1
|
Guldager R, Nordentoft S, Poulsen I, Aadal L, Loft MI. Wants and needs for involvement reported by relatives of patients with a malignant brain tumor: a scoping review. JBI Evid Synth 2023; 21:2188-2210. [PMID: 37435678 DOI: 10.11124/jbies-22-00311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this scoping review was to identify and map the breadth of available evidence on relatives' wants and needs for involvement throughout the course of the disease in patients with a malignant brain tumor. INTRODUCTION Patients diagnosed with a malignant brain tumor often have a poor prognosis, including a rapid progression of the disease, with changing physical, cognitive, and psychosocial symptoms. The caregiver burden is described as multifaceted, and relatives often neglect their own physical, emotional, and social needs. INCLUSION CRITERIA This review included studies that defined or assessed the wants and needs for involvement of relatives of patients with a malignant brain tumor throughout the disease and treatment trajectory. The populations were relatives of patients with a malignant brain tumor in various settings. METHODS The JBI methodology for scoping reviews was followed in accordance with a previously published a priori protocol. An extensive search was conducted in the MEDLINE (PubMed), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), and Embase (Ovid). Gray literature was searched using Grey Matters and BASE. The initial search was conducted in February 2020 and updated in March 2022. This review was limited to studies published since January 2010 in English, German, or Scandinavian languages. The data were extracted using a data extraction tool (authors, year of publication, country of origin, setting, study methods, and findings related to wants and needs for involvement) created by the authors. Textual data mapping of wants and needs for involvement were synthesized narratively using a basic qualitative content analysis. The review findings are reported as a descriptive summary, with tables and figures to support the data. RESULTS The search identified 3830 studies, of which 10 were included. The studies were conducted in 6 countries and were published between 2010 and 2018. In total, 4 studies applied a qualitative study design that used semi-structured interviews, 2 studies applied a mixed methods design that used questionnaires and semi-structured interviews, 1 study applied a multi-method design, and 3 studies used a quantitative survey. Research was conducted in a variety of settings, including community palliative care, inpatient centers, outpatient, home, and post-bereavement. The findings showed that most of the relatives' needs were related to the caregiver role. The relatives were actively involved in the patients' disease and treatment trajectories. However, relatives were often required to adopt the caregiver role and a large amount of responsibility at short notice. Thus, they expressed a need for a stronger connection with health care professionals because their needs changed as rapidly as the disease progressed. Relatives also had a need related to maintaining hope, which was essential for their involvement. Relatives' wants for involvement in the patients' disease and treatment trajectories depended on a significant and timely amount of information. CONCLUSIONS The findings reveal that relatives are actively involved in the patients' disease and treatment trajectories. The relatives want and need support for their involvement, which is related directly to the accessibility and availability of health care professionals, as the demands placed on them change rapidly throughout the progression of the disease. One way to address relatives' wants and needs may be to further strengthen the relationship between the relatives and health care professionals. SUPPLEMENTAL DIGITAL CONTENT A Danish-language version of the abstract of this review is available as Supplemental Digital Content [ http://links.lww.com/SRX/A26 ]. A German-language version of the abstract of this review is available at Supplemental Digital Content [ http://links.lww.com/SRX/A35 ].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rikke Guldager
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Sara Nordentoft
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ingrid Poulsen
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager and Hvidovre Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark
- Research Unit Nursing and Health Care, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Lena Aadal
- Hammel Neurorehabilitation and Research Centre, Hammel, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Mia Ingerslev Loft
- Research Unit Nursing and Health Care, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Guldager R, Nordentoft S, Aadal L, Loft MI, Poulsen I. Wants and needs of relatives' involvement in patient care: the same but different. JBI Evid Synth 2023; 21:2154-2155. [PMID: 37935421 DOI: 10.11124/jbies-23-00469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Rikke Guldager
- Department of Neurosurgery, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Sara Nordentoft
- Department of Neurosurgery, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lena Aadal
- Hammel Neurorehabilitation and Research Centre, Hammel, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Mia Ingerslev Loft
- Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Roskilde University, Department for People and Technology, Roskilde, Denmark
| | - Ingrid Poulsen
- Roskilde University, Department for People and Technology, Roskilde, Denmark
