1
|
Nwabufo CK, Hoque MT, Yip L, Khara M, Mubareka S, Pollanen MS, Bendayan R. SARS-CoV-2 infection dysregulates the expression of clinically relevant drug metabolizing enzymes in Vero E6 cells and membrane transporters in human lung tissues. Front Pharmacol 2023; 14:1124693. [PMID: 37180730 PMCID: PMC10172598 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1124693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2023] Open
Abstract
SARS-CoV-2-mediated interactions with drug metabolizing enzymes and membrane transporters (DMETs) in different tissues, especially lung, the main affected organ may limit the clinical efficacy and safety profile of promising COVID-19 drugs. Herein, we investigated whether SARS-CoV-2 infection could dysregulate the expression of 25 clinically relevant DMETs in Vero E6 cells and postmortem lung tissues from COVID-19 patients. Also, we assessed the role of 2 inflammatory and 4 regulatory proteins in modulating the dysregulation of DMETs in human lung tissues. We showed for the first time that SARS-CoV-2 infection dysregulates CYP3A4 and UGT1A1 at the mRNA level, as well as P-gp and MRP1 at the protein level, in Vero E6 cells and postmortem human lung tissues, respectively. We observed that at the cellular level, DMETs could potentially be dysregulated by SARS-CoV-2-associated inflammatory response and lung injury. We uncovered the pulmonary cellular localization of CYP1A2, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, and CYP2D6, as well as ENT1 and ENT2 in human lung tissues, and observed that the presence of inflammatory cells is the major driving force for the discrepancy in the localization of DMETs between COVID-19 and control human lung tissues. Because alveolar epithelial cells and lymphocytes are both sites of SARS-CoV-2 infection and localization of DMETs, we recommend further investigation of the pulmonary pharmacokinetic profile of current COVID-19 drug dosing regimen to improve clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chukwunonso K. Nwabufo
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- OneDrug, Toronto, ON, Canada
- *Correspondence: Chukwunonso K. Nwabufo, ,
| | - Md. Tozammel Hoque
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lily Yip
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Maliha Khara
- Ontario Forensic Pathology Service, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Samira Mubareka
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Michael S. Pollanen
- Ontario Forensic Pathology Service, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Reina Bendayan
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Grañana-Castillo S, Montanha MC, Bearon R, Khoo S, Siccardi M. Evaluation of drug-drug interaction between rilpivirine and rifapentine using PBPK modelling. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13:1076266. [PMID: 36588698 PMCID: PMC9797969 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1076266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Tuberculosis remains the leading cause of death among people living with HIV. Rifapentine is increasingly used to treat active disease or prevent reactivation, in both cases given either as weekly or daily therapy. However, rifapentine is an inducer of CYP3A4, potentially interacting with antiretrovirals like rilpivirine. This in silico study investigates the drug-drug interaction (DDI) magnitude between daily oral rilpivirine 25 mg with either daily 600 mg or weekly 900 mg rifapentine. A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was built in Simbiology (Matlab R2018a) to simulate the drug-drug interaction. The simulated PK parameters from the PBPK model were verified against reported clinical data for rilpivirine and rifapentine separately, daily rifapentine with midazolam, and weekly rifapentine with doravirine. The simulations of concomitant administration of rifapentine with rilpivirine at steady-state lead to a maximum decrease on AUC0-24 and Ctrough by 83% and 92% on day 5 for the daily rifapentine regimen and 68% and 92% for the weekly regimen on day 3. In the weekly regimen, prior to the following dose, AUC0-24 and Ctrough were still reduced by 47% and 53%. In both simulations, the induction effect ceased 2 weeks after the interruption of rifapentine's treatment. A daily double dose of rilpivirine after initiating rifapentine 900 mg weekly was simulated but failed to compensate the drug-drug interaction. The drug-drug interaction model suggested a significant decrease on rilpivirine exposure which is unlikely to be corrected by dose increment, thus coadministration should be avoided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Grañana-Castillo
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom,*Correspondence: Sandra Grañana-Castillo,
| | - Maiara Camotti Montanha
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Rachel Bearon
- Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Saye Khoo
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Marco Siccardi
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Co-Culture of THP-1 Cells and Normal Human Epidermal Keratinocytes (NHEK) for Modified Human Cell Line Activation Test (h-CLAT). APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/app12126207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
To improve the accuracy of skin sensitization prediction of chemicals by conventional alternative methods using cells, it is important to reproduce the environment of skin in vitro, such as the crosstalk between keratinocytes and dendritic cells (DCs). We developed a skin sensitization test system based on the markers and criteria of the human cell line activation test (h-CLAT), which combines THP-1 cells as a surrogate for DCs and keratinized normal human epidermal keratinocytes (NHEK). After exposure to chemicals via keratinized NHEK, the cell surface expression of CD54 and CD86 on THP-1 was measured by flow cytometry. This co-culture system evaluated 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB), a typical sensitizer, as positive, lactic acid (LA), a non-sensitizer, as negative, and isoeugenol (IE), a prohapten that requires biological activation to acquire skin sensitization, as positive. However, the expression levels of CD54 and CD86 in DNCB-treated THP-1 were lower than those in normal h-CLAT. Therefore, we investigated the effects of the medium and secretion by NHEK cells on THP-1 cells. CD54 and CD86 expression was enhanced in monocultured THP-1 in the medium for keratinized NHEK and in the conditioned medium of keratinized NHEK. The increase in CD54 and CD86 by changes in the medium type was higher than that by the NHEK secretion; therefore, it was found that the medium composition has a large effect on the evaluation index among the experimental parameters in the co-culture system. It is necessary to find the optimal medium for immunotoxicity assessment in the co-culture system.
Collapse
|
4
|
Araki H, Takenaka T, Takahashi K, Yamashita F, Matsuoka K, Yoshisue K, Ieiri I. A semimechanistic population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic model incorporating autoinduction for the dose justification of TAS-114. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol 2022; 11:604-615. [PMID: 34951129 PMCID: PMC9124359 DOI: 10.1002/psp4.12747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2021] [Revised: 10/17/2021] [Accepted: 11/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
TAS-114 is a dual deoxyuridine triphosphatase (dUTPase) and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) inhibitor expected to widen the therapeutic index of capecitabine. Its maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was determined from a safety perspective in a combination study with capecitabine; however, its inhibitory effects on DPD activity were not assessed in the study. The dose justification to select its MTD as the recommended dose in terms of DPD inhibition has been required, but the autoinduction profile of TAS-114 made it difficult. To this end, an approach using a population pharmacokinetic (PPK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) model incorporating autoinduction was planned; however, the utility of this approach in the dose justification has not been reported. Thus, the aim of this study was to demonstrate the utility of a PPK/PD model incorporating autoinduction in the dose justification via a case study of TAS-114. Plasma concentrations of TAS-114 from 185 subjects and those of the endogenous DPD substrate uracil from 24 subjects were used. A two-compartment model with first-order absorption with lag time and an enzyme turnover model were selected for the pharmacokinetic (PK) model. Moreover, an indirect response model was selected for the PD model to capture the changes in plasma uracil concentrations. Model-based simulations provided the dose justification that DPD inhibition by TAS-114 reached a plateau level at the MTD, whereas exposures of TAS-114 increased dose dependently. Thus, the utility of a PPK/PD model incorporating autoinduction in the dose justification was demonstrated via this case study of TAS-114.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hikari Araki
- Pharmacokinetics Research LaboratoriesTaiho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.TsukubaIbarakiJapan
| | - Toru Takenaka
- Pharmacokinetics Research LaboratoriesTaiho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.TsukubaIbarakiJapan
| | - Koichi Takahashi
- Pharmacokinetics Research LaboratoriesTaiho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.TsukubaIbarakiJapan
| | - Fumiaki Yamashita
- Pharmacokinetics Research LaboratoriesTaiho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.TsukubaIbarakiJapan
| | - Kazuaki Matsuoka
- Pharmacokinetics Research LaboratoriesTaiho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.TsukubaIbarakiJapan
| | - Kunihiro Yoshisue
- Pharmacokinetics Research LaboratoriesTaiho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.TsukubaIbarakiJapan
| | - Ichiro Ieiri
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Biopharmaceutics, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical SciencesKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan
- Department of PharmacyKyushu University HospitalFukuokaJapan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Smutny T, Bernhauerova V, Smutna L, Tebbens JD, Pavek P. Expression dynamics of pregnane X receptor-controlled genes in 3D primary human hepatocyte spheroids. Arch Toxicol 2021; 96:195-210. [PMID: 34689256 DOI: 10.1007/s00204-021-03177-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2021] [Accepted: 10/06/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The pregnane X receptor (PXR) is a ligand-activated nuclear receptor controlling hepatocyte expression of numerous genes. Although expression changes in xenobiotic-metabolizing, lipogenic, gluconeogenic and bile acid synthetic genes have been described after PXR activation, the temporal dynamics of their expression is largely unknown. Recently, 3D spheroids of primary human hepatocytes (PHHs) have been characterized as the most phenotypically relevant hepatocyte model. We used 3D PHHs to assess time-dependent expression profiles of 12 prototypic PXR-controlled genes in the time course of 168 h of rifampicin treatment (1 or 10 µM). We observed a similar bell-shaped time-induction pattern for xenobiotic-handling genes (CYP3A4, CYP2C9, CYP2B6, and MDR1). However, we observed either biphasic profiles for genes involved in endogenous metabolism (FASN, GLUT2, G6PC, PCK1, and CYP7A1), a decrease for SHP or oscillation for PDK4 and PXR. The rifampicin concentration determined the expression profiles for some genes. Moreover, we calculated half-lives of CYP3A4 and CYP2C9 mRNA under induced or basal conditions and we used a mathematical model to describe PXR-mediated regulation of CYP3A4 expression employing 3D PHHs. The study shows the importance of long-term time-expression profiling of PXR target genes in phenotypically stable 3D PHHs and provides insight into PXR function in liver beyond our knowledge from conventional 2D in vitro models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomas Smutny
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy in Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Akademika Heyrovskeho 1203, Hradec Kralove, 500 05, Czech Republic.
| | - Veronika Bernhauerova
- Department of Biophysics and Physical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy in Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Akademika Heyrovskeho 1203, Hradec Kralove, 500 05, Czech Republic
| | - Lucie Smutna
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy in Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Akademika Heyrovskeho 1203, Hradec Kralove, 500 05, Czech Republic
| | - Jurjen Duintjer Tebbens
- Department of Biophysics and Physical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy in Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Akademika Heyrovskeho 1203, Hradec Kralove, 500 05, Czech Republic
| | - Petr Pavek
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy in Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Akademika Heyrovskeho 1203, Hradec Kralove, 500 05, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Predicting Drug-Drug Interactions between Rifampicin and Ritonavir-Boosted Atazanavir Using PBPK Modelling. Clin Pharmacokinet 2021; 61:375-386. [PMID: 34635995 PMCID: PMC9481493 DOI: 10.1007/s40262-021-01067-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/09/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Objectives The aim of this study was to simulate the drug–drug interaction (DDI) between ritonavir-boosted atazanavir (ATV/r) and rifampicin (RIF) using physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modelling, and to predict suitable dose adjustments for ATV/r for the treatment of people living with HIV (PLWH) co-infected with tuberculosis. Methods A whole-body DDI PBPK model was designed using Simbiology 9.6.0 (MATLAB R2019a) and verified against reported clinical data for all drugs administered alone and concomitantly. The model contained the induction mechanisms of RIF and ritonavir (RTV), the inhibition effect of RTV for the enzymes involved in the DDI, and the induction and inhibition mechanisms of RIF and RTV on the uptake and efflux hepatic transporters. The model was considered verified if the observed versus predicted pharmacokinetic values were within twofold. Alternative ATV/r dosing regimens were simulated to achieve the trough concentration (Ctrough) clinical cut-off of 150 ng/mL. Results The PBPK model was successfully verified according to the criteria. Simulation of different dose adjustments predicted that a change in regimen to twice-daily ATV/r (300/100 or 300/200 mg) may alleviate the induction effect of RIF on ATV Ctrough, with > 95% of individuals predicted to achieve Ctrough above the clinical cut-off. Conclusions The developed PBPK model characterized the induction-mediated DDI between RIF and ATV/r, accurately predicting the reduction of ATV plasma concentrations in line with observed clinical data. A change in the ATV/r dosing regimen from once-daily to twice-daily was predicted to mitigate the effect of the DDI on the Ctrough of ATV, maintaining plasma concentration levels above the therapeutic threshold for most patients. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40262-021-01067-1.
