An inventory of patient-image based risk/dose, image quality and body habitus/size metrics for adult abdomino-pelvic CT protocol optimisation

PURPOSE

Patient-specific protocol optimisation in abdomino-pelvic Computed Tomography (CT) requires measurement of body habitus/size (BH), sensitivity-specificity (surrogates image quality (IQ) metrics) and risk (surrogates often dose quantities) (RD). This work provides an updated inventory of metrics available for each of these three categories of optimisation variables derivable directly from patient measurements or images. We consider objective IQ metrics mostly in the spatial domain (i.e., those related directly to sharpness, contrast, noise quantity/texture and perceived detectability as these are used by radiologists to assess the acceptability or otherwise of patient images in practice).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The search engine used was PubMed with the search period being 2010-2024. The key words used were: 'comput* tomography', 'CT', 'abdom*', 'dose', 'risk', 'SSDE', 'image quality', 'water equivalent diameter', 'size', 'body composition', 'habit*', 'BMI', 'obes*', 'overweight'. Since BH is critical for patient specific optimisation, articles correlating RD vs BH, and IQ vs BH were reviewed.

RESULTS

The inventory includes 11 BH, 12 IQ and 6 RD metrics. 25 RD vs BH correlation studies and 9 IQ vs BH correlation studies were identified. 7 articles in the latter group correlated metrics from all three categories concurrently.

CONCLUSIONS

Protocol optimisation should be fine-tuned to the level of the individual patient and particular clinical query. This would require a judicious choice of metrics from each of the three categories. It is suggested that, for increased utility in clinical practice, more future optimisation studies be clinical task based and involve the three categories of metrics concurrently.

A nonparametric measure of contrast in x-ray images

Objective.We propose a nonparametric figure of merit, the contrast equivalent distance CED, to measure contrast directly from clinical images.Approach.A relative brightness distanceδis calculated by making use of the order statistic of the pixel values. By multiplyingδwith the grey value rangeR, the mean brightness distance MBD is obtained. From the MBD, the CED and the distance-to-noise ratio DNR can be derived. The latter is the ratio of the MBD and a previously suggested nonparametric measureτfor the noise. Since the order statistic is independent of the spatial arrangement of the pixel values, the measures can be obtained directly from clinical images. We apply the new measures to mammography images of an anthropomorphic phantom and of a phantom with a step wedge as well as to CT images of a head phantom.Main results.For low-noise images of a step wedge, the MBD is equivalent to the conventional grey value distance. While this measure permits the evaluation of clinical images, it is sensitive to noise. Therefore, noise has to be quantified at the same time. When the ratioσ/τof the noise standard deviationσtoτis available, validity limits for the CED as a measure of contrast can be established. The new figures of merit can be calculated for entire images as well as on regions of interest (ROI) with an edge length not smaller than 32 px.Significance.The new figures of merit are suited to quantify the quality of clinical images without relying on the assumption of a linear, shift-invariant system. They can be used for any kind of greyscale image, provided the ratioσ/τcan be estimated. This will hopefully help to achieve the optimisation of image quality vs dose required by radioprotection laws.

A novel method for developing contrast-detail curves from clinical patient images based on statistical low-contrast detectability

Purpose. To develop a method to extract statistical low-contrast detectability (LCD) and contrast-detail (C-D) curves from clinical patient images.Method. We used the region of air surrounding the patient as an alternative for a homogeneous region within a patient. A simple graphical user interface (GUI) was created to set the initial configuration for region of interest (ROI), ROI size, and minimum detectable contrast (MDC). The process was started by segmenting the air surrounding the patient with a threshold between -980 HU (Hounsfield units) and -1024 HU to get an air mask. The mask was trimmed using the patient center coordinates to avoid distortion from the patient table. It was used to automatically place square ROIs of a predetermined size. The mean pixel values in HU within each ROI were calculated, and the standard deviation (SD) from all the means was obtained. The MDC for a particular target size was generated by multiplying the SD by 3.29. A C-D curve was obtained by iterating this process for the other ROI sizes. This method was applied to the homogeneous area from the uniformity module of an ACR CT phantom to find the correlation between the parameters inside and outside the phantom, for 30 thoracic, 26 abdominal, and 23 head images.Results. The phantom images showed a significant linear correlation between the LCDs obtained from outside and inside the phantom, with R2values of 0.67 and 0.99 for variations in tube currents and tube voltages. This indicated that the air region outside the phantom can act as a surrogate for the homogenous region inside the phantom to obtain the LCD and C-D curves.Conclusion. The C-D curves obtained from outside the ACR CT phantom show a strong linear correlation with those from inside the phantom. The proposed method can also be used to extract the LCD from patient images by using the region of air outside as a surrogate for a region inside the patient.

Development of non-contact foreign body imaging base on photoacoustic signal intensity measurement

BACKGROUND

It is challenging to visually identify tiny and concealed foreign objects within the body due to their small size and subcutaneous location while they can cause infections.

METHODS

A non-contact photoacoustic system based on Rosencwaig-Gersho photoacoustic theory and dual modulator method is developed for detecting foreign objects in meat.

RESULT

The experiments conducted validate the successful development of this measurement technique with 10 μm spatial resolution and its corresponding mathematical model, demonstrating an 11% Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) in comparison to the experimental results. Dual modulator successfully regulates laser energy at MPE limit.

CONCLUSION

The utilization of non-contact photoacoustic signal intensity measurements enables the identification of foreign objects within the body. Further, the application of mathematical modelling can validate the measurement outcomes. These findings serve as a foundation for creating an affordable and straightforward foreign body detector.

Technology Characterization Through Diverse Evaluation Methodologies: Application to Thoracic Imaging in Photon-Counting Computed Tomography

OBJECTIVE

Different methods can be used to condition imaging systems for clinical use. The purpose of this study was to assess how these methods complement one another in evaluating a system for clinical integration of an emerging technology, photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT), for thoracic imaging.

METHODS

Four methods were used to assess a clinical PCCT system (NAEOTOM Alpha; Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany) across 3 reconstruction kernels (Br40f, Br48f, and Br56f). First, a phantom evaluation was performed using a computed tomography quality control phantom to characterize noise magnitude, spatial resolution, and detectability. Second, clinical images acquired using conventional and PCCT systems were used for a multi-institutional reader study where readers from 2 institutions were asked to rank their preference of images. Third, the clinical images were assessed in terms of in vivo image quality characterization of global noise index and detectability. Fourth, a virtual imaging trial was conducted using a validated simulation platform (DukeSim) that models PCCT and a virtual patient model (XCAT) with embedded lung lesions imaged under differing conditions of respiratory phase and positional displacement. Using known ground truth of the patient model, images were evaluated for quantitative biomarkers of lung intensity histograms and lesion morphology metrics.

RESULTS

For the physical phantom study, the Br56f kernel was shown to have the highest resolution despite having the highest noise and lowest detectability. Readers across both institutions preferred the Br56f kernel (71% first rank) with a high interclass correlation (0.990). In vivo assessments found superior detectability for PCCT compared with conventional computed tomography but higher noise and reduced detectability with increased kernel sharpness. For the virtual imaging trial, Br40f was shown to have the best performance for histogram measures, whereas Br56f was shown to have the most precise and accurate morphology metrics.

CONCLUSION

The 4 evaluation methods each have their strengths and limitations and bring complementary insight to the evaluation of PCCT. Although no method offers a complete answer, concordant findings between methods offer affirmatory confidence in a decision, whereas discordant ones offer insight for added perspective. Aggregating our findings, we concluded the Br56f kernel best for high-resolution tasks and Br40f for contrast-dependent tasks.

A systematic assessment and optimization of photon-counting CT for lung density quantifications

BACKGROUND

Photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT) has recently emerged into clinical use; however, its optimum imaging protocols and added benefits remains unknown in terms of providing more accurate lung density quantification compared to energy-integrating computed tomography (EICT) scanners.

