Pharmacokinetics of Transfer of Azithromycin into the Breast Milk of African Mothers

A literature review of drug transport mechanisms during lactation

Despite the benefits of breastfeeding, lactating mothers who take prescribed medications may discontinue breastfeeding due to concerns associated with infant drug exposure in breastmilk. Consolidating the current knowledge of drug transport to breastmilk may inform understanding of the safety of medication use during lactation. This literature review summarizes the mechanisms of drug transport to breastmilk, details the physicochemical drug properties that may alter the extent of passive transport, and describes the expressional changes in mammary drug transporters that may affect active transport. During the period of 20 July 2023 to 11 August 2023, PubMed® was searched to identify journal articles pertinent to the mechanisms of drug transport from maternal plasma to breastmilk and the expression of mammary drug transporters during lactation. From the 28 studies included in this review, four mechanisms were identified for transporting drugs from maternal plasma to breastmilk: passive transport, active transport, lipid co-transport, and transcytosis. The lactational expression of 20 drug transporters was further summarized, with 9 transporters demonstrating downregulated expression during lactation and 11 transporters demonstrating upregulated expression during lactation. Understanding the mechanisms of drug transport to breastmilk may aid in estimating infant drug exposure, developing physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models that describe drug transfer, and initiating clinical drug development programs in the lactating population.

Drugs in Human Milk Part 1: Practical and Analytical Considerations in Measuring Drugs and Metabolites in Human Milk

Human milk is a remarkable biofluid that provides essential nutrients and immune protection to newborns. Breastfeeding women consuming medications could pass the drug through their milk to neonates. Drugs can be transferred to human milk by passive diffusion or active transport. The physicochemical properties of the drug largely impact the extent of drug transfer into human milk. A comprehensive understanding of the physiology of human milk formation, composition of milk, mechanisms of drug transfer, and factors influencing drug transfer into human milk is critical for appropriate selection and use of medications in lactating women. Quantification of drugs in the milk is essential for assessing the safety of pharmacotherapy during lactation. This can be achieved by developing specific, sensitive, and reproducible analytical methods using techniques such as liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry. The present review briefly discusses the physiology of human milk formation, composition of human milk, mechanisms of drug transfer into human milk, and factors influencing transfer of drugs from blood to milk. We further expand upon and critically evaluate the existing analytical approaches/assays used for the quantification of drugs in human milk.

A systematic review on maternal-to-infant transfer of drugs through breast milk during the treatment of malaria, tuberculosis, and neglected tropical diseases

BACKGROUND

Exclusive breastfeeding of infants under 6 months of age is recommended by the World Health Organization. In 2021, over 300 million combined incident cases of malaria, tuberculosis, and neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) were reported, predominantly in low-income countries. For many of the drugs used as first-line treatments for these conditions, there is limited knowledge on infant exposure through breastfeeding with poorly understood consequences. This review summarized available knowledge on mother-to-infant transfer of these drugs to inform future lactation pharmacokinetic studies.

METHODOLOGY

A list of first-line drugs was generated from the latest WHO treatment guidelines. Using standard online databases, 2 independent reviewers searched for eligible articles reporting lactation pharmacokinetics studies and extracted information on study design, participant characteristics, and the mathematical approach used for parameter estimation. A third reviewer settled any disagreements between the 2 reviewers. All studies were scored against the standardized "ClinPK" checklist for conformity to best practices for reporting clinical pharmacokinetic studies. Simple proportions were used to summarize different study characteristics.

FINDINGS

The most remarkable finding was the scarcity of lactation pharmacokinetic data. Only 15 of the 69 drugs we listed had lactation pharmacokinetics fully characterized. Most studies enrolled few mothers, and only one evaluated infant drug concentrations. Up to 66% of the studies used non-compartmental analysis to estimate pharmacokinetic parameters rather than model-based compartmental analysis. Unlike non-compartmental approaches, model-based compartmental analysis provides for dynamic characterization of individual plasma and breast milk concentration-time profiles and adequately characterizes variability within and between individuals, using sparsely sampled data. The "ClinPK" checklist inadequately appraised the studies with variability in the number of relevant criteria across different studies.

CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE

A consensus is required on best practices for conducting and reporting lactation pharmacokinetic studies, especially in neglected diseases such as malaria, tuberculosis, and NTDs, to optimize treatment of mother-infant pairs.

Transfer of antibiotics and their metabolites in human milk: Implications for infant health and microbiota

Antibiotics are an essential tool for perinatal care. While antibiotics can play a life-saving role for both parents and infants, they also cause collateral damage to the beneficial bacteria that make up the host gut microbiota. This is especially true for infants, whose developing gut microbiota is uniquely sensitive to antibiotic perturbation. Emerging evidence suggests that disruption of these bacterial populations during this crucial developmental window can have long-term effects on infant health and development. Although most current studies have focused on microbial disruptions caused by direct antibiotic administration to infants or prenatal exposure to antibiotics administered to the mother, little is known about whether antibiotics in human milk may pose similar risks to the infant. This review surveys current data on antibiotic transfer during lactation and highlights new methodologies to assess drug transfer in human milk. Finally, we provide recommendations for future work to ensure antibiotic use in lactating parents is safe and effective for both parents and infants.

An untargeted metabolomics analysis of exogenous chemicals in human milk and transfer to the infant

Human milk is the optimal infant nutrition. However, although human-derived metabolites (such as lipids and oligosaccharides) in human milk are regularly reported, the presence of exogenous chemicals (such as drugs, food, and synthetic compounds) are often not addressed. To understand the types of exogenous compounds that might be present, human milk (n = 996) was analyzed by untargeted metabolomics. This analysis revealed that lifestyle molecules, such as medications and their metabolites, and industrial sources, such as plasticizers, cosmetics, and other personal care products, are found in human milk. We provide further evidence that some of these lifestyle molecules are also detectable in the newborn's stool. Thus, this study gives important insight into the types of exposures infants receiving human milk might ingest due to the lifestyle choices, exposure, or medical status of the lactating parent.

Effect of intra-partum azithromycin on the development of the infant nasopharyngeal microbiota: A post hoc analysis of a double-blind randomized trial

Background

Sepsis is a leading cause of neonatal death. Intrapartum azithromycin reduces neonatal nasopharyngeal carriage of potentially pathogenic bacteria, a prerequisite for sepsis. Early antibiotic exposure has been associated with microbiota perturbations with varying effects. This study aims to understand the effect of intrapartum azithromycin intervention on the developing nasopharyngeal microbiota of the child.

Methods

Using 16S rRNA gene sequencing, we analysed the microbiota of 343 nasopharyngeal samples collected from birth to 12 months from 109 healthy infants selected from a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial conducted in the Gambia (PregnAnZI-1). In the trial, 829 women were given 2g oral azithromycin or placebo (1:1) during labour with the objective of reducing bacterial carriage in mother and child during the neonatal period. The post-hoc analysis presented here assessed the effect of the intervention on the child nasopharyngeal microbiota development.

Findings

55 children were from mothers given azithromycin and 54 from mothers given placebo. Comparing arms, we found an increase in alpha-diversity at day-6 (p = 0·018), and a significant effect on overall microbiota composition at days 6 and 28 (R² = 4.4%, q = 0·007 and R² = 2.3%, q = 0·018 respectively). At genus level, we found lower representation of Staphylococcus at day-6 (q = 0·0303) and higher representation of Moraxella at 12 months (q = 0·0443). Unsupervised clustering of samples by microbial community similarity showed different community dynamics between the intervention and placebo arms during the neonatal period.

Interpretation

These results indicate that intrapartum azithromycin caused short-term alterations in the nasopharyngeal microbiota with modest overall effect at 12 months of age. Further exploration of the effects of these variations on microbiome function will give more insight on the potential risks and benefits, for the child, associated with this intervention.

Funding

This work was jointly funded by the Medical Research Council (UK) (MC_EX_MR/J010391/1/MRC), Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1196513), and MRCG@LSHTM Doctoral Training Program.

