Incidence of Acute Kidney Injury among Patients Treated with Piperacillin-Tazobactam or Meropenem in Combination with Vancomycin

Concomitant Administration of Vancomycin with a High Dose of Meropenem May Cause Acute Kidney Injury

Coadministering two different classes of antibiotics as empirical therapy can be critical in treating healthcare-associated infections in hospitals. Herein, we report a case of acute kidney injury (AKI) caused by coadministration of vancomycin with high-dose meropenem that manifested as a rapid increase in serum creatinine levels and an associated increase in vancomycin trough concentrations. The patient was diagnosed with meningioma at 50 years and was followed up regularly. The patient underwent surgery and antibiotic treatment between 63 and 66 years for suspected meningitis and pneumonia. Coadministration of vancomycin with high-dose meropenem (6.0 g/day) caused AKI; however, no AKI occurred when vancomycin was administered alone or with a low dose of meropenem (1.5 or 3.0 g/day). To our knowledge, this report is the first to show that administering different dosages of meropenem in combination with vancomycin may contribute to the risk of developing AKI. We suggest that coadministered vancomycin and high-dose meropenem (6.0 g/day) may increase the risk of AKI. Our report adds to the limited literature documenting the coadministration of vancomycin with varying doses of meropenem and its impact on the risk of AKI and highlights the importance of investigating AKI risk in response to varying dosages of meropenem when it is coadministered with vancomycin.

Effect modification of dosing strategy (AUC or trough) on AKI associated with vancomycin in combination with piperacillin/tazobactam or cefepime and meropenem

Piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP), cefepime (FEP), or meropenem (MEM) and vancomycin (VAN) are commonly used in combination for sepsis. Studies have shown an increased risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) with TZP and VAN compared to FEP or MEM. VAN guidelines recommend area under the curve (AUC) monitoring over trough (Tr) to minimize the risk of AKI. We investigated the association of AKI and MAKE-30 with the two VAN monitoring strategies when used in combination with TZP or FEP/MEM. Adult patients between 2015 and 2019 with VAN > 72 hours were included. Patients with AKI prior to or within 48 hours of VAN or baseline CrCl of ≤30 mL/min were excluded. Four cohorts were defined: FEP/MEM/Tr, FEP/MEM/AUC, TZP/Tr, and TZP/AUC. A Cox Proportional Hazard Model was used to model AKI as a function of the incidence rate of at-risk days, testing monitoring strategy as a treatment effect modification. Multivariable logistic regression was used to model MAKE-30. Overall incidence of AKI was 18.6%; FEP/MEM/Tr = 115 (14.6%), FEP/MEM/AUC = 52 (14.9%), TZP/Tr = 189 (26%), and TZP/AUC = 96 (17.1%) (P < 0.001). Both drug group [(TZP; P = 0.0085)] and monitoring strategy [(Tr; P = 0.0007)] were highly associated with the development of AKI; however, the effect was not modified with interaction term [(TZP*Tr); 0.085)]. The odds of developing MAKE-30 were not different between any group and FEP/MEM/AUC. The effect of VAN/TZP on the development of AKI was not modified by the VAN monitoring strategy (AUC vs trough). MAKE-30 outcomes were not different among the four cohorts.

Epidemiology of Vancomycin in Combination With Piperacillin/Tazobactam-Associated Acute Kidney Injury in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Several studies have shown that vancomycin combined with piperacillin/tazobactam (VPT) increased the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) compared with other antibiotics in children. However, the epidemiology of VPT-associated AKI in children is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the incidence and risk factors of VPT-associated AKI in children.

DATA SOURCES

Literature databases of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), VIP Database, WanFang Database, and China Biology Medicine Disc were searched from inception to November 2023. References of included studies were also manually checked.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Two independent reviewers selected studies, extracted data, and quality assessment. Meta-analyses were performed to quantify the incidence and risk factors of VPT-associated AKI in children.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Sixteen cohort studies were identified. Overall, the incidence of VPT-associated AKI in children was 24.3% (95% CI: 17.9%-30.6%). The incidence of VPT-associated AKI in critically ill children (26.6%) was higher than that in noncritically ill children (10.9%). Moreover, higher serum vancomycin trough concentration (>15 mg/L), use of vasopressors, combination of nephrotoxins and intensive care unit admission were risk factors for VPT-associated AKI in children (P < 0.05).

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE

Identifying high-risk groups and determining safer treatments is critical to reducing the incidence of VPT-associated AKI in children.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of VPT-associated AKI in children is high, especially in critically ill children. Medication regimens should be personalized based on the presence of individual risk factors. Moreover, renal function was regularly assessed throughout treatment with VPT.

The Effect of Vancomycin and Piperacillin-Tazobactam on Incidence of Acute Kidney Injury in Patients With Obesity

Background: Increasing evidence suggests that administration of combination vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam (VPT) increases the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) beyond that of vancomycin alone. But these investigations have not evaluated AKI risk specifically in an increasingly prevalent obese population in whom VPT pharmacokinetics are altered. Objective: To evaluate AKI risk with VPT administration to patients with obesity. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study of obese patients admitted to 2 separate academic teaching hospitals from January 2010 to December 2021, who received VPT, or vancomycin plus either cefepime, meropenem, or ceftazidime. The primary outcome evaluated AKI when patients were treated with or without VPT. Results: A total of 227 patients were evaluated (114 in VPT, vs 113 in control group). Overall, body mass index (35.6 kg/m2 ± 4.8vs 36.1 kg/m2 ± 5.2; P = .44) was similar between the VPT and control groups respectively. Total vancomycin dose on day 1 of antibiotic therapy (3,432 mg ± 935 vs 2,732 mg ± 912; P < .01) and nephrotoxin administration (75.4% vs 62.8%; P = .04) were higher in the VPT group. Incidence of AKI was higher in the VPT group (37.7%vs 14.2%; P = .01) and on regression analysis VPT was predictive of developing AKI (OR = 3.9; 95% CI = 2.0-7.7; P < .01). Conclusion and Relevance: In this retrospective study, the incidence of AKI was increased in obese patients receiving therapy with VPT. Vancomycin combination therapy with ceftazidime, cefepime, and meropenem appeared to be safe and was associated with less nephrotoxicity. Cautious use of VPT and further investigation with larger studies are warranted in this area.

In vitro inhibition and eradication of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii biofilms by riparin III and colistin combination

Acinetobacter baumannii, a prominent emerging pathogen, is responsible for persistent and recurrent healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). Its bacterial resistance and virulence factors, such as biofilm formation, contribute to its survival in hospital environments. Combination therapy has proven to be an effective approach for controlling these infections; however, antimicrobial resistance and compound toxicity can hinder antimicrobial efficacy. Numerous in vitro studies have demonstrated the synergistic effect of antimicrobials and natural products against multidrug-resistant (MDR) A. baumannii biofilm. Riparin III, a natural alkamide derived from Aniba riparia (Nees) Mez., possesses various biological activities, including significant antimicrobial potential. Nonetheless, no reports are available on the use of this compound in conjunction with conventional antimicrobials. Hence, this study aimed to investigate the inhibition and eradication of A. baumannii MDR biofilm by combining riparin III and colistin, along with potential ultrastructural changes observed in vitro. Clinical isolates of A. baumannii, known for their robust biofilm production, were inhibited, or eradicated in the presence of the riparin III/colistin combination. Furthermore, the combination resulted in several ultrastructural alterations within the biofilm, such as elongated cells and coccus morphology, partial or complete disruption of the biofilm's extracellular matrix, and cells exhibiting cytoplasmic material extravasation. At the synergistic concentrations, the riparin III/colistin combination exhibited a low hemolytic percentage, ranging from 5.74% to 6.19%, exerting inhibitory and eradicating effects on the A. baumannii biofilm, accompanied by notable ultrastructural changes. These findings suggest its potential as a promising alternative for therapeutic purposes.

