Population pharmacokinetics of gentamicin and dosing optimization for infants

The impact of extracorporeal support on antimicrobial pharmacokinetics in critically ill neonatal and paediatric patients: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

Infections represent a major risk for critically ill neonatal and paediatric patients requiring extracorporeal life-saving support such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and/or continuous renal replacement therapies (CRRT). Patient outcomes rely on achieving target antimicrobial concentrations. In critically ill adults on extracorporeal support, suboptimal antimicrobial concentrations have been shown to be common. Our objective was to systematically review antimicrobial pharmacokinetic studies in critically ill term neonatal and paediatric patients receiving ECMO and/or CRRT and compare them to similar cohorts of patients not receiving ECMO or CRRT.

METHODS

Studies published between 1990 and 2022 were identified through systematic searches in PUBMED, Embase, Web of Science, Medline, Google Scholar and CINAHL. Studies were included which provided antimicrobial pharmacokinetic parameters (volume of distribution and clearance) in the neonatal and paediatric patients receiving ECMO and/or CRRT. Studies were excluded if no antimicrobial pharmacokinetic parameters were described or could be calculated.

RESULTS

Forty-four pharmacokinetic studies were identified describing 737 patients, with neonatal patients recruited in 70% of the ECMO studies and <1% of the CRRT studies. Of all the studies, 50% were case reports or case series. The pharmacokinetics were altered for gentamicin, daptomycin, ceftolozane, micafungin, voriconazole, cefepime, fluconazole, piperacillin, and vancomycin, although considerable patient variability was described.

CONCLUSION

Significant gaps remain in our understanding of the pharmacokinetic alterations in neonatal and paediatric patients receiving ECMO and CRRT support.

Pragmatic physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling to support clinical implementation of optimized gentamicin dosing in term neonates and infants: proof-of-concept

Introduction

Modeling and simulation can support dosing recommendations for clinical practice, but a simple framework is missing. In this proof-of-concept study, we aimed to develop neonatal and infant gentamicin dosing guidelines, supported by a pragmatic physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling approach and a decision framework for implementation.

Methods

An already existing PBPK model was verified with data of 87 adults, 485 children and 912 neonates, based on visual predictive checks and predicted-to-observed pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter ratios. After acceptance of the model, dosages now recommended by the Dutch Pediatric Formulary (DPF) were simulated, along with several alternative dosing scenarios, aiming for recommended peak (i.e., 8-12 mg/L for neonates and 15-20 mg/L for infants) and trough (i.e., <1 mg/L) levels. We then used a decision framework to weigh benefits and risks for implementation.

Results

The PBPK model adequately described gentamicin PK. Simulations of current DPF dosages showed that the dosing interval for term neonates up to 6 weeks of age should be extended to 36-48 h to reach trough levels <1 mg/L. For infants, a 7.5 mg/kg/24 h dose will reach adequate peak levels. The benefits of these dose adaptations outweigh remaining uncertainties which can be minimized by routine drug monitoring.

Conclusion

We used a PBPK model to show that current DPF dosages for gentamicin in term neonates and infants needed to be optimized. In the context of potential uncertainties, the risk-benefit analysis proved positive; the model-informed dose is ready for clinical implementation.

Gentamicin Pharmacokinetics and Optimal Dosage in Infant Patients: A Case Report and Literature Review

