Pharmacokinetics of telbivudine in subjects with various degrees of hepatic impairment

Determination of telbivudine in the plasma of chronic hepatitis B patients in long-term treatment by high-performance liquid chromatographic-tandem mass spectrometry

Creatine kinase elevation is commonly reported in telbivudine-treated patients. However, little is known about the relationship between this adverse drug reaction and plasma concentration. In this study, a sensitive, rapid and safe quantitative bioanalytical method has been established by using LC-MS/MS for the determination of telbivudine in a clinical study of chronic hepatitis B patients. The assay was linear in a dynamic 10-10,000 ng/mL range (r² > 0.999) and total analysis time was 6 min in this method. The validated method was applied to quantitatively determine plasma concentration in chronic hepatitis B patients during long-term telbivudine treatment. The results revealed that telbivudine concentration in the creatine kinase-elevated group (707.92-2788.78 ng/mL) was significantly higher than those with normal creatine kinase (412.63-1108.32 ng/mL). This method was adapted for therapeutic drug monitoring.

Telbivudine protects against renal impairment in patients with chronic hepatitis B infection

It has been reported that treatment with telbivudine might be associated with a significant improvement of renal function in patients with chronic hepatitis B. To confirm this finding, a systematic literature review was conducted. Four online databases (PubMed, CNKI/FMJS, Ovid and SpringerLink) were searched. Serum creatinine, glomerular filtration rate and estimated glomerular filtration rate changes from baseline to the end of the treatment were analyzed. A total of seven full-text articles and 13 abstracts with sample sizes ranging from 15 to 689 patients fulfilled the selection criteria for review. The results showed that long-term treatment with telbivudine, either as monotherapy or combined with other nucleos(t)ide analogs, can significantly improve renal function in chronic hepatitis B patients, particularly those at high risk of renal impairment.

Cumulative incidence and risk factors of creatine kinase elevation associated with telbivudine

PURPOSE

An increasing number of studies are reporting a high frequency of creatine kinase (CK) elevation during telbivudine therapy; however, few reports have focused on the cumulative incidence and risk factors of CK elevation. This study was performed to investigate the cumulative incidence and risk factors of CK elevation in Chinese patients treated with telbivudine.

METHODS

In this observational study, patients with chronic hepatitis B receiving telbivudine therapy between July 2008 and December 2013 were enrolled. The cumulative incidence of CK elevation was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method combined with the log rank test. Risk factors were determined using Cox proportional hazards regression models.

RESULTS

A total of 207 eligible patients were analyzed. The cumulative incidence of CK elevation at 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72 months was 51.2 %, 68.9 %, 75.1 %, 78.1 %, 78.1 %, and 78.1 %, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that male and lower baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were significant risk factors for CK elevation.

CONCLUSIONS

The cumulative incidence of CK elevation after long-term telbivudine use is quite high, and gender and baseline eGFR may be useful predictors. However, when combined with regular monitoring of CK levels, especially for patients with lower eGFR, telbivudine is a relatively safe nucleoside analog treatment for chronic hepatitis B.

Treatment of HBeAg positive chronic hepatitis B: interferon or nucleoside analogues

Interferon alpha has restricted efficacy in as much as only a proportion of patients show a response. However, in appropriately selected HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients, sustained suppression of viral replication can be achieved, and HBeAg or even HBsAg seroconversion can be attained. Thus, finite course of interferon alpha can be successful, and offer an advantage to patient. Interferon (IFN) remains a benchmark therapy for chronic hepatitis B. The main advantages of IFN-α over nucleoside analogues are the absence of resistance and the possibility of immune-mediated clearance of hepatitis B. Unfortunately, side effects preclude the use of interferon alpha in substantial proportions of patients, and prolonged maintenance therapy to suppress hepatitis B virus (HBV) is not feasible. Nucleoside analogues are given by mouth, once per day, and the safety, potency and efficacy have improved and facilitated treatment. However, maintenance of long-term suppression is required for the majority of patients. In general, treatment of chronic hepatitis B should target patients with active disease and viral replication, preferably before the signs and symptoms of cirrhosis or significant injury has occurred. Current EASL guidelines suggest that treatment be based on the evaluation of three criteria: Serum aminotransferase levels, serum HBV DNA levels and histological grade and stage. Many questions remain unanswered on the optimal treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis B with a nucleoside vs interferon alpha. Both forms of treatment have benefits and the choice should be selected and tailored. Stopping or futility rules can be implemented in patients who fail interferon. Recent data suggest the safety and efficacy of nucleoside analogues in the third trimester of pregnancy to reduce the risk of transmission from mothers to their children.

