Scale-sensitivity: A cognitive resource basic to music perception

Human Sensorimotor Activity as a Factor of Cognitive Resource Development

The cognitive resource phenomenon, its factors, and performance are a relevant topic of Russian psychology. Numerous publications feature the psychological content of the cognitive resource concept and various phenomena as forms of its manifestation. However, domestic psychology sees no cognitive resource potential in sensorimotor activity, nor does it see sensorimotor activity as a factor that facilitates human cognitive resources. The article considers sensorimotor activity as a cognitive resource and describes a transspective analysis of various approaches to the phenomenon of cognitive resource. The authors defined the latter as a complex multi-level construct. Various cognitive resource models proved that sensorimotor activity is a manifestation of the cognitive resource and its integral part. However, the transspective analysis requires further research on sensorimotor activity in the cognitive resource structure.

Inadequate pitch-difference sensitivity prevents half of all listeners from discriminating major vs minor tone sequences

Substantial evidence suggests that sensitivity to the difference between the major vs minor musical scales may be bimodally distributed. Much of this evidence comes from experiments using the "3-task." On each trial in the 3-task, the listener hears a rapid, random sequence of tones containing equal numbers of notes of either a G major or G minor triad and strives (with feedback) to judge which type of "tone-scramble" it was. This study asks whether the bimodal distribution in 3-task performance is due to variation (across listeners) in sensitivity to differences in pitch. On each trial in a "pitch-difference task," the listener hears two tones and judges whether the second tone is higher or lower than the first. When the first tone is roved (rather than fixed throughout the task), performance varies dramatically across listeners with median threshold approximately equal to a quarter-tone. Strikingly, nearly all listeners with thresholds higher than a quarter-tone performed near chance in the 3-task. Across listeners with thresholds below a quarter-tone, 3-task performance was uniformly distributed from chance to ceiling; thus, the large, lower mode of the distribution in 3-task performance is produced mainly by listeners with roved pitch-difference thresholds greater than a quarter-tone.

Sensitivity to major versus minor musical modes is bimodally distributed in young infants

The difference between major and minor scales plays a central role in Western music. However, recent research using random tone sequences ("tone-scrambles") has revealed a dramatically bimodal distribution in sensitivity to this difference: 30% of listeners are near perfect in classifying major versus minor tone-scrambles; the other 70% perform near chance. Here, whether or not infants show this same pattern is investigated. The anticipatory eye-movements of thirty 6-month-old infants were monitored during trials in which the infants heard a tone-scramble whose quality (major versus minor) signalled the location (right versus left) where a subsequent visual stimulus (the target) would appear. For 33% of infants, these anticipatory eye-movements predicted target location with near perfect accuracy; for the other 67%, the anticipatory eye-movements were unrelated to the target location. In conclusion, six-month-old infants show the same distribution as adults in sensitivity to the difference between major versus minor tone-scrambles.

How rests and cyclic sequences influence performance in tone-scramble tasks

When classifying major versus minor tone-scrambles (random sequences of pure tones), most listeners (70%) perform at chance while the remaining listeners perform nearly perfectly. The current study investigated whether inserting rests and cyclic sequences into the stimuli could heighten sensitivity in such tasks. In separate blocks, listeners classified tone-scramble variants as major versus minor ("3" task) or fourth versus tritone ("4" task). In three "Fast" variants, tones were played at 65 ms/tone as a continuous, random stream ("FR"), or with a rest after every fourth tone ("FRwR"), or as a repeating sequence of four tones with a rest after every fourth tone ("FCwR"). In the "Slow" variant, tones were played at 325 ms/tone in random order. In both the 3 and 4 tasks, performance was ordered from best to worst as follows: FRwR > FR > FCwR > Slow. Post hoc analysis revealed that performance was suppressed in the Slow and FCwR task-variants due to a powerful bias inclining listeners to respond "major" or "fourth" ("minor" or "tritone") if the 4-note sequence defining the stimulus ended on a high (low) note. Overall, the results indicate that inserting regular rests into random tone sequences heightens sensitivity to musical mode.

Many listeners cannot discriminate major vs minor tone-scrambles regardless of presentation rate

A tone-scramble is a random sequence of pure tones. Previous studies have found that most listeners (≈ 70%) perform near chance in classifying rapid tone-scrambles composed of multiple copies of notes in G-major vs G-minor triads; the remaining listeners perform nearly perfectly [Chubb, Dickson, Dean, Fagan, Mann, Wright, Guan, Silva, Gregersen, and Kowalski (2013). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 134(4), 3067-3078; Dean and Chubb (2017). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 142(3), 1432-1440]. This study tested whether low-performing listeners might improve with slower stimuli. In separate tasks, stimuli were tone-scrambles presented at 115, 231, 462, and 923 notes per min. In each task, the listener classified (with feedback) stimuli as major vs minor. Listeners who performed poorly in any of these tasks performed poorly in all of them. Strikingly, performance was worst in the task with the slowest stimuli. In all tasks, most listeners were biased to respond "major" ("minor") if the stimulus ended on a note high (low) in pitch. Dean and Chubb introduced the name "scale-sensitivity" for the cognitive resource that separates high- from low-performing listeners in tone-scramble classification tasks, suggesting that this resource confers sensitivity to the full gamut of qualities that music can attain by being in a scale. In ruling out the possibility that performance in these tasks depends on speed of presentation, the current results bolster this interpretation.