Otoacoustic emissions, hair cells, and myosin motors

Criticality and chaos in auditory and vestibular sensing

The auditory and vestibular systems exhibit remarkable sensitivity of detection, responding to deflections on the order of angstroms, even in the presence of biological noise. The auditory system exhibits high temporal acuity and frequency selectivity, allowing us to make sense of the acoustic world around us. As the acoustic signals of interest span many orders of magnitude in both amplitude and frequency, this system relies heavily on nonlinearities and power-law scaling. The vestibular system, which detects ground-borne vibrations and creates the sense of balance, exhibits highly sensitive, broadband detection. It likewise requires high temporal acuity so as to allow us to maintain balance while in motion. The behavior of these sensory systems has been extensively studied in the context of dynamical systems theory, with many empirical phenomena described by critical dynamics. Other phenomena have been explained by systems in the chaotic regime, where weak perturbations drastically impact the future state of the system. Using a Hopf oscillator as a simple numerical model for a sensory element in these systems, we explore the intersection of the two types of dynamical phenomena. We identify the relative tradeoffs between different detection metrics, and propose that, for both types of sensory systems, the instabilities giving rise to chaotic dynamics improve signal detection.

Otoacoustic Emissions in Non-Mammals

Otoacoustic emissions (OAE) that were sound-induced, current-induced, or spontaneous have been measured in non-mammalian land vertebrates, including in amphibians, reptiles, and birds. There are no forms of emissions known from mammals that have not also been observed in non-mammals. In each group and species, the emission frequencies clearly lie in the range known to be processed by the hair cells of the respective hearing organs. With some notable exceptions, the patterns underlying the measured spectra, input-output functions, suppression threshold curves, etc., show strong similarities to OAE measured in mammals. These profound similarities are presumably traceable to the fact that emissions are produced by active hair-cell mechanisms that are themselves dependent upon comparable nonlinear cellular processes. The differences observed—for example, in the width of spontaneous emission peaks and delay times in interactions between peaks—should provide insights into how hair-cell activity is coupled within the organ and thus partially routed out into the middle ear.

Evidence supporting synchrony between two active ears due to interaural coupling

Motivated by recent developments suggesting that interaural coupling in non-mammals allows for the two active ears to effectively synchronize, this report describes otoacoustic measurements made in the oral cavity of lizards. As expected from that model, spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs) were readily measurable in the mouth, which is contiguous with the interaural airspace. Additionally, finite element model calculations were made to simulate the interaural acoustics based upon SOAE-related tympanic membrane vibrational data. Taken together, these data support the notion of two active ears synchronizing by virtue of acoustic coupling and have potential implications for sound localization at low-levels.

Modeling the characteristics of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in lizards

Lizard auditory papillae have proven to be an attractive object for modelling the production of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAE). Here we use an established model (Vilfan and Duke, 2008) and extend it by exploring the effect of varying the number of oscillating elements, the strength of the parameters that describe the coupling between oscillators, the strength of the oscillators, and additive noise. The most remarkable result is that the actual number of oscillating elements hardly influences the spectral pattern, explaining why spectra from very different papillar dimensions are similar. Furthermore, the spacing between spectral peaks primarily depends on the reactive coupling between the oscillator elements. This is consistent with observed differences between lizard species with respect to tectorial covering of hair cells and SOAE peak spacings. Thus, the model provides a basic understanding of the variation in SOAE properties across lizard species.

A Bundle of Mechanisms: Inner-Ear Hair-Cell Mechanotransduction

In the inner ear, the deflection of hair bundles, the sensory organelles of hair cells, activates mechanically-gated channels (MGCs). Hair bundles monitor orientation of the head, its angular and linear acceleration, and detect sound. Force applied to MGCs is shaped by intrinsic hair-bundle properties, by the mechanical load on the bundle, and by the filter imparted by the environment of the hair bundle. Channel gating and adaptation, the ability of the bundle to reset its operating point, contribute to hair-bundle mechanics. Recent data from mammalian hair cells challenge longstanding hypotheses regarding adaptation mechanisms and hair-bundle coherence. Variations between hair bundles from different organs in hair-bundle mechanics, mechanical load, channel gating, and adaptation may allow a hair bundle to selectively respond to specific sensory stimuli.

Frequency locking in auditory hair cells: Distinguishing between additive and parametric forcing

- The auditory system displays remarkable sensitivity and frequency discrimination, attributes shown to rely on an amplification process that involves a mechanical as well as a biochemical response. Models that display proximity to an oscillatory onset (also known as Hopf bifurcation) exhibit a resonant response to distinct frequencies of incoming sound, and can explain many features of the amplification phenomenology. To understand the dynamics of this resonance, frequency locking is examined in a system near the Hopf bifurcation and subject to two types of driving forces: additive and parametric. Derivation of a universal amplitude equation that contains both forcing terms enables a study of their relative impact on the hair cell response. In the parametric case, although the resonant solutions are 1 : 1 frequency locked, they show the coexistence of solutions obeying a phase shift of π, a feature typical of the 2 : 1 resonance. Different characteristics are predicted for the transition from unlocked to locked solutions, leading to smooth or abrupt dynamics in response to different types of forcing. The theoretical framework provides a more realistic model of the auditory system, which incorporates a direct modulation of the internal control parameter by an applied drive. The results presented here can be generalized to many other media, including Faraday waves, chemical reactions, and elastically driven cardiomyocytes, which are known to exhibit resonant behavior.

Salient features of otoacoustic emissions are common across tetrapod groups and suggest shared properties of generation mechanisms

Otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) are faint sounds generated by healthy inner ears that provide a window into the study of auditory mechanics. All vertebrate classes exhibit OAEs to varying degrees, yet the biophysical origins are still not well understood. Here, we analyzed both spontaneous (SOAE) and stimulus-frequency (SFOAE) otoacoustic emissions from a bird (barn owl, Tyto alba) and a lizard (green anole, Anolis carolinensis). These species possess highly disparate macromorphologies of the inner ear relative to each other and to mammals, thereby allowing for novel insights into the biomechanical mechanisms underlying OAE generation. All ears exhibited robust OAE activity, and our chief observation was that SFOAE phase accumulation between adjacent SOAE peak frequencies clustered about an integral number of cycles. Being highly similar to published results from human ears, we argue that these data indicate a common underlying generator mechanism of OAEs across all vertebrates, despite the absence of morphological features thought essential to mammalian cochlear mechanics. We suggest that otoacoustic emissions originate from phase coherence in a system of coupled oscillators, which is consistent with the notion of "coherent reflection" but does not explicitly require a mammalian-type traveling wave. Furthermore, comparison between SFOAE delays and auditory nerve fiber responses for the barn owl strengthens the notion that most OAE delay can be attributed to tuning.

