β-Arrestin-dependent ERK signaling reduces anxiety-like and conditioned fear-related behaviors in mice

ClickArr: a novel, high-throughput assay for evaluating β-arrestin isoform recruitment

Background: Modern methods for quantifying signaling bias at G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) rely on using a single β-arrestin isoform. However, it is increasingly appreciated that the two β-arrestin isoforms have unique roles, requiring the ability to assess β-arrestin isoform preference. Thus, methods are needed to efficiently screen the recruitment of both β-arrestin isoforms as they compete for a target GPCR in cells. Methods: We used molecular cloning to develop fusion proteins of the δ-opioid receptor (δOR), β-arrestin 1, and β-arrestin 2 to fragments of click beetle green and click beetle red luciferases. In this assay architecture, recruitment of either β-arrestin 1 or 2 to the δOR generates a spectrally distinct bioluminescent signal, allowing us to co-transfect all three constructs into cells prior to agonist challenge. Results: We demonstrate that our new assay, named "ClickArr," is a live-cell assay that simultaneously reports the recruitment of both β-arrestin isoforms as they compete for interaction with the δOR. We further find that the partial δOR agonist TAN67 has a significant efficacy bias for β-arrestin 2 over β-arrestin 1 when recruitment is normalized to the reference agonist leu-enkephalin. We confirm that ClickArr reports this bias when run either as a high-throughput endpoint or high-throughput kinetic assay, and cross-validate this result using the PathHunter assay, an orthogonal commercial assay for reporting β-arrestin recruitment to the δOR. Conclusion: Our results suggest that agonist:GPCR complexes can have relative β-arrestin isoform bias, a novel signaling bias that may potentially open up a new dimension for drug development.

Dissecting the Relationship Between Neuropsychiatric and Neurodegenerative Disorders

Neurodegenerative diseases (NDDs) and neuropsychiatric disorders (NPDs) are two common causes of death in elderly people, which includes progressive neuronal cell death and behavioral changes. NDDs include Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, Huntington's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, multiple sclerosis, and motor neuron disease, characterized by cognitive defects and memory impairment, whereas NPDs include depression, seizures, migraine headaches, eating disorders, addictions, palsies, major depressive disorders, anxiety, and schizophrenia, characterized by behavioral changes. Mounting evidence demonstrated that NDDs and NPDs share an overlapping mechanism, which includes post-translational modifications, the microbiota-gut-brain axis, and signaling events. Mounting evidence demonstrated that various drug molecules, namely, natural compounds, repurposed drugs, multitarget directed ligands, and RNAs, have been potentially implemented as therapeutic agents against NDDs and NPDs. Herein, we highlighted the overlapping mechanism, the role of anxiety/stress-releasing factors, cytosol-to-nucleus signaling, and the microbiota-gut-brain axis in the pathophysiology of NDDs and NPDs. We summarize the therapeutic application of natural compounds, repurposed drugs, and multitarget-directed ligands as therapeutic agents. Lastly, we briefly described the application of RNA interferences as therapeutic agents in the pathogenesis of NDDs and NPDs. Neurodegenerative diseases and neuropsychiatric diseases both share a common signaling molecule and molecular phenomenon, namely, pro-inflammatory cytokines, γCaMKII and MAPK/ERK, chemokine receptors, BBB permeability, and the gut-microbiota-brain axis. Studies have demonstrated that any alterations in the signaling mentioned above molecules and molecular phenomena lead to the pathophysiology of neurodegenerative diseases, namely, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, Huntington's disease, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and neuropsychiatric disorders, such as bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, depression, anxiety, autism spectrum disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder.

