GPR35: from enigma to therapeutic target

The orphan G-protein-coupled receptor 35 (GPR35), although poorly characterised, is attracting considerable interest as a therapeutic target. Marked differences in pharmacology between human and rodent orthologues of the receptor and a dearth of antagonists with affinity for mouse and rat GPR35 have previously restricted the use of preclinical disease models. The development of improved ligands, novel transgenic knock-in mouse lines, and detailed analysis of the disease relevance of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have greatly enhanced understanding of the key roles of GPR35 and have stimulated efforts towards disease-targeted proof-of-concept studies. In this opinion article, new information on the biology of the receptor is considered, whilst insight into how GPR35 is currently being assessed for therapeutic utility - in areas ranging from inflammatory bowel diseases to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and various cancers - is also provided.

Pamoic acid is an inhibitor of HMGB1·CXCL12 elicited chemotaxis and reduces inflammation in murine models of Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia

BACKGROUND

High-mobility group box 1 protein (HMGB1) is an ubiquitous nuclear protein that once released in the extracellular space acts as a Damage Associated Molecular Pattern and promotes inflammation. HMGB1 is significantly elevated during Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections and has a clinical relevance in respiratory diseases such as Cystic Fibrosis (CF). Salicylates are HMGB1 inhibitors. To address pharmacological inhibition of HMGB1 with small molecules, we explored the therapeutic potential of pamoic acid (PAM), a salicylate with limited ability to cross epithelial barriers.

METHODS

PAM binding to HMGB1 and CXCL12 was tested by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy using chemical shift perturbation methods, and inhibition of HMGB1·CXCL12-dependent chemotaxis was investigated by cell migration experiments. Aerosol delivery of PAM, with single or repeated administrations, was tested in murine models of acute and chronic P. aeruginosa pulmonary infection in C57Bl/6NCrlBR mice. PAM efficacy was evaluated by read-outs including weight loss, bacterial load and inflammatory response in lung and bronco-alveolar lavage fluid.

RESULTS

Our data and three-dimensional models show that PAM is a direct ligand of both HMGB1 and CXCL12. We also showed that PAM is able to interfere with heterocomplex formation and the related chemotaxis in vitro. Importantly, PAM treatment by aerosol was effective in reducing acute and chronic airway murine inflammation and damage induced by P. aeruginosa. The results indicated that PAM reduces leukocyte recruitment in the airways, in particular neutrophils, suggesting an impaired in vivo chemotaxis. This was associated with decreased myeloperoxidase and neutrophil elastase levels. Modestly increased bacterial burdens were recorded with single administration of PAM in acute infection; however, repeated administration in chronic infection did not affect bacterial burdens, indicating that the interference of PAM with the immune system has a limited risk of pulmonary exacerbation.

CONCLUSIONS

This work established the efficacy of treating inflammation in chronic respiratory diseases, including bacterial infections, by topical delivery in the lung of PAM, an inhibitor of HMGB1.

Kidney-targeted irradiation triggers renal ischaemic preconditioning in mice

Renal ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) causes acute kidney injury (AKI). Ischemic preconditioning (IPC) attenuates I/R-associated AKI. Whole-body irradiation induces renal IPC in mice. Still, the mechanisms remain largely unknown. Furthermore, the impact of kidney-centered irradiation on renal resistance against I/R has not been studied. Renal irradiation (8.5Gy) was done in male 8-12-week-old C57bl/6 mice using Small Animal Radiation Therapy (SmART) device. Left renal I/R was performed by clamping the renal pedicles for 30 minutes, with simultaneous right nephrectomy, at 7, 14, and 28 days post-irradiation. The renal reperfusion lasted 48 hours. Following I/R, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and creatinine (SCr) levels were lower in pre-irradiated mice compared to controls, so was the histological Jablonski score of AKI. The metabolomics signature of renal I/R was attenuated in pre-irradiated mice. The numbers of PCNA-, CD11b-, and F4-80-positive cells in the renal parenchyma post-I/R were reduced in pre-irradiated versus control groups. Such an IPC was significantly observed as early as D14 post-irradiation. RNA-Seq showed an up-regulation of angiogenesis- and stress response-related signaling pathways in irradiated non-ischemic kidneys at D28. RT-qPCR confirmed the increased expression of VEGF, ALK5, HO1, PECAM1, NOX2, HSP70, and HSP27 in irradiated kidneys compared to controls. In addition, irradiated kidneys showed an increased CD31-positive vascular area compared to controls. A 14-day gavage of irradiated mice with the anti-angiogenic drug Sunitinib before I/R abrogated the irradiation-induced IPC at both functional and structural levels. Our observations suggest that kidney-centered irradiation activates pro-angiogenic pathways and induces IPC, with preserved renal function and attenuated inflammation post-I/R.

