Preclinical assessment of the abuse potential of purified botanical cannabidiol: self-administration, drug discrimination, and physical dependence

Metabolism and liver toxicity of cannabidiol

Increasing public interest has resulted in the widespread use of non-pharmaceutical cannabidiol (CBD) products. The sales of CBD products continue to rise, accompanied by concerns regarding unsubstantiated benefits, lack of product quality control, and potential health risks. Both animal and human studies have revealed a spectrum of toxicological effects linked to the use of CBD. Adverse effects related to exposure of humans to CBD include changes in appetite, gastrointestinal discomfort, fatigue, and elevated liver aminotransferase enzymes. Animal studies reported changes in organ weight, reproduction, liver function, and the immune system. This review centers on human-derived data, including clinical studies and in vitro investigations. Animal studies are also included when human data is not available. The objective is to offer an overview of CBD-related hepatotoxicity, metabolism, and potential CBD-drug interactions, thereby providing insights into the current understanding of CBD's impact on human health. It's important to note that this review does not serve as a risk assessment but seeks to summarize available information to contribute to the broader understanding of potential toxicological effects of CBD on the liver.

A critical assessment of the abuse, dependence and associated safety risks of naturally occurring and synthetic cannabinoids

Various countries and US States have legalized cannabis, and the use of the psychoactive1 and non-psychoactive cannabinoids is steadily increasing. In this review, we have collated evidence from published non-clinical and clinical sources to evaluate the abuse, dependence and associated safety risks of the individual cannabinoids present in cannabis. As context, we also evaluated various synthetic cannabinoids. The evidence shows that delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) and other psychoactive cannabinoids in cannabis have moderate reinforcing effects. Although they rapidly induce pharmacological tolerance, the withdrawal syndrome produced by the psychoactive cannabinoids in cannabis is of moderate severity and lasts from 2 to 6 days. The evidence overwhelmingly shows that non-psychoactive cannabinoids do not produce intoxicating, cognitive or rewarding properties in humans. There has been much speculation whether cannabidiol (CBD) influences the psychoactive and potentially harmful effects of Δ9-THC. Although most non-clinical and clinical investigations have shown that CBD does not attenuate the CNS effects of Δ9-THC or synthetic psychoactive cannabinoids, there is sufficient uncertainty to warrant further research. Based on the analysis, our assessment is cannabis has moderate levels of abuse and dependence risk. While the risks and harms are substantially lower than those posed by many illegal and legal substances of abuse, including tobacco and alcohol, they are far from negligible. In contrast, potent synthetic cannabinoid (CB1/CB2) receptor agonists are more reinforcing and highly intoxicating and pose a substantial risk for abuse and harm. 1 "Psychoactive" is defined as a substance that when taken or administered affects mental processes, e.g., perception, consciousness, cognition or mood and emotions.

Investigation of Cannabidiol in the Mouse Drug Discrimination Paradigm

Introduction: Cannabidiol (CBD) has gained considerable public and scientific attention because of its known and potential medicinal properties, as well as its commercial success in a wide range of products. Although CBD lacks cannabimimetic intoxicating side effects in humans and fails to substitute for cannabinoid type-1 receptor (CB1R) agonists in laboratory animal models of drug discrimination paradigm, anecdotal reports describe it as producing a "pleasant" subjective effect in humans. Thus, we speculated that this phytocannabinoid may elicit distinct subjective effects. Accordingly, we investigated whether mice would learn to discriminate CBD from vehicle. Additionally, we examined whether CBD may act as a CB1R allosteric and whether it would elevate brain endocannabinoid concentrations. Materials and Methods: C57BL/6J mice underwent discrimination training of either CBD or the high-efficacy CB1R agonist CP55,940 from vehicle. Additionally, we examined whether CBD or the CB1R-positive allosteric modulator ZCZ011 would alter the CP55,940 discriminative cue. Finally, we tested whether an acute CBD injection would elevate endocannabinoid levels in brain, and also quantified blood and brain levels of CBD. Results: Mice failed to discriminate high doses of CBD from vehicle following 124 training days, though the same subjects subsequently acquired CP55,940 discrimination. In a second group of mice trained to discriminate CP55,940, CBD neither elicited substitution nor altered response rates. A single injection of 100 or 200 mg/kg CBD did not affect brain levels of endogenous cannabinoids and related lipids and resulted in high drug concentrations in blood and whole brain at 0.5 h and continued to increase at 3 h. Discussion: CBD did not engender an interoceptive stimulus, did not disrupt performance in a food-motivated operant task, and lacked apparent effectiveness in altering brain endocannabinoid levels or modulating the pharmacological effects of a CB1R agonist. These findings support the assertions that CBD lacks abuse liability and its acute administration does not appear to play a functional role in modulating key components of the endocannabinoid system in whole animals.

Discriminative-stimulus effects of cannabidiol oil in Sprague-Dawley rats

Cannabidiol (CBD) is one of the major centrally active phytocannabinoid components of cannabis, and has been approved by the FDA only for the treatment of seizures associated with three rare disorders. It has also been touted as a potential treatment for anxiety in place of more traditional treatments like benzodiazepines. Although there is some evidence of anxiolytic effects of CBD, its suitability as a substitute for benzodiazepines is unknown. This experiment was designed to assess the extent to which CBD shares interoceptive discriminative-stimulus properties with the anxiolytic drug chlordiazepoxide (CDP), a benzodiazepine. In the present experiment, a range of doses (0-1569 mg/kg) of over-the-counter CBD oil was administered (i.g.) in male Sprague-Dawley rats trained to discriminate 5.6 mg/kg CDP from saline. Due to the long time-course effects of CBD, generalization tests were conducted at 90 and 120 min post-CBD administration. The two highest doses of CBD tested (1064 and 1569 mg/kg) were found to partially substitute for 5.6 mg/kg CDP, with mean percent responding on the CDP-associated lever reaching above 20% at time 2 (120 min post-CBD administration), suggesting that high doses of the over-the-counter CBD oils used in this experiment share interoceptive discriminative-stimulus properties to some degree with CDP. These results are novel in comparison to existing research into stimulus effects of CBD, in which substitution for benzodiazepines has not previously been observed.