Gentamicin is an aminoglycoside antibiotic that is mostly used for the pediatric population. While the pediatric population is classified into neonates, infants, children, and adolescents based on developmental or maturational changes, infants are often overlooked in research. Three infant cases receiving gentamicin are presented to illustrate the pharmacokinetics and optimum dosage of gentamicin. Three infant patients received gentamicin (5.6-7.5 mg/kg/day) for urinary tract infections (UTIs) or bacteremia caused by Enterobacter aerogenes. The trough (Cmin) and peak (Cpeak) concentrations of gentamicin were 0.2-1.8 and 8.9 mg/L, respectively. The Cmin of a patient receiving gentamicin at 9.0 mg/kg/day was 3.3 mg/L, and the patient showed a decrease in urinary volume. The other two patients fully recovered from the infection and did not experience any adverse events. Additionally, we reviewed three studies regarding infant patients receiving gentamicin. The studies used gentamicin therapy for Gram-negative pathogen infections and UTIs caused by Escherichia coli and Enterococcus faecalis. The Cmin and Cpeak of patients receiving gentamicin at 2.2-7.5 mg/kg/day were 0.58-2.15 mg/kg and 4.67-8.88 mg/L, respectively. All patients were cured without any adverse events. Gentamicin dosages below 7.5 mg/kg/day may be effective and safe for use in infant patients. However, the optimal dosing regimen of gentamicin in infant patients is controversial, and limited data are available.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Gentamicin in Various Patient Populations and Consequences for Optimal Dosing for Gram-Negative Infections: An Updated Review

Gentamicin is an aminoglycoside antibiotic with a small therapeutic window that is currently used primarily as part of short-term empirical combination therapy. Gentamicin dosing schemes still need refinement, especially for subpopulations where pharmacokinetics can differ from pharmacokinetics in the general adult population: obese patients, critically ill patients, paediatric patients, neonates, elderly patients and patients on dialysis. This review summarizes the clinical pharmacokinetics of gentamicin in these patient populations and the consequences for optimal dosing of gentamicin for infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria, highlighting new insights from the last 10 years. In this period, several new population pharmacokinetic studies have focused on these subpopulations, providing insights into the typical values of the most relevant pharmacokinetic parameters, the variability of these parameters and possible explanations for this variability, although unexplained variability often remains high. Both dosing schemes and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) targets varied widely between these studies. A gentamicin starting dose of 7 mg/kg based on total body weight (or on adjusted body weight in obese patients) appears to be the optimal strategy for increasing the probability of target attainment (PTA) after the first administration for the most commonly used PK/PD targets in adults and children older than 1 month, including critically ill patients. However, evidence that increasing the PTA results in higher efficacy is lacking; no studies were identified that show a correlation between estimated or predicted PK/PD target attainment and clinical success. Although it is unclear if performing therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for optimization of the PTA is of clinical value, it is recommended in patients with highly variable pharmacokinetics, including patients from all subpopulations that are critically ill (such as elderly, children and neonates) and patients on intermittent haemodialysis. In addition, TDM for optimization of the dosing interval, targeting a trough concentration of at least < 2 mg/L but preferably < 0.5–1 mg/L, has proven to reduce nephrotoxicity and is therefore recommended in all patients receiving more than one dose of gentamicin. The usefulness of the daily area under the plasma concentration–time curve for predicting nephrotoxicity should be further investigated. Additionally, more research is needed on the optimal PK/PD targets for efficacy in the clinical situations in which gentamicin is currently used, that is, as monotherapy for urinary tract infections or as part of short-term combination therapy.

Individualized precision dosing approaches to optimize antimicrobial therapy in pediatric populations

Introduction:Severe infections continue to impose a major burden on critically ill children and mortality rates remain stagnant. Outcomes rely on accurate and timely delivery of antimicrobials achieving target concentrations in infected tissue. Yet, developmental aspects, disease-related variables, and host factors may severely alter antimicrobial pharmacokinetics in pediatrics. The emergence of antimicrobial resistance increases the need for improved treatment approaches.Areas covered:This narrative review explores why optimization of antimicrobial therapy in neonates, infants, children, and adolescents is crucial and summarizes the possible dosing approaches to achieve antimicrobial individualization. Finally, we outline a roadmap toward scientific evidence informing the development and implementation of precision antimicrobial dosing in critically ill children.The literature search was conducted on PubMed using the following keywords: neonate, infant, child, adolescent, pediatrics, antimicrobial, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic target, Bayes dosing software, optimizing, individualizing, personalizing, precision dosing, drug monitoring, validation, attainment, and software implementation. Further articles were sought from the references of the above searched articles.Expert opinion:Recently, technological innovations have emerged that enabled the development of individualized antimicrobial dosing approaches in adults. More work is required in pediatrics to make individualized antimicrobial dosing approaches widely operationalized in this population.

