Effect of fluconazole on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of delavirdine in human immunodeficiency virus-positive patients

Which metabolites circulate?

Characterization of the circulating metabolites for a new chemical entity in humans is essential for safety assessment, an understanding of their contributions to pharmacologic activities, and their potential involvement in drug-drug interactions. This review examines the abundance of metabolites relative to the total parent drug [metabolite-to-parent (M/P) ratio] from 125 drugs in relation to their structural and physicochemical characteristics, lipoidal permeability, protein binding, and fractional formation from parent (fm). Our analysis suggests that fm is the major determinant of total drug M/P ratio for amine, alcohol, N- and S-oxide, and carboxylic acid metabolites. Passage from the hepatocyte to systemic circulation does not appear to be limiting owing to the vast majority of metabolites formed being relatively lipid permeable. In some cases, active transport plays an important role in this process (e.g., carboxylic acid metabolites). Differences in total parent drug clearance and metabolite clearance are attenuated by the reduction in lipophilicity introduced by the metabolic step and resultant compensatory changes in unbound clearance and protein binding. A small subclass of these drugs (e.g., terfenadine) is unintentional prodrugs with very high parent drug clearance, resulting in very high M/P ratios. In contrast, arenol metabolites show a more complex relationship with fm due largely to the new metabolic routes (conjugation) available to the metabolite compared with the parent drug molecule. For these metabolites, a more thorough understanding of the elimination clearance of the metabolite is critical to discern the likelihood of whether the phenol will constitute a major circulating metabolite.

Effect of Food on the Steady-State Pharmacokinetics of Delavirdine in Patients with HIV Infection

OBJECTIVE

In a prior single-dose study that examined the effect of food on delavirdine pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers, the absorption of delavirdine mesylate was delayed and the area under the curve was reduced by 26% in the presence of food. Since the complex, nonlinear pharmacokinetics of delavirdine do not permit a simple extrapolation of the results of a single-dose study to steady state, the present multiple-dose study was performed.

PATIENTS AND STUDY DESIGN

Thirteen stable patients with HIV-1 infection (two females, 11 males; CD4 count range 124-588 cells/mm(3)) completed a randomised, crossover study in which subjects received two 14-day treatments with delavirdine mesylate 400mg every 8 hours. In treatment A, all delavirdine doses were administered on an empty stomach and in treatment B were taken with food. A pharmacokinetic evaluation was performed on day 14 of each treatment period.

SETTING

An ambulatory AIDS research centre in an academic medical centre.

INTERVENTIONS

Administration of delavirdine with and without food.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Pharmacokinetic parameters for delavirdine.

RESULTS

The maximum concentration (C(max)) [+/- standard deviation] in treatment A was 29.6 +/- 13.6muM and in treatment B it was 23.0 +/- 8.61muM (p = 0.037). The minimum concentrations (C(min)) were 9.45 +/- 6.7muM and 11.2 +/- 9.2muM, respectively (p > 0.05). The oral clearances (CL(oral)) were 17.8 +/- 41.6 L/h (treatment A) and 18.5 +/- 39.0 L/h (treatment B) [p > 0.05]. Similar patterns were observed for N-dealkylated delavirdine with a significant difference only in C(max) (4.13 vs 3.47muM [p = 0.022], treatment A vs B).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicated that, in contrast to the increased CL(oral) noted in a prior single-dose study, food did not have a significant effect at steady state on the area under the plasma concentration-time curve or C(min). Although C(max) was significantly lower when the drug was taken taken with food, the clinical relevance of this parameter as compared with the trough concentration is unclear since the current focus for antiretrovirals is on maintaining trough concentrations in excess of in vitro inhibitory concentrations.

Current use of anti-infectives in dermatology

Dermatologic diseases encompass a broad category of pathologic situations. Infection remains a significant aspect of the pathology faced in patient encounters, and it is natural to expect that anti-infectives play a major element in the armamentarium utilized by dermatologists. Aside from the treatment of the classic bacterial and fungal infections, there are now new uses for antiviral agents to help suppress recurrent disease, such as herpes simplex. There is also the novel approach of using anti-infectives, or agents that have been thought to have antimicrobial activity, to treat inflammatory diseases. This review describes anti-infectives, beginning with common antibiotics used to treat bacterial infections. The discussion will then cover the current use of antivirals. Finally, the description of antifungals will be separated, starting with the oral agents and ending with the topical antimycotics. The use of anti-infectives in tropical dermatology has been purposefully left out, and perhaps should be the subject of a separate review. Cutaneous bacterial infections consist chiefly of those microorganisms that colonize the skin, such as species of staphylococcus and streptococcus. Propionibacterium acnes and certain other anaerobes can be involved in folliculitis, pyodermas and in chronic conditions such as hidradenitis suppurativa.