In Defense of Mothers: Why Pregnant and Breastfeeding Women Should Be Included in Mass Drug Administration Programs

Mass drug administration (MDA) programs are a critical component of efforts to treat and eliminate trachoma, a leading cause of blindness worldwide. Despite the importance of these programs for individual and community health, pregnant and breastfeeding women have historically been excluded from treatment in these programs. Countries with active MDA programs also tend to have high fertility rates, and thus women may be left untreated for years at a time. Not only do these women suffer from the symptoms of disease (pain and eventual blindness), but also failure to include the entire population in drug administration programs leaves pockets of infection in the community, risking outright failure of eradication efforts. The medication used most commonly, azithromycin, appears to be safe for use in pregnancy and breastfeeding. The time has come to include pregnant and breastfeeding women in MDA programs, not just for them, but also for their communities.

Impact of intra-partum azithromycin on carriage of group A streptococcus in the Gambia: a posthoc analysis of a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial

Background

Group A Streptococcus (GAS) is a major human pathogen and an important cause of maternal and neonatal sepsis. Asymptomatic bacterial colonization is considered a necessary step towards sepsis. Intra-partum azithromycin may reduce GAS carriage.

Methods

A posthoc analysis of a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized-trial was performed to determine the impact of 2 g oral dose of intra-partum azithromycin on maternal and neonatal GAS carriage and antibiotic resistance. Following screening, 829 mothers were randomized who delivered 843 babies. GAS was determined by obtaining samples from the maternal and newborn nasopharynx, maternal vaginal tract and breastmilk. Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) of GAS isolates was performed using the Illumina Miseq platform.

Results

GAS carriage was lower in the nasopharynx of both mothers and babies and breast milk among participants in the azithromycin arm. No differences in GAS carriage were found between groups in the vaginal tract. The occurrence of azithromycin-resistant GAS was similar in both arms, except for a higher prevalence in the vaginal tract among women in the azithromycin arm. WGS revealed all macrolide-resistant vaginal tract isolates from the azithromycin arm were Streptococcus dysgalactiae subspecies equisimilis expressing Lancefield group A carbohydrate (SDSE(A)) harbouring macrolide resistant genes msr(D) and mef(A). Ten of the 45 GAS isolates (22.2%) were SDSE(A).

Conclusions

Oral intra-partum azithromycin reduced GAS carriage among Gambian mothers and neonates however carriage in the maternal vaginal tract was not affected by the intervention due to azithromycin resistant SDSE(A). SDSE(A) resistance must be closely monitored to fully assess the public health impact of intrapartum azithromycin on GAS.

Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01800942

A comprehensive review of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic in animals: exploration of interaction with antibiotics of Shuang-Huang-Lian preparations

As a traditional Chinese medicine, Shuang-Huang-Lian (SHL) has been widely used for treating infectious diseases of the respiratory tract such as encephalitis, pneumonia and asthma. During the past few decades, considerable research has focused on the pharmacological action, pharmacokinetic interaction with antibiotics and clinical applications of SHL. A huge and more recent body of pharmacokinetic study supports the combination of SHL and antibiotics has different effects such as antagonism and synergism. SHL has been one of the best-selling traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) products. However, there is no system review of SHL preparations, ranging from protection against respiratory tract infections to interaction with antibiotics. Since their important significance in clinical therapy, the pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic, and interactions with antibiotics of SHL were reviewed and discussed. In addition, this review attempts to explore the possible potential mechanism of SHL preparations in prevention and treatment of COVID-19. We are concerned about what is known of the effects of SHL against virus, bacterium, and its interactions with antibiotics, providing a new strategy for expanding the clinical research and medication of SHL preparations.

Short-term increase in the carriage of azithromycin-resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in mothers and their newborns following intra-partum azithromycin: a post hoc analysis of a double-blind randomized trial

Objectives

To evaluate the impact of one oral dose of intrapartum azithromycin (2 g) on the carriage and antibiotic resistance of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in the nasopharynx, breast milk and vaginal swabs of mothers and K. pneumoniae in the nasopharynx of their newborns.