PURPOSE

To systematically assess the performance of a clinical PCCT scanner for lung density quantifications and compare it against EICT.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study involved a retrospective analysis of subjects scanned (August-December 2021) using a clinical PCCT system. The influence of altering reconstruction parameters was studied (reconstruction kernel, pixel size, slice thickness). A virtual CT dataset of anthropomorphic virtual subjects was acquired to demonstrate the correspondence of findings to clinical dataset, and to perform systematic imaging experiments, not possible using human subjects. The virtual subjects were imaged using a validated, scanner-specific CT simulator of a PCCT and two EICT (defined as EICT A and B) scanners. The images were evaluated using mean absolute error (MAE) of lung and emphysema density against their corresponding ground truth.

RESULTS

Clinical and virtual PCCT datasets showed similar trends, with sharper kernels and smaller voxel sizes increasing percentage of low-attenuation areas below -950 HU (LAA-950) by up to 15.7 ± 6.9% and 11.8 ± 5.5%, respectively. Under the conditions studied, higher doses, thinner slices, smaller pixel sizes, iterative reconstructions, and quantitative kernels with medium sharpness resulted in lower lung MAE values. While using these settings for PCCT, changes in the dose level (13 to 1.3 mGy), slice thickness (0.4 to 1.5 mm), pixel size (0.49 to 0.98 mm), reconstruction technique (70 keV-VMI to wFBP), and kernel (Qr48 to Qr60) increased lung MAE by 15.3 ± 2.0, 1.4 ± 0.6, 2.2 ± 0.3, 4.2 ± 0.8, and 9.1 ± 1.6 HU, respectively. At the optimum settings identified per scanner, PCCT images exhibited lower lung and emphysema MAE than those of EICT scanners (by 2.6 ± 1.0 and 9.6 ± 3.4 HU, compared to EICT A, and by 4.8 ± 0.8 and 7.4 ± 2.3 HU, compared to EICT B). The accuracy of lung density measurements was correlated with subjects' mean lung density (p < 0.05), measured by PCCT at optimum setting under the conditions studied.

CONCLUSION

Photon-counting CT demonstrated superior performance in density quantifications, with its influences of imaging parameters in line with energy-integrating CT scanners. The technology offers improvement in lung quantifications, thus demonstrating potential toward more objective assessment of respiratory conditions.

Myelography Using Energy-Integrating Detector CT Versus Photon-Counting Detector CT for Detection of CSF-Venous Fistulas in Patients With Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension

BACKGROUND. CSF-venous fistulas (CVFs), which are an increasingly recognized cause of spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH), are often diminutive in size and exceedingly difficult to detect by conventional imaging. OBJECTIVE. This purpose of this study was to compare energy-integrating detector (EID) CT myelography and photon-counting detector (PCD) CT myelography in terms of image quality and diagnostic performance for detecting CVFs in patients with SIH. METHODS. This retrospective study included 38 patients (15 men and 23 women; mean age, 55 ± 10 [SD] years) with SIH who underwent both clinically indicated EID CT myelography (slice thickness, 0.625 mm) and PCD CT myelography (slice thickness, 0.2 mm; performed in ultrahigh-resolution mode) to assess for CSF leak. Three blinded radiologists reviewed examinations in random order, assessing image noise, discernibility of spinal nerve root sleeves, and overall image quality (each assessed using a scale of 0-100, with 100 denoting highest quality) and recording locations of the CVFs. Definite CVFs were defined as CVFs described in CT myelography reports using unequivocal language and having an attenuation value greater than 70 HU. RESULTS. For all readers, PCD CT myelography, in comparison with EID CT myelography, showed higher mean image noise (reader 1: 69.9 ± 18.5 [SD] vs 37.6 ± 15.2; reader 2: 59.5 ± 8.7 vs 49.3 ± 12.7; and reader 3: 57.6 ± 13.2 vs 42.1 ± 16.6), higher mean nerve root sleeve discernibility (reader 1: 81.6 ± 21.7 [SD] vs 30.4 ± 13.6; reader 2: 83.6 ± 10 vs 70.1 ± 18.9; and reader 3: 59.6 ± 13.5 vs 50.5 ± 14.4), and higher mean overall image quality (reader 1: 83.2 ± 20.0 [SD] vs 38.1 ± 13.5; reader 2: 80.1 ± 10.1 vs 72.4 ± 19.8; and reader 3: 57.8 ± 11.2 vs 51.9 ± 13.6) (all p < .05). Eleven patients had a definite CVF. Sensitivity and specificity of EID CT myelography and PCD CT myelography for the detection of definite CVF were 45% and 96% versus 64% and 85%, respectively, for reader 1; 36% and 100% versus 55% and 96%, respectively, for reader 2; and 57% and 100% versus 55% and 93%, respectively, for reader 3. The sensitivity was significantly higher for PCD CT myelography than for EID CT myelography for reader 1 and reader 2 (both p < .05) and was not significantly different between the two techniques for reader 3 (p = .45); for all three readers, specificity was not significantly different between the two modalities (all p > .05). CONCLUSION. In comparison with EID CT myelography, PCD CT myelography yielded significantly improved image quality with significantly higher sensitivity for CVFs (for two of three readers), without significant loss of specificity. CLINICAL IMPACT. The findings support a potential role for PCD CT myelography in facilitating earlier diagnosis and targeted treatment of SIH, avoiding high morbidity during potentially prolonged diagnostic workups.

Image quality of photon counting and energy integrating chest CT - Prospective head-to-head comparison on same patients

PURPOSE

To prospectively compare the image quality of high-resolution, low-dose photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) with standard energy-integrating-detector CT (EID) on the same patients.

METHOD

IRB-approved, prospective study; patients received same-day non-contrast CT on EID and PCD-CT (NAEOTOM Alpha, blinded) with clinical protocols. Four blinded radiologists evaluated subsegmental bronchial wall definition, noise, and overall image quality in randomized order (0 = worst; 100 = best). Cases were quantitatively compared using the average Global-Noise-Index (GNI), Noise-Power-Spectrum average frequency (fav), NPS frequency-peak (fpeak), Task-Transfer-Function-10%-frequency (f10) an adjusted detectability index (d'adj), and applied output radiation doses (CTDIvol).

RESULTS

Sixty patients were prospectively imaged (27 men, mean age 67 ± 10 years, mean BMI 27.9 ± 6.5, 15.9-49.4 kg/m2). Subsegmental wall definition was rated significantly better for PCD-CT than EID (mean 71 [56-87] vs 60 [45-76]; P < 0.001), noise was rated higher for PCD-CT (48 [26-69] vs 34 [13-56]; P < 0.001). Overall image quality was rated significantly higher for PCD-CT than EID (66 [48-85] vs 61 [42-79], P = 0.008). Automated image quality measures showed similar differences for PCD-CT vs EID (mean GNI 70 ± 19 HU vs 26 ± 8 HU, fav 0.35 ± 0.02 vs 0.25 ± 0.02 mm-1, fpeak 0.07 ± 0.01 vs 0.09 ± 0.03 mm-1, f10 0.7 ± 0.08 vs 0.6 ± 0.1 mm-1, all p-values < 0.001). PCD-CT showed a 10% average d'adj increase (-49% min, 233% max). PCD-CT studies were acquired at significantly lower radiation doses than EID (mean CTDIvol 4.5 ± 2.1 vs 7.7 ± 3.2 mGy, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Though PCD-CT had higher measured and perceived noise, it offered equivalent or better diagnostic quality compared to EID at lower radiation doses, due to its improved resolution.