Trial of a Novel Oral Cannabinoid Formulation in Patients with Hypertension: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Pharmacogenetic Study

Cannabidiol (CBD) is a non-psychoactive cannabinoid, and available evidence suggests potential efficacy in the treatment of many disorders. DehydraTECH™2.0 CBD is a patented capsule formulation that improves the bioabsorption of CBD. We sought to compare the effects of CBD and DehydraTECH™2.0 CBD based on polymorphisms in CYP P450 genes and investigate the effects of a single CBD dose on blood pressure. In a randomized and double-blinded order, 12 females and 12 males with reported hypertension were given either placebo capsules or DehydraTECH™2.0 CBD (300 mg of CBD, each). Blood pressure and heart rate were measured during 3 h, and blood and urine samples were collected. In the first 20 min following the dose, there was a greater reduction in diastolic blood pressure (p = 0.025) and mean arterial pressure MAP (p = 0.056) with DehydraTECH™2.0 CBD, which was probably due to its greater CBD bioavailability. In the CYP2C9*2*3 enzyme, subjects with the poor metabolizer (PM) phenotype had higher plasma CBD concentrations. Both CYP2C19*2 (p = 0.037) and CYP2C19*17 (p = 0.022) were negatively associated with urinary CBD levels (beta = -0.489 for CYP2C19*2 and beta = -0.494 for CYP2C19*17). Further research is required to establish the impact of CYP P450 enzymes and the identification of metabolizer phenotype for the optimization of CBD formulations.

Experimental strategies to discover and develop the next generation of psychedelics and entactogens as medicines

Research on classical psychedelics (psilocybin, LSD and DMT) and entactogen, MDMA, has produced a renaissance in the search for more effective drugs to treat psychiatric, neurological and various peripheral disorders. Psychedelics and entactogens act though interaction with 5-HT_2A and other serotonergic receptors and/or monoamine reuptake transporters. 5-HT, which serves as a neurotransmitter and hormone, is ubiquitously distributed in the brain and peripheral organs, tissues and cells where it has vasoconstrictor, pro-inflammatory and pro-nociceptive actions. Serotonergic psychedelics and entactogens have known safety and toxicity risks. For these drugs, the risks been extensively researched and empirically assessed through human experience. However, novel drug-candidates require thorough non-clinical testing not only to predict clinical efficacy, but also to address the risks they pose during clinical development and later after approval as prescription medicines. We have defined the challenges researchers will encounter when developing novel serotonergic psychedelics and entactogens. We describe screening techniques to predict clinical efficacy and address the safety/toxicity risks emerging from our knowledge of the existing drugs: 1) An early-stage, non-clinical screening cascade to pharmacologically characterise novel drug-candidates. 2) Models to detect hallucinogenic activity. 3) Models to differentiate hallucinogens from entactogens. 4) Non-clinical preclinical lead optimisation technology (PLOT) screening to select drug-candidates. 5) Modified animal models to evaluate the abuse and dependence risks of novel psychedelics in Safety Pharmacology testing. Our intention has been to design non-clinical screening strategies that will reset the balance between benefits and harms to deliver more effective and safer novel psychedelics for clinical use. This article is part of the Special Issue on 'National Institutes of Health Psilocybin Research Speaker Series'.

Effects of Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), cannabidiol (CBD), and THC/CBD mixtures on fentanyl versus food choice in rhesus monkeys

INTRODUCTION

There is considerable interest in utilizing cannabis-based products as adjuvants to opioid agonist therapies as phytocannabinoids like Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) or synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists appear to enhance the pain-relieving effects of opioids without enhancing problematic effects of opioids. Cannabis is a pharmacologically complex plant with hundreds of compounds, some of which may have interactive effects. Therefore, studying compounds like THC in isolation does not accurately reflect the clinical use of cannabis.

METHODS

This study examined the effects of THC and cannabidiol (CBD), the two most prominent compounds in cannabis, on the reinforcing effects of fentanyl in rhesus monkeys in a food versus drug choice procedure. Responding on one lever was reinforced by delivery of a sucrose pellet, and responding on another lever was reinforced by delivery of an i.v. infusion of fentanyl. In each monkey, the largest dose of fentanyl that produced less than 20 % drug choice and the smallest dose of fentanyl that produced more than 80% drug choice was determined. Effects of pretreatment with THC and CBD, alone and in mixtures, were then examined.

RESULTS

THC, CBD, and THC:CBD mixtures did not reliably enhance or diminish choice for fentanyl up to doses that suppressed responding in most monkeys, though some individual differences were observed, with THC and THC:CBD mixtures decreasing choice for large doses of fentanyl in one monkey and increasing choice for small doses of fentanyl in another.

CONCLUSIONS

Phytocannabinoids like THC and CBD, administered alone or in mixtures, do not appear to reliably alter the reinforcing effects of opioids.