- Research Unit of Nursing and Health Care, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital - Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Soendergaard PL, Arango-Lasprilla JC, Wolffbrandt MM, Dornonville de la Cour FL, Biering-Sørensen F, Norup A. Investigating the Effectiveness of a Family Intervention after Acquired Brain or Spinal Cord Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12093214. [PMID: 37176654 PMCID: PMC10179666 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12093214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2023] [Revised: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Acquired brain injury (ABI) or spinal cord injury (SCI) constitutes a severe life change for the entire family, often resulting in decreased quality of life (QoL) and increased caregiver burden. The objective of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of a family intervention in individuals with ABI or SCI and in their family members. (2) Methods: An RCT of a family intervention group (FIG) vs. a psychoeducational group (PEG) (ratio 1:1) was performed. The FIG received an eight-week manual-based family intervention, and the PEG received one psychoeducational session. Self-reported questionnaires on QoL with the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and on caregiver burden with the Caregiver Burden Scale (CBS) were the primary outcomes. The data analysis involved linear mixed-effects regression models. (3) Results: In total, 74 participants were allocated randomly to the FIG and 84 were allocated randomly to the PEG. The FIG had significantly larger improvements on the MCS and significantly larger reductions on the CBS at the two-month follow-up than participants in the PEG (mean differences of 5.64 points on the MCS and -0.26 points on the CBS). At the eight-month follow-up, the between-group difference remained significant (mean difference of 4.59 points) on the MCS, whereas that on the CBS was borderline significant (mean change of -0.14 points). (4) Conclusions: Family intervention was superior to psychoeducation, with larger improvements in QoL and larger reductions in caregiver burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pernille Langer Soendergaard
- Neurorehabilitation Research and Knowledge Centre, Rigshospitalet, 2600 Glostrup, Denmark
- Department of Psychology, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark
- Neurorehabilitation-CPH, City of Copenhagen, 2900 Hellerup, Denmark
| | | | - Mia Moth Wolffbrandt
- Neurorehabilitation Research and Knowledge Centre, Rigshospitalet, 2600 Glostrup, Denmark
- Department of Psychology, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark
| | - Frederik Lehman Dornonville de la Cour
- Neurorehabilitation Research and Knowledge Centre, Rigshospitalet, 2600 Glostrup, Denmark
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
- The Elsass Foundation, 2920 Charlottenlund, Denmark
| | - Fin Biering-Sørensen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Brain and Spinal Cord Injuries, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, 2600 Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Anne Norup
- Neurorehabilitation Research and Knowledge Centre, Rigshospitalet, 2600 Glostrup, Denmark
- Department of Psychology, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Guldager R, Nordentoft S, Aadal L, Loft MI, Vilhelmsen MA, Poulsen I. Interventions facilitating the involvement of relatives of patients with acquired brain injury or malignant brain tumour through the course of disease: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e062069. [PMID: 36717149 PMCID: PMC9887697 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Research identifying the needs of relatives of patients with an acquired brain injury or malignant brain tumours is emerging, and the importance of relative involvement is widely acknowledged. However, the intention of involvement does not seem to be present in current practice and healthcare professionals' routines. The complexity of involvement of relatives is comprehensive, and there is a lack of overview of interventions facilitating and enhancing involvement of relatives. This scoping review aims to identify and map the available evidence on interventions facilitating involvement of relatives of patients with acquired brain injury or malignant brain tumour throughout the disease trajectory. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The proposed scoping review will be performed following the Joanna Briggs Institute's methodology for scoping reviews. Published and unpublished literature in English, Scandinavian and German from January 2010 to August 2022 will be considered. The searches will be conducted using electronic bibliographic databases. This scoping review will consider studies describing interventions provided by multidisciplinary healthcare professionals. The key aspects of the interventions could, for example, be educational, informational, emotional, social or physical support aiming towards involvement of the relatives. This scoping review will consider all study designs, except for literature reviews of all types and designs. The data will be extracted using a data extraction tool developed to record specific data, including details of authors, year of publication, country, setting, study population, study design and key aspects of the intervention (mode, duration, intensity, provider) and type of primary and secondary outcomes applied to measure the interventions. The results will be presented in tabular form, accompanied by a descriptive summary related to the objective of the present scoping review. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This scoping review is conducted as part of a larger postdoc project, which has been approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency (ID P-2020-547). The results will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed journal and presented at local, national and international conferences on brain injuries and brain cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rikke Guldager
- Department of Neurosurgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen East, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Sara Nordentoft
- Department of Neurosurgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen East, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lena Aadal
