1
|
Patel MM, Adrada BE, Fowler AM, Rauch GM. Molecular Breast Imaging and Positron Emission Mammography. PET Clin 2023; 18:487-501. [PMID: 37258343 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2023.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
There is growing interest in application of functional imaging modalities for adjunct breast imaging due to their unique ability to evaluate molecular/pathophysiologic changes, not visible by standard anatomic breast imaging. This has led to increased use of nuclear medicine dedicated breast-specific single photon and coincidence imaging systems for multiple indications, such as supplemental screening, staging of newly diagnosed breast cancer, evaluation of response to neoadjuvant treatment, diagnosis of local disease recurrence in the breast, and problem solving. Studies show that these systems maybe especially useful for specific subsets of patients, not well served by available anatomic breast imaging modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miral M Patel
- Department of Breast Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe, CPB5.3208, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| | - Beatriz Elena Adrada
- Department of Breast Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe, CPB5.3208, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Amy M Fowler
- Department of Radiology, Section of Breast Imaging and Intervention, University of Wisconsin - Madison, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53792-3252, USA; Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53792-3252, USA
| | - Gaiane M Rauch
- Department of Abdominal Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe, Unit 1473, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Breast Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe, Unit 1473, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Najjar R. Radiology's Ionising Radiation Paradox: Weighing the Indispensable Against the Detrimental in Medical Imaging. Cureus 2023; 15:e41623. [PMID: 37435015 PMCID: PMC10331516 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.41623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Ionising radiation stands as an indispensable protagonist in the narrative of medical imaging, underpinning diagnostic evaluations and therapeutic interventions across an array of medical conditions. However, this protagonist poses a paradox - its inestimable service to medicine coexists with an undercurrent of potential health risks, primarily DNA damage and subsequent oncogenesis. The narrative of this comprehensive review unfurls around this intricate enigma, delicately balancing the indispensable diagnostic utility against the non-negotiable commitment to patient safety. In this critical discourse, the intricacies of ionising radiation are dissected, illuminating not only its sources but also the associated biological and health hazards. The exploration delves into the labyrinth of strategies currently deployed to minimise exposure and safeguard patients. By casting light on the scientific nuances of X-rays, computed tomography (CT), and nuclear medicine, it traverses the complex terrain of radiation use in radiology, to promote safer medical imaging practices, and to facilitate an ongoing dialogue about diagnostic necessity and risk. Through a rigorous examination, the pivotal relationship between radiation dose and dose response is elucidated, unravelling the mechanisms of radiation injury and distinguishing between deterministic and stochastic effects. Moreover, protection strategies are illuminated, demystifying concepts such as justification, optimisation, the As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) principle, dose and diagnostic reference levels, along with administrative and regulatory approaches. With an eye on the horizon, promising avenues of future research are discussed. These encompass low-radiation imaging techniques, long-term risk assessment in large patient cohorts, and the transformative potential of artificial intelligence in dose optimisation. This exploration of the nuanced complexities of radiation use in radiology aims to foster a collaborative impetus towards safer medical imaging practices. It underscores the need for an ongoing dialogue around diagnostic necessity and risk, thereby advocating for a continual reassessment in the narrative of medical imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reabal Najjar
- Medical Imaging, Canberra Hospital, Australian Capital Territory (ACT) Health, Canberra, AUS
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Evaluation of a High-Sensitivity Organ-Targeted PET Camera. SENSORS 2022; 22:s22134678. [PMID: 35808181 PMCID: PMC9269056 DOI: 10.3390/s22134678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2022] [Revised: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 06/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this study is to evaluate the performance of the Radialis organ-targeted positron emission tomography (PET) Camera with standardized tests and through assessment of clinical-imaging results. Sensitivity, count-rate performance, and spatial resolution were evaluated according to the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) NU-4 standards, with necessary modifications to accommodate the planar detector design. The detectability of small objects was shown with micro hotspot phantom images. The clinical performance of the camera was also demonstrated through breast cancer images acquired with varying injected doses of 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (18F-FDG) and qualitatively compared with sample digital full-field mammography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and whole-body (WB) PET images. Micro hotspot phantom sources were visualized down to 1.35 mm-diameter rods. Spatial resolution was calculated to be 2.3 ± 0.1 mm for the in-plane resolution and 6.8 ± 0.1 mm for the cross-plane resolution using maximum likelihood expectation maximization (MLEM) reconstruction. The system peak noise equivalent count rate was 17.8 kcps at a 18F-FDG concentration of 10.5 kBq/mL. System scatter fraction was 24%. The overall efficiency at the peak noise equivalent count rate was 5400 cps/MBq. The maximum axial sensitivity achieved was 3.5%, with an average system sensitivity of 2.4%. Selected results from clinical trials demonstrate capability of imaging lesions at the chest wall and identifying false-negative X-ray findings and false-positive MRI findings, even at up to a 10-fold dose reduction in comparison with standard 18F-FDG doses (i.e., at 37 MBq or 1 mCi). The evaluation of the organ-targeted Radialis PET Camera indicates that it is a promising technology for high-image-quality, low-dose PET imaging. High-efficiency radiotracer detection also opens an opportunity to reduce administered doses of radiopharmaceuticals and, therefore, patient exposure to radiation.