β-Arrestins: Structure, Function, Physiology, and Pharmacological Perspectives

The two β-arrestins, β-arrestin-1 and -2 (systematic names: arrestin-2 and -3, respectively), are multifunctional intracellular proteins that regulate the activity of a very large number of cellular signaling pathways and physiologic functions. The two proteins were discovered for their ability to disrupt signaling via G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) via binding to the activated receptors. However, it is now well recognized that both β-arrestins can also act as direct modulators of numerous cellular processes via either GPCR-dependent or -independent mechanisms. Recent structural, biophysical, and biochemical studies have provided novel insights into how β-arrestins bind to activated GPCRs and downstream effector proteins. Studies with β-arrestin mutant mice have identified numerous physiologic and pathophysiological processes regulated by β-arrestin-1 and/or -2. Following a short summary of recent structural studies, this review primarily focuses on β-arrestin-regulated physiologic functions, with particular focus on the central nervous system and the roles of β-arrestins in carcinogenesis and key metabolic processes including the maintenance of glucose and energy homeostasis. This review also highlights potential therapeutic implications of these studies and discusses strategies that could prove useful for targeting specific β-arrestin-regulated signaling pathways for therapeutic purposes. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The two β-arrestins, structurally closely related intracellular proteins that are evolutionarily highly conserved, have emerged as multifunctional proteins able to regulate a vast array of cellular and physiological functions. The outcome of studies with β-arrestin mutant mice and cultured cells, complemented by novel insights into β-arrestin structure and function, should pave the way for the development of novel classes of therapeutically useful drugs capable of regulating specific β-arrestin functions.

Structural basis of allosteric modulation of metabotropic glutamate receptor activation and desensitization

The metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) are neuromodulatory family C G protein coupled receptors which assemble as dimers and allosterically couple extracellular ligand binding domains (LBDs) to transmembrane domains (TMDs) to drive intracellular signaling. Pharmacologically, mGluRs can be targeted either at the LBDs by glutamate and synthetic orthosteric compounds or at the TMDs by allosteric modulators. Despite the potential of allosteric TMD-targeting compounds as therapeutics, an understanding of the functional and structural basis of their effects on mGluRs is limited. Here we use a battery of approaches to dissect the distinct functional and structural effects of orthosteric versus allosteric ligands. We find using electrophysiological and live cell imaging assays that both agonists and positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) can drive activation and desensitization of mGluRs. The effects of PAMs are pleiotropic, including both the ability to boost the maximal response to orthosteric agonists and to serve independently as desensitization-biased agonists across mGluR subtypes. Conformational sensors reveal PAM-driven inter-subunit re-arrangements at both the LBD and TMD. Motivated by this, we determine cryo-electron microscopy structures of mGluR3 in the presence of either an agonist or antagonist alone or in combination with a PAM. These structures reveal PAM-driven re-shaping of intra- and inter-subunit conformations and provide evidence for a rolling TMD dimer interface activation pathway that controls G protein and beta-arrestin coupling.

Highlights

-Agonists and PAMs drive mGluR activation, desensitization, and endocytosis-PAMs are desensitization-biased and synergistic with agonists-Four combinatorial ligand conditions reveal an ensemble of full-length mGluR structures with novel interfaces-Activation and desensitization involve rolling TMD interfaces which are re-shaped by PAM.

Receptor expression and signaling properties in the brain, and structural ligand motifs that contribute to delta opioid receptor agonist-induced seizures

The δ opioid receptor (δOR) is a therapeutic target for the treatment of various neurological disorders, such as migraines, chronic pain, alcohol use, and mood disorders. Relative to μ opioid receptor agonists, δOR agonists show lower abuse liability and may be potentially safer analgesic alternatives. However, currently no δOR agonists are approved for clinical use. A small number of δOR agonists reached Phase II trials, but ultimately failed to progress due to lack of efficacy. One side effect of δOR agonism that remains poorly understood is the ability of δOR agonists to produce seizures. The lack of a clear mechanism of action is partly driven by the fact that δOR agonists range in their propensity to induce seizure behavior, with multiple δOR agonists reportedly not causing seizures. There is a significant gap in our current understanding of why certain δOR agonists are more likely to induce seizures, and what signal-transduction pathway and/or brain area is engaged to produce these seizures. In this review we provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of knowledge of δOR agonist-mediated seizures. The review was structured to highlight which agonists produce seizures, which brain regions have been implicated and which signaling mediators have been examined in this behavior. Our hope is that this review will spur future studies that are carefully designed and aimed to solve the question why certain δOR agonists are seizurogenic. Obtaining such insight may expedite the development of novel δOR clinical candidates without the risk of inducing seizures. This article is part of the Special Issue on "Opioid-induced changes in addiction and pain circuits".

