Pharmacokinetics of murine anti-human CD3 antibodies in man are determined by the disappearance of target antigen

Importance of Target-Mediated Drug Disposition (TMDD) of Small-Molecule Compounds and Its Impact on Drug Development-Example of the Class Effect of HSD-1 Inhibitors

With more potent drug candidates being developed, the incidence of target-mediated drug disposition (TMDD) in small-molecule compounds has significantly increased in the past decade. Moreover, TMDD appears to apply to some small-molecule compound classes. The main purpose of the current review is to increase the awareness of TMDD in a series of small-molecule inhibitors of 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 (HSD-1) using ABT-384, SPI-62, MK-0916, BMS-823778, and BI-187004 as case examples. Although developed independently by different pharmaceutical companies, these HSD-1 inhibitors demonstrated strikingly similar nonlinear pharmacokinetic behaviors when wide dose ranges were evaluated in first-in-human (FIH) single ascending dose (SAD) and multiple ascending dose (MAD) studies. Recognizing TMDD in small-molecule compounds is important, as the information can be leveraged to select the appropriate dose regimen, improve clinical trial design, as well as predict pharmacological target occupancy. In this review, we summarize the general pharmacokinetic features that facilitate the recognition of small-molecule TMDD, provide case examples of specific HSD-1 inhibitors, highlight the importance of recognizing TMDD of small-molecule compounds during clinical development, and comment on the importance of utilizing pharmacometric modeling to facilitate the quantitative understanding of small-molecule compounds exhibiting TMDD.

Comparison of CD3e Antibody and CD3e-sZAP Immunotoxin Treatment in Mice Identifies sZAP as the Main Driver of Vascular Leakage

Anti-CD3-epsilon (CD3e) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and CD3e immunotoxins (ITs) are promising targeted therapy options for various T-cell disorders. Despite significant advances in mAb and IT engineering, vascular leakage syndrome (VLS) remains a major dose-limiting toxicity for ITs and has been poorly characterized for recent "engineered" mAbs. This study undertakes a direct comparison of non-mitogenic CD3e-mAb (145-2C11 with Fc-silentTM murine IgG1: S-CD3e-mAb) and a new murine-version CD3e-IT (saporin-streptavidin (sZAP) conjugated with S-CD3e-mAb: S-CD3e-IT) and identifies their distinct toxicity profiles in mice. As expected, the two agents showed different modes of action on T cells, with S-CD3e-mAb inducing nearly complete modulation of CD3e on the cell surface, while S-CD3e-IT depleted the cells. S-CD3e-IT significantly increased the infiltration of polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs) into the tissue parenchyma of the spleen and lungs, a sign of increased vascular permeability. By contrast, S-CD3e-mAbs-treated mice showed no notable signs of vascular leakage. Treatment with control ITs (sZAP conjugated with Fc-silent isotype antibodies) induced significant vascular leakage without causing T-cell deaths. These results demonstrate that the toxin portion of S-CD3e-IT, not the CD3e-binding portion (S-CD3e-mAb), is the main driver of vascular leakage, thus clarifying the molecular target for improving safety profiles in CD3e-IT therapy.

Population pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of moxetumomab pasudotox in patients with relapsed or refractory hairy cell leukaemia

AIMS

To characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) of moxetumomab pasudotox, an anti-CD22 recombinant immunotoxin, in adults with relapsed or refractory hairy cell leukaemia, we examined data from a phase 1 study (Study 1001; n = 49) and from the pivotal clinical study (Study 1053; n = 74).

METHODS

Data from both studies were pooled (n = 123) to develop a population PK model. Covariates included demographics, disease state, liver and kidney function, prior treatment, and antidrug antibodies (ADAs). Exposure-response and exposure-safety were analysed separately by study. A 1-compartment model with linear elimination from the central compartment and 2 clearance (CL) rates was developed.

RESULTS

Moxetumomab pasudotox was cleared more rapidly after cycle 1, day 1 (CL₁ = 24.7 L/h) than subsequently (CL₂ = 3.76 L/h), with high interindividual variability (116 and 109%, respectively). In Study 1053, patients with ADA titres >10 240 showed ~4-fold increase in CL. Higher exposures (≥median) were related to higher response rates, capillary leak syndrome and increased creatinine (Study 1053 only), or grade ≥3 adverse events (Study 1001 only). Clinical benefits were still observed in patients with lower exposure or high ADA titres.