Collapse
|
4
|
Banaei A, Hashemi B, Bakhshandeh M. Estimating cancer risks due to whole lungs low dose radiotherapy with different techniques for treating COVID-19 pneumonia. Radiat Oncol 2022; 17:10. [PMID: 35057839 PMCID: PMC8771186 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01971-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2021] [Accepted: 12/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low dose radiotherapy (LDRT) of whole lungs with photon beams is a novel method for treating COVID-19 pneumonia. This study aimed to estimate cancer risks induced by lung LDRT for different radiotherapy delivery techniques. METHOD Four different radiotherapy techniques, including 3D-conformal with anterior and posterior fields (3D-CRT AP-PA), 3D-conformal with 8 coplanar fields (3D-CRT 8 fields), eight fields intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), and volumetric modulated arc therapy using 2 full arcs (VMAT) were planned on the CT images of 32 COVID-19 patients with the prescribed dose of 1 Gy to the lungs. Organ average and maximum doses, and PTV dose distribution indexes were compared between different techniques. The radiation-induced cancer incidence and cancer-specific mortality, and cardiac heart disease risks were estimated for the assessed techniques. RESULTS In IMRT and VMAT techniques, heart (mean and max), breast (mean, and max), and stomach (mean) doses and also maximum dose in the body were significantly lower than the 3D-CRT techniques. The calculated conformity indexes were similar in all the techniques. However, the homogeneity indexes were lower (i.e., better) in intensity-modulated techniques (P < 0.03) with no significant differences between IMRT and VMAT plans. Lung cancer incident risks for all the delivery techniques were similar (P > 0.4). Cancer incidence and mortality risks for organs located closer to lungs like breast and stomach were higher in 3D-CRT techniques than IMRT or VMAT techniques (excess solid tumor cancer incidence risks for a 30 years man: 1.94 ± 0.22% Vs. 1.68 ± 0.17%; and women: 6.66 ± 0.81% Vs. 4.60 ± 0.43%: cancer mortality risks for 30 years men: 1.63 ± 0.19% Vs. 1.45 ± 0.15%; and women: 3.63 ± 0.44% Vs. 2.94 ± 0.23%). CONCLUSION All the radiotherapy techniques had low cancer risks. However, the overall estimated risks induced by IMRT and VMAT radiotherapy techniques were lower than the 3D-CRT techniques and can be used clinically in younger patients or patients having greater concerns about radiation induced cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amin Banaei
- Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Al-Ahmad and Chamran Cross, 1411713116 Tehran, Iran
| | - Bijan Hashemi
- Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Al-Ahmad and Chamran Cross, 1411713116 Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohsen Bakhshandeh
- Department of Radiology Technology, Faculty of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Brown M, Covington MF. Comparative Benefit-to-Radiation Risk Ratio of Molecular Breast Imaging, Two-Dimensional Full-Field Digital Mammography with and without Tomosynthesis, and Synthetic Mammography with Tomosynthesis. Radiol Imaging Cancer 2019; 1:e190005. [PMID: 33778669 DOI: 10.1148/rycan.2019190005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2019] [Revised: 04/25/2019] [Accepted: 04/30/2019] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Purpose To apply previously published benefit-to-risk ratio methods for mammography and molecular breast imaging (MBI) risk estimates to an expanded range of mammographic screening techniques, compressed breast thicknesses, and screening views. Materials and Methods Only previously published estimates were used; therefore, this study was exempt from the requirement to obtain institutional review board approval. Benefit-to-risk ratios were calculated as the ratio of breast cancer deaths averted and lives lost to screening over 10-year intervals starting at age 40 years for MBI, two-dimensional (2D) full-field digital mammography (FFDM) alone, 2D FFDM with synthetic mammography, and 2D FFDM with tomosynthesis for two-, four-, and five-view screening mammography and compressed breast thicknesses of 20-29 mm, 50-59 mm, and 80-89 mm. Results Central estimates of the benefit-to-risk ratios ranged from 3 to 179 for screening mammography and from 5 to 9 for MBI. Benefit-to-risk ratios for MBI were inferior to those for mammography for most scenarios, but MBI may be performed at an equal or superior benefit-to-risk ratio for women aged 40-59 years with a compressed breast thickness of at least 80 mm and for those undergoing mammographic screening examinations with four or five views per breast. The benefit-to-risk ratios across all ages with use of tomosynthesis plus 2D FFDM as a screening examination were 45% lower than those for tomosynthesis plus synthetic mammography. Conclusion Benefit-to-risk ratios for MBI are within the lower range of those for mammography when accounting for variation in mammography technique, compressed breast thickness, and age. Benefit-to-risk ratios of synthetic mammography plus tomosynthesis are superior to those of tomosynthesis plus 2D FFDM.Keywords: Breast, Mammography, Molecular Imaging, Molecular Imaging-Cancer, Radiation Safety, Radionuclide Studies, Screening, Tomosynthesis© RSNA, 2019See also the commentary by Hruska in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Brown
- Sections of Nuclear Medicine (M.B., M.F.C.) and Breast Imaging (M.F.C.), Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd, Campus Box 8131, St Louis, MO 63110
| | - Matthew F Covington
- Sections of Nuclear Medicine (M.B., M.F.C.) and Breast Imaging (M.F.C.), Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd, Campus Box 8131, St Louis, MO 63110
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Narayanan D, Berg WA. Dedicated Breast Gamma Camera Imaging and Breast PET: Current Status and Future Directions. PET Clin 2018; 13:363-381. [PMID: 30100076 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2018.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Recent advances in nuclear medicine instrumentation have led to the emergence of improved molecular imaging techniques to image breast cancer: dedicated gamma cameras using γ-emitting 99mTc-sestamibi and breast-specific PET cameras using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose. This article focuses on the current role of such approaches in the clinical setting including diagnosis, assessing local extent of disease, monitoring response to therapy, and, for gamma camera imaging, possible supplemental screening in women with dense breasts. Barriers to clinical adoption and technologies and radiotracers under development are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deepa Narayanan
- National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD 20850, USA.
| | - Wendie A Berg
- Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC, 300 Halket Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Manapragada PP. Molecular Imaging in Management of Breast Cancer. Semin Roentgenol 2018; 53:301-310. [PMID: 30449348 DOI: 10.1053/j.ro.2018.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
8
|
Mendes BM, Trindade BM, Fonseca TCF, de Campos TPR. Assessment of radiation-induced secondary cancer risk in the Brazilian population from left-sided breast-3D-CRT using MCNPX. Br J Radiol 2017; 90:20170187. [PMID: 28937271 PMCID: PMC6047661 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20170187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2017] [Revised: 09/06/2017] [Accepted: 09/08/2017] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this work was to simulate a 6MV conventional breast 3D conformational radiation therapy (3D-CRT) with physical wedges (50 Gy/25#) in the left breast, calculate the mean absorbed dose in the body organs using robust models and computational tools and estimate the secondary cancer-incidence risk to the Brazilian population. METHODS The VW female phantom was used in the simulations. Planning target volume (PTV) was defined in the left breast. The 6MV parallel-opposed fields breast-radiotherapy (RT) protocol was simulated with MCNPx code. The absorbed doses were evaluated in all the organs. The secondary cancer-incidence risk induced by radiotherapy was calculated for different age groups according to the BEIR VII methodology. RESULTS RT quality indexes indicated that the protocol was properly simulated. Significant absorbed dose values in red bone marrow, RBM (0.8 Gy) and stomach (0.6 Gy) were observed. The contralateral breast presented the highest risk of incidence of a secondary cancer followed by leukaemia, lung and stomach. The risk of a secondary cancer-incidence by breast-RT, for the Brazilian population, ranged between 2.2-1.7% and 0.6-0.4%. CONCLUSION RBM and stomach, usually not considered as OAR, presented high second cancer incidence risks of 0.5-0.3% and 0.4-0.1%, respectively. This study may be helpful for breast-RT risk/benefit assessment. Advances in knowledge: MCNPX-dosimetry was able to provide the scatter radiation and dose for all body organs in conventional breast-RT. It was found a relevant risk up to 2.2% of induced-cancer from breast-RT, considering the whole thorax organs and Brazilian cancer-incidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Bruno Machado Trindade
