Risk factors for treatment failure of polymyxin B monotherapy for carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infections

Rapid Prediction of Multidrug-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae through Deep Learning Analysis of SERS Spectra

Klebsiella pneumoniae is listed by the WHO as a priority pathogen of extreme importance that can cause serious consequences in clinical settings. Due to its increasing multidrug resistance all over the world, K. pneumoniae has the potential to cause extremely difficult-to-treat infections. Therefore, rapid and accurate identification of multidrug-resistant K. pneumoniae in clinical diagnosis is important for its prevention and infection control. However, the limitations of conventional and molecular methods significantly hindered the timely diagnosis of the pathogen. As a label-free, noninvasive, and low-cost method, surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) spectroscopy has been extensively studied for its application potentials in the diagnosis of microbial pathogens. In this study, we isolated and cultured 121 K. pneumoniae strains from clinical samples with different drug resistance profiles, which included polymyxin-resistant K. pneumoniae (PRKP; n = 21), carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae, (CRKP; n = 50), and carbapenem-sensitive K. pneumoniae (CSKP; n = 50). For each strain, a total of 64 SERS spectra were generated for the enhancement of data reproducibility, which were then computationally analyzed via the convolutional neural network (CNN). According to the results, the deep learning model CNN plus attention mechanism could achieve a prediction accuracy as high as 99.46%, with robustness score of 5-fold cross-validation at 98.87%. Taken together, our results confirmed the accuracy and robustness of SERS spectroscopy in the prediction of drug resistance of K. pneumoniae strains with the assistance of deep learning algorithms, which successfully discriminated and predicted PRKP, CRKP, and CSKP strains. IMPORTANCE This study focuses on the simultaneous discrimination and prediction of Klebsiella pneumoniae strains with carbapenem-sensitive, carbapenem-resistant, and polymyxin-resistant phenotypes. The implementation of CNN plus an attention mechanism makes the highest prediction accuracy at 99.46%, which confirms the diagnostic potential of the combination of SERS spectroscopy with the deep learning algorithm for antibacterial susceptibility testing in clinical settings.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of polymyxin B in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae murine infection models

BACKGROUND

Although polymyxin B has been in use since the late 1950s, there have been limited studies done to unravel its pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) index.

METHODS

We determined, in neutropenic infected mice, the PK, plasma protein binding and PK/PD index best correlating with efficacy for Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae strains.

RESULTS

The pharmacokinetic profile showed non-linear PK; dose was significantly correlated with absorption rate and clearance. The inhibitory sigmoid dose-effect model for the fCmax/MIC index of E. coli fitted best, but was only modestly higher than the R2 of %fT>MIC and fAUC/MIC (R2 0.91-0.93). For K. pneumoniae the fAUC/MIC index had the best fit, which was slightly higher than the R2 of %fT>MIC and fCmax/MIC (R2 0.85-0.91). Static targets of polymyxin B fAUC/MIC were 27.5-102.6 (median 63.5) and 5.9-60.5 (median 11.6) in E. coli and in K. pneumoniae isolates, respectively. A 1 log kill effect was only reached in two E. coli isolates and one K. pneumoniae. The PTA with the standard dosing was low for isolates with MIC >0.25 mg/L.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms that fAUC/MIC can describe the exposure-response relationship for polymyxin B. The 1 log kill effect was achieved in the minority of the isolates whereas polymyxin B PK/PD targets cannot be attained for the majority of clinical isolates with the standard dosing regimen, indicating that polymyxin B may be not effective against serious infections as monotherapy.

Coexistence of tet(A) and blaKPC-2 in the ST11 hypervirulent tigecycline- and carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from a blood sample

Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae are distributed worldwide. This study aimed to characterize a hypervirulent tigecycline-resistant and carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae strain, XJ-K2, collected from a patient's blood. We tested antimicrobial susceptibility, virulence, and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) on strain XJ-K2. WGS data were used to identify virulence and resistance genes and to perform multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and phylogenetic analysis. Three novel plasmids, including a pLVPK-like virulence plasmid (pXJ-K2-p1) and two multiple resistance plasmids (pXJ-K2-KPC-2 and pXJ-K2-p3), were discovered in strain XJ-K2. The IncFII(pCRY) plasmid pXJ-K2-p3 carried the dfrA14, sul2, qnrS1, bla_LAP-2, and tet(A) resistance genes. The IncFII(pHN7A8)/IncR plasmid pXJ-K2-KPC-2 also carried a range of resistance elements, containing rmtB, bla_KPC-2, bla_TEM-1, bla_CTX-M-65, and fosA3. MLST analysis revealed that strain XJ-K2 belonged to sequence type 11 (ST11). Seven complete phage sequences and many virulence genes were found in strain XJ-K2. Meanwhile, antimicrobial susceptibility tests and G. mellonella larval infection models confirmed the extensively drug resistance (XDR) and hypervirulence of KJ-K2. To our knowledge, this is the first observation and description of the ST11 hypervirulent tigecycline- and carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae strain co-carrying bla_KPC-2 and the tet(A) in a patient's blood in China. Further investigation is needed to understand the resistance and virulence mechanisms of this significant hypervirulent tigecycline- and carbapenem-resistant strain.

Mortality-Related Risk Factors and Novel Antimicrobial Regimens for Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) has become a significant public health problem in the last decade. We aimed to explore the risk factors of mortality in patients with CRE infections and to focus on the current evidence on antimicrobial regimens for CRE infections, particularly from the perspective of mortality.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed by searching the databases of EMBASE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library to identify studies that evaluated mortality-related risk factors and antimicrobial regimens for CRE infections published from 2012 to 2022.

RESULTS

In total, 33 and 28 studies were included to analyze risk factors and antibiotic treatment, respectively. The risk factors most frequently reported as significantly associated with CRE mortality were antibiotic use (92.9%; 26/28 studies), comorbidities (88.7%; 23/26 studies), and hospital-related factors (82.8%; 24/29 studies). In 10 studies that did not contain ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ-AVI) therapy, seven demonstrated significantly lower mortality in combination therapy than in monotherapy. However, 5 of 6 studies identified no substantial difference between CAZ-AVI monotherapy and CAZ-AVI combination therapy. Six studies reported substantially lower mortality in CAZ-AVI regimens than in other regimens.

