Topology of class A G protein-coupled receptors: insights gained from crystal structures of rhodopsins, adrenergic and adenosine receptors

Identification and functional analysis of six melanocortin-4-receptor-like (MC4R-like) mutations in goldfish (Carassius auratus)

Melanocortin receptor-4 (MC4R) belongs to the G protein-coupled receptor family, characterized by a classical structure of seven transmembrane domains (7TMD). They play an important role in food intake and weight regulation. In the present study, we identified melanocortin-4-receptor-like (caMC4RL) mutants of goldfish from the Qian River in the Qin Ling region and characterized their functional properties, including the constitutive activities of the mutants, ligand-induced cAMP and ERK1/2 accumulation, and AMPK activation. The results show that six caMC4RL mutants were identified in goldfish from the Qian River in the Qin Ling region, and are located in the conserved position of the Cyprinidae MC4Rs. The mutations (E57K, P296S, and R302T/K) result in the loss of Gs signaling function. The mutations (P296 and R302T/K) exhibited biased signaling in response to ACTH stimulation in the MAPK/ERK pathway. In addition, the E57K mutant may play a role in weight regulation and could serve as molecular markers for molecular breeding. These data will provide fundamental information for functional studies of teleost GPCR mutants and MC4R isoforms.

Role of orphan G-protein coupled receptors in tissue ischemia: A comprehensive review

Ischemic events lead to many diseases and deaths worldwide. Ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) occurs due to reduced blood circulation in tissues followed by blood reflow. Reoxygenation of ischemic tissues is characterized by oxidative stress, inflammation, energy distress, and endoplasmic reticulum stress. There are still no adequate clinical protocols or pharmacological approaches to address the consequences of I/R damage. G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are important therapeutic targets. They compose a large family of seven transmembrane-spanning proteins that are involved in many biological functions. Orphan GPCRs are a large subgroup of these receptors expressed in different organs. In the present review, we summarized the literature regarding the role of orphan GPCRs in I/R in different organs. We focused on the effect of these receptors on modulating cellular and molecular processes underlying ischemia including apoptosis, inflammation, and autophagy. The study showed that GPR3, GPR4, GPR17, GPR30, GPR31, GPR35, GPR37, GPR39, GPR55, GPR65, GPR68, GPR75, GPR81, and GPR91 are involved in ischemic events, mainly in the brain and heart. These receptors offer new possibilities for treating I/R injuries in the body.

Two entry tunnels in mouse TAAR9 suggest the possibility of multi-entry tunnels in olfactory receptors

Orthosteric binding sites of olfactory receptors have been well understood for ligand-receptor interactions. However, a lack of explanation for subtle differences in ligand profile of olfactory receptors even with similar orthosteric binding sites promotes more exploration into the entry tunnels of the receptors. An important question regarding entry tunnels is the number of entry tunnels, which was previously believed to be one. Here, we used TAAR9 that recognizes important biogenic amines such as cadaverine, spermine, and spermidine as a model for entry tunnel study. We identified two entry tunnels in TAAR9 and described the residues that form the tunnels. In addition, we found two vestibular binding pockets, each located in one tunnel. We further confirmed the function of two tunnels through site-directed mutagenesis. Our study challenged the existing views regarding the number of entry tunnels in the subfamily of olfactory receptors and demonstrated the possible mechanism how the entry tunnels function in odorant recognition.

Dimeric Rhodopsin R135L Mutant-Transducin-like Complex Sheds Light on Retinitis Pigmentosa Misfunctions

Rhodopsin (RHO) is a light-sensitive pigment in the retina and the main prototypical protein of the G-protein-coupled receptor (GCPR) family. After receiving a light stimulus, RHO and its cofactor retinylidene undergo a series of structural changes that initiate an intricate transduction mechanism. Along with RHO, other partner proteins play key roles in the signaling pathway. These include transducin, a GTPase, kinases that phosphorylate RHO, and arrestin (Arr), which ultimately stops the signaling process and promotes RHO regeneration. A large number of RHO genetic mutations may lead to very severe retinal dysfunction and eventually to impaired dark adaptation disease called autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa (adRP). In this study, we used molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to evaluate the different behaviors of the dimeric form of wild-type RHO (WT dRHO) and its mutant at position 135 of arginine to leucine (dR135L), both in the free (noncomplexed) and in complex with the transducin-like protein (Gtl). Gtl is a heterotrimeric model composed of a mixture of human and bovine G proteins. Our calculations allow us to explain how the mutation causes structural changes in the RHO dimer and how this can affect the signal that transducin generates when it is bound to RHO. Moreover, the structural modifications induced by the R135L mutation can also account for other misfunctions observed in the up- and downstream signaling pathways. The mechanism of these dysfunctions, together with the transducin activity reduction, provides structure-based explanations of the impairment of some key processes that lead to adRP.

Identification of small molecule allosteric modulators that act as enhancers/disrupters of rhodopsin oligomerization

The elongated cilia of the outer segment of rod and cone photoreceptor cells can contain concentrations of visual pigments of up to 5 mM. The rod visual pigments, G protein–coupled receptors called rhodopsins, have a propensity to self-aggregate, a property conserved among many G protein–coupled receptors. However, the effect of rhodopsin oligomerization on G protein signaling in native cells is less clear. Here, we address this gap in knowledge by studying rod phototransduction. As the rod outer segment is known to adjust its size proportionally to overexpression or reduction of rhodopsin expression, genetic perturbation of rhodopsin cannot be used to resolve this question. Therefore, we turned to high-throughput screening of a diverse library of 50,000 small molecules and used a novel assay for the detection of rhodopsin dimerization. This screen identified nine small molecules that either disrupted or enhanced rhodopsin dimer contacts in vitro. In a subsequent cell-free binding study, we found that all nine compounds decreased intrinsic fluorescence without affecting the overall UV-visible spectrum of rhodopsin, supporting their actions as allosteric modulators. Furthermore, ex vivo electrophysiological recordings revealed that a disruptive, hit compound #7 significantly slowed down the light response kinetics of intact rods, whereas compound #1, an enhancing hit candidate, did not substantially affect the photoresponse kinetics but did cause a significant reduction in light sensitivity. This study provides a monitoring tool for future investigation of the rhodopsin signaling cascade and reports the discovery of new allosteric modulators of rhodopsin dimerization that can also alter rod photoreceptor physiology.