Simplified Dosing Regimens for Gentamicin in Neonatal Sepsis

Background: The effectiveness of antibiotics for the treatment of severe bacterial infections in newborns in resource-limited settings has been determined by empirical evidence. However, such an approach does not warrant optimal exposure to antibiotic agents, which are known to show different disposition characteristics in this population. Here we evaluate the rationale for a simplified regimen of gentamicin taking into account the effect of body size and organ maturation on pharmacokinetics. The analysis is supported by efficacy data from a series of clinical trials in this population.

Methods: A previously published pharmacokinetic model was used to simulate gentamicin concentration vs. time profiles in a virtual cohort of neonates. Model predictive performance was assessed by supplementary external validation procedures using therapeutic drug monitoring data collected in neonates and young infants with or without sepsis. Subsequently, clinical trial simulations were performed to characterize the exposure to intra-muscular gentamicin after a q.d. regimen. The selection of a simplified regimen was based on peak and trough drug levels during the course of treatment.

Results: In contrast to current World Health Organization guidelines, which recommend gentamicin doses between 5 and 7.5 mg/kg, our analysis shows that gentamicin can be used as a fixed dose regimen according to three weight-bands: 10 mg for patients with body weight <2.5 kg, 16 mg for patients with body weight between 2.5 and 4 kg, and 30 mg for those with body weight >4 kg.

Conclusion: The choice of the dose of an antibiotic must be supported by a strong scientific rationale, taking into account the differences in drug disposition in the target patient population. Our analysis reveals that a simplified regimen is feasible and could be used in resource-limited settings for the treatment of sepsis in neonates and young infants with sepsis aged 0–59 days.

Population pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid in Mexican patients with lupus nephritis

Background

Mycophenolic acid (MPA) is an effective oral immunosuppressive drug used to treat lupus nephritis (LN), which exhibits large pharmacokinetic variability. This study aimed to characterize MPA pharmacokinetic behaviour in Mexican LN patients and to develop a population pharmacokinetic model which identified factors that influence MPA pharmacokinetic variability.

Methods

Blood samples from LN patients treated with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) were collected pre dose and up to six hours post dose. MPA concentrations were determined by a validated ultra-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry technique. Patients were genotyped for polymorphisms in enzymes (UGT1A8, 1A9 and 2B7) and transporters (ABCC2 and SLCO1B3). The anthropometric, clinical, genetic and co-medication characteristics of each patient were considered as potential covariates to explain the variability.

Results

A total of 294 MPA concentrations from 40 LN patients were included in the development of the model. The data were analysed using NONMEM software and were best described by a two-compartment linear model. MPA CL, Vc, Vp, Ka and Q were 15.4 L/h, 22.86 L, 768 L, 1.28 h−1and 20.3 L/h, respectively. Creatinine clearance and prednisone co-administration proved to have influence on clearance, while body weight influenced Vc. The model was internally validated, proving to be stable. MMF dosing guidelines were obtained through stochastic simulations performed with the final model.

Conclusions

This is the first MPA population pharmacokinetic model to have found that co-administration of prednisone results in a considerable increase on clearance. Therefore, this and the other covariates should be taken into account when prescribing MMF in order to optimize the immunosuppressant therapy in patients with LN.

Standard-dose gentamicin does not increase risk of patent ductus arteriosus

BACKGROUND

Rates of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) and infection are high in preterm infants. Preterm infants with infection are more likely to develop symptomatic PDA, a potentially fatal disease. Clinically, gentamicin is widely used for early-onset infection in neonates including preterm infants. A recent study demonstrated that standard-dose gentamicin itself, not infection, increased risk of PDA in mice, suggesting that gentamicin should be avoided in neonates with a risk of PDA. This claim has been insufficiently investigated in subsequent in-vivo experiments. We reevaluated the in-vivo effect of standard-dose gentamicin on patency of the rat ductus arteriosus (DA).

METHODS

1) To evaluate the effect of gentamicin on DA patency duration, gentamicin was intraperitoneally injected immediately after birth. 2) To evaluate the effect of gentamicin on DA reopening, gentamicin was intraperitoneally injected 30 min after birth. In both scenarios, 30 min after gentamicin administration, rapid whole-body freezing was performed and the inner diameter of the DA was measured.