Making CT Dose Monitoring Meaningful: Augmenting Dose with Imaging Quality

Due to the concerns about radiation dose associated with medical imaging, radiation dose monitoring systems (RDMSs) are now utilized by many radiology providers to collect, process, analyze, and manage radiation dose-related information. Currently, most commercially available RDMSs focus only on radiation dose information and do not track any metrics related to image quality. However, to enable comprehensive patient-based imaging optimization, it is equally important to monitor image quality as well. This article describes how RDMS design can be extended beyond radiation dose to simultaneously monitor image quality. A newly designed interface was evaluated by different groups of radiology professionals (radiologists, technologists, and physicists) on a Likert scale. The results show that the new design is effective in assessing both image quality and safety in clinical practices, with an overall average score of 7.8 out of 10.0 and scores ranging from 5.5 to 10.0. Radiologists rated the interface highest at 8.4 out of 10.0, followed by technologists at 7.6 out of 10.0, and medical physicists at 7.5 out of 10.0. This work demonstrates how the assessment of the radiation dose can be performed in conjunction with the image quality using customizable user interfaces based on the clinical needs associated with different radiology professions.

Pediatric Applications of Photon-Counting Detector CT

Photon-counting detector (PCD) CT represents the most recent generational advance in CT technology. PCD CT has the potential to reduce image noise, improve spatial resolution and contrast resolution, and provide multispectral capability, all of which may be achieved with an overall decrease in the radiation dose. These effects may be used to reduce the iodinated contrast media dose and potentially obtain multiphase images through a single-acquisition technique. The benefits of PCD CT have previously been shown primarily in phantoms and adult patients. This article describes the application of PCD CT in children, as illustrated by clinical examples from a commercially available PCD CT system.

Evaluation of deep-learning image reconstruction for chest CT examinations at two different dose levels

AIMS

The aims of the present study were to, for both a full-dose protocol and an ultra-low dose (ULD) protocol, compare the image quality of chest CT examinations reconstructed using TrueFidelity (Standard kernel) with corresponding examinations reconstructed using ASIR-V (Lung kernel) and to evaluate if post-processing using an edge-enhancement filter affects the noise level, spatial resolution and subjective image quality of clinical images reconstructed using TrueFidelity.

METHODS

A total of 25 patients were examined with both a full-dose protocol and an ULD protocol using a GE Revolution APEX CT system (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, USA). Three different reconstructions were included in the study: ASIR-V 40%, DLIR-H, and DLIR-H with additional post-processing using an edge-enhancement filter (DLIR-H + E2). Five observers assessed image quality in two separate visual grading characteristics (VGC) studies. The results from the studies were statistically analyzed using VGC Analyzer. Quantitative evaluations were based on determination of two-dimensional power spectrum (PS), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and spatial resolution in the reconstructed patient images.

RESULTS

For both protocols, examinations reconstructed using TrueFidelity were statistically rated equal to or significantly higher than examinations reconstructed using ASIR-V 40%, but the ULD protocol benefitted more from TrueFidelity. In general, no differences in observer ratings were found between DLIR-H and DLIR-H + E2. For the three investigated image reconstruction methods, ASIR-V 40% showed highest noise and spatial resolution and DLIR-H the lowest, while the CNR was highest in DLIR-H and lowest in ASIR-V 40%.

CONCLUSION

The use of TrueFidelity for image reconstruction resulted in higher ratings on subjective image quality than ASIR-V 40%. The benefit of using TrueFidelity was larger for the ULD protocol than for the full-dose protocol. Post-processing of the TrueFidelity images using an edge-enhancement filter resulted in higher image noise and spatial resolution but did not affect the subjective image quality.

A nonparametric measure of noise in x-ray diagnostic images-mammography

Objective.In x-ray diagnostics, modern image reconstruction or image processing methods may render established methods of image quality assessment inadequate. Task specific quality assessment by using model observers has the disadvantage of being very labour-intensive. Therefore, it appears highly desirable to develop novel image quality parameters that neither rely on the linearity and the shift-invariace of the imaging system nor require the acquisition of hundreds of images as is necessary for the application of model observers, and which can be derived directly from diagnostic images.Approach.A new measure for the noise based on non-maximum-suppression images is defined and its properties are explored using simulated images before it is applied to an exposure series of mammograms of a homogeneous phantom and a 3D-printed breast phantom to demonstrate its usefulness under realistic conditions.Main results.The new noise parameter cannot only be derived from images with a homogeneous background but it can be extracted directly from images containing anatomic structures and is proportional to the standard deviation of the noise. At present, the applicability is restricted to mammography, which satisfies the assumption of short covariance length of the noise.Significance.The new measure of the noise is but a first step of the development of a set of parameters that are required to quantify image quality directly from diagnostic images without relying on the assumption of a linear, shift-invariant system, e.g. by providing measures of sharpness, contrast and structural complexity, in addition to the noise measure. For mammography, a convenient method is now available to quantify noise in processed diagnostic images.

A New Algorithm for Automatically Calculating Noise, Spatial Resolution, and Contrast Image Quality Metrics: Proof-of-Concept and Agreement With Subjective Scores in Phantom and Clinical Abdominal CT

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to develop a proof-of-concept computer algorithm to automatically determine noise, spatial resolution, and contrast-related image quality (IQ) metrics in abdominal portal venous phase computed tomography (CT) imaging and to assess agreement between resulting objective IQ metrics and subjective radiologist IQ ratings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An algorithm was developed to calculate noise, spatial resolution, and contrast IQ parameters. The algorithm was subsequently used on 2 datasets of anthropomorphic phantom CT scans, acquired on 2 different scanners (n = 57 each), and on 1 dataset of patient abdominal CT scans (n = 510). These datasets include a range of high to low IQ: in the phantom dataset, this was achieved through varying scanner settings (tube voltage, tube current, reconstruction algorithm); in the patient dataset, lower IQ images were obtained by reconstructing 30 consecutive portal venous phase scans as if they had been acquired at lower mAs. Five noise, 1 spatial, and 13 contrast parameters were computed for the phantom datasets; for the patient dataset, 5 noise, 1 spatial, and 18 contrast parameters were computed. Subjective IQ rating was done using a 5-point Likert scale: 2 radiologists rated a single phantom dataset each, and another 2 radiologists rated the patient dataset in consensus. General agreement between IQ metrics and subjective IQ scores was assessed using Pearson correlation analysis. Likert scores were grouped into 2 categories, "insufficient" (scores 1-2) and "sufficient" (scores 3-5), and differences in computed IQ metrics between these categories were assessed using the Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

The algorithm was able to automatically calculate all IQ metrics for 100% of the included scans. Significant correlations with subjective radiologist ratings were found for 4 of 5 noise (R2 range = 0.55-0.70), 1 of 1 spatial resolution (R2 = 0.21 and 0.26), and 10 of 13 contrast (R2 range = 0.11-0.73) parameters in the phantom datasets and for 4 of 5 noise (R2 range = 0.019-0.096), 1 of 1 spatial resolution (R2 = 0.11), and 16 of 18 contrast (R2 range = 0.008-0.116) parameters in the patient dataset. Computed metrics that significantly differed between "insufficient" and "sufficient" categories were 4 of 5 noise, 1 of 1 spatial resolution, 9 and 10 of 13 contrast parameters for phantom the datasets and 3 of 5 noise, 1 of 1 spatial resolution, and 10 of 18 contrast parameters for the patient dataset.

CONCLUSION

The developed algorithm was able to successfully calculate objective noise, spatial resolution, and contrast IQ metrics of both phantom and clinical abdominal CT scans. Furthermore, multiple calculated IQ metrics of all 3 categories were in agreement with subjective radiologist IQ ratings and significantly differed between "insufficient" and "sufficient" IQ scans. These results demonstrate the feasibility and potential of algorithm-determined objective IQ. Such an algorithm should be applicable to any scan and may help in optimization and quality control through automatic IQ assessment in daily clinical practice.