A Large-Scale Multicenter Retrospective Study on Nephrotoxicity Associated With Empiric Broad-Spectrum Antibiotics in Critically Ill Patients

BACKGROUND

Evidence regarding acute kidney injury associated with concomitant administration of vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam is conflicting, particularly in patients in the ICU.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does a difference exist in the association between commonly prescribed empiric antibiotics on ICU admission (vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam, vancomycin and cefepime, and vancomycin and meropenem) and acute kidney injury?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study using data from the eICU Research Institute, which contains records for ICU stays between 2010 and 2015 across 335 hospitals. Patients were enrolled if they received vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam, vancomycin and cefepime, or vancomycin and meropenem exclusively. Patients initially admitted to the ED were included. Patients with hospital stay duration of < 1 h, receiving dialysis, or with missing data were excluded. Acute kidney injury was defined as Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes stage 2 or 3 based on serum creatinine component. Propensity score matching was used to match patients in the control (vancomycin and meropenem or vancomycin and cefepime) and treatment (vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam) groups, and ORs were calculated. Sensitivity analyses were performed to study the effect of longer courses of combination therapy and patients with renal insufficiency on admission.

RESULTS

Thirty-five thousand six hundred fifty-four patients met inclusion criteria (vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam, n = 27,459; vancomycin and cefepime, n = 6,371; vancomycin and meropenem, n = 1,824). Vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam was associated with a higher risk of acute kidney injury and initiation of dialysis when compared with that of both vancomycin and cefepime (Acute kidney injury: OR, 1.37 [95% CI, 1.25-1.49]; dialysis: OR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.14-1.45]) and vancomycin and meropenem (Acute kidney injury: OR, 1.27 [95%, 1.06-1.52]; dialysis: OR, 1.56 [95% CI, 1.23-2.00]). The odds of acute kidney injury developing was especially pronounced in patients without renal insufficiency receiving a longer duration of vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam therapy compared with vancomycin and meropenem therapy.

INTERPRETATION

VPT is associated with a higher risk of acute kidney injury than both vancomycin and cefepime and vancomycin and meropenem in patients in the ICU, especially for patients with normal initial kidney function requiring longer durations of therapy. Clinicians should consider vancomycin and meropenem or vancomycin and cefepime to reduce the risk of nephrotoxicity for patients in the ICU.

Piperacillin–Tazobactam Plus Vancomycin-Associated Acute Kidney Injury in Adults: Can Teicoplanin or Other Antipseudomonal Beta-Lactams Be Remedies?

Numerous observational studies and meta-analyses have suggested that combination therapy consisting of piperacillin–tazobactam (TZP) and vancomycin (VAN) augments acute kidney injury (AKI) risk when compared to viable alternatives, such as cefepime–vancomycin (FEP–VAN) and meropenem–VAN. However, the exact pathophysiological mechanisms of this phenomenon are still unclear. One major limitation of the existing studies is the utilization of serum creatinine to quantify AKI since serum creatinine is not a sufficiently sensitive and specific biomarker to truly define the causal relationship between TZP–VAN exposure and nephrotoxicity. Even so, some preventive measures can be taken to reduce the risk of AKI when TZP–VAN is preferred. These measures include limiting the administration of TZP–VAN to 72 h, choosing FEP–VAN in place of TZP–VAN in appropriate cases, monitoring the VAN area under the curve level rather than the VAN trough level, avoiding exposure to other nephrotoxic agents, and minimizing the prescription of TZP–VAN for patients with a high risk of AKI. More data are needed to comment on the beneficial impact of the extended-infusion regimen of TZP on nephrotoxicity. Additionally, TZP and teicoplanin can be reasonable alternatives to TZP–VAN for the purpose of lowering AKI risk. However, the data are scarce to advocate this practice convincingly.

Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients Treated with Vancomycin and Zosyn or an Alternative: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Zosyn^® (piperacillin-tazobactam; Pfizer Medical, New York, NY), a valuable antibiotic against gram-negative bacteria, combined with vancomycin (Z+V) is known for its high incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI), particularly in the intensive care unit (ICU), leading to the frequent use of alternatives for gram-negative coverage (Alt+V). Because there are limited data describing AKI on these alternative antibiotic agents, a systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to determine if these regimens were indeed associated with decreased rates of AKI. Patients and Methods: A literature review was performed electronically from its inception to November 1, 2018, screening for relevant literature by title, abstract and full text according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines within the following databases: PubMed/Medline, CINAHL, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Studies were included if they contained adults who had been admitted to the ICU for treatment and had received a combination of intravenous Z + V or Alt+V as well as had AKI measured during administration of these antibiotic agents. Studies were excluded if they represented pediatric populations, did not receive care in an ICU during their hospital admission, only received monotherapy for antibiotic treatment or received antibiotic treatment for less than 48 hours. Independent extraction was performed by two reviewers. Risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) methodology for retrospective studies. Random-effects models were used to calculate any differences between rates of AKI after Z + V or Alt + V. Results: Fourteen articles (totaling 30,399 patients) were included. All studies available were retrospective in design. Compared with Alt + V, Z + V was associated with a higher risk ratio of AKI (1.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.46-2.19; p < 0.001). Cefepime (C + V) was the most common alternative to Zosyn, and Z + V was associated with higher rates of kidney injury compared with C + V (1.70; 95% CI, 1.36-2.12; p < 0.00001). However, there was substantial heterogeneity in the data collected as well as high risk of bias. Conclusions: Zosyn plus vancomycin is associated with more risk of AKI compared with Alt+V coverage in ICU adult populations. However, the conclusions were limited by the retrospective nature of the studies, high bias of included articles, and heterogeneity of the included studies.

Risk of acute kidney injury associated with anti-pseudomonal and anti-MRSA antibiotic strategies in critically ill patients

Background

An increased risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) with the widely prescribed piperacillin-tazobactam(PTZ)-vancomycin combination in hospitalized patients has recently been reported, but evidence in ICU patients remain uncertain. This study evaluates the association between the exposure of various broad-spectrum antibiotic regimens with Pseudomonas and/or methicillin-resistance Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) coverage and the risk of AKI in critically ill patients.

