1
|
Anderson SR, Burg E, Suveg L, Litovsky RY. Review of Binaural Processing With Asymmetrical Hearing Outcomes in Patients With Bilateral Cochlear Implants. Trends Hear 2024; 28:23312165241229880. [PMID: 38545645 PMCID: PMC10976506 DOI: 10.1177/23312165241229880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Revised: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 04/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Bilateral cochlear implants (BiCIs) result in several benefits, including improvements in speech understanding in noise and sound source localization. However, the benefit bilateral implants provide among recipients varies considerably across individuals. Here we consider one of the reasons for this variability: difference in hearing function between the two ears, that is, interaural asymmetry. Thus far, investigations of interaural asymmetry have been highly specialized within various research areas. The goal of this review is to integrate these studies in one place, motivating future research in the area of interaural asymmetry. We first consider bottom-up processing, where binaural cues are represented using excitation-inhibition of signals from the left ear and right ear, varying with the location of the sound in space, and represented by the lateral superior olive in the auditory brainstem. We then consider top-down processing via predictive coding, which assumes that perception stems from expectations based on context and prior sensory experience, represented by cascading series of cortical circuits. An internal, perceptual model is maintained and updated in light of incoming sensory input. Together, we hope that this amalgamation of physiological, behavioral, and modeling studies will help bridge gaps in the field of binaural hearing and promote a clearer understanding of the implications of interaural asymmetry for future research on optimal patient interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean R. Anderson
- Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical School, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Emily Burg
- Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Lukas Suveg
- Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Ruth Y. Litovsky
- Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
- Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Park LR, Preston E, Noxon AS, Dillon MT. Comparison of test methods to assess the implanted ear alone for pediatric cochlear implant recipients with single-sided deafness. Cochlear Implants Int 2021; 22:283-290. [PMID: 33761831 DOI: 10.1080/14670100.2021.1903715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The purpose of this investigation was to compare three test methods for isolating the test ear for children with single-sided deafness (SSD) who use a cochlear implant (CI). METHODS Word recognition was assessed for five CI recipients with SSD and six bilateral CI recipients with no acoustic hearing. For the SSD subjects, performance was compared: 1) in the sound field with masking in the normal-hearing ear, 2) in the sound field with an earplug and earmuff ("plug-and-muff"), and 3) via direct connect (DC). For the bilateral CI subjects, performance was compared: 1) in the sound field and 2) via DC. RESULTS For the bilateral CI subjects, word recognition was similar when assessed in the sound field versus via DC. For the SSD subjects, performance was similar when assessed with the plug-and-muff and DC methods but was significantly poorer with masking presented to the normal-hearing ear. DISCUSSION Masking the normal-hearing ear to isolate the CI for word recognition is problematic in this population. The plug-and-muff and DC test methods may provide a more accurate assessment. CONCLUSION DC or plug-and-muff methods are recommended to isolate the CI-ear for word recognition testing in children with SSD. Patient specific variables should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa R Park
- Department of Otolaryngology / Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Elizabeth Preston
- Department of Otolaryngology / Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Amy S Noxon
- Division of Speech & Hearing Sciences, Department of Allied Health Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Margaret T Dillon
- Department of Otolaryngology / Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Marrufo-Pérez MI, Johannesen PT, Lopez-Poveda EA. Correlation and Reliability of Behavioral and Otoacoustic-Emission Estimates of Contralateral Medial Olivocochlear Reflex Strength in Humans. Front Neurosci 2021; 15:640127. [PMID: 33664649 PMCID: PMC7921326 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.640127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2020] [Accepted: 01/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The roles of the medial olivocochlear reflex (MOCR) in human hearing have been widely investigated but remain controversial. We reason that this may be because the effects of MOCR activation on cochlear mechanical responses can be assessed only indirectly in healthy humans, and the different methods used to assess those effects possibly yield different and/or unreliable estimates. One aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between three methods often employed to assess the strength of MOCR activation by contralateral acoustic stimulation (CAS). We measured tone detection