CONCLUSION

Several risk factors, particularly antibiotic use and patients' comorbidities, are strong risk factors for CRE mortality. The optimal regimen for CRE infections remains controversial. Combination therapy should be considered when carbapenems, colistin, tigecycline, or aminoglycosides are administered. CAZ-AVI appears to be a promising antibiotic for CRE infections. Most importantly, treatment should be individualized according to the source and severity of the disease or other highly related risk factors.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of peptide antibiotics

Antimicrobial resistance is a major global health challenge. As few new efficacious antibiotics will become available in the near future, peptide antibiotics continue to be major therapeutic options for treating infections caused by multidrug-resistant pathogens. Rational use of antibiotics requires optimisation of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics for the treatment of different types of infections. Toxicodynamics must also be considered to improve the safety of antibiotic use and, where appropriate, to guide therapeutic drug monitoring. This review focuses on the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics/toxicodynamics of peptide antibiotics against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative and Gram-positive pathogens. Optimising antibiotic exposure at the infection site is essential for improving their efficacy and minimising emergence of resistance.

Efficacy of Ceftazidime-Avibactam Versus Polymyxin B and Risk Factors Affecting Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Infections a Retrospective Study

Background: The worldwide outbreak of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) has become an urgent public health problem. High mortality and lack of effective treatments further pose new challenges to control this infection. However, studies about the evaluation of available antibiotics for CRKP infection are limited. The present study aimed to compare the efficacy of polymyxin B versus ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ/AVI) in Chinese patients with CRKP infections and to identify risk factors affecting 7-day bacterial eradication and 28-day all-cause mortality. Methods: From January 8, 2018, to July 6, 2020, a total of 115 adult CRKP infected patients from two tertiary teaching hospitals in Shanghai, China were enrolled based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. By reviewing electronic medical records of these patients, demographic and clinical data were extracted. The selected patients were divided into polymyxin B and CAZ/AVI groups according to primary antibiotic exposure to compare therapeutic effects. Binary logistic and cox's regression analysis were performed to identify risk factors for 7-day bacterial eradication and all-cause mortality. Results: One hundred and five patients were treated with polymyxin B (67.8%) or CAZ/AVI (32.2%). Patients in the CAZ/AVI group had significantly lower rates of 28-day mortality (8.1 vs 29.5%, p = 0.013), higher microbiological eradication and 28-day clinical success. Multivariate analysis showed that Charlson comorbidity index (≥3) and prior antibiotic use within 90 days were independent risk factors for poor microbiological eradication. Cox's regression analysis indicated that the length of hospitalization after CRKP infection and baseline creatinine clearance negatively affected 28-day mortality. Conclusion: CAZ/AVI was more effective than polymyxin B and appeared to be a promising drug for CRKP infection, especially for critically ill patients.

Polymyxin B Pharmacodynamics in the Hollow-Fiber Infection Model: What You See May Not Be What You Get

Dose range studies for polymyxin B (PMB) regimens of 0.75 to 12 mg/kg given every 12 h (q12h) were evaluated for bacterial killing and resistance prevention against an AmpC-overexpressing Pseudomonas aeruginosa and a blaKPC-3-harboring Klebsiella pneumoniae in 10-day in vitro hollow-fiber models. An exposure-response was observed. But all regimens failed due to regrowth. Lower-dose regimens amplified isolates that expressed transient, lower-level adaptive resistance to PMB (MICs ≤ 4 mg/liter). Higher PMB dosages amplified isolates that expressed this resistance mechanism, a higher-MIC "moderately stable" adaptive resistance, and a higher-MIC stable resistance to PMB. Failure of the highest dose regimens was solely due to subpopulations that expressed the two higher-level resistances. Total and bioactive PMB concentrations in broth declined below targeted PK profiles within hours of treatment initiation and prior to bacterial regrowth. With treatment failure, the total PMB measured in bacteria was substantially higher than in broth. But the bioactive PMB in broth and bacteria were low to nondetectable. Together, these findings suggest a sequence of events for treatment failure of the clinical regimen. First, PMB concentrations in broth are diluted as PMB binds to bacteria, resulting in total and bioactive PMB in broth that is lower than targeted. Bacterial regrowth and treatment failure follow, with emergence of subpopulations that express transient lower-level adaptive resistance to PMB and possibly higher-level adaptive and stable resistances. Higher-dose PMB regimens can prevent the emergence of transient lower-level adaptive resistance, but they do not prevent treatment failure due to isolates that express higher-level resistance mechanisms.

Clinical Efficacy of Polymyxin B in Patients Infected with Carbapenem-Resistant Organisms

Purpose

Carbapenem-resistant organisms (CROs) pose great challenges for clinical treatment. Polymyxin B (PMB) is one of the “last resort” choices of CRO infections. We explored the possible factors affecting PMB efficacy.

Patients and Methods

This retrospective study involved CRO-infected patients treated with PMB for ≥72 h. The endpoint indicator was clinical efficacy. We compared the characteristics (demographics, pathogenic bacteria, PMB treatment) between patients who had “clinical success” (CS) and “clinical failure” (CF).

Results

A total of 191 patients were enrolled: 110 in the CS group and 81 in the CF group. The total cumulative dose for the CS group was higher than the CF group [1100 (700–1443.75) vs 800 (500–1112.5) mg; P = 0.001]. Treatment duration in the CS group was longer than the CF group [11 (8–14) vs 8 (6–11) days; P < 0.000]. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed mechanical ventilation, vasoactive agents, multiple-site infection, and total cumulative dose to be independently associated with clinical efficacy. Cox survival analysis for 30-day mortality also showed that the use of vasoactive agents and the total cumulative dose of PMB could influence survival time and mortality rate independently.

Conclusion

PMB had good efficacy and a low prevalence of adverse reactions. The total cumulative dose, duration of PMB treatment, mechanical ventilation, vasoactive agents, and multiple-site infection were factors associated with the clinical efficacy of PMB.

