The report of Task Group 100 of the AAPM: Application of risk analysis methods to radiation therapy quality management

Results of an Artificial Intelligence-Based Image Review System to Detect Patient Misalignment Errors in a Multi-institutional Database of Cone Beam Computed Tomography-Guided Radiation Therapy

PURPOSE

Present knowledge of patient setup and alignment errors in image guided radiation therapy (IGRT) relies on voluntary reporting, which is thought to underestimate error frequencies. A manual retrospective patient-setup misalignment error search is infeasible owing to the bulk of cases to be reviewed. We applied a deep learning-based misalignment error detection algorithm (EDA) to perform a fully automated retrospective error search of clinical IGRT databases and determine an absolute gross patient misalignment error rate.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The EDA was developed to analyze the registration between planning scans and pretreatment cone beam computed tomography scans, outputting a misalignment score ranging from 0 (most unlikely) to 1 (most likely). The algorithm was trained using simulated translational errors on a data set obtained from 680 patients treated at 2 radiation therapy clinics between 2017 and 2022. A receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to obtain target thresholds. DICOM Query and Retrieval software was integrated with the EDA to interact with the clinical database and fully automate data retrieval and analysis during a retrospective error search from 2016 to 2017 and from 2021 to 2022 for the 2 institutions, respectively. Registrations were flagged for human review using both a hard-thresholding method and a prediction trending analysis over each individual patient's treatment course. Flagged registrations were manually reviewed and categorized as errors (>1 cm misalignment at the target) or nonerrors.

RESULTS

A total of 17,612 registrations were analyzed by the EDA, resulting in 7.7% flagged events. Three previously reported errors were successfully flagged by the EDA, and 4 previously unreported vertebral body misalignment errors were discovered during case reviews. False positive cases often displayed substantial image artifacts, patient rotation, and soft tissue anatomy changes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results validated the clinical utility of the EDA for bulk image reviews and highlighted the reliability and safety of IGRT, with an absolute gross patient misalignment error rate of 0.04% ± 0.02% per delivered fraction.

Evaluation and improvement of the safety of 3D-printed template assisted intracavitary/interstitial brachytherapy for cervical cancer using repeat FMEA

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

3D-printed templates are used in intracavitary/interstitial brachytherapy (3DP-IC/IS) for locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). We applied failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) twice in one year to improve 3DP-IC/IS safety.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A risk assessment group was established. We created a process map for 3DP-IC/IS procedures, identifying potential failure modes (FMs) and evaluating occurrence (O), detectability (D), severity (S), and risk priority number (RPN = O*D*S). High RPN values identified high-risk FMs, and quality control (QC) methods were determined by root cause analysis. A second FMEA was performed a year later.

RESULTS

The 3DP-IC/IS process included 10 main steps, 48 subprocesses, and 54 FMs. Initial RPN values ranged from 4.50 to 171.00 (median 50.50; average 52.18). Ten high-risk FMs were identified: (1) unreasonable needle track design (171.00/85.50), (2) noncoplanar needle label identification failure (126.00/64.00), (3) template model reconstruction failure (121.50/62.50), (4) improper gauze filling (112.00/60.25), (5) poor needle position (112.00/52.50). QC interventions lowered all high-risk RPN values during the second assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

A feasible 3DP-IC/IS process was proposed. Staff training, automatic needle path planning, insertion guidance diagrams, template checking, system commissioning, and template design improvements effectively enhanced process safety.

Comprehensive clinical implementation, workflow, and FMEA of bespoke silicone bolus cast from 3D printed molds using open-source resources

BACKGROUND

Bolus materials have been used for decades in radiotherapy. Most frequently, these materials are utilized to bring dose closer to the skin surface to cover superficial targets optimally. While cavity filling, such as nasal cavities, is desirable, traditional commercial bolus is lacking, requiring other solutions. Recently, investigators have worked on utilizing 3D printing technology, including commercially available solutions, which can overcome some challenges with traditional bolus.

PURPOSE

To utilize failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) to successfully implement a comprehensive 3D printed bolus solution to replace commercial bolus in our clinic using a series of open-source (or free) software products.

METHODS

3D printed molds for bespoke bolus were created by exporting the DICOM structures of the bolus designed in the treatment planning system and manipulated to create a multipart mold for 3D printing. A silicone (Ecoflex 00-30) mixture is poured into the mold and cured to form the bolus. Molds for sheet bolus of five thicknesses were also created. A comprehensive FMEA was performed to guide workflow adjustments and QA steps.

RESULTS

The process map identified 39 and 30 distinct steps for the bespoke and flat sheet bolus workflows, respectively. The corresponding FMEA highlighted 119 and 86 failure modes, with 69 shared between the processes. Misunderstanding of plan intent was a potential cause for most of the highest-scoring failure modes, indicating that physics and dosimetry involvement early in the process is paramount.

CONCLUSION

FMEA informed the design and implementation of QA steps to guarantee a safe and high-quality comprehensive implementation of silicone bolus from 3D printed molds. This approach allows for greater adaptability not afforded by traditional bolus, as well as potential dissemination to other clinics due to the open-source nature of the workflow.

Improving the safety of radiotherapy treatment processes via incident-driven FMEA feedback loops

BACKGROUND

Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) is a valuable tool for radiotherapy risk assessment, yet its outputs might be unreliable due to failures not being identified or due to a lack of accurate error rates.

PURPOSE

A novel incident reporting system (IRS) linked to an FMEA database was tested and evaluated. The study investigated whether the system was suitable for validating a previously performed analysis and whether it could provide accurate error rates to support the expert occurrence ratings of previously identified failure modes.

METHODS

Twenty-three pre-identified failure modes of our external beam radiotherapy process, covering the process steps from patient admission to treatment delivery, were proffered on dedicated FMEA feedback and incident reporting terminals generated by the IRS. The clinical setting involved a computed tomography scanner, dosimetry, and five linacs. Incoming reports were used as basis to identify additional failure modes or confirm initial ones. The Kruskal-Wallis H test was applied to compare the risk priorities of the retrospective and prospective failure modes. Wald's sequential probability ratio test was used to investigate the correctness of the experts' occurrence ratings by means of the number of incoming reports.

RESULTS

Over a 15-month period, 304 reports were submitted. There were 0.005 (confidence interval [CI], 0.0014-0.0082) reported incidents per imaging study and 0.0006 (CI, 0.0003-0.0009) reported incidents per treatment fraction. Sixteen additional failure modes could be identified, and their risk priorities did not differ from those of the initial failure modes (p = 0.954). One failure mode occurrence rating could be increased, whereas the other 22 occurrence ratings could not be disproved.

CONCLUSIONS

Our approach is suitable for validating FMEAs and deducing additional failure modes on a continual basis. Accurate error rates can only be provided if a sufficient number of reports is available.

A body mass index-based method for "MR-only" abdominal MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy

PURPOSE

Dose calculation for MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) at the 0.35 T MR-Linac is currently based on deformation of planning CTs (defCT) acquired for each patient. We present a simple and robust bulk density overwrite synthetic CT (sCT) method for abdominal treatments in order to streamline clinical workflows.

METHOD

Fifty-six abdominal patient treatment plans were retrospectively evaluated. All patients had been treated at the MR-Linac using MR datasets for treatment planning and plan adaption and defCT for dose calculation. Bulk density CTs (4M-sCT) were generated from MR images with four material compartments (bone, lung, air, soft tissue). The relative electron densities (RED) for bone and lung were extracted from contoured CT structure average REDs. For soft tissue, a correlation between BMI and RED was evaluated. Dose was recalculated on 4M-sCT and compared to dose distributions on defCTs assessing dose differences in the PTV and organs at risk (OAR).

RESULTS

Mean RED of bone was 1.17 ± 0.02, mean RED of lung 0.17 ± 0.05. The correlation between BMI and RED for soft tissue was statistically significant (p < 0.01). PTV dose differences between 4M-sCT and defCT were Dmean: -0.4 ± 1.0%, D1%: -0.3 ± 1.1% and D95%: -0.5 ± 1.0%. OARs showed D2%: -0.3 ± 1.9% and Dmean: -0.1 ± 1.4% differences. Local 3D gamma index pass rates (2%/2mm) between dose calculated using 4M-sCT and defCT were 96.8 ± 2.6% (range 89.9-99.6%).

CONCLUSION

The presented method for sCT generation enables precise dose calculation for MR-only abdominal MRgRT.

Development and clinical implementation of a digital system for risk assessments for radiation therapy

Before introducing new treatment techniques, an investigation of hazards due to unintentional radiation exposures is a reasonable activity for proactively increasing patient safety. As dedicated software is scarce, we developed a tool for risk assessment to design a quality management program based on best practice methods, i.e., process mapping, failure modes and effects analysis and fault tree analysis. Implemented as a web database application, a single dataset was used to describe the treatment process and its failure modes. The design of the system and dataset allowed failure modes to be represented both visually as fault trees and in a tabular form. Following the commissioning of the software for our department, previously conducted risk assessments were migrated to the new system after being fully re-assessed which revealed a shift in risk priorities. Furthermore, a weighting factor was investigated to bring risk levels of the migrated assessments into perspective. The compensation did not affect high priorities but did re-prioritize in the midrange of the ranking. We conclude that the tool is suitable to conduct multiple risk assessments and concomitantly keep track of the overall quality management activities.