Effect of bidirectional mechanoelectrical coupling on spontaneous oscillations and sensitivity in a model of hair cells

Sensory hair cells of amphibians exhibit spontaneous activity in their hair bundles and membrane potentials, reflecting two distinct active amplification mechanisms employed in these peripheral mechanosensors. We use a two-compartment model of the bullfrog's saccular hair cell to study how the interaction between its mechanical and electrical compartments affects the emergence of distinct dynamical regimes, and the role of this interaction in shaping the response of the hair cell to weak mechanical stimuli. The model employs a Hodgkin-Huxley-type system for the basolateral electrical compartment and a nonlinear hair bundle oscillator for the mechanical compartment, which are coupled bidirectionally. In the model, forward coupling is provided by the mechanoelectrical transduction current, flowing from the hair bundle to the cell soma. Backward coupling is due to reverse electromechanical transduction, whereby variations of the membrane potential affect adaptation processes in the hair bundle. We isolate oscillation regions in the parameter space of the model and show that bidirectional coupling affects significantly the dynamics of the cell. In particular, self-sustained oscillations of the hair bundles and membrane potential can result from bidirectional coupling, and the coherence of spontaneous oscillations can be maximized by tuning the coupling strength. Consistent with previous experimental work, the model demonstrates that dynamical regimes of the hair bundle change in response to variations in the conductances of basolateral ion channels. We show that sensitivity of the hair cell to weak mechanical stimuli can be maximized by varying coupling strength, and that stochasticity of the hair bundle compartment is a limiting factor of the sensitivity.

Integrating the active process of hair cells with cochlear function

Uniquely among human senses, hearing is not simply a passive response to stimulation. Our auditory system is instead enhanced by an active process in cochlear hair cells that amplifies acoustic signals several hundred-fold, sharpens frequency selectivity and broadens the ear's dynamic range. Active motility of the mechanoreceptive hair bundles underlies the active process in amphibians and some reptiles; in mammals, this mechanism operates in conjunction with prestin-based somatic motility. Both individual hair bundles and the cochlea as a whole operate near a dynamical instability, the Hopf bifurcation, which accounts for the cardinal features of the active process.

The physics of hearing: fluid mechanics and the active process of the inner ear

Most sounds of interest consist of complex, time-dependent admixtures of tones of diverse frequencies and variable amplitudes. To detect and process these signals, the ear employs a highly nonlinear, adaptive, real-time spectral analyzer: the cochlea. Sound excites vibration of the eardrum and the three miniscule bones of the middle ear, the last of which acts as a piston to initiate oscillatory pressure changes within the liquid-filled chambers of the cochlea. The basilar membrane, an elastic band spiraling along the cochlea between two of these chambers, responds to these pressures by conducting a largely independent traveling wave for each frequency component of the input. Because the basilar membrane is graded in mass and stiffness along its length, however, each traveling wave grows in magnitude and decreases in wavelength until it peaks at a specific, frequency-dependent position: low frequencies propagate to the cochlear apex, whereas high frequencies culminate at the base. The oscillations of the basilar membrane deflect hair bundles, the mechanically sensitive organelles of the ear's sensory receptors, the hair cells. As mechanically sensitive ion channels open and close, each hair cell responds with an electrical signal that is chemically transmitted to an afferent nerve fiber and thence into the brain. In addition to transducing mechanical inputs, hair cells amplify them by two means. Channel gating endows a hair bundle with negative stiffness, an instability that interacts with the motor protein myosin-1c to produce a mechanical amplifier and oscillator. Acting through the piezoelectric membrane protein prestin, electrical responses also cause outer hair cells to elongate and shorten, thus pumping energy into the basilar membrane's movements. The two forms of motility constitute an active process that amplifies mechanical inputs, sharpens frequency discrimination, and confers a compressive nonlinearity on responsiveness. These features arise because the active process operates near a Hopf bifurcation, the generic properties of which explain several key features of hearing. Moreover, when the gain of the active process rises sufficiently in ultraquiet circumstances, the system traverses the bifurcation and even a normal ear actually emits sound. The remarkable properties of hearing thus stem from the propagation of traveling waves on a nonlinear and excitable medium.

The effects of air pressure on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions of lizards

Small changes of air pressure outside the eardrum of five lizard species led to changes in frequency, level, and peak width of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAE). In contrast to humans, these changes generally occurred at very small pressures (<20 mbar). As in humans, SOAE amplitudes were generally reduced. Changes of SOAE frequency were both positive and negative, while in humans, they are mostly positive. In addition, in lizards, these effects often showed obvious hysteresis and non-repeatability. The correlation between peak width and height was negative in two species (comparable to humans) and positive in one species. In two other species, no correlation was found. Consequently, a simple oscillator model that explained the negative correlation in humans could not be generally applied to lizards. This presumably reflects the fact that in lizards, the spontaneous otoacoustic emission of sound from the ear consists of a combination of stable oscillations (as in humans), unstable narrow-band oscillations, and broad-band emissions, evident as "plateaus" in emission spectra.

Experiments in comparative hearing: Georg von Békésy and beyond

Georg von Békésy was one of the first comparative auditory researchers. He not only studied basilar membrane (BM) movements in a range of mammals of widely different sizes, he also worked on the chicken basilar papilla and the frog middle ear. We show that, in mammals, at least, his data do not differ from those that could be collected using modern techniques but with the same, very loud sounds. There is in all cases a major difference to frequency maps collected using low-level sounds. In contrast, the same cannot be said of his chicken data, perhaps due to the different roles played by the BM in mammals and birds. In lizards, the BM is not tuned and it is perhaps good that Békésy did not begin with those species and get discouraged in his seminal comparative work.

