Trovafloxacin, a new fluoroquinolone with potent activity against Streptococcus pneumoniae

Microbial Resistance to Antibiotics and Effective Antibiotherapy

Currently, the efficacy of antibiotics is severely affected by the emergence of the antimicrobial resistance phenomenon, leading to increased morbidity and mortality worldwide. Multidrug-resistant pathogens are found not only in hospital settings, but also in the community, and are considered one of the biggest public health concerns. The main mechanisms by which bacteria develop resistance to antibiotics include changes in the drug target, prevention of entering the cell, elimination through efflux pumps or inactivation of drugs. A better understanding and prediction of resistance patterns of a pathogen will lead to a better selection of active antibiotics for the treatment of multidrug-resistant infections.

Ocular pharmacokinetic study following single and multiple azithromycin administrations in pigmented rabbits

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate whether the ocular pharmacokinetic parameters observed following systemic administration are also seen following topical administration.

METHODS

Azithromycin concentrations were measured by HPLC-MS in pigmented rabbits' tears, cornea, bulbar conjunctiva, and aqueous humor following single instillation and twice-daily instillations for three consecutive days of topical 1.50% azithromycin dihydrate solution.

RESULTS

Following a single administration, azithromycin levels were higher than the MIC 4 microg/g breakpoint for susceptible germs for at least 4 hr in tears, 1 hr in conjunctiva, and 1 hr in cornea after instillation. Following multiple administrations, azithromycin levels were higher than the MIC 4 microg/g for at least 16 hr in tears, 24 hr in conjunctivae, and 1 week in cornea after the last instillation.

CONCLUSIONS

Both dosage regimens resulted in adequate and long-lasting azithromycin levels in the conjunctiva, the ocular target tissue relative to the expected therapeutic indication in man (bacterial conjunctivitis), and also in the cornea and tears.

Effect of ethanol on fluoroquinolone efficacy in a rat model of pneumococcal pneumonia

This investigation compared the effect of ethanol on fluoroquinolone antibiotic efficacy and pharmacodynamics in an ethanol-fed rat model of pneumococcal pneumonia. Male Sprague-Dawley rats received a liquid diet containing 36% of total calories as ethanol. Paired controls (pair-fed controls) were fed a liquid diet without ethanol or received rat chow. Diets began 7 days before and continued for 10 days after transtracheal infections with 10 times the 50% lethal dose of type 3 Streptococcus pneumoniae. Beginning 18 h after infection, the rats received once daily subcutaneous phosphate-buffered saline, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, or trovafloxacin at 50 or 100 mg/kg of body weight. White blood cell counts were determined, blood samples were collected for culture, and mortality was recorded. Additional rats were killed on day 5 for pharmacodynamic studies and quantitative cultures of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Bacteremia occurred by day 3 in 20 of 22 untreated rats. All 22 untreated rats died by day 9. Moxifloxacin treatment was effective in all diet groups at both the 50- and 100-mg/kg doses. In contrast, 50-mg/kg doses of levofloxacin and trovafloxacin improved survival in ethanol-fed rats but were ineffective in chow-fed rats. High-dose trovafloxacin at 100 mg/kg was associated with increased mortality in pair-fed rats. The free-fraction area under the concentration-time curve/MIC ratio exceeded 50 with all antibiotics in the ethanol group but dropped below 30 with levofloxacin and trovafloxacin in the pair- and chow-fed rats, with higher mortality. Achievement of adequate antibiotic-free fraction area under the concentration-time curve/MIC ratios helps overcome ethanol-induced immune defects induced in experimental pneumococcal pneumonia.

Effect of cirrhosis on antibiotic efficacy in a rat model of pneumococcal pneumonia

A rat model was used to study the effects of cirrhosis on antibiotic therapy of pneumococcal pneumonia. Cirrhotic and control male Sprague-Dawley rats were infected transtracheally with type 3 Streptococcus pneumoniae. Treatment began 18 h later with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), azithromycin (50 mg/kg), trovafloxacin (50 mg/kg), or ceftriaxone (100 mg/kg) injected subcutaneously twice daily for 5 days. Antibiotic concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. Azithromycin, trovafloxacin, and ceftriaxone were all equally effective at preventing mortality in both cirrhotic and normal rats. Free fraction area under the curve to minimum inhibitory concentration ratio (AUC/MIC) and maximum calculated serum concentration to MIC ratio (C(max)/MIC) and percent time that the serum concentration exceeded the MIC (%T > MIC) were greater for ceftriaxone compared with azithromycin or trovafloxacin. Azithromycin achieved higher concentrations in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), epithelial lining fluid (ELF), and BAL white blood cells than ceftriaxone or trovafloxacin in cirrhotic rats. Macrolide, beta-lactam, or fluoroquinolone antibiotic efficacy in a pneumococcal pneumonia model does not appear to be affected by hepatic cirrhosis.