Stereospecific modulation of dimeric rhodopsin

The classic concept that GPCRs function as monomers has been challenged by the emerging evidence of GPCR dimerization and oligomerization. Rhodopsin (Rh) is the only GPCR whose native oligomeric arrangement was revealed by atomic force microscopy demonstrating that Rh exists as a dimer. However, the role of Rh dimerization in retinal physiology is currently unknown. In this study, we identified econazole and sulconazole, two small molecules that disrupt Rh dimer contacts, by implementing a cell-based high-throughput screening assay. Racemic mixtures of identified lead compounds were separated and tested for their stereospecific binding to Rh using UV-visible spectroscopy and intrinsic fluorescence of tryptophan (Trp) 265 after illumination. By following the changes in UV-visible spectra and Trp265 fluorescence in vitro, we found that binding of R-econazole modulates the formation of Meta III and quenches the intrinsic fluorescence of Trp265. In addition, electrophysiological ex vivo recording revealed that R-econazole slows photoresponse kinetics, whereas S-econazole decreased the sensitivity of rods without effecting the kinetics. Thus, this study contributes new methodology to identify compounds that disrupt the dimerization of GPCRs in general and validates the first active compounds that disrupt the Rh dimer specifically.-Getter, T., Gulati, S., Zimmerman, R., Chen, Y., Vinberg, F., Palczewski, K. Stereospecific modulation of dimeric rhodopsin.

Structural Insight into the Binding Mode of FXR and GPBAR1 Modulators

In this chapter we provide an exhaustive overview of the binding modes of bile acid (BA) and non-BA ligands to the nuclear farnesoid X receptor (FXR) and the G-protein bile acid receptor 1 (GPBAR1). These two receptors play a key role in many diseases related to lipid and glucose disorders, thus representing promising pharmacological targets. We pay particular attention to the chemical and structural features of the ligand-receptor interaction, providing guidelines to achieve ligands endowed with selective or dual activity towards the receptor and paving the way to future drug design studies.

The DRY motif and the four corners of the cubic ternary complex model

Recent structural data on GPCRs using a variety of spectroscopic approaches suggest that GPCRs adopt a dynamic conformational landscape, with ligands stabilizing subsets of these states to activate one or more downstream signaling effectors. A key outstanding question posed by this emerging dynamic structural model of GPCRs is what states, active, inactive, or intermediate are captured by the numerous crystal structures of GPCRs complexed with a variety of agonists, partial agonists, and antagonists. In the early nineties the discovery of inverse agonists and constitutive activity led to the idea that the active receptor state (R^⁎) is an intrinsic property of the receptor itself rather than of the RG complex, eventually leading to the formulation of the cubic ternary complex model (CTC). Here, by a careful analysis of a series of data obtained with a number of mutants of the highly conserved E/DRY motif, we show evidences for the existence of all the receptor states theorized by the CTC, four 'uncoupled (R, R^⁎ and HR and HR^⁎), and, consequently four 'coupled' (RG, R^⁎G, HRG and HR^⁎G). The E/DRY motif located at the cytosolic end of transmembrane helix III of Class A GPCRs has been widely studied and analyzed because it forms a network of interactions believed to lock receptors in the inactive conformation (R), and, thus, to play a key role in receptor activation. Our conclusions are supported by recent crystal and NMR spectra, as well as by results obtained with two prototypical GPCRs using a new FRET technology that de-couples G protein binding to the receptor from signal transduction. Thus, despite its complexity and limitations, we propose that the CTC is a useful framework to reconcile pharmacological, biochemical and structural data.

Membrane cholesterol access into a G-protein-coupled receptor

Cholesterol is a key component of cell membranes with a proven modulatory role on the function and ligand-binding properties of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Crystal structures of prototypical GPCRs such as the adenosine A_2A receptor (A_2AR) have confirmed that cholesterol finds stable binding sites at the receptor surface suggesting an allosteric role of this lipid. Here we combine experimental and computational approaches to show that cholesterol can spontaneously enter the A_2AR-binding pocket from the membrane milieu using the same portal gate previously suggested for opsin ligands. We confirm the presence of cholesterol inside the receptor by chemical modification of the A_2AR interior in a biotinylation assay. Overall, we show that cholesterol's impact on A_2AR-binding affinity goes beyond pure allosteric modulation and unveils a new interaction mode between cholesterol and the A_2AR that could potentially apply to other GPCRs.

G-protein-coupled receptors trigger several signalling pathways and their activity was proposed to be allosteric modulated by cholesterol. Here the authors use molecular dynamics simulations and ligand binding assays to show that membrane cholesterol can bind to adenosine A_2A receptor orthosteric site.

Novel Structural Approaches to Study GPCR Regulation

BACKGROUND

Upon natural agonist or pharmacological stimulation, G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are subjected to posttranslational modifications, such as phosphorylation and ubiquitination. These posttranslational modifications allow protein-protein interactions that turn off and/or switch receptor signaling as well as trigger receptor internalization, recycling or degradation, among other responses. Characterization of these processes is essential to unravel the function and regulation of GPCR.

METHODS

In silico analysis and methods such as mass spectrometry have emerged as novel powerful tools. Both approaches have allowed proteomic studies to detect not only GPCR posttranslational modifications and receptor association with other signaling macromolecules but also to assess receptor conformational dynamics after ligand (agonist/antagonist) association.

RESULTS

this review aims to provide insights into some of these methodologies and to highlight how their use is enhancing our comprehension of GPCR function. We present an overview using data from different laboratories (including our own), particularly focusing on free fatty acid receptor 4 (FFA4) (previously known as GPR120) and α1A- and α1D-adrenergic receptors. From our perspective, these studies contribute to the understanding of GPCR regulation and will help to design better therapeutic agents.

Communication: Analytical optimal pulse shapes obtained with the aid of genetic algorithms: Controlling the photoisomerization yield of retinal

We recently proposed a Quantum Optimal Control (QOC) method constrained to build pulses from analytical pulse shapes [R. D. Guerrero et al., J. Chem. Phys. 143(12), 124108 (2015)]. This approach was applied to control the dissociation channel yields of the diatomic molecule KH, considering three potential energy curves and one degree of freedom. In this work, we utilized this methodology to study the strong field control of the cis-trans photoisomerization of 11-cis retinal. This more complex system was modeled with a Hamiltonian comprising two potential energy surfaces and two degrees of freedom. The resulting optimal pulse, made of 6 linearly chirped pulses, was capable of controlling the population of the trans isomer on the ground electronic surface for nearly 200 fs. The simplicity of the pulse generated with our QOC approach offers two clear advantages: a direct analysis of the sequence of events occurring during the driven dynamics, and its reproducibility in the laboratory with current laser technologies.

