Noninvasive fetal RHD genotyping to guide targeted anti-D prophylaxis-an external quality assessment workshop

Why do RhD negative pregnant women still become anti-D immunized despite prophylaxis with anti-D immunoglobulin?

Maternal allo-anti-D in RhD negative pregnant women may cause mild to severe hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. Although several other antibodies may also destroy red blood cells of the fetus and newborn, preventive measures with anti-D immunoglobulin are only available for D antigen. Targeted antenatal care together with postpartum prophylaxis with anti-D immunoglobulin has significantly reduced the D-alloimmunization risk. Potentially sensitizing events like trauma to the pregnant abdomen, vaginal bleeding, and amniocentesis may lead to fetomaternal hemorrhage and necessitate additional doses. Despite comprehensive programs with these targeted measures, allo-anti-D is still the most common reason for severe hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. Where do we fail then? Here, in this review, I would therefore like to discuss the reasons for D-alloimmunizations hoping that the greater focus will pave the way for further reduction in the number of pregnancy-related allo-anti-Ds.

Antenatal RHD screening to guide antenatal anti-D immunoprophylaxis in non-immunized D- pregnant women

In pregnancy, D- pregnant women may be at risk of becoming immunized against D when carrying a D+ fetus, which may eventually lead to hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. Administrating antenatal and postnatal anti-D immunoglobulin prophylaxis decreases the risk of immunization substantially. Noninvasive fetal RHD genotyping, based on testing cell-free DNA extracted from maternal plasma, offers a reliable tool to predict the fetal RhD phenotype during pregnancy. Used as a screening program, antenatal RHD screening can guide the administration of antenatal prophylaxis in non-immunized D- pregnant women so that unnecessary prophylaxis is avoided in those women who carry a D- fetus. In Europe, antenatal RHD screening programs have been running since 2009, demonstrating high test accuracies and program feasibility. In this review, an overview is provided of current state-of-the-art antenatal RHD screening, which includes discussions on the rationale for its implementation, methodology, detection strategies, and test performance. The performance of antenatal RHD screening in a routine setting is characterized by high accuracy, with a high diagnostic sensitivity of ≥99.9 percent. The result of using antenatal RHD screening is that 97-99 percent of the women who carry a D- fetus avoid unnecessary prophylaxis. As such, this activity contributes to avoiding unnecessary treatment and saves valuable anti-D immunoglobulin, which has a shortage worldwide. The main challenges for a reliable noninvasive fetal RHD genotyping assay are low cell-free DNA levels, the genetics of the Rh blood group system, and choosing an appropriate detection strategy for an admixed population. In many parts of the world, however, the main challenge is to improve the basic care for D- pregnant women.

Preliminary study of noninvasive prenatal screening for 22q11.2 deletion/duplication syndrome using multiplex dPCR assay

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to establish a cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) assay using multiplex digital PCR (dPCR) for identifying fetuses at increased risk of 22q11.2 deletion/duplication syndrome.

METHODS

Six detection sites and their corresponding probes were designed for the 22q11.2 recurrent region. A dPCR assay for the noninvasive screening of 22q11.2 deletion/duplication syndrome was established. A total of 130 plasma samples from pregnant women (including 15 samples with fetal 22q11.2 deletion/duplication syndrome) were blindly tested for evaluating the sensitivity and specificity of the established assay.

RESULTS

DNA with different sizes of 22q11.2 deletion/duplication was detected via dPCR, indicating that the designed probes and detection sites were reasonable and effective. In the retrospective clinical samples, 11 out of 15 samples of pregnant women with 22q11.2 deletion/duplication were detected during the cffDNA assay, and accurate regional localization was achieved. Among the 115 normal samples, 111 were confirmed to be normal. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used for assessing the cut-off values and AUC for these samples. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive as well as negative predictive values were 73.3%, 96.5%, 73.3%, and 96.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The cffDNA assay based on dPCR technology for the noninvasive detection of 22q11.2 recurrent copy number variants in fetuses detected most affected cases, including smaller but relatively common nested deletions, with a low false-positive rate. It is a potential, efficient and simple method for the noninvasive screening of 22q11.2 deletion/duplication syndrome.