Collapse
|
7
|
Jahns H, Degaonkar R, Podbevsek P, Gupta S, Bisbe A, Aluri K, Szeto J, Kumar P, LeBlanc S, Racie T, Brown CR, Castoreno A, Guenther DC, Jadhav V, Maier MA, Plavec J, Egli M, Manoharan M, Zlatev I. Small circular interfering RNAs (sciRNAs) as a potent therapeutic platform for gene-silencing. Nucleic Acids Res 2021; 49:10250-10264. [PMID: 34508350 PMCID: PMC8501968 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2021] [Revised: 08/05/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
In order to achieve efficient therapeutic post-transcriptional gene-silencing mediated by the RNA interference (RNAi) pathway, small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) must be chemically modified. Several supra-RNA structures, with the potential to stabilize siRNAs metabolically have been evaluated for their ability to induce gene silencing, but all have limitations or have not been explored in therapeutically relevant contexts. Covalently closed circular RNA transcripts are prevalent in eukaryotes and have potential as biomarkers and disease targets, and circular RNA mimics are being explored for use as therapies. Here we report the synthesis and evaluation of small circular interfering RNAs (sciRNAs). To synthesize sciRNAs, a sense strand functionalized with the trivalent N-acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc) ligand and cyclized using ‘click’ chemistry was annealed to an antisense strand. This strategy was used for synthesis of small circles, but could also be used for synthesis of larger circular RNA mimics. We evaluated various sciRNA designs in vitro and in vivo. We observed improved metabolic stability of the sense strand upon circularization and off-target effects were eliminated. The 5′-(E)-vinylphosphonate modification of the antisense strand resulted in GalNAc-sciRNAs that are potent in vivo at therapeutically relevant doses. Physicochemical studies and NMR-based structural analysis, together with molecular modeling studies, shed light on the interactions of this novel class of siRNAs, which have a partial duplex character, with the RNAi machinery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hartmut Jahns
- Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | | | - Peter Podbevsek
- Slovenian NMR Center, National Institute of Chemistry, Hajdrihova 19, SI-1001 Ljubljana, Slovenia, EU
| | - Swati Gupta
- Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | - Anna Bisbe
- Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | - Krishna Aluri
- Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | - John Szeto
- Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | - Pawan Kumar
- Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | - Sarah LeBlanc
- Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | - Tim Racie
- Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | | | | | | | - Vasant Jadhav
- Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | | | - Janez Plavec
- Slovenian NMR Center, National Institute of Chemistry, Hajdrihova 19, SI-1001 Ljubljana, Slovenia, EU
| | - Martin Egli
- Department of Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
| | | | - Ivan Zlatev
- Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Dunvald ACD, Järvinen E, Mortensen C, Stage TB. Clinical and Molecular Perspectives on Inflammation-Mediated Regulation of Drug Metabolism and Transport. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2021; 112:277-290. [PMID: 34605009 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.2432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Inflammation is a possible cause of variability in drug response and toxicity due to altered regulation in drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters (DMETs) in humans. Here, we evaluate the clinical and in vitro evidence on inflammation-mediated modulation of DMETs, and the impact on drug metabolism in humans. Furthermore, we identify and discuss the gaps in our current knowledge. A systematic literature search on PubMed, Embase, and grey literature was performed in the period of February to September 2020. A total of 203 papers was included. In vitro studies in primary human hepatocytes revealed strong evidence that CYP3A4 is strongly downregulated by inflammatory cytokines IL-6 and IL-1β. CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, and CYP2D6 were downregulated to a lesser extent. In clinical studies, acute and chronic inflammatory diseases were observed to cause downregulation of CYP enzymes in a similar pattern. However, there is no clear correlation between in vitro studies and clinical studies, mainly because most in vitro studies use supraphysiological cytokine doses. Moreover, clinical studies demonstrate considerable variability in terms of methodology and inconsistencies in evaluation of the inflammatory state. In conclusion, we find inflammation and pro-inflammatory cytokines to be important factors in regulation of drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters. The observed downregulation is clinically relevant, and we emphasize caution when treating patients in an inflammatory state with narrow therapeutic index drugs. Further research is needed to identify the full extent of inflammation-mediated changes in DMETs and to further support personalized medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann-Cathrine Dalgård Dunvald
- Clinical Pharmacology, Pharmacy, and Environmental Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense C, Denmark
| | - Erkka Järvinen
- Clinical Pharmacology, Pharmacy, and Environmental Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense C, Denmark
| | - Christina Mortensen
- Clinical Pharmacology, Pharmacy, and Environmental Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense C, Denmark
| | - Tore B Stage
- Clinical Pharmacology, Pharmacy, and Environmental Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense C, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Erasmus C, Aucamp J, Smit FJ, Seldon R, Jordaan A, Warner DF, N'Da DD. Synthesis and comparison of in vitro dual anti-infective activities of novel naphthoquinone hybrids and atovaquone. Bioorg Chem 2021; 114:105118. [PMID: 34216896 DOI: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2021.105118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2020] [Revised: 05/11/2021] [Accepted: 06/19/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
A principal factor that contributes towards the failure to eradicate leishmaniasis and tuberculosis infections is the reduced efficacy of existing chemotherapies, owing to a continuous increase in multidrug-resistant strains of the causative pathogens. This accentuates the dire need to develop new and effective drugs against both plights. A series of naphthoquinone-triazole hybrids was synthesized and evaluated in vitro against Leishmania (L.) and Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) strains. Their cytotoxicities were also evaluated, using the human embryonic kidney cell line (HEK-293). The hybrids were found to be non-toxic towards human cells and had demonstrated micromolar cellular antileishmanial and antimycobacterial potencies. Hybrid 13, i.e. 2-{[1-(4-methylbenzyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl]methoxy}naphthalene-1,4-dione was the most active of all. It was found with MIC90 0.5 µM potency against Mtb in a protein free medium, and with half-maxima inhibitory concentrations (IC50) of 0.81 µM and 1.48 µM against the infective promastigote parasites of L. donavani and L. major, respectively, with good selectivity towards these pathogens (SI 22 - 65). Comparatively, the clinical naphthoquinone, atovaquone, although less cytotoxic, was found to be two-fold less antimycobacterial potent, and six- to twelve-fold less active against leishmania. Hybrid 13 may therefore stand as a potential anti-infective hit for further development in the search for new antitubercular and antileishmanial drugs. Elucidation of its exact mechanism of action and molecular targets will constitute future endeavour.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chané Erasmus
- Pharmaceutical Chemistry, School of Pharmacy, North-West University, Potchefstroom 2520, South Africa
| | - Janine Aucamp
- Centre of Excellence for Pharmaceutical Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom 2520, South Africa
| | - Frans J Smit
- Centre of Excellence for Pharmaceutical Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom 2520, South Africa
| | - Ronnett Seldon
- SAMRC Drug Discovery and Development Research Unit, University of Cape Town, Cape Town 7700, South Africa
| | - Audrey Jordaan
- SAMRC/NHLS/UCT Molecular Mycobacteriology Research Unit, Department of Pathology and Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, 7925, South Africa
| | - Digby F Warner
- SAMRC/NHLS/UCT Molecular Mycobacteriology Research Unit, Department of Pathology and Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, 7925, South Africa; Wellcome Centre for Clinical Infectious Diseases Research in Africa, University of Cape Town, Cape Town 7925, South Africa
| | - David D N'Da
- Centre of Excellence for Pharmaceutical Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom 2520, South Africa.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Smythe MA, Burns C, Liu Q, Garwood CL. Potential Dexamethasone-Direct Oral Anticoagulant Drug Interaction: Is This a Concern in COVID? Ann Pharmacother 2021; 56:319-329. [PMID: 34137279 DOI: 10.1177/10600280211025042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the literature on a potential dexamethasone-direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) drug interaction and provide management considerations with COVID hypercoagulability. DATA SOURCES A search of EMBASE, PubMed, and Google Scholar (January 1990 to May 2021), limited to the English language, using applicable search terms resulted in 137 articles, with 21 relevant articles included. Regulatory agency and clinical guidance documents were also reviewed. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION Included articles describe in vitro or in vivo animal or human data for dexamethasone induction of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 or P-glycoprotein (P-gp). DATA SYNTHESIS Dexamethasone has the potential to interact with the DOACs via CYP3A4 and/or P-gp induction. Only apixaban and rivaroxaban have CYP3A4 metabolism. Dexamethasone can increase CYP3A4 activity by up to 70% and reduce the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of CYP3A4 substrates by >40%, which is consistent with criteria for a weak CYP inducer. In rodents, dexamethasone P-gp induction is associated with AUC reductions of 20% to 50%. Human data are lacking. RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE Severe COVID-19 infection is associated with hypercoagulability. Although heparins are the preferred anticoagulants for hospitalized COVID-19 patients, DOACs are being utilized. Dexamethasone is recommended for hospitalized COVID-19 patients requiring supplemental oxygen. The concurrent use of dexamethasone and apixaban or rivaroxaban in such patients carries the potential for reduced anticoagulant effect during a state of heightened thrombotic risk. CONCLUSIONS Concurrent use of dexamethasone and apixaban or rivaroxaban in hospitalized COVID-19 patients with laboratory evidence of COVID coagulopathy should be avoided until higher-quality data are available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maureen A Smythe
- Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.,Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA
| | | | | | - Candice L Garwood
- Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.,Detroit Medical Center, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Peng Y, Cheng Z, Xie F. Evaluation of Pharmacokinetic Drug-Drug Interactions: A Review of the Mechanisms, In Vitro and In Silico Approaches. Metabolites 2021; 11:metabo11020075. [PMID: 33513941 PMCID: PMC7912632 DOI: 10.3390/metabo11020075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2020] [Revised: 01/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Pharmacokinetic drug–drug interactions (DDIs) occur when a drug alters the absorption, transport, distribution, metabolism or excretion of a co-administered agent. The occurrence of pharmacokinetic DDIs may result in the increase or the decrease of drug concentrations, which can significantly affect the drug efficacy and safety in patients. Enzyme-mediated DDIs are of primary concern, while the transporter-mediated DDIs are less understood but also important. In this review, we presented an overview of the different mechanisms leading to DDIs, the in vitro experimental tools for capturing the factors affecting DDIs, and in silico methods for quantitative predictions of DDIs. We also emphasized the power and strategy of physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models for the assessment of DDIs, which can integrate relevant in vitro data to simulate potential drug interaction in vivo. Lastly, we pointed out the future directions and challenges for the evaluation of pharmacokinetic DDIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Feifan Xie
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +86-0731-8265-0446
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wong SG, Ramsden D, Dallas S, Fung C, Einolf HJ, Palamanda J, Chen L, Goosen TC, Siu YA, Zhang G, Tweedie D, Hariparsad N, Jones B, Yates PD. Considerations from the Innovation and Quality Induction Working Group in Response to Drug-Drug Interaction Guidance from Regulatory Agencies: Guidelines on Model Fitting and Recommendations on Time Course for In Vitro Cytochrome P450 Induction Studies Including Impact on Drug Interaction Risk Assessment. Drug Metab Dispos 2020; 49:94-110. [DOI: 10.1124/dmd.120.000055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2020] [Accepted: 10/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
|
13
|
Docci L, Klammers F, Ekiciler A, Molitor B, Umehara K, Walter I, Krähenbühl S, Parrott N, Fowler S. In Vitro to In Vivo Extrapolation of Metabolic Clearance for UGT Substrates Using Short-Term Suspension and Long-Term Co-cultured Human Hepatocytes. AAPS JOURNAL 2020; 22:131. [DOI: 10.1208/s12248-020-00482-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2020] [Accepted: 07/10/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
|
14
|
Chan TS, Scaringella YS, Raymond K, Taub ME. Evaluation of Erythromycin as a Tool to Assess CYP3A Contribution of Low Clearance Compounds in a Long-Term Hepatocyte Culture. Drug Metab Dispos 2020; 48:690-697. [PMID: 32503882 DOI: 10.1124/dmd.120.090951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2020] [Accepted: 04/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Long-term hepatocyte culture systems such as HepatoPac are well suited to evaluate the metabolic turnover of low clearance (CL) drugs because of their sustained metabolic capacity and longer-term viability. Erythromycin (ERY), a moderate, mechanism-based inhibitor of CYP3A, was evaluated as a tool in the HepatoPac model to assess contribution of CYP3A to the clearance of drug candidates. ERY inhibited CYP3A activity by 58% and 80% at 3 and 10 μM, respectively, for up to 72 hours. At 30 µM, ERY inhibited midazolam hydroxylation by >85% for the entire 144-hour duration of the incubation. Alprazolam CLint was inhibited 58% by 3 μM of ERY, 75% by 15 μM of ERY, 89% by 30 μM of ERY, and 94% by 60 μM of ERY. ERY (30 μM) did not markedly affect CLint of substrates for several other major cytochrome P450 isoforms evaluated and did not markedly inhibit uridine diphosphoglucuronosyl transferase (UGT) isoforms 1A1, 1A3, 1A4, 1A6, 1A9, 2B7, or 2B15 as assessed using recombinant UGTs. ERY only mildly increased CYP3A4 gene expression by 2.1-fold (14% of rifampicin induction) at 120 µM, indicating that at effective concentrations for inhibition of CYP3A activity (30-60 µM), arylhydrocarbon receptor, constitutive androstane receptor, and pregnane-X-receptor activation are not likely to markedly increase levels of other drug-metabolizing enzymes or transporters. ERY at concentrations up to 60 µM was not toxic for up to 6 days of incubation. Use of ERY to selectively inhibit CYP3A in high-functioning, long-term hepatocyte models such as HepatoPac can be a valuable strategy to evaluate the contribution of CYP3A metabolism to the overall clearance of slowly metabolized drug candidates. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This work describes the use of erythromycin as a selective inhibitor of CYP3A to assess the contribution of CYP3A in the metabolism of compounds using long-term hepatocyte cultures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom S Chan
- Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc., Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Ridgefield, Connecticut
| | - Young-Sun Scaringella
- Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc., Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Ridgefield, Connecticut
| | - Klairynne Raymond
- Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc., Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Ridgefield, Connecticut
| | - Mitchell E Taub
- Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc., Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Ridgefield, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Yadav J, Paragas E, Korzekwa K, Nagar S. Time-dependent enzyme inactivation: Numerical analyses of in vitro data and prediction of drug-drug interactions. Pharmacol Ther 2020; 206:107449. [PMID: 31836452 PMCID: PMC6995442 DOI: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2019.107449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme kinetics often do not conform to Michaelis-Menten assumptions, and time-dependent inactivation (TDI) of CYPs displays complexities such as multiple substrate binding, partial inactivation, quasi-irreversible inactivation, and sequential metabolism. Additionally, in vitro experimental issues such as lipid partitioning, enzyme concentrations, and inactivator depletion can further complicate the parameterization of in vitro TDI. The traditional replot method used to analyze in vitro TDI datasets is unable to handle complexities in CYP kinetics, and numerical approaches using ordinary differential equations of the kinetic schemes offer several advantages. Improvement in the parameterization of CYP in vitro kinetics has the potential to improve prediction of clinical drug-drug interactions (DDIs). This manuscript discusses various complexities in TDI kinetics of CYPs, and numerical approaches to model these complexities. The extrapolation of CYP in vitro TDI parameters to predict in vivo DDIs with static and dynamic modeling is discussed, along with a discussion on current gaps in knowledge and future directions to improve the prediction of DDI with in vitro data for CYP catalyzed drug metabolism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaydeep Yadav
- Amgen Inc., 360 Binney Street, Cambridge, MA 02142, United States; Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19140, United States
| | - Erickson Paragas
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19140, United States
| | - Ken Korzekwa
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19140, United States
| | - Swati Nagar
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19140, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
Engineering approaches were adopted for liver microsystems to recapitulate cell arrangements and culture microenvironments in vivo for sensitive, high-throughput and biomimetic drug screening. This review introduces liver microsystems in vitro for drug hepatotoxicity, drug-drug interactions, metabolic function and enzyme induction, based on cell micropatterning, hydrogel biofabrication and microfluidic perfusion. The engineered microsystems provide varied microenvironments for cell culture that feature cell coculture with non-parenchymal cells, in a heterogeneous extracellular matrix and under controllable perfusion. The engineering methods described include cell micropatterning with soft lithography and dielectrophoresis, hydrogel biofabrication with photolithography, micromolding and 3D bioprinting, and microfluidic perfusion with endothelial-like structures and gradient generators. We discuss the major challenges and trends of liver microsystems to study drug response in vitro.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jyong-Huei Lee
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Kuan-Lun Ho
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Shih-Kang Fan
- Department of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 66506, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ramsden D, Fung C, Hariparsad N, Kenny JR, Mohutsky M, Parrott NJ, Robertson S, Tweedie DJ. Perspectives from the Innovation and Quality Consortium Induction Working Group on Factors Impacting Clinical Drug-Drug Interactions Resulting from Induction: Focus on Cytochrome 3A Substrates. Drug Metab Dispos 2019; 47:1206-1221. [PMID: 31439574 DOI: 10.1124/dmd.119.087270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2019] [Accepted: 08/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
A recent publication from the Innovation and Quality Consortium Induction Working Group collated a large clinical data set with the goal of evaluating the accuracy of drug-drug interaction (DDI) prediction from in vitro data. Somewhat surprisingly, comparison across studies of the mean- or median-reported area under the curve ratio showed appreciable variability in the magnitude of outcome. This commentary explores the possible drivers of this range of outcomes observed in clinical induction studies. While recommendations on clinical study design are not being proposed, some key observations were informative during the aggregate analysis of clinical data. Although DDI data are often presented using median data, individual data would enable evaluation of how differences in study design, baseline expression, and the number of subjects contribute. Since variability in perpetrator pharmacokinetics (PK) could impact the overall DDI interpretation, should this be routinely captured? Maximal induction was typically observed after 5-7 days of dosing. Thus, when the half-life of the inducer is less than 30 hours, are there benefits to a more standardized study design? A large proportion of CYP3A4 inducers were also CYP3A4 inhibitors and/or inactivators based on in vitro data. In these cases, using CYP3A selective substrates has limitations. More intensive monitoring of changes in area under the curve over time is warranted. With selective CYP3A substrates, the net effect was often inhibition, whereas less selective substrates could discern induction through mechanisms not susceptible to inhibition. The latter included oral contraceptives, which raise concerns of reduced efficacy following induction. Alternative approaches for modeling induction, such as applying biomarkers and physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling (PBPK), are also considered. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The goal of this commentary is to stimulate discussion on whether there are opportunities to optimize clinical drug-drug interaction study design. The overall aim is to reduce, understand and contextualize the variability observed in the magnitude of induction across reported clinical studies. A large clinical CYP3A induction dataset was collected and further analyzed to identify trends and gaps. Reporting individual victim PK data, characterizing perpetrator PK and including additional PK assessments for mixed-mechanism perpetrators may provide insights into how these factors impact differences observed in clinical outcomes. The potential utility of biomarkers and PBPK modeling are discussed in considering future directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diane Ramsden
- Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, Massachusetts (D.R.); Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Boston, Massachusetts (C.F., N.H., S.R.); Genentech, South San Francisco, California (J.R.K.); Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana (M.M.); Roche Innovation Center, Basel, Switzerland (N.J.P.); and Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey (D.T.)