Complex Pharmacology of Free Fatty Acid Receptors

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are historically the most successful family of drug targets. In recent times it has become clear that the pharmacology of these receptors is far more complex than previously imagined. Understanding of the pharmacological regulation of GPCRs now extends beyond simple competitive agonism or antagonism by ligands interacting with the orthosteric binding site of the receptor to incorporate concepts of allosteric agonism, allosteric modulation, signaling bias, constitutive activity, and inverse agonism. Herein, we consider how evolving concepts of GPCR pharmacology have shaped understanding of the complex pharmacology of receptors that recognize and are activated by nonesterified or "free" fatty acids (FFAs). The FFA family of receptors is a recently deorphanized set of GPCRs, the members of which are now receiving substantial interest as novel targets for the treatment of metabolic and inflammatory diseases. Further understanding of the complex pharmacology of these receptors will be critical to unlocking their ultimate therapeutic potential.

Functions of DPLIY motif and helix 8 of human melanocortin-3 receptor

The melanocortin-3 receptor (MC3R) is a member of the family A G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). The MC3R remains the most enigmatic of the melanocortin receptors with regard to its physiological functions, especially its role in energy homeostasis. The N/DPxxY motif and the eighth helix (helix 8) in the carboxyl terminus of GPCRs have been identified to be important for receptor expression, ligand binding, signal transduction and internalization. To gain a better understanding of the structure-function relationship of MC3R, we performed a systematic study of all 20 residues in this domain using alanine-scanning mutagenesis. We showed that although all mutants were expressed normally on the cell surface, eleven residues were important for ligand binding and one was indispensable for downstream cAMP generation. F347A showed constitutive activity in cAMP signaling while all the other mutants had normal basal activities. We studied the signaling capacity of nine mutants in the ERK1/2 signaling pathway. All of these mutants showed normal basal ERK1/2 phosphorylation levels. The pERK1/2 levels of six binding- or signaling-defective mutants were enhanced upon agonist stimulation. The unbalanced cAMP and pERK1/2 signaling pathways suggested the existence of biased signaling in MC3R mutants. In summary, we showed that the DPLIY motif and helix 8 was important for MC3R activation and signal transduction. Our data led to a better understanding of the structure-function relationship of MC3R.

Transmembrane domains of attraction on the TSH receptor

The TSH receptor (TSHR) has the propensity to form dimers and oligomers. Our data using ectodomain-truncated TSHRs indicated that the predominant interfaces for oligomerization reside in the transmembrane (TM) domain. To map the potentially interacting residues, we first performed in silico studies of the TSHR transmembrane domain using a homology model and using Brownian dynamics (BD). The cluster of dimer conformations obtained from BD analysis indicated that TM1 made contact with TM4 and two residues in TM2 made contact with TM5. To confirm the proximity of these contact residues, we then generated cysteine mutants at all six contact residues predicted by the BD analysis and performed cysteine cross-linking studies. These results showed that the predicted helices in the protomer were indeed involved in proximity interactions. Furthermore, an alternative experimental approach, receptor truncation experiments and LH receptor sequence substitution experiments, identified TM1 harboring a major region involved in TSHR oligomerization, in agreement with the conclusion from the cross-linking studies. Point mutations of the predicted interacting residues did not yield a substantial decrease in oligomerization, unlike the truncation of the TM1, so we concluded that constitutive oligomerization must involve interfaces forming domains of attraction in a cooperative manner that is not dominated by interactions between specific residues.

Structure and function of serotonin G protein-coupled receptors

Serotonin receptors are prevalent throughout the nervous system and the periphery, and remain one of the most lucrative and promising drug discovery targets for disorders ranging from migraine headaches to neuropsychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia and depression. There are 14 distinct serotonin receptors, of which 13 are G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), which are targets for approximately 40% of the approved medicines. Recent crystallographic and biochemical evidence has provided a converging understanding of the basic structure and functional mechanics of GPCR activation. Currently, two GPCR crystal structures exist for the serotonin family, the 5-HT1B and 5-HT2B receptor, with the antimigraine and valvulopathic drug ergotamine bound. The first serotonin crystal structures not only provide the first evidence of serotonin receptor topography but also provide mechanistic explanations into functional selectivity or biased agonism. This review will detail the findings of these crystal structures from a molecular and mutagenesis perspective for driving rational drug design for novel therapeutics incorporating biased signaling.

Conformational selection and equilibrium governs the ability of retinals to bind opsin

Despite extensive study, how retinal enters and exits the visual G protein-coupled receptor rhodopsin remains unclear. One clue may lie in two openings between transmembrane helix 1 (TM1) and TM7 and between TM5 and TM6 in the active receptor structure. Recently, retinal has been proposed to enter the inactive apoprotein opsin (ops) through these holes when the receptor transiently adopts the active opsin conformation (ops*). Here, we directly test this "transient activation" hypothesis using a fluorescence-based approach to measure rates of retinal binding to samples containing differing relative fractions of ops and ops*. In contrast to what the transient activation hypothesis model would predict, we found that binding for the inverse agonist, 11-cis-retinal (11CR), slowed when the sample contained more ops* (produced using M257Y, a constitutively activating mutation). Interestingly, the increased presence of ops* allowed for binding of the agonist, all-trans-retinal (ATR), whereas WT opsin showed no binding. Shifting the conformational equilibrium toward even more ops* using a G protein peptide mimic (either free in solution or fused to the receptor) accelerated the rate of ATR binding and slowed 11CR binding. An arrestin peptide mimic showed little effect on 11CR binding; however, it stabilized opsin · ATR complexes. The TM5/TM6 hole is apparently not involved in this conformational selection. Increasing its size by mutagenesis did not enable ATR binding but instead slowed 11CR binding, suggesting that it may play a role in trapping 11CR. In summary, our results indicate that conformational selection dictates stable retinal binding, which we propose involves ATR and 11CR binding to different states, the latter a previously unidentified, open-but-inactive conformation.

From atomic structures to neuronal functions of g protein-coupled receptors

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are essential mediators of signal transduction, neurotransmission, ion channel regulation, and other cellular events. GPCRs are activated by diverse stimuli, including light, enzymatic processing of their N-termini, and binding of proteins, peptides, or small molecules such as neurotransmitters. GPCR dysfunction caused by receptor mutations and environmental challenges contributes to many neurological diseases. Moreover, modern genetic technology has helped identify a rich array of mono- and multigenic defects in humans and animal models that connect such receptor dysfunction with disease affecting neuronal function. The visual system is especially suited to investigate GPCR structure and function because advanced imaging techniques permit structural studies of photoreceptor neurons at both macro and molecular levels that, together with biochemical and physiological assessment in animal models, provide a more complete understanding of GPCR signaling.