thresholds (N = 28), click-evoked otoacoustic emission (CEOAE) input/output (I/O) curves (N = 18), and distortion-product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) I/O curves (N = 18) for various test frequencies in the presence and the absence of CAS (broadband noise of 60 dB SPL). As expected, CAS worsened tone detection thresholds, suppressed CEOAEs and DPOAEs, and horizontally shifted CEOAE and DPOAE I/O curves to higher levels. However, the CAS effect on tone detection thresholds was not correlated with the horizontal shift of CEOAE or DPOAE I/O curves, and the CAS-induced CEOAE suppression was not correlated with DPOAE suppression. Only the horizontal shifts of CEOAE and DPOAE I/O functions were correlated with each other at 1.5, 2, and 3 kHz. A second aim was to investigate which of the methods is more reliable. The test–retest variability of the CAS effect was high overall but smallest for tone detection thresholds and CEOAEs, suggesting that their use should be prioritized over the use of DPOAEs. Many factors not related with the MOCR, including the limited parametric space studied, the low resolution of the I/O curves, and the reduced numbers of observations due to data exclusion likely contributed to the weak correlations and the large test–retest variability noted. These findings can help us understand the inconsistencies among past studies and improve our understanding of the functional significance of the MOCR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam I Marrufo-Pérez
- Instituto de Neurociencias de Castilla y León, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Peter T Johannesen
- Instituto de Neurociencias de Castilla y León, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
- Instituto de Neurociencias de Castilla y León, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.,Departamento de Cirugía, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Misurelli SM, Goupell MJ, Burg EA, Jocewicz R, Kan A, Litovsky RY. Auditory Attention and Spatial Unmasking in Children With Cochlear Implants. Trends Hear 2020; 24:2331216520946983. [PMID: 32812515 PMCID: PMC7446264 DOI: 10.1177/2331216520946983] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
The ability to attend to target speech in background noise is an important skill, particularly for children who spend many hours in noisy environments. Intelligibility improves as a result of spatial or binaural unmasking in the free-field for normal-hearing children; however, children who use bilateral cochlear implants (BiCIs) demonstrate little benefit in similar situations. It was hypothesized that poor auditory attention abilities might explain the lack of unmasking observed in children with BiCIs. Target and interferer speech stimuli were presented to either or both ears of BiCI participants via their clinical processors. Speech reception thresholds remained low when the target and interferer were in opposite ears, but they did not show binaural unmasking when the interferer was presented to both ears and the target only to one ear. These results demonstrate that, in the most extreme cases of stimulus separation, children with BiCIs can ignore an interferer and attend to target speech, but there is weak or absent binaural unmasking. It appears that children with BiCIs mostly experience poor encoding of binaural cues rather than deficits in ability to selectively attend to target speech.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara M Misurelli
- Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison.,Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health
| | | | | | | | - Alan Kan
- Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison.,School of Engineering, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Ruth Y Litovsky
- Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison.,Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ozdemir I, Bozdemir K, Callioglu EE, Bayazit D, Şalviz M. Effects of a sequential cochlear implant of minimum comfort, impedance and electrically evoked compound action potential values of the initial cochlear implant. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2020; 277:2235-2241. [PMID: 32447497 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-020-06062-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2019] [Accepted: 05/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the impact of sequential second CI on the electrophysiological parameters of the initial CI. METHODS Totally, 30 children who received sequential CIs between January and July 2018 were included in the study. All patients received the same brand of CI (Advanced Bionics, HIRES 90K Advantage 1J). Of 16 CI electrodes, 3rd (E3), 7th (E7) and 11th (E11), and 15th (E15) electrodes which were corresponding to the apical, middle, and basal cochlea were used in the measurements. The tNRI, electrode impedance and M levels were recorded as the contralateral CI was switched off and on, respectively. RESULTS As the second CI was switched off, the impedance, tNRI and M values of initial CI 1st, 3rd and 6th months were not significantly different (p > 0.05). There was a significant difference between the impedance, tNRI and M values of initial CI as the second CI was switched on (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION Activation of the sequential second CI leads to a decrease in the tNRI and M levels of the initial CI. This condition can increase the efficiency obtained by CIs. However, these changes should be remembered during CI programming.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilyas Ozdemir