Antifungal therapy--state of the art at the beginning of the 21st century

The most relevant information on the present state of the art of antifungal chemotherapy is reviewed in this chapter. For dermatomycoses a variety of topical antifungals are available, and safe and efficacious systemic treatment, especially with the fungicidal drug terbinafine, is possible. The duration of treatment can be drastically reduced. Substantial progress in the armamentarium of drugs for invasive fungal infections has been made, and a new class of antifungals, echinocandins, is now in clinical use. The following drugs in oral and/or intravenous formulations are available: the broad spectrum polyene amphotericin B with its new "clothes"; the sterol biosynthesis inhibitors fluconazole, itraconazole, and voriconazole; the glucan synthase inhibitor caspofungin; and the combination partner flucytosine. New therapy schedules have been studied; combination therapy has found a significant place in the treatment of severely compromised patients, and the field of prevention and empiric therapy is fast moving. Guidelines exist nowadays for the treatment of various fungal diseases and maintenance therapy. New approaches interfering with host defenses or pathogenicity of fungal cells are being investigated, and molecular biologists are looking for new targets studying the genomics of pathogenic fungi.

Liquid/liquid extraction using 96-well plate format in conjunction with hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for the analysis of fluconazole in human plasma

A bioanalytical method using automated sample transferring, automated liquid/liquid extraction (LLE) and hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was developed for the determination of fluconazole in human plasma. Samples of 0.05 ml were transferred into 96-well plate using automatic liquid handler (Multiprobe II). Automated LLE was carried out on a 96-channel programmable liquid handling workstation (Quadra 96) using methyl-tetra butyl ether as the extraction solvent. The extract was evaporated to dryness, reconstituted, and injected onto a silica column using an aqueous-organic mobile phase. The chromatographic run time was 2.0 min per injection, with retention times of 1.47 and 1.44 min for fluconazole and internal standard (IS) ritonavir, respectively. The detection was by monitoring fluconazole at m/z 307-->238 and IS at m/z 721-->296, respectively. The standard curve range was 0.5-100 ng ml(-1). The inter-day precision and accuracy of the quality control samples were <7.1% relative standard deviation and <2.2% relative error.

Simple and rapid quantification of the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors nevirapine, delavirdine, and efavirenz in human blood plasma using high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet absorbance detection

A simple reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography assay for the simultaneous quantitative determination of three HIV non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (nevirapine, delavirdine, and efavirenz) in human blood plasma is described. The method was validated over the range of 10 ng/ml to 50 microg/ml for nevirapine, 25 ng/ml to 25 microg/ml for delavirdine, and 10 ng/ml to 10 microg/ml for efavirenz. The method is accurate (average accuracies over eight concentrations ranging from 87.3 to 113%), and precise (within-day and between-day precision measures ranging from 0.12 to 7.9% and 0.26 to 5.9%, respectively). All three non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors proved to be stable under various conditions. Due to its simplicity, this assay can readily be used for investigational or clinical monitoring of plasma concentrations.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors

Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) are a diverse group of compounds that induce allosteric changes in the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) reverse transcriptase, thus rendering the enzyme incapable of converting viral RNA to DNA. Unlike nucleoside analogue inhibitors of reverse transcriptase, NNRTIs do not require sequential phosphorylation to elicit antiretroviral activity. There are currently 3 approved NNRTIs: nevirapine, delavirdine and efavirenz. Although possessing a common mechanism of action, these agents can be differentiated by both molecular and pharmacokinetic characteristics. Each of the NNRTIs is metabolised to some degree by the cytochrome P450 (CYP) system of enzymes, making them prone to clinically significant drug interactions. In addition, they elicit variable effects on other medications, acting as either inducers or inhibitors of drugs metabolised by CYP. These drug interactions are an important consideration in the clinical use of these agents as a part of combination antiretroviral therapy. Additional factors such as the influence of food and pH on oral absorption, and protein binding, must also be considered.

