Nacubactam Enhances Meropenem Activity against Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Producing KPC

Assessment of the activity and mechanisms of resistance to cefiderocol and combinations of β-lactams and the novel β-lactamase inhibitors avibactam, taniborbactam, zidebactam, nacubactam, xeruborbactam, and ANT3310 in emerging double-carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales

We aimed to investigate the activity of and mechanisms of resistance to cefiderocol and innovative β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations in a nationwide collection of double-carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales. In all, 57 clinical isolates co-producing two carbapenemases collected from Spanish hospitals during the period 2017-2022 were analyzed. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values for ceftazidime, ceftazidime/avibactam, aztreonam, aztreonam/avibactam, aztreonam/nacubactam, cefiderocol, cefepime, cefepime/taniborbactam, cefepime/zidebactam, cefepime/nacubactam, imipenem, imipenem/relebactam, meropenem, meropenem/vaborbactam, meropenem/xeruborbactam, and meropenem/ANT3310 were determined by reference broth microdilution. Genetic drivers of resistance were analyzed by whole-genome sequencing (WGS). The collection covered nine carbapenemase associations: VIM + OXA-48 (21/57), NDM + OXA-48 (11/57), KPC + VIM (10/57), KPC + OXA-48 (6/57), IMP + OXA-48 (3/57), NDM + KPC (2/57), NDM + VIM (2/57), NDM + GES (1/57), and KPC + IMP (1/57). Ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam, and meropenem/vaborbactam were the least active options. Aztreonam/avibactam and aztreonam/nacubactam were active against the whole collection and yielded MIC50/MIC90 values of ≤0.25/0.5 mg/L and 1/2 mg/L, respectively. Cefepime/zidebactam (56/57 susceptible), meropenem/xeruborbactam (56/57 susceptible), cefepime/nacubactam (55/57 susceptible), and cefiderocol (53/57 susceptible) were also highly active, with MIC50/MIC90 values ranging from ≤0.25-2 mg/L to 2-4 mg/L, respectively. Meropenem/ANT3310 (MIC50/MIC90 = 0.5/≥64 mg/L; 47/57 susceptible) and cefepime/taniborbactam (MIC50/MIC90 = 0.5/16 mg/L; 44/57 susceptible) also retained high levels of activity, although they were affected by NDM-type enzymes in combination with porin deficiency. Our findings highlight that cefiderocol and combinations of β-lactams and the novel β-lactamase inhibitors avibactam, nacubactam, taniborbactam, zidebactam, xeruborbactam, and ANT3310 show promising activity against double-carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales.

Evolving resistance landscape in gram-negative pathogens: An update on β-lactam and β-lactam-inhibitor treatment combinations for carbapenem-resistant organisms

Antibiotic resistance has become a global threat as it is continuously growing due to the evolution of β-lactamases diminishing the activity of classic β-lactam (BL) antibiotics. Recent antibiotic discovery and development efforts have led to the availability of β-lactamase inhibitors (BLIs) with activity against extended-spectrum β-lactamases as well as Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing carbapenem-resistant organisms (CRO). Nevertheless, there is still a lack of drugs that target metallo-β-lactamases (MBL), which hydrolyze carbapenems efficiently, and oxacillinases (OXA) often present in carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. This review aims to provide a snapshot of microbiology, pharmacology, and clinical data for currently available BL/BLI treatment options as well as agents in late stage development for CRO harboring various β-lactamases including MBL and OXA-enzymes.

New Agents Are Coming, and So Is the Resistance

Antimicrobial resistance is a global threat that requires urgent attention to slow the spread of resistant pathogens. The United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has emphasized clinician-driven antimicrobial stewardship approaches including the reporting and proper documentation of antimicrobial usage and resistance. Additional efforts have targeted the development of new antimicrobial agents, but narrow profit margins have hindered manufacturers from investing in novel antimicrobials for clinical use and therefore the production of new antibiotics has decreased. In order to combat this, both antimicrobial drug discovery processes and healthcare reimbursement programs must be improved. Without action, this poses a high probability to culminate in a deadly post-antibiotic era. This review will highlight some of the global health challenges faced both today and in the future. Furthermore, the new Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines for resistant Gram-negative pathogens will be discussed. This includes new antimicrobial agents which have gained or are likely to gain FDA approval. Emphasis will be placed on which human pathogens each of these agents cover, as well as how these new agents could be utilized in clinical practice.