Hippocampal Proteomics Reveals the Role of Glutamatergic Synapse Activation in the Depression Induced by Perfluorooctane Sulfonate

Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), a new type of persistent organic pollutant in the environment of water, has drawn significant attention in recent years due to its widespread prevalence and high toxicity. Neurotoxicity is regarded as one of the major toxic effects of PFOS, while research studies on PFOS-induced depression and the underlying mechanisms remain scarce. In this study, behavioral tests revealed the depressive-like behaviors in PFOS-exposed male mice. Neuron damages including pyknosis and staining deepening were identified through hematoxylin and eosin staining. Then, we noticed the elevation of glutamate and proline levels as well as the decline of glutamine and tryptophan levels. Proteomics analysis identified 105 differentially expressed proteins that change in a dose-dependent manner and revealed that PFOS exposure activated the glutamatergic synapse signaling pathway, which were further confirmed by Western blot, and the data were consistent with the findings of the proteomics analysis. Additionally, the downstream signaling cyclic AMP-responsive element-binding protein (CREB)/brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and synaptic plasticity-related postsynaptic density protein 95, synaptophysin, were downregulated. Our results highlight that PFOS exposure may inhibit the synaptic plasticity of the hippocampus via glutamatergic synapse and the CREB/BDNF signaling pathway to cause depressive-like behaviors in male mice.

The Differential Influence of PZM21, A Nonrewarding μ-opioid Receptor Agonist With G Protein Bias, on Behavioural Despair and Fear Response in Mice

A growing body of evidence points out the involvement of the µ-opioid receptors in the modulation of stress-related behaviour. It has been suggested that µ-opioid receptor agonists may attenuate behavioural despair following animals' exposure to an acute, inescapable stressor. Moreover, morphine was shown to ameliorate fear memories caused by a traumatic experience. As typical µ-opioid receptor agonists entail a risk of serious side effects and addiction, novel, possibly safer and less addictive agonists of this receptor are currently under investigation. One of them, PZM21, preferentially acting via the G protein signalling pathway, was previously shown to be analgesic, but less addictive than morphine. Here, we aimed to further test this ligand in stress-related behavioural paradigms in mice. The study has shown that, unlike morphine, PZM21 does not decrease immobility in the forced swimming and tail suspension tests. On the other hand, we observed that both mice treated with PZM21 and those receiving morphine presented a slight attenuation of freezing across the consecutive fear memory retrievals in the fear conditioning test. Therefore, our study implies that at the range of tested doses, PZM21, a nonrewarding representative of G protein-biased µ-opioid receptor agonists, may interfere with fear memory consolidation while having no beneficial effects on behavioural despair in mice.

G protein-coupled receptors in neurodegenerative diseases and psychiatric disorders

Neuropsychiatric disorders are multifactorial disorders with diverse aetiological factors. Identifying treatment targets is challenging because the diseases are resulting from heterogeneous biological, genetic, and environmental factors. Nevertheless, the increasing understanding of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) opens a new possibility in drug discovery. Harnessing our knowledge of molecular mechanisms and structural information of GPCRs will be advantageous for developing effective drugs. This review provides an overview of the role of GPCRs in various neurodegenerative and psychiatric diseases. Besides, we highlight the emerging opportunities of novel GPCR targets and address recent progress in GPCR drug development.

Receptors Involved in Mental Disorders and the Use of Clozapine, Chlorpromazine, Olanzapine, and Aripiprazole to Treat Mental Disorders

Mental illnesses are a global health challenge, and effective medicines are needed to treat these conditions. Psychotropic drugs are commonly prescribed to manage mental disorders, such as schizophrenia, but unfortunately, they can cause significant and undesirable side effects, such as myocarditis, erectile dysfunction, and obesity. Furthermore, some schizophrenic patients may not respond to psychotropic drugs, a condition called schizophrenia-treatment resistance. Fortunately, clozapine is a promising option for patients who exhibit treatment resistance. Unlike chlorpromazine, scientists have found that clozapine has fewer neurological side effects. Additionally, olanzapine and aripiprazole are well-known for their moderating effects on psychosis and are widely used in clinical practice. To further maximize drug efficacy, it is critical to deeply understand the receptors or signaling pathways central to the nervous system, such as serotonin, histamine, trace amines, dopamine, and G-protein coupled receptors. This article provides an overview of the receptors mentioned above, as well as the antipsychotics that interact with them, such as olanzapine, aripiprazole, clozapine, and chlorpromazine. Additionally, this article discusses the general pharmacology of these medications.