X-ray structural information of GPCRs in drug design: what are the limitations and where do we go?

INTRODUCTION

In 2007, the X-ray structural determination of non-rhodopsin G-Protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), considered the most extensively targeted protein class for marketed drugs, commenced. With the relatively rapid availability of additional structures, an assessment of the progression made is needed in addition to the assessment of the understandings gleaned, deployment successes and forthcoming prospects.

AREAS COVERED

The author reviews the approaches and tools that have made it possible to determine the three dimensional structures of GPCRs using X-ray crystallography. Furthermore, the author describes the methods suited for crystallization of membrane bound GPCR proteins including the lipidic cubic phase and various protein modification approaches. The author also provides highlights, from the literature, of the structures determined to date including targets solved, the nature of the content provided (such as selectivity, activating vs. inactivating determinants) and how these structural features relate to drug design strategies.

EXPERT OPINION

The GPCR X-ray structures that have been so far determined have yielded significant information. This has presented dramatic evidence concerning their ability to impact the discovery of compounds through their action as traditional, orthosteric modulators. It is, however, noted that more challenging design strategies, such as identifying biased agonists and the use of sites remote from the orthosteric site for allosteric modulation, are still in their infancy.

Homology model-assisted elucidation of binding sites in GPCRs

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are important mediators of cell signaling and a major family of drug targets. Despite recent breakthroughs, experimental elucidation of GPCR structures remains a formidable challenge. Homology modeling of 3D structures of GPCRs provides a practical tool for elucidating the structural determinants governing the interactions of these important receptors with their ligands. The working model of the binding site can then be used for virtual screening of additional ligands that may fit this site, for determining and comparing specificity profiles of related receptors, and for structure-based design of agonists and antagonists. The current review presents the protocol and enumerates the steps for modeling and validating the residues involved in ligand binding. The main stages include (a) modeling the receptor structure using an automated fragment-based approach, (b) predicting potential binding pockets, (c) docking known binders, (d) analyzing predicted interactions and comparing with positions that have been shown to bind ligands in other receptors, (e) validating the structural model by mutagenesis.

G protein-coupled receptors--recent advances

The years 2000 and 2007 witnessed milestones in current understanding of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) structural biology. In 2000 the first GPCR, bovine rhodopsin, was crystallized and the structure was solved, while in 2007 the structure of β(2)-adrenergic receptor, the first GPCR with diffusible ligands, was determined owing to advances in microcrystallization and an insertion of the fast-folding lysozyme into the receptor. In parallel with those crystallographic studies, the biological and biochemical characterization of GPCRs has advanced considerably because those receptors are molecular targets for many of currently used drugs. Therefore, the mechanisms of activation and signal transduction to the cell interior deduced from known GPCRs structures are of the highest importance for drug discovery. These proteins are the most diversified membrane receptors encoded by hundreds of genes in our genome. They participate in processes responsible for vision, smell, taste and neuronal transmission in response to photons or binding of ions, hormones, peptides, chemokines and other factors. Although the GPCRs share a common seven-transmembrane α-helical bundle structure their binding sites can accommodate thousands of different ligands. The ligands, including agonists, antagonists or inverse agonists change the structure of the receptor. With bound agonists they can form a complex with a suitable G protein, be phosphorylated by kinases or bind arrestin. The discovered signaling cascades invoked by arrestin independently of G proteins makes the GPCR activating scheme more complex such that a ligand acting as an antagonist for G protein signaling can also act as an agonist in arrestin-dependent signaling. Additionally, the existence of multiple ligand-dependent partial activation states as well as dimerization of GPCRs result in a 'microprocessor-like' action of these receptors rather than an 'on-off' switch as was commonly believed only a decade ago.

The significance of G protein-coupled receptor crystallography for drug discovery

Crucial as molecular sensors for many vital physiological processes, seven-transmembrane domain G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) comprise the largest family of proteins targeted by drug discovery. Together with structures of the prototypical GPCR rhodopsin, solved structures of other liganded GPCRs promise to provide insights into the structural basis of the superfamily's biochemical functions and assist in the development of new therapeutic modalities and drugs. One of the greatest technical and theoretical challenges to elucidating and exploiting structure-function relationships in these systems is the emerging concept of GPCR conformational flexibility and its cause-effect relationship for receptor-receptor and receptor-effector interactions. Such conformational changes can be subtle and triggered by relatively small binding energy effects, leading to full or partial efficacy in the activation or inactivation of the receptor system at large. Pharmacological dogma generally dictates that these changes manifest themselves through kinetic modulation of the receptor's G protein partners. Atomic resolution information derived from increasingly available receptor structures provides an entrée to the understanding of these events and practically applying it to drug design. Supported by structure-activity relationship information arising from empirical screening, a unified structural model of GPCR activation/inactivation promises to both accelerate drug discovery in this field and improve our fundamental understanding of structure-based drug design in general. This review discusses fundamental problems that persist in drug design and GPCR structural determination.

Evolutionary grass roots for odor recognition

Considerable evidence supports the idea that odorant recognition depends on specific sequence variations in olfactory receptor (OR) proteins. Much of this emerges from in vitro screens in heterogenous expression systems. However, the ultimate proof should arise from measurements of odorant thresholds in human individuals harboring different OR genetic variants, a research vein that has so far been only scantly explored. The study of McRae et al., published in this issue of Chemical Senses, shows how the recognition of a grassy odorant depends on specific OR interindividual sequence changes. It provides a clear relevant example for the impact of genetics on olfaction and is an excellent portrayal of the power of human genomics to decipher olfactory perception.

