Accelerator beam data commissioning equipment and procedures: Report of the TG-106 of the Therapy Physics Committee of the AAPM

AAPM WGTG51 Report 385: Addendum to the AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy electron beams

An Addendum to the AAPM's TG-51 protocol for the determination of absorbed dose to water is presented for electron beams with energies between 4 MeV and 22 MeV (1.70 cm ≤ R 50 ≤ 8.70 cm $1.70\nobreakspace {\rm cm} \le R_{\text{50}} \le 8.70\nobreakspace {\rm cm}$ ). This updated formalism allows simplified calibration procedures, including the use of calibrated cylindrical ionization chambers in all electron beams without the use of a gradient correction. Newk Q $k_{Q}$ data are provided for electron beams based on Monte Carlo simulations. Implementation guidance is provided. Components of the uncertainty budget in determining absorbed dose to water at the reference depth are discussed. Specifications for a reference-class chamber in electron beams include chamber stability, settling, ion recombination behavior, and polarity dependence. Progress in electron beam reference dosimetry is reviewed. Although this report introduces some major changes (e.g., gradient corrections are implicitly included in the electron beam quality conversion factors), they serve to simplify the calibration procedure. Results for absorbed dose per linac monitor unit are expected to be up to approximately 2 % higher using this Addendum compared to using the original TG-51 protocol.

Implementation of an ionization chamber array for linear accelerator monthly dosimetry QA

PURPOSE

The IC Profiler (ICP) manufactured by Sun Nuclear Corporation (SNC) is an ionization chamber (IC) array used for linear accelerator dosimetry measurements. Previous work characterized response of the ICP under various conditions, but there is limited work of its implementation into monthly QA measurement procedures. This work quantifies ICP accuracy and variables that affect accuracy for beam output measurements, and demonstrates feasibility of using the ICP for all recommended monthly dosimetry measurements.

METHODS

A total of 1985 output measurements on six Varian TrueBeam and Edge linear accelerators were performed using three ICP with quad wedges (QWs) and were compared with conventional IC measurements. The accuracy of the ICP for beam output was characterized as the difference between the ICP and IC. Variables that affect ICP accuracy, including gain settings, calibrations, and template baselining as well as machine or energy-specific bias were investigated. Measurements of profile constancy, energy, dose rate constancy, wedge factors, and gating were performed.

RESULTS

The initially observed mean output difference between the ICP and IC was 0.16% (0.61%). When gain settings were optimized, the output difference accuracy improved to -0.02% (0.38%). The output accuracy of the ICP was not dependent on array, dose, temperature and pressure calibrations, or template baselining. Statistically, ICP output accuracy was dependent on machine and beam energy, but clinically, all measurements fell within 0.5% of unity. ICP measurements of energy, dose rate constancy, and wedge factors matched passing results with conventional IC in water measurements. Gating and beam profile constancy measurements demonstrated good stability using the ICP. Finally, monthly dosimetry QA using ICP was completed in an average of 33 min compared to 66 min using the IC.

CONCLUSION

This work demonstrated the feasibility and efficiency of using the ICP, with specific considerations, as a measurement device for dosimetric linear accelerator monthly QA.

Skin dose investigations on a 0.5 T parallel rotating biplanar linac-MR using Monte Carlo simulations and measurements

BACKGROUND

The Alberta rotating biplanar linac-MR has a 0.5 T magnetic field parallel to the beamline. When developing a new linac-MR system, interactions of charged particles with the magnetic field necessitate careful consideration of skin dose and tissue interface effects.

PURPOSE

To investigate the effect of the magnetic field on skin dose using measurements and Monte Carlo (MC) simulations.

METHODS

We develop an MC model of our linac-MR, which we validate by comparison with ion chamber measurements in a water tank. Additionally, MC simulation results are compared with radiochromic film surface dose measurements on solid water. Variations in surface dose as a function of field size are measured using a parallel plate ion chamber in solid water. Using an anthropomorphic computational phantom with a 2 mm-thick skin layer, we investigate dose distributions resulting from three beam arrangements. Magnetic field on and off scenarios are considered for all measurements and simulations.

RESULTS

For a 20 × 20 cm2 field size,D 0.2 c c ${D_{0.2cc}}$ (the minimum dose to the hottest contiguous 0.2 cc volume) for the top 2 mm of a simple water phantom is 72% when the magnetic field is on, compared to 34% with magnetic field off (values are normalized to the central axis dose maximum). Parallel plate ion chamber measurements demonstrate that the relative increase in surface dose due to the magnetic field decreases with increasing field size. For the anthropomorphic phantom,D ∼ 0.2 c c ${D_{ \sim 0.2cc}}$ (minimum skin dose in the hottest 1 × 1 × 1 cm3 cube) shows relative increases of 20%-28% when the magnetic field is on compared to when it is off. With magnetic field off, skinD ∼ 0.2 c c ${D_{ \sim 0.2cc}}$ is 71%, 56%, and 21% for medial-lateral tangents, anterior-posterior beams, and a five-field arrangement, respectively. For magnetic field on, the corresponding skinD ∼ 0.2 c c ${D_{ \sim 0.2cc}}$ values are 91%, 67%, and 25%.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a validated MC model of our linac-MR, surface doses are calculated in various scenarios. MC-calculated skin dose varies depending on field sizes, obliquity, and the number of beams. In general, the parallel linac-MR arrangement results in skin dose enhancement due to charged particles spiraling along magnetic field lines, which impedes lateral motion away from the central axis. Nonetheless, considering the results presented herein, treatment plans can be designed to minimize skin dose by, for example, avoiding oblique beams and using a larger number of fields.

Fitting Monte Carlo simulation results with an empirical model of megavoltage x-ray beams for rapid depth dose calculations in water

Objective. The purpose of this study was to assess a method of accelerating Monte Carlo simulations for modeling depth dose distributions from megavoltage x-ray beams by fitting them to an empirically-derived function.Approach. Using Geant4, multiple simulations of a typical medical linear accelerator beam in water and in water with an air cavity were conducted with varying numbers of initial electrons. The resulting percent depth dose curves were compared to published data from actual linear accelerator measurements. Two methods were employed to reduce computation time for this modeling process. First, an empirical function derived from measurements at a particular linear accelerator energy, source-to-surface distance, and field size was used to directly fit the simulated data. Second, a linear regression was performed to predict the empirical function's parameters for simulations with more initial electrons.Main results. Fitting simulated depth dose curves with the empirical function yielded significant improvements in either accuracy or computation time, corresponding to the two methods described. When compared to published measurements, the maximum error for the largest simulation was 5.58%, which was reduced to 2.01% with the best fit of the function. Fitting the empirical function around the air cavity heterogeneity resulted in errors less than 2.5% at the interfaces. The linear regression prediction modestly improved the same simulation with a maximum error of 4.22%, while reducing the required computation time from 66.53 h to 43.75 h.Significance. This study demonstrates the effective use of empirical functions to expedite Monte Carlo simulations for a range of applications from radiation protection to food sterilization. These results are particularly impactful in radiation therapy treatment planning, where time and accuracy are especially valuable. Employing these methods may improve patient outcomes by ensuring that dose delivery more accurately matches the prescription or by shortening the preparation time before treatment in Monte Carlo-based treatment planning systems.

Characterization of a novel pulse normalization technology for beam scanning of small fields without a reference chamber

PURPOSE

A novel pulse normalization technology enabling the acquisition of low noise beam data without the use of a physical reference chamber has recently been commercially released. The purpose of this study was to characterize the use of this technology for beam scanning of small fields required in the commissioning of a stereotactic radiotherapy program.

METHODS

Three detectors (Edge diode, microDiamond, PinPoint) were used to acquire beam data under three conditions: with a reference chamber, with pulse normalization and no reference chamber (PN), and without pulse normalization and no reference chamber (nPN). Percent depth dose (PDD) scans were acquired for 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 cm2 field sizes and profiles were acquired at 1.4, 10, and 30 cm depths using continuous scanning. The coefficient of variation (CoV) was calculated for all beam data to compare signal-to-noise and gamma comparisons (1%, 1 mm) were calculated of the PN and nPN scans compared to the reference data.

RESULTS

Average 95th percentile CoV values were similar for all detectors across conditions, with PN data being comparable to reference data and minor increases observed for nPN data. Mean gamma pass rates for PN PDD scans exceeded 98% for all detectors. Profile gamma pass rates were 100% for all detectors at 1.4 and 10 cm depth. At 30 cm depth, profiles acquired with the PinPoint and microDiamond detectors had lower mean gamma pass rates than the Edge, at 95% and 95.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A novel pulse normalization technology was demonstrated to be effective for acquiring beam profiles and PDDs for small fields without the use of a physical reference chamber. Limitations in how the method is implemented led to some errors in data acquired using lower sensitivity detectors. When used with a diode, pulse normalization produced equivalent scans to those acquired with a reference chamber.