Methods

We performed a post hoc analysis of a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized-trial (ratio 1:1) conducted in The Gambia. Breast milk (BM) and vaginal swabs (VS) from mothers and nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) from mother-newborn pairs were collected at different timepoints during the 4 week follow-up. Samples were processed using standard microbiological procedures. For BM and NPS post-intervention results were combined for analysis.

Results

In the original trial 829 mothers were randomized. In this analysis, complete sample sets were available for 630 mothers for E. coli analysis (76.0%) and 564 mother-newborn pairs for K. pneumoniae analysis (68.0%). For E. coli, carriage prevalence in BM and VS was similar in both arms but resistance was higher in the azithromycin arm in VS (2.6% versus 0%, P = 0.004). For K. pneumoniae, carriage prevalence was higher in the azithromycin arm for BM (13.8% versus 8.7%, P = 0.055) but not for VS or NPS. Prevalence of azithromycin resistant K. pneumoniae was higher in the azithromycin arm for BM (3.6% versus 1.0%, P = 0.050) and VS (1.5% versus 0% P = 0.057).

Conclusions

Oral intrapartum azithromycin did not reduce carriage of E. coli and K. pneumoniae and was associated with an increase in the prevalence of azithromycin-resistant E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates in BM and VS.

Breastfeeding and Medication Use in Kidney Disease

Pregnancy in CKD is a condition fraught with challenges including multiple medications, high-risk pregnancy followed by maternal and fetal compromise such as preterm delivery, and low birth weight infant. Breastfeeding is unique in its impact on the mother and the baby, their bonding, and future health implications impacting the society. Breast milk is produced specific for the infant by the biological mother. It changes in composition with lactation stage and leads to optimal growth of the baby including establishing circadian rhythms, getting protective antibodies, and establishing a healthy gut microbiome. Multiple hormones influence the composition of the milk. Lactation is maintained by removal of the milk. Blood-milk barrier allows for the specific composition of milk by transporting different sized molecules through different mechanisms. It is safe to assume that most medications will be found in some amount in human milk; however, the impact of that is usually not enough to justify stopping breastfeeding. When the mother's milk is not available, formula or donor milk can be considered. There are resources to guide the use of medications during lactation that the providers should be aware of and use, to guide medication and breastfeeding recommendations.

Updated pharmacokinetic considerations for the use of antimalarial drugs in pregnant women

INTRODUCTION

The association between pregnancy and altered drug pharmacokinetic (PK) properties is acknowledged, as is its impact on drug plasma concentrations and thus therapeutic efficacy. However, there have been few robust PK studies of antimalarial use in pregnancy. Given that inadequate dosing for prevention or treatment of malaria in pregnancy can result in negative maternal/infant outcomes, along with the potential to select for parasite drug resistance, it is imperative that reliable pregnancy-specific dosing recommendations are established.

AREAS COVERED

PK studies of antimalarial drugs in pregnancy. The present review summarizes the efficacy and PK properties of WHO-recommended therapies used in pregnancy, with a focus on PK studies published since 2014.

EXPERT OPINION

Changes in antimalarial drug disposition in pregnancy are well described, yet pregnant women continue to receive treatment regimens optimized for non-pregnant adults. Contemporary in silico modeling has recently identified a series of alternative dosing regimens that are predicted to provide optimal therapeutic efficacy for pregnant women.

Breastfeeding mothers with COVID-19 infection: a case series

Background

The first reports of the Chinese experience in the management of newborns of mothers with SARS-CoV 2 infection did not recommend mother-baby contact or breastfeeding. At present, the most important International Societies, such as WHO and UNICEF, promote breastfeeding and mother-baby contact as long as adequate measures to control COVID-19 infection are followed. In cases where maternal general health conditions impede direct breastfeeding or in cases of separation between mother and baby, health organizations encourage and support expressing milk and safely providing it to the infants.