Therapies in preclinical and in early clinical development for the treatment of urinary tract infections: from pathogens to therapies

INTRODUCTION

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are a prevalent health challenge characterized by the invasion and multiplication of microorganisms in the urinary system. The continuous exploration of novel therapeutic interventions is imperative. Advances in research offer hope for revolutionizing the management of UTIs and improving the overall health outcomes for individuals affected by these infections.

AREAS COVERED

This review aimed to provide an overview of existing treatments for UTIs, highlighting their strengths and limitations. Moreover, we explored and analyzed the latest therapeutic modalities under clinical development. Finally, the review offered a picture into the potential implications of these therapies on the future landscape of UTIs treatment, discussing possible advancements and challenges for further research.

EXPERT OPINION

Comprehensions into the pathogenesis of UTIs have been gleaned from foundational basic science studies, laying the groundwork for the exploration of novel therapeutic interventions. The primary source of evidence originates predominantly from animal studies conducted on murine models. Nevertheless, the lack of clinical trials interferes the acquisition of robust evidence in humans. The challenges presented by the heterogeneity and virulence of uropathogens add an additional layer of complexity, posing an obstacle that scientists and clinicians are actively grappling with in their pursuit of effective solutions.

Role of β-Lactamase Inhibitors as Potentiators in Antimicrobial Chemotherapy Targeting Gram-Negative Bacteria

Since the discovery of penicillin, β-lactam antibiotics have commonly been used to treat bacterial infections. Unfortunately, at the same time, pathogens can develop resistance to β-lactam antibiotics such as penicillins, cephalosporins, monobactams, and carbapenems by producing β-lactamases. Therefore, a combination of β-lactam antibiotics with β-lactamase inhibitors has been a promising approach to controlling β-lactam-resistant bacteria. The discovery of novel β-lactamase inhibitors (BLIs) is essential for effectively treating antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections. Therefore, this review discusses the development of innovative inhibitors meant to enhance the activity of β-lactam antibiotics. Specifically, this review describes the classification and characteristics of different classes of β-lactamases and the synergistic mechanisms of β-lactams and BLIs. In addition, we introduce potential sources of compounds for use as novel BLIs. This provides insights into overcoming current challenges in β-lactamase-producing bacteria and designing effective treatment options in combination with BLIs.

Reviewing novel treatment options for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales

INTRODUCTION

Carbapenem resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are a major threat to global health and hospital-onset CRE infections have risen during the COVID-19 pandemic. Novel antimicrobials are now available for the treatment of CRE infections. There remains an urgent need for new antimicrobials for CRE, especially for those producing metallo-β-lactamases.

AREAS COVERED

This article discusses previously published research supporting currently available novel antimicrobials for the treatment of CRE infections. Newer compounds currently being evaluated in clinical trials are covered. A literature search was conducted in PubMed over all available dates for relevant published papers and conference abstracts with the search terms, 'CRE,' 'carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales,' 'β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor,' 'KPC,' 'NDM,' 'metallo-β-lactamase,' 'ceftazidime-avibactam,' 'meropenem-vaborbactam,' 'imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam,' 'cefiderocol,' 'eravacycline,' 'plazomicin,' 'taniborbactam,' 'zidebactam,' and 'nacubactam.'

EXPERT OPINION

Novel antimicrobials for CRE infections have been developed, most notably the β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, though treatment options for infections with metallo-β-lactamase producing Enterobacterales remain few and have limitations. Development of antibiotics with activity against metallo-β-lactamase producing Enterobacterales is eagerly awaited, and there are promising new compounds in clinical trials. Finally, more clinical research is needed to optimize and individualize treatment approaches, which will help guide antimicrobial stewardship initiatives aimed at reducing the spread of CRE and development of further resistance.

Natural protein engineering in the Ω-loop: the role of Y221 in ceftazidime and ceftolozane resistance in Pseudomonas-derived cephalosporinase

