• Reference Citation Analysis
  • v
  • v
  • Find an Article
Find an Article PDF (4646951)   Today's Articles (2606)   Subscriber (50690)
For: Smith DW, Finley CC. Effects of electrode configuration on psychophysical strength-duration functions for single biphasic electrical stimuli in cats. J Acoust Soc Am 1997;102:2228-2237. [PMID: 9348680 DOI: 10.1121/1.419636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Number Cited by Other Article(s)
1
Garadat SN, Colesa DJ, Swiderski DL, Raphael Y, Pfingst BE. Estimating health of the implanted cochlea using psychophysical strength-duration functions and electrode configuration. Hear Res 2022;414:108404. [PMID: 34883366 PMCID: PMC8761176 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2021.108404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2021] [Revised: 11/17/2021] [Accepted: 11/25/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
2
He S, Xu L, Skidmore J, Chao X, Riggs WJ, Wang R, Vaughan C, Luo J, Shannon M, Warner C. Effect of Increasing Pulse Phase Duration on Neural Responsiveness of the Electrically Stimulated Cochlear Nerve. Ear Hear 2021;41:1606-1618. [PMID: 33136636 PMCID: PMC7529657 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000000876] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
3
Zhou N, Zhu Z, Dong L, Galvin J. Sensitivity to Pulse Phase Duration as a Marker of Neural Health Across Cochlear Implant Recipients and Electrodes. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2021;22:177-192. [PMID: 33559041 PMCID: PMC7943680 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-021-00784-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2020] [Accepted: 01/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]  Open
4
Tak S, Yathiraj A. Comparison of Relative Loudness Judgment in Children using Listening Devices with Typically Developing Children. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2021;25:e54-e63. [PMID: 33542752 PMCID: PMC7850889 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1702971] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2019] [Accepted: 12/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]  Open
5
Di Lella FA, Parreño M, Fernandez F, Boccio CM, Ausili SA. Measuring the Electrical Status of the Bionic Ear. Re-thinking the Impedance in Cochlear Implants. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2020;8:568690. [PMID: 33072726 PMCID: PMC7530401 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.568690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2020] [Accepted: 08/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]  Open
6
Zhou N, Dong L, Galvin JJ. A behavioral method to estimate charge integration efficiency in cochlear implant users. J Neurosci Methods 2020;342:108802. [PMID: 32522551 DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2020.108802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2019] [Revised: 05/26/2020] [Accepted: 06/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
7
Zhou N, Cadmus M, Dong L, Mathews J. Temporal Modulation Detection Depends on Sharpness of Spatial Tuning. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2018;19:317-330. [PMID: 29696448 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-018-0663-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2017] [Accepted: 03/22/2018] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]  Open
8
Zhou N, Dong L. Evaluating Multipulse Integration as a Neural-Health Correlate in Human Cochlear-Implant Users: Relationship to Psychometric Functions for Detection. Trends Hear 2018;21:2331216517690108. [PMID: 28150534 PMCID: PMC5308440 DOI: 10.1177/2331216517690108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]  Open
9
Langner F, Saoji AA, Büchner A, Nogueira W. Adding simultaneous stimulating channels to reduce power consumption in cochlear implants. Hear Res 2017;345:96-107. [PMID: 28104408 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2016] [Revised: 01/10/2017] [Accepted: 01/12/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
10
Joshi SN, Dau T, Epp B. A Model of Electrically Stimulated Auditory Nerve Fiber Responses with Peripheral and Central Sites of Spike Generation. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2017;18:323-342. [PMID: 28054149 PMCID: PMC5352616 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-016-0608-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2016] [Accepted: 12/05/2016] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]  Open
11
Chatterjee M, Kulkarni AM. Sensitivity to pulse phase duration in cochlear implant listeners: effects of stimulation mode. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2014;136:829-40. [PMID: 25096116 PMCID: PMC4144184 DOI: 10.1121/1.4884773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2013] [Revised: 06/09/2014] [Accepted: 06/11/2014] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
12
Spread of excitation varies for different electrical pulse shapes and stimulation modes in cochlear implants. Hear Res 2012;290:21-36. [DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2012.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2012] [Revised: 04/23/2012] [Accepted: 05/04/2012] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
13
Rattay F, Paredes L, Leao R. Strength-duration relationship for intra- versus extracellular stimulation with microelectrodes. Neuroscience 2012;214:1-13. [PMID: 22516015 PMCID: PMC3401985 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2012] [Revised: 03/06/2012] [Accepted: 04/05/2012] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
14
Vollmer M, Beitel RE, Snyder RL, Leake PA. Spatial selectivity to intracochlear electrical stimulation in the inferior colliculus is degraded after long-term deafness in cats. J Neurophysiol 2007;98:2588-603. [PMID: 17855592 PMCID: PMC2430866 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00011.2007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]  Open
15