Comparison of otoacoustic emissions within gecko subfamilies: morphological implications for auditory function in lizards

Otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) are sounds emitted by the ear and provide a non-invasive probe into mechanisms underlying peripheral auditory transduction. This study focuses upon a comparison of emission properties in two phylogenetically similar pairs of gecko: Gekko gecko and Hemidactylus turcicus and Eublepharis macularius and Coleonyx variegatus. Each pair consists of two closely related species within the same subfamily, with quantitatively known morphological properties at the level of the auditory sensory organ (basilar papilla) in the inner ear. Essentially, the comparison boils down to an issue of size: how does overall body size, as well as the inner-ear dimensions (e.g., papilla length and number of hair cells), affect peripheral auditory function as inferred from OAEs? Estimates of frequency selectivity derived from stimulus-frequency emissions (emissions evoked by a single low-level tone) indicate that tuning is broader in the species with fewer hair cells/shorter papilla. Furthermore, emissions extend outwards to higher frequencies (for similar body temperatures) in the species with the smaller body size/narrower interaural spacing. This observation suggests the smaller species have relatively improved high-frequency sensitivity, possibly related to vocalizations and/or aiding azimuthal sound localization. For one species (Eublepharis), emissions were also examined in both juveniles and adults. Qualitatively similar emission properties in both suggests that inner-ear function is adult like soon after hatching and that external body size (e.g., middle-ear dimensions and interaural spacing) has a relatively small impact upon emission properties within a species.

Tectorial membrane morphological variation: effects upon stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions

The tectorial membrane (TM) is widely believed to play an important role in determining the ear's ability to detect and resolve incoming acoustic information. While it is still unclear precisely what that role is, the TM has been hypothesized to help overcome viscous forces and thereby sharpen mechanical tuning of the sensory cells. Lizards present a unique opportunity to further study the role of the TM given the diverse inner-ear morphological differences across species. Furthermore, stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs), sounds emitted by the ear in response to a tone, noninvasively probe the frequency selectivity of the ear. We report estimates of auditory tuning derived from SFOAEs for 12 different species of lizards with widely varying TM morphology. Despite gross anatomical differences across the species examined herein, low-level SFOAEs were readily measurable in all ears tested, even in non-TM species whose basilar papilla contained as few as 50-60 hair cells. Our measurements generally support theoretical predictions: longer delays/sharper tuning features are found in species with a TM relative to those without. However, SFOAEs from at least one non-TM species (Anolis) with long delays suggest there are likely additional micromechanical factors at play that can directly affect tuning. Additionally, in the one species examined with a continuous TM (Aspidoscelis) where cell-to-cell coupling is presumably relatively stronger, delays were intermediate. This observation appears consistent with recent reports that suggest the TM may play a more complex macromechanical role in the mammalian cochlea via longitudinal energy distribution (and thereby affect tuning). Although significant differences exist between reptilian and mammalian auditory biophysics, understanding lizard OAE generation mechanisms yields significant insight into fundamental principles at work in all vertebrate ears.

The auditory brainstem response in two lizard species

Although lizards have highly sensitive ears, it is difficult to condition them to sound, making standard psychophysical assays of hearing sensitivity impractical. This paper describes non-invasive measurements of the auditory brainstem response (ABR) in both Tokay geckos (Gekko gecko; nocturnal animals, known for their loud vocalizations) and the green anole (Anolis carolinensis, diurnal, non-vocal animals). Hearing sensitivity was measured in 5 geckos and 7 anoles. The lizards were sedated with isoflurane, and ABRs were measured at levels of 1 and 3% isoflurane. The typical ABR waveform in response to click stimulation showed one prominent and several smaller peaks occurring within 10 ms of the stimulus onset. ABRs to brief tone bursts revealed that geckos and anoles were most sensitive between 1.6-2 kHz and had similar hearing sensitivity up to about 5 kHz (thresholds typically 20-50 dB SPL). Above 5 kHz, however, anoles were more than 20 dB more sensitive than geckos and showed a wider range of sensitivity (1-7 kHz). Generally, thresholds from ABR audiograms were comparable to those of small birds. Best hearing sensitivity, however, extended over a larger frequency range in lizards than in most bird species.

Interactions between hair cells shape spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in a model of the tokay gecko's cochlea

BACKGROUND

The hearing of tetrapods including humans is enhanced by an active process that amplifies the mechanical inputs associated with sound, sharpens frequency selectivity, and compresses the range of responsiveness. The most striking manifestation of the active process is spontaneous otoacoustic emission, the unprovoked emergence of sound from an ear. Hair cells, the sensory receptors of the inner ear, are known to provide the energy for such emissions; it is unclear, though, how ensembles of such cells collude to power observable emissions.

METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

We have measured and modeled spontaneous otoacoustic emissions from the ear of the tokay gecko, a convenient experimental subject that produces robust emissions. Using a van der Pol formulation to represent each cluster of hair cells within a tonotopic array, we have examined the factors that influence the cooperative interaction between oscillators.

CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE

A model that includes viscous interactions between adjacent hair cells fails to produce emissions similar to those observed experimentally. In contrast, elastic coupling yields realistic results, especially if the oscillators near the ends of the array are weakened so as to minimize boundary effects. Introducing stochastic irregularity in the strength of oscillators stabilizes peaks in the spectrum of modeled emissions, further increasing the similarity to the responses of actual ears. Finally, and again in agreement with experimental findings, the inclusion of a pure-tone external stimulus repels the spectral peaks of spontaneous emissions. Our results suggest that elastic coupling between oscillators of slightly differing strength explains several properties of the spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in the gecko.

A critique of the critical cochlea: Hopf--a bifurcation--is better than none

The sense of hearing achieves its striking sensitivity, frequency selectivity, and dynamic range through an active process mediated by the inner ear's mechanoreceptive hair cells. Although the active process renders hearing highly nonlinear and produces a wealth of complex behaviors, these various characteristics may be understood as consequences of a simple phenomenon: the Hopf bifurcation. Any critical oscillator operating near this dynamic instability manifests the properties demonstrated for hearing: amplification with a specific form of compressive nonlinearity and frequency tuning whose sharpness depends on the degree of amplification. Critical oscillation also explains spontaneous otoacoustic emissions as well as the spectrum and level dependence of the ear's distortion products. Although this has not been realized, several valuable theories of cochlear function have achieved their success by incorporating critical oscillators.