Optimization of treatment workflow for 0.35T MR-Linac system

PURPOSE

This study presents a novel and comprehensive framework for evaluating magnetic resonance guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) workflow by integrating the Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) approach with Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing (TDABC). We assess the workflow for safety, quality, and economic implications, providing a holistic understanding of the MRgRT implementation. The aim is to offer valuable insights to healthcare practitioners and administrators, facilitating informed decision-making regarding the 0.35T MRIdian MR-Linac system's clinical workflow.

METHODS

For FMEA, a multidisciplinary team followed the TG-100 methodology to assess the MRgRT workflow's potential failure modes. Following the mitigation of primary failure modes and workflow optimization, a treatment process was established for TDABC analysis. The TDABC was applied to both MRgRT and computed tomography guided RT (CTgRT) for typical five-fraction stereotactic body RT (SBRT) treatments, assessing total workflow and costs associated between the two treatment workflows.

RESULTS

A total of 279 failure modes were identified, with 31 categorized as high-risk, 55 as medium-risk, and the rest as low-risk. The top 20% risk priority numbers (RPN) were determined for each radiation oncology care team member. Total MRgRT and CTgRT costs were assessed. Implementing technological advancements, such as real-time multi leaf collimator (MLC) tracking with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), auto-segmentation, and increasing the Linac dose rate, led to significant cost savings for MRgRT.

CONCLUSION

In this study, we integrated FMEA with TDABC to comprehensively evaluate the workflow and the associated costs of MRgRT compared to conventional CTgRT for five-fraction SBRT treatments. FMEA analysis identified critical failure modes, offering insights to enhance patient safety. TDABC analysis revealed that while MRgRT provides unique advantages, it may involve higher costs. Our findings underscore the importance of exploring cost-effective strategies and key technological advancements to ensure the widespread adoption and financial sustainability of MRgRT in clinical practice.

Process failure mode and effects analysis for external beam radiotherapy: Introducing a literature-based template and a novel action priority

PURPOSE

The first aim of the study was to create a general template for analyzing potential failures in external beam radiotherapy, EBRT, using the process failure mode and effects analysis (PFMEA). The second aim was to modify the action priority (AP), a novel prioritization method originally introduced by the Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG), to work with different severity, occurrence, and detection rating systems used in radiation oncology.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The AIAG PFMEA approach was employed in combination with an extensive literature survey to develop the EBRT-PFMEA template. Subsets of high-risk failure modes found through the literature survey were added to the template where applicable. Our modified AP for radiation oncology (RO AP) was defined using a weighted sum of severity, occurrence, and detectability. Then, Monte Carlo simulations were conducted to compare the original AIAG AP, the RO AP, and the risk priority number (RPN). The results of the simulations were used to determine the number of additional corrective actions per failure mode and to parametrize the RO AP to our department's rating system.

RESULTS

An EBRT-PFMEA template comprising 75 high-risk failure modes could be compiled. The AIAG AP required 1.7 additional corrective actions per failure mode, while the RO AP ranged from 1.3 to 3.5, and the RPN required 3.6. The RO AP could be parametrized so that it suited our rating system and evaluated severity, occurrence, and detection ratings equally to the AIAG AP.

CONCLUSIONS

An adjustable EBRT-PFMEA template is provided which can be used as a practical starting point for creating institution-specific templates. Moreover, the RO AP introduces transparent action levels that can be adapted to any rating system.

Prospective risk analysis of the online-adaptive artificial intelligence-driven workflow using the Ethos treatment system

PURPOSE

The recently introduced Varian Ethos system allows adjusting radiotherapy treatment plans to anatomical changes on a daily basis. The system uses artificial intelligence to speed up the process of creating adapted plans, comes with its own software solutions and requires a substantially different workflow. A detailed analysis of possible risks of the associated workflow is presented.

METHODS

A prospective risk analysis of the adaptive workflow with the Ethos system was performed using Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA). An interprofessional team collected possible adverse events and evaluated their severity as well as their chance of occurrence and detectability. Measures to reduce the risks were discussed.

RESULTS

A total of 122 events were identified, and scored. Within the 20 events with the highest-ranked risks, the following were identified: Challenges due to the stand-alone software solution with very limited connectivity to the existing record and verify software and digital patient file, unfamiliarity with the new software and its limitations and the adaption process relying on results obtained by artificial intelligence. The risk analysis led to the implementation of additional quality assurance measures in the workflow.

CONCLUSIONS

The thorough analysis of the risks associated with the new treatment technique was the basis for designing details of the workflow. The analysis also revealed challenges to be addressed by both, the vendor and customers. On the vendor side, this includes improving communication between their different software solutions. On the customer side, this especially includes establishing validation strategies to monitor the results of the black box adaption process making use of artificial intelligence.

Technical recommendations for implementation of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy and Helical Tomotherapy Total Body Irradiation

As a component of myeloablative conditioning before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), Total Body Irradiation (TBI) is employed in radiotherapy centers all over the world. In recent and coming years, many centers are changing their technical setup from a conventional TBI technique to multi-isocenter conformal arc therapy techniques such as Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) or Helical Tomotherapy (HT). These techniques allow better homogeneity and control of the target prescription dose, and provide more freedom for individualized organ-at-risk sparing. The technical design of multi-isocenter/multi-plan conformal TBI is complex and should be developed carefully. A group of early adopters with conformal TBI experience using different treatment machines and treatment planning systems came together to develop technical recommendations and share experiences, in order to assist departments wishing to implement conformal TBI, and to provide ideas for standardization of practices.

A method for empirically validating FMEA RPN scores in a radiation oncology clinic using physics QC data

In failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA), the components of the risk priority number (RPN) for a failure mode (FM) are often chosen by consensus. We describe an empirical method for estimating the occurrence (O) and detectability (D) components of a RPN. The method requires for a given FM that its associated quality control measure be performed twice as is the case when a FM is checked for in an initial physics check and again during a weekly physics check. If instances of the FM caught by these checks are recorded, O and D can be computed. Incorporation of the remaining RPN component, Severity, is discussed. This method can be used as part of quality management design ahead of an anticipated FMEA or afterwards to validate consensus values.

Re-evaluation of the prospective risk analysis for artificial-intelligence driven cone beam computed tomography-based online adaptive radiotherapy after one year of clinical experience

Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based online adaptation is increasingly being introduced into many clinics. Upon implementation of a new treatment technique, a prospective risk analysis is required and enhances workflow safety. We conducted a risk analysis using Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) upon the introduction of an online adaptive treatment programme (Wegener et al., Z Med Phys. 2022). A prospective risk analysis, lacking in-depth clinical experience with a treatment modality or treatment machine, relies on imagination and estimates of the occurrence of different failure modes. Therefore, we systematically documented all irregularities during the first year of online adaptation, namely all cases in which quality assurance detected undesired states potentially leading to negative consequences. Additionally, the quality of automatic contouring was evaluated. Based on those quantitative data, the risk analysis was updated by an interprofessional team. Furthermore, a hypothetical radiation therapist-only workflow during adaptive sessions was included in the prospective analysis, as opposed to the involvement of an interprofessional team performing each adaptive treatment. A total of 126 irregularities were recorded during the first year. During that time period, many of the previously anticipated failure modes (almost) occurred, indicating that the initial prospective risk analysis captured relevant failure modes. However, some scenarios were not anticipated, emphasizing the limits of a prospective risk analysis. This underscores the need for regular updates to the risk analysis. The most critical failure modes are presented together with possible mitigation strategies. It was further noted that almost half of the reported irregularities applied to the non-adaptive treatments on this treatment machine, primarily due to a manual plan import step implemented in the institution's workflow.

The report of AAPM task group 288: Recommendations for guiding radiotherapy event narratives

Incident reporting and learning systems provide an opportunity to identify systemic vulnerabilities that contribute to incidents and potentially degrade quality. The narrative of an incident is intended to provide a clear, easy to understand description of an incident. Unclear, incomplete or poorly organized narratives compromise the ability to learn from them. This report provides guidance for drafting effective narratives, with particular attention to the use of narratives in incident reporting and learning systems (IRLS). Examples are given that compare effective and less than effective narratives. This report is mostly directed to organizations that maintain IRLS, but also may be helpful for individuals who desire to write a useful narrative for entry into such a system. Recommendations include the following: (1) Systems should allow a one- or two-sentence, free-text synopsis of an incident without guessing at causes; (2) Information included should form a sequence of events with chronology; and (3) Reporting and learning systems should consider using the headings suggested to guide the reporter through the narrative: (a) incident occurrences and actions by role; (b) prior circumstances and actions; (c) method by which the incident was identified; (d) equipment related details if relevant; (e) recovery actions by role; (f) relevant time span between responses; (g) and how individuals affected during or immediately after incident. When possible and appropriate, supplementary information including relevant data elements should be included using numerical scales or drop-down choices outside of the narrative. Information that should not be included in the narrative includes: (a) patient health information (PHI); (b) conjecture or blame; (c) jargon abbreviations or details without specifying their significance; (d) causal analysis.