Delavirdine: clinical pharmacokinetics and drug interactions

Delavirdine, a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI), is a potent and specific inhibitor of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase. The approved therapeutic regimen for delavirdine is 400mg 3 times daily in combination with appropriate antiretroviral agents; however, a dose of 600mg twice daily appears to provide similar systemic exposure. The steady-state pharmacokinetics of delavirdine are not appreciably affected by food. Delavirdine undergoes extensive metabolism by cytochrome P450 (CYP) with little urinary excretion of unchanged drug. Metabolic drug interactions between delavirdine and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors are unlikely as their metabolic pathways differ; delavirdine has no effect on the pharmacokinetics of zidovudine. Concomitant use of CYP inducers, such as rifampicin (rifampin), rifabutin, phenytoin, phenobarbital or carbamazepine, should be avoided since delavirdine plasma concentrations are significantly lowered. Reduction in gastric acidity (pH > 3) decreases the extent of delavirdine absorption, so administration of antacids and the buffered formulations of didanosine should be separated from that of delavirdine by at least 1 hour. Delavirdine, unlike other currently available NNRTI agents, is an inhibitor rather than an inducer of CYP isozymes. Consequently, the drug interaction profile and rationale for combining delavirdine with other antiretroviral agents is unique among the current NNRTI agents. Delavirdine inhibits the CYP3A4-mediated metabolism of HIV protease inhibitors and thereby increases systemic exposure to protease inhibitors. The ability of delavirdine to enhance the pharmacokinetic profiles of protease inhibitors may permit the use of simplified administration regimens. Combining delavirdine and indinavir removes the food restrictions during indinavir administration. Furthermore, the superior virological response observed in antiretroviral regimens containing delavirdine and protease inhibitors has been attributed to the favourable pharmacokinetic interactions and the introduction of a new drug class in NNRTI-naïve therapy-experienced patients. Pharmacokinetic drug interactions are an important consideration in selecting an HIV treatment regimen, due to the multiplicity of drugs that are coadministered and the varying direction and magnitude of interaction that can occur. Considerations for utilising delavirdine in a treatment regimen are different than for other NNRTI agents due to the unique drug interaction profile of delavirdine.

Delavirdine: a review of its use in HIV infection

Delavirdine, a bisheteroarylpiperazine derivative, is a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) that allosterically binds to HIV-1 reverse transcriptase, inhibiting both the RNA- and DNA-directed DNA polymerase functions of the enzyme. Delavirdine in combination with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) produced sustained reductions in plasma viral loads and improvements in immunological responses in large randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of 48 to 54 weeks' duration. In patients with advanced HIV infection, triple therapy with delavirdine, zidovudine and lamivudine, didanosine or zalcitabine for 1 year significantly prolonged the time to virological failure compared with dual therapy (delavirdine plus zidovudine or 2 NRTIs; p < 0.0001). After 50 weeks' treatment, plasma HIV RNA levels were below the limit of detection (LOD; <50 copies/ml) for 40% of patients receiving triple therapy but for only 6% of those receiving dual NRTI therapy. Preliminary results suggest that delavirdine also has beneficial effects on surrogate markers as a component of protease inhibitor-containing triple or quadruple regimens. At 16 to 48 weeks, the minimum mean reduction in plasma viral load from baseline was 2.5 log10 copies/ml and mean CD4+ counts increased by 100 to 313 cells/microl. The proportion of patients with plasma HIV RNAlevels below the LOD (usually 200 to 500 copies/ml) ranged from 48 to 100% after > or = 16 weeks. Delavirdine was also effective as a component of saquinavir soft gel capsule-containing salvage regimens. Since delavirdine shares a common metabolic pathway (cytochrome P450 3A pathway) with other NNRTIs, HIV protease inhibitors and several drugs used to treat opportunistic infections in patients infected with HIV, the drug is associated with a number of pharmacokinetic interactions. Some of these drug interactions are clinically significant, necessitating dosage adjustments or avoidance of co-administration. Delavirdine is not recommended for use with lovastatin, simvastatin, rifabutin, rifampicin, sildenafil, ergot derivatives, quinidine, midazolam, carbamazepine, phenobarbital or phenytoin. Importantly, the drug favourably increases the plasma concentration of several protease inhibitors. Delavirdine is generally well tolerated. Skin rash is the most frequently reported adverse effect, occurring in 18 to 50% of patients receiving delavirdine-containing combination therapy in clinical trials. Although a high proportion of patients developed a rash, it was typically mild to moderate in intensity, did not result in discontinuation or adjustment of treatment in most patients and resolved quickly. The occurrence of Stevens-Johnson syndrome was rare (1 case in 1,000 patients). A retrospective analysis of pooled clinical trial data indicated that there was no significant difference in the incidence of liver toxicity, liver failure or noninfectious hepatitis between delavirdine-containing and non-delavirdine-containing antiretroviral treatment groups. In addition, the incidence of lipodystrophy, metabolic lipid disorders, hyperglycaemia and hypertriglyceridaemia was not significantly different between these 2 treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In combination with NRTIs. delavirdine produces sustained improvements in surrogate markers of HIV disease and prolongs the time to virological failure in adult patients with HIV infection. Preliminary data of delavirdine as a component of protease inhibitor-containing triple or quadruple highly active antiretroviral therapy regimens indicate that patients achieve marked improvements in virological and immunological markers. The drug is generally well tolerated, with a transient skin rash, typically of mild to moderate intensity, being the most common adverse effect. Delavirdine is an effective component of recommended antiretroviral treatment strategies for adult patients with HIV infection and, in combination with 2 NRTIs as a first-line therapy, the drug has the advantage of sparing protease inhibitors for subsequent use. Since delavirdine favourably increases plasma concentrations of several protease inhibitors, the drug may also be beneficial as a component of salvage therapy in combination with protease inhibitors.