A wide variety of clinically observed single amino acid substitutions in the Ω-loop region have been associated with increased minimum inhibitory concentrations and resistance to ceftazidime (CAZ) and ceftolozane (TOL) in Pseudomonas-derived cephalosporinase and other class C β-lactamases. Herein, we demonstrate the naturally occurring tyrosine to histidine substitution of amino acid 221 (Y221H) in Pseudomonas-derived cephalosporinase (PDC) enables CAZ and TOL hydrolysis, leading to similar kinetic profiles (k cat = 2.3 ± 0.2 µM and 2.6 ± 0.1 µM, respectively). Mass spectrometry of PDC-3 establishes the formation of stable adducts consistent with the formation of an acyl enzyme complex, while spectra of E219K (a well-characterized, CAZ- and TOL-resistant comparator) and Y221H are consistent with more rapid turnover. Thermal denaturation experiments reveal decreased stability of the variants. Importantly, PDC-3, E219K, and Y221H are all inhibited by avibactam and the boronic acid transition state inhibitors (BATSIs) LP06 and S02030 with nanomolar IC50 values and the BATSIs stabilize all three enzymes. Crystal structures of PDC-3 and Y221H as apo enzymes and complexed with LP06 and S02030 (1.35-2.10 Å resolution) demonstrate ligand-induced conformational changes, including a significant shift in the position of the sidechain of residue 221 in Y221H (as predicted by enhanced sampling well-tempered metadynamics simulations) and extensive hydrogen bonding between the enzymes and BATSIs. The shift of residue 221 leads to the expansion of the active site pocket, and molecular docking suggests substrates orientate differently and make different intermolecular interactions in the enlarged active site compared to the wild-type enzyme.

Antibiotics in development for multiresistant gram-negative bacilli

The rapid increase in antibiotic(ATB) resistance among Gram-negative bacilli(BGN), especially in strains of Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii, with high resistance patterns (XDR), poses a huge threat to health systems worldwide. In the last decade, different ATBs have been developed against XDR, some of which combine a lactam β along with a β-lactamase inhibitor, while others use non-β-lactam inhibitors. Most of them have adequate "in vitro" activity on several β-lactamases of class A, C and D of Ambler. However, combinations such as Ceftazidime/avibactam, Ceftolozane/Tazobactam and Meropenem/vaborbactam have no activity against metallo-β-lactamases(MβL). New combinations such as Aztreonan/AVI, Cefepime/Zidebactam, or new cephalosporins such as Cefiderocol, have efficacy against MβL enzymes. Although some of these combinations are already approved and in the commercialization phase, many of them have yet to define their place within the treatment of microorganisms with high resistance through clinical studies.

Microbiological, Clinical, and PK/PD Features of the New Anti-Gram-Negative Antibiotics: β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitors in Combination and Cefiderocol—An All-Inclusive Guide for Clinicians

Bacterial resistance mechanisms are continuously and rapidly evolving. This is particularly true for Gram-negative bacteria. Over the last decade, the strategy to develop new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors (BLs/BLIs) combinations has paid off and results from phase 3 and real-world studies are becoming available for several compounds. Cefiderocol warrants a separate discussion for its peculiar mechanism of action. Considering the complexity of summarizing and integrating the emerging literature data of clinical outcomes, microbiological mechanisms, and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties of the new BL/BLI and cefiderocol, we aimed to provide an overview of data on the following compounds: aztreonam/avibactam, cefepime/enmetazobactam, cefepime/taniborbactam, cefepime/zidebactam, cefiderocol, ceftaroline/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam, meropenem/nacubactam and meropenem/vaborbactam. Each compound is described in a dedicated section by experts in infectious diseases, microbiology, and pharmacology, with tables providing at-a-glance information.

Global Threat of Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria

Infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Gram-negative bacteria (GNB), including carbapenem-resistant (CR) Enterobacterales (CRE; harboring mainly bla_KPC, bla_NDM, and bla_OXA-48-like genes), CR- or MDR/XDR-Pseudomonas aeruginosa (production of VIM, IMP, or NDM carbapenemases combined with porin alteration), and Acinetobacter baumannii complex (producing mainly OXA-23, OXA-58-like carbapenemases), have gradually worsened and become a major challenge to public health because of limited antibiotic choice and high case-fatality rates. Diverse MDR/XDR-GNB isolates have been predominantly cultured from inpatients and hospital equipment/settings, but CRE has also been identified in community settings and long-term care facilities. Several CRE outbreaks cost hospitals and healthcare institutions huge economic burdens for disinfection and containment of their disseminations. Parenteral polymyxin B/E has been observed to have a poor pharmacokinetic profile for the treatment of CR- and XDR-GNB. It has been determined that tigecycline is suitable for the treatment of bloodstream infections owing to GNB, with a minimum inhibitory concentration of ≤ 0.5 mg/L. Ceftazidime-avibactam is a last-resort antibiotic against GNB of Ambler class A/C/D enzyme-producers and a majority of CR-P. aeruginosa isolates. Furthermore, ceftolozane-tazobactam is shown to exhibit excellent in vitro activity against CR- and XDR-P. aeruginosa isolates. Several pharmaceuticals have devoted to exploring novel antibiotics to combat these troublesome XDR-GNBs. Nevertheless, only few antibiotics are shown to be effective in vitro against CR/XDR-A. baumannii complex isolates. In this era of antibiotic pipelines, strict implementation of antibiotic stewardship is as important as in-time isolation cohorts in limiting the spread of CR/XDR-GNB and alleviating the worsening trends of resistance.