RESULTS

Standard-dose gentamicin (5 μg/g) did not prolong patency of the DA or increase the likelihood of DA reopening in rat neonates. High-dose gentamicin (100 μg/g), however, significantly prolonged patency of the DA and was associated with DA reopening in rat neonates, although the dilative effect did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

Standard-dose gentamicin does not increase the risk of PDA in rat neonates. This study suggests that standard-dose gentamicin can be used to treat infection in neonates without increasing PDA morbidity.

Antibiotic-impregnated bone cement for preventing infection in patients receiving primary total hip and knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Surgical-site infections after primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA) are a significant issue. Antibiotic-impregnated bone cement (AIBC) has been widely used for the treatment of infected joints, but routine use of AIBC in primary TJA remains controversial. In this systematic review, we evaluated the efficacy of AIBC in reducing surgical-site infections after primary TJA.

METHODS

We systematically searched Pubmed, EMbase, Cochrane Library, CMB, CNKI, and WanFang Data for studies (published until June 1, 2019) evaluating AIBC use in reducing infection rates. Two reviewers independently screened the literature according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of included studies. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3 software. The registration number is CRD42017078341 in PROSPERO.

RESULTS

In total, 10 studies were included, resulting in a sample size of 13,909 arthroplasty cases. The overall pooled data demonstrated that, compared with systemic antibiotics, AIBC was more effective in decreasing deep infection rates (odds ratio [OR] = 0.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.14-0.89, P = .030), although there were higher superficial infection rates with AIBC (OR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.11-2.11, P = .010). Compared to systemic antibiotics alone, AIBC with systemic antibiotics significantly decreased deep infection rates (OR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.41-0.75, P = .0001) but there was no difference in superficial infection rates (OR = 1.43, 95% CI = 0.81-2.54, P = .220). In the subgroup analysis, both randomized controlled trials and cohort studies had reduced deep infection rates after primary TJA (OR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.37-0.99, P = .050 and OR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.34-0.70, P = .0001, respectively). AIBC decreased deep infection rates in both total hip and knee arthroplasty (OR = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.12-0.52, P = .0002 and OR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.45-0.87, P = .005, respectively). Deep infection rates were significantly decreased by AIBC with gentamicin (OR = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.20-0.49, P < .00001) but unaffected by AIBC with cefuroxime (OR = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.10-1.20, P = .100). Deep infection rates in the AIBC and control groups were similar when laminar airflow was applied to the operating room (OR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.60-1.35, P = .620); however, without laminar airflow, the efficacy of AIBC in decreasing deep infection rates was significantly higher than that of control group (OR = 0.21, 95% CI = 0.08-0.59, P = .003).

CONCLUSIONS

AIBC may significantly decrease deep infection rates after primary total hip and knee arthroplasty, with or without systemic antibiotics.

Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Gentamicin in Pediatrics

The primary objective of this work was to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) of gentamicin across the whole pediatric age spectrum from premature neonates to young adults with a single model by identifying significant clinical predictors. A nonlinear mixed-effect population PK model was developed with retrospective therapeutic drug-monitoring data. A total of 6459 drug concentration measurements from 3370 hospitalized patients were collected for model building (n = 2357) and evaluation (n = 1013). In agreement with previously reported models, a 2-compartment model with first-order elimination best described the drug PK. Patient-specific factors significantly impacting gentamicin clearance included fat-free mass, postmenstrual age, and serum creatinine (SCr). Based on our model, the deviation of the individual SCr from the age-dependent expected mean SCr value (SCrM) can result in a 40% lower clearance in a patient with renal impairment than that in a patient with normal kidney function, with SCrM:SCr ratios between 0.16 and 3.2 in this study. Consistent with the known age-dependent changes of the proportion of extracellular water in body weight, the inclusion of the impact of extracellular water maturation on the central volume of distribution was found to improve the model fitting significantly. In comparison with other published models, model evaluation suggested the developed model was the least biased and physiologically most representative. These results will be used to inform individualized initial dosing strategies and serve as a prior PK model for Bayesian updating and forecasting as individual clinical observations become available.