Grid/lattice therapy: consideration of small field dosimetry

Small-field dosimetry used in special procedures such as gamma knife, Cyberknife, Tomotherapy, IMRT, and VMAT has been in evolution after several radiation incidences with very significant (70%) errors due to poor understanding of the dosimetry. IAEA-TRS-483 and AAPM-TG-155 have provided comprehensive information on small-fields dosimetry in terms of code of practice and relative dosimetry. Data for various detectors and conditions have been elaborated. It turns out that with a suitable detectors dose measurement accuracy can be reasonably (±3%) achieved for 6 MV beams for fields >1×1 cm2. For grid therapy, even though the treatment is performed with small fields created by either customized blocks, multileaf collimator (MLC), or specialized devices, it is multiple small fields that creates combined treatment. Hence understanding the dosimetry in collection of holes of small field is a separate challenge that needs to be addressed. It is more critical to understand the scattering conditions from multiple holes that form the treatment grid fields. Scattering changes the beam energy (softer) and hence dosimetry protocol needs to be properly examined for having suitable dosimetric parameters. In lieu of beam parameter unavailability in physical grid devices, MLC-based forward and inverse planning is an alternative path for bulky tumours. Selection of detectors in small field measurement is critical and it is more critical in mixed beams created by scattering condition. Ramification of small field concept used in grid therapy along with major consideration of scattering condition is explored. Even though this review article is focussed mainly for dosimetry for low-energy megavoltage photon beam (6 MV) but similar procedures could be adopted for high energy beams. To eliminate small field issues, lattice therapy with the help of MLC is a preferrable choice.

Investigation of triaxial cables and microdetectors in small field dosimetry

Background. Small field dosimetry presents unique challenges with source occlusion, lateral charged particle equilibrium and detector size. As detector volume decreases, signal strength declines while noise increases, deteriorating the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). This issue may be compounded by triaxial cables connecting detectors to electrometers. However, effects of cables, critical for precision dosimetry, are often overlooked. There is a need to evaluate triaxial cable and detector impacts on SNR in small fields. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the influence of triaxial cables and microdetectors on signal-to-noise ratios in small-field dosimetry. This study also aims to establish the importance of cable quality assurance for measurement accuracy.Methods. Six 9.1 m length triaxial cables from different manufacturers were tested with six microdetectors (microDiamond, PinPoint, EDGE, Plastic scintillator, microSilicon, SRS-Diode). A 6 MV photon beam (TrueBeam) was used, with a water phantom at 5 cm depth with 0.5 × 0.5 cm2to 10 × 10 cm2fields at 600 MU min-1. Readings were acquired using cable-detector permutations with a dedicated electrometer (except the scintillator which has its own). Cables had differing connector types, conductor materials, insulation, and diameters. Detectors had various sensitive volumes, materials, typical signals, and bias voltages.Results. Normalized field output correction factors (FOFs) relative differences of 13.4% and 4.6% between the highest and lowest values across triaxial cables for 0.5 × 0.5 cm2and 1 × 1 cm2fields, respectively. The maximum difference in FOF between any cable-detector combinations was 0.2% for the smallest field size. No consistent FOF trend was observed across all detectors when increasing cable diameter. Additionally, the non-normalized FOF differences of 0.9% and 0.3% were observed between cables for 0.5 × 0.5 cm2and 1 × 1 cm2fields, respectively.Conclusions. Regular triaxial cable quality assurance is critical for precision small field dosimetry. A national protocol is needed to standardize cable evaluations/calibrations, particularly for small signals ( Collapse

Key Words

• QA
• SNR
• microdetectors
• small field dosimetry
• triaxial cable

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Signal-To-Noise Ratio
• Radiometry/instrumentation
• Radiometry/methods
• Phantoms, Imaging
• Equipment Design
• Photons
• Humans

Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

James J Sohn Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, United States of America
Indra J Das Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, 60611, United States of America

Collapse

Planar dose calculation of electron therapy

Purpose.The aim of this study is to determine the planar dose distribution of irregularly-shaped electron beams at their maximum dose depth (zmax) using the modied lateral build-up ratio (LBR) and curve-fitting methods.Methods.Circular and irregular cutouts were created using Cerrobend alloy for a 14 × 14 cm2applicator. Percentage depth dose (PDD) at the standard source-surface-distance (SSD = 100 cm) and point dose at different SSD were measured for each cutout. Orthogonal profiles of the cutouts were measured atzmax. Data were collected for 6, 9, 12, and 15 MeV electron beam energies on a VERSA HDTMLINAC using the IBA Blue Phantom23D water phantom system. The planar dose distributions of the cutouts were also measured atzmaxin solid water using EDR2 films.Results.The measured PDD curves were normalized to a normalization depth (d0) of 1 mm. The lateral-buildup-ratio (LBR), lateral spread parameter (σR(z)), and effective SSD (SSDeff) for each cutout were calculated using the PDD of the open applicator as the reference field. The modified LBR method was then employed to calculate the planar dose distribution of the irregular cutouts within the field at least 5 mm from the edge. A simple curve-fitting model was developed based on the profile shapes of the circular cutouts around the field edge. This model was used to calculate the planar dose distribution of the irregular cutouts in the region from 3 mm outside to 5 mm inside the field edge. Finally, the calculated planar dose distribution was compared with the film measurement.Conclusions.The planar dose distribution of electron therapy for irregular cutouts atzmaxwas calculated using the improved LBR method and a simple curve-fitting model. The calculated profiles were within 3% of the measured values. The gamma passing rate with a 3%/3 mm and 10% dose threshold was more than 96%.

Electron streaming dose measurements and calculations on a 1.5 T MR-Linac

PURPOSE

To evaluate the accuracy of different dosimeters and the treatment planning system (TPS) for assessing the skin dose due to the electron streaming effect (ESE) on a 1.5 T magnetic resonance (MR)-linac.

METHOD

Skin dose due to the ESE on an MR-linac (Unity, Elekta) was investigated using a solid water phantom rotated 45° in the x-y plane (IEC61217) and centered at the isocenter. The phantom was irradiated with 1 × 1, 3 × 3, 5 × 5, 10 × 10, and 22 × 22 cm2 fields, gantry at 90°. Out-of-field doses (OFDs) deposited by electron streams generated at the entry and exit surface of the angled phantom were measured on the surface of solid water slabs placed ±20.0 cm from the isocenter along the x-direction. A high-resolution MOSkin™ detector served as a benchmark due to its shallower depth of measurement that matches the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) recommended depth for skin dose assessment (0.07 mm). MOSkin™ doses were compared to EBT3 film, OSLDs, a diamond detector, and the TPS where the experimental setup was modeled using two separate calculation parameters settings: a 0.1 cm dose grid with 0.2% statistical uncertainty (0.1 cm, 0.2%) and a 0.2 cm dose grid with 3.0% statistical uncertainty (0.2 cm, 3.0%).

RESULTS

OSLD, film, the 0.1 cm, 0.2%, and 0.2 cm, 3.0% TPS ESE doses, underestimated skin doses measured by the MOSkin™ by as much as -75.3%, -7.0%, -24.7%, and -41.9%, respectively. Film results were most similar to MOSkin™ skin dose measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

These results show that electron streams can deposit significant doses outside the primary field and that dosimeter choice and TPS calculation settings greatly influence the reported readings. Due to the steep dose gradient of the ESE, EBT3 film remains the choice for accurate skin dose assessment in this challenging environment.

[Estimation of Uncertainty of the VMAT Absolute Dose Measurement Due to the Phantom Setup Error Using a Treatment Planning System]

PURPOSE

When performing single-point dose verification in VMAT, it is necessary to avoid the regions with steep dose gradient. We propose a method to obtain the estimated value ( Uplan) of uncertainty of the absolute dose measurement due to the phantom setup error by using dose gradient calculated from treatment planning system (TPS), for evaluating the appropriate measurement points.

METHODS

The dose gradient was calculated from the planned dose values in the vicinity of the isocenter point using TPS. The phantom setup error was estimated. The Uplan was calculated using the proposed formula after estimating the phantom setup error. Then, the dose gradient was calculated from the measured dose values in the vicinity of the isocenter point specified by TPS using the Tough water phantom with ionization chamber (IC), and Umeas was calculated as in Uplan.

RESULTS

The correlation coefficient between Uplan and Umeas was 0.984, which indicates a high correlation. The average of the difference between Umeas and Uplan was -0.24%. We considered that this result was caused by the influence of volume averaging effect of IC.