| | - Conrad Fung
- Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, Massachusetts (D.R.); Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Boston, Massachusetts (C.F., N.H., S.R.); Genentech, South San Francisco, California (J.R.K.); Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana (M.M.); Roche Innovation Center, Basel, Switzerland (N.J.P.); and Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey (D.T.)
| | - Niresh Hariparsad
- Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, Massachusetts (D.R.); Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Boston, Massachusetts (C.F., N.H., S.R.); Genentech, South San Francisco, California (J.R.K.); Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana (M.M.); Roche Innovation Center, Basel, Switzerland (N.J.P.); and Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey (D.T.)
| | - Jane R Kenny
- Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, Massachusetts (D.R.); Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Boston, Massachusetts (C.F., N.H., S.R.); Genentech, South San Francisco, California (J.R.K.); Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana (M.M.); Roche Innovation Center, Basel, Switzerland (N.J.P.); and Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey (D.T.)
| | - Michael Mohutsky
- Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, Massachusetts (D.R.); Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Boston, Massachusetts (C.F., N.H., S.R.); Genentech, South San Francisco, California (J.R.K.); Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana (M.M.); Roche Innovation Center, Basel, Switzerland (N.J.P.); and Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey (D.T.)
| | - Neil J Parrott
- Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, Massachusetts (D.R.); Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Boston, Massachusetts (C.F., N.H., S.R.); Genentech, South San Francisco, California (J.R.K.); Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana (M.M.); Roche Innovation Center, Basel, Switzerland (N.J.P.); and Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey (D.T.)
| | - Sarah Robertson
- Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, Massachusetts (D.R.); Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Boston, Massachusetts (C.F., N.H., S.R.); Genentech, South San Francisco, California (J.R.K.); Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana (M.M.); Roche Innovation Center, Basel, Switzerland (N.J.P.); and Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey (D.T.)
| | - Donald J Tweedie
- Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, Massachusetts (D.R.); Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Boston, Massachusetts (C.F., N.H., S.R.); Genentech, South San Francisco, California (J.R.K.); Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana (M.M.); Roche Innovation Center, Basel, Switzerland (N.J.P.); and Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey (D.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
van Eijk M, Boosman RJ, Schinkel AH, Huitema ADR, Beijnen JH. Cytochrome P450 3A4, 3A5, and 2C8 expression in breast, prostate, lung, endometrial, and ovarian tumors: relevance for resistance to taxanes. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2019; 84:487-499. [PMID: 31309254 PMCID: PMC6682574 DOI: 10.1007/s00280-019-03905-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2019] [Accepted: 07/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Enzymes of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) subfamily 3A and 2C play a major role in the metabolism of taxane anticancer agents. While their function in hepatic metabolism of taxanes is well established, expression of these enzymes in solid tumors may play a role in the in situ metabolism of drugs as well, potentially affecting the intrinsic taxane susceptibility of these tumors. This article reviews the available literature on intratumoral expression of docetaxel- and paclitaxel-metabolizing enzymes in mammary, prostate, lung, endometrial, and ovarian tumors. Furthermore, the clinical implications of the intratumoral expression of these enzymes are reviewed and the potential of concomitant treatment with protease inhibitors (PIs) as a method to inhibit CYP3A4-mediated metabolism is discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maarten van Eijk
- Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - René J Boosman
- Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alfred H Schinkel
- Division of Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alwin D R Huitema
- Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jos H Beijnen
- Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Division of Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Science Faculty, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80082, 3508 TB, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Gjestad C, Hole K, Haslemo T, Diczfalusy U, Molden E. Effect of Grapefruit Juice Intake on Serum Level of the Endogenous CYP3A4 Metabolite 4β-Hydroxycholesterol-an Interaction Study in Healthy Volunteers. AAPS JOURNAL 2019; 21:58. [PMID: 31020430 DOI: 10.1208/s12248-019-0330-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2019] [Accepted: 04/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
4β-Hydroxycholesterol (4βOHC) is an endogenous CYP3A4 metabolite. However, it is unclear whether circulating levels of 4βOHC may reflect hepatic CYP3A4 activity or both hepatic and intestinal enzyme activity. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of grapefruit juice, regarded to be a selective intestinal CYP3A4 inhibitor, on serum 4βOHC levels in healthy volunteers. The participants (n = 22) consumed grapefruit juice twice daily for 3 weeks followed by a 2-week washout period. Blood samples for measurements of 4βOHC and the non-CYP3A4-derived oxysterols 24-hydroxycholesterol (24OHC) and 27-hydroxycholesterol (27OHC), as well as lathosterol and total cholesterol, were drawn on days 0, 7, 21, and 35. Median individual changes (ratios) in cholesterol-corrected 4βOHC levels from baseline to weeks 1, 3, and 5 were 0.94 (P = 0.2), 0.98 (P = 0.3), and 0.97 (P = 0.9), respectively. In comparison, median changes (ratios) in cholesterol-corrected levels of 24OHC at the same points were 1.01 (P = 0.6), 0.98 (P = 0.3), and 0.99 (P = 0.5), and of 27OHC 1.01 (P = 0.8), 0.97 (P = 0.5), and 0.99 (P = 0.2). Surprisingly, serum concentration of cholesterol was significantly reduced by approximately 5% after 1 week (P = 0.03), while median cholesterol-corrected levels of lathosterol increased significantly and persistently by approximately 15% during the whole 5-week period (P < 0.04). In conclusion, the present findings suggest that intestinal CYP3A4 is not relevant for the overall formation of 4βOHC in healthy volunteers. The fact that grapefruit juice altered cholesterol homeostasis should be further investigated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Gjestad
- Center for Psychopharmacology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, PO Box 85, Vinderen, N-0319, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Kristine Hole
- Center for Psychopharmacology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, PO Box 85, Vinderen, N-0319, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tore Haslemo
- Center for Psychopharmacology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, PO Box 85, Vinderen, N-0319, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ulf Diczfalusy
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden
| | - Espen Molden
- Center for Psychopharmacology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, PO Box 85, Vinderen, N-0319, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Docci L, Parrott N, Krähenbühl S, Fowler S. Application of New Cellular and Microphysiological Systems to Drug Metabolism Optimization and Their Positioning Respective to In Silico Tools. SLAS DISCOVERY 2019; 24:523-536. [PMID: 30817893 DOI: 10.1177/2472555219831407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
New cellular model systems for drug metabolism applications, such as advanced 2D liver co-cultures, spheroids, and microphysiological systems (MPSs), offer exciting opportunities to reproduce human biology more closely in vitro with the aim of improving predictions of pharmacokinetics, drug-drug interactions, and efficacy. These advanced cellular systems have quickly become established for human intrinsic clearance determination and have been validated for several other absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) applications. Adoption will be driven through the demonstration of clear added value, for instance, by more accurate and precise clearance predictions and by more reliable extrapolation of drug interaction potential leading to faster progression to pivotal proof-of-concept studies. New experimental systems are attractive when they can (1) increase experimental capacity, removing optimization bottlenecks; (2) improve measurement quality of ADME properties that impact pharmacokinetics; and (3) enable measurements to be made that were not previously possible, reducing risk in ADME prediction and candidate selection. As new systems become established, they will find their place in the repository of tools used at different stages of the research and development process, depending on the balance of value, throughput, and cost. In this article, we give a perspective on the integration of these new methodologies into ADME optimization during drug discovery, and the likely applications and impacts on drug development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Docci
- 1 Pharmaceutical Sciences, Roche Pharma Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Centre Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,2 Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Neil Parrott
- 1 Pharmaceutical Sciences, Roche Pharma Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Centre Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Stephen Fowler
- 1 Pharmaceutical Sciences, Roche Pharma Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Centre Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Mosedale M, Eaddy JS, Trask OJ, Holman NS, Wolf KK, LeCluyse E, Ware BR, Khetani SR, Lu J, Brock WJ, Roth SE, Watkins PB. miR-122 Release in Exosomes Precedes Overt Tolvaptan-Induced Necrosis in a Primary Human Hepatocyte Micropatterned Coculture Model. Toxicol Sci 2019; 161:149-158. [PMID: 29029277 DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfx206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (IDILI) is thought to often result from an adaptive immune attack on the liver. However, it has been proposed that the cascade of events culminating in an adaptive immune response begins with drug-induced hepatocyte stress, release of exosomal danger signals, and innate immune activation, all of which may occur in the absence of significant hepatocelluar death. A micropatterned coculture model (HepatoPac) was used to explore the possibility that changes in exosome content precede overt necrosis in response to the IDILI drug tolvaptan. Hepatocytes from 3 human donors were exposed to a range of tolvaptan concentrations bracketing plasma Cmax or DMSO control continuously for 4, 24, or 72 h. Although alanine aminotransferase release was not significantly affected at any concentration, tolvaptan exposures at approximately 30-fold median plasma Cmax resulted in increased release of exosomal microRNA-122 (miR-122) into the medium. Cellular imaging and microarray analysis revealed that the most significant increases in exosomal miR-122 were associated with programmed cell death and small increases in membrane permeability. However, early increases in exosome miR-122 were more associated with mitochondrial-induced apoptosis and oxidative stress. Taken together, these data suggest that tolvaptan treatment induces cellular stress and exosome release of miR-122 in primary human hepatocytes in the absence of overt necrosis, providing direct demonstration of this with a drug capable of causing IDILI. In susceptible individuals, these early events may occur at pharmacologic concentrations of tolvaptan and may promote an adaptive immune attack that ultimately results in clinically significant liver injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Merrie Mosedale
- Institute for Drug Safety Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709.,Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| | - J Scott Eaddy
- Institute for Drug Safety Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709.,Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| | - O Joseph Trask
- Institute for Drug Safety Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709
| | - Natalie S Holman
- Institute for Drug Safety Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709.,Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599.,Curriculum in Toxicology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| | - Kristina K Wolf
- Institute for Drug Safety Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709.,QPS DMPK Hepatic Biosciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709
| | - Edward LeCluyse
- Institute for Drug Safety Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709.,Curriculum in Toxicology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| | - Brenton R Ware
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523.,Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60607
| | - Salman R Khetani
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60607
| | - Jingtao Lu
- Institute for Drug Safety Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709
| | - William J Brock
- Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc, Rockville, Maryland 20850.,Brock Scientific Consulting, Montgomery Village, Maryland 20886
| | - Sharin E Roth
- Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc, Rockville, Maryland 20850
| | - Paul B Watkins
- Institute for Drug Safety Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709.,Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kenny JR, Ramsden D, Buckley DB, Dallas S, Fung C, Mohutsky M, Einolf HJ, Chen L, Dekeyser JG, Fitzgerald M, Goosen TC, Siu YA, Walsky RL, Zhang G, Tweedie D, Hariparsad N. Considerations from the Innovation and Quality Induction Working Group in Response to Drug-Drug Interaction Guidances from Regulatory Agencies: Focus on CYP3A4 mRNA In Vitro Response Thresholds, Variability, and Clinical Relevance. Drug Metab Dispos 2018; 46:1285-1303. [PMID: 29959133 DOI: 10.1124/dmd.118.081927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2018] [Accepted: 06/18/2018] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The Innovation and Quality Induction Working Group presents an assessment of best practice for data interpretation of in vitro induction, specifically, response thresholds, variability, application of controls, and translation to clinical risk assessment with focus on CYP3A4 mRNA. Single concentration control data and Emax/EC50 data for prototypical CYP3A4 inducers were compiled from many human hepatocyte donors in different laboratories. Clinical CYP3A induction and in vitro data were gathered for 51 compounds, 16 of which were proprietary. A large degree of variability was observed in both the clinical and in vitro induction responses; however, analysis confirmed in vitro data are able to predict clinical induction risk. Following extensive examination of this large data set, the following recommendations are proposed. a) Cytochrome P450 induction should continue to be evaluated in three separate human donors in vitro. b) In light of empirically divergent responses in rifampicin control and most test inducers, normalization of data to percent positive control appears to be of limited benefit. c) With concentration dependence, 2-fold induction is an acceptable threshold for positive identification of in vitro CYP3A4 mRNA induction. d) To reduce the risk of false positives, in the absence of a concentration-dependent response, induction ≥ 2-fold should be observed in more than one donor to classify a compound as an in vitro inducer. e) If qualifying a compound as negative for CYP3A4 mRNA induction, the magnitude of maximal rifampicin response in that donor should be ≥ 10-fold. f) Inclusion of a negative control adds no value beyond that of the vehicle control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane R Kenny
- Genentech, South San Francisco, California (J.R.K.); Boehringer Ingelheim, Ridgefield, Connecticut (D.R.); Sekisui-XenoTech LLC, Kansas City, Kansas (D.B.B.); Janssen R&D, Spring House, Pennsylvania (S.D.); Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Boston, Massachusetts (C.F., N.H.); Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana (M.M.); Novartis, East Hanover, New Jersey (H.J.E.); GlaxoSmithKline, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania (L.C.); Amgen Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts (J.G.D.); Sanofi, Waltham, Massachusetts (M.F.); Pfizer Global Research and Development, Groton, Connecticut (T.C.G.); Eisai, Andover, Massachusetts (Y.A.S.); EMD Serono R&D Institute, Inc., Billerica, Massachusetts (R.L.W.); Corning Life Sciences, Woburn, Massachusetts (G.Z.); and Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey (D.T.)