Applying the six-sigma methodology to determine the limits of quality control (QC) tests for a specific linear accelerator

PURPOSE

We aimed to show the framework of the six-sigma methodology (SSM) that can be used to determine the limits of QC tests for the linear accelerator (Linac). Limits for QC tests are individually determined using the SSM.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The SSM is based on the define-measure-analyze-improve-control (DMAIC) stages to improve the process. In the "define" stage, the limits of QC tests were determined. In the "measure" stage, a retrospective collection of daily QC data using a Machine Performance Check platform was performed from January 2020 to December 2022. In the "analyze" stage, the process of determining the limits was proposed using statistical analyses and process capability indices. In the "improve" stage, the capability index was used to calculate the action limits. The tolerance limit was established using the larger one of the control limits in the individual control chart (I-chart). In the "control" stage, daily QC data were collected prospectively from January 2023 to May 2023 to monitor the effect of action limits and tolerance limits.

RESULTS

A total of 798 sets of QC data including beam, isocenter, collimation, couch, and gantry tests were collected and analyzed. The Collimation Rotation offset test had the min-Cp, min-Cpk, min-Pp, and min-Ppk at 2.53, 1.99, 1.59, and 1.25, respectively. The Couch Rtn test had the max-Cp, max-Cpk, max-Pp, and max-Ppk at 31.5, 29.9, 23.4, and 22.2, respectively. There are three QC tests with higher action limits than the original tolerance. Some data on the I-chart of the beam output change, isocenter KV offset, and jaw X1 exceeded the lower tolerance and action limit, which indicated that a system deviation occurred and reminded the physicist to take action to improve the process.

CONCLUSIONS

The SSM is an excellent framework to use in determining the limits of QC tests. The process capability index is an important parameter that provides quantitative information on determining the limits of QC tests.

Safety and Efficiency Analysis of Operational Decision-Making During Cone Beam Computed Tomography-Based Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy

PURPOSE

Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based online adaptive radiation therapy (ART) is especially beneficial for patients with large interfractional anatomic changes. However, treatment planning and review decisions need to be made at the treatment console in real-time and may be delegated to clinical staff whose conventional scope of practice does not include making such decisions. Therefore, implementation can create new safety risks and inefficiencies. The objective of this work is to systematically analyze the safety and efficiency implications of human decision-making during the treatment session for CBCT-based online ART.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The analysis was performed by applying the Systems-Theoretical Process Analysis technique and its extension for human decision-making. Four centers of different CBCT-based online ART practice models comprised the analysis team.

RESULTS

The general radiation therapy control structure was refined to model the interactions between routine treatment delivery staff and in-person or remote support staff. The treatment delivery staff perform 6 key control actions. Eighteen undesirable states of those control actions were identified as affecting safety and/or efficiency. In turn, 97 hazardous clinical scenarios were identified, with the control action "prepare and position patient" having the least number of scenarios and "delineate/edit influencer and target structures" having the most. Five of these are specific to either in-person or remote support during the treatment session, and 12 arise from staff support in general.

CONCLUSIONS

An optimally safe and efficient online ART program should require little to no support staff at the treatment console to reduce staff coordination. Uptraining of the staff already at the treatment console is needed to achieve this goal. Beyond the essential knowledge and skills such as contour editing and the selection of an optimal plan, uptraining should also target the specific cognitive biases identified in this work and the cognitive strategies to overcome these biases. Additionally, technological and organizational changes are necessary.

Rapid Switching of a C-Series Linear Accelerator Between Conventional and Ultrahigh-Dose-Rate Research Mode With Beamline Modifications and Output Stabilization

PURPOSE

In this study, a C-series linear accelerator was configured to enable rapid and reliable conversion between the production of conventional electron beams and an ultrahigh-dose-rate (UHDR) electron beamline to the treatment room isocenter for FLASH radiation therapy. Efforts to tune the beam resulted in a consistent, stable UHDR beamline.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The linear accelerator was configured to allow for efficient switching between conventional and modified electron output modes within 2 minutes. Additions to the air system allow for retraction of the x-ray target from the beamline when the 10 MV photon mode is selected. With the carousel set to an empty port, this grants access to the higher current pristine electron beam normally used to produce clinical photon fields. Monitoring signals related to the automatic frequency control system allows for tuning of the waveguide while the machine is in a hold state so a stable beam is produced from the initial pulse. A pulse counting system implemented on an field-programmable gate array-based controller platform controls the delivery to a desired number of pulses. Beam profiles were measured with Gafchromic film. Pulse-by-pulse dosimetry was measured using a custom electrometer designed around the EDGE diode.

RESULTS

This method reliably produces a stable UHDR electron beam. Open-field measurements of the 16-cm full-width, half-maximum gaussian beam saw average dose rates of 432 Gy/s at treatment isocenter. Pulse overshoots were limited and ramp up was eliminated. Over the last year, there have been no recorded incidents that resulted in machine downtime due to the UHDR conversions.

CONCLUSIONS

Stable 10 MeV UHDR beams were generated to produce an average dose rate of 432 Gy/s at the treatment room isocenter. With a reliable pulse-counting beam control system, consistent doses can be delivered for FLASH experiments with the ability to accommodate a wide range of field sizes, source-to-surface distances, and other experimental apparatus that may be relevant for future clinical translation.

Quantifying the Risk of Technology-Driven Health Disparities in Radiation Oncology

PURPOSE

New technologies are continuously emerging in radiation oncology. Inherent technological limitations can result in health care disparities in vulnerable patient populations. These limitations must be considered for existing and new technologies in the clinic to provide equitable care.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We created a health disparity risk assessment metric inspired by failure mode and effects analysis. We provide sample patient populations and their potential associated disparities, guidelines for clinics and vendors, and example applications of the methodology.

RESULTS

A disparity risk priority number can be calculated from the product of 3 quantifiable metrics: the percentage of patients impacted, the severity of the impact of dosimetric uncertainty or quality of the radiation plan, and the clinical dependence on the evaluated technology. The disparity risk priority number can be used to rank the risk of suboptimal care due to technical limitations when comparing technologies and to plan interventions when technology is shown to have inequitable performance in the patient population of a clinic.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed methodology may simplify the evaluation of how new technology impacts vulnerable populations, help clinics quantify the limitations of their technological resources, and plan appropriate interventions to improve equity in radiation treatments.

PTCOG Ocular Statement: Expert Summary of Current Practices and Future Developments in Ocular Proton Therapy

Although rare cancers, ocular tumors are a threat to vision, quality of life, and potentially life expectancy of a patient. Ocular proton therapy (OPT) is a powerful tool for successfully treating this disease. The Particle Therapy Co-Operative Ocular Group) formulated an Evidence and Expert-Based Executive Summary of Current Practices and Future Developments in OPT: comparative dosimetric and clinical analysis with the different OPT systems is essential to set up planning guidelines, implement best practices, and establish benchmarks for eye preservation, vision, and quality of life measures. Contemporary prospective trials in select subsets of patients (eg, tumors near the optic disc and/or macula) may allow for dosimetric and clinical analysis between different radiation modalities and beamline systems to evaluate differences in radiation delivery and penumbra, and resultant tumor control, normal tissue complication rates, and overall clinical cost-effectiveness. To date, the combination of multimodal imaging (fundus photography, ultrasound, etc), ophthalmologist assessment, and clip surgery with radiation planning have been keys to successful treatment. Increased use of three-dimensional imaging (computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging) is anticipated although its spatial resolution might be a limiting factor (eg, detection of flat diffuse tumor parts). Commercially produced ocular treatment-planning systems are under development and their future use is expected to expand across OPT centers. Future continuity of OPT will depend on the following: (1) maintaining and upgrading existing older dedicated low-energy facilities, (2) maintaining shared, degraded beamlines at large proton therapy centers, and (3) developing adapted gantry beams of sufficient quality to maintain the clinical benefits of sharp beam conformity. Option (1) potentially offers the sharpest beams, minimizing impact on healthy tissues, whereas (2) and (3) potentially offer the advantage of substantial long-term technical support and development as well as the introduction of new approaches. Significant patient throughputs and close cooperation between medical physics, ophthalmology, and radiation therapy, underpinned by mutual understanding, is crucial for a successful OPT service.

Repurposing DailyQA3 for an efficient and spot position sensitive daily quality assurance tool for proton therapy

INTRODUCTION

Daily quality assurance is an integral part of a radiotherapy workflow to ensure the dose is delivered safely and accurately to the patient. It is performed before the first treatment of the day and needs to be time and cost efficient for a multiple gantries proton center. In this study, we introduced an efficient method to perform QA for output constancy, range verification, spot positioning accuracy and imaging and proton beam isocenter coincidence with DailyQA3.

METHODS

A stepped acrylic block of specific dimensions is fabricated and placed on top of the DailyQA3 device. Treatment plans comprising of two different spread-out Bragg peaks and five individual spots of 1.0 MU each are designed to be delivered to the device. A mathematical framework to measure the 2D distance between the detectors and individual spot is introduced and play an important role in realizing the spot positioning and centering QA. Lastly, a 5 months trends of the QA for two gantries are presented.