CONCLUSION

The Uplan obtained from this proposed method reflects the uncertainty of the absolute dose measurement due to the phantom setup error and is useful for evaluating the appropriate measurement points for absolute dose measurement.

Monte Carlo evaluation of uncertainties in photon and electron TG-51 absorbed dose calibration

PURPOSE

The accuracy of dose delivery to all patients treated with medical linacs depends on the accuracy of beam calibration. Dose delivery cannot be any more accurate than this. Given the importance of this, it seems worthwhile taking another look at the expected uncertainty in TG-51 photon dose calibration and a first look at electron calibration. This work builds on the 2014 addendum to TG-51 for photons and adds to it by also considering electrons. In that publication, estimates were made of the uncertainty in the dose calibration. In this paper, we take a deeper look at this important issue.

METHODS

The methodology used here is more rigorous than previous determinations as it is based on Monte Carlo simulation of uncertainties. It is assumed that mechanical QA has been performed following TG-142 prior to beam calibration and that there are no uncertainties that exceed the tolerances specified by TG-142.

RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS

Despite the different methodology and assumptions, the estimated uncertainty in photon beam calibration is close to that in the addendum. The careful user should be able to easily reach a 95% confidence interval (CI) of ± 2.3% for photon beam calibration with standard instrumentation. For electron beams calibrated with a Farmer chamber, the estimated uncertainties are slightly larger, and the 95% CI is ±2.6% for 6 MeV and slightly smaller than this for 18 MeV. There is no clear energy dependence in these results. It is unlikely that the user will be able to improve on these uncertainties as the dominant factor in the uncertainty resides in the ion chamber dose calibration factorN D , w 60 Co $N_{D,w}^{{}^{60}{\mathrm{Co}}}$ . For both photons and electrons, reduction in the ion chamber depth uncertainty below about 0.5 mm and SSD uncertainty below 1 mm have almost no effect on the total dose uncertainty, as uncertainties beyond the user's control totally dominate under these circumstances.

[Investigation of the Usefulness of Monte Carlo Simulation in Electron Beam Therapy Using Body Surface Lead Cutout]

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to understand the PDD and OAR during electron beam therapy using lead cutout on the body surface.

METHODS

The Monte Carlo code PHITS version 3.24 was used to simulate PDD and OAR. The simulation results were compared with actual measurements using a silicon diode detector to evaluate the validity of the simulation results.

RESULTS

The simulated PDD and OAR parameters of the linac agreed with the measured values within 2 mm. When the lead cutout on the body surface was used, all parameters except for R100 agreed with the measured values within 2 mm. The cutout sizes of the broad-beam square irradiation fields were 3 cm for 6 MeV, 5 cm for 12 MeV, and 8 cm for 18 MeV when the lead cutout on the body surface was used.

CONCLUSION

The Monte Carlo simulation was useful for understanding the PDD and OAR of the lead cutout irradiation fields, which are difficult to measure.

Determination of thePrpand radial dose correction factor in reference dosimetry

Objectives.In an addendum to AAPM TG-51 protocol, McEwenet al, (DOI:10.1118/1.4866223) introduced a new factorPrpto account for the radial dose distribution of the photon beam over the detector volume mainly in flattening filter free (FFF) beams.Prpand its extension to non-FFF beam reference dosimetry is investigated to see its impact in a clinical situation.Approches.ThePrpwas measured using simplified version of Sudhyadhomet al(DOI:10.1118/1.4941691) for Elekta and Varian FFF beams with two commonly used calibration detectors; PTW-30013 and Exradin-A12 ion chambers after acquiring high resolution profiles in detectors cardinal coordinates. For radial dose correction factor, the ion chambers were placed in a small water phantom and the central axis position was set to center of the sensitive volume on the treatment table and was studied by rotating the table by 15-degree interval from -90 to +90 degrees with respect to the initial (zero) position.Main results.The magnitude ofPrpvaries very little with machine, detector and beam energies to a value of 1.003 ± 0.0005 and 1.005 ± 0.0005 for 6FFF and 10FFF, respectively. The radial anisotropy for the Elekta machine with Exradin-A12 and PTW-30013 detector the magnitudes are in the range of (0.9995±0.0011 to 1.0015±0.0010) and (0.9998±0.0007 to 1.0015±0.0010), respectively. Similarly, for the Varian machine with Exradin-A12 and PTW-30013 ion chambers, the magnitudes are in the range of (1.0004±0.0010 to 1.0018±0.0018) and (1.0006±0.0009 to 1.0027±0.0007), respectively.Significance.ThePrpis ≤ 0.3% and 0.5% for 6FFF and 10FFF, respectively. The radial dose correction factor in regular beams also does not impact the dosimetry where the maximum magnitude is ±0.2% which is within experimental uncertainty.

Technical note: Commissioning of a linear accelerator producing ultra-high dose rate electrons

BACKGROUND

Ultra-high dose rate radiation (UHDR) is being explored by researchers in promise of advancing radiation therapy treatments.

PURPOSE

This work presents the commissioning of Varian's Flash Extension for research (FLEX) conversion of a Clinac to deliver UHDR electrons.

METHODS

A Varian Clinac iX with the FLEX conversion was commissioned for non-clinical research use with 16 MeV UHDR (16H) energy. This involved addition of new hardware, optimizing the electron gun voltages, radiofrequency (RF) power, and steering coils in order to maximize the accelerated electron beam current, sending the beam through custom scattering foils to produce the UHDR with 16H beam. Profiles and percent depth dose (PDD) measurements for 16H were obtained using radiochromic film in a custom vertical film holder and were compared to 16 MeV conventional electrons (16C). Dose rate and dose per pulse (DPP) were calculated from measured dose in film. Linearity and stability were assessed using an Advanced Markus ionization chamber.

RESULTS

Energies for 16H and 16C had similar beam quality based on PDD measurements. Measurements at the head of the machine (61.3 cm SSD) with jaws set to 10×10 cm2 showed the FWHM of the profile as 7.2 cm, with 3.4 Gy as the maximum DPP and instantaneous dose rate of 8.1E5 Gy/s. Measurements at 100 cm SSD with 10 cm standard cone showed the full width at half max (FWHM) of the profile as 10.5 cm, 1.08 Gy as the maximum DPP and instantaneous dose rate of 2.E5 Gy/s. Machine output with number of pulses was linear (R = 1) from 1 to 99 delivered pulses. Output stability was measured within ±1% within the same session and within ±2% for daily variations.

CONCLUSIONS

The FLEX conversion of the Clinac is able to generate UHDR electron beams which are reproducible with beam properties similar to clinically used electrons at 16 MeV. Having a platform which can quickly transition between UHDR and conventional modes (<1 min) can be advantageous for future research applications.

Evaluation of RADIANCE Monte Carlo algorithm for treatment planning in electron based Intraoperative Radiotherapy (IOERT)

PURPOSE

To perform experimental as well as independent Monte Carlo (MC) evaluation of the MC algorithm implemented in RADIANCE version 4.0.8, a dedicated treatment planning system (TPS) for 3D electron dose calculations in intraoperative radiation therapy (IOERT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The MOBETRON 2000 (IntraOp Medical Corporation, Sunnyvale, CA) IOERT accelerator was employed. PDD and profiles for five cylindrical plastic applicators with 50-90 mm diameter and 0°, 30° beveling were measured in a water phantom, at nominal energies of 6, 9 and 12 MeV. Additional PDD measurements were performed for all the energies without applicator. MC modeling of the MOBETRON was performed with the user code BEAMnrc and egs_chamber of the MC simulation toolkit EGSnrc. The generated phase space files of the two 0°-bevel applicators (50 mm, 80 mm) and three energies in both RADIANCE and BEAMnrc, were used to determine PDD and profiles in various set-ups of virtual water phantoms with air and bone inhomogeneities. 3D dose distributions were also calculated in image data sets of an anthropomorphic tissue-equivalent pelvis phantom. Image acquisitions were realized with a CT scanner (Philips Big Bore CT, Netherlands). Gamma analysis was applied to quantify the deviations of the RADIANCE calculations to the measurements and EGSnrc calculations. Gamma criteria normalized to the global maximum were investigated between 2%, 2 mm and 3%, 3 mm.

RESULTS

RADIANCE MC calculations satisfied the gamma criteria of 3%, 3 mm with a tolerance limit of 85% passing rate compared to in- water phantom measurements, except for the dose profiles of the 30° beveled applicators. Mismatches lay in surface doses, in umbra regions and in the beveled end of the 30° applicators. A very good agreement to the EGSnrc calculations in heterogeneous media was observed. Deviations were more pronounced for the larger applicator diameter and higher electron energy. In 3D dose comparisons in the anthropomorphic phantom, gamma passing rates were higher than 96 % for both simulated applicators.

