Behavioral Characterization of κ Opioid Receptor Agonist Spiradoline and Cannabinoid Receptor Agonist CP55940 Mixtures in Rats

Discovery of κ Opioid Receptor (KOR)-Selective d-Tetrapeptides with Improved In Vivo Antinociceptive Effect after Peripheral Administration

Peripherally active tetrapeptides as selective κ opioid receptor (KOR) agonists have been prepared in good overall yields and high purity following solid-phase peptide synthesis via Fmoc protection strategy. Structural modifications at the first and second position of the lead compound FF(d-Nle)R-NH2 (FE200041) were contemplated with aromatic side chains containing d-amino acids, such as (d)-pF-Phe, (d)-mF-Phe, (d)-oF-Phe, which led to highly selective and efficacious KOR agonists endowed with strong antinociceptive activity in vivo following intravenous (i.v.) and subcutaneous (s.c.) administration in the tail flick and formalin tests. These results suggest potential clinical applications in the treatment of neuropathic and inflammatory pain.

Opioid-sparing effect of cannabinoids for analgesia: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical and clinical studies

Cannabinoid co-administration may enable reduced opioid doses for analgesia. This updated systematic review on the opioid-sparing effects of cannabinoids considered preclinical and clinical studies where the outcome was analgesia or opioid dose requirements. We searched Scopus, Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, Medline, and Embase (2016 onwards). Ninety-two studies met the search criteria including 15 ongoing trials. Meta-analysis of seven preclinical studies found the median effective dose (ED₅₀) of morphine administered with delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol was 3.5 times lower (95% CI 2.04, 6.03) than the ED₅₀ of morphine alone. Six preclinical studies found no evidence of increased opioid abuse liability with cannabinoid administration. Of five healthy-volunteer experimental pain studies, two found increased pain, two found decreased pain and one found reduced pain bothersomeness with cannabinoid administration; three demonstrated that cannabinoid co-administration may increase opioid abuse liability. Three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) found no evidence of opioid-sparing effects of cannabinoids in acute pain. Meta-analysis of four RCTs in patients with cancer pain found no effect of cannabinoid administration on opioid dose (mean difference -3.8 mg, 95% CI -10.97, 3.37) or percentage change in pain scores (mean difference 1.84, 95% CI -2.05, 5.72); five studies found more adverse events with cannabinoids compared with placebo (risk ratio 1.13, 95% CI 1.03, 1.24). Of five controlled chronic non-cancer pain trials; one low-quality study with no control arm, and one single-dose study reported reduced pain scores with cannabinoids. Three RCTs found no treatment effect of dronabinol. Meta-analyses of observational studies found 39% reported opioid cessation (95% CI 0.15, 0.64, I² 95.5%, eight studies), and 85% reported reduction (95% CI 0.64, 0.99, I² 92.8%, seven studies). In summary, preclinical and observational studies demonstrate the potential opioid-sparing effects of cannabinoids in the context of analgesia, in contrast to higher-quality RCTs that did not provide evidence of opioid-sparing effects.

Interactive effects of (±)-trans-U50488 and its stereoisomers with cannabinoids

The adverse effects of mu opioid agonists have spurred a renewed interest in using kappa opioid receptor (KOR) agonists as analgesics. KOR agonists also have potential for development as diuretics for the treatment of edema and hypertension. Here, we evaluated the discriminative stimulus, antinociceptive, and diuretic effects of the kappa agonist (±)-trans-U-50488 and its stereoisomers (-)-(1S,2S)-U-50488 or (+)-(1R,2R)-U-50488) alone and in combination with the cannabinoid agonist (-)-CP 55,940. To establish (±)-U-50488 as a discriminative stimulus, rats (n = 12) were trained to discriminate intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of 5.6 mg/kg of (±)-trans-U-50488 from saline under a fixed-ratio 20 (FR-20) schedule of food reinforcement. Then, antinociception was assessed using two procedures: warm water tail withdrawal and von Frey paw withdrawal. Diuretic effects were assessed in separate rats (n = 6/group). Doses of (±)-U-50488 and (-)-U-50488 that served as discriminative stimuli produced significant increases in urine output, but at lower doses than those that produced antinociception. In contrast, (+)-U-50488 alone had no discriminative stimulus or diuretic effects at the doses tested, but did produce antinociception in the von Frey assay. When three cannabinoids and morphine were tested in the (±)-U-50488 discrimination procedure to determine the similarity of these drugs' discriminative stimulus effects to those for (±)-U-50488, the rank order similarity was (-)-CP 55,940 > (-)-trans-THC > (+)-WIN 55,212-2 ≥ morphine. (-)-CP 55,940 alone (0.056 mg/kg) partially substituted for the discriminative stimulus effects of (±)-U-50488 and produced significant diuretic and antinociceptive effects. (-)-CP 55,940 in combination with (±)-U-50488 also produced a two-fold leftward shift in the discriminative stimulus curve for (±)-U-50488, and near-additive antinociception with (±)-U-50488 and (+)-U-50488. Further, the diuretic effect of (-)-CP 55,940 was enhanced by a dose of (+)-U50488, which itself did not alter urine output. These data together indicate that a combination of cannabinoid and kappa opioid agonists can enhance diuresis, but may have limited potential for serving as opioid-sparing pharmacotherapeutics for treatment of pain.