Lizard auditory papillae: an evolutionary kaleidoscope

The evolutionary processes that modified the structure and function of lizard auditory papillae during the separation of the familial lineages during the Jurassic have resulted in a remarkable variety of family-typical papillae. These papillae vary structurally in their size, in the patterns of the distribution of hair-cell types, in the presence or absence of sub-papillae and in the configurations of the tectorial membranes. Functional differences, however, are much smaller than the structural variations might lead one to expect. To some extent, differences in innervation patterns and tectorial configurations compensate for 10-fold differences in papillar length. Nonetheless, although lizards with tiny papillae are able to maintain frequency-selective and relatively sensitive hearing, the best selectivity and most sensitive hearing is found in the largest and most complex papillae. Fundamental considerations of the tonotopic organisation of papillae leads to a likely scheme mapping the evolution of the hearing organs found in modern lizard families.

Somatic motility and hair bundle mechanics, are both necessary for cochlear amplification?

Hearing organs have evolved to detect sounds across several orders of magnitude of both intensity and frequency. Detection limits are at the atomic level despite the energy associated with sound being limited thermodynamically. Several mechanisms have evolved to account for the remarkable frequency selectivity, dynamic range, and sensitivity of these various hearing organs, together termed the active process or cochlear amplifier. Similarities between hearing organs of disparate species provides insight into the factors driving the development of the cochlear amplifier. These properties include: a tonotopic map, the emergence of a two hair cell system, the separation of efferent and afferent innervations, the role of the tectorial membrane, and the shift from intrinsic tuning and amplification to a more end organ driven process. Two major contributors to the active process are hair bundle mechanics and outer hair cell electromotility, the former present in all hair cell organs tested, the latter only present in mammalian cochlear outer hair cells. Both of these processes have advantages and disadvantages, and how these processes interact to generate the active process in the mammalian system is highly disputed. A hypothesis is put forth suggesting that hair bundle mechanics provides amplification and filtering in most hair cells, while in mammalian cochlea, outer hair cell motility provides the amplification on a cycle by cycle basis driven by the hair bundle that provides frequency selectivity (in concert with the tectorial membrane) and compressive nonlinearity. Separating components of the active process may provide additional sites for regulation of this process.

Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in lizards: a comparison of the skink-like lizard families Cordylidae and Gerrhosauridae

Lizard families can be grouped into larger units comprising those families that are closely related and whose auditory papillae are morphologically very similar. Based on the few species studied at that time [Manley, G.A., 1997. Diversity in hearing-organ structure and the characteristics of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in lizards. In: Lewis, E.R., Long, G.R., Lyon, R.F., Narins, P.M., Steele, C.R. (Eds.), Diversity in Auditory Mechanics. World Scientific Publishing Co., Singapore, pp. 32-38], it was suggested that SOAE spectral patterns are strongly influenced by papillar anatomy. However, in two family groups, only one single species has been studied and we have no data on the regularity of pattern within related lizard families. Within the group of skink-like lizards, whose papillae all have salletal tectorial structures, the only detailed SOAE studies so far were on the skink genus Tiliqua. To ascertain the similarity of SOAE in species from families related to the skinks, we have studied one species each from two families that are closely related to skinks, the Cordylidae (Girdle-tailed lizards) and the Gerrhosauridae (plated lizards). Gerrhosaurus and Cordylus have a similar number and amplitudes of SOAE to Tiliqua (Skinkidae). The maximal frequency shifts of SOAE under the influence of external tones is also similar to that of Tiliqua. However, the maximal suppression and maximal facilitation are smaller. In general, the patterns displayed by the SOAE of lizards of these two new families are recognizably similar to the skink Tiliqua, suggesting that the anatomy of the papilla and the tectorial structures do play an important role in determining how SOAE are manifested in papillae that possess tectorial sallets.

Acoustical coupling of lizard eardrums

Lizard ears are clear examples of two-input pressure-difference receivers, with up to 40-dB differences in eardrum vibration amplitude in response to ipsi- and contralateral stimulus directions. The directionality is created by acoustical coupling of the eardrums and interaction of the direct and indirect sound components on the eardrum. The ensuing pressure-difference characteristics generate the highest directionality of any similar-sized terrestrial vertebrate ear. The aim of the present study was to measure the gain of the direct and indirect sound components in three lizard species: Anolis sagrei and Basiliscus vittatus (iguanids) and Hemidactylus frenatus (gekkonid) by laser vibrometry, using either free-field sound or a headphone and coupler for stimulation. The directivity of the ear of these lizards is pronounced in the frequency range from 2 to 5 kHz. The directivity is ovoidal, asymmetrical across the midline, but largely symmetrical across the interaural axis (i.e., front-back). Occlusion of the contralateral ear abolishes the directionality. We stimulated the two eardrums with a coupler close to the eardrum to measure the gain of the sound pathways. Within the frequency range of maximal directionality, the interaural transmission gain (compared to sound arriving directly) is close to or even exceeds unity, indicating a pronounced acoustical transparency of the lizard head and resonances in the interaural cavities. Our results show that the directionality of the lizard ear is caused by the acoustic interaction of the two eardrums. The results can be largely explained by a simple acoustical model based on an electrical analog circuit.

Multifrequency forcing of a Hopf oscillator model of the inner ear

In response to a sound stimulus, the inner ear emits sounds called otoacoustic emissions. While the exact mechanism for the production of otoacoustic emissions is not known, active motion of individual hair cells is thought to play a role. Two possible sources for otoacoustic emissions, both localized within individual hair cells, include somatic motility and hair bundle motility. Because physiological models of each of these systems are thought to be poised near a Hopf bifurcation, the dynamics of each can be described by the normal form for a system near a Hopf bifurcation. Here we demonstrate that experimental results from three-frequency suppression experiments can be predicted based on the response of an array of noninteracting Hopf oscillators tuned at different frequencies. This supports the idea that active motion of individual hair cells contributes to active processing of sounds in the ear. Interestingly, the model suggests an explanation for differing results recorded in mammals and nonmammals.

What have lizard ears taught us about auditory physiology?

The structure of the basilar papilla of the inner ear of lizards is the most diverse among all vertebrates. Research on a variety of lizard ears, animals that are remarkably robust under laboratory conditions, has provided the field of auditory research with valuable information, particularly on the minimum structural requirements for sensitive, selective hearing and on the importance of the tectorial membrane and active processes in this regard. Despite the absence of a tuned basilar membrane, lizard ears produce highly frequency selective hearing through micromechanical tuning of small, resonant hair-cell-tectorial units or of free-standing hair bundles. These units are driven by an active process that also underlies spontaneous and other otoacoustic emissions. Lizard ears provided the first in vivo evidence that the active process is calcium-sensitive and lies within the stereovillar bundles of the hair cells.

Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions from free-standing stereovillar bundles of ten species of lizard with small papillae

Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAE) were measured in 10 lizard species from the families Iguanidae, Agamidae and Anguidae. The typical feature of these papillae is that the hair cells in the higher-frequency papillar regions that produce SOAE are not covered by a tectorial structure. The number of hair cells in the species used here was between 58 and 292 per ear. SOAE could be measured from all species, but some of their characteristics varied with papillar anatomy. Thus very small papillae produced fewer and smaller SOAE than larger papillae.

Synaptic ultrastructure of Drosophila Johnston's organ axon terminals as revealed by an enhancer trap

The role of auditory circuitry is to decipher relevant information from acoustic signals. Acoustic parameters used by different insect species vary widely. All these auditory systems, however, share a common transducer: tympanal organs as well as the Drosophila flagellar ears use chordotonal organs as the auditory mechanoreceptors. We here describe the central neural projections of the Drosophila Johnston's organ (JO). These neurons, which represent the antennal auditory organ, terminate in the antennomechanosensory center. To ensure correct identification of these terminals we made use of a beta-galactosidase-expressing transgene that labels JO neurons specifically. Analysis of these projection pathways shows that parallel JO fibers display extensive contacts, including putative gap junctions. We find that the synaptic boutons show both chemical synaptic structures as well as putative gap junctions, indicating mixed synapses, and belong largely to the divergent type, with multiple small postsynaptic processes. The ultrastructure of JO fibers and synapses may indicate an ability to process temporally discretized acoustic information.

Predicting severity of cochlear hair cell damage in adult chickens using DPOAE input-output functions

Distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) were recorded from the ear canal of aged broiler chickens which have been shown to present with age-related cochlear degeneration [Hear. Res. 166 (2002) 82]. We describe the relationship between the shape of the DPOAE input-output (I/O) function and the type of hair cell damage present at and between the cochlear frequency places of the DPOAE primary tones (f1 and f2). The mid stimulus level compressive growth of the mean DPOAE I/O functions is reduced in a graded fashion relative to the severity of hair cell damage. However, individual DPOAE I/O functions within most hair cell damage groups show large variability from this characteristic. Various least squares regression models were used to predict hair cell density from indices derived from the DPOAE I/O function (area, threshold and slope). The results showed that no simple linear relationship exists between hair cell density and the DPOAE I/O function indices. Multivariate binary logistic regression used DPOAE I/O function indices to predict membership in hair cell damage groups. The logistic model revealed that DPOAE threshold can be used to predict the occurrence of severe/total hair cell damage with good specificity though poor sensitivity.

Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in monitor lizards

Monitors (all of which belong to the genus Varanus) make up a very uniform family of often large lizards. They have a large auditory papilla that is not highly specialized, but is divided into two unequal sub-papillae. All hair cells are covered by a tectorial membrane. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAE) were examined in Cape monitor lizards (Varanus exanthematicus) and found between 1.08 and 2.91 kHz (at 32 degrees C) and with levels between -2.8 and 25.8 dB SPL. The frequency of SOAE was temperature dependent, with a maximal shift of 0.07 octaves/degrees C. All SOAE could be suppressed by external tones, most easily by tones near the center frequency and thus suppression tuning curves were V-shaped. In addition, SOAE could be facilitated by external tones, the amplitude increasing up to 10 dB. The most effective tones were generally those between 0.33 and 0.75 octaves above the respective center frequency of the SOAE. External tones could also change the center frequency of SOAE by up to several hundred Hz, most tones causing frequency 'pushing'. Compared to SOAE of other lizards, Varanus SOAE have larger amplitudes and show larger frequency shifts with temperature. Both of these features may be the result of the coupling of large numbers of hair cells via the continuous tectorial membrane.

The effect of hair bundle shape on hair bundle hydrodynamics of non-mammalian inner ear hair cells for the full frequency range

The effect of the size and the shape of the hair bundle of a hair cell in the inner ear of non-mammals on its motion for the full range of frequencies is determined thereby extending the results of a previous analysis of hair bundle motion for high and low frequencies [Hear Res. 141 (2000) 39-50]. A hemispheroid is used to represent the hair bundle because it can represent a full range of shapes, from thin, pencil-like shapes to wide, flat, disk-like shapes. Boundary element methods are used to approximate the solution for the hydrodynamics. For physiologically relevant parameters, an excellent match is obtained between the model's predictions and measurements of hair bundle motion in the free-standing region of the basilar papilla of the alligator lizard [Aranyosi, Measuring sound-induced motions of the alligator lizard cochlea. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, PhD Thesis, 2002]. Neither in the model's predictions nor in experimental measurements is sharp tuning observed. The model predicted the low frequency region of neural tuning curves for the alligator lizard and bobtail lizard, but could not predict the sharp tuning or the high frequency region. An element that represents an active mechanism is added to the hair bundle model to predict neural tuning curves, which are sharply tuned, and an excellent match is obtained for all the characteristics of neural tuning curves for the alligator lizard, and for the low and high frequency regions for the bobtail lizard. The model does not predict well the sharp tuning of the shorter hair bundles of the bobtail lizard, possibly because it does not represent tectorial sallets.

Evolution of structure and function of the hearing organ of lizards

Following their origin during the early Cretaceous, the lizards radiated early into a number of families. This radiation was accompanied by a diversification in the structure of the inner ear. The morphology of the auditory basilar papilla is family-specific, with large variations in a number of parameters. At the physiologic level, this wide variation does not result in an equivalent range of physiologic parameters. This review considers the possible influence of various morphologic features on function, and correlates these features with physiologic response parameters. Anatomical variety that does not result in significant changes in the inputs to the brain is "neutral" with regard to selection pressures. This independence apparently removed evolutionary constraints and led to some of the great variety of auditory papillae seen. Other anatomical features are more important and do produce significant effects at the level of the auditory nerve.

What drives mechanical amplification in the mammalian cochlea?

The recent report by Peter Dallos and colleagues of the gene and protein responsible for outer hair cell somatic motility (Zheng, Shen, He, Long, Madison, & Dallos, 2000), and the work of James Hudspeth and colleagues demonstrating that vestibular stereocilia are capable of providing power that may boost the vibration of structures within the inner ear (Martin & Hudspeth, 1999), presents the tantalizing possibility that we may not be far away from answering the question what drives mechanical amplification in the mammalian cochlea? This article reviews the evidence for and against each of somatic motility as the motor, and a motor in the hair cell bundle, producing cochlear mechanical amplification. We consider three models based on somatic motility as the motor and two based on a motor in the hair cell bundle. Available evidence supports a hair cell bundle motor in nonmammals but the upper frequency limit of mammalian hearing in general exceeds that of nonmammals, in many cases by an order of magnitude or more. Only time will tell whether an evolutionary dichotomy exists (Manley, Kirk, Köppl, & Yates, 2001).