Evaluating parameters affecting drug fate at the intramuscular injection site

Intramuscular (IM) injections are a well-established method of delivering a variety of therapeutics formulated for parenteral administration. While the wide range of commercial IM pharmaceuticals provide a wealth of pharmacokinetic (PK) information following injection, there remains an inadequate understanding of drug fate at the IM injection site that could dictate these PK outcomes. An improved understanding of injection site events could improve approaches taken by formulation scientists to identify therapeutically effective and consistent drug PK outcomes. Interplay between the typically non-physiological aspects of drug formulations and the homeostatic IM environment may provide insights into the fate of drugs at the IM injection site, leading to predictions of how a drug will behave post-injection in vivo. Immune responses occur by design after e.g. vaccine administration, however immune responses post-injection are not in the scope of this article. Taking cues from existing in vitro modelling technologies, the purpose of this article is to propose "critical parameters" of the IM environment that could be examined in hypothesis-driven studies. Outcomes of such studies might ultimately be useful in predicting and improving in vivo PK performance of IM injected drugs.

Activation of GPR35 protects against cerebral ischemia by recruiting monocyte-derived macrophages

Pamoic acid is a potent ligand for G protein Coupled Receptor 35 (GPR35) and exhibits antinociceptive property. GPR35 activation leads to increased energy utilization and the expression of anti-inflammatory genes. However, its role in brain disorders, especially in stroke, remains unexplored. Here we show in a mouse model of stroke that GPR35 activation by pamoic acid is neuroprotective. Pharmacological inhibition of GPR35 reveals that pamoic acid reduces infarcts size in a GPR35 dependent manner. The flowcytometric analysis shows the expression of GPR35 on the infiltrating monocytes/macrophages and neutrophils in the ischemic brain. Pamoic acid treatment results in a preferential increment of noninflammatory Ly-6C^Lo monocytes/macrophages in the ischemic brain along with the reduced neutrophil counts. The neuroprotective effect of GPR35 activation depends on protein kinase B (Akt) and p38 MAPK. Together we conclude that GPR35 activation by pamoic acid reprograms Ly-6C^Lo monocytes/macrophages to relay a neuroprotective signal into the ischemic brain.

Comparison of triptorelin acetate vs triptorelin pamoate in the treatment of Central precocious puberty (CPP): a retrospective study

The aim of this study is to compare the clinical and biochemical outcomes of triptorelin acetate (TPA) versus triptorelin pamoate (TPP) treatment in girls with central precocious puberty. A total of 60 patients with idiopathic CPP were retrospectively recruited. Thirty girls were treated with triptorelin acetate 3.75 mg/month (TPA group) and thirty girls in a second group received triptorelin pamoate 3.75 mg/4 weeks (TPP group). Patient follow-up at 12 and 24 months included GnRH Test at 12 months and baseline LH at 24 months. Patients were monitored with pelvic ultrasound, X-Ray of the hand and wrist and anthropometric evaluations. A total of 60/60 girls showed a good response to both formulations. Significant reductions in basal and LH peaks, estradiol values, breast pubertal stage, progression of bone age and growth velocity rate after 12 months treatment were obtained in both groups, demonstrating the equivalence of the two formulations in regulating the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis. Triptorelin pamoate provided a more effective and significant reduction in LH peak after 12 months in comparison with triptorelin acetate more effective in reducing ovarian volume and endometrial thickness. Both formulations were equivalent, even though the LH peak was significantly lower in girls treated with triptorelin pamoate.