Reproducible and sustained regulation of Gαs signalling using a metazoan opsin as an optogenetic tool

Originally developed to regulate neuronal excitability, optogenetics is increasingly also used to control other cellular processes with unprecedented spatiotemporal resolution. Optogenetic modulation of all major G-protein signalling pathways (Gq, Gi and Gs) has been achieved using variants of mammalian rod opsin. We show here that the light response driven by such rod opsin-based tools dissipates under repeated exposure, consistent with the known bleaching characteristics of this photopigment. We continue to show that replacing rod opsin with a bleach resistant opsin from Carybdea rastonii, the box jellyfish, (JellyOp) overcomes this limitation. Visible light induced high amplitude, reversible, and reproducible increases in cAMP in mammalian cells expressing JellyOp. While single flashes produced a brief cAMP spike, repeated stimulation could sustain elevated levels for 10s of minutes. JellyOp was more photosensitive than currently available optogenetic tools, responding to white light at irradiances ≥1 µW/cm(2). We conclude that JellyOp is a promising new tool for mimicking the activity of Gs-coupled G protein coupled receptors with fine spatiotemporal resolution.

ER-bound steps in the biosynthesis of G protein-coupled receptors

The polypeptide of a G protein-coupled receptor is inserted into the membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum while being translated and this process by itself may be sufficient to establish the proper receptor fold. X-ray structures reveal a common polypeptide topology with little variation in the alignment and orientation of the seven transmembrane segments, the proximal carboxyl terminus (C-tail) and parts of the extracellular loops. These define a structural core the stability of which probably represents a major criterion for the receptor to pass endoplasmic reticulum (ER) quality control; point mutations affecting the structure of the core have an extraordinary chance of causing receptor retention. In contrast, cytoplasmic loops 2 and 3 and the distal C-tail are poorly ordered at least in the absence of an interaction partner. Similarly, the amino terminal tail of rhodopsin-related receptors (but not of receptor subtypes where ligand binding requires a stable fold of the N-tail) is unlikely to establish a stable fold. These segments can cause ER retention when mutated to inappropriately expose hydrophobic peptide patches; to prevent protein aggregation chaperone molecules attach to them thus initiating selection for ER-associated degradation. It is less clear however if there are additional mechanisms to specifically survey the transmembrane core at the level of the lipid bilayer or if insufficient packing is detected due to misalignment of the cytoplasmic or extracellular face of the receptor.

Structure prediction of G protein-coupled receptors and their ensemble of functionally important conformations

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are integral membrane proteins whose "pleiotropic" nature enables transmembrane (TM) signal transduction, amplification, and diversification via G protein-coupled and β arrestin-coupled pathways. GPCRs appear to enable this by being structurally flexible and by existing in different conformational states with potentially different signaling and functional consequences. We describe a method for the prediction of the three-dimensional structures of these different conformations of GPCRs starting from their amino acid sequence. It combines a unique protocol of computational methods that first predict the TM regions of these receptors and TM helix shapes based on those regions, which is followed by a locally complete sampling of TM helix packings and their scoring that results in a few (~10-20) lowest energy conformations likely to play a role in binding to different ligands and signaling events. Prediction of the structures for multiple conformations of a GPCR is starting to enable the testing of multiple hypotheses related to GPCR activation and binding to ligands with different signaling profiles.

Microscopic binding of M5 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor with antagonists by homology modeling, molecular docking, and molecular dynamics simulation

By performing homology modeling, molecular docking, and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, we have developed three-dimensional (3D) structural models of the M5 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) and two complexes for M5 mAChR binding with antagonists SVT-40776 and solifenacin in the environment of lipid bilayer and solvent water. According to the simulated results, each of the antagonists is oriented horizontally in the binding pocket formed by transmembrane helices 2, 3, and 5-7. The cationic headgroup of each of the antagonists interacts with a negatively charged residue, Asp110, through electrostatic and hydrogen-bonding interactions. The simulated results also reveal some significant difference between the binding modes of SVT-40776 and solifenacin. In particular, SVT-40776 is persistently hydrogen bonded with the side chain of residue Tyr458, whereas solifenacin cannot form a similar hydrogen bond with residues around its carbonyl group. Such significant difference in the binding structures is consistent with the fact that SVT-40776 has a much higher binding affinity (K(d) = 0.4 nM) to M5 mAChR than that of solifenacin (K(d) = 31 nM) with the same reeptor. The calculated binding free energy change (-2.3 ± 0.3 kcal/mol) from solifenacin to SVT-40776 is in good agreement with the experimentally derived binding free energy change (-2.58 kcal/mol), suggesting that our modeled M5 mAChR structure and its complexes with the antagonists are reliable. The new structural insights obtained from this computational study are expected to stimulate further biochemical and pharmacological studies on the detailed structures of M5 and other subtypes of mAChRs.

Bihelix: Towards de novo structure prediction of an ensemble of G-protein coupled receptor conformations

G-Protein Coupled Receptors (GPCRs) play a critical role in cellular signal transduction pathways and are prominent therapeutic targets. Recently there has been major progress in obtaining experimental structures for a few GPCRs. Each GPCR, however, exhibits multiple conformations that play a role in their function and we have been developing methods aimed at predicting structures for all these conformations. Analysis of available structures shows that these conformations differ in relative helix tilts and rotations. The essential issue is, determining how to orient each of the seven helices about its axis since this determines how it interacts with the other six helices. Considering all possible helix rotations to ensure that no important packings are overlooked, and using rotation angle increments of 30° about the helical axis would still lead to 12(7) or 35 million possible conformations each with optimal residue positions. We show in this paper how to accomplish this. The fundamental idea is to optimize the interactions between each pair of contacting helices while ignoring the other 5 and then to estimate the energies of all 35 million combinations using these pair-wise interactions. This BiHelix approach dramatically reduces the effort to examine the complete set of conformations and correctly identifies the crystal packing for the experimental structures plus other near-native packings we believe may play an important role in activation. This approach also enables a detailed structural analysis of functionally distinct conformations using helix-helix interaction energy landscapes and should be useful for other helical transmembrane proteins as well.

Characterizing and predicting the functional and conformational diversity of seven-transmembrane proteins

The activation of seven-transmembrane receptors (7TMRs) allows cells to sense their environment and convert extracellular signals (like hormone binding) into intracellular signals (through G protein-coupled and/or β arrestin-coupled pathways). A single 7TMR is capable of transducing a wide spectrum of physiological responses inside a cell by coupling to these pathways. This intracellular pleiotropic action is enabled by multiple conformations exhibited by these receptors. Developments in membrane protein structure determination technologies have led to a rapid increase in crystal structures for many 7TMRs. Majority of these receptors have been crystallized in their inactive conformation and, for some, one of the many active conformations has also been crystallized. Given the topological constraints of a lipid bilayer that results in a single fold of seven almost parallel TM helices connected by mostly unstructured loops, these structures exhibit a diversity of conformations not only across the receptors but also across the different functional forms for receptors with structures for one of the functionally active conformations. Here we present a method to characterize this conformational diversity in terms of transmembrane helix topology (TMHTOP) parameters and how to use these helix orientation parameters to predict functionally-distinct multiple conformations for these receptors. The TMHTOP parameters enable a quantification of the structural changes that underlie 7TMR activation and also sheds a unique mechanistic light on the pleiotropic nature of these receptors. It provides a common language to describe the 7TMR activation mechanisms as well as differences across many receptors in terms of visually intuitive structural parameters. Protein structure prediction methods can use these parameters to describe 7TMR conformational ensembles, which coupled to experimental data can be used to develop testable hypotheses for the structural basis of 7TMR functions.