A review of population pharmacokinetic models of gentamicin in paediatric patients

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVES

Gentamicin is often used for the treatment of Gram-negative infections. Due to pharmacokinetic variability in paediatric patients, appropriate dosing of gentamicin in the paediatric population is challenging. This article reviews published population pharmacokinetic models of gentamicin in paediatric patients, identifies covariates that significantly influence gentamicin pharmacokinetics, and determines whether there is a consensus on proposed dosing for intravenous gentamicin in this population.

METHODS

The PubMed database was searched for articles published until the end of 2017. If the articles described population pharmacokinetic models of gentamicin in the paediatric population (after intravenous administration of gentamicin), the following data were extracted: type of study, year of publication, population characteristics and number of patients, gentamicin dosing, total number of gentamicin (serum and/or plasma) concentrations, type of population modelling approach, developed model with pharmacokinetic parameters and covariates included.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

In most of the studies, one- or two-compartment modelling was applied. The mean estimated gentamicin clearance for newborns, infants and the complete paediatric population was 0.048, 0.13 and 0.067 L/h/kg, respectively, and the mean predicted volume of distribution was 0.475, 0.35 and 0.33 L/kg, respectively. The values reflect differences in body composition and kidney maturation within the different paediatric populations. Gentamicin pharmacokinetics were most influenced by age, body size and renal function.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Based on our review, the authors agree on a prolonged dosing interval for preterm and term newborns (up to 48 hours). However, there was no agreement on proposed dosing with respect to gestational age. In general, the proposed daily doses were lower compared to those initially applied for preterm newborns and comparable to those for term newborns. For infants and children, the dosing interval remained unchanged (24 hours), but the proposed daily doses were higher than actually applied. When differences in the paediatric population are considered and an appropriate population PK model with applicable covariates is applied, dosing can be individualized. In the future, studies of gentamicin pharmacokinetics in paediatric patients should focus on currently underestimated covariates, such as fat-free mass, concomitantly administered drugs, body temperature and critical illness because these can change gentamicin PK considerably. Consequently, different dosing is required and TDM becomes even more important.

Optimizing Gentamicin Dosing in Pediatrics Using Monte Carlo Simulations

Gentamicin is known to have concentration-dependent bactericidal activity, and its nephrotoxic effect is well described. We developed a population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model to optimize gentamicin dosing in pediatrics. Data were retrospectively collected for pediatric patients 1 month to 12 years of age, admitted to general pediatric wards or intensive care units and received gentamicin for suspected or proven Gram-negative infections at King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. A total of 306 gentamicin peak and trough concentrations sets from 107 patients were analyzed with mean (±standard deviation) patient age and weight of 4.5 ± 3.5 years and 16.7 ± 10.8 kg, respectively. Gentamicin pharmacokinetics were adequately described with a one compartment system (R = 0.82, bias = 1.75% and precision = 88% for population predictions and R = 0.94, bias = 5% and precision = 29% for individual predictions). The gentamicin pharmacokinetic parameters were as follows: volume of distribution = 8.9 L, total body clearance = 2.8 L/h for a 20-kg patient. Monte Carlo simulations showed that doses of 5-6 mg/kg/dose once daily are adequate only to treat infections with Gram-negative organisms having minimal inhibitory concentration less than 1 µg/mL. While, at minimal inhibitory concentration of 1 µg/mL, higher doses (7-8 mg/kg/dose once daily) are needed to maximize the efficacy of gentamicin. However, at minimal inhibitory concentration of 2 µg/mL, even a 10 mg/kg dose showed poor target attainment (52%). The finding of this study highlights the need to reevaluate the current breakpoints of gentamicin and also to assess the safety of higher doses of gentamicin in pediatrics.

External Evaluation of a Gentamicin Infant Population Pharmacokinetic Model Using Data from a National Electronic Health Record Database

Gentamicin is a common antibiotic used in neonates and infants. A recently published population pharmacokinetic (PK) model was developed using data from multiple studies, and the objective of our analyses was to evaluate the feasibility of using a national electronic health record (EHR) database for further external evaluation of this model. Our results suggest that, with proper data capture procedures, EHR data can serve as a potential data source for external evaluation of PK models.