Digital PCR and its applications in noninvasive prenatal testing

In the past decade, digital PCR (dPCR), as a new nucleic acid absolute quantification technology, has been widely used in clinical research. dPCR does not rely on the standard curve and has a higher tolerance to inhibitors. Therefore, it is more accurate than quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) for the absolute quantification of target sequences. In this article, we aim to review the application of dPCR in noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT). We focused on the progress of dPCR in screening and identifying fetal chromosome aneuploidies and monogenic mutations. We introduced some common strategies for dPCR in NIPT and analyzed the advantages and disadvantages of different methods. In addition, we compared dPCR with qPCR and next-generation sequencing, respectively, and described their superiority and shortcomings in clinical applications. Finally, we envisaged what the future of dPCR might be in NIPT. Although dPCR can provide reproducible results with improved accuracy due to the digital detection system, it is essential to combine the merits of dPCR and other molecular techniques to achieve more effective and accurate prenatal diagnostic strategies.

Recommendation for validation and quality assurance of non-invasive prenatal testing for foetal blood groups and implications for IVD risk classification according to EU regulations

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Non-invasive assays for predicting foetal blood group status in pregnancy serve as valuable clinical tools in the management of pregnancies at risk of detrimental consequences due to blood group antigen incompatibility. To secure clinical applicability, assays for non-invasive prenatal testing of foetal blood groups need to follow strict rules for validation and quality assurance. Here, we present a multi-national position paper with specific recommendations for validation and quality assurance for such assays and discuss their risk classification according to EU regulations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed the literature covering validation for in-vitro diagnostic (IVD) assays in general and for non-invasive foetal RHD genotyping in particular. Recommendations were based on the result of discussions between co-authors.

RESULTS

In relation to Annex VIII of the In-Vitro-Diagnostic Medical Device Regulation 2017/746 of the European Parliament and the Council, assays for non-invasive prenatal testing of foetal blood groups are risk class D devices. In our opinion, screening for targeted anti-D prophylaxis for non-immunized RhD negative women should be placed under risk class C. To ensure high quality of non-invasive foetal blood group assays within and beyond the European Union, we present specific recommendations for validation and quality assurance in terms of analytical detection limit, range and linearity, precision, robustness, pre-analytics and use of controls in routine testing. With respect to immunized women, different requirements for validation and IVD risk classification are discussed.

CONCLUSION

These recommendations should be followed to ensure appropriate assay performance and applicability for clinical use of both commercial and in-house assays.

Prediction of fetal blood group antigens from maternal plasma using Ion AmpliSeq HD technology

BACKGROUND

Fetal blood group (BG) and platelet (HPA) antigens may trigger maternal immunization, causing a fetal disease. Noninvasive prenatal diagnostics (NIPT) predicts fetal genotype, identifying pregnancies with no risk. All current techniques detect fetal antigen alleles with unspecific background and without estimation of fetal fraction, thus new protocols for detection of fetal BG/HPA alleles with ultrahigh sensitivity still need to be tested to improve NIPT.

AIM

To design NIPT of clinically important antigens using Ion AmpliSeq HD technology.

METHODS

Plasma DNA from 36 pregnant women (9-33 week of gestation, 24 immunized with anti-HPA-1a,-3b,-15a, -K, or -D+C+S), with known BG/HPA genotypes of their neonates/partners, was tested on Ion S5 System using the Ion AmpliSeq HD designer custom gene panel. NGS contained 25 rs-targets encoding relevant BG/HPA antigens and 10 markers.

RESULTS

Using the NGS protocol, 76 out of 85 differences in fetal/maternal BG/HPA genotypes were determined in concentration above 2% fetal paternally inherited allele chimerism. The level of unspecific reads for BG/HPA alleles was below 0.87%. In 24 immunized women NGS revealed feto-maternal incompatibility in 11 cases (from 2.44% to 7.41%) and excluded in 10 (<0.05%), three cases had inconclusive results (1.79%, 0.19%, 0.11%). The presence of fetal DNA was confirmed in each case by detecting markers with at least 2% chimerism.

CONCLUSION

The use of Ion AmpliSeq HD technology improves the prediction of feto-maternal incompatibility, increasing the sensitivity of BG/HPA NIPT and serving confirmation of the fetal DNA at the same workflow.