RESULTS

The outputs are monitored by two ion chambers in the DailyQA3 and a tolerance of± 3 % $ \pm 3\% $ are used. The range of the SOBPs are monitored by the ratio of ion chamber signals and a tolerance of± 1 mm $ \pm 1\ {\mathrm{mm}}$ is used. Four diodes at± 10 cm $ \pm 10\ {\mathrm{cm}}$ from the central ion chambers are used for spot positioning QA, while the central ion chamber is used for imaging and proton beam isocenter coincidence QA. Using the framework, we determined the absolute signal threshold corresponding to the offset tolerance between the individual proton spot and the detector. A1.5 mm $1.5\ {\mathrm{mm}}$ tolerances are used for both the positioning and centering QA. No violation of the tolerances is observed in the 5 months trends for both gantries.

CONCLUSION

With the proposed approach, we can perform four QA items in the TG224 within 10 min.

Implementation of an ionization chamber array for linear accelerator monthly dosimetry QA

PURPOSE

The IC Profiler (ICP) manufactured by Sun Nuclear Corporation (SNC) is an ionization chamber (IC) array used for linear accelerator dosimetry measurements. Previous work characterized response of the ICP under various conditions, but there is limited work of its implementation into monthly QA measurement procedures. This work quantifies ICP accuracy and variables that affect accuracy for beam output measurements, and demonstrates feasibility of using the ICP for all recommended monthly dosimetry measurements.

METHODS

A total of 1985 output measurements on six Varian TrueBeam and Edge linear accelerators were performed using three ICP with quad wedges (QWs) and were compared with conventional IC measurements. The accuracy of the ICP for beam output was characterized as the difference between the ICP and IC. Variables that affect ICP accuracy, including gain settings, calibrations, and template baselining as well as machine or energy-specific bias were investigated. Measurements of profile constancy, energy, dose rate constancy, wedge factors, and gating were performed.

RESULTS

The initially observed mean output difference between the ICP and IC was 0.16% (0.61%). When gain settings were optimized, the output difference accuracy improved to -0.02% (0.38%). The output accuracy of the ICP was not dependent on array, dose, temperature and pressure calibrations, or template baselining. Statistically, ICP output accuracy was dependent on machine and beam energy, but clinically, all measurements fell within 0.5% of unity. ICP measurements of energy, dose rate constancy, and wedge factors matched passing results with conventional IC in water measurements. Gating and beam profile constancy measurements demonstrated good stability using the ICP. Finally, monthly dosimetry QA using ICP was completed in an average of 33 min compared to 66 min using the IC.

CONCLUSION

This work demonstrated the feasibility and efficiency of using the ICP, with specific considerations, as a measurement device for dosimetric linear accelerator monthly QA.

Clinical effects of re-evaluating a lung SBRT failure mode and effects analysis in a radiotherapy department

PURPOSE

The increasing complexity of radiation treatments can hinder its clinical success. This study aimed to better understand evolving risks by re-evaluating a Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) in lung SBRT.

METHODS

An experienced multidisciplinary team conducted an FMEA and made a reassessment 3 years later. A process map was developed with potential failure modes (FMs) identified. High-risk FMs and their possible causes and corrective actions were determined. The initial FMEA analysis was compared to gain a deeper perspective.

RESULTS

We identified 232 FMs. The high-risk processes were plan approval, target contouring, and patient evaluation. The corrective measures were based on stricter standardization of plan approval, pre-planning peer review, and a supporting pretreatment checklist, which substantially reduced the risk priority number in the revised FMEA. In the FMEA reassessment, we observed that the increased complexity and number of patients receiving lung SBRT conditioned a more substantial presence of human factors and communication errors as causal conditions and a potential wrong dose as a final effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Conducting a lung SBRT FMEA analysis has identified high-risk conditions that have been effectively mitigated in an FMEA reanalysis. Plan approval has shown to be a weak link in the process. The increasing complexity of treatments and patient numbers have shifted causal factors toward human failure and communication errors. The potential of a wrong dose as a final effect augments in this scenario. We propose that digital and artificial intelligence options are needed to mitigate potential errors in high-complexity and high-risk RT scenarios.

Real-time gated proton therapy with a reduced source to imager distance: Commissioning and quality assurance

INTRODUCTION

Real-time gated proton therapy (RGPT) is a motion management technique unique to the Hitachi particle therapy system. It uses pulsed fluoroscopy to track an implanted fiducial marker. There are currently no published guidelines on how to conduct the commissioning and quality assurance. In this work we reported on our centre's commissioning workflow and our daily and monthly QA procedures.

METHODS

Six commissioning measurements were designed for RGPT. The measurements include imaging qualities, fluoroscopic exposures, RGPT marker tracking accuracy, temporal gating latency, fiducial marker tracking fidelity and an end-to-end proton dosimetry measurement. Daily QA consists of one measurement on marker localization accuracy. Four months daily QA trends are presented. Monthly QA consists of three measurementson the gating latency, fluoroscopy imaging quality and dosimetry verification of gating operation with RGPT.

RESULTS

The RGPT was successfully commissioned in our centre. The air kerma rates were within 15 % from specifications and the marker tracking accuracies were within 0.245 mm. The gating latencies for turning the proton beam on and off were 119.5 and 50.0 ms respectively. The 0.4x10.0 mm2 Gold AnchorTM gave the best tracking results with visibility up to 30 g/cm2. Gamma analysis showed that dose distribution of a moving and static detectors had a passing rate of more than 95 % at 3 %/3mm. The daily marker localization QA results were all less than 0.2 mm.

CONCLUSION

This work could serve as a good reference for other upcoming Hitachi particle therapy centres who are interested to use RGPT as their motion management solution.

AAPM Task Group 334: A guidance document to using radiotherapy immobilization devices and accessories in an MR environment

Use of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in radiation therapy has increased substantially in recent years as more radiotherapy centers are having MR simulators installed, requesting more time on clinical diagnostic MR systems, or even treating with combination MR linear accelerator (MR-linac) systems. With this increased use, to ensure the most accurate integration of images into radiotherapy (RT), RT immobilization devices and accessories must be able to be used safely in the MR environment and produce minimal perturbations. The determination of the safety profile and considerations often falls to the medical physicist or other support staff members who at a minimum should be a Level 2 personnel as per the ACR. The purpose of this guidance document will be to help guide the user in making determinations on MR Safety labeling (i.e., MR Safe, Conditional, or Unsafe) including standard testing, and verification of image quality, when using RT immobilization devices and accessories in an MR environment.

Causal analysis of radiotherapy safety incidents based on a hybrid model of HFACS and Bayesian network

Objective

This research investigates the role of human factors of all hierarchical levels in radiotherapy safety incidents and examines their interconnections.

Methods

Utilizing the human factor analysis and classification system (HFACS) and Bayesian network (BN) methodologies, we created a BN-HFACS model to comprehensively analyze human factors, integrating the hierarchical structure. We examined 81 radiotherapy incidents from the radiation oncology incident learning system (RO-ILS), conducting a qualitative analysis using HFACS. Subsequently, parametric learning was applied to the derived data, and the prior probabilities of human factors were calculated at each BN-HFACS model level. Finally, a sensitivity analysis was conducted to identify the human factors with the greatest influence on unsafe acts.

Results

The majority of safety incidents reported on RO-ILS were traced back to the treatment planning phase, with skill errors and habitual violations being the primary unsafe acts causing these incidents. The sensitivity analysis highlighted that the condition of the operators, personnel factors, and environmental factors significantly influenced the occurrence of incidents. Additionally, it underscored the importance of organizational climate and organizational process in triggering unsafe acts.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest a strong association between upper-level human factors and unsafe acts among radiotherapy incidents in RO-ILS. To enhance radiation therapy safety and reduce incidents, interventions targeting these key factors are recommended.

The Prediction of Stress in Radiation Therapy: Integrating Artificial Intelligence with Biological Signals

This study aimed to predict stress in patients using artificial intelligence (AI) from biological signals and verify the effect of stress on respiratory irregularity. We measured 123 cases in 41 patients and calculated stress scores with seven stress-related features derived from heart-rate variability. The distribution and trends of stress scores across the treatment period were analyzed. Before-treatment information was used to predict the stress features during treatment. AI models included both non-pretrained (decision tree, random forest, support vector machine, long short-term memory (LSTM), and transformer) and pretrained (ChatGPT) models. Performance was evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation, exact match ratio, accuracy, recall, precision, and F1 score. Respiratory irregularities were calculated in phase and amplitude and analyzed for correlation with stress score. Over 90% of the patients experienced stress during radiation therapy. LSTM and prompt engineering GPT4.0 had the highest accuracy (feature classification, LSTM: 0.703, GPT4.0: 0.659; stress classification, LSTM: 0.846, GPT4.0: 0.769). A 10% increase in stress score was associated with a 0.286 higher phase irregularity (p < 0.025). Our research pioneers the use of AI and biological signals for stress prediction in patients undergoing radiation therapy, potentially identifying those needing psychological support and suggesting methods to improve radiotherapy effectiveness through stress management.

Continuous quality improvement project to reduce the downtime of medical linear accelerators: A case study at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital

Objective

To analyse and continually improve existing issues in the quality improvement process of medical linear accelerators (LINACs) and enhance the quality control management of LINACs.