Effects of the antifungal agents on oxidative drug metabolism: clinical relevance

This article reviews the metabolic pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions with the systemic antifungal agents: the azoles ketoconazole, miconazole, itraconazole and fluconazole, the allylamine terbinafine and the sulfonamide sulfamethoxazole. The majority of these interactions are metabolic and are caused by inhibition of cytochrome P450 (CYP)-mediated hepatic and/or small intestinal metabolism of coadministered drugs. Human liver microsomal studies in vitro, clinical case reports and controlled pharmacokinetic interaction studies in patients or healthy volunteers are reviewed. A brief overview of the CYP system and the contrasting effects of the antifungal agents on the different human drug-metabolising CYP isoforms is followed by discussion of the role of P-glycoprotein in presystemic extraction and the modulation of its function by the antifungal agents. Methods used for in vitro drug interaction studies and in vitro-in vivo scaling are then discussed, with specific emphasis on the azole antifungals. Ketoconazole and itraconazole are potent inhibitors of the major drug-metabolising CYP isoform in humans, CYP3A4. Coadministration of these drugs with CYP3A substrates such as cyclosporin, tacrolimus, alprazolam, triazolam, midazolam, nifedipine, felodipine, simvastatin, lovastatin, vincristine, terfenadine or astemizole can result in clinically significant drug interactions, some of which can be life-threatening. The interactions of ketoconazole with cyclosporin and tacrolimus have been applied for therapeutic purposes to allow a lower dosage and cost of the immunosuppressant and a reduced risk of fungal infections. The potency of fluconazole as a CYP3A4 inhibitor is much lower. Thus, clinical interactions of CYP3A substrates with this azole derivative are of lesser magnitude, and are generally observed only with fluconazole dosages of > or =200 mg/day. Fluconazole, miconazole and sulfamethoxazole are potent inhibitors of CYP2C9. Coadministration of phenytoin, warfarin, sulfamethoxazole and losartan with fluconazole results in clinically significant drug interactions. Fluconazole is a potent inhibitor of CYP2C19 in vitro, although the clinical significance of this has not been investigated. No clinically significant drug interactions have been predicted or documented between the azoles and drugs that are primarily metabolised by CYP1A2, 2D6 or 2E1. Terbinafine is a potent inhibitor of CYP2D6 and may cause clinically significant interactions with coadministered substrates of this isoform, such as nortriptyline, desipramine, perphenazine, metoprolol, encainide and propafenone. On the basis of the existing in vitro and in vivo data, drug interactions of terbinafine with substrates of other CYP isoforms are unlikely.

Survival following fulminant hepatic failure from fluconazole induced hepatitis

We present a case of recovery from fulminant hepatic failure secondary to high serum levels of fluconazole precipitated by amphotericin B induced renal dysfunction. Fluconazole dose adjustment or alternative antifungal treatment should be considered in patients with impaired renal function.