| | - Diane Ramsden
- Genentech, South San Francisco, California (J.R.K.); Boehringer Ingelheim, Ridgefield, Connecticut (D.R.); Sekisui-XenoTech LLC, Kansas City, Kansas (D.B.B.); Janssen R&D, Spring House, Pennsylvania (S.D.); Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Boston, Massachusetts (C.F., N.H.); Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana (M.M.); Novartis, East Hanover, New Jersey (H.J.E.); GlaxoSmithKline, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania (L.C.); Amgen Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts (J.G.D.); Sanofi, Waltham, Massachusetts (M.F.); Pfizer Global Research and Development, Groton, Connecticut (T.C.G.); Eisai, Andover, Massachusetts (Y.A.S.); EMD Serono R&D Institute, Inc., Billerica, Massachusetts (R.L.W.); Corning Life Sciences, Woburn, Massachusetts (G.Z.); and Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey (D.T.)
| | - David B Buckley
- Genentech, South San Francisco, California (J.R.K.); Boehringer Ingelheim, Ridgefield, Connecticut (D.R.); Sekisui-XenoTech LLC, Kansas City, Kansas (D.B.B.); Janssen R&D, Spring House, Pennsylvania (S.D.); Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Boston, Massachusetts (C.F., N.H.); Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana (M.M.); Novartis, East Hanover, New Jersey (H.J.E.); GlaxoSmithKline, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania (L.C.); Amgen Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts (J.G.D.); Sanofi, Waltham, Massachusetts (M.F.); Pfizer Global Research and Development, Groton, Connecticut (T.C.G.); Eisai, Andover, Massachusetts (Y.A.S.); EMD Serono R&D Institute, Inc., Billerica, Massachusetts (R.L.W.); Corning Life Sciences, Woburn, Massachusetts (G.Z.); and Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey (D.T.)
| | - Shannon Dallas
- Genentech, South San Francisco, California (J.R.K.); Boehringer Ingelheim, Ridgefield, Connecticut (D.R.); Sekisui-XenoTech LLC, Kansas City, Kansas (D.B.B.); Janssen R&D, Spring House, Pennsylvania (S.D.); Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Boston, Massachusetts (C.F., N.H.); Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana (M.M.); Novartis, East Hanover, New Jersey (H.J.E.); GlaxoSmithKline, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania (L.C.); Amgen Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts (J.G.D.); Sanofi, Waltham, Massachusetts (M.F.); Pfizer Global Research and Development, Groton, Connecticut (T.C.G.); Eisai, Andover, Massachusetts (Y.A.S.); EMD Serono R&D Institute, Inc., Billerica, Massachusetts (R.L.W.); Corning Life Sciences, Woburn, Massachusetts (G.Z.); and Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey (D.T.)
| | - Conrad Fung
- Genentech, South San Francisco, California (J.R.K.); Boehringer Ingelheim, Ridgefield, Connecticut (D.R.); Sekisui-XenoTech LLC, Kansas City, Kansas (D.B.B.); Janssen R&D, Spring House, Pennsylvania (S.D.); Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Boston, Massachusetts (C.F., N.H.); Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana (M.M.); Novartis, East Hanover, New Jersey (H.J.E.); GlaxoSmithKline, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania (L.C.); Amgen Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts (J.G.D.); Sanofi, Waltham, Massachusetts (M.F.); Pfizer Global Research and Development, Groton, Connecticut (T.C.G.); Eisai, Andover, Massachusetts (Y.A.S.); EMD Serono R&D Institute, Inc., Billerica, Massachusetts (R.L.W.); Corning Life Sciences, Woburn, Massachusetts (G.Z.); and Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey (D.T.)
| | - Michael Mohutsky
- Genentech, South San Francisco, California (J.R.K.); Boehringer Ingelheim, Ridgefield, Connecticut (D.R.); Sekisui-XenoTech LLC, Kansas City, Kansas (D.B.B.); Janssen R&D, Spring House, Pennsylvania (S.D.); Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Boston, Massachusetts (C.F., N.H.); Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana (M.M.); Novartis, East Hanover, New Jersey (H.J.E.); GlaxoSmithKline, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania (L.C.); Amgen Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts (J.G.D.); Sanofi, Waltham, Massachusetts (M.F.); Pfizer Global Research and Development, Groton, Connecticut (T.C.G.); Eisai, Andover, Massachusetts (Y.A.S.); EMD Serono R&D Institute, Inc., Billerica, Massachusetts (R.L.W.); Corning Life Sciences, Woburn, Massachusetts (G.Z.); and Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey (D.T.)
| | - Heidi J Einolf
- Genentech, South San Francisco, California (J.R.K.); Boehringer Ingelheim, Ridgefield, Connecticut (D.R.); Sekisui-XenoTech LLC, Kansas City, Kansas (D.B.B.); Janssen R&D, Spring House, Pennsylvania (S.D.); Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Boston, Massachusetts (C.F., N.H.); Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana (M.M.); Novartis, East Hanover, New Jersey (H.J.E.); GlaxoSmithKline, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania (L.C.); Amgen Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts (J.G.D.); Sanofi, Waltham, Massachusetts (M.F.); Pfizer Global Research and Development, Groton, Connecticut (T.C.G.); Eisai, Andover, Massachusetts (Y.A.S.); EMD Serono R&D Institute, Inc., Billerica, Massachusetts (R.L.W.); Corning Life Sciences, Woburn, Massachusetts (G.Z.); and Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey (D.T.)
| | - Liangfu Chen
- Genentech, South San Francisco, California (J.R.K.); Boehringer Ingelheim, Ridgefield, Connecticut (D.R.); Sekisui-XenoTech LLC, Kansas City, Kansas (D.B.B.); Janssen R&D, Spring House, Pennsylvania (S.D.); Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Boston, Massachusetts (C.F., N.H.); Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana (M.M.); Novartis, East Hanover, New Jersey (H.J.E.); GlaxoSmithKline, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania (L.C.); Amgen Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts (J.G.D.); Sanofi, Waltham, Massachusetts (M.F.); Pfizer Global Research and Development, Groton, Connecticut (T.C.G.); Eisai, Andover, Massachusetts (Y.A.S.); EMD Serono R&D Institute, Inc., Billerica, Massachusetts (R.L.W.); Corning Life Sciences, Woburn, Massachusetts (G.Z.); and Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey (D.T.)
| | - Joshua G Dekeyser
- Genentech, South San Francisco, California (J.R.K.); Boehringer Ingelheim, Ridgefield, Connecticut (D.R.); Sekisui-XenoTech LLC, Kansas City, Kansas (D.B.B.); Janssen R&D, Spring House, Pennsylvania (S.D.); Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Boston, Massachusetts (C.F., N.H.); Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana (M.M.); Novartis, East Hanover, New Jersey (H.J.E.); GlaxoSmithKline, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania (L.C.); Amgen Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts (J.G.D.); Sanofi, Waltham, Massachusetts (M.F.); Pfizer Global Research and Development, Groton, Connecticut (T.C.G.); Eisai, Andover, Massachusetts (Y.A.S.); EMD Serono R&D Institute, Inc., Billerica, Massachusetts (R.L.W.); Corning Life Sciences, Woburn, Massachusetts (G.Z.); and Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey (D.T.)
| | - Maria Fitzgerald
- Genentech, South San Francisco, California (J.R.K.); Boehringer Ingelheim, Ridgefield, Connecticut (D.R.); Sekisui-XenoTech LLC, Kansas City, Kansas (D.B.B.); Janssen R&D, Spring House, Pennsylvania (S.D.); Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Boston, Massachusetts (C.F., N.H.); Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana (M.M.); Novartis, East Hanover, New Jersey (H.J.E.); GlaxoSmithKline, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania (L.C.); Amgen Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts (J.G.D.); Sanofi, Waltham, Massachusetts (M.F.); Pfizer Global Research and Development, Groton, Connecticut (T.C.G.); Eisai, Andover, Massachusetts (Y.A.S.); EMD Serono R&D Institute, Inc., Billerica, Massachusetts (R.L.W.); Corning Life Sciences, Woburn, Massachusetts (G.Z.); and Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey (D.T.)
| | - Theunis C Goosen
- Genentech, South San Francisco, California (J.R.K.); Boehringer Ingelheim, Ridgefield, Connecticut (D.R.); Sekisui-XenoTech LLC, Kansas City, Kansas (D.B.B.); Janssen R&D, Spring House, Pennsylvania (S.D.); Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Boston, Massachusetts (C.F., N.H.); Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana (M.M.); Novartis, East Hanover, New Jersey (H.J.E.); GlaxoSmithKline, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania (L.C.); Amgen Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts (J.G.D.); Sanofi, Waltham, Massachusetts (M.F.); Pfizer Global Research and Development, Groton, Connecticut (T.C.G.); Eisai, Andover, Massachusetts (Y.A.S.); EMD Serono R&D Institute, Inc., Billerica, Massachusetts (R.L.W.); Corning Life Sciences, Woburn, Massachusetts (G.Z.); and Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey (D.T.)
| | - Y Amy Siu
- Genentech, South San Francisco, California (J.R.K.); Boehringer Ingelheim, Ridgefield, Connecticut (D.R.); Sekisui-XenoTech LLC, Kansas City, Kansas (D.B.B.); Janssen R&D, Spring House, Pennsylvania (S.D.); Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Boston, Massachusetts (C.F., N.H.); Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana (M.M.); Novartis, East Hanover, New Jersey (H.J.E.); GlaxoSmithKline, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania (L.C.); Amgen Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts (J.G.D.); Sanofi, Waltham, Massachusetts (M.F.); Pfizer Global Research and Development, Groton, Connecticut (T.C.G.); Eisai, Andover, Massachusetts (Y.A.S.); EMD Serono R&D Institute, Inc., Billerica, Massachusetts (R.L.W.); Corning Life Sciences, Woburn, Massachusetts (G.Z.); and Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey (D.T.)
| | - Robert L Walsky
- Genentech, South San Francisco, California (J.R.K.); Boehringer Ingelheim, Ridgefield, Connecticut (D.R.); Sekisui-XenoTech LLC, Kansas City, Kansas (D.B.B.); Janssen R&D, Spring House, Pennsylvania (S.D.); Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Boston, Massachusetts (C.F., N.H.); Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana (M.M.); Novartis, East Hanover, New Jersey (H.J.E.); GlaxoSmithKline, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania (L.C.); Amgen Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts (J.G.D.); Sanofi, Waltham, Massachusetts (M.F.); Pfizer Global Research and Development, Groton, Connecticut (T.C.G.); Eisai, Andover, Massachusetts (Y.A.S.); EMD Serono R&D Institute, Inc., Billerica, Massachusetts (R.L.W.); Corning Life Sciences, Woburn, Massachusetts (G.Z.); and Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey (D.T.)
| | - George Zhang
- Genentech, South San Francisco, California (J.R.K.); Boehringer Ingelheim, Ridgefield, Connecticut (D.R.); Sekisui-XenoTech LLC, Kansas City, Kansas (D.B.B.); Janssen R&D, Spring House, Pennsylvania (S.D.); Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Boston, Massachusetts (C.F., N.H.); Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana (M.M.); Novartis, East Hanover, New Jersey (H.J.E.); GlaxoSmithKline, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania (L.C.); Amgen Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts (J.G.D.); Sanofi, Waltham, Massachusetts (M.F.); Pfizer Global Research and Development, Groton, Connecticut (T.C.G.); Eisai, Andover, Massachusetts (Y.A.S.); EMD Serono R&D Institute, Inc., Billerica, Massachusetts (R.L.W.); Corning Life Sciences, Woburn, Massachusetts (G.Z.); and Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey (D.T.)