Methods

Data were collected from eight LINACs (sourced from three manufacturers) at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital using Excel diaries between January 2019 and December 2020. The data description and analysis were performed using the analytic hierarchy process, SPSSAU and Excel software, and mean-time-to-repair (MTTR)/mean-time-between-failure (MTBF) metrics. Continuous quality improvement was executed using the quality control circle (QCC) quality management method.

Results

After quality improvement, the risk frequency of 'LINAC down' events decreased by 43.63% and downtime was reduced by 40.45%. The weight of downtime risk improved by 73.69%. The MTTR recovery value increased by 31.90%, and MTBF reliability increased by 2.97 h. The simulation results demonstrated that the proposed quality improvement measures could effectively decrease the frequency and duration of downtimes, consequently extending the normal operational time of LINACs.

Conclusion

Transitioning from instant repair to preventative maintenance can enhance the operational efficiency of equipment and yield economic benefits for hospitals. The QCC method and the event risk evaluation model are effective in reducing the downtime of LINACs and improving their quality control management.

TEAM participation in the irradiation of IROC phantoms for cooperative group clinical trials

The participation of radiation oncology team members in the irradiation of Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core (IROC) phantom for cooperative group clinical trials is essential to comply with the latest quality management philosophy. Medical dosimetrists are expected to develop treatment plans for the irradiation of IROC phantoms. For advanced treatment techniques, such as three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT), intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), the irradiation of the IROC phantoms serves as quality audit. If successful, the irradiation processes demonstrate that the institution has the knowledge of the protocol, and has the appropriate equipment to comply with the protocol requirements. This article describes three IROC phantoms used for credentialing external beam photon beam therapy, delivered using conventional medical linear accelerators, to the medical dosimetry community. Guidance and strategies for the development of treatment plans are discussed. Our institutional irradiation of the three IROC phantoms, delivered using the Truebeam medical linear accelerator, resulted in consistent dose accuracy to within ±1%. The participation of the team members may reduce the overall published failing rate stated to be about one-third of all participating institutions.

Comparison of failure modes and effects analyses and time for brachytherapy ring and tandem applicator digitization between manual and solid applicator source placement methods

PURPOSE

Ring and tandem (R&T) applicator digitization is currently performed at our institution by manually defining the extent of the applicators. Digitization can also be achieved using solid applicators: predefined, 3D models with geometric constraints. This study compares R&T digitization using manual and solid applicator methods through Failure Modes and Effects Analyses (FMEAs) and comparative time studies. We aim to assess the suitability of solid applicator method implementation for R&T cases METHODS: Six qualified medical physicists (QMPs) and two medical physics residents scored potential modes of failure of manual digitization in an FMEA as recommended by TG-100. Occurrence, severity, and detectability (OSD) values were averaged across respondents and then multiplied to form combined Risk Priority Numbers (RPNs) for analysis. Participants were trained to perform treatment planning using a developed solid applicator protocol and asked to score a second FMEA on the distinct process steps from the manual method. For both methods, participant digitization was timed. FMEA and time data were analyzed across methods and participant samples RESULTS: QMPs rated the RPNs of the current, manual method of digitization statistically lower than residents did. When comparing the unique FMEA steps between the two digitization methods, QMP respondents found no significant difference in RPN means. Residents, however, rated the solid applicator method as higher risk. Further, after the solid applicator method was performed twice by participants, the time to digitize plans was not significantly different from manual digitization CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates the non-inferiority of the solid applicator method to manual digitization in terms of risk, according to QMPs, and time, across all participants. Differences were found in FMEA evaluation and solid applicator technique adoption based on years of brachytherapy experience. Further practice with the solid applicator protocol is recommended because familiarity is expected to lower FMEA occurrence ratings and further reduce digitization times.

Towards quality management of artificial intelligence systems for medical applications

The use of artificial intelligence systems in clinical routine is still hampered by the necessity of a medical device certification and/or by the difficulty of implementing these systems in a clinic's quality management system. In this context, the key questions for a user are how to ensure robust model predictions and how to appraise the quality of a model's results on a regular basis. In this paper we discuss some conceptual foundation for a clinical implementation of a machine learning system and argue that both vendors and users should take certain responsibilities, as is already common practice for high-risk medical equipment. We propose the methodology from AAPM Task Group 100 report No. 283 as a conceptual framework for developing risk-driven a quality management program for a clinical process that encompasses a machine learning system. This is illustrated with an example of a clinical workflow. Our analysis shows how the risk evaluation in this framework can accommodate artificial intelligence based systems independently of their robustness evaluation or the user's in-house expertise. In particular, we highlight how the degree of interpretability of a machine learning system can be systematically accounted for within the risk evaluation and in the development of a quality management system.

Technical note: A universal worksheet for failure mode and effects analysis-A project of the Japanese College of Medical Physics

BACKGROUND

Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA), which is an effective tool for error prevention, has garnered considerable attention in radiotherapy. FMEA can be performed individually, by a group or committee, and online.

PURPOSE

To meet the needs of FMEA for various purposes and improve its accessibility, we developed a simple, self-contained, and versatile web-based FMEA risk analysis worksheet.

METHODS

We developed an FMEA worksheet using Google products, such as Google Sheets, Google Forms, and Google Apps Script. The main sheet was created in Google Sheets and contained elements necessary for performing FMEA by a single person. Automated tasks were implemented using Apps Script to facilitate multiperson FMEA; these functions were built into buttons located on the main sheet.

RESULTS

The usability of the FMEA worksheet was tested in several situations. The worksheet was feasible for individual, multiperson, seminar, meeting, and online purposes. Simultaneous online editing, automated survey form creation, automatic analysis, and the ability to respond to the form from multiple devices, including mobile phones, were particularly useful for online and multiperson FMEA. Automation enabled through Google Apps Script reduced the FMEA workload.

CONCLUSIONS

The FMEA worksheet is versatile and has a seamless workflow that promotes collaborative work for safety.

Validation and Efficiency Evaluation of Automated Quality Assurance Software SunCHECK™ Machine for Mechanical and Dosimetric Quality Assurance

Recent decades have witnessed transformative advances in radiation physics and computer technology, revolutionizing the precision of radiation therapy. The adoption of intricate treatment techniques such as three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy, volumetric-modulated arc therapy, and image-guided radiotherapy necessitates robust quality assurance (QA) programs. This study introduces the SunCHECK™ Machine (SCM), a web-based QA platform, presenting early results from its integration into a comprehensive QA program. linear accelerators (LINAC) demand QA programs to uphold machine characteristics within accepted tolerances. The increasing treatment complexity underscores the need for streamlined procedures. The selection of QA tools is vital, requiring efficiency, accuracy, and alignment with clinic needs, as per recommendations such as the AAPM task group 142 report. The materials and methods section details SCM implementation in various QA aspects, encompassing daily QA (DQA), imaging QA with Catphan, conventional output assessment with a water phantom, and LINAC isocenter verification through the Winston-Lutz test. Challenges in QA processes, such as manual data transcription and limited device integration, are highlighted. Early results demonstrate SCM's significant reduction in QA time, ensuring accuracy and efficiency. Its automation eliminates interobserver variation and human errors, contributing to time savings and near-immediate result publication. SCM's role in consolidating and storing DQA data within a single platform is emphasized, offering potential in resource optimization, especially in resource-limited settings. In conclusion, SCM shows promise for efficient and accurate mechanical and dosimetric QA in radiation therapy. The study underscores SCM's potential to address contemporary QA challenges, contributing to improved resource utilization without compromising quality and safety standards.

Multi-phase failure modes and effects analysis for low dose bilateral whole lung irradiation of COVID-19 positive patients requiring respiratory ventilation

PURPOSE

To identify high-priority risks in a clinical trial investigating the use of radiation to alleviate COVID-19 pneumonia using a multi-phase failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA).

METHODS

A comprehensive FMEA survey of 133 possible causes of failure was developed for the clinical trial workflow (Phase I). The occurrence, severity, and detection risk of each possible cause of failure was scored by three medical physicists. High-risk potential failure modes were identified using the risk priority number (RPN) and severity scores, which were re-scored by 13 participants in radiation oncology (Phase II). Phase II survey scores were evaluated to identify steps requiring possible intervention and examine risk perception patterns. The Phase II participants provided consensus scores as a group.

RESULTS

Thirty high-priority failure modes were selected for the Phase II survey. Strong internal consistency was shown in both surveys using Cronbach's alpha (αc ≥ 0.85). The 10 failures with the largest median RPN values concerned SARS-CoV-2 transmission (N = 6), wrong treatment (N = 3), and patient injury (N = 1). The median RPN was larger for COVID-related failures than other failure types, primarily due to the perceived difficulty of failure detection. Group re-scoring retained 8/10 of the highest-priority risk steps that were identified in the Phase II process, and discussion revealed interpretation differences of process steps and risk evaluation. Participants who were directly involved with the trial working group had stronger agreement on severity scores than those who were not.

CONCLUSIONS

The high ranking of failures concerning SARS-CoV-2 transmission suggest that these steps may require additional quality management intervention when treating critically ill COVID-19+ patients. The results also suggest that a multi-phase FMEA survey led by a facilitator may be a useful tool for assessing risks in radiation oncology procedures, supporting future efforts to adapt FMEA to clinical procedures.