- Department of Audiology, Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Kazim Bozdemir
- Department of Otolaryngology, Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Elif Ersoy Callioglu
- Department of Otolaryngology, Ankara City Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - Dilara Bayazit
- Department of Audiology, Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Mehdi Şalviz
- Department of Otolaryngology, Yeni Yuzyil University, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wijetillake AA, van Hoesel RJM, Cowan R. Sequential stream segregation with bilateral cochlear implants. Hear Res 2019; 383:107812. [PMID: 31630083 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2019.107812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2019] [Revised: 10/05/2019] [Accepted: 10/07/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Sequential stream segregation on the basis of binaural 'ear-of-entry', modulation rate and electrode place-of-stimulation cues was investigated in bilateral cochlear implant (CI) listeners using a rhythm anisochrony detection task. Sequences of alternating 'A' and 'B' bursts were presented via direct electrical stimulation and comprised either an isochronous timing structure or an anisochronous structure that was generated by delaying just the 'B' bursts. 'B' delay thresholds that enabled rhythm anisochrony detection were determined. Higher thresholds were assumed to indicate a greater likelihood of stream segregation, resulting specifically from stream integration breakdown. Results averaged across subjects showed that thresholds were significantly higher when monaural 'A' and 'B' bursts were presented contralaterally rather than ipsilaterally, and that diotic presentation of 'A', with a monaural 'B', yielded intermediate thresholds. When presented monaurally and ipsilaterally, higher thresholds were also found when successive bursts had mismatched rather than matched modulation rates. In agreement with previous studies, average delay thresholds also increased as electrode separation between bursts increased when presented ipsilaterally. No interactions were found between ear-of-entry, modulation rate and place-of-stimulation. However, combining moderate electrode difference cues with either diotic-'A' ear-of-entry cues or modulation-rate mismatch cues did yield greater threshold increases than observed with any of those cues alone. The results from the present study indicate that sequential stream segregation can be elicited in bilateral CI users by differences in the signal across ears (binaural cues), in modulation rate (monaural cues) and in place-of-stimulation (monaural cues), and that those differences can be combined to further increase segregation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Robert Cowan
- The Hearing CRC, 550 Swanston St, Carlton, 3053, Victoria, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Nogueira W, Krüger B, Büchner A, Lopez-Poveda E. Contralateral suppression of human hearing sensitivity in single-sided deaf cochlear implant users. Hear Res 2018; 373:121-129. [PMID: 29941311 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2018.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2017] [Revised: 05/28/2018] [Accepted: 06/07/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Cochlear implants (CIs) are being implanted in people with unilateral hearing loss because they can improve speech intelligibility and sound source localization. Though designed to restore the afferent auditory stimulation, the CI possibly restores some efferent effects. The present study aimed at investigating this possibility. Five single-sided deaf CI users with less than 30 dB hearing loss up to 4 kHz in their acoustic ear participated in the study. Absolute thresholds for their acoustic ears were measured for pure tones of 500 and 4000 Hz with durations of 10 and 200 ms in the presence and in the absence of contralateral broadband electrical stimulation (CBES) delivered with the CI. The electrical stimulus consisted of pulse trains (symmetric biphasic pulses with phase duration 36 μs) on all 16 electrodes sequentially stimulated at a rate of 843 Hz. Its intensity was set to sound as loud as broadband noise at 50 or 60 dB SPL in the acoustic ear. Thresholds were measured using a three-interval, three-alternative, forced-choice procedure with a two-down, one-up adaptive rule to estimate the level for 71% correct in the psychometric function. Thresholds measured without the CBES were lower for the longer than for the shorter tones, and the difference was larger at 500 than at 4000 Hz. CBES equivalent to 50 or 60 dB SPL caused significant threshold elevation only for short (10 ms) and low frequency (500 Hz) acoustic tones of 1.2 and 2.2 dB. These increases appear smaller than previously reported for normal hearing listeners in related experiments. These results support the notion that for single-sided deaf CI users, the CI modulates hearing in the acoustic ear. The possible mechanisms that may be contributing this effect are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Waldo Nogueira
- Medical University Hannover, Cluster of Excellence "Hearing4all", Hannover, Germany.
