberg
- West Cancer Center, 7945 Wolf River Boulevard, Germantown, TN 38183, USA. Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Germantown, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wicherska-Pawłowska K, Rybka J, Prajs I, Szmigiel K, Tyc J, Frączak E, Biedroń M, Kalicińska E, Szymczak D, Wróbel T. The comparison of effectiveness and safety between different biosimilars of G-CSF in the mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) for autologous transplantation (autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation, auto-PBSCT). J Clin Apher 2019; 35:4-8. [PMID: 31663634 DOI: 10.1002/jca.21750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2019] [Revised: 08/17/2019] [Accepted: 09/07/2019] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Autologous peripheral blood marrow stem cell transplantation (auto-PBSCT) preceded by high-dose chemotherapy is a well-known method of treatment for patients with hematological cancers. Performing the procedure entails obtaining from the patient their own stem cells from peripheral blood using G-CSF. Currently, various filgrastim biosimilars are widely used. AIM OF THE STUDY The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of three different biosimilars of filgrastim in PBSC mobilization in patients with hematological malignancies. MATERIALS AND METHODS This is a retrospective analysis of 282 patients (118 women and 164 men) who underwent stem cells mobilization for auto-PBSCT in the Department of Hematology in Wroclaw in 2012-2014. Three filgrastim biosimilars were used: Tevagrastim (95), Nivestim (92), and Zarzio (95). Ninety patients (32%) were diagnosed with multiple myeloma, 55 (19%) with Hodgkin's lymphoma, 90 (32%) with NHLs, 20 (7%) with acute myeloid leukemia, and 27 (10%) with another hematological cancer. RESULTS The mean number of CD34+ cells collected during the first leukapheresis was 5.95 × 106 /kg for Tevagrastim, 7.08 × 106 /kg for Nivestim, and 6.8 × 106 /kg for Zarzio (P > .05). The necessary number of leukapheresis for patients receiving Zarzio, Nivestim, and Tevagrastim was 1.32, 1.37, and 1.66, respectively (P > .05). The percentage of effective mobilizations was 88.2% for Zarzio, 86.2% for Nivestim, and 84.9% for Tevagrastim. The side effects included bone pain and headache. CONCLUSION All tested biosimilars demonstrated similar effectiveness and safety profiles in patients with hematological tumors undergoing PBSC mobilization; therefore, they can be used interchangeably.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katarzyna Wicherska-Pawłowska
- Department of Hematology, Blood Cancer and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Wroclaw University Hospital, Wroclaw, Lower Silesia, Poland.,Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Lower Silesia, Poland
| | - Justyna Rybka
- Department of Hematology, Blood Cancer and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Wroclaw University Hospital, Wroclaw, Lower Silesia, Poland.,Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Lower Silesia, Poland
| | - Iwona Prajs
- Department of Hematology, Blood Cancer and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Wroclaw University Hospital, Wroclaw, Lower Silesia, Poland
| | | | - Joanna Tyc
- Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Lower Silesia, Poland
| | - Ewa Frączak
- Department of Hematology, Blood Cancer and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Wroclaw University Hospital, Wroclaw, Lower Silesia, Poland
| | - Monika Biedroń
- Department of Hematology, Blood Cancer and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Wroclaw University Hospital, Wroclaw, Lower Silesia, Poland
| | - Elżbieta Kalicińska
- Department of Hematology, Blood Cancer and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Wroclaw University Hospital, Wroclaw, Lower Silesia, Poland
| | - Donata Szymczak
- Department of Hematology, Blood Cancer and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Wroclaw University Hospital, Wroclaw, Lower Silesia, Poland
| | - Tomasz Wróbel
- Department of Hematology, Blood Cancer and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Wroclaw University Hospital, Wroclaw, Lower Silesia, Poland.,Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Lower Silesia, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Krendyukov A, Schiestl M. Biosimilars in oncology: A decade of experience with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and its implications for monoclonal antibodies. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2019:102785. [PMID: 31405784 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2019.07.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2018] [Revised: 09/24/2018] [Accepted: 07/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Biosimilars offer the potential for improved sustainability of cancer care. In oncology, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and erythropoiesis-stimulating agent biosimilars have been available for almost a decade, with biosimilars of monoclonal antibodies a more recent development. Sandoz biosimilar filgrastim was approved based on Phase III confirmatory studies conducted in patients with breast cancer experiencing chemotherapy-induced neutropenia, with other indications granted based on extrapolation. Despite the fact that extrapolation is a well-established scientific principle in regulation of biological medicines, it is a commonly misunderstood part of the biosimilar concept. Broad experience from almost a decade of use of Sandoz biosimilar filgrastim includes >21 million patient-days exposure and >9 years of real-world clinical evidence, indicates extrapolation successfully at work. Together, this can help reassure oncologists that extrapolation is based on sound scientific principles. Efforts to improve understanding of extrapolation are critical to ensure the acceptance of future oncology biosimilar monoclonal antibodies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andriy Krendyukov
- Former employee of HEXAL AG, Industriestr. 25, D-83607, Holzkirchen, Germany.