Sakata M, Hareyama M, Heil TA, Henson MM, Henson OW, Webber RL, Nair MK, Smith DW. High-resolution in situ imaging of cochlear implant electrode arrays in cat temporal bones using Tuned Aperture Computed Tomography (TACT). Ear Hear 2007;28:435-43. [PMID: 17609606 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0b013e31806dc24e] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
16
Sakata M, Hareyama M, Heil TA, Henson MM, Henson OW, Nair MK, Smith DW. Optimization of TACT imaging protocols for in situ visualization of cochlear electrode arrays in cat temporal bones. Ear Hear 2007;28:444-50. [PMID: 17609607 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0b013e31806dc1e3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
17
Prado-Guitierrez P, Fewster LM, Heasman JM, McKay CM, Shepherd RK. Effect of interphase gap and pulse duration on electrically evoked potentials is correlated with auditory nerve survival. Hear Res 2006;215:47-55. [PMID: 16644157 PMCID: PMC1831823 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2006.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 117] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2006] [Accepted: 03/07/2006] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
18
Hughes ML, Abbas PJ. Electrophysiologic channel interaction, electrode pitch ranking, and behavioral threshold in straight versus perimodiolar cochlear implant electrode arrays. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2006;119:1538-47. [PMID: 16583899 DOI: 10.1121/1.2164969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
19
Middlebrooks JC. Effects of cochlear-implant pulse rate and inter-channel timing on channel interactions and thresholds. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2004;116:452-68. [PMID: 15296005 DOI: 10.1121/1.1760795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
20
Ferguson WD, Collins LM, Smith DW. Psychophysical threshold variability in cochlear implant subjects. Hear Res 2003;180:101-13. [PMID: 12782358 DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(03)00111-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
21
Raggio MW, Schreiner CE. Neuronal responses in cat primary auditory cortex to electrical cochlear stimulation: IV. Activation pattern for sinusoidal stimulation. J Neurophysiol 2003;89:3190-204. [PMID: 12783954 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00341.2002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]  Open
22
Bierer JA, Middlebrooks JC. Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: dependence on electrode configuration. J Neurophysiol 2002;87:478-92. [PMID: 11784764 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00212.2001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 142] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]  Open
23
Vollmer M, Beitel RE, Snyder RL. Auditory detection and discrimination in deaf cats: psychophysical and neural thresholds for intracochlear electrical signals. J Neurophysiol 2001;86:2330-43. [PMID: 11698523 DOI: 10.1152/jn.2001.86.5.2330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]  Open
24
Miller AL, Arenberg JG, Middlebrooks JC, Pfingst BE. Cochlear implant thresholds: comparison of middle latency responses with psychophysical and cortical-spike-activity thresholds. Hear Res 2001;152:55-66. [PMID: 11223281 DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(00)00236-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
25
Miller AL. Effects of chronic stimulation on auditory nerve survival in ototoxically deafened animals. Hear Res 2001;151:1-14. [PMID: 11124447 DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(00)00226-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
26
Beitel RE, Snyder RL, Schreiner CE, Raggio MW, Leake PA. Electrical cochlear stimulation in the deaf cat: comparisons between psychophysical and central auditory neuronal thresholds. J Neurophysiol 2000;83:2145-62. [PMID: 10758124 DOI: 10.1152/jn.2000.83.4.2145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]  Open
27
Chatterjee M, Fu QJ, Shannon RV. Effects of phase duration and electrode separation on loudness growth in cochlear implant listeners. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2000;107:1637-44. [PMID: 10738817 DOI: 10.1121/1.428448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
28
Bruce IC, White MW, Irlicht LS, O'Leary SJ, Clark GM. The effects of stochastic neural activity in a model predicting intensity perception with cochlear implants: low-rate stimulation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1999;46:1393-404. [PMID: 10612897 DOI: 10.1109/10.804567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
29
Miller AL, Smith DW, Pfingst BE. Across-species comparisons of psychophysical detection thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea: II. Strength-duration functions for single, biphasic pulses. Hear Res 1999;135:47-55. [PMID: 10491953 DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(99)00089-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
30
Miller AL, Smith DW, Pfingst BE. Across-species comparisons of psychophysical detection thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea: I. Sinusoidal stimuli. Hear Res 1999;134:89-104. [PMID: 10452379 DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(99)00072-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
31
Zeng FG, Galvin JJ, Zhang C. Encoding loudness by electric stimulation of the auditory nerve. Neuroreport 1998;9:1845-8. [PMID: 9665613 DOI: 10.1097/00001756-199806010-00033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
32
Miller CA, Abbas PJ, Rubinstein JT, Robinson BK, Matsuoka AJ, Woodworth G. Electrically evoked compound action potentials of guinea pig and cat: responses to monopolar, monophasic stimulation. Hear Res 1998;119:142-54. [PMID: 9641327 DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(98)00046-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
PrevPage 1 of 1 1Next
© 2004-2024 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA