Human exposures and their associated hearing loss profiles: Music industry professionals

A Survey on Knowledge, Attitude & Practice of Yakshagana Mela Artists Towards Music-Induced Hearing Loss

Purpose

Yakshagana is a type of folk-art theatre portraying mythological and historical stories. It includes artists who play predominantly percussion instruments besides cymbals and harmonium. Professional musicians exposing themselves to deafening sounds are prone to develop noise-induced complications. [1] One such professional in the coastal districts of Karnataka state is a Yakshagana himmela (backstage) artist. There is no reported literature concerning these artists' hearing health and problems. Hence, the proposed study was aimed at developing, validating and assessing the Knowledge, Attitude and Practice (KAP )of Yakshagana Mela artists towards Music-Induced Hearing Loss (MIHL), a possible risk factor of their profession.

Method

This study was carried out on 139 yakshagana mela artists with a mean age of 41.63 years. It was conducted in two phases. In the first phase, an expert committee discussion was conducted to verify, modify and validate the questionnaire. The second phase included the administration of the developed questionnaire on the artists.

Results

The sum scores for each domain of KAP were computed. Scores above 80% were defined as good knowledge, practice, and a positive attitude. The findings of the study revealed that more than half of the participants demonstrated inadequate knowledge (63.3%) and negative attitude (63.7%), but a fair level of practice (65.4%).

Conclusion

From the outcome of the present study, it can be inferred that in spite of being in a profession with a high risk of MIHL, the participants considered hearing health as their least priority. The study illustrates the need for initiating hearing and conservation programs to improve awareness & combat music induced hearing loss in this population.

Preclinical prospects of investigational agents for hearing loss treatment

INTRODUCTION

: Hearing loss has a high prevalence, with aging, noise exposure, ototoxic drug therapies, and genetic mutations being some of the leading causes of hearing loss. Health conditions such as cardiovascular disease and diabetes are associated with hearing loss, perhaps due to shared vascular pathology in the ear and in other tissues.

AREAS COVERED

: Issues in the design of preclinical research preclude the ability to make comparisons regarding the relative efficacy of different drugs of interest for possible hearing loss prevention or hearing restoration. This has not slowed the advancement of candidate therapeutics into human clinical testing. There is a robust pipeline with drugs that have different mechanisms of action providing diverse candidate therapies and opportunities for combination therapies to be considered.

EXPERT OPINION

: Much of the preclinical research literature lacks standard study design elements such as dose response testing, and lack of standardization of test protocols significantly limits conclusions regarding relative efficacy. Nonetheless, the many positive results to date have supported translation of preclinical efforts into clinical trials assessing potential human benefits. Approval of the first hearing loss prevention therapeutic is a major success, providing a pathway for other drugs to follow.

Music as a unique source of noise-induced hearing loss

Music is among the most important artistic, cultural, and entertainment modalities in any society. With the proliferation of music genres and the technological advances that allow people to consume music in any location and at any time, music over-exposure has become a significant public health issue. Music-induced hearing loss has a great deal in common with noise-induced hearing loss. However, there are important differences that make music a unique insult to the auditory system and a unique threat to public health. Its unique properties also make it a potentially valuable asset in sound conditioning paradigms. This review discusses hearing loss from noise and music, comparing and contrasting the two. Recent research on music-induced hearing loss is reviewed, followed by discussion of the differences in music-induced hearing loss between performers and consumers. The review concludes with a discussion of the potential of music as a sound conditioning stimulus to protect against acquired hearing loss.

[The professional ear user-implications for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of ear diseases]

BACKGROUND

Perfect hearing is crucial to the practice of various professions, such as instrument makers, musicians, sound engineers, and other professions not related to music, such as sonar technicians. For people of these occupational groups, we propose the term "professional ear user" (PEU) in analogy to "professional voice user". PEUs have special requirements for their hearing health, as they have well-known above-average auditory perceptual abilities on which they are professionally dependent.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this narrative review is to summarize selected aspects of the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of ear disorders in PEUs.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Prevention of hearing disorders and other ear diseases includes protection from excessive sound levels, avoidance of ototoxins and nicotine, and a safe manner of cleaning the outer auditory canal. Diagnosing hearing disorders in PEUs can be challenging, since subclinical but relevant changes in hearing cannot be reliably objectified by conventional audiometric methods. Moreover, the fact that a PEU is affected by an ear disease may influence treatment decisions. Further, physicians must be vigilant for non-organic ear diseases in PEUs. Lastly, measures to promote comprehensive ear health in PEUs as part of an educational program and to maintain ear health by means of a specialized otolaryngology service are discussed. In contrast to existing concepts, we lay the attention on the entirety of occupational groups that are specifically dependent on their ear health in a professional setting. In this context, we suggest avoiding a sole focus on hearing disorders and their prevention, but rather encourage the maintenance of a comprehensive ear health.

Clinical and investigational tools for monitoring noise-induced hyperacusis

Hyperacusis is a recognized perceptual consequence of acoustic overexposure that can lead to debilitating psychosocial effects. Despite the profound impact of hyperacusis on quality of life, clinicians and researchers lack objective biomarkers and standardized protocols for its assessment. Outcomes of conventional audiologic tests are highly variable in the hyperacusis population and do not adequately capture the multifaceted nature of the condition on an individual level. This presents challenges for the differential diagnosis of hyperacusis, its clinical surveillance, and evaluation of new treatment options. Multiple behavioral and objective assays are emerging as contenders for inclusion in hyperacusis assessment protocols but most still await rigorous validation. There remains a pressing need to develop tools to quantify common nonauditory symptoms, including annoyance, fear, and pain. This review describes the current literature on clinical and investigational tools that have been used to diagnose and monitor hyperacusis, as well as those that hold promise for inclusion in future trials.

Prevention of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss Using Investigational Medicines for the Inner Ear: Previous Trial Outcomes Should Inform Future Trial Design

Significance: Noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) is an important public health issue resulting in decreased quality of life for affected individuals, and significant costs to employers and governmental agencies. Recent Advances: Advances in the mechanistic understanding of NIHL have prompted a growing number of proposed, in-progress, and completed clinical trials for possible protections against NIHL via antioxidants and other drug agents. Thirty-one clinical trials evaluating prevention of either temporary or permanent NIHL were identified and are reviewed. Critical Issues: This review revealed little consistency in the noise-exposed populations in which drugs are evaluated or the primary outcomes used to measure NIHL prevention. Changes in pure-tone thresholds were the most common primary outcomes; specific threshold metrics included both average hearing loss and incidence of significant hearing loss. Changes in otoacoustic emission (OAE) amplitude were relatively common secondary outcomes. Extended high-frequency (EHF) hearing and speech-in-noise perception are commonly adversely affected by noise exposure but are not consistently included in clinical trials assessing prevention of NIHL. Future Directions: Multiple criteria are available for monitoring NIHL, but the specific criterion to be used to define clinically significant otoprotection remains a topic of discussion. Audiogram-based primary outcome measures can be combined with secondary outcomes, including OAE amplitude, EHF hearing, speech-in-noise testing, tinnitus surveys, and patient-reported outcomes. Standardization of test protocols for the above primary and secondary outcomes, and associated reporting criterion for each, would facilitate clinical trial design and comparison of results across investigational drug agents. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 36, 1171-1202.

Investigational Medicinal Products for the Inner Ear: Review of Clinical Trial Characteristics in ClinicalTrials.gov

BACKGROUND

The previous 30 years have provided information on the mechanisms of cell death in the inner ear after noise exposure, ototoxic drug injury, and during aging, and clinical trials have emerged for all of these acquired forms of hearing loss. Sudden hearing loss is less well understood, but restoration of hearing after sudden hearing loss is also a long-standing drug target, typically using steroids as an intervention but with other agents of interest as well.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this review was to describe the state of the science regarding clinical testing of investigational medicinal products for the inner ear with respect to treatment or prevention of acquired hearing loss.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Comprehensive search and summary of clinical trials listed in the National Library of Medicine (www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov) database identified 61 clinical trials.

RESULTS

Study phase, status, intervention, and primary, secondary, and other outcomes are summarized for studies assessing prevention of noise-induced hearing loss, prevention of drug-induced hearing loss, treatment of stable sensorineural hearing loss, and treatment of sudden sensorineural hearing loss.

CONCLUSION

This review provides a comprehensive summary of the state of the science with respect to investigational medicinal products for the inner ear evaluated in human clinical trials, and the current challenges for the field.

Noise-Induced Hearing Loss and its Prevention: Current Issues in Mammalian Hearing

Noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) has been well investigated across diverse mammalian species and the potential for prevention of NIHL is of broad interest. To most efficiently develop novel therapeutic interventions, a good understanding of the current state of knowledge regarding mechanisms of injury is essential. The overarching goals of this review are to 1) concisely summarize the current state of knowledge, and 2) provide opinions on the most significant future trends and developments.

Noise-induced hearing loss and its prevention: Integration of data from animal models and human clinical trials

Animal models have been used to gain insight into the risk of noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) and its potential prevention using investigational new drug agents. A number of compounds have yielded benefit in pre-clinical (animal) models. However, the acute traumatic injury models commonly used in pre-clinical testing are fundamentally different from the chronic and repeated exposures experienced by many human populations. Diverse populations that are potentially at risk and could be considered for enrollment in clinical studies include service members, workers exposed to occupational noise, musicians and other performing artists, and children and young adults exposed to non-occupational (including recreational) noise. Both animal models and clinical populations were discussed in this special issue, followed by discussion of individual variation in vulnerability to NIHL. In this final contribution, study design considerations for NIHL otoprotection in pre-clinical and clinical testing are integrated and broadly discussed with evidence-based guidance offered where possible, drawing on the contributions to this special issue as well as other existing literature. The overarching goals of this final paper are to (1) review and summarize key information across contributions and (2) synthesize information to facilitate successful translation of otoprotective drugs from animal models into human application.

Noise-induced hearing loss: Translating risk from animal models to real-world environments

Noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) is a common injury for service members and civilians. Effective prevention of NIHL with drug agents would reduce the prevalence of NIHL. There are a host of challenges in translation of investigational new drug agents from animals into human clinical testing, however. Initial articles in this special issue describe common pre-clinical (animal) testing paradigms used to assess potential otoprotective drug agents and design-related factors that impact translation of promising agents into human clinical trials. Additional articles describe populations in which NIHL has a high incidence and factors that affect individual vulnerability. While otoprotective drugs will ultimately be developed for use by specific noise-exposed populations, there has been little effort to develop pre-clinical (animal) models that accurately model exposure hazards across diverse human populations. To facilitate advances in the translational framework for NIHL otoprotection in pre-clinical and clinical testing, the overarching goals of the current series are to (1) review the animal models that have been used, highlighting the relevance to the human populations of interest, (2) provide insight into the populations for whom pharmaceutical interventions might, or might not, be appropriate, and (3) highlight the factors that drive the significant individual variability observed in humans.

Octave band noise exposure: Laboratory models and otoprotection efforts

With advances in the understanding of mechanisms of noise injury, the past 30 years have brought numerous efforts to identify drugs that prevent noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL). The diverse protocols used across investigations have made comparisons across drugs difficult. A systematic review of the literature by Hammill [(2017). Doctoral thesis, The University of Texas at Austin] identified original reports of chemical interventions to prevent or treat hearing loss caused by noise exposure. An initial search returned 3492 articles. After excluding duplicate articles and articles that did not meet the systematic review inclusion criteria, a total of 213 studies published between 1977 and 2016 remained. Reference information, noise exposure parameters, species, sex, method of NIHL assessment, and pharmaceutical intervention details for these 213 studies were entered into a database. Frequency-specific threshold shifts in control animals (i.e., in the absence of pharmaceutical intervention) are reported here. Specific patterns of hearing loss as a function of species and noise exposure parameters are provided to facilitate the selection of appropriate pre-clinical models. The emphasis of this report is octave band noise exposure, as this is one of the most common exposure protocols across pharmacological otoprotection studies.