| | - Donald Tweedie
- Genentech, South San Francisco, California (J.R.K.); Boehringer Ingelheim, Ridgefield, Connecticut (D.R.); Sekisui-XenoTech LLC, Kansas City, Kansas (D.B.B.); Janssen R&D, Spring House, Pennsylvania (S.D.); Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Boston, Massachusetts (C.F., N.H.); Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana (M.M.); Novartis, East Hanover, New Jersey (H.J.E.); GlaxoSmithKline, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania (L.C.); Amgen Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts (J.G.D.); Sanofi, Waltham, Massachusetts (M.F.); Pfizer Global Research and Development, Groton, Connecticut (T.C.G.); Eisai, Andover, Massachusetts (Y.A.S.); EMD Serono R&D Institute, Inc., Billerica, Massachusetts (R.L.W.); Corning Life Sciences, Woburn, Massachusetts (G.Z.); and Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey (D.T.)
| | - Niresh Hariparsad
- Genentech, South San Francisco, California (J.R.K.); Boehringer Ingelheim, Ridgefield, Connecticut (D.R.); Sekisui-XenoTech LLC, Kansas City, Kansas (D.B.B.); Janssen R&D, Spring House, Pennsylvania (S.D.); Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Boston, Massachusetts (C.F., N.H.); Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana (M.M.); Novartis, East Hanover, New Jersey (H.J.E.); GlaxoSmithKline, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania (L.C.); Amgen Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts (J.G.D.); Sanofi, Waltham, Massachusetts (M.F.); Pfizer Global Research and Development, Groton, Connecticut (T.C.G.); Eisai, Andover, Massachusetts (Y.A.S.); EMD Serono R&D Institute, Inc., Billerica, Massachusetts (R.L.W.); Corning Life Sciences, Woburn, Massachusetts (G.Z.); and Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey (D.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Yadav J, Korzekwa K, Nagar S. Improved Predictions of Drug-Drug Interactions Mediated by Time-Dependent Inhibition of CYP3A. Mol Pharm 2018; 15:1979-1995. [PMID: 29608318 PMCID: PMC5938745 DOI: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.8b00129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Time-dependent inactivation (TDI) of cytochrome P450s (CYPs) is a leading cause of clinical drug-drug interactions (DDIs). Current methods tend to overpredict DDIs. In this study, a numerical approach was used to model complex CYP3A TDI in human-liver microsomes. The inhibitors evaluated included troleandomycin (TAO), erythromycin (ERY), verapamil (VER), and diltiazem (DTZ) along with the primary metabolites N-demethyl erythromycin (NDE), norverapamil (NV), and N-desmethyl diltiazem (NDD). The complexities incorporated into the models included multiple-binding kinetics, quasi-irreversible inactivation, sequential metabolism, inhibitor depletion, and membrane partitioning. The resulting inactivation parameters were incorporated into static in vitro-in vivo correlation (IVIVC) models to predict clinical DDIs. For 77 clinically observed DDIs, with a hepatic-CYP3A-synthesis-rate constant of 0.000 146 min-1, the average fold difference between the observed and predicted DDIs was 3.17 for the standard replot method and 1.45 for the numerical method. Similar results were obtained using a synthesis-rate constant of 0.000 32 min-1. These results suggest that numerical methods can successfully model complex in vitro TDI kinetics and that the resulting DDI predictions are more accurate than those obtained with the standard replot approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaydeep Yadav
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Temple University School of Pharmacy, 3307 North Broad Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19140, United States
| | - Ken Korzekwa
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Temple University School of Pharmacy, 3307 North Broad Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19140, United States
| | - Swati Nagar
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Temple University School of Pharmacy, 3307 North Broad Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19140, United States
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Chan CYS, Roberts O, Rajoli RKR, Liptrott NJ, Siccardi M, Almond L, Owen A. Derivation of CYP3A4 and CYP2B6 degradation rate constants in primary human hepatocytes: A siRNA-silencing-based approach. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 2018; 33:179-187. [PMID: 29921509 DOI: 10.1016/j.dmpk.2018.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2017] [Revised: 12/22/2017] [Accepted: 01/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
The first-order degradation rate constant (kdeg) of cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes is a known source of uncertainty in the prediction of time-dependent drug-drug interactions (DDIs) in physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modelling. This study aimed to measure CYP kdeg using siRNA to suppress CYP expression in primary human hepatocytes followed by incubation over a time-course and tracking of protein expression and activity to observe degradation. The magnitude of gene knockdown was determined by qPCR and activity was measured by probe substrate metabolite formation and CYP2B6-Glo™ assay. Protein disappearance was determined by Western blotting. During a time-course of 96 and 60 h of incubation, over 60% and 76% mRNA knockdown was observed for CYP3A4 and CYP2B6, respectively. The kdeg of CYP3A4 and CYP2B6 protein was 0.0138 h-1 (±0.0023) and 0.0375 h-1 (±0.025), respectively. The kdeg derived from probe substrate metabolism activity was 0.0171 h-1 (±0.0025) for CYP3A4 and 0.0258 h-1 (±0.0093) for CYP2B6. The CYP3A4 kdeg values derived from protein disappearance and metabolic activity were in relatively good agreement with each other and similar to published values. This novel approach can now be used for other less well-characterised CYPs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Y S Chan
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, The University of Liverpool, 70 Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L69 3GF, UK
| | - Owain Roberts
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, The University of Liverpool, 70 Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L69 3GF, UK
| | - Rajith K R Rajoli
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, The University of Liverpool, 70 Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L69 3GF, UK
| | - Neill J Liptrott
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, The University of Liverpool, 70 Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L69 3GF, UK
| | - Marco Siccardi
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, The University of Liverpool, 70 Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L69 3GF, UK
| | - Lisa Almond
- Simcyp (a Certara Company), Blades Enterprise Centre, John Street, Sheffield, S2 4SU, UK
| | - Andrew Owen
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, The University of Liverpool, 70 Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L69 3GF, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Da-Silva F, Boulenc X, Vermet H, Compigne P, Gerbal-Chaloin S, Daujat-Chavanieu M, Klieber S, Poulin P. Improving Prediction of Metabolic Clearance Using Quantitative Extrapolation of Results Obtained From Human Hepatic Micropatterned Cocultures Model and by Considering the Impact of Albumin Binding. J Pharm Sci 2018. [PMID: 29524447 DOI: 10.1016/j.xphs.2018.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
The objective was to compare, with the same data set, the predictive performance of 3 in vitro assays of hepatic clearance (CL), namely, micropatterned cocultures (also referring to HepatoPac®) and suspension as well as monolayer hepatocytes to define which assay is the most accurate. Furthermore, existing in vitro-to-in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE) methods were challenged to verify which method is the most predictive (i.e., direct scaling method without binding correction, conventional method based either on the unbound fraction in plasma (fup) according to the free-drug hypothesis, or based on an fup value adjusted for the albumin [ALB]-facilitated hepatic uptake phenomenon). Accordingly, the role of ALB binding was specifically challenged, and consequently, the ALB production was monitored in parallel to the metabolic stability. The ALB concentration data were used to compare the in vitro assays and to adjust the value of fup of each drug to mimic the ALB-facilitated hepatic uptake phenomenon. The results confirmed that the direct and conventional IVIVE methods generally overpredicted and underpredicted the CL in vivo in humans, respectively. However, the underprediction of the conventional IVIVE method based on fup was significantly reduced from data generated with the HepatoPac® system compared with the 2 other in vitro assays, which is possibly because that system is producing ALB at a rate much closer to the in vivo condition in liver. Hence, these observations suggest that the presence of more ALB molecules per hepatocyte in that HepatoPac® system may have facilitated the hepatic uptake of several bound drugs because their intrinsic CL was increased instead of being decreased by the ALB binding effect. Accordingly, the IVIVE method based on the fup value adjusted for the ALB-facilitated uptake phenomenon gave the lowest prediction bias from the statistical analyses. This study indicated that the HepatoPac® system combined with the adjusted value of fup was the most reliable IVIVE method and revealed the importance of quantifying the in vitro-to-in vivo variation of ALB concentration to improve the CL predictions, which would help any future physiologically based pharmacokinetics modeling exercise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franck Da-Silva
- Sanofi R&D, Montpellier, France; Institute for Regenerative Medicine and Biotherapy, Université et CHU de Montpellier, INSERM, Montpellier, France
| | | | | | | | - Sabine Gerbal-Chaloin
- Institute for Regenerative Medicine and Biotherapy, Université et CHU de Montpellier, INSERM, Montpellier, France
| | - Martine Daujat-Chavanieu
- Institute for Regenerative Medicine and Biotherapy, Université et CHU de Montpellier, INSERM, Montpellier, France
| | | | - Patrick Poulin
- Consultant, Patrick Poulin Inc., Québec City, Canada; Associate professor, School of Public Health, IRSPUM, Université de Montréal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Kratochwil NA, Triyatni M, Mueller MB, Klammers F, Leonard B, Turley D, Schmaler J, Ekiciler A, Molitor B, Walter I, Gonsard PA, Tournillac CA, Durrwell A, Marschmann M, Jones R, Ullah M, Boess F, Ottaviani G, Jin Y, Parrott NJ, Fowler S. Simultaneous Assessment of Clearance, Metabolism, Induction, and Drug-Drug Interaction Potential Using a Long-Term In Vitro Liver Model for a Novel Hepatitis B Virus Inhibitor. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2018; 365:237-248. [PMID: 29453199 DOI: 10.1124/jpet.117.245712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2017] [Accepted: 01/26/2018] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Long-term in vitro liver models are now widely explored for human hepatic metabolic clearance prediction, enzyme phenotyping, cross-species metabolism, comparison of low clearance drugs, and induction studies. Here, we present studies using a long-term liver model, which show how metabolism and active transport, drug-drug interactions, and enzyme induction in healthy and diseased states, such as hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, may be assessed in a single test system to enable effective data integration for physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling. The approach is exemplified in the case of (3S)-4-[[(4R)-4-(2-Chloro-4-fluorophenyl)-5-methoxycarbonyl-2-thiazol-2-yl-1,4-dihydropyrimidin-6-yl]methyl]morpholine-3-carboxylic acid RO6889678, a novel inhibitor of HBV with a complex absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) profile. RO6889678 showed an intracellular enrichment of 78-fold in hepatocytes, with an apparent intrinsic clearance of 5.2 µl/min per mg protein and uptake and biliary clearances of 2.6 and 1.6 µl/min per mg protein, respectively. When apparent intrinsic clearance was incorporated into a PBPK model, the simulated oral human profiles were in good agreement with observed data at low doses but were underestimated at high doses due to unexpected overproportional increases in exposure with dose. In addition, the induction potential of RO6889678 on cytochrome P450 (P450) enzymes and transporters at steady state was assessed and cotreatment with ritonavir revealed a complex drug-drug interaction with concurrent P450 inhibition and moderate UDP-glucuronosyltransferase induction. Furthermore, we report on the first evaluation of in vitro pharmacokinetics studies using HBV-infected HepatoPac cocultures. Thus, long-term liver models have great potential as translational research tools exploring pharmacokinetics of novel drugs in vitro in health and disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole A Kratochwil
- Pharmaceutical Sciences (N.A.K., M.B.M., F.K., A.E., B.M., I.W., P.-A.G., C.A.T., A.D., M.M., R.J., M.U., F.B., N.J.P., S.F.) and Inflammation, Immunology, and Infectious Diseases Therapeutic Areas (M.T., B.L., D.T., J.S.), Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Basel, Switzerland; and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Roche Innovation Center Shanghai, Roche R&D Center (China) Ltd., Pudong, Shanghai, China (G.O., Y.Y.)
| | - Miriam Triyatni
- Pharmaceutical Sciences (N.A.K., M.B.M., F.K., A.E., B.M., I.W., P.-A.G., C.A.T., A.D., M.M., R.J., M.U., F.B., N.J.P., S.F.) and Inflammation, Immunology, and Infectious Diseases Therapeutic Areas (M.T., B.L., D.T., J.S.), Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Basel, Switzerland; and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Roche Innovation Center Shanghai, Roche R&D Center (China) Ltd., Pudong, Shanghai, China (G.O., Y.Y.)
| | - Martina B Mueller
- Pharmaceutical Sciences (N.A.K., M.B.M., F.K., A.E., B.M., I.W., P.-A.G., C.A.T., A.D., M.M., R.J., M.U., F.B., N.J.P., S.F.) and Inflammation, Immunology, and Infectious Diseases Therapeutic Areas (M.T., B.L., D.T., J.S.), Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Basel, Switzerland; and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Roche Innovation Center Shanghai, Roche R&D Center (China) Ltd., Pudong, Shanghai, China (G.O., Y.Y.)
| | - Florian Klammers
- Pharmaceutical Sciences (N.A.K., M.B.M., F.K., A.E., B.M., I.W., P.-A.G., C.A.T., A.D., M.M., R.J., M.U., F.B., N.J.P., S.F.) and Inflammation, Immunology, and Infectious Diseases Therapeutic Areas (M.T., B.L., D.T., J.S.), Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Basel, Switzerland; and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Roche Innovation Center Shanghai, Roche R&D Center (China) Ltd., Pudong, Shanghai, China (G.O., Y.Y.)
| | - Brian Leonard
- Pharmaceutical Sciences (N.A.K., M.B.M., F.K., A.E., B.M., I.W., P.-A.G., C.A.T., A.D., M.M., R.J., M.U., F.B., N.J.P., S.F.) and Inflammation, Immunology, and Infectious Diseases Therapeutic Areas (M.T., B.L., D.T., J.S.), Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Basel, Switzerland; and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Roche Innovation Center Shanghai, Roche R&D Center (China) Ltd., Pudong, Shanghai, China (G.O., Y.Y.)