Methods and findings

A retrospective cohort study based on the publicly available MIMIC-III database reporting hospitalization data from ICU patients from a large academic medical center between 2001 and 2012. Adult patients receiving an anti-pseudomonal or an anti-MRSA agent in the ICU for more than 24-hours were included. Non-PTZ anti-pseudomonal agents were compared to PTZ; non-vancomycin agents covering MRSA were compared to vancomycin; and their combinations were compared to the PTZ-vancomycin combination. The primary outcome was defined as new or worsening AKI within 7 days of the antibiotic exposure using an adjusted binomial generalized estimating equation. Overall, 18 510 admissions from 15 673 individual patients, cumulating 169 966 days of antibiotherapy were included. When compared to PTZ, exposure to another anti-pseudomonal agent was associated with lower AKI risk (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.80–0.91; p < .001). When compared to vancomycin, exposure to another anti-MRSA was also associated with lower AKI risk (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.64–0.80; p < .001). Finally, when compared to the PTZ-vancomycin combination, exposure to another regimen with a similar coverage was associated with an even lower risk (OR, 0.63; 95% CI; 0.54–0.73; p < .001). A sensitivity analysis of patients with high illness severity showed similar results.

Conclusions

These results suggest that the risk of AKI in ICU patients requiring antibiotherapy may be partially mitigated by the choice of antibiotics administered. Further clinical trials are required to confirm these findings.

Comparative Risk of Acute Kidney Injury Following Concurrent Administration of Vancomycin with Piperacillin/Tazobactam or Meropenem: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

The study aims to comparatively assess the nephrotoxicity of vancomycin when combined with piperacillin-tazobactam (V + PT) or meropenem (V + M) in adult patients hospitalized in general wards or intensive care units. We searched MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and Web of Science for observational studies evaluating incidences of AKI in adult patients receiving V + PT or V + M for at least 48 h in general wards or intensive care units. The primary outcome was AKI events, while the secondary outcomes were hospital length of stay, need for renal replacement therapy (RRT), and mortality events. The odds ratio (OR), or mean difference for the hospital length of stay, with a corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) from the inverse variance weighting random-effects model were estimated for the risk of AKI, RRT, and mortality. Of the 112 studies identified, twelve observational studies were included in this meta-analysis with a total of 14,511 patients. The odds of having AKI were significantly higher in patients receiving V + PT compared with V + M (OR = 2.31; 95%CI 1.69–3.15). There were no differences between V + PT and V + M in the hospital length of stay, RRT, or mortality outcomes. Thus, clinicians should be vigilant while using V + PT, especially in patients who are at high risk of AKI.

Association of antibiotic use and acute kidney injury in patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common among hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). We aimed to estimate and compare the risk of AKI for various antibiotic combinations in adults hospitalized for CAP.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of the Premier Healthcare Database containing all admissions for 660 US hospitals from 2010 to 2015. We included adults aged ≥18 years hospitalized with CAP and considered 6 different antibiotic combinations based on continuous use in the first 3 hospital days. The primary outcome was incident AKI, defined by ICD-9 codes 584.5-584-9. We evaluated associations of AKI with in-hospital mortality and length-of-stay. We excluded patients who were admitted directly to the intensive care unit, had AKI codes present on admission or had dialysis in the first 2 days. We used generalized linear mixed models with the hospital as a random effect and covariate adjustment for patient demographics, comorbidities, other treatments on day 0/1, and hospital characteristics.

RESULTS

The total sample included 449,535 patients, 3.15% of whom developed AKI. All other regimens but fluoroquinolones exhibited higher AKI odds than 3rd generation cephalosporin with or without macrolide. The combination of piperacillin/tazobactam and vancomycin with or without other antibiotics was associated with the highest AKI odds (OR = 1.89; 95% CI: 1.73-2.06). Patients with incident AKI had an increased odds of hospital mortality (OR = 6.37; 95% CI: 6.07-6.69) and longer length-of-stay (mean multiplier = 1.84; 95% CI: 1.82, 1.86).

CONCLUSION

Compared to 3rd generation cephalosporin with or without macrolide, piperacillin/tazobactam, vancomycin, and their combination were associated with higher odds of developing AKI, which in turn were associated with worse clinical outcomes.

Comparison of novel rapid diagnostic of blood culture identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing by Accelerate Pheno system and BioFire FilmArray Blood Culture Identification and BioFire FilmArray Blood Culture Identification 2 panels

Background

Conventional turnaround time (TAT) for positive blood culture (PBC) identification (ID) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is 2–3 days. We evaluated the TAT and ID/AST performance using clinical and seeded samples directly from PBC bottles with different commercial approaches: (1) Accelerate Pheno® system (Pheno) for ID/AST; (2) BioFire® FilmArray® Blood Culture Identification (BCID) Panel and/ or BCID2 for ID; (3) direct AST by VITEK® 2 (direct AST); and (4) overnight culture using VITEK® 2 colony AST.

Results

A total of 141 PBC samples were included in this evaluation. Using MALDI-TOF (Bruker MALDI Biotyper) as the reference method for ID, the overall monomicrobial ID sensitivity/specificity are as follows: Pheno 97.9/99.9%; BCID 100/100%; and BCID2 100/100%, respectively. For AST performance, broth microdilution (BMD) was used as the reference method. For gram-negatives, overall categorical and essential agreements (CA/EA) for each method were: Pheno 90.3/93.2%; direct AST 92.6/88.5%; colony AST 94.4/89.5%, respectively. For gram-positives, the overall CA/EAs were as follows: Pheno 97.2/98.89%; direct AST 97.2/100%; colony AST 97.2/100%, respectively. The BCID/BCID2 and direct AST TATs were around 9–20 h (1/9-19 h for ID with resistance markers/AST), with 15 min/sample hands-on time. In comparison, Pheno TATs were around 8–10 h (1.5/7 h for ID/AST) with 2 min/sample hands-on time, maintains a clinically relevant fast report of antibiotic minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and allows for less TAT and hands-on time.

Conclusion

In conclusion, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study conducted as such in Asia; all studied approaches achieved satisfactory performance, factors such as TAT, panel of antibiotics choices and hands-on time should be considered for the selection of appropriate rapid ID and AST of PBC methods in different laboratory settings.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12866-021-02403-y.

Impact of a Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction Panel on Duration of Empiric Antibiotic Therapy in Suspected Bacterial Meningitis

Background

Multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) panels allow for rapid detection or exclusion of pathogens causing meningitis and encephalitis (ME). The clinical impact of rapid multiplex PCR ME panel results on the duration of empiric antibiotic therapy is not well characterized.

Methods

We performed a retrospective prepost study at our institution that evaluated the clinical impact of a multiplex PCR ME panel among adults with suspected bacterial meningitis who received empiric antibiotic therapy and underwent lumbar puncture in the emergency department. The primary outcome was the duration of empiric antibiotic therapy.

Results

The positive pathogen detection rates were similar between pre- and post-multiplex PCR ME panel periods (17.5%, 24 of 137 vs 20.3%, 14 of 69, respectively). The median duration of empiric antibiotic therapy was significantly reduced in the post-multiplex PCR ME panel period compared with the pre-multiplex PCR ME panel period (34.7 vs 12.3 hours, P = .01). At any point in time, 46% more patients in the post-multiplex PCR ME panel period had empiric antibiotic therapy discontinued or de-escalated compared with the pre-multiplex PCR ME panel period (sex- and immunosuppressant use-adjusted hazard ratio 1.46, P = .01). The median hospital length of stay was shorter in the post-multiplex PCR ME panel period (3 vs 4 days, P = .03).