Safety evaluation of telbivudine

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Successful treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) often requires long-term oral nucleoside/nucleotide agents which can be associated with viral resistance, patient non-compliance and adverse effects. Telbivudine is one of the more potent options available, with a 6.5- to 6.6-log copies/ml hepatitis B DNA reduction at 12 weeks in an early viral kinetic study, a potency comparable to entecavir. It is also one of the few drugs in the treatment of CHB under FDA pregnancy Category B.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

The efficacy and safety profile of telbivudine in compensated and decompensated CHB patients compared to other agents are discussed. Viral resistance, characteristic adverse effects including elevation in creatine kinase and peripheral neuropathy in telbivudine treatment are reviewed. Infrequent but significant adverse effects of other nucleoside/nucleotide analogs are highlighted.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

Readers are provided the latest update on the clinical profile of long-term use of telbivudine.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Long-term telbivudine treatment offers effective viral suppression to CHB patients with certain baseline characteristics and on-treatment virologic response. Creatine kinase elevation is not a good predictor of muscle-related adverse effects with nucleoside/nucleotide analogs. But significant myopathy and neuropathy have been reported in a small number of patients receiving telbivudine.

Telbivudine: a review of its use in compensated chronic hepatitis B

Telbivudine (Sebivo®; Tyzeka®) is a synthetic nucleoside analogue that inhibits replication of hepatitis B virus (HBV). It is used in the treatment of adults with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) with evidence of viral replication and persistently elevated serum ALT and/or AST levels, and/or histological evidence of active disease. Telbivudine is a potent antiviral that provides effective and sustained viral suppression in patients with compensated CHB. In clinical trials, treatment outcomes were improved significantly more with telbivudine 600 mg once daily than with lamivudine 100 mg or adefovir 10 mg once daily, and telbivudine-treated patients had significantly less viral resistance than lamivudine-treated patients. Increasing rates of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion were achieved in HBeAg-positive patients during periods of up to 4 years continuous telbivudine treatment, and seroconversion was durable in most patients throughout a 2-year, off-treatment follow-up, indicating the potential for a finite treatment period in this group of patients. Telbivudine is associated with a medium genetic barrier to resistance and, as patients with undetectable HBV DNA levels have significantly improved outcomes, it is recommended that HBV DNA levels are monitored at week 24 (and 6 monthly thereafter), with the addition of a nucleoside/nucleotide analogue without cross resistance (such as adefovir dipivoxil) if viraemia is present to reduce the risk of resistance (Roadmap concept). Telbivudine was generally well tolerated in clinical trials for periods of up to 4 years, and has a similar tolerability profile to that of lamivudine. A minority of telbivudine-treated patients experience creatinine kinase elevation, usually transient, and myopathy occurs rarely. In modelled cost effectiveness studies in several Asian countries, treatment with telbivudine Roadmap was cost effective in HBeAg-positive patients. Thus, telbivudine provides a valuable treatment option in CHB, particularly when administered using the Roadmap concept in HbeAg-positive patients.

Safety and efficacy of telbivudine for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B

Telbivudine was recently approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B. Phase III studies indicated its antiviral potency with 6- to 6.5-log copies/mL reductions in hepatitis B DNA levels at year 1, comparable to other potent agents such as entecavir or tenofovir. Genotypic resistance rates, however, reached 25% at year 2 in hepatitis B e-antigen positive subjects and 11% in hepatitis B e-antigen negative subjects, preventing it from becoming a preferred first-line drug for hepatitis B. Furthermore, its signature resistance mutation (a change from methionine to isoleucine at position 204 in the reverse transcriptase domain of the hepatitis B polymerase) also confers cross-resistance to entecavir, lamivudine, and emtricitabine. Telbivudine is well tolerated, with elevations in creatine phosphokinase being the most common abnormality observed in clinical trials. Most often, elevations were asymptomatic. Future research in hepatitis B will focus on the best ways to use existing therapies, including telbivudine, sequentially or in combination in order to maximize viral suppression and minimize the development of antiviral resistance.