A Biophysical Approach to the Identification of Novel ApoE Chemical Probes

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common type of dementia and, after age, the greatest risk factor for developing AD is the allelic variation of apolipoprotein E (ApoE), with homozygote carriers of the ApoE4 allele having an up to 12-fold greater risk of developing AD than noncarriers. Apolipoprotein E exists as three isoforms that differ in only two amino acid sites, ApoE2 (Cys112/Cys158), ApoE3 (Cys112/Arg158), and ApoE4 (Arg112/Arg158). These amino acid substitutions are assumed to alter ApoE structure and function, and be responsible for the detrimental effects of ApoE4 via a mechanism that remains unclear. The hypothesis that a structural difference between ApoE4 and ApoE3 (and ApoE2) is the cause of the ApoE4-associated increased risk for AD forms the basis of a therapeutic approach to modulate ApoE4 structure, and we were therefore interested in screening to identify new chemical probes for ApoE4. In this regard, a high-yield protocol was developed for the expression and purification of recombinant full-length ApoE, and three diverse biophysical screening assays were established and characterized; an optical label-free assay (Corning Epic) for hit identification and microscale thermophoresis (MST) and isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) as orthogonal assays for hit confirmation. The 707 compounds in the National Institute of Health clinical collection were screened for binding to ApoE4, from which six confirmed hits, as well as one analogue, were identified. Although the compounds did not differentiate between ApoE isoforms, these data nevertheless demonstrate the feasibility of using a biophysical approach to identifying compounds that bind to ApoE and that, with further optimization, might differentiate between isoforms to produce a molecule that selectively alters the function of ApoE4.

G protein-coupled receptors not currently in the spotlight: free fatty acid receptor 2 and GPR35

It is widely appreciated that G protein‐coupled receptors have been the most successfully exploited class of targets for the development of small molecule medicines. Despite this, to date, less than 15% of the non‐olfactory G protein‐coupled receptors in the human genome are the targets of a clinically used medicine. In many cases, this is likely to reflect a lack of understanding of the basic underpinning biology of many G protein‐coupled receptors that are not currently in the spotlight, as well as a paucity of pharmacological tool compounds and appropriate animal models to test in vivo function of such G protein‐coupled receptors in both normal physiology and in the context of disease. ‘Open Innovation’ arrangements, in which pharmaceutical companies and public–private partnerships provide wider access to tool compounds identified from ligand screening programmes, alongside enhanced medicinal chemistry support to convert such screening ‘hits’ into useful ‘tool’ compounds will provide important routes to improved understanding. However, in parallel, novel approaches to define and fully appreciate the selectivity and mode of action of such tool compounds, as well as better understanding of potential species orthologue variability in the pharmacology and/or signalling profile of a wide range of currently poorly understood and understudied G protein‐coupled receptors, will be vital to fully exploit the therapeutic potential of this large target class. I consider these themes using as exemplars two G protein‐coupled receptors, free fatty acid receptor 2 and GPR35.

A 6-Month Trial of the Efficacy and Safety of Triptorelin Pamoate (11.25 mg) Every 3 Months in Children with Precocious Puberty: A Retrospective Comparison with Triptorelin Acetate

BACKGROUND/AIMS

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a triptorelin pamoate (11.25 mg) 3-month formulation in the management of central precocious puberty (CPP) (TP Study) and to retrospectively compare it with a triptorelin acetate (11.25 mg) 3-month formulation (TA Study).

METHODS

We conducted two phase III, multicentre, single-stage, non-comparative, open-label studies. In the TP Study, patients with CPP received an intramuscular injection of triptorelin pamoate 11.25 mg at baseline and 3 months after baseline. Hormonal changes as well as safety and efficacy endpoints were measured at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months.