Conclusions

The implementation of the multiplex PCR ME panel for bacterial meningitis reduced the duration of empiric antibiotic therapy and possibly hospital length of stay compared with traditional microbiological testing methods.

Comparative Prevalence of Acute Kidney Injury in Chinese Patients Receiving Vancomycin with Concurrent β-Lactam Antibiotics: A Retrospective Cohort Study

PURPOSE

The combination of vancomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam (VAN + PTZ) provides a broad spectrum of activity against multiple pathogens. However, a major issue in previous research concerned significant nephrotoxicity associated with this drug combination, and most studies have been conducted in American and European countries, with no similar data available from China. Therefore, this study evaluated the nephrotoxic effects of VAN + PTZ in a large-scale Chinese cohort to determine the prevalence of acute kidney injury (AKI) in this population by comparing PTZ and vancomycin monotherapies and the combined use of vancomycin and β-lactam antibiotics.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study identified adult patients who received vancomycin either as monotherapy or in combination with PTZ or carbapenem (VAN + CAR) for at least 48 hours at Jiangsu Province Hospital from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2018. Patients were also evaluated for the development of AKI, defined according to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcome criteria. Duration of vancomycin exposure, steady-state trough vancomycin concentrations, and other risk factors for AKI were assessed. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted to validate our results and comparatively evaluate the nephrotoxicity of β-lactam antibiotics in combination with vancomycin.

FINDINGS

In all, 752 patients were included in the present study. The prevalence of AKI was higher in the VAN + PTZ group than in the VAN and VAN + CAR groups (15.2% vs 4.0% and 6.0%, respectively). After adjustment for confounding factors, VAN + PTZ was still related to AKI (odds ratio [OR] = 4.37; 95% CI, 1.65-11.59; P = 0.003). The network meta-analysis indicated that VAN + PTZ was associated with a significantly higher risk for AKI than was VAN (OR = 3.23; 95% CI, 2.50-4.35), PTZ (OR = 2.86; 95% CI, 1.92-4.12), VAN + cefepime (FEP) (OR = 2.37; 95% CI, 1.80-3.19), or VAN + CAR (OR = 2.28; 95% CI, 1.64-3.21). However, there was no significant difference with respect to AKI prevalence among the VAN, PTZ, VAN + FEP, and VAN + CAR groups.

IMPLICATIONS

The prevalence of AKI was higher with VAN + PTZ therapy than with VAN or PTZ monotherapy or with the concurrent use of VAN and FEP or CAR in our study. Clinicians should adequately assess renal function and consider this differential risk for nephrotoxicity when choosing empiric antibiotics in hospitalized patients to minimize the rates of AKI.

Lowered Risk of Nephrotoxicity through Intervention against the Combined Use of Vancomycin and Tazobactam/Piperacillin: A Retrospective Cohort Study

The combined use of vancomycin (VCM) and tazobactam/piperacillin (TAZ/PIPC) is a major risk factor for nephrotoxicity. We sought to evaluate interventions against the combined use of VCM and TAZ/PIPC. This retrospective cohort study involved patients who considered the combined use of VCM and TAZ/PIPC as a treatment. Patients that had either or both antimicrobials replaced were assigned to the intervention group, whereas those who were continued on combination therapy were assigned to the comparison group. The primary endpoint was the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI). The survival rate of patients on day 30 was evaluated as the secondary endpoint. The comparison and intervention groups were composed of 65 and 68 patients, respectively, and the incidence rates of AKI were 44.6% and 17.6%, respectively. Cox proportional hazard analysis identified the intervention as the only independent factor against AKI development, with a hazard ratio of 0.282 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.141 to 0.565). For the incidence of AKI of grade greater than 1, the hazard ratio was 0.114 (95% CI, 0.025 to 0.497). The survival rates on day 30 in the comparison and intervention groups were 92.3% and 91.2%, respectively, with a relative risk of 0.988 (95% CI, 0.892 to 1.094). The trough VCM concentration was not associated with the incidence of AKI in patients receiving the combination therapy. This study demonstrated that intervention against the combined use of VCM and TAZ/PIPC can lower the risk of nephrotoxicity. IMPORTANCE The combined use of vancomycin (VCM) and tazobactam/piperacillin (TAZ/PIPC) is a major risk factor for nephrotoxicity. We retrospectively evaluated interventions against the combined use of VCM and TAZ/PIPC. Patients for whom either or both antimicrobials were replaced were assigned to the intervention group (65 patients), whereas those who were continued on combination therapy were assigned to the comparison group (68 patients). The primary endpoint was the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI). The incidence rates of AKI in the intervention and comparison groups were 44.6% and 17.6%, respectively. Cox proportional hazard analysis identified intervention as the only independent factor against AKI development, with a hazard ratio of 0.282 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.141 to 0.565). In conclusion, this study demonstrated that intervention against the combined use of VCM and TAZ/PIPC can lower the risk of nephrotoxicity.

Comparative incidence of acute kidney injury in patients on vancomycin therapy in combination with cefepime, piperacillin-tazobactam or meropenem

Recent studies have shown that the incidence of nephrotoxicity increases when vancomycin is combined with a beta-lactam antibiotic. The objective of this study was to compare the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) in adult patients who received vancomycin with either piperacillin-tazobactam (VPT), cefepime (VC), or meropenem (VM). This was a single center retrospective chart review. Patients were included if they were 18 years or older, received 48 hours of combination therapy and antibiotics were started within 24 hours of each other. Exclusion criteria were receiving more than one combination of antibiotics, serum creatinine > 1.2 mg/dL, AKI at the time of inclusion, or any form of renal replacement therapy. Two hundred patients met inclusion criteria. A total of 27 (13%) patients experienced AKI. The incidence of AKI was 21.6%, 9%, and 7.4% in the VPT, VC and VM groups, respectively. A patient who received VPT was 5 times more likely to develop AKI when compared to a patient who received VC (adjusted OR 5.09 95% CI (1.51-17.08), p = 0.008) and 7 times more likely to develop AKI when compared to VM (adjusted OR 7.03 95% CI (1.97-28.08), p = 0.002). This study found a statistically significant difference in the incidence of AKI in patient receiving VPT when compared to VC or VM. This finding supports the need for careful monitoring of renal function in patients receiving VPT therapy and routine evaluation for de-escalation of antimicrobial therapy.

Attributable nephrotoxicity of vancomycin in critically ill patients: a marginal structural model study

BACKGROUND

Although vancomycin nephrotoxicity is recognizable, critically ill patients have other potential reasons for acute kidney injury (AKI) and determining its attributable nephrotoxic risk in this population can be cumbersome.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the risk of AKI attributable to vancomycin, controlling for baseline and time-dependent confounders.