Susceptibilities to levofloxacin in Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis clinical isolates from children: results from 2000-2001 and 2001-2002 TRUST studies in the United States

Among respiratory tract isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae from children, resistance to penicillins, cephalosporins, macrolides, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT) increases on an annual basis. Pediatric patients who do not respond to conventional therapy for respiratory tract infections someday may be treated with fluoroquinolones. In this study, MICs of beta-lactams, azithromycin, SXT, and levofloxacin were determined and interpreted by using NCCLS guidelines for isolates of S. pneumoniae (2,834 from children and 10,966 from adults), Haemophilus influenzae (629 from children and 2,281 from adults), and Moraxella catarrhalis (389 from children and 1,357 from adults) collected during the 2000-2001 and 2001-2002 respiratory illness seasons in the United States as part of the ongoing TRUST surveillance studies. Rates of resistance to penicillin, azithromycin, and SXT were > or = 7.5% higher among patients < or = 4 years old than among patients 5 to 10, 11 to 17, and > or = 18 years old in both the 2000-2001 and the 2001-2002 respiratory illness seasons. Levofloxacin resistance was detected in 2 of 2,834 isolates (0.07%) from patients <18 years old. Levofloxacin MICs of 0.25 to 1 micro g/ml accounted for 99.6, 99.5, 99.3, 99.7, 98.4, and 98.0% of isolates from patients < 2, 2 to 4, 5 to 10, 11 to 17, 18 to 64, and > 64 years old. Multidrug resistance was twice as common among patients < or = 4 years old (25.3%) as among patients 5 to 10 years old (13.7%), 11 to 17 years old (11.9%), 18 to 64 years old (12.1%), and > 64 years old (12.4%). The most common multidrug resistance phenotype in S. pneumoniae isolates for all age groups was resistance to penicillin, azithromycin, and SXT (70.3 to 76.6%). For H. influenzae and M. catarrhalis isolates from patients < 2, 2 to 4, 5 to 10, 11 to 17, 18 to 64, and > 64 years old, levofloxacin MICs at which 90% of the isolates were inhibited were 0.015 and 0.03 to 0.06 microg/ml, respectively, in the 2000-2001 and 2001-2002 respiratory illness seasons. In the 2000-2001 and 2001-2002 respiratory illness season surveillance studies in the United States, 99.9% of pediatric isolates of S. pneumoniae were susceptible to levofloxacin. If fluoroquinolones become a treatment option for pediatric patients, careful monitoring of fluoroquinolone susceptibilities will be increasingly important in future surveillance studies.

The macrolides

Erythromycin, which was introduced over 50 years ago, was the first macrolide to be used clinically. "New" macrolides, for the treatment of patients with various infectious diseases, were not clinically introduced until 40 years later. The pharmacokinetic and adverse events profile of erythromycin initially limited its use to an alternative agent for patients with allergy to beta-lactam agents. However, the emergence of atypical and/or new pathogens and the ongoing escalation of acquired antimicrobial resistance has impacted on the empirical and organism directed therapy of infectious diseases. Azithromycin and clarithromycin were developed by enhancing the basic macrolide structure. Some of the basic features associated with these new agents include a pharmacokinetic profiles that allow once or twice daily dosing with a much lower incidence of side effects and a substantially broader spectrum of activity which includes some Gram-negative bacilli, atypical pathogens and new, unconventional or uncommon pathogens. Clinical trial data has supported the use of "new" macrolides in a wide range of clinical indications, however, some specific indications are currently restricted to treatment with either azithromycin or clarithromycin. Macrolide resistance is a class effect and depending on the mechanism will confer either low or high level resistance. While resistance is problematic, it does not always result in clinical failure. The macrolides are a valuable class of antimicrobial agent and play an important role in the management of infectious diseases.

Quinolone treatment for pediatric bacterial meningitis: a comparative study of trovafloxacin and ceftriaxone with or without vancomycin

BACKGROUND

Trovafloxacin is a new fluoroquinolone that exhibits good penetration into the central nervous system and excellent antimicrobial activity against common meningeal pathogens, including beta-lactam-resistant pneumococci.

PURPOSE AND DESIGN

A multicenter, randomized clinical trial was conducted in children with bacterial meningitis to compare the safety and efficacy of trovafloxacin with that of ceftriaxone with or without vancomycin therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 311 patients, ages 3 months to 12 years, were enrolled, of whom 203 were fully evaluable, 108 treated with trovafloxacin and 95 with the conventional regimen. Both groups were comparable with regard to baseline characteristics: age; cerebrospinal fluid findings; use of dexamethasone; history of seizures; and etiologic agents. No significant differences between trovafloxacin and the comparator, respectively, were detected in any of the following outcome measures: clinical success at 5 to 7 weeks after treatment (79% vs. 81%); deaths (2% vs. 3%); seizures after enrollment (22% vs. 21%); and severe sequelae (14% vs. 14%). Only 4 of 284 children developed joint abnormalities up to 6 months after treatment, 1 (0.9%) child received trovafloxacin and 3 (3.1%) received the comparator regimen. None of the evaluable patients experienced significant abnormalities of liver function during treatment. One nonevaluable patient who received trovafloxacin for 5 days and ceftriaxone for 11 days was readmitted to the hospital with hepatitis of unknown etiology 1 day after discharge. The episode resolved with liver function tests returning to normal within 2 months.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that trovafloxacin is an effective antibiotic for treatment of pediatric bacterial meningitis. These favorable results support further evaluation of fluoroquinolone therapy for children with meningitis or other serious bacterial infections.