Up-regulation of BDNF/TrkB signaling by δ opioid receptor agonist SNC80 modulates depressive-like behaviors in chronic restraint-stressed mice

Depressive disorder is a psychiatric disease characterized by its main symptoms of low mood and anhedonia. Due to its complex etiology, current clinical treatments for depressive disorder are limited. In this study, we assessed the role of the δ opioid receptor (δOR) system in the development of chronic-restraint-stressed (CRS)-induced depressive behaviors. We employed a 21-day CRS model and detected the c-fos activation and protein levels' changes in enkephalin (ENK)/δOR. It was found that the hippocampus and amygdala were involved in CRS-induced depression. The expression of pro-enkephalin (PENK), the precursors of the endogenous ligand for δOR, was significantly decreased in the hippocampus and amygdala following CRS. We then treated the mice with SNC80, a specific δOR agonist, to examine its anti-depressant effects in the tail suspension test (TST), forced swimming test (FST), and sucrose preference test (SPT). SNC80 administration significantly reversed depressive-like behaviors, and this antidepressant effect could be blocked by a TrkB inhibitor: ANA-12. Although ANA-12 treatment had no significant effect on the expression of ENK/δOR, it blocked the promoting effects of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF)/tyrosine kinase B(TrkB) signaling by SNC80 in the hippocampus and amygdala. Therefore, the present study demonstrates that SNC80 exerts anti-depressant effects by up-regulating the BDNF/TrkB signaling pathway in the hippocampus and amygdala in CRS-induced depression and provides evidence that δOR's agonists may be potential anti-depressant therapeutic agents.

Deletion of Arrb2 Down-regulates Autophagy in the Mouse Hippocampus via Akt-mTOR Pathway Activation

The cytoplasmic multifunctional adaptor protein β-arrestin 2 (Arrb2) is involved in the occurrence of various nervous system diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease. Previous laboratory studies have shown that the expression and function of the Arrb2 gene was increased in valproic acid-induced autistic mice models. However, few reports have examined the possible role of Arrb2 in the pathogenesis of autism spectrum disorder. Therefore, Arrb2-deficient (Arrb2^-/-) mice were further studied to uncover the physiological function of Arrb2 in the nervous system. In this study, we found that Arrb2^-/- mice had normal behavioral characteristics compared with wild-type mice. The autophagy marker protein LC3B was decreased in the hippocampus of Arrb2^-/- mice compared to wild-type mice. Western blot analysis revealed that deletion of Arrb2 caused hyperactivation of Akt-mTOR signaling in the hippocampus. In addition, abnormal mitochondrial dysfunction was observed in Arrb2^-/- hippocampal neurons, which was characterized by a reduction in mitochondrial membrane potential and adenosine triphosphate production and an increase in reactive oxygen species levels. Therefore, this study elucidates the interaction between Arrb2 and the Akt-mTOR signaling pathway and provides insights into the role of Arrb2 in hippocampal neuron autophagy.

Discovery and Structural Explorations of G-Protein Biased μ-Opioid Receptor Agonists

Compounds that activate only the G-protein signalling pathway represent an effective strategy for making safer opioids. In the present study, we report the design, synthesis and evaluation of two classes of novel PZM21 derivatives containing the benzothiophene ring and biphenyl ring group respectively as biased μ-opioid receptor (μOR) agonists. The new compound SWG-LX-33 showed potent μOR agonist activity and produced μOR-dependent analgesia. SWG-LX-33 does not activate the β-arrestin-2 signalling pathway in vitro even at high concentrations. Computational docking demonstrated the amino acid residue ASN150 to be critical for the weak efficacy and potency of μOR agonists in arrestin recruitment.

Role of ARRB1 in prognosis and immunotherapy: A Pan-Cancer analysis

Background: β-arrestin1 (ARRB1), was originally identified as a multifunctional adaptor protein. Although ARRB1 has recently been shown to also play an important role in tumor growth, metastasis, inflammation, and immunity, its relationship with distinct tumor types and the tumor immune microenvironment remains unclear.