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hematopoietic Progenitor Cell Mobilization for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma in Contemporary Era. CLINICAL LYMPHOMA MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA 2019; 19:200-205. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2018.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2018] [Revised: 12/10/2018] [Accepted: 12/12/2018] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
14
|
Potter A, Beck B, Ngorsuraches S. Tbo-filgrastim versus filgrastim for stem cell mobilization and engraftment in autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients: A retrospective review. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2019; 26:23-28. [PMID: 30854925 DOI: 10.1177/1078155219833444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Filgrastim, a granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, is commonly used in autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCTs) to assist with peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) collection and to support stem cell engraftment. In the United States, tbo-filgrastim is approved under its own Biologic License Application and is limited to a single indication excluding the HSCT population. METHODS Approximately one year after a system-wide formulary change to tbo-filgrastim for all on- and off-label indications, our institution conducted an IRB-approved retrospective comparison of tbo-filgrastim to filgrastim in the autologous HSCT setting. The study included 71 patients who received an autologous HSCT from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2016 with a documented administration of tbo-filgrastim or filgrastim. RESULTS There were no statistically significant differences noted on CD34 + counts during stem cell mobilization, neutrophil engraftment, infection rates during the engraftment phase, nor duration of hospitalization during the engraftment phase. More patients in the tbo-filgrastim group received plerixafor per protocol resulting in more patients meeting their PBPC collection goal in one day with fewer collection days overall, a result potentially confounded by institutional protocol changes. Utilizing tbo-filgrastim offered an average cost savings per patient of $2664.26 ($1907.33 for PBPC mobilization and $756.93 for stem cell engraftment) when comparing dollars spent on granulocyte colony-stimulating factor products only. CONCLUSION Tbo-filgrastim demonstrates comparable efficacy with a cost savings benefit compared to filgrastim for autologous PBPC mobilization and stem cell engraftment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Bradley Beck
- Avera McKennan Hospital and University Health Center, Sioux Falls, SD, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Torres-Acosta MA, Harrison RP, Csaszar E, Rito-Palomares M, Brunck MEG. Ex vivo Manufactured Neutrophils for Treatment of Neutropenia-A Process Economic Evaluation. Front Med (Lausanne) 2019; 6:21. [PMID: 30881955 PMCID: PMC6405517 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2017] [Accepted: 01/23/2019] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Neutropenia is a common side-effect of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) chemotherapy characterized by a critical drop in neutrophil blood concentration. Neutropenic patients are prone to infections, experience poorer clinical outcomes, and require expensive medical care. Although transfusions of donor neutrophils are a logical solution to neutropenia, this approach has not gained clinical traction, primarily due to challenges associated with obtaining sufficiently large numbers of neutrophils from donors whilst logistically managing their extremely short shelf-life. A protocol has been developed that produces clinical-scale quantities of neutrophils from hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPC) in 10 L single-use bioreactors (1). This strategy could be used to mass produce neutrophils and generate sufficient cell numbers to allow decisive clinical trials of neutrophil transfusion. We present a bioprocess model for neutrophil production at relevant clinical-scale. We evaluated two production scenarios, and the impact on cost of goods (COG) of multiple model parameters including cell yield, materials costs, and process duration. The most significant contributors to cost were consumables and raw materials, including the cost of procuring HSPC-containing umbilical cord blood. The model indicates that the most cost-efficient culture volume (batch size) is ~100 L in a single bioreactor. This study serves as a framework for decision-making and optimization strategies when contemplating the production of clinical quantities of cells for allogeneic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Richard P Harrison
- Centre for Biological Engineering, Holywell Park, Loughborough University, Loughborough, United Kingdom.,Wolfson Centre for Stem Cells, Tissue Engineering and Modelling (STEM), School of Medicine, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Elizabeth Csaszar
- Centre for Commercialization of Regenerative Medicine, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Marco Rito-Palomares
- Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Tecnológico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico
| | - Marion E G Brunck
- Centro de Biotecnología FEMSA, Tecnológico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bailén R, Pérez-Corral AM, Pascual C, Kwon M, Serrano D, Gayoso J, Balsalobre P, Muñoz C, Díez-Martín JL, Anguita J. Factors predicting peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization in healthy donors in the era of related alternative donors: Experience from a single center. J Clin Apher 2019; 34:373-380. [DOI: 10.1002/jca.21685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2018] [Revised: 01/03/2019] [Accepted: 01/09/2019] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Rebeca Bailén