Comparative study of treatment with penicillin, ceftriaxone, trovafloxacin, quinupristin-dalfopristin and vancomycin in experimental endocarditis due to penicillin- and ceftriaxone-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae

The efficacy of different antibiotics was compared in an experimental model of aortic valve endocarditis in rabbits, using a serotype 19 strain of Streptococcus pneumoniae resistant to penicillin (MIC 12 mg/L) and ceftriaxone (MIC 12 mg/L). The results were compared with those of a control group, which received no treatment. One hundred and nineteen animals were treated with one of the following antibiotic regimens: im procaine penicillin G at a dosage of 300,000 U/kg weight/12 h (16 animals); iv trovafloxacin, 13.3 mg/kg/12 h (31 animals); iv ceftriaxone, 75 mg/kg/24 h (21 animals); iv vancomycin, 20 mg/kg/12 h (15 animals) and im quinupristin-dalfopristin, 30 mg/kg/8 h (20 animals). All the antibiotics used in this study proved to be efficient in reducing numbers of S. pneumoniae and in increasing the percentage of aortic vegetations that were rendered sterile compared with the control group. Penicillin at the dosage used in our study was capable of achieving serum concentrations two or three times greater than the MIC, thus demonstrating its effectiveness as an antibiotic for this endocarditis model. No significant difference was observed between the effects of vancomycin, quinupristin-dalfopristin and penicillin. Vancomycin proved to be more efficient than trovofloxacin in reducing the bacterial load and increasing the numbers sterilized. There was also a tendency for this antibiotic to be more effective than ceftriaxone in reducing the bacterial load of the vegetations. There was a statistically significant correlation between the weight of the vegetations and their bacterial load. In the light of these results, vancomycin and quinupristin-dalfopristin may be considered suitable alternatives to penicillin for the treatment of penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae endocarditis.

Pharmacokinetics of a fluoronaphthyridone, trovafloxacin (CP 99,219), in infants and children following administration of a single intravenous dose of alatrofloxacin

The pharmacokinetics of trovafloxacin following administration of a single intravenous dose of alatrofloxacin, equivalent to 4 mg of trovafloxacin per kg of body weight, were determined in 6 infants (ages 3 to 12 months) and 14 children (ages, 2 to 12 years). There was rapid conversion of alatrofloxacin to trovafloxacin, with an average +/- standard deviation (SD) peak trovafloxacin concentration determined at the end of the infusion of 4.3 +/- 1.4 microg/ml. The primary pharmacokinetic parameters (average +/- SD) analyzed were volume of distribution at steady state (1.6 +/- 0.6 liters/kg), clearance (151 +/- 82 ml/h/kg), and half-life (9.8 +/- 2.9 h). The drug was well tolerated by all children. There were no age-related differences in any of the pharmacokinetic parameters studied. Less than 5% of the administered dose was excreted in the urine over 24 h. On the basis of the mean area under the concentration-time curve of 30.5 +/- 10.1 microg. h/ml and the susceptibility (< or =0.5 microg/ml) of common pediatric bacterial pathogens to trovafloxacin, dosing of 4 mg/kg/day once or twice daily should be appropriate.

Community-acquired pneumonia

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide and has significant financial implications for health-care systems. The epidemiology and fundamental biology of the disease has evolved, reflecting the human immunodeficiency virus pandemic, increasing world travel, and, as always, poverty. The promise held out by molecular diagnostic technology has yet to deliver in this arena, and antibiotic resistance continues to drive the quest for new antimicrobial agents. The emergence of multidrug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae, the microorganism most often implicated as a cause of CAP, continues to threaten treatment options. The evolution of this organism, the persistently high mortality rate associated with CAP, and increasing health-care costs have prompted the publication of guidelines by various authorities that can be used to assist in the initial assessment of the patient and then guide empirical antimicrobial therapy. It is unclear whether these guidelines will have significant impact on cost and mortality, although the trend toward a rational and evidence-based approach to antimicrobial therapy must be a goal to aspire to.

Clinical evaluation of the tolerability and efficacy of trovafloxacin compared with sparfloxacin in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical tolerability and efficacy of trovafloxacin compared with sparfloxacin in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections.

DESIGN

This was a randomised, double-blind, controlled, parallel study.

PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS

92 patients with lower respiratory tract infection were enrolled in three centres. 45 patients received trovafloxacin 200mg once daily orally for 10 days and 43 patients received sparfloxacin 400mg on the first day and 200mg once daily orally for 9 days. Clinical evaluation was performed for fever, dyspnoea, pulmonary symptoms, cough and sputum on days 1, 3, 6 and 12 of the study along with bacteriological evaluation on days 1 and 12. Any adverse effects were also recorded during the study period.

RESULTS

There was a significant reduction in the severity of symptoms from day 4 until the end of the study. Clinical cure or improvement was seen in 87 and 95% of the trovafloxacin and sparfloxacin groups, respectively. Bacteriological eradication rates were 84 and 89% for the trovafloxacin and sparfloxacin groups, respectively. The number of adverse effects was 10 and 13 reported by 10 and 13 patients in the trovafloxacin and sparfloxacin groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Trovafloxacin is well tolerated and effective in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections in a dosage of 200mg daily. It was observed that the efficacy and tolerability of trovafloxacin is comparable to that of sparfloxacin (200mg daily, with a loading dose of 400mg on the first day) in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections. However, further studies are needed to confirm this.

Killing activities of trovafloxacin alone and in combination with beta-lactam agents, rifampin, or vancomycin against Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates with various susceptibilities to extended-spectrum cephalosporins at concentrations clinically achievable in cerebrospinal fluid

The killing activities of trovafloxacin alone and in combination with beta-lactam agents (extended-spectrum cephalosporins, meropenem), rifampin, or vancomycin were evaluated against 20 genotypically characterized Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates for which amoxicillin MICs were >/=4 microg/ml (cefotaxime MICs, >/=4 microg/ml for six strains) at concentrations clinically achievable in cerebrospinal fluid. At 6 h the mean killing activity of trovafloxacin alone (range, 2.6 to 2.9 log(10) CFU/ml) did not vary significantly according to the susceptibility of the strains to beta-lactam agents. The activities of trovafloxacin or vancomycin added to the beta-lactam agents and the combination trovafloxacin-vancomycin were additive or indifferent. Against the ceftriaxone-resistant isolates, the killing activity of the combination of a beta-lactam agent and trovafloxacin did not differ significantly from that of a beta-lactam agent and vancomycin.

