Metaboreceptor activation in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: Linking cardiac and peripheral vascular haemodynamics

Cardiac output-mediated regulation of cerebral blood flow during exercise: Clinical perspectives on the indirect impact of muscle metaboreflex

The muscle metaboreflex stimulates the elevation of arterial blood pressure, aiming to rectify the oxygen deficit by enhancing oxygen delivery to support muscle activity. Moreover, activating the muscle metaboreflex significantly increases cardiac output (CO) by increasing factors such as heart rate, ventricular contractility, preload, stroke volume and mobilization of central blood volume. Previous studies indicate that ageing and cardiovascular diseases modify the muscle metaboreflex during exercise, limiting the ability to increase CO during physical activity. Alongside reduced exercise capacity, the attenuated rise in CO due to abnormal muscle metaboreflex in these patients impedes the increase in cerebral blood flow during exercise. Considering that CO plays a pivotal role in regulating cerebral blood flow adequately during exercise, this occurrence might contribute to an elevated risk of cerebral diseases, and it could also, at least, reduce the effective role of exercise in preventing cerebral disease and dementia among elderly individuals and patients with cardiovascular conditions. Therefore, it is important to consider this phenomenon when optimizing the effectiveness of exercise rehabilitation in patients with cardiovascular disease to prevent cerebral diseases and dementia.

Neural control of the circulation during exercise in heart failure with reduced and preserved ejection fraction

Patients with heart failure with reduced (HFrEF) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) exhibit severe exercise intolerance that may be due, in part, to inappropriate cardiovascular and hemodynamic adjustments to exercise. Several neural mechanisms and locally released vasoactive substances work in concert through complex interactions to ensure proper adjustments to meet the metabolic demands of the contracting skeletal muscle. Specifically, accumulating evidence suggests that disease-related alterations in neural mechanisms (e.g., central command, exercise pressor reflex, arterial baroreflex, and cardiopulmonary baroreflex) contribute to heightened sympathetic activation and impaired ability to attenuate sympathetic vasoconstrictor responsiveness that may contribute to reduced skeletal muscle blood flow and severe exercise intolerance in patients with HFrEF. In contrast, little is known regarding these important aspects of physiology in patients with HFpEF, though emerging data reveal heightened sympathetic activation and attenuated skeletal muscle blood flow during exercise in this patient population that may be attributable to dysregulated neural control of the circulation. The overall goal of this review is to provide a brief overview of the current understanding of disease-related alterations in the integrative neural cardiovascular responses to exercise in both HFrEF and HFpEF phenotypes, with a focus on sympathetic nervous system regulation during exercise.

Consequences of group III/IV afferent feedback and respiratory muscle work on exercise tolerance in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

Exercise intolerance and exertional dyspnoea are the cardinal symptoms of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). In HFrEF, abnormal autonomic and cardiopulmonary responses arising from locomotor muscle group III/IV afferent feedback is one of the primary mechanisms contributing to exercise intolerance. HFrEF patients also have pulmonary system and respiratory muscle abnormalities that impair exercise tolerance. Thus, the primary impetus for this review was to describe the mechanistic consequences of locomotor muscle group III/IV afferent feedback and respiratory muscle work in HFrEF. To address this, we first discuss the abnormal autonomic and cardiopulmonary responses mediated by locomotor muscle afferent feedback in HFrEF. Next, we outline how respiratory muscle work impairs exercise tolerance in HFrEF through its effects on locomotor muscle O2 delivery. We then discuss the direct and indirect evidence supporting an interaction between locomotor muscle group III/IV afferent feedback and respiratory muscle work during exercise in HFrEF. Last, we outline future research directions related to locomotor and respiratory muscle abnormalities to progress the field forward in understanding the pathophysiology of exercise intolerance in HFrEF. NEW FINDINGS: What is the topic of this review? This review is focused on understanding the role that locomotor muscle group III/IV afferent feedback and respiratory muscle work play in the pathophysiology of exercise intolerance in patients with heart failure. What advances does it highlight? This review proposes that the concomitant effects of locomotor muscle afferent feedback and respiratory muscle work worsen exercise tolerance and exacerbate exertional dyspnoea in patients with heart failure.