CONCLUSION

Despite a high incidence of immunogenicity with increased clearance, moxetumomab pasudotox demonstrated efficacy in hairy cell leukaemia.

Concept of Pharmacologic Target-Mediated Drug Disposition in Large-Molecule and Small-Molecule Compounds

Target-mediated drug disposition (TMDD) is a term to describe a nonlinear pharmacokinetic (PK) phenomenon that is caused by high-affinity binding of a compound to its pharmacologic targets. As the interaction between a drug and its pharmacologic target belongs to the process of pharmacodynamics (PD), TMDD can be viewed as a consequence of "PD affecting PK." Although there are numerous TMDD-related articles in the literature, most of them focus on characterizing TMDD using various mathematical models, which may not be suitable for those readers who have little interest in mathematical modeling and only want to have an understanding of the basic concept. The goal of this review is to serve as a "primer" on TMDD. This review explains (1) how TMDD happens; (2) why large-molecule and small-molecule compounds exhibiting TMDD demonstrate substantially different nonlinear PK behaviors; (3) what nonlinear PK profiles look like in large-molecule and small-molecule compounds exhibiting TMDD, using pegfilgrastim, erythropoietin, ABT-384, and linagliptin as case examples; and (4) how to identify whether the nonlinear PK of a compound is because of TMDD.

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Properties of Drug Delivery Systems

The use of drug delivery systems (DDS) is an attractive approach to facilitate uptake of therapeutic agents at the desired site of action, particularly when free drug has poor pharmacokinetics/biodistribution (PK/BD) or significant off-site toxicities. Successful translation of DDS into the clinic is dependent on a thorough understanding of the in vivo behavior of the carrier, which has, for the most part, been an elusive goal. This is, at least in part, due to significant differences in the mechanisms controlling pharmacokinetics for classic drugs and DDSs. In this review, we summarize the key physiologic mechanisms controlling the in vivo behavior of DDS, compare and contrast this with classic drugs, and describe engineering strategies designed to improve DDS PK/BD. In addition, we describe quantitative approaches that could be useful for describing PK/BD of DDS, as well as critical steps between tissue uptake and pharmacologic effect.

Target-mediated disposition population pharmacokinetics model of erythropoietin in premature neonates following multiple intravenous and subcutaneous dosing regimens

Routine erythropoietin (Epo) therapy for neonatal anemia is presently controversial due to its modest response. We speculate that an important contributor to this modest response is that previous clinical study designs were not driven by rigorous mechanistic and kinetic insights into the complex pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of Epo in this population. To address this therapeutic opportunity, we conducted a prospective clinical study to investigate the PK of Epo in very-low-birth-weight (VLBW) premature neonates using a unique Epo dosing algorithm that accounts for complex neonatal erythropoietic physiology. Twenty-seven subjects received up to 10 intravenous or subcutaneous exogenous doses of Epo (600 or 1200 U/kg) during the first 4 weeks of life. Subjects were administered two doses of Epo 1200 U/kg on days 2 and 16, and eight doses of Epo 600 U/kg on days 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 14, 15, and 28 following birth. We have developed for the first time a mechanistic, target-mediated disposition model that provides novel insights into the mechanisms driving Epo PK in VLBW neonates. Epo association rate, k_on, was estimated to be 0.00610 pM^-1h^-1, and the dissociation rate k_off was 0.112 h^-1. Internalization of the Epo-target complex (k_int) and the total receptor concentration (R_max) were estimated to be 0.118 h^-1 and 133 pM, respectively. Following s.c. administration, the absorption rate (k_a) of Epo was 0.0738h^-1 and bioavailability was 78.0%. Our mechanism-based population pharmacokinetic analysis provided quantitative insight into Epo kinetics in VLBW neonates; the information gained will assist in deriving dosing strategies for neonatal anemia and for neuroprotection efficacy studies.

Physiologically-based modeling of monoclonal antibody pharmacokinetics in drug discovery and development

Over the past few decades, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have become one of the most important and fastest growing classes of therapeutic molecules, with applications in a wide variety of disease areas. As such, understanding of the determinants of mAb pharmacokinetic (PK) processes (absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination) is crucial in developing safe and efficacious therapeutics. In the present review, we discuss the use of physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models as an approach to characterize the in vivo behavior of mAbs, in the context of the key PK processes that should be considered in these models. Additionally, we discuss current and potential future applications of PBPK in the drug discovery and development timeline for mAbs, spanning from identification of potential target molecules to prediction of potential drug-drug interactions. Finally, we conclude with a discussion of currently available PBPK models for mAbs that could be implemented in the drug development process.