Optimization of diagnostic strategy for non-invasive cell-free foetal RHD determination from maternal plasma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to optimize routine non-invasive prenatal detection of fetal RHD gene from plasma of RhD-negative pregnant women (the median of gestational age was 25 weeks, range 10-38) to detect RhD materno-fetal incompatibility and to avoid the redundant immunoprophylaxis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Initially only one exon of RHD gene (exon 10) was investigated in 281 plasma samples (144 verified after delivery), in the second phase three RHD exons (5, 7, 10) were analyzed in 246 samples of plasma and maternal genomic DNA (204 verified) by real-time PCR method. Detection of Y-chromosomal sequence DYS-14 and five X-chromosomal insertion/deletion polymorphisms was used to confirm the fetal cfDNA detectability in plasma. Specific polymorphisms in RHD gene were detected by sequence-specific primer PCR in nine samples.

RESULTS

When only the RHD exon 10 was tested, 2·8% of verified samples were false positive and 3·5% false negative. With three RHD exons (5, 7, 10) and maternal genomic DNA testing, only one case was false negative (0·5%). Nine samples were inconclusive due to RHD-positive results in maternal genomic DNA. These samples were analyzed for specific mutations in RHD gene. Combination of both methods for fetal cfDNA verification succeeded in 75% of tested group.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of analysis of three RHD exons and maternal genomic DNA to routine practice lowers dramatically the ratio of false positive and negative results. This method enables more accurate determination of fetal RHD status with the reduction of unnecessary medical care and RhD immunoprophylaxis.

Prenatal RHD genotyping in Croatia: preliminary results

OBJECTIVES

Croatian Institute of Transfusion Medicine (CITM) implemented non-invasive fetal RHD genotyping as a request for targeted antenatal anti-D prophylaxis. The diagnostic performance of in-house RT-PCR method for fetal RHD genotyping and preliminary results are analyzed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Evaluation included results of RHD genotyping for 205 RhD negative pregnant women, 12-36th week of gestation, whose samples were received in period between 2015 and 2020. QIAsymphony SP DSP Virus Midi Kit was used for cffDNA extraction on QIAsymphony SP platform (Qiagen, Germany). Fragments of RHD exons 7 and 10 and later exon 5 were RT-PCR amplified. As internal controls, amplification of SRY gene or RASSF1A fragment and β-actin genes digested with BsTUI were used.

RESULTS

We identified 70.72% (145/205) positive and 28.78% (59/205) negative fetal RHD genotypes. We had one inconclusive result (0.50%) due to the interference of maternal DNA with variant genotype RHD*09.02.00/01/*01N.01. When compared to newborns RhD phenotypes, no false negative and three false positive results (3/199, 1.50%) were observed. The test yielded 100% sensitivity and 95.08% specificity, while diagnostic accuracy was 98.48%. We were able to determine one case of fetal variant genotype RHD*04.04/*01N.01 inherited from the father. The negative and positive predictive test values were 100% and 97.86%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Automated cffDNA extraction and RT-PCR amplification of fetal RHD exons 5,7,10 and fragments of SRY, RASSF1A genes represents highly reliable system for determining fetal RHD status which enables targeted antenatal anti-D prophylaxis. To obtain high specificity of cffDNA extraction, strict and thoroughly cleaning procedures are required.

Assessment of Fetal Rhesus D and Gender with Cell-Free DNA and Exosomes from Maternal Blood

The detection of fetal cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from maternal plasma has enabled the development of essential techniques in prenatal diagnosis during recent years. Extracellular vesicles including exosomes were determined to carry fetal DNA fragments. Considering the known difficulties during isolation and stability of cfDNA, exosomes might provide a new opportunity for prenatal diagnosis and screening. In this study, comparison of cfDNA and exosome DNA (exoDNA) for predicting the fetal sex and Rhesus D (RHD) genotype was performed by using real-time polymerase chain reaction with simultaneous amplification of sequences of SRY and RHD genes. Fetal sex and RHD were determined in 100 and 81 RHD-negative pregnant women with cfDNA and exoDNA, respectively. The gestation ages of pregnant women were between 9 and 40 weeks. The results were compared with the neonatal phenotype for gender and a serological test for RHD. The cfDNA revealed 95.75% sensitivity and 100% specificity in RHD positivity and 100% sensitivity and 95.45% specificity in SRY positivity. Cohen's agreement coefficient in the Kappa test ranged from 0.8 to 1.0 (P < 0.00001). Although the exoDNA failed to amplify 16 cases, the remaining 65 cases revealed a true estimate for both fetal RHD and SRY genes with 100% sensitivity and specificity. Successful application of exoDNA and cfDNA with real-time PCR for fetal genotyping enables this technique to be applied in the assessment of fetal RHD and gender during pregnancy, allowing initiation of early treatment methods and avoiding unnecessary interventions and cost.