- Department of Research, Hammel Neurorehabilitation and Research Centre, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus Universitet, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Mia Ingerslev Loft
- Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Research Unit Nursing and Health Care, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Maria Amalie Vilhelmsen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen East, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Quality and Patientcare, Amager & Hvidovre Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Ingrid Poulsen
- Research Unit Nursing and Health Care, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, Amager Hvidovre Hospital, Traumatic Brain Injury Unit, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark, Hvidovre, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rasmussen MS, Howe EI, Andelic N, Soberg HL. Associations between protective resources and family functioning after traumatic brain injury: A cross-sectional study using a structural equation modeling approach. NeuroRehabilitation 2023; 52:47-58. [PMID: 36617761 PMCID: PMC9912729 DOI: 10.3233/nre-220131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A strength-based approach in the rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury (TBI) is recommended for patients and their families. However, further exploration of the complexity of individual and family factors is needed. OBJECTIVE To explore the associations between individual protective resources in patients and family members and the overall family functioning using a strength-based approach. METHODS Secondary analysis of data collected at baseline in a randomized controlled trial. Structural equation modeling with two latent constructs and six observed variables was performed. Outcome measures included the Resilience Scale for Adults, the Mental Component Summary (SF-36), the General Self-Efficacy Scale, and the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale-IV. RESULTS Hundred and twenty-two participants (60 patients, 62 family members) with a mean age of 43 years were included at a median of 11 months post-injury. The final model demonstrated a strong covariance (coefficient = 0.61) between the latent Protective construct and Family functioning. Model-fit statistics indicated an acceptable fit to the data. CONCLUSION Higher levels of protective resources (resilience, self-efficacy, and mental HRQL) were positively associated with family functioning. These resources should be further assessed in patients and their families, to identify factors that can be strengthened through TBI rehabilitation intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mari S. Rasmussen
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Health and Society, Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models & Services (CHARM), Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Emilie I. Howe
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Nada Andelic
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Health and Society, Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models & Services (CHARM), Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Helene L. Soberg
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Met - Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Guldager R, Nordentoft S, Poulsen I, Aadal L, Loft MI. Wants and needs for involvement experienced by relatives of patients with an acquired brain injury: a scoping review. JBI Evid Synth 2022; 21:886-912. [PMID: 36729839 DOI: 10.11124/jbies-22-00022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This scoping review identifies and maps the breadth of available evidence on relatives' wants and needs for involvement in the care of patients with an acquired brain injury. INTRODUCTION Acquired brain injuries often occur suddenly and unexpectedly. Suffering from an acquired brain injury has major consequences, not only for the patients, due to the devastating impact on their physical, cognitive, social, and psychological well-being, but also for the relatives who may need to take on a lifelong role as carers. Research has cited some benefits of involving relatives in the care of patients, including positive effects on the patients' health outcomes; however, there are few studies showing how relatives can be involved. INCLUSION CRITERIA Studies that defined or assessed relatives' wants and needs for involvement with the care of patients with an acquired brain injury in all settings were included. Studies were included if they described any kind of wants and needs for involvement experienced from the perspective of relatives. The review considered all study designs, except for literature reviews. METHODS The JBI methodology for conducting a scoping review was employed in accordance with an a priori published protocol. An extensive search was conducted in MEDLINE (PubMed), CINAHL (EBSCO), and Embase (Ovid). Gray literature was searched using Grey Matters and BASE. The initial search was conducted in February 2020 and updated in September 2021. This review was limited to studies published in English, German, or Scandinavian languages since January 2010. The data were extracted using a data extraction tool (authors, year of publication, country of origin, setting, study methods, and findings related to wants and needs for involvement) created by the authors. The review findings are reported as a descriptive summary, with tables and figures supporting the data. RESULTS The search identified 3854 studies, 31 of which were included. The studies were published between 2010 and 2021 and were conducted across 9 countries. In total, 16 studies applied a qualitative study design, 4 studies used a descriptive approach, 4 studies used a quantitative research design, 4 studies reported using a mixed methods design, and 3 studies employed a multi-methods design. The studies were conducted across a variety of settings, ranging from acute care to home. The international literature on the involvement of relatives with patients with acquired brain injuries comprises multiple published studies on different aspects of the topic and within various care contexts. The findings identified few studies describing wants and needs experienced by relatives in relation to involvement in the patient's disease trajectory. CONCLUSIONS The findings show that relatives' wants and needs are primarily related to information and communication, but are also related to collaboration with health care professionals. The findings illustrate that the complexity of involvement is comprehensive, with multiple aspects to consider.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rikke Guldager