Medical Physics 3.0 and Its Relevance to Radiology

Medical Physics 3.0 is a grassroots movement within the medical physics community to re-envision a new commitment and engagement of physics in the care process. In this model, a physicist, present in either the clinic or the laboratory, is to practice physics for the direct benefit of the patient, either immediately in the clinical setting or eventually through research. As a demonstration of this shift of focus, this article offers a framework by which medical physics can better serve the rigor and quality of radiological practice. This is accomplished through (1) patient-centered metrics of imaging dose and quality that are generalizable across and relatable to varying tasks; (2) prospectively prescribing protocols and dose based on needed quality; and (3) retrospectively monitoring and targeting dose and quality across practice. The article also suggests a model for this opportunity in which the current "consultant" physicist is vested with the responsibility to fully contribute her essential expertise in the care of individual patients.

Development, validation, and relevance of in vivo low-contrast task transfer function to estimate detectability in clinical CT images

PURPOSE

The current state-of-the-art calculation of detectability index (d') is largely phantom-based, with the latest being based on a hybrid phantom noise power spectrum (NPS) combined with patient-specific noise magnitude and high-contrast air-skin interface. The purpose of this study was to develop and assess the use of fully patient-specific measurements of noise and low-contrast resolution, derived entirely from patient images on d'.

METHODS

This study developed a d' calculation that is patient- and task-specific, employing newly developed algorithms for estimating patient-specific NPS and low-contrast task transfer function (TTF). The TTF estimation methodology used a trained regression support vector machine (SVM) to estimate a fitted form of the TTF given a variance-normalized estimate of the NPS (referred to as the TTF_NPS ). The regression SVM was trained and tested using five-fold cross-validation on 192 scans (4 dose levels x 6 reconstruction kernels x 4 repeats) of a phantom with low-contrast polyethylene insert and reconstructed with filtered backprojection and iterative reconstructions across 12 clinically relevant kernels (FBP: B20f, B31f, B45f; SAFIRE: I26f, I31f, J45f with strengths: 2, 3, 5). To test the low-contrast TTF estimation method, the estimated TTF_NPS measurements were compared to (1) TTF measurements from the air-phantom interface (referred to as the TTF_air , representing the most patient-specific clinical alternative) and (2) TTF measurements from the edge of the low-contrast polyethylene insert (referred to as the TTF_poly ), which represented the gold standard of low-contrast TTF measurement. Patient-specific NPS, patient-specific noise magnitude, and patient-specific low-contrast TTF were further combined with a reference task function to calculate a d' (according to a non-prewhitening matched filter model) across 1120 lesions previously evaluated in 2AFC human observer detection of liver lesions. The resulting values were compared to the observer results using a generalized linear mixed-effects statistical model. The correlations between the model and observer results were also compared with previously reported values (using a hybrid method with phantom-derived NPS and TTF_air ).

RESULTS

The TTF_NPS more accurately represented resolution across the considered reconstruction settings, compared with the TTF_air . The out-of-fold predictions of the TTF_NPS had statistically better root-mean-square error concordance (p < 0.05, one-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum test) to gold standard than the TTF_air (the alternative, measured from the air-phantom interface). Detectability indices informed by purely patient-specific NPS and TTF were strongly correlated with 2AFC outcomes (p < 0.05). R² between human detection accuracy and model-predicted detection accuracy were shown to be greater for those measured with patient-specific d' than for the hybrid d' but failed to rise to the level of statistical significance (p ≥ 0.05, bootstrap resampled corrected paired Student's t-test).

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that fully patient-specific characterization of image quality based on in vivo NPS and low-contrast TTF offer advantages over hybrid methods. The results in terms of d' favorably relate to observer detection of liver lesions. The method can potentially be integrated into an automated image quality tracking system to assess image quality across a computed tomography clinical operation without needing phantom scans.

Assessment of the global noise algorithm for automatic noise measurement in head CT examinations

PURPOSE

The global noise (GN) algorithm has been previously introduced as a method for automatic noise measurement in clinical CT images. The accuracy of the GN algorithm has been assessed in abdomen CT examinations, but not in any other body part until now. This work assesses the GN algorithm accuracy in automatic noise measurement in head CT examinations.

METHODS

A publicly available image dataset of 99 head CT examinations was used to evaluate the accuracy of the GN algorithm in comparison to reference noise values. Reference noise values were acquired using a manual noise measurement procedure. The procedure used a consistent instruction protocol and multiple observers to mitigate the influence of intra- and interobserver variation, resulting in precise reference values. Optimal GN algorithm parameter values were determined. The GN algorithm accuracy and the corresponding statistical confidence interval were determined. The GN measurements were compared across the six different scan protocols used in this dataset. The correlation of GN to patient head size was also assessed using a linear regression model, and the CT scanner's X-ray beam quality was inferred from the model fit parameters.

RESULTS

Across all head CT examinations in the dataset, the range of reference noise was 2.9-10.2 HU. A precision of ±0.33 HU was achieved in the reference noise measurements. After optimization, the GN algorithm had a RMS error 0.34 HU corresponding to a percent RMS error of 6.6%. The GN algorithm had a bias of +3.9%. Statistically significant differences in GN were detected in 11 out of the 15 different pairs of scan protocols. The GN measurements were correlated with head size with a statistically significant regression slope parameter (p < 10-7 ). The CT scanner X-ray beam quality estimated from the slope parameter was 3.5 cm water HVL (2.8-4.8 cm 95% CI).

CONCLUSION

The GN algorithm was validated for application in head CT examinations. The GN algorithm was accurate in comparison to reference manual measurement, with errors comparable to interobserver variation in manual measurement. The GN algorithm can detect noise differences in examinations performed on different scanner models or using different scan protocols. The trend in GN across patients of different head sizes closely follows that predicted by a physical model of X-ray attenuation.

Comparison of 12 surrogates to characterize CT radiation risk across a clinical population

OBJECTIVES

Quantifying radiation burden is essential for justification, optimization, and personalization of CT procedures and can be characterized by a variety of risk surrogates inducing different radiological risk reflections. This study compared how twelve such metrics can characterize risk across patient populations.

METHODS

This study included 1394 CT examinations (abdominopelvic and chest). Organ doses were calculated using Monte Carlo methods. The following risk surrogates were considered: volume computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol), dose-length product (DLP), size-specific dose estimate (SSDE), DLP-based effective dose (EDk ), dose to a defining organ (ODD), effective dose and risk index based on organ doses (EDOD, RI), and risk index for a 20-year-old patient (RIrp). The last three metrics were also calculated for a reference ICRP-110 model (ODD,0, ED0, and RI0). Lastly, motivated by the ICRP, an adjusted-effective dose was calculated as [Formula: see text]. A linear regression was applied to assess each metric's dependency on RI. The results were characterized in terms of risk sensitivity index (RSI) and risk differentiability index (RDI).

RESULTS

The analysis reported significant differences between the metrics with EDr showing the best concordance with RI in terms of RSI and RDI. Across all metrics and protocols, RSI ranged between 0.37 (SSDE) and 1.29 (RI0); RDI ranged between 0.39 (EDk) and 0.01 (EDr) cancers × 103patients × 100 mGy.

CONCLUSION

Different risk surrogates lead to different population risk characterizations. EDr exhibited a close characterization of population risk, also showing the best differentiability. Care should be exercised in drawing risk predictions from unrepresentative risk metrics applied to a population.

KEY POINTS

• Radiation risk characterization in CT populations is strongly affected by the surrogate used to describe it. • Different risk surrogates can lead to different characterization of population risk. • Healthcare professionals should exercise care in ascribing an implicit risk to factors that do not closely reflect risk.

Harmonization of in-plane resolution in CT using multiple reconstructions from single acquisitions

PURPOSE

To providea methodology that removes the spatial variability of in-plane resolution using different CT reconstructions. The methodology does not require any training, sinogram, or specific reconstruction method.