Electrically evoked otoacoustic emissions from the chicken ear

The outer hair cell electromotile response is believed to underlie the sharp tuning and exquisite sensitivity of the mammalian inner ear, and contribute to the production of electrically evoked otoacoustic emissions (EEOAEs) and sound-evoked otoacoustic emissions (OAEs). Avian ears are also sharply tuned, extremely sensitive and generate spontaneous and sound-evoked OAEs, but avian hair cells do not exhibit somatic electromotility. However, stereocilia bundle movements have been observed in avian and amphibian hair cells suggesting that EEOAEs might arise from electrically evoked bundle movements. Here, we demonstrate for the first time that AC current applied to the round window of the chicken evokes EEOAE of up to 18 dB SPL. The EEOAE produces a bandpass response with maximum amplitude in the 1000-3000 Hz range; the response drops off rapidly above 4000 Hz and below 500 Hz. The impulse response to current pulses is characterized by a large peak sometimes followed by a damped oscillation with a frequency around 2000 Hz. EEOAEs decreased significantly after anoxia and paraformaldehyde damage of the cochlea. Kanamycin-induced hair cell loss also caused a significant reduction in EEOAE and distortion product OAE; these emissions showed only a small recovery at long recovery times, when most hair cells should have regenerated. These results suggest that the EEOAE has a biological origin in the cochlea, which could presumably involve electrically evoked stereocilia bundle movements.

Effects of 4-aminopyridine on electrically evoked cochlear emissions and mechano-transduction in guinea pig outer hair cells

Stimulation of the cochlea with alternating current produces sound in the ear canal. These electrically evoked oto-acoustic emissions (EEOAEs) are attributed to electro-motility of outer hair cells (OHCs). Earlier work suggested EEOAEs were sensitive to the open probability of OHC mechano-electrical transduction (MET) channels. They were attenuated by 4-aminopyridine (4-AP) and amplitude-modulated by low frequency sound, consistent with current gaining access to a motility source via the MET conductance. However, inconsistencies in the behaviour as well as physical considerations argued against this simple interpretation. In this study the behaviour of EEOAEs in the presence of 4-AP in scala media was examined along with OHC transfer functions derived from low frequency cochlear microphonic (CM) waveforms. Both the level and the modulation of the EEOAEs were reduced by 4-AP, but disproportionately more so than the 4-AP-induced loss of CM. In addition, the modulation as well as the level of the EEOAEs recovered more rapidly than the CM. Both these results indicated that 4-AP modified the process of EEOAE generation independently of its effect on the gross receptor current through the MET conductance. Changes in the derived OHC transfer functions, specifically shifts in the estimated operating bias of the MET channels, indicated the effects of 4-AP applied to the endolymphatic surface of OHCs were complex. It is suggested that both direct and indirect consequences of a 4-AP blockade may have contributed. 4-AP was ineffective when applied to scala tympani.

Effect of inner and outer hair cell lesions on electrically evoked otoacoustic emissions

When the cochlea is stimulated by a sinusoidal current, the inner ear emits an acoustic signal at the stimulus frequency, termed the electrically evoked otoacoustic emission (EEOAE). Recent studies have found EEOAEs in birds lacking outer hair cells (OHCs), raising the possibility that other types of hair cells, including inner hair cells (IHCs), may generate EEOAEs. To determine the relative contribution of IHCs and OHCs to the generation of the EEOAE, we measured the amplitude of EEOAEs, distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs), the cochlear microphonic (CM) and the compound action potential (CAP) in normal chinchillas and chinchillas with IHC lesions or IHC plus OHC lesions induced by carboplatin. Selective IHC loss had little or no effect on CM amplitude and caused a slight reduction in mean DPOAE amplitude. However, IHC loss resulted in a massive reduction in CAP amplitude. Importantly, selective IHC lesions did not reduce EEOAE amplitude, but instead, EEOAE amplitude increased at high frequencies. When both IHCs and OHCs were destroyed, the amplitude of the CM, DPOAE and EEOAE all decreased. The increase in EEOAE amplitude seen with IHC loss may be due to (1) loss of tonic efferent activity to the OHCs, (2) change in the mechanical properties of the cochlea or (3) elimination of EEOAEs produced by IHCs in phase opposition to those from OHCs.

Evidence for an active process and a cochlear amplifier in nonmammals

The last two decades have produced a great deal of evidence that in the mammalian organ of Corti outer hair cells undergo active shape changes that are part of a "cochlear amplifier" mechanism that increases sensitivity and frequency selectivity of the hearing epithelium. However, many signs of active processes have also been found in nonmammals, raising the question as to the ancestry and commonality of these mechanisms. Active movements would be advantageous in all kinds of sensory hair cells because they help signal detection at levels near those of thermal noise and also help to overcome fluid viscosity. Such active mechanisms therefore presumably arose in the earliest kinds of hair cells that were part of the lateral line system of fish. These cells were embedded in a firm epithelium and responded to relative motion between the hair bundle and the hair cell, making it highly likely that the first active motor mechanism was localized in the hair-cell bundle. In terrestrial nonmammals, there are many auditory phenomena that are best explained by the presence of a cochlear amplifier, indicating that in this respect the mammalian ear is not unique. The latest evidence supports siting the active process in nonmammals in the hair-cell bundle and in intimate association with the transduction process.

Theoretical considerations of plant gravisensing

The mechanisms proposed to explain gravity sensing can be divided into two groups, "statolith" and "non-statolith" mechanisms. The traditional estimates of the plausibility of these mechanisms are based on the analysis of the signal-to-noise ratio. The existing data indicate that the problem of plant gravisensing may be related to the general problem of the detection of weak signals in mechanoreceptors. This paper reviews the known mechanisms of plant gravisensing as well as the latest nonlinear stochastic models of mechanoreception in which noise promotes detection and amplification of weak signals. These models based on nonlinear stochastic phenomena may be used to explain plant gravisensing, if the cell is considered a dynamic, spatially distributed system of active intracellular cytoskeletal networks and mechanosensitive proteins.