CONCLUSIONS

RADIANCE MC algorithm agrees within 3%, 3 mm criteria with in-water phantom measurements and EGSnrc MC dose distributions in heterogeneous media for 0°-bevel applicators. The user should be aware of missing scattering components and the 30° beveled applicators should be used with attention.

Multileaf Collimator Modeling and Commissioning for Complex Radiation Treatment Plans Using 2-Dimensional (2D) Diode Array MapCHECK2

Purpose: This study aims to develop a data-collecting package ExpressMLC and investigate the applicability of MapCHECK2 for multileaf collimator (MLC) modeling and commissioning for complex radiation treatment plans. Materials and methods: The MLC model incorporates realistic parameters to account for sophisticated MLC features. A set of 8 single-beam plans, denoted by ExpressMLC, is created for the determination of parameters. For the commissioning of the MLC model, 4 intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans specified by the AAPM TG 119 report were transferred to a computed tomography study of MapCHECK2, recalculated, and compared to measurements on a Varian accelerator. Both per-beam and composite-beam dose verification were conducted. Results: Through sufficient characterization of the MLC model, under 3%/2 mm and 2%/2 mm criteria, MapCHECK2 can be used to accurately verify per beam dose with gamma passing rate better than 90.9% and 89.3%, respectively, while the Gafchromic EBT3 films can achieve gamma passing rate better than 89.3% and 85.7%, respectively. Under the same criteria, MapCHECK2 can achieve composite beam dose verification with a gamma passing rate better than 95.9% and 90.3%, while the Gafchromic EBT3 films can achieve a gamma passing rate better than 96.1% and 91.8%; the p-value from the Mann Whitney test between gamma passing rates of the per beam dose verification using full MapCHECK2 package calibrated MLC model and film calibrated MLC model is .44 and .47, respectively; the p-value between those of the true composite beam dose verification is .62 and .36, respectively. Conclusion: It is confirmed that the 2-dimensional (2D) diode array MapCHECK2 can be used for data collection for MLC modeling with the combination of the ExpressMLC package of plans, whose doses are sufficient for the determination of MLC parameters. It could be a fitting alternative to films to boost the efficiency of MLC modeling and commissioning without sacrificing accuracy.

Characteristics of a plastic scintillation detector in photon beam dosimetry

BACKGROUND

Plastic scintillating detectors (PSD) have gained popularity due to small size and are ideally suited in small-field dosimetry due to no correction needed and hence detector reading can be compared to dose. Likewise, these detectors are active and water equivalent. A new PSD from Blue Physics is characterized in photon beam.

PURPOSE

Innovation in small-field dosimetry detector has led us to examine Blue Physics PSD (BP-PSD) for use in photon beams from linear accelerator.

METHODS

BP-PSD was acquired and its characteristics were evaluated in photon beams from a Varian TrueBeam. Data were collected in a 3D water tank. Standard parameters; dose, dose rate, energy, angular dependence and temperature dependence were studied. Depth dose, profiles and output in a reference condition as well as small fields were measured.

RESULTS

BP-PSD is versatile and provides data very similar to an ion chamber when Cerenkov radiation is properly accounted. This device measures data pulse by pulse which very few detectors can perform. The differences between ion chamber data and PSD are < 2% in most cases. The angular dependence is a bit pronounces to 1.5% which is due to PSD housing. Depth dose and profiles are comparable within < 1% to an ion chamber. For small fields this detector provides suitable field output factor compared to other detectors and Monte Carlo (MC) simulated data without any added correction factor.

CONCLUSIONS

The characteristics of Blue Physics PSD is uniquely suitable in photon beam and more so in small fields. The data are reproducible compared to ion chamber for most parameters and ideally suitable for small-field dosimetry without any correction factor.

Evaluation of ion chamber response for applications in electron FLASH radiotherapy

Ion chambers are required for calibration and reference dosimetry applications in radiation therapy (RT). However, exposure of ion chambers in ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) conditions pertinent to FLASH-RT leads to severe saturation and ion recombination, which limits their performance and usability. The purpose of this study was to comprehensively evaluate a set of commonly used commercially available ion chambers in RT, all with different design characteristics, and use this information to produce a prototype ion chamber with improved performance in UHDR conditions as a first step toward ion chambers specific for FLASH-RT. The Advanced Markus and Exradin A10, A26, and A20 ion chambers were evaluated. The chambers were placed in a water tank, at a depth of 2 cm, and exposed to an UHDR electron beam at different pulse repetition frequency (PRF), pulse width (PW), and pulse amplitude settings on an IntraOp Mobetron. Ion chamber responses were investigated for the various beam parameter settings to isolate their dependence on integrated dose, mean dose rate and instantaneous dose rate, dose-per-pulse (DPP), and their design features such as chamber type, bias voltage, and collection volume. Furthermore, a thin parallel-plate (TPP) prototype ion chamber with reduced collector plate separation and volume was constructed and equally evaluated as the other chambers. The charge collection efficiency of the investigated ion chambers decreased with increasing DPP, whereas the mean dose rate did not affect the response of the chambers (± 1%). The dependence of the chamber response on DPP was found to be solely related to the total dose within the pulse, and not on mean dose rate, PW, or instantaneous dose rate within the ranges investigated. The polarity correction factor (Ppol ) values of the TPP prototype, A10, and Advanced Markus chambers were found to be independent of DPP and dose rate (± 2%), while the A20 and A26 chambers yielded significantly larger variations and dependencies under the same conditions. Ion chamber performance evaluated under different irradiation conditions of an UHDR electron beam revealed a strong dependence on DPP and a negligible dependence on the mean and instantaneous dose rates. These results suggest that modifications to ion chambers design to improve their usability in UHDR beamlines should focus on minimizing DPP effects, with emphasis on optimizing the electric field strength, through the construction of smaller electrode separation and larger bias voltages. This was confirmed through the production and evaluation of a prototype ion chamber specifically designed with these characteristics.

Simulation of consequences of using nonideal detectors during beam data commissioning measurements

BACKGROUND

Beam data commissioning is a core task of radiotherapy physicists. Despite multiple detectors available, a feasible measurement program compromises between detector properties and time constraints. Therefore, it is important to understand how nonideal measurement data propagates into patient dose calculation.

PURPOSE

We simulated the effects of realistic errors, due to beam commissioning with presumably nonoptimal detectors, on the resulting patient dose distributions. Additionally, the detectability of such beam commissioning errors during patient plan quality assurance (QA) was evaluated.

METHODS

A clinically used beam model was re-commissioned introducing changes to depth dose curves, output factors, profiles or combinations of those. Seventeen altered beam models with incremental changes of the modelling parameters were created to analyze dose changes on simplified anatomical phantoms. Additionally, fourteen altered models incorporate changes in the order of signal differences reported for typically used detectors. Eighteen treatment plans of different types were recalculated on patient CT data sets using the altered beam models.

RESULTS

For the majority of clinical plans, dose distributions in the target volume recalculated on the patient computed tomography data were similar between the original and the modified beam models, yielding global 2%/2 mm gamma pass rates above 98.9%. Larger changes were observed for certain combinations of beam modelling errors and anatomical sites, most extreme for output factor changes in a small target volume plan with a pass rate of 80.6%. Modelling an enlarged penumbra as if measured with a 0.125 cm3 ion chamber had the largest effect on the dose distribution (average pass rate of 96.5%, lowest 85.4%). On different QA phantom geometries, dose distributions between calculations with modified and unmodified models typically changed too little to be detected in actual measurements.

CONCLUSION

While the simulated errors during beam modelling had little effect on most plans, in some cases changes were considerable. High-quality penumbra and small field output factor should be a main focus of commissioning measurements. Detecting modelling issues using standard patient QA phantoms is unlikely. Verification of a beam model should be performed especially for plans with high modulation and in different depths or geometries representing the variety of situations expected clinically.

Technical note: Point-by-point ion-recombination correction for accurate dose profile measurement in high dose-per-pulse irradiation field

BACKGROUND

Although flattening filter free (FFF) beams are commonly used in clinical treatment, the accuracy of dose measurements in FFF beams has been questioned. Higher dose per pulse (DPP) such as FFF beams from a linear accelerator may cause problems in dose profile measurements using an ionization chamber due to the change of the charge collection efficiency. Ionization chambers are commonly used for percent depth dose (PDD) measurements. Changes of DPP due to chamber movement during PDD measurement can vary the ion collection efficiency of ionization chambers. In the case of FF beams, the DPP fluctuation is negligible, but in the case of the FFF beams, the DPP is 2.5 ∼ 4 times larger than that of the FF beam, and the change in ion collection efficiency is larger than that of the FF beam. PDD profile normalized by maximum dose depth, 10 cm depth for example, may therefore be affected by the ion collection efficiency.