METHODS

The methodology is formulated as a reconstruction problem. The desired sharp image is modeled as an unobservable variable to be estimated from an arbitrary number of observations with spatially variant resolution. The methodology comprises three steps: (1) density harmonization, which removes the density variability across reconstructions; (2) point spread function (PSF) estimation, which estimates a spatially variant PSF with arbitrary shape; (3) deconvolution, which is formulated as a regularized least squares problem. The assessment was performed with CT scans of phantoms acquired with three different Siemens scanners (Definition AS, Definition AS+, Drive). Four low-dose acquisitions reconstructed with backprojection and iterative methods were used for the resolution harmonization. A sharp, high-dose (HD) reconstruction was used as a validation reference. The different factors affecting the in-plane resolution (radial, angular, and longitudinal) were studied with regression analysis of the edge decay (between 10% and 90% of the edge spread function (ESF) amplitude).

RESULTS

Results showed that the in-plane resolution improves remarkably and the spatial variability is substantially reduced without compromising the noise characteristics. The modulated transfer function (MTF) also confirmed a pronounced increase in resolution. The resolution improvement was also tested by measuring the wall thickness of tubes simulating airways. In all scanners, the resolution harmonization obtained better performance than the HD, sharp reconstruction used as a reference (up to 50 percentage points). The methodology was also evaluated in clinical scans achieving a noise reduction and a clear improvement in thin-layered structures. The estimated ESF and MTF confirmed the resolution improvement.

CONCLUSION

We propose a versatile methodology to reduce the spatial variability of in-plane resolution in CT scans by leveraging different reconstructions available in clinical studies. The methodology does not require any sinogram, training, or specific reconstruction, and it is not limited to a fixed number of input images. Therefore, it can be easily adopted in multicenter studies and clinical practice. The results obtained with our resolution harmonization methodology evidence its suitability to reduce the spatially variant in-plane resolution in clinical CT scans without compromising the reconstruction's noise characteristics. We believe that the resolution increase achieved by our methodology may contribute in more accurate and reliable measurements of small structures such as vasculature, airways, and wall thickness.

Variability in image quality and radiation dose within and across 97 medical facilities

Purpose: To characterize variability in image quality and radiation dose across a large cohort of computed tomography (CT) examinations and identify the scan factors with the highest influence on the observed variabilities. Approach: This retrospective institutional-review-board-exempt investigation was performed on 87,629 chest and abdomen-pelvis CT scans acquired for 97 facilities from 2018 to 2019. Images were assessed in terms of noise, resolution, and dose metrics (global noise, frequency in which modulation transfer function is at 0.50, and volumetric CT dose index, respectively). The results were fit to linear mixed-effects models to quantify the variabilities as affected by scan parameters and settings and patient characteristics. A list of factors, ranked by t -value with p < 0.05 , was ascertained for each of the six mixed effects models. A type III p -value test was used to assess the influence of facility. Results: Across different facilities, image quality and dose were significantly different ( p < 0.05 ), with little correlation between their mean magnitudes and consistency (Pearson's correlation coefficient < 0.34 ). Scanner model, slice thickness, recon field-of-view and kernel, mAs, kVp, patient size, and centering were the most influential factors. The two body regions exhibited similar rankings of these factors for noise (Spearman's correlation coefficient = 0.76 ) and dose (Spearman's correlation coefficient = 0.86 ) but not for resolution (Spearman's correlation coefficient = 0.52 ). Conclusions: Clinical CT scans can vary in image quality and dose with broad implications for diagnostic utility and radiation burden. Average scan quality was not correlated with interpatient scan-quality consistency. For a given facility, this variability can be quite large, with magnitude differences across facilities. The knowledge of the most influential factors per body region may be used to better manage these variabilities within and across facilities.

An Improved Method of Automated Noise Measurement System in CT Images

Background:

It is necessary to have an automated noise measurement system working accurately to optimize dose in computerized tomography (CT) examinations.

Objective:

This study aims to develop an algorithm to automate noise measurement that can be implemented in CT images of all body regions.

Materials and Methods:

In this retrospective study, our automated noise measurement method consists of three steps as follows: the first is segmenting the image of the patient. The second is developing a standard deviation (SD) map by calculating the SD value for each pixel with a sliding window operation. The third step is estimating the noise as the smallest SD from the SD map. The proposed method was applied to the images of a homogenous phantom and a full body adult anthropomorphic phantom, and retrospectively applied to 27 abdominal images of patients.

Results:

For a homogeneous phantom, the noises calculated using our proposed and previous algorithms have a linear correlation with R² = 0.997. It is found that the noise magnitude closely follows the magnitude of the water equivalent diameter (D_w) in all body regions. The proposed algorithm is able to distinguish the noise magnitude due to variations in tube currents and different noise suppression techniques such as strong, standard, mild, and weak ones in a reconstructed image using the AIDR 3D algorithm.

Conclusion:

An automated noise calculation has been proposed and successfully implemented in all body regions. It is not only accurate and easy to implement but also not influenced by the subjectivity of user.

Patient-based Performance Assessment for Pediatric Abdominal CT: An Automated Monitoring System Based on Lesion Detectability and Radiation Dose

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE

To deploy an automated tool for evaluating pediatric body computed tomography (CT) performance utilizing metrics of radiation dose and image quality for the task of liver lesion detection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This IRB approved retrospective investigation used 507 IV-contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic CT scans of pediatric patients (<18 years) between June 2014 and November 2017 acquired on three scanner models from two manufacturers. The scans were evaluated in terms of radiation metrics (CTDI_vol, DLP, and SSDE) as well as task-based performance based on the clinical task of detecting a 5 mm liver lesion with a 10 HU attenuation difference from background liver. An informatics algorithm extracted a previously-validated quantitative detectability index (d') from each case reflective of the likelihood of detecting a liver lesion. The results were analyzed in terms of the relationship between d' and radiation dose metrics.

RESULTS

There was minimal SSDE variability by age. Median SSDE at 100 kV on one scanner model was 5.2 mGy (5.0-5.4 mGy interquartile range). However, when assessing image quality by applying d', the age groups separated such that the younger patients had higher d' values than older patients. Similar trends were seen in all scanners.

CONCLUSIONS

An automated method to assess clinical image quality for pediatric CT provided a metric of image quality that varied as expected across ages (i.e., higher quality for younger patients). This tool affords the establishment of a quality reference level that, in addition to dose estimations currently available, would allow for enhanced assessment (e.g., facilitated audit) of CT imaging performance.

A Benchmark for automatic noise measurement in clinical computed tomography

PURPOSE

Assessment of image quality directly in clinical image data is an important quality control objective as phantom-based testing does not fully represent image quality across patient variation. Computer algorithms for automatically measuring noise in clinical computed tomography (CT) images have been introduced, but the accuracy of these algorithms is unclear. This work benchmarks the accuracy of the global noise (GN) algorithm for automatic noise measurement in contrast-enhanced abdomen CT exams in comparison to precise reference noise measurements. The GN algorithm was further optimized compared to the previous report in the literature.

METHODS

Reference values of noise were established in a public image dataset of 82 contrast-enhanced abdomen CT exams. The reference noise values were obtained by manual regions-of-interest measurements of pixel standard deviation in the liver parenchyma according to an instruction protocol. Noise measurements taken by six observers were averaged together to improve reference noise statistical precision. The GN algorithm was used to automatically measure noise in each image set. The accuracy of the GN algorithm was determined in terms of RMS error compared to reference noise. The GN algorithm was optimized by conducting 1000 trials with random algorithm parameter values. The trial with the lowest RMS error was used to select optimum algorithm parameters.

RESULTS

The range of noise across CT image sets was 8.8-28.8 HU. Reference noise measurements were made with a precision of ±0.78 HU (95% confidence interval). The RMS error of automatic noise measurement was 0.93 HU (0.77-1.19 HU 95% confidence interval). The automatic noise measurements were equally accurate across image sets of varying noise magnitude. Optimum GN algorithm parameter values were: a kernel size of 7 pixels, and soft tissue lower and upper thresholds of 0 and 170 HU, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The performance of automatic noise measurement was benchmarked in a large clinical CT dataset. The study provides a framework for thorough validation of automatic clinical image quality measurement methods. The GN algorithm was optimized and validated for automatic measurement of soft-tissue noise in abdomen CT exams.