Systems pharmacology and enhanced pharmacodynamic models for understanding antibody-based drug action and toxicity

Pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) models seek to describe the temporal pattern of drug exposures and their associated pharmacological effects produced at micro- and macro-scales of organization. Antibody-based drugs have been developed for a large variety of diseases, with effects exhibited through a comprehensive range of mechanisms of action. Mechanism-based PK/PD and systems pharmacology models can play a major role in elucidating and integrating complex antibody pharmacological properties, such as nonlinear disposition and dynamical intracellular signaling pathways triggered by ligation to their cognate targets. Such complexities can be addressed through the use of robust computational modeling techniques that have proven powerful tools for pragmatic characterization of experimental data and for theoretical exploration of antibody efficacy and adverse effects. The primary objectives of such multi-scale mathematical models are to generate and test competing hypotheses and to predict clinical outcomes. In this review, relevant systems pharmacology and enhanced PD (ePD) models that are used as predictive tools for antibody-based drug action are reported. Their common conceptual features are highlighted, along with approaches used for modeling preclinical and clinically available data. Key examples illustrate how systems pharmacology and ePD models codify the interplay among complex biology, drug concentrations, and pharmacological effects. New hybrid modeling concepts that bridge cutting-edge systems pharmacology models with established PK/ePD models will be needed to anticipate antibody effects on disease in subpopulations and individual patients.

Physiologically-based modeling to predict the clinical behavior of monoclonal antibodies directed against lymphocyte antigens

Many clinically approved and investigational monoclonal antibody (mAb)-based therapeutics are directed against proteins located in the systemic circulation, including cytokines, growth factors, lymphocyte proteins, and shed antigens. Interaction between mAb and target may lead to non-linear pharmacokinetics (PK), characterized by rapid, target-mediated elimination. Several groups have reported that determinants of target-mediated elimination could include mAb-target binding, target expression, and target turnover. Recently, we scaled a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model for mAb disposition to man and used it to predict the non-linear PK of mAbs directed against tumor epithelial proteins. In this work, we extended the previously described model to account for the influence of lymphocyte proteins on mAb PK in man. To account for the dynamic behavior of lymphocytes in the circulation, lymphocyte cycling between blood and lymphoid organs was described using first-order transfer rate constants. Use of lymphocyte cycling and reported target turnover rates in the model allowed the accurate prediction of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PD) of 4 mAbs (TRX1, MTRX1011a, rituximab, daclizumab) directed against 3 lymphocyte targets (CD4, CD20, CD25). The results described here suggest that the proposed model structure may be useful in the a priori prediction of the PK/PD properties of mAbs directed against antigens in the circulation.

Small-Molecule Compounds Exhibiting Target-Mediated Drug Disposition (TMDD): A Minireview

Nonlinearities are commonplace in pharmacokinetics, and 1 special source is the saturable binding of the drug to a high-affinity, low-capacity target, a phenomenon known as target-mediated drug disposition (TMDD). Compared with large-molecule compounds undergoing TMDD, which has been well recognized due to its high prevalence, TMDD in small-molecule compounds is more counterintuitive and has not been well appreciated. With more and more potent small-molecule drugs acting on highly specific targets being developed as well as increasingly sensitive analytical techniques becoming available, many small-molecule compounds have recently been reported to have nonlinear pharmacokinetics imparted by TMDD. To expand our current knowledge of TMDD in small-molecule compounds and increase the awareness of this clinically important phenomenon, this minireview provides an overview of the small-molecule compounds that demonstrate nonlinear pharmacokinetics imparted by TMDD. The present review also summarizes the general features of TMDD in small-molecule compounds and highlights the differences between TMDD in small-molecule compounds and large-molecule compounds.

Key factors influencing ADME properties of therapeutic proteins: A need for ADME characterization in drug discovery and development

Protein therapeutics represent a diverse array of biologics including antibodies, fusion proteins, and therapeutic replacement enzymes. Since their inception, they have revolutionized the treatment of a wide range of diseases including respiratory, vascular, autoimmune, inflammatory, infectious, and neurodegenerative diseases, as well as cancer. While in vivo pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and efficacy studies are routinely carried out for protein therapeutics, studies that identify key factors governing their absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) properties have not been fully investigated. Thorough characterization and in-depth study of their ADME properties are critical in order to support drug discovery and development processes for the production of safer and more effective biotherapeutics. In this review, we discuss the main factors affecting the ADME characteristics of these large macromolecular therapies. We also give an overview of the current tools, technologies, and approaches available to investigate key factors that influence the ADME of recombinant biotherapeutic drugs, and demonstrate how ADME studies will facilitate their future development.