Rescuing the Last-Line Polymyxins: Achievements and Challenges

Antibiotic resistance is a major global health challenge and, worryingly, several key Gram negative pathogens can become resistant to most currently available antibiotics. Polymyxins have been revived as a last-line therapeutic option for the treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram negative bacteria, in particular Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacterales. Polymyxins were first discovered in the late 1940s but were abandoned soon after their approval in the late 1950s as a result of toxicities (e.g., nephrotoxicity) and the availability of "safer" antibiotics approved at that time. Therefore, knowledge on polymyxins had been scarce until recently, when enormous efforts have been made by several research teams around the world to elucidate the chemical, microbiological, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic, and toxicological properties of polymyxins. One of the major achievements is the development of the first scientifically based dosage regimens for colistin that are crucial to ensure its safe and effective use in patients. Although the guideline has not been developed for polymyxin B, a large clinical trial is currently being conducted to optimize its clinical use. Importantly, several novel, safer polymyxin-like lipopeptides are developed to overcome the nephrotoxicity, poor efficacy against pulmonary infections, and narrow therapeutic windows of the currently used polymyxin B and colistin. This review discusses the latest achievements on polymyxins and highlights the major challenges ahead in optimizing their clinical use and discovering new-generation polymyxins. To save lives from the deadly infections caused by Gram negative "superbugs," every effort must be made to improve the clinical utility of the last-line polymyxins. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Antimicrobial resistance poses a significant threat to global health. The increasing prevalence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacterial infections has been highlighted by leading global health organizations and authorities. Polymyxins are a last-line defense against difficult-to-treat MDR Gram negative pathogens. Unfortunately, the pharmacological information on polymyxins was very limited until recently. This review provides a comprehensive overview on the major achievements and challenges in polymyxin pharmacology and clinical use and how the recent findings have been employed to improve clinical practice worldwide.

A Comparative Study of the Microbiological Efficacy of Polymyxin B on Different Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria Infections

Objective: The emergence of carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB) has brought great challenges to clinical anti-infection treatment around the world. Polymyxins are often considered as the last line of defense in the treatment of CR-GNB infections. In this study, we explored the microbiological efficacy of Polymyxin B (PMB) on different CR-GNB infections as well as the factors influencing microbiological efficacy. Methods: CR-GNB infected patients with PMB-based regimens were enrolled. Clinical and microbiological data were collected from the medical electronic record system of the Second Xiangya hospital. The efficacy of PMB on different CR-GNB was evaluated by the clearance rate at 7-days and within the course of treatment, as well as the 30-day mortality rate. Results: A total of 294 CR-GNB infected patients were enrolled: 154 CR-Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB), 55 CR-Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP), and 85 CR-Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA). The CRAB group had the highest 7-day bacterial clearance rate [(CRAB: 39.0%) vs. (CRKP: 29.4%) vs. (CRPA: 14.5%), P = 0.003] and total bacterial clearance rate [(CRAB: 49.0%) vs. (CRKP: 39.8%) vs. (CRPA: 18.2%), P < 0.001] among the three groups, while the bacterial clearance rate of the CRPA group was the lowest. Multivariate logistic regression showed that the differences among the three groups were multiple CR-GNB infections (P = 0.004), respiratory infections (P = 0.001), PMB resistance (P < 0.001), and the combination of tigecycline (P < 0.001). Binary logistic regression showed that multiple CR-GNB infection [(7-day bacterial clearance: P = 0.004) & (total bacterial clearance: P = 0.011)] and bacterial species [(7-day bacterial clearance: P < 0.001) & (total bacterial clearance: P < 0.001)] were independent risk factors for microbiological efficacy. Conclusion: PMB exhibited differential microbiological efficacy on different types of CR-GNB infections; it had the best effect on CRAB, followed by CRKP and CRPA. Multiple CR-GNB infections and bacterial species were independent risk factors for microbiological efficacy.

Clinical use of intravenous polymyxin B for the treatment of patients with multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections: An evaluation of the current evidence

OBJECTIVES

The epidemic dimensions of the emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacterial infections have led to the revival of old antibiotics, including the polymyxins.

METHODS

We performed a review and meta-analysis to evaluate the current literature data regarding the effectiveness and safety of intravenous polymyxin B in patients with MDR Gram-negative bacterial infections and the overall mortality and nephrotoxicity in patients treated with intravenous polymyxin B either as monotherapy or combination therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 5 prospective and 28 retrospective studies, 1 cross-sectional study, 2 retrospective case series and 7 case reports provided data regarding the effectiveness and/or toxicity of intravenous polymyxin B. All-cause mortality of 2910 patients (from 27 studies) who received intravenous polymyxin B was 41.2% (95% CI 35.5-47.0%). All-cause nephrotoxicity of 2994 patients (from 28 studies) treated with intravenous polymyxin B was 40.7% (95% CI 35.0-46.6%). Renal failure among 2111 patients (from 14 studies) was 11.2% (95% CI 8.7-13.9%).

CONCLUSION

Mortality of patients treated with intravenous polymyxin B is similar to the literature-reported mortality of patients treated with intravenous colistin, while nephrotoxicity associated with polymyxin B use is possibly milder compared with colistin use based on literature data. Head-to-head prospective studies would help to clarify the benefit of polymyxin B over colistin. However, a critical evaluation of the existing worldwide literature data supports the need for availability of the intravenous formulation of polymyxin B as a potentially useful option for the treatment of patients with MDR and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Gram-negative bacterial infections.

Systematic review on estimated rates of nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity in patients treated with polymyxins

BACKGROUND

Nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity are commonly associated with polymyxin treatment; however, the emergence of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria with limited therapeutic options has resulted in increased use of polymyxins.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the rates of nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity during polymyxin treatment and whether any factors influence these.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were searched on 2 January 2020.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Studies reporting nephrotoxicity and/or neurotoxicity rates in patients with infections treated with polymyxins were included. Reviews, meta-analyses and reports not in English were excluded.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients hospitalized with infections treated with systemic or inhaled polymyxins were included. For comparative analyses, patients treated with non-polymyxin-based regimens were also included.

METHODS

Meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model; subgroup meta-analyses were conducted where data permitted using a mixed-effects model.

