Edg2 receptor functionality: gialpha1 coexpression and fusion protein studies

Impact of fusion to Gα(i2) and co-expression with RGS proteins on pharmacological properties of human cannabinoid receptors CB₁R and CB₂R

OBJECTIVES

G protein coupled receptor (GPCR)-Gα fusion proteins are often employed to investigate receptor/G protein interaction. In this study, the impact of Gα fusion proteins on pharmacology of CBRs, both mediating signals through Gα(i) proteins, were investigated. Gα(i2) was fused to the C-terminus of the CBRs or co-expressed with non-fused Gα(i2) in Sf9 cells, always together with Gβ₁γ₂. Furthermore, the impact of RGS proteins on CBR signaling in combination with the CBR fusion approach was examined, using RGS4 and RGS19 as paradigms.

METHODS

CBR ligands were characterized in the steady-state GTPase assay and pharmacological properties of ligands in the different test systems were correlated.

KEY FINDINGS

Fusion of CBRs to Gα(i2) enhanced the maximal stimulatory effects of ligands compared to the co-expression system, especially for CB₂R. RGS4, but not RGS19, behaved as a GTPase-activating protein at CBRs in the Gα(i2) co-expression and fusion system. Fusion of GPCR, most prominently CB₂R, to Gα(i2) , and co-expression with RGS4 altered the pharmacological properties of ligands.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that fusion of CB₂R to Gα(i2) and co-expression with RGS4 impedes with conformational changes. Moreover, our results support the concept of ligand-specific receptor conformations. Finally, this paper describes the most sensitive CBR test system currently available.

Signal transduction responses to lysophosphatidic acid and sphingosine 1-phosphate in human prostate cancer cells

BACKGROUND

Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) and sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) are lipid mediators that bind to G-protein-coupled receptors. In this study, signaling responses to 18:1 LPA and S1P were examined in parallel in three human prostate cancer cell lines: PC-3, Du145, and LNCaP.

METHODS

Receptor expression was assessed by RT-PCR, Northern blotting, and immunoblotting. Cellular responses to mediators were studied by proliferation assays, phosphoprotein immunoblotting, and phospholipid metabolism assays.

RESULTS

All cell lines express mRNA for both LPA and S1P receptors. PC-3 and Du145, but not LNCaP, proliferate in response to LPA and S1P. Epidermal growth factor (EGF), phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA), LPA, and S1P induce activation of Erks in PC-3 and Du145; only EGF and PMA activate Erks in LNCaP. In Du145 and PC-3, Akt is activated by EGF, LPA, and S1P. Akt is constitutively active in LNCaP; EGF but not LPA or S1P stimulates further phosphorylation. FAK is phosphorylated in response to both LPA and S1P in PC-3 and Du145, but not in LNCaP. LPA and S1P stimulate phospholipase D (PLD) activity to varying extents in the different cell lines. Notably, both lipid mediators activate PLD in LNCaP. In Du145, LPA, but not S1P, activates PLD and enhances cellular production of LPA.

CONCLUSIONS

Although both LPA and S1P induce signal transduction in all prostate cancer cell lines studied, a proliferation response is observed only when the Erk, Akt, and FAK pathways are activated. Other responses to the lipid mediators, such as PLD activation, likely contribute to other cellular outcomes.

Ligand screening system using fusion proteins of G protein-coupled receptors with G protein alpha subunits

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) constitute one of the largest families of genes in the human genome, and are the largest targets for drug development. Although a large number of GPCR genes have recently been identified, ligands have not yet been identified for many of them. Various assay systems have been employed to identify ligands for orphan GPCRs, but there is still no simple and general method to screen for ligands of such GPCRs, particularly of G(i)-coupled receptors. We have examined whether fusion proteins of GPCRs with G protein alpha subunit (Galpha) could be utilized for ligand screening and showed that the fusion proteins provide an effective method for the purpose. This article focuses on the followings: (1) characterization of GPCR genes and GPCRs, (2) identification of ligands for orphan GPCRs, (3) characterization of GPCR-Galpha fusion proteins, and (4) identification of ligands for orphan GPCRs using GPCR-Galpha fusion proteins.

S-nitrosothiols modulate G protein-coupled receptor signaling in a reversible and highly receptor-specific manner

Background

Recent studies indicate that the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling machinery can serve as a direct target of reactive oxygen species, including nitric oxide (NO) and S-nitrosothiols (RSNOs). To gain a broader view into the way that receptor-dependent G protein activation – an early step in signal transduction – might be affected by RSNOs, we have studied several receptors coupling to the G_i family of G proteins in their native cellular environment using the powerful functional approach of [³⁵S]GTPγS autoradiography with brain cryostat sections in combination with classical G protein activation assays.