Analysis of the Clinical Pipeline of Treatments for Drug-Resistant Bacterial Infections: Despite Progress, More Action Is Needed

There is an urgent global need for new strategies and drugs to control and treat multidrug-resistant bacterial infections. In 2017, the World Health Organization (WHO) released a list of 12 antibiotic-resistant priority pathogens and began to critically analyze the antibacterial clinical pipeline. This review analyzes "traditional" and "nontraditional" antibacterial agents and modulators in clinical development current on 30 June 2021 with activity against the WHO priority pathogens mycobacteria and Clostridioides difficile. Since 2017, 12 new antibacterial drugs have been approved globally, but only vaborbactam belongs to a new antibacterial class. Also innovative is the cephalosporin derivative cefiderocol, which incorporates an iron-chelating siderophore that facilitates Gram-negative bacteria cell entry. Overall, there were 76 antibacterial agents in clinical development (45 traditional and 31 nontraditional), with 28 in phase 1, 32 in phase 2, 12 in phase 3, and 4 under regulatory evaluation. Forty-one out of 76 (54%) targeted WHO priority pathogens, 16 (21%) were against mycobacteria, 15 (20%) were against C. difficile, and 4 (5%) were nontraditional agents with broad-spectrum effects. Nineteen of the 76 antibacterial agents have new pharmacophores, and 4 of these have new modes of actions not previously exploited by marketed antibacterial drugs. Despite there being 76 antibacterial clinical candidates, this analysis indicated that there were still relatively few clinically differentiated antibacterial agents in late-stage clinical development, especially against critical-priority pathogens. We believe that future antibacterial research and development (R&D) should focus on the development of innovative and clinically differentiated candidates that have clear and feasible progression pathways to the market.

The role of new carbapenem combinations in the treatment of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections

Multi-drug resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacteria represent a growing threat, with an increasing prevalence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) infections, for which treatment options are limited. New treatment combinations composed of a β-lactam antibiotic plus a potent β-lactamase inhibitor (BLI) with anti-carbapenemase activity have been developed, including two carbapenem/BLI combinations that are commercially available-meropenem/vaborbactam (Vabomere® in the US, Vaborem® in Europe; Melinta Therapeutics) and imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam (Recarbrio®; Merck Sharp & Dohme), plus one other (meropenem/nacubactam) in early clinical development. This review provides a summary of the preclinical evidence supporting the use of carbapenem/BLI combinations and presents the clinical evidence across a range of MDR Gram-negative infections, with a focus on the use of meropenem/vaborbactam. All three BLIs have shown in vivo activity against Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase and other class A carbapenemases. In 2019, meropenem/vaborbactam was listed in the WHO's list of essential medicines, because of its activity against priority 1 antibiotic-resistant pathogens. Meropenem/vaborbactam has considerable in vitro and in vivo activity against CRE, and in vitro evidence showing a low potential for resistance at clinically relevant doses. In randomized trials, meropenem/vaborbactam was non-inferior to piperacillin/tazobactam in patients with complicated urinary tract infection and more effective than the best-available treatment in patients with serious CRE infections. Meropenem/vaborbactam is well tolerated and, based on clinical experience, demonstrated lower toxicity compared with the combination regimens that have previously been the standard of care. In conclusion, carbapenem/BLI combinations represent an important therapeutic strategy in patients with MDR Gram-negative infections.

Current and future perspectives in the treatment of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections

Microbial resistance is a serious threat to human health worldwide. Among the World Health Organisation's list of priority resistant bacteria, three are listed as critical-the highest level of concern-and all three are Gram-negative. Gram-negative resistance has spread worldwide via a variety of mechanisms, the most problematic being via AmpC enzymes, extended-spectrum β-lactamases, and carbapenemases. A combination of older drugs, many with high levels of toxicity, and newer agents are being used to combat multidrug resistance, with varying degrees of success. This review discusses the current treatments for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, including new agents, older compounds, and new combinations of both, and some new treatment targets that are currently under investigation.