RESULTS

The baseline characteristics of the 37 patients in the TP Study were similar to those of the TA Study population. A suppressed luteinising hormone (LH) response (LH peak ≤3 IU/l) to the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone test at 3 months (primary endpoint) occurred in 83.8 and 82.8% of the cases in the TP and the TA Study, respectively. At 6 months, a suppressed LH response occurred in 86.5 and 96.8% of the cases in the TP and the TA Study, respectively. Pubertal development was slowed in both studies. Adverse events were mild to moderate and resolved without sequelae in the TP Study.

CONCLUSION

Triptorelin pamoate 11.25 mg administered at 3-month intervals is an effective and well-tolerated treatment in patients with CPP. The efficacy and safety profiles appear similar to those reported in the literature for triptorelin acetate 11.25 mg. © 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Role of Buffers in Protein Formulations

Buffers comprise an integral component of protein formulations. Not only do they function to regulate shifts in pH, they also can stabilize proteins by a variety of mechanisms. The ability of buffers to stabilize therapeutic proteins whether in liquid formulations, frozen solutions, or the solid state is highlighted in this review. Addition of buffers can result in increased conformational stability of proteins, whether by ligand binding or by an excluded solute mechanism. In addition, they can alter the colloidal stability of proteins and modulate interfacial damage. Buffers can also lead to destabilization of proteins, and the stability of buffers themselves is presented. Furthermore, the potential safety and toxicity issues of buffers are discussed, with a special emphasis on the influence of buffers on the perceived pain upon injection. Finally, the interaction of buffers with other excipients is examined.

G protein-coupled receptor 35: an emerging target in inflammatory and cardiovascular disease

G protein-coupled receptor 35 (GPR35) is an orphan receptor, discovered in 1998, that has garnered interest as a potential therapeutic target through its association with a range of diseases. However, a lack of pharmacological tools and the absence of convincingly defined endogenous ligands have hampered the understanding of function necessary to exploit it therapeutically. Although several endogenous molecules can activate GPR35 none has yet been confirmed as the key endogenous ligand due to reasons that include lack of biological specificity, non-physiologically relevant potency and species ortholog selectivity. Recent advances have identified several highly potent synthetic agonists and antagonists, as well as agonists with equivalent potency at rodent and human orthologs, which will be useful as tool compounds. Homology modeling and mutagenesis studies have provided insight into the mode of ligand binding and possible reasons for the species selectivity of some ligands. Advances have also been made in determining the role of the receptor in disease. In the past, genome-wide association studies have associated GPR35 with diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease, type 2 diabetes, and coronary artery disease. More recent functional studies have implicated it in processes as diverse as heart failure and hypoxia, inflammation, pain transduction and synaptic transmission. In this review, we summarize the progress made in understanding the molecular pharmacology, downstream signaling and physiological function of GPR35, and discuss its emerging potential applications as a therapeutic target.

Crucial positively charged residues for ligand activation of the GPR35 receptor

GPR35 is a G protein-coupled receptor expressed in the immune, gastrointestinal, and nervous systems in gastric carcinomas and is implicated in heart failure and pain perception. We investigated residues in GPR35 responsible for ligand activation and the receptor structure in the active state. GPR35 contains numerous positively charged amino acids that face into the binding pocket that cluster in two distinct receptor regions, TMH3-4-5-6 and TMH1-2-7. Computer modeling implicated TMH3-4-5-6 for activation by the GPR35 agonists zaprinast and pamoic acid. Mutation results for the TMH1-2-7 region of GPR35 showed no change in ligand efficacies at the K1.32A, R2.65A, R7.33A, and K7.40A mutants. However, mutation of arginine residues in the TMH3-4-5-6 region (R4.60, R6.58, R3.36, R(164), and R(167) in the EC2 loop) had effects on signaling for one or both agonists tested. R4.60A resulted in a total ablation of agonist-induced activation in both the β-arrestin trafficking and ERK1/2 activation assays. R6.58A increased the potency of zaprinast 30-fold in the pERK assay. The R(167)A mutant decreased the potency of pamoic acid in the β-arrestin trafficking assay. The R(164)A and R(164)L mutants decreased potencies of both agonists. Similar trends for R6.58A and R(167)A were observed in calcium responses. Computer modeling showed that the R6.58A mutant has additional interactions with zaprinast. R3.36A did not express on the cell surface but was trapped in the cytoplasm. The lack of surface expression of R3.36A was rescued by a GPR35 antagonist, CID2745687. These results clearly show that R4.60, R(164), R(167), and R6.58 play crucial roles in the agonist initiated activation of GPR35.