A randomized, crossover design study of the pharmacology of extended-spectrum fluoroquinolones for pneumococcal infections

STUDY OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were to characterize the single-dose and steady-state plasma pharmacokinetics of IV levofloxacin and IV alatrofloxacin, and to compare the results to pneumococcal isolate sensitivities in order to estimate the clinical efficacy of current community-acquired pneumonia treatment regimens against pneumococcal infections.

DESIGN

Two-way, open-label, randomized, crossover study.

PARTICIPANTS

Each of 12 healthy volunteer subjects received IV levofloxacin, 500 mg qd for 7 days, and IV alatrofloxacin, 200 mg qd for 7 days. The two regimens were separated by a 2-week washout period.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Plasma concentration profiles were collected around the first and final doses of both regimens and were assayed for their respective quinolone concentrations. When the peak concentrations for both agents were compared to standard twofold dilution minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values for pneumococcal isolates, it was discovered that the breakpoint MIC value at which each compound would no longer achieve a peak plasma concentration/MIC ratio of at least 12:1 was 0.5 mg/L for levofloxacin and 0.25 mg/L for alatrofloxacin.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the MIC that inhibits 90% of isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae for both of these agents (1.0 to 2.0 mg/L for levofloxacin and 0.125 to 0.25 mg/L for trovafloxacin), our results indicate that although the once-daily regimen of alatrofloxacin appears to be appropriate for this pathogen, a more aggressive regimen may need to be investigated to optimize the clinical and microbiological effects of levofloxacin.

The macrolides: erythromycin, clarithromycin, and azithromycin

In addition to erythromycin, macrolides now available in the United States include azithromycin and clarithromycin. These two new macrolides are more chemically stable and better tolerated than erythromycin, and they have a broader antimicrobial spectrum than erythromycin against Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC), Haemophilus influenzae, nontuberculous mycobacteria, and Chlamydia trachomatis. All three macrolides have excellent activity against the atypical respiratory pathogens (C. pneumoniae and Mycoplasma species) and the Legionella species. Azithromycin and clarithromycin have pharmacokinetics that allow shorter dosing schedules because of prolonged tissue levels. Both azithromycin and clarithromycin are active agents for MAC prophylaxis in patients with late-stage acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), although azithromycin may be the preferable agent because of fewer drug-drug interactions. Clarithromycin is the most active MAC antimicrobial agent and should be part of any drug regimen for treating active MAC disease in patients with or without AIDS. Although both azithromycin and clarithromycin are well tolerated by children, azithromycin has the advantage of shorter treatment regimens and improved tolerance, potentially improving compliance in the treatment of respiratory tract and skin or soft tissue infections. Intravenously administered azithromycin has been approved for treatment of adults with mild to moderate community-acquired pneumonia or pelvic inflammatory diseases. An area of concern is the increasing macrolide resistance that is being reported with some of the common pathogens, particularly Streptococcus pneumoniae, group A streptococci, and H. influenzae. The emergence of macrolide resistance with these common pathogens may limit the clinical usefulness of this class of antimicrobial agents in the future.

The new fluoroquinolones: A critical review

OBJECTIVE

This paper reviews the literature available on the new fluoroquinolones - clinafloxacin, gatifloxacin, grepafloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, sparfloxacin and trovafloxacin - to compare these agents with each other and contrast them with ciprofloxacin, an older fluoroquinolone.

DATA SELECTION

Published papers used were obtained by searching MEDLINE for articles published between 1994 and 1998, inclusive. References of published papers were also obtained and reviewed. Abstracts from scientific proceedings were reviewed.

DATA EXTRACTION

Due to the limited data available on several of the agents, criteria for study inclusion in the in vitro, pharmacokinetics and in vivo sections were not restrictive.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The new fluoroquinolones offer excellent Gram-negative bacillary activity and improved Gram-positive activity (eg, against Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus) over ciprofloxacin. Clinafloxacin, gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin, sparfloxacin and trovafloxacin display improved activity against anaerobes (eg, Bacteriodes fragilis). All of the new fluoroquinolones have a longer serum half-life than ciprofloxacin (allowing for once daily dosing), and several are eliminated predominantly by nonrenal means. No clinical trials are available comparing the new fluoroquinolones with each other. Clinical trials comparing the new fluoroquinolones with standard therapy have demonstrated good efficacy in a variety of infections. Their adverse effect profile is similar to that of ciprofloxacin. Clinafloxacin and sparfloxacin cause a high incidence of phototoxicity (1.5% to 14% and 2% to 11.7%, respectively), grepafloxacin causes a high incidence of taste perversion (9% to 17%) and trovafloxacin causes a high incidence of dizziness (11%). They all interact with metal ion-containing drugs (eg, antacids), and clinafloxacin and grepafloxacin interact with theophylline. The new fluoroquinolones are expensive; however, their use may result in savings in situations where, because of their potent and broad spectrum of activity, they can be used orally in place of intravenous antibiotics.