Emerging Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infection, Its Epidemiology and Novel Treatment Options: A Review

Infections due to multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae have become major international public health problem due to the inadequate treatment options and the historically lagged pace of development of novel antimicrobial drugs. Inappropriate antimicrobial use in humans and animals coupled with increased global connectivity aided to the transmission of drug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections. Carbapenems are the medications of choice for extended-spectrum beta-lactamase and AmpC producers, but alternatives are currently needed because carbapenem resistance is increasing globally. This review pointed to discuss emerging drug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, its epidemiology and novel treatment options for infections, which date back from 2010 to 2019 by searching Google Scholar, PubMed, PMC, Hinari and other different websites. The occurrence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae is reported worldwide with great regional variability. The rise of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae poses a threat to all nations. Enzyme synthesis, efflux pumps, and porin mutations are the main methods by which Enterobacteriaceae acquire resistance to carbapenems. The major resistance mechanism among these is enzyme synthesis. Most carbapenem resistance is caused by three enzyme groups: Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (Ambler class A), metallo-ß-lactamases (Ambler class B), and oxacillinase-48 (Ambler class D). Ceftazidime–avibactam, which was newly licensed for carbapenemase producers, is the most common treatment option for infections. Meropenem–vaborbactam, imipenem–relebactam, plazomicin, cefiderocol, eravacycline, and aztreonam–avibactam are recently reported to be active against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae; and are also in ongoing trials for different populations and combinations with other antibacterial agents. Overall, treatment must be tailored to the patient’s susceptibility profile, type and degree of infection, and personal characteristics.

Old and New Beta-Lactamase Inhibitors: Molecular Structure, Mechanism of Action, and Clinical Use

The β-lactams have a central place in the antibacterial armamentarium, but the increasing resistance to these drugs, especially among Gram-negative bacteria, is becoming one of the major threats to public health worldwide. Treatment options are limited, and only a small number of novel antibiotics are in development. However, one of the responses to this threat is the combination of β-lactam antibiotics with β-lactamase inhibitors, which are successfully used in the clinic for overcoming resistance by inhibiting β-lactamases. The existing inhibitors inactivate most of class A and C serine β-lactamases, but several of class D and B (metallo-β-lactamase) are resistant. The present review provides the status and knowledge concerning current β-lactamase inhibitors and an update on research efforts to identify and develop new and more efficient β-lactamase inhibitors.

Treatment for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales infections: recent advances and future directions

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are a growing threat to human health worldwide. CRE often carry multiple resistance genes that limit treatment options and require longer durations of therapy, are more costly to treat, and necessitate therapies with increased toxicities when compared with carbapenem-susceptible strains. Here, we provide an overview of the mechanisms of resistance in CRE, the epidemiology of CRE infections worldwide, and available treatment options for CRE. We review recentlyapproved agents for the treatment of CRE, including ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, imipenem-relebactam, cefiderocol, and novel aminoglycosides and tetracyclines. We also discuss recent advances in phage therapy and antibiotics that are currently in development targeted to CRE. The potential for the development of resistance to these therapies remains high, and enhanced antimicrobial stewardship is imperative both to reduce the spread of CRE worldwide and to ensure continued access to efficacious treatment options.

Carbapenemase producing Klebsiella pneumoniae: implication on future therapeutic strategies

Introduction: The emergence of carbapenemase resistant Gram-negative is designated as an 'urgent' priority of public health. Carbapenemase producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (CPKP) is linked with significant mortality. Conventionally used antibiotics (polymyxins, tigecycline, aminoglycosides, etc.) are associated with poor efficacy and toxicity profiles are quite worrisome.Areas covered: This article reviews mechanism of resistance and evidence regarding novel treatments of infections caused by CPKP, focusing mainly on currently approved new therapies and implications on future therapeutic strategies. A review of novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors (BLI) recently approved and in clinical development as well as cefiderocol, eravacycline and apramycin are discussed.Expert opinion: Newly approved and forthcoming antimicrobial agents are promising to combat infections caused by CPKP. Ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, and imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam are novel agents with favorable outcome and associated with improved mortality in KPC-producing K. pneumoniae infections. However, are inactive against metallo-β-lactamases (MBL). Novel BLI in later stage of development, i.e. aztreonam-avibactam, cefepime-zidebactam, cefepime-taniborbactam, and meropenem-nacubactam as well as cefiderocol are active in vitro against both KPC and MBL. Potential expectations of future therapeutic strategies are improved potency against CPKP, more tolerable safety profile, and capability of overcoming current resistance mechanism of multidrug-resistant K. pneumoniae.