Biofilm infections between Scylla and Charybdis: interplay of host antimicrobial peptides and antibiotics

Purpose

The aim of this study is to improve the anti-biofilm activity of antibiotics. We hypothesized that the antimicrobial peptide (AMP) complex of the host’s immune system can be used for this purpose and examined the assumption on model biofilms.

Methods

FLIP7, the AMP complex of the blowfly Calliphora vicina containing a combination of defensins, cecropins, diptericins and proline-rich peptides was isolated from the hemolymph of bacteria-challenged maggots. The complex interaction with antibiotics of various classes was studied in biofilm and planktonic cultures of Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Acinetobacter baumannii by the checkerboard method using trimethyl tetrazolium chloride cell viability and crystal violet biofilm eradication assays supplemented with microscopic analysis.

Results

We found that FLIP7 demonstrated: high synergy (fractional inhibitory concentration index <0.25) with meropenem, amikacin, kanamycin, ampicillin, vancomycin and cefotaxime; synergy with clindamycin, erythromycin and chloramphenicol; additive interaction with oxacillin, tetracycline, ciprofloxacin and gentamicin; and no interaction with polymyxin B. The interaction in planktonic cell models was significantly weaker than in biofilms of the same strains. The analysis of the dose–effect curves pointed to persister cells as a likely target of FLIP7 synergistic effect. The biofilm eradication assay showed that the effect also caused total destruction of S. aureus and E. coli biofilm materials. The effect allowed reducing the effective anti-biofilm concentration of the antibiotic to a level well below the one clinically achievable (2–3 orders of magnitude in the case of meropenem, ampicillin, cefotaxime and oxacillin).

Conclusion

FLIP7 is a highly efficient host antimicrobial system helping antibiotics to overcome biofilm barriers through persisters’ sensitization and biofilm material destruction. It is promising for the treatment of biofilm infections as an adjuvant of various small-molecule antibiotics.

Population pharmacokinetic modelling, Monte Carlo simulation and semi-mechanistic pharmacodynamic modelling as tools to personalize gentamicin therapy

Population pharmacokinetic modelling, Monte Carlo simulation and semi-mechanistic pharmacodynamic modelling are all tools that can be applied to personalize gentamicin therapy. This review summarizes and evaluates literature knowledge on the population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of gentamicin and identifies areas where further research is required to successfully individualize gentamicin therapy using modelling and simulation techniques. Thirty-five studies have developed a population pharmacokinetic model of gentamicin and 15 studies have made dosing recommendations based on Monte Carlo simulation. Variability in gentamicin clearance was most commonly related to renal function in adults and body weight and age in paediatrics. Nine studies have related aminoglycoside exposure indices to clinical outcomes. Most commonly, efficacy has been linked to a Cmax/MIC ≥7-10 and a AUC24/MIC ≥70-100. No study to date has shown a relationship between predicted achievement of exposure targets and actual clinical success. Five studies have developed a semi-mechanistic pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model to predict bacteria killing and regrowth following gentamicin exposure and one study has developed a deterministic model of aminoglycoside nephrotoxicity. More complex semi-mechanistic models are required that consider the immune response, use of multiple antibiotics, the severity of illness, and both efficacy and toxicity. As our understanding grows, dosing of gentamicin based on sound pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic principles should be applied more commonly in clinical practice.