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Sara Nordentoft
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ingrid Poulsen
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager and Hvidovre Hospital Hvidovre, Denmark.,Research Unit Nursing and Health Care, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Lena Aadal
- Hammel Neurorehabilitation and Research Centre, Hammel, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Mia Ingerslev Loft
- Research Unit Nursing and Health Care, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Balice-Bourgois C, Bonetti L, Tolotti A, Liptrott SJ, Villa M, Luca CE, Steiner LM, Biegger A, Goncalves S, Moser L, Palermo A, Sari D, Valcarenghi D. Experiences and Needs of Patients, Caregivers and Nurses during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Study Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Multicentre Study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph191912838. [PMID: 36232138 PMCID: PMC9566058 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191912838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2022] [Revised: 10/02/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic is a major public health problem with millions of confirmed cases and deaths described. Nurses are among the health care professionals most involved at the front line, caring for those affected by COVID-19. Patients and families have been subjected to a high emotional burden of fear, anxiety, and uncertainty. The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on the approach to patients, the organisation of care, and communication with patients and their families, all requiring considerable adaptation on the part of nurses and health care professionals. The overall aim of this research was to find out the needs of patients with COVID-19, the nursing interventions provided and their outcomes, and to explore the experiences of the nurses, patients, and caregivers. A mixed method study will be performed with a convergent design. The study was divided into three phases. Quantitative methods involved nurses and patients affected by COVID-19 with a questionnaire. Qualitative methods involved nurses, patients, and caregivers with interviews and finally a quantitative analysis of the nursing documentation of the interviewed patients. We hope that this study will help us to understand and identify the main nursing and support needs expressed by patients and their families at different stages of their illness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colette Balice-Bourgois
- Institute of Paediatrics of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Via Gallino, 12, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland
- Nursing Research Competence Centre, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Viale Officina, 3, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Loris Bonetti
- Nursing Research Competence Centre, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Viale Officina, 3, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland
- Department of Business Economics, Health and Social Care, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland, Via Violino, 11, 6928 Manno, Switzerland
| | - Angela Tolotti
- Nursing Research Competence Centre, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Viale Officina, 3, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland
- Nursing Development and Research Unit, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Via Gallino, 12, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Sarah Jayne Liptrott
- Nursing Research Competence Centre, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Viale Officina, 3, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland
- Nursing Development and Research Unit, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Via Gallino, 12, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland
- Ospedale Regionale di Bellinzona e Valli, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Via Gallino, 12, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Michele Villa
- Nursing Research Competence Centre, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Viale Officina, 3, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland
- Cardiocentro Ticino Institute, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Via Tesserete, 48, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Corina Elena Luca
- Nursing Research Competence Centre, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Viale Officina, 3, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland
- Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Via Tesserete, 46, 6903 Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Laura Maria Steiner
- Nursing Research Competence Centre, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Viale Officina, 3, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland
- Department of Business Economics, Health and Social Care, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland, Via Violino, 11, 6928 Manno, Switzerland
| | - Annette Biegger
- Nursing Department Direction, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Viale Officina, 3, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Silvia Goncalves