Adaptation in hair cells

Hair cells adapt to sustained deflections of the hair bundle via Ca(2+)-dependent negative feedback on the open probability of the mechanosensitive transduction channels. A model posits that adaptation relieves the input to the transduction channels--force applied by elastic tip links between stereocilia--by repositioning the insertions of the links in the stereocilium. The tip link insertion and transduction channel are dragged by myosins moving on the stereocilium's actin core. This model accounts for many aspects of adaptation in hair cells of the frog saccule, where adaptation time constants are tens of milliseconds. Adaptation in hair cells of the turtle cochlea is much faster, possibly reflecting a more direct mechanism such as Ca2+ binding to the transduction channel. Adaptation mechanisms attenuate the transduction current at low frequencies and may be tuned to different corner frequencies according to the stimulus demands of the inner ear organ. Other sites of adaptation in the inner ear include accessory structures, voltage-dependent properties of hair cells, and afferent transmitter release. A remaining challenge is to understand how these processes work together to shape the output of the inner ear to natural stimuli.

Auditory sensitivity provided by self-tuned critical oscillations of hair cells

We introduce the concept of self-tuned criticality as a general mechanism for signal detection in sensory systems. In the case of hearing, we argue that active amplification of faint sounds is provided by a dynamical system that is maintained at the threshold of an oscillatory instability. This concept can account for the exquisite sensitivity of the auditory system and its wide dynamic range as well as its capacity to respond selectively to different frequencies. A specific model of sound detection by the hair cells of the inner ear is discussed. We show that a collection of motor proteins within a hair bundle can generate oscillations at a frequency that depends on the elastic properties of the bundle. Simple variation of bundle geometry gives rise to hair cells with characteristic frequencies that span the range of audibility. Tension-gated transduction channels, which primarily serve to detect the motion of a hair bundle, also tune each cell by admitting ions that regulate the motor protein activity. By controlling the bundle's propensity to oscillate, this feedback automatically maintains the system in the operating regime where it is most sensitive to sinusoidal stimuli. The model explains how hair cells can detect sounds that carry less energy than the background noise.

Effects of salicylates and aminoglycosides on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in the Tokay gecko

The high sensitivity and sharp frequency discrimination of hearing depend on mechanical amplification in the cochlea. To explore the basis of this active process, we examined the pharmacological sensitivity of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs) in a lizard, the Tokay gecko. In a quiet environment, each ear produced a complex but stable pattern of emissions. These SOAEs were reversibly modulated by drugs that affect mammalian otoacoustic emissions, the salicylates and the aminoglycoside antibiotics. The effect of a single i.p. injection of sodium salicylate depended on the initial power of the emissions: ears with strong control SOAEs displayed suppression at all frequencies, whereas those with weak control emissions showed enhancement. Repeated oral administration of acetylsalicylic acid reduced all emissions. Single i.p. doses of gentamicin or kanamycin suppressed SOAEs below 2.6 kHz, while modulating those above 2.6 kHz in either of two ways. For ears whose emission power at 2.6-5.2 kHz encompassed more than half of the total, individual emissions displayed facilitation as great as 35-fold. For the remaining ears, emissions dropped to as little as one-sixth of their initial values. The similarity of the responses of reptilian and mammalian cochleas to pharmacological intervention provides further evidence for a common mechanism of cochlear amplification.

Functional recovery in the avian ear after hair cell regeneration

Trauma to the inner ear in birds, due to acoustic overstimulation or ototoxic aminoglycosides, can lead to hair cell loss which is followed by regeneration of new hair cells. These processes are paralleled by hearing loss followed by significant functional recovery. After acoustic trauma, functional recovery is rapid and nearly complete. The early and major part of functional recovery after sound trauma occurs before regenerated hair cells become functional. Even very intense sound trauma causes loss of only a proportion of the hair cell population, mainly so-called short hair cells residing on the abneural mobile part of the avian basilar membrane. Uncoupling of the tectorial membrane from the hair cells during sound overexposure may serve as a protection mechanism. The rapid functional recovery after sound trauma appears not to be associated with regeneration of the lost hair cells, but with repair processes involving the surviving hair cells. Small residual functional deficits after recovery are most likely associated with the missing upper fibrous layer of the tectorial membrane which fails to regenerate after sound trauma. After aminoglycoside trauma, functional recovery is slower and parallels the structural regeneration more closely. Aminoglycosides cause damage to both types of hair cells, starting at the basal (high frequency) part of the basilar papilla. However, functional hearing loss and recovery also occur at lower frequencies, associated with areas of the papilla where hair cells survive. Functional recovery in these low frequency areas is complete, whereas functional recovery in high frequency areas with complete hair cell loss is incomplete, despite regeneration of the hair cells. Permanent residual functional deficits remain. This indicates that in low frequency regions functional recovery after aminoglycosides involves repair of nonlethal injury to hair cells and/or hair cell-neural synapses. In the high frequency regions functional recovery involves regenerated hair cells. The permanent functional deficits after the regeneration process in these areas are most likely associated with functional deficits in the regenerated hair cells or shortcomings in the synaptic reconnections of nerve fibers with the regenerated hair cells. In conclusion, the avian inner ear appears to be much more resistant to trauma than the mammalian ear and possesses a considerable capacity for functional recovery based on repair processes along with its capacity to regenerate hair cells. The functional recovery in areas with regenerated hair cells is considerable but incomplete.

Interactive effects of the middle ear pathology and the associated hearing loss on transient-evoked otoacoustic emission measures

Sixty-three children aged 4 to 17 years were examined by tympanometry, pure-tone audiometry, transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs), and otoscopy to evaluate the effects of middle ear pathologies and the associated hearing loss on TEOAEs. TEOAE measures were highly specific (93.8%) in identifying normal ears that passed both audiometric and tympanometric criteria. The sensitivity for identifying abnormal ears was also reasonable (83. 3%). The effects of the middle ear abnormality were most significant, regardless of the degree of hearing loss, when the tympanogram was type B with normal volume measures, which is associated with reduced eardrum mobility and middle ear fluid. The middle ear conditions producing the greater negative pressure, which in turn led to more conductive hearing loss, also produced more TEOAE failures. The mere presence of an open ventilation tube was not a determining factor for absent TEOAEs because 60% of the open ventilation tubes had normal TEOAEs. Provided that the clinician understands the effects of middle ear pathologies on otoacoustic emissions, TEOAEs can be a great asset for diagnosis of both otologic and audiologic disorders.