[Implementation and Effectiveness of Measures to Prevent Recurrence of Incidents Developed through Root Cause Analysis Using Work Flowchart]

PURPOSE

Incidents are recommended to be analyzed by root cause analysis (RCA). Our institution also conducts RCA for incidents and takes measures to prevent recurrence. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of countermeasures against the root causes analyzed by RCA in order to prevent recurrence of incidents.

METHODS

Since the treatment planning CT scanner was replaced, incidents of failure to zero adjustment the coordinates of the bed position occurred four times during a three-month period. The RCA was used to investigate the root causes of these incidents and to formulate measures to prevent recurrence. To evaluate the effectiveness of the recurrence prevention measures, we collected the number of recurrence of incidents during the first year after the effectiveness of the recurrence prevention measures, and used the chi-square test to determine the significant difference in the probability of an incident occurring at a significance level of 5% or less.

RESULTS

The measures to prevent the recurrence of incidents were to double-check that the coordinates of the bed position were adjusted to zero and to simulate operations based on a work flow that incorporated this double-check. During the first year period following the implementation of these recurrence prevention measures, the number of recurrence incidents was zero, and the probability of their occurrence decreased statistically significantly (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Thorough double-checks and work simulation based on the work flow are effective methods for preventing the recurrence of incidents.

Assessing the impact of distortion correction on Gamma Knife radiosurgery for multiple metastasis: Volumetric and dosimetric analysis

Introduction

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a robust neuroimaging technique and is the preferred method for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) planning. However, MRI data always contain distortions caused by hardware and patient factors.

Research question

Can these distortions potentially compromise the effectiveness and safety of SRS treatments?

Material and methods

Twenty-six MR datasets with multiple metastatic brain tumors (METs) used for Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) were retrospectively evaluated. A commercially available software was used for distortion correction. Geometrical agreement between corrected and uncorrected tumor volumes was evaluated using MacDonald criteria, Euclidian distance, and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). SRS plans were generated using uncorrected tumor volumes, which were assessed to determine their coverage of the corrected tumor volumes.

Results

The median target volume was 0.38 cm3 (range,0.01-12.38 cm3). A maximum displacement of METs of up to 2.87 mm and a median displacement of 0.55 mm (range,0.1-2.87 mm) were noted. The median DSC between uncorrected and corrected MRI was 0.92, and the most concerning case had a DSC of 0.46. Although all plans met the optimization criterion of at least 98% of the uncorrected tumor volume (median 99.55%, range 98.1-100%) receiving at least 100% of the prescription dose, the percent of the corrected tumor volume receiving the total prescription dose was a median of 95.45% (range,23.1-99.5%).

Discussion and conclusion

MRI distortion, though visually subtle, has significant implications for SRS planning. Regular utilization of corrected MRI is recommended for SRS planning as distortion is sometimes enough to cause a volumetric miss of SRS targets.

Radiation Oncology Ransomware Attack Response Risk Analysis Using Failure Modes and Effects Analysis

PURPOSE

There have been numerous significant ransomware attacks impacting Radiation Oncology in the past 5 years. Research into ransomware attack response in Radiation Oncology has consisted of case reports and descriptive articles and has lacked quantitative studies. The purpose of this work was to identify the significant safety risks to patients being treated with radiation therapy during a ransomware attack scenario, using Failure Modes and Effects Analysis.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A multi-institutional and multidisciplinary team conducted a Failure Modes and Effects Analysis by developing process maps and using Risk Priority Number (RPN) scores to quantify the increased likelihood of incidents in a ransomware attack scenario. The situation that was simulated was a ransomware attack that had removed the capability to access the Record and Verify (R&V) system. Five situations were considered: 1) a standard treatment of a patient with and without an R&V, 2) a standard treatment of a patient for the first fraction right after the R&V capabilities are disabled, and 3) 3 situations in which a plan modification was required. RPN scores were compared with and without R&V functionality.

RESULTS

The data indicate that RPN scores increased by 71% (range, 38%-96%) when R&V functionality is disabled compared with a nonransomware attack state where R&V functionality is available. The failure modes with the highest RPN in the simulated ransomware attack state included incorrectly identifying patients on treatment, incorrectly identifying where a patient is in their course of treatment, treating the incorrect patient, and incorrectly tracking delivered fractions.

CONCLUSIONS

The presented study quantifies the increased risk of incidents when treating in a ransomware attack state, identifies key failure modes that should be prioritized when preparing for a ransomware attack, and provides data that can be used to guide future ransomware resiliency research.

Automated target placement for VMAT lattice radiation therapy: enhancing efficiency and consistency

Objective. An algorithm was developed for automated positioning of lattice points within volumetric modulated arc lattice radiation therapy (VMAT LRT) planning. These points are strategically placed within the gross tumor volume (GTV) to receive high doses, adhering to specific separation rules from adjacent organs at risk (OARs). The study goals included enhancing planning safety, consistency, and efficiency while emulating human performance.Approach. A Monte Carlo-based algorithm was designed to optimize the number and arrangement of lattice points within the GTV while considering placement constraints and objectives. These constraints encompassed minimum spacing between points, distance from OARs, and longitudinal separation along thez-axis. Additionally, the algorithm included an objective to permit, at the user's discretion, solutions with more centrally placed lattice points within the GTV. To validate its effectiveness, the automated approach was compared with manually planned treatments for 24 previous patients. Prior to clinical implementation, a failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) was conducted to identify potential shortcomings.Main results.The automated program successfully met all placement constraints with an average execution time (over 24 plans) of 0.29 ±0.07 min per lattice point. The average lattice point density (# points per 100 c.c. of GTV) was similar for automated (0.725) compared to manual placement (0.704). The dosimetric differences between the automated and manual plans were minimal, with statistically significant differences in certain metrics like minimum dose (1.9% versus 1.4%), D5% (52.8% versus 49.4%), D95% (7.1% versus 6.2%), and Body-GTV V30% (20.7 c.c. versus 19.7 c.c.).Significance.This study underscores the feasibility of employing a straightforward Monte Carlo-based algorithm to automate the creation of spherical target structures for VMAT LRT planning. The automated method yields similar dose metrics, enhances inter-planner consistency for larger targets, and requires fewer resources and less time compared to manual placement. This approach holds promise for standardizing treatment planning in prospective patient trials and facilitating its adoption across centers seeking to implement VMAT LRT techniques.

Enhancing Safety in AI-Driven Cone Beam CT-based Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy: Development and Implementation of an Interdisciplinary Workflow

Purpose

The emerging online adaptive radiation therapy (OART) treatment strategy based on cone beam computed tomography allows for real-time replanning according to a patient's current anatomy. However, implementing this procedure requires a new approach across the patient's care path and monitoring of the "black box" adaptation process. This study identifies high-risk failure modes (FMs) associated with AI-driven OART and proposes an interdisciplinary workflow to mitigate potential medical errors from highly automated processes, enhance treatment efficiency, and reduce the burden on clinicians.

Methods and Materials

An interdisciplinary working group was formed to identify safety concerns in each process step using failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA). Based on the FMEA results, the team designed standardized procedures and safety checklists to prevent errors and ensure successful task completion. The Risk Priority Numbers (RPNs) for the top twenty FMs were calculated before and after implementing the proposed workflow to evaluate its effectiveness. Three hundred seventy-four adaptive sessions across 5 treatment sites were performed, and each session was evaluated for treatment safety and FMEA assessment.

Results

The OART workflow has 4 components, each with 4, 8, 13, and 4 sequentially executed tasks and safety checklists. Site-specific template preparation, which includes disease-specific physician directives and Intelligent Optimization Engine template testing, is one of the new procedures introduced. The interdisciplinary workflow significantly reduced the RPNs of the high-risk FMs, with an average decrease of 110 (maximum reduction of 305.5 and minimum reduction of 27.4).

Conclusions

This study underscores the importance of addressing high-risk FMs associated with AI-driven OART and emphasizes the significance of safety measures in its implementation. By proposing a structured interdisciplinary workflow and integrated checklists, the study provides valuable insights into ensuring the safe and efficient delivery of OART while facilitating its effective integration into clinical practice.

ACPSEM position paper: pre-treatment patient specific plan checks and quality assurance in radiation oncology

The Australasian College of Physical Scientists and Engineers in Medicine (ACPSEM) has not previously made recommendations outlining the requirements for physics plan checks in Australia and New Zealand. A recent workforce modelling exercise, undertaken by the ACPSEM, revealed that the workload of a clinical radiation oncology medical physicist can comprise of up to 50% patient specific quality assurance activities. Therefore, in 2022 the ACPSEM Radiation Oncology Specialty Group (ROSG) set up a working group to address this issue. This position paper authored by ROSG endorses the recommendations of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) Task Group 218, 219 and 275 reports with some contextualisation for the Australia and New Zealand settings. A few recommendations from other sources are also endorsed to complete the position.