METHODS

Time-fixed and daily time-varying variables were extracted from a large public database. The exposures analysed were: (i) IV vancomycin; (ii) serum trough level greater than 15 and 20 mg/L; and (iii) concomitant exposure to vancomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam or other antipseudomonal β-lactams. Censoring and exposure inverse probability of treatment weighting were calculated. Marginal structural models were plotted to evaluate AKI, severe AKI (stage 2/3) and need of renal replacement therapy (RRT).

RESULTS

A total of 26 865 patients were included; 19.7% received vancomycin during ICU stay. After adjusting for fixed and time-variable confounders, vancomycin exposure was associated with AKI (HR = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.09-1.38), but not with severe AKI or need of RRT (HR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.91-1.23 and HR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.74-1.29, respectively). A serum trough level greater than 20 mg/L was associated with AKI (HR = 1.90, 95% CI = 1.52-2.30) and severe AKI (HR = 1.69, 95% CI = 1.31-2.19), but showed no statistically significant association with need of RRT (HR = 1.48, 95% CI = 0.92-2.56). The vancomycin + piperacillin/tazobactam combination was not associated with a greater risk than vancomycin alone.

CONCLUSIONS

The attributable nephrotoxicity of vancomycin in critically ill patients is significantly lower than previously suggested and severe AKI is related to vancomycin only when trough serum levels are greater than 20 mg/L.

The Mechanism of Drug Nephrotoxicity and the Methods for Preventing Kidney Damage

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a global health challenge of vast proportions, as approx. 13.3% of people worldwide are affected annually. The pathophysiology of AKI is very complex, but its main causes are sepsis, ischemia, and nephrotoxicity. Nephrotoxicity is mainly associated with the use of drugs. Drug-induced AKI accounts for 19-26% of all hospitalized cases. Drug-induced nephrotoxicity develops according to one of the three mechanisms: (1) proximal tubular injury and acute tubular necrosis (ATN) (a dose-dependent mechanism), where the cause is related to apical contact with drugs or their metabolites, the transport of drugs and their metabolites from the apical surface, and the secretion of drugs from the basolateral surface into the tubular lumen; (2) tubular obstruction by crystals or casts containing drugs and their metabolites (a dose-dependent mechanism); (3) interstitial nephritis induced by drugs and their metabolites (a dose-independent mechanism). In this article, the mechanisms of the individual types of injury will be described. Specific groups of drugs will be linked to specific injuries. Additionally, the risk factors for the development of AKI and the methods for preventing and/or treating the condition will be discussed.

Impact of combining vancomycin with piperacillin/tazobactam or with meropenem on vancomycin-induced nephrotoxicity

Vancomycin (VAN) is a broad-spectrum antibiotic against Gram-positive cocci used empirically with other broad-spectrum antibiotics, such as piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP), cefepime, or meropenem (MEM). Conflicting literature on the rates of acute kidney injury (AKI) of VAN with TZP is reported, and studies on AKI rate with MEM are limited. This study aimed to evaluate AKI rates in patients receiving VAN with either TZP or MEM. This was a retrospective cohort study of patients received either VAN-TZP or VAN-MEM for ≥ 72 h. Patients with a baseline serum creatinine (SCr) of ≥ 1.5 mg/dL were excluded. The primary outcome was rate of AKI as defined by the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines. SCr was recorded at baseline and 3-5 days post antibiotics initiation. 158 patients were included, 77 in the VAN-TZP group versus 81 in the VAN-MEM group. While the percentage of patients meeting AKI definition was numerically higher in the VAN-MEM group, the difference was not significant (10.4% vs. 21%; P = 0.07). As such, change in SCr was not significantly different between the two groups (- 7.4 vs. - 6.1%; P = 0.7). In-hospital mortality was higher in the VAN-MEM group (23.4% vs. 39.5%; P = 0.03) possibly because the majority of this group's patients were critically ill. This study showed that combining MEM with VAN did not offer the benefit of a lower rate of AKI compared with a combination with TZP. Therefore, patients with no risk factors for infections resistant to TZP can continue to receive TZP with VAN without risking AKI development.

Comparison of teicoplanin versus vancomycin in combination with piperacillin-tazobactam or meropenem for the risk of acute kidney injury

We compared the rates of acute kidney injury (AKI), 7-day and 30-day mortalities, and resolution of AKI at discharge in combination therapies involving either teicoplanin (TEI) or vancomycin (VAN) with piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP) or meropenem (MER). In a single-center, retrospective cohort study, adult patients (>18 years) who had a baseline serum creatinine level within 24 h of admission and who received study antibiotics for at least 48 h were included. The primary outcome was AKI incidence after therapy per RIFLE criteria. Multivariate logistic regression and propensity score match analyses were employed for statistical comparisons. Data from 379 patients were evaluated. In multivariate analysis (MVA) of the whole cohort, TZP-VAN combination was associated with significantly higher rate of AKI as compared with TZP-TEI (aOR: 3.21, 95% CI, 1.36-7.57; p = 0.008) or with MER-VAN (aOR: 2.28, 95% CI, 1.008-5.18; p = 0.048). In MVA of the matched cohorts, TZP-VAN as compared with TZP-TEI and MER-VAN was associated with 3.96 times (95% CI, 1.48-10.63, p = 0.006) and 3.11 times (95% CI, 1.12-8.62; p = 0.028) increased risk of AKI, respectively. No differences between MER-TEI and MER-VAN combinations were detected. Seven-day and 30-day mortalities and resolution rates of AKI were similar in all comparisons. Teicoplanin can be preferred instead of VAN when combination with TZP is used particularly for patients with high AKI risk.

Nephrotoxicity from Vancomycin Combined with Piperacillin-Tazobactam: A Comprehensive Review

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have identified the combination of vancomycin with piperacillin-tazobactam (VPT) to be associated with increased nephrotoxicity. Multiple, large cohort studies have found this widely used combination to have a higher risk of nephrotoxicity than other regimens in a variety of populations.

SUMMARY

This review summarizes the epidemiology and clinical features of VPT-associated acute kidney injury (AKI). Potential mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of this phenomenon are also discussed. Key Message: VPT-associated nephrotoxicity is a recently recognized clinical entity. Clinical strategies to minimize the risk of toxicity in this setting include antimicrobial stewardship, monitoring of kidney function, and emerging data supporting the potential role for novel biomarkers in predicting and managing AKI.

Bone and joint infections caused by Clostridium perfringens: a case series

The objective of this study was to evaluate antimicrobial therapy outcomes of bone and joint infections (BJI) caused by Clostridium perfringens. We investigated remission of symptoms and the absence of relapse or reinfection during follow-up. Among the 8 patients with C. perfringens BJI, the type of infection was early prosthesis infection (n = 2), osteosynthetic device infection (n = 4), and chronic osteomyeletis (n = 2). Clindamycin-rifampicin combination was given in 4 cases and metronidazole in 4 cases. The overall success rate was 87.5%. Among the 7 patients who completed antibiotic treatment, the success rate was 100%. The clindamycin-rifampicin combination appeared to be effective in patients with C. perfringens BJI.