- Programa de Ciências e Técnicas Nucleares - Departamento de Engenharia Nuclear, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | - Telma Cristina Ferreira Fonseca
- Programa de Ciências e Técnicas Nucleares - Departamento de Engenharia Nuclear, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | - Tarcisio Passos Ribeiro de Campos
- Programa de Ciências e Técnicas Nucleares - Departamento de Engenharia Nuclear, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Diemoz PC, Bravin A, Sztrókay-Gaul A, Ruat M, Grandl S, Mayr D, Auweter S, Mittone A, Brun E, Ponchut C, Reiser MF, Coan P, Olivo A. A method for high-energy, low-dose mammography using edge illumination x-ray phase-contrast imaging. Phys Med Biol 2016; 61:8750-8761. [PMID: 27893445 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/61/24/8750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Since the breast is one of the most radiosensitive organs, mammography is arguably the area where lowering radiation dose is of the uttermost importance. Phase-based x-ray imaging methods can provide opportunities in this sense, since they do not require x-rays to be stopped in tissue for image contrast to be generated. Therefore, x-ray energy can be considerably increased compared to those usually exploited by conventional mammography. In this article we show how a novel, optimized approach can lead to considerable dose reductions. This was achieved by matching the edge-illumination phase method, which reaches very high angular sensitivity also at high x-ray energies, to an appropriate image processing algorithm and to a virtually noise-free detection technology capable of reaching almost 100% efficiency at the same energies. Importantly, while proof-of-concept was obtained at a synchrotron, the method has potential for a translation to conventional sources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul C Diemoz
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rhodes DJ, Hruska CB, Conners AL, Hunt KN, O'Connor MK. Benefit-to-Radiation Risk for Breast Screening Tests Is a Flawed Concept. Radiology 2016; 281:978-980. [PMID: 27870632 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2016161334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Carrie B Hruska
- Radiology, † Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905
| | - Amy Lynn Conners
- Radiology, † Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905
| | - Katie N Hunt
- Radiology, † Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
|
12
|
Adrada BE, Moseley T, Rauch GM. Molecular Breast Imaging: Role as a Screening Modality. CURRENT BREAST CANCER REPORTS 2016. [DOI: 10.1007/s12609-016-0225-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
13
|
Hendrick RE, Tredennick T. Benefit to Radiation Risk of Breast-specific Gamma Imaging Compared with Mammography in Screening Asymptomatic Women with Dense Breasts. Radiology 2016; 281:583-588. [PMID: 27257949 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2016151581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To estimate the benefit-to-radiation risk ratios of mammography alone, breast-specific gamma imaging (BSGI) alone, and mammography plus BSGI in women with dense breasts who were asymptomatic and examined in the 2015 study by Rhodes et al. Materials and Methods This study uses previously published breast cancer detection rates and estimates of radiation dose and radiation risk and is, therefore, exempt from institutional review board approval. By using breast cancer detection rates for mammography alone, BSGI alone, and mammography plus BSGI from the study by Rhodes et al, as well as lifetime estimates of radiation-induced cancer mortality for mammography and BSGI on the basis of the Biologic Effects of Ionizing Radiation VII report, the benefit-to-radiation risk ratios of mammography alone, BSGI alone, and mammography plus BSGI performed annually over 10-year age intervals from ages 40 to 79 years are estimated. Results The benefit-to-radiation risk ratio is estimated to be 13 for women who are 40-49 years old and are screened with mammography, a figure that approximately doubles for each subsequent 10-year age interval up to 70-79 years old. For low-dose BSGI, annual screening benefit-to-radiation risk ratios are estimated to be 5 for women 40-49 years old and to double by age 70-79 years, while mammography plus BSGI has benefit-to-radiation risk ratios similar to those of BSGI alone. There are wide ranges for all of these estimates. Conclusion While lower dose (300 MBq) BSGI has estimated benefit-to-radiation risk ratios well in excess of 1 for screening of asymptomatic women with dense breasts who are 40 years old and older, it does not match the benefit-to-radiation risk ratio of screening mammography. © RSNA, 2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Edward Hendrick
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Colorado-Denver, School of Medicine, 12700 E 19th Ave, Mail Stop C278, Aurora, CO 80045 (R.E.H.); and Breast Imaging Section, Department of Radiology, University of Colorado-Denver, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo (T.T.)
| | - Tara Tredennick
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Colorado-Denver, School of Medicine, 12700 E 19th Ave, Mail Stop C278, Aurora, CO 80045 (R.E.H.); and Breast Imaging Section, Department of Radiology, University of Colorado-Denver, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo (T.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Taurone S, Galli F, Signore A, Agostinelli E, Dierckx RAJO, Minni A, Pucci M, Artico M. VEGF in nuclear medicine: Clinical application in cancer and future perspectives (Review). Int J Oncol 2016; 49:437-47. [PMID: 27277340 DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2016.3553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2016] [Accepted: 03/28/2016] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Clinical trials using antiangiogenic drugs revealed their potential against cancer. Unfortunately, a large percentage of patients does not yet benefit from this therapeutic approach highlighting the need of diagnostic tools to non-invasively evaluate and monitor response to therapy. It would also allow to predict which kind of patient will likely benefit of antiangiogenic therapy. Reasons for treatment failure might be due to a low expression of the drug targets or prevalence of other pathways. Molecular imaging has been therefore explored as a diagnostic technique of choice. Since the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF/VEGFR) pathway is the main responsible of tumor angiogenesis, several new drugs targeting either the soluble ligand or its receptor to inhibit signaling leading to tumor regression could be involved. Up today, it is difficult to determine VEGF or VEGFR local levels and their non-invasive measurement in tumors might give insight into the available target for VEGF/VEGFR-dependent antiangiogenic therapies, allowing therapy decision making and monitoring of response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Filippo Galli
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, 'Sapienza' University, Rome, Italy
| | - Alberto Signore
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, 'Sapienza' University, Rome, Italy
| | - Enzo Agostinelli
- Department of Biochemical Sciences 'A. Rossi Fanelli', 'Sapienza' University, Rome, Italy
| | - Rudi A J O Dierckx
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Antonio Minni
- Department of Sensory Organs, 'Sapienza' University, Rome, Italy
| | - Marcella Pucci
- Department of Sensory Organs, 'Sapienza' University, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Artico
- Department of Sensory Organs, 'Sapienza' University, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Even-Sapir E, Golan O, Menes T, Weinstein Y, Lerman H. Breast Imaging Utilizing Dedicated Gamma Camera and (99m)Tc-MIBI: Experience at the Tel Aviv Medical Center and Review of the Literature Breast Imaging. Semin Nucl Med 2016; 46:286-93. [PMID: 27237439 DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2016.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