CONCLUSIONS

The new fluoroquinolones offer advantages over ciprofloxacin in terms of improved in vitro activity and pharmacokinetics. Whether these advantages translate into improved clinical outcomes is presently unknown. The new fluoroquinolones have the potential to emerge as important therapeutic agents in the treatment of respiratory tract and genitourinary tract infections.

In vitro and in vivo antimicrobial activities of T-3811ME, a novel des-F(6)-quinolone

The in vitro and in vivo activities of T-3811ME, a novel des-F(6)-quinolone, were evaluated in comparison with those of some fluoroquinolones, including a newly developed one, trovafloxacin. T-3811, a free base of T-3811ME, showed a wide range of antimicrobial spectra, including activities against Chlamydia trachomatis, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. In particular, T-3811 exhibited potent activity against various gram-positive cocci, with MICs at which 90% of the isolates are inhibited (MIC90s) of 0.025 to 6.25 microgram/ml. T-3811 was the most active agent against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and streptococci, including penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae (PRSP). T-3811 also showed potent activity against quinolone-resistant gram-positive cocci with GyrA and ParC (GrlA) mutations. The activity of T-3811 against members of the family Enterobacteriaceae and nonfermentative gram-negative rods was comparable to that of trovafloxacin. In common with other fluoroquinolones, T-3811 was highly active against Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, and Legionella sp., with MIC90s of 0.0125 to 0.1 microgram/ml. T-3811 showed a potent activity against anaerobic bacteria, such as Bacteroides fragilis and Clostridium difficile. T-3811 was the most active agent against C. trachomatis (MIC, 0.008 microgram/ml) and M. pneumoniae (MIC90, 0.0313 microgram/ml). The activity of T-3811 against M. tuberculosis (MIC90, 0.0625 microgram/ml) was potent and superior to that of trovafloxacin. In experimental systemic infection with a GrlA mutant of S. aureus and experimental pneumonia with PRSP in mice, T-3811ME showed excellent therapeutic efficacy in oral and subcutaneous administrations.

Pharmacodynamics of trovafloxacin, ofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae in an in vitro pharmacokinetic model

An in vitro pharmacokinetic model was used to simulate the pharmacokinetics of trovafloxacin, ofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin in human serum and to compare their pharmacodynamics against eight Streptococcus pneumoniae strains. The MICs of ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin ranged from 1 to 2 micrograms/ml. Trovafloxacin was 8- to 32-fold more potent, with MICs of 0.06 to 0.12 microgram/ml. Logarithmic-phase cultures were exposed to peak concentrations of trovafloxacin, ofloxacin, or ciprofloxacin achieved in human serum after 200-, 400-, and 750-mg oral doses, respectively. Trovafloxacin was dosed at 0 and 24 h, and ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin were dosed at 0, 12, and 24 h. Human elimination pharmacokinetics were simulated, and viable bacterial counts were measured at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, and 36 h. Trovafloxacin was rapidly and significantly bactericidal against all eight strains evaluated, with viable bacterial counts decreasing at least 5 logs to undetectable levels. Times to 99.9% killing were only 1 to 3 h. Although the rate of killing with ofloxacin was substantially slower than that with trovafloxacin, ofloxacin was also able to eradicate all eight strains from the model, despite a simulated area under the inhibitory curve/MIC ratio (AUC/MIC) of only 49. In contrast, ciprofloxacin eradicated only five strains (AUC/MIC = 44) from the model. Against the other three strains (AUC/MIC = 22), the antibacterial activity of ciprofloxacin was substantially diminished. These data corroborate clinical data and suggest that trovafloxacin has a pharmacodynamic advantage over ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin against S. pneumoniae in relation to its enhanced antipneumococcal activity.

Advances in antimicrobial therapy of community-acquired pneumonia

Community-acquired pneumonia has a significant impact upon healthcare in North America and worldwide. In the U.S. it is responsible for three to four million cases yearly and 78,000 deaths. It is not a homogeneous entity and it may be caused by a number of pathogens including Streptococcus pneumoniae, the atypicals (Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydia pneumoniae and Legionella species) Haemophilus influenzae and Gram-negative rods. While it is clear that directed therapy is the ideal, empiric therapy is likely to remain the norm for some time to come. This is because of limitations in current diagnostic techniques, the possibility of infection with co-pathogens and the broad spectrum of antimicrobial activity required to treat the various pathogens which may be responsible for infection in any given patient. Of great concern is the increase in the incidence of resistant pathogens seen in community-acquired pneumonia. Of particular significance are the isolates of S. pneumoniae which display resistance to penicillin and macrolides although the exact clinical relevance has yet to be determined. New guidelines for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia have been developed by the Infectious Disease Society of America which include the new fluoroquinolones. These agents offer the potential for monotherapy of community-acquired pneumonia in cases which previously required combination regimens such as a macrolide and a beta-lactam. There is great concern however, that these agents not be used inappropriately thereby hastening the emergence of resistance to the fluoroquinolone class of antimicrobials.

Trovafloxacin: a new fluoroquinolone

OBJECTIVE

To review the pharmacology, antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, and safety of trovafloxacin.