Population pharmacokinetics of telbivudine and determination of dose adjustment for patients with renal impairment

Telbivudine is a new nucleoside analog indicated for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B infection. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed based on data pooled from 16 early phase studies in 363 healthy participants and patients. Telbivudine was administered as single and/or multiple doses of 25 to 1800 mg daily for up to 28 days. A 2-compartment model with first-order input and lag time provided the best fit to the data. A final model was built with identified covariates, including creatinine clearance on plasma clearance, dose and race on bioavailability fraction, and body weight on central volume of distribution. The final model was applied to simulate steady-state exposure for patients with impaired renal function for various dosing regimens. Results from these simulation analyses support that in patients with moderate to severe renal impairment or end-stage renal disease, reduced daily doses of telbivudine could be an alternative to interval adjustment to achieve exposure comparable to patients with normal renal function or mild renal impairment treated with the full clinical dose.

Telbivudine in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B

INTRODUCTION

The treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection has been revolutionized in the past decade by the increased availability of effective antiviral agents. Telbivudine is an L-nucleoside that is structurally related to lamivudine and has recently been approved for use in patients with chronic HBV infection. Telbivudine is highly selective for HBV DNA and inhibits viral DNA synthesis with no effect on human DNA or other viruses. This article reviews the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, therapeutic efficacy and safety of telbivudine, and discusses its place in the current armamentarium against HBV.

METHODS

Relevant publications were identified from searches of Medline and PubMed between 2000 and 2008, using the search terms "hepatitis B/HBV," "telbivudine/LdT," "beta-L-thymidine," "pharmacokinetics," "safety," "adverse events," and "resistance." The reference lists of retrieved articles were searched for relevant studies.

RESULTS

Phase 3 clinical studies demonstrate that telbivudine is superior to lamivudine over a 2-year period in hepatitis B e-antigen (HBeAg)-positive and HBeAg-negative patients. Telbivudine was associated with a statistically significantly greater reduction in HBV DNA, greater proportion of alanine aminotransferase normalization, and greater histological response than lamivudine. Furthermore, telbivudine use resulted in fewer cases of treatment failure and less virological resistance than lamivudine. However, after 2 years of therapy, telbivudine resistance was appreciable (25%) and considerably higher than that seen with other new antivirals such as tenofovir and entecavir. Overall, telbivudine was found to be safe, although grade 3 or 4 adverse events, including elevations in creatine kinase, were more commonly found in patients receiving telbivudine than lamivudine. Telbivudine is not active against lamivudine-resistant HBV.

CONCLUSIONS

Telbivudine is a new antiviral agent joining the armamentarium against HBV. It is superior to lamivudine in terms of therapeutic response and resistance profile. However, concerns about resistance with long-term use, along with inferior cost-effective analyses, have relegated telbivudine to a second-line agent in the management of chronic HBV infection.

Telbivudine for the treatment of hepatitis B disease

Chronic hepatitis B affects approximately 350 million individuals worldwide leading to approximately 500,000 deaths annually. Current therapy includes immune modulators such as IFN-α and the oral antiviral agents, nucleoside analogs such as lamivudine and entecavir, and nucleotide analogs such as adefovir and tenofovir. Recently, telbivudine was approved in the USA for treatment of HBV disease. It is a synthetic nucleoside analog of thymidine that requires phosphorylation to convert to the active triphosphate form. Telbivudine is rapidly absorbed with a long half-life allowing for once-daily dosing. Clinical trials have demonstrated superior antiviral efficacy compared with lamivudine. Telbivudine has shown good correlations between antiviral efficacy at 24 weeks and a favorable outcome at 2 years. Telbivudine is well-tolerated, although monitoring for myopathies is recommended. Telbivudine resistance rates were lower compared with lamivudine. Telbivudine is an option for monotherapy in naive patients or for use in combination therapy in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B.

Telbivudine: a hepatitis B-specific antiviral

Telbivudine, a l-nucleoside enantiomer, is a potent specific inhibitor of hepatitis B virus (HBV) polymerase. It recently completed Phase III trials and has been licensed in most countries worldwide. It has shown superior efficacy compared with lamivudine in therapeutic response, reduction in HBV DNA, proportion of patients with undetectable HBV DNA, reduced primary treatment failure and reduced viral resistance over 2 years, in Hepatitis B e antigen-positive and -negative patients. Further studies show that switching to telbivudine in lamivudine-suboptimal responders improves the reduction in HBV DNA at week 24 and shows superiority compared with adefovir in reduction of HBV DNA at week 24. Multivariate analysis showed that week 24 HBV DNA best predicted outcomes at 2 years and a 'hepatitis B roadmap' concept has been proposed to manage patients based on this. Thus, telbivudine is a useful addition to the current landscape of hepatitis B therapeutic agents.