Heterologous expression of functional G-protein-coupled receptors in Caenorhabditis elegans

New strategies for expression, purification, functional characterization, and structural determination of membrane-spanning G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are constantly being developed because of their importance to human health. Here, we report a Caenorhabditis elegans heterologous expression system able to produce milligram amounts of functional native and engineered GPCRs. Both bovine opsin [(b)opsin] and human adenosine A(2A) subtype receptor [(h)A(2A)R] expressed in neurons or muscles of C. elegans were localized to cell membranes. Worms expressing these GPCRs manifested changes in motor behavior in response to light and ligands, respectively. With a newly devised protocol, 0.6-1 mg of purified homogenous 9-cis-retinal-bound bovine isorhodopsin [(b)isoRho] and ligand-bound (h)A(2A)R were obtained from C. elegans from one 10-L fermentation at low cost. Purified recombinant (b)isoRho exhibited its signature absorbance spectrum and activated its cognate G-protein transducin in vitro at a rate similar to native rhodopsin (Rho) obtained from bovine retina. Generally high expression levels of 11 native and mutant GPCRs demonstrated the potential of this C. elegans system to produce milligram quantities of high-quality GPCRs and possibly other membrane proteins suitable for detailed characterization.

Homology model and docking studies on porcine β₂ adrenoceptor: description of two binding sites

The affinity of the classical β(2) adrenoceptor-selective inverse agonist ICI118,551 is notoriously lower for porcine β(2) adrenoceptors (p(2)βAR) than for human β(2) adrenoceptors (hβ(2)AR) but molecular mechanisms for this difference are still unclear. Homology 3-D models of pβ(2)AR can be useful in predicting similarities and differences, which might in turn increase the comparative understanding of ligand interactions with the hβ(2)AR. In this work, the pβ(2)AR amino acid sequence was used to carry out homology modeling. The selected pβ(2)AR 3-D structure was structurally and energetically optimized and used as a model for further theoretical study. The homology model of pβ(2)AR has a 3-D structure very similar to the crystal structures of recently studied hβ(2)AR. This was also corroborated by sequence identity, RMSD, Ramachandran map, TM-score and docking results. Upon performing molecular docking simulations with the AutoDock4.0.1 program on pβ(2)AR, it was found that a set of well-known β(2)AR ligands reach two distinct binding sites on pβ(2)AR. Whereas one of these sites is similar to that reported on the hβ(2)AR crystal structure, the other can explain some important experimental observations. Additionally, the theoretical affinity estimated for ICI118,551 closely agrees with affinities estimated from experimental in vitro data. The experimental differences between the human/porcine β(2)ARs in relation to ligand affinity can in part be elucidated by observations in this molecular modeling study.

Structural mechanisms of constitutive activation in the C5a receptors with mutations in the extracellular loops: molecular modeling study

Previously we demonstrated by random saturation mutagenesis a set of mutations in the extracellular (EC) loops that constitutively activate the C5a receptor (C5aR) (Klco et al., Nat Struct Mol Biol 2005;12:320-326; Klco et al., J Biol Chem 2006;281:12010-12019). In this study, molecular modeling revealed possible conformations for the extracellular loops of the C5a receptors with mutations in the EC2 loop or in the EC3 loop. Comparison of low-energy conformations of the EC loops defined two distinct clusters of conformations typical either for strongly constitutively active mutants of C5aR (the CAM cluster) or for nonconstitutively active mutants (the non-CAM cluster). In the CAM cluster, the EC3 loop was turned towards the transmembrane (TM) helical bundle and more closely interacted with EC2 than in the non-CAM cluster. This suggested a structural mechanism of constitutive activity where EC3 contacts EC2 leading to EC2 interactions with helix TM3, thus triggering movement of TM7 towards TM2 and TM3. The movement initiates rearrangement of the system of hydrogen bonds between TM2, TM3 and TM7 including formation of the hydrogen bond between the side chains of D82(2.50) in TM2 and N296(7.49) in TM7, which is crucial for formation of the activated states of the C5a receptors (Nikiforovich et al., Proteins: Struct Funct Gene 2011;79:787-802). Since the relative large length of EC3 in C5aR (13 residues) is comparable with those in many other members of rhodopsin family of GPCRs (13-19 residues), our findings might reflect general mechanisms of receptor constitutive activation. The very recent X-ray structure of the agonist-induced constitutively active mutant of rhodopsin (Standfuss et al., Nature 2011;471:656-660) is discussed in view of our modeling results.

Diffusion NMR and bicelle morphology

This minireview focuses on diffusion NMR studies in bicelles. Following a discourse on diffusion fundamentals, and a comparative overview of fluorescence and NMR-based techniques for measuring diffusion, the pulsed field gradient (PFG) NMR diffusion method is introduced, emphasizing its specific advantages and limitations when applied to diffusion measurements in macroscopically oriented lamellar systems such as magnetically aligned bicelles. The utility of PFG NMR diffusion measurements in bicellar model membrane systems for examining lateral diffusion of membrane-bound molecular species is demonstrated, along with certain features of lateral diffusion that such studies illuminate. Further, those aspects of bicelle morphology that have been resolved using PFG NMR diffusion studies of various molecular weight soluble polymeric species are reviewed. The discussion concludes with an outline of future prospects for diffusion NMR studies in bicelles.

Structural and functional relationships between photoreceptor tetraspanins and other superfamily members

The two primary photoreceptor-specific tetraspanins are retinal degeneration slow (RDS) and rod outer segment membrane protein-1 (ROM-1). These proteins associate together to form different complexes necessary for the proper structure of the photoreceptor outer segment rim region. Mutations in RDS cause blinding retinal degenerative disease in both rods and cones by mechanisms that remain unknown. Tetraspanins are implicated in a variety of cellular processes and exert their function via the formation of tetraspanin-enriched microdomains. This review focuses on correlations between RDS and other members of the tetraspanin superfamily, particularly emphasizing protein structure, complex assembly, and post-translational modifications, with the goal of furthering our understanding of the structural and functional role of RDS and ROM-1 in outer segment morphogenesis and maintenance, and our understanding of the pathogenesis associated with RDS and ROM-1 mutations.