Safety considerations of current drug treatment strategies for nosocomial pneumonia

Introduction: Nosocomial pneumonia unfortunately remains a frequent event for which appropriate antibiotic treatment is central to improving outcomes. Physicians must choose an early and appropriate empirical treatment, basing their decision on the safety profile and possible side effects. Areas covered: In this review, we analyzed the safety profiles of the most common antimicrobials for treating nosocomial pneumonia. Beta-lactams are used most often for these infections, with a high percentage (6% to 25%) of patients reporting allergy or hypersensitivity reactions; however, exhaustive evaluation is key because it seems possible to de-label as many as 90% by proper assessment. Combinations including a beta-lactam are recommended in patients with risk factors for drug-resistant microorganisms and septic shock. Although aminoglycosides are safe for 3-5 days of therapy, renal function should be monitored. Fluoroquinolones must also be used with care given the risk of collagen degradation and cardiovascular events, mainly aneurysm or aortic dissection. Linezolid or vancomycin are both viable for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, but linezolid seems to be the superior option. Antibiotic stewardships programs must be developed for each center. Expert opinion: Choosing the most appropriate antimicrobial based on information from national and international guidelines, local microbiology data, and stewardship programs may reduce the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. Daily assessment for the emergence of adverse events related to antimicrobial use is essential.

Risk of acute kidney injury and Clostridioides difficile infection with piperacillin/tazobactam, cefepime and meropenem with or without vancomycin

BACKGROUND

Empiric antimicrobial therapy for healthcare-acquired infections often includes vancomycin plus an antipseudomonal beta-lactam (AP-BL). These agents vary in risk for adverse events, including acute kidney injury (AKI) and Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). Studies have only examined these risks separately; thus, our objective was to simultaneously evaluate AKI and CDI risks with AP-BL in the same patient cohort.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 789,200 Veterans Health Administration medical admissions from July 1, 2010 through June 30, 2016. The antimicrobials examined were vancomycin, cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam, and meropenem. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to contrast risks for AKI and CDI across individual target antimicrobials and vancomycin combination therapies, including adjustment for known confounders.

RESULTS

With respect to the base rate of AKI among patients who did not receive a target antibiotic (4.6%), the adjusted hazards ratios for piperacillin/tazobactam, cefepime, and meropenem were 1.50 (95% CI: 1.43-1.54), 1.00 (0.95-1.05), 0.92 (0.83-1.01), respectively. Co-administration of vancomycin increased AKI rates (data not shown). Similarly, against the base rate of CDI (0.7%), these ratios were 1.21 (1.07-1.36), 1.89 (1.62-2.20), and 1.99 (1.55-2.56), respectively. Addition of vancomycin had minimal impact on CDI rates (data not shown).

CONCLUSIONS

Piperacillin/tazobactam increased AKI risk, which was exacerbated by concurrent vancomycin. Cefepime and meropenem increased CDI risk relative to piperacillin/tazobactam. Clinicians should consider the risks and benefits of AP-BL when selecting empiric regimens. Further well-designed studies evaluating the global risks of AP-BL and patient specific characteristics that can guide empiric selection are needed.

Evaluation of area under the concentration-time curve-guided vancomycin dosing with or without piperacillin-tazobactam on the incidence of acute kidney injury

OBJECTIVES

Recent studies suggest that the combination of piperacillin-tazobactam (P-T) and vancomycin increases the risk for acute kidney injury (AKI). The purpose of this study was to determine if area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)-guided vancomycin dosing reduced the incidence of AKI in a sample of patients who also received P-T.

METHODS

This single-centre, retrospective, pre-post quasi-experimental study compared the incidence of AKI before and after a health-system-wide change from trough- to AUC-guided vancomycin dosing using two post-distribution levels. The primary outcome was AKI, defined as an increase in serum creatinine ≥0.5 mg/dL or 50% from baseline for two consecutive measurements, in patients who received vancomycin with or without concomitant P-T.

RESULTS

In total, 636 patients were included in this study (308 trough-guided, 328 AUC-guided); of these, 118 patients in each group received concomitant P-T. The primary outcome occurred in 35 (11.4%) patients in the trough-guided group and 24 (7.3%) patients in the AUC-guided group (P=0.105). There was no difference in the incidence of AKI in the population receiving concomitant P-T between dosing strategies. The incidence of AKI was significantly higher in patients who received concomitant P-T compared with patients who did not receive concomitant P-T in both the trough-guided group [21/118 (17.8%) versus 14/190 (7.4%), respectively; P=0.003] and the AUC-guided group [16/118 (13.6%) versus 8/210 (3.8%), respectively; P=0.0011].

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of AKI did not differ significantly between trough- and AUC-guided vancomycin dosing. Caution should be taken when combining vancomycin and P-T regardless of dosing strategy. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Vancomycin plus piperacillin/tazobactam and acute kidney injury risk: A review of the literature

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Acute kidney injury is a devastating consequence observed with antibiotic therapy. The objective of this review was to summarize available data regarding the rates of acute kidney injury with vancomycin plus piperacillin/tazobactam compared to other beta-lactam combinations.

METHODS

A PubMed search from 2011 to May 2020 was conducted using the following search terms: vancomycin AND piperacillin/tazobactam AND acute kidney injury. Additional references were identified from a review of citations. Articles evaluating exclusively paediatric patients and articles evaluating vancomycin monotherapy as the comparator group were excluded. Case reports and case series were also excluded.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

There were 18 studies included. Ten studies adjusted for potential confounders of acute kidney injury. Fourteen retrospective studies, one prospective study and three meta-analyses found the combination of vancomycin/piperacillin/tazobactam to be associated with a higher rate of acute kidney injury than the comparator group(s).

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Although there are data to support that the combination of vancomycin plus piperacillin-tazobactam increases the risk of acute kidney, much of the data come from small retrospective studies with variable adjustment for confounders. Furthermore, study heterogeneity on inclusion criteria and evaluation of long-term outcomes should be cautiously interpreted. Finally, additional data suggest that the risk of acute kidney injury seems to be minimized with shorter courses of therapy. Without prospective studies available, antimicrobial stewardship efforts should continue to target reducing broad-spectrum regimens, often limiting the need for long-term vancomycin/piperacillin/tazobactam combination.

Incidence of Acute Kidney Injury Among Critically Ill Patients With Brief Empiric Use of Antipseudomonal β-Lactams With Vancomycin

BACKGROUND

Nephrotoxins contribute to 20%-40% of acute kidney injury (AKI) cases in the intensive care unit (ICU). The combination of piperacillin-tazobactam (PTZ) and vancomycin (VAN) has been identified as nephrotoxic, but existing studies focus on extended durations of therapy rather than the brief empiric courses often used in the ICU. The current study was performed to compare the risk of AKI with a short course of PTZ/VAN to with the risk associated with other antipseudomonal β-lactam/VAN combinations.