Correlation of Algorithmic and Visual Assessment of Lesion Detection in Clinical Images

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Clinically-relevant quantitative measures of task-based image quality play key roles in effective optimization of medical imaging systems. Conventional phantom-based measures do not adequately reflect the real-world image quality of clinical Computed Tomography (CT) series which is most relevant for diagnostic decision-making. The assessment of detectability index which incorporates measurements of essential image quality metrics on patient CT images can overcome this limitation. Our current investigation extends and validates the technique on standard-of-care clinical cases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We obtained a clinical CT image dataset from an Institutional Review Board-approved prospective study on colorectal adenocarcinoma patients for detecting hepatic metastasis. For this study, both perceptual image quality and lesion detection performance of same-patient CT image series with standard and low dose acquisitions in the same breath hold and four processing algorithms applied to each acquisition were assessed and ranked by expert radiologists. The clinical CT image dataset was processed using the previously validated method to estimate a detectability index for each known lesion size in the size distribution of hepatic lesions relevant for the imaging task and for each slice of a CT series. We then combined these lesion-size-specific and slice-specific detectability indexes with the size distribution of hepatic lesions relevant for the imaging task to compute an effective detectability index for a clinical CT imaging condition of a patient. The assessed effective detectability indexes were used to rank task-based image quality of different imaging conditions on the same patient for all patients. We compared the assessments to those by expert radiologists in the prospective study in terms of rank order agreement between the rankings of algorithmic and visual assessment of lesion detection and perceptual quality.

RESULTS

Our investigation indicated that algorithmic assessment of lesion detection and perceptual quality can predict observer assessment for detecting hepatic metastasis. The algorithmic and visual assessment of lesion detection and perceptual quality are strongly correlated using both the Kendall's Tau and Spearman's Rho methods (perfect agreement has value 1): for assessment of lesion detection, 95% of the patients have rank correlation coefficients values exceeding 0.87 and 0.94, respectively, and for assessment of perceptual quality, 0.85 and 0.94, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study used algorithmic detectability index to assess task-based image equality for detecting hepatic lesions and validated it against observer rankings on standard-of-care clinical CT cases. Our study indicates that detectability index provides a robust reflection of overall image quality for detecting hepatic lesions under clinical CT imaging conditions. This demonstrates the concept of utilizing the measure to quantitatively assess the quality of the information content that different imaging conditions can provide for the same clinical imaging task, which enables targeted optimization of clinical CT systems to minimize clinical and patient risks.

Technical Note: Validation of TG 233 phantom methodology to characterize noise and dose in patient CT data

PURPOSE

Phantoms are useful tools in diagnostic CT, but practical limitations reduce phantoms to being only a limited patient surrogate. Furthermore, a phantom with a single cross sectional area cannot be used to evaluate scanner performance in modern CT scanners that use dose reduction techniques such as automated tube current modulation (ATCM) and iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms to adapt x-ray flux to patient size, reduce radiation dose, and achieve uniform image noise. A new multisized phantom (Mercury Phantom, MP) has been introduced, representing multiple diameters. This work aimed to ascertain if measurements from MP can predict radiation dose and image noise in clinical CT images to prospectively inform protocol design.

METHODS

The adult MP design included four different physical diameters (18.5, 23.0, 30.0, and 37.0 cm) representing a range of patient sizes. The study included 1457 examinations performed on two scanner models from two vendors, and two clinical protocols (abdominopelvic with and chest without contrast). Attenuating diameter, radiation dose, and noise magnitude (average pixel standard deviation in uniform image) was automatically estimated in patients and in the MP using a previously validated algorithm. An exponential fit of CTDI_vol and noise as a function of size was applied to patients and MP data. Lastly, the fit equations from the phantom data were used to fit the patient data. In each patient distribution fit, the normalized root mean square error (nRMSE) values were calculated in the residuals' plots as a metric to indicate how well the phantom data can predict dose and noise in clinical operations as a function of size.

RESULTS

For dose across patient size distributions, the difference between nRMSE from patient fit and MP model data prediction ranged between 0.6% and 2.0% (mean 1.2%). For noise across patient size distributions, the nRMSE difference ranged between 0.1% and 4.7% (mean 1.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

The Mercury Phantom provided a close prediction of radiation dose and image noise in clinical patient images. By assessing dose and image quality in a phantom with multiple sizes, protocol parameters can be designed and optimized per patient size in a highly constrained setup to predict clinical scanner and ATCM system performance.

Validation of algorithmic CT image quality metrics with preferences of radiologists

PURPOSE

Automated assessment of perceptual image quality on clinical Computed Tomography (CT) data by computer algorithms has the potential to greatly facilitate data-driven monitoring and optimization of CT image acquisition protocols. The application of these techniques in clinical operation requires the knowledge of how the output of the computer algorithms corresponds to clinical expectations. This study addressed the need to validate algorithmic image quality measurements on clinical CT images with preferences of radiologists and determine the clinically acceptable range of algorithmic measurements for abdominal CT examinations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Algorithmic measurements of image quality metrics (organ HU, noise magnitude, and clarity) were performed on a clinical CT image dataset with supplemental measures of noise power spectrum from phantom images using techniques developed previously. The algorithmic measurements were compared to clinical expectations of image quality in an observer study with seven radiologists. Sets of CT liver images were selected from the dataset where images in the same set varied in terms of one metric at a time. These sets of images were shown via a web interface to one observer at a time. First, the observer rank ordered the CT images in a set according to his/her preference for the varying metric. The observer then selected his/her preferred acceptable range of the metric within the ranked images. The agreement between algorithmic and observer rankings of image quality were investigated and the clinically acceptable image quality in terms of algorithmic measurements were determined.

RESULTS

The overall rank-order agreements between algorithmic and observer assessments were 0.90, 0.98, and 1.00 for noise magnitude, liver parenchyma HU, and clarity, respectively. The results indicate a strong agreement between the algorithmic and observer assessments of image quality. Clinically acceptable thresholds (median) of algorithmic metric values were (17.8, 32.6) HU for noise magnitude, (92.1, 131.9) for liver parenchyma HU, and (0.47, 0.52) for clarity.

CONCLUSIONS

The observer study results indicated that these algorithms can robustly assess the perceptual quality of clinical CT images in an automated fashion. Clinically acceptable ranges of algorithmic measurements were determined. The correspondence of these image quality assessment algorithms to clinical expectations paves the way toward establishing diagnostic reference levels in terms of clinically acceptable perceptual image quality and data-driven optimization of CT image acquisition protocols.

Automated MTF measurement in CT images with a simple wire phantom

This study developed a simple wire phantom and an algorithm to automatically measure the modulation transfer function (MTF) in computed tomography (CT) and implemented it to evaluate the effect of focal spot size and reconstruction filter type. The phantom consisted of a resin cylinder filled with water, with a tin wire of diameter 0.1 mm positioned along the center of the cylinder. The automated MTF algorithm used an axial image of the phantom and comprised several steps. The center position of a region of interest (ROI) was automatically determined at the center of the wire image. The pixels were then summed along the y-direction to obtain the profile of the pixel values at a point along the x-direction. Following this, both edges of the profile were made equal to zero. The profile curve was then normalized so that the total of all the data was equal to unity. The normalized profile curve is the line spread function (LSF), and the MTF curve was obtained by taking its Fourier transform. Our system (phantom and algorithm) is able to differentiate the MTFs of CT images from different focal sizes and reconstruction filter types.