Intraoperative radiation therapy with 50 kV x-rays: A multi-institutional review

This report covers clinical implementation of a low kV intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) program with the INTRABEAM® System (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany). Based on collective user experience from eight institutions, we discuss best methods of INTRABEAM quality assurance (QA) tests, commissioning measurements, clinical workflow, treatment planning, and potential avenues for research. The guide provides pertinent background information and clinical justification for IORT. It describes the INTRABEAM system and commissioning measurements along with a TG100 risk management analysis to ensure safety and accuracy of the IORT program. Following safety checks, dosimetry measurements are performed for verification of field flatness and symmetry, x-ray output, and depth dose. Also discussed are dose linearity checks, beam isotropy, ion chamber measurements, calibration protocols, and in-vivo dosimetry with optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters OSLDs, and radiochromic film. Emphasis is placed on the importance of routine QA procedures (daily, monthly, and annual) performed at regular intervals for a successful IORT program. For safe and accurate dose delivery, tests of important components of IORT clinical workflow are emphasized, such as, dose prescription, pre-treatment QA, treatment setup, safety checks, radiation surveys, and independent checks of delivered dose. Challenges associated with in-vivo dose measurements are discussed, along with special treatment procedures and shielding requirements. The importance of treatment planning in IORT is reviewed with reference to a Monte Carlo-based commercial treatment planning system highlighting its main features and limitations. The report concludes with suggested topics for research including CT-based image-guided treatment planning and improved prescription dose accuracy. We hope that this multi-institutional report will serve as a guidance document on the clinical implementation and use of INTRABEAM IORT.

Automated detection of vertebral body misalignments in orthogonal kV and MV guided radiotherapy: application to a comprehensive retrospective dataset

Objective. In image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT), off-by-one vertebral body misalignments are rare but potentially catastrophic. In this study, a novel detection method for such misalignments in IGRT was investigated using densely-connected convolutional networks (DenseNets) for applications towards real-time error prevention and retrospective error auditing.Approach. A total of 4213 images acquired from 527 radiotherapy patients aligned with planar kV or MV radiographs were used to develop and test error-detection software modules. Digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) and setup images were retrieved and co-registered according to the clinically applied alignment contained in the DICOM REG files. A semi-automated algorithm was developed to simulate patient positioning errors on the anterior-posterior (AP) and lateral (LAT) images shifted by one vertebral body. A DenseNet architecture was designed to classify either AP images individually or AP and LAT image pairs. Receiver-operator characteristic curves (ROC) and areas under the curves (AUC) were computed to evaluate the classifiers on test subsets. Subsequently, the algorithm was applied to the entire dataset in order to retrospectively determine the absolute off-by-one vertebral body error rate for planar radiograph guided RT at our institution from 2011-2021.Main results. The AUCs for the kV models were 0.98 for unpaired AP and 0.99 for paired AP-LAT. The AUC for the MV AP model was 0.92. For a specificity of 95%, the paired kV model achieved a sensitivity of 99%. Application of the model to the entire dataset yielded a per-fraction off-by-one vertebral body error rate of 0.044% [0.0022%, 0.21%] for paired kV IGRT including one previously unreported error.Significance. Our error detection algorithm was successful in classifying vertebral body positioning errors with sufficient accuracy for retrospective quality control and real-time error prevention. The reported positioning error rate for planar radiograph IGRT is unique in being determined independently of an error reporting system.

A single-institution experience with 177Lu RPT workflow improvements and qualifying the SPECT/CT imaging for dosimetry

Background and purpose

Implementing any radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) program requires a comprehensive review of system readiness, appropriate workflows, and training to ensure safe and efficient treatment delivery. A quantitative assessment of the dose delivered to targets and organs at risk (OAR) using RPT is possible by correlating the absorbed doses with the delivered radioactivity. Integrating dosimetry into an established RPT program demands a thorough analysis of the necessary components and system fine-tuning. This study aims to report an optimized workflow for molecular radiation therapy using 177Lu with a primary focus on integrating patient-specific dosimetry into an established radiopharmaceutical program in a radiation oncology setting.

Materials and methods

We comprehensively reviewed using the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle, including efficacy and accuracy of delivery and all aspects of radiation safety of the RPT program. The GE Discovery SPECT/CT 670DR™ system was calibrated per MIM protocol for dose calculation on MIM SurePlan™ MRT software. Jaszcak Phantom with 15-20 mCi of 177Lu DOTATATE with 2.5 µM EDTA solution was used, with the main energy window defined as 208 keV ±10% (187.6 to 229.2 keV); the upper scatter energy window was set to 240 keV ±5% (228 to 252 keV), while the lower scatter energy window was 177.8 keV ±5% (168.9 to 186.7 keV). Volumetric quality control tests and adjustments were performed to ensure the correct alignment of the table, NM, and CT gantry on SPECT/CT. A comprehensive end-to-end (E2E) test was performed to ensure workflow, functionality, and quantitative dose accuracy.

Results

Workflow improvements and checklists are presented after systematically analyzing over 400 administrations of 177Lu-based RPT. Injected activity to each sphere in the NEMA Phantom scan was quantified, and the MIM Sureplan MRT reconstruction images calculated activities within ±12% of the injected activity. Image alignment tests on the SPECT/CT showed a discrepancy of more than the maximum tolerance of 2.2 mm on any individual axis. As a result of servicing the machine and updating the VQC and COR corrections, the hybrid imaging system was adjusted to achieve an accuracy of <1 mm in all directions.

Conclusion

Workflows and checklists, after analysis of system readiness and adequate training for staff and patients, are presented. Hardware and software components for patient-specific dosimetry are presented with a focus on hybrid image registration and correcting any errors that affect dosimetric quantification calculation. Moreover, this manuscript briefly overviews the necessary quality assurance requirements for converting diagnostic images into dosimetry measurement tools and integrating dosimetry for RPT based on 177Lu.

Plan complexity metrics for head and neck VMAT competition plans

Previous plan competitions have largely focused on dose metric assessments. However, whether the submitted plans were realistic and reasonable from a quality assurance (QA) perspective remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between aperture-based plan complexity metrics (PCM) in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) competition plans and clinical treatment plans verified through patient-specific QA (PSQA). In addition, the association of PCMs with plan quality was examined. A head and neck (HN) plan competition was held for Japanese institutions from June 2019 to July 2019, in which 210 competition plans were submitted. Dose distribution quality was quantified based on dose-volume histogram (DVH) metrics by calculating the dose distribution plan score (DDPS). Differences in PCMs between the two VMAT treatment plan groups (HN plan competitions held in Japan and clinically accepted HN VMAT plans through PSQA) were investigated. The mean (± standard deviation) DDPS for the 98 HN competition plans was 158.5 ± 20.6 (maximum DDPS: 200). DDPS showed a weak correlation with PCMs with a maximum r of 0.45 for monitor unit (MU); its correlation with some PCMs was "very weak." Significant differences were found in some PCMs between plans with the highest 20% DDPSs and the remaining plans. The clinical VMAT and competition plans revealed similar distributions for some PCMs. Deviations in PCMs for the two groups were comparable, indicating considerable variability among planners regarding planning skills. The plan complexity for HN VMAT competition plans increased for high-quality plans, as shown by the dose distribution. Direct comparison of PCMs between competition plans and clinically accepted plans showed that the submitted HN VMAT competition plans were realistic and reasonable from the QA perspective. This evaluation may provide a set of criteria for evaluating plan quality in plan competitions.

Radiation Oncology Peer Review in a Community Setting: The Value of Prospective Review

Peer review is an important component of any radiation oncology continuous quality improvement program. While limited guidelines exist, there is no consensus about how peer review should be performed, and large variations exist among different institutions. The purpose of this report is to describe our experience with peer review at a busy Radiation Oncology clinic and to evaluate the difference between prospective and retrospective peer review. We also performed a failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) of the peer review process. Starting in 2015, every peer review session was tracked, including recommended changes to treatment plans. We reviewed the frequency, types and severity of these changes. A team of physicians and physicists conducted an FMEA of the peer review process. Between April 2015 and June 2020, a total of 3,691 patients were peer-reviewed. Out of those, 1,903 were prospective reviews (51.6%). Plans reviewed before treatment were almost 4.5 times more likely to be changed by peer review than those reviewed after the start of treatment (0.9% vs 0.2%). Plan changes after the start of treatment had a higher severity than changes prior to the start of treatment. FMEA identified several critical components of peer review. While there is no national standard for peer review, it is evident that prospective peer review is preferable. There may be a subconscious reluctance to change plans already underway, which could be a barrier to improving plans with the peer review process. Rather than reviewing in a group setting, it would be ideal to individually assign review tasks that are embedded in the clinical flow, assuring prospective review for all patients prior to final physician approval. Individual review rather than group review may be more candid, due to interpersonal concerns about publicly disagreeing with colleagues.

Errors in manual radiotherapy treatment procedures and their evolution in a low resource setting: Uganda's experience

PURPOSE

In Uganda, two-dimensional (2D) radiotherapy treatments have been in use since the establishment of radiotherapy in 1995. Preliminary investigations of treatment records in November 2019 showed evidence of gaps requiring urgent attention. The purpose of this study was to improve the safety of the treatments.