PURPOSE

In this study, we investigate the characteristics of the ion collection efficiency change depending on the DPP of each ionization chamber in the FFF beam. We furthermore propose a method to obtain the chamber- independent PDD by applying a DPP-dependent ion recombination correction.

METHODS

Prior to investigating the relationship between DPP and charge collection efficiency, Jaffe-plots were generated with different DPP settings to investigate the linearity between the applied voltage and collected charge. The absolute dose measurement using eight ionization chambers under the irradiation settings of 0.148, 0.087, and 0.008 cGy/pulse were performed. Applied voltages for the Jaffe-plots were 100, 125, 150, 200, 250, and 300 V. The ion recombination correction factor Pion was calculated by the two-voltage analysis (TVA) method at the applied voltages of 300 and 100 V. The DPP dependency of the charge collection efficiency for each ionization chamber were evaluated from the DPP- Pion plot. PDD profiles for the 10 MV FFF beam were measured using Farmer type chambers (TN30013, FC65-P, and FC65-G) and mini-type chambers (TN31010, TN31021, CC13, CC04, and FC23-C). The PDD profiles were corrected with ion recombination correction at negative and positive polar applied voltages of 100 and 300 V.

RESULTS

From the DPP-Pion relation for each ionization chamber with DPP ranging from 0.008 cGy/pulse to 0.148 cGy/pulse, all Farmer and mini-type chambers satisfied the requirements described in AAPM TG-51 addendum. However, Pion for the CC13 was most affected by DPP among tested chambers. The maximum deviation among PDDs using eight ionization chambers for 10 MV FFF was about 1%, but the deviation was suppressed to about 0.5% by applying ion recombination correction at each depth.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the deviation of PDD profile among the ionization chambers was reduced by the ion recombination coefficient including the DPP dependency, especially for high DPP beams such as FFF beams. The present method is particularly effective for CC13, where the ion collection efficiency is highly DPP dependent.

Modeling linear accelerator (Linac) beam data by implicit neural representation learning for commissioning and quality assurance applications

BACKGROUND

Linear accelerator (Linac) beam data commissioning and quality assurance (QA) play a vital role in accurate radiation treatment delivery and entail a large number of measurements using a variety of field sizes. How to optimize the effort in data acquisition while maintaining high quality of medical physics practice has been sought after.

PURPOSE

We propose to model Linac beam data through implicit neural representation (NeRP) learning. The potential of the beam model in predicting beam data from sparse measurements and detecting data collection errors was evaluated, with the goal of using the beam model to verify beam data collection accuracy and simplify the commissioning and QA process.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

NeRP models with continuous and differentiable functions parameterized by multilayer perceptrons (MLPs) were used to represent various beam data including percentage depth dose (PDD) and profiles of 6 MV beams with and without flattening filter. Prior knowledge of the beam data was embedded into the MLP network by learning the NeRP of a vendor-provided "golden" beam dataset. The prior-embedded network was then trained to fit clinical beam data collected at one field size and used to predict beam data at other field sizes. We evaluated the prediction accuracy by comparing network-predicted beam data to water tank measurements collected from 14 clinical Linacs. Beam datasets with intentionally introduced errors were used to investigate the potential use of the NeRP model for beam data verification, by evaluating the model performance when trained with erroneous beam data samples.

RESULTS

Linac beam data predicted by the model agreed well with water tank measurements, with averaged Gamma passing rates (1%/1 mm passing criteria) higher than 95% and averaged mean absolute errors less than 0.6%. Beam data samples with measurement errors were revealed by inconsistent beam predictions between networks trained with correct versus erroneous data samples, characterized by a Gamma passing rate lower than 90%.

CONCLUSION

A NeRP beam data modeling technique has been established for predicting beam characteristics from sparse measurements. The model provides a valuable tool to verify beam data collection accuracy and promises to simplify commissioning/QA processes by reducing the number of measurements without compromising the quality of medical physics service.

Comparison of 116 Radiosurgery Treatment Plans for Multi-Leaf and Cone Collimator on a Varian Edge Linac: Are Cones Superior in the Daily Routine?

Delivering focused radiation doses via linear accelerators is a crucial component of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases. The Varian Edge linear accelerator provides highly conformal radiation therapy through a high-definition multi-leaf collimator (HD120 MLC) and conical collimator (CC). HD120 MLC adapts to the shape of the target volume using movable tungsten leaves, while CC has a block of conical shape (cones). CC in SRS treatments of small brain metastases is preferred due to its mechanical stability and steeper dose fall-off, potentially sparing organs at risk (OARs) and the brain better than HD120 MLC. This study aims to determine if CC offers significant advantages over HD120 MLC for SRS treatments. For 116 metastatic lesions, CC and HD120 MLC treatment plans were created in Varian Eclipse TPS and compared based on various dose parameters, robustness tests, and QA measurements. The results indicate that CC provides no significant advantages over HD120 MLC, except for slight, clinically insignificant benefits in brain sparing and dose fall-off for the smallest lesions. HD120 MLC outperforms CC in almost every aspect, making it a better choice for irradiating brain metastases with 0.1 cm³ or higher volumes.

Comparison of derived correction factors for effects of ion recombination and photon beam quality index following TG-51 and TRS-398 dosimetry protocols

In this study, ion recombination correction factor (k_S) and beam quality conversion factor ( [Formula: see text] ) values were extracted following the recommendations of the TRS-398 and TG-51 dosimetry protocols for widely used cylindrical ionization chambers for high energy photon beam dosimetry to quantify the agreement between the instructions for these two protocols for absolute dosimetry inside water. Four different types of cylindrical ionization chambers comprising Farmer (TM30013), Semiflex 0.125 cm³ (TM31010), Semiflex 0.3 cm³ (TM31013), and PinPoint (TM31016) were considered, and k_S and [Formula: see text] values were determined at photon energies of 6 MV and 15 MV. The maximum difference between the measured k_S values according to the instructions in the TRS-398 and TG-51 protocols was 0.03%. The k_S data measured with both protocols agreed well with those measured by using the Jaffe-plot approach, where the maximum difference was about 0.33%. The observed differences between the [Formula: see text] factors measured by using the TRS-398 and TG-51 dosimetry protocols at photon energies of 6 MV and 15 MV were 0.37% and 0.55%, respectively. The [Formula: see text] values measured using the TG-51 dosimetry protocols were slightly closer to those measured by a reference ionization chamber dosimeter. We conclude that the maximum differences were about 0.4% and 0.6% in the absorbed dose measurements according to the TRS-398 and TG-51 instructions at photon energies of 6 MV and 15 MV, respectively. The type of ionization chamber employed also affected the differences, where the maximum and minimum dose differences were found using the Farmer and PinPoint chambers, respectively.

Haralick texture feature analysis for characterization of specific energy and absorbed dose distributions across cellular to patient length scales

Objective.To investigate an approach for quantitative characterization of the spatial distribution of dosimetric data by introducing Haralick texture feature analysis in this context.Approach.Monte Carlo simulations are used to generate 3D arrays of dosimetric data for 2 scenarios: (1) cell-scale microdosimetry: specific energy (energy imparted per unit mass) in cell-scale targets irradiated by photon spectra (¹²⁵I,¹⁹²Ir, 6 MV); (2) tumour-scale dosimetry: absorbed dose in voxels for idealized models of¹²⁵I permanent implant prostate brachytherapy, considering 'TG186' (realistic tissues including 0% to 5% intraprostatic calcifications; interseed attenuation) and 'TG43' (water model, no interseed attenuation) conditions. Five prominent Haralick features (homogeneity, contrast, correlation, local homogeneity, entropy) are computed and trends are interpreted using fundamental radiation physics.Main results.In the cell-scale scenario, the Haralick measures quantify differences in 3D specific energy distributions due to source spectra. For example, contrast and entropy are highest for¹²⁵I reflecting the large variations in specific energy in adjacent voxels (photoelectric interactions; relatively short range of electrons), while 6 MV has the highest homogeneity with smaller variations in specific energy between voxels (Compton scattering dominates; longer range of electrons). For the tumour-scale scenario, the Haralick measures quantify differences due to TG186/TG43 simulation conditions and the presence of calcifications. For example, as calcifications increase from 0% to 5%, contrast increases while correlation decreases, reflecting the large differences in absorbed dose in adjacent voxels (higher absorbed dose in voxels with calcification due to photoelectric interactions).Significance.Haralick texture analysis provides a quantitative method for the characterization of 3D dosimetric distributions across cellular to tumour length scales, with promising future applications including analyses of multiscale tissue models, patient-specific data, and comparison of treatment approaches.