Mechanistic considerations for the use of monoclonal antibodies for cancer therapy

Since the approval of rituximab in 1997, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have become an increasingly important component of therapeutic regimens in oncology. The success of mAbs as a therapeutic class is a result of great strides that have been made in molecular biology and in biotechnology over the past several decades. Currently, there are 14 approved mAb products for oncology indications, and there are ten additional mAbs in late stages of clinical trials. Compared to traditional chemotherapeutic agents, mAbs have several advantages, including a long circulating half-life and high target specificity. Antibodies can serve as cytotoxic agents when administered alone, exerting a pharmacologic effect through several mechanisms involving the antigen binding (Fab) and/or Fc domains of the molecule, and mAbs may also be utilized as drug carriers, targeting a toxic payload to cancer cells. The extremely high affinity of mAbs for their targets, which is desirable with respect to pharmacodynamics (i.e., contributing to the high therapeutic selectivity of mAb), often leads to complex, non-linear, target-mediated pharmacokinetics. In this report, we summarize the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics of mAbs that have been approved and of mAbs that are near approval for oncology indications, with particular focus on the molecular and cellular mechanisms responsible for their disposition and efficacy.

Pharmacokinetic studies of protein drugs: past, present and future

Among the growing number of therapeutic proteins on the market, there is an emergence of biotherapeutics designed from our comprehension of the physiological mechanisms responsible for their peripheral and tissue pharmacokinetics. Most of them have been optimized to increase their half-life through glycosylation engineering, polyethylene glycol conjugation or Fc fusion. However, our understanding of biological drug behaviors is still its infancy compared to the huge amount of data regarding small molecular weight drugs accumulated over half a century. Unfortunately, therapeutic proteins share few resemblances with these drugs. For instance drug-targeted-mediated disposition, binding to glycoreceptors, lysosomal recycling, large hydrodynamic volume and electrostatic charge are typical critical characteristics that cannot be derived from our anterior knowledge of classical drugs. However, the numerous discoveries made in the two last decades have driven and will continue to drive new options in biochemical engineering and support the design of complex delivery systems. Most of these new developments will be supported by novel analytical methods for assessing in vitro or in vivo metabolism parameters.

Monoclonal antibodies: what are the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations for drug development?

INTRODUCTION

The number of monoclonal antibodies available for clinical use and under development has dramatically increased in the last 10 years. Understanding their pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics is essential for selecting the right clinical candidate, correct dose and regimen for a target indication.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews the existing literature and knowledge of monoclonal antibodies. Specifically, the authors discuss monoclonal antibodies with respect to their pharmacokinetics (including absorption, distribution and elimination) and their pharmacodynamics. The authors also look at the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship, scaling from preclinical to clinical studies and selection of the first-in-human dose.

EXPERT OPINION

Monoclonal antibodies have complex pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics that are dependent on several factors. Therefore, it is important to improve our understanding of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of monoclonal antibodies from a basic research standpoint. It is also equally important to apply mechanistic pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models to interpret the experimental results and facilitate efforts to predict the safety and efficacy of monoclonal antibodies.

Otelixizumab in the treatment of Type 1 diabetes mellitus

Anti-CD3 antibodies have been demonstrated in both animal and human studies to be able to reverse autoimmune diseases; for example Type 1 diabetes. Not only does treatment with anti-CD3 antibodies result in the removal of pathogenic T cells but evidence suggests that a state of operational tolerance can be induced through the effects on regulatory T cells. The clinical use of anti-CD3 antibodies has been hampered by their safety profile. However, the introduction of humanized, nonmitogenic, aglycosylated anti-CD3 antibodies, such as otelixizumab, and promising results reported in newly-diagnosed patients with Type 1 diabetes, have renewed the interest for these antibodies in the treatment of autoimmune diseases.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have been used in the treatment of various diseases for over 20 years and combine high specificity with generally low toxicity. Their pharmacokinetic properties differ markedly from those of non-antibody-type drugs, and these properties can have important clinical implications. mAbs are administered intravenously, intramuscularly or subcutaneously. Oral administration is precluded by the molecular size, hydrophilicity and gastric degradation of mAbs. Distribution into tissue is slow because of the molecular size of mAbs, and volumes of distribution are generally low. mAbs are metabolized to peptides and amino acids in several tissues, by circulating phagocytic cells or by their target antigen-containing cells. Antibodies and endogenous immunoglobulins are protected from degradation by binding to protective receptors (the neonatal Fc-receptor [FcRn]), which explains their long elimination half-lives (up to 4 weeks). Population pharmacokinetic analyses have been applied in assessing covariates in the disposition of mAbs. Both linear and nonlinear elimination have been reported for mAbs, which is probably caused by target-mediated disposition. Possible factors influencing elimination of mAbs include the amount of the target antigen, immune reactions to the antibody and patient demographics. Bodyweight and/or body surface area are generally related to clearance of mAbs, but clinical relevance is often low. Metabolic drug-drug interactions are rare for mAbs. Exposure-response relationships have been described for some mAbs. In conclusion, the parenteral administration, slow tissue distribution and long elimination half-life are the most pronounced clinical pharmacokinetic characteristics of mAbs.