Results

We demonstrate that RSNOs, like S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO) and S-nitrosocysteine (CysNO), can modulate GPCR signaling via reversible, thiol-sensitive mechanisms probably involving S-nitrosylation. RSNOs are capable of very targeted regulation, as they potentiate the signaling of some receptors (exemplified by the M2/M4 muscarinic cholinergic receptors), inhibit others (P2Y₁₂ purinergic, LPA₁lysophosphatidic acid, and cannabinoid CB₁ receptors), but may only marginally affect signaling of others, such as adenosine A₁, μ-opioid, and opiate related receptors. Amplification of M2/M4 muscarinic responses is explained by an accelerated rate of guanine nucleotide exchange, as well as an increased number of high-affinity [³⁵S]GTPγS binding sites available for the agonist-activated receptor. GSNO amplified human M4 receptor signaling also under heterologous expression in CHO cells, but the effect diminished with increasing constitutive receptor activity. RSNOs markedly inhibited P2Y₁₂ receptor signaling in native tissues (rat brain and human platelets), but failed to affect human P2Y₁₂ receptor signaling under heterologous expression in CHO cells, indicating that the native cellular signaling partners, rather than the P2Y₁₂ receptor protein, act as a molecular target for this action.

Conclusion

These in vitro studies show for the first time in a broader general context that RSNOs are capable of modulating GPCR signaling in a reversible and highly receptor-specific manner. Given that the enzymatic machinery responsible for endogenous NO production is located in close proximity with the GPCR signaling complex, especially with that for several receptors whose signaling is shown here to be modulated by exogenous RSNOs, our data suggest that GPCR signaling in vivo is likely to be subject to substantial, and highly receptor-specific modulation by NO-derived RSNOs.

A single amino acid determines preference between phospholipids and reveals length restriction for activation of the S1P4 receptor

Background

Sphingosine-1-phosphate and lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) are ligands for two related families of G protein-coupled receptors, the S1P and LPA receptors, respectively. The lysophospholipid ligands of these receptors are structurally similar, however recognition of these lipids by these receptors is highly selective. A single residue present within the third transmembrane domain (TM) of S1P receptors is thought to determine ligand selectivity; replacement of the naturally occurring glutamic acid with glutamine (present at this position in the LPA receptors) has previously been shown to be sufficient to change the specificity of S1P₁ from S1P to 18:1 LPA.

Results

We tested whether mutation of this "ligand selectivity" residue to glutamine could confer LPA-responsiveness to the related S1P receptor, S1P₄. This mutation severely affected the response of S1P₄ to S1P in a [³⁵S]GTPγS binding assay, and imparted sensitivity to LPA species in the order 14:0 LPA > 16:0 LPA > 18:1 LPA. These results indicate a length restriction for activation of this receptor and demonstrate the utility of using LPA-responsive S1P receptor mutants to probe binding pocket length using readily available LPA species. Computational modelling of the interactions between these ligands and both wild type and mutant S1P₄ receptors showed excellent agreement with experimental data, therefore confirming the fundamental role of this residue in ligand recognition by S1P receptors.

Conclusions

Glutamic acid in the third transmembrane domain of the S1P receptors is a general selectivity switch regulating response to S1P over the closely related phospholipids, LPA. Mutation of this residue to glutamine confers LPA responsiveness with preference for short-chain species. The preference for short-chain LPA species indicates a length restriction different from the closely related S1P₁ receptor.

The [35S]GTPgammaS binding assay: approaches and applications in pharmacology

Receptors of the of seven transmembrane spanning, heterotrimeric G protein coupled family (GPCR) play crucial roles in regulating physiological functions and consequently are targets for the action of many classes of drugs. Activation of receptor by agonist leads to the dissociation of GDP from Galpha of the Galphabetagamma heterotrimer, followed by the binding of GTP to Galpha and subsequent modulation of downstream effectors. The G protein heterotrimer is reformed by GTPase activity of the Galpha subunit, forming Galpha-GDP and so allowing Galpha and Gbetagamma to recombine. The [35S]GTPgammaS assay measures the level of G protein activation following agonist occupation of a GPCR, by determining the binding of the non-hydrolyzable analog [35S]GTPgammaS to Galpha subunits. Thus, the assay measures a functional consequence of receptor occupancy at one of the earliest receptor-mediated events. The assay allows for traditional pharmacological parameters of potency, efficacy and antagonist affinity, with the advantage that agonist measures are not subjected to amplification or other modulation that may occur when analyzing parameters further downstream of the receptor. In general the assay is experimentally more feasible for receptors coupled to the abundant G(i/o) proteins. Nevertheless, [35S]GTPgammaS binding assays are used with GPCRs that couple to the G(s) and G(q) families of G proteins, especially in artificial expression systems, or using receptor-Galpha constructs or immunoprecipitation of [35S]GTPgammaS-labeled Galpha. The relative simplicity of the assay has made it very popular and its use is providing insights into contemporary pharmacological topics including the roles of accessory proteins in signaling, constitutive activity of receptors and agonist specific signaling.