Evaluation of scanning resolution, detector choice and detector orientation to be used for accurate and time-efficient commissioning of a 6MV clinical linear accelerator

The present study is aimed at exploring different scanning parameters, detectors and their orientations for time-efficient and accurate commissioning of a 6 MV clinical linear accelerator (LINAC). Beam profiles and percentage depth dose (PDD) curves were measured with a PTW dosimetry diode, a PTW Semiflex and a PinPoint ion chamber in different orientations. To acquire beam data, equidistant (step size of 0.5 mm, 1 mm, 2 mm and 3 mm) and fanline (step size of 2-0.5 mm, 2-1 mm, 3-0.5 mm and 3-1 mm) scanning modes were employed and data measurement time was recorded. Scan time per measurement point was also varied (0.2 s, 0.5 s and 1.0 s) to investigate its effect on the accuracy and acquisition time of beam data. Accuracy of the measured data was analyzed on the basis of the variation between measured data and data modeled by a treatment planning system. Beam profiles (particularly in penumbra region) were found to be sensitive to variation in scanning resolution and showed an improved accuracy with decrease in step size, while PDD curves were affected negligibly. The accuracy of beam data obtained with the PTW dosimetry diode and the PinPoint ion chamber was higher than those obtained with the PTW Semiflex ion chamber for small fields (2 × 2 cm² and 3 × 3 cm²). However, the response of the PTW diode and the PinPoint ion chamber was significantly indifferent in these fields. Furthermore, axial orientation of the PTW Semiflex ion chamber improved accuracy of profiles and PDDs as compared to radial orientation, while such a difference was not significant for the PinPoint ion chamber. It is concluded that a scan time of 0.2 s/point with a fanline scanning resolution of 2-1 mm for beam profiles and 3 mm for PDDs are most favorable in terms of accuracy and time efficiency. For small fields (2 × 2 cm² and 3 × 3 cm²), a PinPoint ion chamber in radial orientation or a dosimetry diode in axial orientation are recommended for both beam profiles and PDDs. If a PinPoint ion chamber and a PTW dosimetry diode are not available, a Semiflex ion chamber in axial orientation may be used for small fields.

On the measurement of scaling factors in the RW3 plastic phantom during high energy electron beam dosimetry

Ionometric electron dosimetry inside water-equivalent plastic phantoms demands special considerations including determination of depth scaling and fluence scaling factors (c_pl and h_pl) to shift from in-phantom measurements to those relevant to water. This study evaluates these scaling factors for RW3 slab phantom and also introduces a new coefficient, k(RW3), for direct conversion from RW3 measurements to water without involving scaling factors. The RW3 solid phantom developed by the PTW Company was used and the corresponding scaling factors including c_pl, h_pl, and k(RW3) were measured for conventional electron energies of 4, 6, 9, 12, and 16 MeV. Separate measurements were performed in water and the RW3 slab phantom using the Advanced Markus chamber. The validity of the reported scaling factors was confirmed by comparing the direct and indirect percentage depth dose (PDD) measurements in water and in the RW3 phantom. The c_pl values for the RW3 phantom were respectively equal to 0.915, 0.927, 0.934, 0.937, and 0.937 for 4, 6, 9, 12, and 16 MeV electron energies. The h_pl and k(RW3) values were dependent on the depth of investigation and electron energy. Application of the c_pl-h_pl factors and k(RW3) coefficients to measured data inside the RW3 can reliably reproduce the measured PDD curves in water. The mean difference between the PDDs measured directly and indirectly in water and in the RW3 phantom was less than 1.2% in both approaches for PDD conversion (c_pl-h_pl coupling and the use of k(RW3)). The measured scaling factors and k(RW3) coefficients are sufficiently relevant to mimic water-based dosimetry results through indirect measurements inside the RW3 slab phantom. Nevertheless, employing k(RW3) is more straightforward than the c_pl-h_pl approach because it does not involve scaling and it is also less time-consuming.

Machine performance and stability of the first clinical self-shielded stereotactic radiosurgery system: Initial 2-year experience

This study provides insight into the overall system performance, stability, and delivery accuracy of the first clinical self-shielded stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) system. Quality assurance procedures specifically developed for this unit are discussed, and trends and variations over the course of 2-years for beam constancy, targeting and dose delivery are presented. Absolute dose calibration for this 2.7 MV unit is performed to deliver 1 cGy/MU at d_max  = 7 mm at a source-to-axis-distance (SAD) of 450 mm for a 25 mm collimator. Output measurements were made with 2-setups: a device that attaches to a fixed position on the couch (daily) and a spherical phantom that attaches to the collimating wheel (monthly). Beam energy was measured using a cylindrical acrylic phantom at depths of 100 (D₁₀ ) and 200 (D₂₀ ) mm. Beam profiles were evaluated using Gafchromic film and compared with TPS beam data. Accuracy in beam targeting was quantified with the Winston-Lutz (WL) and end-to-end (E2E) tests. Delivery quality assurance (DQA) was performed prior to clinical treatments using Gafchromic EBT3/XD film. Net cumulative output adjustments of 15% (pre-clinical), 9% (1st year) and 3% (2nd year) were made. The mean output was 0.997 ± 0.010 cGy/MU (range: 0.960-1.046 cGy/MU) and 0.993 ± 0.029 cGy/MU (range: 0.884-1.065 cGy/MU) for measurements with the daily and monthly setups, respectively. The mean relative beam energy (D₁₀ /D₂₀ ) was 0.998 ± 0.004 (range: 0.991-1.006). The mean total targeting error was 0.46 ± 0.17 mm (range: 0.06-0.98 mm) for the WL and 0.52 ± 0.28 mm (range: 0.11-1.27 mm) for the E2E tests. The average gamma pass rates for DQA measurements were 99.0% and 90.5% for 2%/2 mm and 2%/1 mm gamma criteria, respectively. This SRS unit meets tolerance limits recommended by TG-135, MPPG 9a., and TG-142 with a treatment delivery accuracy similar to what is achieved by other SRS systems.

An ESTRO-ACROP guideline on quality assurance and medical physics commissioning of online MRI guided radiotherapy systems based on a consensus expert opinion

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this consensus expert opinion was to define quality assurance (QA) tests for online magnetic resonance image (MRI) guided radiotherapy (oMRgRT) systems and to define the important medical physics aspects for installation and commissioning of an oMRgRT system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten medical physicists and two radiation oncologists experienced in oMRgRT participated in the survey. In the first round of the consensus expert opinion, ideas on QA and commissioning were collected. Only tests and aspects different from commissioning of a CT guided radiotherapy (RT) system were considered. In the following two rounds all twelve participants voted on the importance of the QA tests, their recommended frequency and their suitability for the two oMRgRT systems approved for clinical use as well as on the importance of the aspects to consider during medical physics commissioning.

RESULTS

Twenty-four QA tests were identified which are potentially important during commissioning and routine QA on oMRgRT systems compared to online CT guided RT systems. An additional eleven tasks and aspects related to construction, workflow development and training were collected. Consensus was found for most tests on their importance, their recommended frequency and their suitability for the two approved systems. In addition, eight aspects mostly related to the definition of workflows were also found to be important during commissioning.

CONCLUSIONS

A program for QA and commissioning of oMRgRT systems was developed to support medical physicists to prepare for safe handling of such systems.

Small field output factor measurement and verification for CyberKnife robotic radiotherapy and radiosurgery system using 3D polymer gel, ionization chamber, diode, diamond and scintillator detectors, Gafchromic film and Monte Carlo simulation

The dosimetry of small fields has become tremendously important with the advent of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery, where small field segments or very small fields are used to treat tumors. With high dose gradients in the stereotactic radiosurgery or radiotherapy treatment, small field dosimetry becomes challenging due to the lack of lateral electronic equilibrium in the field, x-ray source occlusion, and detector volume averaging. Small volume and tissue-equivalent detectors are recommended to overcome the challenges. With the lack of a perfect radiation detector, studies on available detectors are ongoing with reasonable disagreement and uncertainties. The joint IAEA and AAPM international code of practice (CoP) for small field dosimetry, TRS 483 (Alfonso et al., 2017) provides guidelines and recommendations for the dosimetry of small static fields in external beam radiotherapy. The CoP provides a methodology for field output factor (FOF) measurements and use of field output correction factors for a series of small field detectors and strongly recommends additional measurements, data collection and verification for CyberKnife (CK) robotic stereotactic radiotherapy/radiosurgery system using the listed detectors and more new detectors so that the FOFs can be implemented clinically. The present investigation is focused on using 3D gel along with some other commercially available detectors for the measurement and verification of field output factors (FOFs) for the small fields available in the CK system. The FOF verification was performed through a comparison with published data and Monte Carlo simulation. The results of this study have proved the suitability of an in-house developed 3D polymer gel dosimeter, several commercially available detectors, and Gafchromic films as a part of small field dosimetric measurements for the CK system.