Methods

A series of 22 case studies of newborns to mothers with COVID-19 infection from March 14th to April 14th, 2020 was conducted. Mothers and newborns were followed for a median period of 1.8 consecutive months.

Results

Out of 22 mothers, 20 (90.9%) chose to breastfeed their babies during hospital admission. Timely initiation and skin to skin contact at delivery room was performed in 54.5 and 59.1%, respectively. Eighty two percent of newborns to mothers with COVID-19 were fed with breast milk after 1 month, decreasing to 77% at 1.8 months. Six of 22 (37.5%) mothers with COVID-19 required transitory complementary feeding until exclusive breastfeeding was achieved. During follow-up period, there were no major complications, and no neonates were infected during breastfeeding.

Conclusions

Our experience shows that breastfeeding in newborns of mothers with COVID-19 is safe with the adequate infection control measures to avoid mother-baby contagion. Supplementing feeding with pasteurized donor human milk or infant formula may be effective, until exclusive breastfeeding is achieved.

Repurposing azithromycin for neonatal neuroprotection

BACKGROUND

Inflammation contributes to neonatal hypoxic-ischemic brain injury pathogenesis. We evaluated the neuroprotective efficacy of azithromycin, a safe, widely available antibiotic with anti-inflammatory properties, in a neonatal rodent hypoxic-ischemic brain injury model.

METHODS

Seven-day-old rats underwent right carotid artery ligation followed by 90-min 8% oxygen exposure; this procedure elicits quantifiable left forepaw functional impairment and right cerebral hemisphere damage. Sensorimotor function (vibrissae-stimulated forepaw placing, grip strength) and brain damage were compared in azithromycin- and saline-treated littermates 2-4 weeks later. Multiple treatment protocols were evaluated (variables included doses ranging from 15 to 45 mg/kg; treatment onset 15 min to 4 h post-hypoxia, and comparison of 1 vs. 3 injections).

RESULTS

All azithromycin doses improved function and reduced brain damage; efficacy was dose dependent, and declined with increasing treatment delay. Three azithromycin injections, administered over 48 h, improved performance on both function measures and reduced brain damage more than a single dose.

CONCLUSION

In this neonatal rodent model, azithromycin improved functional and neuropathology outcomes. If supported by confirmatory studies in complementary neonatal brain injury models, azithromycin could be an attractive candidate drug for repurposing and evaluation for neonatal neuroprotection in clinical trials.

A Randomized Open-Label Evaluation of the Antimalarial Prophylactic Efficacy of Azithromycin-Piperaquine versus Sulfadoxine-Pyrimethamine in Pregnant Papua New Guinean Women

Emerging malaria parasite sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) resistance has prompted assessment of alternatives for intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy (IPTp). The objective was to evaluate the tolerability and prophylactic efficacy of azithromycin (AZ) plus piperaquine (PQ) in pregnant women in Papua New Guinea. The study was an open-label, randomized, parallel-group trial. A total of 122 women (median gestation, 26 weeks [range, 14 to 32 weeks]) were randomized 1:1 to three daily doses of 1 g AZ plus 960 mg PQ tetraphosphate or single-dose SP (4,500 mg sulfadoxine plus 225 mg pyrimethamine), based on computer-generated block randomization. Tolerability was assessed to day 7, and efficacy was assessed to day 42 (when participants were returned to usual care) and at delivery. Data for 119 participants (AZ-PQ, n = 61; SP, n = 58) were analyzed. Both regimens were well tolerated, but AZ-PQ was associated with more gastrointestinal side effects (31%) and dizziness (21%). Eight women (6.7%) were parasitemic at recruitment but all were aparasitemic by 72 h. There were no differences in blood smear positivity rates between AZ-PQ and SP up to day 42 (0% versus 5.2%; relative risk [RR], 0.14 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01 to 2.58] [P = 0.18]; absolute risk reduction [ARR], 5.2% [95% CI, -1.3 to 11.6%]) and at the time of delivery (0% versus 8.7%; RR, 0.11 [95% CI, 0.01 to 2.01] [P = 0.14]; ARR, 8.7% [95% CI, -0.2 to 17.6%]). Of 92 women who were monitored to parturition, 89 (97%) delivered healthy babies; there were 3 stillbirths (SP, n = 1; AZ-PQ, n = 2 [twins]). There was a higher live birth weight (mean ± standard deviation) in the AZ-PQ group (3.13 ± 0.42 versus 2.88 ± 0.55 kg [P = 0.016]; mean difference, 0.25 kg [95% CI, 0.02 to 0.48 kg]). AZ-PQ is a promising candidate for IPTp.