Mechanisms of hair cell tuning

Mechanosensory hair cells of the vertebrate inner ear contribute to acoustic tuning through feedback processes involving voltage-gated channels in the basolateral membrane and mechanotransduction channels in the apical hair bundle. The specific number and kinetics of calcium-activated (BK) potassium channels determine the resonant frequency of electrically tuned hair cells. Kinetic variation among BK channels may arise through alternative splicing of slo gene mRNA and combination with modulatory beta subunits. The number of transduction channels and their rate of adaptation rise with hair cell response frequency along the cochlea's tonotopic axis. Calcium-dependent feedback onto transduction channels may underlie active hair bundle mechanics. The relative contributions of electrical and mechanical feedback to active tuning of hair cells may vary as a function of sound frequency.

Contralateral suppression of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions by harmonic complex tones in humans

Variations in the amplitude of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) produced by a contralateral complex tone were measured in 26 normal-hearing human subjects. TEOAEs were evoked using a 1-kHz tone pip at 60 dB SPL. The contralateral complex consisted of harmonic components with frequencies between 400 and 2000 Hz; it was presented at levels ranging from 40 to 50 dB SL and its fundamental frequency (F0) was varied. In experiment 1, the dependence of TEOAE amplitude variations on the F0 of the contralateral complex was measured by varying the F0 from 50 to 400 Hz in octave steps. The results revealed a nonmonotonic dependence of TEOAE amplitude variations on contralateral F0, with significantly larger TEOAE suppression for F0's of 100 and 200 Hz than for F0's of 50 and 400 Hz. Experiment 2, in which the harmonics were summed in alternating sine-cosine phase instead of constant sine phase, showed a shift of the function relating TEOAE attenuation to F0 towards lower F0's, indicating that the waveform repetition rate, rather than harmonic spacing, was the actual factor of the dependence of contralateral TEOAE attenuation on F0. Furthermore, significantly smaller suppression was observed with the alternating-phase complexes than with the sine-phase complexes, suggesting an influence of the waveform crest factor. Experiment 3 showed no difference between the contralateral TEOAE attenuation effects produced by positive and negative Schroeder-phase complexes. Overall, these results bring further arguments for the notion that contralaterally induced medial olivocochlear bundle (MOCB) activity, as measured through the contralateral suppression of TEOAEs in humans, is sensitive to the rate of temporal envelope fluctuations of the contralateral stimulus, with preferential rates around 100-200 Hz.

Enhancement of electrically evoked oto-acoustic emissions associated with low-frequency stimulus bias of the basilar membrane towards scala vestibuli

Electrically evoked oto-acoustic emissions (EEOAEs) are sounds present in the ear canal when ac current is passed into the cochlea. EEOAEs are attributed to the activation of fast electromotile responses in outer hair cells (OHCs). An interesting property of EEOAEs is the phenomenon of "acoustic enhancement," where the emission amplitude is increased by moderate-level sound [D. C. Mountain and A. E. Hubbard, Hear. Res. 42, 195-202 (1989)]. In this report a form of enhancement is described which occurs with displacements of the basilar membrane toward scala vestibuli, during amplitude modulation of the EEOAE waveform by low-frequency tones. This "SV-bias enhancement" possibly consists of two components: (i) a low-level component induced by sound at levels which produce nonlinear growth of the cochlear microphonic and which may be equivalent to the "acoustic enhancement" described previously, and (ii) a high-level component which occurs at sound levels well above those which cause saturation of the cochlear microphonic. The low-level component could be explained by either an increased access of the extrinsically applied current to a membrane-based source of OHC motility, perhaps coupled with a reduction in negative feedback, or an increase in electromotile output during scala vestibuli displacements, but the origin of the high-level component is obscure.

Phylogenetic development of the cochlea and its innervation

Comparative studies of vertebrate hearing organs have enabled an integrated approach to difficult questions related to function. Recent evidence for the independent evolution of similar hearing-organ specializations, in particular hair-cell differentiation, has helped identify common problems of hearing receptors and put them in a new perspective. Evidence that cochlear amplification is an ancient phenomenon has widened the search for the motor mechanism involved. In this regard, different hypotheses are best examined by making optimal use of natural structural variations. Studies on the evolution of the efferent system have provided new routes to investigate its function.

Cochlear electrically evoked emissions modulated by mechanical transduction channels

Cochlear outer hair cells are capable of both mechanical-to-electrical and electrical-to-mechanical transduction. Vibration of their stereocilia by sound is believed to stimulate somatic motility via a receptor potential developed across the basolateral membrane, thereby enhancing the mechanical vibration and increasing the sensitivity and frequency selectivity of the ear. Extrinsic electrical currents, applied at the tops of the cells, also appear to activate motility in vivo, presumably after entering the cell. Earlier experiments suggested such currents might enter through the transduction channels themselves, but an alternative shunt pathway through the membrane capacitance seems more likely on physical grounds. We therefore recorded electrically evoked oto-acoustic emissions while modulating the transduction channels by driving them with low-frequency sound. Recordings of the low-frequency cochlear microphonic provided a measure of the mean electrical conductance through the channels during sound stimulation. Emissions increased during displacement of the basilar membrane toward scala vestibuli, when the channels were biased open, and decreased on the opposite phase, and the modulation of the emission was in direct proportion to the cochlear microphonic. The results are the strongest evidence yet that electrically evoked emissions are generated directly by mechanisms related to cochlear transduction and lead to the surprising conclusion that, for frequencies up to at least 12 kHz, extrinsic electrical currents enter the hair cell predominantly by the resistive pathway through the transduction channels. Alternatively, the results might be consistent with direct modulation of a motility source driven by capacitive currents but whose output depends on the state of the channels.

Mechanical amplification of stimuli by hair cells

Unlike any other known sensory receptor, the hair cell uses positive feedback to augment the stimulus to which it responds. In the internal ears of many vertebrates, hair cells amplify the inputs to their mechanosensitive hair bundles. Outer hair cells of the mammalian cochlea display a unique form of somatal motility that may underlie their contribution to amplification. In other receptor organs, hair cells may effect amplification by hair-bundle movements driven by the activity of myosin or of transduction channels. Recent work has demonstrated the presence of several myosin isozymes in hair bundles, confirmed that bundles display myosin ATPase activity, and shown that the work performed by myosin molecules could account for one aspect of the amplificatory process.