The scope of the current article is the clinical role of gamma cameras dedicated for breast imaging and (99m)Tc-MIBI tumor-seeking tracer, as both a screening modality among a healthy population and as a diagnostic modality in patients with breast cancer. Such cameras are now commercially available. The technology utilizing a camera composed of a NaI (Tl) detector is termed breast-specific gamma imaging. The technology of dual-headed camera composed of semiconductor cadmium zinc telluride detectors that directly converts gamma-ray energy into electronic signals is termed molecular breast imaging. Molecular breast imaging system has been installed at the Department of Nuclear medicine at the Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv in 2009. The article reviews the literature well as our own experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Einat Even-Sapir
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
| | - Orit Golan
- Department of Radiology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Breast Imaging Unit, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Tehillah Menes
- Department of Surgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Breast surgery unit, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Yuliana Weinstein
- Department of Radiology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Breast Imaging Unit, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Hedva Lerman
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
|
17
|
Brem RF, Ruda RC, Yang JL, Coffey CM, Rapelyea JA. Breast-Specific γ-Imaging for the Detection of Mammographically Occult Breast Cancer in Women at Increased Risk. J Nucl Med 2016; 57:678-84. [PMID: 26823569 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.168385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2015] [Accepted: 12/10/2015] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
UNLABELLED Breast-specific γ-imaging (BSGI) is a physiologic imaging modality that can detect subcentimeter and mammographically occult breast cancer, with a sensitivity and specificity comparable to MRI. The purpose of this study was to determine the incremental increase in breast cancer detection when BSGI is used as an adjunct to mammography in women at increased risk for breast cancer. METHODS All patients undergoing BSGI from April 2010 through January 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Eligible patients were identified as women at increased risk for breast cancer and whose most recent mammogram was benign. Examinations exhibiting focally increased radiotracer uptake were considered positive. Incremental increase in cancer detection was calculated as the percentage of mammographically occult BSGI-detected breast cancer and the number of mammographically occult breast cancers detected per 1,000 women screened. RESULTS Included in this study were 849 patients in whom 14 BSGI examinations detected mammographically occult breast cancer. Patients ranged in age from 26 to 83 y, with a mean age of 57 y. Eleven of 14 cancers were detected in women with dense breasts. The addition of BSGI to the annual breast screen of asymptomatic women at increased risk for breast cancer yields 16.5 cancers per 1,000 women screened. When high-risk lesions and cancers were combined, BSGI detected 33.0 high-risk lesions and cancers per 1,000 women screened. CONCLUSION BSGI is a reliable adjunct modality to screening mammography that increases breast cancer detection by 1.7% (14/849) in women at increased risk for breast cancer, comparable to results reported for breast MRI. BSGI is beneficial in breast cancer detection in women at increased risk, particularly in those with dense breasts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel F Brem
- George Washington University Medical Faculty Associates, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Rachel C Ruda
- George Washington University Medical Faculty Associates, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Jialu L Yang
- George Washington University Medical Faculty Associates, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Caitrín M Coffey
- George Washington University Medical Faculty Associates, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Jocelyn A Rapelyea
- George Washington University Medical Faculty Associates, Washington, District of Columbia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kuhn KJ, Rapelyea JA, Torrente J, Teal CB, Brem RF. Comparative Diagnostic Utility of Low-Dose Breast-Specific Gamma Imaging to Current Clinical Standard. Breast J 2015; 22:180-8. [PMID: 26662297 DOI: 10.1111/tbj.12550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
To retrospectively compare low-dose (7-10 mCi) to high-dose (15-30 mCi) breast-specific gamma imaging (BSGI) in the detection of breast cancer. A retrospective review of 223 consecutive women who underwent BSGI exam between February 2011 and August 2013 with subsequent pathologic analysis was performed. Women were divided into low-dose and high-dose groups. The results of BSGI and pathology were compared, and the sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were determined. A subgroup analysis was performed to evaluate specificity using benign follow-up imaging to establish true-negative results. There were 223 women who met inclusion criteria with 109 patients with 153 lesions in the low-dose group and 114 patients with 145 lesions in the high-dose group. Pathologic correlation demonstrates sensitivities of 97.6% (95% CI = 90.9-99.6%) and 94.6% (95% CI = 84.2-98.6%; p = 0.093), PPVs of 62.1% (95% CI = 53.2-70.3%) and 50.5% (95% CI = 40.6-60.3%, p = 0.089), and NPVs of 90.5% (95% CI = 68.2-98.3%) and 92.5% (95% CI = 78.5-98.0%, p = 0.781) in the low-dose and high-dose groups, respectively. Subgroup analysis included 72 patients with 98 lesions in the low-dose group and 116 patients with 132 lesions in the high-dose group, with a specificity of 53.7% (95% CI = 39.7-67.1%) and 66.3% (95% CI = 56.2-75.2%%, p = 0.143), respectively. Low-dose BSGI demonstrated high sensitivity and NPV in the detection of breast cancer comparable to the current standard dose BSGI, with moderate specificity and PPV in a limited subgroup analysis, which was associated with a substantial number of false-positives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin J Kuhn
- Department of Breast Imaging, The George Washington University Medical Faculty Associates, Washington, DC
| | - Jocelyn A Rapelyea
- Department of Breast Imaging, The George Washington University Medical Faculty Associates, Washington, DC
| | - Jessica Torrente
- Department of Breast Imaging, The George Washington University Medical Faculty Associates, Washington, DC
| | - Christine B Teal
- Breast Care Center, The George Washington University Medical Faculty Associates, Washington, DC
| | - Rachel F Brem
- Department of Breast Imaging, The George Washington University Medical Faculty Associates, Washington, DC
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Armaroli P, Villain P, Suonio E, Almonte M, Anttila A, Atkin WS, Dean PB, de Koning HJ, Dillner L, Herrero R, Kuipers EJ, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Minozzi S, Paci E, Regula J, Törnberg S, Segnan N. European Code against Cancer, 4th Edition: Cancer screening. Cancer Epidemiol 2015; 39 Suppl 1:S139-52. [PMID: 26596722 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2015.10.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2015] [Revised: 10/09/2015] [Accepted: 10/14/2015] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