- Hematology and Hemotherapy Department; Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón; Madrid Spain
| | - Ana María Pérez-Corral
- Hematology and Hemotherapy Department; Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón; Madrid Spain
- Gregorio Marañón Health Research Institute; Madrid Spain
| | - Cristina Pascual
- Hematology and Hemotherapy Department; Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón; Madrid Spain
- Gregorio Marañón Health Research Institute; Madrid Spain
| | - Mi Kwon
- Hematology and Hemotherapy Department; Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón; Madrid Spain
- Gregorio Marañón Health Research Institute; Madrid Spain
| | - David Serrano
- Hematology and Hemotherapy Department; Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón; Madrid Spain
- Gregorio Marañón Health Research Institute; Madrid Spain
| | - Jorge Gayoso
- Hematology and Hemotherapy Department; Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón; Madrid Spain
- Gregorio Marañón Health Research Institute; Madrid Spain
| | - Pascual Balsalobre
- Hematology and Hemotherapy Department; Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón; Madrid Spain
- Gregorio Marañón Health Research Institute; Madrid Spain
| | - Cristina Muñoz
- Hematology and Hemotherapy Department; Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón; Madrid Spain
| | - José Luis Díez-Martín
- Hematology and Hemotherapy Department; Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón; Madrid Spain
- Gregorio Marañón Health Research Institute; Madrid Spain
- Medicine Department; Universidad Complutense de Madrid; Madrid Spain
| | - Javier Anguita
- Hematology and Hemotherapy Department; Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón; Madrid Spain
- Gregorio Marañón Health Research Institute; Madrid Spain
- Medicine Department; Universidad Complutense de Madrid; Madrid Spain
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Current use of biosimilar G-CSF for haematopoietic stem cell mobilisation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2018; 54:858-866. [DOI: 10.1038/s41409-018-0350-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2018] [Revised: 09/11/2018] [Accepted: 09/11/2018] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
18
|
Moalic-Allain V. Medical and ethical considerations on hematopoietic stem cells mobilization for healthy donors. Transfus Clin Biol 2018; 25:136-143. [PMID: 29555414 DOI: 10.1016/j.tracli.2018.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2018] [Accepted: 02/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is a common procedure potentially beneficial to many individuals with cancer, hematological, or inherited disorders, and has highlighted the need of related or unrelated donors to perform allograft. Donation of hematopoietic stem cells, either through bone marrow harvest or peripheral blood stem cell collection, is well-established and widespread. Over the past two decades, the peripheral blood stem cell collection by aphaeresis has become the main source of hematopoietic stem cells for transplantation, due to faster engraftment and practicability and lower risk of relapse for high-risk patients. For peripheral blood stem cell donation, donors require mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells from bone marrow into the blood stream. This is performed by growth factors injections. This article is a review of reported applications of growth factors (original granulocyte colony stimulating factor and its biosimilars), for healthy donors' peripheral blood stem cell mobilization, in terms of toxicity, side effects, efficacy and follow-up. There is still an ethical dilemma for clinicians involved in allograft, because they expose healthy donors to drugs. It is important to dispel some of the critical concerns regarding their use in healthy volunteers, particularly because they receive no personal therapeutic benefit from this procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Moalic-Allain
- Laboratoire de génétique moléculaire et d'histocompatibilité, pôle de pathologie biologie, CHRU Morvan, bâtiment 5 bis, RDC, 2, avenue Foch, 29609 Brest cedex, France.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Krendyukov A, Schiestl M. Extrapolation concept at work with biosimilar: a decade of experience in oncology. ESMO Open 2018; 3:e000319. [PMID: 29644102 PMCID: PMC5890855 DOI: 10.1136/esmoopen-2017-000319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2017] [Revised: 01/13/2018] [Accepted: 01/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
|
20
|
Biosimilar filgrastim (leucostim®) have similar efficacy in steady-state hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization compared to original filgrastim (neupogen®) and lenograstim (granocyte®): A retrospective multicenter study. Transfus Apher Sci 2017; 56:832-835. [DOI: 10.1016/j.transci.2017.11.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
21
|