Promiscuous coupling at receptor-Galpha fusion proteins. The receptor of one covalent complex interacts with the alpha-subunit of another

Fusion proteins between heptahelical receptors (GPCR) and G protein alpha-subunits show enhanced signaling efficiency in transfected cells. This is believed to be the result of molecular proximity, because the interaction between linked modules of one protein chain, if not constrained by structure, should be strongly favored compared with the same in which partners react as free species. To test this assumption we made a series of fusion proteins (type 1 and 4 opioid receptors with G(o) and beta(2) adrenergic and dopamine 1 receptors with G(sL)) and some mutated analogs carrying different tags and defective GPCR or Galpha subunits. Using cotransfection experiments with readout protocols able to distinguish activation at fused and non-fused alpha-subunits, we found that both the GPCR and the Galpha limb of one fusion protein can freely interact with non-fused proteins and the tethered partners of a neighboring fusion complex. Moreover, a bulky polyanionic inhibitor can suppress with identical potency receptor-Galpha interaction, either when occurring between latched domains of a fused system or separate elements of distinct molecules, indicating that the binding surfaces are equally accessible in both cases. These data demonstrate that there is no entropy drive from the linked condition of fusion proteins and suggest that their signaling may result from the GPCR of one complex interacting with the alpha-subunit of another. Moreover, the enhanced coupling efficiency commonly observed for fusion proteins is not due to the receptor tether, but to the transmembrane helix that anchors Galpha to the membrane.

Identification of a phosphothionate analogue of lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) as a selective agonist of the LPA3 receptor

Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) is a bioactive lysophospholipid mediator that acts through G protein-coupled receptors. Most cell lines in culture express one or more LPA receptors, making it difficult to assign a response to specific LPA receptors. Dissection of the signaling properties of LPA has been hampered by lack of LPA receptor subtype-specific agonists and antagonists. The present study characterizes an ester-linked thiophosphate derivative (1-oleoyl-2-O-methyl-rac-glycerophosphothionate, OMPT) of LPA. OMPT is a functional LPA analogue with potent mitogenic activity in fibroblasts. In contrast to LPA, OMPT does not couple to the pheromone response through the LPA(1) receptor in yeast cells. OMPT induces intracellular calcium increases efficiently in LPA(3) receptor-expressing Sf9 cells but poorly in LPA(2) receptor-expressing cells. Guanosine 5'-O-(3-[(35)S]thio)triphosphate binding assays in mammalian cells showed that LPA exhibits agonistic activity on all three LPA receptor subtypes, whereas OMPT has a potent agonistic effect only on the LPA(3) receptor. In transiently transfected HEK293 cells, OMPT stimulates mitogen-activated protein kinases through the LPA(3) but not the LPA(1) or LPA(2) receptors. Furthermore, OMPT-induced intracellular calcium mobilization in mammalian cells is efficiently inhibited by the LPA(1)/LPA(3) receptor-selective antagonist VPC12249. These results establish that OMPT is an LPA(3)-selective agonist. OMPT binding to the LPA(3) receptor in mammalian cells is sufficient to elicit multiple responses, including activation of G proteins, calcium mobilization, and activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases. Thus OMPT offers a powerful probe for the dissection of LPA signaling events in complex mammalian systems.

Regulation of the avidity of ternary complexes containing the human 5-HT(1A) receptor by mutation of a receptor contact site on the interacting G protein alpha subunit

1 Fusion proteins were constructed between the human 5-HT(1A) receptor and pertussis toxin-resistant forms of both G(i1)alpha and G(o1)alpha mutated at residue(351) from cysteine to either glycine or isoleucine. Each of these was expressed stably in HEK293 cells. 2 Increasing concentrations of GDP inhibited binding of the agonist [(3)H]-8-OH-DPAT but not the antagonist [(3)H]-MPPF to each construct. 3 The IC(50) for GDP was greater for constructs containing isoleucine at residue(351) of the G proteins compared to those with glycine at this position. 4 The G protein antagonist suramin had similar effects to GDP on the binding of [(3)H]-8-OH-DPAT. 5 The proportion of 5-HT(1A) receptor binding sites detected by [(3)H]-MPPF that displayed high affinity for 8-OH-DPAT was significantly greater when the interacting G protein contained isoleucine rather than glycine at residue(351). 6 The 5-HT(1A) receptor displayed similar avidity of interaction with G(i1)alpha and G(o1)alpha. 7 These results indicate that a higher avidity ternary complex is formed between 8-OH-DPAT, the 5-HT(1A) receptor and G proteins when isoleucine rather than glycine is located at residue(351) of the interacting G protein.