Assessing the Potency of β-Lactamase Inhibitors with Diverse Inactivation Mechanisms against the PenA1 Carbapenemase from Burkholderia multivorans

Burkholderia cepacia complex (Bcc) poses a serious health threat to people with cystic fibrosis or compromised immune systems. Infections often arise from Bcc strains, which are highly resistant to many classes of antibiotics, including β-lactams. β-Lactam resistance in Bcc is conferred largely via PenA-like β-lactamases. Avibactam was previously shown to be a potent inactivator of PenA1. Here, we examined the inactivation mechanism of PenA1, a class A serine carbapenemase from Burkholderia multivorans using β-lactamase inhibitors (β-lactam-, diazabicyclooctane-, and boronate-based) with diverse mechanisms of action. In whole cell based assays, avibactam, relebactam, enmetazobactam, and vaborbactam restored susceptibility to piperacillin against PenA1 expressed in Escherichia coli. The rank order of potency of inactivation in vitro based on k_inact/K_I or k₂/K values (range: 3.4 × 10² to 2 × 10⁶ M^-1 s^-1) against PenA1 was avibactam > enmetazobactam > tazobactam > relebactam > clavulanic acid > vaborbactam. The contribution of selected amino acids (S70, K73, S130, E166, N170, R220, K234, T237, and D276) in PenA1 toward inactivation was evaluated using site-directed mutagenesis. The S130A, R220A, and K234A variants of PenA1 were less susceptible to inactivation by avibactam. The R220A variant was purified and assessed via steady-state inhibition kinetics and found to possess increased K_i-app values and decreased k_inact/K_I or k₂/K values against all tested inhibitors compared to PenA1. Avibactam was the most affected by the alanine replacement at 220 with a nearly 400-fold decreased acylation rate. The X-ray crystal structure of the R220A variant was solved and revealed loss of the hydrogen bonding network between residues 237 and 276 leaving a void in the active site that was occupied instead by water molecules. Michaelis-Menten complexes were generated to elucidate the molecular contributions of the poorer in vitro inhibition profile of vaborbactam against PenA1 (k₂/K, 3.4 × 10² M^-1 s^-1) and was compared to KPC-2, a class A carbapenemase that is robustly inhibited by vaborbactam. The active site of PenA1 is larger than that of KPC-2, which impacted the ability of vaborbactam to form favorable interactions, and as a result the carboxylate of vaborbactam was drawn toward K234/T235 in PenA1 displacing the boronic acid from approaching the nucleophilic S70. Moreover, in PenA1, the tyrosine at position 105 compared to tryptophan in KPC-2, was more flexible rotating more than 90°, and as a result PenA1's Y105 competed for binding with the cyclic boronate vs the thiophene moiety of vaborbactam, further precluding inhibition of PenA1 by vaborbactam. Given the 400-fold decreased k₂/K for the R220A variant compared to PenA1, acyl-enzyme complexes were generated via molecular modeling and compared to the PenA1-avibactam crystal structure. The water molecules occupying the active site of the R220A variant are unable to stabilize the T237 and D276 region of the active site altering the ability of avibactam to form favorable interactions compared to PenA1. The former likely impacts the ability of all inhibitors to effectively acylate this variant enzyme. Based on the summation of all evidence herein, the utility of these newer β-lactamase inhibitors (i.e., relebactam, enmetazobactam, avibactam, and vaborbactam) in combination with a β-lactam against B. multivorans producing PenA1 and the R220A variant is promising.

How to kill Pseudomonas-emerging therapies for a challenging pathogen

As the number of effective antibiotics dwindled, antibiotic resistance (AR) became a pressing concern. Some Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates are resistant to all available antibiotics. In this review, we identify the mechanisms that P. aeruginosa uses to evade antibiotics, including intrinsic, acquired, and adaptive resistance. Our review summarizes many different approaches to overcome resistance. Antimicrobial peptides have potential as therapeutics with low levels of resistance evolution. Rationally designed bacteriophage therapy can circumvent and direct evolution of AR and virulence. Vaccines and monoclonal antibodies are highlighted as immune-based treatments targeting specific P. aeruginosa antigens. This review also identifies promising drug combinations, antivirulence therapies, and considerations for new antipseudomonal discovery. Finally, we provide an update on the clinical pipeline for antipseudomonal therapies and recommend future avenues for research.