Telbivudine in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B

Treatment of chronic hepatitis B with oral nucleos(t)ide analogs is evolving rapidly with newer compounds gaining approval. Recently, the US FDA and European Medicines Agency (EMEA) have approved telbivudine, a potent anti-hepatitis B virus (HBV)-specific agent with a hitherto excellent safety profile. This review focuses on the efficacy of this agent in chronic hepatitis B compared with lamivudine, evaluated clinically in Phase II and a large Phase III study. Monitoring of the virologic response under treatment with sensitive HBV-DNA assays has been applied, aiming at increasing efficacy and reducing HBV resistance. The results are critically presented and the evolving concept of effective long-term telbivudine and other nucleos(t)ide analog therapy, predicted by the extent of suppression of HBV replication at week 24, are analyzed and discussed.

Telbivudine

Telbivudine, the unmodified L-enantiomer of the naturally occurring nucleoside D-thymidine, is a potent synthetic nucleoside analogue. It acts as a hepatitis B virus (HBV) polymerase inhibitor and preferentially inhibits HBV second strand (DNA-dependent) compared with first strand (RNA-dependent) DNA synthesis. More telbivudine than lamivudine recipients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis B and similar proportions of telbivudine or lamivudine recipients with HBeAg-negative disease achieved a therapeutic response at 52 weeks in the large 2-year GLOBE trial. In a phase III trial in Chinese patients, greater reductions in serum HBV DNA occurred with telbivudine than lamivudine at 52 weeks. Reductions in serum HBV DNA at 24 weeks were greater with telbivudine than adefovir in the 1-year switching trial. A lower residual viral load at 52 weeks was seen in patients who received telbivudine or who switched from adefovir to telbivudine at 24 weeks than in patients receiving adefovir. In the 1-year lamivudine switching trial in patients with serum HBV DNA levels >3 log10 copies/mL despite having received prior treatment with lamivudine for a mean of [almost equal or equal to]7 months, those randomised to telbivudine therapy achieved greater reductions in serum HBV DNA levels at 24 weeks than patients randomised to continue lamivudine therapy. Telbivudine was generally well tolerated and most adverse events were of mild or moderate severity. The incidence of severe ALT flares with telbivudine was half that seen with lamivudine at both 52 and 104 weeks in the GLOBE trial.

Pharmacokinetics of telbivudine in subjects with various degrees of renal impairment

This study evaluates the effect of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of telbivudine. Thirty-six subjects were assigned, on the basis of creatinine clearance (CL(CR)), to 1 of 5 renal function groups with 6 to 8 subjects per group: normal renal function; mild, moderate, or severe renal impairment; or end-stage renal disease [ESRD] requiring hemodialysis. Subjects received a single oral dose of telbivudine at 600 mg (normal function and mild impairment), 400 mg (moderate impairment), or 200 mg (severe impairment and ESRD); plasma and/or urine samples were collected over a 48-h period for pharmacokinetic analyses. Telbivudine was well tolerated by all subjects. The pharmacokinetics of 600 mg of telbivudine were comparable for subjects with mild renal impairment and normal renal function. Likewise, for subjects with moderate to severe impairment, including ESRD, reduced doses from 200 to 400 mg produced plasma exposure similar to that for subjects with normal renal function. These results indicate that the pharmacokinetics of telbivudine were dependent on renal function, especially for subjects with moderate to severe renal impairment or ESRD. Apparent total plasma clearance, renal clearance (CL(R)), and urinary excretion of telbivudine decreased as renal function deteriorated. A linear relationship was established between CL(R) and CL(CR). In ESRD subjects, a routine 3.5- to 4-h hemodialysis session removed telbivudine from plasma at an extraction ratio of approximately 45%, representing a approximately 23% reduction in total exposure. These results suggest that while no adjustment of the telbivudine dose appears necessary for subjects with mild renal impairment, dose adjustment is warranted for those with moderate to severe renal impairment or ESRD in order to achieve optimal plasma exposure.

Telbivudine

Each month, subscribers to The Formulary Monograph Service receive five to six well-documented monographs on drugs that are newly released or are in late phase 3 trials. The monographs are targeted to your Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee. Subscribers also receive monthly one-page summary monographs on the agents that are useful for agendas and pharmacy/nursing in-services. A comprehensive target drug utilization evaluation (DUE) is also provided each month. With a subscription, the monographs are sent to you in print and CD-ROM forms and are available online. Monographs can be customized to meet the needs of your facility. Subscribers to the The Formulary Monograph Service also receive access to a pharmacy bulletin board, The Formulary Information Exchange (The F.I.X.). All topics pertinent to clinical and hospital pharmacy are discussed on The F.I.X.