Korkmaz S, Altuntas F. What is the role of biosimilar G-CSF agents in hematopoietic stem cell mobilization at present? Transfus Apher Sci 2017; 56:795-799. [PMID: 29153313 DOI: 10.1016/j.transci.2017.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells, which has largely replaced bone marrow harvesting as a source of hematopoietic stem cells, using recombinant agents such as filgrastim or lenograstim has become a standard procedure in both patients and healthy donors prior to peripheral blood stem cell collection for autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Published literature data suggest that mobilization with recombinant granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) is safe and mobilization outcomes are satisfactory. In recent years, besides G-CSF originators, biosimilar G-CSF agents have been approved by the regulatory agencies for the same indications. Current data showed that by using the biosimilar G-CSF, similar results regarding safety and efficacy of hematopoietic stem cell mobilization may be achieved compared to the originator G-CSF. Although the issues such as the similarity to a licenced biological medicine, differences in manufacturing processes, the potential to cause immunogenicity, extrapolation and interchangeability of these biosimilar products are still being discussed by the scientific area, however, more experience with these agents now exists in approved endications and there seems to be no reason to expect significant differences between biosimilar G-CSF and originator G-CSF regarding their efficacy and safety in both patients and healthy donors. Also, the significant cost savings of biosimilars in real life setting may enhance the use of these agents in the future. Nonetheless, the collection of long-term follow-up data is mandatory for both patients and healthy donors, and multicentre randomized clinical trials that directly compare biosimilar G-CSF with the originator G-CSF are needed in order to allow the transplant community to make informed decisions regarding the choice of G-CSF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serdal Korkmaz
- University of Health Sciences, Kayseri Training and Research Hospital, Department of Hematology, Kayseri, Turkey.
| | - Fevzi Altuntas
- University of Health Sciences, Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Department of Hematology and BMT Unit, Ankara, Turkey; Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Bhamidipati PK, Fiala MA, Grossman BJ, DiPersio JF, Stockerl-Goldstein K, Gao F, Uy GL, Westervelt P, Schroeder MA, Cashen AF, Abboud CN, Vij R. Results of a Prospective Randomized, Open-Label, Noninferiority Study of Tbo-Filgrastim (Granix) versus Filgrastim (Neupogen) in Combination with Plerixafor for Autologous Stem Cell Mobilization in Patients with Multiple Myeloma and Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2017; 23:2065-2069. [PMID: 28797783 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.07.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2017] [Accepted: 07/30/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) improves survival in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Traditionally, filgrastim (Neupogen; recombinant G-CSF) has been used in as a single agent or in combination with plerixafor for stem cell mobilization for auto-HSCT. In Europe, a biosimilar recombinant G-CSF (Tevagrastim) has been approved for various indications similar to those of reference filgrastim, including stem cell mobilization for auto-HSCT; however, in the United States, tbo-filgrastim (Granix) is registered under the original biological application and is not approved for stem cell mobilization. In retrospective studies, stem cell mobilization with tbo-filgrastim has shown similar efficacy and toxicity as filgrastim, but no prospective studies have been published to date. We have conducted the first prospective randomized trial comparing the safety and efficacy of tbo-filgrastim in combination with plerixafor with that of filgrastim in combination with plerixafor for stem cell mobilization in patients with MM and NHL. This is a phase 2 prospective randomized (1:1) open-label single-institution noninferiority study of tbo-filgrastim and filgrastim with plerixafor in patients with MM or NHL undergoing auto-HSCT. Here 10 µg/kg/day of tbo-filgrastim/filgrastim was administered s.c. for 5 days (days 1 to 5). On day 4 at approximately 1800 hours, 0.24 mg/kg of plerixafor was administered s.c. Apheresis was performed on day 5 with a target cumulative collection goal of at least 5.0 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg. The primary objective was to compare day 5 CD34+ cells/kg collected. Secondary objectives included other mobilization endpoints, safety, engraftment outcomes, and hospital readmission rate. A total of 97 evaluable patients were enrolled (tbo-filgrastim, n = 46; filgrastim, n = 51). Tbo-filgrastim was not inferior to filgrastim in terms of day 5 CD34+ cell collection (mean, 11.6 ± 6.7 CD34+ cells/kg versus 10.0 ± 6.8 CD34+ cells/kg. Multivariate analysis revealed a trend toward increased mobilization in the tbo-filgrastim arm, but this was not statistically significant. The tbo-filgrastim and filgrastim arms were similar in all secondary endpoints. Tbo-filgrastim is not inferior in efficacy and has similar safety compared to reference filgrastim when used for stem cell mobilization in patients with MM and NHL. Granix can be safely used instead of Neupogen for stem cell collection in patients undergoing auto-HSCT for MM or NHL. The study is registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02098109.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pavan Kumar Bhamidipati
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Mark A Fiala
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Brenda J Grossman
- Division of Laboratory and Genomic Medicine, Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - John F DiPersio
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Keith Stockerl-Goldstein
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Feng Gao
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Geoffrey L Uy
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Peter Westervelt
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Mark A Schroeder
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Amanda F Cashen