METHODS

Records of 1164 patients treated in 1387 courses (1412 sites) on Cobalt-60 units were reviewed todetermine the frequency and dosimetric implications of events that occurred at different stepsof the radiotherapy process. The results were presented and discussed with the differentprofessionals for learning purposes.

RESULTS

Most common dosimetric eventswere omission of block tray, bolus and couch transmission factors in time calculations, incorrect field sizes and depths, wrong beam weighting, independent calculations and prescription doses contributing 28.6 %, 10.1 %, 6.0 %,11.9 %, 10.1 %, 5.4 %, 4.8 % and 8.9 % to the 168 observed errors. Comparison of the calculated treatment doses with the prescribed doses showed that 88 % of the 1412 sites were treated with radiation doses within an accuracy of ± 5 %. However, an analysis of the evolution along the years demonstrated an improvement from 82.8 % in 2018 to 86.1 % in 2019, and 93.2 % in 2020. Most common procedural events were incomplete setup instructions and missing patient data in the record and verify system of the Co-60 units for 57 % and 60.1 % of the 1164 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Opportunities for improvement of safety in the delivery of radiotherapy treatments were identified. Learning from these past errors should raise awareness in the team leading to a safer treatments.

Radiation oncology department policy development for patients who may become pregnant

In the context of radiation oncology, radiation exposure from radiation therapy simulation, image guidance, and radiation therapy procedures can have severe adverse biological effects on a developing embryo or fetus. Patients who may be pregnant are screened for the possibility of pregnancy to prevent unnecessary or excessive exposure of radiation in utero. Some radiation therapy patients for whom a pregnancy test is indicated may elect to decline the test. In addition, some patients who are found upon screening to be pregnant may decide, with their attending radiation oncologist, to continue with treatment. A radiation oncology department policy was developed to provide guidelines regarding screening and consent. The policy was designed to prevent unnecessary exposure to patients who may be pregnant, and to limit dose to the embryo or fetus in patients for whom treatment is medically indicated. The policy is presented as an example for physicists intending to develop or revise their own practice's policy regarding patients who may become pregnant.

Clinical implementation of failure modes and effects analysis for gynecological high-dose-rate brachytherapy

Purpose

To use failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) to identify failure modes for gynecological high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy pathway and score with severity, occurrence, and detectability.

Material and methods

A research team was organized to observe gynecological HDR brachytherapy pathway, and draw detailed process map to identify all potential failure modes (FMs). The whole team scored FMs based on three parameters, including occurrence (O), detectability (D), and severity (S), and then multiplied three scores to obtain risk priority number (RPN). All FMs were ranked according to RPNs and/or severity scores, and FMs with the highest RPN scores (> 100) and severity scores (> 8) were selected for in-depth analysis. Fault tree analysis (FTA) was applied to find progenitor causes of high-risk FMs and their propagation path, and determine which steps in the process need to be changed and optimized. Efficiency of each existing preventive methods to detect and stop FMs was analyzed, and proposals to improve quality management (QM) and ensure patient safety were suggested.

Results

The whole gynecological HDR brachytherapy pathway consisted of 5 sub-processes and 30 specific steps, in which 57 FMs were identified. Twelve high-risk FMs were found, including 7 FMs with RPNs > 100 and 5 FMs with severity scores > 8. For these FMs, 2 were in the insertion stage, 1 in the imaging stage, 4 in the treatment planning stage, and 5 in the final stage of treatment delivery. The most serious of these FMs was the change in organ at risk (OAR) during treatment delivery (RPN = 245.7). The FM that occurred most frequently was the applicator shift during patient transfer.

Conclusions

Failure modes and effects analysis is a prospective risk-based tool that can identity high-risk steps before failures occur, provide preventive measures to stop their occurrence, and improve quality management system.

Initial experience with an electron FLASH research extension (FLEX) for the Clinac system

PURPOSE

Radiotherapy delivered at ultra-high-dose-rates (≥40 Gy/s), that is, FLASH, has the potential to effectively widen the therapeutic window and considerably improve the care of cancer patients. The underlying mechanism of the FLASH effect is not well understood, and commercial systems capable of delivering such dose rates are scarce. The purpose of this study was to perform the initial acceptance and commissioning tests of an electron FLASH research product for preclinical studies.

METHODS

A linear accelerator (Clinac 23EX) was modified to include a non-clinical FLASH research extension (the Clinac-FLEX system) by Varian, a Siemens Healthineers company (Palo Alto, CA) capable of delivering a 16 MeV electron beam with FLASH and conventional dose rates. The acceptance, commissioning, and dosimetric characterization of the FLEX system was performed using radiochromic film, optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters, and a plane-parallel ionization chamber. A radiation survey was conducted for which the shielding of the pre-existing vault was deemed sufficient.

RESULTS

The Clinac-FLEX system is capable of delivering a 16 MeV electron FLASH beam of approximately 1 Gy/pulse at isocenter and reached a maximum dose rate >3.8 Gy/pulse near the upper accessory mount on the linac gantry. The percent depth dose curves of the 16 MeV FLASH and conventional modes for the 10 × 10 cm2 applicator agreed within 0.5 mm at a range of 50% of the maximum dose. Their respective profiles agreed well in terms of flatness but deviated for field sizes >10 × 10 cm2 . The output stability of the FLASH system exhibited a dose deviation of <1%. Preliminary cell studies showed that the FLASH dose rate (180 Gy/s) had much less impact on the cell morphology of 76N breast normal cells compared to the non-FLASH dose rate (18 Gy/s), which induced large-size cells.

CONCLUSION

Our studies characterized the non-clinical Clinac-FLEX system as a viable solution to conduct FLASH research that could substantially increase access to ultra-high-dose-rate capabilities for scientists.

Radiation Therapy Physics Quality Assurance and Management Practices in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: An Initial Pilot Survey in Six Countries and Validation Through a Site Visit

Purpose

Our purpose was to assess physics quality assurance (QA) practices in less resourced radiation therapy (RT) centers to improve quality of care.

Methods and Materials

A preliminary study was conducted in 2020 of 13 select RT centers in 6 countries, and in 2021, our team conducted onsite visits to all the RT centers in Ghana, one of the countries from the initial survey. The RT centers included 1 private and 2 public institutions (denoted as Public-1 and Public-2). Follow-up surveys were sent to 17 medical physicists from the site visit. Questions centered on the topics of equipment, institutional practice, physics quality assurance, management, and safety practices. Qualitative and descriptive methods were used for data analysis. Questions regarding operational challenges (machine downtime, patient-related issues, power outages, and staffing) were asked on a 5-point Likert scale.

Results

The preliminary survey from 2020 had a 92% response rate. One key result showed that for RT centers in lower gross national income per capita countries there was a direct correlation between QA needs and the gross national income per capita of the country. The needs identified included film/array detectors, independent dose calculation software, calibration of ion chambers, diodes, thermoluminiscence diodes (TLDs), phantoms for verification, Treatment Planning System (TPS) test phantoms, imaging test phantoms and film dosimeters, education, and training. For the post survey after the site visit in 2021, we received a 100% response rate. The private and the Public-1 institutions each have computed tomography simulators located in their RT center. The average daily patient external beam workload for each clinic on a linear accelerator was: private = 25, Public-1 = 55, Public-2 = 40. The Co-60 workload was: Public-1 = 45, Public-2 = 25 (there was no Co-60 at the private hospital). Public-1 and -2 lacked the equipment necessary to conform to best practices in Task Group reports (TG) 142 and 198. Public-2 reported significant operational challenges. Notably, Public-1 and -2 have peer review chart rounds, which are attended by clinical oncologists, medical physicists, physicians, and physics trainees. All 17 physicists who responded to the post site visit survey indicated they had a system of documenting, tracking, and trending patient-related safety incidents, but only 1 physicist reported using International Atomic Energy Agency Safety in Radiation Oncology.

Conclusions

The preliminary study showed a direct correlation between QA needs and the development index of a country, and the follow-up survey examines operational and physics QA practices in the RT clinics in Ghana, one of the initial countries surveyed. This will form the basis of a planned continent-wide survey in Africa intended to spotlight QA practices in low- and middle-income countries, the challenges faced, and lessons learned to help understand the gaps and needs to support local physics QA and management programs. Audits during the site visit show education and training remain the most important needs in operating successful QA programs.

Facilitating the application of systems-theoretic process analysis in healthcare: Creating control structures using process maps

Systems-theoretic process analysis (STPA) is a prospective safety assessment tool increasingly applied in healthcare. A problem hampering STPA proliferation is the difficulty of modeling systems for analysis by creating control structures. In this work, a method is proposed to use existing process maps-commonly available in healthcare-when creating a control structure. The proposed method entails (1) extract information from the process map, (2) determine the modeling boundary of the control structure, (3) transfer the extracted information to the control structure, (4) add additional information to complete the control structure. Two case studies were conducted: (1) ambulance patient offloading in the emergency department and (2) ischemic stroke care with intravenous thrombolysis. The amount of process map-derived information in the control structures was quantified. On average, 68% of the information in the final control structures was derived from the process map. Additional control actions and feedback were added from nonprocess map sources for management and frontline controllers. Despite the differences between process maps and control structures, much of the information in a process map can be used when creating a control structure. The method enables the creation of a control structure from a process map to be done in a structured fashion.