RESULTS

In total, 237 reports of randomized controlled trials, cohort and case-control studies were eligible for inclusion; most were single-arm observational studies. Nephrotoxic events in 35,569 patients receiving polymyxins were analysed. Overall nephrotoxicity rate was 0.282 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.259-0.307). When excluding studies where >50% of patients received inhaled-only polymyxin treatment or nephrotoxicity assessment was by methods other than internationally recognized criteria (RIFLE, KDIGO or AKIN), the nephrotoxicity rate was 0.391 (95% CI 0.364-0.419). The odds of nephrotoxicity were greater with polymyxin therapies compared to non-polymyxin-based regimens (odds ratio 2.23 (95% CI 1.58-3.15); p < 0.001). Meta-analyses showed a significant effect of polymyxin type, dose, patient age, number of concomitant nephrotoxins and use of diuretics, glycopeptides or vasopressors on the rate of nephrotoxicity. Polymyxin therapies were not associated with a significantly different rate of neurotoxicity than non-polymyxin-based regimens (p 0.051). The overall rate of neurotoxicity during polymyxin therapy was 0.030 (95% CI 0.020-0.043).

CONCLUSIONS

Polymyxins are associated with a higher risk of nephrotoxicity than non-polymyxin-based regimens.

Molecular and epidemiological surveillance of polymyxin-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae strains isolated from Brazil with multiple mgrB gene mutations

The prevalence of polymyxin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae is increasing worldwide. Their emergence is worrisome and limits therapeutic options for severely ill patients. We aimed to investigate the molecular and epidemiological characteristics of polymyxin-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae circulating in Brazilian hospitals. Polymyxin-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates from two Brazilian healthcare facilities were characterized phenotypically and subjected to whole genome sequencing (WGS). Using the WGS data we determined their sequence type, resistance gene content (resistome), their composition of virulence genes and plasmids. ST11 was the most common (80 %) sequence type among the isolates followed by ST345, ST15 and ST258. A resistome analysis revealed the common presence of bla_KPC-2 and less frequently bla_SHV-11, bla_TEM-1, bla_CTX-M-15, and bla_OXA-9. Genes conferring resistance to aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, phenicols, sulphonamides, tetracyclines, trimethoprim and macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin were also detected. We observed a clonal spread of polymyxin-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates, with polymyxin-resistance associated with various alterations in the mgrB gene including inactivation by an insertion sequence and nonsense point mutations. We additionally identified a novel 78-bp repeat sequence, encoding a MgrB protein with 26 amino acids duplicated in six isolates. This is the first observation of this type of alteration being associated with polymyxin resistance. Our findings demonstrate that mgrB alterations were the most common source of polymyxin-resistance in Brazilian clinical settings. Interestingly, distinct genetic events were identified among clonally related isolates, including a new amino acid alteration. The clinical implications and investigation of the resistance mechanisms is of great importance to patient safety and control of these infections, particularly in long-term care facilities.

Polymyxin resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae: multifaceted mechanisms utilized in the presence and absence of the plasmid-encoded phosphoethanolamine transferase gene mcr-1

OBJECTIVES

Until plasmid-mediated mcr-1 was discovered, it was believed that polymyxin resistance in Gram-negative bacteria was mainly mediated by the chromosomally-encoded EptA and ArnT, which modify lipid A with phosphoethanolamine (pEtN) and 4-amino-4-deoxy-l-arabinose (l-Ara4N), respectively. This study aimed to construct a markerless mcr-1 deletion mutant in Klebsiella pneumoniae, validate a reliable reference gene for reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) and investigate the interactions among mcr-1, arnT and eptA, in response to polymyxin treatments using pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD).

METHODS

An isogenic markerless mcr-1 deletion mutant (II-503Δmcr-1) was generated from a clinical K. pneumoniae II-503 isolate. The efficacy of different polymyxin B dosage regimens was examined using an in vitro one-compartment PK/PD model and polymyxin resistance was assessed using population analysis profiles. The expression of mcr-1, eptA and arnT was examined using RT-qPCR with a reference gene pepQ, and lipid A was profiled using LC-MS. In vivo polymyxin B efficacy was investigated in a mouse thigh infection model.

RESULTS

In K. pneumoniae II-503, mcr-1 was constitutively expressed, irrespective of polymyxin exposure. Against II-503Δmcr-1, an initial bactericidal effect was observed within 4 h with polymyxin B at average steady-state concentrations of 1 and 3 mg/L, mimicking patient PK. However, substantial regrowth and concomitantly increased expression of eptA and arnT were detected. Predominant l-Ara4N-modified lipid A species were detected in II-503Δmcr-1 following polymyxin B treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study demonstrating a unique markerless deletion of mcr-1 in a clinical polymyxin-resistant K. pneumoniae. The current polymyxin B dosage regimens are suboptimal against K. pneumoniae, regardless of mcr, and can lead to the emergence of resistance.

Mortality, clinical and microbiological response following antibiotic therapy among patients with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infections (a meta-analysis dataset)

This meta-analysis was conducted to assess mortality, clinical and microbiological response following antibiotic therapy among patients with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) infections. Fifty-four observational studies involving 3195 CRKP-infected patients who received antibiotic treatment were included. We found combination therapy to be associated with lower mortality than monotherapy, but no differences in clinical and microbiological response. Among the various combination therapies, no significant differences in mortality, clinical and microbiological response were found. Moreover, clinical outcomes did not differ significantly among various monotherapies. This report describes the data related to the article entitled: "A systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment outcomes following antibiotic therapy among patients with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infections".

Clinical Use of Polymyxin B

Polymyxin B is another clinically available polymyxin that has re-emerged in clinical practice to treat infections caused by multi-drug (MDR) or extensively-drug-resistant (XDR) Gram-negative bacteria (GNB). Its chemical structure is very similar to the structure of polymyxin E (colistin). However, since the latter is administered as a prodrug, there are major pharmacokinetic differences between both polymyxins that may potentially determine different clinical and microbiological outcomes. Studies addressing clinical or microbiological outcomes in patients treated with polymyxin B for MDR or XDR GNB are reviewed in this chapter.