Methods: We analyzed the ARRB1 expression profile and clinical characteristics in 33 cancer types using datasets from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Clinical parameters such as patient survival, tumor stage, age, and gender were used to assess the prognostic value of ARRB1. The Human Protein Atlas (HPA) database was used to explore ARRB1 protein expression data. ESTIMATE and CIBERSORT algorithms were performed to assess immune infiltration. Furthermore, putative correlations between ARRB1 and tumor-infiltrating immune cells, the signatures of T-cell subtypes, immunomodulators, the tumor mutation burden (TMB), Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1), and microsatellite instability (MSI) were also explored. Gene functional enrichment was determined using GSEA. GSE40435 and GSE13213 cohorts were used to validate the correlation of ARRB1 with KIRC and LUAD clinicopathological parameters. Finally, the relationship between ARRB1 and immunotherapeutic responses was assessed using three independent immunotherapy cohorts, namely, GSE67501, GSE168204, and IMvigor210.

Results: We found that ARRB1 expression levels were lower in 17 tumor tissues than in the corresponding normal tissues. We further found that ARRB1 expression was significantly correlated with tumor stage in BRCA, ESCA, KIRC, TGCT, and THCA, while in some tumors, particularly KIRC and LUAD, ARRB1 expression was associated with better prognosis. ARRB1 expression was also positively correlated with the stromal score or the immune score in some tumors. Regarding immune cell infiltration, ARRB1 expression in DLBC was positively correlated with M1 macrophage content and negatively correlated with B-cell infiltration. Additionally, there was a broad correlation between ARRB1 expression and three classes of immunomodulators. Furthermore, high ARRB1 expression levels were significantly correlated with some tumor immune-related pathways. Finally, ARRB1 expression was significantly associated with MSI, PD-L1, and TMB in some tumors and with the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in melanoma.

Conclusion: ARRB1 has prognostic value in malignant tumors, especially in KIRC and LUAD. At the same time, ARRB1 was closely correlated with the tumor immune microenvironment and indicators of immunotherapy efficacy, indicating its great potential as a reliable marker for predicting the efficacy of immunotherapy.

Exploration of beta-arrestin isoform signaling pathways in delta opioid receptor agonist-induced convulsions

The δ-opioid receptor (δOR) has been considered as a therapeutic target in multiple neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders particularly as δOR agonists are deemed safer alternatives relative to the more abuse-liable µ-opioid receptor drugs. Clinical development of δOR agonists, however, has been challenging in part due to the seizure-inducing effects of certain δOR agonists. Especially agonists that resemble the δOR-selective agonist SNC80 have well-established convulsive activity. Close inspection suggests that many of those seizurogenic δOR agonists efficaciously recruit β-arrestin, yet surprisingly, SNC80 displays enhanced seizure activity in β-arrestin 1 knockout mice. This finding led us to hypothesize that perhaps β-arrestin 1 is protective against, whereas β-arrestin 2 is detrimental for δOR-agonist-induced seizures. To investigate our hypothesis, we characterized three different δOR agonists (SNC80, ADL5859, ARM390) in cellular assays and in vivo in wild-type and β-arrestin 1 and β-arrestin 2 knockout mice for seizure activity. We also investigated downstream kinases associated with β-arrestin-dependent signal transduction. We discovered that δOR agonist-induced seizure activity strongly and positively correlates with β-arrestin 2 efficacy for the agonist, but that indirect inhibition of ERK activation using the MEK inhibitor SL327 did not inhibit seizure potency and duration. Inhibition of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling with honokiol but not PQR530, attenuated SNC80 seizure duration in β-arrestin 1 knockout, but honokiol did not reduce SNC80-induced seizures in wild-type mice. Ultimately, our results indicate that β-arrestin 2 is correlated with δOR agonist-induced seizure intensity, but that global β-arrestin 1 knockout mice are a poor model system to investigate their mechanism of action.

Selective δ-Opioid Receptor Agonist, KNT-127, Facilitates Contextual Fear Extinction via Infralimbic Cortex and Amygdala in Mice