In order to update the previous version of the European Code against Cancer and formulate evidence-based recommendations, a systematic search of the literature was performed according to the methodology agreed by the Code Working Groups. Based on the review, the 4th edition of the European Code against Cancer recommends: "Take part in organized cancer screening programmes for: Bowel cancer (men and women); Breast cancer (women); Cervical cancer (women)." Organized screening programs are preferable because they provide better conditions to ensure that the Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Screening are followed in order to achieve the greatest benefit with the least harm. Screening is recommended only for those cancers where a demonstrated life-saving effect substantially outweighs the potential harm of examining very large numbers of people who may otherwise never have, or suffer from, these cancers, and when an adequate quality of the screening is achieved. EU citizens are recommended to participate in cancer screening each time an invitation from the national or regional screening program is received and after having read the information materials provided and carefully considered the potential benefits and harms of screening. Screening programs in the European Union vary with respect to the age groups invited and to the interval between invitations, depending on each country's cancer burden, local resources, and the type of screening test used For colorectal cancer, most programs in the EU invite men and women starting at the age of 50-60 years, and from then on every 2 years if the screening test is the guaiac-based fecal occult blood test or fecal immunochemical test, or every 10 years or more if the screening test is flexible sigmoidoscopy or total colonoscopy. Most programs continue sending invitations to screening up to the age of 70-75 years. For breast cancer, most programs in the EU invite women starting at the age of 50 years, and not before the age of 40 years, and from then on every 2 years until the age of 70-75 years. For cervical cancer, if cytology (Pap) testing is used for screening, most programs in the EU invite women starting at the age of 25-30 years and from then on every 3 or 5 years. If human papillomavirus testing is used for screening, most women are invited starting at the age of 35 years (usually not before age 30 years) and from then on every 5 years or more. Irrespective of the test used, women continue participating in screening until the age of 60 or 65 years, and continue beyond this age unless the most recent test results are normal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paola Armaroli
- CPO Piemonte, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, via S. Francesco da Paola 31, 10123 Turin, Italy
| | - Patricia Villain
- International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 150 Cours Albert Thomas, 69372 Lyon Cedex 08, France
| | - Eero Suonio
- International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 150 Cours Albert Thomas, 69372 Lyon Cedex 08, France
| | - Maribel Almonte
- International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 150 Cours Albert Thomas, 69372 Lyon Cedex 08, France
| | - Ahti Anttila
- Mass Screening Registry, Finnish Cancer Registry, Unioninkatu 22, 00130 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Wendy S Atkin
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, St. Mary's Campus, Norfolk Place, London W2 1NY, United Kingdom
| | - Peter B Dean
- International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 150 Cours Albert Thomas, 69372 Lyon Cedex 08, France
| | - Harry J de Koning
- Departments of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, PO Box 2040, 3000CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lena Dillner
- Department of Infectious Disease, Karolinska University Hospital, S-17176 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Rolando Herrero
- International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 150 Cours Albert Thomas, 69372 Lyon Cedex 08, France
| | - Ernst J Kuipers
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- Departments of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, PO Box 2040, 3000CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Silvia Minozzi
- CPO Piemonte, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, via S. Francesco da Paola 31, 10123 Turin, Italy
| | - Eugenio Paci
- ISPO-Cancer Prevention and Research Institute, Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Unit, Ponte Nuovo - Padiglione Mario Fiori, Via delle Oblate 2, 50141 Florence, Italy
| | - Jaroslaw Regula
- Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Department of Gastroenterology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Sven Törnberg
- Department of Cancer Screening, Stockholm Regional Cancer Centre, PO Box 6909, S-102 39 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Nereo Segnan
- CPO Piemonte, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, via S. Francesco da Paola 31, 10123 Turin, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ng KH, Lau S. Vision 20/20: Mammographic breast density and its clinical applications. Med Phys 2015; 42:7059-77. [PMID: 26632060 DOI: 10.1118/1.4935141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Kwan-Hoong Ng
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and University of Malaya Research Imaging Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Susie Lau
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and University of Malaya Research Imaging Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
|
22
|
Alternative screening for women with dense breasts: breast-specific gamma imaging (molecular breast imaging). AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015; 204:252-6. [PMID: 25615745 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.14.13525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. Given mammography's limitations in evaluating dense breasts, examination with breast-specific gamma imaging (BSGI)-also called molecular breast imaging (MBI)-has been proposed. We review the literature pertinent to the performance of BSGI in patients with dense breasts. CONCLUSION. Many studies have reported the sensitivity of BSGI in finding cancers even in dense breasts. However, BSGI has not yet been validated as an effective screening tool in large prospective studies. In addition, whole-body dose remains a significant concern.
Collapse
|
23
|
O'Connor MK, Calabrese EJ. Response to Comments on “Estimating Risks of Low Radiation Doses—A Critical Review of the BEIR VII Report and Its Use of the Linear No-Threshold (LNT) Hypothesis”. Radiat Res 2015; 183:481-4. [DOI: 10.1667/rr4029.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
24
|
Huang ML, Rose S, Yang WT. Breast cancer screening: meeting the challenges of today and exploring the technologies of tomorrow. Semin Roentgenol 2015; 50:88-100. [PMID: 25770339 DOI: 10.1053/j.ro.2014.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Monica L Huang
- Department of Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
| | - Stephen Rose
- Solis Women's Health, Houston, TX; Rose Imaging Specialists, Houston, TX; TOPS Comprehensive Breast Center, Houston, TX
| | - Wei T Yang
- Department of Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
O’Connor MK. Molecular breast imaging: an emerging modality for breast cancer screening. BREAST CANCER MANAGEMENT 2015; 4:33-40. [PMID: 25621015 PMCID: PMC4303579 DOI: 10.2217/bmt.14.49] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Screening mammography is recognized as an imperfect imaging tool that performs poorly in women with dense breast tissue - a limitation which has driven demand for supplemental screening techniques. One potential supplemental technique is molecular breast imaging (MBI). Significant improvements in gamma camera technology allow MBI to be performed at low radiation doses, comparable with those of tomosynthesis and mammography. A recent screening trial in women with dense breast tissue yielded a cancer detection rate of 3.2 per 1000 for mammography alone and 12.0 per 1000 for the combination of mammography and MBI. MBI also demonstrated a lower recall rate than that of mammography. MBI is a promising supplemental screening technique in women with dense breast tissue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael K O’Connor
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; Tel.: +1 507 284 7083; Fax: +1 507 266 4461
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Hong H, Chen F, Zhang Y, Cai W. New radiotracers for imaging of vascular targets in angiogenesis-related diseases. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2014; 76:2-20. [PMID: 25086372 DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2014.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2014] [Revised: 07/14/2014] [Accepted: 07/22/2014] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Tremendous advances over the last several decades in positron emission tomography (PET) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) allow for targeted imaging of molecular and cellular events in the living systems. Angiogenesis, a multistep process regulated by the network of different angiogenic factors, has attracted world-wide interests, due to its pivotal role in the formation and progression of different diseases including cancer, cardiovascular diseases (CVD), and inflammation. In this review article, we will summarize the recent progress in PET or SPECT imaging of a wide variety of vascular targets in three major angiogenesis-related diseases: cancer, cardiovascular diseases, and inflammation. Faster drug development and patient stratification for a specific therapy will become possible with the facilitation of PET or SPECT imaging and it will be critical for the maximum benefit of patients.