| | - Benjamin Krüger
- Medical University Hannover, Cluster of Excellence "Hearing4all", Hannover, Germany
| | - Andreas Büchner
- Medical University Hannover, Cluster of Excellence "Hearing4all", Hannover, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Imsiecke M, Krüger B, Büchner A, Lenarz T, Nogueira W. Electric-acoustic forward masking in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing. Hear Res 2018; 364:25-37. [PMID: 29673567 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2018.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2017] [Revised: 03/07/2018] [Accepted: 04/02/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
In order to investigate the temporal mechanisms of the auditory system, psychophysical forward masking experiments were conducted in cochlear implant users who had preserved acoustic hearing in the ipsilateral ear. This unique electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) population allowed the measurement of threshold recovery functions for acoustic or electric probes in the presence of electric or acoustic maskers, respectively. In the electric masking experiment, the forward masked threshold elevation of acoustic probes was measured as a function of the time interval after the offset of the electric masker, i.e. the masker-to-probe interval (MPI). In the acoustic masking experiment, the forward masked threshold elevation of electric probe stimuli was investigated under the influence of a preceding acoustic masker. Since electric pulse trains directly stimulate the auditory nerve, this novel experimental setup allowed the acoustic adaptation properties (attributed to the physiology of the hair cells) to be differentiated from the subsequent processing by more central mechanisms along the auditory pathway. For instance, forward electric masking patterns should result more from the auditory-nerve response to electrical stimulation, while forward acoustic masking patterns should primarily be the result of the recovery from adaptation at the hair-cell neuron interface. Electric masking showed prolonged threshold elevation of acoustic probes, which depended significantly on the masker-to-probe interval. Additionally, threshold elevation was significantly dependent on the similarity between acoustic stimulus frequency and electric place frequency, the electric-acoustic frequency difference (EAFD). Acoustic masking showed a reduced, but statistically significant effect of electric threshold elevation, which did not significantly depend on MPI. Lastly, acoustic masking showed longer decay times than electric masking and a reduced dependency on EAFD. In conclusion, the forward masking patterns observed for combined electric-acoustic stimulation provide further insights into the temporal mechanisms of the auditory system. For instance, the asymmetry in the amount of threshold elevation, the dependency on EAFD and the time constants for the recovery functions of acoustic and electric masking all indicate that there must be several processes with different latencies (e.g. neural adaptation, depression of spontaneous activity, efferent systems) that are involved in forward masking recovery functions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina Imsiecke
- Department of Otolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany.
| | - Benjamin Krüger
- Department of Otolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany; Cluster of Excellence 'Hearing4All', Hanover, Germany.
| | - Andreas Büchner
- Department of Otolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany; Cluster of Excellence 'Hearing4All', Hanover, Germany.
| | - Thomas Lenarz
- Department of Otolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany; Cluster of Excellence 'Hearing4All', Hanover, Germany.
| | - Waldo Nogueira
- Department of Otolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany; Cluster of Excellence 'Hearing4All', Hanover, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lee DH, Aronoff JM. Changing stimulation patterns can change the broadness of contralateral masking functions for bilateral cochlear implant users. Hear Res 2018; 363:55-61. [PMID: 29548706 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2018.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2017] [Revised: 02/19/2018] [Accepted: 03/02/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Past studies have found that contralateral masking functions are sharper than ipsilateral masking functions for cochlear implant (CI) users. This could suggest that contralateral masking effects are only sensitive to the peak of the masker stimulation for this population. To determine if that is the case, this study investigated whether using broader stimulation patterns affects the broadness of the contralateral masking function. Contralateral masking functions were measured for six bilateral CI users using both a broad and narrow masker. Findings from this study revealed that the broad masker resulted in a broader contralateral masking function. This would suggest that stimulation outside of the peak of the masker affects contralateral masking functions for CI users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel H Lee
- Department of Speech and Hearing Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 901 S. 6th St., Champaign, IL 61820, USA.