Rational Combinations of Polymyxins with Other Antibiotics

Combinations of antimicrobial agents are often used in the management of infectious diseases. Antimicrobial agents used as part of combination therapy are often selected empirically. As regrowth and the emergence of polymyxin (either colistin or polymyxin B) resistance has been observed with polymyxin monotherapy, polymyxin combination therapy has been suggested as a possible means by which to increase antimicrobial activity and reduce the development of resistance. This chapter provides an overview of preclinical and clinical investigations of CMS/colistin and polymyxin B combination therapy. In vitro data and animal model data suggests a potential clinical benefit with many drug combinations containing clinically achievable concentrations of polymyxins, even when resistance to one or more of the drugs in combination is present and including antibiotics normally inactive against Gram-negative organisms. The growing body of data on the emergence of polymyxin resistance with monotherapy lends theoretical support to a benefit with combination therapy. Benefits include enhanced bacterial killing and a suppression of polymyxin resistant subpopulations. However, the complexity of the critically ill patient population, and high rates of treatment failure and death irrespective of infection-related outcome make demonstrating a potential benefit for polymyxin combinations extremely challenging. Polymyxin combination therapy in the clinic remains a heavily debated and controversial topic. When combinations are selected, optimizing the dosage regimens for the polymyxin and the combinatorial agent is critical to ensure that the benefits outweigh the risk of the development of toxicity. Importantly, patient characteristics, pharmacokinetics, the site of infection, pathogen and resistance mechanism must be taken into account to define optimal and rational polymyxin combination regimens in the clinic.

Nephrotoxicity prevalence in patients treated with polymyxins: a systematic review with meta-analysis of observational studies

Colistin and polymyxin B are increasingly reintroduced in clinical practice due to the absence of effective antibiotics for the treatment of emerging infections caused by gram-negative bacteria. The synthesis of current evidence on the characteristics of polymyxins, especially regarding nephrotoxicity, is necessary. This study aims to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort-type observational studies in order to identify the prevalence of nephrotoxicity in patients treated with either colistin or polymyxin B. PubMed, Scopus, and DOAJ electronic databases were searched, and manual searches were done. Cohort studies evaluating renal damage (nephrotoxicity) in adult patients caused by colistin or polymyxin B were included. Meta-analyses of the prevalence of nephrotoxicity as well as cumulative meta-analysis and meta-regression were conducted. After the systematic searches, 95 cohorts (n = 7911 patients) were included for analysis. The nephrotoxicity prevalence was 26.7% [confidence interval (CI) 95%: 22.8-30.9%] for colistin and 29.8% (CI 23.8-36.7%) for polymyxin B (P = 0.720). The publication year of the studies, the criteria used to classify renal damage, and the nephrotoxicity as primary or secondary outcome showed a significant influence on the adverse event rates.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of low versus high dose colistin in the treatment of multi-drug resistant pneumonia in Saudi Arabia

Background Gram negative pathogens are increasingly resistant to commonly used first line antibiotics and colistin is in most cases the only medicine available. There is very limited information available comparing the effectiveness and costs of low versus high dose colistin with studies showing efficacy with both doses and with variable levels of adverse effects. The absence of a definite dosing strategy makes a model to compare low dose and high dose colistin invaluable in making decisions regarding the appropriate use of colistin. Objective This study was designed to evaluate the cost effectiveness of low versus high dose colistin in the treatment of Pneumonia caused by colistin-only sensitive gram negative bacteria from the perspective of a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia. Setting 300-bed tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia. Method A retrospective review was conducted to compare the costs and outcomes of treatment of pneumonia with low versus high dose colistin. The model followed an average patient from initiation of treatment until clinical cure or failure. Main outcome measures The main outcomes were cure, nephrotoxicity, total direct costs per episode, cost per additional cure and cost per nephrotoxicity avoided. Results There was no significant difference between high and low dose colistin with regards to clinical cure (30% vs. 21%; p = 0.292). Significantly more patients experienced nephrotoxicity with high versus low dose colistin (30% vs. 8%; p = 0.004). With low dose colistin the incremental costs per nephrotoxicity avoided was SAR-3056.28. One-way sensitivity analyses did not change the overall results. Conclusion Low dose was not inferior to high dose colistin in terms of clinical cure and had a lower incidence of nephrotoxicity resulting in significant cost avoidance.

Resurgence of Polymyxin B for MDR/XDR Gram-Negative Infections: An Overview of Current Evidence

Polymyxin B has resurged in recent years as a last resort therapy for Gram-negative multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extremely drug resistant (XDR) infections. Understanding newer evidence on polymyxin B is necessary to guide clinical decision making. Here, we present a literature review of polymyxin B in Gram-negative infections with update on its pharmacology.

Predictors of polymyxin B treatment failure in Gram-negative healthcare-associated infections among critically ill patients

BACKGROUND

With increasing prevalence and spread of multidrug resistant Gram-negative infections, parenteral polymyxins resurged in clinical practice. The primary aim of the study was to determine the predictors of treatment failure and in-hospital mortality among critically ill patients treated with polymyxin B.

METHODS

Demographic data, underlying diseases, procedures and details on polymyxin B therapy were retrospectively analyzed in a cohort of 84 patients who received intravenous polymyxin B in an intensive care unit from 2010 to 2014.

RESULTS

Polymyxin B was used to treat bacteremia (46.4% of cases) and pneumonia (53.6%). Majority of the pathogens isolated were Acinetobacter spp. (96.4%). The mortality rate was 48.8%, of which 82.9% was attributed to polymyxin B treatment failure. The independent predictors of treatment failure were low doses of polymyxin B (p = 0.002), shorter duration of therapy (p = 0.009), not combining with cefoperazone/sulbactam (p = 0.030), female gender (p = 0.004), administered for treatment of bacteremia (p = 0.023) and renal impairment (p = 0.021). Low polymyxin B doses (p = 0.007), not combining with cefoperazone/sulbactam (p = 0.024), female gender (p = 0.048) and renal impairment (p = 0.022) were also significant predictors for in-hospital mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on the association of inadequate dose of polymyxin B (<15,000 units/kg/day) with poor outcome in critically ill patients. Besides that, further clinical studies are warranted to evaluate the use of cefoperazone/sulbactam as second antibiotic in the combination therapy.