Endogenous opiates and behavior: 2017

This paper is the fortieth consecutive installment of the annual anthological review of research concerning the endogenous opioid system, summarizing articles published during 2017 that studied the behavioral effects of molecular, pharmacological and genetic manipulation of opioid peptides and receptors as well as effects of opioid/opiate agonists and antagonists. The review is subdivided into the following specific topics: molecular-biochemical effects and neurochemical localization studies of endogenous opioids and their receptors (1), the roles of these opioid peptides and receptors in pain and analgesia in animals (2) and humans (3), opioid-sensitive and opioid-insensitive effects of nonopioid analgesics (4), opioid peptide and receptor involvement in tolerance and dependence (5), stress and social status (6), learning and memory (7), eating and drinking (8), drug abuse and alcohol (9), sexual activity and hormones, pregnancy, development and endocrinology (10), mental illness and mood (11), seizures and neurologic disorders (12), electrical-related activity and neurophysiology (13), general activity and locomotion (14), gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic functions (15), cardiovascular responses (16), respiration and thermoregulation (17), and immunological responses (18).

Kappa Opioid Agonist-Induced Diuresis: Characteristics, Mechanisms, and Beyond

Activation of the kappa opioid receptor (KOR) induces antinociception, anti-pruritic activity, diuresis, sedation, and dysphoria. KOR agonist-induced diuresis is characterized as water diuresis, in which water excretion with urine is increased without altering electrolyte excretion. Both centrally and peripherally acting KOR agonists promote diuresis. KOR antagonists block KOR agonist-evoked diuresis suggesting that the diuretic effect is through activation of the KOR. Studies in different experimental animal species and in humans indicate that KOR agonists decrease antidiuretic hormone (ADH) secretion and release from the hypothalamus and posterior pituitary; decrease response to ADH in kidneys; increase renal sympathetic nerve activity; and increase adrenaline, noradrenaline, and dopamine release from the adrenal medulla. The therapeutic potentials of KOR agonists as water diuretics have been studied in animal models of cerebral edema due to ischemia and intracranial mass, hypertension, and cirrhosis. This chapter reviews characteristics, possible mechanisms, as well as therapeutic potentials of KOR agonist-induced diuresis.

Investigation of the Adrenergic and Opioid Binding Affinities, Metabolic Stability, Plasma Protein Binding Properties, and Functional Effects of Selected Indole-Based Kratom Alkaloids

Selected indole-based kratom alkaloids were evaluated for their opioid and adrenergic receptor binding and functional effects, in vivo antinociceptive effects, plasma protein binding, and metabolic stability. Mitragynine, the major alkaloid in Mitragyna speciosa (kratom), had higher affinity at opioid receptors than at adrenergic receptors while the vice versa was observed for corynantheidine. The observed polypharmacology of kratom alkaloids may support its utilization to treat opioid use disorder and withdrawal.

Cannabinoid-induced lower lip retraction in rats

RATIONALE

Lower lip retraction (LLR) in rats has been described as a distinctive effect of 5-HT_1A agonists. In the course of evaluating behavioral effects of cannabinoid agonists in rats, LLR effects were evident following injection of several cannabinoid agonists.

OBJECTIVES

To pharmacologically characterize cannabinoid-induced LLR in rats.