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE search (January 1966-April 1998) was conducted for relevant literature using the terms CP-99,219, CP-116,519, trovafloxacin, and alatrofloxacin. Abstracts published by the American Society of Microbiology during 1995-1997 meetings were also reviewed.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

All in vitro, animal, and human studies were reviewed for the antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of trovafloxacin.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Trovafloxacin is a new fluoroquinolone with enhanced activity against gram-positive and anaerobic microorganisms. The oral bioavailability under fasting conditions is approximately 88%. The elimination half-life of trovafloxacin is approximately 10 hours. Less than 10% of trovafloxacin is eliminated unchanged in the urine. Trovafloxacin is effective in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia and nosocomial pneumonia with cure rates of > 90% and 77%, respectively. Trovafloxacin is comparable with ceftriaxone in the treatment of meningococcal meningitis in children; each produces a cure rate of approximately 90%. In treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection, both ciprofloxacin and trovafloxacin achieve an eradication rate of > or = 93%. Trovafloxacin is similar to ofloxacin in the treatment of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis and acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis, with clinical success in 97% of patients with each drug. The common adverse effects of trovafloxacin include dizziness, headache, and gastrointestinal intolerance.

CONCLUSIONS

The advantages of once-daily dosing and enhanced activity of trovafloxacin against gram-positive and anaerobic organisms may expand its use over available fluoroquinolones. Further studies are needed to define its role in the treatment of various infectious diseases.

The antibacterial effects of ciprofloxacin and trovafloxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae in an in vitro dynamic model

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the newer fluoroquinolone antibiotics such as trovafloxacin posses enhanced activity against Gram-positive organisms, including Streptococcus pneumoniae, because the clinical activity of older quinolones against pneumococci has been questioned. METHODS: In this study, the bactericidal activities of ciprofloxacin and trovafloxacin against six strains of penicillin-resistant and -sensitive strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae were compared using an in vitro model that simulates human pharmacokinetics. Ciprofloxacin was administered at 750 mg every 12 h, higher than the usual daily dose of 500 mg twice a day. Trovafloxacin was administered at 300 mg every 24 h for the six strains and at 200 mg every 24 h for three of the strains. RESULTS: The single 300-mg dose of trovafloxacin killed five of the six strains in 4 h, with no bacterial regrowth. Ciprofloxacin reduced the initial inoculum by 3--5 logs by 24 h. Although the 300-mg dose of trovafloxacin more rapidly eradicated susceptible strains, the activity of trovafloxacin at 200 mg every 24 h was similar to that of ciprofloxacin at 750 mg every 12 h against the three strains tested. CONCLUSION: Trovafloxacin (and ciprofloxacin at high doses) eradicates susceptible strains of pneumococci in an in vitro dynamic model.

Safety and tolerability of intravenous-to-oral treatment and single-dose intravenous or oral prophylaxis with trovafloxacin

BACKGROUND

The new fourth-generation fluoroquinolone, trovafloxacin, is active in vitro against gram-positive and gram-negative organisms, atypical pathogens, and anaerobes, and has pharmacokinetics permitting once-daily intravenous or oral dosing. Safety/tolerability data from phase II/III clinical trials of sequential intravenous alatrofloxacin to oral trovafloxacin and single-dose intravenous or oral prophylaxis are summarized.

METHODS

All trials were double-blind, randomized, and multicenter. In multidose trials with alatrofloxacin, 1,257 patients requiring initial intravenous therapy received once-daily alatrofloxacin (trovafloxacin prodrug, 200 or 300 mg/day) followed by oral 200 mg/day trovafloxacin. An additional 444 patients received a single alatrofloxacin or trovafloxacin dose prophylactically for surgical procedures.

RESULTS

Therapy with alatrofloxacin was well tolerated. The most common treatment-related adverse events in studies of intravenous alatrofloxacin followed by oral trovafloxacin were nausea, headache, insertion site reaction, and dizziness. In single-dose intravenous or oral prophylaxis studies, insertion-site reaction, pruritus, and insertion-site pain were the most common treatment-related adverse events. No serious quinolone toxicity or drug interactions were reported. The incidence of serious treatment-related adverse events was < 1% in both the alatrofloxacin and comparator groups. In comparative trials, mortality due to all causes after trovafloxacin was similar to that after comparative agents; there was no mortality related to trovafloxacin administration.

CONCLUSION

In this large patient sample, intravenous alatrofloxacin followed by oral trovafloxacin was safe and well tolerated. Serious adverse events, such as phototoxicity, cardiovascular toxicity, and hemolytic anemia associated with older fluoroquinolones, were not noted with trovafloxacin. No interactions of trovafloxacin with other drugs were reported. The safety and tolerability of trovafloxacin, along with in vitro activity against key pathogens and pharmacokinetics permitting once-daily administration, support its oral and intravenous use in patients with obstetric, gynecologic, and intra-abdominal infections as well as for prophylaxis of surgical infection.

Overview of quinolones in the treatment and prevention of surgical infection

Postoperative infection remains a complication of surgical procedures, resulting in increased morbidity, mortality, and cost. The frequent polymicrobial etiology and emerging patterns of resistance continue to compromise cure rates. Although quinolones have many attractive properties for the surgical setting, combination therapy is routinely indicated for appropriate coverage. Advanced-generation quinolones, such as trovafloxacin, offer an increased antimicrobial spectrum, including activity against important surgical pathogens, and longer elimination half-lives. These newer agents may be used intravenously or orally as once-daily single-agent therapy for surgical prophylaxis, and in place of combination therapy for complex intra-abdominal and pelvic infections.

A double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study of oral trovafloxacin on bowel microflora in healthy male volunteers

BACKGROUND

Treatment with oral antibiotic drugs generally influences normal fecal flora. These changes can be both beneficial (eg, elimination of aerobic, gram-negative bacilli) and detrimental (eg, the appearance of resistant pathogenic micro-organisms). Trovafloxacin, a new fluoroquinolone with in vitro activity against anaerobes, and gram-negative, gram-positive, and atypical pathogens, is a potentially beneficial antimicrobial for bowel sterilization. This double-blind trial investigated the effect of trovafloxacin on the normal microbial bowel flora of healthy male subjects.