[Medications in breastfeeding: what evidence is there?]

Breastfeeding plays a fundamental role in the benefits for the health of the newborn child and the nursing mother. The use of medications during breastfeeding is a relevant issue, by virtue of the frequent need for pharmacological treatment in the postpartum period. The scope of this article was to conduct a review of the literature regarding the efficacy and safety of medications used during the breastfeeding period. A search was conducted in the PubMed (National Library of Medicine), ScienceDirect and Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde (BVS) databases for articles published in Portuguese, English and Spanish in the period from 1981 to 2016. This review discusses the risk of the use of medications during lactation and the effects that they may have on the breastfed infant. Few medications are contraindicated and others require care due the risk of adverse effects on breastfed infants or in the suppression of breast milk volume. Therefore, the dissemination of updated information for the health professional to adequately assess the risks and the benefits of the use of medications during breastfeeding is of vital importance, thereby contributing to avoid early weaning.

Association between exposure to macrolides and the development of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Macrolides are bacteriostatic antibiotics with a broad spectrum of activity against Gram-positive bacteria. The aim of this study was to systematically review and meta-analyze the association between infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (IHPS) and macrolides. Nine databases were searched systematically for studies with information on the association between macrolides and IHPS. We combined findings using random effects models. Our study revealed 18 articles investigating the association between macrolides and IHPS. There was a significant association between the development of IHPS and erythromycin (2.38, 1.06-5.39). The association was strong when erythromycin was used during the first 2 weeks of life (8.14, 4.29-15.45). During breastfeeding, use of macrolides showed no significant association with IHPS in infants (0.96, 0.61-1.53). IHPS was not associated with erythromycin (1.11, 0.9-1.36) or macrolides use during pregnancy (1.15, 0.98-1.36).Conclusions: There is an association between erythromycin use during infancy and developing IHPS in infants. However, no significant association was found between macrolides use during pregnancy or breastfeeding. Additional large studies are needed to further evaluate potential association with macrolide use. What is known? • Erythromycin intake in the first 2 weeks of life is associated with an increased risk of pyloric stenosis. What is New? • There is currently no evidence of significant association between macrolides use during pregnancy or breastfeeding and pyloric stenosis.

Pharmacokinetic interaction between shuanghuanglian and azithromycin injection: a nonlinear mixed-effects model analysis in rats

1. This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetic interaction of shuanghuanglian (SHL) and azithromycin in rats, and to provide experimental support for rational drug use in clinics. 2. High-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection (HPLC-UV) and high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) approaches were respectively developed to detect the forsythiaside (active component of SHL) and azithromycin concentrations. Both non-compartmental and compartmental analyzes were employed to calculate pharmacokinetic parameters. A nonlinear mixed-effects modeling method was applied to fit the drug concentration-time data. The influence of drug coadministration on pharmacokinetic parameters was tested using forward inclusion and backward elimination procedures. 3. After drug co-administration, areas under the drug concentration-time curve (AUC) and half-lives (T_1/2) of both azithromycin and forsythiaside increased significantly, meanwhile, the drug clearance (CL) decreased compared to single drug administration. Both forsythiaside and azithromycin exposures increased after coadministration. Two-compartment models were suitable to describe the in vivo behavior of both azithromycin and forsythiaside. The coadministration of SHL could significantly decrease the central volume of azithromycin (V_CA) and forsythiaside clearance (CL_F) decreased after co-intravenous administration of azithromycin. 4. Co-intravenous administration of forsythiaside and azithromycin could significantly increase drug exposures for both drugs. Lower dose can provide sufficient drug exposure to obtain antibacterial activity. The coadministration may be a potential method to increase therapy efficiency while decrease adverse drug reactions.