| | - Justin M Aronoff
- Department of Speech and Hearing Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 901 S. 6th St., Champaign, IL 61820, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In natural hearing, cochlear mechanical compression is dynamically adjusted via the efferent medial olivocochlear reflex (MOCR). These adjustments probably help understanding speech in noisy environments and are not available to the users of current cochlear implants (CIs). The aims of the present study are to: (1) present a binaural CI sound processing strategy inspired by the control of cochlear compression provided by the contralateral MOCR in natural hearing; and (2) assess the benefits of the new strategy for understanding speech presented in competition with steady noise with a speech-like spectrum in various spatial configurations of the speech and noise sources. DESIGN Pairs of CI sound processors (one per ear) were constructed to mimic or not mimic the effects of the contralateral MOCR on compression. For the nonmimicking condition (standard strategy or STD), the two processors in a pair functioned similarly to standard clinical processors (i.e., with fixed back-end compression and independently of each other). When configured to mimic the effects of the MOCR (MOC strategy), the two processors communicated with each other and the amount of back-end compression in a given frequency channel of each processor in the pair decreased/increased dynamically (so that output levels dropped/increased) with increases/decreases in the output energy from the corresponding frequency channel in the contralateral processor. Speech reception thresholds in speech-shaped noise were measured for 3 bilateral CI users and 2 single-sided deaf unilateral CI users. Thresholds were compared for the STD and MOC strategies in unilateral and bilateral listening conditions and for three spatial configurations of the speech and noise sources in simulated free-field conditions: speech and noise sources colocated in front of the listener, speech on the left ear with noise in front of the listener, and speech on the left ear with noise on the right ear. In both bilateral and unilateral listening, the electrical stimulus delivered to the test ear(s) was always calculated as if the listeners were wearing bilateral processors. RESULTS In both unilateral and bilateral listening conditions, mean speech reception thresholds were comparable with the two strategies for colocated speech and noise sources, but were at least 2 dB lower (better) with the MOC than with the STD strategy for spatially separated speech and noise sources. In unilateral listening conditions, mean thresholds improved with increasing the spatial separation between the speech and noise sources regardless of the strategy but the improvement was significantly greater with the MOC strategy. In bilateral listening conditions, thresholds improved significantly with increasing the speech-noise spatial separation only with the MOC strategy. CONCLUSIONS The MOC strategy (1) significantly improved the intelligibility of speech presented in competition with a spatially separated noise source, both in unilateral and bilateral listening conditions; (2) produced significant spatial release from masking in bilateral listening conditions, something that did not occur with fixed compression; and (3) enhanced spatial release from masking in unilateral listening conditions. The MOC strategy as implemented here, or a modified version of it, may be usefully applied in CIs and in hearing aids.
Collapse
|
11
|
Krüger B, Büchner A, Nogueira W. Simultaneous masking between electric and acoustic stimulation in cochlear implant users with residual low-frequency hearing. Hear Res 2017; 353:185-196. [PMID: 28688755 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.06.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2017] [Revised: 06/27/2017] [Accepted: 06/28/2017] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Ipsilateral electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) is becoming increasingly important in cochlear implant (CI) treatment. Improvements in electrode designs and surgical techniques have contributed to improved hearing preservation during implantation. Consequently, CI implantation criteria have been expanded toward people with significant residual low-frequency hearing, who may benefit from the combined use of both the electric and acoustic stimulation in the same ear. However, only few studies have investigated the mutual interaction between electric and acoustic stimulation modalities. This work characterizes the interaction between both stimulation modalities using psychophysical masking experiments and cone beam computer tomography (CBCT). Two psychophysical experiments for electric and acoustic masking were performed to measure the hearing threshold elevation of a probe stimulus in the presence of a masker stimulus. For electric masking, the probe stimulus was an acoustic tone while the masker stimulus was an electric pulse train. For acoustic masking, the probe stimulus was an electric pulse train and the masker stimulus was an acoustic tone. Five EAS users, implanted with a CI and ipsilateral residual low-frequency hearing, participated in the study. Masking was determined at different electrodes and different acoustic frequencies. CBCT scans were used to determine the individual place-pitch frequencies of the intracochlear electrode contacts by using the Stakhovskaya place-to-frequency transformation. This allows the characterization of masking as a function of the difference between electric and acoustic stimulation sites, which we term the electric-acoustic frequency difference (EAFD). The results demonstrate a significant elevation of detection thresholds for both experiments. In electric masking, acoustic-tone thresholds increased exponentially with decreasing EAFD. In contrast, for the acoustic masking experiment, threshold elevations were present regardless of the tested EAFDs. Based on the present findings, we conclude that there is an asymmetry between the electric and the acoustic masker modalities. These observations have implications for the design and fitting of EAS sound-coding strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Krüger
- Department of Otolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Cluster of Excellence Hearing4all, Hannover, Germany.
| | - Andreas Büchner
- Department of Otolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Cluster of Excellence Hearing4all, Hannover, Germany.