Drug interactions with itraconazole, fluconazole, and terbinafine and their management

A drug interaction develops when the effect of a drug is increased or decreased or when a new effect is produced by the prior, concurrent, or subsequent administration of the other. Before prescribing a drug, it is important to obtain a thorough drug history of the prescription and nonprescription medications taken by the patient. The nonprescription medications may include items such as nutritional supplements and herbal medications. The risk of side effects is an inevitable consequence of drug use. The frequency of adverse reactions is increased in those patients receiving multiple medications. Drug interactions reported in animal or in vitro studies may not necessarily develop in humans. When drug interactions are observed with a particular agent, it cannot be automatically assumed that all closely related drugs will necessarily produce the same interaction. However, caution is advised until sufficient experience accrues. The prescriber should not overestimate or underestimate the potential for a given drug interaction on the basis of personal experience alone. Drug interactions will not necessarily occur in every patient who is given a particular combination of drugs known to produce an interaction. For a clinically significant drug interaction to be manifest, several other factors may be relevant other than just using the two drugs. In many instances drug interactions can be predicted and therefore avoided if the pharmacodynamic effects, the pharmacokinetic properties, and the mechanisms of action of the 2 drugs in question are known. In the case of contraindicated drugs, it may be possible to use an alternative agent.

Rapid quantification of delavirdine, a novel non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, in human plasma using isocratic reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection

Delavirdine is a novel non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor for the treatment of HIV-1-infected patients. A simple and rapid high-performance liquid chromatographic method for the quantification of delavirdine in human plasma suitable for drug monitoring in patients is described. Sample pretreatment consists of protein precipitation with acetonitrile and subsequent evaporation of the extract to concentrate the analyte. The drug is separated from endogenous compounds by isocratic reversed-phase, high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with fluorescence detection. The optimal excitation and emission wavelengths are 300 and 425 nm, respectively. The method has been validated over the range of 50-50 000 ng/ml using only 200 microl of plasma samples. The assay is linear over this concentration range as indicated by the F-test for lack of fit. Within- and between-day precisions are less than 4.4% for all quality control samples. The lower limit of quanititation is 50 ng/ml. Recovery of delavirdine from human plasma is 93.8%. Delavirdine is stable under various conditions, for example 1 h at 60 degrees C and one week at 4 degrees C. This validated assay is suited for use in pharmacokinetic studies with delavirdine and can readily be implemented in the setting of a hospital laboratory for the monitoring of delavirdine concentrations.

Pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction study of delavirdine and indinavir in healthy volunteers

The potential pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction between delavirdine, a nonnucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitor, and indinavir, an inhibitor of HIV protease, was evaluated in healthy volunteers. Subjects received a single 800-mg dose of indinavir sulfate on day 1 (baseline). Delavirdine mesylate 400 mg was administered three times daily on days 2 through 10. On day 9, a single 400-mg dose and on day 10 a single 600-mg dose of indinavir were given along with morning doses of delavirdine. Pharmacokinetic evaluations of indinavir were made on days 1, 9, and 10, and of delavirdine on days 8, 9, and 10. Fourteen healthy male volunteers completed the study. Single doses of indinavir had no clinically important effects on the pharmacokinetics of delavirdine. Mean indinavir Cmax values for the 400-mg and 600-mg doses administered concomitantly with delavirdine were dose proportionally lower than that observed following the 800-mg dose administered alone. Mean Tmax values were similar and ranged from 1.0 +/- 0.3/hour for indinavir 800 mg administered alone to 1.3 +/- 0.4/hour for indinavir 600 mg administered with delavirdine. These results indicate that delavirdine had no clinically important effect on the rate of indinavir absorption. In contrast, the mean indinavir AUC0-infinity, value following the 400-mg dose administered with delavirdine was only 14% lower than the baseline value determined for the 800-mg indinavir dose (25,400 +/- 6960 nM hour versus 29,600 +/- 7920 nM hour), and the mean indinavir AUC0-infinity value for the 600-mg indinavir dose administered with delavirdine (42,700 +/- 9800 nM hour) was 44% greater than the baseline value. All differences among mean AUC0-infinity values were statistically significant. Mean indinavir half-life values were slightly longer when indinavir was given in a dose with delavirdine than when indinavir was administered alone. These results suggest that delavirdine inhibits metabolism of indinavir and support the possibility of a reduction in the magnitude or frequency of indinavir dosage when given in combination with delavirdine.