| | - Dan Turley
- Pharmaceutical Sciences (N.A.K., M.B.M., F.K., A.E., B.M., I.W., P.-A.G., C.A.T., A.D., M.M., R.J., M.U., F.B., N.J.P., S.F.) and Inflammation, Immunology, and Infectious Diseases Therapeutic Areas (M.T., B.L., D.T., J.S.), Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Basel, Switzerland; and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Roche Innovation Center Shanghai, Roche R&D Center (China) Ltd., Pudong, Shanghai, China (G.O., Y.Y.)
| | - Josephine Schmaler
- Pharmaceutical Sciences (N.A.K., M.B.M., F.K., A.E., B.M., I.W., P.-A.G., C.A.T., A.D., M.M., R.J., M.U., F.B., N.J.P., S.F.) and Inflammation, Immunology, and Infectious Diseases Therapeutic Areas (M.T., B.L., D.T., J.S.), Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Basel, Switzerland; and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Roche Innovation Center Shanghai, Roche R&D Center (China) Ltd., Pudong, Shanghai, China (G.O., Y.Y.)
| | - Aynur Ekiciler
- Pharmaceutical Sciences (N.A.K., M.B.M., F.K., A.E., B.M., I.W., P.-A.G., C.A.T., A.D., M.M., R.J., M.U., F.B., N.J.P., S.F.) and Inflammation, Immunology, and Infectious Diseases Therapeutic Areas (M.T., B.L., D.T., J.S.), Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Basel, Switzerland; and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Roche Innovation Center Shanghai, Roche R&D Center (China) Ltd., Pudong, Shanghai, China (G.O., Y.Y.)
| | - Birgit Molitor
- Pharmaceutical Sciences (N.A.K., M.B.M., F.K., A.E., B.M., I.W., P.-A.G., C.A.T., A.D., M.M., R.J., M.U., F.B., N.J.P., S.F.) and Inflammation, Immunology, and Infectious Diseases Therapeutic Areas (M.T., B.L., D.T., J.S.), Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Basel, Switzerland; and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Roche Innovation Center Shanghai, Roche R&D Center (China) Ltd., Pudong, Shanghai, China (G.O., Y.Y.)
| | - Isabelle Walter
- Pharmaceutical Sciences (N.A.K., M.B.M., F.K., A.E., B.M., I.W., P.-A.G., C.A.T., A.D., M.M., R.J., M.U., F.B., N.J.P., S.F.) and Inflammation, Immunology, and Infectious Diseases Therapeutic Areas (M.T., B.L., D.T., J.S.), Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Basel, Switzerland; and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Roche Innovation Center Shanghai, Roche R&D Center (China) Ltd., Pudong, Shanghai, China (G.O., Y.Y.)
| | - Pierre-Alexis Gonsard
- Pharmaceutical Sciences (N.A.K., M.B.M., F.K., A.E., B.M., I.W., P.-A.G., C.A.T., A.D., M.M., R.J., M.U., F.B., N.J.P., S.F.) and Inflammation, Immunology, and Infectious Diseases Therapeutic Areas (M.T., B.L., D.T., J.S.), Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Basel, Switzerland; and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Roche Innovation Center Shanghai, Roche R&D Center (China) Ltd., Pudong, Shanghai, China (G.O., Y.Y.)
| | - Charles A Tournillac
- Pharmaceutical Sciences (N.A.K., M.B.M., F.K., A.E., B.M., I.W., P.-A.G., C.A.T., A.D., M.M., R.J., M.U., F.B., N.J.P., S.F.) and Inflammation, Immunology, and Infectious Diseases Therapeutic Areas (M.T., B.L., D.T., J.S.), Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Basel, Switzerland; and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Roche Innovation Center Shanghai, Roche R&D Center (China) Ltd., Pudong, Shanghai, China (G.O., Y.Y.)
| | - Alexandre Durrwell
- Pharmaceutical Sciences (N.A.K., M.B.M., F.K., A.E., B.M., I.W., P.-A.G., C.A.T., A.D., M.M., R.J., M.U., F.B., N.J.P., S.F.) and Inflammation, Immunology, and Infectious Diseases Therapeutic Areas (M.T., B.L., D.T., J.S.), Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Basel, Switzerland; and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Roche Innovation Center Shanghai, Roche R&D Center (China) Ltd., Pudong, Shanghai, China (G.O., Y.Y.)
| | - Michaela Marschmann
- Pharmaceutical Sciences (N.A.K., M.B.M., F.K., A.E., B.M., I.W., P.-A.G., C.A.T., A.D., M.M., R.J., M.U., F.B., N.J.P., S.F.) and Inflammation, Immunology, and Infectious Diseases Therapeutic Areas (M.T., B.L., D.T., J.S.), Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Basel, Switzerland; and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Roche Innovation Center Shanghai, Roche R&D Center (China) Ltd., Pudong, Shanghai, China (G.O., Y.Y.)
| | - Russell Jones
- Pharmaceutical Sciences (N.A.K., M.B.M., F.K., A.E., B.M., I.W., P.-A.G., C.A.T., A.D., M.M., R.J., M.U., F.B., N.J.P., S.F.) and Inflammation, Immunology, and Infectious Diseases Therapeutic Areas (M.T., B.L., D.T., J.S.), Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Basel, Switzerland; and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Roche Innovation Center Shanghai, Roche R&D Center (China) Ltd., Pudong, Shanghai, China (G.O., Y.Y.)
| | - Mohammed Ullah
- Pharmaceutical Sciences (N.A.K., M.B.M., F.K., A.E., B.M., I.W., P.-A.G., C.A.T., A.D., M.M., R.J., M.U., F.B., N.J.P., S.F.) and Inflammation, Immunology, and Infectious Diseases Therapeutic Areas (M.T., B.L., D.T., J.S.), Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Basel, Switzerland; and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Roche Innovation Center Shanghai, Roche R&D Center (China) Ltd., Pudong, Shanghai, China (G.O., Y.Y.)
| | - Franziska Boess
- Pharmaceutical Sciences (N.A.K., M.B.M., F.K., A.E., B.M., I.W., P.-A.G., C.A.T., A.D., M.M., R.J., M.U., F.B., N.J.P., S.F.) and Inflammation, Immunology, and Infectious Diseases Therapeutic Areas (M.T., B.L., D.T., J.S.), Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Basel, Switzerland; and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Roche Innovation Center Shanghai, Roche R&D Center (China) Ltd., Pudong, Shanghai, China (G.O., Y.Y.)
| | - Giorgio Ottaviani
- Pharmaceutical Sciences (N.A.K., M.B.M., F.K., A.E., B.M., I.W., P.-A.G., C.A.T., A.D., M.M., R.J., M.U., F.B., N.J.P., S.F.) and Inflammation, Immunology, and Infectious Diseases Therapeutic Areas (M.T., B.L., D.T., J.S.), Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Basel, Switzerland; and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Roche Innovation Center Shanghai, Roche R&D Center (China) Ltd., Pudong, Shanghai, China (G.O., Y.Y.)
| | - Yuyan Jin
- Pharmaceutical Sciences (N.A.K., M.B.M., F.K., A.E., B.M., I.W., P.-A.G., C.A.T., A.D., M.M., R.J., M.U., F.B., N.J.P., S.F.) and Inflammation, Immunology, and Infectious Diseases Therapeutic Areas (M.T., B.L., D.T., J.S.), Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Basel, Switzerland; and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Roche Innovation Center Shanghai, Roche R&D Center (China) Ltd., Pudong, Shanghai, China (G.O., Y.Y.)
| | - Neil J Parrott
- Pharmaceutical Sciences (N.A.K., M.B.M., F.K., A.E., B.M., I.W., P.-A.G., C.A.T., A.D., M.M., R.J., M.U., F.B., N.J.P., S.F.) and Inflammation, Immunology, and Infectious Diseases Therapeutic Areas (M.T., B.L., D.T., J.S.), Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Basel, Switzerland; and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Roche Innovation Center Shanghai, Roche R&D Center (China) Ltd., Pudong, Shanghai, China (G.O., Y.Y.)
| | - Stephen Fowler
- Pharmaceutical Sciences (N.A.K., M.B.M., F.K., A.E., B.M., I.W., P.-A.G., C.A.T., A.D., M.M., R.J., M.U., F.B., N.J.P., S.F.) and Inflammation, Immunology, and Infectious Diseases Therapeutic Areas (M.T., B.L., D.T., J.S.), Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Basel, Switzerland; and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Roche Innovation Center Shanghai, Roche R&D Center (China) Ltd., Pudong, Shanghai, China (G.O., Y.Y.)
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Febvre-James M, Bruyère A, Le Vée M, Fardel O. The JAK1/2 Inhibitor Ruxolitinib Reverses Interleukin-6-Mediated Suppression of Drug-Detoxifying Proteins in Cultured Human Hepatocytes. Drug Metab Dispos 2017; 46:131-140. [DOI: 10.1124/dmd.117.078048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2017] [Accepted: 11/17/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
|
28
|
Hariparsad N, Ramsden D, Palamanda J, Dekeyser JG, Fahmi OA, Kenny JR, Einolf H, Mohutsky M, Pardon M, Siu YA, Chen L, Sinz M, Jones B, Walsky R, Dallas S, Balani SK, Zhang G, Buckley D, Tweedie D. Considerations from the IQ Induction Working Group in Response to Drug-Drug Interaction Guidance from Regulatory Agencies: Focus on Downregulation, CYP2C Induction, and CYP2B6 Positive Control. Drug Metab Dispos 2017. [PMID: 28646080 DOI: 10.1124/dmd.116.074567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The European Medicines Agency (EMA), the Pharmaceutical and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA), and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have issued guidelines for the conduct of drug-drug interaction studies. To examine the applicability of these regulatory recommendations specifically for induction, a group of scientists, under the auspices of the Drug Metabolism Leadership Group of the Innovation and Quality (IQ) Consortium, formed the Induction Working Group (IWG). A team of 19 scientists, from 16 of the 39 pharmaceutical companies that are members of the IQ Consortium and two Contract Research Organizations reviewed the recommendations, focusing initially on the current EMA guidelines. Questions were collated from IQ member companies as to which aspects of the guidelines require further evaluation. The EMA was then approached to provide insights into their recommendations on the following: 1) evaluation of downregulation, 2) in vitro assessment of CYP2C induction, 3) the use of CITCO as the positive control for CYP2B6 induction by CAR, 4) data interpretation (a 2-fold increase in mRNA as evidence of induction), and 5) the duration of incubation of hepatocytes with test article. The IWG conducted an anonymous survey among IQ member companies to query current practices, focusing specifically on the aforementioned key points. Responses were received from 19 companies. All data and information were blinded before being shared with the IWG. The results of the survey are presented, together with consensus recommendations on downregulation, CYP2C induction, and CYP2B6 positive control. Results and recommendations related to data interpretation and induction time course will be reported in subsequent articles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niresh Hariparsad
- Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Boston, Massachusetts (N.H.); Genentech, South San Francisco, California (J.R.K.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Florham Park, New Jersey (H.E.); Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana (M.M.); Boehringer Ingelheim, Ridgefield, Connecticut (D.R.); Merck and Co., Kenilworth, New Jersey (J.P.), Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, California (J.D.), Pfizer Global Research and Development, Groton, Connecticut (O.A.F.); Sanofi Pharmaceuticals, ChillyMazarin, France (M.P.); Eisai Pharmaceuticals, Andover, Massachusetts (A.Y.S.); Glaxo SmithKline, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania (L.C.); Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, Connecticut (M.S.); AstraZeneca, Mölndal, Sweden (B.J.); EMD Serono, Billerica, Massachusetts (R.W.);Janssen R&D, Spring House, Pennsylvania (S.D.); Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceuticals Co., Cambridge, Massachusetts (S.K.B.); Corning Life Sciences; Woburn, Massachusetts (G.Z.); XenoTech LLC, Lenexa, Kansas (D.B.); Merck and Co., West Point, Pennsylvania (D.T.)
| | - Diane Ramsden
- Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Boston, Massachusetts (N.H.); Genentech, South San Francisco, California (J.R.K.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Florham Park, New Jersey (H.E.); Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana (M.M.); Boehringer Ingelheim, Ridgefield, Connecticut (D.R.); Merck and Co., Kenilworth, New Jersey (J.P.), Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, California (J.D.), Pfizer Global Research and Development, Groton, Connecticut (O.A.F.); Sanofi Pharmaceuticals, ChillyMazarin, France (M.P.); Eisai Pharmaceuticals, Andover, Massachusetts (A.Y.S.); Glaxo SmithKline, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania (L.C.); Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, Connecticut (M.S.); AstraZeneca, Mölndal, Sweden (B.J.); EMD Serono, Billerica, Massachusetts (R.W.);Janssen R&D, Spring House, Pennsylvania (S.D.); Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceuticals Co., Cambridge, Massachusetts (S.K.B.); Corning Life Sciences; Woburn, Massachusetts (G.Z.); XenoTech LLC, Lenexa, Kansas (D.B.); Merck and Co., West Point, Pennsylvania (D.T.)
| | - Jairam Palamanda
- Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Boston, Massachusetts (N.H.); Genentech, South San Francisco, California (J.R.K.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Florham Park, New Jersey (H.E.); Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana (M.M.); Boehringer Ingelheim, Ridgefield, Connecticut (D.R.); Merck and Co., Kenilworth, New Jersey (J.P.), Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, California (J.D.), Pfizer Global Research and Development, Groton, Connecticut (O.A.F.); Sanofi Pharmaceuticals, ChillyMazarin, France (M.P.); Eisai Pharmaceuticals, Andover, Massachusetts (A.Y.S.); Glaxo SmithKline, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania (L.C.); Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, Connecticut (M.S.); AstraZeneca, Mölndal, Sweden (B.J.); EMD Serono, Billerica, Massachusetts (R.W.);Janssen R&D, Spring House, Pennsylvania (S.D.); Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceuticals Co., Cambridge, Massachusetts (S.K.B.); Corning Life Sciences; Woburn, Massachusetts (G.Z.); XenoTech LLC, Lenexa, Kansas (D.B.); Merck and Co., West Point, Pennsylvania (D.T.)