Strategies for the treatment of polymyxin B-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections

In this study, the activity of meropenem (MEM), fosfomycin (FOF) and polymyxin B (PMB), alone and in combination, was analysed. In addition, optimisation of the pharmacodynamic index of MEM and FOF against six isolates of OXA-23-producing Acinetobacter baumannii (including three resistant to PMB) that were not clonally related was assessed. Antimicrobial combinations were evaluated by chequerboard analysis and were considered synergistic when the fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) was ≤0.5. Pharmacodynamic analyses of the MEM and FOF dosing schemes were performed by Monte Carlo simulation. The target pharmacodynamic index (%ƒT>MIC) for MEM and FOF was ≥40% and ≥70%, respectively, and a probability of target attainment (PTA) ≥0.9 was considered adequate. Among the PMB-resistant isolates, combinations of PMB+MEM and PMB+FOF+MEM showed the highest synergistic activity (FICI ≤0.125); isolates that were previously PMB-resistant were included in the susceptible category using CLSI interpretive criteria. Pharmacodynamic evaluation found that for a FOF minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of ≤16μg/mL, treatment both by bolus dosing and prolonged infusion achieved adequate PTA, whilst for MIC=32μg/mL only infusion achieved adequate PTA. For a MEM MIC of 4μg/mL, only the bolus treatment scheme with 1.5g q6h and the infusion schemes with 1.0g q8h, 1.5g q6h and 2.0g q8h achieved PTA ≥0.9. Results of antimicrobial and pharmacodynamic analyses can assist in treating infections caused by multidrug-resistant A. baumannii. However, in vivo clinical studies are essential to evaluate the true role of these compounds, including intravenous antimicrobial FOF therapy.

Effectiveness and Safety of Tigecycline Compared with Other Broad-Spectrum Antimicrobials in Abdominal Solid Organ Transplant Recipients with Polymicrobial Intraabdominal Infections

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Because patients with abdominal solid organ transplants (SOTs) are at increased risk of polymicrobial intraabdominal infections (IAIs) following transplantation, the objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness and adverse event profile of tigecycline with those of other broad-spectrum therapies for polymicrobial IAIs in this population.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Large academic medical center with multiple outpatient clinics.

PATIENTS

A total of 81 adult SOT recipients were included who were treated for confirmed or suspected polymicrobial IAIs from 2007-2012. Of these patients, 27 received tigecycline and 54 received comparator therapy with a broad-spectrum β-lactam (e.g., piperacillin-tazobactam, cefepime, or meropenem) with or without glycopeptide or lipopeptide gram-positive therapy (vancomycin or daptomycin) (comparator group). Patients in the comparator group were matched to tigecycline-treated patients based on transplant type (kidney, combined kidney-pancreas, combined kidney-liver, or solitary pancreas) in a 1:2 ratio (tigecycline-to-other broad-spectrum antibiotics).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Data on patient demographics, comorbidities, and clinical variables were collected and compared by using bivariate analyses. Clinical outcomes-clinical cure, improvement or failure, and disease recurrence-as well as death within 1 year were analyzed by bivariate analyses and logistic regression. Clinical cure was lower in the tigecycline group versus the comparator group (40.7% vs 72.2%, p=0.008), but cure combined with improvement was similar between the two groups (85.2% vs 88.9%, p=0.724). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that treatment with comparator antibiotics increased the odds of cure (odds ratio [OR] 1.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.15-12.27) and reduced the odds of treatment failure (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.07-4.55) and death within 1 year (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.22-2.86); however, patients receiving comparator antibiotics were more likely to have disease recurrence (OR 1.45, 95% CI 0.33-6.36). Patients receiving tigecycline experienced a higher rate of adverse events than those receiving comparator antibiotics (29.6% vs 9.3%, p=0.026).

CONCLUSION

Patients receiving tigecycline were less likely to achieve optimal clinical outcomes and had more adverse events. Alternative regimens should be selected over tigecycline for the treatment of polymicrobial IAIs in abdominal SOT recipients until additional studies are completed to examine its role in this population.

Endotoxin neutralization by an O-antigen specific monoclonal antibody: A potential novel therapeutic approach against Klebsiella pneumoniae ST258

Klebsiella pneumoniae ST258 is a globally distributed multi-drug resistant pathogen responsible for severe invasive infections. In this study, the different virulence potential of K. pneumoniae ST258 isolates in endotoxin susceptible versus resistant animal models was shown. Furthermore, ST258 clinical isolates were found highly sensitive to the bactericidal effect of naive animal and human serum. These observations imply that LPS, released from the rapidly lysed bacteria, may contribute to the high mortality associated with ST258 bacteremia cases.

A humanized version (mAb A1102) of a previously described murine mAb specific for the conserved LPS O-antigen, was tested for endotoxin neutralization. A1102 was able to neutralize TLR-4 activation by ST258-derived LPS in vitro with an efficacy exceeding that of polymyxin B by 3 orders of magnitude. Passive immunization with A1102 afforded a significant level of protection in a galactosamine-sensitized mouse model of endotoxemia, induced by ST258-derived LPS, or upon challenge with live bacteria. Efficacy was retained using an aglycosylated IgG, as well as upon complement depletion, suggesting that Fc-independent endotoxin neutralization may be the main protective mechanism in this model, in spite of the complement-dependent bactericidal and opsonic activities additionally observed for A1102 in vitro. Furthermore, rabbits that are naturally highly susceptible to endotoxin, were also significantly protected by low doses of A1102 when challenged with an ST258 strain.

Given this unique mode of action and the high protective efficacy of this mAb, passive immunization, as prophylactic or adjunct therapeutic approach for the treatment of infections caused by ST258 isolates should be considered.

Mortality markers in nosocomial Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infection

PURPOSE

Klebsiella pneumoniae is the most common endogen agent for nosocomial infections. In this study, mortality markers were investigated in patients with nosocomial K. pneumoniae blood stream infection (NKp BSI).

METHODS

The characteristics of patients >16 years who had NKp BSI diagnosis by daily active surveillance between January 2012 and January 2016 were retrospectively evaluated. Patients who died until 28th day of the clinical follow up and those who survived until this time were statistically compared in terms of various risk factors.

RESULTS

One hundred ninety patients were included into the study. Mortality rate was 47.9%, carbapenem resistance was 43.2%. Statistical analysis have shown that in presence of post-NKp BSI sepsis, septic shock, following in intensive care unit (ICU), meropenem resistance, kidney failure, NKp BSI secondary to pneumonia, use of invasive instruments such as central venous catheter (CVC), urinary catheter (UC) and mechanical ventilator (MV), colostomy, transfusion and hemodialysis mortality was significantly higher. In patients admitted into the hospital for neurological disorders, pancreaticobiliary tract (PBT) diseases and patients who have undergone endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and patients in whom NKp BSI secondary to PBT infection mortality rate was lower.