A single amino acid determines lysophospholipid specificity of the S1P1 (EDG1) and LPA1 (EDG2) phospholipid growth factor receptors

The phospholipid growth factors sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) and lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) are ligands for the related G protein-coupled receptors S1P(1)/EDG1 and LPA(1)/EDG2, respectively. We have developed a model of LPA(1) that predicts interactions between three polar residues and LPA. One of these, glutamine 125, which is conserved in the LPA receptor subfamily (LPA(1)/EDG2, LPA(2)/EDG4, and LPA(3)/EDG7), hydrogen bonds with the LPA hydroxyl group. Our previous S1P(1) study identified that the corresponding glutamate residue, conserved in all S1P receptors, ion pairs with the S1P ammonium. These two results predict that this residue might influence ligand recognition and specificity. Characterization of glutamate/glutamine interchange point mutants of S1P(1) and LPA(1) validated this prediction as the presence of glutamate was required for S1P recognition, whereas LPA recognition was possible with either glutamine or glutamate. The most likely explanation for this dual specificity behavior is a shift in the equilibrium between the acid and conjugate base forms of glutamic acid due to other amino acids surrounding that position in LPA(1), producing a mixture of receptors including those having an anionic glutamate that recognize S1P and others with a neutral glutamic acid that recognize LPA. Thus, computational modeling of these receptors provided valid information necessary for understanding the molecular pharmacology of these receptors.

Activity of 2-substituted lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) analogs at LPA receptors: discovery of a LPA1/LPA3 receptor antagonist

The physiological implications of lysophosphatidic acid occupancy of individual receptors are largely unknown because selective agonists/antagonists are unavailable currently. The molecular cloning of three high-affinity lysophosphatidic acid receptors, LPA1, LPA2, and LPA3, provides a platform for developing receptor type-selective ligands. Starting with an N-acyl ethanolamide phosphate LPA analog, we made a series of substitutions at the second carbon to generate compounds with varying spatial, stereochemical, and electronic characteristics. Analysis of this series at each recombinant LPA receptor using a guanosine 5'-O-(3-[35S]thio)triphosphate (GTP[gamma35S]) binding assay revealed sharp differences in activity. Our results suggest that these receptors have one spatially restrictive binding pocket that interacts with the 2-substituted moieties and prefers small hydrophobic groups and hydrogen bonding functionalities. The agonist activity predicted by the GTP[gamma35S] binding assay was reflected in the activity of a subset of compounds in increasing arterial pressure in anesthetized rats. One compound with a bulky hydrophobic group (VPC12249) was a dual LPA1/LPA3 competitive antagonist. Several compounds that had smaller side chains were found to be LPA1-selective agonists.

Analytical pharmacology of G protein-coupled receptors by stoichiometric expression of the receptor and G(alpha) protein subunits

The description of a new family of recombinant proteins, which are constructed by the covalent fusion of the cDNA encoding a G protein-coupled receptor with that of a G(alpha) protein subunit, has recently been introduced as an original strategy to explore receptor pharmacology under defined experimental conditions. As such, a controlled 1:1 stoichiometry of receptor and G(alpha) protein expression can be achieved, as well as a forced spatial proximity to each other. Fusion proteins have been revealed as active at the receptor ligand binding level and functional at the G(alpha) protein and effector level. Insights on analytical pharmacological data are discussed for wild-type and mutant receptors interacting with a given G(alpha) protein subunit and different subtypes of either wild-type or mutant G(alpha) proteins activated by a single receptor subtype. A possible alteration of the receptor:G(alpha) protein selectivity may occur due either to the spatial proximity of both protein partners or to a constraint receptor state unable to accommodate to different G(alpha) protein states. Coactivation of endogenous G(alpha) proteins in host cells expressing a fusion protein has also been observed, but depends mainly on the coupling efficiency of the receptor and G(alpha) protein engaged in the fusion process. The ligand's apparent intrinsic activity has been shown to be either enhanced, attenuated, or unmodified when the functional responses of a fusion protein are compared to the coexpression of both fusion protein partners.