| | - Joshua G Dekeyser
- Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Boston, Massachusetts (N.H.); Genentech, South San Francisco, California (J.R.K.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Florham Park, New Jersey (H.E.); Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana (M.M.); Boehringer Ingelheim, Ridgefield, Connecticut (D.R.); Merck and Co., Kenilworth, New Jersey (J.P.), Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, California (J.D.), Pfizer Global Research and Development, Groton, Connecticut (O.A.F.); Sanofi Pharmaceuticals, ChillyMazarin, France (M.P.); Eisai Pharmaceuticals, Andover, Massachusetts (A.Y.S.); Glaxo SmithKline, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania (L.C.); Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, Connecticut (M.S.); AstraZeneca, Mölndal, Sweden (B.J.); EMD Serono, Billerica, Massachusetts (R.W.);Janssen R&D, Spring House, Pennsylvania (S.D.); Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceuticals Co., Cambridge, Massachusetts (S.K.B.); Corning Life Sciences; Woburn, Massachusetts (G.Z.); XenoTech LLC, Lenexa, Kansas (D.B.); Merck and Co., West Point, Pennsylvania (D.T.)
| | - Odette A Fahmi
- Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Boston, Massachusetts (N.H.); Genentech, South San Francisco, California (J.R.K.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Florham Park, New Jersey (H.E.); Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana (M.M.); Boehringer Ingelheim, Ridgefield, Connecticut (D.R.); Merck and Co., Kenilworth, New Jersey (J.P.), Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, California (J.D.), Pfizer Global Research and Development, Groton, Connecticut (O.A.F.); Sanofi Pharmaceuticals, ChillyMazarin, France (M.P.); Eisai Pharmaceuticals, Andover, Massachusetts (A.Y.S.); Glaxo SmithKline, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania (L.C.); Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, Connecticut (M.S.); AstraZeneca, Mölndal, Sweden (B.J.); EMD Serono, Billerica, Massachusetts (R.W.);Janssen R&D, Spring House, Pennsylvania (S.D.); Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceuticals Co., Cambridge, Massachusetts (S.K.B.); Corning Life Sciences; Woburn, Massachusetts (G.Z.); XenoTech LLC, Lenexa, Kansas (D.B.); Merck and Co., West Point, Pennsylvania (D.T.)
| | - Jane R Kenny
- Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Boston, Massachusetts (N.H.); Genentech, South San Francisco, California (J.R.K.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Florham Park, New Jersey (H.E.); Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana (M.M.); Boehringer Ingelheim, Ridgefield, Connecticut (D.R.); Merck and Co., Kenilworth, New Jersey (J.P.), Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, California (J.D.), Pfizer Global Research and Development, Groton, Connecticut (O.A.F.); Sanofi Pharmaceuticals, ChillyMazarin, France (M.P.); Eisai Pharmaceuticals, Andover, Massachusetts (A.Y.S.); Glaxo SmithKline, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania (L.C.); Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, Connecticut (M.S.); AstraZeneca, Mölndal, Sweden (B.J.); EMD Serono, Billerica, Massachusetts (R.W.);Janssen R&D, Spring House, Pennsylvania (S.D.); Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceuticals Co., Cambridge, Massachusetts (S.K.B.); Corning Life Sciences; Woburn, Massachusetts (G.Z.); XenoTech LLC, Lenexa, Kansas (D.B.); Merck and Co., West Point, Pennsylvania (D.T.)
| | - Heidi Einolf
- Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Boston, Massachusetts (N.H.); Genentech, South San Francisco, California (J.R.K.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Florham Park, New Jersey (H.E.); Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana (M.M.); Boehringer Ingelheim, Ridgefield, Connecticut (D.R.); Merck and Co., Kenilworth, New Jersey (J.P.), Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, California (J.D.), Pfizer Global Research and Development, Groton, Connecticut (O.A.F.); Sanofi Pharmaceuticals, ChillyMazarin, France (M.P.); Eisai Pharmaceuticals, Andover, Massachusetts (A.Y.S.); Glaxo SmithKline, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania (L.C.); Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, Connecticut (M.S.); AstraZeneca, Mölndal, Sweden (B.J.); EMD Serono, Billerica, Massachusetts (R.W.);Janssen R&D, Spring House, Pennsylvania (S.D.); Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceuticals Co., Cambridge, Massachusetts (S.K.B.); Corning Life Sciences; Woburn, Massachusetts (G.Z.); XenoTech LLC, Lenexa, Kansas (D.B.); Merck and Co., West Point, Pennsylvania (D.T.)
| | - Michael Mohutsky
- Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Boston, Massachusetts (N.H.); Genentech, South San Francisco, California (J.R.K.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Florham Park, New Jersey (H.E.); Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana (M.M.); Boehringer Ingelheim, Ridgefield, Connecticut (D.R.); Merck and Co., Kenilworth, New Jersey (J.P.), Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, California (J.D.), Pfizer Global Research and Development, Groton, Connecticut (O.A.F.); Sanofi Pharmaceuticals, ChillyMazarin, France (M.P.); Eisai Pharmaceuticals, Andover, Massachusetts (A.Y.S.); Glaxo SmithKline, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania (L.C.); Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, Connecticut (M.S.); AstraZeneca, Mölndal, Sweden (B.J.); EMD Serono, Billerica, Massachusetts (R.W.);Janssen R&D, Spring House, Pennsylvania (S.D.); Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceuticals Co., Cambridge, Massachusetts (S.K.B.); Corning Life Sciences; Woburn, Massachusetts (G.Z.); XenoTech LLC, Lenexa, Kansas (D.B.); Merck and Co., West Point, Pennsylvania (D.T.)
| | - Magalie Pardon
- Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Boston, Massachusetts (N.H.); Genentech, South San Francisco, California (J.R.K.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Florham Park, New Jersey (H.E.); Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana (M.M.); Boehringer Ingelheim, Ridgefield, Connecticut (D.R.); Merck and Co., Kenilworth, New Jersey (J.P.), Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, California (J.D.), Pfizer Global Research and Development, Groton, Connecticut (O.A.F.); Sanofi Pharmaceuticals, ChillyMazarin, France (M.P.); Eisai Pharmaceuticals, Andover, Massachusetts (A.Y.S.); Glaxo SmithKline, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania (L.C.); Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, Connecticut (M.S.); AstraZeneca, Mölndal, Sweden (B.J.); EMD Serono, Billerica, Massachusetts (R.W.);Janssen R&D, Spring House, Pennsylvania (S.D.); Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceuticals Co., Cambridge, Massachusetts (S.K.B.); Corning Life Sciences; Woburn, Massachusetts (G.Z.); XenoTech LLC, Lenexa, Kansas (D.B.); Merck and Co., West Point, Pennsylvania (D.T.)
| | - Y Amy Siu
- Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Boston, Massachusetts (N.H.); Genentech, South San Francisco, California (J.R.K.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Florham Park, New Jersey (H.E.); Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana (M.M.); Boehringer Ingelheim, Ridgefield, Connecticut (D.R.); Merck and Co., Kenilworth, New Jersey (J.P.), Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, California (J.D.), Pfizer Global Research and Development, Groton, Connecticut (O.A.F.); Sanofi Pharmaceuticals, ChillyMazarin, France (M.P.); Eisai Pharmaceuticals, Andover, Massachusetts (A.Y.S.); Glaxo SmithKline, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania (L.C.); Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, Connecticut (M.S.); AstraZeneca, Mölndal, Sweden (B.J.); EMD Serono, Billerica, Massachusetts (R.W.);Janssen R&D, Spring House, Pennsylvania (S.D.); Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceuticals Co., Cambridge, Massachusetts (S.K.B.); Corning Life Sciences; Woburn, Massachusetts (G.Z.); XenoTech LLC, Lenexa, Kansas (D.B.); Merck and Co., West Point, Pennsylvania (D.T.)
| | - Liangfu Chen
- Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Boston, Massachusetts (N.H.); Genentech, South San Francisco, California (J.R.K.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Florham Park, New Jersey (H.E.); Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana (M.M.); Boehringer Ingelheim, Ridgefield, Connecticut (D.R.); Merck and Co., Kenilworth, New Jersey (J.P.), Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, California (J.D.), Pfizer Global Research and Development, Groton, Connecticut (O.A.F.); Sanofi Pharmaceuticals, ChillyMazarin, France (M.P.); Eisai Pharmaceuticals, Andover, Massachusetts (A.Y.S.); Glaxo SmithKline, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania (L.C.); Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, Connecticut (M.S.); AstraZeneca, Mölndal, Sweden (B.J.); EMD Serono, Billerica, Massachusetts (R.W.);Janssen R&D, Spring House, Pennsylvania (S.D.); Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceuticals Co., Cambridge, Massachusetts (S.K.B.); Corning Life Sciences; Woburn, Massachusetts (G.Z.); XenoTech LLC, Lenexa, Kansas (D.B.); Merck and Co., West Point, Pennsylvania (D.T.)
| | - Michael Sinz
- Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Boston, Massachusetts (N.H.); Genentech, South San Francisco, California (J.R.K.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Florham Park, New Jersey (H.E.); Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana (M.M.); Boehringer Ingelheim, Ridgefield, Connecticut (D.R.); Merck and Co., Kenilworth, New Jersey (J.P.), Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, California (J.D.), Pfizer Global Research and Development, Groton, Connecticut (O.A.F.); Sanofi Pharmaceuticals, ChillyMazarin, France (M.P.); Eisai Pharmaceuticals, Andover, Massachusetts (A.Y.S.); Glaxo SmithKline, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania (L.C.); Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, Connecticut (M.S.); AstraZeneca, Mölndal, Sweden (B.J.); EMD Serono, Billerica, Massachusetts (R.W.);Janssen R&D, Spring House, Pennsylvania (S.D.); Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceuticals Co., Cambridge, Massachusetts (S.K.B.); Corning Life Sciences; Woburn, Massachusetts (G.Z.); XenoTech LLC, Lenexa, Kansas (D.B.); Merck and Co., West Point, Pennsylvania (D.T.)
| | - Barry Jones
- Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Boston, Massachusetts (N.H.); Genentech, South San Francisco, California (J.R.K.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Florham Park, New Jersey (H.E.); Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana (M.M.); Boehringer Ingelheim, Ridgefield, Connecticut (D.R.); Merck and Co., Kenilworth, New Jersey (J.P.), Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, California (J.D.), Pfizer Global Research and Development, Groton, Connecticut (O.A.F.); Sanofi Pharmaceuticals, ChillyMazarin, France (M.P.); Eisai Pharmaceuticals, Andover, Massachusetts (A.Y.S.); Glaxo SmithKline, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania (L.C.); Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, Connecticut (M.S.); AstraZeneca, Mölndal, Sweden (B.J.); EMD Serono, Billerica, Massachusetts (R.W.);Janssen R&D, Spring House, Pennsylvania (S.D.); Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceuticals Co., Cambridge, Massachusetts (S.K.B.); Corning Life Sciences; Woburn, Massachusetts (G.Z.); XenoTech LLC, Lenexa, Kansas (D.B.); Merck and Co., West Point, Pennsylvania (D.T.)
| | - Robert Walsky
- Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Boston, Massachusetts (N.H.); Genentech, South San Francisco, California (J.R.K.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Florham Park, New Jersey (H.E.); Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana (M.M.); Boehringer Ingelheim, Ridgefield, Connecticut (D.R.); Merck and Co., Kenilworth, New Jersey (J.P.), Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, California (J.D.), Pfizer Global Research and Development, Groton, Connecticut (O.A.F.); Sanofi Pharmaceuticals, ChillyMazarin, France (M.P.); Eisai Pharmaceuticals, Andover, Massachusetts (A.Y.S.); Glaxo SmithKline, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania (L.C.); Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, Connecticut (M.S.); AstraZeneca, Mölndal, Sweden (B.J.); EMD Serono, Billerica, Massachusetts (R.W.);Janssen R&D, Spring House, Pennsylvania (S.D.); Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceuticals Co., Cambridge, Massachusetts (S.K.B.); Corning Life Sciences; Woburn, Massachusetts (G.Z.); XenoTech LLC, Lenexa, Kansas (D.B.); Merck and Co., West Point, Pennsylvania (D.T.)
| | - Shannon Dallas
- Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Boston, Massachusetts (N.H.); Genentech, South San Francisco, California (J.R.K.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Florham Park, New Jersey (H.E.); Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana (M.M.); Boehringer Ingelheim, Ridgefield, Connecticut (D.R.); Merck and Co., Kenilworth, New Jersey (J.P.), Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, California (J.D.), Pfizer Global Research and Development, Groton, Connecticut (O.A.F.); Sanofi Pharmaceuticals, ChillyMazarin, France (M.P.); Eisai Pharmaceuticals, Andover, Massachusetts (A.Y.S.); Glaxo SmithKline, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania (L.C.); Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, Connecticut (M.S.); AstraZeneca, Mölndal, Sweden (B.J.); EMD Serono, Billerica, Massachusetts (R.W.);Janssen R&D, Spring House, Pennsylvania (S.D.); Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceuticals Co., Cambridge, Massachusetts (S.K.B.); Corning Life Sciences; Woburn, Massachusetts (G.Z.); XenoTech LLC, Lenexa, Kansas (D.B.); Merck and Co., West Point, Pennsylvania (D.T.)
| | - Suresh K Balani
- Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Boston, Massachusetts (N.H.); Genentech, South San Francisco, California (J.R.K.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Florham Park, New Jersey (H.E.); Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana (M.M.); Boehringer Ingelheim, Ridgefield, Connecticut (D.R.); Merck and Co., Kenilworth, New Jersey (J.P.), Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, California (J.D.), Pfizer Global Research and Development, Groton, Connecticut (O.A.F.); Sanofi Pharmaceuticals, ChillyMazarin, France (M.P.); Eisai Pharmaceuticals, Andover, Massachusetts (A.Y.S.); Glaxo SmithKline, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania (L.C.); Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, Connecticut (M.S.); AstraZeneca, Mölndal, Sweden (B.J.); EMD Serono, Billerica, Massachusetts (R.W.);Janssen R&D, Spring House, Pennsylvania (S.D.); Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceuticals Co., Cambridge, Massachusetts (S.K.B.); Corning Life Sciences; Woburn, Massachusetts (G.Z.); XenoTech LLC, Lenexa, Kansas (D.B.); Merck and Co., West Point, Pennsylvania (D.T.)