Cardiovascular responses to static handgrip exercise and postexercise ischemia in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is characterized by reduced ability to sustain physical activity that may be due partly to disease-related changes in autonomic function that contribute to dysregulated cardiovascular control during muscular contraction. Thus, we used a combination of static handgrip exercise (HG) and postexercise ischemia (PEI) to examine the pressor response to exercise and isolate the skeletal muscle metaboreflex, respectively. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), cardiac output (CO), and total peripheral resistance (TPR) were assessed during 2-min of static HG at 30 and 40% of maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) and subsequent PEI in 16 patients with HFpEF and 17 healthy, similarly aged controls. Changes in MAP were lower in patients with HFpEF compared with controls during both 30%MVC (Δ11 ± 7 vs. Δ15 ± 8 mmHg) and 40%MVC (Δ19 ± 14 vs. Δ30 ± 8 mmHg), and a similar pattern of response was evident during PEI (30%MVC: Δ8 ± 5 vs. Δ12 ± 8 mmHg; 40%MVC: Δ13 ± 10 vs. Δ18 ± 9 mmHg) (group effect: P = 0.078 and P = 0.017 at 30% and 40% MVC, respectively). Changes in HR, CO, and TPR did not differ between groups during HG or PEI (P > 0.05). Taken together, these data suggest a reduced pressor response to static muscle contractions in patients with HFpEF compared with similarly aged controls that may be mediated partly by a blunted muscle metaboreflex. These findings support a disease-related dysregulation in neural cardiovascular control that may reduce an ability to sustain physical activity in HFpEF.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The current investigation has identified a diminution in the exercise-induced rise in arterial blood pressure (BP) that persisted during postexercise ischemia (PEI) in an intensity-dependent manner in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) compared with older, healthy controls. These findings suggest that the pressor response to exercise is reduced in patients with HFpEF, and this deficit may be mediated, in part, by a blunted muscle metaboreflex, highlighting the consequences of impaired neural cardiovascular control during exercise in this patient group.

The ventilatory component of the muscle metaboreflex is overstimulated in transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis patients with poor aerobic capacity

Background: The exercise pressor reflex, i.e., metabo- and mechano-reflex, partially regulates the control of ventilation and cardiovascular function during exercise. Abnormal exercise pressor reflex response has been associated with exaggerated ventilatory drive, sympathovagal imbalance and exercise limitation in chronic heart failure patients. Whether metaboreflex is over-activated and participate to poor aerobic capacity in patients with hereditary transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (CA-TTR) is unknown. Methods: Twenty-two CA-TTR patients (aged 76 ± 7, 68% male) with the V122I (p.Val142Ile) transthyretin underwent a thorough evaluation including heart rate variability metrics, electrochemical skin conductance (ESC), physical function cardiopulmonary exercise testing, and muscle metaboreflex assessment. Eleven control subjects were chosen for muscle metaboreflex assessment. Results: Age-matched controls (n = 11) and CA-TTR patients (n = 22) had similar metaboreflex sensitivity for heart rate, stroke volume, cardiac index and mean systemic arterial pressure. Compared with age-matched controls, metaboreflex sensitivity for systemic vascular resistance (-18.64% ± 6.91% vs 3.14% ± 23.35%) and minute-ventilation responses (-9.65% ± 14.83% vs 11.84% ± 23.1%) was markedly increased in CA-TTR patients. Values of ESC displayed positive correlations with stroke volume (r = 0.53, p = 0.011) and cardiac index (r = 0.51, p = 0.015) components of metaboreflex sensitivity, an inverse correlation with systemic vascular resistance (r = -0.55, p = 0.008) and a trend with mean arterial (r = -0.42, p = 0.052) components of metaboreflex sensitivity. Peak aerobic capacity (peak VO₂%) displayed an inverse correlation with the ventilation component of metaboreflex sensitivity (r = -0.62, p = 0.015). Conclusion: Consistent with the "muscle hypothesis" in heart failure, it is proposed that deterioration of skeletal muscle function in hereditary CA-TTR patients may activate muscle metaboreflex, leading to an increase in ventilation and sensation of breathlessness, the perception of fatigue, and overall sympathetic activation.