International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. LXXXVIII. G protein-coupled receptor list: recommendations for new pairings with cognate ligands

In 2005, the International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology Committee on Receptor Nomenclature and Drug Classification (NC-IUPHAR) published a catalog of all of the human gene sequences known or predicted to encode G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), excluding sensory receptors. This review updates the list of orphan GPCRs and describes the criteria used by NC-IUPHAR to recommend the pairing of an orphan receptor with its cognate ligand(s). The following recommendations are made for new receptor names based on 11 pairings for class A GPCRs: hydroxycarboxylic acid receptors [HCA₁ (GPR81) with lactate, HCA₂ (GPR109A) with 3-hydroxybutyric acid, HCA₃ (GPR109B) with 3-hydroxyoctanoic acid]; lysophosphatidic acid receptors [LPA₄ (GPR23), LPA₅ (GPR92), LPA₆ (P2Y5)]; free fatty acid receptors [FFA4 (GPR120) with omega-3 fatty acids]; chemerin receptor (CMKLR1; ChemR23) with chemerin; CXCR7 (CMKOR1) with chemokines CXCL12 (SDF-1) and CXCL11 (ITAC); succinate receptor (SUCNR1) with succinate; and oxoglutarate receptor [OXGR1 with 2-oxoglutarate]. Pairings are highlighted for an additional 30 receptors in class A where further input is needed from the scientific community to validate these findings. Fifty-seven human class A receptors (excluding pseudogenes) are still considered orphans; information has been provided where there is a significant phenotype in genetically modified animals. In class B, six pairings have been reported by a single publication, with 28 (excluding pseudogenes) still classified as orphans. Seven orphan receptors remain in class C, with one pairing described by a single paper. The objective is to stimulate research into confirming pairings of orphan receptors where there is currently limited information and to identify cognate ligands for the remaining GPCRs. Further information can be found on the IUPHAR Database website (http://www.iuphar-db.org).

Orthologue selectivity and ligand bias: translating the pharmacology of GPR35

GPR35 is a poorly characterized G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) that has been suggested as a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of diabetes, hypertension and asthma. Two endogenously produced ligands have been suggested as activators of GPR35, although the relevance of these remains unclear. Recently, a series of surrogate agonist ligands and the first antagonists of GPR35 have been identified. However, marked differences in the potency of agonists at species orthologues of GPR35 have been noted, and this presents substantial challenges in translating the pharmacology at the cloned human receptor to ex vivo and in vivo studies of the physiological function of this receptor in animal models. Currently identified agonists will probably not display high selectivity for GPR35. By contrast, comparisons of the potency of ligands at species orthologues of GPR35 have provided insight into the nature of the ligand binding pocket and could result in the identification of more potent and selective ligands.

GPR35 as a Novel Therapeutic Target

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) remain the best studied class of cell surface receptors and the most tractable family of proteins for novel small molecule drug discovery. Despite this, a considerable number of GPCRs remain poorly characterized and in a significant number of cases, endogenous ligand(s) that activate them remain undefined or are of questionable physiological relevance. GPR35 was initially discovered over a decade ago but has remained an "orphan" receptor. Recent publications have highlighted novel ligands, both endogenously produced and synthetic, which demonstrate significant potency at this receptor. Furthermore, evidence is accumulating which highlights potential roles for GPR35 in disease and therefore, efforts to characterize GPR35 more fully and develop it as a novel therapeutic target in conditions that range from diabetes and hypertension to asthma are increasing. Recently identified ligands have shown marked species selective properties, indicating major challenges for future drug development. As we begin to understand these issues, the continuing efforts to identify novel agonist and antagonist ligands for GPR35 will help to decipher its true physiological relevance; translating multiple assay systems in vitro, to animal disease systems in vivo and finally to man.