CONCLUSIONS

Sepsis, septic shock, clinical conditions requiring ICU treatment and meropenem resistance increase mortality rates in NKp BSI significantly. Mortality was higher also in patients with NKp BSI secondary to pneumonia, in kidney failure and when invasive instruments were used. On the other hand, in patients who were admitted to the hospital for neurological disorders and PBT diseases mortality rate was lower.

Optimizing Polymyxin Combinations Against Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria

Polymyxin combination therapy is increasingly used clinically. However, systematic investigations of such combinations are a relatively recent phenomenon. The emerging pharmacodynamic (PD) and pharmacokinetic (PK) data on CMS/colistin and polymyxin B suggest that caution is required with monotherapy. Given this situation, polymyxin combination therapy has been suggested as a possible way to increase bacterial killing and reduce the development of resistance. Considerable in vitro data have been generated in support of this view, particularly recent studies utilizing dynamic models. However, most existing animal data are of poor quality with major shortcomings in study design, while clinical data are generally limited to retrospective analysis and small, low-power, prospective studies. This article provides an overview of clinical and preclinical investigations of CMS/colistin and polymyxin B combination therapy.

Antimicrobial Activity and Toxicity of the Major Lipopeptide Components of Polymyxin B and Colistin: Last-line Antibiotics against Multidrug-Resistant Gram-negative Bacteria

Polymyxin B and colistin are currently used as a 'last-line' treatment for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. However very little is known about the pharmacological differences between polymyxin B₁, polymyxin B₂, colistin A, colistin B, the major cyclic lipopeptides components present in polymyxin B and colistin products. Here, we report on the in vitro and in vivo antimicrobial activity and toxicity of these major lipopeptide components. All four lipopeptides had comparable MICs (<0.125-4 mg/L) against a panel of clinical Gram-negative isolates. They also had comparable in vivo antimicrobial activity (Δlog₁₀ CFU/mL >-3) and nephrotoxicity (mild to moderate histological damage) in mouse models. However, polymyxin B₁ and colistin A showed significantly higher (> 3-fold) in vitro apoptotic effect on human kidney proximal tubular HK-2 cells than polymyxin B2 and colistin B, respectively. Compared to the commercial polymyxin and colistin products, the individual lipopeptide components had slightly more in vivo antimicrobial activity. Our results highlight the need to re-assess pharmacopoeial standards for polymyxins B and colistin and to standardize the composition of the different commercial products of polymyxin antibiotics.

Polymyxin combinations: pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics for rationale use

Since their reintroduction into the clinic in the 1980s, the polymyxin antibiotics colistin-administered intravenously as an inactive prodrug, colistin methanesulfonate (CMS)-and polymyxin B have assumed an important role as salvage therapy for otherwise untreatable gram-negative infections. However, the emerging pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic data on CMS/colistin and polymyxin B indicate that polymyxin monotherapy is unlikely to generate plasma concentrations that are reliably efficacious. Additionally, regrowth and the emergence of resistance with monotherapy are commonly reported even when concentrations exceed those achieved clinically. Given this situation, polymyxin combination therapy, which is increasingly being used clinically, has been suggested as a possible means of increasing antimicrobial activity and reducing the development of resistance. Although considerable in vitro data support this view, investigations of polymyxin combination therapy in patients have only recently commenced. The currently available clinical data for polymyxin combinations are generally limited to retrospective analyses and small, low-powered, prospective studies using traditional dosage regimens that achieve low plasma concentrations. Considering the potential for rapid development of resistance to polymyxins, well-designed clinical trials that include higher-dose polymyxin regimens are urgently required to provide a more definitive answer regarding the role of polymyxin combination therapy compared with monotherapy. In this article, we provide an overview of key in vitro and clinical investigations examining CMS/colistin and polymyxin B combination therapy.

Cefepime combined with amoxicillin/clavulanic acid: a new choice for the KPC-producing K. pneumoniae infection

OBJECTIVE

Clinical treatment for blaKPC-positive Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates is challenging because the recommended antibiotic options are limited and are extraordinarily expensive. This study aimed to explore a new therapy for infection caused by KPC-producing K. pneumoniae.

METHODS

Patients with blaKPC-positive K. pneumoniae infection, were prospectively screened and were categorised into two groups: patients in the study group received a combination-based therapy of cefepime and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and the control group received tigecycline-based therapy. The pathogen clearance rate, 28-day mortality and cost of the antibiotic treatment were compared between the two groups. Moreover, the checkerboard microdilution method was performed to determine the synergy between cefepime and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid in vitro.

RESULTS

Twenty-six and 25 cases were enrolled in the study and control groups. The mortality and the overall pathogen clearance rate showed no significant differences (P=0.311 and P=0.447). Both the total cost and the portion of the cost not covered by insurance were higher for the control group compared to the study group (both P<0.001). Consistently, synergy (65.4%) and partial synergy (26.9%) were the main effects.

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast to the currently recommended tigecycline-based therapy, cefepime and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid combination was an effective and economical option to KPC-KP infection in China.

Infections caused by KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae: differences in therapy and mortality in a multicentre study

OBJECTIVES

Infections caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae (Kp) carbapenemase (KPC)-producing strains of Kp have become a significant threat in recent years. To assess their outcomes and identify risk factors for 14 day mortality, we conducted a 4 year (2010-13) retrospective cohort study in five large Italian teaching hospitals.

METHODS

The cohort included 661 adults with bloodstream infections (BSIs; n = 447) or non-bacteraemic infections (lower respiratory tract, intra-abdominal structure, urinary tract or other sites) caused by a KPC-Kp isolate. All had received ≥48 h of therapy (empirical and/or non-empirical) with at least one drug to which the isolate was susceptible.

RESULTS

Most deaths occurred within 2 weeks of infection onset (14 day mortality: 225/661, 34.1%). Logistic regression analysis identified BSI (OR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.34-3.29), presentation with septic shock (OR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.47-4.08), inadequate empirical antimicrobial therapy (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.01-2.18), chronic renal failure (OR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.44-3.58), high APACHE III score (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.04-1.07) and colistin-resistant isolates (OR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.37-3.46) as independent predictors of 14 day mortality. Combination therapy with at least two drugs displaying in vitro activity against the isolate was associated with lower mortality (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.35-0.77), in particular in patients with BSIs, lung infections or high APACHE III scores and/or septic shock at infection onset. Combinations that included meropenem were associated with significantly higher survival rates when the KPC-Kp isolate had a meropenem MIC of ≤8 mg/L.