Collapse
|
27
|
Kuo W, Ciet P, Tiddens HAWM, Zhang W, Guillerman RP, van Straten M. Monitoring Cystic Fibrosis Lung Disease by Computed Tomography. Radiation Risk in Perspective. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2014; 189:1328-36. [DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201311-2099ci] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
|
28
|
|
29
|
Hruska CB, O'Connor MK. Nuclear imaging of the breast: translating achievements in instrumentation into clinical use. Med Phys 2013; 40:050901. [PMID: 23635248 DOI: 10.1118/1.4802733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Approaches to imaging the breast with nuclear medicine and∕or molecular imaging methods have been under investigation since the late 1980s when a technique called scintimammography was first introduced. This review charts the progress of nuclear imaging of the breast over the last 20 years, covering the development of newer techniques such as breast specific gamma imaging, molecular breast imaging, and positron emission mammography. Key issues critical to the adoption of these technologies in the clinical environment are discussed, including the current status of clinical studies, the efforts at reducing the radiation dose from procedures associated with these technologies, and the relevant radiopharmaceuticals that are available or under development. The necessary steps required to move these technologies from bench to bedside are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carrie B Hruska
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Garcia EM, Storm ES, Atkinson L, Kenny E, Mitchell LS. Current Breast Imaging Modalities, Advances, and Impact on Breast Care. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2013; 40:429-57. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ogc.2013.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
31
|
Mainiero MB, Lourenco A, Mahoney MC, Newell MS, Bailey L, Barke LD, D'Orsi C, Harvey JA, Hayes MK, Huynh PT, Jokich PM, Lee SJ, Lehman CD, Mankoff DA, Nepute JA, Patel SB, Reynolds HE, Sutherland ML, Haffty BG. ACR Appropriateness Criteria Breast Cancer Screening. J Am Coll Radiol 2013; 10:11-4. [PMID: 23290667 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2012.09.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 105] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2012] [Accepted: 09/24/2012] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Mammography is the recommended method for breast cancer screening of women in the general population. However, mammography alone does not perform as well as mammography plus supplemental screening in high-risk women. Therefore, supplemental screening with MRI or ultrasound is recommended in selected high-risk populations. Screening breast MRI is recommended in women at high risk for breast cancer on the basis of family history or genetic predisposition. Ultrasound is an option for those high-risk women who cannot undergo MRI. Recent literature also supports the use of breast MRI in some women of intermediate risk, and ultrasound may be an option for intermediate-risk women with dense breasts. There is insufficient evidence to support the use of other imaging modalities, such as thermography, breast-specific gamma imaging, positron emission mammography, and optical imaging, for breast cancer screening. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review includes an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.
Collapse
|
32
|
Gaykema SB, Brouwers AH, Lub-de Hooge MN, Pleijhuis RG, Timmer-Bosscha H, Pot L, van Dam GM, van der Meulen SB, de Jong JR, Bart J, de Vries J, Jansen L, de Vries EG, Schröder CP. 89Zr-Bevacizumab PET Imaging in Primary Breast Cancer. J Nucl Med 2013; 54:1014-8. [DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.112.117218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 127] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
|
33
|
Sun Y, Wei W, Yang HW, Liu JL. Clinical usefulness of breast-specific gamma imaging as an adjunct modality to mammography for diagnosis of breast cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2013; 40:450-63. [PMID: 23151912 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-012-2279-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2012] [Accepted: 10/05/2012] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of breast-specific gamma imaging (BSGI) as an adjunct modality to mammography for detecting breast cancer. METHODS Comprehensive searches of MEDLINE (1984 to August 2012) and EMBASE (1994 to August 2012) were performed. A summary receiver operating characteristic curve (SROC) was constructed to summarize the overall test performance of BSGI. The sensitivities for detecting subcentimetre cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) were pooled. The potential of BSGI to complement mammography was also evaluated by identifying mammography-occult breast cancer. RESULTS Analysis of the studies revealed that the overall validity estimates of BSGI in detecting breast cancer were as follows: sensitivity 95 % (95 % CI 93-96 %), specificity 80 % (95 % CI 78-82 %), positive likelihood ratio 4.63 (95 % CI 3.13-6.85), negative likelihood ratio 0.08 (95 % CI 0.05-0.14), and diagnostic odds ratio 56.67 (95 % CI 26.68-120.34). The area under the SROC was 0.9552 and the Q* point was 0.8977. The pooled sensitivities for detecting subcentimetre cancer and DCIS were 84 % (95 % CI 80-88 %) and 88 % (95 % CI 81-92 %), respectively. Among patients with normal mammography, 4 % were diagnosed with breast cancer by BSGI, and among those with mammography suggestive of malignancy or new biopsy-proven breast cancer, 6 % were diagnosed with additional cancers in the breast by BSGI. CONCLUSION BSGI had a high diagnostic performance as an excellent adjunct modality to mammography for detecting breast cancer. The ability to identify subcentimetre cancer and DCIS was also high.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Sun
- Department of Breast Surgery of Guangxi Cancer Hospital, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi, People's Republic of China
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Abstract
Breast cancer screening is a highly complex and more recently a controversial topic. Conventional screening includes breast self-examination, clinical breast examination, and screening mammography. Several newer imaging modalities have been introduced into the screening armamentarium including breast magnetic resonance imaging and whole-breast automated ultrasound. Novel imaging techniques like positron emission mammography are currently under clinical investigation in the hopes of improving the sensitivity of breast cancer screening. In addition, the development of biochemical assays, which employ minimally invasive sampling are also promising.
Collapse
|
35
|
Donovan EM, James H, Bonora M, Yarnold JR, Evans PM. Second cancer incidence risk estimates using BEIR VII models for standard and complex external beam radiotherapy for early breast cancer. Med Phys 2012; 39:5814-24. [PMID: 23039620 PMCID: PMC3498624 DOI: 10.1118/1.4748332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare organ specific cancer incidence risks for standard and complex external beam radiotherapy (including cone beam CT verification) following breast conservation surgery for early breast cancer. METHOD Doses from breast radiotherapy and kilovoltage cone beam CT (CBCT) exposures were obtained from thermoluminescent dosimeter measurements in an anthropomorphic phantom in which the positions of radiosensitive organs were delineated. Five treatment deliveries were investigated: (i) conventional tangential field whole breast radiotherapy (WBRT), (ii) noncoplanar conformal delivery applicable to accelerated partial beast irradiation (APBI), (iii) two-volume simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) treatment, (iv) forward planned three-volume SIB, and (v) inverse-planned three volume SIB. Conformal and intensity modulated radiotherapy methods were used to plan the complex treatments. Techniques spanned the range from simple methods appropriate for patient cohorts with a low cancer recurrence risk to complex plans relevant to cohorts with high recurrence risk. Delineated organs at risk included brain, salivary glands, thyroid, contralateral breast, left and right lung, esophagus, stomach, liver, colon, and bladder. Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation (BEIR) VII cancer incidence models were applied to the measured mean organ doses to determine lifetime attributable risk (LAR) for ages at exposure from 35 to 80 yr according to radiotherapy techniques, and included dose from the CBCT imaging. RESULTS All LAR decreased with age at exposure and were lowest for brain, thyroid, liver, and bladder (<0.1%). There was little dependence of LAR on radiotherapy technique for these organs and for colon and stomach. LAR values for the lungs for the three SIB techniques were two to three times those from WBRT and APBI. Uncertainties in the LAR models outweigh any differences in lung LAR between the SIB methods. Constraints in the planning of the SIB methods ensured that contralateral breast doses and LAR were comparable to WBRT, despite their added complexity. The smaller irradiated volume of the ABPI plan contributed to a halving of LAR for contralateral breast compared with the other plan types. Daily image guided radiotherapy (IGRT) for a left breast protocol using kilovoltage CBCT contributed <10% to LAR for the majority of organs, and did not exceed 22% of total organ dose. CONCLUSIONS Phantom measurements and calculations of LAR from the BEIR VII models predict that complex breast radiotherapy techniques do not increase the theoretical risk of second cancer incidence for organs distant from the treated breast, or the contralateral breast where appropriate plan constraints are applied. Complex SIB treatments are predicted to increase the risk of second cancer incidence in the lungs compared to standard whole breast radiotherapy; this is outweighed by the threefold reduction in 5 yr local recurrence risk for patients of high risk of recurrence, and young age, from the use of radiotherapy. APBI may have a favorable impact on risk of second cancer in the contralateral breast and lung for older patients at low risk of recurrence. Intensive use of IGRT increased the estimated values of LAR but these are dominated by the effect of the dose from the radiotherapy, and any increase in LAR from IGRT is much lower than the models' uncertainties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E M Donovan
- Joint Department of Physics, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton SM2 5PT, UK.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Hruska CB, Weinmann AL, Tello Skjerseth CM, Wagenaar EM, Conners AL, Tortorelli CL, Maxwell RW, Rhodes DJ, O'Connor MK. Proof of concept for low-dose molecular breast imaging with a dual-head CZT gamma camera. Part II. Evaluation in patients. Med Phys 2012; 39:3476-83. [PMID: 22755727 DOI: 10.1118/1.4719959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Molecular breast imaging (MBI) has shown promise as an adjunct screening technique to mammography for women with dense breasts. The demonstration of reliable lesion detection with MBI performed at low administered doses of Tc-99 m sestamibi, comparable in effective radiation dose to screening mammography, is essential to adoption of MBI for screening. The concept of performing low-dose MBI with dual-head cadmium zinc telluride (CZT) gamma cameras has been investigated in phantoms in Part I. In this work, the objectives were to evaluate the impact of the count sensitivity improvement methods on image quality in patient MBI exams and to determine if adequate lesion detection could be achieved at reduced doses. METHODS Following the implementation of two count sensitivity improvement methods, registered collimation optimized for near-field imaging and energy acceptance window optimized for CZT, MBI exams were performed in the course of clinical care. Clinical image count density (counts/cm(2)) was compared between standard MBI [740 MBq (20 mCi) Tc-99 m sestamibi, standard collimation, standard energy window] and low-dose MBI [296 MBq (8 mCi) Tc-99 m sestamibi, optimized collimation, wide energy window] in a cohort of 50 patients who had both types of MBI exams performed. Lesion detection at low doses was evaluated in a separate cohort of 32 patients, in which low-dose MBI was performed following 296 MBq injection and acquired in dynamic mode, allowing the generation of images acquired for 2.5, 5, 7.5, and 10 min/breast view with proportionately reduced count densities. Diagnostic accuracy at each count density level was compared and kappa statistic was used to assess intrareader agreement between 10 min acquisitions and those at shorter acquisition durations. RESULTS In patient studies, low-dose MBI performed with 296 MBq Tc-99 m sestamibi and new optimal collimation/wide energy window resulted in an average relative gain in count density of 4.2 ± 1.3 compared to standard MBI performed with 740 MBq. Interpretation of low-dose 296 MBq images with count densities corresponding to acquisitions of 2.5, 5, 7.5, and 10 min/view and median lesion size of 1.4 cm resulted in similar diagnostic accuracy across count densities and substantial to near-perfect intrareader agreement between full 10 min-views and lower count density views. CONCLUSIONS Review of patient studies showed that registered optimized collimation and wide energy window resulted in a substantial gain in count sensitivity as previously indicated by phantom results. This proof of concept work indicates that MBI performed at administered doses of 296 MBq Tc-99 m sestamibi with the applied count sensitivity improvements permits the detection of small breast lesions in patients. Findings suggest that further reductions in acquisition duration or administered dose may be achievable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carrie B Hruska
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Hruska CB, Weinmann AL, O'Connor MK. Proof of concept for low-dose molecular breast imaging with a dual-head CZT gamma camera. Part I. Evaluation in phantoms. Med Phys 2012; 39:3466-75. [PMID: 22755726 DOI: 10.1118/1.4718665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Molecular breast imaging (MBI) is a nuclear medicine technology that uses dual-head cadmium zinc telluride (CZT) gamma cameras to image functional uptake of a radiotracer, Tc-99m sestamibi, in the breast. An important factor in adoption of MBI in the screening setting is reduction of the necessary administered dose of Tc-99m sestamibi from the typically used dose of 740 MBq to approximately 148 MBq, such that MBI's whole-body effective dose is comparable to that of screening mammography. Methods that increase MBI count sensitivity may allow a proportional reduction in the necessary administered dose. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of two count sensitivity improvement methods on image quality by evaluating count sensitivity, spatial resolution, and lesion contrast in phantom simulations. METHODS Two dual-head CZT-based MBI systems were studied: LumaGem and Discovery NM 750b. Two count sensitivity improvement methods were implemented: registered collimators optimized for dedicated breast imaging and widened energy acceptance window optimized for use with CZT. System sensitivity, spatial resolution, and tumor contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were measured comparing standard collimation and energy window setting [126-154 keV (+10%, -10%)] with optimal collimation and a wide energy window [110-154 keV (+10%, -21%)]. RESULTS Compared to the standard collimator designs and energy windows for these two systems, use of registered optimized collimation and wide energy window increased system sensitivity by a factor of 2.8-3.6. Spatial resolution decreased slightly for both systems with new collimation. At 3 cm from the collimator face, LumaGem's spatial resolution was 4.8 and 5.6 mm with standard and optimized collimation; Discovery NM 750b's spatial resolution was 4.4 and 4.6 mm with standard and optimized collimation, respectively. For both systems, at tumor depths of 1 and 3 cm, use of optimized collimation and wide energy window significantly improved CNR compared to standard settings for tumors 8.0 and 9.2 mm in diameter. At the closer depth of 1 cm, optimized collimation and wide energy window also significantly improved CNR for 5.9 mm tumors on Discovery NM 750b. CONCLUSIONS Registered optimized collimation and wide energy window yield a substantial gain in count sensitivity and measurable gain in CNR, with some loss in spatial resolution compared to the standard collimator designs and energy windows used on these two systems. At low-count densities calculated to represent doses of 148 MBq, this tradeoff results in adequate count density and lesion contrast for detection of lesions ≥8 mm in the middle of a typical breast (3 cm deep) and lesions ≥6 mm close to the collimator (1 cm deep).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carrie B Hruska
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Molecular Imaging in Breast Cancer: From Whole-Body PET/CT to Dedicated Breast PET. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2012; 2012:438647. [PMID: 22848217 PMCID: PMC3400419 DOI: 10.1155/2012/438647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2012] [Accepted: 05/21/2012] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Positron emission tomography (PET), with or without integrated computed tomography (CT), using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) is based on the principle of elevated glucose metabolism in malignant tumors, and its use in breast cancer patients is frequently being investigated. It has been shown useful for classification, staging, and response monitoring, both in primary and recurrent disease. However, because of the partial volume effect and limited resolution of most whole-body PET scanners, sensitivity for the visualization of small tumors is generally low. To improve the detection and quantification of primary breast tumors with FDG PET, several dedicated breast PET devices have been developed. In this nonsystematic review, we shortly summarize the value of whole-body PET/CT in breast cancer and provide an overview of currently available dedicated breast PETs.
Collapse
|
39
|
The Impact of Reduced Injected Radioactivity on Image Quality of Molecular Breast Imaging Tomosynthesis. BREAST IMAGING : 11TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP, IWDM 2012, PHILADELPHIA, PA, USA, JULY 8-11, 2012 : PROCEEDINGS. INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON BREAST IMAGING (11TH : 2012 : PHILADELPHIA, PA.) 2012. [PMID: 28835942 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-31271-7_39] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register]
Abstract
This study's objective is to compare image quality in 3-D molecular breast imaging tomosynthesis (MBIT) with that in planar molecular breast imaging (MBI) over a range of breast radioactivity concentrations. Using gelatin and point source phantoms lesion contrast, lesion signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and spatial resolution were compared for a range of lesion sizes and depths. For both MBI and MBIT, lesion contrast is essentially constant with changing activity while SNR decreases by a factor of 1.5 - 2 between 100% and 25% activity levels. For nearly all lesion sizes and locations contrast and SNR are significantly higher for MBIT than MBI, potentially permitting greater reductions in injected dose. Spatial resolution in MBI is dependent on lesion depth but independent of lesion location with MBIT. Reconstructed MBIT spatial resolution is substantially better than that in the projection images, suggesting future use of higher sensitivity collimators for even further reductions in injected activity.
Collapse
|
40
|
Breast-specific gamma imaging in the detection of atypical ductal hyperplasia and lobular neoplasia. Acad Radiol 2012; 19:661-6. [PMID: 22578225 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2012.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2011] [Revised: 02/14/2012] [Accepted: 02/16/2012] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES Atypical lesions such as atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) and lobular neoplasia are nonmalignant lesions that are associated with significant increased risk of developing breast cancer. Atypical lesions have been reported to present with focal increased radiotracer uptake on breast-specific gamma imaging (BSGI) examination, a novel physiologic tool for the detection of breast cancer. To date the sensitivity of BSGI in the detection of atypical lesions has not been reported. The purpose of this study is to determine the sensitivity of BSGI in detecting ADH and lobular neoplasia. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 1316 patients who received a BSGI exam between January 2006 and July 2009 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients who underwent minimally invasive biopsy and subsequent surgical excision where the highest pathology was solely ADH or lobular neoplasia (reported as ALH, lobular carcinoma in situ or lobular neoplasia), according to the pathology database were included (n = 15). The sensitivity was determined as the percentage of positive BSGI exams out of all patients diagnosed with ADH or lobular neoplasia who received a BSGI. RESULTS Patient ages ranged from 39 to 67 (mean, 52). Eight of 15 patients had ADH, 6/15 lobular neoplasia, and 1/15 ADH and lobular neoplasia in one lesion. Fifteen of the 15 (100%) patients with surgically confirmed ADH or lobular neoplasia had a positive BSGI, with focally increased radiotracer uptake at the site of the verified high-risk lesion. CONCLUSION BSGI has a high sensitivity for the detection of atypical, high-risk breast lesions. A diagnosis of an atypical lesion is concordant with focal increased radiotracer uptake with BSGI and can identify women at increased risk for breast cancer.
Collapse
|
41
|
Narod SA. Screening of women at high risk for breast cancer. Prev Med 2011; 53:127-30. [PMID: 21745498 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.06.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2011] [Revised: 06/20/2011] [Accepted: 06/24/2011] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
A woman may be at high risk of breast cancer because of a strong family history of breast cancer or because she carries a mutation in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene. The annual risk for women in this category is between 1% and 2% and the lifetime risk of breast cancer among gene carriers may approach 80%. Several recent trials have reported that the sensitivity of MRI for imaging breast cancer greatly exceeds that of conventional mammography, but no study has yet determined that annual MRI reduces breast cancer-specific mortality. Women with breast cancer and a BRCA1 mutation typically develop aggressive breast cancers and the prognosis is relatively poor for women with small node-negative breast cancers (compared to non-carriers) in particular, if chemotherapy is not given. It is hoped that annual MRI screening combined with appropriate treatment will result in decreased mortality for this and other groups of high-risk women. MRI-based screening for women at moderate risk is a topic of great interest--MRI has not yet been endorsed in moderate risk women because of the high cost of screening and because the specificity of the screening test is not yet determined in this subgroup.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven A Narod
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital and the Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|