METHODS

Subjects were randomized (in a 2:1 ratio) to receive either 200 mg trovafloxacin once daily for 10 days or a matching placebo. Fecal samples were collected at two baseline occasions, on visit days 4, 7, 10, and 17, and at follow-up. Bacterial species were identified and quantified in the fecal samples.

RESULTS

Twelve subjects received the active drug and seven received placebo. No Enterobacteriaceae were found in samples from days 4 to 10 in subjects receiving trovafloxacin. No changes in Enterobacteriaceae were found throughout the study in subjects receiving placebo. Incidental Enterobacteriaceae were isolated from subjects in the trovafloxacin group at the end of the study. No clinically significant differences were found in either group with respect to prevalence, appearance, or disappearance of aerobic gram-positive cocci, anaerobic bacteria, or yeasts. All tested Enterobacteriaceae were highly susceptible to trovafloxacin. No increase in minimum inhibitory concentration values was seen in day 17 and follow-up samples for isolated Escherichia coli strains. No Clostridium difficile was found in day 17 or follow-up samples from subjects in the trovafloxacin group. All tests for clostridium toxin were negative.

CONCLUSIONS

During the treatment period, E. coli could not be cultured from the feces of the 12 healthy subjects receiving 200 mg trovafloxacin daily during days 4 to 10. All isolated Enterobacteriaceae were susceptible to trovafloxacin and no changes in susceptibility were found after the treatment period. In subjects treated with trovafloxacin, the prevalence and number of gram-positive bacteria were rapidly reduced. Trovafloxacin is able to selectively and reversibly suppress bowel flora.

Activities of new fluoroquinolones against fluoroquinolone-resistant pathogens of the lower respiratory tract

The activities of six new fluoroquinolones (moxifloxacin, grepafloxacin, gatifloxacin, trovafloxacin, clinafloxacin, and levofloxacin) compared with those of sparfloxacin and ciprofloxacin with or without reserpine (20 microg/ml) were determined for 19 Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates, 5 Haemophilus sp. isolates, and 10 Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates with decreased susceptibility to ciprofloxacin from patients with clinically confirmed lower respiratory tract infections. Based upon the MICs at which 50% of isolates were inhibited (MIC50s) and MIC90s, the most active agent was clinafloxacin, followed by (in order of decreasing activity) trovafloxacin, moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin, sparfloxacin, and grepafloxacin. Except for clinafloxacin (and gatifloxacin and trovafloxacin for H. influenzae), none of the new agents had improved activities compared with that of ciprofloxacin for P. aeruginosa and H. influenzae. A variable reserpine effect was observed for ciprofloxacin and S. pneumoniae; however, for 9 of 19 (47%) isolates the MIC of ciprofloxacin was decreased by at least fourfold, suggesting the presence of an efflux pump contributing to the resistance phenotype. The laboratory parC (Ser79) mutant strain of S. pneumoniae required eightfold more ciprofloxacin for inhibition than the wild-type strain, but there was no change in the MIC of sparfloxacin and only a 1-dilution increase in the MICs of the other agents. For efflux pump mutant S. pneumoniae the activities of all the newer agents, except for levofloxacin, were reduced. Except for clinafloxacin, all second-step laboratory mutants required at least 2 microg of all fluoroquinolones per ml for inhibition.

Community-acquired pneumonia

This seminar reviews the aetiology, clinical presentation, approach to diagnosis, and management of immunocompetent adults with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Pneumonia is a common clinical entity, particularly among the elderly. A thorough understanding of the epidemiology and microbiology of CAP is essential for appropriate diagnosis and management. Although the microbiology of CAP has remained relatively stable over the last decade, there is new information on the incidence of atypical pathogens, particularly in patients not admitted to hospital, and new information on the incidence of pathogens in cases of severe CAP and in CAP in the elderly. Recent studies have provided new data on risk factors for mortality in CAP, which can assist the clinician in decisions about the need for hospital admission. The emergence of antimicrobial resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae, the organism responsible for most cases of CAP, has greatly affected the approach to therapy, especially in those patients who are treated empirically. Guidelines for the therapy of CAP have been published by the American Thoracic Society, the British Thoracic Society, and, most recently, the Infectious Diseases Society of America. These guidelines differ in their emphasis on empirical versus pathogenic-specific management.

Management of infections due to antibiotic-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae

Antibiotic-resistant strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae are becoming more prevalent throughout the world; this has resulted in modifications of treatment approaches. Management of bacterial meningitis has the greatest consensus. Strategies for treating other systemic infections such as pneumonia, bacteremia, and musculoskeletal infections are evolving, in part related to the availability of new antibiotics which are active in vitro against isolates resistant to penicillin and the extended-spectrum cephalosporins. However, there are currently very limited data related to the clinical efficacy of these new agents. The studies upon which current recommendations are based are reviewed. Otitis media represents the single most common infection due to S. pneumoniae. Recommendations for treatment of acute otitis media due to drug-resistant strains and the rationale for these recommendations are discussed.