A Population Pharmacokinetic Model of Gentamicin in Pediatric Oncology Patients To Facilitate Personalized Dosing

To ensure the safe and effective dosing of gentamicin in children, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is recommended. TDM utilizing Bayesian forecasting software is recommended but is unavailable, as no population model that describes the pharmacokinetics of gentamicin in pediatric oncology patients exists. This study aimed to develop and externally evaluate a population pharmacokinetic model of gentamicin to support personalized dosing in pediatric oncology patients. A nonlinear mixed-effect population pharmacokinetic model was developed from retrospective data. Data were collected from 423 patients for model building and a further 52 patients for external evaluation. A two-compartment model with first-order elimination best described the gentamicin disposition. The final model included renal function (described by fat-free mass and postmenstrual age) and the serum creatinine concentration as covariates influencing gentamicin clearance (CL). Final parameter estimates were as follow CL, 5.77 liters/h/70 kg; central volume of distribution, 21.6 liters/70 kg; peripheral volume of distribution, 13.8 liters/70 kg; and intercompartmental clearance, 0.62 liter/h/70 kg. External evaluation suggested that current models developed in other pediatric cohorts may not be suitable for use in pediatric oncology patients, as they showed a tendency to overpredict the observations in this population. The final model developed in this study displayed good predictive performance during external evaluation (root mean square error, 46.0%; mean relative prediction error, -3.40%) and may therefore be useful for the personalization of gentamicin dosing in this cohort. Further investigations should focus on evaluating the clinical application of this model.

Scaling clearance in paediatric pharmacokinetics: All models are wrong, which are useful?

Linked Articles

This article is commented on in the editorial by Holford NHG and Anderson BJ. Why standards are useful for predicting doses. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2017; 83: 685–7. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13230

Aim

When different models for weight and age are used in paediatric pharmacokinetic studies it is difficult to compare parameters between studies or perform model‐based meta‐analyses. This study aimed to compare published models with the proposed standard model (allometric weight^0.75 and sigmoidal maturation function).

Methods

A systematic literature search was undertaken to identify published clearance (CL) reports for gentamicin and midazolam and all published models for scaling clearance in children. Each model was fitted to the CL values for gentamicin and midazolam, and the results compared with the standard model (allometric weight exponent of 0.75, along with a sigmoidal maturation function estimating the time in weeks of postmenstrual age to reach half the mature value and a shape parameter). For comparison, we also looked at allometric size models with no age effect, the influence of estimating the allometric exponent in the standard model and, for gentamicin, using a fixed allometric exponent of 0.632 as per a study on glomerular filtration rate maturation. Akaike information criteria (AIC) and visual predictive checks were used for evaluation.

Results

No model gave an improved AIC in all age groups, but one model for gentamicin and three models for midazolam gave slightly improved global AIC fits albeit using more parameters: AIC drop (number of parameters), –4.1 (5), –9.2 (4), –10.8 (5) and –10.1 (5), respectively. The 95% confidence interval of estimated CL for all top performing models overlapped.

Conclusion

No evidence to reject the standard model was found; given the benefits of standardised parameterisation, its use should therefore be recommended.

Gentamicin dosing strategy in patients with end-stage renal disease receiving haemodialysis: evaluation using a semi-mechanistic pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model

OBJECTIVES

Gentamicin is widely used in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients for the treatment of infections. The goal of this study was to find the most reasonable dosing regimen for gentamicin in ESRD patients receiving haemodialysis.

METHODS

The in vitro antimicrobial activity of gentamicin was evaluated by static and dynamic time-kill experiments against three bacterial strains of MSSA, MRSA and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. A semi-mechanistic pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model was established afterwards, allowing the characterization of the antibacterial effect of gentamicin in the human body. The model was utilized to assess dosing regimens of gentamicin in ESRD patients receiving haemodialysis, taking both efficacy and safety into account.

RESULTS

The PK/PD model was capable of describing the bacterial response to gentamicin exposure in all three strains. Simulation based on the PK/PD model showed that pre-dialysis and post-dialysis dosing would bring comparable benefit to the ESRD patient regardless of whether the PK/PD target (fCmax/MIC >8-fold) was achieved, while the post-dialysis dosing resulted in a significantly lower trough concentration. The result of simulated dose fractionation demonstrated that both fCmax/MIC and fAUC(0-24)/MIC are strong predictors of drug effectiveness, but the PK/PD model would provide a more precise prediction of antibacterial activity as well as valuable information on dose selection in ESRD patients receiving haemodialysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study supports the original FDA label with regard to the dosing regimen of gentamicin in ESRD patients, which offers adequate clinical benefit as well as an acceptable safety profile.