Therapeutic monoclonal antibody concentration monitoring: free or total?

Most therapeutic monoclonal antibodies are designed to bind a specific antigen to elicit pharmacological effects. Accurate quantification of a therapeutic monoclonal antibody in biological matrices is essential for assessing its pharmacokinetics and selecting an effective dosing regimen. Therapeutic antibodies may exist in free, partially bound and fully bound forms in the bloodstream. The choice of which form(s) to measure and how to measure them is gaining much attention with the increase in the number of soluble therapeutic targets. This article will review the bioanalytical methods used in supporting the clinical development of the US FDA-approved therapeutic monoclonal antibodies and also discuss how different factors, such as assay format, target and antibody concentrations, and sample dilutions, can have an impact on the measurement of each form of antibody. Appreciation of which form of drug is being measured and what factors may impact measurement under different conditions are important for interpretation of the pharmacokinetics of therapeutic antibodies.

Safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary clinical activity of inotuzumab ozogamicin, a novel immunoconjugate for the treatment of B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results of a phase I study

PURPOSE Inotuzumab ozogamicin (CMC-544) is an antibody-targeted chemotherapy agent composed of a humanized anti-CD22 antibody conjugated to calicheamicin, a potent cytotoxic agent. This was a phase I study to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), safety, and preliminary efficacy of inotuzumab ozogamicin in an expanded MTD cohort of patients with relapsed or refractory CD22(+) B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). PATIENTS AND METHODS Inotuzumab ozogamicin was administered intravenously as a single agent once every 3 or 4 weeks at doses ranging from 0.4 to 2.4 mg/m(2). Outcomes included MTD, safety, pharmacokinetics, response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival. Results Seventy-nine patients were enrolled. The MTD was determined to be 1.8 mg/m(2). Common adverse events at the MTD were thrombocytopenia (90%), asthenia (67%), and nausea and neutropenia (51% each). The objective response rate at the end of treatment was 39% for the 79 enrolled patients, 68% for all patients with follicular NHL treated at the MTD, and 15% for all patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated at the MTD. Median PFS was 317 days (approximately 10.4 months) and 49 days for patients with follicular NHL and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, respectively. CONCLUSION Inotuzumab ozogamicin has demonstrated efficacy against CD22(+) B-cell NHL, with reversible thrombocytopenia as the main toxicity.

Target-mediated drug disposition model: approximations, identifiability of model parameters and applications to the population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of biologics

Models for drugs exhibiting target-mediated drug disposition (TMDD) describe biological processes in which drug-target binding significantly influences both pharmacodynamics (PD) and pharmacokinetics (PK). TMDD models are often over-parameterized and their parameters are difficult to estimate based on available data. Approximations of the general model have been suggested, but even these simpler forms can be over-parameterized when, for example, target and drug-target complex concentrations are not available. This work i) reviews TMDD equations, their approximations and methods to study identifiability of model parameters; ii) reviews the publications that used TMDD equations to describe PK and PD of biologics; and iii) discusses issues of identifiability of the TMDD model parameters related to study design and data analysis. Examples demonstrate that use of the TMDD equations for the population PK and PD modeling is most successful when the target and drug-target complex concentrations are available in addition to the drug concentration data. TMDD parameter estimates can be trusted only when they are identifiable, that is, can be estimated from the available data with sufficient precision. Parameter identifiability analysis should be an integral part of the TMDD system investigation. It also should be used prospectively for optimal study design.