Image Quality Performance of Virtual Single-Source CT Using Dual-Source Computed Tomography

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to analyze the image quality provided by a dual-source (DS) data set and a single-source (SS) data set at the same radiation exposure, in order to evaluate a dose splitting method for dual-source scanning protocols.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A 192-slice dual-source third generation CT (Somatom Force; Siemens Healthcare, Forchheim, Germany) was used to image a Catphan phantom (Catphan503; The Phantom Laboratory, Salem, New York) utilizing different X-ray tube voltages from 70 to 120 kVp with an organ-based tube-current modulation technique (X-CARE; Siemens Healthcare, Forchheim, Germany). In order to keep the radiation dose (given by volume computed tomography dose index) in a clinically relevant range, different X-ray tube time-current products ranging from 80 to 300 mAs were selected. The data sets by each X-ray tube voltage were collected using a single-source as well as a dual-source mode. The measurements in the dual-source mode were performed with five different tube currents of the X-ray tube A and B. Thereby, the tube current ratios were 50%|50% (DS 0.5), 60%|40% (DS 0.6), 70%|30% (DS 0.7), 80%|20% (DS 0.8), and 90%|10% (DS 0.9). The images were reconstructed by the use of a filter-back projection (Br40) and an advanced mode led iterative reconstruction algorithms (advanced modeled iterative reconstruction algorithms [ADMIRE]; Siemens Healthcare, Forchheim, Germany) with a strength range of 1-5. The image quality was evaluated in terms of noise, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), low-contrast detectability expressed as the structural similarity index (SSIM) and spatial resolution quantified by the full width at half maximum of the line-spread function.

RESULTS

Image noise decreased by the use of the dual-source mode, which led to improvement of their CNR compared to the single-source mode. SSIM showed an almost constant behavior by both modes. The spatial resolution indicated a lower trend by the dual-source mode in comparison to the single-source mode. However, the loss of the spatial resolution performance was lower than 5% for the dual-source modes.

CONCLUSION

The presented phantom study demonstrated that SSIM and spatial resolution performance obtained by dual-source CT protocols showed a negligible variation to those by the single-source CT. However, the noise and CNR displayed an improvement for the dual-source CT. Therefore, the use of the dual-source CT enables to split the radiation dose between X-ray tubes and to compare the data sets with different radiation dose levels without loss in the image quality.

Deep learning application engine (DLAE): Development and integration of deep learning algorithms in medical imaging

Herein we introduce a deep learning (DL) application engine (DLAE) system concept, present potential uses of it, and describe pathways for its integration in clinical workflows. An open-source software application was developed to provide a code-free approach to DL for medical imaging applications. DLAE supports several DL techniques used in medical imaging, including convolutional neural networks, fully convolutional networks, generative adversarial networks, and bounding box detectors. Several example applications using clinical images were developed and tested to demonstrate the capabilities of DLAE. Additionally, a model deployment example was demonstrated in which DLAE was used to integrate two trained models into a commercial clinical software package.

Expanding the Concept of Diagnostic Reference Levels to Noise and Dose Reference Levels in CT

OBJECTIVE. Diagnostic reference levels were developed as guidance for radiation dose in medical imaging and, by inference, diagnostic quality. The objective of this work was to expand the concept of diagnostic reference levels to explicitly include noise of CT examinations to simultaneously target both dose and quality through corresponding reference values. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The study consisted of 2851 adult CT examinations performed with scanners from two manufacturers and two clinical protocols: abdominopelvic CT with IV contrast administration and chest CT without IV contrast administration. An institutional informatics system was used to automatically extract protocol type, patient diameter, volume CT dose index, and noise magnitude from images. The data were divided into five reference patient size ranges. Noise reference level, noise reference range, dose reference level, and dose reference range were defined for each size range. RESULTS. The data exhibited strong dependence between dose and patient size, weak dependence between noise and patient size, and different trends for different manufacturers with differing strategies for tube current modulation. The results suggest size-based reference intervals and levels for noise and dose (e.g., noise reference level and noise reference range of 11.5-12.9 HU and 11.0-14.0 HU for chest CT and 10.1-12.1 HU and 9.4-13.7 HU for abdominopelvic CT examinations) that can be targeted to improve clinical performance consistency. CONCLUSION. New reference levels and ranges, which simultaneously consider image noise and radiation dose information across wide patient populations, were defined and determined for two clinical protocols. The methods of new quantitative constraints may provide unique and useful information about the goal of managing the variability of image quality and dose in clinical CT examinations.

Harmonization of chest CT scans for different doses and reconstruction methods

PURPOSE

To develop and validate a computed tomography (CT) harmonization technique by combining noise-stabilization and autocalibration methodologies to provide reliable densitometry measurements in heterogeneous acquisition protocols.

METHODS

We propose to reduce the effects of spatially variant noise such as nonuniform patterns of noise and biases. The method combines the statistical characterization of the signal-to-noise relationship in the CT image intensities, which allows us to estimate both the signal and spatially variant variance of noise, with an autocalibration technique that reduces the nonuniform biases caused by noise and reconstruction techniques. The method is firstly validated with anthropomorphic synthetic images that simulate CT acquisitions with variable scanning parameters: different dosage, nonhomogeneous variance of noise, and various reconstruction methods. We finally evaluate these effects and the ability of our method to provide consistent densitometric measurements in a cohort of clinical chest CT scans from two vendors (Siemens, n = 54 subjects; and GE, n = 50 subjects) acquired with several reconstruction algorithms (filtered back-projection and iterative reconstructions) with high-dose and low-dose protocols.

RESULTS

The harmonization reduces the effect of nonhomogeneous noise without compromising the resolution of the images (25% RMSE reduction in both clinical datasets). An analysis through hierarchical linear models showed that the average biases induced by differences in dosage and reconstruction methods are also reduced up to 74.20%, enabling comparable results between high-dose and low-dose reconstructions. We also assessed the statistical similarity between acquisitions obtaining increases of up to 30% points and showing that the low-dose vs high-dose comparisons of harmonized data obtain similar and even higher similarity than the observed for high-dose vs high-dose comparisons of nonharmonized data.

CONCLUSION

The proposed harmonization technique allows to compare measures of low-dose with high-dose acquisitions without using a specific reconstruction as a reference. Since the harmonization does not require a precalibration with a phantom, it can be applied to retrospective studies. This approach might be suitable for multicenter trials for which a reference reconstruction is not feasible or hard to define due to differences in vendors, models, and reconstruction techniques.

A method to measure slice sensitivity profiles of CT images under low-contrast and high-noise conditions

Noise reduction features of iterative reconstruction (IR) methods in computed tomography might accompany the sacrifice of the longitudinal resolution, or slice sensitivity profile (SSP), at low contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) conditions. To assess the benefit of IR methods correctly, the difference of SSP between IR methods and filtered-backprojection (FBP) must be taken into account. Therefore, SSP measurement under low-CNR conditions is necessary. Although edge methods are predominantly used, their performance under low-CNR conditions appears to be not fully established. We developed a method that is compatible with extremely low-CNR conditions. Thin plastic disk-shaped sheets embedded in acrylic resin were used as low-contrast test objects. The lowest peak contrast used was approximately 17 [HU]. We assessed the performance of our method by using FBP images. We identified a source of measurement instability aside from noise: the measured thin-slice SSP is dependent on the orbital phase of helical scan, presumably because of cone-beam artifacts. This impediment to high accuracy is manageable using phase-controlled scans. We confirmed that table position repeatability is much better than the value of the specifications, and therefore the ensemble-averaged images of multiple scans can be used for SSP measurement. Accurate measurement of SSP under extremely low-CNR conditions is possible, even when the test object is visually indiscernible from the noisy background. Low-contrast SSP behavior is elucidated for IR methods (AIDR-3D, FIRST, and AiSR-V) by using this measurement method.

