Distortion-product otoacoustic emission suppression growth in normal and noise-exposed rabbits

Memantine's action against aminoglycoside-induced ototoxicity

The objectives of this study were (1) to assess the protective role of NMDA antagonists against the ototoxic effects of aminoglycosides, (2) to provide any possible evidence between ototoxicity due to aminoglycosides and excitotoxicity. An animal experiment was conducted. Twenty-eight, 3-month-old female New Zealand rabbits, weighing 1,000-1,500 g, were studied prospectively for 28 days after intramuscular administration of amikacin (15 mg/kg/day divided into two equal doses) for 14 days. Twenty-one rabbits were categorized into three equal treatment groups and seven animals received no medication and served as the control group. The animals of A, B and C groups were injected, intramuscularly, with amikacin 15 mg/kg/day, divided into two equal doses every day for 14 days. Animals of group A received in parallel memantine (per os) and those of group B received p.o. the same volume of placebo solution. The rabbits of the third group (group C) received on the 15th day and every 2 days for the next 2 weeks, until the day 28, memantine of the same quantity as the members of group A. Differences in DPOAE amplitudes, and therefore in cochlear activity, between group A and group B were revealed. DPOAE amplitudes of group B were further reduced compared to the respective amplitudes in rabbits of group A. No improvement was observed in DPOAE measurements performed after the discontinuation of injections. The findings in group C should be examined separately. The measurements showed apparent reversal ototoxic effects in four of the animals. The development of aminoglycoside otoprotective strategies is a primary goal in ototoxicity research. The administration of NMDA antagonists has been shown to prevent, at least to some extent, toxic damage to hair cells in guinea pigs, treated with aminoglycoside antibiotics.

Distortion-product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in hearing-impaired humans

Distortion-product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) suppression tuning curves (STCs) were measured in 65 hearing-impaired (HI) subjects at f(2) frequencies of 2.0, 2.8, 4.0, and 5.6 kHz and L(2) levels relative to sensation level (SL) from 10 dB to as much as 50 dB. Best frequency, cochlear-amplifier gain (tip-to-tail difference, T-T), and tuning (Q(ERB)) were estimated from STCs. As with normal-hearing (NH) subjects, T-T differences and Q(ERB) decreased as L(2) increased. T-T differences and Q(ERB) were reduced in HI ears (compared to normal) for conditions in which L(2) was fixed relative to behavioral threshold (dB SL). When STCs were compared with L(2) at constant sound pressure levels (dB SPL), differences between NH and HI subjects were reduced. The large effect of level and small effect of hearing loss were both confirmed by statistical analyses. Therefore, the magnitude of the differences in DPOAE STCs between NH and HI subjects is mainly dependent on the manner in which level (L(2)) is specified. Although this conclusion may appear to be at odds with previous, invasive measures of cochlear-response gain and tuning, the apparent inconsistency may be resolved when the manner of specifying stimulus level is taken into account.

Growth of suppression using distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements in hearing-impaired humans

Growth of distortion-product otoacoustic emission suppression was measured in 65 subjects with mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss (HI). Measurements were made at four probe frequencies (f(2)) and up to five L(2) levels. Eleven suppressor frequencies (f(3)) were used for each f(2), L(2) combination. These data were compared to data from normal-hearing (NH) subjects (Gorga et al., 2011a). In both NH and HI subjects, growth of suppression depended on the relation between f(2) and f(3), such that the slope was close to one when f(3) ≈ f(2), steeper than one when f(3) < f(2), and shallower than one when f(3) > f(2). Differences in growth of suppression between NH and HI subjects were not observed for fixed f(2), L(2) combinations, however large differences were observed in suppressor "threshold" when compared at the same probe sensation level (dB SL). Smaller group differences were observed when compared at the same probe sound-pressure level (dB SPL). Therefore, the extent of these differences depended on how probe level (L(2)) was specified. When the results from NH and HI subjects are compared with each other and with psychophysical studies of masking, differences are observed that have implications for the remediation of mild-to-moderate hearing loss.

Ototoxicity caused by once- and twice-daily administration of amikacin in rabbits

OBJECTIVE

The cochleotoxic effects of aminoglycosides, such as amikacin, are well-established. The aim of the present study was to investigate the possible differences in cochleotoxic effects between once-daily administration (ODA) and twice-daily administration (TDA) of amikacin simulating pediatric dosing.

METHODS

Twenty-one rabbits were used. Seven animals received intramuscularly amikacin once daily (ODA-group) and seven received the drug twice daily (TDA-group), for a total time period of 2 weeks. All the animals were subjected to Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions (DPOAEs) every 3 days since beginning of the experiment. The rest 7 animals did not receive any medication and served as controls (Control group). Two measurements (7 and 14 days) were obtained following the cease of drug administration.

RESULTS

Reduced cochlear activity (as depicted in the respective reduced DPOAE-amplitudes) compared to the pre-treatment state was found in both ODA- and TDA-groups. Cochlear activity was reduced at a wider range of frequencies (from 593 to 4031Hz in TDA-group and from 593 to 1093Hz in ODA-group) and to a higher degree in group B than in group A. Cochlear activity was reduced earlier in ODA-group than in TDA-group. No differences to the pre-treatment state were observed in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

The above findings suggest that less frequent administration in higher dose of amikacin is associated with minimal cochleotoxicity.

Sex differences in distortion-product and transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions compared

Although several studies have documented the existence of sex differences in spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs) and transient-evoked OAEs (TEOAEs) in humans, less has been published about sex differences in distortion-product OAEs (DPOAEs). Estimates of sex and ear differences were extracted from a data set of OAE measurements previously collected for other purposes. In accord with past findings, the sex differences for TEOAEs were substantial for both narrowband and wideband measures. By contrast, the sex differences for DPOAEs were about half the size of those for TEOAEs. In this sample, the ear differences were small for TEOAEs in both sexes and absent for DPOAEs. One implication is that the cochlear mechanisms underlying DPOAEs appear to be less susceptible to whatever influences are responsible for producing sex differences in TEOAEs and SOAEs in humans. We discuss the possibility that differences in the effective level of the stimuli may contribute to these outcomes.

Objective threshold estimation and measurement of the residual background noise in auditory evoked potentials of goldfish

A survey of papers using auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) published over the last 10 years (Table I) demonstrates that most AEP studies in animals have used subjective methods for auditory threshold determination. Subjective methods greatly reduce the value of statistical hypothesis testing and jeopardize tests of hypothetical experimental group differences in hearing sensitivity. Correspondingly, many attempts have been made to develop objective threshold determination methods, but these have not been used widely. Further, they seldom include an appreciation of the effects of residual noise in the AEP. In this study, AEPs evoked by tonal and noise stimuli in goldfish (Carassius auratus) were recorded and the residual background noise was measured and analyzed in detail. High variability was found in residual noise, but can be effectively controlled with a simple modification of averaging routines. Considerable interobserver disagreements were found using subjective threshold estimation. An objective method of threshold determination was developed based on comparison between AEP amplitude and controlled residual noise, using a signal detection theory approach to set specific threshold criteria. The usefulness of AEP in hypothesis testing for auditory function requires more control over residual background noise amplitudes and the use of objective threshold determination techniques.