- Ospedale Regionale di Locarno, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Via all'Ospedale, 1, 6600 Locarno, Switzerland
| | - Laura Moser
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Via Gallino, 12, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Antonio Palermo
- Ospedale Regionale di Bellinzona e Valli, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Via Gallino, 12, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Davide Sari
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Via Gallino, 12, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Dario Valcarenghi
- Nursing Research Competence Centre, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Viale Officina, 3, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Fusco A, Galluccio C, Castelli L, Pazzaglia C, Pastorino R, Pires Marafon D, Bernabei R, Giovannini S, Padua L. Severe Acquired Brain Injury: Prognostic Factors of Discharge Outcome in Older Adults. Brain Sci 2022; 12:brainsci12091232. [PMID: 36138968 PMCID: PMC9496921 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12091232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2022] [Revised: 09/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Severe Acquired Brain Injury (sABI) is a leading cause of disability and requires intensive rehabilitation treatment. Discharge from the rehabilitation ward is a key moment in patient management. Delays in patient discharge can adversely affect hospital productivity and increase healthcare costs. The discharge should be structured from the hospital admission toward the most appropriate environment. The purpose of our study is to investigate early predictors of outcome for discharge in older adults with sABI. A retrospective study was performed on 22 patients who were admitted to an intensive neurorehabilitation unit between June 2019 and December 2021. Patients were divided into two outcome categories, good outcome (GO) or poor outcome (PO), based on discharge destination, and the possible prognostic factors were analyzed at one and two months after admission. Among the factors analyzed, changes in the Disability Rating Scale (DRS) and Level of Cognitive Functioning (LCF) at the first and second month of hospitalization were predictive of GO at discharge (DRS, p = 0.025; LCF, p = 0.011). The presence of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy at two months after admission was also significantly associated with PO (p = 0.038). High Body Mass Index (BMI) and the presence of sepsis at one month after admission were possible predictors of PO (BMI p = 0.048; sepsis p = 0.014). An analysis of dynamic predictors could be useful to guarantee an early evaluation of hospital discharge in frail patients with sABI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Augusto Fusco
- UOC Neuroriabilitazione ad Alta Intensità, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Caterina Galluccio
- UOC Neuroriabilitazione ad Alta Intensità, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Department of Geriatrics and Orthopaedics, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Letizia Castelli
- UOC Neuroriabilitazione ad Alta Intensità, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Department of Aging, Neurological, Orthopaedic and Head-Neck Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Costanza Pazzaglia
- UOC Neuroriabilitazione ad Alta Intensità, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Roberta Pastorino
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health—Public Health Area, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Section of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Denise Pires Marafon
- Section of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Bernabei
- Department of Geriatrics and Orthopaedics, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Department of Aging, Neurological, Orthopaedic and Head-Neck Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Silvia Giovannini
- Department of Geriatrics and Orthopaedics, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
- UOS Neuroriabilitazione Post-acuzie, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-06-3015-4382
| | - Luca Padua
- UOC Neuroriabilitazione ad Alta Intensità, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Department of Geriatrics and Orthopaedics, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pusa S, Saveman BI, Sundin K. Family systems nursing conversations: influences on families with stroke. BMC Nurs 2022; 21:108. [PMID: 35524243 PMCID: PMC9078019 DOI: 10.1186/s12912-022-00873-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 04/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Since a family member’s stroke affects the entire family, family systems nursing conversations (FSNCs) may be an appropriate intervention to support the family as a whole. The purpose of our study was to illuminate family members’ experiences within their family situations 6 months after participating in FSNCs when a family member under 65 years of age had suffered a stroke. Methods Fourteen semi-structured follow-up interviews were conducted with family members 6 months after they had completed a series of 3 FSNCs. The interview transcripts were subjected to qualitative content analysis. Results Family members experienced that the FSNCs had contributed to greater understanding of each other and greater closeness in the family. The FSNCs had also facilitated a mutual understanding of the family’s situation, which they could better manage and move forward with together. Conclusions FSNCs can support relational aspects and healthy transitions within families. However, long-term follow-up research is needed to generate sound evidence and inform education about FSNCs, as well as to facilitate their implementation. As a result, families may become better able to prevent the negative outcomes of illness in the family.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanna Pusa
- Department of Nursing, Umeå University, Campus Örnsköldsvik, Box 843, S-891 18, Örnsköldsvik, Sweden.