Present and Future Perspectives on Therapeutic Options for Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacterales Infections

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are included in the list of the most threatening antibiotic resistance microorganisms, being responsible for often insurmountable therapeutic issues, especially in hospitalized patients and immunocompromised individuals and patients in intensive care units. The enzymatic resistance to carbapenems is encoded by different β-lactamases belonging to A, B or D Ambler class. Besides compromising the activity of last-resort antibiotics, CRE have spread from the clinical to the environmental sectors, in all geographic regions. The purpose of this review is to present present and future perspectives on CRE-associated infections treatment.

New β-Lactam-β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations

The limited armamentarium against drug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli has led to the development of several novel β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (BLBLIs). In this review, we summarize their spectrum of in vitro activities, mechanisms of resistance, and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) characteristics. A summary of available clinical data is provided per drug. Four approved BLBLIs are discussed in detail. All are options for treating multidrug-resistant (MDR) Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Ceftazidime-avibactam is a potential drug for treating Enterobacterales producing extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL), Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC), AmpC, and some class D β-lactamases (OXA-48) in addition to carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Ceftolozane-tazobactam is a treatment option mainly for carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (non-carbapenemase producing), with some activity against ESBL-producing Enterobacterales Meropenem-vaborbactam has emerged as treatment option for Enterobacterales producing ESBL, KPC, or AmpC, with similar activity as meropenem against P. aeruginosa Imipenem-relebactam has documented activity against Enterobacterales producing ESBL, KPC, and AmpC, with the combination having some additional activity against P. aeruginosa relative to imipenem. None of these drugs present in vitro activity against Enterobacterales or P. aeruginosa producing metallo-β-lactamase (MBL) or against carbapenemase-producing Acinetobacter baumannii Clinical data regarding the use of these drugs to treat MDR bacteria are limited and rely mostly on nonrandomized studies. An overview on eight BLBLIs in development is also provided. These drugs provide various levels of in vitro coverage of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, with several drugs presenting in vitro activity against MBLs (cefepime-zidebactam, aztreonam-avibactam, meropenem-nacubactam, and cefepime-taniborbactam). Among these drugs, some also present in vitro activity against carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (cefepime-zidebactam and cefepime-taniborbactam) and A. baumannii (cefepime-zidebactam and sulbactam-durlobactam).

New Carbapenemase Inhibitors: Clearing the Way for the β-Lactams

Carbapenem resistance is a major global health problem that seriously compromises the treatment of infections caused by nosocomial pathogens. Resistance to carbapenems mainly occurs via the production of carbapenemases, such as VIM, IMP, NDM, KPC and OXA, among others. Preclinical and clinical trials are currently underway to test a new generation of promising inhibitors, together with the recently approved avibactam, relebactam and vaborbactam. This review summarizes the main, most promising carbapenemase inhibitors synthesized to date, as well as their spectrum of activity and current stage of development. We particularly focus on β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations that could potentially be used to treat infections caused by carbapenemase-producer pathogens of critical priority. The emergence of these new combinations represents a step forward in the fight against antimicrobial resistance, especially in regard to metallo-β-lactamases and carbapenem-hydrolysing class D β-lactamases, not currently inhibited by any clinically approved inhibitor.

New strategies and structural considerations in development of therapeutics for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae

Antimicrobial resistance poses a significant threat to our ability to treat infections. Especially concerning is the emergence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE). In the new 2019 United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Antibiotic Resistance Report, CRE remain in the most urgent antimicrobial resistance threat category. There is good reason for this concerning designation. In particular, the combination of several resistance elements in CRE can make these pathogens untreatable or effectively untreatable with our current armamentarium of anti-infective agents. This article reviews recently approved agents with activity against CRE and a range of modalities in the pipeline, from early academic investigation to those in clinical trials, with a focus on structural aspects of new antibiotics. Another article in this series addresses the need to incentive pharmaceutical companies to invest in CRE antimicrobial development and to encourage hospitals to make these agents available in their formularies. This article will also consider the need for change in requirements for antimicrobial susceptibility testing implementation in clinical laboratories to address practical roadblocks that impede our efforts to provide even existing CRE antibiotics to our patients.