METHODS

The study included a retrospective cohort of 3299 ICU patients who received ≥24 but ≤72 hours of an antipseudomonal β-lactam/VAN combination: PTZ/VAN, cefepime (CEF)/VAN, or meropenem (MER)/VAN. The risk of developing stage 2 or 3 AKI was compared between antibiotic groups with multivariable logistic regression adjusted for relevant confounders. We also compared the risk of persistent kidney dysfunction, dialysis dependence, or death at 60 days between groups.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of stage 2 or 3 AKI was 9%. Brief exposure to PTZ/VAN did not confer a greater risk of stage 2 or 3 AKI after adjustment for relevant confounders (adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval] for PTZ/VAN vs CEF/VAN, 1.11 [.85-1.45]; PTZ/VAN vs MER/VAN, 1.04 [.71-1.42]). No significant differences were noted between groups at 60-day follow-up in the outcomes of persistent kidney dysfunction (P = .08), new dialysis dependence (P = .15), or death (P = .09).

CONCLUSION

Short courses of PTZ/VAN were not associated with a greater risk of short- or 60-day adverse renal outcomes than other empiric broad-spectrum combinations.

Effective implementation of the Accelerate Pheno™ system for positive blood cultures

Using conventional methods, organism identification (ID) and antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) results are available ∼1.5–3 days after positive blood culture. New technologies can reduce this time to 8–12 h, allowing therapy to be optimized substantially sooner. To make full use of fast ID and AST results requires overcoming various hurdles to effective implementation, including restructuring laboratory workflows to optimize timeliness of results and modifying clinical pathways to respond more quickly when results are available. Efficient laboratory procedures and clinical interventions coupled with fast and accurate identification and AST results have the potential to substantially reduce overall costs and provide more-sophisticated and effective patient management.

Drug-induced acute kidney injury: diverse mechanisms of tubular injury

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Medications are a relatively common cause of acute kidney injury (AKI), especially in hospitalized patients who are exposed to numerous agents. Drug-related acute tubular/tubulointerstitial injury is the most common cause of AKI associated with these agents. Toxic effects of drugs and their renal handling often lead to various forms of AKI.

RECENT FINDINGS

The inherent nephrotoxicity of drugs and their transport and metabolism by the kidneys play an important role in the occurrence of acute tubular injury. Apical transport of the aminoglycosides by endocytosis and apical pinocytosis of filtered hydroxyethyl starch into cells lead to acute tubular dysfunction. Transport of tenofovir and cisplatin by organic anion and cation transporters in the basolateral surface of the proximal tubule, respectively, are associated with intracellular drug accumulation and injury. Intratubular deposition of drug crystals with associated AKI occurs with several drugs, in particular the anticancer agent methotrexate. A potentially new mechanism of drug-induced AKI was described with vancomycin - acute vancomycin-related cast nephropathy. Immune-mediated acute tubulointerstitial injury is another cause of drug-induced AKI, as seen with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

SUMMARY

Drugs lead to AKI through mechanisms that involve their inherent toxicity as well as their transport and handling by the kidneys.

Acute kidney injury following the concurrent administration of antipseudomonal β-lactams and vancomycin: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney injury is a major complication of vancomycin treatment, especially when it is co-administered with other nephrotoxins.

OBJECTIVES

This meta-analysis aims to comparatively assess the nephrotoxicity of antipseudomonal β-lactams when combined with vancomycin.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, Scopus, CENTRAL and Clinicaltrials.gov databases were systematically searched from inception through 20 August 2019.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Studies evaluating acute kidney injury risk following the concurrent use of antipseudomonal β-lactams and vancomycin were selected.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult and paediatric patients treated in hospital or intensive care unit.

INTERVENTIONS

Administration of vancomycin combined with any antipseudomonal β-lactam.

METHODS

Acute kidney injury incidence was defined as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included severity, onset, duration, need of renal replacement therapy, length of hospitalization and mortality. Quality of evidence was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool and the Confidence In Network Meta-Analysis approach.

RESULTS

Forty-seven cohort studies were included, with a total of 56 984 patients. In the adult population, the combination of piperacillin-tazobactam and vancomycin resulted in significantly higher nephrotoxicity rates than vancomycin monotherapy (odds ratio (OR) 2.05, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.17-3.46) and its concurrent use with meropenem (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.02-3.10) or cefepime (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.13-2.77). In paediatric patients, acute kidney injury was significantly higher with vancomycin plus piperacillin-tazobactam than vancomycin alone (OR 4.18, 95% CI 1.01-17.29) or vancomycin plus cefepime OR 3.71, 95% CI 1.08-11.24). No significant differences were estimated for the secondary outcomes. Credibility of outcomes was judged as moderate, mainly due to imprecision and inter-study heterogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam is associated with higher acute kidney injury rates than its parallel use with meropenem or cefepime. Current evidence is exclusively observational and is limited by inter-study heterogeneity. Randomized controlled trials are needed to verify these results and define preventive strategies to minimize nephrotoxicity risk.

Piperacillin-Tazobactam Added to Vancomycin Increases Risk for Acute Kidney Injury: Fact or Fiction?

Vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam are 2 of the most commonly prescribed antibiotics in hospitals. Recent data from multiple meta-analyses suggest that the combination increases the risk for vancomycin-induced kidney injury when compared to alternative viable options. However, these studies are unable to prove biologic plausibility and causality as randomized controlled trials have not been performed. Furthermore, these studies define acute kidney injury according to thresholds of serum creatinine rise. Serum creatinine is not a direct indicator of renal injury, rather a surrogate of glomerular function. More reliable, specific, and sensitive biomarkers are needed to truly define if there is a causal relationship with increased toxicity when piperacillin-tazobactam is added to vancomycin. This viewpoint will explore the available evidence for and against increased acute kidney injury in the setting of vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam coadministration.

The Right Time to Safely Re-Evaluate Empirical Antimicrobial Treatment of Hip or Knee Prosthetic Joint Infections

Currently, no guideline provides recommendations on the duration of empirical antimicrobial treatment (EAT) in prosthetic joint infection (PJI). The aim of our study was to describe the time to growth of bacteria involved in PJI, rendering possible decreased duration of EAT. Based on a French multicentre prospective cohort study, culture data from patients with confirmed hip or knee PJI were analysed. For each patient, five samples were processed. Time to positivity was defined as the first positive medium in at least one sample for virulent pathogens and as the first positive medium in at least two samples for commensals. Definitive diagnosis of polymicrobial infections was considered the day the last bacteria were identified. Among the 183 PJIs, including 28 polymicrobial infections, microbiological diagnosis was carried out between Day 1 (D1) and D5 for 96.7% of cases. There was no difference in the average time to positivity between acute and chronic PJI (p = 0.8871). Microbiological diagnosis was given earlier for monomicrobial than for polymicrobial infections (p = 0.0034). When an optimized culture of peroperative samples was carried out, almost all cases of PJI were diagnosed within five days, including polymicrobial infections. EAT can be re-evaluated at D5 according to microbiological documentation.

Broad-spectrum antibiotic use and poor outcomes in community-onset pneumonia: a cohort study

QUESTION

Is broad-spectrum antibiotic use associated with poor outcomes in community-onset pneumonia after adjusting for confounders?