| | | | - Karin Sundin
- Department of Nursing, Umeå University, Campus Örnsköldsvik, Box 843, S-891 18, Örnsköldsvik, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Is the "Family Glass Cabin" Useful to Safely Allow Inpatient-Caregiver Interaction in the COVID-19 Era? A Pilot Study on Severe Acquired Brain Injury. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11061623. [PMID: 35329947 PMCID: PMC8950736 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11061623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Revised: 03/08/2022] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) is a life-changing event that can have a devastating impact on all aspects of a person’s functioning. Patients with ABI present several behavioral problems that have worsened during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aimed at investigating the role of a “Family Glass Cabin” (FGC) both in improving cognitive function and communicative abilities of people with ABI and in potentiating the mental health of their caregivers. Fifteen subjects affected by ABI and their caregivers were enrolled in this experimental study. Training was performed through the FGC and was based on either psychoeducational sessions for the caregivers or cognitive stimulations for the patients. The participants attended biweekly meetings for 12 consecutive weeks. Each participant was assessed by means of a complete psychometric and clinical battery, before (T0) and after (T1) the training. We found significant changes in all patients’ outcomes, including global cognitive function and communication abilities (p < 0.01), as well as an improvement in caregivers’ well-being. Our data suggest that the physical presence of the caregiver in the rehabilitation setting, using a safe setting such as the FGC, can be a valuable means to increase ABI patients’ functional recovery and reduce caregivers’ anxiety and emotional burden.
Collapse
|
11
|
de Goumoëns V, Ayigah K, Joye D, Ryvlin P, Ramelet AS. The Development of an Early Intervention for Supporting Families of Persons With Acquired Brain Injuries: The SAFIR © Intervention. JOURNAL OF FAMILY NURSING 2022; 28:6-16. [PMID: 34617490 PMCID: PMC8814967 DOI: 10.1177/10748407211048217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
Families of persons with acquired brain injuries need to be supported from the early phase of hospitalization. To date, no known early family intervention is available for this population. Using the Medical Research Council Framework, we developed a new intervention based on the Calgary Assessment and Intervention Models that includes the family preferences, clinician's expertise, and the contextual resources. This paper aims to describe the complete development process including a scoping review, an assessment of families and clinicians' needs, an evaluation of the contextual resources, and an adaptation of the theoretical framework. Using a systemic perspective, we tailored the new intervention to involve the stakeholder's preferences. The result is an early family intervention named SAFIR©, led by a clinical nurse specialist, including five core components and structured around three phases and a follow-up. The next steps will be focused on assessment of the clinical feasibility of this new intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Véronique de Goumoëns
- La Source School of Nursing, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Av. Vinet 30, Lausanne
- University Institute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Lausanne University Hospital, (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
- HESAV School of Health Sciences, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland
| | - Koffi Ayigah
- HESAV School of Health Sciences, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland
| | - Daniel Joye
- Lausanne University Hospital, (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | - Anne-Sylvie Ramelet
- University Institute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Lausanne University Hospital, (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Dichman C, Wagner MK, Joshi VL, Bernild C. Feeling responsible but unsupported: How relatives of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors experience the transition from hospital to daily life - A focus group study. Nurs Open 2021; 8:2520-2527. [PMID: 33638939 PMCID: PMC8363397 DOI: 10.1002/nop2.779] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2020] [Revised: 12/26/2020] [Accepted: 01/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM To generate knowledge about how relatives of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors experience the transition between hospital and daily life. The research question was "how do relatives of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors experience collaboration and communication with healthcare professionals, and what is emphasized as important in the transition from hospital to daily life". DESIGN Qualitative design. METHODS Six semi-structured focus group interviews were conducted with 23 relatives of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors who participated in a residential rehabilitation course. Data was collected between November 2018 and March 2019. Transcripts were analysed using a phenomenological hermeneutic approach. RESULTS The analysis generated three themes "a necessary presence," "communication with healthcare professionals on the cardiac ward" and "the abrupt disappearance of the system." Relatives of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors feel a great responsibility when coping and adjusting to their new life. In the transition to daily life, a focus on systematic involvement and collaboration with relatives should be an essential part of the post-cardiac arrest pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilla Dichman