Dosimetric characterization of a novel commercial plastic scintillation detector with an MR-Linac

BACKGROUND

Plastic scintillators have been used as radiation detectors for the past few years, as they are water-equivalent and independent of the dose, dose rate, and angle of incidence. In addition, they are also independent of the presence of a magnetic field and could be used for in vivo dosimetry in an MR-Linac. With the advent of a new commercial scintillation detector, Blue Physics Model 10, its characterization has been performed on an MR-Linac with a view to future applications.

PURPOSE

To perform the dosimetric characterization and study potential applications of a novel commercial plastic scintillation detector in a MR-Linac.

METHODS

Scintillation detector description, calibration procedure, short-term repeatability, dose-response linearity, dose-rate dependence, angular dependence, and temperature dependence have been studied. Percent-depth-dose (PDD) and beam profiles were measured for small fields and a standard field, as well as output factors, for comparison with other PTW detectors: a diamond diode and PinPoint and Semiflex 3D ionization chambers. The suitability of the plastic scintillator for in vivo dosimetry in a magnetic field has also been studied measuring the dose to a point in an anthropomorphic phantom while acquiring MR imaging. This measured dose was compared with that calculated with Monaco planning system and with that measured with a PTW Semiflex 3D chamber, the latter without acquiring MR images.

RESULTS

Short-term repeatability presented negligible variations (<0.4%) for 100 and 20 MU. Similar results were obtained for dose-response linearity and dose-rate dependence. A small angular dependence was determined, while the scintillator resulted practically independent of the temperature. PDDs showed excellent agreement except in the build-up region, and calculated penumbras with the profiles given by the scintillator were between the ones obtained with the diamond detector and the PinPoint ionization chamber. Measured OF with the scintillator were the highest between all detectors, 1.26% higher than the value obtained with the microdiamond for the smallest field measured, 0.5 × 0.5 cm² . Finally, the total dose to a point measured with the scintillator was 0.51% higher compared to that calculated by the planning system.

CONCLUSION

The Blue Physics model 10 scintillation system showed excellent dosimetric characteristics. Its response independent of the temperature and the presence of a magnetic field make it suitable for in vivo dosimetry in an MR-Linac while acquiring MR images, which could solve the impossibility of performing a dosimetric QA for each adapted plan. Furthermore, its temporal resolution allows independent radiation pulses to be measured and visualized, which could be used in future applications.

Treatment plan prescreening for patient-specific quality assurance measurements using independent Monte Carlo dose calculations

PURPOSE

This study proposes a method to identify plans that failed patient-specific quality assurance (QA) and attempts to establish a criterion to prescreen treatment plans for patient-specific QA measurements with independent Monte Carlo dose calculations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patient-specific QA results measured with an ArcCHECK diode array of 207 patients (head and neck: 25; thorax: 61; abdomen: 121) were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were treated with the volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique and plans were optimized with a Pinnacle v16.2 treatment planning system using an analytical algorithm-based dose engine. Afterwards, phantom verification plans were designed and recalculated by an independent GPU-accelerated Monte Carlo (MC) dose engine, ArcherQA. Moreover, sensitivity and specificity analyzes of gamma passing rates between measurements and MC calculations were carried out to show the ability of MC to monitor failing plans (ArcCHECK 3%/3 mm,<90%), and attempt to determine the appropriate threshold and gamma passing rate criterion utilized by ArcherQA to prescreen treatment plans for ArcCHECK measurements. The receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was also utilized to characterize the performance of different gamma passing rate criterion used by ArcherQA.

RESULTS

The thresholds for 100% sensitivity to detect plans that failed patient-specific QA by independent calculation were 97.0%, 95.4%, and 91.0% for criterion 3%/3 mm, 3%/2 mm, and 2%/2 mm, respectively, which corresponded to specificities of 0.720, 0.528, and 0.585, respectively. It was shown that the 3%/3 mm criterion with 97% threshold for ArcherQA demonstrated perfect sensitivity and the highest specificity compared with other criteria, which may be suitable for prescreening treatment plans treated with the investigated machine to implement measurement-based patient-specific QA of patient plans. In addition, the area under the curve (AUC) calculated from ROC analysis for criterion 3%/3 mm, 3%/2 mm, and 2%/2 mm used by ArcherQA were 0.948, 0.924, and 0.929, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Independent dose calculation with the MC-based program ArcherQA has potential as a prescreen treatment for measurement-based patient-specific QA. AUC values (>0.9) showed excellent classification accuracy for monitoring failing plans with independent MC calculations.

Does radiation therapy need more than two photon energies from Linac?

Purpose

Modern Linacs are equipped with multiple photon energies for radiation therapy, and proper energy is chosen for each case based on tumor characteristics and patient anatomy. The aim of this study is to investigate whether it is necessary to have more than two photons energies.

Methods

The principle of photon energy synthesis is presented. It is shown that a photon beam of any intermediate energy (Esyn) can be synthesized from a linear combination of a low energy (Elow) and a high energy (Ehigh). The principle is validated on a wide range of scenarios: different intermediate photon energies on the same Linac; between Linacs from the same manufacturer or different manufacturers; open and wedge beams; and extensive photon energies available from published reference data. In addition, 3D dose distributions in water phantom are compared using Gamma analysis. The method is further demonstrated in clinical cases of various tumor sites and multiple treatment modalities. Experimental measurements are performed for IMRT plans and they are analyzed using the standard clinical protocol.

Results

The synthesis coefficients vary with energy and field size. The root mean square error (RMSE) is within 1.1% for open and wedge fields. Excellent agreement was observed for British Journal of Radiology (BJR) data with an average RMSE of 0.11%. The 3D Gamma analysis shows a good match for all field sizes in the water phantom and all treatment modalities for the five clinical cases. The minimum gamma passing rate of 95.7% was achieved at 1%/1mm criteria for two measured dose distributions of IMRT plans.

Conclusion

A Linac with two photon energies is capable of producing dosimetrically equivalent plans of any energy in-between through the photon energy synthesis, supporting the notion that there is no need to equip more than two photon energies on each Linac. This can significantly reduce the cost of equipment for radiation therapy.

AAPM WGTG51 Report 374: Guidance for TG-51 reference dosimetry

Practical guidelines that are not explicit in the TG-51 protocol and its Addendum for photon beam dosimetry are presented for the implementation of the TG-51 protocol for reference dosimetry of external high-energy photon and electron beams. These guidelines pertain to: (i) measurement of depth-ionization curves required to obtain beam quality specifiers for the selection of beam quality conversion factors, (ii) considerations for the dosimetry system and specifications of a reference-class ionization chamber, (iii) commissioning a dosimetry system and frequency of measurements, (iv) positioning/aligning the water tank and ionization chamber for depth ionization and reference dose measurements, (v) requirements for ancillary equipment needed to measure charge (triaxial cables and electrometers) and to correct for environmental conditions, and (vi) translation from dose at the reference depth to that at the depth required by the treatment planning system. Procedures are identified to achieve the most accurate results (errors up to 8% have been observed) and, where applicable, a commonly used simplified procedure is described and the impact on reference dosimetry measurements is discussed so that the medical physicist can be informed on where to allocate resources.

AAPM MEDICAL PHYSICS PRACTICE GUIDELINE 5.b: Commissioning and QA of treatment planning dose calculations-Megavoltage photon and electron beams

The American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) is a nonprofit professional society whose primary purposes are to advance the science, education, and professional practice of medical physics. The AAPM has more than 8000 members and is the principal organization of medical physicists in the United States. The AAPM will periodically define new practice guidelines for medical physics practice to help advance the science of medical physics and to improve the quality of service to patients throughout the United States. Existing medical physics practice guidelines will be reviewed for the purpose of revision or renewal, as appropriate, on their fifth anniversary or sooner. Each medical physics practice guideline represents a policy statement by the AAPM, has undergone a thorough consensus process in which it has been subjected to extensive review, and requires the approval of the Professional Council. The medical physics practice guidelines recognize that the safe and effective use of diagnostic and therapeutic radiology requires specific training, skills, and techniques, as described in each document. Reproduction or modification of the published practice guidelines and technical standards by those entities not providing these services is not authorized. The following terms are used in the AAPM practice guidelines:

Must and Must Not: Used to indicate that adherence to the recommendation is considered necessary to conform to this practice guideline. While must is the term to be used in the guidelines, if an entity that adopts the guideline has shall as the preferred term, the AAPM considers that must and shall have the same meaning.