Successful prediction of the intra- and extracellular loops of four G-protein-coupled receptors

We present results of the restoration of all crystallographically available intra- and extracellular loops of four G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs): bovine rhodopsin (bRh), the turkey β-1 adrenergic receptor (β1Ar), and the human β-2 adrenergic (β2Ar) and A2A adenosine (A2Ar) receptors. We use our Protein Local Optimization Program (PLOP), which samples conformational space from first principles to build sets of loop candidates and then discriminates between them using our physics-based, all-atom energy function with implicit solvent. We also discuss a new kind of explicit membrane calculation developed for GPCR loops that interact, either in the native structure or in low-energy false-positive structures, with the membrane, and thus exist in a multiphase environment not previously incorporated in PLOP. Our results demonstrate a significant advance over previous work reported in the literature, and of particular note we are able to accurately restore the extremely long second extracellular loop (ECL2), which is also key for GPCR ligand binding. In the case of β2Ar, accurate ECL2 restoration required seeding a small helix into the loop in the appropriate region, based on alignment with the β1Ar ECL2 loop, and then running loop reconstruction simulations with and without the seeded helix present; simulations containing the helix attain significantly lower total energies than those without the helix, and have rmsds close to the native structure. For β1Ar, the same protocol was used, except the alignment was done to β2Ar. These results represent an encouraging start for the more difficult problem of accurate loop refinement for GPCR homology modeling.

Uniform isotope labeling of a eukaryotic seven-transmembrane helical protein in yeast enables high-resolution solid-state NMR studies in the lipid environment

Overexpression of isotope-labeled multi-spanning eukaryotic membrane proteins for structural NMR studies is often challenging. On the one hand, difficulties with achieving proper folding, membrane insertion, and native-like post-translational modifications frequently disqualify bacterial expression systems. On the other hand, eukaryotic cell cultures can be prohibitively expensive. One of the viable alternatives, successfully used for producing proteins for solution NMR studies, is yeast expression systems, particularly Pichia pastoris. We report on successful implementation and optimization of isotope labeling protocols, previously used for soluble secreted proteins, to produce homogeneous samples of a eukaryotic seven-transmembrane helical protein, rhodopsin from Leptosphaeria maculans. Even in shake-flask cultures, yields exceeded 5 mg of purified uniformly (13)C,(15)N-labeled protein per liter of culture. The protein was stable (at least several weeks at 5°C) and functionally active upon reconstitution into lipid membranes at high protein-to-lipid ratio required for solid-state NMR. The samples gave high-resolution (13)C and (15)N solid-state magic angle spinning NMR spectra, amenable to a detailed structural analysis. We believe that similar protocols can be adopted for challenging mammalian targets, which often resist characterization by other structural methods.

Allosteric modulation of family C G-protein-coupled receptors: from molecular insights to therapeutic perspectives

Allosteric receptor modulation is an attractive concept in drug targeting because it offers important potential advantages over conventional orthosteric agonism or antagonism. Allosteric ligands modulate receptor function by binding to a site distinct from the recognition site for the endogenous agonist. They often have no effect on their own and therefore act only in conjunction with physiological receptor activation. This article reviews the current status of allosteric modulation at family C G-protein coupled receptors in the light of their specific structural features on the one hand and current concepts in receptor theory on the other hand. Family C G-protein-coupled receptors are characterized by a large extracellular domain containing the orthosteric agonist binding site known as the "venus flytrap module" because of its bilobal structure and the dynamics of its activation mechanism. Mutational analysis and chimeric constructs have revealed that allosteric modulators of the calcium-sensing, metabotropic glutamate and GABA(B) receptors bind to the seven transmembrane domain, through which they modify signal transduction after receptor activation. This is in contrast to taste-enhancing molecules, which bind to different parts of sweet and umami receptors. The complexity of interactions between orthosteric and allosteric ligands is revealed by a number of adequate biochemical and electrophysiological assay systems. Many allosteric family C GPCR modulators show in vivo efficacy in behavioral models for a variety of clinical indications. The positive allosteric calcium sensing receptor modulator cinacalcet is the first drug of this type to enter the market and therefore provides proof of principle in humans.

Recognition in the face of diversity: interactions of heterotrimeric G proteins and G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) kinases with activated GPCRs

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent the largest class of integral membrane protein receptors in the human genome. Despite the great diversity of ligands that activate these GPCRs, they interact with a relatively small number of intracellular proteins to induce profound physiological change. Both heterotrimeric G proteins and GPCR kinases are well known for their ability to specifically recognize GPCRs in their active state. Recent structural studies now suggest that heterotrimeric G proteins and GPCR kinases identify activated receptors via a common molecular mechanism despite having completely different folds.

Cross-pharmacology analysis of G protein-coupled receptors

The degree of applicability of chemogenomic approaches to protein families depends on the accuracy and completeness of pharmacological data and the corresponding level of pharmacological similarity observed among their protein members. The recent public domain availability of pharmacological data for thousands of small molecules on 204 G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) provides a firm basis for an in-depth cross-pharmacology analysis of this superfamily. The number of protein targets included in the cross-pharmacology profile of the different GPCRs changes significantly upon varying the ligand similarity and binding affinity criteria. However, with the exception of muscarinic receptors, aminergic GPCRs distinguish themselves from the rest of the members in the family by their remarkably high levels of pharmacological similarity among them. Clusters of non-GPCR targets related by cross-pharmacology with particular GPCRs are identified and the implications for unwanted side-effects, as well as for repurposing opportunities, discussed.