METHODS

Lower lip retraction was scored using a 3-point scale for up to 6 h after injection of the cannabinoid agonists Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ⁹-THC, 1-10 mg/kg), AM7499 (0.01-1.0 mg/kg), or AM2389 (0.003-0.1 mg/kg), or, for comparison, the 5-HT_1A agonist 8-OH-DPAT (0.01-0.3 mg/kg). Next, antagonist effects of rimonabant (1-10 mg/kg) and WAY100635 (0.3 mg/kg) on LLR produced by cannabinoid or 5-HT_1A agonists were evaluated. Lastly, effects of 8-OH-DPAT were determined following pretreatment with AM2389 (0.003-0.01 mg/kg) or Δ⁹-THC (1 mg/kg).

RESULTS

All three cannabinoid agonists produced LLR. Effects of AM2389 were attenuated by both rimonabant and WAY100635 whereas effects of 8-OH-DPAT were antagonized by WAY 100635 but not by rimonabant. Pretreatment with 1 mg/kg Δ⁹-THC or 0.01 mg/kg AM2389 shifted the 8-OH-DPAT dose-effect function for LLR to the left and isobolographic analysis of the data indicates CB1 and 5-HT_1A interactions can be supraadditive.

CONCLUSIONS

Cannabinoid agonists produce LLR in rats, an effect heretofore ascribed only to activity at 5-HT_1A receptors, via CB1 receptor-mediated actions. Co-administration of a cannabinoid agonist and the 5-HT_1A agonist 8-OH-DPAT results in a synergistic effect on LLR.

The effects of alcohol and cannabinoid exposure during the brain growth spurt on behavioral development in rats

Cannabis is the most commonly used illicit drug among pregnant women. Moreover, over half of pregnant women who are consuming cannabis are also consuming alcohol; however, the consequences of combined prenatal alcohol and cannabis exposure on fetal development are not well understood. The current study examined behavioral development following exposure to ethanol (EtOH) and/or CP-55,940 (CP), a cannabinoid receptor agonist. From postnatal days (PD) 4-9, a period of brain development equivalent to the third trimester, Sprague-Dawley rats received EtOH (5.25 g/kg/day) or sham intubation, as well as CP (0.4 mg/kg/day) or vehicle. All subjects were tested on open field activity (PD 18-21), elevated plus maze (PD 25), and spatial learning (PD 40-46) tasks. Both EtOH and CP increased locomotor activity in the open field, and the combination produced more severe overactivity than either exposure alone. Similarly, increases in thigmotaxis in the Morris water maze were caused by either EtOH or CP alone, and were more severe with combined exposure, although only EtOH impaired spatial learning. Finally, developmental CP significantly increased time spent in the open arms on the elevated plus maze. Overall, these data indicate that EtOH and CP produce some independent effects on behavior, and that the combination produces more severe overactivity in the open field. Importantly, these data suggest that prenatal cannabis disrupts development and combined prenatal exposure to alcohol and cannabis may be particularly damaging to the developing fetus, which has implications for the lives of affected individuals and families and also for establishing public health policy.

Interactions between kappa and mu opioid receptor agonists: effects of the ratio of drugs in mixtures

RATIONALE

Pain is the leading reason for seeking health care, and mu opioid receptor agonists continue to be prescribed despite well-documented adverse effects. Kappa opioid receptor agonists have antinociceptive effects with little to no abuse liability and might be useful for treating pain in mixtures. Kappa:mu opioid mixtures might be useful if therapeutic effects of each drug can be selectively increased while reducing or avoiding the adverse effects that occur with larger doses of each drug alone.

OBJECTIVE

This study characterized the effects of the kappa opioid receptor agonist spiradoline alone (0.32-56 mg/kg) and in 1:10, 1:3, 1:1, and 3:1 mixtures with the mu opioid receptor agonists morphine (1.0-32 mg/kg) and etorphine (1-10 μg/kg) on warm water tail-withdrawal latency, body temperature, responding for food, and fecal output in male Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 24).

RESULTS

Antinociceptive effects were greater than additive for 1:10 and 1:3 spiradoline:morphine mixtures and for 1:10, 1:3, and 1:1 spiradoline:etorphine mixtures. The potency of spiradoline to produce hypothermia was greater with 1:3 and 3:1 spiradoline:etorphine mixtures but not with 1:10 or 1:1 mixtures or with any spiradoline:morphine mixture. The effects of 1:3 spiradoline:morphine on responding for food were additive, whereas 1:1 and 3:1 were greater than additive. Spiradoline did not significantly alter morphine-induced decreases in fecal output.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, mixtures of kappa and mu opioids might have therapeutic potential for treating pain, particularly when the mixture has a greater ratio of mu to kappa agonist. If adverse effects of each constituent drug are reduced or avoided, then kappa:mu mixtures might be advantageous to mu opioids alone.