| | - George Zhang
- Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Boston, Massachusetts (N.H.); Genentech, South San Francisco, California (J.R.K.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Florham Park, New Jersey (H.E.); Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana (M.M.); Boehringer Ingelheim, Ridgefield, Connecticut (D.R.); Merck and Co., Kenilworth, New Jersey (J.P.), Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, California (J.D.), Pfizer Global Research and Development, Groton, Connecticut (O.A.F.); Sanofi Pharmaceuticals, ChillyMazarin, France (M.P.); Eisai Pharmaceuticals, Andover, Massachusetts (A.Y.S.); Glaxo SmithKline, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania (L.C.); Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, Connecticut (M.S.); AstraZeneca, Mölndal, Sweden (B.J.); EMD Serono, Billerica, Massachusetts (R.W.);Janssen R&D, Spring House, Pennsylvania (S.D.); Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceuticals Co., Cambridge, Massachusetts (S.K.B.); Corning Life Sciences; Woburn, Massachusetts (G.Z.); XenoTech LLC, Lenexa, Kansas (D.B.); Merck and Co., West Point, Pennsylvania (D.T.)
| | - David Buckley
- Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Boston, Massachusetts (N.H.); Genentech, South San Francisco, California (J.R.K.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Florham Park, New Jersey (H.E.); Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana (M.M.); Boehringer Ingelheim, Ridgefield, Connecticut (D.R.); Merck and Co., Kenilworth, New Jersey (J.P.), Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, California (J.D.), Pfizer Global Research and Development, Groton, Connecticut (O.A.F.); Sanofi Pharmaceuticals, ChillyMazarin, France (M.P.); Eisai Pharmaceuticals, Andover, Massachusetts (A.Y.S.); Glaxo SmithKline, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania (L.C.); Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, Connecticut (M.S.); AstraZeneca, Mölndal, Sweden (B.J.); EMD Serono, Billerica, Massachusetts (R.W.);Janssen R&D, Spring House, Pennsylvania (S.D.); Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceuticals Co., Cambridge, Massachusetts (S.K.B.); Corning Life Sciences; Woburn, Massachusetts (G.Z.); XenoTech LLC, Lenexa, Kansas (D.B.); Merck and Co., West Point, Pennsylvania (D.T.)
| | - Donald Tweedie
- Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Boston, Massachusetts (N.H.); Genentech, South San Francisco, California (J.R.K.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Florham Park, New Jersey (H.E.); Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana (M.M.); Boehringer Ingelheim, Ridgefield, Connecticut (D.R.); Merck and Co., Kenilworth, New Jersey (J.P.), Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, California (J.D.), Pfizer Global Research and Development, Groton, Connecticut (O.A.F.); Sanofi Pharmaceuticals, ChillyMazarin, France (M.P.); Eisai Pharmaceuticals, Andover, Massachusetts (A.Y.S.); Glaxo SmithKline, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania (L.C.); Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, Connecticut (M.S.); AstraZeneca, Mölndal, Sweden (B.J.); EMD Serono, Billerica, Massachusetts (R.W.);Janssen R&D, Spring House, Pennsylvania (S.D.); Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceuticals Co., Cambridge, Massachusetts (S.K.B.); Corning Life Sciences; Woburn, Massachusetts (G.Z.); XenoTech LLC, Lenexa, Kansas (D.B.); Merck and Co., West Point, Pennsylvania (D.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Takahashi RH, Shahidi-Latham SK, Wong S, Chang JH. Applying Stable Isotope Labeled Amino Acids in Micropatterned Hepatocyte Coculture to Directly Determine the Degradation Rate Constant for CYP3A4. Drug Metab Dispos 2017; 45:581-585. [DOI: 10.1124/dmd.116.074393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2016] [Accepted: 03/10/2017] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
|
30
|
Fahmi OA, Shebley M, Palamanda J, Sinz MW, Ramsden D, Einolf HJ, Chen L, Wang H. Evaluation of CYP2B6 Induction and Prediction of Clinical Drug-Drug Interactions: Considerations from the IQ Consortium Induction Working Group-An Industry Perspective. Drug Metab Dispos 2016; 44:1720-30. [PMID: 27422672 PMCID: PMC11024975 DOI: 10.1124/dmd.116.071076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2016] [Accepted: 07/14/2016] [Indexed: 04/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) due to CYP2B6 induction have recently gained prominence and clinical induction risk assessment is recommended by regulatory agencies. This work aimed to evaluate the potency of CYP2B6 versus CYP3A4 induction in vitro and from clinical studies and to assess the predictability of efavirenz versus bupropion as clinical probe substrates of CYP2B6 induction. The analysis indicates that the magnitude of CYP3A4 induction was higher than CYP2B6 both in vitro and in vivo. The magnitude of DDIs caused by induction could not be predicted for bupropion with static or dynamic models. On the other hand, the relative induction score, net effect, and physiologically based pharmacokinetics SimCYP models using efavirenz resulted in improved DDI predictions. Although bupropion and efavirenz have been used and are recommended by regulatory agencies as clinical CYP2B6 probe substrates for DDI studies, CYP3A4 contributes to the metabolism of both probes and is induced by all reference CYP2B6 inducers. Therefore, caution must be taken when interpreting clinical induction results because of the lack of selectivity of these probes. Although in vitro-in vivo extrapolation for efavirenz performed better than bupropion, interpretation of the clinical change in exposure is confounded by the coinduction of CYP2B6 and CYP3A4, as well as the increased contribution of CYP3A4 to efavirenz metabolism under induced conditions. Current methods and probe substrates preclude accurate prediction of CYP2B6 induction. Identification of a sensitive and selective clinical substrate for CYP2B6 (fraction metabolized > 0.9) is needed to improve in vitro-in vivo extrapolation for characterizing the potential for CYP2B6-mediated DDIs. Alternative strategies and a framework for evaluating the CYP2B6 induction risk are proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Odette A Fahmi
- Pfizer Inc., Groton, Connecticut (O.A.F.); AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, Illinois (M.S.); Merck Research Laboratories, Rahway, New Jersey (J.P.); Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, Connecticut (M.W.S.); Boehringer Ingelheim, Ridgefield, Connecticut (D.R.); Novartis, East Hanover, New Jersey (H.J.E.); GlaxoSmithKline, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania (L.C.); and University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland (H.W.)
| | - Mohamad Shebley
- Pfizer Inc., Groton, Connecticut (O.A.F.); AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, Illinois (M.S.); Merck Research Laboratories, Rahway, New Jersey (J.P.); Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, Connecticut (M.W.S.); Boehringer Ingelheim, Ridgefield, Connecticut (D.R.); Novartis, East Hanover, New Jersey (H.J.E.); GlaxoSmithKline, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania (L.C.); and University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland (H.W.)
| | - Jairam Palamanda
- Pfizer Inc., Groton, Connecticut (O.A.F.); AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, Illinois (M.S.); Merck Research Laboratories, Rahway, New Jersey (J.P.); Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, Connecticut (M.W.S.); Boehringer Ingelheim, Ridgefield, Connecticut (D.R.); Novartis, East Hanover, New Jersey (H.J.E.); GlaxoSmithKline, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania (L.C.); and University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland (H.W.)
| | - Michael W Sinz
- Pfizer Inc., Groton, Connecticut (O.A.F.); AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, Illinois (M.S.); Merck Research Laboratories, Rahway, New Jersey (J.P.); Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, Connecticut (M.W.S.); Boehringer Ingelheim, Ridgefield, Connecticut (D.R.); Novartis, East Hanover, New Jersey (H.J.E.); GlaxoSmithKline, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania (L.C.); and University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland (H.W.)
| | - Diane Ramsden
- Pfizer Inc., Groton, Connecticut (O.A.F.); AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, Illinois (M.S.); Merck Research Laboratories, Rahway, New Jersey (J.P.); Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, Connecticut (M.W.S.); Boehringer Ingelheim, Ridgefield, Connecticut (D.R.); Novartis, East Hanover, New Jersey (H.J.E.); GlaxoSmithKline, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania (L.C.); and University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland (H.W.)
| | - Heidi J Einolf
- Pfizer Inc., Groton, Connecticut (O.A.F.); AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, Illinois (M.S.); Merck Research Laboratories, Rahway, New Jersey (J.P.); Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, Connecticut (M.W.S.); Boehringer Ingelheim, Ridgefield, Connecticut (D.R.); Novartis, East Hanover, New Jersey (H.J.E.); GlaxoSmithKline, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania (L.C.); and University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland (H.W.)
| | - Liangfu Chen
- Pfizer Inc., Groton, Connecticut (O.A.F.); AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, Illinois (M.S.); Merck Research Laboratories, Rahway, New Jersey (J.P.); Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, Connecticut (M.W.S.); Boehringer Ingelheim, Ridgefield, Connecticut (D.R.); Novartis, East Hanover, New Jersey (H.J.E.); GlaxoSmithKline, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania (L.C.); and University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland (H.W.)
| | - Hongbing Wang
- Pfizer Inc., Groton, Connecticut (O.A.F.); AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, Illinois (M.S.); Merck Research Laboratories, Rahway, New Jersey (J.P.); Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, Connecticut (M.W.S.); Boehringer Ingelheim, Ridgefield, Connecticut (D.R.); Novartis, East Hanover, New Jersey (H.J.E.); GlaxoSmithKline, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania (L.C.); and University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland (H.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Yu Y, Loi CM, Hoffman J, Wang D. Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Palbociclib. J Clin Pharmacol 2016; 57:173-184. [DOI: 10.1002/jcph.792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2016] [Revised: 06/14/2016] [Accepted: 07/06/2016] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Yanke Yu
- Clinical Pharmacology; Global Product Development; Pfizer; La Jolla CA USA
| | - Cho-Ming Loi
- Pharmacokinetics; Dynamics and Metabolism; Pfizer Worldwide Research and Development; La Jolla CA USA
| | - Justin Hoffman
- Clinical Pharmacology; Global Product Development; Pfizer; La Jolla CA USA
| | - Diane Wang
- Clinical Pharmacology; Global Product Development; Pfizer; La Jolla CA USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Dixit V, Moore A, Tsao H, Hariparsad N. Application of Micropatterned Cocultured Hepatocytes to Evaluate the Inductive Potential and Degradation Rate of Major Xenobiotic Metabolizing Enzymes. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2015; 44:250-61. [PMID: 26658225 DOI: 10.1124/dmd.115.067173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2015] [Accepted: 12/08/2015] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Long-term coculture models of hepatocytes are promising tools to study drug transport, clearance, and hepatoxicity. In this report we compare the basal expression of drug disposition genes and the inductive response of prototypical inducers (rifampin, phenobarbital, phenytoin) in hepatocyte two-dimensional monocultures and the long-term coculture model (HepatoPac). All the inducers used in the study increased the expression and activity of CYP3A4, CYP2B6 and CYP2C enzymes in the HepatoPac cultures. The coculture model showed a consistent and higher induction of CYP2C enzymes compared with the monocultures. The EC50 of rifampin for CYP3A4 and CYP2C9 was up to 10-fold lower in HepatoPac than the monocultures. The EC50 of rifampin calculated from the clinical drug interaction studies correlated well with the EC50 observed in the HepatoPac cultures. Owing to the long-term stability of the HepatoPac cultures, we were able to directly measure a half-life (t1/2) for both CYP3A4 and CYP2B6 using the depletion kinetics of mRNA and functional activity. The t1/2 for CYP3A4 mRNA was 26 hours and that for the functional protein was 49 hours. The t1/2 of CYP2B6 was 38 hours (mRNA) and 68 hours (activity), which is longer than CYP3A4 and shows the differential turnover of these two proteins. This is the first study to our knowledge to report the turnover rate of CYP2B6 in human hepatocytes. The data presented here demonstrate that the HepatoPac cultures have the potential to be used in long-term culture to mimic complex clinical scenarios.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vaishali Dixit
- Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Amanda Moore
- Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Hong Tsao
- Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Niresh Hariparsad
- Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
March S, Ramanan V, Trehan K, Ng S, Galstian A, Gural N, Scull MA, Shlomai A, Mota MM, Fleming HE, Khetani SR, Rice CM, Bhatia SN. Micropatterned coculture of primary human hepatocytes and supportive cells for the study of hepatotropic pathogens. Nat Protoc 2015; 10:2027-53. [PMID: 26584444 PMCID: PMC5867906 DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2015.128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 106] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The development of therapies and vaccines for human hepatropic pathogens requires robust model systems that enable the study of host-pathogen interactions. However, in vitro liver models of infection typically use either hepatoma cell lines that exhibit aberrant physiology or primary human hepatocytes in culture conditions in which they rapidly lose their hepatic phenotype. To achieve stable and robust in vitro primary human hepatocyte models, we developed micropatterned cocultures (MPCCs), which consist of primary human hepatocytes organized into 2D islands that are surrounded by supportive fibroblast cells. By using this system, which can be established over a period of days, and maintained over multiple weeks, we demonstrate how to recapitulate in vitro hepatic life cycles for the hepatitis B and C viruses and the Plasmodium pathogens P. falciparum and P. vivax. The MPCC platform can be used to uncover aspects of host-pathogen interactions, and it has the potential to be used for drug and vaccine development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra March
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Vyas Ramanan
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kartik Trehan
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Shengyong Ng
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ani Galstian
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nil Gural
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Margaret A Scull
- Laboratory of Virology and Infectious Disease, Center for the Study of Hepatitis C, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Amir Shlomai
- Laboratory of Virology and Infectious Disease, Center for the Study of Hepatitis C, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Maria M Mota
- Unidade de Malaria, Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Heather E Fleming
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Salman R Khetani
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
| | - Charles M Rice
- Laboratory of Virology and Infectious Disease, Center for the Study of Hepatitis C, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sangeeta N Bhatia
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
- Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|