Long-lasting effect of oral azithromycin taken by women during labour on infant nutrition: Follow-up cohort of a randomized clinical trial in western Gambia

Objective

To assess the effect of administering an oral dose of 2g of azithromycin in Gambian women during labour on infant growth.

Methods

Children whose mothers had been randomized to receive either an oral dose of 2g of azithromycin or placebo during labour were visited at home at the end of infancy by trained study nurses blind to the treatment allocation. The follow-up visit of these cohorts (exposed and non-exposed to azithromycin), which was not part of the original trial design, was conducted between November 2014 and May 2015 when the infants were 11 to 13 months of age. During visits, nurses recorded anthropometrical measurements and transcribed information from the infants’ welfare cards.

Results

Four-hundred and sixty-five (79.6%) of the 584 infants aged 11–13 months at the time of the survey were recruited. The proportion of children with an age-adjusted Z-score <-2SD for mid-upper-arm circumference (MUAC) was lower among those exposed to azithromycin [1.3% versus 6.3%, OR = 0.21 95%CI (0.06,0.72), p = 0.006] and there was weak evidence of a difference in the proportion of infants with weight-for-age (WAZ) Z-score <-2SD [7.1% versus 12.1%, OR = 0.58 95%CI (0.33,1.04), p = 0.065]. For all other malnutrition indicators the proportions were similar in the exposed and un-exposed cohort.

Conclusions

Our results show that azithromycin in labour may have a beneficial effect in MUAC among children who are below the curve. Larger studies with closer follow-up are warranted.

Trial registration (main trial)

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01800942.

Antibiotics and lactation: An overview of relative infant doses and a systematic assessment of clinical studies

Breastfeeding is important for the development of the child. Many antibiotics are considered safe during breastfeeding. The aim of the study was to assess the quality of lactation studies with antibiotics using the FDA and International Lactation Consultant Association quality guidelines for lactation studies. The secondary goal was to determine the exposure of the breastfed infant to antibiotics in relation to bacterial resistance and the developing microbiome. A literature search was performed and the included studies were scored on methodology, parameters concerning maternal exposure to antibiotics, maternal plasma and milk sampling. The infant exposure has been calculated and expressed as a percentage of a normal infant therapeutic dose. Sixty-six studies were included in five antibiotic groups (broad-spectrum penicillin, cephalosporins, macrolides and lincosamides, quinolones and sulphonamides). Cephalosporins were the most studied group of antibiotics (n = 21). Fifteen studies met all the criteria of "mother exposure to antibiotic". Six studies met every criterion related to "plasma sampling". Only one case report met all listed criteria for lactation studies. The correct calculation of infant exposure to antibiotics via the milk:plasma ratio (AUC) varies between 13% for macrolides and 38% for broad-spectrum penicillin. The highest assessed exposure as a percentage of infant therapeutic dose was for metronidazole (11%). The studies meet to a limited extent with the quality standards for lactation research. The breastfed infants are exposed to a subtherapeutic concentration of antibiotics.

Drugs in Lactation

One impediment to breastfeeding is the lack of information on the use of many drugs during lactation, especially newer ones. The principles of drug passage into breastmilk are well established, but have often not been optimally applied prospectively. Commonly used preclinical rodent models for determining drug excretion into milk are very unreliable because of marked differences in milk composition and transporters compared to those of humans. Measurement of drug concentrations in humans remains the gold standard, but computer modeling is promising. New FDA labeling requirements present an opportunity to apply modeling to preclinical drug development in place of conventional animal testing for drug excretion into breastmilk, which should improve the use of medications in nursing mothers.