The ethnic minority traveler

Although the ethnic minority traveler is exposed to the same risks as other travelers, there are special considerations that make them vulnerable to certain diseases. In addition, many ethnic minority travelers are traditionally underserved by the medical community and often travel without the benefit of adequate counseling and immunization. The specific disease entities covered in this article include parasitic diseases (e.g. malaria, trypanosomiasis, intestinal helminths), tuberculosis, and other respiratory diseases, dengue, and sexually transmitted diseases and HIV.

Bacteriological activity of trovafloxacin, a new quinolone, against respiratory tract pathogens

The use of established fluoroquinolones, such as ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin, as empirical therapy for the treatment of moderate-to-severe respiratory tract infections is limited by their poor activity against gram-positive and atypical pathogens. Data from in vitro susceptibility studies and in vivo animal protection models suggest that the new fluoroquinolone, trovafloxacin, compared with ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin offers equivalent activity against gram-negative pathogens and improved activity against gram-positive pathogens. In particular, susceptibility data indicate that trovafloxacin is at least 16-fold more potent than either ciprofloxacin or ofloxacin against penicillin-susceptible and penicillin-resistant strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Other susceptible pathogens include Streptococcus pyogenes, vancomycin-susceptible Enterococcus faecalis and the atypical respiratory pathogens Legionella pneumophila, Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Chlamydia pneumoniae. In vivo studies involving models of protection against acute systemic infection and pneumococcal pneumonia in mice, and Legionnaires' disease in guinea pigs, indicate that the antibacterial spectrum observed for trovafloxacin in vitro extends to the in vivo setting. Together, these findings suggest that trovafloxacin may offer clinical efficacy against respiratory pathogens superior to that of ciprofloxacin and of ofloxacin, and may find a useful role as empiric therapy in both the community and hospital setting.

Comparison of in vitro activity of trovafloxacin against gram-positive and gram-negative organisms with quinolones and beta-lactam antimicrobial agents

The in vitro activity of trovafloxacin against 721 Gram-negative and 498 Gram-positive organisms was determined by the standard microdilution broth method using commercially prepared frozen microtiter plates. The activity of trovafloxacin was compared to ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, amoxicillin/clavulanate, ampicillin/sulbactam (1:1), piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftriaxone, and imipenem. Trovafloxacin had equal or greater activity compared with the other agents tested against Citrobacter diversus, Enterobacter aerogenes, Enterobacter cloacae, Escherichia coli, Haemophilus influenzae, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Serratia marcescens, staphylococci, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus pyogenes, Streptococcus viridans, group G streptococci, Enterococcus faecalis, and E. faecium. The reliability of the commercially prepared plates for testing the in vitro activity of the quinolones was evaluated by comparing identical isolates also tested by broth microdilution using laboratory prepared plates. The commercially prepared plates generally correlated, within one- to twofold dilutions, with the laboratory prepared plates. There was, however, a large discrepancy obtained when testing Enterobacter agglomerans and E. cloacae, where the commercially prepared plates yielded a significantly higher MIC90 value.

Comparative in vitro activities of four new fluoroquinolones against Streptococcus pneumoniae determined by Etest

Clinafloxacin, levofloxacin, sparfloxacin and trovafloxacin were tested by Etest against 188 Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates. Clinafloxacin and trovafloxacin were 2-4-fold more potent than sparfloxacin and 8-fold more than levofloxacin. Two isolates, both serotype 6, with high-level quinolone resistance (> or = 8 micrograms/ml) were detected. The Etest is a practical means for determining S. pneumoniae susceptibilities to new fluoroquinolones.

In vitro activity of trovafloxacin against Chlamydia pneumoniae

The in vitro susceptibilities of 12 strains of Chlamydia pneumoniae to a new quinolone, trovafloxacin, and ofloxacin, doxycycline, erythromycin, and azithromycin were determined. The activity of trovafloxacin was similar to that of ofloxacin, with a MIC at which 90% of the isolates are inhibited and a minimal concentration at which 90% of the isolates are killed of 1.0 microg/ml, but trovafloxacin was less active than doxycycline, erythromycin, and azithromycin.

Trovafloxacin

Trovafloxacin is a fluoroquinolone antibacterial agent with a broad spectrum of activity. Trovafloxacin has similar or 2-fold lower activity than ciprofloxacin against Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Against Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis, trovafloxacin has similar activity to ciprofloxacin. Other susceptible Gram-negative pathogens include Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis and mycoplasmas. The drug is active against Gram-positive bacteria and consistently displayed greater activity (2- to 8-fold) than ciprofloxacin against all staphylococci and streptococci tested; activity included methicillin-resistant staphylococci and penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. Trovafloxacin has some activity against vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Anaerobes such as Bacteroides and Clostridium spp. are also susceptible to trovafloxacin. Preliminary clinical data suggest that trovafloxacin is effective in the treatment of patients with upper and lower respiratory tract and uncomplicated urinary tract infections and infections caused by C. trachomatis or N. gonorrhoeae. The most frequently noted adverse event with trovafloxacin is dizziness which is reported in 11% of patients versus 3% of those receiving comparator agents. Other commonly reported events (> 1% of patients) are nausea, headache, vomiting, vaginitis and diarrhoea.

Antimicrobial agents

Antimicrobial agents active against multi-resistant Gram-positive bacteria are considered to be of major commercial potential. Commercially viable agents that have been included in recent successful trials include the streptogramins, novel glycopeptides, oxazolidinones and potent quinolones. Cationic peptides have generated much interest, but their utility as successful drug candidates remains questionable. Novel compound classes for possible exploitation include non-beta-lactam beta-lactamase inhibitors, inhibitors of lipid A biosynthesis and tRNA synthetase inhibitors.