Response to Comments on "Cortical folding scales universally with surface area and thickness, not number of neurons"

Structural covariance networks in schizophrenia: A systematic review Part II

BACKGROUND

Examination of structural covariance network (SCN) is gaining prominence among the strategies to delineate dysconnectivity that case-control morphometric comparisons cannot address. Part II of this review extends on the part I of the review that included SCN studies using statistical approaches by examining SCN studies applying graph theoretic approaches to elucidate network properties in schizophrenia. This review also includes SCN studies using graph theoretic or statistical approaches on persons at-risk for schizophrenia.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted for peer-reviewed publications using different keywords and keyword combinations for schizophrenia and risk for schizophrenia. Thirteen studies on schizophrenia and five on persons at risk for schizophrenia met the criteria.

RESULTS

A variety of findings from over the last 1½ decades showing qualitative and quantitative differences in the global and local structural connectome in schizophrenia are described. These observations include altered hub patterns, disrupted network topology and hierarchical organization of the brain, and impaired connections that may be localized to default mode, executive control, and dorsal attention networks. Some of these connectomic alterations were observed in persons at-risk for schizophrenia before the onset of the illness.

CONCLUSIONS

Observed disruptions may reduce network efficiency and capacity to integrate information. Further, global connectomic changes were not schizophrenia-specific but local network changes were. Existing studies have used different atlases for brain parcellation, examined different morphometric features, and patients at different stages of illness making it difficult to conduct meta-analysis. Future studies should harmonize such methodological differences to facilitate meta-analysis and also elucidate causal underpinnings of dysconnectivity.

Isolation and culture of porcine primary fetal progenitors and neurons from the developing dorsal telencephalon

The development of long-term surviving fetal cell cultures from primary cell tissue from the developing brain is important for facilitating studies investigating neural development and for modelling neural disorders and brain congenital defects. The field faces current challenges in co-culturing both progenitors and neurons long-term. Here, we culture for the first time, porcine fetal cells from the dorsal telencephalon at embryonic day (E) 50 and E60 in conditions that promoted both the survival of progenitor cells and young neurons. We applied a novel protocol designed to collect, isolate and promote survival of both progenitors and young neurons. Herein, we used a combination of low amount of fetal bovine serum, together with pro-survival factors, including basic fibroblast growth factor and retinoic acid, together with arabinofuranosylcytosine and could maintain progenitors and facilitate in vitro differentiation into calbindin 1+ neurons and reelin+ interneurons for a period of 7 days. Further improvements to the protocol that might extend the survival of the fetal primary neural cells would be beneficial. The development of new porcine fetal culture methods is of value for the field, given the pig's neuroanatomical and developmental similarities to the human brain.

Inferring Evolutionary Process From Neuroanatomical Data

Brain evolution has interested neuroanatomists for over a century. These interests often fall on how free the brain is to evolve independently of the body, how free brain regions are to evolve independently of each other, and how different environmental and ecological factors affect the brain over evolutionary time. But despite major advances in phylogenetic methods, comparative neuroanatomists have tended to limit their macroevolutionary toolbox to regression-based analyses and ignored the scope of evolutionary process-based models at their disposal. This Review summarizes the history of comparative neuroanatomy and highlights the pitfalls of the methodologies traditionally used. It provides an overview of evolutionary process-based modeling approaches for investigating univariate and multivariate data, as well as more sophisticated methods that incorporate hypotheses about biotic and abiotic pressures that may drive brain evolution. The benefits of evolutionary process-based models, and shortcomings of regression-based ones, are illustrated with widely used neuroanatomical data. Ultimately, the intent of this Review is to be a guide for subsuming macroevolutionary methods not typically used in comparative neuroanatomy, in order to improve our understanding of how the brain evolves.

Universality in human cortical folding in health and disease

The folding of the cortex in mammalian brains across species has recently been shown to follow a universal scaling law that can be derived from a simple physics model. However, it was yet to be determined whether this law also applies to the morphological diversity of different individuals in a single species, in particular with respect to factors, such as age, sex, and disease. To this end, we derived and investigated the cortical morphology from magnetic resonance images (MRIs) of over 1,000 healthy human subjects from three independent public databases. Our results show that all three MRI datasets follow the scaling law obtained from the comparative neuroanatomical data, which strengthens the case for the existence of a common mechanism for cortical folding. Additionally, for comparable age groups, both male and female brains scale in exactly the same way, despite systematic differences in size and folding. Furthermore, age introduces a systematic shift in the offset of the scaling law. In the model, this shift can be interpreted as changes in the mechanical forces acting on the cortex. We also applied this analysis to a dataset derived from comparable cohorts of Alzheimer's disease patients and healthy subjects of similar age. We show a systematically lower offset and a possible change in the exponent for Alzheimer's disease subjects compared with the control cohort. Finally, we discuss implications of the changes in offset and exponent in the data and relate it to existing literature. We, thus, provide a possible mechanistic link between previously independent observations.