| | - Waldo Nogueira
- Department of Otolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Cluster of Excellence Hearing4all, Hannover, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Aronoff JM, Stelmach J, Padilla M, Landsberger DM. Interleaved Processors Improve Cochlear Implant Patients' Spectral Resolution. Ear Hear 2016; 37:e85-90. [PMID: 26656190 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000000249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Cochlear implant patients have difficulty in noisy environments, in part, because of channel interaction. Interleaving the signal by sending every other channel to the opposite ear has the potential to reduce channel interaction by increasing the space between channels in each ear. Interleaving still potentially provides the same amount of spectral information when the two ears are combined. Although this method has been successful in other populations such as hearing aid users, interleaving with cochlear implant patients has not yielded consistent benefits. This may be because perceptual misalignment between the two ears, and the spacing between stimulation locations must be taken into account before interleaving. DESIGN Eight bilateral cochlear implant users were tested. After perceptually aligning the two ears, 12-channel maps were made that spanned the entire aligned portions of the array. Interleaved maps were created by removing every other channel from each ear. Participants' spectral resolution and localization abilities were measured with perceptually aligned processing strategies both with and without interleaving. RESULTS There was a significant improvement in spectral resolution with interleaving. However, there was no significant effect of interleaving on localization abilities. CONCLUSIONS The results indicate that interleaving can improve cochlear implant users' spectral resolution. However, it may be necessary to perceptually align the two ears and/or use relatively large spacing between stimulation locations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin M Aronoff
- 1Department of Speech and Hearing Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, USA; 2Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA; 3Communication and Neuroscience Division, House Ear Institute, Los Angeles, California, USA; and 4Department of Otolaryngology, New York University, New York, New York, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Fletcher MD, Krumbholz K, de Boer J. Effect of Contralateral Medial Olivocochlear Feedback on Perceptual Estimates of Cochlear Gain and Compression. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2016; 17:559-575. [PMID: 27550069 PMCID: PMC5112214 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-016-0574-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2015] [Accepted: 06/17/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The active cochlear mechanism amplifies responses to low-intensity sounds, compresses the range of input sound intensities to a smaller output range, and increases cochlear frequency selectivity. The gain of the active mechanism can be modulated by the medial olivocochlear (MOC) efferent system, creating the possibility of top-down control at the earliest level of auditory processing. In humans, MOC function has mostly been measured by the suppression of otoacoustic emissions (OAEs), typically as a result of MOC activation by a contralateral elicitor sound. The exact relationship between OAE suppression and cochlear gain reduction, however, remains unclear. Here, we measured the effect of a contralateral MOC elicitor on perceptual estimates of cochlear gain and compression, obtained using the established temporal masking curve (TMC) method. The measurements were taken at a signal frequency of 2 kHz and compared with measurements of click-evoked OAE suppression. The elicitor was a broadband noise, set to a sound pressure level of 54 dB to avoid triggering the middle ear muscle reflex. Despite its low level, the elicitor had a significant effect on the TMCs, consistent with a reduction in cochlear gain. The amount of gain reduction was estimated as 4.4 dB on average, corresponding to around 18 % of the without-elicitor gain. As a result, the compression exponent increased from 0.18 to 0.27.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark D Fletcher
- Medical Research Council Institute of Hearing Research, The University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK
- School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK
- Institute of Sound and Vibration Research, University of Southampton, Highfield Campus, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK
| | - Katrin Krumbholz
- Medical Research Council Institute of Hearing Research, The University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.
| | - Jessica de Boer
- Medical Research Council Institute of Hearing Research, The University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Aronoff JM, Padilla M, Fu QJ, Landsberger DM. Contralateral masking in bilateral cochlear implant patients: a model of medial olivocochlear function loss. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0121591. [PMID: 25798581 PMCID: PMC4370517 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2014] [Accepted: 02/13/2015] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Contralateral masking is the phenomenon where a masker presented to one ear affects the ability to detect a signal in the opposite ear. For normal hearing listeners, contralateral masking results in masking patterns that are both sharper and dramatically smaller in magnitude than ipsilateral masking. The goal of this study was to investigate whether medial olivocochlear (MOC) efferents are needed for the sharpness and relatively small magnitude of the contralateral masking function. To do this, bilateral cochlear implant patients were tested because, by directly stimulating the auditory nerve, cochlear implants circumvent the effects of the MOC efferents. The results indicated that, as with normal hearing listeners, the contralateral masking function was sharper than the ipsilateral masking function. However, although there was a reduction in the magnitude of the contralateral masking function compared to the ipsilateral masking function, it was relatively modest. This is in sharp contrast to the results of normal hearing listeners where the magnitude of the contralateral masking function is greatly reduced. These results suggest that MOC function may not play a large role in the sharpness of the contralateral masking function but may play a considerable role in the magnitude of the contralateral masking function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin M. Aronoff