Muscle metaboreflex adaptations to exercise training in health and disease

Abnormalities in the muscle metaboreflex concur to exercise intolerance and greater cardiovascular risk. Exercise training benefits neurocardiovascular function at rest and during exercise, but its role in favoring muscle metaboreflex in health and disease remains controversial. While some authors demonstrated that exercise training enhanced the sensitization of muscle metabolically afferents and improved neurocardiovascular responses to muscle metaboreflex activation, others reported unaltered responses. This narrative review aimed to: (a) highlight the current evidence on the effects of exercise training upon cardiovascular and autonomic responses to muscle metaboreflex activation; (b) analyze the role of training components and indicate potential mechanisms of metaboreflex adaptations; and (c) address key methodological features for future research. Though limited, accumulated evidence suggests that muscle metaboreflex adaptations depend on the individual clinical status, exercise modality, and training duration. In healthy populations, most trials negated the hypothesis of metaboreflex improvement due to chronic exercise, irrespective of the training duration. Favorable changes in patients with impaired metaboreflex, particularly chronic heart failure, mostly resulted from long-term interventions (> 16 weeks) including aerobic exercise of moderate to high intensity, performed in isolation or within multimodal training. Potential mechanisms of metaboreflex improvements include enhanced sensitivity of channels and receptors, greater antioxidant capacity, lower metabolite accumulation, increased functional sympatholysis, and muscle perfusion. Future research should investigate: (1) the dose-response relationship of training components within different exercise modalities to elicit improvements in individuals showing intact or impaired muscle metaboreflex; and (2) potential and specific underlying mechanisms of metaboreflex improvements in individuals with different medical conditions.

Central Command and the Regulation of Exercise Heart Rate Response in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

BACKGROUND

Chronotropic incompetence is common in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and is linked to impaired aerobic capacity. Whether upstream autonomic signaling pathways responsible for raising exercise heart rate are impaired in HFpEF is unknown. We investigated the integrity of central command and muscle metaboreceptor function, 2 predominant mechanisms responsible for exertional increases in heart rate, in patients with HFpEF and senior controls.

METHODS

Fourteen healthy senior controls (7 men, 7 women) and 20 carefully screened patients with HFpEF (8 men, 12 women) underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing (peak Vo₂) and static handgrip exercise at 40% of maximal voluntary contraction to fatigue with postexercise circulatory arrest for 2 minutes to assess central command and metaboreceptor function, respectively.

RESULTS

Peak Vo₂ (13.1±3.4 versus 22.7±4.0 mL/kg/min; P<0.001) and heart rate (122±20 versus 155±14 bpm; P<0.001) were lower in patients with HFpEF than senior controls. There were no significant differences in peak heart rate response during static handgrip between groups (patients with HFpEF versus controls: 90±13 versus 93±10 bpm; P=0.49). Metaboreceptor function, defined as mean arterial blood pressure at the end of postexercise circulatory arrest, was not significantly different between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Central command (vagally mediated) and metaboreceptor function (sympathetically mediated) in patients with HFpEF were not different from those in healthy senior controls despite significantly lower peak whole-body exercise heart rates. These results demonstrate key reflex autonomic pathways regulating exercise heart rate responsiveness are intact in HFpEF.

Clinical safety of blood flow-restricted training? A comprehensive review of altered muscle metaboreflex in cardiovascular disease during ischemic exercise

Blood flow restriction training (BFRT) is an increasingly widespread method of exercise that involves imposed restriction of blood flow to the exercising muscle. Blood flow restriction is achieved by inflating a pneumatic pressure cuff (or a tourniquet) positioned proximal to the exercising muscle before, and during, the bout of exercise (i.e., ischemic exercise). Low-intensity BFRT with resistance training promotes comparable increases in muscle mass and strength observed during high-intensity exercise without blood flow restriction. BFRT has expanded into the clinical research setting as a potential therapeutic approach to treat functionally impaired individuals, such as the elderly, and patients with orthopedic and cardiovascular disease/conditions. However, questions regarding the safety of BFRT must be fully examined and addressed before the implementation of this exercise methodology in the clinical setting. In this respect, there is a general concern that BFRT may generate abnormal reflex-mediated cardiovascular responses. Indeed, the muscle metaboreflex is an ischemia-induced, sympathoexcitatory pressor reflex originating in skeletal muscle, and the present review synthesizes evidence that BFRT may elicit abnormal cardiovascular responses resulting from increased metaboreflex activation. Importantly, abnormal cardiovascular responses are more clearly evidenced in populations with increased cardiovascular risk (e.g., elderly and individuals with cardiovascular disease). The evidence provided in the present review draws into question the cardiovascular safety of BFRT, which clearly needs to be further investigated in future studies. This information will be paramount for the consideration of BFRT exercise implementation in clinical populations.