Monoclonal antibody pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics

More than 20 monoclonal antibodies have been approved as therapeutic drugs by the US Food and Drug Administration, and it is quite likely that the number of approved antibodies will double in the next 7-10 years. Antibody drugs show several desirable characteristics, including good solubility and stability, long persistence in the body, high selectivity and specificity, and low risk for bioconversion to toxic metabolites. However, many antibody drugs demonstrate attributes that complicate drug development, including very poor oral bioavailability, incomplete absorption following intramuscular or subcutaneous administration, nonlinear distribution, and nonlinear elimination. In addition, antibody administration often leads to an endogenous antibody response, which may alter the pharmacokinetics and efficacy of the therapeutic antibody. Antibodies have been developed for a wide range of disease conditions, with effects produced through a complex array of mechanisms. This article attempts to provide a brief overview of the main determinants of antibody pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (2008); 84, 5, 548-558 doi:10.1038/clpt.2008.170.

Target-mediated drug disposition and dynamics

Nonlinear pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics may result from several capacity-limited processes and often represent complicating factors in characterizing the pharmacological properties of drugs. Target-mediated drug disposition (TMDD) corresponds to a special case wherein a significant proportion of a drug (relative to dose) is bound with high affinity to a pharmacological target, such that this interaction is reflected in the pharmacokinetic properties of the drug. Dose-dependent effects on apparent pharmacokinetic parameters may manifest, including the steady-state volume of distribution and total systemic clearance. Although a few small molecular weight compounds have been identified to exhibit TMDD, the incidence of TMDD is likely to increase particularly among emerging biotechnology pharmaceuticals. The goal of this commentary is to describe the basic tenets of TMDD and discuss several mathematical modeling approaches for characterizing this phenomenon. Whereas traditional pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models assume that the amount of the drug-target complex is negligible relative to the total amount of drug in the body, integrated mechanism-based models of TMDD incorporate the binding and stoichiometry of drug-target binding. These models may be utilized to infer the time-course of inaccessible system variables, such as the in vivo density of the drug-target complex, and provide a suitable platform for ascertaining the apparent pharmacodynamic implications of TMDD.

Antibody pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics

The U.S. Food and Drug administration (FDA) has approved several polyclonal antibody preparations and at least 18 monoclonal antibody preparations (antibodies, antibody fragments, antibody fusion proteins, etc.). These drugs, which may be considered as a diverse group of therapeutic proteins, are associated with several interesting pharmacokinetic characteristics. Saturable binding with target antigen may influence antibody disposition, potentially leading to nonlinear distribution and elimination. Independent of antigen interaction, concentration-dependent elimination may be expected for IgG antibodies, due to the influence of the Brambell receptor, FcRn, which protects IgG from catabolism. Antibody administration may induce the development of an endogenous antibody response, which may alter the pharmacokinetics of the therapeutic antibody. Additionally, the pharmacodynamics of antibodies are also complex; these drugs may be used for a wide array of therapeutic applications, and effects may be achieved by a variety of mechanisms. This article provides an overview of many of the complexities associated with antibody pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.

Treatment of acute kidney allograft rejection with a non-mitogenic CD3 antibody

T3/4.A is a non-mitogenic murine IgA mAb to human CD3 that was selected for clinical studies to provide an alternative for the mitogenic, T cell-activating, therapeutic mAb OKT3. Previously, we reported that T3/4.A is better tolerated in humans than the IgG2a-CD3 mAb T3/4.2a. Here we report the results of a phase II clinical trial to assess the immunosuppressive potential of T3/4.A. Eighteen first kidney transplant recipients with a first rejection episode were included. Baseline immunosuppression consisted of cyclosporin and prednisolone. Rejection treatment consisted of 5 mg mAb per day during 10 days. Fourteen patients responded, of whom four experienced a second rejection within 2 weeks, one experienced chronic rejection after 2.5 years, whereas the others remained rejection-free after treatment (median duration of follow-up 42 months). Four patients did not respond and eventually lost their graft. These results are similar to treatment results with OKT3, as reported in the literature. Following the first dose of T3/4.A, side effects were limited, and reduced compared to OKT3-treated controls. On the second day, 15 patients developed transient vomiting and/or diarrhoea, which coincided with elevated serum levels of proinflammatory cytokines. Minimal or even no side effects occurred during the remaining days, which is in sharp contrast to that seen generally during OKT3 treatment. Both T cell numbers and TCR expression were reduced during the therapy. We conclude that T3/4.A is a good alternative for OKT3 to treat rejection episodes in renal transplant recipients.