- Department of Speech and Hearing Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, United States of America
- Communication and Neuroscience Division, House Research Institute, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Monica Padilla
- Communication and Neuroscience Division, House Research Institute, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
- Department of Otolaryngology, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - Qian-Jie Fu
- Communication and Neuroscience Division, House Research Institute, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - David M. Landsberger
- Communication and Neuroscience Division, House Research Institute, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
- Department of Otolaryngology, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Aguilar E, Johannesen PT, Lopez-Poveda EA. Contralateral efferent suppression of human hearing sensitivity. Front Syst Neurosci 2015; 8:251. [PMID: 25642172 PMCID: PMC4295548 DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2014] [Accepted: 12/21/2014] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The present study aimed at characterizing the suppressing effect of contralateral medial olivocochlear (MOC) efferents on human auditory sensitivity and mechanical cochlear responses at sound levels near behavioral thresholds. Absolute thresholds for pure tones of 500 and 4000 Hz with durations between 10-500 ms were measured in the presence and in the absence of a contralateral broadband noise. The intensity of the noise was fixed at 60 dB SPL to evoke the contralateral MOC reflex without evoking the middle-ear muscle reflex. In agreement with previously reported findings, thresholds measured without the contralateral noise decreased with increasing tone duration, and the rate of decrease was faster at 500 than at 4000 Hz. Contralateral stimulation increased thresholds by 1.07 and 1.72 dB at 500 and 4000 Hz, respectively. The mean increase (1.4 dB) just missed statistical significance (p = 0.08). Importantly, the across-frequency mean threshold increase was significantly greater for long than for short probes. This effect was more obvious at 4000 Hz than at 500 Hz. Assuming that thresholds depend on the MOC-dependent cochlear mechanical response followed by an MOC-independent, post-mechanical detection mechanism, the present results at 4000 Hz suggest that MOC efferent activation suppresses cochlear mechanical responses more at lower than at higher intensities across the range of intensities near threshold, while the results at 500 Hz suggest comparable mechanical suppression across the threshold intensity range. The results are discussed in the context of central masking and of auditory models of efferent suppression of cochlear mechanical responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enzo Aguilar
- Auditory Computation and Psychoacoustics, Instituto de Neurociencias de Castilla y León, Universidad de SalamancaSalamanca, Spain
- Grupo de Audiología, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca, Universidad de SalamancaSalamanca, Spain
| | - Peter T. Johannesen
- Auditory Computation and Psychoacoustics, Instituto de Neurociencias de Castilla y León, Universidad de SalamancaSalamanca, Spain
- Grupo de Audiología, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca, Universidad de SalamancaSalamanca, Spain
| | - Enrique A. Lopez-Poveda
- Auditory Computation and Psychoacoustics, Instituto de Neurociencias de Castilla y León, Universidad de SalamancaSalamanca, Spain
- Grupo de Audiología, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca, Universidad de SalamancaSalamanca, Spain
- Departamento de Cirugía, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de SalamancaSalamanca, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Guérit F, Santurette S, Chalupper J, Dau T. Investigating interaural frequency-place mismatches via bimodal vowel integration. Trends Hear 2014; 18:18/0/2331216514560590. [PMID: 25421087 PMCID: PMC4271743 DOI: 10.1177/2331216514560590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
For patients having residual hearing in one ear and a cochlear implant (CI) in the opposite ear, interaural place-pitch mismatches might be partly responsible for the large variability in individual benefit. Behavioral pitch-matching between the two ears has been suggested as a way to individualize the fitting of the frequency-to-electrode map but is rather tedious and unreliable. Here, an alternative method using two-formant vowels was developed and tested. The interaural spectral shift was inferred by comparing vowel spaces, measured by presenting the first formant (F1) to the nonimplanted ear and the second (F2) on either side. The method was first evaluated with eight normal-hearing listeners and vocoder simulations, before being tested with 11 CI users. Average vowel distributions across subjects showed a similar pattern when presenting F2 on either side, suggesting acclimatization to the frequency map. However, individual vowel spaces with F2 presented to the implant did not allow a reliable estimation of the interaural mismatch. These results suggest that interaural frequency-place mismatches can be derived from such vowel spaces. However, the method remains limited by difficulties in bimodal fusion of the two formants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- François Guérit
- Hearing Systems, Department of Electrical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Sébastien Santurette
- Hearing Systems, Department of Electrical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Josef Chalupper
- Advanced Bionics European Research Center GmbH, Hanover, Germany
| | - Torsten Dau
- Hearing Systems, Department of Electrical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|