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Camille N Abboud
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Ravi Vij
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Lisenko K, Baertsch MA, Meiser R, Pavel P, Bruckner T, Kriegsmann M, Schmitt A, Witzens-Harig M, Ho AD, Hillengass J, Wuchter P. Comparison of biosimilar filgrastim, originator filgrastim, and lenograstim for autologous stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma. Transfusion 2017; 57:2359-2365. [PMID: 28653421 DOI: 10.1111/trf.14211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2017] [Revised: 05/10/2017] [Accepted: 05/16/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) originators such as filgrastim (Neupogen) and lenograstim (Granocyte) are widely used for peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization. In recent years, biosimilar agents have been approved for the same indications. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the mobilization efficiency of the three G-CSF variants originator filgrastim, lenograstim, and the biosimilar Filgrastim Hexal in a homogeneous group of multiple myeloma (MM) patients in first-line therapy. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS Overall mobilization data of 250 patients with MM were included. Of these patients, 74 (30%), 131 (52%), and 45 (18%) were mobilized with originator filgrastim, biosimilar Filgrastim Hexal, or lenograstim, respectively, at a dose of 5 to 10 µg/kg body weight subcutaneously starting from Day 5 after chemomobilization with CAD (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, dexamethasone) until completion of PBSC collection. RESULTS All but one patient reached the collection goal of a minimum of at least 2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg body weight during a median of one (range, one to three) leukapheresis session. No significant differences in CD34+ mobilization and collection yields between the filgrastim-mobilized (median, 10.5; range, 2.7-40.4), Filgrastim Hexal-mobilized (median, 9.9; range, 0.2-26.0), and lenograstim-mobilized (median, 10.7; range, 3.1-27.9 CD34+ cells × 106 /kg body weight) patients were observed. CONCLUSION Concerning the clinically relevant efficiencies of PBSC mobilization and in terms of reaching the individual collection target, this retrospective study did not detect any significant differences between the three G-CSF variants in the analyzed patient cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Lisenko
- Department of Medicine V, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Renate Meiser
- Department of Medicine V, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Petra Pavel
- Stem Cell Laboratory, IKTZ Heidelberg GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Bruckner
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mark Kriegsmann
- Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anita Schmitt
- Department of Medicine V, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Anthony D Ho
- Department of Medicine V, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jens Hillengass
- Department of Medicine V, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Patrick Wuchter
- Institute of Transfusion Medicine and Immunology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, German Red Cross Blood Service Baden-Württemberg-Hessen, Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Nasillo V, Paolini A, Riva G, Morselli M, Potenza L, Coluccio V, Maccaferri M, Colaci E, Fantuzzi V, Messerotti A, Arletti L, Pioli V, Lugli E, Gilioli A, Quadrelli C, Zucchini P, Vallerini D, Lagreca I, Barozzi P, Cuoghi A, Bresciani P, Marasca R, Mariano MT, Ceccherelli G, Comoli P, Campioli D, Trenti T, Narni F, Luppi M, Forghieri F. Effectiveness of originator (Neupogen) and biosimilar (Zarzio) filgrastim in autologous peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in adults with acute myeloid leukemia: a single-center retrospective study. Leuk Lymphoma 2017; 59:225-228. [PMID: 28587560 DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2017.1321748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenzo Nasillo
- a Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Section of Hematology , University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico , Modena , Italy
| | - Ambra Paolini
- a Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Section of Hematology , University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico , Modena , Italy
| | - Giovanni Riva
- a Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Section of Hematology , University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico , Modena , Italy
| | - Monica Morselli
- a Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Section of Hematology , University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico , Modena , Italy
| | - Leonardo Potenza
- a Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Section of Hematology , University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico , Modena , Italy
| | - Valeria Coluccio
- a Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Section of Hematology , University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico , Modena , Italy
| | - Monica Maccaferri
- a Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Section of Hematology , University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico , Modena , Italy
| | - Elisabetta Colaci
- a Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Section of Hematology , University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico , Modena , Italy
| | - Valeria Fantuzzi
- a Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Section of Hematology , University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico , Modena , Italy