Facilitation of fear extinction is a desirable action for the drugs to treat fear-related diseases, such as posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). We previously reported that a selective agonist of the δ-opioid receptor (DOP), KNT-127, facilitates contextual fear extinction in mice. However, its site of action in the brain and the underlying molecular mechanism remains unknown. Here, we investigated brain regions and cellular signaling pathways that may mediate the action of KNT-127 on fear extinction. Twenty-four hours after the fear conditioning, mice were reexposed to the conditioning chamber for 6 min as extinction training (reexposure 1). KNT-127 was microinjected into either the basolateral nucleus of the amygdala (BLA), hippocampus (HPC), prelimbic (PL), or infralimbic (IL) subregions of the medial prefrontal cortex, 30 min before reexposure 1. Next day, mice were reexposed to the chamber for 6 min as memory testing (reexposure 2). KNT-127 that infused into the BLA and IL, but not HPC or PL, significantly reduced the freezing response in reexposure 2 compared with those of control. The effect of KNT-127 administered into the BLA and IL was antagonized by pretreatment with a selective DOP antagonist. Further, the effect of KNT-127 was abolished by local administration of MEK/ERK inhibitor into the BLA, and PI3K/Akt inhibitor into the IL, respectively. These results suggested that the effect of KNT-127 was mediated by MEK/ERK signaling in the BLA, PI3K/Akt signaling in the IL, and DOPs in both brain regions. Here, we propose that DOPs play a role in fear extinction via distinct signaling pathways in the BLA and IL.

Identification of a Novel Delta Opioid Receptor Agonist Chemotype with Potential Negative Allosteric Modulator Capabilities

The δ-opioid receptor (δOR) holds great potential as a therapeutic target. Yet, clinical drug development, which has focused on δOR agonists that mimic the potent and selective tool compound SNC80 have largely failed. It has increasingly become apparent that the SNC80 scaffold carries with it potent and efficacious β-arrestin recruitment. Here, we screened a relatively small (5120 molecules) physical drug library to identify δOR agonists that underrecruit β-arrestin, as it has been suggested that compounds that efficaciously recruit β-arrestin are proconvulsant. The screen identified a hit compound and further characterization using cellular binding and signaling assays revealed that this molecule (R995045, compound 1) exhibited ten-fold selectivity over µ- and κ-opioid receptors. Compound 1 represents a novel chemotype at the δOR. A subsequent characterization of fourteen analogs of compound 1, however did not identify a more potent δOR agonist. Computational modeling and in vitro characterization of compound 1 in the presence of the endogenous agonist leu-enkephalin suggest compound 1 may also bind allosterically and negatively modulate the potency of Leu-enkephalin to inhibit cAMP, acting as a ‘NAM-agonist’ in this assay. The potential physiological utility of such a class of compounds will need to be assessed in future in vivo assays.

Evaluation of Kratom Opioid Derivatives as Potential Treatment Option for Alcohol Use Disorder

Background and Purpose:Mitragyna speciosa extract and kratom alkaloids decrease alcohol consumption in mice at least in part through actions at the δ-opioid receptor (δOR). However, the most potent opioidergic kratom alkaloid, 7-hydroxymitragynine, exhibits rewarding properties and hyperlocomotion presumably due to preferred affinity for the mu opioid receptor (µOR). We hypothesized that opioidergic kratom alkaloids like paynantheine and speciogynine with reduced µOR potency could provide a starting point for developing opioids with an improved therapeutic window to treat alcohol use disorder.

Experimental Approach: We characterized paynantheine, speciociliatine, and four novel kratom-derived analogs for their ability to bind and activate δOR, µOR, and κOR. Select opioids were assessed in behavioral assays in male C57BL/6N WT and δOR knockout mice.

Key Results: Paynantheine (10 mg∙kg⁻¹, i.p.) produced aversion in a limited conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigm but did not produce CPP with additional conditioning sessions. Paynantheine did not produce robust antinociception but did block morphine-induced antinociception and hyperlocomotion. Yet, at 10 and 30 mg∙kg⁻¹ doses (i.p.), paynantheine did not counteract morphine CPP. 7-hydroxypaynantheine and 7-hydroxyspeciogynine displayed potency at δOR but limited µOR potency relative to 7-hydroxymitragynine in vitro, and dose-dependently decreased voluntary alcohol consumption in WT but not δOR in KO mice. 7-hydroxyspeciogynine has a maximally tolerated dose of at least 10 mg∙kg⁻¹ (s.c.) at which it did not produce significant CPP neither alter general locomotion nor induce noticeable seizures.

Conclusion and Implications: Derivatizing kratom alkaloids with the goal of enhancing δOR potency and reducing off-target effects could provide a pathway to develop novel lead compounds to treat alcohol use disorder with an improved therapeutic window.