Bradycardia and Hypothermia Complicating Azithromycin Treatment

Patient: Male, 4

Final Diagnosis: Febrile neutropenia

Symptoms: Fever

Medication: Azithromycin

Clinical Procedure: —

Specialty: Infectious Diseases

Adverse events in women and children who have received intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis treatment: a systematic review

Background

Adverse events from intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) are poorly documented yet essential to inform clinical practice for neonatal group B Streptococcus (GBS) disease prevention. In this systematic review, we appraised and synthesised the evidence on the adverse events of IAP in the mother and/or her child.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Science Citation Index from date of inception until October 16th 2016. Reference lists of included studies and relevant systematic reviews were hand-searched. We included primary studies in English that reported any adverse events from intrapartum antibiotics for any prophylactic purpose compared to controls. The search was not restricted to prophylaxis for GBS but excluded women with symptoms of infection or undergoing caesarean section. Two reviewers assessed the methodological quality of studies, using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, and the Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Nonrandomised Studies. Results were synthesised narratively and displayed in text and tables.

Results

From 2364 unique records, 30 studies were included. Despite a wide range of adverse events reported in 17 observational studies and 13 randomised controlled trials (RCTs), the evidence was inconsistent and at high risk of bias. Only one RCT investigated the long-term effects of IAP reporting potentially serious outcomes such as cerebral palsy; however, it had limited applicability and unclear biological plausibility. Seven observational studies showed that IAP for maternal GBS colonisation alters the infant microbiome. However, study populations were not followed through to clinical outcomes, therefore clinical significance is unknown. There was also observational evidence for increased antimicrobial resistance, however studies were at high or unclear risk of bias.

Conclusions

The evidence base to determine the frequency of adverse events from intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis for neonatal GBS disease prevention is limited. As RCTs may not be possible, large, better quality, and longitudinal observational studies across countries with widespread IAP could fill this gap.

Trial registration

CRD42016037195.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12884-017-1432-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Bioanalytical challenge: A review of environmental and pharmaceuticals contaminants in human milk

An overview of bioanalytical methods for the determination of environmental and pharmaceutical contaminants in human milk is presented. The exposure of children to these contaminants through lactation has been widely investigated. The human milk contains diverse proteins, lipids, and carbohydrates and the concentration of these components is drastically altered during the lactation period providing a high degree of an analytical challenge. Sample collection and pretreatment are still considered the Achilles' heel. This review presents liquid chromatographic methods developed in the last 10 years for this complex matrix with focuses in the extraction and quantification steps. Green sample preparation protocols have been emphasized.

Oral azithromycin given during labour decreases bacterial carriage in the mothers and their offspring: a double-blind randomized trial

Bacterial sepsis remains a leading cause of death among neonates with Staphylococcus aureus, group B streptococcus (GBS) and Streptococcus pneumoniae identified as the most common causative pathogens in Africa. Asymptomatic bacterial colonization is an intermediate step towards sepsis. We conducted a phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial to determine the impact of giving one oral dose of azithromycin to Gambian women in labour on the nasopharyngeal carriage of S. aureus, GBS or S. pneumoniae in the newborn at day 6 postpartum. Study participants were recruited in a health facility in western Gambia. They were followed for 8 weeks and samples were collected during the first 4 weeks. Between April 2013 and April 2014 we recruited 829 women who delivered 843 babies, including 13 stillbirths. Sixteen babies died during the follow-up period. No maternal deaths were observed. No serious adverse events related to the intervention were reported. According to the intent-to-treat analysis, prevalence of nasopharyngeal carriage of the bacteria of interest in the newborns at day 6 was lower in the intervention arm (28.3% versus 65.1% prevalence ratio 0.43; 95% CI 0.36–0.52, p <0.001). At the same time-point, prevalence of any bacteria in the mother was also lower in the azithromycin group (nasopharynx, 9.3% versus 40.0%, p <0.001; breast milk, 7.9% versus 21.6%, p <0.001; and the vaginal tract, 13.2% versus 24.2%, p <0.001). Differences between arms lasted for at least 4 weeks. Oral azithromycin given to women in labour decreased the carriage of bacteria of interest in mothers and newborns and may lower the risk of neonatal sepsis.

Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01800942.