| | - Andrea Messerotti
- a Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Section of Hematology , University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico , Modena , Italy
| | - Laura Arletti
- a Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Section of Hematology , University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico , Modena , Italy
| | - Valeria Pioli
- a Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Section of Hematology , University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico , Modena , Italy
| | - Elisabetta Lugli
- a Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Section of Hematology , University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico , Modena , Italy
| | - Andrea Gilioli
- a Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Section of Hematology , University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico , Modena , Italy
| | - Chiara Quadrelli
- a Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Section of Hematology , University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico , Modena , Italy
| | - Patrizia Zucchini
- a Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Section of Hematology , University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico , Modena , Italy
| | - Daniela Vallerini
- a Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Section of Hematology , University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico , Modena , Italy
| | - Ivana Lagreca
- a Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Section of Hematology , University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico , Modena , Italy
| | - Patrizia Barozzi
- a Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Section of Hematology , University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico , Modena , Italy
| | - Angela Cuoghi
- a Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Section of Hematology , University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico , Modena , Italy
| | - Paola Bresciani
- a Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Section of Hematology , University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico , Modena , Italy
| | - Roberto Marasca
- a Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Section of Hematology , University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico , Modena , Italy
| | - Maria Teresa Mariano
- b Immuno-Transfusional Medicine Unit , Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico , Modena , Italy
| | - Giovanni Ceccherelli
- b Immuno-Transfusional Medicine Unit , Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico , Modena , Italy
| | - Patrizia Comoli
- c Pediatric Hematology Unit , Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Policlinico San Matteo , Pavia , Italy
| | - Daniele Campioli
- d Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology , Unità Sanitaria Locale (USL) , Modena , Italy
| | - Tommaso Trenti
- d Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology , Unità Sanitaria Locale (USL) , Modena , Italy
| | - Franco Narni
- a Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Section of Hematology , University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico , Modena , Italy
| | - Mario Luppi
- a Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Section of Hematology , University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico , Modena , Italy
| | - Fabio Forghieri
- a Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Section of Hematology , University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico , Modena , Italy
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Yosupov N, Haimov H, Juodzbalys G. Mobilization, Isolation and Characterization of Stem Cells from Peripheral Blood: a Systematic Review. EJOURNAL OF ORAL MAXILLOFACIAL RESEARCH 2017; 8:e1. [PMID: 28496961 PMCID: PMC5423306 DOI: 10.5037/jomr.2017.8101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2017] [Accepted: 03/20/2017] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Objectives The purpose of this article is to systematically review the methods of mobilization, isolation and characterization of stem cells from peripheral blood and to discuss their potential therapeutic applications for bone tissue regeneration. Material and Methods An electronic literature search was performed through MEDLINE (PubMed) electronic database. The search was restricted to English language articles published during the last 10 years, from January 2006 to November 2016. Results In total, 37 literature sources were reviewed, and 11 of the most relevant articles that are suitable to the criteria were selected. Articles were analysed with data on animals and humans for mobilization, isolation and characterization of stem cells from peripheral blood. From the examination of selected articles, the mobilization materials, side effects, alternatives and factors affecting the extracted amount of mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) from mobilized peripheral blood of healthy individuals, as well as characterization of mobilized MSC were reviewed in this article. Conclusions Bone tissue engineering is a potential alternative strategy in bone regeneration and bone defect repair, however, insufficiency data display in the literature on potential therapeutic applications of peripheral blood stem cells for bone tissue regeneration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natali Yosupov
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, KaunasLithuania
| | - Haim Haimov
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, KaunasLithuania
| | - Gintaras Juodzbalys
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, KaunasLithuania
| |
Collapse
|