The latest advances in β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations for the treatment of Gram-negative bacterial infections

Introduction: Antimicrobial resistance in Gram-negative pathogens is a significant threat to global health. β-Lactams (BL) are one of the safest and most-prescribed classes of antibiotics on the market today. The acquisition of β-lactamases, especially those which hydrolyze carbapenems, is eroding the efficacy of BLs for the treatment of serious infections. During the past decade, significant advances were made in the development of novel BL-β-lactamase inhibitor (BLI) combinations to target β-lactamase-mediated resistant Gram-negatives.Areas covered: The latest progress in 20 different approved, developing, and preclinical BL-BLI combinations to target serine β-lactamases produced by Gram-negatives are reviewed based on primary literature, conference abstracts (when available), and US clinical trial searches within the last 5 years. The majority of the compounds that are discussed are being evaluated as part of a BL-BLI combination.Expert opinion: The current trajectory in BLI development is promising; however, a significant challenge resides in the selection of an appropriate BL partner as well as the development of resistance linked to the BL partner. In addition, dosing regimens for these BL-BLI combinations need to be critically evaluated. A revolution in bacterial diagnostics is essential to aid clinicians in the appropriate selection of novel BL-BLI combinations for the treatment of serious infections.

Molecular Epidemiology of and Risk Factors for Extensively Drug-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Infections in Southwestern China: A Retrospective Study

Background: The increasing prevalence of extensively drug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (XDR-KP) poses a serious threat to clinical anti-infective treatment. This retrospective study assessed the molecular epidemiology of and risk factors for infections with XDR-KP to investigate the mechanism of drug resistance and the epidemiological characteristics.

Methods: A retrospective 1:2 case-control study was conducted at Chongqing Renji Affiliated Hospital of the Chinese Academy of Sciences University from January 2015 to December 2017. A total of 69 non-repetitive XDR-KP strains were collected. Patients infected with XDR-KP comprised the case group, and 138 matched patients with non-XDR-KP infection at the same site comprised the control group. The chi-square test and logistic regression were performed to evaluate the related risk factors. Molecular typing was performed by multilocus sequence typing (MLST). Potential resistance genes were detected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and sequencing. Predictors of 28-day mortality in patients with XDR-KP infection were also identified in our study.

Results: Only tigecycline and polymyxin B showed favorable in vitro drug sensitivity tests. These XDR-KP strains had a high prevalence rate (n = 66, 95.7%) of carbapenemase-related drug resistance genes. Among them, KPC-2 was the most frequently detected gene (n = 52, 75.4%). Particularly, all of the isolates harbored multiple drug resistance genes. Epidemiological analysis showed that fifty-eight XDR-KP isolates were resistant strains with the ST-11 genotype. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that ICU admission (OR: 3.28, 95% CI: 1.66–6.49, P < 0.001), tracheal cannula (OR: 3.16, 95% CI: 1.48–6.76, P = 0.003), and carbapenem exposure (OR: 3.16, 95% CI: 1.25–7.98, P = 0.015) were independent risk factors for XDR-KP infection. Solid tumors (OR: 7.22, 95% CI: 1.84–28.34, P = 0.005) and septic shock (OR: 9.46, 95% CI: 2.00–44.72, P = 0.005) were independent risk factors for 28-day mortality from XDR-KP infection.

Conclusion: This study showed that XDR-KP isolates were highly resistant and exhibited clonal transmission. ST11 was the predominant epidemic type of XDR-KP producing KPC-2 in Southwestern China. Physicians should be aware of these high-risk patients with notable predictive factors for XDR-KP infection. These findings may provide some recommendation for the diagnosis and treatment of patients infected with XDR-KP strains in Southwestern China.

Carbapenemases in Enterobacteriaceae: Detection and Antimicrobial Therapy

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) have spread rapidly around the world in the past few years, posing great challenges to human health. The plasmid-mediated horizontal transmission of carbapenem-resistance genes is the main cause of the surge in the prevalence of CRE. Therefore, the timely and accurate detection of CRE, especially carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae, is very important for the clinical prevention and treatment of these infections. A variety of methods for the rapid detection of CRE phenotypes and genotypes have been developed for use in clinical microbiology laboratories. To overcome the lack of efficient antibiotics, CRE infections are often treated with combination therapies. Moreover, novel drugs and emerging strategies appeared successively and in various stages of development. In this article, we summarized the global distribution of various carbapenemases. And we focused on summarizing and comparing the advantages and limitations of the detection methods and the therapeutic strategies of CRE primarily.