Through the cooperation of The Formulary, Hospital Pharmacy publishes selected reviews in this column. If you would like information about The Formulary Monograph Service or The F.I.X., call The Formulary at 800-322-4349. The April 2007 monograph topics are mesalamine, hydroxocobalamin for injection, mifamurtide, satraplatin, and vernakalant. The DUE is on mesalamine.

Antiviral therapy and resistance with hepatitis B virus infection

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is still the most common cause of hepatocellular carcinoma and liver cirrhosis world wide. Recently, however, there has been quite dramatic improvement in the understanding of HBV associated liver disease and its treatment. It has become clear that high viral replication is a major risk factor for the development of both cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Early studies have shown lamivudine lowers the risk of HBV associated complications. There are currently three nucleos(t)ides licensed, in addition to interferon, and there are more drugs coming to the market soon. Interferon or its pegylated counterpart are still the only options for treatment with defined end points, while nucleos(t)ides therapy is used mostly for long term treatment. Combination therapies have not been shown to be superior to monotherapy in naïve patients, however, the outcome depends on how the end point is defined. Interferon plus lamivudine achieves a higher viral suppression than either treatment alone, even though Hbe-seroconversion was not different after a one year treatment. HBV-genotypes emerge as relevant factors, with genotypes "A" and "B" responding relatively well to interferon, achieving up to 20% HBsAg clearance in the case of genotype "A". In addition to having a defined treatment duration, interferon has the advantage of lacking resistance selection, which is a major drawback for lamivudine and the other nucleos(t)ides. The emergence of resistance against adefovir and entecavir is somewhat slower in naïve compared to lamivudine resistant patients. Adefovir has a low resistance profile with 3%, 9%, 18%, and 28% after 2, 3, 4, and 5 years, respectively, while entecavir has rarely produced resistance in naïve patients for up to 3 years.

Two-year assessment of entecavir resistance in Lamivudine-refractory hepatitis B virus patients reveals different clinical outcomes depending on the resistance substitutions present

Entecavir (ETV) is a deoxyguanosine analog approved for use for the treatment of chronic infection with wild-type and lamivudine-resistant (LVDr) hepatitis B virus (HBV). In LVD-refractory patients, 1.0 mg ETV suppressed HBV DNA levels to below the level of detection by PCR (<300 copies/ml) in 21% and 34% of patients by Weeks 48 and 96, respectively. Prior studies showed that virologic rebound due to ETV resistance (ETVr) required preexisting LVDr HBV reverse transcriptase substitutions M204V and L180M plus additional changes at T184, S202, or M250. To monitor for resistance, available isolates from 192 ETV-treated patients were sequenced, with phenotyping performed for all isolates with all emerging substitutions, in addition to isolates from all patients experiencing virologic rebounds. The T184, S202, or M250 substitution was found in LVDr HBV at baseline in 6% of patients and emerged in isolates from another 11/187 (6%) and 12/151 (8%) ETV-treated patients by Weeks 48 and 96, respectively. However, use of a more sensitive PCR assay detected many of the emerging changes at baseline, suggesting that they originated during LVD therapy. Only a subset of the changes in ETVr isolates altered their susceptibilities, and virtually all isolates were significantly replication impaired in vitro. Consequently, only 2/187 (1%) patients experienced ETVr rebounds in year 1, with an additional 14/151 (9%) patients experiencing ETVr rebounds in year 2. Isolates from all 16 patients with rebounds were LVDr and harbored the T184 and/or S202 change. Seventeen other novel substitutions emerged during ETV therapy, but none reduced the susceptibility to ETV or resulted in a rebound. In summary, ETV was effective in LVD-refractory patients, with resistant sequences arising from a subset of patients harboring preexisting LVDr/ETVr variants and with approximately half of the patients experiencing a virologic rebound.

Treatment of chronic hepatitis B: efficacy of current drugs and prospects for the future

Chronic hepatitis B is an important clinical problem often leading to severe complications. In this review, the results obtained in the last few years with the use of current drugs, such as interferon and nucleo(t)side analogues, are summarized and the problems of obtaining a sustained remission, which is only achieved in a small number of patients, are discussed. The new approaches, such as the use of combinations of drugs, to optimize long-term tolerable treatment are also considered.