Non-invasive prenatal testing for management of haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn induced by maternal alloimmunisation

Anti-D immunoglobulin prophylaxis reduces the risk of RhD negative women becoming alloimmunised to the RhD antigen and is a major preventative strategy in reducing the burden of haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). HDFN also arises from other maternal red cell antibodies, with the most clinically significant, after anti-D, being anti-K, anti-c and anti-E. Among the 39 human blood group systems advanced genomic technologies are still revealing novel or rare antigens involved in maternal alloimmunisation. Where clinically significant maternal antibodies are detected in pregnancy, non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) of cell-free fetal DNA provides a safe way to assess the fetal blood group antigen status. This provides information as to the risk for HDFN and thus guides management strategies. In many countries, NIPT fetal RHD genotyping as a diagnostic test using real-time PCR has already been integrated into routine clinical care for the management of women with allo-anti-D to assess the risk for HDFN. In addition, screening programs have been established to provide antenatal assessment of the fetal RHD genotype in non-alloimmunised RhD negative pregnant women to target anti-D prophylaxis to those predicted to be carrying an RhD positive baby. Both diagnostic and screening assays exhibit high accuracy (over 99 %). NIPT fetal genotyping for atypical (other than RhD) blood group antigens presents more challenges as most arise from a single nucleotide variant. Recent studies show potential for genomic and digital technologies to provide a personalised medicine approach with NIPT to assess fetal blood group status for women with other (non-D) red cell antibodies to manage the risk for HDFN.

Two Reliable Methodical Approaches for Non-Invasive RHD Genotyping of a Fetus from Maternal Plasma

Noninvasive fetal RHD genotyping is an important tool for predicting RhD incompatibility between a pregnant woman and a fetus. This study aimed to assess a methodological approach other than the commonly used one for noninvasive fetal RHD genotyping on a representative set of RhD-negative pregnant women. The methodology must be accurate, reliable, and broadly available for implementation into routine clinical practice. A total of 337 RhD-negative pregnant women from the Czech Republic region were tested in this study. The fetal RHD genotype was assessed using two methods: real-time PCR and endpoint quantitative fluorescent (QF) PCR. We used exon-7-specific primers from the RHD gene, along with internal controls. Plasma samples were analyzed and measured in four/two parallel reactions to determine the accuracy of the RHD genotyping. The RHD genotype was verified using DNA analysis from a newborn buccal swab. Both methods showed an excellent ability to predict the RHD genotype. Real-time PCR achieved its greatest accuracy of 98.6% (97.1% sensitivity and 100% specificity (95% CI)) if all four PCRs were positive/negative. The QF PCR method also achieved its greatest accuracy of 99.4% (100% sensitivity and 98.6% specificity (95% CI)) if all the measurements were positive/negative. Both real-time PCR and QF PCR were reliable methods for precisely assessing the fetal RHD allele from the plasma of RhD-negative pregnant women.

Potential of Next-Generation Sequencing in Noninvasive Fetal Molecular Blood Group Genotyping

Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn and fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia are caused by maternal antibodies against fetal alloantigens on red blood cells or platelets that are inherited from the father. After transplacental transport to the fetal circulation, antibodies of the IgG class may cause severe fetal anemia or bleeding complications. The indication for noninvasive fetal blood group genotyping is given if a clinically relevant antibody is detected in a pregnant woman and if the father is heterozygous (or unknown) for the implicated blood group allele. This mini-review will focus on the advantages and current limitations of next-generation sequencing (NGS) for noninvasive diagnosis of fetal blood groups which is, in contrast to fetal aneuploidy screening, proposed only by some research groups. Targeted massively parallel sequencing of short DNA fragments from maternal cell-free plasma samples enables counting of fetal alleles for many single nucleotide polymorphisms in parallel. This information can be utilized for estimation of the fetal fraction of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) as well as detection of the paternal blood group allele in question. Adherence to a cut-off of ≥4% fetal fraction for reporting conclusive results is recommended to avoid false-negative results due to low fetal fraction. For screening purposes of fetal RHD in RhD-negative pregnant women, real-time PCR methods are very well established. However, for diagnostic purposes, the targeted amplicon-based NGS approach has the inherent capability to estimate the fetal fraction of cfDNA. In the future, improving the accuracy of NGS by consensus sequencing of single cfDNA molecules may enable reliable fetal blood group genotyping already in the first trimester of pregnancy.