METHODS

We performed a retrospective, observational cohort study of 1995 adults with pneumonia admitted from four US hospital emergency departments. We used multivariable regressions to investigate the effect of broad-spectrum antibiotics on 30-day mortality, length of stay, cost and Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). To address indication bias, we developed a propensity score using multilevel (individual provider) generalised linear mixed models to perform inverse-probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to estimate the average treatment effect in the treated. We also manually reviewed a sample of mortality cases for antibiotic-associated adverse events.

RESULTS

39.7% of patients received broad-spectrum antibiotics, but drug-resistant pathogens were recovered in only 3%. Broad-spectrum antibiotics were associated with increased mortality in both the unweighted multivariable model (OR 3.8, 95% CI 2.5-5.9; p<0.001) and IPTW analysis (OR 4.6, 95% CI 2.9-7.5; p<0.001). Broad-spectrum antibiotic use by either analysis was also associated with longer hospital stay, greater cost and increased CDI. Healthcare-associated pneumonia was not associated with mortality independent of broad-spectrum antibiotic use. In manual review we identified antibiotic-associated events in 17.5% of mortality cases.

CONCLUSION

Broad-spectrum antibiotics appear to be associated with increased mortality and other poor outcomes in community-onset pneumonia.

Probabilistic chemotherapy in knee and hip replacement infection: the place of linezolid

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) can occur with a wide range of microorganisms and clinical features. After replacement surgery of prosthetic joint, prescription of probabilistic broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy is usual, while awaiting microbial culture results. The aim of our study was to describe the antibiotic susceptibility of microorganisms isolated from hip and knee PJI. The data were collected to determine the best alternative to the usual combination of piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP) or cefotaxime (CTX) and vancomycin (VAN). Based on a French prospective, multicenter study, we analyzed microbiological susceptibility to antibiotics of 183 strains isolated from patients with confirmed hip or knee PJI. In vitro susceptibility was evaluated: TZP+VAN, TZP+linezolid (LZD), CTX+VAN, and CTX+LZD. We also analyzed resistance to different antibiotics commonly used as oral alternatives. Among the 183 patients with PJI, 62 (34%) had a total knee prosthesis, and 121 (66%) a hip prosthesis. The main identified bacteria were Staphylococcus aureus (32.2% of isolates), coagulase-negative staphylococci (27.3%), Enterobacteriaceae (14.2%), and Streptococcus (13.7%). Infections were polymicrobial for 28 (15.3%) patients. All combinations were highly effective: CTX+VAN, CTX+LZD, TZP+VAN, and TZP+LZD (93.4%, 94%, 98.4%, and 98.9% of all cases respectively). Use of LZD instead of VAN in combination with a broad-spectrum beta-lactam covers almost all of the bacteria isolated in PJI. This association should be considered in probabilistic chemotherapy, as it is particularly easy to use (oral administration and no vancomycin monitoring).

Comparison of acute kidney injury and clinical prognosis of vancomycin monotherapy and combination therapy with beta-lactams in the intensive care unit

Antibiotics induced acute kidney injury (AKI) risk in critically ill patients is not well known. This study aimed to evaluate the AKI development and clinical outcomes in critically ill adult patients treated with vancomycin (VAN) or combined with piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP) or meropenem (MEM). This was a retrospective study on critically ill adult patients who were given VAN, TZP or MEM and maintained for at least 48 h. The risk of AKI development and clinical outcomes were compared using the simple analysis and multivariate logistic regression. Three hundred forty patients were eligible. The incidence of any AKI was significantly higher in patients treated with VAN + TZP than those with VAN + MEM or VAN alone (52.7% vs. 27.7% vs. 25.7%; p < .0001). The adjusted odds of AKI increased 2.43-fold in VAN + TZP versus VAN, but not different in VAN + MEM versus VAN. However, AKI duration and recovery rate were not statistically different. In addition, all-cause death within 30 days after AKI onset was not significantly associated with antibiotic regimens. AKI incidence is higher in critically ill patients administered with VAN + TZP than those with VAN + MEM or VAN. However, no obvious evidence was found to prove that antibiotic-induced AKI leads to poor clinical outcomes.

Does nephrotoxicity develop less frequently when vancomycin is combined with imipenem-cilastatin than with meropenem? A comparative study

Introduction: Nephrotoxicity is a frequent complication of vancomycin therapy. Experimental studies in different animal species have demonstrated the attenuation of vancomycin-associated nephrotoxicity with cilastatin administration. This study aimed to evaluate if imipenem-cilastatin attenuates vancomycin-associated nephrotoxicity, in patients treated with combinations of vancomycin and carbapenems. Methods: This retrospective, propensity-score matched study was conducted at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh and Jeddah. Nephrotoxicity was compared in patients who received imipenem-cilastatin + vancomycin or meropenem + vancomycin. Patients with no history of renal disease who received imipenem-cilastatin + vancomycin or meropenem + vancomycin for a minimum of 72 h, from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2017, were included. Nephrotoxicity was defined according to the RIFLE criteria (Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, End-stage renal disease) if sustained for least 72 h. Results: A total of 227 patients were included in the analysis, consisting of 121 patients in the imipenem-cilastatin + vancomycin group, and 106 patients in the meropenem + vancomycin group. In the unmatched data set the rate of nephrotoxicity was 8.2% in imipenem-cilastatin + vancomycin group and 20.7% in the meropenem + vancomycin group (p = .007). Logistic regression analysis showed that imipenem-cilastatin + vancomycin therapy was associated with a 56% lower rate of nephrotoxicity compared to meropenem + vancomycin therapy. Propensity-score matching resulted in rates of nephrotoxicity of 6.2% and 17.1% in the imipenem-cilastatin + vancomycin group and the meropenem + vancomycin groups, respectively (p = .034). Conclusion: Vancomycin-associated nephrotoxicity developed less frequently when vancomycin was combined with imipenem-cilastatin than when combined with meropenem.

Incidence of Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Vancomycin with Concomitant Piperacillin-Tazobactam, Cefepime, or Meropenem

Critically ill patients are frequently treated with empirical antibiotic therapy, including vancomycin and β-lactams. Recent evidence suggests an increased risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients who received a combination of vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam (VPT) compared with patients who received vancomycin alone or vancomycin in combination with cefepime (VC) or meropenem (VM), but most studies were conducted predominately in the non-critically ill population. A retrospective cohort study that included 2,492 patients was conducted in the intensive care units of a large university hospital with the primary outcome being the development of any AKI. The rates of any AKI, as defined by the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines, were 39.3% for VPT patients, 24.2% for VC patients, and 23.5% for VM patients (P < 0.0001 for both comparisons). Similarly, the incidences of stage 2 and stage 3 AKI were also significantly higher for VPT patients than for the patients in the other groups. The rates of stage 2 and stage 3 AKI, respectively, were 15% and 6.6% for VPT patients, 5.8% and 1.8% for VC patients, and 6.6% and 1.3% for VM patients (P < 0.0001 for both comparisons). In multivariate analysis, the use of vancomycin in combination with piperacillin-tazobactam was found to be an independent predictor of AKI (odds ratio [OR], 2.161; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.620 to 2.883). In conclusion, critically ill patients receiving the combination of VPT had the highest incidence of AKI compared to critically ill patients receiving either VC or VM.