Structure-function analysis of helix 8 of human calcitonin receptor-like receptor within the adrenomedullin 1 receptor

Adrenomedullin 1 (AM(1)) receptor is a heterodimer composed of calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CLR) - a family B G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) - and receptor activity-modifying protein 2 (RAMP2). Both family A and family B GPCRs possess an eighth helix (helix 8) in the proximal portion of their C-terminal tails; however, little is known about the function of helix 8 in family B GPCRs. We therefore investigated the structure-function relationship of human (h)CLR helix 8, which extends from Glu430 to Trp439, by separately transfecting nine point mutants into HEK-293 cells stably expressing hRAMP2. Glu430, Val431, Arg437 and Trp439 are all conserved among family B GPCRs. Flow cytometric analysis revealed that Arg437Ala or Trp438Ala mutation significantly reduced cell surface expression of the receptor complex, leading to a ∼20% reduction in specific (125)I-AM binding but little change in their IC(50) values. Both mutants showed 6-8-fold higher EC(50) values for AM-induced cAMP production and ∼50% reductions in their maximum responses. Glu430Ala mutation also reduced AM signaling by ∼45%, but surface expression and (125)I-AM binding were nearly the same as with wild-type CLR. Surprisingly, Glu430Ala and Val431Ala mutations significantly enhanced AM-induced internalization of the mutant receptor complexes. Taken together, these findings suggest that within hCLR helix 8, Glu430 is crucial for Gs coupling, and Arg437 and Trp439 are involved in both cell surface expression of the hAM(1) receptor and Gs coupling. Moreover, the Glu430-Val431 sequence may participate in the negative regulation of hAM(1) receptor internalization, which is not dependent on Gs coupling.

Imaging-based approaches to understanding g protein-coupled receptor signalling complexes

In the last 10 years, imaging assays based on resonance energy transfer (RET) and protein fragment complementation have made it possible to study interactions between components of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signalling complexes in living cells under physiological conditions. Here, we consider the history of such approaches, the current tools available and how they have changed our understanding of GPCR signalling. We also discuss some theoretical and methodological issues important when combining the different types of assay.

Adenosine A2A receptor is involved in cell surface expression of A2B receptor

The A2A and A2B adenosine receptors (A2AR and A2BR) are implicated in many physiological processes. However, the mechanisms of their intracellular maturation and trafficking are poorly understood. In comparative studies of A2AR versus A2BR expression in transfected cells, we noticed that the levels of cell surface expression of A2BR were significantly lower than those of A2AR. A large portion of the A2BR was degraded by the proteasome. Studies of cell surface expression of A2BR chimeric molecules in transfectants suggested that A2BR does not have the dominant forward transport signal for export from the endoplasmic reticulum to the cell surface. A2BR surface expression was increased in A2BR chimeras where the A2BR carboxyl terminus (CT) was replaced or fused with the A2AR CT. Co-transfection of A2AR with A2BR enhanced surface expression of A2BR though the F(X)(6)LL motif in the A2AR CT. The requirements of A2AR expression for better A2BR cell surface expression was not only established in transfectants but also confirmed by observations of much lower levels of A2BR-induced intracellular cAMP accumulation in response to A2BR-activating ligand in splenocytes from A2AR(-/-) mice than in wild type mice. The results of mechanistic studies suggested that poor A2BR expression at the cell surface might be accounted for mainly by the lack of a dominant forward transport signal from the endoplasmic reticulum to the plasma membrane; it is likely that A2BR forms a hetero-oligomer complex for better function.

Hydrophobicity profiles in G protein-coupled receptor transmembrane helical domains

The lack of a crystallographically derived structure for all but three G (TP [guanosine triphosphate]-binding) protein-coupled receptor (GPCRs) proteins necessitates the use of computationally derived methods to determine their structures. Computational methodologies allow a mechanistic glimpse into GPCR-ligand interactions at a molecular level to better understand the initial steps leading to a protein's biologic functions, ie, protecting the ligands that activate, deactivate, or inhibit the protein, stabilizing protein structure in the membrane's lipid bilayer, and ensuring that the hydrophilic environment within the GPCR-binding pocket is maintained. Described here is a formalism that quantifies the amphiphilic nature of a helix, by determining the effective hydrophobicity (or hydrophilicity) at specific positions around it. This formalism will enable computational protein modelers to position helices so that the functional aspects of GPCRs are adequately represented in the model. Hydro-Eff®, an online tool, allows users to calculate effective helical hydrophobicities.

Simplified modeling approach suggests structural mechanisms for constitutive activation of the C5a receptor

Molecular modeling of conformational changes occurring in the transmembrane region of the complement factor 5a receptor (C5aR) during receptor activation was performed by comparing two constitutively active mutants (CAMs) of C5aR, NQ (I124N/L127Q), and F251A, to those of the wild-type C5aR and NQ-N296A (I124N/L127Q/N296A), which have the wild-type phenotype. Modeling involved comprehensive sampling of various rotations of TM helices aligned to the crystal template of the dark-adapted rhodopsin along their long axes. By assuming that the relative energies of the spontaneously activated states of CAMs should be lower or at least comparable to energies characteristic for the ground states, we selected the plausible models for the conformational states associated with constitutive activation in C5aR. The modeling revealed that the hydrogen bonds between the side chains of D82-N119, S85-N119, and S131-C221 characteristic for the ground state were replaced by the hydrogen bonds D82-N296, N296-Y300, and S131-R134, respectively, in the activated states. Also, conformational transitions that occurred upon activation were hindered by contacts between the side chains of L127 and F251. The results rationalize the available data of mutagenesis in C5aR and offer the first specific molecular mechanism for the loss of constitutive activity in NQ-N296A. Our results also contributed to understanding the general structural mechanisms of activation in G-protein-coupled receptors lacking the "ionic lock", R(3.50) and E/D(6.30). Importantly, these results were obtained by modeling approaches that deliberately simplify many elements in order to explore potential conformations of GPCRs involving large-scale molecular movements.

The luteinizing hormone receptor: insights into structure-function relationships and hormone-receptor-mediated changes in gene expression in ovarian cancer cells

The luteinizing hormone receptor (LHR), one of the three glycoprotein hormone receptors, is necessary for critical reproductive processes, including gonadal steroidogenesis, oocyte maturation and ovulation, and male sex differentiation. Moreover, it has been postulated to contribute to certain neoplasms, particularly ovarian cancer. A member of the G protein-coupled receptor family, LHR contains a relatively large extracellular domain responsible for high affinity hormone binding; transmembrane activation then leads to G protein coupling and subsequent second messenger production. This review deals with recent advances in our understanding of LHR structure and structure-function relationships, as well as hormone-mediated changes in gene expression in ovarian cancer cells expressing LHR. Suggestions are also made for critical gaps that need to be filled as the field advances, including determination of the three-dimensional structure of inactive and active receptor, elucidation of the mechanism by which hormone binding to the extracellular domain triggers the activation of Gs, clarification of the putative roles of LHR in non-gonadal tissues, and the role, if any, of activated receptor in the development or progression of ovarian cancer.