Medical Physics 3.0: Ensuring Quality and Safety in Medical Imaging

Medical imaging often involves radiation and thus radiation protection. Radiation protection in medicine is only one component of the broader calling of health care professionals: fostering human health. As such, radiation risk needs to be put into the context of the larger mandate of improved outcomes in health care. Medical physicists, according to the new vision of Medical Physics 3.0, make a significant contribution to this mandate as they engage proactively and meaningfully in patient care. Facing the new realities of value-based, personalized, and evidence-based practice, Medical Physics 3.0 is an initiative to make physics inform every patient's care by fostering new skills and expanding horizons for the medical physics profession. It provides a framework by which medical physicists can maintain and improve their integral roles in, and contributions to, health care, its innovation, and its precision. One way that Medical Physics 3.0 will manifest itself in medical imaging practice is by engaging physicists to ensure the precise and optimized use of radiation. Optimization takes place through knowing the defining attributes of the technology in use, the specifics of the patient's situation, and the goals of the imaging and/or intervention. The safety as well as the quality of the procedure is ascertained quantitatively and optimized prospectively, ensuring a proper balance between quality and safety to offer maximum potential benefit to the patient. The results of procedures across the health care operation are then retrospectively analyzed to ensure that each procedure has, in actuality, delivered the targeted quality and safety objectives. Characterizing quality and safety in quantitative terms, objectively optimizing them in the practice of personalized care, and analyzing the results from clinical operations all require the unique combination of precision and innovation that physicists bring to the development and practice of medicine.

The Use of Model-based Iterative Reconstruction to Optimize Chest CT Examinations for Diagnosing Lung Metastases in Patients with Sarcoma: A Phantom Study

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

This phantom study aimed to evaluate low-dose (LD) chest computed tomography (CT) protocols using model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) for diagnosing lung metastases in patients with sarcoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An adult female anthropomorphic phantom was scanned with a 64-slice CT using four LD protocols and a standard-dose protocol. Absorbed organ doses were measured with 10 metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor dosimeters. Furthermore, Monte Carlo simulations were performed to estimate organ and effective doses. Image quality in terms of image noise, contrast, and resolution was measured from the CT images reconstructed with conventional filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and MBIR algorithms. All the results were compared to the performance of the standard-dose protocol.

RESULTS

Mean absorbed organ and effective doses were reduced by approximately 95% with the LD protocol (100-kVp tube voltage and a fixed 10-mA tube current) compared to the standard-dose protocol (120-kVp tube voltage and tube current modulation) while yielding an acceptable image quality for diagnosing round-shaped lung metastases. The effective doses ranged from 0.16 to 2.83 mSv in the studied protocols. The image noise, contrast, and resolution were maintained or improved when comparing the image quality of LD protocols using MBIR to the performance of the standard-dose chest CT protocol using filtered back projection. The small round-shaped lung metastases were delineated at levels comparable to the used protocols.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiation exposure in patients can be reduced significantly by using LD chest CT protocols and MBIR algorithm while maintaining image quality for detecting round-shaped lung metastases.

The Need for Practical and Accurate Measures of Value for Radiology

Radiologists play a critical role in helping the health care system achieve greater value. Unfortunately, today radiology is often judged by simple "checkbox" metrics, which neither directly reflect the value radiologists provide nor the outcomes they help drive. To change this system, first, we must attempt to better define the elusive term value and, then, quantify the value of imaging through more relevant and meaningful metrics that can be more directly correlated with outcomes. This framework can further improve radiology's value by enhancing radiologists' integration into the care team and their engagement with patients. With these improvements, we can maximize the value of imaging in the overall care of patients.

An algorithm for automated modulation transfer function measurement using an edge of a PMMA phantom: Impact of field of view on spatial resolution of CT images

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to introduce a new algorithm for automated measurement of the modulation transfer function (MTF) using an edge of a readily available phantom and to evaluate the effect of reconstruction filter and field of view (FOV) on the spatial resolution in the CT images.

METHODS

Our automated MTF measurement consisted of several steps. The center of the image was established and an appropriate region of interest (ROI) designated. The edge spread function (ESF) was determined, and a suitably interpolated ESF curve was differentiated to obtain the line spread function (LSF). The LSF was Fourier transformed to obtain the MTF. All these steps were accomplished automatically without user intervention. The results of the automated MTF from the edge phantom were validated by comparing them with a point image, and the results of the automated calculation were validated by the standard fitting method. The automated MTF calculation was then applied to the images of two polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) phantoms and a wire phantom which had been scanned by a Toshiba Alexion 4-slice CT scanner and reconstructed with various filter types and FOVs.

RESULTS

The difference in the 50% MTF values obtained from the edge and point phantoms were within ±4%. The values from the automated and fitted methods agreed to within ±2%, indicating that the automated MTF calculation was accurate. The automated MTF calculation was able to differentiate MTF curves for various filters. The spatial resolution values were 0.37 ± 0.00, 0.71 ± 0.01, and 0.78 ± 0.01 cycles/mm for FC13, FC30 and FC52 filters, respectively. The spatial resolution of the images decrease linearly (R²  > 0.98) with increasing FOVs.

CONCLUSION

An automated MTF method was successfully developed using an edge phantom, the PMMA phantom. The method is easy to implement in a clinical environment and is not influenced by user experience.

Method for automatic detection of defective ultrasound linear array transducers based on uniformity assessment of clinical images - A case study

The purpose of the present study was to test an idea of and describe a concept of a novel method of detecting defects related to horizontal nonuniformities in ultrasound equipment. The method is based on the analysis of ultrasound images collected directly from the clinical workflow. In total over 31000 images from three ultrasound scanners from two vendors were collected retrospectively from a database. An algorithm was developed and applied to the images, 150 at a time, for detection of systematic dark regions in the superficial part of the images. The result was compared with electrical measurements (FirstCall) of the transducers, performed at times when the transducers were known to be defective. The algorithm made similar detection of horizontal nonuniformities for images acquired at different time points over long periods of time. The results showed good subjective visual agreement with the available electrical measurements of the defective transducers, indicating a potential use of clinical images for early and automatic detection of defective transducers, as a complement to quality control.

Estimating detectability index in vivo: development and validation of an automated methodology

This study's purpose was to develop and validate a method to estimate patient-specific detectability indices directly from patients' CT images (i.e., in vivo). The method extracts noise power spectrum (NPS) and modulation transfer function (MTF) resolution properties from each patient's CT series based on previously validated techniques. These are combined with a reference task function (10-mm disk lesion with [Formula: see text] HU contrast) to estimate detectability indices for a nonprewhitening matched filter observer model. This method was applied to CT data from a previous study in which diagnostic performance of 16 readers was measured for the task of detecting subtle, hypoattenuating liver lesions ([Formula: see text]), using a two-alternative-forced-choice (2AFC) method, over six dose levels and two reconstruction algorithms. In vivo detectability indices were estimated and compared to the human readers' binary 2AFC outcomes using a generalized linear mixed-effects statistical model. The results of this modeling showed that the in vivo detectability indices were strongly related to 2AFC outcomes ([Formula: see text]). Linear comparison between human-detection accuracy and model-predicted detection accuracy (for like conditions) resulted in Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients exceeding 0.84. These results suggest the potential utility of using in vivo estimates of a detectability index for an automated image quality tracking system that could be implemented clinically.

Automated, patient-specific estimation of regional imparted energy and dose from tube current modulated computed tomography exams across 13 protocols

Currently, computed tomography (CT) dosimetry relies on surrogates for dose, such as CT dose index and size-specific dose estimates, rather than dose per se. Organ dose is considered as the gold standard for radiation dosimetry. However, organ dose estimation requires precise knowledge of organ locations. Regional imparted energy and dose can also be used to quantify radiation burden and are beneficial because they do not require knowledge of organ size or location. This work investigated an automated technique to retrospectively estimate the imparted energy from tube current-modulated (TCM) CT exams across 13 protocols. Monte Carlo simulations of various head and body TCM CT examinations across various tube potentials and TCM strengths were performed on 58 adult computational extended cardiac-torso phantoms to develop relationships between scanned mass and imparted energy normalized by dose length product. Results from the Monte Carlo simulations indicate that normalized imparted energy increases with increasing both scanned mass and tube potential, but it is relatively unaffected by the strength of the TCM. The automated algorithm was tested on 40 clinical datasets with a 98% success rate.