Should and Should Not: Used to indicate a prudent practice to which exceptions may occasionally be made in appropriate circumstances.

[Effect of Differences in Insert Materials of Cutout Block on Dose Distribution in Electron Radiotherapy: Comparison between Measurements and Monte Carlo Simulation]

INTRODUCTION

In electron beam radiotherapy, an irradiation field is created with a cutout block using a low melting point lead alloy. The block can be replaced with a lead plate as a shield. Dose distribution is expected to be affected by differences in the material and thickness of the shield. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the cause of differences in dose distribution by reproducing the electron beam irradiation condition via Monte Carlo simulation, comparing dose distribution when each shield is used and analyzing energy fluence distribution.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Radiation interaction in the treatment device manufactured by Varian was assessed using the general-purpose simulation code, and the dose distribution in the water was calculated. Electron energy fluence and incident angle of the electron fluence incident on the water surface were analyzed, and the effect of the difference in the shield was investigated in the irradiation field limited to 3 cm or less.

RESULTS

Regarding dose distribution, the deviation in the buildup area became larger when the lead plate was made thinner. A difference of 1.6-6.8% was observed on an average when comparing the buildup region of depth dose distributions except for 1×1 cm² field. In electron energy fluence, the lower the lead thickness, the higher the low energy component, which affected the buildup region. The effect was greater as the electron beam energy increased.

CONCLUSION

It was possible to evaluate the difference in scattered radiation between the low melting point lead alloy and the lead plate by MC simulation. Based on the study findings, the effect of scattered electrons generated from the block was strong as a factor.

Investigation on the impact of the leaf trailing effect using the Halcyon integrated platform system

PURPOSE

The double-stacked design of the Halcyon multileaf collimator (MLC) presents new challenges for treatment planning systems (TPSs). The leaf trailing effect has recently been described as the result of the interplay between the fluence transmitted through the leaf tip ends of each MLC layer. This effect makes the dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) dependent on the distance between the leaves of different layers (trailing distance) and is not adequately modeled by the Eclipse TPS. The purpose of our study was to investigate and report the dose discrepancies produced by these limitations in clinical plans and to explore how these discrepancies can be mitigated and avoided.

METHODS

The integrated platform with the Halcyon v2 system, Eclipse and Aria v15.6, was used. The dose discrepancies were obtained with EPID images and the portal dosimetry software and validated using radiochromic film dosimetry. The results for the AIDA commissioning test and for nine selected clinical beams with the sliding window intensity modulated radiotherapy (dIMRT) technique were thoroughly analyzed and presented. First, the DICOM RT plans were exported and the fluences were computed using different leaf tip models, and then were compared. Second, the detailed characteristics of the corresponding leaf sequences were investigated. Finally, modified DICOM RT plans were created in which the non-collimating (backup) leaves were retracted 2 mm to increase the leaf trailing distance, the modified plans were imported back into the TPS and the measurements were repeated. Dedicated in-house tools were developed in Python to carry out all analyses.

RESULTS

Dose discrepancies greater than 10% and regions of gamma failure were found in both the AIDA test and clinical beams using static-gantry dIMRT. Fluence analysis highlighted that the discrepancies were due to limitations in the MLC model implemented in the TPS. Analysis of leaf sequences indicated that regions of failure were associated with very low leaf speeds and virtually motionless leaves within the beam aperture. Some of these discrepancies were mitigated by increasing the trailing distance of the non-collimating leaves without affecting the beam aperture, but this strategy was not possible in regions where the leaves from both layers actively defined the beam aperture.

CONCLUSIONS

Current limitations of the MLC model in Eclipse produced discrepancies between calculated and delivered doses in clinical beams that caused plan-specific quality assurance failures and interruptions in the clinical workflow. Careful evaluation of the clinical plans produced by Eclipse for the Halcyon is recommended, especially for static gantry dIMRT treatments. Some characteristics of leaf sequences are problematic and should be avoided in clinical plans and, in general, a better leaf tip model is needed. This is particularly important in adaptive radiotherapy treatments, where the accuracy and reliability of TPS dose calculations are of the utmost importance.

Impact of systematic MLC positional uncertainties on the quality of single-isocenter multi-target VMAT-SRS treatment plans

Purpose

To study the impact of systematic MLC leaf positional uncertainties (stemming from mechanical inaccuracies or sub‐optimal MLC modeling) on the quality of intracranial single‐isocenter multi‐target VMAT‐SRS treatment plans. An estimation of appropriate tolerance levels is attempted.

Methods

Five patients, with three to four metastases and at least one target lying in close proximity to organs‐at‐risk (OARs) were included in this study. A single‐isocenter multi‐arc VMAT plan per patient was prepared, which served as the reference for dosimetric impact evaluation. A range of leaf offsets was introduced (±0.03 mm up to ±0.30 mm defined at the MLC plane) to both leaf banks, by varying the leaf offset MLC modeling parameter in Monaco for all the prepared plans, in order to simulate projected leaf offsets of ±0.09 mm up to ±0.94 mm at the isocenter plane, respectively. For all offsets simulated and cases studied, dose distributions were re‐calculated and compared with the corresponding reference ones. An experimental dosimetric procedure using the SRS mapCHECK diode array was also performed to support the simulation study results and investigate its suitability to detect small systematic leaf positional errors.

Results

Projected leaf offsets of ±0.09 mm were well‐tolerated with respect to both target dosimetry and OAR‐sparing. A linear relationship was found between D_95% percentage change and projected leaf offset (slope: 12%/mm). Impact of projected offset on target dosimetry was strongly associated with target volume. In two cases, plans that could be considered potentially clinically unacceptable (i.e., clinical dose constraint violation) were obtained even for projected offsets as small as 0.19 mm. The performed experimental dosimetry check can detect potential small systematic leaf errors.

Conclusions

Plan quality indices and dose–volume metrics are very sensitive to systematic sub‐millimeter leaf positional inaccuracies, projected at the isocenter plane. Acceptable and tolerance levels in systematic MLC uncertainties need to be tailored to VMAT‐SRS spatial and dosimetric accuracy requirements.

Treatment planning system commissioning of the first clinical biology‐guided radiotherapy machine

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Validity of equivalent square field concept in small field dosimetry

PURPOSE

The equivalent Square (ES) concept has been used for traditional radiation fields defined by the machine collimating system. For small fields, the concept S_clin was introduced based on measuring dosimetric field width (full-width half maximum, FWHM) of the cardinal axis of the beam profiles. The pros and cons of this concept are evaluated in small fields and compared with the traditional ES using area and perimeter (4A/P) method based on geometric field size settings e.g. light field settings.

METHODS

One hundred thirty-seven square and rectangular fields from 5-50 mm with every possible permutation (keeping one jaw fixed and varying other jaw from 5 mm to 50 mm) were utilized to measure FWHM for the validation of S_clin . Using a microSilicon detector and a scanning water tank, measurements were performed on an Elekta (Versa) machine with Agility head and a Varian TrueBeam with different MLC/Jaw design to evaluate the S_clin concept and to understand the effect of exchange factor in small fields. Field output factors were also measured for all 137 fields.

RESULTS

The data fitting for fields ranging from 5-50 mm between the traditional 4A/P method and S_clin shows differences and indicates a linear relationship with distinct separation of slope for Elekta and Varian machines. As Elekta does not have y jaws, the ES based on 4A/P < S_clin but for the Varian linac 4A/P > S_clin for square fields. Our measured data shows that both methods are equally valid but does vary by the machine design. The field output factor is dependent on the elongation factor as well as machine design. For fields with sides ≥10 mm, the exchange factor is nearly identical in both machines with magnitude up to 4% which is close to measurement uncertainty (±3%) but for small fields (<10 mm) the Elekta machine has higher exchange factors compared to the Varian machine.

CONCLUSION

The results demonstrate that the two concepts for defining equivalent field (S_clin and 4A/P) are equivalent and can be directly related through an empirical equation. This study confirms that 4A/P is still valid for small fields except for very small fields (≤10 mm) where source occlusion is a dominating factor. The S_clin method is potentially sensitive to measurement uncertainty due to measurement of FWHM which is machine, detector and user dependent, while the 4A/P method relies mainly on geometry of the machine and has less dependency on type of machine, detector and user. The exchange factors are comparable for both types of machines. The conclusion is based on data from an Elekta with Agility head and a Varian TrueBeam machine that may have potential for bias due to light field/collimator set up and alignment. Care should be taken in extrapolating these data to any other machine. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.