CONCLUSIONS

KPC-Kp infections are associated with high mortality. Treatment with two or more drugs displaying activity against the isolate improves survival, mainly in patients who are critically ill.

Preventive and therapeutic strategies in critically ill patients with highly resistant bacteria

The antibiotic pipeline continues to diminish and the majority of the public remains unaware of this critical situation. The cause of the decline of antibiotic development is multifactorial and currently most ICUs are confronted with the challenge of multidrug-resistant organisms. Antimicrobial multidrug resistance is expanding all over the world, with extreme and pandrug resistance being increasingly encountered, especially in healthcare-associated infections in large highly specialized hospitals. Antibiotic stewardship for critically ill patients translated into the implementation of specific guidelines, largely promoted by the Surviving Sepsis Campaign, targeted at education to optimize choice, dosage, and duration of antibiotics in order to improve outcomes and reduce the development of resistance. Inappropriate antimicrobial therapy, meaning the selection of an antibiotic to which the causative pathogen is resistant, is a consistent predictor of poor outcomes in septic patients. Therefore, pharmacokinetically/pharmacodynamically optimized dosing regimens should be given to all patients empirically and, once the pathogen and susceptibility are known, local stewardship practices may be employed on the basis of clinical response to redefine an appropriate regimen for the patient. This review will focus on the most severely ill patients, for whom substantial progress in organ support along with diagnostic and therapeutic strategies markedly increased the risk of nosocomial infections.

Is combination therapy for carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae the new standard of care?

Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae causes serious nosocomial infections and therapeutic options are limited. There is increasing evidence suggesting that combination antibiotic therapy is more effective than monotherapy and leads to better outcomes. However, questions remain about which regimen is optimal and how to balance the potential benefits of combination therapy versus the risks and possible complications (e.g., toxicity, increased costs, Clostridium difficile infection). Well-designed randomized clinical trials are needed to clarify these issues.

Efficacy of polymyxins in the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis

In recent years, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae has become endemic in many countries. Because of limited treatment options, the abandoned "old antibiotics", polymyxins, have been reintroduced to the clinic. To evaluate the clinical efficacy of polymyxins in the treatment of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, we systemically searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases and analyzed the available evidence. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis statement were followed, and the I(2) method was used for heterogeneity. Nineteen controlled and six single-arm cohort studies comprising 1086 patients met the inclusion criteria. For controlled studies, no significant difference was noted for overall mortality (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.58-1.08; p=0.15), clinical response rate (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.61-2.54; p=0.55), or microbiological response rate (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.26-1.36; p=0.22) between polymyxin-treated groups and the control groups. Subgroup analyses showed that 28-day or 30-day mortality was lower in patients who received polymyxin combination therapy than in those who received monotherapy (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.19-0.68; p<0.01) and the control groups (OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.31-0.75; p<0.01). The results of the six single-arm studies were in accordance with the findings of controlled studies. One controlled and two single-arm studies that evaluated the occurrence of nephrotoxicity reported a pooled incidence rate of 19.2%. Our results suggest that polymyxins may be as efficacious as other antimicrobial therapies for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infection. Compared to polymyxin monotherapy, combination regimens may achieve lower 28-day or 30-day mortality. Future large-volume, well-designed randomized control trials are required to determine the role of polymyxins in treating carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections.

To B or not to B, that is the question: is it time to replace colistin with polymyxin B?

The polymyxins-colistin and polymyxin B-are an increasingly important part of the antimicrobial arsenal given the rising rate of infections due to multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria. Although the drugs have available since the 1950s, only recently have pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data been available to guide appropriate use of these drugs. Far more data and global clinical experience exist for colistin, available as the prodrug colistimethate sodium (CMS), compared with polymyxin B. Concerns raised about variability in the ability to achieve therapeutic drug concentrations when dosing CMS have led many clinicians to desire a more pharmacokinetically reliable product. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic advantages of polymyxin B compared with CMS are compelling, but clinical experience has not consistently corroborated these data. Prospective, comparative data evaluating both drugs in combination with other antimicrobials as well as comparing polymyxin B and CMS directly will inform optimal use of each drug. Some of these investigations are currently under way. In the meantime, based on current data, both drugs appear to be appropriate for use in the clinical setting.

Efficacy and safety of low-dose colistin in the treatment for infections caused by multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Infections due to multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB) are a significant burden to the healthcare system globally. Colistin is the drug of choice for MDR-GNB and recent studies recommend high doses. This study investigated the safety of low-dose colistin and the relationship of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of colistin with bacterial cure in the treatment for MDR-GNB infections.

METHODS

Computerized dispensing records identified all patients who received colistin during January 2010 and December 2011. Patients who were aged < 12 years old, who received colistin for < 72 h or had moderate to severe renal impairment were excluded. Medical records of the remaining patients were reviewed for the necessary data to determine the bacterial cure and nephrotoxicity of colistin. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine the predictors of bacterial cure.

RESULTS

A total of 125 evaluable patients received colistin during the study period. Ninety-four of 125 (75·2%) patients achieved bacterial cure. No statistically significant differences were observed between patients who achieved and failed to achieve bacterial cure with regards to age, gender, site of infection, mg/kg dose or duration of colistin use. The average MIC in the bacterial cure group was significantly lower than the MIC in the bacterial failure group (P = 0·002). Similarly, 30-day mortality from the last dose of colistin was significantly lower in the bacterial cure group (P = 0·002). Nephrotoxicity occurred in 12·8% of patients and was not associated with the dose of colistin or concomitant use of nephrotoxic medications. MIC of <1 μg/mL was the only significant independent predictor of bacterial cure in the multivariate logistic regression analysis (P = 0·015), whereas infection caused by MDR Klebsiella pneumonia was an independent risk factor for bacterial failure (P = 0·049).

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Low-dose colistin is an effective option in the treatment for infections caused by MDR-GNB with a low incidence of nephrotoxicity. Patients who achieved bacterial cure had significantly lower MIC values of colistin against MDR-GNB than those who failed to achieve it. Colistin dose should be based on the MIC data of a given patient or local antimicrobial sensitivity data to maximize its efficacy.