- Department of CardiologyThe Heart CentreCopenhagen University Hospital RigshospitaletCopenhagenDenmark
| | - Mette Kirstine Wagner
- Department of CardiologyThe Heart CentreCopenhagen University Hospital RigshospitaletCopenhagenDenmark
| | - Vicky L. Joshi
- REHPAThe Danish Knowledge Centre for Rehabilitation and Palliative CareDepartment of Clinical ResearchUniversity of Southern DenmarkOdenseDenmark
| | - Camilla Bernild
- Department of CardiologyThe Heart CentreCopenhagen University Hospital RigshospitaletCopenhagenDenmark
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Rasmussen MS, Andelic N, Pripp AH, Nordenmark TH, Soberg HL. The effectiveness of a family-centred intervention after traumatic brain injury: A pragmatic randomised controlled trial. Clin Rehabil 2021; 35:1428-1441. [PMID: 33858221 PMCID: PMC8495317 DOI: 10.1177/02692155211010369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Objectives: To determine the effectiveness of a family-centred intervention for patients with traumatic brain injury and family members. Design: Open-labelled, two-armed randomised controlled trial. Settings: Outpatient clinic and family residences. Participants: Sixty-one patients (33 women) with traumatic brain injury, with mean (SD) age 43.8 (12.2), and 63 family members (33 women), with mean (SD) age 42.6 (11.3), were assign to intervention (n = 30 families) and control group (n = 31 families). Intervention: An eight-session single-family intervention to improve individual and family functioning. Outcome measures: Self-reported questionnaires at start-of-treatment, median (IQR) 11.4 (8.4, 15.9) months post-injury, and at two follow-ups, 2.7 (2.3, 3.8) and 9.2 (8.2, 9.9) months after start-of-treatment. Primary outcome measures were the SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS) and Caregiver Burden Scale (CGB). Secondary outcome measures were the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale (FACES) and Quality of Life after Brain Injury Questionnaire (QOLIBRI). Group differences were analysed with linear mixed-model analysis for repeated measurements. Results: No significant between-group differences were found. The intervention group significantly improved on the MCS, the CGB and FACES in the treatment period, whereas the controls did not. The mean (SD) MCS change in the treatment period was 2.4 (1.1) points P = 0.028 in the intervention group. Mean (SE) MCS scores were 47.9 (1.26) and 47.3 (1.27) in the intervention and control group at last follow-up. Conclusions: Receiving an eight-session family intervention, in addition to specialised rehabilitation for the patients, was not superior to rehabilitation at a specialised traumatic brain injury outpatient clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mari S Rasmussen
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Health and Society, Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models & Services (CHARM), Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Nada Andelic
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Health and Society, Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models & Services (CHARM), Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Are H Pripp
- Oslo Centre of Biostatistics and Epidemiology Research Support Services, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tonje H Nordenmark
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Helene L Soberg
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, OsloMet - Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lockwood C, Dos Santos KB, Pap R. Practical Guidance for Knowledge Synthesis: Scoping Review Methods. Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci) 2019; 13:287-294. [PMID: 31756513 DOI: 10.1016/j.anr.2019.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2019] [Accepted: 11/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Scoping reviews are a useful approach to synthesizing research evidence although the objectives and methods are different to that of systematic reviews, yet some confusion persists around how to plan and prepare so that a completed scoping review complies with best practice in methods and meets international standards for reporting criteria. This paper describes how to use available guidance to ensure a scoping review project meets global standards, has transparency of methods and promotes readability though the use of innovative approaches to data analysis and presentation. We address some of the common issues such as which projects are more suited to systematic reviews, how to avoid an inadequate search and/or poorly reported search strategy, poorly described methods and lack of transparency, and the issue of how to plan and present results that are clear, visually compelling and accessible to readers. Effective pre-planning, adhering to protocol and detailed consideration of how the results data will be communicated to the readership are critical. The aim of this article is to provide clarity about what is meant by conceptual clarity and how pre-planning enables review authors to produce scoping reviews which are of high quality, reliability and readily publishable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Craig Lockwood
- Implementation Science, The Joanna Briggs Institute, North Adelaide, Australia.
| | - Kelli Borgess Dos Santos
- School of Nursing, University Federal of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Brazil; The Brazilian Centre for Evidence-based Healthcare: A Joanna Briggs Centre of Excellence, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Robin Pap
- School of Science and Health, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|